Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Stromal Fibroblasts from the Interface Zone of Triple Negative Breast Carcinomas Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and its Inhibition by Emodin

  • Hsiang-Chi Hsu ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Hsiang-Chi Hsu, Liang-Chih Liu

    Affiliation Department of Biological Science and Technology, College of Biopharmaceutical and Food Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Liang-Chih Liu ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Hsiang-Chi Hsu, Liang-Chih Liu

    Affiliations Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Hao-Yu Wang,

    Affiliation Department of Biological Science and Technology, College of Biopharmaceutical and Food Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Chao-Ming Hung,

    Affiliations Department of General Surgery, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, School of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Ying-Chao Lin,

    Affiliations Division of Neurosurgery, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taichung Branch, Taiwan, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Science, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Chi-Tang Ho,

    Affiliation Department of Food Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America

  • Tzong-Der Way

    tdway@mail.cmu.edu.tw

    Affiliations Department of Biological Science and Technology, College of Biopharmaceutical and Food Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Department of Health and Nutrition Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan

Abstract

“Triple negative breast cancer” (TNBC) is associated with a higher rate and earlier time of recurrence and worse prognosis after recurrence. In this study, we aimed to examine the crosstalk between fibroblasts and TNBC cells. The fibroblasts were isolated from TNBC patients’ tissue in tumor burden zones, distal normal zones and interface zones. The fibroblasts were indicated as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), normal zone fibroblasts (NFs) and interface zone fibroblasts (INFs). Our study found that INFs grew significantly faster than NFs and CAFs in vitro. The epithelial BT20 cells cultured with the conditioned medium of INFs (INFs-CM) and CAFs (CAFs-CM) showed more spindle-like shape and cell scattering than cultured with the conditioned medium of NFs (NFs-CM). These results indicated that factors secreted by INFs-CM or CAFs-CM could induce the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype in BT20 cells. Using an in vitro co-culture model, INFs or CAFs induced EMT and promoted cancer cell migration in BT20 cells. Interestingly, we found that emodin inhibited INFs-CM or CAFs-CM-induced EMT programming and phenotype in BT20 cells. Previous studies reported that CAFs and INFs-secreted TGF-β promoted human breast cancer cell proliferation, here; our results indicated that TGF-β initiated EMT in BT20 cells. Pretreatment with emodin significantly suppressed the TGF-β-induced EMT and cell migration in BT20 cells. These results suggest that emodin may be used as a novel agent for the treatment of TNBC.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and affects the lives of millions of women worldwide each year. The specific group accounts for approximately 15–20% of all breast cancer is triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC is defined by the lack of demonstrable expression of the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) or HER2 proteins [1]. TNBC has a higher rate of distant recurrence and shorter overall survival in the metastatic setting compared with other subtypes of breast cancer. Metastatic TNBC is an aggressive disease and the median survival is less than one year. Almost all TNBC patients die from the progression of their disease despite adjuvant chemotherapy [2]. Therefore, novel anti-cancer drugs with higher efficiency and specificity are urgently needed.

Recent studies indicated that solid tumors comprised not only neoplastic cells but also surrounded by a variety of non-neoplastic cells, most notably fibroblasts, adipocytes, endothelial cells, pericytes, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and immune cells that constitute a ‘tumor microenvironment’. The crosstalk between neoplastic cells and non-neoplastic cells plays an important role in tumor progression, and responses to antitumor therapy [3, 4]. The fibroblast is one of the most crucial components of tumor microenvironment, which promotes the remodeling of extracellular matrix (ECM) and produces paracrine growth factors that control cell proliferation, survival and death [5]. Such fibroblasts, known as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), have been reported to be associated with the progression of various cancer types such as prostate [68], pancreatic [9], head and neck [10] and breast cancers [11]. These results suggest that the stromal fibroblasts in tumor tissues possess biological characteristics distinct from those of normal fibroblasts. However, the specific functional contributions of fibroblasts located in the interface zone between the normal zone and the tumor invasion front remain largely unknown.

An approximately 90% of breast cancer deaths are caused by local invasion and distant metastasis, however, the mechanism underlying this event remains poorly defined. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a cellular process critical to normal morphogenesis, was recognized as an important mechanism for the initial step of metastasis [12, 13]. EMT results in loss of features characteristic of epithelial cells and acquisition of a mesenchymal nature. Recent studies have examined EMT in tumor invasion, chemoresistance, and the relationship between cancer stem cells [1416]. Some signals received from tumor microenvironments, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), IL-6, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF), can trigger EMT [1719]. It is important to examine the signals mediated by these microenvironment stimuli in initiating and controlling EMT and cancer metastasis.

Emodin (1,3,8-trihydroxy-6-methylanthraquinone) is an anthraquinone derivative present in the root and rhizome of Rheum palmatum L. (Polygonaceae). This herb is widely used in traditional Chinese and Japanese medicine. Emodin possesses a number of biological activities such as antiviral, anti-inflammatory, anti-ulcerogenic, immunosuppressive, pro-apoptotic and chemopreventive activities [20]. However, so far there is little evidence showing the possible effects of emodin on tumor invasion and metastasis.

In the present study, we tested whether fibroblasts isolated from TNBC patients’ tissues in tumor burden zones (CAFs), distal normal zones (NFs) and interface zones (INFs) contributed distinctive microenvironmental influences on TNBC. Our results demonstrated that fibroblasts isolated from different zones differed with respect to their ability to induce EMT. Moreover, we also tested whether emodin could inhibit the ability of different fibroblasts promoting TNBC progression. Our results found that emodin inhibited EMT induced by CAFs or INFs. These findings suggest that emodin is a promising candidate for TNBC prevention.

Materials and Methods

Reagents and antibodies

The compounds emodin and 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Human recombinant TGF-β was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Primary antibodies against Snail, E-cadherin, β-cadherin, MMP-2 and Slug were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Primary antibody against vimentin was purchased from Abcam Inc. (Cambridge, MA, USA). Primary antibodies against Twist were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Primary antibody against β-actin was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Secondary antibodies, HRP-conjugated Goat anti-Mouse IgG and Goat anti-Rabbit IgG, were obtained from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA).

Cell lines and cell cultures

BT20 cells (ATCC® HTB-19™) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). BT20 cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells were grown in a humidified incubator which provided an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at a constant temperature of 37°C. Materials used for cell cultures were purchased from Invitrogen (Burlington, Ontario, Canada).

Isolation of primary fibroblasts

TNBC patients’ tissues were obtained from patients undergoing surgery at China Medical University Hospital, Taiwan. The protocol for the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of China Medical University Hospital (CMUH-104-REC2–121). All participants signed written informed consent forms detailing tissue use for comprehensive experiments on breast cancer. We obtained tumor specimens from three zones: the normal zone (at least 10 mm distal normal tissue from the outer tumor boundary), interface zone (adjacent tissue within 5 mm of the outer tumor boundary) and tumor zone (tissue within the tumor boundary). The tumor specimens were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin for routine histopathological analysis. The remnant was used to isolate primary fibroblasts as described previously [21].

Confocal microscopy

Cells were fixed for 20 min in 3% formaldehyde in PBS, permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS for 5 min, and blocked with 3% FBS for 20 minutes. The expression of E-cadherin or vimentin in the cells was analyzed through Leica confocal microscopy conducted using a monoclonal primary antibody. Nuclear staining was done with DAPI.

Direct co-culture of fibroblasts and BT20 cells

The CAFs, NFs, and INFs were directly co-cultured with BT20 cells as described previously [21]. CAFs, NFs, INFs or BT20 cells were incubated with serum-free DMEM/F12 containing 5 μM CellTracker Green CMFDA (5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate; Invitrogen, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) for 45 minutes at 37°C. The solution was replaced with fresh, prewarmed medium for an additional 2 h. The cells were washed twice with PBS and then unstained fibroblasts or BT20 cells were seeded onto plates containing CMFDA-stained fibroblasts or BT20 cells, respectively. Finally, the co-cultures were incubated with medium (DMEM/F12, 1% FBS and 100 IU/mL penicillin with 100 μg/mL streptomycin) for 1 week. Using confocal microscopy, CMFDA-stained cells were easily distinguished from unstained cells.

Wound healing assay

BT20 cells grown to approximately 50% confluence were stained with CMFDA and then co-cultured with CAFs, NFs, or INFs, respectively. Cells were allowed to grow to 100% confluence and then scratched by a sterile pipette tip and rinsed with PBS to remove cellular debris. Allow cells to grow and close the wound for 24 h. Wound closure was measured in ten random fields at 200X magnification using Image-Pro Express software and a NIKON TE2000-U Inverted Microscope. Data of three independent experiments were analyzed by t-test using GraphPad Prism 5 software.

Western blot analysis

Briefly, cells in 10-cm culture dishes (1 × 106 per dish) were treated with the indicated in figure legends. Fifty micrograms of protein extract was loaded into sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gels, and the separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose filters. The filters were probed with the appropriate primary antibody. Western blotting was conducted as recently described [22].

Statistical analysis

All values were expressed as mean ±S.D. Each value was the mean of at least three individual experiments in each group. Student’s t-test was used for statistical comparison. Asterisk indicates that the values were significantly different from the control (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

Results

Comparison of primary fibroblasts isolated from different zones of TNBC patients’ tissues

We first obtained representative TNBC patients’ tissues from three zones: the tumor zone, interface zone and normal zone (Fig 1). Fibroblasts were isolated from TNBC patients’ tissues in the normal, interface and tumor zones, which were correspondingly designated as NFs, INFs and CAFs, respectively. Our study found that each type of fibroblast obtained from two patients possessed the basic fibroblast characteristics of an identical and long spindle-shaped morphology. Moreover, the strong expression of fibroblastic marker vimentin and being negative for epithelial marker E-cadherin in each type of fibroblast (Fig 2A). Oppositely, a human mammary epithelial cell line BT20 cells displayed an up-regulation of epithelial marker (Fig 2A). To compare the growth rate of primary fibroblasts isolated from different zones, we counted the cell number. After seeding at the same density (5,000 cells/well) in 6-well plates and culturing for 4 days, the number of INFs was increased relative to NFs and CAFs (Fig 2B).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Collection of representative TNBC patient’s tissue.

TNBC patient’s tissue was grossly divided into three distinct regions: the tumor zone, interface zone and normal zone. For subsequent fibroblasts isolation, the histological analysis was confirmed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and a representative sample of tissue was collected from three distinct regions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164661.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Comparison of primary fibroblasts from three distinct regions.

(A) Normal zone fibroblasts (NFs), interface zone fibroblasts (INFs) and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) were obtained from two patients. Each type of fibroblasts and BT20 cells were examined by phase-contrast microscopy and immunostaining for E-cadherin and vimentin; nuclei were stained with DAPI. (B) NFs, INFs, and CAFs seeded at the same density (5000 cells/well) in 6-well plates for 5 days. Cell numbers were calculated by Trypan Blue assay under the same experimental conditions. The number of INFs was increased relative to NFs and CAFs (*, p < 0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164661.g002

INFs or CAFs induced EMT programming and phenotype in TNBC cells

Recent study found that CAFs promoted aggressive phenotypes of breast cancer cells through EMT [23]. To determine whether NFs, INFs and CAFs had different capacities to modulate tumor progression, the conditioned medium of NFs (NFs-CM), INFs (INFs-CM) and CAFs (CAFs-CM) were collected and used to culture BT20 cells. As shown in Fig 3A and S1 File, the epithelial BT20 cells cultured with INFs-CM or CAFs-CM showed more spindle-like shape and cell scattering than cultured with NFs-CM. To investigate the changes of EMT phenotype induced by NFs-CM, INFs-CM and CAFs-CM in BT20 cells, we examined the expression of epithelial marker E-cadherin, mesenchymal marker vimentin and β-cadherin. Our results showed that BT20 cells cultured with INFs-CM or CAFs-CM had decreased expression of epithelial marker E-cadherin, and increased expression of mesenchymal marker vimentin and β-cadherin (Fig 3B). The expression levels of mesenchymal marker MMP2, Snail, Slug and Twist were upregulated in BT20 cells cultured with INFs-CM or CAFs-CM (Fig 3C). These factors secreted by INFs-CM or CAFs-CM could induce the EMT phenotype in BT20 cells.

thumbnail
Fig 3. INFs and CAFs induced EMT programming and phenotype in BT20 cells.

(A) The conditioned medium of NFs (NFs-CM), INFs (INFs-CM) and CAFs (CAFs-CM) were collected in 24 h and 48 h and used to culture BT20 cells for 24 h (24–24, 48–24) and 48 h (24–48, 48–48). Phase-contrast pictures were taken using a 103 objective. (B) BT20 cells were treated with NFs-CM, INFs-CM and CAFs-CM for indicated time periods. The cells were then harvested and lysed for the detection of E-cadherin, vimentin, β-catenin, and β-actin. (C) BT20 cells were treated with NFs-CM, INFs-CM and CAFs-CM for indicated time periods. The cells were then harvested and lysed for the detection of MMP-2, snail, slug, twist, and β-actin. Western blot data presented are representative of those obtained in at least 3 separate experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164661.g003

INFs or CAFs induced EMT programming and phenotype in BT20 cells in an in vitro co-culture model

To further determine whether NFs, INFs and CAFs had different capacities to induce the EMT phenotype, we co-cultured NFs, INFs and CAFs directly with BT20 cells, allowing direct cancer cells and fibroblasts interaction. We examined the expression of mesenchymal marker vimentin (red) after co-culture BT20 cells and CMFDA-stained (green) fluorescent fibroblasts by immunofluorescence staining. Direct co-culture of BT20 cells with INFs or CAFs showed higher percentage of vimentin-positive cells than did those co-cultured with NFs (Fig 4A). The results indicated that INFs or CAFs induced EMT programming and phenotype in co-cultured BT20 cells.

thumbnail
Fig 4. INFs and CAFs induced EMT programming and phenotype in an in vitro co-culture model.

(A) The CAFs, NFs, and INFs were directly co-cultured with BT20 cells. The adherent CAFs, NFs, and INFs or BT20 cells were stained by 5 μM CMFDA. CMFDA-stained fibroblasts (green) were distinguished from unstained cancer cells. Immunofluorescence staining for vimentin (red) in co-cultures of BT-20 and fibroblasts. (B) BT20 cells grown to approximately 50% confluence were pre-stained with CMFDA and then co-cultured with CAFs, NFs, or INFs. Cells were allowed to grow to 100% confluence and then scratched by a plastic tip and washed by PBS to remove cell debris. The cells were incubated for 12 h to allow cells to grow and close the wound. The cell motility data are plotted as means with S.D.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164661.g004

INFs or CAFs promoted cancer cell migration under co-culture conditions

Cancer cells enhanced ability of migration and invasion through EMT [12]. To examine whether NFs, INFs and CAFs promoted BT20 cells migration, we performed a wound healing assay under direct co-culture of BT20 cells with different types of fibroblasts. After scratching, BT20 cells were allowed to recover and their capacity to migrate and fill the wound area was assessed. Direct co-culture of BT20 cells with INFs or CAFs, phase contrast microscopic observation indicated that the size of the wound area was lower than those co-cultured with NFs (Fig 4B). Moreover, fluorescent photomicrographs showed that CMFDA-stained BT20 cells (green) were observed to migrate into the wound area in the co-cultures of INFs or CAFs (Fig 4B). The results indicated that INFs and CAFs were able to promote BT20 cell migration. Interestingly, INFs possessed the more potent effect on migratory behavior than CAFs.

EMT programming and phenotype were blocked by emodin in BT20 cells cultured with INFs-CM or CAFs-CM

Previous study indicated that emodin inhibits the migration, invasion and metastasis of TNBC cells [24]. To test whether INFs-CM or CAFs-CM-induced EMT programming and phenotype were blocked by emodin. Emodin was added to INFs-CM or CAFs-CM for culturing BT20 cells. Then, the changes in cell morphology were assessed following treatment of BT20 cells with INFs-CM or CAFs-CM with or without emodin for 24 and 48 h. Emodin inhibited INFs-CM or CAFs-CM-induced BT20 cells spindle-like shape and cell scattering (Fig 5A). We next examined the expression of mesenchymal markers (vimentin, β-catenin and MMP-2) and found that increased mesenchymal markers stimulated by INFs-CM were reversed by adding emodin in BT20 cells in a dose and time-dependent manner (Fig 5B). Furthermore, increased mesenchymal markers stimulated by CAFs-CM were reversed by adding emodin in BT20 cells in a dose and time-dependent manner (Fig 5C). These results indicated that emodin inhibited INFs-CM or CAFs-CM-induced EMT programming and phenotype in BT20 cells.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Emodin inhibited INFs and CAFs induced EMT programming and phenotype in BT20 cells.

(A) The changes in cell morphology were assessed following treatment of BT20 cells with INFs-CM or CAFs-CM for indicated time periods with or without 30 μM emodin. Emodin can reverse the EMT properties from fibroblastic shape recover to the cobble-stone shaped. (B) BT20 cells were treated with INFs-CM for indicated time periods with or without 30 μM emodin. (C) BT20 cells were treated with CNFs-CM for indicated time periods with or without 30 μM emodin. The cells were then harvested and lysed for the detection of vimentin, β-catenin, MMP-2, and β-actin. Western blot data presented are representative of those obtained in at least 3 separate experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164661.g005

TGF-β induced EMT programming and phenotype in BT20 cells

CAFs and INFs-secreted TGF-β promote human breast cancer cells proliferation [2527]. We next determined whether CAFs and INFs-secreted TGF-β initiated EMT in TNBC cells. The cell morphology was assessed following treatment of BT20 cells with various concentrations (1–10 ng/mL) of TGF-β for 24 h. After treatment with TGF-β, BT20 cells altered their morphology to assume more of a fibroblast-like appearance and reduced their cell-cell contact (S2 Fig in S1 File). After treatment of BT20 cells with various concentrations (1–10 ng/mL) of TGF-β for 24 h, the expressions of the epithelial phenotype marker (E-cadherin) and mesenchymal phenotype marker (vimentin) were determined. TGF-β decreased E-cadherin expression and increased vimentin expression in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 6A). These results indicated that TGF-β induced EMT programming and phenotype in BT20 cells.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Emodin blocks TGF-β-induced EMT in BT20 cells.

(A) BT20 cells were treated with various concentrations (1–10 ng/mL) of TGF-β for 24 h. The cells were then harvested and lysed for the detection of E-cadherin, vimentin, and β-actin. (B) BT20 cells were pretreated with DMSO (control) or 20 μM emodin for indicated time periods and then stimulated with TGF-β (2 ng/mL) for 24 h. The cells were harvested and lysed for the detection of E-cadherin, vimentin, and β-actin. (C) BT20 cells were pretreated with DMSO (control) or increasing emodin concentrations (5–20 μM) for 2 h and then stimulated with TGF-β (2 ng/mL) for 24 h. The cells were harvested and lysed for the detection of E-cadherin, vimentin, and β-actin. Western blot data presented are representative of those obtained in at least 3 separate experiments. (D) For wound healing assay, confluent BT20 monolayer was pretreated with DMSO (control) or increasing emodin concentrations (5–20 μM) for 2 h, cells were scratched by pipette tips and washed to remove the debris and following by fresh medium containing 0.5% serum with emodin. Cells were then incubated with 2 ng/mL TGF-β for 24 h. TGF-β-induced cell motility was determined by measuring the closure of wound. Data were plotted by mean ± S.D. (n = 3). The closure distance of the control cells was set to 1. Emodin significantly inhibited TGF-β-induced cell motility (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164661.g006

Emodin blocked TGF-β-induced EMT programming and phenotype in BT20 cells

To determine whether emodin affected the TGF-β-induced EMT programming and phenotype, BT20 cells were pretreated with emodin prior to stimulation with TGF-β. Pretreatment with emodin significantly restored the TGF-β-induced downregulation of E-cadherin and upregulation of vimentin in a dose and time-dependent manner (Fig 6B and 6C). We next examined whether emodin blocked TGF-β-induced cell migration. Pretreated confluent BT20 cells with various concentrations of emodin for 2 h, cells were scratched and then incubated with 2 ng/mL of TGF-β for 24 h. BT20 cells were allowed to recover and their capacity to migrate and fill the wound area was determined by measuring the wound closure assessed. Our results indicated that TGF-β significantly induced cell migration, however, the TGF-β-induced cell migration was inhibited by emodin in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 6D).

Discussion

Traditionally, most anticancer drugs are designed to kill tumor cells. However, recent studies have demonstrated that cancers not only contain tumor cells but also have very complex substances with multiple components involved in tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. Fibroblasts are a major component of solid tumors and associated with cancer cells at all stages of cancer progression. In the present study, we demonstrated the differential interactions between fibroblasts from different tumor zones and TNBC cells. Our study found that CAFs and INFs grown with human TNBC BT20 cells dramatically promoted cell migration and induced an EMT process. Under the same experimental conditions, this effect was not detected or was weaker when NFs were grown with BT20 cells. Importantly, INFs were more competent in promoting these changes in BT20 cells than were CAFs. Targeting these cells through suppressing their supportive procarcinogenic paracrine effects is mandatory for improving the current therapies that are mainly targeting TNBC. To this end, we tested the effect of emodin in suppressing the carcinogenic effects of active CAFs and INFs. We have shown that emodin inhibited INFs-CM or CAFs-CM-induced EMT programming and phenotype.

Fibroblasts are a key determinant in the malignant progression of cancer cells through the involvement in progressive genetic instability, angiogenesis [28], EMT [29], deregulation of anti-tumor immune responses [30], and remodeling of the extracellular matrix [31]. Recent reports indicated that CAFs could promote aggressive phenotypes of breast cancer cells. Yu et al demonstrated that CAFs promoted aggressive phenotypes of breast cancer cells through EMT induced by paracrine TGF-β1 [32]. Al-Ansari et al demonstrated that p16(INK4A) downregulation in breast stromal fibroblasts is an important step toward their migration and invasion by inducing EMT [33]. Lebret et al demonstrated a role for CAFs, but not for NFs, in increasing the migratory ability of PMC42-LA cells [34]. In this study, we demonstrated that CAFs enhanced the aggressive behaviors and migration in TNBC cells by inducing or promoting EMT. Collectively, these results suggested that CAFs could promote migration and invasion through induction of EMT in various types of breast cancer cells.

Compared with normal fibroblasts, our and previous data demonstrated that CAFs possess different biological properties and functions. However, the biological and molecular characterization of fibroblasts located in the interface zone remain largely unknown. In this study, we found that INFs were more potential in inducing EMT in TNBC cells than were CAFs. INFs-CM decreased the expression of E-cadherin, and increased the expression of vimentin and β-cadherin higher than that induced by CAFs-CM. Moreover, a number of studies have reported that invasion markers in tumor tissues are most dynamic and active within the interface zone, where active cancer invasion or EMT occurs [21, 3538]. From these results, we concluded that INFs may be the primary fibroblasts involved in the remodeling of cells and tissue during invasion and metastasis of TNBC cells.

Non-toxic natural compounds that can inhibit cancer-stroma crosstalk by normalizing the tumor microenvironment may boost the traditional tumor cell–directed therapy. It has been reported that emodin significantly inhibits cell viability and induces apoptosis in several cancer cell lines [3941]. However, so far there is little evidence on whether emodin may also influence the interaction between tumor cells and normal fibroblasts. In the current work, we clarified the role of emodin in tumor microenvironment. EMT related changes induced by INFs-CM or CAFs-CM in BT20 cells could be discerned at both morphological and molecular levels. Interestingly, emodin would reverse all INFs-CM or CAFs-CM-induced EMT related changes in BT20 cells. Chen T et al., found that emodin ameliorated glucose-induced EMT and subsequent podocyte dysfunction partly through integrin-linked kinase (ILK), which might provide a potential novel therapeutic option for diabetic kidney disease [42]. Our previous study also found that emodin inhibited TWIST1-induced EMT by inhibiting the β-catenin and Akt pathways [43]. Moreover, suppression of CK2α by the CK2α activity inhibitor emodin decreased the expression levels of vimentin and the transcription factors snail1 and smad2/3, and increased the expression of E-cadherin [44]. Taken together, these findings uncover an important role for emodin as a potent inhibitor of EMT.

Several subsequent studies established crucial roles of TGF-β-induced EMT in tumor progression. Recently, the effect of emodin on TGF-β signaling pathway and its functional relevance to proliferation, invasion and metastasis in cancer cells have been identified. Thacker PC et al., found that emodin downregulated the TGF-β activated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in human cervical cancer cells [45]. Herein, in agreement with previous reports, we showed that TGF-β induced EMT in TNBC cells and this process could be effectively blocked by emodin. Emodin blocked TGF-β-induced scattering and spindle-like morphology. Moreover, TGF-β downregulated E-cadherin and upregulated vimentin was significantly inhibited by emodin.

In conclusion, it is suggested that INFs from the interface zone of the TNBC patients’ tissues may have a potential dynamic region that is a key factor leading to TNBC progression and metastasis. Emodin may prevent the activation of fibroblasts and also avert the EMT related changes induced in epithelial tumor cells by INFs-CM. These results lead us to suggest emodin as a potential new treatment agent for TNBC.

Supporting Information

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: TDW.
  2. Formal analysis: YCL.
  3. Methodology: HCH LCL.
  4. Validation: HYW CMH.
  5. Writing – review & editing: CTH.

References

  1. 1. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clinical Cancer Research. 2007; 13(15 Pt 1):4429–34.
  2. 2. Haffty BG, Yang Q, Reiss M, Kearney T, Higgins SA, Weidhaas J, et al. Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006; 24(36):5652–7. pmid:17116942
  3. 3. Petrulio CA, Kim-Schulze S, Kaufman HL. The tumour microenvironment and implications for cancer immunotherapy. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy. 2006; 6(7):671–84. pmid:16805707
  4. 4. Joyce JA, Pollard JW. Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2009; 9(4):239–52. pmid:19279573
  5. 5. Tlsty TD, Coussens LM. Annual Review of Pathology. 2006; 1:119–50.
  6. 6. Franco OE, Hayward SW. Targeting the tumor stroma as a novel therapeutic approach for prostate cancer. Advances in Pharmacology. 2012; 65:267–313. pmid:22959029
  7. 7. Cunha GR, Young P. Role of stroma in oestrogen-induced epithelial proliferation. Epithelial Cell Biology. 1992; 1(1):18–31. pmid:1307934
  8. 8. Chung LW, Li W, Gleave ME, Hsieh JT, Wu HC, Sikes RA, et al. Human prostate cancer model: roles of growth factors and extracellular matrices. Journal of cellular biochemistry. Supplement. 1992; 16H:99–105. pmid:1289680
  9. 9. Hwang RF, Moore T, Arumugam T, Ramachandran V, Amos KD, Rivera A, et al. Cancer-associated stromal fibroblasts promote pancreatic tumor progression. Cancer Research. 2008; 68(3):918–26. pmid:18245495
  10. 10. Johansson AC, Ansell A, Jerhammar F, Lindh MB, Grénman R, Munck-Wikland E, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce matrix metalloproteinase-mediated cetuximab resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Molecular Cancer Research. 2012; 10(9):1158–68. pmid:22809838
  11. 11. Kojima Y, Acar A, Eaton EN, Mellody KT, Scheel C, Ben-Porath I, et al. Autocrine TGF-beta and stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) signaling drives the evolution of tumor-promoting mammary stromal myofibroblasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010; 107(46):20009–14. pmid:21041659
  12. 12. Cardiff RD. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition tumors: Fallacious or snail's pace? Clinical Cancer Research. 2005; 11(24 Pt 1):8534–7.
  13. 13. Thompson EW, Newgreen DF, Tarin D. Carcinoma invasion and metastasis: a role for epithelial-mesenchymal transition? Cancer Research. 2005; 65(14):5991–5; discussion 5995. pmid:16024595
  14. 14. Micalizzi DS, Farabaugh SM, Ford HL. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer: parallels between normal development and tumor progression. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 2010; 15(2):117–34. pmid:20490631
  15. 15. Creighton CJ, Chang JC, Rosen JM. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in tumor-initiating cells and its clinical implications in breast cancer. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 2010; 15(2):253–60. pmid:20354771
  16. 16. Blick T, Hugo H, Widodo E, Waltham M, Pinto C, Mani SA, et al. Epithelial mesenchymal transition traits in human breast cancer cell lines parallel the CD44(hi/)CD24 (lo/-) stem cell phenotype in human breast cancer. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 2010; 15(2):235–52. pmid:20521089
  17. 17. Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell. 2009; 139(5):871–90. pmid:19945376
  18. 18. Yang J, Weinberg RA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis. Developmental Cell. 2008; 14(6):818–29. pmid:18539112
  19. 19. Polyak K, Weinberg RA. Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2009; 9(4):265–73. pmid:19262571
  20. 20. Srinivas G, Babykutty S, Sathiadevan PP, Srinivas P. Molecular mechanism of emodin action: transition from laxative ingredient to an antitumor agent. Medicinal Research Reviews. 2007; 27(5):591–608. pmid:17019678
  21. 21. Gao MQ, Kim BG, Kang S, Choi YP, Park H, Kang KS, et al. Stromal fibroblasts from the interface zone of human breast carcinomas induce an epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like state in breast cancer cells in vitro. Journal of Cell Science. 2010; 123(Pt 20):3507–14. pmid:20841377
  22. 22. Huang CH, Tsai SJ, Wang YJ, Pan MH, Kao JY, Way TD. EGCG inhibits protein synthesis, lipogenesis, and cell cycle progression through activation of AMPK in p53 positive and negative human hepatoma cells. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 2009; 53(9):1156–65.
  23. 23. Yu Y, Xiao CH, Tan LD, Wang QS, Li XQ, Feng YM. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition of breast cancer cells through paracrine TGF-β signalling. British Journal of Cancer. 2014; 110(3):724–32. pmid:24335925
  24. 24. Sun Y, Wang X, Zhou Q, Lu Y, Zhang H, Chen Q, et al. Inhibitory effect of emodin on migration, invasion and metastasis of human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro and in vivo. Oncology Reports. 2015; 33(1):338–46. pmid:25370743
  25. 25. Weber CE, Kothari AN, Wai PY, Li NY, Driver J, Zapf MA, et al. Osteopontin mediates an MZF1-TGF-β1-dependent transformation of mesenchymal stem cells into cancer-associated fibroblasts in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2015; 34(37):4821–33. pmid:25531323
  26. 26. Gao MQ, Kim BG, Kang S, Choi YP, Yoon JH, Cho NH. Human breast cancer-associated fibroblasts enhance cancer cell proliferation through increased TGF-α cleavage by ADAM17. Cancer Letters. 2013; 336(1):240–6. pmid:23684931
  27. 27. Kim BG, An HJ, Kang S, Choi YP, Gao MQ, Park H, et al. Laminin-332-rich tumor microenvironment for tumor invasion in the interface zone of breast cancer. American Journal of Pathology. 2011; 178(1):373–81. pmid:21224074
  28. 28. Orimo A, Gupta PB, Sgroi DC, Arenzana-Seisdedos F, Delaunay T, Naeem R, et al. Stromal fibroblasts present in invasive human breast carcinomas promote tumor growth and angiogenesis through elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 secretion. Cell. 2005; 121(3):335–48. pmid:15882617
  29. 29. Radisky DC, Levy DD, Littlepage LE, Liu H, Nelson CM, Fata JE, et al. Rac1b and reactive oxygen species mediate MMP-3-induced EMT and genomic instability. Nature. 2005; 436(7047):123–7. pmid:16001073
  30. 30. Djouad F, Plence P, Bony C, Tropel P, Apparailly F, Sany J, et al. Immunosuppressive effect of mesenchymal stem cells favors tumor growth in allogeneic animals. Blood. 2003; 102(10):3837–44. pmid:12881305
  31. 31. Bhowmick NA, Neilson EG, Moses HL. Stromal fibroblasts in cancer initiation and progression. Nature. 2004; 432(7015):332–7. pmid:15549095
  32. 32. Yu Y, Xiao CH, Tan LD, Wang QS, Li XQ, Feng YM. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition of breast cancer cells through paracrine TGF-β signalling. British Journal of Cancer. 2014; 110(3):724–32. pmid:24335925
  33. 33. Al-Ansari MM, Hendrayani SF, Shehata AI, Aboussekhra A. p16(INK4A) represses the paracrine tumor-promoting effects of breast stromal fibroblasts. Oncogene. 2013; 32(18):2356–64. pmid:22751126
  34. 34. Lebret SC, Newgreen DF, Thompson EW, Ackland ML. Induction of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in PMC42-LA human breast carcinoma cells by carcinoma-associated fibroblast secreted factors. Breast Cancer Research. 2007; 9(1):R19. pmid:17311675
  35. 35. De Wever O, Pauwels P, De Craene B, Sabbah M, Emami S, Redeuilh G, et al. Molecular and pathological signatures of epithelial-mesenchymal transitions at the cancer invasion front. Histochemistry and Cell Biology. 2008; 130(3):481–94. pmid:18648847
  36. 36. Kang S, Shim HS, Lee JS, Kim DS, Kim HY, Hong SH, et al. Molecular proteomics imaging of tumor interfaces by mass spectrometry. Journal of Proteome Research. 2010; 9(2):1157–64. pmid:19821573
  37. 37. Kim BG, An HJ, Kang S, Choi YP, Gao MQ, Park H, et al. Laminin-332-rich tumor microenvironment for tumor invasion in the interface zone of breast cancer. American Journal of Pathology. 2011; 178(1):373–81. pmid:21224074
  38. 38. Shan LH, Sun WG, Han W, Qi L, Yang C, Chai CC, et al. Roles of fibroblasts from the interface zone in invasion, migration, proliferation and apoptosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2012; 65(10):888–95. pmid:22844068
  39. 39. Wang SC, Zhang L, Hortobagyi GN, Hung MC. Targeting HER2: recent developments and future directions for breast cancer patients. Seminars in Oncology. 2001; 28(6 Suppl 18):21–9.
  40. 40. Su YT, Chang HL, Shyue SK, Hsu SL. Emodin induces apoptosis in human lung adenocarcinoma cells through a reactive oxygen species-dependent mitochondrial signaling pathway. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2005; 70(2):229–41. pmid:15941563
  41. 41. Chen YC, Shen SC, Lee WR, Hsu FL, Lin HY, Ko CH, et al. Emodin induces apoptosis in human promyeloleukemic HL-60 cells accompanied by activation of caspase 3 cascade but independent of reactive oxygen species production. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2002; 64(12):1713–24. pmid:12445860
  42. 42. Chen T, Zheng LY, Xiao W, Gui D, Wang X, Wang N. Emodin ameliorates high glucose induced-podocyte epithelial-mesenchymal transition in-vitro and in-vivo. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 2015;35(4):1425–36. pmid:25791065
  43. 43. Way TD, Huang JT, Chou CH, Huang CH, Yang MH, Ho CT. Emodin represses TWIST1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells by inhibiting the β-catenin and Akt pathways. European Journal of Cancer. 2014; 50(2):366–78. pmid:24157255
  44. 44. Zou J, Luo H, Zeng Q, Dong Z, Wu D, Liu L. Protein kinase CK2α is overexpressed in colorectal cancer and modulates cell proliferation and invasion via regulating EMT-related genes. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2011; 9:97. pmid:21702981
  45. 45. Thacker PC, Karunagaran D. Curcumin and emodin down-regulate TGF-β signaling pathway in human cervical cancer cells. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0120045. pmid:25786122