Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Molecular Analysis of Chinese Celastrus and Tripterygium and Implications in Medicinal and Pharmacological Studies

Abstract

Celastrus and Tripterygium species, which are used in traditional Chinese medicine, have attracted much attention due to their anti-tumor promoting and neuroprotective activities, in addition to their applications in autoimmune disorders. However, systematic relationships between them and among species are unclear, and it may disturb their further medicinal utilization. In the present study, the molecular analysis of combined chloroplast and nuclear markers of all Chinese Celastrus and Tripterygium was performed, and clear inter- and intra-genus relationships were presented. The result suggests that Tripterygium constitute a natural monophyletic clade within Celastrus with strong support value. Fruit and seed type are better than inflorescence in subgeneric classification. Chinese Celastrus are classified for three sections: Sect. Sempervirentes (Maxim.) CY Cheng & TC Kao, Sect. Lunatus XY Mu & ZX Zhang, sect. nov., and Sect. Ellipticus XY Mu & ZX Zhang, sect. nov. The phylogenetic data was consistent with their chemical components reported previously. Owing to the close relationship, several evergreen Celastrus species are recommended for chemical and pharmacological studies. Our results also provide reference for molecular identification of Chinese Celastrus and Tripterygium.

Citation: Mu X-Y, Zhao L-C, Zhang Z-X (2017) Molecular Analysis of Chinese Celastrus and Tripterygium and Implications in Medicinal and Pharmacological Studies. PLoS ONE 12(1): e0169973. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169973

Editor: Shilin Chen, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, CHINA

Received: July 14, 2016; Accepted: December 24, 2016; Published: January 12, 2017

Copyright: © 2017 Mu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All of the molecular data of different markers have been deposited in National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Accession numbers can be found in the Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work received financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (31400193 and J1310002 to XYM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Plants of the genus Celastrus and Tripterygium (Celastraceae), which have a long history of use in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), have attracted much interest due to diverse pharmacological activities such as anti-tumor promoting and neuroprotective [1–5]. Celastrol, a pentacyclic triterpene extracted from T. wilfordii, is found to be a powerful leptin sensitizer, which has potential as an anti-obesity therapeutic agent [6]. Related plant materials are also used as important folk medicines to treat fever, chills, joint pain, and a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory-related conditions [7–8]. Celastrus angulatus Maxim. and T. wilfordii Hook f. have been the main focus of chemical and pharmacological studies among the two genera, which are known as Ku Pi Teng and Lei Gong Teng, respectively. Although hundreds of secondary metabolites including sesquiterpenes, alkaloids, triterpenes, diterpines, and flavonoids have been identified, newer constituents offering more far-reaching, interesting, and applicable prospects are reported recently [9–14].

Comparing to fast developments in chemical and pharmacological studies from a limited number of species, morphology-based subgeneric classification and phylogenetic relationship of these two important TCM lianas is obscure. Although they are morphologically different, two species recognized and composed of Tripterygium are nested as a monophyletic clade in Celastrus with a moderate support value [15]. Considering the obvious differences in flower and fruit characteristics between these two genera, it is necessary to elucidate their phylogenetic relationship by comprehensive molecular analysis. Despite three sections classified for Chinese Celastrus mainly based on inflorescence [16], such scheme is not supported by molecular phylogenetic result, and the relationship of these species and the sections need further investigation. In the previous study, cauline cyme and lunate seeds are found to be distinct characters to one of the maximal supported monophyletic clade in Celastrus, Ser. Laterales Di [17]. Celastrus yuloensis, a new species reported recently [18], is morphologically similar to species in Ser. Laterales. Although possesses lunate seeds, C. yuloensis have completely different inflorescence type, the axillary long cymes. The phylogenetic position of C. yuloensis will provide useful value for morphology-based subgeneric classification of Celastrus in China.

Although exact species identification is fundamental in pharmacological and chemical study, misidentification of rural material may occur occasionally. Because of variable morphology and polymorphic traits inter- and intra-generic of Celastrus and Tripterygium, specimens are frequently misidentified in herbaria. It is important to identify plant species correctly when new chemical constituents are found from related material, especially in poisoning and mortality cases from a forensic view. Molecular identification brings a good opportunity for accurate identification of herbal medicinal materials [19]. Related method and result are very important for species identification from pharmacological, chemical and forensic perspective in Celastrus and Tripterygium.

Secondary metabolites are restricted to particular taxonomic groups such as genus, family, or a closely related group [20]. The family Celastraceae is well-known to produce various terpenoid derivatives. Considering that a large number of similar chemistry constituent are found in C. angulatus, C. orbiculatus, C. paniculatus, C. hindsii and Tripterygium [7–8], related constituent may be also existed in closely related species. Due to poor sampling of Celastrus species and the limited number of markers used, a more comprehensive analysis of all Chinese Celastrus species is necessary [21], which will broaden the utilization of potentially important medicinal germplasm resources, and further validate and refine forensic application of the two genera.

The purpose of this study was to investigate inter- and intra-generic relationships between Celastrus and Tripterygium in China and to further clarify this relationship, and to evaluate the potential value of inflorescence vs. fruit and seed for subgeneric classification in Celastrus. Molecular phylogenetic analysis was performed on all species of Celastrus and Tripterygium in China with six markers from nuclear and plastid DNA sequences. The results reported pave a way for molecular identification of Celastrus and Tripterygium and the exploration and utilization of additional species for chemical and pharmacological studies.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

The field investigation and samples collection in National Nature Reserves were permitted by related management bureaus from Guangxi Nonggang and Hubei Shennongjia. Individuals from Taiwan were sent by Herbarium of Taiwan Forestry Research Institute (TAIF). No specific permissions were required for other locations which are neither privately owned nor protected and the field study did not involve endangered or protected species.

Plant material

All 20 recognized species of Celastrus from China [22], including two newly identified species, C. obovatifolius and C. yuloensis [18, 23], and two Tripterygium species [21], were included in this study. For the purpose of avoiding potential hybrids that may complicate the data analysis, individuals of these species were selected from their typical distribution area in China. Three species of Euonymus L. and one species of Glyptopetalum Thwaites were chosen as outgroups based on Mu et al. [15]. Considering the consistency of the samples submitted to GenBank, sequences of two synonyms, C. oblanceifolius and C. glaucophyllus, were used to represent C. aculeatus and C. hookeri, respectively. A list of sample information and GenBank accession numbers is provided (S1 Table).

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing

Two nuclear (ETS and ITS) DNA and four plastid DNA (psbA-trnH, rbcL, rpl16, and trnL-F) were employed. Sequences of all samples of rbcL marker and some new samples of other species were newly amplified and sequenced. The following primers were used for both amplification and sequencing: 18S-IGS and ETS1F for the ETS region [24]; ITS4 and ITS5 for the ITS region [25]; psbA-F and trnH-R for the psbA-trnH region [26]; 1F and 1024R for the rbcL region [27]; F71 and R1516 for the rpl16 region [28]; and c and f for the trnL-F region [29].

Total genomic DNA was extracted from fresh silica gel-dried leaves using a plant genomic DNA kit (Tiangen Biotech CO., LTD, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed in a final volume of 20 μL with ddH2O (14.1 μL), Taq buffer (2 μL), dNTPs (1.6 μL), primers (forward and reverse, 0.5 μL per primer), Taq-polymerase (2.5 U/L, 0.3 μL), and total DNA (1 μL) using an Eppendorf 580BR Thermal Cycler. PCR cycling parameters for the six regions were as follows: a 94°C initial hot start for 3 min, followed by 32 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s, 72°C for 60–70 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min.

Amplified products were sequenced by the SinoGenoMax Co., LTD. (Beijing, China). Raw sequence fragments were assembled using Sequencher v.4.1.4 (Gene-Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA). Sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL X [30] with default settings and manual-adjusted following the similarity criterion [31] using Se–Al v.2.0 [32] to improve the alignment. Regions where homology was difficult to assess (the 78 bp in the psbA-trnH region) were excluded from the final dataset.

Data analysis

An incongruence length difference (ILD) test was performed for topological incongruence among partitions [33]. Given that the plastid genome behaves as a single-linked region exhibiting low levels of variation, four plastid regions were combined as a priori. Congruence between ETS and ITS and combined cpDNA and nrDNA were examined using PAUP v4.0a150 [34]. Following Cunningham [35], no case of strongly supported incongruence was detected between ETS and ITS (P = 0.06), while it existed between cpDNA and nrDNA (P = 0.01). However, there was no significant conflict among highly supported subclades, and the combined data yielded a better tree than the individual ones, we combined the cpDNA and nrDNA for final analysis.

Phylogenetic analyses for chloroplast, nuclear, and combined datasets were performed using the Maximum Parsimony (MP) in PAUP*, Maximum Likelihood (ML) in RAxML [36], and Bayesian inference (BI) in Mrbayes 3.2 [37]. MP analyses were performed following our previous work [15]. ML analyses were conducted using RAxML v. 8.1.12 with 1000 replicates under the GTRGAMMA model as implemented on the HiPerGator 2.0 at the University of Florida. Prior to ML and BI analyses, a model of sequence evolution for each matrix was determined using Modeltest 3.7 [38] as implemented in MrMTgui [39] based on the Akaike information criterion [40]. For BI analyses, the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm was performed for each dataset, with three hot chains and one cold chain for 2×106 generations in parallel mode. Trees were sampled every 1000 generations beginning with a random tree. The run was stopped when the average standard deviation of split frequencies was less than 0.005 in all the cases in this study. Bayesian posterior probabilities (BIPP) was calculated as the 50% majority rule consensus of all sampled trees with the first 20% discarded as burn-in. MPBS, MLBS and BIPP are presented on the phylogenetic trees.

Results and Discussion

Dataset characteristics

Detailed information on both individual data partitions and the combined data matrix is summarized (Table 1). The result shows that tree topology and clade support value generated by six single markers is poor (Fig A-F in S1 File). Tree topology and clade support value of combined chloroplast markers (Fig G in S1 File) are better than combined nuclear markers (Fig H in S1 File). The combined chloroplast and nuclear markers obtained the best tree topology and clade support value. Considering that trees generated from MP, ML and BI were essentially the same, the 50% majority rule consensus tree obtained from BI of the combined ncDNA+cpDNA dataset was selected for final analysis (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Bayesian inference of the phylogenetic relationship between Chinese Celastrus and Tripterygium from combined chloroplast and nuclear DNA datasets.

Support values are presented above (BIPP, >95 is shown) and below (MPBS and MLBS, >50 is shown) the branches (-: support value <95 for BIPP or 50 for MPBS and MLBS; *: full support value). Fl.: Subgeneric classification of Chinese Celastrus based on inflorescence, fruit and seed in Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, A: Sect. Axillares; C: Sect. Celastrus; S: Sect. Sempervirentes. Fr.: Subgeneric classification of Chinese Celastrus based on fruit and seed proposed in this study, L: Sect. Lunatus, E: Sect. Ellipticus, S: Sect. Sempervirentes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169973.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Statistics from phylogenetic analyses of individual and combined data sets.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169973.t001

Phylogenetic trees obtained from nuclear ETS and ITS are much better resolved (Fig A-B in S1 File), while trees of single chloroplast markers are generated with many polytomy and low clade support value (Fig C-F in S1 File). Trees of combined nuclear and chloroplast markers are better resolved than that of single markers, respectively (Fig G-H in S1 File). After combination of chloroplast and nuclear markers, the phylogenetic tree obtained the best tree topology and clade support value. Take into consideration the result of present and previous studies [15], it is implied that the combined data can provide better information for molecular identification in the genus Celastrus. Considering that several samples for each species are deposited in our laboratory, a standard DNA barcoding analysis is programmed.

Phylogenetic reconstruction and medicinal implications

A comprehensive molecular analysis of Chinese Celastrus and Tripterygium was performed. The relationship between Tripterygium and Celastrus was further investigated and determined to be closer than that previously reported. Four Tripterygium samples collected from Northeast to Southwest China, grouped as two subclades, corroborated the results by Law et al. [21]. Tripterygium was nested in the base of the Celastrus tree with a stronger support value than our previous result [15]. Although the support value of BI was low (BIpp = 91, not presented on the tree), a moderate MPBS and MLBS value were obtained (MPBS = 75 (vs. 73 in previous study), MLBS = 69 in this study; not calculated in the previous study), implying that the monophyletic group Tripterygium represent a natural clade in Celastrus. Paraffin section analysis of flower development between representatives of these two genera may provide additional information and verify their relationship; experiments addressing these issues are currently underway in our laboratory.

Phylogenetic position of C. yuloensis is resolved in a monophyletic clade in the present study (Fig 1 clade a), which provides important evidence for subgeneric classification scheme in Celastrus. Although Sect. Celastrus, Sect. Axillares and Sect. Sempervirentes are divided for Chinese Celastrus, none of they are supported by molecular result [15]. However, a monophyletic group including C. aculeatus, C. kusanoi, C. stylosus and C. hirsutus was fully supported by both molecular result and morphological characteristics (cauline inflorescence and lunate seeds) in our previous work. Although morphologically similar to both C. stylosus and C. hirsutus, C. yuloensis differs from them with several characteristics, especially the long (vs. short) axillary (vs. cauline) cymes. In the present study, C. yuloensis is resolved as the most closet sister of the above two species and nested in the same monophyletic clade with approximately full support value (BIpp = 100, MPBS = 98, MLBS = 90), which indicate that fruit and seed characteristics are better than inflorescence for subgeneric classification in Celastrus. There are three kinds of fruit and seed type in Chinese Celastrus: the first type contains species with 3-6-seeded fruit and ellipsoid seed ≤5 mm in length (Fig 2A), the second type includes species with 3-6-seeded fruit and lunate seed ≤6 mm in length (Fig 2B), and the third type is composed those of 1-seeded fruit and elliptic seed ≥8 mm in length (Fig 2C). Combing morphological characters and molecular phylogenetic results, a new morphology-based section for Chinese Celastrus is provided here: Sect. Sempervirentes CY Cheng & TC Kao, including 1-seeded fruit species such as C. virens, C. monospermoides, C. monospermus and C. hindsii; Sect. Lunatus XY Mu & ZX Zhang, sect. nov., including 3-6-seeded fruit and lunate seed species such as C. aculeatus, C. kusanoi, C. stylosus, C. hirsutus and C. yuloensis; Sect. Ellipticus XY Mu & ZX Zhang, sect. nov., including the remaining 11 3-6-seeded fruit and elliptic seed species.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Seed type of Celastrus in China.

3-6-seeded fruit with ellipsoid seed (A, without aril), 3-6-seeded fruit with lunate seed (B, without aril) and 1-seeded fruit with ellipsoid seed (C, covered by dry aril).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169973.g002

The morphological complex consisting of five species was detected as a monophyletic group (clade b), whose inter-species relationships are still obscure, and need further clarification. Celastrus orbiculatus, a species frequently used in TCM, neighbors C. gemmatus. The former is morphologically similar to the latter, except its mostly orbicular (vs. elliptic) leaves (Fig 3A and 3B), and short and round buds < 4 mm (vs. elliptic buds >5 mm, Fig 3C and 3D). Celastrus orbiculatus is mostly distributed at north of Qinling Mountains while C. gemmatus is mainly distributed at south of it. However, it is very difficult to distinguish them in Qinling-Dabie Mountains. It is interesting and deserving to further investigate the evolutionary history and phylogeography of these two species, and the potential influence of Qinling-Dabie Mountains as vicariance in speciation. Based on comprehensive specimens examinations of Celastrus in main herbaria of China (e.g. CDBI, IBK, IBSC, KUN, PE, PEM, SZ and WH), specimens of other species are frequently misidentified as C. orbiculatus. Celastrol extracted from bark of C. orbiculatus is reported recently [41], while related plants are collected in the field from Yangchun City of Guangdong Province. However, Guangdong Province is located out of the distribution range of C. orbiculatus. Celastrus angulatus, positioned at foot of clade c, is one of the most famous TCMs in Celastrus that widely distributed in China covering subtropical to northern temperate areas, and can be recognized by its relatively large leaves and terminal long panicles. Life form is an obvious difference between clade c and the remaining Celastrus species. Plants of the former are deciduous and distributed in subtropical to temperate areas, whereas those of the latter are mostly evergreen and grow in tropical to subtropical regions. Although reported as deciduous, individuals of C. paniculatus are more similar to evergreens in that they also grow in subtropical and tropical zones.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Leaf and bud morphology of Celastrus orbiculatus and C. gemmatus.

A, C: Leaves and bud of C. orbiculatus; B, D: Leaves and bud of C. gemmatus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169973.g003

Phylogenetic-chemotaxonomic relationship

The inter-genus relationship concluded by molecular analysis was consistent to the chemical and pharmacological revision of Celastrus, Euonymus and Tripgerygium. Based on the latest chemical reviews [7–8], Tripterygium species share a number of common chemical constituents with Celastrus species including sesquiterpenes, diterpenes, triterpenes, alkaloids, and flavonoids. However, chlorogenic acid reported in Euonymus is not reported in these Celastrus and Tripterygium [42]. There are 13 dihydroagarofurans (sesquiterpene) in Tripterygium, whereas 93 were found mostly in C. angulatus, C. orbiculatus and C. paniculatus. Similarly, 6 euonymine-type sesquiterpene alkaloids were found in Tripterygium, and 4 were found in C. hindsii and C. gemmatus; friedooleananes with a benzenoid ring were only found in C. paniculatus and Tripterygium. According to the molecular phylogenetic tree, C. hindsii, C. monospermus, C. monospermoides and C. virens were very close to Tripterygium species. The consistency of chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic data indicated that some Celastrus species might have similar chemical components with Tripterygium species. Considering the prospects in medicinal use, more attention should be paid on these Celastrus species, especially C. monospermus, C. monospermoides, and C. virens due to their unique merits. First, these species are evergreen, are widely distributed in Southeast to Southwest Asia, and can provide more rural material. Second, trunks of these species grow faster than others, and can thus provide more material for medicinal studies and industrial production. Third, fruits of these species are three to five times larger than that of other species, and their maturation rates are high, thereby providing an increased amount of seeds and arils.

Conclusion

The molecular analyses performed in this study provide a better resolved phylogenetic relationship of two genera of Chinese important medicinal plants, Tripterygium and Celastrus. Tripterygium was determined to be a monophyletic clade of Celastrus with a strong support value. The phylogenetic position of a unique species, C. yuloensis, is resolved in a monophyletic clade with approximately full support value, which implies that fruit and seed type are better characteristics for subgeneric classification of Chinese Celastrus than inflorescence. A new section scheme combined morphological and molecular result is proposed for Chinese Celastrus. A more comprehensive analysis with additional molecular markers will be helpful to differentiate and elucidate the phylogenetic relationships of the morphological complex. The result of combined nuclear and chloroplast DNA provides reference for molecular identification of Chinese Celastrus and Tripterygium species. Furthermore, evergreen species of Celastrus distributed in Southeast China, such as C. monospermus, C. monospermoides, and C. virens, are highly recommended as potentially important medicinal germplasm in TCM for several merits.

Supporting Information

S1 File. Tree topology and clade support value of single and combined markers in this study (A-H Figures).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169973.s001

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Voucher information (samples and OUT, voucher information, locality) and GenBank accession numbers used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169973.s002

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ye M, Qiao X and Li K in School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Peking University for their helpful advices, Sun M for RAxML computation in the University of Florida, Xu B, Zheng BJ, Lv J, Lin QW, and Chung SW for providing related specimens and leaf material.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: XYM ZXZ.
  2. Formal analysis: XYM.
  3. Funding acquisition: XYM ZXZ.
  4. Investigation: XYM LCZ.
  5. Methodology: XYM.
  6. Project administration: ZXZ.
  7. Software: XYM.
  8. Supervision: ZXZ.
  9. Validation: XYM LCZ ZXZ.
  10. Writing – original draft: XYM LCZ ZXZ.
  11. Writing – review & editing: XYM LCZ.

References

  1. 1. Antonoff MB, Chugh R, Borja-Cacho D, Dudeja V, Clawson KA, Skube SJ, et al. Triptolide therapy for neuroblastoma decreases cell viability in vitro and inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Surgery. 2009; 146:282–290. pmid:19628086
  2. 2. Li X, Jiang Z, Zhang L. Triptolide: Progress on research in pharmacodynamics and toxicology. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014; 155:67–79. pmid:24933225
  3. 3. Wang LY, Wu J, Yang Z, Wang XJ, Fu Y, Liu SZ, et al. (M)- and (P)-bicelaphanol A, dimeric trinorditerpenes with promising neuroprotective activity from Celastrus orbiculatus. J Nat Prod. 2013; 76:745–749. pmid:23421714
  4. 4. Weng J, Yen M, Lin W. Cytotoxic constituents from Celastrus paniculatus induce apoptosis and autophagy in breast cancer cells. Phytochemistry. 2013; 94:211–219. pmid:23810286
  5. 5. Zhu Y, Liu Y, Qian Y, Dai X, Yang L, Chen J, et al. Research on the efficacy of Celastrus orbiculatus in suppressing TGF-beta1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition by inhibiting HSP27 and TNF-alpha-induced NF-kappa B/Snail signaling pathway in human gastric adenocarcinoma. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014; 14:433. pmid:25370696
  6. 6. Liu J, Lee J, Hernandez MAS, Mazitschek R, Ozcan U. Treatment of obesity with Celastrol. Cell. 2015; 161:999–1011. pmid:26000480
  7. 7. Brinker AM, Ma J, Lipsky PE, Raskin I. Medicinal chemistry and pharmacology of genus Tripterygium (Celastraceae). Phytochemistry. 2007; 68:732–766. pmid:17250858
  8. 8. Su XH, Zhang ML, Zhan WH, Hou CH, Shi QW, Gu YC, et al. Chemical and pharmacological studies of the plants from genus Celastrus. Chem Biodiversity. 2009; 6:146–161.
  9. 9. Hu X, Han W, Han Z, Liu Q, Xu X, Fu P, et al. A new macrocyclic lactone and a new quinoflavan from Celastrus hindsii. Phytochemisty Lett. 2014; 7:169–172.
  10. 10. Luo Y, Pu X, Luo G, Zhou M, Ye Q, Liu Y, et al. Nitrogen-containing dihydro-beta-agarofuran derivatives from Tripterygium wilfordii. J Nat Prod. 2014; 77:1650–1657. pmid:24963543
  11. 11. Tang W, Bai S, Tong L, Duan W, Su J, Chen J, et al. Chemical constituents from Celastrus aculeatus. Merr Biochem Syst Ecol. 2014; 54:78–82.
  12. 12. Wang XJ, Wang LY, Fu Y, Wu J, Tang XC, Zhao WM, et al. Promising effects on ameliorating mitochondrial function and enhancing Akt signaling in SH-SY5Y cells by (M)-bicelaphanol A, a novel dimeric podocarpane type trinorditerpene isolated from Celastrus orbiculatus. Phytomedicine. 2013; 20:1064–1070. pmid:23746757
  13. 13. Wu J, Zhou Y, Wang L, Zuo J, Zhao W. Terpenoids from root bark of Celastrus orbiculatus. Phytochemistry. 2012; 75:159–168. pmid:22206928
  14. 14. Zhang H, Zhao T, Dong J, Chen R, Li Z, Qin H. Four new sesquiterpene polyol esters from Celastrus angulatus. Phytochemistry Lett. 2014; 7:101–106.
  15. 15. Mu XY, Zhao LC, Zhang ZX. Phylogeny of Celastrus L. (Celastraceae) inferred from two nuclear and three plastid markers. J Plant Res. 2012; 125:619–630. pmid:22466413
  16. 16. Cheng JR, Gao ZJ. Celastrus L. In: Wu CY. (ed) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Science Press, Beijing. 1999; 45(3):96–128.
    • 17. Di WZ. A preliminary study on Celastrus L. in Sichuan and Shaanxi provinces. J Northwest Univ Chin. 1978; 1:81–93.
    • 18. Ao Y, Mu XY, Tan YH, Zhang ZX. Celastrus yuloensis (Celastraceae), a new species from China. Ann Bot Fenn. 2012; 49: 267–270.
    • 19. Techen N, Parveen I, Pan Z, Khan IA. DNA barcoding of medicinal plant material for identification. Curr Opin Biotech. 2014; 25:103–110. pmid:24484887
    • 20. Balandrin MF, Klocke JA, Wurtele ES, Bollinger WH. Natural plant chemicals: sources of industrial and medicinal materials. Science. 1985; 228:1154–1160. pmid:3890182
    • 21. Law SK, Simmons MP, Techen N, Khan IA, He MF, Shaw PC, et al. Molecular analyses of the Chinese herb Leigongteng (Tripterygium wilfordii Hook.f.). Phytochemistry. 2011; 72:21–26. pmid:21094504
    • 22. Mu XY. Taxonomic revision of Celastrus L. (Celastraceae) in China, Ph. D. dissertation. Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 2012.
      • 23. Mu XY, Xia XF, Zhao LC, Zhang ZX. Celastrus obovatifolius sp. nov. (Celastraceae) from China. Nord J Bot. 2012; 30:53–57.
      • 24. Baldwin BG, Markos S. Phylogenetic utility of the external transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S–26S rDNA: congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998; 10:449–463. pmid:10051397
      • 25. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Shinsky JJ, White TJ. (eds.), PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1990.
        • 26. Hamilton MB. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. Mol Ecol. 1999; 8:521–522. pmid:10199016
        • 27. Lledo MD, Crespo MB, Cameron KM, Fay MF, Chase MW. Systematics of Plumbaginaceae based upon cladistic analysis of rbcL sequence data. Syst Bot. 1998; 23:21–29.
        • 28. Kelchner SA, Clark LG. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the chloroplast rpl16 intron in Chusquea and the Bambusoideae (Poaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1997; 8:385–397. pmid:9417896
        • 29. Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J. Universal primers for amplification of three noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol. 1991; 17:1105–1109. pmid:1932684
        • 30. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The Clustal_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 24:4876–4882.
        • 31. Simmons MP. Independence of alignment and tree search. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004; 31:874–879. pmid:15120385
        • 32. Rambaut A. Se-Al sequence alignment editor v2.0all. University of Oxford, Oxford, 2002.
          • 33. Farris JS, Kallersjl M, Kluge AG, Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics. 1994; 10:315–319.
          • 34. Swofford DL. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. 2002.
            • 35. Cunningham CW. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol Biol Evol. 1997; 14:733–740. pmid:9214746
            • 36. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30:1312–1313. pmid:24451623
            • 37. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012; 61: 539–542. pmid:22357727
            • 38. Posada D, Crandall KA. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998; 14: 817–818. pmid:9918953
            • 39. Nuin P. MrMTgui 1.0 (version 1.6) [online]. Available from http://www.genedrift.org/mtgui.php [accessed 19 November 2010]. 2005.
              • 40. Posada D, Buckley TR. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: Advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol. 2004; 53: 793–808. pmid:15545256
              • 41. Liu HL, Feng YJ, Chen DS, Wang DY. Chemical constituents of the bark of Celastrus orbiculatus. Chin Tradit Patent Med. 2010; 32:1169–1172.
              • 42. Sharma A. Chandra SS. Prakash SO. Dhobhal SM. Kumar KS. Genus Euonymus: chemical and pharmacological perception. Mini-Rev Org Chem. 2012; 9: 341–351.