In vivo functional neurochemistry of human cortical cholinergic function during visuospatial attention

Michael Lindner; Tiffany Bell; Somya Iqbal; Paul Gerald Mullins; Anastasia Christakou

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171338

Abstract

Cortical acetylcholine is involved in key cognitive processes such as visuospatial attention. Dysfunction in the cholinergic system has been described in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders. Levels of brain acetylcholine can be pharmacologically manipulated, but it is not possible to directly measure it in vivo in humans. However, key parts of its biochemical cascade in neural tissue, such as choline, can be measured using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). There is evidence that levels of choline may be an indirect but proportional measure of acetylcholine availability in brain tissue. In this study, we measured relative choline levels in the parietal cortex using functional (event-related) MRS (fMRS) during performance of a visuospatial attention task, with a modelling approach verified using simulated data. We describe a task-driven interaction effect on choline concentration, specifically driven by contralateral attention shifts. Our results suggest that choline MRS has the potential to serve as a proxy of brain acetylcholine function in humans.

Citation: Lindner M, Bell T, Iqbal S, Mullins PG, Christakou A (2017) In vivo functional neurochemistry of human cortical cholinergic function during visuospatial attention. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0171338. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171338

Editor: Andrea Motta, National Research Council of Italy, ITALY

Received: August 11, 2016; Accepted: January 19, 2017; Published: February 13, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Lindner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: Data are available from the Open Science Framework database (osf.io/52gwz).

Funding: The study was supported by a Human Frontier Science Program (www.hfsp.org) grant to AC (RGP0048/2012). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Cholinergic neurotransmission in the brain is important for cognitive functions such as selective attention [1] and various forms of learning [2], and has been implicated in a number of pathologies, including Alzheimer’s disease [3] and schizophrenia [4]. Cortical acetylcholine (ACH) involvement in visuospatial and sustained attention is well-documented in both animal [5,6] and, indirectly, in human research [7]. Despite its importance, although levels of ACH can be pharmacologically manipulated in both animals and humans, it is not possible to directly measure brain ACH in humans. Therefore, until now, it has not been possible to monitor the unperturbed central cholinergic system in humans. This study was designed to address this gap, using functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS).

There is significant evidence for cortical cholinergic involvement in visuospatial attention in the parietal cortex. For example, cholinergic receptors in the parietal cortex of rats are involved in attention processes [8,9], and muscarinic receptor antagonism in humans changes parietal theta oscillations [10,11]. We concentrated on ventral posterior parietal cortex, as there is converging evidence from various techniques for its role in visuospatial attention, including from electrophysiology [12], neuropsychology [13], and neuroimaging [14,15]. Posterior parietal cortex is associated specifically with controlling visuospatial attentional shifts [14,16], while evidence for hemispheric laterality in this involvement has been found using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) [15], electroencephalography (EEG) [17], and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) [18]. Further, systemic administration of the cholinergic agonist physostigmine, leads to a unilateral cholinergic enhancement effect on alpha/beta oscillations in ventral parietal cortex (at the border with occipital cortex; parieto-occipital cortex, or POC) during visuospatial attention shifts, as measured with magnetoencephalography (MEG) [7].

This body of evidence leads to the prediction that cholinergic involvement during shifts of visuospatial attention is unilateral, and happens in the hemisphere opposite the hemispace towards which the shift occurs.

A key part of the ACH biochemical cascade in neural tissue is choline (CHO) (see detailed overview in Fig 1): In neurons, ACH released in the synapse is broken down into CHO and acetate. After CHO is taken up back into the cell, it is immediately phosphorylated into phosphocholine (PHC) by a kinase. CHO is also found bound in the membranes of both neuronal and non-neuronal cells as phosphatidylcholine (PYC). When cell membrane integrity is compromised or altered (e.g. in tumors), PYC can be broken down into glycerophosphocholine (GPC), phosphocholine (PHC), and finally CHO (or directly into free CHO) [19].

Download:

Fig 1. The choline-acetylcholine cycle.

The enzyme choline acetyltransferase builds acetylcholine (ACH) from choline (CHO) and acetyl-CoA. After ACH is released in the synaptic cleft, the enzyme acetylcholinesterase converts ACH into the inactive metabolites CHO and acetate. After re-uptake into the pre-synaptic terminal, free CHO is phosphorylated into phosphocholine (PHC), a reaction catalysed by choline kinase. PHC is available to mobilise CHO for further ACH production via phospholipase C. CHO is also bound in the cell membrane as phosphatidylcholine (PYC). PHC can be then converted to CDP-choline by CTP:phosphocholinecytidyltransferase. The enzyme CDP-choline:1,2-diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferase then converts the CDP-choline into phosphatidylcholine (PYC) [20]. PYC can also be broken down (via phospholipase C) into glycerophosphocholine (GPC), phosphocholine (PHC), and finally CHO (and side products), or (via phospholipase D) directly into free CHO [19]. In the chemical spectra acquired with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) CHO, GPC and PHC are the only “visible” metabolites of the CHO cycle.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171338.g001

Of the metabolites involved in the ACH cycle, CHO, GPC and PHC are “visible” in the chemical spectra acquired with MRS [21,22]. There is evidence that levels of CHO are an indirect but proportional measure of ACH availability in brain tissue [3,21]. It is unlikely that MRS at 3T can resolve the very low free CHO concentration fluctuations that might be directly associated with ACH release [21]. However, it is possible that event-related fluctuations in the cholinergic MRS signal captured at the right timescale could indirectly betray cholinergic contributions to function. For instance, ACH release increases free CHO in the synaptic cleft, as acetylcholinesterase rapidly converts unbound ACH into CHO and acetate. The dynamics of CHO re-uptake into the presynaptic cell are coupled to the rate of ACH release, but the process is slower than ACH release itself [23]. As a consequence, free CHO in the synaptic cleft cannot be transported back into the presynaptic cell instantaneously, imposing a "bottleneck" with increasing CHO concentration in the cleft which may be exploitable. Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS), i.e. the dynamic in vivo measure of metabolites (in contrast to average metabolite concentration estimation with MRS), could contribute to this potential application, through tracking putative task-dependent fluctuations in cholinergic metabolites.

Based on this rationale, and on the evidence for cholinergic involvement in visuospatial attention, we measured functional (task-related) cholinergic metabolite levels in the POC using fMRS during performance of a visuospatial attention task. We tested whether fluctuations in CHO concentration, related to cortical ACH release during visuospatial attention, could be captured with MRS. We also used simulated data (with varying ratios of CHO concentrations) to independently confirm the validity of our techniques for the detection of relative task-related changes in CHO. The aim of the study was to provide the first direct evidence for human cortical cholinergic involvement in visuospatial attention shifts. Based on the hemispheric laterality of visual attention [15,17,18] we predicted a specific unilateral increase in CHO during the performance of contralateral attention shifts, a byproduct of increased ACH release into the synapse. A broader aim of the study was to provide direct support for the idea of using cholinergic MRS as a proxy for studying ACH function in the human brain.

Materials and methods

Visuospatial attention experiment

Participants.

Nineteen healthy, right-handed volunteers were recruited from the University of Reading. Due to technical problems three participants had to be excluded from the analysis, because their button presses were not recorded. The remaining 16 participants (11 female) had a mean age of 23.81 years (SD = 5.61). Participants reported no history of neurological disorder and had normal or corrected-to-normal vision. Participants received information about the study in writing, were given the opportunity to ask any questions, and gave written informed consent in advance of their participation. The study was approved by the University of Reading Research Ethics Committee (reference 13/15).

Task and procedure.

We used a visuospatial attention task which cued participants to covertly shift their attention to one of two spatial locations and report the rotation orientation of a gabor grating stimulus, as described previously [7]. A fixation cross was presented in the centre of the screen during the whole trial. Participants had to fixate it constantly to prevent effects of eye movement in the MRS spectra. In each trial, a 0.5s cue (an arrow pointing left, right, or up) replaced the fixation cross (Fig 2).

Download:

Fig 2. Overview of trial and MRS acquisition timing.

Trial timing (top): Each trial had a total length of 5s and begun with a short onset jitter of 0–0.29 s, followed by a cue (0.5s) and a jittered inter stimulus interval (ISI) of 0.8 to 1.3s. The stimuli were presented for 0.5s followed by a maximum response interval of 2.2s and an inter trial interval (ITI) of 0.2 to 0.5s. MRS acquisition (bottom): We collected two MRS acquisitions for each trial (2.5s)—an early epoch, covering the cue, the attention shift phase and part of the stimuli, and a late epoch covering the rest of the trial.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171338.g002

The arrow cued participants to shift their attention to the same side of the computer display. Two gabor gratings appeared on the left and right of the display after a jittered interval that lasted between 0.8 and 1.3s. Participants were required to report, through a button press, the tilt orientation (clockwise or counter-clockwise) of the grating that appeared on the cued side, while ignoring the stimulus on the non-cued side of the display.

The discrete experimental conditions were defined depending on whether attention was shifted to the ipsilateral or contralateral hemispace of the display, relative to the voxel placement for MRS acquisition (ipsilateral or contralateral condition respectively). During control trials (neutral condition), the cue was an arrow pointing up, following which participants had to simply press one of the two available buttons. Each trial was split into an early epoch (attention), encompassing the attentional shift, and a late epoch (baseline), during which the response took place. Participants were allowed a maximum of 2.2s to perform their response. The trials ended with a jittered inter-trial interval with a duration between 0.5 and 1s. Each trial had a total duration of 5s (Fig 2).

The position of the MRS voxel (left or right POC) relative to the cue characterized trials as ipsilateral (attention shift in the acquisition hemispace) or contralateral (attention shift in the opposite hemispace). We use the abbreviations “ipsi” and “contra” respectively for the experimental conditions, and “neutral” for the control condition. We used an event-related design with 96 trials in each of three blocks, with a break of 3mins between blocks. The three conditions were counterbalanced over the three blocks and were presented in a pseudo-randomized order, where the same condition was repeated no more than twice in a row.

In advance of data acquisition, participants performed two training sessions inside the scanner (one before the experiment and one during a structural scan) in which the rotation of the gratings (starting with 4°) was adjusted in order to attain an accuracy rate of 90% (over blocks of 24 trials), by increasing (+1°) or decreasing (-0.25°) the degree of rotation. The individual’s rotation degree at the end of each training session was used as the starting degree for the task during the functional localizer and the MRS acquisition (see behavioral results below). During the MRS acquisition the rotation degree was constantly adjusted in the same way, to maintain accuracy at 90%.

We performed two one-way ANOVAs for repeated-measures to assess any differences in reaction time (RT) or accuracy between the ipsilateral, contralateral and neutral conditions.

Data acquisition.

All ¹H-MRS spectra and MR images were acquired on a Siemens TRIO MRI System (Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics, Reading, UK) using an eight channel head coil.

Structural scan.

Following the functional localizer, we obtained a high resolution whole brain T1 weighted image (1x1x1mm voxel resolution, field of view = 250mm, 176 slices, TR = 2020ms, TE = 2.9ms, flip angle = 9°). Both the functional localizer and the structural scan were used to guide the individual anatomical localization for the MRS voxel placement.

fMRI localizer for MRS voxel placement.

For the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) localizer (3x3x3mm voxel resolution, field of view = 192mm, 27 slices, TR = 2000ms, TE = 32ms, flip angle = 90°) we used a block design with 12 trials per block (either only control trials or a mixture of experimental (i.e. attention shift) trials) and 3 blocks of each type. We used the online General Linear Model analysis software in the SIEMENS echo planar imaging sequence to contrast experimental vs. control conditions, identifying participant-specific functional activation in the POC during visuospatial attention shifts compared to the control condition. Individual activation in the POC was used as the centre for the MRS voxel positioning. See Fig 3 for the sum of the voxel position maps, i.e. the voxel position overlap, in MNI space.

Download:

Fig 3. Sum of MRS voxels over all subjects.

For better visualization the MRS voxel masks were transformed to MNI space. All subjects contributed to coordinates with the highest overlap, including the average center coordinate (MNI -18, -72, 42) (yellow color).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171338.g003

MRS single voxel event-related acquisition.

For each participant three blocks of 192 single voxel point-resolved spectroscopy sequence (PRESS) acquisitions (15x15x15mm, TR = 2500ms, TE = 30ms, no averages, advanced shim mode) were acquired in the POC (for 7 participants in the left hemisphere and for 9 in the right). For each of the experimental trials (N = 288) two single voxel ¹H-MRS measurements were acquired–an early and a late epoch. The onsets of the trials were jittered (between 0 and 290ms; mean = 108ms, SD = 66) in relation to the onset of the early epoch (see Fig 2). The trial and acquisition timings ensured that attention shifts occurred only during the first epoch. After each of the three blocks, corresponding spectra without water suppression (15x15x15mm, TR = 2000ms, TE = 30ms, 16 averages, advanced shim mode)at the same voxel position were acquired as reference.

Because it is not possible to implement post-acquisition movement correction in MRS, we used the SIEMENS Auto Align Scout for all measures to minimize the variability of the voxel position in the three MRS sequences by adjusting the voxel position to the actual head position of the participant before each MRS sequence.

MRS data analysis.

Preprocessing and data analyses were performed using java-based Magnetic Resonance User Interface (jMRUI; software version 4.0 (http://www.mrui.uab.es/mrui) [24]).

Spectra from incorrect trials were removed, resulting in between 65 to100 (mean: 85.92 measures, SD = 8.75) measures per condition. The spectra from each single volume scan in a sequence were phase-corrected using the subsequent H₂O reference scan. We averaged spectra of ipsilateral, contralateral and neutral trials for the early (attention) and the late epochs (baseline) separately for right and left hemisphere voxels. The averages were then pre-processed in JMRUI (removing the water peak and apodizing with a 3Hz Gaussian kernel). The non-linear least squares fitting algorithm (Automated Quantification of Short Echo time MRS Signals, AQSES, [25]) within jMRUI was used to estimate metabolite concentrations. We used a simulated model basis sets for 17 metabolites (acetate, aspartate, CHO, creatine, gamma-aminobutyric acid, glucose, glutamate (GLU), glutamine, GPC, lactate, myo-inositol, N-acetylaspartate (NAA), phosphocreatine, PHC, scyllo-inositol, succinate, and taurine).

The detection of CHO changes separately from changes in other choline-containing metabolites (CCMs) is not trivial in MRS using a 3T MRI scanner. The detectable CCM peaks are very close to each other (Fig 4). Consequently, typical MRS studies use models for quantitation of global concentration of cholinergic metabolites [26]. In our study, because of the strong biochemical hypothesis, we are especially interested in the relative differences in CHO concentration between task conditions separately from other CCMs.

Download:

Fig 4. Choline-containing metabolite spectrum.

Spectral patterns for the metabolites CHO, PHC and GPC simulated using VeSPA (https://scion.duhs.duke.edu/vespa/project). Metabolites were simulated at a field strength of 3T (main field 123.25MHz) using a PRESS pulse sequence (TE1 = 20ms, TE2 = 10ms).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171338.g004

Therefore, we modeled CHO separately from a PHC/GPC combined peak (model MOD_CHO_sep). It is important to demonstrate that this strategy is robust and serves the experimental question. We therefore also implemented the global CCM modelling strategy, by also using a model where all 3 CCMs were modelled together into one peak (model MOD_CHO_global).

For both models we used a previously described optimization procedure for model fitting [27]: The NAA peak of the standard metabolite model was aligned to 2.02ppm. The averaged data for each condition for each participant was also aligned so that the NAA peak was at 2.02ppm, as was the NAA peak of the averaged data of all conditions for each participant. The model was run in AQSES with equal phase for all metabolites (begin time fixed; delta damping: -10 to 25Hz; delta frequency: -5 to 5Hz; no background handling; 0 truncated points; 2048 points; normalization: on).

We performed a partial volume correction to account for individual voxel tissue concentration based on a procedure described in [28]. The high-resolution T1 weighted images were segmented into grey and white matter using Statistical Parametric Mapping toolbox (SPM), so tissue content within the MRS voxels could be assessed [29]. Voxel registration was performed using custom-made scripts developed in MATLAB (Release 2012b, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA), generating a mask for voxel location by combining location information from the Siemens raw file with orientation and location information contained within the T1 image. The application of this mask to the grey matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) images enabled the calculation of partial volume within the region of interest by establishing the percentage of each tissue type within the relevant voxels. These percentages were used to correct metabolite concentrations for partial volume and relaxation effects as described by [29].

To exclude potential blood-oxygen-level-dependent related effects on any concentration levels reported and possible water changes during neuronal activity, the results were referenced to another metabolite. Typically, NAA, creatine (CRE) or water are used as reference metabolites in MRS [30]. The estimated concentrations of CRE or NAA did not show task related concentration changes (see Results section for details). Because we optimized the detection of our spectra by maximizing the NAA peak, we did not use NAA as reference to avoid any direct effect of the optimization on the referenced CHO concentration values. CRE did not show any task related effects or interactions. Therefore, we used CRE as reference for our metabolites of interest (MOIs).

Tests of significance were performed using two-factorial ANOVAs for repeated measures with the factors condition (ipsilateral, neutral and contralateral) and epoch (attention vs. baseline) controlling for mean reaction time in the three conditions. We performed this test for all MOIs.

We also checked for effects of potential nuisance variables such as gender, age and time-of-day of the scans. We used the Bonferroni method to correct for multiple comparisons.

Simulation

Data simulation.

We simulated metabolite peaks using the simulation option "NMR-Scope" of jMRUI [24] to produce synthetic data equivalent to data acquired at 3T. We used the same parameters as in our experiment: TE = 30ms, 2048 sampling points. We simulated 17 metabolites with amounts derived from independent experimental testing (acetate, aspartate, CHO, creatine, gamma-aminobutyric acid, glucose, glutamate, glutamine, GPC, lactate, myo-inositol, N-acetylaspartate (NAA), phosphocreatine, PHC, scyllo-inositol, succinate, taurine). We simulated all combinations of 11 different amounts of CHO and 11 different amounts of PHC (the range for both was from 0 (no CHO/PHC at all) to 2/3 of the NAA peak. We then added the same amount of white noise to this data as we had in our real data (mean SD~ = 200).

For all combinations of simulated CHO and PHC we created 20 iterations using MATLAB, which were imported into jMRUI for analysis.

Data analysis.

Data analyses were performed using jMRUI [24] with the quantitation procedure AQSES as we did with the experimental data. We analyzed all 20 iterations with each model (MOD_CHO_global and MOD_CHO_sep). In order to test whether we could discriminate between metabolite levels, we performed Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (MWW) tests between the detected amplitude of neighboring levels of each CHO and PHC. The results were corrected for multiple comparisons using false discovery rate correction (FDR; q<0.05).

For visualization, we averaged the 20 iterations of each combination and analyzed the average datasets with both the MOD_CHO_sep and MOD_CHO_global models.

Results

Using fMRS, we detected a task-related increase in CHO following visuospatial attention shifts. Importantly, this effect was specific to CHO, and specific to the MRS acquisition voxel contralateral to the attentional shift, in line with predictions.

Visuospatial attention experiment

Behavioral data.

The individual detectable rotation degrees at the beginning of the MRS sessions (starting degree) ranged from 0.76° to 4.25° (mean = 1.82°, SE = 0.27). The mean degree during the MRS sessions ranged from 0.70° to 4.95° (mean = 1.95°, SE = 0.32). The initial and mean degree did not correlate with participant gender or age, nor with the time of the day that the testing took place. The average reaction time (RT) for the neutral condition (327ms, SE = 23.0) was significantly faster than for the two other conditions (ipsilateral: 605ms, SE = 36.1; contralateral: 622 ms, SE = 39.0), driving a significant main effect of conditions (F(2,14) = 56.952, p <<0.05). There was a small but statistically significant difference in RT between the ipsilateral and contralateral conditions (t(15) = -2.320, p<0.05), however RTs were highly correlated between the two conditions over participants (r(14) = 0.982, p<0.001). Nevertheless, we controlled for RT in the MRS data analyses. The two experimental conditions (ipsilateral and contralateral) did not differ in accuracy (t(15) = 1.324, p = 0.205).

MRS data: Effects of interest.

CHO levels were increased following the attention epoch during baseline, but only in the contralateral condition (see Fig 5). An analysis of the CHO concentrations using a two-factorial ANOVA for repeated measures, controlling for RT, revealed a significant interaction between condition and epoch (F(2) = 5.433, p<0.05, partial η² = 0.312), but no significant main effects of condition (F(2) = 0.081, p = 0.922) or epoch (F(2) = 1.976, p = 0.185). Paired samples t-tests of the change in concentration between epochs showed that the change was significant in the contralateral condition (t(15) = -2.124, p = 0.051), but not in the ipsilateral (t(15) = -0.754, p = 0.462) or neutral conditions (t(15) = 1.335, p = 0.202).

Download:

Fig 5. Task-related choline changes.

Changes in the concentration of choline between the early and late epochs (early-late) in the different experimental conditions (Ipsi: MRS acquisition ipsilateral to the shift; Neutral: no attention shift (free choice) trial; Contra: MRS acquisition contralateral to the attention shift).Choline increased only after contralateral visuospatial attention shifts, and there was a statistically significant interaction between condition and epoch. Error bars indicate the standard error.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171338.g005

This effect was specific to CHO (as quantified with MOD_CHO_sep). The combined PHC/GPC concentration estimate (quantified with the same model) showed no main effect of condition (F(2) = 0.395, p = 0.678) or epoch (F(2) = 0.668, p = 0.430), and no condition by epoch interaction (F(2) = 2.437, p = 0.109). Similarly, the combined choline-containing compounds concentration estimate (quantified with MOD_CHO_global) showed no main effect of condition (F(2) = 1.326, p = 0.284) or epoch (F(2) = 0.334, p = 0.574), and no condition by epoch interaction (F(2) = 1.870, p = 0.176).

MRS data: Acquisition, functional, and nuisance variable controls.

Acquisition hemisphere; effects on CHO concentration: There was no main effect of hemisphere as a between-subjects factor (F(1) = 0.148, p = 0.708) on the repeated measures ANCOVA (controlling for RT) of CHO levels across condition (ipsilateral, contralateral and control) and trial epoch (attention versus baseline), and no 3-way interaction (F(2) = 1.134, p = 0.340), but there remained a significant condition by trial epoch interaction (F(2) = 6.170, p = 0.007), as in the effect of interest (above).

Acquisition hemisphere; effects on variance of CHO concentration estimate: Cramer Rao lower bounds were low for the estimates of all metabolites of interest (less than 30% of metabolite concentration) [31]. There were no effects of acquisition hemisphere on CHO CRB levels, regardless of condition and trial epoch (all t-tests: p>0.5).

Acquisition hemisphere; effects on signal-to-noise ratio: The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was quantified as the average CRE signal divided by the average noise (amplitude variance outside the metabolite region) in the control condition. Acquisition hemisphere had no effect on SNR (L: 1.018 (0.878), R: 0.881 (0.476); t(14) = 0.402, p = 0.694).

Acquisition hemisphere; effects on tissue composition: There was no effect of hemisphere on the tissue composition of the acquired voxels as shown by independent samples t-tests (left versus right) for grey matter (t(14) = 0.855, p = 0.407), white matter (t(14) = -0.563, p = 0.582), and cerebrospinal fluid (t(14) = -0.653, p = 0.524).

Reference metabolites: To show that the effects of interest were not global effects of the measurement procedure, we checked for task-related effects on CRE and NAA (Fig 6, unreferenced values, left and middle panels respectively). There was no main effect of condition (F(2) = 1.327, p = 0.280) or epoch (F(2) = 0.043, p = 0.838) on CRE, and no condition by epoch interaction (F(2) = 0.387, p = 0.683). Similarly, there was no main effect of condition (F(2) = 0.626, p = 0.541) or epoch (F(2) = 1.074, p = 0.316) on NAA, and no condition by epoch interaction (F(2) = 2.673, p = 0.085).

Download:

Fig 6. Reference metabolites and functional control.

There were no effects of condition (ipsilateral, neutral or contralateral) or epoch (attention or baseline), and no condition by epoch interaction on reference and control metabolites: CRE (left), NAA (middle) and GLU (right).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171338.g006

Functional metabolite control: Glutamate (GLU) release is likely to accompany attentional shifts, given observed BOLD changes in similar tasks [16]. However, if GLU involvement could be measured with fMRS, we had no reason to expect it to be unilateral, in contrast to our main hypothesis about CHO involvement. Glutamate (GLU) is detectable with the point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence that we used for data acquisition [32]. However, there was no effect of condition (F(2) = 0.198, p = 0.821) or epoch (F(1) = 0.596, p = 0.452), and no condition by epoch interaction (F(2) = 0.078, p = 0.925) on GLU concentration (Fig 6).

Nuisance variable controls: Age, voxel tissue composition (i.e. percentage of white matter, grey matter or CSF) and testing time-of-day did not show any correlations with the concentrations of the MOIs (CHO, GLU; NAA and CRE) during the two trial epochs (all Pearson’s correlation tests, corrected for multiple comparisons, p>0.05). There was also no effect of gender on any metabolite concentrations (all independent samples t-tests (males versus females): p>0.05), with the exception of GLU concentration during the baseline epoch of the neutral condition (t(14) = -3.685, p = 0.002), which nonetheless did not alter the reported effects.

Simulation

To independently compare our model (MOD_CHO_sep) with the alternative model (MOD_CHO_global) regarding their ability to detect relative changes in CHO, we created simulated MRS datasets with different amounts of CHO and PHC (see methods section for more details).

We used simulated data to test the possibility of detecting relative changes in cholinergic metabolites in different data sets. Because we were especially interested in the relative changes in CHO, we simulated data with different levels of CHO and PHC while keeping all other metabolites constant. Fig 7 shows the detected amplitudes of CHO, PHC/GPC, NAA and CRE from the analysis of the averaged simulated data using both models.

Download:

Fig 7. Choline-containing metabolite amplitude changes in synthetic data.

Amplitudes of choline (CHO, red) and the combined phosphocholine/glycerophosphocholine peak (PHC/GPC, blue) estimated using the MOD_CHOsep (top) and MOD_CHOglobal (bottom) models in synthetic data. Estimated levels of CHO (red) and PHC/GPC (blue) show an increase in line with the simulated levels of CHO and PHC. Also shown are the levels of NAA and CRE and GPC (right panel). Note that the bottom panel shows combined amplitudes for choline-containing compounds as the MOD_CHOglobal model does not differentiate between CHO and other choline-containing metabolites.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171338.g007

The quantitation of the simulated data averaged over iterations using MOD_CHO_sep shows relative increases in the CHO and PHC levels which are fairly independent from each other, providing evidence that the model can discriminate the metabolites at 3T-relevant, physiological concentrations and noise levels. The standard deviations of the amplitudes are stable and small for all CHO and PHC combinations. The NAA, CRE and GPC amplitudes are simulated to be stable over all CHO and PHC combinations, so they control for systematic error in the process. The total amount of detected cholinergic metabolites is higher using the MOD_CHO_global. However, the standard deviation increases with increasing CHO and PHC levels than in the MOD_CHO_sep analysis.

MWW tests revealed significant increase between neighboring CHO levels in 82.8% of cases (67.7% after correction for multiple comparison using FDR). For PHC, this rate was 82.8% (50.5% after FDR) (Fig 8).

Download:

Fig 8. Sensitivity of amplitude change detection.

Results of the significance tests between neighboring CHO (red) and PHC (blue) simulated levels over 20 iterations. Bright colors represent differences between the neighboring levels detected as statistically significant after correcting for multiple comparison using FDR (q<0.05). Dark colors represent uncorrected significance and black denotes no significant result.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171338.g008

Discussion

This study provides direct evidence for the involvement of the human cortical cholinergic system in visuospatial attention. We used event-related MRS to track changes in the concentration of CHO in the POC during visuospatial attention shifts. We show task-related changes in CHO driven by concentration increases after attention shifts in the contralateral, but not in the ipsilateral hemi-field. This finding is in line with prior evidence for cholinergic involvement in visuospatial attention in this region [7], and for the laterality of processing attentional shifts [15,17,18]. This laterality effect is thought to be related to an indirect unilateral coupling of ACH release from the prefrontal to the parietal cortex in attention processes [33].

The average CHO concentration in brain tissue shows age related changes [34], and fluctuates with time of day because of different reasons, e.g. alcohol usage [35], athletic skills [36], and dietary CHO uptake [37]. Despite such possible confounding effects, we show that the task specific changes in CHO concentration do not correlate with the age of the participants, nor with the time-of-day of the scans.

The frequencies of the choline containing metabolites are very close in the spectra acquired with MRS at 3T, and it may be thought that fitting CHO separately from other CHO-containing peaks is problematic given that the resulting concentration estimates are anti-correlated because of their interdependence. This is a valid source of skepticism, and significant further development is needed to fully validate the cholinergic fMRS paradigm. However, in this study we explicitly address the modelling challenges using extensive simulation data. Although the dynamics of CHO and PHC (in particular) are coupled in the ACH cycle (Fig 1), there are physiological reasons why this coupling is non-linear as outlined above, which can be capitalized to further disentangle functional from model-fitting effects.

Importantly, we found a robust effect for CHO, but not for PHC and GPC (the other contributors to the cholinergic MRS footprint), not for the choline-containing metabolites fitted together, and not for GLU (our non-cholinergic functional control). This effect was specific to the contralateral condition, compared to both the intra-subject ipsilateral and control conditions, in line with our theoretical prediction.

In addition, using simulated data, we demonstrated that it is possible to detect relative differences in CHO levels using our model, which showed an accurate fit. It has been demonstrated that the composite cholinergic ¹H MRS peak at 3T correlates best with CHO and to a lesser extent with PHC [21]. Therefore, even if absolute CHO quantification were not possible at 3T, our findings suggest it may be better to model CHO separately to decrease the overall error in fitting. This captures more of the variability of the cholinergic metabolite peak complexes (which are not single peaks) and of their relationship to each other. The relative changes in CHO and the combined PCH and GPC estimate measured between different spectra were very accurate, allowing relative changes in CHO during different epochs of the task to be robustly detected. Therefore, when MRS is used for functional (task-related) measurement of CHO, our model can be used within-subjects to detect the relative differences in CHO levels between conditions.

A key question for further validation of cholinergic MRS to study human ACH function will be to establish the conditions under which phasic concentration changes in choline containing metabolites may be quantifiable with MRS. For the time being, we postulate that, in our experiment, the task-dependent changes in CHO concentration were driven by increases in extracellular CHO concentration following ACH release during the attentional shift, as acetylcholinesterase converts unbound ACH into CHO and acetate. Animal experiments show that extracellular choline levels can increase more than three-fold following ACH hydrolysis (although this process may not be contained to the synapse) [38].

ACH hydrolysis is followed by the reuptake of CHO into to presynaptic cell via the high affinity choline transporter (CHT), a sodium- and chloride-dependent protein expressed selectively in cholinergic neurons [39,40]. CHO transport is thought to be the rate-limiting regulatory step in ACH synthesis, providing a direct link between CHO and ACH concentration dynamics [23,41]. CHT is tightly regulated with respect to cholinergic signaling through its steady state-enrichment on terminal vesicles and activity-dependent shuttling to the plasma membrane in response to presynaptic excitation [42–45]. As a consequence, the prospect of imaging activity-dependent cholinergic regulation is significantly enhanced by recent efforts to characterize it as a potential pharmacological intervention target [42]. Importantly, there is recent evidence that a genetic polymorphism of CHT, which limits CHO transport capacity, is associated with decreased recruitment of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex under increased attentional demands [46].

Our current conceptualization of this mechanism is further supported by evidence that increased extracellular CHO may further down-regulate its re-uptake mechanism [47], possibly by inducing a rapid decrease in cell-surface expression of its high affinity transporter CHT1 [41]. Therefore, individuals for whom the balance of ACH break-down in the synapse and CHO re-uptake is not efficient, would show progressively increasing CHO and, ultimately, potentially compromised ACH function. This hypothesis can be directly tested in an appropriate animal model and with human MRS.

This rationale is in line with evidence that attentional enhancement following systemic physostigmine administration is due to cumulative effects, asynchronous with the shifting process. Physostigmine inhibits acetylcholinesterase, and therefore acts via modulation of ACH break-down in the synapse, as opposed to ACH release. For example, in a systemic cholinergic enhancement study the maximum enhancement effect on spatial attention (in a task similar to the one used here) was found in the post-stimulus phase, and not during shifting [7], supporting the idea that the rate of CHO re-uptake and phosphorylation may be driving the observed modulatory effect. In other words, physostigmine administration may act to alleviate inefficiency, rather than enhance function per se.

The results of this study suggest that relative CHO levels, as measured with event-related MRS, may be associated with the well-established function of cortical ACH in visuospatial attention shifts. This is in line with evidence from animal models and slice preparation studies that demonstrates a relationship between tissue availability of CHO and ACH concentration [3,48].

The open questions outlined above notwithstanding, our findings support the idea that cholinergic MRS can be a useful proxy for the study of ACH function, a prospect which warrants further attention. Importantly, our data suggests that relative functional fluctuations between CHO and other MRS-visible cholinergic metabolites can be distinguished at 3T. This opens up the possibility of tractable broader opportunities for in vivo functional neurochemical imaging of the human cholinergic system, which is currently not part of the empirical agenda.

Our findings more generally suggest that event-related measurement of brain metabolites with fMRS may allow for characterization of in vivo functional neurochemistry under conditions with strong a priori hypothesized involvement, and thus support previous studies investigating other neurometabolites [49–57].

In summary, we describe a task-driven increase in CHO in the parietal cortex, specifically following contralateral attention shifts. To our knowledge, this is the first time that event-related MRS has been used to detect functional changes in the human central cholinergic system associated with attention. Further refinement of in vivo functional measurement of the cholinergic system could prove invaluable in the early diagnosis and treatment of diseases that affect cholinergic dysfunction (such as Alzheimer's disease), as well as in charting the progression of non-pathological age-related cognitive decline.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr James Stone and Dr Markus Bauer for advice during the design of the study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: AC.
Data curation: AC ML SI.
Formal analysis: AC ML PGM TB.
Funding acquisition: AC.
Investigation: AC ML SI TB.
Methodology: AC ML PGM TB.
Project administration: AC.
Resources: AC PGM.
Software: ML TB.
Supervision: AC.
Validation: ML PGM TB.
Visualization: AC ML TB.
Writing – original draft: AC ML.
Writing – review & editing: AC ML PGM TB SI.

References

1. Perry E, Walker M, Grace J, Perry R. Acetylcholine in mind: a neurotransmitter correlate of consciousness? Trends Neurosci. 1999;22: 273–80. pmid:10354606
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Hasselmo ME. The role of acetylcholine in learning and memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16: 710–715. pmid:17011181
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Wang X-C, Du X-X, Tian Q, Wang J-Z. Correlation between choline signal intensity and acetylcholine level in different brain regions of rat. Neurochem Res. 2008;33: 814–9. pmid:17940879
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Holt DJ, Bachus SE, Hyde TM, Wittie M, Herman MM, Vangel M, et al. Reduced density of cholinergic interneurons in the ventral striatum in schizophrenia: an in situ hybridization study. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;58: 408–16. pmid:16023618
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Hasselmo ME, Sarter M. Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition. Neuropsychopharmacology. Nature Publishing Group; 2011;36: 52–73. pmid:20668433
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Sarter M, Hasselmo ME, Bruno JP, Givens B. Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detection. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2005;48: 98–111. pmid:15708630
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Bauer M, Kluge C, Bach D, Bradbury D, Heinze HJ, Dolan RJ, et al. Cholinergic Enhancement of Visual Attention and Neural Oscillations in the Human Brain. Curr Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2012;22: 397–402. pmid:22305751
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Beane M, Drew A, Massey K, Marrocco R. Infusion of cholinergic and noradrenergic agents into rat posterior parietal cortex modifies orienting and alerting components of covert visual attention. Progr No 674 13 Abstr Viewer/Iternary Plan Washington, DC. 2002; Society for Neuroscience, 2002 Online.
9. Peters M St., Demeter E, Lustig C, Bruna JP, Sarter M. Enhanced Control of Attention by Stimulating Mesolimbic- Corticopetal Cholinergic Circuitry. J Neurophysiol. 2011;31: 9760–9771.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Osipova D, Ahveninen J, Kaakkola S, Jääskeläinen IP, Huttunen J, Pekkonen E. Effects of scopolamine on MEG spectral power and coherence in elderly subjects. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114: 1902–1907. pmid:14499752
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Osipova D, Ahveninen J, Jensen O, Ylikoski A, Pekkonen E. Altered generation of spontaneous oscillations in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage. 2005;27: 835–41. pmid:15961323
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Colby CL, Goldberg ME. Space and Attention in Parietal Cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22: 319–349. pmid:10202542
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Mesulam MM. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;354: 1325–1346. pmid:10466154
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3: 201–15. pmid:11994752
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Silver M a, Ress D, Heeger DJ. Topographic maps of visual spatial attention in human parietal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94: 1358–71. pmid:15817643
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Yantis S, Schwarzbach J, Serences JT, Carlson RL, Steinmetz M a, Pekar JJ, et al. Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5: 995–1002. pmid:12219097
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Wauschkuhn B, Verleger R, Wascher E, Klostermann W, Heide W, Kömpf D, et al. Lateralized Human Cortical Activity for Shifting Visuospatial Attention and Initiating Saccades. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80: 2900–2910. pmid:9862894
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Hilgetag CC, Théoret H, Pascual-Leone A. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced “virtual lesions” of human parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4: 953–7. pmid:11528429
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Boulanger Y, Labelle M, Khiat a. Role of phospholipase A(2) on the variations of the choline signal intensity observed by 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in brain diseases. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000;33: 380–9. pmid:11011072
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Li Z, Vance DE. Phosphatidylcholine and choline homeostasis. J Lipid Res. 2008;49: 1187–94. pmid:18204095
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Miller BL, Changl L, Booth R, Ernst T, D M, Ph D, et al. In vivo 1H-MRS Choline: Correlation with in vitro chemistry/histology. Life Sci. 1996;58: 1929–1935. pmid:8637421
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Ross AJ, Sachdev PS. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in cognitive research. Brain Res Rev. 2004;44: 83–102. pmid:15003387
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Lockman PR, Allen DD. The transport of choline. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2002;28: 749–771. pmid:12236062
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Naressi A, Couturier C, Devos JM, Janssen M, Mangeat C, de Beer R, et al. Java-based graphical user interface for the MRUI quantitation package. Magn Reson Mater Physics, Biol Med. 2001;12: 141–52.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Poullet J-B, Sima DM, Simonetti AW, De Neuter B, Vanhamme L, Lemmerling P, et al. An automated quantitation of short echo time MRS spectra in an open source software environment: AQSES. NMR Biomed. 2007;20: 493–504. pmid:17167819
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Zhu H, Barker PB. MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging of the brain. Methods Mol Biol. NIH Public Access; 2011;711: 203–26. pmid:21279603
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Minati L, Aquino D, Bruzzone M, Erbetta A. Quantitation of normal metabolite concentrations in six brain regions by in-vivo ¹ H-MR spectroscopy. J Med Phys. 2010;35: 154. pmid:20927223
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Posse S, Otazo R, Caprihan A, Bustillo J, Chen H, Henry PG, et al. Proton echo-planar spectroscopic imaging of J-coupled resonances in human brain at 3 and 4 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58: 236–244. pmid:17610279
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Gasparovic C, Song T, Devier D, Bockholt HJ, Caprihan A, Mullins PG, et al. Use of tissue water as a concentration reference for proton spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55: 1219–26. pmid:16688703
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Mullins PG, McGonigle DJ, O’Gorman RL, Puts N a J, Vidyasagar R, Evans CJ, et al. Current practice in the use of MEGA-PRESS spectroscopy for the detection of GABA. Neuroimage. Elsevier Inc.; 2012;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Graveron-Demilly D. Quantification in magnetic resonance spectroscopy based on semi-parametric approaches. MAGMA. 2014;27: 113–30. pmid:23892473
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Henry ME, Lauriat TL, Shanahan M, Renshaw PF, Jensen JE. Accuracy and stability of measuring GABA, glutamate, and glutamine by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a phantom study at 4 Tesla. J Magn Reson. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;208: 210–8. pmid:21130670
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Nelson CL, Sarter M, Bruno JP. Prefrontal cortical modulation of acetylcholine release in posterior parietal cortex. Neuroscience. 2005;132: 347–59. pmid:15802188
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Harris JL, Yeh H-W, Swerdlow RH, Choi I-Y, Lee P, Brooks WM. High-field proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy reveals metabolic effects of normal brain aging. Neurobiol Aging. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;35: 1686–94. pmid:24559659
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Klatskin G. The effect of alcohol on the choline requirement: I. Changes in the rat’s liver following prolonged inestion of alcohol. J Exp Med. 1954;100: 605–614. pmid:13211917
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Allwörden HN, Horn S, Kahl J, Rg, Feldheim W. The influence of lecithin on plasma choline concentrations in triathletes and adolescent runners during exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993;67: 87–91. pmid:8375373
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Bidulescu A, Chambless LE, Siega-Riz AM, Zeisel SH, Heiss G. Repeatability and measurement error in the assessment of choline and betaine dietary intake: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Nutr J. 2009;8: 14. pmid:19232103
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Parikh V, Sarter M. Cortical choline transporter function measured in vivo using choline-sensitive microelectrodes: clearance of endogenous and exogenous choline and effects of removal of cholinergic terminals. J Neurochem. 2006;97: 488–503. pmid:16539662
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Kus L, Borys E, Ping Chu Y, Ferguson SM, Blakely RD, Emborg ME, et al. Distribution of high affinity choline transporter immunoreactivity in the primate central nervous system. J Comp Neurol. 2003;463: 341–57. pmid:12820166
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Black S a G, Rylett RJ. Choline transporter CHT regulation and function in cholinergic neurons. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem. 2012;12: 114–21. pmid:22483273
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Okuda T, Konishi A, Misawa H, Haga T. Substrate-induced internalization of the high-affinity choline transporter. J Neurosci. 2011;31: 14989–97. pmid:22016532
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Ennis EA, Wright J, Retzlaff CL, McManus OB, Lin Z, Huang X, et al. Identification and characterization of ML352: a novel, noncompetitive inhibitor of the presynaptic choline transporter. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2015;6: 417–27. pmid:25560927
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Saltarelli MD, Yamada K, Coyle JT. Phospholipase A2 and 3H-hemicholinium-3 binding sites in rat brain: a potential second-messenger role for fatty acids in the regulation of high-affinity choline uptake. J Neurosci. 1990;10: 62–72. pmid:2299401
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Gates J, Ferguson SM, Blakely RD, Apparsundaram S. Regulation of choline transporter surface expression and phosphorylation by protein kinase C and protein phosphatase 1/2A. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;310: 536–45. pmid:15064333
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Pinthong M, Black SAG, Ribeiro FM, Pholpramool C, Ferguson SSG, Rylett RJ. Activity and subcellular trafficking of the sodium-coupled choline transporter CHT is regulated acutely by peroxynitrite. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;73: 801–12. pmid:17971421
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Berry AS, Blakely RD, Sarter M, Lustig C. Cholinergic capacity mediates prefrontal engagement during challenges to attention: evidence from imaging genetics. Neuroimage. 2015;108: 386–95. pmid:25536497
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Kuhar MJ, Murrin LC. Sodium-dependent, high affinity choline uptake. J Neurochem. 1978;30: 15–21. pmid:340615
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Katz-Brull R, Koudinov AR, Degani H. Direct detection of brain acetylcholine synthesis by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Brain Res. 2005;1048: 202–10. pmid:15921662
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Lally N, Mullins PG, Roberts M V, Price D, Gruber T, Haenschel C. Glutamatergic correlates of gamma-band oscillatory activity during cognition: A concurrent ER-MRS and EEG study. Neuroimage. Elsevier Inc.; 2014;85: 823–833. pmid:23891885
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Lin Y, Stephenson MC, Xin L, Napolitano A, Morris PG. Investigating the metabolic changes due to visual stimulation using functional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 7T. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32: 1484–95. pmid:22434070
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Gussew A, Rzanny R, Erdtel M, Scholle HC, Kaiser W a, Mentzel HJ, et al. Time-resolved functional 1H MR spectroscopic detection of glutamate concentration changes in the brain during acute heat pain stimulation. Neuroimage. Elsevier Inc.; 2010;49: 1895–902. pmid:19761852
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Mangia S, Tkác I, Gruetter R, Van De Moortele P-F, Giove F, Maraviglia B, et al. Sensitivity of single-voxel 1H-MRS in investigating the metabolism of the activated human visual cortex at 7 T. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24: 343–8. pmid:16677939
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Mullins PG, Rowland LM, Jung RE, Sibbitt WL. A novel technique to study the brain’s response to pain: proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuroimage. 2005;26: 642–6. pmid:15907322
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Nishitani N. Dynamics of cognitive processing in the human hippocampus by neuromagnetic and neurochemical assessments. Neuroimage. 2003;20: 561–571. pmid:14527616
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Taylor R, Schaefer B, Densmore M, Neufeld RWJ, Rajakumar N, Williamson PC, et al. Increased glutamate levels observed upon functional activation in the anterior cingulate cortex using the Stroop Task and functional spectroscopy. Neuroreport. 2015;26: 107–12. pmid:25536234
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. Huang Z, Davis Iv HH, Yue Q, Wiebking C, Duncan NW, Zhang J, et al. Increase in glutamate/glutamine concentration in the medial prefrontal cortex during mental imagery: A combined functional mrs and fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Apšvalka D, Gadie A, Clemence M, Mullins PG. Event-related dynamics of glutamate and BOLD effects measured using functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS) at 3T in a repetition suppression paradigm. Neuroimage. 2015;
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Perry E, Walker M, Grace J, Perry R. Acetylcholine in mind: a neurotransmitter correlate of consciousness? Trends Neurosci. 1999;22: 273–80. pmid:10354606
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Hasselmo ME. The role of acetylcholine in learning and memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16: 710–715. pmid:17011181
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Wang X-C, Du X-X, Tian Q, Wang J-Z. Correlation between choline signal intensity and acetylcholine level in different brain regions of rat. Neurochem Res. 2008;33: 814–9. pmid:17940879
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Holt DJ, Bachus SE, Hyde TM, Wittie M, Herman MM, Vangel M, et al. Reduced density of cholinergic interneurons in the ventral striatum in schizophrenia: an in situ hybridization study. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;58: 408–16. pmid:16023618
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Hasselmo ME, Sarter M. Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition. Neuropsychopharmacology. Nature Publishing Group; 2011;36: 52–73. pmid:20668433
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Sarter M, Hasselmo ME, Bruno JP, Givens B. Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detection. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2005;48: 98–111. pmid:15708630
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Bauer M, Kluge C, Bach D, Bradbury D, Heinze HJ, Dolan RJ, et al. Cholinergic Enhancement of Visual Attention and Neural Oscillations in the Human Brain. Curr Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2012;22: 397–402. pmid:22305751
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Beane M, Drew A, Massey K, Marrocco R. Infusion of cholinergic and noradrenergic agents into rat posterior parietal cortex modifies orienting and alerting components of covert visual attention. Progr No 674 13 Abstr Viewer/Iternary Plan Washington, DC. 2002; Society for Neuroscience, 2002 Online.

[ref9] 9. Peters M St., Demeter E, Lustig C, Bruna JP, Sarter M. Enhanced Control of Attention by Stimulating Mesolimbic- Corticopetal Cholinergic Circuitry. J Neurophysiol. 2011;31: 9760–9771.
View Article
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Osipova D, Ahveninen J, Kaakkola S, Jääskeläinen IP, Huttunen J, Pekkonen E. Effects of scopolamine on MEG spectral power and coherence in elderly subjects. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114: 1902–1907. pmid:14499752
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Osipova D, Ahveninen J, Jensen O, Ylikoski A, Pekkonen E. Altered generation of spontaneous oscillations in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage. 2005;27: 835–41. pmid:15961323
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Colby CL, Goldberg ME. Space and Attention in Parietal Cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22: 319–349. pmid:10202542
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Mesulam MM. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;354: 1325–1346. pmid:10466154
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3: 201–15. pmid:11994752
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Silver M a, Ress D, Heeger DJ. Topographic maps of visual spatial attention in human parietal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94: 1358–71. pmid:15817643
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Yantis S, Schwarzbach J, Serences JT, Carlson RL, Steinmetz M a, Pekar JJ, et al. Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5: 995–1002. pmid:12219097
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Wauschkuhn B, Verleger R, Wascher E, Klostermann W, Heide W, Kömpf D, et al. Lateralized Human Cortical Activity for Shifting Visuospatial Attention and Initiating Saccades. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80: 2900–2910. pmid:9862894
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Hilgetag CC, Théoret H, Pascual-Leone A. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced “virtual lesions” of human parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4: 953–7. pmid:11528429
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Boulanger Y, Labelle M, Khiat a. Role of phospholipase A(2) on the variations of the choline signal intensity observed by 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in brain diseases. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000;33: 380–9. pmid:11011072
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Li Z, Vance DE. Phosphatidylcholine and choline homeostasis. J Lipid Res. 2008;49: 1187–94. pmid:18204095
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Miller BL, Changl L, Booth R, Ernst T, D M, Ph D, et al. In vivo 1H-MRS Choline: Correlation with in vitro chemistry/histology. Life Sci. 1996;58: 1929–1935. pmid:8637421
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Ross AJ, Sachdev PS. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in cognitive research. Brain Res Rev. 2004;44: 83–102. pmid:15003387
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Lockman PR, Allen DD. The transport of choline. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2002;28: 749–771. pmid:12236062
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Naressi A, Couturier C, Devos JM, Janssen M, Mangeat C, de Beer R, et al. Java-based graphical user interface for the MRUI quantitation package. Magn Reson Mater Physics, Biol Med. 2001;12: 141–52.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Poullet J-B, Sima DM, Simonetti AW, De Neuter B, Vanhamme L, Lemmerling P, et al. An automated quantitation of short echo time MRS spectra in an open source software environment: AQSES. NMR Biomed. 2007;20: 493–504. pmid:17167819
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Zhu H, Barker PB. MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging of the brain. Methods Mol Biol. NIH Public Access; 2011;711: 203–26. pmid:21279603
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Minati L, Aquino D, Bruzzone M, Erbetta A. Quantitation of normal metabolite concentrations in six brain regions by in-vivo ¹ H-MR spectroscopy. J Med Phys. 2010;35: 154. pmid:20927223
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Posse S, Otazo R, Caprihan A, Bustillo J, Chen H, Henry PG, et al. Proton echo-planar spectroscopic imaging of J-coupled resonances in human brain at 3 and 4 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58: 236–244. pmid:17610279
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Gasparovic C, Song T, Devier D, Bockholt HJ, Caprihan A, Mullins PG, et al. Use of tissue water as a concentration reference for proton spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55: 1219–26. pmid:16688703
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Mullins PG, McGonigle DJ, O’Gorman RL, Puts N a J, Vidyasagar R, Evans CJ, et al. Current practice in the use of MEGA-PRESS spectroscopy for the detection of GABA. Neuroimage. Elsevier Inc.; 2012;
View Article
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Graveron-Demilly D. Quantification in magnetic resonance spectroscopy based on semi-parametric approaches. MAGMA. 2014;27: 113–30. pmid:23892473
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] PubMed/NCBI

[118] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Henry ME, Lauriat TL, Shanahan M, Renshaw PF, Jensen JE. Accuracy and stability of measuring GABA, glutamate, and glutamine by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a phantom study at 4 Tesla. J Magn Reson. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;208: 210–8. pmid:21130670
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] PubMed/NCBI

[122] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Nelson CL, Sarter M, Bruno JP. Prefrontal cortical modulation of acetylcholine release in posterior parietal cortex. Neuroscience. 2005;132: 347–59. pmid:15802188
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Harris JL, Yeh H-W, Swerdlow RH, Choi I-Y, Lee P, Brooks WM. High-field proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy reveals metabolic effects of normal brain aging. Neurobiol Aging. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;35: 1686–94. pmid:24559659
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Klatskin G. The effect of alcohol on the choline requirement: I. Changes in the rat’s liver following prolonged inestion of alcohol. J Exp Med. 1954;100: 605–614. pmid:13211917
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] PubMed/NCBI

[134] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Allwörden HN, Horn S, Kahl J, Rg, Feldheim W. The influence of lecithin on plasma choline concentrations in triathletes and adolescent runners during exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993;67: 87–91. pmid:8375373
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Bidulescu A, Chambless LE, Siega-Riz AM, Zeisel SH, Heiss G. Repeatability and measurement error in the assessment of choline and betaine dietary intake: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Nutr J. 2009;8: 14. pmid:19232103
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Parikh V, Sarter M. Cortical choline transporter function measured in vivo using choline-sensitive microelectrodes: clearance of endogenous and exogenous choline and effects of removal of cholinergic terminals. J Neurochem. 2006;97: 488–503. pmid:16539662
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] PubMed/NCBI

[146] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Kus L, Borys E, Ping Chu Y, Ferguson SM, Blakely RD, Emborg ME, et al. Distribution of high affinity choline transporter immunoreactivity in the primate central nervous system. J Comp Neurol. 2003;463: 341–57. pmid:12820166
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Black S a G, Rylett RJ. Choline transporter CHT regulation and function in cholinergic neurons. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem. 2012;12: 114–21. pmid:22483273
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Okuda T, Konishi A, Misawa H, Haga T. Substrate-induced internalization of the high-affinity choline transporter. J Neurosci. 2011;31: 14989–97. pmid:22016532
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Ennis EA, Wright J, Retzlaff CL, McManus OB, Lin Z, Huang X, et al. Identification and characterization of ML352: a novel, noncompetitive inhibitor of the presynaptic choline transporter. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2015;6: 417–27. pmid:25560927
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Saltarelli MD, Yamada K, Coyle JT. Phospholipase A2 and 3H-hemicholinium-3 binding sites in rat brain: a potential second-messenger role for fatty acids in the regulation of high-affinity choline uptake. J Neurosci. 1990;10: 62–72. pmid:2299401
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] PubMed/NCBI

[166] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Gates J, Ferguson SM, Blakely RD, Apparsundaram S. Regulation of choline transporter surface expression and phosphorylation by protein kinase C and protein phosphatase 1/2A. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;310: 536–45. pmid:15064333
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] PubMed/NCBI

[170] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Pinthong M, Black SAG, Ribeiro FM, Pholpramool C, Ferguson SSG, Rylett RJ. Activity and subcellular trafficking of the sodium-coupled choline transporter CHT is regulated acutely by peroxynitrite. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;73: 801–12. pmid:17971421
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] PubMed/NCBI

[174] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Berry AS, Blakely RD, Sarter M, Lustig C. Cholinergic capacity mediates prefrontal engagement during challenges to attention: evidence from imaging genetics. Neuroimage. 2015;108: 386–95. pmid:25536497
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] PubMed/NCBI

[178] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Kuhar MJ, Murrin LC. Sodium-dependent, high affinity choline uptake. J Neurochem. 1978;30: 15–21. pmid:340615
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] PubMed/NCBI

[182] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Katz-Brull R, Koudinov AR, Degani H. Direct detection of brain acetylcholine synthesis by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Brain Res. 2005;1048: 202–10. pmid:15921662
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[184] View Article

[185] PubMed/NCBI

[186] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Lally N, Mullins PG, Roberts M V, Price D, Gruber T, Haenschel C. Glutamatergic correlates of gamma-band oscillatory activity during cognition: A concurrent ER-MRS and EEG study. Neuroimage. Elsevier Inc.; 2014;85: 823–833. pmid:23891885
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[188] View Article

[189] PubMed/NCBI

[190] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Lin Y, Stephenson MC, Xin L, Napolitano A, Morris PG. Investigating the metabolic changes due to visual stimulation using functional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 7T. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32: 1484–95. pmid:22434070
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] PubMed/NCBI

[194] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Gussew A, Rzanny R, Erdtel M, Scholle HC, Kaiser W a, Mentzel HJ, et al. Time-resolved functional 1H MR spectroscopic detection of glutamate concentration changes in the brain during acute heat pain stimulation. Neuroimage. Elsevier Inc.; 2010;49: 1895–902. pmid:19761852
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] PubMed/NCBI

[198] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Mangia S, Tkác I, Gruetter R, Van De Moortele P-F, Giove F, Maraviglia B, et al. Sensitivity of single-voxel 1H-MRS in investigating the metabolism of the activated human visual cortex at 7 T. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24: 343–8. pmid:16677939
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[200] View Article

[201] PubMed/NCBI

[202] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Mullins PG, Rowland LM, Jung RE, Sibbitt WL. A novel technique to study the brain’s response to pain: proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuroimage. 2005;26: 642–6. pmid:15907322
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[204] View Article

[205] PubMed/NCBI

[206] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Nishitani N. Dynamics of cognitive processing in the human hippocampus by neuromagnetic and neurochemical assessments. Neuroimage. 2003;20: 561–571. pmid:14527616
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[208] View Article

[209] PubMed/NCBI

[210] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Taylor R, Schaefer B, Densmore M, Neufeld RWJ, Rajakumar N, Williamson PC, et al. Increased glutamate levels observed upon functional activation in the anterior cingulate cortex using the Stroop Task and functional spectroscopy. Neuroreport. 2015;26: 107–12. pmid:25536234
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[212] View Article

[213] PubMed/NCBI

[214] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Huang Z, Davis Iv HH, Yue Q, Wiebking C, Duncan NW, Zhang J, et al. Increase in glutamate/glutamine concentration in the medial prefrontal cortex during mental imagery: A combined functional mrs and fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;
View Article
Google Scholar

[216] View Article

[217] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Apšvalka D, Gadie A, Clemence M, Mullins PG. Event-related dynamics of glutamate and BOLD effects measured using functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS) at 3T in a repetition suppression paradigm. Neuroimage. 2015;
View Article
Google Scholar

[219] View Article

[220] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Visuospatial attention experiment

Participants.

Task and procedure.

Data acquisition.

Structural scan.

fMRI localizer for MRS voxel placement.

MRS single voxel event-related acquisition.

MRS data analysis.

Simulation

Data simulation.

Data analysis.

Results

Visuospatial attention experiment

Behavioral data.

MRS data: Effects of interest.

MRS data: Acquisition, functional, and nuisance variable controls.

Simulation

Discussion

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References