Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Selection and validation of reference genes for qRT-PCR analysis during biological invasions: The thermal adaptability of Bemisia tabaci MED

  • Tian-Mei Dai,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, PR China

  • Zhi-Chuang Lü,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, PR China

  • Wan-Xue Liu,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, PR China

  • Fang-Hao Wan

    wanfanghao@caas.cn

    Affiliations State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, PR China, Agricultural Genome Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, PR China

Abstract

The Bemisia tabaci Mediterranean (MED) cryptic species has been rapidly invading to most parts of the world owing to its strong ecological adaptability, which is considered as a model insect for stress tolerance studies under rapidly changing environments. Selection of a suitable reference gene for quantitative stress-responsive gene expression analysis based on qRT-PCR is critical for elaborating the molecular mechanisms of thermotolerance. To obtain accurate and reliable normalization data in MED, eight candidate reference genes (β-act, GAPDH, β-tub, EF1-α, GST, 18S, RPL13A and α-tub) were examined under various thermal stresses for varied time periods by using geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper algorithms, respectively. Our results revealed that β-tub and EF1-α were the best reference genes across all sample sets. On the other hand, 18S and GADPH showed the least stability for all the samples studied. β-act was proved to be highly stable only in case of short-term thermal stresses. To our knowledge this was the first comprehensive report on validation of reference genes under varying temperature stresses in MED. The study could expedite particular discovery of thermotolerance genes in MED. Further, the present results can form the basis of further research on suitable reference genes in this invasive insect and will facilitate transcript profiling in other invasive insects.

Introduction

Global change and climate warming have exposed ectothermic organisms to multifarious environmental stresses, which in turn allow organisms to use or exploit various strategies to increase their adaptability in face of environmental changes [1, 2]. Invasive insects, with the characteristics of spread rapidly and colonized successfully throughout varying environments, are becoming optimal models for studying the patterns and mechanisms of adaptability to environmental variation [3, 4]. Temperature is one of the foremost environmental factors affecting the rate of insect invasions as well as the abundance, distribution on a global scale [57]. With the mean global temperature increasing, exotic insects are exhibiting an upper thermal limit [810]. Understanding the thermal stress response patterns could be helpful in revealing the invasion mechanism of insects’ rapid adaptation to the new environments.

Gene expression data associate with the main characteristics of the rapidly response of stress-responsive during biological invasion is crucial to study the insects expansion and adaptation mechanisms [2, 11]. At the transcriptional level, reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) has currently become a valuable tool for assessing gene expression and quantifying mRNA transcripts [12, 13] owing to its high sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, reproducibility and synchronized quantification of gene expression in diverse samples with a broad dynamic range [14]. However, its accuracy and reliability are determined by several experimental variations such as quality and amount of initial sample, RNA integrity, cDNA quality and PCR amplification efficiency [15]. In order to overcome the limitation of this method, a robust normalization strategy is utilized by using reference genes, whose expression levels should remain stable independent of tissue types, developmental stages and experimental conditions [16, 17]. Nevertheless, previous experiments evidently showed that the expression of universal reference genes in arthropods could be variable, particularly in different tissues, developmental stages and experimental conditions such as length of exposure to distinct abiotic factors [1821]. Moreover, normalisation against a single reference gene has been found to be insufficient without the selection of multiple reference genes [15, 22, 23]. Consequently, for accurate normalisation it is vital to evaluate the stability of reference genes for each species and experimental designs prior to qRT-PCR analysis [24, 25].

The whitefly B. tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) is a cosmopolitan, polyphagous invasive and economically important pest with a wide range of crops through direct feeding, depositing honeydew and transmitting plant viruses [2628]. MED, which was first characterized in samples collected in the south of Spain and Portugal [29], has successfully invaded and colonized to most of the provinces. Subsequently, MED could be fast adaptation with a wide range of dramatically different local environments in China and widely displace local cryptic species and Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) [30], owing to its potential to adapt to various environmental temperatures [3133]. B. tabaci has emerged as a promising model to understand the molecular basis of abiotic stress tolerance and adaptation for invasion biology [3437]. As an invasive species, thermotolerance represent crucial mechanism for MED to successfully colonize new habitats [3840]. Thus, the knowledge of MED temperature tolerance at the molecular level is invaluable for understanding its biological and invasive traits.

Till date, the study about using suitable reference genes for gene expression analysis under different thermal stresses for varied range of time periods was not comprehensive in MED. The present study was carried out to assess the most suitable candidate reference genes for normalisation of qRT-PCR data in MED after exposed to cold and heat temperature in a short- and long-term basis experiments. Eight reference genes, which commonly used as reference genes in previous studies were selected for assessment, including 18S ribosomal RNA (18S), glutathione S-transferase (GST), beta-actin (β-act), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), beta-1-tubulin (β-tub), alpha-tubulin (α-tub), ribosomal protein L13a (RPL13A) and elongation factor 1 alpha (EF1-α). Analysis was performed by using the three MS Excel-based programs including GeNorm [24], NormFinder [41] and BestKeeper [22]. To validate the selected reference genes, the expression profile of target gene transient receptor potential (TRP) was investigated.

Materials and methods

Insects

MED population was collected from tomato plants in Beijing (40°1′ N, 116°6′ E), China in July in 2012, and had been maintained in the laboratory for 50-60 generations when used in the experiments. MED was maintained, without laboratory exposure to insecticides, on tomato plants, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill (Zhongza No. 9), reared at 26 ± 2°C with 50 ± 10.0% relative humidity (RH) and a 14 L:10D photoregime provided by artificial lights. All tests were performed with adults.

Treatments

Considering that MED had invaded to almost all the provinces striding across latitude 3°51′ N- 53°33′ N from south to north [42], and emerged in the field from mid-April to late October [4345]. During above periods, the lowest and highest temperature of different regions ranges from 0-20°C and 15-40°C, respectively (https://www.wunderground.com/history/). Thus, based on the occurrence time of MED in filed, we designed a serial of temperatures for short-term thermal stresses, including cold temperatures (0°C, 12°C) or heat temperatures (35°C, 40°C) for varied time periods (1 h, 3 h, 5 h). Simultaneously, considering the optimal temperature of MED ranges from 28°C to 33°C, and the development extreme temperature range is 15–35°C [4650], as well as mean monthly temperatures of different regions range from 15-35°C, we designed a serial of temperatures for long-term thermal stresses, including cold temperatures (17°C, 21°C) or heat temperatures (32°C, 35°C) for varied time periods (5 d, 10 d, 15 d, 20 d and the time of G0 to G1). G1 means the time that G0 young adults were exposed to thermal stress to spawn until hatch into G1 young adults. The stability of candidate reference genes was tested for adult whitefly across above thermal stresses. Because adult age is associated with different responses to temperature stress [51], we standardized adult age using only newly emerged whitefly adults that were younger than 3 hours. The ratio of female-male was 1:1 in each treatment group.

Short-term thermal stresses

Newly emerged MED adults were placed together in a 5 mL centrifuge tube. To confirm all whitefly adults underwent temperature stress, the tubes were covered with cotton along 1/4 tube length from the top of the tubes. The whiteflies inside the tubes were exposed to cold temperatures (0°C, 12°C) in three different durations (1 h, 3 h, 5 h) in a constant environment (K6-cc-NR; Huber Kältemaschinenbau GmbH, Offenburg, Germany) and heat temperatures (35°C, 40°C) in three different durations (1 h, 3 h, 5 h) in a water bath (CC-106A; Huber Kältemaschinenbau GmbH, Offenburg, Germany), respectively. After stress exposure, all samples were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen for 3 min, then stored at -80°C prior to qRT-PCR analysis. Adults maintained at 26°C (1 h, 3 h, 5 h) were used as untreated controls. Each treatment had three repetitions and each repetition had 200 adults.

Long-term thermal stresses

Newly emerged MED adults were collected from tomato plants for each of the follow four treatments, which were conducted in climate-controlled chambers (Shaifu, Ningbo, China) at a photoperiod of 14:10 (L: D) h, and 65 ± 10.0% RH. The whiteflies inside the cages were exposed to cold temperatures (17°C, 21°C) for 5 d, 10 d, 15 d, 20 d and G1, and heat temperatures (32°C, 35°C) for 5 d, 10 d, 15 d, 20 d and G1, respectively. After stress exposure, all samples were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen for 3min, then stored at -80°C prior to qRT-PCR analysis. Adults maintained at 26°C (5 d, 10 d, 15 d, 20 d, G1) were used as untreated controls. Each treatment had three repetitions and each repetition had 200 adults.

Candidate reference genes and primers design

In the present study, four candidate reference genes (β-act, GAPDH, β-tub, EF1-α) were chosen due to their highest expression stability under temperature stresses [5255]. For examples, EF1-α and GAPDH were the most stable reference genes under various abiotic stresses (included thermo stresses) in Panonychus citri [55], β-act and GAPDH could be the reference genes in Channa striatus under both short and long-term thermal stresses [52], β-tub was the most stable genes during thermal stresses in Toxoptera citricida [53]. The other four performed reference genes (18S, GST, α-tub and RPL13A) were selected since they had revealed stable expression patterns in different developmental stages and tissues in B. tabaci [21], Rhodnius prolixus[56], Bactrocera minax [57], Thitarodes armoricanus [58]. Traditionally, these genes are involved in ubiquitous cellular processes and commonly used as internal controls for qRT-PCR in hemiptera [19, 59, 60]. The primers used in the qRT-PCR reactions were designed with Oligo 7.0 software (MBI Inc, Cascade, CO, USA). The main characteristics of the primers are listed in Table 1.

thumbnail
Table 1. Candidate reference genes and primers used for qRT-PCR analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173821.t001

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from approximately 200 MED adults using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNAs were quantified via NanoPhotometerTM P330 (Implen, Munich, Germany), and with A260/A280 ratios were ranging from 1.8 to 2.0 and A260/A230 ratios were typically above 2.0. The RNA quality was also evaluated via 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. 2.0 μg of total RNA was used to synthesize cDNAs using the Super Script First-Strand Synthesis System (Transgen, Beijing, China) according to the instructions.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Real-time PCR were performed using an ABI 7500 Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). All the amplifications were confirmed by sequencing, and the specificity of qRT-PCR reactions was estimated by melting curve analysis. For qRT-PCR assays, 10 μL of 2×TransStartTM Green qPCR SuperMix (Transgen, Beijing, China) were used for reaction mixtures that also contained 1 μL of the cDNA template, 0.4 μL of Passive Reference Dye, and 0.3 μL of each 10 μM primer solution in a 20 μL final volume. A thermalcycler was with the following cycling condition: (1) 30 s at 94°C, (2) 40 cycles of 5 s at 94°C, 30 s at 60°C. Three independent biological duplications were performed for all the reference genes studied and data for each biological duplicate were carried out in triplicate. A control without cDNA template was included in all of the batches. The amplification efficiency (E) of all primer pairs was validated by constructing a standard curve using a 2-fold serial dilution of cDNA template using the equation: E = (10[-1/slope]-1) ×100 [61].

Statistical analysis

Expression levels were determined as the number of cycles needed for the amplification to reach a fixed threshold in the exponential phase of the PCR reaction [62]. Gene stabilities of the eight candidate reference genes were evaluated by three commonly used software, BestKeeper, geNorm version 3.5 (https://genorm.cmgg.be/), and NormFinder version 0.953 (http://moma.dk/normfinder-software/). GeNorm is one of the most commonly used algorithms to estimates the expression stability measure (M-value) calculating the mean pairwise variation (V) of each gene relative to all other genes included in the analysis [24]. Gene with the lowest M-value is considered the most stable gene in the tested conditions. In addition, to determine the optimal number of genes reference genes to use, the pairwise variation Vn/n+1 can be calculated between two sequential normalization factors. A large pairwise variation means that the added reference gene has a significant effect and should preferably be included for producing a reliable normalization factor. NormFinder is another Excel-based visual basic application that uses a model based on a variance estimation approach analyzing each sample set individually and also estimating intra- and inter-group variation in expression across different sample sets [41]. Top ranked reference genes will have minimum intra group variation and the lowest stability value. BestKeeper estimates the variability in the expression of the reference genes based on calculations of the Ct data variations and pairwise coefficient of variance of expression levels and identifies the best genes as those with least standard deviation (SD). For both geNorm and NormFinder, Ct values are necessary to convert into relative quantities using the formula: 2−ΔCt, in which ΔCt = the corresponding Ct value−minimum Ct value according to the described methods. For the BestKeeper application, the raw averaged Ct values were used (without transformation) to calculate the gene stability values according to the instructions contained with the program. Statistical analyses of the gene expression data were determined by ANOVA in SPSS v.16.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) with a threshold of P < 0.05.

Estimation of expression of TRP gene

In order to validate the selected reference genes, we analyzed the relative expression levels of TRP gene. To compare the influence of different normalization strategies, the expression of TRP genes was normalized using both selected reference gene individually and gene combinations using the 2−ΔΔCt method (Livak & Schmittgen) [63]. Based on the equation ΔΔCt = (Cttarget − Ctreference) treatment − (Cttarget − Ctreference) control. A 26°C sample was used as the calibrator sample (expression = 1). Target gene mRNA expression were analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test with a threshold of P < 0.05.

Results

Selection of candidate reference genes, primer specificity and amplification efficiency

Seven reference genes primer sequences used in this study were previously identified in B. tabaci [18, 21]. While, primer sequences of β-tub were designed from the conserved regions of related sequences available in the transcriptome of B. tabaci [64]. The specificity and accuracy of the primers were confirmed by melting curve analysis (S1 Fig), where single amplification and single peak suggested the absence of primer dimmers and non-specific PCR products, respectively. The E and correlation coefficients (R2) of the candidate reference genes were determined using the slopes of the standard curves obtained by serial dilutions which fall in the acceptable range of 100–110% for the E, and 0.99–1.00 for the R2. The information of qRT-PCR primers and the amplification characteristic of reference genes are summarizes in Table 1.

Expression profiles of reference genes during thermal stresses

The raw expression levels for eight reference genes were determined across all sample sets and represented in Tables A-D in S1 File. Means and standard deviations of Ct values for eight reference genes are summarized (Table 2; Fig 1). Gene expression analysis of eight reference genes across the 40 samples exhibited a wide range of mean Ct value, ranging from 9.94 for 18S to 22.40 for GST, while the mean Ct of the majority of reference genes ranged from 18.57 to 20.75 with moderately abundant expression level. In the five groups, the mean Ct values showed a minimum of 9.41±1.55 and maximum of 22.90±0.93 for highest and lowest expression levels for 18S and GST, respectively (Table 2).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Expression levels of eight candidate reference genes in MED.

Line across the box depict the median value and inside the box show the Ct values. The top and bottom whiskers are determine by the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173821.g001

thumbnail
Table 2. Distribution of the Ct values of each candidate reference gene in B.tabaci MED.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173821.t002

Stability ranking of the candidate reference genes

Expression stability of the candidate reference genes were determined by geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper, which evaluated the stability ranking of each reference gene by using the Ct values across all sample sets. The stability ranking analyses done by the three methods were detailed below.

geNorm analysis.

The geNorm software is employed as a means for determining the average expression stability for all genes with a threshold expression stability M value of 0.5 to identify reference genes with stable expression. The geNorm ranking of the reference genes stability in all investigated samples are summarized in Table 3. The results suggested that β-tub was the most stable candidate reference gene in all 40 samples of MED, whereas 18S was revealed less stability. Moreover, the two genes of α-tub and β-tub were identified as the most stably expressed genes in the control, short-term heat exposure and long-term cold exposure samples. While the geNorm analysis also indicated that β-tub and EF1-α were the most stably expressed genes in short-term cold exposure samples and long-term heat exposure samples (Fig 2). Furthermore, the traditional reference genes, such as β-act, 18S, GAPDH did not exhibit high stability and even showed great variation under some conditions. Although most studies had used only one gene as an internal control for normalization, the use of two or more reference genes for normalization might produce more reliable results. To determine the optimal number of reference genes needed for normalization, geNorm also calculated the pairwise variation (Vn/n+1) between the two sequential normalization factors. The result provided a V2/3 below the cut off value of 0.15 indicating that two reference genes were best sufficient for normalization in all experimental conditions (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Stability rankings of eight candidate reference genes calculated by geNorm.

The average expression stability values (M) of eight reference genes were plotted from the least stable (left) to the most stable (right) in (A) all samples, (B) control, (C) short-term cold exposure, (D) short-term heat exposure, (E) long-term cold exposure and (F) long-term heat exposure.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173821.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. The pairwise variation (V) of eight candidate reference genes for an accurate normalization.

The pairwise variation (Vn/Vn+1) was analyzed between normalization factors NFn and NFn+1 to determine the optimal number of references genes required for accurate normalization in MED. A threshold value of 0.15 was suggested for valid normalization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173821.g003

thumbnail
Table 3. Expression stability values of eight candidate reference genes calculated using geNorm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173821.t003

NormFinder analysis.

The NormFinder analyzes gene expression variation for all eight candidate reference genes by calculating SD values, and the lowest SD value indicates the highest expression stability. The results are given in Table 4. This analysis method identified that EF1-α was the best optimal internal control genes in almost all of the samples and conditions, with the exception of the short-term cold exposure samples showed β-tub and RPL13A were the most stable genes (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 4. Expression stability values of eight candidate reference genes calculated using NormFinder.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173821.t004

BestKeeper analysis.

BestKeeper analyzes the stability of candidate reference genes based on the coefficient of variance and the SD of the Ct values, by using the average Ct value of each duplication reaction [65]. Reference genes are identified as the most stable genes exhibited the lowest SD, and genes with SD less than 1 were considered acceptable [66]. As shown in Table 5, β-tub was the most stably expressed genes with the lowest SD values in all samples, short-term heat exposure and the control samples (0.69, 0.58 and 0.24, respectively). For both short- and long-term cold exposure samples, GADPH was the most stable gene with lowest SD values 0.33 and 0.91, respectively. While EF1-α was most stable in long-term heat exposure samples with the value of 0.68. The results of BestKeeper analysis showed little differences from those obtained from geNorm and Normfinder.

thumbnail
Table 5. Expression stability values of eight candidate reference genes calculated using BestKeeper.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173821.t005

Validation of selected reference genes using a real case study.

To evaluate the selected reference genes, we examined the expression patterns of TRP gene after various temperature stresses. The expression of TRP gene was normalized by both each of the selected stable genes (β-tub or EF1-α) and recommended gene combinations (β-tub + EF1-α). The expression of TRP normalized by EF1-α was significantly overrated at 40°C after 1h and 3h exposure (Fig 4B), at 17°C after 20 d exposure (Fig 4C) and at 35°C after 5 d exposure (Fig 4D), compared to the results obtained by β-tub and β-tub + EF1-α as internal control, whereas the expression of TRP normalized by β-tub was significantly underestimated at 21°C after the time of G0 to G1 exposure (Fig 4C) and at 35°C after 15 d exposure (Fig 4D), compared to the results obtained by EF1-α and β-tub + EF1-α as internal control. Consequently, the results suggested that the use of single reference gene may significantly influence the quantification of gene expression, while multiple reference genes are preferred to minimize possible errors.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Normalized expression of the TRP under temperature stress using both single reference genes and gene combinations.

Results are represented as mean ± SD. Different letters (a, b) shows the statistical difference (P <0.05) among the normalization strategies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173821.g004

Discussion

Lately focus of biological invasions research has been directed towards to understand the mechanisms of quick adaptation to rising global temperature [3133, 39, 67]. In particular, investigating the molecular mechanisms of thermotolerance during biological invasions can help to understand the ecological adaptation of invasive alien species, and further offer a great opportunity to dissect how organisms cope with rapidly changing environments in the wild. The most well-characterized molecular responses to temperature stresses are the variation of gene expression levels [68]. Furthermore, qRT-PCR is a preferred method for reliable quantification of gene expression levels. In qRT-PCR, normalization the gene expression levels of reference gene is critical for obtaining accurate and reliable relative quantification results [16, 69]. Rarely a reference gene could be non-differentially expressed across different experimental conditions [70]. For this, we used qRT-PCR to validate suitable reference genes for gene expression research under varied temperatures.

In the present study, eight candidate reference genes were carried out to test their efficacy under different thermal stresses in MED. Three different algorithms statistical models were applied to our data to providing a robust screening approach. It was assumed that a comparison of different mathematical models would allow reliable evaluation and avoid the selection of co-regulated transcripts [41]. The results showed that the top three reference genes determined by NormFinder were EF1-α, RPL13A and β-tub, whereas in GeNorm analysis methods, β-tub, EF1-α and α-tub were identified as the three most stable genes, additionally the top three reference genes produced by BestKeeper were not the all the same according to different experimental sets. Meanwhile, the results by all applied methods demonstrated that the traditional reference genes, such as β-act, 18S and GAPDH did not always exhibit high stability and even showed great variation under some conditions. Slightly inconsistencies among these three algorithms were expected since different analytical principles are used by each of them as mentioned previously in “Materials and methods”. Although different best single reference gene or gene combinations were yielded among the three algorithms for all samples, the comprehensive ranking order for most group samples showed that β-tub, EF1-α and α-tub were nearly the top three most stable reference genes, demonstrating the suitability of the identified reference genes under various temperature stresses in MED.

β-act is a cytoskeletal protein and part of the contractile apparatus involving in a number of cellular processes [71], assumed to be moderately abundant expression [25]. In several insects, β-act has been top-ranked as a reference gene in expression studies under short-term thermal stresses in Ditylum brightwellii [72], C. striatus [52], T. citricida [53], Sesamia inferens [73]. A striking finding of this study was that the traditionally preferred reference gene β-act was highly variable and was ranked last one in most samples in our study, but not in the short-term temperature samples. As many previous studies had revealed that β-act were challenged for their suitability as the internal controls on Leptinotarsa decemlineata [74], B. tabaci [19], Agrilus planipennis [75] and Tribolium castaneum [76]. Maybe it was due to that mild heat stress might lead to β-act filaments reorganized into stress fibers, and extreme high temperature treatment could lead to the disorganized of β-act [77]. Consequentially, the expression level of β-act was instable under various temperature stresses.

The expression stability of GAPDH was moderated among all sample sets in this study, and the results were inconsistent with other studies, which identifying GAPDH as the most stable gene under thermal stresses in P. citri [55], D. brightwellii [72] and C. striatus [52]. Moreover, recent studies suggested that the expression of GAPDH gene varied considerably depending upon developmental stage, tissue, experimental condition and species [19, 53, 60], therefore it is a controversial gene. Hence, our results would not recommend GAPDH as a suitable reference gene for MED exposed to thermal stresses.

In contrast, our results showed EF1-α exhibited stable expression with respect to the most commonly used reference genes among various temperature stresses. EF1-α is involved in protein synthesis and is widely used as a normalizer in insects. For example, EF1-α appeared as the most stable genes under different developmental stages and tissues in L. decemlineata [74], A. planipennis [75], Aphis glycines [59] and B. tabaci [19]. Additionally, EF1-α also showed the highest stability in response to various abiotic factors such as in Drosophila melanogaster treated with heat-shock stress [25], as well as in T. citricida treated with starvation and UV irradiation stress [47].

β-tub was surprisingly identified as top-ranked reference genes in all sample sets. Similarly, β-tub was the most stable gene in Ericerus pela [78] and T. citricida [53] under temperature treatments, T. armoricanus under dietary treatments [58]. Thus, all these results suggested that each experiment should investigate a normalizer reference gene for a specific requirement and condition rather than adopting reference gene from other studies.

In the present study, we used the two most stable selected reference genes (β-tub and EF1-α) in whitefly under temperature stress, to normalize the expression of TRP separately. It showed significant different results at 40°C after 1h and 3h exposure, at 17°C after 20 d exposure, at 35°C after 5 d and 15d exposure and at 21°C after the time of G0 to G1 exposure (Fig 4). The results indicated that even using a single most stable reference gene after assessment, it may also mislead the explanation of expression analysis. As a result, to obtain reliable and accurate results, multiple reference genes should be used in quantitative gene expression studies.

Conclusion

In summary, our work was the first in-depth study to identify and validate reference genes for qRT-PCR data normalization under comprehensive temperature stresses in MED. The present study suggested that β-tub and EF1-α had the greatest stability across various thermal treatments. 18S, GADPH and β-act were the least stable gene suggesting that it should be not used as a reference gene to study gene expression under various thermal treatments in MED. In recent years, it has become clear that the expression stability of a putative reference gene has to be verified before each qRT-PCR experiment under all the experimental conditions. Meanwhile, a single reference gene is generally not enough to obtain reliable and accurate results and hence multiple reference genes should be used in quantitative gene expression studies. The present results would provide the compressive information of reference genes to study gene expression in MED and other invasive insects. Further, it will help to understand the underlying thermotolerance molecular mechanisms in invasive insects.

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

This research project was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC1200600), the Ministry of Science and Technology, China, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672088), and the Special Fund for Scientific Research in Environmental Protection Public Interest (201409061), and the Common Wealth Special Fund for the Agricultural Industry (No. 201303019), and the International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China (2015DFG32300).

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: TMD FHW.
  2. Data curation: TMD.
  3. Formal analysis: TMD.
  4. Funding acquisition: ZCL WXL FHW.
  5. Investigation: TMD ZCL.
  6. Methodology: TMD.
  7. Project administration: ZCL WXL FHW.
  8. Resources: TMD ZCL WXL FHW.
  9. Software: TMD.
  10. Supervision: ZCL WXL FHW.
  11. Validation: TMD.
  12. Visualization: TMD ZCL.
  13. Writing – original draft: TMD.
  14. Writing – review & editing: TMD ZCL WXL FHW.

References

  1. 1. Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, et al. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature. 2002; 416(6879):389–395. pmid:11919621
  2. 2. de Nadal E, Ammerer G, Posas F. Controlling gene expression in response to stress. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 12(12):833–845. pmid:22048664
  3. 3. Dukes JS. Responses of invasive species to a changing climate and atmosphere. In: Richardson D.M. (ed.) Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of charles elton. Wiley- Blackwell, Chichester, UK. 2011; 345–357.
  4. 4. Ward NL, Masters GJ. Linking climate change and species invasion: an illustration using insect herbivores. Glob Change Biol. 2007; 13(8):1605–1615.
  5. 5. Hellmann JJ, Byers JE, Bierwagen BG, Dukes JS. Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conserv Biol. 2008; 22(3):534–543. pmid:18577082
  6. 6. Hazell SP, Neve BP, Groutides C, Douglas AE, Blackburn TM, Bale JS. Hyperthermic aphids: insights into behaviour and mortality. J Insect Physiol. 2010; 56(2):123–131. pmid:19737571
  7. 7. Lancaster LT. Widespread range expansions shape latitudinal variation in insect thermal limits. Nat Clim Change. 2016:29–2016.
  8. 8. Cannon RJC. The implications of predicted climate change for insect pests in the UK, with emphasis on non-indigenous species. Glob Chang Biol. 1998; 4(4):785–796.
  9. 9. Battisti A, Stastny M, Netherer S, Robinet C, Schopf A, Roques A, et al. Expansion of geographic range in the pine processionary moth caused by increased winter temperatures. Ecol Appl. 2008; 15(6):2084–2096.
  10. 10. Musolin DL. Insects in a warmer world: ecological, physiological and life-history responses of true bugs (Heteroptera) to climate change. Glob Chang Biol. 2007; 13(8):1565–1585.
  11. 11. Picard DJ, Schulte PM. Variation in gene expression in response to stress in two populations of Fundulus heteroclitus. Comp Biochem Phys A. 2004; 137(1):205–216.
  12. 12. Vanguilder HD, Vrana KE, Freeman WM. Twenty-five years of quantitative PCR for gene expression analysis. BioTechniques. 2008; 44(5):619–626. pmid:18474036
  13. 13. de Boer ME, Berg S, Timmermans MJ, Dunnen JTD, Straalen NMV, Ellers J, et al. High throughput nano-liter RT-qPCR to classify soil contamination using a soil arthropod. BMC Mol Biol. 2011; 12(1):1–11.
  14. 14. Kubista M, Andrade JM, Bengtsson M, Forootan A, Jonák J, Lind K, et al. The real-time polymerase chain reaction. Mol Aspects Med. 2006; 27(2-3):95–125. pmid:16460794
  15. 15. Bustin S, Benes V, Garson J, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, et al. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009; 55(4):611–622. pmid:19246619
  16. 16. Bustin SA. Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Mol Endocrinol. 2000; 25(2):169–193. pmid:11013345
  17. 17. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29(9): e45. pmid:11328886
  18. 18. Su YL, He WB, Wang J, Li JM, Liu SS, Wang XW. Selection of Endogenous Reference Genes for Gene Expression Analysis in the Mediterranean Species of the Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Complex. J Econ Entomol. 2013; 106(3):1446–1455. pmid:23865213
  19. 19. Li R, Xie W, Wang S, Wu Q, Yang N, Yang X, et al. Reference gene selection for qRT-PCR analysis in the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). PLOS ONE. 2013; 8(1):e53006. pmid:23308130
  20. 20. Collins C. Identification and evaluation of suitable reference genes for gene expression studies in the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Asia I) by reverse transcription quantitative realtime PCR. J Insect Sci. 2014; 14(5):63.
  21. 21. Liang P, Guo Y, Zhou X, Gao X. Expression Profiling in Bemisia tabaci under Insecticide Treatment: Indicating the Necessity for Custom Reference Gene Selection. PLOS ONE. 2014; 9(1):e87514. pmid:24498122
  22. 22. Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper – Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 2004; 26(6):509–515. pmid:15127793
  23. 23. Chervoneva I, Li Y, Schulz S, Croker S, Wilson C, Waldman SA, et al. Selection of optimal reference genes for normalization in quantitative RT-PCR. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11(10):1–15.
  24. 24. Vandesompele J, Preter KD, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Roy NV, Paepe AD, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002; 3(7):research0034.1–research.11.
  25. 25. Ponton F, Chapuis MP, Pernice M, Sword GA, Simpson SJ. Evaluation of potential reference genes for reverse transcription-qPCR studies of physiological responses in Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol. 2011; 57(6):840–850. pmid:21435341
  26. 26. Byrne DN, Bellow JrTS. Whitefly biology. Annu Rev Entomol. 1991; 36, 431–457.
  27. 27. Oliveira M, Henneberry T, Anderson P. History, current status, and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci. Crop Protect. 2001; 20(9):709–723.
  28. 28. Brown JK, Czosnek H. Whitefly transmission of plant viruses. Adv. Bot. Res. 2002; 36, 65–100.
  29. 29. Guirao P, Beitia F, Cenis JL. Biotype determination of Spanish populations of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Bull Entomol Res. 1997; 87(6):587–593.
  30. 30. Hu J, De Barro P, Zhao H, Wang J, Nardi F, Liu S-S. An extensive field survey combined with a phylogenetic analysis reveals rapid and widespread invasion of two alien whiteflies in China. PLOS ONE. 2011; 6(1):e16061. pmid:21283707
  31. 31. Lee CE. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002; 17, 386–391.
  32. 32. Cui XH, Wan FH, Xie M, Liu TX. Effects of heat shock on survival and reproduction of two whitefly species, Trialeurodes vaporariorum and Bemisia tabaci biotype B. J. Insect Sci. 2008; 24, 1–10
  33. 33. Yu H, Wan FH, Guo JY. Different thermal tolerance and hsp gene expression in invasive and indigenous sibling species of Bemisia tabaci. Biol Invasions. 2012; 14(8):1587–1595.
  34. 34. Mahadav A, Kontsedalov S, Czosnek H, Ghanim M. Thermotolerance and gene expression following heat stress in the whitefly Bemisia tabaci B and Q biotypes. Insect Biochem Molec. 2009; 39(10):668–676.
  35. 35. Lü ZC, Wan FH. Differential gene expression in whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) B-biotype females and males under heat-shock condition. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics. 2008; 3: 257–262. pmid:20494845
  36. 36. Lü ZC, Wan FH. Using double-stranded RNA to explore the role of heat shock protein genes in heat tolerance in Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). J Exp Biol. 2011; 214:764–769. pmid:21307062
  37. 37. Lü ZC, Li Q, Liu WX, Wan FH. Transient receptor potential is essential for high temperature tolerance in invasive Bemisia tabaci Middle East Asia Minor 1 cryptic species. PLOS ONE. 2014; 9(9): e108428. pmid:25254364
  38. 38. Lü ZC, Wang YM, Zhu SG, Yu H, Guo JY, Wan FH. Trade-offs between survival, longevity and reproduction and considerable genetic variation in survival tolerance in the Mediterranean whitefly, Bemisia tabaci after temperature stress. J Insect Sci. 2014; 14(124):1–14.
  39. 39. Lü ZC, Gao QL, Yu H, Guo JY, Wan FH. Increased survival and prolonged longevity mainly contribute to the temperature-adaptive evolutionary strategy in invasive Bemisia tabaci Middle East Asia Minor 1. J Insect Sci. 2014; 14(143): 1–5.
  40. 40. Ma FZ, Lü ZC, Wang R, Wan FH. Heritability and evolutionary potential in thermal tolerance traits in the invasive mediterranean cryptic species of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). PLOS ONE. 2014; 9(7): e103279. pmid:25054554
  41. 41. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(15):5245–5250. pmid:15289330
  42. 42. Liu YQ, Liu SS. Species status of Bemisia tabaci complex and their distributions in China. Journal of Biosafety. 2012, 21(4): 247–255.
  43. 43. Li J. The Research of Occurrence and Population Ecology of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in Cotton in Turpan. Xinjiang Agricultural University. 2009.
  44. 44. Fu X, Ye LF, Wang GQ, Ge F. Occurrence and development for Bemisia tabaci and Trialeurodes vaporariorum in Heilongjiang Province. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology. 2011, 48(1):32–37.
  45. 45. Zhao W. Population dynamics of Bemisia tabaci in tobacco fields of Shandong province and control methods for this pest. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. 2014.
  46. 46. Wang K, Tsai J H. Development and reproduction of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on five host plants. Ann Entomol Soc Am.1996, 89: 375 – 384.
  47. 47. Drost YC, Van Lenteren JC, Van Roermund HJW. Life-history parameters of different biotypes of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in relation to temperature and host plant: a selective review. B Entomol Res. 1998, 88:219–229.
  48. 48. Muñiz M, Nombela G. Differential variation in development of the B- and Q-biotypes of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on sweet pepper at constant temperatures. Environ Entomol. 2001, 30:720–727.
  49. 49. Nava-Camberos U, Riley DG, Harris MK. Temperature and host plant effects on development, survival, and fecundity of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Environ Entomol. 2001, 30:55–63.
  50. 50. Bonato O, Lurette A, Vidal C, Fargues J. Modelling temperature-dependent bionomics of Bemisia tabaci (Q-biotype). Physiol Entomol. 2007, 32: 50–55.
  51. 51. Bowler K, Terblanche JS. Insect thermal tolerance: what is the role of ontogeny, ageing and senescence? Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008; 83(3):339–355. pmid:18979595
  52. 52. Purohit GK, Mahanty A, Mohanty BP, Mohanty S. Evaluation of housekeeping genes as references for quantitative real-time PCR analysis of gene expression in the murrel Channa striatus under high-temperature stress. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2015; 42(1):1–11.
  53. 53. Shang F, Wei DD, Jiang ZX, Wei D, Shen MG, Feng CY, et al. Reference Gene Validation for quantitative PCR under various biotic and abiotic stress conditions in Toxoptera citricida (Hemiptera, Aphidiae). J Econ Entomol. 2015; 108(4):2040–2047. pmid:26470351
  54. 54. Fu W, Xie W, Zhang Z, Wang SL, Wu QJ, Liu Y, et al. Exploring valid reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR analysis in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Int J Biol Sci. 2013, 9(8):792–802. pmid:23983612
  55. 55. Niu JZ, Dou W, Ding TB, Yang LH, Shen GM, Wang JJ. Evaluation of suitable reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR during development and abiotic stress in Panonychus citri (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae). Mol Biol Rep. 2012; 39(5):5841–5849. pmid:22203483
  56. 56. Paim RM, Pereira MH, Ponzio RD, Rodrigues JO, Guarneri AA, Gontijo NF, et al. Validation of reference genes for expression analysis in the salivary gland and the intestine of Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) under different experimental conditions by quantitative real-time PCR. BMC Research Notes. 2012, 5(1):128.
  57. 57. Wang J, Zhao J, Liu YH. Evaluation of endogenous reference genes in Bactrocera minax (Diptera:Tephritidae). Acta Entomologica Sinica. 2014, 57(12):1375–1380.
  58. 58. Liu G, Qiu X, Cao L, Zhang Y, Zhan Z, Han R. Evaluation of reference genes for reverse transcription quantitative pcr studies of physiological responses in the ghost moth, Thitarodes armoricanus (Lepidoptera, Hepialidae). PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(7).
  59. 59. Bansal R, Mamidala P, Mian MA, Mittapalli O, Michel AP. Validation of reference genes for gene expression studies in Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J Econ Entomol. 2012; 105(4):1432–1438. pmid:22928326
  60. 60. Yuan M, Lu Y, Zhu X, Wan H, Shakeel M, Zhan S, et al. Selection and Evaluation of Potential Reference Genes for Gene Expression Analysis in the Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) Using Reverse-Transcription Quantitative PCR. PLOS ONE. 2014; 9(1):e86503. pmid:24466124
  61. 61. Radonić A, Thulke S, Mackay IM, Landt O, Siegert W, Nitsche A. Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2004; 313(4):856–862.
  62. 62. Walker NJ. A technique whose time has come. Science. 2002; 296(5567):557–559. pmid:11964485
  63. 63. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta DeltaC (T)) method. Method. 2001; 25, 402–408.
  64. 64. Xie W, Meng Q, Wu Q, Wang S, Yang X, Yang N, et al. Pyrosequencing the Bemisia tabaci transcriptome reveals a highly diverse bacterial community and a robust system for insecticide resistance. PLOS ONE. 2012; 7(4):e35181-e. pmid:22558125
  65. 65. Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper – Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 2004; 26(6):509–515. pmid:15127793
  66. 66. Xiao X, Ma J, Wang J, Wu X, Li P, Yao Y. Validation of suitable reference genes for gene expression analysis in the halophyte Salicornia europaea by real-time quantitative PCR. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5:788. pmid:25653658
  67. 67. Wan FH, Zhang GF, Liu SS, Luo C, Chu D, Zhang YJ, et al. Invasive mechanism and management strategy of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) biotype B: Progress report of 973 Program on invasive alien species in China. Chinese Science Serial C-Life Science. 2009; 52(1): 88–95.
  68. 68. Zhao L, Jones WA. Expression of heat shock protein genes in insect stress responses. Invertebr Surviv J. 2012; 9:93–101.
  69. 69. Gibson UE, Heid CA, Williams PM. A novel method for real time quantitative RT-PCR. Genome Res. 1996; 6: 995–1001. pmid:8908519
  70. 70. Pérez R, Tupacyupanqui I, Dunner S. Evaluation of suitable reference genes for gene expression studies in bovine muscular tissue. BMC Mol Biol. 2008; 9(1):1–6.
  71. 71. Wada A, Fukuda M, Mishima M, Nishida E. Nuclear export of actin: a novel mechanism regulating the subcellular localization of a major cytoskeletal protein. EMBO J. 1998; 17(6):1635–1641. pmid:9501085
  72. 72. Guo R, Lee MA, Ki JS. Normalization genes for mRNA expression in the marine diatom Ditylum brightwellii following exposure to thermal and toxic chemical stresses. J Appl Phycol. 2013; 25(4):1101–1109.
  73. 73. Tang XT, Sun M, Lu MX, Du YZ. Expression patterns of five heat shock proteins in Sesamia inferens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) during heat stress. J Asia-Pac Entomol. 2015; 18(3):529–533.
  74. 74. Shi XQ, Guo WC, Wan PJ, Zhou LT, Ren XL, Ahmat T, et al. Validation of reference genes for expression analysis by quantitative real-time PCR in Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). BMC Research Notes. 2013; 6(1):1–10.
  75. 75. Rajarapu SP, Mamidala P, Mittapalli O. Validation of reference genes for gene expression studies in the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). Insect Sci. 2012; 19(1):41–46.
  76. 76. Lord JC, Hartzer K, Toutges M, Oppert B. Evaluation of quantitative PCR reference genes for gene expression studies in Tribolium castaneum after fungal challenge. J Microbiol Meth. 2010; 80(2):219–221.
  77. 77. Toivola DM, Strnad P, Habtezion A, Omary MB. Intermediate filaments take the heat as stress proteins. Trends Cell Biol. 2010; 20(2):79–91. pmid:20045331
  78. 78. Yu SH, Yang P, Sun T, Qi Q, Wang XQ, Xu DL, et al. Identification and evaluation of reference genes in the Chinese white wax scale insect Ericerus pela. SpringerPlus. 2016; 5(1):1–8.