Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Use of Mesh in Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis and Risk-Benefit Analysis

  • Beat P. Müller-Stich,
  • Hannes G. Kenngott,
  • Matthias Gondan,
  • Christian Stock,
  • Georg R. Linke,
  • Franziska Fritz,
  • Felix Nickel,
  • Markus K. Diener,
  • Carsten N. Gutt,
  • Moritz Wente,
  • Markus W. Büchler,
  • Lars Fischer

In Fig 4, the images for panel A and panel B are switched. Please see the correct Fig 4 and its caption here.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Meta-analysis of A) hernia recurrence and B) complications after LMAH and LH.

Black rectangles are randomized controlled trials; dark gray rectangles are case control studies; light gray rectangles are case series with control group. LMAH, laparoscopic mesh augmented hiatoplasty; LH, laparoscopic hiatoplasty; OR, Odds Ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. Studies included in the meta-analysis are detailed in the supporting information files (S1 Table).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171865.g001

Reference

  1. 1. Müller-Stich BP, Kenngott HG, Gondan M, Stock C, Linke GR, Fritz F, et al. (2015) Use of Mesh in Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis and Risk-Benefit Analysis. PLoS ONE 10(10): e0139547. pmid:26469286

Citation: Müller-Stich BP, Kenngott HG, Gondan M, Stock C, Linke GR, Fritz F, et al. (2017) Correction: Use of Mesh in Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis and Risk-Benefit Analysis. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0171865. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171865

Published: February 3, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Müller-Stich et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.