Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: What Is a “Community Perception” of REDD+? A Systematic Review of How Perceptions of REDD+ Have Been Elicited and Reported in the Literature

  • Stibniati S. Atmadja,
  • Erin O. Sills

There are errors in the Funding section. The correct funding information is as follows: This research is part of the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry and the Global Comparative Study on REDD+, with funding support from the USAID (grant number MTO069018, http://www.usaid.gov/), the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) (grant number QZA 12/0882 and QZA-16/0110 No. 1500551, http://www.norad.no/), the International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) (grant number KI II 7–42206-6/75, https://www.international-climate-initiative.com), and the CGIAR. The above mentioned funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Reference

  1. 1. Atmadja SS, Sills EO (2016) What Is a “Community Perception” of REDD+? A Systematic Review of How Perceptions of REDD+ Have Been Elicited and Reported in the Literature. PLoS ONE 11(11): e0155636. pmid:27802284

Citation: Atmadja SS, Sills EO (2017) Correction: What Is a “Community Perception” of REDD+? A Systematic Review of How Perceptions of REDD+ Have Been Elicited and Reported in the Literature. PLoS ONE 12(3): e0173547. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173547

Published: March 2, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Atmadja, Sills. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.