Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus on Polish pig farms

  • Aneta Mroczkowska,

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, Warsaw, Poland

  • Jacek Żmudzki,

    Affiliation Department of Swine Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland

  • Natalia Marszałek,

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, Warsaw, Poland

  • Monika Orczykowska-Kotyna,

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, Warsaw, Poland

  • Iga Komorowska,

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, Warsaw, Poland

  • Agnieszka Nowak,

    Affiliation Department of Swine Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland

  • Anna Grzesiak,

    Affiliation Department of Swine Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland

  • Ewelina Czyżewska-Dors,

    Affiliation Department of Swine Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland

  • Arkadiusz Dors,

    Affiliation Department of Swine Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland

  • Zygmunt Pejsak,

    Affiliation Department of Swine Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland

  • Waleria Hryniewicz,

    Affiliations Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, Warsaw, Poland, Centre of Quality Control in Microbiology, Warsaw, Poland

  • Tomasz Wyszomirski,

    Affiliation Faculty of Biology, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

  • Joanna Empel

    jempel@cls.edu.pl

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, Warsaw, Poland

Abstract

Background

Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus (LA-SA) draws increasing attention due to its particular ability to colonize farm animals and be transmitted to people, which in turn leads to its spread in the environment. The aim of the study was to determine the dissemination of LA-SA on pig farms selected throughout Poland, characterize the population structure of identified S. aureus, and assess the prevalence of LA-SA carriage amongst farmers and veterinarians being in contact with pigs.

Methods and findings

The study was conducted on 123 pig farms (89 farrow-to-finish and 34 nucleus herds), located in 15 out of 16 provinces of Poland. Human and pig nasal swabs, as well as dust samples were analyzed. S. aureus was detected on 79 (64.2%) farms from 14 provinces. Amongst these farms LA-SA-positive farms dominated (71/79, 89.9%, 95% CI [81.0%, 95.5%]). The prevalence of LA-MRSA-positive farms was lower than LA-MSSA-positive (36.6% of LA-SA-positive farms, 95% CI [25.5%, 48.9%] vs. 74.6%, 95% CI [62.9%, 84.2%]). In total, 190 S. aureus isolates were identified: 72 (38%) MRSA and 118 (62%) methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), of which 174 (92%) isolates were classified to three livestock-associated lineages: CC398 (73%), CC9 (13%), and CC30/ST433 (6%). All CC398 isolates belonged to the animal clade. Four LA-MRSA clones were detected: ST433-IVa(2B) clone (n = 8, 11%), described to the best of our knowledge for the first time, and three ST398 clones (n = 64, 89%) with the most prevalent being ST398-V(5C2&5)c, followed by ST398-V(5C2), and ST398-IVa(2B).

Nasal carriage of LA-SA by pig farmers was estimated at 13.2% (38/283), CC398 carriage at 12.7% (36/283) and ST398-MRSA carriage at 3.2% (9/283), whereas by veterinarians at 21.1% (8/38), 18.4% (7/38) and 10.5% (4/38), respectively.

Conclusions

The prevalence of LA-MRSA-positive pig farms in Poland has increased considerably since 2008, when the first MRSA EU baseline survey was conducted in Europe. On Polish pig farms CC398 of the animal clade predominates, this being also reflected in the prevalence of CC398 nasal carriage in farmers and veterinarians. However, finding a new ST433-IVa(2B) clone provides evidence for the continuing evolution of LA-MRSA and argues for further monitoring of S. aureus in farm animals.

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the major human opportunistic pathogens responsible for wide range of infections [1]. Of particular concern remain methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains causing severe infections with treatment limitations. Initially, MRSA strains had been restricted to the hospital environment (hospital-associated MRSA, HA-MRSA), but later they also emerged in the community (community-associated, CA-MRSA) [2]. During the past decade, a new subpopulation of S. aureus, so-called livestock-associated S. aureus (LA-SA), has been described. The first LA-SA strains were reported amongst pigs and pig farmers in France and the Netherlands; livestock-associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) strains were represented exclusively by clonal complex (CC) 398, whereas livestock-associated methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (LA-MSSA) were more diverse and encompassed S. aureus of both CC398 and sequence type (ST) 9 or 433 [3, 4]. In subsequent years CC398-MRSA strains were identified in pigs all over the world [58]. Although different MRSA lineages adapted to pigs have been reported, only two of them are recognized as the most prevalent: CC398 in Europe, and CC9 in Asia [911]. CC398-MRSA strains are drawing increased attention on grounds of their particular ability to colonize livestock animals, and be transmitted to persons being in contact with colonized animals and their environment [1215]. Despite suggestions that CC398 is less virulent than other MRSA lineages, a number of studies demonstrate infections caused by CC398-MRSA in humans, especially in pig farmers and their family members [1619] and indicate food-producing animals as a potential source of their origin.

The epidemiological situation associated with LA-SA is not well recognized in the eastern and south-eastern countries of the European Union, and the number of publications concerning the prevalence of LA-MRSA on livestock farms and in animal-food products in this region is limited. In Poland, the first ST398-MRSA strains were observed in 2008 in specimens from humans (veterinarians having contact with pigs) [20]. As our country is one of the largest pork producers, ranked fourth in the European Union in 2013, with 1.6 million tons of pig meat per year and sixth with almost 11 million pigs produced per year (Eurostat 2014, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/agriculture/data/main-tables), data from a S. aureus structured survey on Polish pig farms would expand knowledge on the LA-SA population in Europe.

The aim of the study was to determine the dissemination of LA-SA, both MRSA and MSSA, on pig farms selected throughout Poland, characterize the population structure of S. aureus identified in humans, pigs and their environment, and assess the prevalence of LA-SA carriage amongst farmers and veterinarians being in contact with pigs.

Material and methods

Farm selection and characteristics

The existing database of the Department of Swine Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute was used to contact over 400 veterinarians, taking care of over 3,500 swine herds in Poland. The selection process was performed by contacting veterinary practitioners that agreed to contribute in the study. As a consequence, in the period from August 2010 to November 2012 a cross-sectional study was conducted on 123 pig farms (89 farrow-to-finish and 34 nucleus herds), located in 15 out of 16 provinces of Poland. The number of farms selected was proportional to the headage of pig per 100 ha in a particular province. The study did not include the Lower Silesia Province, where pig production is amongst the lowest in the country. The size of the farrow-to-finish herds ranged from ten to 2000 sows (median 80) and of the nucleus herds from nine to 1000 (median 54). Sixty-four (52%) farms had their own pig production, while 59 (48%) purchased gilts and/or boars from other sources. Thirty-nine (32%) farms obeyed the rules of good management applying the All-In-All-Out (AIAO) procedure and 57 (46%) farms did not. For 27 (22%) of farms no data were obtained. In the AIAO procedure the animals are kept together in groups. The groups are closely matched by age, weight, production stage and condition. The animals are moved into and out of facilities in groups. The facilities are cleaned and thoroughly disinfected between groups of animals. Most of the farms weaned their piglets between 21–49 days of life, with an average of 28 days.

Sampling procedure

There were three sources of material: human and pig nasal swabs and environmental dust samples. From each farm, both pig nasal swabs and dust samples were collected during one-off screening (one visit at the farm) in three different sectors: farrowing unit (sows), nursery and fattening unit. Five nasal swabs from five healthy pigs and five environmental dust samples were collected from each sector. Dust samples were taken mainly from pens and ventilator ducts. Whenever possible, five pigs from each age group were selected using a convenience sampling scheme that avoided sampling more than one pig in co-mingled groups. If all three age groups were not present on the farm, pigs from the available groups were sampled.

Nasal swabs were collected at the same time, from consenting owners of the farms, individual workers taking care of animals (hereinafter all referred to as”pig farmers”) and from veterinarians supervising pig farms. The vets working on several farms were screened only once. The number of nasal swabs collected from farm personnel depended on the number of workers employed at each farm and individual agreement to be sampled given by every person.

One swab per volunteer on each farm was taken from both nares personally after swabbing training. In total, 321 human nasal swabs (283 from pig farmers and 38 from vets), 1845 pig nasal swabs and 1845 dust samples were collected. All samples were stored at 4°C and passed on directly to the laboratory. Nasal cotton swabs were transported in Amies medium (Medlab Products, Raszyn, Poland).

At the time of the project application and realization ethical approval was not required for taking nasal swabs according to local and national regulations (the project was reviewed and accepted by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland and additional approval was not recquired). All human participants signed an informed consent form. Collected data were anonymized before analysis at the National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy.

Bacterial isolates

Material from five pig nasal swabs, collected in each farm sector, were pooled into one sample, placed in a 100 ml Mueller-Hinton Broth (BD BBL, France) supplemented with 6.5% NaCl and incubated at 37°C for 16–20 h. The same was done with dust swabs. In total, 738 cultures were set up (369 from pigs and 369 from dust samples). One milliliter of each bacterial culture was inoculated into 9 ml Trypticase Soy Broth (BD BBL, France) supplemented with aztreonam (75 mg/l) and incubated for a further 16–20 h at 37°C. One loop-full of each positive culture, as well as nasal swabs from humans, were spread at the same time onto Chapman agar (bioMérieux, France) and chromogenic agar selective for S. aureus species (SAID, bioMérieux, France) and incubated for 24–48 h at 37°C. Grown colonies were subcultured on 5% sheep blood agar (BD BBL, France). Bacteria were stored at -80°C for further identification.

Species identification was based on phenotypic criteria including colony morphology, and both CF and coagulase tests. Additionally MicrogenTM Staph (Microgen Bioproducts Limited, Camberley, Surrey, UK) rapid confirmatory latex agglutination test for S. aureus was used.

All S. aureus isolates were tested for methicillin resistance by using the cefoxitin-disc diffusion method. The analysis was performed according to procedure and breakpoints proposed by EUCAST recommendations [21] with S. aureus ATCC29213 as the reference strain. Isolates were also screened by PCR for the presence of the mecA and the mecC gene as described earlier [22, 23].

Total DNA preparation

Total DNA of the S. aureus isolates was purified using Genomic Mini DNA kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Genetic background determination

Initially, S. aureus isolates were screened by PCR for identification of CC398 [24] and in all accessory gene regulator (agr) allotypes were determined [25]. Amongst CC398 isolates discrimination between human and animal clade was performed [26].

spa typing was performed [27] and spa-types were determined by using the Ridom StaphType software v.2.1.1 (Ridom GmbH) [28]. The BURP algorithm was used to assign spa-types into spa-clonal complexes (spa-CCs) with defined default parameters "exclude spa-types shorter than 5 repeats" and "cluster spa-types into the same group if cost distances are less than 4" [29].

Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) was performed on selected isolates, 36 MRSA and 62 MSSA [30]. At least one isolate per each spa-type detected in each source of material was analyzed. The sequence type (ST) was also determined for three non-spa-typeable isolates. Allele numbers and STs were assigned through the S. aureus MLST database (http://saureus.mlst.net).

Clonal complexes, CCs, were determined using the eBURSTv3 algorithm (http://saureus.mlst.net/eburst) and restricted to STs that share five or more alleles of seven loci examined with founder or subfounders, within each predicted clonal group [31]. The analysis was performed on April 29th, 2016.

SCCmec typing

SCCmec types and subtypes were determined [32, 33], and those of type V were analyzed by additional strategies [34, 35]. The presence of the czrC gene encoding cadmium and zinc resistance was detected [36]. The SCCmec elements were classified according to guidelines proposed by the International Working Group on the Classification of SCC elements [37]. Direct repeat unit (dru) VNTR regions associated with SCCmec elements were determined [38] and dru-types were assigned through dru-typing database (http://dru-typing.org).

ACME and toxin genes profiling.

Detection of the arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME) was performed in duplex PCR with primers AIPS.29 and AIPS.28 (locus arc) and AIPS.45 and AIPS.46 (locus opp3) [39].

The presence of the lukS-PV and lukF-PV genes encoding Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) was determined [40], and the detection of the following genes coding for staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) was performed: sea, seb, sec, sed [41], see, seg, seh, sei [42], and sep [43].

Detection of prophage of integrase type 3 (φSaint3) and IEC types classification.

The presence of φSaint3 was determined by detection of the prophage integrase type 3 (int3) gene [44]. The composition of sak, chp, and scn genes from the human-specific Immune Evasion Cluster (IEC), carried on φSaint3, was determined by PCR and IEC types were classified [45].

Statistical analysis

Exact (permutation) chi-square tests were used to detect differences between frequencies of S. aureus types in farm/sample categories, and interval estimates for proportions and odds ratios were found by exact methods using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, 2014) [46].

Genetic diversity, on the grounds of spa-types, was estimated using Simpson’s index of diversity (SID) with 95% confidence intervals [47, 48].

Definitions

Farms were defined as S. aureus-positive, when at least one S. aureus isolate was identified in a farm sample from pig farmer, pig or environmental dust. Equivalent criteria were applied for defining of LA-SA-positive farms. Isolates were classified as LA-SA when they belonged to livestock-associated CCs (LA-CCs): CC398, CC9 or CC30/ST433.

MRSA clones were defined based on ST and SCCmec type/subtype association [30].

Results

Distribution of LA-SA across the country and on farms

S. aureus was detected on 79 out of 123 (64.2%) farms from 14 provinces (Table 1). Amongst these farms LA-SA-positive dominated (71/79, 89.9%, 95% CI [81.0%, 95.5%]). On 18 farms (25.4% of LA-SA-positive farms) S. aureus was identified exclusively in samples from pig farmers. Both LA-MRSA and LA-MSSA were observed on eight farms (11.3%), while LA-MRSA and LA-MSSA alone were identified on 18 (25.4%) and 45 (63.4%) farms, respectively. LA-SA-positive farms comprised 52.9% (18/34) of nucleus herds and 59.6% (53/89) of farrow-to-finish, including 50.0% (32/64) of farms with its own production of pigs, and 66.1% (39/59) purchasing gilts and/or boars from another sources. Thirty (42.3%) LA-SA-positive farms obeyed the AIAO procedure and the same number did not. For 11 (15.5%) farms, no information was available.

thumbnail
Table 1. Geographical location and S. aureus status of pig farms (n = 123) contributed to survey in Poland, 2010–2012.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170745.t001

LA-MRSA isolates were detected on 26 farms (21.1% of all) from 11 provinces, while LA-MSSA on 53 farms (43.1% of all) from 12 provinces. Amongst all LA-SA-positive farms, the prevalence of LA-MRSA-positive farms was lower than LA-MSSA-positive ones (36.6%, 95% CI [25.5%, 48.9%] vs. 74.6%, 95% CI [62.9%, 84.2%]). LA-MRSA-positive farms comprised 26.5% (9/34) of nucleus and 19.1% (17/89) farrow-to-finish herds, with isolates from pig farmers, pigs and dust detected on five (14.7%), four (11.8%) and seven (20.6%) nucleus, and three (3.4%), 11 (12.4%) and 12 (13.5%) farrow-to-finish farms, respectively. Regarding LA-MSSA-positive farms, they comprised 35.3% (12/34) of nucleus and 46.1% (41/89) farrow-to-finish herds, with isolates from pig farmers, pigs and dust detected on seven (20.6%), six (17.6%) and six (17.6%) nucleus, and 20 (22.5%), 23 (25.8%) and nine (10.1%) farrow-to-finish farms, respectively.

No differences were demonstrated in distribution of LA-SA-positive farms throughout the country but, due to modest sample size their existence cannot be excluded (wide confidence intervals for odds ratios, not shown). Regarding LA-SA-negative farms, which encompassed 35.8% (44/123) of all farms studied, we did not notice any differences concerning geographic location, type of farm, size of herd or application of AIAO procedure, compared with LA-SA-positive ones.

Molecular analysis

In total, 190 isolates were identified as S. aureus, including MRSA (n = 72, 37.9%) and MSSA (n = 118, 62.1%). The isolates were classified into 10 genetic lineages: CC398 (72.6% of all isolates), CC9 (13.2%), CC30 (7.9%), CC22 (1.6%), CC1, CC8, CC15 (1.1% each), CC5, CC12, and CC182 (0.5% each). Four of these lineages, CC5, CC8, CC15, and CC182, were detected exclusively amongst isolates from humans (Fig 1A). Thirty-four spa-types were identified (Fig 1B), 7 and 34 amongst MRSA and MSSA, respectively.

thumbnail
Fig 1. S. aureus genetic lineages and spa-clonal complexes (spa-CCs) determined on Polish pig farms.

(A) Distribution and the total number of S. aureus isolates from humans (farmers and veterinarians), pigs and environmental dust amongst MLST clonal complexes (CCs). The number of MRSA isolates is in brackets. *One isolate from pig farmer and all isolates from pigs and dust belonged to ST433. (B) Population structure based on spa-CCs BURP analysis; MLST CCs as well as ST433 within CC30 are indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170745.g001

None of the S. aureus isolates carried lukS/lukF-PV genes and ACME element. MRSA isolates carried mecA gene and SCCmec elements classified to type IV or V. The int3 gene was identified exclusively in ten MSSA isolates, including one ST398-MSSA from a pig farmer. Based on the presence of sea, sep, scn, chp, and sak genes five IEC types (A, B, D, E and F) have been determined, with the predominant type B (60.0%). IECs were more prevalent in non-LA-MSSA than LA-MSSA isolates (p = 0.0063), and in human than non-human isolates (p = 0.0011). The molecular characteristics of MRSA and MSSA isolates from S. aureus-positive pig farms are shown in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.

thumbnail
Table 2. Molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates (n = 72) from 26 MRSA-positive pig farms in Poland.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170745.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Molecular characteristics of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates (n = 118) from 61 MSSA-positive pig farms in Poland.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170745.t003

Characteristics of S. aureus isolates from LA-CCs

Three livestock-associated genetic lineages, CC398, CC9, and CC30/ST433, comprised 91.6% (174/190) of S. aureus isolates studied. LA-MRSA isolates were found in two of them, CC398 and CC30/ST433. CC398 isolates, both MRSA and MSSA, as well as MSSA isolates of CC9 and CC30/ST433 were identified in all types of samples, while ST433-MRSA only in non-human samples (from pigs and dust). CC398-MRSA were more frequently observed in dust samples than in samples from pig farmers (p = 0.006).

Twenty-three spa-types were identified amongst LA-MSSA isolates of which seven, t011, t034, t108, t318, t2582, t4389 and t5452, were shared with LA-MRSA. The LA-MSSA population was more diverse than LA-MRSA in terms of spa-types (SID = 0.843, 95% CI [0.785, 0.906] vs. SID = 0.697, 95% CI [0.634, 0.761]).

CC398, the most prevalent CC (n = 138), was detected on 59 (48.0% of all) farms from 13 provinces, with MRSA found on 24 (19.5%) farms from 11 provinces and MSSA on 40 (32.5%) farms from 11 provinces. All CC398 isolates were assigned to the animal clade. Thirteen different spa-types were identified and clustered by BURP analysis into one clonal complex spa-CC 034. Over 75% isolates were classified to three predominant spa-types: t034 (43.5%), t011 (22.5%), and t4389 (10.1%). All six spa-types determined amongst CC398-MRSA were also found amongst CC398-MSSA isolates, however amongst MRSA dominated t011 (46.9%) and t034 (39.1%), whereas amongst MSSA—t034 (47.3%), t4389 (16.2%), and t1928 (10.8%). With one exception, SCCmec elements of CC398 belonged to type V (n = 63, 87.5% of MRSA). Fifty-four of the SCCmec V (85.7%) were classified as type V(5C2&5)c. All of them carried czrC, ccrC2 and ccrC8 but not orf33 and orf35 genes. They were characterized by eight dru-types, with the most prevalent dt11a (n = 42). Seven of the SCCmec V elements (11.1%) were classified as type V(5C2). All of them were characterized by the presence of ccrC, orf33 and orf35 genes and were of dru-type dt11p, exclusively identified in this type V. In none of them was the czrC gene detected.

On 10 farms ST398 isolates were identified in both pig farmers and non-human reservoirs. The isolates from the same farm shared their characteristics (spa-type, SCCmec-type and dru-type in case of MRSA or spa-type in case of MSSA).

CC9, the second largest CC, was detected on 13 (10.6%) farms from seven provinces and embraced only MSSA isolates. Seven spa-types were identified, with the predominant types: t1430 (36.0%) and, observed exclusively in pigs, t337 (28.0%). All spa-types but one were grouped into one spa-CC 1334.

CC30/ST433 genetic lineage was distinguished within CC30, the third numerous CC in this study. MRSA and MSSA isolates of CC30/ST433, were detected on two and three farms, respectively, each from a different province. Isolates were assigned to three spa-types clustered into one spa-CC 021, with the most prevalent being t318. All MRSA isolates belonged to a new clone ST433-IVa(2B).

LA-SA carriage in the human population

Amongst S. aureus detected in humans, 50 isolates were from pig farmers and 11 from vets (Fig 1A). The majority of S. aureus isolates (n = 36, 72.0%) found among pig farmers belonged to genetic lineage CC398; the remaining represented CC1, CC5, CC8, CC9, CC15, CC22, CC30, and CC182. Isolates from vets were classified to three CCs: CC398, CC9, and CC15. All MRSA isolates (n = 13) identified in the human population belonged to ST398. Nasal carriage of LA-SA by pig farmers was estimated at 13.2% (38/283), CC398 carriage at 12.7% (36/283) and ST398-MRSA carriage at 3.2% (9/283), whereas by veterinarians at 21.1% (8/38), 18.4% (7/38) and 10.5% (4/38), respectively. Amongst pig farmers, CC398-MSSA carriage (9.5% (27/283); 95%CI [6.4%, 13.6%]) was higher than CC398-MRSA carriage (3.2%; 95%CI [1.5%, 6.0%]).

Discussion

The epidemiology of S. aureus in Western and Central Europe has changed significantly in the past decade due to the emergence of genetic lineages adapted to livestock animals, especially to pigs. Here we present the results of the first structured survey conducted on pig farms in Poland, which partially fill the gap concerning the prevalence and molecular characteristics of livestock-associated S. aureus, both MRSA and MSSA, in the central and eastern EU countries.

In 2008, when the first MRSA EU baseline survey on dust samples from pig holdings was conducted in Europe, Poland was classified amongst countries with the lowest occurrence of MRSA-positive farms [10]. Since that time, as our study shows, the prevalence of LA-MRSA-positive farms has increased considerably, from 2.1% to 20.6% in breeding (nucleus) holdings (95% CI for Odds Ratio [2.6, 77]), and from 3.4% to 13.5% in production (farrow-to-finish) holdings (95% CI for OR [1.48, 14.9]). However, it still remains lower than those observed in 2008 on pig farms in Belgium, Germany, or Spain [10]. One valid explanation of the observed higher percentage of LA-MRSA-positive farms may be the increase in imports of piglets, over the past years to Poland, from countries like Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands [49], where the rates of LA-MRSA colonized pigs are high [14, 50]. The lower prevalence of LA-MRSA-positive than LA-MSSA-positive farms, observed in our study, may arise from the fact that one-fourth of LA-SA-positive farms have been classified based on S. aureus isolates detected exclusively in samples from pig farmers, where the occurrence of LA-MSSA is higher than LA-MRSA.

The nasal carriage of ST398-MRSA by farmers exposed to pigs in this study was low (3.2%) compared with rates in similar populations from other countries, ranging from about 20% in Canada and USA [5, 7] to over 80% in Belgium, Denmark and Germany [12, 51]. Concurrently, CC398-MRSA carriage amongst Polish pig farmers was three times lower than CC398-MSSA. The reason for this remains unclear, however, it was earlier observed in Germany that the frequency of transfer events of CC398-MSSA amongst non-exposed to pigs people living on pig farms was twice as high as for CC398-MRSA [12]. Our results may support these findings and/or may suggest that within the CC398 lineage MSSA strains are better adopted to humans than MRSA. However, since our findings are contrary to results described by Denis et al., who showed considerably higher nasal carriage of ST398-MRSA than ST398-MSSA in pig farmers from Belgium [52], only further studies could clarify this issue.

Regarding the prevalence of ST398-MRSA amongst Polish veterinarians (10.5%), it seems to be on a moderate level, comparable with that reported in Belgian livestock veterinarians (7.5%), but lower than observed in veterinarians exposed to pigs in Germany, estimated at 45% [12, 53].

Three CCs, CC398, CC9, and CC30/ST433, have been identified as the most frequent, detected on over half of the pig farms studied. All these CCs are presently recognized as the main pig-associated ones worldwide. In Western and Central Europe the predominant CC398 comprise both MRSA and MSSA, while the other two CCs are generally represented by MSSA strains [5456].

LA-SA isolates analyzed in the current study shared features typical for pig-associated strains, like the absence of toxin genes such as exfoliative toxins, toxic-shock syndrome 1 toxin as well as Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes [57, 58]. With the one exception, CC398-MSSA-t1928 from human, they carried neither φSaint3 prophage nor the IEC genes, which is also characteristic for isolates adapted to animals [5961]. All CC398 isolates analyzed belonged to the animal clade and the majority of them represented three classical, in Western and Central Europe, pig-borne spa-types, t011, t034 and t108 [14, 6266]. However, the distribution of major spa-types varied between MRSA and MSSA. While in the MRSA population two predominant spa-types, t011 and t034, occurred at similar levels, amongst MSSA exclusively t034 dominated. This observation is in contrast to other reports, where the spa-type distribution of CC398-MSSA mirrored the most frequently detected spa-types for CC398-MRSA, like t011 and t034 in Belgium [56] or t034 in Denmark [54, 67].

Even though almost 90% of LA-MRSA isolates characterized in this study were assigned to CC398, the remaining MRSA, from CC30/ST433 genetic background should deserve particular attention. These MRSA isolates belonged to clone ST433-t318-IVa, that to the best of our knowledge is described here for the first time and may constitute a new LA-MRSA clone of pig origin. The isolates of the emerged clone were identified in non-human samples on two pig farms located in two, non-bordering provinces; one in the northern-eastern (Podlaskie) and second in the southern (Małopolskie) part of Poland. There were no relationships between the two farms and both purchased gilts and/or boars from other sources. Whereas CC30/ST433 is a well established LA-MSSA genetic lineage in Europe for more than 20 years [3, 54], MRSA of this lineage had not been observed till 2009. The first and the only one, until now, clone ST433-MRSA, characterized by spa-type t1333 and SCCmecV with czrC gene, conferring cadmium and zinc resistance, was isolated from pigs in Denmark [68], where the ST433-t1333 genotype had been earlier identified as the second most common MSSA genotype amongst pigs [54]. During our study only one ST433-MSSA isolate of spa-type t318 was found, however, this spa-type was the most frequent amongst MSSA from pig nasal swabs collected at a slaughterhouse in South-Western Poland [69]. We do not have evidence that the new clone emerged in Poland, nevertheless we cannot exclude that it arose de novo by the acquisition of the SCCmec IVa element by S. aureus of the genetic background disseminated in our country.

Identification of a new MRSA-ST433-IVa clone provides further proof for the spread of SCCmec elements in pig-associated S. aureus genetic lineage. Additional characterization of CC30/ST433 strains, both MRSA and MSSA, from different geographical regions may be crucial for better understanding the evolution of this lineage and its impact on global epidemiology.

We are aware of some of the limitations of this work. First, the study was extended in time for over two years and some of the farms could have changed their status from MRSA-positive to MRSA-negative and vice versa during the study period. Second, the prevalence of S. aureus isolates from pigs and environmental dust could be underestimated due to the sampling method and the pooling procedure used in the study. Nevertheless, the study allowed to establish a reference point for epidemiological investigations to be held on livestock animals, especially pigs, in the future.

In conclusion, S. aureus from pig farms in Poland belong to well established in Western and Central Europe LA-SA genetic lineages, CC398, CC9 and CC30/ST433. CC398 of the animal clade predominates on Polish pig farms, which is also reflected in the prevalence of CC398 nasal carriage in both farmers and veterinarians, having professional contacts with pigs. However, finding a new CC30/ST433-IVa(2B) clone and increasing the rate of CC398-MRSA during the last five years provides evidence for the continuing evolution and expansion of LA-MRSA in Poland. Further monitoring of S. aureus in farm animals is strongly required due to possible impact on public health.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the veterinarians and owners of the pig farms for participating in the study; without their help this investigation would not have been possible.

The results described in this work have been partly presented at the 3rd ASM-ESCMID Conference on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococci in Animals: Veterinary and Public Health Implications, 4–7 November 2013, Copenhagen, Denmark; Poster no. 4–7.11”Molecular characterization of S. aureus associated with pig environment in Poland, 2010–2013”.

Part of this study, performed by TW, was carried out at the Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, established within a project co-financed by the EU European Regional Development Fund under the Innovative Economy Operational Program, 2007–2013.

We gratefully acknowledge the use of the S. aureus MLST database which was located at Imperial College London and funded by the Wellcome Trust.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: JŻ JE WH ZP.
  2. Data curation: JE AM AN AG AD.
  3. Formal analysis: JE AM TW.
  4. Funding acquisition: JŻ JE WH.
  5. Investigation: AM NM MO-K IK JE AN AG EC-D AD JŻ.
  6. Project administration: JŻ JE.
  7. Resources: JŻ JE TW WH AD.
  8. Supervision: JE JŻ WH ZP.
  9. Validation: AM JE JŻ.
  10. Visualization: AM JE.
  11. Writing – original draft: JE AM JŻ.
  12. Writing – review & editing: AM JŻ NM MO-K IK AN AG EC-D AD ZP WH TW JE.

References

  1. 1. Lowy FD. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 520–532. pmid:9709046
  2. 2. Grundmann H, Aires-de-Sousa M, Boyce J, Tiemersma E. Emergence and resurgence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a public-health threat. Lancet 2006; 368: 874–885. pmid:16950365
  3. 3. Armand-Lefevre L, Ruimy R, Andremont A. Clonal comparison of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from healthy pig farmers, human controls, and pigs. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11: 711–714. pmid:15890125
  4. 4. Voss A, Loeffen F, Bakker J, Klaassen C, Wulf M. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11: 1965–1966. pmid:16485492
  5. 5. Khanna T, Friendship R, Dewey C, Weese JS. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in pigs and pig farmers. Vet Microbiol 2008; 128: 298–303. pmid:18023542
  6. 6. Lim SK, Nam HM, Jang GC, Lee HS, Jung SC, Kwak HS. The first detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in pigs in Korea. Vet Microbiol 2012; 155: 88–92. pmid:21899962
  7. 7. Smith TC, Gebreyes WA, Abley MJ, Harper AL, Forshey BM, Male MJ, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs and farm workers on conventional and antibiotic-free swine farms in the USA. PLoS One 2013; 8: e63704. pmid:23667659
  8. 8. Moreno LZ, Dutra MC, Moreno M, Ferreira TS, Silva GF, Matajira CE, et al. Vancomycin-intermediate livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398/t9538 from swine in Brazil. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2016; 111: 659–661. pmid:27759766
  9. 9. McCarthy AJ, Lindsay JA, Loeffler A. Are all meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) equal in all hosts? Epidemiological and genetic comparison between animal and human MRSA. Vet Dermatol 2012; 23: 267–275. pmid:22823579
  10. 10. EFSA. Analysis of the base-line survey on the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in holdings with breeding pigs, in the EU, 2008. Part A: MRSA prevalence estimates. EFSA J 2009; 7 (11): 1376.
  11. 11. Chuang YY, Huang YC. Livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Asia: an emerging issue? Int J Antimicrob Agents 2015; 45: 334–340. pmid:25593014
  12. 12. Cuny C, Nathaus R, Layer F, Strommenger B, Altmann D, Witte W. Nasal colonization of humans with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) CC398 with and without exposure to pigs. PLoS One 2009; 4: e6800. pmid:19710922
  13. 13. van den Broek IV, van Cleef BA, Haenen A, Broens EM, van der Wolf PJ, van den Broek MJ, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in people living and working in pig farms. Epidemiol Infect 2009; 137: 700–708. pmid:18947444
  14. 14. Dahms C, Hübner NO, Cuny C, Kramer A. Occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in farm workers and the livestock environment in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany. Acta Vet Scand 2014; 56: 53. pmid:25142727
  15. 15. van Cleef BA, van Benthem BH, Verkade EJ, van Rijen MM, Kluytmans-van den Bergh MF, Graveland H, et al. Livestock-associated MRSA in household members of pig farmers: transmission and dynamics of carriage, a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0127190. pmid:25993665
  16. 16. Lewis HC, Mølbak K, Reese C, Aarestrup FM, Selchau M, Sørum M, et al. Pigs as source of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 infections in humans, Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis 2008; 14: 1383–1389. pmid:18760004
  17. 17. Pan A, Battisti A, Zoncada A, Bernieri F, Boldini M, Franco A, et al. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 infection, Italy. Emerg Infect Dis 2009; 15: 845–847. pmid:19402995
  18. 18. Aspiroz C, Lozano C, Vindel A, Lasarte JJ, Zarazaga M, Torres C. Skin lesion caused by ST398 and ST1 MRSA, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis 2010; 16: 157–159. pmid:20031071
  19. 19. Wulf MW, Verduin CM, van Nes A, Huijsdens X, Voss A. Infection and colonization with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 versus other MRSA in an area with a high density of pig farms. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2012; 31: 61–65. pmid:21533878
  20. 20. Marszalek N, Empel J, Zmudzki J, Nowak A, Pejsak Z, Hryniewicz W. First methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) of ST398 isolated in Poland from nasal carriers. http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/eccmid19/abstract.asp?id=74990.
  21. 21. EUCAST. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. 2015; Version 5.0.
  22. 22. Murakami K, Minamide W, Wada K, Nakamura E, Teraoka H, Watanabe S. Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29: 2240–2244. pmid:1939577
  23. 23. Cuny C, Layer F, Strommenger B, Witte W. Rare occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC130 with a novel mecA homologue in humans in Germany. PLoS One 2011; 6: e24360. pmid:21931689
  24. 24. Stegger M, Lindsay JA, Moodley A, Skov R, Broens EM, Guardabassi L. Rapid PCR detection of Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 398 by targeting the restriction-modification system carrying sau1-hsdS1. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49: 732–734. pmid:21123532
  25. 25. Gilot P, Lina G, Cochard T, Poutrel B. Analysis of the genetic variability of genes encoding the RNA III-activating components Agr and TRAP in a population of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 4060–4067. pmid:12409375
  26. 26. Cuny C, Abdelbary M, Layer F, Werner G, Witte W. Prevalence of the immune evasion gene cluster in Staphylococcus aureus CC398. Vet Microbiol 2015; 177: 219–223. pmid:25778546
  27. 27. Aires-de-Sousa M, Boye K, de Lencastre H, Deplano A, Enright MC, Etienne J, et al. High interlaboratory reproducibility of DNA sequence-based typing of bacteria in a multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 619–621. pmid:16455927
  28. 28. Harmsen D, Claus H, Witte W, Rothganger J, Claus H, Turnwald D, et al. Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 5442–5448. pmid:14662923
  29. 29. Mellmann A, Weniger T, Berssenbrügge C, Rothgänger J, Sammeth M, Stoye J, et al. Based Upon Repeat Pattern (BURP): an algorithm to characterize the long-term evolution of Staphylococcus aureus populations based on spa polymorphisms. BMC Microbiol 2007; 7: 98. pmid:17967176
  30. 30. Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 1008–1015. pmid:10698988
  31. 31. Tavares A, Faria NA, de Lencastre H, Miragaia M. Population structure of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) in Portugal over a 19-year period (1992–2011). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 33: 423–432. pmid:24057140
  32. 32. Milheiriço C, Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H. Update to the multiplex PCR strategy for assignment of mec element types in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 3374–3377. pmid:17576837
  33. 33. Milheiriço C, Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H. Multiplex PCR strategy for subtyping the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IV in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: 'SCCmec IV multiplex'. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 60: 42–48. pmid:17468509
  34. 34. Zhang K, McClure JA, Elsayed S, Louie T, Conly JM. Novel multiplex PCR assay for characterization and concomitant subtyping of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec types I to V in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43: 5026–5033. pmid:16207957
  35. 35. Higuchi W, Takano T, Teng LJ, Yamamoto T. Structure and specific detection of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type VII. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008; 377: 752–756. pmid:18926798
  36. 36. Cavaco LM, Hasman H, Stegger M, Andersen PS, Skov R, Fluit AC, et al. Cloning and occurrence of czrC, a gene conferring cadmium and zinc resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 3605–3608. pmid:20585119
  37. 37. . Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 4961–4967. pmid:19721075
  38. 38. Goering RV, Morrison D, Al-Doori Z, Edwards GF, Gemmell CG. Usefulness of mec-associated direct repeat unit (dru) typing in the epidemiological analysis of highly clonal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Scotland. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008; 14: 964–969. pmid:18828855
  39. 39. Diep BA, Stone GG, Basuino L, Graber CJ, Miller A, des Etages SA, et al. The arginine catabolic mobile element and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec linkage: convergence of virulence and resistance in the USA300 clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis 2008; 197: 1523–1530. pmid:18700257
  40. 40. Lina G, Piemont Y, Godail-Gamot F, Bes M, Peter MO, Gauduchon V, et al. Involvement of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29: 1128–1132. pmid:10524952
  41. 41. Mehrotra M, Wang G, Johnson WM. Multiplex PCR for detection of genes for Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins, toxic shock syndrome toxin 1, and methicillin resistance. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 1032–1035. pmid:10698991
  42. 42. Moore PC, Lindsay JA. Genetic variation among hospital isolates of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: evidence for horizontal transfer of virulence genes. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 2760–2767. pmid:11473989
  43. 43. Kumagai R, Nakatani K, Ikeya N, Kito Y, Kaidoh T, Takeuchi S. Quadruple or quintuple conversion of hlb, sak, sea (or sep), scn, and chp genes by bacteriophages in non-β-hemolysin-producing bovine isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Vet Microbiol 2007; 122: 190–195. pmid:17300883
  44. 44. Moodley A, Espinosa-Gongora C, Nielsen SS, McCarthy AJ, Lindsay JA, Guardabassi L. Comparative host specificity of human- and pig- associated Staphylococcus aureus clonal lineages. PLoS One 2012; 7: e49344. pmid:23166643
  45. 45. van Wamel WJ, Rooijakkers SH, Ruyken M, van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA. The innate immune modulators staphylococcal complement inhibitor and chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus are located on β-hemolysin-converting bacteriophages. J Bacteriol 2006; 188: 1310–1315. pmid:16452413
  46. 46. SAS/STAT 13.2 User’s Guide. (Cary, NC: SAS Institute), (2014).
  47. 47. Simpson EH. Measurement of diversity. Nature 1949; 163: 688.
  48. 48. Grundmann H, Hori S, Tanner G. Determining confidence intervals when measuring genetic diversity and the discriminatory abilities of typing methods for microorganisms. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 4190–4192. pmid:11682558
  49. 49. Dors A, Czyzewska E, Pomorska-Mól M, Kolacz R, Pejsak Z. Effect of various husbandry conditions on the production parameters of swine herds in Poland. Pol J Vet Sci 2013; 16: 707–713. pmid:24597306
  50. 50. Broens EM, Graat EA, Van der Wolf PJ, Van de Giessen AW, De Jong MC. Prevalence and risk factor analysis of livestock associated MRSA-positive pig herds in The Netherlands. Prev Vet Med 2011; 102: 41–49. pmid:21733585
  51. 51. Garcia-Graells C, van Cleef BA, Larsen J, Denis O, Skov R, Voss A. Dynamic of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 in pig farm households: a pilot study. PLoS One 2013; 8: e65512. pmid:23741497
  52. 52. Denis O, Suetens C, Hallin M, Catry B, Ramboer I, Dispas M, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in swine farm personnel, Belgium. Emerg Infect Dis 2009; 15: 1098–1101. pmid:19624929
  53. 53. Garcia-Graells C, Antoine J, Larsen J, Catry B, Skov R, Denis O. Livestock veterinarians at high risk of acquiring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398. Epidemiol Infect 2012; 140: 383–389. pmid:22082716
  54. 54. Hasman H, Moodley A, Guardabassi L, Stegger M, Skov RL, Aarestrup FM. spa type distribution in Staphylococcus aureus originating from pigs, cattle and poultry. Vet Microbiol 2010; 141: 326–331. pmid:19833458
  55. 55. Argudín MA, Tenhagen BA, Fetsch A, Sachsenröder J, Käsbohrer A, Schroeter A, et al. Virulence and resistance determinants of German Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates from nonhuman sources. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011; 77: 3052–3060. pmid:21378035
  56. 56. Vandendriessche S, Vanderhaeghen W, Larsen J, de Mendonça R, Hallin M, Butaye P, et al. High genetic diversity of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) from humans and animals on livestock farms and presence of SCCmec remnant DNA in MSSA CC398. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014; 69: 355–362. pmid:24072172
  57. 57. Kadlec K, Ehricht R, Monecke S, Steinacker U, Kaspar H, Mankertz J, et al. Diversity of antimicrobial resistance pheno- and genotypes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from diseased swine. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 64: 1156–1164. pmid:19808235
  58. 58. Hallin M, De Mendonca R, Denis O, Lefort A, El Garch F, Butaye P, et al. Diversity of accessory genome of human and livestock-associated ST398 methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Infect Genet Evol 2011; 11: 290–299. pmid:21145988
  59. 59. Sung JM, Lloyd DH, Lindsay JA. Staphylococcus aureus host specificity: comparative genomics of human versus animal isolates by multi-strain microarray. Microbiology 2008; 154: 1949–1959. pmid:18599823
  60. 60. McCarthy AJ, Witney AA, Gould KA, Moodley A, Guardabassi L, Voss A, et al. The distribution of mobile genetic elements (MGEs) in MRSA CC398 is associated with both host and country. Genome Biol Evol 2011; 3: 1164–1174. pmid:21920902
  61. 61. McCarthy AJ, Witney AA, Lindsay JA. Staphylococcus aureus temperate bacteriophage: carriage and horizontal gene transfer is lineage associated. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2012; 2: 1–10.
  62. 62. Battisti A, Franco A, Merialdi G, Hasman H, Iurescia M, Lorenzetti R, et al. Heterogeneity among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Italian pig finishing holdings. Vet Microbiol 2010; 142: 361–366. pmid:19914010
  63. 63. Price LB, Stegger M, Hasman H, Aziz M, Larsen J, Andersen PS, et al. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. mBio 2012; 3: e00305–00311. pmid:22354957
  64. 64. Brandt KM, Mellmann A, Ballhausen B, Jenke C, van der Wolf PJ, Broens EM, et al. Evaluation of multiple-locus variable number of tandem repeats analysis for typing livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 2013; 8: e54425. pmid:23349886
  65. 65. Vandendriessche S, Vanderhaeghen W, Soares FV, Hallin M, Catry B, Hermans K, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and genetic diversity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carried by humans and animals across livestock production sectors. J Antimicrob Chemother 2013; 68: 1510–1516. pmid:23429641
  66. 66. Habrun B, Račić I, Beck R, Budimir A, Benić M, Kompes G, et al. The presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on large pig breeding farms in Croatia. Acta Vet Hung 2011; 59: 419–425. pmid:22079702
  67. 67. Guardabassi L, Stegger M, Skov R. Retrospective detection of methicillin resistant and susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in Danish slaughter pigs. Vet Microbiol 2007; 122: 384–386. pmid:17467199
  68. 68. Agersø Y, Hasman H, Cavaco LM, Pedersen K, Aarestrup FM. Study of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Danish pigs at slaughter and in imported retail meat reveals a novel MRSA type in slaughter pigs. Vet Microbiol 2012; 157: 246–250. pmid:22245403
  69. 69. Krupa P, Bystroń J, Podkowik M, Empel J, Mroczkowska A, Bania J. Population structure and oxacillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus from pigs and pork meat in South-West of Poland. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 141475. pmid:26064878