Figures
Abstract
Diagnosis of KSHV-infected individuals remains a challenge. KSHV prevalence is high in several populations with high prevalence of HIV, leading to increased risk of development of Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS). While current assays are reliable for detecting antibodies to KSHV, none are routinely utilized to identify individuals with KSHV infection and thus at increased risk for KS due to assay complexity, lack of access to testing, and cost, particularly in resource-limited settings. Here we describe the addition of KSHV proteins LANA and K8.1 to a previously evaluated HIV/co-infection multiplexed fluorescence immunoassay system. This study demonstrates assay performance by measuring antibody reactivity for KSHV and HIV-1 in a collection of clinical specimens from patients with biopsy-proven KS and sourced negative controls. The KSHV assay correctly identified 155 of 164 plasma samples from patients with biopsy-proven KS and 85 of 93 KSHV antibody (Ab)-negative samples for a sensitivity of 95.1% and specificity of 91.4%. Assay performance for HIV-1 detection was also assessed with 100% agreement with independently verified HIV-1 Ab-positive and Ab-negative samples. These results demonstrate good sensitivity and specificity for detection of antibody to KSHV antigens, and demonstrate the potential for multiplexed co-infection testing in resource-limited settings to identify those at increased risk for HIV-1-related complications.
Citation: Logan C, Todorof K, Fiorillo SP, Campbell TB, Elder JH, Borok M, et al. (2016) Rapid Multiplexed Immunoassay for Detection of Antibodies to Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus. PLoS ONE 11(9): e0163616. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163616
Editor: Ke Lan, Institut Pasteur of Shanghai Chinese Academy of Sciences, CHINA
Received: February 2, 2016; Accepted: September 12, 2016; Published: September 26, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Logan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award number R44AI068543, provided directly to MBio Diagnostics, Inc. The funders provided support in the form of salaries for authors KT and MJL, but did not have any additional role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Competing interests: This manuscript is a result of the collaboration between authors from the University of California, San Diego, the University of Colorado, and the commercial organization MBio Diagnostics, Inc. Funding was provided by the NIH directly to MBio Diagnostics under a Small Business Innovative Research grant for development of diagnostic technologies. Two authors of the manuscript are current employees of MBio Diagnostics, Inc. The authors’ affiliation does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Introduction
Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), also referred to as human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8), is a γ-herpesvirus related to the Epstein-Barr virus[1–3], and is the etiologic agent associated with Kaposi’s Sarcoma (KS), Multicentric Castlemans’s Disease (MCD), and Primary Effusion Lymphoma (PEL)[1–7]. KS is a common malignancy among human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected persons, however it can also occur in non-HIV infected individuals. Other epidemiologic forms include the classical, endemic, and post-transplant forms of disease [8–10]. With effective antiretroviral therapy, the incidence of HIV-related KS has dramatically decreased in developed countries; however incidence remains high in areas where both HIV-1 and KSHV infections are prevalent[8].
The development of reliable, accurate, and inexpensive diagnostic and screening tests for KSHV is critical to assess its prevalence in populations, to screen organ and blood donors, and potentially to determine individual risk of developing KS or other malignancies. The genome of KSHV is 165-kb and encodes for 90 gene products, many of which allow evasion of the host immune system and facilitate persistent infection[9, 11]. Infection with KSHV can be identified by the presence of antibodies to the virus or of nucleic acids in blood or tissue. PCR-based approaches for diagnosis and screening are limited by variable clinical sensitivity[12–21], as well as by complexity and cost. Several studies have shown associations between the level of KSHV DNA and the likelihood of KS disease and the stage of KS disease, thus suggesting it could be used as a prognostic tool. However, many studies show a failure to detect KSHV DNA in patients with known seroreactivity and even with active KS disease. Thus, PCR is less suited for use as a screening tool for KSHV infection, particularly in asymptomatic individuals. Antibody detection via immunofluorescence assays, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), and western blotting are available, but these serologic tests are rarely used clinically to identify those who have sub-clinical infection and are thus at risk for development of KS, at least partially due to cost and complexity. An advantage of the antibody detection (serology) assays is that they can potentially be configured in simpler formats than the PCR assays. Serologic tests using recombinant KSHV antigens and multi-antigen algorithms have shown promise[22–26]. Some of the major antigenic proteins identified include the latently expressed v-cyclin and latency associated nuclear antigen (LANA), also known as ORF73, as well as K8.1 and ORF65, which are expressed in the lytic cycle. Recently, excellent sensitivity and specificity were demonstrated using these four antigens in combination, indicating this mixture would be useful in serological screening for KSHV in individuals with or at risk for KS[9, 27].
MBio Diagnostics has developed a rapid diagnostic system for simultaneous and cost-effective testing for HIV and co-infections. This system consists of a simple reader instrument and planar waveguide imaging technology to deliver a panel of serologic immunoassay results using a single drop of blood, serum, or plasma[28]. The MBio system can deliver a serological profile in less than 30 minutes, and therefore could provide the panel of results at the time of HIV screening. After HIV diagnosis, guidelines suggest testing for common co-infections such as hepatitis B and C and syphilis[29]. In settings with KSHV, it would also be beneficial to identify KSHV serostatus at the time of HIV diagnosis to more effectively target antiretroviral therapy and employ other interventions to improve surveillance for KS to aid earlier detection and treatment. The MBio multiplexed serology system can deliver multiple serology results at the time of HIV confirmation, without the overhead costs, complicated laboratory procedures, or complex sample management.
In this study, a simple-to-use, prototype HIV / KSHV antibody detection system is demonstrated on a collection of clinical plasma and serum specimens. Results demonstrate the potential for multiplexed co-infection panel testing in a format with applicability in resource-limited settings.
Methods
Clinical samples
A total of 164 human plasma samples were previously obtained from participants enrolled in studies of KS conducted at the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences. Samples were provided under an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved protocol at the University of California, San Diego. All samples were obtained from patients with confirmed HIV infection and biopsy-proven KS. A total of 93 human serum controls were sourced through Valley Biomedical (Winchester, VA). Sourced specimens were previously tested by the vendor using FDA-approved methods and found negative for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C, HIV, and syphilis. These samples are expected to be at low risk for KSHV infection, though KSHV serological status was not performed by the vendor.
KSHV ELISA
Anti-KSHV antibodies were determined on all samples using a commercially available, purified whole-virus ELISA kit produced by Advanced Biotechnologies, Inc. Sample testing was performed per the general procedure outlined in the package insert. Once the reaction was complete, plates were read by measuring optical density (OD) at the recommended wavelength of 450nm, using a DTC-880 Multimode Plate Reader manufactured by Beckman Coulter. Cutoff values were obtained by averaging the three negative control well readings from the raw data output and multiplying the result by 3.0 per package insert instructions. A result is considered positive (reactive) if the OD/cutoff ratio is ≥1, negative (non-reactive) if OD/cutoff ratio is ≤0.75, and equivocal (borderline) when the OD/cutoff ratio is 0.76–0.99 (per package insert).
Protein expression and purification
Selection of LANA and K8.1 proteins or fragments thereof was based on published observations for the primary reactivities to these proteins by patient sera[9, 19, 22, 23, 25–27, 30–41]. Amino acid residues corresponding to positions 843–1129 of LANA were chosen for expression, based on predicted likelihood for presence of reactive antibody epitopes. K8.1 clones encompassed the entire protein-coding region for each protein (amino acid sequences shown below). The sequences shown in the GenBank repository for K8.1 (accession No. YP_001129404) and LANA (Accession No. YP_001129431) were used to derive the corresponding DNA regions encoding the protein or protein segment to be employed for protein expression constructs. The DNA sequences were then provided to DNA2.0, Inc. (Newark, CA) for gene synthesis, with codons optimized for expression in Escherichia coli (DNA 2.0) with the restriction sites XhoI and BamHI engineered on the 5’ and 3’ ends respectively, to facilitate excision from pJ201 (DNA 2.0’s cloning vector) and ligation into pET28 for expression. Insertion into pET28 at the XhoI site results in addition of a 6-histidine tag at the N-terminus to allow later purification of the expressed protein by nickel chromatography. In addition, the vector encodes a thrombin site for removal of the His tag, if desired, as well as a T7-derived epitope tag for detection of the recombinant protein. DNA was prepared in the NEB10B cells and protein was expressed in Rosetta2 cells. Note that the leader sequence for the K8.1 protein was maintained in the construct to allow for modification of the construct for eukaryotic cell expression if desired. These amino acid sequences are highly specific for bacteriophage T7 and HHV8, respectively. Potential cross-reactivity with antibodies in some HHV8-negative individuals is controlled by use of non-related recombinant proteins expressed in the same vector and purified in the same manner.
Bacteria transformed with each expression construct were grown at 37C and induced for expression by the addition of 5 mM IPTG when the cultures reached approximately 1 OD550. Expression was allowed to continue for 4 hours, at which time the bacteria were pelleted, then re-suspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8 and frozen at -80C.
Cells were typically thawed the next day for protein purification and the solution was made 10% with NP40, then homogenized using a Waring® blender for 30 seconds. The homogenate was then centrifuged at 8,000 x g for 1 hr. Supernatants were then decanted, filtered and subjected to nickel chromatography using chelating sepharose (GE Healthcare) saturated with NiS04.
Sequences employed for each construct:
LANA:
MGSSHHHHHHSSGLVPRGSHMASMTGGQQMGRGSMEVEEQEEQELEEVEEQEEQELEEVEEQEQQGVEQQEQETVEEPIILHGSSSEDEMEVDYPVVSTHEQIASSPPGDNTPDDDPQPGPSREYRYVLRTSPPHRPGVRMRRVPVTHPKKPHPRYQQPPVPYRQIDDCPAKARPQHIFYRRFLGKDGRRDPKCQWKFAVIFWGNDPYGLKKLSQAFQFGGVKAGPVSCLPHPGPDQSPITYCVYVYCQNKDTSKKVQMARLAWEASHPLAGNLQSSIVKFKKPLPLTQPGENQGPGDSPQEMT*
K8.1:
MGSSHHHHHHSSGLVPRGSHMASMTGGQQMGRGSMSSTQIRTEIPVALLILCLCLVACHANCPTYRSHLGFWQEGWSGQVYQDWLGRMNCSYENMTALEAVSLNGTRLAAGSPSSEYPNVSVSVEDTSASGSGEDAIDESGSGEEERPVTSHVTFMTQSVQATTELTDALISAFSGSYSSGEPSRTTRIRVSPVAENGRNSGASNRVPFSATTTTTRGRDAHYNAEIRTHLYILWAVGLLLGLVLILYLCVPRCRRKKPYIV*
The HIV gp41 protein was a commercially sourced recombinant protein expressed in E. coli and purified by SDS-PAGE.
Assay cartridge and instrument
The system consists of disposable cartridges and a simple reader instrument, based on planar waveguide imaging technology. The cartridge incorporates a microarray of recombinant antigens and antibody controls in a fluidic channel, providing multiple parallel fluorescence immunoassay results for a single sample[28]. A protein microarray was printed to the planar waveguide and subsequently assembled into an injection-molded, disposable cartridge as previously described[28]. The HIV / KSHV antibody detection cartridge comprised an array of three antigens: HIV-1 gp41 and KSHV antigens LANA and K8.1. The array also included controls with anti-human IgG (sample control) and printed human IgG (detect reagent control).
Assay reagents.
Other reagents include purified human IgG (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), goat anti-human IgG (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL), and goat anti-human IgG conjugated with fluorescent dye (DyLight649; KPL, Inc.). Assay reagents include bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma Life Science, St. Louis, MO), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), blocker casein in PBS, and Tween 20 (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL).
MBio system assay procedure.
Samples were processed in cartridges on the benchtop at ambient temperature (20 to 25°C). Since the assay is independent of the reader instrument, sample cartridges were batch processed. A 6-μl aliquot of plasma was diluted in 194μl of diluent (PBS, 0.5% casein, 0.05% Tween 20). Of this diluted sample mixture, 175μl was loaded into the cartridge by transfer pipet, followed by a 15-minute incubation. One hundred seventy-five microliters of wash buffer (PBS, 0.1% Tween 20) was then added to the cartridge input port and allowed to flow through the cartridge for 3 minutes, followed by the addition of 175μl of dye-conjugated anti-human IgG in diluent (PBS, 1mg/ml BSA, and 0.05% Tween 20) and incubated for 10 minutes. Total assay time is approximately 30 minutes and a single operator can run 20 to 25 samples in parallel (batch mode). By comparison, time-to-result for the ELISA 96-well plate was approximately 2 hours with multiple manual interventions.
Data Analysis
Antibody reactivity on the MBio System is based on a semi-quantitative analysis of signal / cutoff (S/CO). Cutoff values were determined for each viral antigen independently using the collection of commercially sourced negative sera described above. To establish cutoffs for the two KSHV antigens, mean and standard deviations for signal intensity were calculated for each antigen. Three of the 93 negative samples gave antibody-antigen reactivities that were greater than 3 standard deviations from the mean for the 93 sample set. These 3 samples were excluded, and the KSHV antigen cutoffs were re-calculated as the mean plus three standard deviations using the remaining 90 samples. By choosing to exclude 3 “high signal negatives” in the cutoff calculation, and by using distribution of 3 standard deviations instead of 5, we are biasing the assay for sensitivity at the potential cost of losing specificity. Cutoffs for the HIV gp41 feature were calculated using all 93 negative samples and calculating mean plus 5 standard deviations. The 5 standard deviation approach ensures the HIV Ab assay meets the specificity performance of widely used assays.
For the clinical HIV/KSHV samples, signal intensity on each antigen feature in the array was measured in the MBio System and Signal/Cutoff was calculated. S/CO > 1.05 is reported as positive; S/CO < 0.95 is reported as negative. Results with 1.05 ≥ S/CO ≥ 0.95 are reported as indeterminate. Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism software were used for statistical analysis. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the MBio S/CO values among groups.
For the clinical analysis, simple linear regression was used to examine for potential univariate associations between the MBio S/CO of positive samples and corresponding patient characteristics, including KSHV PBMC and plasma viral load, CD4 count, HIV RNA viral load, gender, age, and KS stage (T1 and T0). Multiple linear regression models were used for multivariate results to adjust for potential confounders. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS® version 9.2, assuming a two-sided significance level of 0.05.
Results
Clinical Samples
A total of 164 human plasma samples obtained from participants in studies of KS conducted at the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences were used in this study (Table 1). Demographic characteristics of the patients from whom the samples were obtained included a median age of 37 years; 65% were from males; KS tumor stage was T0 in 23% of participants and T1, or more advanced disease, in 77%. Of the samples with contemporaneous immunologic and virologic parameters measured, the median CD4+ T-cell count was 143 cells/μl and the median plasma HIV-1 RNA level was 4.59 log copies/mL. The median KSHV plasma DNA level was 1.78 log copies/mL and the median PBMC KSHV DNA level was 3.24 log copies/105 cells.
KSHV ELISA Results
KSHV antibody reactivity by ELISA was positive in 158 of 164 biopsy-proven KS-positive samples (96.3% sensitivity, 95% CI = 93.5% to 99.2%). One sample was reported as equivocal / borderline. None of the 93 control sera showed KSHV antibody reactivity (100% specificity).
MBio Array System Results
KSHV antibody reactivity.
KSHV antibody reactivity (S/CO) results are presented in Fig 1. Receiver-Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for each individual antigen and for the maximum signal/cutoff value and are provided in Fig 2. The median S/CO for the LANA antigen in the KS-positive samples was 3.17, which was > 100-fold higher than the median S/CO of the controls with a median S/CO of 0.03 (Mann-Whitney U test 741.0, P < 0.0001). The median S/CO for the K8.1 antigen in the KS-positive samples was 7.26, which was > 200-fold higher than the median S/CO of the negative controls with a median S/CO of 0.03 (Mann-Whitney U test 555.0, P < 0.0001).
“POS” indicates the Kaposi’s Sarcoma biopsy-positive samples. “NEG” indicates negative control sera as determined by KSHV ELISA. The box and whisker plots show the median, 10th, 25th, 75th and 90th percentiles. The circles show location of the 5th and 95th percentiles.
Considered independently, the MBio K8.1 assay reported antibody reactivity for 152 of 164 KS-positive samples (sensitivity = 92.7%; 95% CI = 88.7% to 96.7%) and called 87 of 93 control samples as negative (specificity 93.5%; 95% CI = 88.6% to 98.5%). The LANA assay reported 3 indeterminate results (1.17% indeterminate rate) and reported antibody reactivity for 122 of 161 KS-positive samples (sensitivity = 75.8%; 95% CI = 69.2% to 82.4%) and called 89 of 93 control samples as negative (specificity 95.7%; 95% CI = 91.6% to 99.8%). The LANA has significantly lower sensitivity than K8.1. We note here that the specificity analysis below is non-ideal in that it is based on a self-referential dataset, i.e., the control samples used to establish cutoffs are the same samples used in the specificity calculations.
Relatively low correlation of S/CO is observed between K8.1 and LANA. For the collection of 164 biopsy-proven KS samples, the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient for K8.1 and LANA S/CO values is 0.20. One could thus expect that a combination of two antigens could improve overall assay sensitivity. In fact, three KS-positive samples that were negative on the K8.1 assay gave positive reactivity on the LANA assay (one K8.1 negative was indeterminate on LANA). Given this information, a two-antigen KSHV algorithm was applied in which a sample is considered positive if either (or both) of the K8.1 and LANA antigens show reactivity. With this dual antigen algorithm approach, antibody reactivity was reported on 155 of 163 KS-positive samples (sensitivity = 95.1%; 95% CI = 91.0% to 98.0%). One sample from a participant with active KS was reported as KSHV indeterminate using the dual antigen algorithm (0.4% indeterminate rate). The dual antigen algorithm reported 85 of 93 control samples as negative. The dual antigen assay produced two addition false positive results relative to the K8.1 assay (8 versus 6), indicating a slight decrease in specificity. Of the false positive control samples, 4 were positive on the K8.1 assay, 2 on the LANA, and 2 on both assays. All were negative on the ELISA. Defining accuracy as (true positives + true negatives)/total, results are 82.1% for LANA, 92.7% for K8.1, and 93.4% for the dual antigen approach. We note that the K8.1 alone and the dual antigen algorithm are statistically equivalent for this dataset.
Comparing specific samples between MBio and ELISA, 3 of 8 MBio false negatives (no Ab reactivity in KS-positive samples) were also negative by ELISA. The ELISA thus has slightly better sensitivity in the KS-positive sample collection than the MBio assay (96.3% versus 95.1%, although both are within 95% CI). Of the remaining five samples, the OD/cutoff ratio on the ELISA platform ranged from 1.10 to 8.99, with a median OD/cutoff of 3.47.
For samples from patients with KS that were identified as KSHV antibody positive, both antigens demonstrated robust antibody titers. The median S/CO for K8.1 was 8.16, which was significantly higher than the median S/CO for LANA at 5.33 (Mann-Whitney U test 6753, p 0.0001). The LANA antigen identified 122 positive samples (74.4%). By including the K8.1 antigen on the array 152 positive samples were identified, increasing the sensitivity of the assay to 92.7%.
HIV-1 antibody reactivity.
The MBio Array System simultaneously assesses HIV-1 and KSHV antibody reactivity for each sample. Of the 164 HIV-seropositive samples from KS patients, all 164 were reported as HIV-1 Antibody reactive on the MBio assay. A total of 66 HIV-seronegative samples were tested with the HIV assay. One of the 66 was indeterminate, and 65 of 66 were non-reactive.
Multivariate Analysis
Clinical data were available for 163 samples with both MBio S/CO and ELISA O.D. level results. The KS positive samples were evaluated for potential association with KSHV PBMC and plasma viral loads, CD4 count, HIV RNA viral load, gender, age and KS stage (T1 and T0). In the univariate analysis, a higher MBio S/CO level was significantly associated with having a T1 KS stage (p = 0.02). Male gender and having a higher KSHV plasma viral load also showed association, although not significant (both p<0.09). In multivariate modeling, after adjusting for all clinical variables, only being male (p = 0.04) remained significant. The association with T1 KS stage was no longer significant and the clinical variables explained only 5% of the variability in the final multivariate model (Table 2).
In univariate analysis, a higher ELISA O.D. level was significantly associated with being male (p = 0.03), having T1 KS stage (p = 0.01) and higher HIV RNA viral load (p = 0.04). In multivariate modeling, after adjusting for all clinical variables, being male (p = 0.004), T1 KS stage (p = 0.03), and KSHV PBMC viral load (p = 0.04) were significant (Table 2). However, the clinical variables explained only 12% of the variability in the multivariate model. HIV RNA viral load was not included in the since results were available for less than a third of the cohort.
Discussion
Knowledge of co-infection status with several critical co-pathogens in those with HIV-1 infection could be of substantial value in devising optimal management strategies for those with one or more of these co-infections, including strategies to prevent malignancies associated with them. Based on the evidence that effective antiretroviral therapy decreases the incidence of KS, it is hypothesized that early identification and antiretroviral treatment of HIV-infected persons with KSHV would substantially reduce KS-associated morbidity and mortality[8, 42–45]. Despite improvements in detection, serologic tests are rarely used clinically to identify those who have sub-clinical infection and are thus at risk for development of KS, due to cost and general lack of access to central laboratories in the places where the virus is most prevalent. A readily accessible and affordable method for the identification of individuals with KSHV and other co-infections would allow clinicians to factor this information into clinical decision-making, potentially starting ART at higher CD4 cell counts in areas where this is not yet routine despite updated guidelines for universal treatment, or increasing KS surveillance for earlier detection as strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality.
In this initial study, the MBio serodiagnostic assay showed 95.1% sensitivity in detecting antibody in plasma from patients with KS. Robust signals were detected with both the K8.1 and LANA antigens, but the S/CO was higher for K8.1 than for LANA. In addition, more samples demonstrated reactivity to the lytic K8.1 antigen, which has also been shown in previous studies, and is expected due to replicating virus in the setting of active KS disease[36, 37, 46]. The results are also supported by our finding that the S/CO was higher in individuals with more advanced T1 KS stage, though this did not remain significant in the multivariate analysis. We also demonstrated that parameters associated with advanced HIV disease were not associated with KSHV S/CO values as we might have expected.
One limitation of this study is that only samples from patients with biopsy-proven KS were used to assess performance of the assay. Overestimation of performance is a concern, due to higher antibody titers in KS patients compared to those with asymptomatic KSHV infection[24, 47–54]. Future studies utilizing additional cohorts including those with asymptomatic KSHV infection are necessary to confirm the accuracy of this approach.
Another limitation is the use of only 2 antigens on the array. Prior studies demonstrated the additional benefit of using v-cyclin, as well as other KSHV proteins[9, 23, 25, 27, 55, 56], but v-cyclin was not included in this analysis because of difficulties in printing it onto the array. Three of the eight KS-positive samples that were classified as negative by the MBio assay were also negative on the ELISA platform. Of the remaining 5 samples, the ELISA signals varied, ranging from 1.10 to 8.99. This suggests that the higher sensitivity of the ELISA platform might be attributable to additional antigens present in a whole-viral lysate that were not represented in the two-antigen MBio array. Thus it might be possible to increase the sensitivity of the assay by expanding the antigens included in the array. Because the primary goal of this initial study was feasibility, a truncated LANA protein was expressed to improve yield, and a bacterial expression system was selected for ease and cost. Sensitivity of the assay may also be improved by using the full length LANA protein and use of insect or mammalian cells for protein expression, and will be considered in future studies.
The MBio system can simultaneously measure up to 30 markers, so addition of other immunological targets to improve the sensitivity and specificity can be readily implemented. Another major advantage of this multiplexed system is the ability to simultaneously assess for the presence of other co-infections. This omits the need for multiple testing platforms to screen for co-infections, which both simplifies the testing process and conserves sample volumes. With further optimization, this system can potentially be implemented into the point of care, such that knowledge of co-infections may be used for clinical decision-making, and can also be used in blood donor screening and in epidemiologic studies evaluating HIV and co-infections in various populations.
In conclusion, these preliminary results indicate that the MBio system can detect antibody titers to KSHV antigens with good sensitivity and specificity approaching that of a commercially available ELISA. Further studies will be performed to evaluate the benefit of additional antigens on the array and to investigate antibody profiles in additional cohorts, including PEL, MCD, and especially asymptomatic infection. Once the optimal antigens are selected, more formal validation studies will be performed, specifically to evaluate both accuracy and reproducibility of the improved assay. Additional studies are ongoing to optimize the assay for screening of HIV-1, KSHV and other important co-infections for use in clinical care in resource-limited settings.
Acknowledgments
This publication was made possible with help from the Protein Expression and Proteomics Core of the University of California, San Diego, Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), an NIH-funded program, which is supported by the following NIH Institutes and Centers: NIAID, NCI, NIMH, NIDA, NICHD, NHLBI, NIA, NIGMS, and NIDDK.
Author Contributions
- Conceived and designed the experiments: MJL CAB RTS.
- Performed the experiments: CL KT.
- Analyzed the data: CL KT SPF TBC.
- Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TBC MB IG LG BN JHE.
- Wrote the paper: CL JHE RTS.
References
- 1. Chang Y, Cesarman E, Pessin MS, Lee F, Culpepper J, Knowles DM, et al. Identification of herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma. Science 1994,266:1865–1869. pmid:7997879
- 2. Moore PS, Gao SJ, Dominguez G, Cesarman E, Lungu O, Knowles DM, et al. Primary characterization of a herpesvirus agent associated with Kaposi's sarcomae. J Virol 1996,70:549–558. pmid:8523568
- 3. Whitby D, Howard MR, Tenant-Flowers M, Brink NS, Copas A, Boshoff C, et al. Detection of Kaposi sarcoma associated herpesvirus in peripheral blood of HIV-infected individuals and progression to Kaposi's sarcoma. Lancet 1995,346:799–802. pmid:7674745
- 4. Boshoff C, Whitby D, Hatziioannou T, Fisher C, van der Walt J, Hatzakis A, et al. Kaposi's-sarcoma-associated herpesvirus in HIV-negative Kaposi's sarcoma. Lancet 1995,345:1043–1044.
- 5. Cesarman E, Chang Y, Moore PS, Said JW, Knowles DM. Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in AIDS-related body-cavity-based lymphomas. N Engl J Med 1995,332:1186–1191. pmid:7700311
- 6. Huang YQ, Li JJ, Kaplan MH, Poiesz B, Katabira E, Zhang WC, et al. Human herpesvirus-like nucleic acid in various forms of Kaposi's sarcoma. Lancet 1995,345:759–761. pmid:7891487
- 7. Soulier J, Grollet L, Oksenhendler E, Cacoub P, Cazals-Hatem D, Babinet P, et al. Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in multicentric Castleman's disease. Blood 1995,86:1276–1280. pmid:7632932
- 8. Borok M, Fiorillo S, Gudza I, Putnam B, Ndemera B, White IE, et al. Evaluation of plasma human herpesvirus 8 DNA as a marker of clinical outcomes during antiretroviral therapy for AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma in Zimbabwe. Clin Infect Dis 2010,51:342–349. pmid:20572760
- 9. Burbelo PD, Leahy HP, Groot S, Bishop LR, Miley W, Iadarola MJ, et al. Four-antigen mixture containing v-cyclin for serological screening of human herpesvirus 8 infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2009,16:621–627. pmid:19261774
- 10. Ganem D. KSHV infection and the pathogenesis of Kaposi's sarcoma. Annu Rev Pathol 2006,1:273–296. pmid:18039116
- 11. Coscoy L. Immune evasion by Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. Nat Rev Immunol 2007,7:391–401. pmid:17457345
- 12. Ferreira S, Sanabani S, Reis AD, Chamone DF, Sabino EC. Human herpesvirus type 8 among Brazilian blood donors. Transfusion 2003,43:1764–1765. pmid:14674378
- 13. Hudnall SD, Chen T, Allison P, Tyring SK, Heath A. Herpesvirus prevalence and viral load in healthy blood donors by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Transfusion 2008,48:1180–1187.
- 14. Hudnall SD, Chen T, Rady P, Tyring S, Allison P. Human herpesvirus 8 seroprevalence and viral load in healthy adult blood donors. Transfusion 2003,43:85–90.
- 15. Machado PR, Farias KJ, Pereira MG, Freitas PP, Fonseca BA. Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) detected by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in HIV patients with or without Kaposi's sarcoma. An analytic cross-sectional study. Sao Paulo Med J 2015.
- 16. Pellett PE, Wright DJ, Engels EA, Ablashi DV, Dollard SC, Forghani B, et al. Multicenter comparison of serologic assays and estimation of human herpesvirus 8 seroprevalence among US blood donors. Transfusion 2003,43:1260–1268.
- 17. Shebl FM, Emmanuel B, Bunts L, Biryahwaho B, Kiruthu C, Huang ML, et al. Population-based assessment of kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus DNA in plasma among Ugandans. J Med Virol 2013,85:1602–1610.
- 18. Levi JE, Nascimento MC, Sumita LM, de Souza VA, Freire WS, Mayaud P, et al. Non-detection of human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) DNA in HHV-8-seropositive blood donors from three Brazilian regions. PLoS One 2011,6:e23546. pmid:21858163
- 19. Martro E, Cannon MJ, Dollard SC, Spira TJ, Laney AS, Ou CY, et al. Evidence for both lytic replication and tightly regulated human herpesvirus 8 latency in circulating mononuclear cells, with virus loads frequently below common thresholds of detection. J Virol 2004,78:11707–11714. pmid:15479812
- 20. Haq IU, Dalla Pria A, Papanastasopoulos P, Stegmann K, Bradshaw D, Nelson M, et al. The clinical application of plasma Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus viral load as a tumour biomarker: results from 704 patients. HIV Med 2016,17:56–61. pmid:26111246
- 21. Campbell TB, Borok M, White IE, Gudza I, Ndemera B, Taziwa A, et al. Relationship of Kaposi sarcoma (KS)-associated herpesvirus viremia and KS disease in Zimbabwe. Clin Infect Dis 2003,36:1144–1151. pmid:12715309
- 22. Jenkins FJ, Hayes RB, Jackson A, Pizza G, Mbisa G, Whitby D, et al. Human herpesvirus 8 seroprevalence among prostate cancer case patients and control subjects. J Infect Dis 2007,196:208–211. pmid:17570107
- 23. Laney AS, Peters JS, Manzi SM, Kingsley LA, Chang Y, Moore PS. Use of a multiantigen detection algorithm for diagnosis of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection. J Clin Microbiol 2006,44:3734–3741. pmid:17021103
- 24. Rabkin CS, Schulz TF, Whitby D, Lennette ET, Magpantay LI, Chatlynne L, et al. Interassay correlation of human herpesvirus 8 serologic tests. HHV-8 Interlaboratory Collaborative Group. J Infect Dis 1998,178:304–309. pmid:9697708
- 25. Zhu L, Wang R, Sweat A, Goldstein E, Horvat R, Chandran B. Comparison of human sera reactivities in immunoblots with recombinant human herpesvirus (HHV)-8 proteins associated with the latent (ORF73) and lytic (ORFs 65, K8.1A, and K8.1B) replicative cycles and in immunofluorescence assays with HHV-8-infected BCBL-1 cells. Virology 1999,256:381–392. pmid:10191203
- 26. Engels EA, Whitby D, Goebel PB, Stossel A, Waters D, Pintus A, et al. Identifying human herpesvirus 8 infection: performance characteristics of serologic assays. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2000,23:346–354. pmid:10836758
- 27. Burbelo PD, Issa AT, Ching KH, Wyvill KM, Little RF, Iadarola MJ, et al. Distinct profiles of antibodies to Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus antigens in patients with Kaposi sarcoma, multicentric Castleman disease, and primary effusion lymphoma. J Infect Dis 2010,201:1919–1922. pmid:20443737
- 28. Lochhead MJ, Todorof K, Delaney M, Ives JT, Greef C, Moll K, et al. Rapid multiplexed immunoassay for simultaneous serodiagnosis of HIV-1 and coinfections. J Clin Microbiol 2011,49:3584–3590. pmid:21865431
- 29.
World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection. In; 2013.
- 30. Amodio E, Goedert JJ, Barozzi P, Riva G, Firenze A, Bonura F, et al. Differences in Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-specific and herpesvirus-non-specific immune responses in classic Kaposi sarcoma cases and matched controls in Sicily. Cancer Sci 2011,102:1769–1773. pmid:21740480
- 31. Benavente Y, Mbisa G, Labo N, Casabonne D, Becker N, Maynadie M, et al. Antibodies against lytic and latent Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpes virus antigens and lymphoma in the European EpiLymph case-control study. Br J Cancer 2011,105:1768–1771. pmid:21952625
- 32. El Amari EB, Toutous-Trellu L, Gayet-Ageron A, Baumann M, Cathomas G, Steffen I, et al. Predicting the evolution of Kaposi sarcoma, in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era. AIDS 2008,22:1019–1028.
- 33. Guadalupe M, Pollock BH, Westbrook S, Redding S, Bullock D, Anstead G, et al. Risk factors influencing antibody responses to Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus latent and lytic antigens in patients under antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011,56:83–90.
- 34. Katano H, Sato Y, Kurata T, Mori S, Sata T. Expression and localization of human herpesvirus 8-encoded proteins in primary effusion lymphoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, and multicentric Castleman's disease. Virology 2000,269:335–344. pmid:10753712
- 35. Lam LL, Pau CP, Dollard SC, Pellett PE, Spira TJ. Highly sensitive assay for human herpesvirus 8 antibodies that uses a multiple antigenic peptide derived from open reading frame K8.1. J Clin Microbiol 2002,40:325–329. pmid:11825937
- 36. Malope-Kgokong BI, Macphail P, Mbisa G, Ratshikhopha E, Maskew M, Stein L, et al. Kaposi's Sarcoma Associated-Herpes Virus (KSHV) Seroprevalence in Pregnant Women in South Africa. Infect Agent Cancer 2010,5:14. pmid:20807396
- 37. Maskew M, Macphail AP, Whitby D, Egger M, Wallis CL, Fox MP. Prevalence and predictors of kaposi sarcoma herpes virus seropositivity: a cross-sectional analysis of HIV-infected adults initiating ART in Johannesburg, South Africa. Infect Agent Cancer 2011,6:22. pmid:22093140
- 38. Mbisa GL, Miley W, Gamache CJ, Gillette WK, Esposito D, Hopkins R, et al. Detection of antibodies to Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus: a new approach using K8.1 ELISA and a newly developed recombinant LANA ELISA. J Immunol Methods 2010,356:39–46. pmid:20211626
- 39. Nascimento MC, de Souza VA, Sumita LM, Freire W, Munoz F, Kim J, et al. Comparative study of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus serological assays using clinically and serologically defined reference standards and latent class analysis. J Clin Microbiol 2007,45:715–720. pmid:17182752
- 40. Ouyang XX, Fu BS, Li BL, Zeng Y, Xu FH, Wang LD. Establishment of an ELISA to detect Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus using recombinant ORF73. Virol Sin 2010,25:168–176. pmid:20960290
- 41. Wakeham K, Johnston WT, Nalwoga A, Webb EL, Mayanja BN, Miley W, et al. Trends in Kaposi's sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus antibodies prior to the development of HIV-associated Kaposi's sarcoma: a nested case-control study. Int J Cancer 2015,136:2822–2830. pmid:25395177
- 42. Jacobson LP, Yamashita TE, Detels R, Margolick JB, Chmiel JS, Kingsley LA, et al. Impact of potent antiretroviral therapy on the incidence of Kaposi's sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas among HIV-1-infected individuals. Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1999,21 Suppl 1:S34–41. pmid:10430217
- 43. Semeere AS, Busakhala N, Martin JN. Impact of antiretroviral therapy on the incidence of Kaposi's sarcoma in resource-rich and resource-limited settings. Curr Opin Oncol 2012,24:522–530.
- 44. Chokunonga E, Borok MZ, Chirenje ZM, Nyakabau AM, Parkin DM. Trends in the incidence of cancer in the black population of Harare, Zimbabwe 1991–2010. Int J Cancer 2013,133:721–729. pmid:23364833
- 45. Chaabna K, Bray F, Wabinga HR, Chokunonga E, Borok M, Vanhems P, et al. Kaposi sarcoma trends in Uganda and Zimbabwe: a sustained decline in incidence? Int J Cancer 2013,133:1197–1203. pmid:23436712
- 46. Wilkinson J, Cope A, Gill J, Bourboulia D, Hayes P, Imami N, et al. Identification of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV)-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes and evaluation of reconstitution of KSHV-specific responses in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-Infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Virol 2002,76:2634–2640. pmid:11861829
- 47. Kumar P, Kuwa NY, Minhas V, Marimo C, Shea DM, Kankasa C, et al. Higher levels of neutralizing antibodies against KSHV in KS patients compared to asymptomatic individuals from Zambia. PLoS One 2013,8:e71254. pmid:23967174
- 48. Chatlynne LG, Lapps W, Handy M, Huang YQ, Masood R, Hamilton AS, et al. Detection and titration of human herpesvirus-8-specific antibodies in sera from blood donors, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients, and Kaposi's sarcoma patients using a whole virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Blood 1998,92:53–58. pmid:9639499
- 49. Newton R, Carpenter L, Casabonne D, Beral V, Babiker A, Darbyshire J, et al. A prospective study of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus and Epstein-Barr virus in adults with human immunodeficiency virus-1. Br J Cancer 2006,94:1504–1509. pmid:16705315
- 50. Gao SJ, Kingsley L, Li M, Zheng W, Parravicini C, Ziegler J, et al. KSHV antibodies among Americans, Italians and Ugandans with and without Kaposi's sarcoma. Nat Med 1996,2:925–928. pmid:8705864
- 51. Kedes DH, Operskalski E, Busch M, Kohn R, Flood J, Ganem D. The seroepidemiology of human herpesvirus 8 (Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus): distribution of infection in KS risk groups and evidence for sexual transmission. Nat Med 1996,2:918–924. pmid:8705863
- 52. Martin JN, Amad Z, Cossen C, Lam PK, Kedes DH, Page-Shafer KA, et al. Use of epidemiologically well-defined subjects and existing immunofluorescence assays to calibrate a new enzyme immunoassay for human herpesvirus 8 antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 2000,38:696–701. pmid:10655369
- 53. Miller G, Rigsby MO, Heston L, Grogan E, Sun R, Metroka C, et al. Antibodies to butyrate-inducible antigens of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus in patients with HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med 1996,334:1292–1297. pmid:8609946
- 54. Simpson GR, Schulz TF, Whitby D, Cook PM, Boshoff C, Rainbow L, et al. Prevalence of Kaposi's sarcoma associated herpesvirus infection measured by antibodies to recombinant capsid protein and latent immunofluorescence antigen. Lancet 1996,348:1133–1138. pmid:8888167
- 55. Labo N, Miley W, Marshall V, Gillette W, Esposito D, Bess M, et al. Heterogeneity and breadth of host antibody response to KSHV infection demonstrated by systematic analysis of the KSHV proteome. PLoS Pathog 2014,10:e1004046. pmid:24675986
- 56. Zheng D, Wan J, Cho YG, Wang L, Chiou CJ, Pai S, et al. Comparison of humoral immune responses to Epstein-Barr virus and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus using a viral proteome microarray. J Infect Dis 2011,204:1683–1691. pmid:21990424