Figures
Abstract
The autoimmune disease antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), along with anti-β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) antibodies and lupus anticoagulant (LA). In this study, we developed a time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (TRFIA) system for simultaneous quantification of aCL IgG and IgM. A 96-well microtiter plate precoated with the complex of cardiolipin from bovine heart and bovine β2GPI was incubated with the anticardiolipin IgG and IgM standard substance or serum, and the conjugate of Eu3+-labeled anti-human IgG and Sm3+-labeled anti-human IgM was pipetted to the wells to form a tipical double-antibody-sandwich immunoreactions; finally the fluorescent intensity of Eu3+ and Sm3+ was detected to reflect the quantity of anticardiolipin IgG and IgM. This assay showed a good relationship between fluorescence intensities and the concentration of anticardiolipin antibody(aCL) IgG and IgM, with a low-end sensitivity of 0.1 U/ml for IgG and 0.1 U/ml for IgM, respectively. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) of the calibrators was 3.0% and 4.51% for IgG, and 2.76% and 4.45% for IgM. The average recovery was 100.38% for aCL IgG and 100.45% for aCL IgM. For serum samples, the results of our method showed a good correlation with those obtained with ELISA kit. Simultaneous detection of aCL-IgG and aCL-IgM in the same reaction well can optimize assay performance by avoiding potential influence of different reaction conditions-timing, and well-to-well difference in concentration and characteristics of cardiolipin antigen. The results of a combo aCL-IgG and aCL-IgM assay for the same sample are more consistent and more reliable. This dual-label time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay is sensitive for detecting aCL IgG and IgM across a wide concentration range with stable reagents and may assist in the clinical diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.
Citation: Hu Z, Jing X, Liu J, Li M, Ye Y, Chen Y (2016) Simultaneous Quantification of Anticardiolipin IgG and IgM by Time Resolved Fluoroimmunoassay. PLoS ONE 11(9): e0163682. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163682
Editor: Sabato D'Auria, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, ITALY
Received: June 12, 2016; Accepted: September 11, 2016; Published: September 23, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This work was supported by the Directive Planning Project of Wuxi Science and Technology Bureau (CSE01010, CSE31N1302).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) are autoimmune antibodies that target the negatively charged cardiolipin on the platelet and the cytomembrane of the endotheliocyte. They are the main antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), along with anti-β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) antibodies and lupus anticoagulant (LA), that characterize the autoimmune disease antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In 1983, Harris et al. developed the first aCL test [1]. In the same year, Graham Hughes and his team published their first report that showed an association of aCL with venous thrombosis, recurrent pregnancy loss, thrombocytopenia, and pulmonary hypertension, which are associated with APS [2,3]. Today, APS still remains a diagnostic challenge for clinicians, largely due to issues related to laboratory testing as well as the expanding range of reported clinical manifestations of APS. The revised 2006 laboratory criteria for APS [4] includes the presence of serum lupus anticoagulant, the presence of a medium or high titer of aCL IgG and/or IgM isotype, and the presence of anti-β2GPI IgG and/or IgM. Of the ‘criteria’ immunoassays for APS, aCL is the most sensitive while anti-β2GPI antibodies are considered highly specific with low sensitivity for APS [5]. Thus, in the initial diagnostic work-up of APS patients, a combination of an aCL ELISA and LA test can identify the majority of the patients [6–8]. However, employing active macromolecular enzyme as maker, the aCL ELISA itself has methodological and diagnostic limitations, particularly, its limited sensitivity, restricted linear range and poor measurement accuracy, which may make it fail to pick up the underlying patients and contribute to the explanation of ‘‘seronegative APS”(a case that patients do have clinical signs suggestive of APS but persistently test negative for antiphospholipid antibodies) [9].
TRFIA is a novel non-isotopic labeling technology developed in 1980s [10–12]. Having the fluorescent lanthanides (usually, Eu3+, Sm3+, Dy3+ and Tb3+) as tracers, TRFIA distinguishes itself by its wide detection range, high sensitivity (10−18 mol/ L), and less susceptibility to matrix interference, and has been well accepted as an ideal quantitative detection method for many analyses of clinical and biological importance. Moreover, the features that the detection windows and testing wavelengths of the four lanthanides were clearly distinguishable from each other makes it possible to be exploited in TRFIA to analyze even four analyses at a time. Of all the 15 lanthanides, Eu3+ is the most commonly used label in time-resolved fluorometry-based analysis because of its higher fluorescence yield and lower background than other lanthanide complexes. Sm3+ has been suggested as counterpart to Eu3+ in a dual-label system because it has equal excitation wavelengths (340nm) to Eu3+ as well as that it can be measured in the enhancement solution (β-NTA contained) optimized for Eu3+ detection [11]. Eu3+ and Tb3+ are another suggested pair in dual-label systems, but the enhancement solution optimized for Eu3+ detection cannot be used for Tb3+ since the later requires fluorinated aliphatic β-diketone for simultaneous detection [13], albeit that they form the most efficient fluorescent chelates [14]. With respect to the different isotypes of aCL, aCL-IgG and aCL-IgM are generally considered to be more strongly associated with the clinical manifestation of APS than aCL-IgA [15–17] and the detection of aCL-IgM antibodies theoretically reflects an early stage of the disease opposed to aCL-IgG which reflects a sustained class-switched immune response. To develop an assay system in which two or more analutes in one sample could be quantified simultaneously has the advantages of procedure simplification, increased throughput and reduced cost per test. However, none of the conventional methods, enzyme immunoassay (EIA) included, could completely meet the actual clinical demands. Considering the above, we developed an aCL IgG/IgM dual-label TRFIA for simultaneous detection of aCL IgG and IgM using the pair of lanthanides Eu3+ and Sm3+ as tracers in this study. Assay characteristics were determined and correlation and comparison to ELISA were performed. Clinical specificity was investigated with 510 samples from patients with other autoimmune manifistations. First, aCL antigen-the complex of cardiolipin from bovin heart and bovine β2GPI was precoated on the microtiter plate; second, the standard substance or serum was added into the wells of plate to incubate with aCL antigen; then, we pipetted conjugate of Eu3+-labeled anti-human IgG and Sm3+-labeled anti-human IgM to the wells to form a tipical double-antibody-sandwich immunoreactions; last, we added enhancement solution to each well and detected the fluorescent intensity using auto DELFIA 1235 TRFIA analyzer. Simultaneously detection for aCL-IgG and aCL-IgM in the same reaction well can avoid the influence brought out by different reaction conditions, different reaction duration and different concentration and characteristics of cardiolipin antigen in ELISA kit. So, the detection results of aCL-IgG and aCL-IgM for the same sample are more consistent and more reliable.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and Reagents
Solid-phase antigen (the complex of cardiolipin from bovine heart plus bovine β2GPI), diethylenetriamine tetraacetic acid (DTTA), monoclonal rabbit anti-human IgM and IgG were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Cardiolipin solution used in this study was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA), which originated from bovin heart. 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates were obtained from Nunc International (Roskilde, Denmark). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) were supplied by the Institute of Biological Products Department of Health (Shanghai, China). Eu3+- and Sm3+- labeling kits were purchased from PE company (EG&G-Wallac, Finland). PD-10 column and Sepharose CL-6B column (1×40cm) were from the Pharmacia Company (NJ, USA). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for aCL-IgG and aCL-IgM detection were purchased from Orgentec Diagnostika Gmbh (Naina, Germany). Auto DELFIA1235 TRFIA analyzer was supplied by Perkin-Elmer Life and Analytical Science/Wallac Oy (Turku, Finland). All additional chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.
Labeling buffer contained 50 mmol/L Na2CO3-NaHCO3 (pH 8.5) and 0.155 mol/L NaCl. Elution buffer included 50 mmol/L Tris-HC1 (pH 7.8), 0.9% NaC1, and 0.05% NaN3. Assay buffer consisted of 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 0.9% NaC1, 0.2% BSA, 0.05% NaN3, 20 μmol/L DTPA, and 0.1% Tween-20. Washing solution was a Tris-HCl buffered saline solution (pH 7.8) which contained 0.9% NaCl, 0.2% Tween-20, and 0.05% NaN3. Enhancement solution was a 0.1 mol/L acetate-phthalate buffer (pH 3.2) that comprised of 0.1% triton X-100, 15 μmol /L β-naphthoyltriflu oroacetone (β-NTA), and 50 μmol/L tri-n-octylphosphine oxide.
Solid-phase plate preparation
The complex of cardiolipin from bovine heart and bovine β2GPI was diluted to be coating buffer with 50 mmol/L Na2CO3-NaHCO3 buffer (pH 9.6), and 200μl coating buffer was added to each well of 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate and incubated overnight at 4°C. The coating buffer was discarded and each well was blocked with 200μl of 3g/L BSA for 2 hours on a miniorbital shaker. The blocking buffer was discarded and plates were dried under vacuum, stored at -20°C in a sealed plastic bag with desiccant until use.
Labeling of anti-human IgM antibodies with Sm3+chelates and anti-human IgG antibodies with Eu3+chelates
Sm3+-labeling of monoclonal rabbit anti-human IgM was performed using a Sm3+-labeling kit strictly according to the manufacture’s instructions. Referring to the manual and previous report [18–19], the amount of each reagent and the reaction situations were followed in order to obtain the best binding efficiency of the labeled antibodies. Anti-human IgM (1ml of 8.1mg/ml) was loaded on a PD-10 column and eluted using sodium carbonate buffer (pH 8.5 50 mmol/L Na2CO3-NaHCO3) containing 0.155mol/L NaCl. Then the protein peak fractions were collected and concentrated to 2g/L. 500μl of the obtained purified second antibody was mixed with 0.2mg lyophilized Sm3+-DTTA, and stirred vigorously for 20 h at 25°C. The resulting mixture was then fractionated on a Sepharose CL-6B column (1×40cm) (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and eluted with 80 mmol/L Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.8). The absorbance values of the eluate were measured at 280 nm to obtain protein peak concentrations. After purification, added equal amount of AR glycerin before aliquoted and stored at -20°C until use.
Monoclonal rabbit anti-human IgG was labeled with Eu3+chelates using a Eu3+-labeling kit and the procedure was the same as the above-mentioned IgM labeling procedure.
Clinical Serum Samples
52 serum specimens from patients with APS were collected for the correlation study. 50 serum samples from healthy volunteers referred to our hospital and 510 serum samples from patients with other auto-immune disease (scleroderma, nephrotic syndrome, ankylosing spondylitis, cerebral infarction, lupus nephritis, Sjogren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis) were collected to test for clinical specificity. All serum specimens were separated at 2360g for 20min at room temperature after collection and stored at -70°C for further analysis. This specimen collection was approved by the Affiliated Wuxi People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. All participants provided written informed consent to participate in this study.
Assay principle and procedure of TRFIA for aCL-IgG and aCL-IgM
A two-site antibody-sandwich immune reaction was adopted to detect aCL IgM and IgG simultaneously in human serum with the dual-label TRFIA with the following steps. Specific antibodies (aCL IgM and IgG) in the patient sample bind to the antigen coated on the surface of the reaction wells. After incubation with shaking for 30 min at 25°C, a washing step removes unbound and non-specifically bound serum or plasma components. Eu3+-labeled anti-human IgG and Sm3+-labeled anti-human IgM conjugates are added into each well of the plate, incubated with shaking for 30min at 25°C. After incubation, a second washing step removes unbound conjugate. Next an enhancement solution is pipetted to each well and shaken for 5 min before reading the fluorescent intensity. Calibration curves were plotted and concentrations of aCL IgG and IgM in samples were determined using Multicalc software program. All procedures were automatically performed by auto DELFIA 1235 TRFIA analyzer with the process designed by our laboratory (Fig 1).
First, pipette 100μl/well pretreated standard substance or serum to microtiter plate that precoated with aCL antigen, and incubated the plate with shaking for 30 min at 25°C. A washing step removes unbound and unspecifically bound serum or plasma components. Second, added 100μl conjugate of buffer diluted Eu3+-labeled anti-human IgG and buffer diluted Sm3+-labeled anti-human IgM into each well, and incubated with shaking for 30min at 25°C. A second washing step removes unbound conjugate. Then, 200μl enhancement solution was pipette to each well and shaken for 5 min. Last, read the fluorescent intensity.
Assay principle and procedure of ELISA for aCL-IgG and aCL-IgM
These ELISAs are indirect enzyme linked immune assay. Specific antibodies (aCL IgM or IgG) in the patient sample bind to the antigen (purified cardiolipin and beta-2-glycoprotien I) coated on the surface of the reaction wells. After incubation, a washing step removes unbound and non-specifically bound serum or plasma components. Next, the enzyme conjugate (HRP-labeled anti-human IgG or HRP-labeled anti-human IgM) is added and binds to the immobilized antibody-antigen-complexes. After incubation, a second washing step removes unbound enzyme conjugate. Then the substrate solution is added and the bound enzyme conjugate hydrolyses the substrate forming a blue coloured product. Addition of an acid stops the reaction generating a yellow end-product. The intensity of the yellow color correlates with the concentration of the antibody-antigen-complex and can be measured photometrically at 450 nm.
Evaluation of the kits
Precision and linear range testing.
Controls were made from three pools of mixed serum specimens with high, intermediate and low concentrations of aCL IgG and IgM were aliquoted and stored at -20°C. Intra- assay precision was determined with 25 reps in one assay testing all three controls; inter-assay precision was determined by running each conrol in duplicate for ten runs. The linear range of the assay was determined by testing serial dilutions of samples from patients with the highest aCL IgG and IgM concentration.
Sensitivity testing.
The sensitivity of the assay was calculated from the mean fluorescent counts (n = 20) of the zero standard plus 2SD in the calibration curve.
Clinical applications.
Plasma from 50 healthy volunteers was collected to verify the clinical specificity. Considering that the diagnosis of APS is complicated by the lack of a golden standard, results detected by the kits were correlated with the clinical criteria for APS.
Coefficient of recovery.
Serial 2-fold dilution of three specimens with known concentrations were detected by the established dual-label TRFIA and the observed values were divided by the expected ones to calculated the coefficient of recovery.
Correlation test.
Detected the aCL IgG and IgM concentrations of 52 serum specimens from patients with APS using the established dual-label TRFIA kit and the results were compared with those obtained with single-label ones as well as an ELISA kit.
Stability testing.
Stability of the aCL IgG/IgM dual-label TRFIA kit and the commercial ELISA kit was determined by incubating the kit at 37°C for 7 days and then testing 20 aCL IgM and IgG positive sera respectively using the treated kits and kits that had been stored under normal storage conditions. Calculated the mean counts of fluorescent intensity and optical densities (ODs) respectively and then compared with values obtained with the one stored in routine conditions.
Results and Discussions
Characterization of labeled antibodies
Eu3+-anti-human IgG antibody was purified by Sepharose CL-6B column and the first eluent peak was collected. According to the Eu3+ standard in the labeling kit as a reference, the first peak contained 77.4 μmol/L of Eu3+ and 9.5 μmol/L of protein, so each anti-human IgG may couple 8.1 Eu3+ ions on average. The labeling rate of Sm3+-anti-human IgM antibody was calculated in the same way. On average there may 7.9 Sm3+ ions per each anti-human IgM antibody according to its first peak obtained 77.4μmol/L of Sm3+ and 10.3 μmol/L of antibody.
Calibration curve for quantification of aCL IgG and IgM
As showed in Fig 2, the time-resolved fluorescence intensities are directly proportional to the concentrations of aCL IgG and IgM. The line equation was Y = 3.30023+0.96853X+0.00398X2 for that of aCL IgG and Y = 2.2889+0.71707X+0.0323X2 for the calibration curve of aCL IgM, where X is the concentration of aCL IgG (U/ml) or aCL IgM (U/ml), and Y is fluorescence intensity.
Assay Precision and detection limits
The precision of the assay was also analyzed by measuring three pools of mixed serum specimens with high, intermediate and low concentration of aCL IgM and IgG 25 times in one series (intra-assay) and in duplicate in ten different series. As shown in Table 1, the intra-assay CV ranged from 1.31% to 4.14% for aCL IgM and from 1.2% to 4.61% for aCL IgG. The inter-assay CV ranged from 2.29% to 6.97% for aCL IgM and from 2.26% to 7.34% for aCL IgG. The sensitivity of the assay, defined as the mean signal of the zero standard plus 2SD, was 0.1 U/ml for aCL IgM and 0.1 U/ml for aCL IgG.
It was analyzed by measuring three pools of mixed serum specimens with high, intermediate and low concentration of aCL IgM and IgG 25 times in one series (intra-assay) and in duplicate in ten different series.
Coefficient of recovery
Recovery with the dual-label TRFIA was determined using dilutions of three specimens with known concentrations of aCL IgG and IgM. The observed values were divided by the expected values to calculate the coefficient of recovery. As shown in Table 2, the average recovery rate of dual-label assay for aCL IgG was 100.38%. As shown in Table 3, the average recovery rate of dual-label assay for aCL IgM was 100.45%.
Correlation with ELISA
Concentration results of 52 serum samples determined by dual-label assay were compared with those obtained with ELISA kit. The scatterplots illustrated that the dual-label assay correlated well with ELISA (Fig 3a and 3b), and the correlation ratio between dual-label and ELISA was 0.924 for aCL IgG and 0.927 for aCL IgM.
Comparison of linear range between ELISA and dual-label TRFIA
Diluted a specimen with strong-positive aCL IgG from 4792.32 U/ml to 0.585 U/ml, and detected the serial dilutions with the established dual-label TRFIA as well as ELISA. The curve of detectable range of the two methods was showed in Fig 4a, from which we observed that for the established TRFIA kit there was a good liner range within 0.585 U/ml to 4792.32 U/ml for aCL IgG, whereas it was within 4.68 U/ml to 149.8 U/ml when using the commercial ELISA one. Then we diluted a specimen with strong-positive aCL IgM from 4956.1 U/ml to 0.605 U/ml and detected the serial dilutions. As showed in Fig 4b, we observed that the good liner range was lay within 4.84–154.88 U/ml when using a commercial ELISA kit, however, for the dual-label TRFIA one, it was lay within 0.605–4956.1 U/ml.
Clinical application
The established aCL IgG/IgM dual-label TRFIA immunoassay was then applied to analyze the aCL IgG and IgM levels of serum specimens from 50 healthy volunteers and only one case of false-positive was produced, that is, the specificity of the assay was 98%. 510 serum specimens from patients with scleroderma, nephrotic syndrome, ankylosing spondylitis, cerebral infarction, lupus nephritis, Sjogren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis were also collected and tested. Table 4 lists the positive rates of aCL IgG and aCL IgM.
Stability of the TRFIA kits
The stability of the dual-label TRFIA kit and the commercial ELISA kits was investigated. After 7 days at 37°C, the stressed kit performance was compared to kits stored under normal conditions. There was a 15.8% decrease in the signal for aCL IgG and 14.7% decrease for aCL IgM. The ELISA kits demonstrated a greater decrease, 33.9% for aCL IgG and 37.6% for aCL IgM. In addition, we observed that the counts of fluorescent intensity obtained by the dual-label TRFIA kit was very stable even after overnight storage. The ODs obtained with the commercial ELISA one decreased quickly over time.
Additionally, because of its independence of the disintegration of the labeling compound, the stability of the aCL IgG/IgM dual-label TRFIA kits were substantially better than the ELISA ones.
The strength and weakness of the dual-label TRFIA
As shown in Table 5, we have made a summarize of strength and weakness of the dual-label TRFIA method used for the anticardiolipin IgG and IgM detection.
Conclusion
A new dual assay for anti-cardiolipin IgG and IgM has been developed utilizing a time resolved fluoroimmunoassay. The dual assay has good precision, a low analytical sensitivity, a good dilution recovery, a wide detection range and good correlation to an established method. Clinical specificity is 98% when evaluated against normal and greater than 90% when evaluated with samples from other disease states. The reagents are stable to heat stress and the fluorescence is stable over time. Compared to the commercial ELISA kits, the new assay had a larger assay range enabling better detection of low concentration samples as well as quantitation of high samples without further dilution and assay. Simultaneous detection of both aCL IgG and aCL IgM, as compared to two separate ELISAs, eliminates the possibility of differing reaction times and conditions, and possible sample instability. Time and labor are saved with running only one assay and not two. This new, dual TRFIA for anti-cardiolipin IgG and IgM has demonstrated good analytical and clinical performance and will enable the laboratory to provide analysis of these analytes in a routine manner.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Directive Planning Project of Wuxi Science and Technology Bureau (CSE01010, CSE31N1302), China.
Author Contributions
- Conceptualization: ZH XJ YC.
- Data curation: ZH XJ YY JL ML YC.
- Formal analysis: ZH XJ YY JL ML YC.
- Funding acquisition: ZH XJ YC.
- Investigation: ZH XJ YC.
- Methodology: ZH XJ YC.
- Project administration: ZH XJ YC.
- Resources: ZH XJ YY JL ML YC.
- Software: ZH XJ.
- Supervision: ZH XJ YC.
- Validation: ZH XJ YY JL ML YC.
- Visualization: ZH XJ YC.
- Writing – original draft: ZH XJ.
- Writing – review & editing: ZH XJ YC.
References
- 1. Harris EN, Gharavi AE, Boey ML, Patel BM, Mackworth-Young CG, Loizou S, et al. Anticardiolipin antibodies: detection by radioimmunoassay and association with thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet 1983;2(8361):1211–4. pmid:6139567
- 2. Sommer S, Goodfield MJ. Connective tissue disease and the skin. Clin Med 2002;2(1):9–6.
- 3. Harris EN. Syndrome of the black swan. Br J Rheumatol 1987;26(5):324–6. pmid:3664156
- 4. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost 2006;4(2):295–12. pmid:16420554
- 5. Suh-Lailam BB, Cromar A, Davis KW, Tebo AE. APhL antibody ELISA as an alternative to anticardiolipin test for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2012;5(3):210–5. pmid:22558475
- 6. Gorki H, Malinovski V, Stanbridge RD. The antiphospholipid syndrome and heart valve surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33(2):168–81. pmid:18082413
- 7. Pierangeli SS, Harris EN. Clinical laboratory testing for the antiphospholipid syndrome. Clin Chim Acta 2005;357(1):17–33. pmid:15893301
- 8. McNally T, Purdy G, Mackie IJ, Machin SJ, Isenberg DA. The use of an anti-beta 2-glycoprotein-I assay for discrimination between anticardiolipin antibodies associated with infection and increased risk of thrombosis. Br J Haematol 1995;91(2):471–3. pmid:8547096
- 9. Cervera R, Conti F, Doria A, Iaccarino L, Valesini G. Does seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome really exist? Autoimmun Rev 2012;11(8):581–4. pmid:22036830
- 10. Dechaud H, Bador R, Claustrat F, Desuzinges C. Laser-excited immunofluorometric assay of prolactin, with use of antibodies coupled to lanthanide-labeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. Clin Chem 1986;32(7):1323–7. pmid:3521942
- 11. Bador R, Dechaud H, Claustrat F, Desuzinges C. Europium and samarium as labels in time-resolved immunofluorometric assay of follitropin. Clin Chem 1987;33(1):48–4. pmid:3100098
- 12. Dechaud H, Bador R, Claustrat F, Desuzinges C, Mallein R. New approach to competitive lanthanide immunoassay: time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay of progesterone with labeled analyte. Clin Chem 1988;34(3):501–4. pmid:3349600
- 13. Hemmila I. Fluoroimmunoassays and immunofluorometric assays. Clin Chem 1985;31(3):359–70. pmid:3882272
- 14. Haddad PR. The application of ternary complexes to spectrofluorometric analysis. Talanta 1977;24(1):1–13. pmid:18962014
- 15. Tincani A, Andreoli L, Casu C, Cattaneo R, Meroni P. Antiphospholipid antibody profile: implications for the evaluation and management of patients. Lupus 2010;19(4):432–5. pmid:20353983
- 16. Galli M, Barbui T. Antiphospholipid syndrome: clinical and diagnostic utility of laboratory tests. Semin Thromb Hemost 2005;31(1):17–8. pmid:15706471
- 17. Selva-O'Callaghan A, Ordi-Ros J, Monegal-Ferran F, Martinez N, Cortes-Hernandez F, Vilardell-Tarres M. IgA anticardiolipin antibodies—relation with other antiphospholipid antibodies and clinical significance. Thromb Haemost 1998;79(2):282–5. pmid:9493576
- 18. Mukkala V-M., Mikola H., Hemmila I.. The synthesis and use of activated N-benzyl derivatives of diethylenetriaminetetraacetic acids: Alternatives with metal ions. Analytical Biochemistry 1989;176(2):319–7. pmid:2500868
- 19. Vira Shaleen et al. Fluorescent-labeled antibodies: Balancing functionality and degree of labeling. Analytical Biochemistry 2010;402:146–5. pmid:20362543