Anti-Invasive and Anti-Proliferative Synergism between Docetaxel and a Polynuclear Pd-Spermine Agent

Ana L. M. Batista de Carvalho; Paula S. C. Medeiros; Francisco M. Costa; Vanessa P. Ribeiro; Joana B. Sousa; Carmen Diniz; Maria P. M. Marques

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167218

Abstract

The present work is aimed at evaluating the antitumour properties of a Pd(II) dinuclear complex with the biogenic polyamine spermine, by investigating: i) the anti-angiogenic and anti-migration properties of a Pd(II) dinuclear complex with spermine (Pd₂Spm); ii) the anti-proliferative activity of Pd₂Spm against a triple negative human breast carcinoma (MDA-MB-231); and finally iii) the putative interaction mediated by combination of Pd₂Spm with Docetaxel. Anti-invasive (anti-angiogenic and anti-migratory) as well as anti-proliferative capacities were assessed, for different combination schemes and drug exposure times, using the CAM assay and VEGFR2 activity measurement, the Matrigel^TM method and the SRB proliferation test. The results thus obtained evidence the ability of Pd₂Spm to restrict angiogenesis and cell migration: Pd₂Spm induced a marked inhibition of migration (43.8±12.2%), and a higher inhibition of angiogenesis (81.8±4.4% for total length values, at 4 μM) as compared to DTX at the clinical dosage 4x10^-2 μM (26.4±14.4%; n = 4 to 11). Combination of Pd₂Spm/DTX was more effective as anti-invasive and anti-proliferative than DTX or Pd₂Spm in sole administration, which is compatible with the occurrence of synergism: for the anti-angiogenic effect, IC_{50(Pd2Spm/DTX)} = 0.5/0.5x10^-2 μM vs IC_50(DTX) = 1.7x10^-2 μM and IC_50(Pd2Spm) = 1.6 μM. In conclusion, the reported effects of Pd₂Spm on angiogenesis, migration and proliferation showed that this compound is a promising therapeutic agent against this type of breast cancer. Moreover, combined administration of Pd₂Spm and DTX was found to trigger a substantial synergetic effect regarding angiogenesis inhibition as well as anti-migratory and anti-proliferative activities reinforcing the putative use of Pd(II) complexes in chemotherapeutic regimens. This is a significant outcome, aiming at the application of these combined strategies towards metastatic breast cancer (or other type of resistant cancers), justifying further studies that include pre-clinical trials.

Citation: Batista de Carvalho ALM, Medeiros PSC, Costa FM, Ribeiro VP, Sousa JB, Diniz C, et al. (2016) Anti-Invasive and Anti-Proliferative Synergism between Docetaxel and a Polynuclear Pd-Spermine Agent. PLoS ONE 11(11): e0167218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167218

Editor: Aamir Ahmad, University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute, UNITED STATES

Received: October 12, 2016; Accepted: November 10, 2016; Published: November 23, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Batista de Carvalho et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: The authors acknowledge financial support from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT): – UID/MULTI/00070/2013, UID/QUI/50006/2013, PhD fellowship SFRH/BD/72851/2010 and PTDC/QEQ-MED/1890/2014 (within Project 3599 – to Promote Scientific Production and Technological Development as well as the formation of thematic networks (3599-PPCDT) – jointly financed by the European Community Fund FEDER).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Angiogenesis plays an important role in several physiological processes but can also be altered in some pathophysiologies, in which either an inhibition or an enhancement have been detected. In cancer, excessive angiogenesis favours tumour spread and development, allowing migration of tumour cells and invasion of tissues far from the primary tumour [1]. Particularly for invasive breast cancers, this process has been found to lead to metastasis even after prolonged periods upon surgical removal of the main tumour, due to neoplastic cell dissemination that leads to minimal residual disease (MRD) [2]. Apart from the well known heterogeneity of this type of tumour, this may explain the poor prognosis associated to it [3–5]. Therefore, development of compounds with the ability to restrict angiogenesis may constitute an important adjuvant strategy in chemotherapeutic regimens, particularly in resistant cancers.

Since Rosenberg’s discovery of cisplatin (cis-Pt(NH₃)₂Cl₂, cDDP) [6–8] only three platinum(II)-based compounds are approved as drugs for clinical use (cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin), but they are often associated to severe side effects and acquired resistance, which strongly limit their application in sole administration. Also, they display a very low efficiency against metastatic cancers. In the last two decades, particular attention has been payed to polynuclear Pt(II) chelates with flexible polyamine ligands, aiming at an improved activity. Furthermore, their Pd(II) analogues have arisen as innovative and promising alternatives to Pt(II)-based drugs [9–13], with less severe adverse effects, particularly when using chelating ligands such as polyamines [13–16]. A careful design of palladium complexes may, thus, allow targetting strategies leading to different profiles of drug activity reducing cross-resistance relative to Pt-agents. In addition to these advances, a combined activity of palladium complexes as anti-invasive and anti-proliferative agents, may exploit their potential as a promising anticancer drug. In fact, although cisplatin/Docetaxel (Taxotere^®, DTX) combinations have been reported to display synergistic anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic activities against human triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) [17, 18], reports of combining therapies involving improved new-generation metal-based drugs (namely Pd-based) and yielding synergism towards this type of cancer are still to be found. Therefore, this work is aimed at investigating the ability of a Pd(II) complex, the Pd₂Spm, to restrict invasion, by inhibiting angiogenesis and/or migration, and simultaneosly act as an anti-proliferative agent against a TNBC cell line (MDA-MB-231). In addition, this work also aims to evaluate the putative interaction of Pd₂Spm compound when combined with DTX challenging the usefulness of this combination as an alternative therapeutic scheme to fight cancer.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

Crystal violet, DMSO (99.9%), DTX (97%), Dulbecco′s Modified Eagle′s Medium–high glucose (DMEM-HG, 4500 mg/L glucose), formalin (10% neutral-buffered formalin, ca. 4% formaldehyde), hydrocortisone, paraffin, penicillin/streptomycin (Pen/Strep), PBS, potassium tetrachloropalladate(II) (K₂PdCl₄ >99.9%), spermine (N,N´-bis(3-aminopropyl)-1,4-diaminobutane >97%), Sulforhodamine B (SRB, monosodium salt, 0.5% (w/v) solution), Trypan blue (0.04% (w/v) solution), trypsin-EDTA (0.05% (w/v) solution), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and inorganic salts and acids and organic solvents (of analytical grade) were from Sigma-Aldrich (Sintra, Portugal). SU5416 –semaxanib was from Selleckchem (Deltaclon, Madrid, Spain). FBS was acquired from Gibco-Life Technologies (Porto, Portugal), and BD Matrigel^TM from BD Biosciences (Porto, Portugal). The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) protein was obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK).

Synthesis of Pd-based compound

Pd₂Spm synthesis was obatined according to published procedures [19], optimised by the authors [20]. Briefly, 2 mmol of K₂PdCl₄ were dissolved in a minimal amount of water, and an aqueous solution containing 1 mmol of spermine was added dropwise under continuous stirring. The reaction was allowed to occur for 24 hours, after which the resulting yellow powder was filtered off and washed with water. Pd₂Spm was solubilised in PBS and sterile-filtered before its addition to the cells.

In vivo CAM assay

The chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay is a suitable and cost-effective model for monitoring neovascularization [21–23], and was used as an in vivo model for angiogenesis, as described elsewhere [24]. Handling and care of chick embryos were conducted according to the European guidelines (Directive 2010/63/EU) on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes in agreement with the NIH guidelines. This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Faculty of Pharmacy of University of Porto (Permit Number: 25/10/2015). Briefly, the fertilised chicken Ross strain eggs were obtained from Aviliz, Amor, Portugal and were incubated with agitation at 37.5°C in a humidified atmosphere. After 3 days of incubation, 2.5 mL of albumen were removed, in order to detach the shell from developing CAM, and a window was opened in the eggshell to expose the embryo. At this stage, the fertilised eggs were sealed with paraffin and incubation continued until day 9, when the windows were unsealed. Three PBS-soaked and one VEGF-soaked (10 ng/mL) coverslips were then placed in each egg, in direct contact with the CAM, and the openings were sealed again with paraffin. The coverslips were previously sterilised and pre-treated with hydrocortisone (a cyclooxygenase inhibitor), to avoid inflammatory responses. At day 11, the windows were unsealed and two of the PBS-soaked coverslips were treated with Pd₂Spm (1 to 4 μM), DTX (1x10^-2 to 4x10^-2 μM) and Pd₂Spm/DTX combinations (1 to 8 μM/1x10^-2 to 8x10^-2 μM). The remained untreated coverslips were used as controls (PBS and VEGF). After re-sealed the windows, the eggs were incubated until day 13. At this time-point, the eggs were opened and the coverslips (bound to the CAM) were removed and placed in PBS. Euthanasia was carried out by chicken gestation process terminated following Home Office specific guidelines at the maximum of 14 days of incubation. Contrast-phase images were obtained using a Moticam 5 digital camera coupled to a Motic^® AE200 inverted microscope (Spectra Services VWR international) (with a 4x magnification). The digital images were analysed using the Angiogenesis Analyser for Fiji [25].

Determination of VEGFR2 activity

In vitro VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase activity was analysed by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit as previously described [26]. Briefly, the assay in 96-well plates, employs an affinity tag labelled capture antibody and a reporter conjugated detector antibody which immunocaptures the analyte in solution. The complex (captured antibody/analyte/detector antibody) is, in turn, immobilised via immunoaffinity of an anti-tag antibody coating the well. Pd₂Spm and DTX were tested separately (at their IC₅₀ concentrations, 1.7 and 1.8x10^-2 μM, respectively), or in combination (at 6x10^-1/6x10^-3 μM for Pd₂Spm/DTX), by incubation with the antibody mixture. Colour development was determined at 450 nm, in an automated microplate reader (Biotek Winooski, USA).

In Vitro Assays

Breast cancer cell culture.

The epithelial human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 (human Caucasian triple-negative, claudin-low, breast carcinoma, lacking the oestrogen, progesterone and human epidermal growth factor receptors (ER, PR and HER2)) was purchased from the European Collection of Cell Cultures (Salisbury, UK). The cells were cultured as monolayers at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂. Cultures were maintained in DMEM-HG medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin and sodium bicarbonate. Cells were subcultured at 80% confluence, using 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (1x) in PBS.

Cell migration assays.

Migration of MDA-MB-231 was measured using the Matrigel^TM cell invasion assay [27]. Briefly, the inserts (BD Falcon, Enzifarma, Portugal) were coated with 250 μg.mL^-1 Matrigel^TM and placed in a cell incubator for 2 hours. The top chambers were then seeded with 5×10⁴ cells in DMEM-HG medium without FBS along with 4 μM–Pd₂Spm and 0.01 μM–DTX, either alone or in combination. The bottom chambers were DMEM-HG supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS. After 72 hours, the cells on the top surface of the membrane (non migrating cells) were gently rubbed with a cotton swab moistened with PBS. The cells spreading to the bottom sides of the membrane (invasive cells) were washed with PBS and fixed with cold 4% formalin for 20 min, and stained with crystal violet. Digital images were acquired with a camera coupled to an inverted microscope (Olympus, Portugal) and invasive cells were quantified by manual counting.

Cell proliferation tests

Sole administration.

MDA-MB-231 cell cultures were established in 24-well plates (1 mL/well) at a density of 3x10⁴ cells/cm², and were allowed to attach for about 24 hours. Triplicates were treated for different incubation periods (3 independent experiments) with several concentrations of the tested compounds (Pd₂Spm from 1 to 16 μM and DTX from 1x10^-2 to 8x10^-2 μM). DTX was solubilised in DMSO (concentration never exceeding 0.1% (v/v)) and diluted in PBS prior to addition to the cell cultures. According to the population doubling time for MDA-MB-231 cells (26 hours, [12]) the 48 and 72 hours time-points after Pd₂Spm or DTX addition were chosen. At each of these, the growth media was aspirated, the cells were washed and fixed with ice-cold methanol (1% (v/v) in acetic acid) and stored at 20°C. After fixation process, cell proliferation was evaluated through the SRB staining assay to obtain the cellular protein content, considered as directly proportional to the cell density [28]. A 0.01% (w/v) DMSO solution was always considered as a control.

Combined administration.

Cells were seeded in 24-well plates (1 mL/well) at a density of 3x10⁴ cells/cm² and were allowed to attach for about 24 hours. Two different drug administration schemes were used: (i) the cells were simultaneously exposed to 1x10^-2 μM DTX, and 2 or 4 μM Pd₂Spm or (ii) the cells were pre-treated with DTX (1x10^-2 μM, 24 hours), after which, the media was removed and the wells washed, fresh DMEM-HG was added and Pd₂Spm administered (the end-points being counted from this time forward). Drug co-administration interactions can occur, and these were assessed following the method described by Berenbaum [29].

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as a percentage of the control and are presented as mean± for n experiments performed (at least three independent experiments). Statistical comparisons between groups, at the same time point, were perfomed with one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc t-test. Signficance was accepted at p values < 0.05.

Proliferation data were obtained from experiments in which both controls and cultures exposed to the tested compounds were established and processed in parallel. IC₅₀ values (relative inhibitory concentration inducing 50% of cell growth) were calculated from dose-response studies for DTX (0 to 8x10^-2 μM) and Pd₂Spm (0 to 16 μM) according to [30].

The synergetic effect of Pd₂Spm/DTX combination was evaluated according to the method of isoboles [31]. An isobologram was plotted for both drugs in order to access if the addition of Pd₂Spm to DTX produces a response different than an additive one. A line (isobole) was drawn, connecting the points of 50% maximum response for each drug, in the absence of the other compound, allowing to interpolate the Pd₂Spm/DTX combinations producing a 50% response.

All data analysis was performed with the GraphPad Prism 6 Software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Results

Pd₂Spm anti-invasive effects

The impact of Pd₂Spm in angiogenesis modulation was assessed by the CAM assay. Several parameters were counted and evaluated–number of extremities, branches and junctions, as well as total length, total branching length and total branches length. These were found to decrease in a concentration-dependent manner, in comparison to values obtained for both the control (PBS, where normal development of egg neovascularisation occurred) and VEGF conditions (where neovascularisation was stimulated). The effect elicited by increasing concentrations of Pd₂Spm is depicted in Fig 1.

Download:

Fig 1. Anti-invasive assays in the presence of DTX, Pd₂Spm and DTX with Pd₂Spm combination.

Quantitative CAM angiogenesis results in the presence of increasing concentrations of DTX, Pd₂Spm and Pd₂Spm/DTX. Eight days after fertilization, DTX, Pd₂Spm, VEGF (positive control) or PBS (negative control) were added to the coverslip (previously sterilised and treated with hydrocortisone). After incubating the eggs for 48 hours, the CAMs were peeled off and photographed. Digital images were analysed using the Angiogenesis Analyser for Fiji [25]. (A)–number of extremities, nodes and branches; (B)–total branches length, total branching length, total length. Anti-migratory assays for the MDA-MB-231 cell line upon exposure to DTX, Pd₂Spm and Pd₂Spm/DTX combination, MDA-MB-231 cell invasion on Matrigel^TM: (C)–Microscopic image (x10) of MDA-MB-231 cells treated with DTX (1x10^-2 μM), Pd₂Spm (4 μM) and Pd₂Spm/DTX combination (1/1x10^-2 μM) stained with crystal violet or (D) quantified by simple counting. The results are expressed as a percentage of the control ± SEM. The one-way ANOVA statistical analysis was used, and the Dunnett’s post-test was carried out to verify the significance of the obtained results (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 versus the control and #p<0.05 versus the VEGF).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167218.g001

DTX is a taxane-type drug that may modify angiogenesis [32], and is, thus, currently used for comparison purposes. We have verified DTX-mediated effects on angiogenesis using the CAM assay. Increasing concentrations were tested for DTX in sole administration (1x10^-2 to 4x10^-2 μM, corresponding to those commonly used in the clinical practice [33]), and a significant anti-angiogenic effect was observed but only at the highest concentration tested, for all the parameters tested (Fig 1(A) and 1(B)). In turn, Pd₂Spm-induced inhibition of angiogenesis was very effective: 81.8±4.4% for total length values, at 4 μM, when compared to the 26.4±14.4% DTX-triggered at the clinically used dosage of 4x10^-2 μM (n = 4 to 11).

The migration ability of the MDA-MB-231 cells was measured using the transwell migration technique (Boyden chamber assay). MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with DTX (1x10^-2 μM) and Pd₂Spm (4 μM), for 72 hours. Matrigel^TM coated inserts were used to assess whether these treatment schemes affected cancer cell migration and adhesion.

Histological images revealed that Pd₂Spm (4 μM) and DTX (1x10^-2 μM) caused a sparse number of cells to spread through the membrane relative to the control, revealing the ability of both compounds per se in preventing cell migration/adhesion (Fig 1).

Pd₂Spm anti-proliferative effect

In order to achieve the proposed objectives, confirmation of the high anti-proliferative profile of DTX against the MDA-MB-231 cell line was the next step (Fig 2(A)). Although DTX was not very effective at the lowest concentration used (1.0x10^-2 μM), for the two highest dosages (4x10^-2 and 8x10^-2 μM), it presented a dramatic effect (from 24 hours onwards of exposure). Comparison of the effects of DTX and Pd₂Spm on the triple-negative breast cancer cells clearly evidenced that while the Pd-agent induced an increasing anti-proliferative activity at all the dosages tested (Fig 2(B)), for DTX a plateau is attained, the highest effect being measured at the 4x10^-2 μM concentration and unaltered at 8x10^-2 μM (Fig 2(A)).

Download:

Fig 2. Antiproliferative effect for the MDA-MB-231 cell line upon exposure to Pd₂Spm and DTX.

Simple proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cells:–treated with either DTX (1-8x10^-2 μM) or Pd₂Spm (1–16 μM), in sole administration. The results are expressed as a percentage of the control ± SEM. The one-way ANOVA statistical analysis was used, and the Dunnett’s post-test was carried out to verify the significance of the obtained results (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, #p<0.0001 versus the control, for the same time-points).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167218.g002

Regarding the Pd₂Spm complex, an IC₅₀ value of 1.7 μM at 48 hours was obtained (Table 1), confirming data obtained for the same cell line at a different incubation time, as previously reported [12]: Pd(II) complex exerted a higher cytotoxic effect than that exhibited by cisplatin (at the same concentration range), not only against the oestrogen-unresponsive MDA-MB-231 cells but also towards the oestrogen-responsive MCF-7 cell line.

Download:

Table 1. IC₅₀ values for Pd₂Spm, DTX and Pd₂Spm/DTX, and Pd₂Spm/DTX synergetic effect towards the MDA-MB-231 cell line, evaluated by the SRB method.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167218.t001

Combination of Pd₂Spm/DTX as a therapeutic strategy

Combination therapy schemes intended to enhance cytostatic activity while decreasing the dosage of each individual component, thus leading to reduced acquired resistance and toxicity, are of the utmost importance mainly when synergism is achieved. DTX is an established anti-mitotic taxane-type drug used against several types of cancer (namely TNBC [12], hormone-refractory prostate and lung cancers), but it is generally administered in combination regimes to avoid chemoresistance [34] Pd₂Spm/DTX combinations were assessed, in search for an additive or synergistic interaction between both drugs (Figs 1 and 3). Their association prompted an increase of the anti-angiogenic effect when compared to the effect observed for each individual compound: 77.7±11.2% for total branching length values versus 42.5±14.9% and 49.5±11.5% for DTX and Pd₂Spm alone, respectively. At lower concentrations of the combined Pd₂Spm– 1 μM/DTX– 1x10^-2 μM, a statistically significant reduction in blood vessels development was observed when compared to the results observed in control conditions: above 50% in the number of extremities (51.6±12.3%), nodes (60.1±9.5%) and branches (58.0±12.6%). Similar results were obtained with total branching length (64.6±11.2%), total branches length (67.0±9.8%) and total length (58.7±9.7%) (n = 4 to 11).

Download:

Fig 3. Combination effect of DTX and Pd₂Spm on angiogenesis.

Eight days after fertilization, Pd₂Spm/DTX, VEGF (positive control) or PBS (negative control) was added to the coverslip (previously sterilised and treated with hydrocortisone). After incubating the eggs for 48 hours, the CAMs were peeled off and photographed. Digital images were analysed using the Angiogenesis Analyser for Fiji [25]. (A)–representative digital CAM image; (B)–quantitative CAM angiogenesis in the presence of increasing concentrations of Pd₂Spm/DTX; (C) Inhibition of VEGFR2 activity in the presence of IC₅₀ concentrations of Pd₂Spm/DTX (determined by the CAM assay) and SU5416 –semaxanib (VEGFR2 inhibitor). The results are expressed as a percentage of the control ± SEM. The one-way ANOVA statistical analysis was used, and the Dunnett’s post-test was carried out to verify the significance of the obtained results (*p<0.05 versus the control).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167218.g003

An anti-angiogenic synergetic effect between Pd₂Spm and DTX was identified (Table 2), following the isobole method [31]. An isobologram for the two drugs (Pd₂Spm and DTX) was analysed, for each parameter (Table 2), unveiling a clear synergism between both drugs.

Download:

Table 2. Pd₂Spm/DTX synergetic effect towards the MDA-MB-231 cell line, evaluated by the CAM assay (at 48 hours of exposure).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167218.t002

Furthermore, the effect of Pd₂Spm and DTX combination on vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) activation was assessed. Interestingly, the anti-angiogenic activity of Pd₂Spm/DTX combination (6x10^-1/6x10^-3 μM) was similar to those of SU5416 (IC₅₀ = 1 μM [26]), used as a positive control and in a concentration corresponding to IC₅₀ inhibited kinase activity. (Fig 3C). SU5416, semaxanib is a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor drug with a potent and selective inhibitory activity at the Flk-1/KDR VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase. It targets the VEGF pathway and both, in vivo and in vitro studies have verified the antiangiogenic potential [35, 36].

Anti-migratory effect mediated by MDA-MB-231 cell line upon exposure to Pd₂Spm/DTX combination lead to an intense inhibition of cell migration (7.2%). This effect was more pronounced than that elicited by the individual compounds per se (either DTX and Pd₂Spm, Fig 1(C) and 1(D)).

In turn, and regarding the antitumour activity mediated by combination of Pd₂Spm and DTX, a high antitumour effectiveness was verified, their growth-inhibiting effect towards the MDA-MB-231 cells having been evaluated through two distinct procedures: (i) the cells were exposed to both drugs at the same time; (ii) the cells were previosly sensitised with DTX– 1x10^-2 μM and then exposed to two different concentrations of Pd₂Spm. Fig 4 shows that both schemes led to a higher cytoxicity when compared to each drug alone, which is confirmed by the evaluation of synergism based on cell growth measurements (Table 2). Also, pre-sensitisation with DTX prompted an even more pronounced effect than simple co-administration of both drugs.

Download:

Fig 4. Antiproliferative assays for the MDA-MB-231 cell line upon exposure to Pd₂Spm/DTX combination.

Simple proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cells simultaneously exposed to: (A) 1x10^-2 μM of DTX, and 2 or 4 μM of Pd₂Spm (scheme(i)); (B) initially exposed to DTX (1x10^-2 μM) for 24 hours, and then to Pd₂Spm (2 or 4 μM) (scheme (ii)). The results are expressed as a percentage of the control ± SEM as a function of Pd₂Spm concentration (since DTX concentration was the same across all experiments, 1x10^-2 μM). The one-way ANOVA statistical analysis was used, and the Dunnett’s post-test was carried out to verify the significance of the obtained results (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, #p<0.0001 versus the control, for the same time-points).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167218.g004

Discussion

In the present work we revealed Pd₂Spm complex as a promising anticancer drug due to its combined: i) anti-angiogenic, ii) anti-migratory and iii) anti-proliferative activities. Moreover, Pd₂Spm complex when combined with a well established anticancer drug (taxane) revealead promising synergistic effects, allowing the use of lower concentrations to achieve equivalent anti-invasive and anti-proliferative effects.

The anti-angiogenic activity elicited by different concentrations of Pd₂Spm complex was compared with that obtained by DTX, also tested in different concentrations. From all the analysed DTX concentrations, in sole administration, 4x10^-2 μM was found to be the most effective dosage in supressing angiogenesis. The anti-angiogenic capacity elicited by the Pd(II) complex, in turn, was suprisingly high, even for the lowest dosage investigated, 1 μM. The measured anti-angiogenic effect was distinct for the Pd₂Spm and DTX agents. In our experimental conditions, DTX is unable to supress proliferation of endothelial cells (a required condition to hinder formation of new vessels), which was evidenced by its inability to alter the number of vessel extremities, nodes or branches. Therefore, the DTX anti-angiogenic effect measured can only be assigned to its capacity to inhibit formation of tubular-like structures, reflected in the detected slight reduction of the total branches length, total branching length and total length. By opposition, Pd₂Spm revealed a high efficacy in supressing both endothelial cell proliferation and tubules development.

In this work, a synergetic effect was observed for Pd₂Spm/DTX combined administration, leading to an effective anti-angiogenic role regarding endothelial cell invasion and migration, as well as tubules formation–this is, therefore, only achieved in the presence of both compounds simultaneously (the taxane and the metal complex). This high anti-angiogenic ability is well justified in view of the recognised effect of the Pd(II) agent on the cellular protein content and the cytoskeleton, previously reported by the authors [12] and closely related to the prevention of formation of the tubular network needed for new vessel development [37] (i.e., preventing one of possible pathways of angiogenesis).

It is well known that angiogenesis involves multiple signalling events (proliferation, migration and vascular permeability), mediated by several pathways. One of such is the VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase activation. In the present study theVEGFR2 activity was determined in the presence of the compounds under study (both isolated and in combination) allowing to conclude that combination of Pd₂Spm/DTX was able to produce similar inhibitory effect than that elicted by the selective inhibitor for VEGFR2 receptor, the compound SU5416 [35, 36]. It is also concluded that angiogenesis inhibition ascribed to Pd₂Spm/DTX combinations (in the CAM assay) can be partially endorsed to VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase activation, since the Pd₂Spm/DTX IC₅₀ dosage caused only a 25% inhibition of the VEGFR2 pathway. Indeed, the antiangiogenic activity observed (due to the action of Pd₂Spm/DTX) can also be explain by the ability of Pd to react with ROS (which have proangiogenic properties) reducing their accumulation in the cells, in a mechanism similar to that occurring with Ni-complex agents [38]. Another possibility lies on the fact that Pd(II) agent can target the cytoskeleton, mostly the microtubules on the cellular protein content and the cytoskeleton (previously reported by the authors [12]), and closely related to the prevention of formation of the tubular network needed for new vessel development [37]. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that Pd₂Spm compound can alter angiogenesis also by modifying other pathways (involved in angiogenesis) such as activation of NRP1 or the ANG (angiopoietin)1/2/TIE 2 receptors [39, 40].

The reported data confirms previous results that describe DTX´s anti-angiogenic effect in combination with other drugs (e.g. monoclonal antibodies such as the VEGF blocker Bevacizumab, but not metal-based agents). In fact, anti-angiogenic agents have been essentially used in combined administration with established cytotoxic chemotherapies. This is due to the fact that by normalising the vasculature around the tumour the concentration of the chemotherapeutic agent in the diseased tissue is increased.

Regarding anti-invasive and anti-angiogenic abilities, the results obtained clearly evidenced that DTX displayed a considerable anti-invasive capacity per se, Pd₂Spm was also able to hinder cell migration and invasion and the combined administration of Pd₂Spm/DTX (at 1x10^-2 μM) showed to be very efficient as an anti-invasive strategy, and significantly more effective than the effect elicited by the taxane in sole administration. The concomitance of this synergetic effect with that detected for anti-proliferative capacity is of paramount relevance for a potential application of these compounds as effective antitumour agents, since their combination schemes (at the dosages and incubation times presently assessed) appear to couple both growth inhibiting and anti-invasive activities against triple negative breast carcinoma.

Indeed, this polynuclear Pd(II) complex is therefore shown to be a very promising antitumour agent, corroborating previous studies by the authors published by our group in other cells lines such as MCF-7 [12] reporting a high impact on proteins and DNA backbone [41] as compared to its Pt(II) homologue and cisplatin, as well as a significant effect on cell morphology particularly targetting the cytoskeleton (mostly the microtubules, [12]), that may explain, at least in part, the anti-angiogenic effect presently observed associated to the inhibition of tubular-like structure formation [37]: these compounds have been shown to display a higher cytotoxicity towards breast cancer (namely TNBC [12]), due to a more severe DNA damage via long-range interstrand drug–DNA adducts not available to conventional drugs [42].

Combination chemotherapy regimens using metal-based agents (e.g. cisplatin-like complexes) plus DTX were found to be highly efficient for improving the patients´ overall survival, mainly in low-prognosis cancers [43, 44]. Therefore, in the present work, apart from assessing the anti-proliferative capacity of each tested agent separately–Pd₂Spm and DTX–the Pd₂Spm/DTX combination was evaluated, at different dosages, and an obvious synergetic activity having been observed leading to much lower IC₅₀ values relatively to those ascribed to the Pd(II) complex alone (up to two orders of magnitude, e.g. 2.5x10^-2 vs 1.7 μM, at 48 hours). Cell pre-sensitisation with DTX (for 24 hours), as opposed to simultaneous drug administation, triggered a considerably more noticeable effect. However, the molecular basis for this sensitisation still remains to be elucidated. Overall, combination between the inorganic agent and the taxane prompted a striking enhancement in cell growth inhibiting efficiency for this type of invasive breast cancer. Also, anti-angiogenic drugs per se were shown to have limited survival benefits. Additionally, this marked synergetic effect between Pd₂Spm and DTX may be justified through the cell sensitisation triggered by the metal-based agent, known to induce a severe DNA damage via direct coordination to the purine bases [12, 45]. DTX, as opposed to the DNA-damaging metal-based agents, interferes with cell division by acting on the cytoskeleton. However, the exact mechanism of synergism between these two agents is still to be clarify at the molecular level, and will be the goal of future studies.

Following the studies on combination schemes of Paclitaxel with the monoclonal antibody Bevacizumab, commonly used as a first-line therapy against metastatic breast cancer [46], the present study evidences the potential of combined administration of another taxane drug (DTX) with a Pd(II)-based agent (Pd₂Spm) that has previously displayed promising cytotoxic properties against human invasive breast cancer, combined with less severe deleterious side effects [12]. Actually, this strategy couples the high cytotoxicity of the DNA-damaging polynuclear metal complex with the anti-angiogenic capacity of both the taxane derivative and the Pd-drug, turning Pd₂Spm into a dual cytotoxic and antiinvasive (anti-angiogenic and anti-migratory) compound. Moreover, DTX is suggested to overcome the recognised VEGF-mediated protective role against Pt-drugs´ anti-proliferative activity (firstly reported for cisplatin-treated human ovarian carcinoma [47]), therefore enhancing Pd₂Spm-induced cell death.

Conclusions

In conclusion, in the present study, the Pd₂Spm effects on angiogenesis, migration and proliferation were reported, revealing this compound as a promising therapeutic agent to treat cancer. Moreover, a combined administration of Pd₂Spm and DTX was assessed and found to trigger a substantial synergetic effect regarding angiogenesis inhibition, but also anti-migratory and anti-proliferative effects, reinforcing the putative use of metal-based Pd(II) complexes in chemotherapeutic regimens. This is a major conclusion, aiming at the application of these combined therapeutic strategies against low prognosis metastatic breast cancer (or other type of resistant cancer), justifying further studies that include pre-clinical trials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: ALMBC.
Formal analysis: ALMBC CD.
Investigation: ALMBC PSCM FMC VPR JBS.
Resources: CD MPMM.
Writing – review & editing: ALMBC CD MPMM.

References

1. Ferrara N, Kerbel RS. Angiogenesis as a Therapeutic Target. Nature. 2005;438(7070):967–74. pmid:16355214
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Janni W, Vogl FD, Wiedswang G, Synnestvedt M, Fehm T, Juckstock J, et al. Persistence of Disseminated Tumor Cells in the Bone Marrow of Breast Cancer Patients Predicts Increased Risk for Relapse—A European Pooled Analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(9):2967–76. pmid:21415211
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Weigelt B, Peterse JL, van 't Veer LJ. Breast Cancer Metastasis: Markers and Models. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(8):591–602. pmid:16056258
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Ismail-Khan R, Bui MM. A review of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Control. 2010;17(3):173–6. pmid:20664514
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Krawczyk N, Banys M, Hartkopf A, Hagenbeck C, Melcher C, Fehm T. Circulating tumour cells in breast cancer. Ecancermedicalscience. 2013;7(352):1–29. pmid:24066018
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Rosenberg B, Vancamp L, Krigas T. Inhibition of Cell Division in Escherichia coli by Electrolysis Products from a Platinum Electrode. Nature. 1965;205:698–9. pmid:14287410
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Rosenber B, Vancamp L, Trosko JE, Mansour VH. Platinum Compounds—a New Class of Potent Antitumour Agents. Nature. 1969;222(5191):385. pmid:5782119
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Wang D, Lippard SJ. Cellular Processing of Platinum Anticancer Drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(4):307–20. pmid:15789122
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Fiuza SM, Amado AM, Oliveira PJ, Sardao VA, Batista de Carvalho LAE, Marques MPM. Pt(II) vs Pd(II) polyamine complexes as new anticancer drugs: A structure-activity study. Lett Drug Des Discov. 2006;3(3):149–51.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Fiuza SM, Amado AM, Marques MPM, Batista de Carvalho LAE. Use of effective core potential calculations for the conformational and vibrational study of platinum(II) anticancer drugs. cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) as a case study. J Phys Chem A. 2008;112(14):3253–9. pmid:18331011
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Fiuza SM, Amado AM, Dos Santos HF, Marques MPM, Batista de Carvalho LAE. Conformational and vibrational study of cis-diamminedichloropalladium(II). Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12(42):14309–21. pmid:20871895
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Fiuza SM, Holy J, Batista de Carvalho LAE, Marques MPM. Biologic Activity of a Dinuclear Pd(II)-spermine Complex Toward Human Breast Cancer. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2011;77(6):477–88. pmid:21371266
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Marques MPM. Platinum and Palladium Polyamine Complexes as Anticancer Agents: The Structural Factor. ISRN Spectrosc. 2013;2013:29.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Oliveira WXC, da Costa MM, Fontes APS, Pinheiro CB, de Paula FCS, Jaimes EHL, et al. Palladium(II) and platinum(II) oxamate complexes as potential anticancer agents: Structural characterization and cytotoxic activity. Polyhedron. 2014;76:16–21.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Kapdi AR, Fairlamb IJS. Anti-cancer palladium complexes: a focus on PdX2L2, palladacycles and related complexes. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43(13):4751–77. pmid:24723061
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Antunovic M, Kriznik B, Ulukaya E, Yilmaz VT, Mihalic KC, Madunic J, et al. Cytotoxic activity of novel palladium-based compounds on leukemia cell lines. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 2015;26(2):180–6. pmid:25280061
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Fan Y, Xu BH, Yuan P, Ma F, Wang JY, Ding XY, et al. Docetaxel-cisplatin might be Superior to Docetaxel-capecitabine in the First-line Treatment of Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(5):1219–25. pmid:23223332
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Tai CJ, Chen CS, Hung CS, Kuo LJ, Wei PL, Chiou JF, et al. Bevacizumab Plus Docetaxel and Cisplatin for Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Pilot Phase II Study. Anticancer Res. 2012;32(12):5501–6. pmid:23225458
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Codina G, Caubet A, Lopez C, Moreno V, Molins E. Palladium(II) and Platinum(II) Polyamine Complexes: X-Ray Crystal Structures of (SP-4-2)-Chloro{N-[(3-amino-κN)propyl]propane-1,3-diamine-κN,κN′}palladium(1+) Tetrachloropalladate (2–) (2 : 1) and (R,S)-Tetrachloro[μ-(spermine)]dipalladium(II) (= {μ-{N,N′-Bis[(3-amino-κN)propyl]butane-1,4-diamine-κN:κN′}}tetrachlorodipalladium). Helv Chim Acta. 1999;82(7):1025–37.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Fiuza SM, Amado AM, Parker SF, Marques MPM, Batista de Carvalho LAE. Conformational Insights and Vibrational Study of a Promising Anticancer Agent: the Role of the Ligand in Pd(II)-amine Complexes. New J Chem. 2015;39(8):6274–83.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. DeFouw DO, Rizzo VJ, Steinfeld R, Feinberg RN. Mapping of the microcirculation in the chick chorioallantoic membrane during normal angiogenesis. Microvasc Res. 1989;38(2):136–47. pmid:2477666
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Richardson M, Singh G. Observations on the Use of the Avian Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Model in Investigations into Angiogenesis. Curr Drug Targets. 2003;3(2):155–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13089959 pmid:12769641
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Lokman NA, Elder ASF, Ricciardelli C, Oehler MK. Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Assay as an in vivo Model to Study the Effect of Newly Identified Molecules on Ovarian Cancer Invasion and Metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(8):9959. pmid:22949841
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Ribatti D. Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane Angiogenesis Model. In: Peng X, Antonyak M, editors. Cardiovascular Development: Humana Press; 2012. p. 47–57.
25. Carpentier G, Martinelli M, Courty J, Cascone I, editors. Angiogenesis Analyzer for ImageJ. 4th ImageJ. User and Developer Conference proceedings; 2012; Mondorf-les-Bains, Luxembourg.
26. Lu J, Zhang K, Nam S, Anderson RA, Jove R, Wen W. Novel angiogenesis inhibitory activity in cinnamon extract blocks VEGFR2 kinase and downstream signaling. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31(3):481–8. pmid:19969552
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Kramer N, Walzl A, Unger C, Rosner M, Krupitza G, Hengstschläger M, et al. In vitro Cell Migration and Invasion Assays. Mutat Res-Rev Mutat Res. 2013;752(1):10–24. pmid:22940039
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Papazisis KT, Geromichalos GD, Dimitriadis KA, Kortsaris AH. Optimization of the Sulforhodamine B Colorimetric Assay. J Immunol Methods. 1997;208(2):151–8. pmid:9433470
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Berenbaum MC. Application of a New Approach for the Quantitation of Drug Synergism to the Combination of Cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum and 1-Beta-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine. Cancer Res. 1992;52(16):4558–60. pmid:1643648
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Sebaugh JL. Guidelines for Accurate EC50/IC50 Estimation. Pharm Stat. 2011;10(2):128–34. pmid:22328315
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Tallarida RJ. Revisiting the Isobole and Related Quantitative Methods for Assessing Drug Synergism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012;342(1):2–8. pmid:22511201
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Reck M, Mellemgaard A, von Pawel J, Gottfried M, Bondarenko I, Cheng Y, et al. Anti-Angiogenic-Apecific Adverse Events in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Nintedanib and Docetaxel. Lung Cancer. 2015;90(2):267–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13089959
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Crown J, O'Leary M, Ooi WS. Docetaxel and Paclitaxel in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: a Review of Clinical Experience. Oncologist. 2004;9(Suppl 2):24–32.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Ghanbari P, Mohseni M, Tabasinezhad M, Yousefi B, Saei AA, Sharifi S, et al. Inhibition of survivin restores the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to docetaxel and vinblastine. Appl Biochem Biotech. 2014;174(2):667–81. pmid:25086926
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. O'Donnell A, Padhani A, Hayes C, Kakkar AJ, Leach M, Trigo JM, et al. A Phase I study of the angiogenesis inhibitor SU5416 (semaxanib) in solid tumours, incorporating dynamic contrast MR pharmacodynamic end points. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(8):876–83. pmid:16222321
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Hoff PM, Wolff RA, Bogaard K, Waldrum S, Abbruzzese JL. A Phase I study of escalating doses of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor semaxanib (SU5416) in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006;36(2):100–3. pmid:16449240
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Bayless KJ, Johnson GA. Role of the Cytoskeleton in Formation and Maintenance of Angiogenic Sprouts. J Vasc Res. 2011;48(5):369–85. pmid:21464572
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Zec M, Srdic-Rajic T, Konic-Ristic A, Todorovic T, Andjelkovic K, Filipovic-Ljeskovic I, et al. Anti-metastatic and anti-angiogenic properties of potential new anti-cancer drugs based on metal complexes of selenosemicarbazones. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2012;12(9):1071–80. pmid:22583413
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature. 2011;473(7347):298–307. pmid:21593862
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Gacche RN, Meshram RJ. Angiogenic Factors as Potential Drug Target: Efficacy and Limitations of Anti-angiogenic Therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta-Rev Cancer. 2014;1846(1):161–79. pmid:24836679
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Batista de Carvalho ALM, Pilling M, Gardner P, Doherty J, Cinque G, Wehbe K, et al. Chemotherapeutic Response to Cisplatin-like Drugs in Human Breast Cancer Cells Probed by Vibrational Microspectroscopy. Farad Discuss. 2016;187(0):273–98. pmid:27063935
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Malina J, Farrell NP, Brabec V. DNA Condensing Effects and Sequence Selectivity of DNA Binding of Antitumor Noncovalent Polynuclear Platinum Complexes. Inorg Chem. 2014;53(3):1662–71. pmid:24428232
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Gralla RJ, Cole JT, Robertson CN, Marques CB, Rittenberg CN. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin: An Active Combination Regimen in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Oncology. 1997;11(Suppl 7):27–30.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Roth AD, Maibach R, Martinelli G, Fazio N, Aapro MS, Pagani O, et al. Docetaxel (Taxotere®)-cisplatin (TC): An effective drug combination in gastric carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2000;11(3):301–6. pmid:10811496
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Marques MPM, Gianolio D, Cibin G, Tomkinson J, Parker SF, Valero R, et al. A Molecular View of Cisplatin's Mode of Action: Interplay with DNA Bases and Acquired Resistance. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17(7):5155–71. pmid:25601325
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Nielsen DL, Andersson M, Andersen JL, Kamby C. Antiangiogenic Therapy for Beast Cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(5):209. pmid:21067536
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Hu G, Ryan S, Zhu Y, Reed E, Li X, Wang G, et al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Modulates Cisplatin Sensitivity in Human Ovarian Carcinoma Cells. Cancer Therapy. 2003;1:31–7.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Ferrara N, Kerbel RS. Angiogenesis as a Therapeutic Target. Nature. 2005;438(7070):967–74. pmid:16355214
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Janni W, Vogl FD, Wiedswang G, Synnestvedt M, Fehm T, Juckstock J, et al. Persistence of Disseminated Tumor Cells in the Bone Marrow of Breast Cancer Patients Predicts Increased Risk for Relapse—A European Pooled Analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(9):2967–76. pmid:21415211
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Weigelt B, Peterse JL, van 't Veer LJ. Breast Cancer Metastasis: Markers and Models. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(8):591–602. pmid:16056258
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Ismail-Khan R, Bui MM. A review of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Control. 2010;17(3):173–6. pmid:20664514
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Krawczyk N, Banys M, Hartkopf A, Hagenbeck C, Melcher C, Fehm T. Circulating tumour cells in breast cancer. Ecancermedicalscience. 2013;7(352):1–29. pmid:24066018
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Rosenberg B, Vancamp L, Krigas T. Inhibition of Cell Division in Escherichia coli by Electrolysis Products from a Platinum Electrode. Nature. 1965;205:698–9. pmid:14287410
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Rosenber B, Vancamp L, Trosko JE, Mansour VH. Platinum Compounds—a New Class of Potent Antitumour Agents. Nature. 1969;222(5191):385. pmid:5782119
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Wang D, Lippard SJ. Cellular Processing of Platinum Anticancer Drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(4):307–20. pmid:15789122
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Fiuza SM, Amado AM, Oliveira PJ, Sardao VA, Batista de Carvalho LAE, Marques MPM. Pt(II) vs Pd(II) polyamine complexes as new anticancer drugs: A structure-activity study. Lett Drug Des Discov. 2006;3(3):149–51.
View Article
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Fiuza SM, Amado AM, Marques MPM, Batista de Carvalho LAE. Use of effective core potential calculations for the conformational and vibrational study of platinum(II) anticancer drugs. cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) as a case study. J Phys Chem A. 2008;112(14):3253–9. pmid:18331011
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Fiuza SM, Amado AM, Dos Santos HF, Marques MPM, Batista de Carvalho LAE. Conformational and vibrational study of cis-diamminedichloropalladium(II). Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12(42):14309–21. pmid:20871895
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Fiuza SM, Holy J, Batista de Carvalho LAE, Marques MPM. Biologic Activity of a Dinuclear Pd(II)-spermine Complex Toward Human Breast Cancer. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2011;77(6):477–88. pmid:21371266
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Marques MPM. Platinum and Palladium Polyamine Complexes as Anticancer Agents: The Structural Factor. ISRN Spectrosc. 2013;2013:29.
View Article
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Oliveira WXC, da Costa MM, Fontes APS, Pinheiro CB, de Paula FCS, Jaimes EHL, et al. Palladium(II) and platinum(II) oxamate complexes as potential anticancer agents: Structural characterization and cytotoxic activity. Polyhedron. 2014;76:16–21.
View Article
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Kapdi AR, Fairlamb IJS. Anti-cancer palladium complexes: a focus on PdX2L2, palladacycles and related complexes. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43(13):4751–77. pmid:24723061
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Antunovic M, Kriznik B, Ulukaya E, Yilmaz VT, Mihalic KC, Madunic J, et al. Cytotoxic activity of novel palladium-based compounds on leukemia cell lines. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 2015;26(2):180–6. pmid:25280061
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Fan Y, Xu BH, Yuan P, Ma F, Wang JY, Ding XY, et al. Docetaxel-cisplatin might be Superior to Docetaxel-capecitabine in the First-line Treatment of Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(5):1219–25. pmid:23223332
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Tai CJ, Chen CS, Hung CS, Kuo LJ, Wei PL, Chiou JF, et al. Bevacizumab Plus Docetaxel and Cisplatin for Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Pilot Phase II Study. Anticancer Res. 2012;32(12):5501–6. pmid:23225458
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Codina G, Caubet A, Lopez C, Moreno V, Molins E. Palladium(II) and Platinum(II) Polyamine Complexes: X-Ray Crystal Structures of (SP-4-2)-Chloro{N-[(3-amino-κN)propyl]propane-1,3-diamine-κN,κN′}palladium(1+) Tetrachloropalladate (2–) (2 : 1) and (R,S)-Tetrachloro[μ-(spermine)]dipalladium(II) (= {μ-{N,N′-Bis[(3-amino-κN)propyl]butane-1,4-diamine-κN:κN′}}tetrachlorodipalladium). Helv Chim Acta. 1999;82(7):1025–37.
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Fiuza SM, Amado AM, Parker SF, Marques MPM, Batista de Carvalho LAE. Conformational Insights and Vibrational Study of a Promising Anticancer Agent: the Role of the Ligand in Pd(II)-amine Complexes. New J Chem. 2015;39(8):6274–83.
View Article
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. DeFouw DO, Rizzo VJ, Steinfeld R, Feinberg RN. Mapping of the microcirculation in the chick chorioallantoic membrane during normal angiogenesis. Microvasc Res. 1989;38(2):136–47. pmid:2477666
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Richardson M, Singh G. Observations on the Use of the Avian Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Model in Investigations into Angiogenesis. Curr Drug Targets. 2003;3(2):155–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13089959 pmid:12769641
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Lokman NA, Elder ASF, Ricciardelli C, Oehler MK. Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Assay as an in vivo Model to Study the Effect of Newly Identified Molecules on Ovarian Cancer Invasion and Metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(8):9959. pmid:22949841
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Ribatti D. Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane Angiogenesis Model. In: Peng X, Antonyak M, editors. Cardiovascular Development: Humana Press; 2012. p. 47–57.

[ref25] 25. Carpentier G, Martinelli M, Courty J, Cascone I, editors. Angiogenesis Analyzer for ImageJ. 4th ImageJ. User and Developer Conference proceedings; 2012; Mondorf-les-Bains, Luxembourg.

[ref26] 26. Lu J, Zhang K, Nam S, Anderson RA, Jove R, Wen W. Novel angiogenesis inhibitory activity in cinnamon extract blocks VEGFR2 kinase and downstream signaling. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31(3):481–8. pmid:19969552
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Kramer N, Walzl A, Unger C, Rosner M, Krupitza G, Hengstschläger M, et al. In vitro Cell Migration and Invasion Assays. Mutat Res-Rev Mutat Res. 2013;752(1):10–24. pmid:22940039
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Papazisis KT, Geromichalos GD, Dimitriadis KA, Kortsaris AH. Optimization of the Sulforhodamine B Colorimetric Assay. J Immunol Methods. 1997;208(2):151–8. pmid:9433470
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Berenbaum MC. Application of a New Approach for the Quantitation of Drug Synergism to the Combination of Cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum and 1-Beta-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine. Cancer Res. 1992;52(16):4558–60. pmid:1643648
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] PubMed/NCBI

[105] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Sebaugh JL. Guidelines for Accurate EC50/IC50 Estimation. Pharm Stat. 2011;10(2):128–34. pmid:22328315
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Tallarida RJ. Revisiting the Isobole and Related Quantitative Methods for Assessing Drug Synergism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012;342(1):2–8. pmid:22511201
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Reck M, Mellemgaard A, von Pawel J, Gottfried M, Bondarenko I, Cheng Y, et al. Anti-Angiogenic-Apecific Adverse Events in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Nintedanib and Docetaxel. Lung Cancer. 2015;90(2):267–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13089959
View Article
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Crown J, O'Leary M, Ooi WS. Docetaxel and Paclitaxel in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: a Review of Clinical Experience. Oncologist. 2004;9(Suppl 2):24–32.
View Article
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Ghanbari P, Mohseni M, Tabasinezhad M, Yousefi B, Saei AA, Sharifi S, et al. Inhibition of survivin restores the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to docetaxel and vinblastine. Appl Biochem Biotech. 2014;174(2):667–81. pmid:25086926
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. O'Donnell A, Padhani A, Hayes C, Kakkar AJ, Leach M, Trigo JM, et al. A Phase I study of the angiogenesis inhibitor SU5416 (semaxanib) in solid tumours, incorporating dynamic contrast MR pharmacodynamic end points. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(8):876–83. pmid:16222321
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Hoff PM, Wolff RA, Bogaard K, Waldrum S, Abbruzzese JL. A Phase I study of escalating doses of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor semaxanib (SU5416) in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006;36(2):100–3. pmid:16449240
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] PubMed/NCBI

[131] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Bayless KJ, Johnson GA. Role of the Cytoskeleton in Formation and Maintenance of Angiogenic Sprouts. J Vasc Res. 2011;48(5):369–85. pmid:21464572
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] PubMed/NCBI

[135] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Zec M, Srdic-Rajic T, Konic-Ristic A, Todorovic T, Andjelkovic K, Filipovic-Ljeskovic I, et al. Anti-metastatic and anti-angiogenic properties of potential new anti-cancer drugs based on metal complexes of selenosemicarbazones. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2012;12(9):1071–80. pmid:22583413
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] PubMed/NCBI

[139] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature. 2011;473(7347):298–307. pmid:21593862
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Gacche RN, Meshram RJ. Angiogenic Factors as Potential Drug Target: Efficacy and Limitations of Anti-angiogenic Therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta-Rev Cancer. 2014;1846(1):161–79. pmid:24836679
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] PubMed/NCBI

[147] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Batista de Carvalho ALM, Pilling M, Gardner P, Doherty J, Cinque G, Wehbe K, et al. Chemotherapeutic Response to Cisplatin-like Drugs in Human Breast Cancer Cells Probed by Vibrational Microspectroscopy. Farad Discuss. 2016;187(0):273–98. pmid:27063935
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Malina J, Farrell NP, Brabec V. DNA Condensing Effects and Sequence Selectivity of DNA Binding of Antitumor Noncovalent Polynuclear Platinum Complexes. Inorg Chem. 2014;53(3):1662–71. pmid:24428232
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Gralla RJ, Cole JT, Robertson CN, Marques CB, Rittenberg CN. Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin: An Active Combination Regimen in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Oncology. 1997;11(Suppl 7):27–30.
View Article
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Roth AD, Maibach R, Martinelli G, Fazio N, Aapro MS, Pagani O, et al. Docetaxel (Taxotere®)-cisplatin (TC): An effective drug combination in gastric carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2000;11(3):301–6. pmid:10811496
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Marques MPM, Gianolio D, Cibin G, Tomkinson J, Parker SF, Valero R, et al. A Molecular View of Cisplatin's Mode of Action: Interplay with DNA Bases and Acquired Resistance. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17(7):5155–71. pmid:25601325
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] PubMed/NCBI

[166] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Nielsen DL, Andersson M, Andersen JL, Kamby C. Antiangiogenic Therapy for Beast Cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(5):209. pmid:21067536
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] PubMed/NCBI

[170] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Hu G, Ryan S, Zhu Y, Reed E, Li X, Wang G, et al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Modulates Cisplatin Sensitivity in Human Ovarian Carcinoma Cells. Cancer Therapy. 2003;1:31–7.
View Article
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

Synthesis of Pd-based compound

In vivo CAM assay

Determination of VEGFR2 activity

In Vitro Assays

Breast cancer cell culture.

Cell migration assays.

Cell proliferation tests

Sole administration.

Combined administration.

Statistical analysis

Results

Pd2Spm anti-invasive effects

Pd2Spm anti-proliferative effect

Combination of Pd2Spm/DTX as a therapeutic strategy

Discussion

Conclusions

Author Contributions

References

Pd₂Spm anti-invasive effects

Pd₂Spm anti-proliferative effect

Combination of Pd₂Spm/DTX as a therapeutic strategy