Characteristics Analysis of F1 Hybrids between Genetically Modified Brassica napus and B. rapa

Soo-In Sohn; Young-Ju Oh; Kyeong-Ryeol Lee; Ho-Cheol Ko; Hyun-Suk Cho; Yeon-Hee Lee; Ancheol Chang

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162103

Abstract

A number of studies have been conducted on hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus and B. rapa or backcross of F₁ hybrid to their parents. However, trait changes must be analyzed to evaluate hybrid sustainability in nature. In the present study, B. rapa and transgenic (BrAGL20) B. napus were hybridized to verify the early flowering phenomenon of F₁ hybrids, and F₁ hybrid traits were analyzed to predict their impact on sustainability. Flowering of F₁ hybrid has been induced slightly later than that of the transgenic B. napus, but flowering was available in the greenhouse without low temperature treatment to young plant, similar to the transgenic B. napus. It is because the BrAGL20 gene has been transferred from transgenic B. napus to F₁ hybrid. The size of F₁ hybrid seeds was intermediate between those of B. rapa and transgenic B. napus, and ~40% of F₁ pollen exhibited abnormal size and morphology. The form of the F₁ stomata was also intermediate between that of B. rapa and transgenic B. napus, and the number of stomata was close to the parental mean. Among various fatty acids, the content of erucic acid exhibited the greatest change, owing to the polymorphism of parental FATTY ACID ELONGASE 1 alleles. Furthermore, F₂ hybrids could not be obtained. However, BC₁ progeny were obtained by hand pollination of B. rapa with F₁ hybrid pollen, with an outcrossing rate of 50%.

Citation: Sohn S-I, Oh Y-J, Lee K-R, Ko H-C, Cho H-S, Lee Y-H, et al. (2016) Characteristics Analysis of F₁ Hybrids between Genetically Modified Brassica napus and B. rapa. PLoS ONE 11(9): e0162103. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103

Editor: Randall P. Niedz, United States Department of Agriculture, UNITED STATES

Received: April 28, 2016; Accepted: August 17, 2016; Published: September 15, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Sohn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and Supporting Information files.

Funding: This study was conducted with the support of the Research Program for Agricultural Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01186703), National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Competing interests: The Institute for Future Environmental Ecology Co., Ltd., does not alter our adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing and materials.

Introduction

The concern associated with the cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops is the increase of weedy or invasive crops as the transgenes are transferred to related species [1,2]. The environmental risk of GM crops can be evaluated, based on the concept of substantial equivalence, by comparing GM and non-GM crops in a natural-like environment, and if any significant differences are observed, the likelihood of negative impact can be used as a measure of risk [3]. Also, the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety III suggests that assessing the environmental risk of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) should be conducted by identifying the organisms’ new genotypic and phenotypic characteristics that could negatively impact the biodiversity of its potential habitat. In addition, although gene flow and introgression are natural processes, gene flow from transgenic plants to wild relatives complicates the potential introgression of new traits.

To date, researchers have attempted to predict the consequences of hybridization and introgression between transgenic crops and related species [4–8]. Halfhill et al. [7] reported that crop-weed hybrids have lower fitness and competitive ability than their parents, regardless of transgene introgression, and such decreases in hybrid fitness are suggested to result from the introduction of crop genes, rather than from the introduction of transgenes. Therefore, the fitness of hybrids derived from transgenic crops in natural ecosystems should be estimated with the sustainability of the transgenic hybrids in the ecosystem through the analysis of transgene introgression course and result, as well as trait changes in the hybrids, owing to the genetic load of crop-derived genes.

Considering the fact that Korea has imported transgenic B. napus seeds and has exported B. rapa seeds, it is very important to assess the gene flow of transgenic B. napus to B. rapa and to determine the ecological impacts of hybridization on the unintentional release of transgenes, in order to establish appropriate biosafety measures. B. rapa is one of the ancestral species of B. napus. A number of studies have shown that the two species can hybridize [9–12], that spontaneous F₁ hybrids occur in nature [13], and that backcrossing occurs when the hybrids are grown in the vicinity of B. rapa [13–19]. Although the average fitness of the F₁ hybrid and first backcross (BC₁) progeny is generally low [9], B. rapa-like plants that contain transgenes can be found even after single backcrosses [10,18–23]. In addition, there have been more studies of hybrids between B. rapa and transgenic B. napus than hybrids between other Brassicaceae and transgenic B. napus; however, due to the genetic diversity of B. rapa the sustainability and ecological effects of crop genes introduced via pollen movement are poorly understood.

The regulation of flowering time is an important trait in terms of crop productivity. AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 (AGL20) is known to encode a MADS-box transcription factor that integrates signals from multiple flowering pathways, including those related to photoperiod, temperature, hormones, and age [24]. A study in Arabidopsis demonstrated that AGL20 expression plays an important role in determining flowering time and affects many floral induction pathways [25]. When AGL20 from B. rapa was introduced into B. napus, the flowering time was advanced by up to 105 d, compared to non-transgenic B. napus [26], and although the early flowering transgenic B. napus has not yet been commercialized, it may be useful for assessing environmental sustainability, with regard to transgene expression and gene flow between transgenic B. napus and B. rapa.

This study aimed to investigate the expression pattern of target gene in the F₁ hybrid between early flowering transgenic B. napus and B. rapa, analyze the environmental sustainabillity through analyzing morphological characteristics and fertility of F₁ hybrid, and anticipate the unintended effects to the environment by the analyses of fatty acids of F₁ seed. To do this, expression of target gene and other flowering-related genes was analyzed in F₁ hybrids and parents. We also have compared the morphological characteristics of seeds, pollens and stomatal apparatus between F₁ hybrids and parents. Fertility of F₁ hybrids was investigated via self-pollination and backcrossing with B. rapa. Also, the content of erucic acid and nucleotide sequences of genes related to the synthesis of erucic acid were analyzed in the F₁ hybrid seeds.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials

Early flowering transgenic Brassica napus L. ‘Youngsan’ (AACC, 2n = 38) was transformed with CAMV 35S-regulated bar and BrAGL20 [26], and B. napus L. ‘Youngsan’ and B. rapa L. ssp. pekinensis ‘Jangkang’ (AA, 2n = 20) seeds were obtained from the National Agrobiodiversity Center (Jeonju, Republic of Korea).

Outcrossing rate of F₁ hybrid between B. rapa and transgenic B. napus

Cross experiments were conducted in the GMO greenhouse of NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Science) located in Suwon, Korea. Interspecific crossability was determined using transgenic B. napus as the pollen donor and B. rapa as the seed parent, by means of artificial emasculation and crossing. For each cross combination, 100~200 flowers from 15 separate plants were crossed. Self-pollinated B. napus and transgenic B. napus were used as controls, and the pod number, number of seeds per pod, and seed weight were investigated after harvest. To obtain the F₂ seeds 20 F₁ plants were self-pollinated. In addition, BC₁ progeny were produced using a F₁ hybrid pollen donor and a B. rapa seed parent. Each of the 10 F₁ hybrid and B. rapa were used to make BC₁ seeds. For all of the progeny, crossability was calculated as the number of full seeds obtained per pollinated flower, and outcrossing rate was estimated by the survival (%) of seedlings after herbicide treatment. Briefly, seedlings were sprayed with 0.3% Basta (Bayer CropScience GmbH, Manheim am Rhein, Germany) at the 4–5 leaf stage and again 4 d later, and seedling survival was measured at 4–7 d after the second application.

Confirmation of hybridization by PCR

Genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves of plants, using the CTAB method [27], and PCR analysis was performed using primer sets for bar (forward primer: 5′-TCTGCACCATCGTCAACCACTACAT-3′; reverse primer 5′-CTGAAGTCCAGCTGCCAGAAAC CCA-3′) or the partial 35S promoter region and BrAGL20 (forward primer: 5-GACGCACAATCCCA CTATC-3′; reverse primer: 5′-TCACTTTCTTGAAGAACAAGG-3′). Because BrAGL20 gene has been cloned from B. rapa and transformed to B. napus, to detect the target gene of BrAGL20 from the F₁ hybrid, a part of 35S promoter of the plant expression vector and BrAGL20 gene were used as the PCR amplification site. The PCR reactions contained 50 ng genomic DNA, 1× f-Taq buffer (Solgent, Republic of Korea), 50 μM dNTP mix, 1× Band Doctor (Solgent), 1.5 U f-Taq DNA polymerase (Solgent), and 25 pM of each primer in a total volume of 50 μl. The reaction conditions for bar amplification were as follows: pre-denaturation at 95°C for 4 min; 39 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s; and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The reaction conditions for amplification of the partial 35S promoter and BrAGL20 were as follows: pre-denaturation at 95°C for 4 min; 39 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, annealing at 53°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. Amplifications were performed in a PTC-100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and the amplified products were electrophoresed on 0.8% agarose gels, stained with EtBr, and visualized using a UV transilluminator.

Confirmation of hybridization by flow cytometry

Fresh seedling leaves were chopped with a sharp razor blade in nuclei extraction buffer (solution A of the High Resolution Kit for Plant DNA; Partec Gmbh, Munster, Germany). After filtration through a 30-μm nylon sieve, the nuclei were stained with a solution that contained 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole-2HCl (i.e., DAPI; solution B of the High Resolution Kit for Plant DNA; Partec GmbH) and analyzed, using a PAS flow cytometer (Partec Gmbh). To estimate ploidy level, the fluorescent intensity peak of each sample was compared to the peaks of plants with known ploidy levels. One month later, leaves of the same plants were re-analyzed for confirmation.

Comparing of flowering time in transgenic B. napus and F₁ hybrid

Seeds were sown in 4-inch pots containing a vermiculite. All plants were grown in a greenhouse under controlled temperatures (22/17°C day/night). The flowering responses were measured in terms of anthesis time (number of days until the first flower in the primary inflorescence opened). All experiments were done three times using at least 10 samples each time.

RNA extraction and real-time RT-PCR

Apical meristem samples were collected from B. napus, B. rapa, transgenic B. napus, and the F₁ hybrid once a week for six weeks. Total RNA was prepared from the apical meristem samples using Trizol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 100 μg aliquots of the preparations were treated with RNase-Free DNase (Qiagen, Ontario, Canada). cDNA was generated by reverse transcribing 3 μg aliquots of the purified RNA in 50 μl reactions, using the ProSTAR First-Strand RT-PCR system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) in the presence of oligo (dT) primers for 1 h at 37°C, and the reactions were terminated with heat inactivation at 70°C for 15 min.

To analyze the expression of the BrAGL20 transgene and other floral-related genes (i.e., AGL24, LFY, and AP1), real-time RT-PCR was performed, using gene-specific primers: (BrAGL20 forward: 5′-ATGGTGAGGGGCAAAACTCA-3′; BrAGL20 reverse: 5′-TCACTTTCTTGAGAACA AG-3′; AGL24 forward: 5′-ATGGCGAGAGAAGATAAGG-3′; AGL24 reverse: 5′-TCATTCCCAA GATGGAAGCCC-3′; LFY forward: 5′-ATGGATCCTGAAGGTTTCACG-3′; LFY reverse 5′-TTAA ACCCCAAAGCGTCCAGA-3′; AP1 forward: 5′-ATGGGAAGGGGTAGGGTTCAA-3′; AP1 reverse: 5′-TCATGCGGCGAAGCAGCCAAG-3′).

All qPCR experiments were performed in a CFX real time system (Bio-Rad, USA) employing SYBR Green real-time RT-PCR Master Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The reaction mixtures contained 5 μl diluted cDNA template (1:25), 10 μl 2× SYBR Green real-time PCR Master Mix (Toyobo), and 0.5 μM of each primer in a final volume of 20 μl. Amplification curves were generated using an initial denaturing step at 95°C for 3 min; followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 56°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 20 s; and melting curve analysis was performed at the end of the cycles (65 to 95°C at 0.2°C/s with continuous fluorescence readings), in order to ensure that single PCR products were obtained. To normalize the results, the B. napus actin gene (NCBI acc. no. KM881429) [28] was used as an internal standard. All real-time RT-PCR reactions were repeated in triplicate, using RNA isolated from three biological replicates, and the gene expression results were analyzed using CFX Manager Software version 1.0 (Bio-Rad).

Structural analysis of pollen and stomata

To observe pollen grains via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), anthers were fixed in formalin—acetic acid—alcohol (FAA) for 48 h, dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol (70%, 85%, 95%, and 100%), and fixed on a worktable with double-sided adhesive. The samples were then subjected to CO₂ critical point drying, sprayed with gold, and imaged using a Philips XL30 ESEM (Philips Co., Netherlands) at 30 kV [29]. Ten images of each sample were randomly selected, and the size and morphological character of the pollen grains were analyzed. In order to observe the stomata, leaf samples were cut to 0.5 cm², processed identically to the pollen, and observed via SEM.

Lipid extraction and fatty acid methyl ester analysis

B. rapa elongates oleic acid (C18:1) to higher-level monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) through the activity of FATTY ACID ELONGASE 1 (FAE1), which results in a seed oil content of ~41.1% erucic acid (C22:1) and eicosenomic acid (C20:1). However, the canola-type B. napus used in the present study possesses a mutated FAE1, which results in the near absence of C20 or higher-level MUFAs. Therefore, the F₁ hybrid will likely contain about half the amount of higher-level MUFAs between B. rapa and transgenic B. napus. To confirm this, we analyzed the fatty acid composition of lipids from the seeds of B. napus, B. rapa, transgenic B. napus, and F₁ hybrids collected at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 DAP.

For lipid extraction, about 100 mg of developing or mature seeds from each plant were crushed in glass tubes with a steel rod, and 0.5 ml toluene and 0.5 ml 5% H₂SO₄ (v/v) in methanol were added to each sample. The tubes were sealed with polytetrafluoroethylene-lined screw caps, and oil extraction and transmethylation were achieved by incubating the samples at 85°C for 90 min, after which 1 ml of 0.9% NaCl (w/v) and 0.5 ml n-hexane were added and the samples were shaken vigorously. The samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm and room temperature for 2 min. The upper phases, which consisted of fatty acid methyl esters, were transferred to gas chromatograph vials and analyzed, using a GC-2010 plus gas chromatograph (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a 30 m × 0.25 mm (i.d.) HP-FFAP column (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), while increasing the oven temperature from 190°C to 230°C at 3.5°C/min. Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas, with a flow rate of 1.3 ml/min.

Comparison of FAE1 sequences

The two paralogous genes, Bn.FAE1-A8 and Bn.FAE1-C3, which are involved in the synthesis of erucic acid and are genetically linked, were cloned from B. napus, B. rapa, transgenic B. napus, and the F₁ hybrids and were evaluated for their relevance to the erucic acid content of F₁ hybrid seeds.

Genomic DNA was extracted from B. napus, B. rapa, transgenic B. napus, and the F₁ hybrid, using the CTAB method [27], and the FAE1 paralogs were amplified using gene-specific PCR primers (FAE1-A8 forward: 5′-GGCACCTTTCATCGGACTAC-3′; FAE1-A8 reverse: 5′-GATAGAACTCGGGGTTTTAGTTG-3′; FAE1-C3 forward: 5′-GGCACCTTTCATCGGACTAC-3′; FAE1-C3 reverse: 5′-TTAACAGAAGATCCTTAACCCC-3′). The PCR reactions contained 50 ng genomic DNA, 4 μl 2.5 mM dNTP mix, 1 U ExTaq polymerase (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan), 1× ExTaq buffer (TaKaRa Bio Inc.), and 10 pmol of each primer in a total volume of 50 μl. The amplification conditions included an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 4 min; followed by 39 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1.5 min; and a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min. Amplifications were performed in a PTC-100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad).

Results

Outcrossing rate analysis between Brassica rapa and transgenic B. napus

Hand pollination of 404 B. rapa flowers resulted in the formation of 301 pods and, thus, a pod setting ratio of 74.5%, and a mean of 17 seeds were acquired from each pod (Table 1). The pod setting ratio of self-pollinated B. rapa was 59.4%, and the crossability index was 10.7. Meanwhile, for self-pollinated B. napus and transgenic B. napus, the pod setting ratios were 68.6% and 82.8%, respectively, and the crossability indices were 22.1 and 15.2. In addition, all of the herbicide resistant F1 hybrids indicated 100% outcrossing. However, out of the 2,457 F₁ hybrid seeds, 600 were cracked (24.4%), owing to precocious germination and seed abortion. Meanwhile, 0.2% and 0% of cracked seeds were observed from self-pollination of B. napus and B. rapa, respectively.

Download:

Table 1. Outcrossing rate analysis of hybridization (F1) and backcross (BC1) progeny.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103.t001

Confirmation of hybridization by PCR and flow cytometry

To study the gene flow from transgenic B. napus to the F₁ plant, PCR analysis was carried out for all F₁ plants showing herbicide resistance (S1 Fig). A 445-bp band that represented the bar gene was detected in the PCR amplification products of all of the herbicide resistant F₁ hybrids, as was the 738 bp band that represented BrAGL20. In addition, the results of flow cytometry indicated that the F₁ hybrid (channel 150) was a triploid hybrid, since B. napus and transgenic B. napus exhibited peaks at channel 200 and B. rapa exhibited a peak at channel 100 (S2 Fig).

Pollen morphology

To investigate whether the hybridization between B. rapa and transgenic B. napus would have induced changes in the shape and size of pollens, the pollens of F₁ hybrids were compared with both parents, B. rapa and transgenic B. napus using SEM (Fig 1, Table 2). The length and width of transgenic B. napus pollen were less than the pollen of B. napus, whereas the F₁ pollen was shorter than the parental mean and ~11.8% wider. In addition, about 40% of the F₁ pollen grains were smaller average (200 μm²) or exhibited abnormal morphology (Fig 1).

Download:

Fig 1. Scanning electron microscope of pollen grains from Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and the F₁ hybrid.

Column 1, pollen sacs; column 2, pollen grains; column 3, archopyle; column 4, enlarged image of pollen grains; column 5, pollen grain surface.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103.g001

Download:

Table 2. Influence of ploidy on floral characteristics of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic B. napus, and F₁ hybrid.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103.t002

Correlation between ploidy and stomatal density

Stomatal apparatus may serve as an important phylogenetic key for plants and thus B. rapa, B. napus, transgenic B. napus and F₁ hybrid were compared to identify any differences in the number and form of stomatal apparatus using SEM. The number of stomata on the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces was different in each of the plants, and the difference was greatest in B. rapa (Fig 2, Table 3).

Download:

Fig 2. Scanning electron microscope of the adaxial and the abaxial leaf surfaces of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and F₁ hybrids. Bar indicates 50 μm.

The two lower rows show enlarged images of two upper rows.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103.g002

Download:

Table 3. Influence of ploidy on various floral characteristics in Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic B. napus and F₁ hybrid.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103.t003

In B. rapa, the number of stomata within 100 μm² surface area was 3.7 on the adaxial surface and 5.7 on the abaxial surface. In B. napus, the number of stomata within 100 μm² surface area was 2 on the adaxial surface and 2.7 on the abaxial surface, and in transgenic B. napus, the number of stomata were 2.3 on the adaxial surface and 3.3 on the abaxial surface. In the F₁ hybrid, the number of stomata was 3 on the adaxial surface and 4.3 on the abaxial surface, which was close to the mean of B. rapa and transgenic B. napus.

Flowering time and expression of flowering-related genes in F₁ hybrids

When B. napus, B. rapa, transgenic B. napus, and the F₁ hybrid were planted in a greenhouse, transgenic B. napus bloomed at 33 d after planting, whereas the F₁ hybrid bloomed at 37 d after planting. In addition, under the same conditions, the expression of BrAGL20 in the apical meristems of transgenic B. napus and the F₁ hybrids exhibited peaks at week 4 that were about 4.5 and 2.1 times higher than that of the actin internal control gene, after which they decreased (Fig 3). Similarly, the expression of AGL24 in transgenic B. napus and the F₁ hybrids increased at week 4, to 3 and 2.1 times that of actin, respectively, after which they decreased. LFY expression also peaked at week 4, to 3.6 and 4.3 times that of actin, in transgenic B. napus and the F₁ hybrids, respectively, and AP1 expression peaked to 3 and 1.6 times that of actin.

Download:

Fig 3. Real-time RT-PCR quantification of (A) BrAGL20, (B) AGL24, (C) LFY, and (D) AP1 expression in Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and F₁ hybrid apical meristems collected over six weeks.

Values indicate the mean (n = 3) accumulation of each gene transcript, relative to the corresponding actin gene levels.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103.g003

Fatty acid composition

The fatty acid composition of B. napus seeds was similar to that of transgenic B. napus seeds (Fig 4, S1 Table), and at 50 DAP, the fatty acid composition of B. napus and transgenic B. napus seeds was 6.1% and 5.3% palmitic acid (C16:0), respectively, 3.1% and 2.8% stearic acid (C18:0), 60.7% and 69.4% oleic acid (C18:1), respectively, 19.2% and 14.1% linoleic acid (C18:2), 6.7% and 4.5% linolenic acid (C18:3), 1.5% and 1.4% eicosenoic acid (C20:1), and 0.09% and 0.06% erucic acid (C22:1). At 50 DAP, the fatty acid composition of B. rapa seeds was 3.3% C16:1, 1.3% C18:0, 33.3% C18:1, 12.3% C18:2, 5.4% C18:3, 10.8% C20:1, and 30.3% C22:1. At 50 DAP, the fatty acid composition of F₁ hybrid seeds was 4.6% C16:0, 1.5% C18:0, 35.9% C18:1, 19.4% C18:2, 6.6% C18:3, 14.4% C20:1, and 17.8% C22:1.

Download:

Fig 4. Erucic acid content (%) of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and F₁ hybrid seeds at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 days after pollination.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103.g004

Characterization of Bn.FAE1-A8 and Bn.FAE1-C3

Bn.FAE1-A8 from B. napus and transgenic B. napus exhibited a C-to-T substitution at 845 bp, as well as a deletion of two adenine residues at 1,422–1,423 bp (Fig 5). However, no changes were observed in the B. rapa sequences, and the F₁ hybrids exhibited a ~50:50 ratio of C and T at 845 bp.

Download:

Fig 5. Nucleotide sequence comparison of BnA8.FAE1 and BnC3.FAE1 from Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and F₁ hybrids.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103.g005

Seed production of the BC1 generation

The hand pollination of 2,294 B. rapa flowers with F₁ hybrid pollen resulted in the formation of 492 pods (21.5% pod setting rate), with an average of four seeds per pod. In the bioassay of BC₁ progeny, 50% of BC₁ progeny exhibited resistance to 0.3% Basta (outcrossing rate; Table 1), and similar to the F₁ hybrid seeds, 460 of 1,956 seeds (23.5%) were cracked. In addition, both the 445 bp band that indicated the amplification of bar and the 738 bp band that indicated the amplification of the partial 35S promoter and BrAGL20 were detected in the PCR amplification products of all of the herbicide-resistant BC₁ progeny (S1 Fig).

Discussion

Outcrossing rate between B. rapa and transgenic B. napus

Although a number of studies have investigated the gene flow of transgenic B. napus to other species in the Brassicaceae, the controversy over the environmental impact of GMOs remains. The facts that the wild relative species of Brassicaceae easily hybridized with transgenic B. napus are greater in number compared to other transgenic crops, and they are largely distributed to the surrounding environment including nearby roadsides to cause environmental issues are the cause of such controversy [14, 1, 19]. However, the acreage of transgenic B. napus increases each year, owing to its economic benefits, and the increase is expected to continue.

The hand pollination of a number of B. rapa cultivars with transgenic B. napus pollen resulted in a wide range of crossability, depending on the B. rapa cultivar [12]. In the present study, 17 seeds were harvested per pod, which indicated moderate crossability between the maternal and paternal parents. Variability in the crossability of different B. rapa genotypes is thought to be influenced by the attachment of pollen grains to the stigma, pollen tube penetration, and the abortion of developing embryos [12]. In addition, another study reported that the amount of callose accumulated by papilla cells during pollination between B. rapa and B. napus forms a reproductive barrier that affects crossability [30].

In the present study, the proportion of seeds that were cracked by precocious germination and abortion was 24.5%, which is lower than that observed by Xiao et al. [12]. Cracked seeds can be attributed to three main causes. When seeds were observed at 10–50 DAP, precocious germination was observed between 10 to 20 DAP when B. rapa was used as the maternal parent and transgenic B. napus was used as the pollen donor (S3 Fig). The phenomenon of precocious germination in hybrids of B. rapa and B. napus been reported previously [12,31,32] and is thought to be caused by seed-specific immunomodulation that switches seed maturation to seed germination [33]. The absence of precocious germination in the hybridization of B. rapa with pollen from resynthesized B. napus suggests that the phenomenon was influenced by the paternal parent [12]. The culling of seeds without normal maturation, owing to the formation of callus tissues during seed development, was another cause of cracking, and although the cause of the phenomenon is still unclear, hormonal imbalance are likely responsible. Lastly, seed abortion, a phenomenon of stalled seed development after fertilization, was considered to be cracked. The formation of cracked seeds was also observed in the backcross of the F₁ hybrid to B. rapa, with a cracked seed ratio (23.5%) that was similar to that of the F₁ hybrids. The size of F₁ hybrid seeds was relatively small compared to that of parent seeds, and the thousand-seed weight was lighter than that of the parents, as well (S2 Table). Small seed size may be a disadvantage for fitness, since it could negatively affect seed emergence, initial seedling size, and initial competitiveness over other plants [34]. The fitness of small seed-derived plants might also be reduced under highly dense or shaded conditions, or in response to drought or herbivory. However, despite the lower thousand-seed weight and seed size of the F₁ hybrids in the present study, 100% germination was observed in un-cracked seeds, and the plants also exhibited great vitality.

Correlation between ploidy level and stomatal density

Stomatal density, guard cell length, and stomatal plastid number are often used as morphological markers for identifying the ploidy level of plants [35–38]. In the present study, the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces of B. napus, B. rapa, transgenic B. napus, and F₁ hybrids in the same development phase were examined via SEM. The stomata of the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces were different in all four plants, and those of B. napus and transgenic B. napus were also different. The stomata of the F₁ hybrid exhibited an intermediate form of B. rapa and transgenic B. napus. In general, as ploidy increases, the density of guard cells and epidermal cells are reported to decrease, whereas the length of the guard cells is reported to increase [37,38]. In the observation of guard cells for diploid and triploid Citrus clementine, there was a positive correlation with ploidy level and stomatal cell length and width and a negative correlation with ploidy level and stomatal density [39]. As the result of analyzing the number of stomata within 100 μm² leaf surface area, the present study found that the number of stomata decreased as ploidy level increased, and the F₁ hybrids exhibited intermediate values, when compared to the parent, which is consistent with the data reported by Padoan et al. [39]. The increased guard cell density, which is related to the transpiration rate of guard cells, is required for the movement of water and nutrients [40], and leaf water loss is higher in diploid plants than in triploid plants [39]. Therefore, it remains to be studied that the relationship between the fitness of F₁ hybrids and the transpiration rate of their guard cells be analyzed under various weather conditions.

Expression of flowering-related genes in F₁ hybrids

Transgenic B. napus started flowering on day 33 on average, whereas the F₁ hybrids started flowering on day 37. Both the F₁ hybrids and the transgenic B. napus bloomed in the greenhouse without vernalization. The difference in flowering time between transgenic B. napus and the F₁ hybrids was considered to result from the expression levels of BrAGL20. Transgenic B. napus, which was homozygous for BrAGL20, exhibited a level of BrAGL20 expression that was ~2.1 times that of the F₁ hybrids, which were hemizygous for BrAGL20. This additive transgene expression was also observed in F₁ hybrids of wild B. rapa and transgenic B. napus that was homozygous for GFP [41]. The expression level of AGL20 in Arabidopsis is known to play an important role in regulating flowering time, and the gene functions as the key floral activator that integrates several floral inductive pathways [25]. In transgenic B. napus, flowering time is increasingly advanced as the expression level of BrAGL20 increased [26].

Flowering time genes that regulate floral transition have been reported to regulate the activity of floral meristem identity genes, including LFY and AP1(APETALA1) [42–44]. SOC1 regulates LFY expression by directly binding to the LFY promoter, and the LFY protein activates AP1 expression by binding to the cis-element of AP1. However, Lee et al. [45] suggested that heterodimerization of SOC1 and AGL24 is the key mechanism of LFY expression, since LFY expression appears in tissues that express SOC1 and AGL24 simultaneously.

In the present study, the expression of AGL24, LFY, and AP1 was found to increase, along with BrAGL20, in the F₁ hybrid and transgenic B. napus from week 4, compared to B. napus and B. rapa. Therefore, the regulation of AGL24, LFY, and AP1 by BrAGL20 expression was likely involved in the early flowering of transgenic B. napus and the F₁ hybrids, and the flowering pattern of these plants is thought to have resulted from the additive expression of BrAGL20. The expression peaks of flowering-related genes decreased in the samples from week 5 and week 6.

Fatty acid composition and FAE1 characterization in F₁ hybrids

The fatty acid composition of Brassicaceae is more genetically diverse than that of other major vegetable oil crops, which suggests that the fatty acid composition can be used as a taxonomic character [46,47]. Among the fatty acids, erucic acid is known to create cardiotoxicity [48]. The B. napus that was developed for edible use has low content of erucic acid, but the B. rapa has erucic acid. Therefore, we aimed to investigate how much content of erucic acid is accumulated in F₁ hybrid seeds, assuming when F₁ hybrid seeds were released to the environment. In the present study, the fatty acid composition of B. napus, B. rapa, transgenic B. napus, and F1 hybrid seeds was analyzed to determine changes in the fatty acid composition of the F₁ hybrid seeds. Erucic acid exhibited the greatest change, and the content of erucic acid in the F₁ hybrid seeds was intermediate between B. rapa and transgenic B. napus.

The modern oilseed Brassica napus, which is also called canola, was discovered along with the germplasm of Liho, which is a German spring forage cultivar with low content of erucic acid that has been used as healthy edible oil [49, 50]. The erucic acid synthesis in B. napus seeds is mainly controlled by two genes with additive effect [51], which are the two linked paralogs Bn.FAE1-A8 and Bn.FAE1-C3 [52–55]. As reported by Wang et al. [56], the cysteine residue at 845 bp in BnFAE1-A8 is essential for gene function, and its substitution results in loss of function. In addition, the erucic acid content was decreased when by deletions at two sites in BnFAE1-C3: the AA site at 1,422–1,423 bp and the AGGC site at 1368–1371 bp. In the analysis of B. napus varieties, the function of the AA site was found to be more important than the AGGC site [56].

In the present study, BnFAE1-A8 and BnFAE1-C3 were cloned from B. rapa, B. napus, transgenic B. napus, and F₁ hybrids, in order to analyze their nucleotide sequences. As a result, we found that cysteine was present at the 845 bp site of BnFAE1-A8 in B. rapa and erucic acid was synthesized at 20 DAP. However, the cysteine residue at the 845 bp site was substituted by a thiamine residue in both B. napus and transgenic B. napus, and the AA site of BnFAE1-C3 was deleted, as well. Although the AGGC site of BnFAE1-C3 remained, the AA site was apparently more important in the synthesis of erucic acid, as mentioned in the literature [56]. Therefore, no erucic acid was synthesized in transgenic B. napus at 10–50 DAP. Since the BnFAE1-A8 gene in the F₁ hybrids was inherited from both B. rapa and transgenic B. napus, the probability of either C or T at the 845 bp site was estimated as 50% each, and sequencing of a number of BnFAE1-A8 from F₁ hybrid, confirmed that the probability of the two variations were each 50%.

In addition, the F₁ hybrids were verified to contain almost half the level of erucic acid in B. rapa at 30 DAP, which is when erucic acid synthesis began. Thus, the erucic acid level could be used to identify F₁ hybrid between B. rapa and transgenic B. napus. In B. rapa, erucic acid was first detected at 20 DAP and increased by over 30% at 30 DAP. In the F₁ hybrids, erucic acid was first detected at 20 DAP, gradually increased by about 12.5% at 30 DAP, and then increased to 50% of the total fatty acids after 30 DAP. As for B. napus and transgenic B. napus, erucic acid was not detected in any seeds at 10–50 DAP.

In the present study, the BrAGL20 transgene was transferred to F₁ hybrids via hand pollination and was expressed stably, as indicated by early flowering. Even though F₂ progeny could not be produced via self-pollination of F₁ hybrids, BC₁ progeny was obtained by backcrossing the F₁ hybrid to B. rapa, which confirms the potential for gene flow in nature if B. rapa is distributed in the vicinity of unintentionally generated co-flowering F₁ hybrids. The frequency distribution of chromosome numbers during the meiosis MII stage of sesquidiploid-like F₁ hybrids was binomially distributed [57]. Gametes with other chromosomes numbers (from n = 10 to n = 19) failed to exhibit any significant difference in competitive ability before fertilization, but the survival rate after fertilization was reported to differ greatly. BC₁ progeny is predicted to have varying numbers of chromosomes and, as a result, to exhibit variation in the expression of the target transgene, as well as in its related phenotypic trait. It is also necessary to backcross each BC₁ progeny to generate subsequent progenies and to investigate their environmental sustainability. In addition, the available genetic resources for Brassicaceae are very diverse, and thus, the characteristics of hybrids from GM canola and other Brassicaceae should be investigated, as well.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. PCR analysis of bar and target gene in Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic B. napus, F₁ hybrid and BC₁ progeny.

PC, positive control (DNA of plant expression vector used for transformation); NC, negative control (instead of template DNA DDW was used for PCR); YS, B. napus L. ‘Youngsan’; JK, B. rapa L. ‘Jangkang’; TG, transgenic B. napus L. cv. Youngsan; F₁, F₁ hybrid of B. rapa L. ‘Jangkang’ and TG B. napus L. ‘Youngsan’; BC₁, First backcross generation of B. rapa ♀ and the F₁ hybrid ♂.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Flow cytometry histograms, showing the ploidy levels of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and F₁ hybrids.

Red arrows indicate the fluorescent intensity peaks used to determine ploidy levels.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Fig. Seed development of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and the F₁ hybrid at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 days after pollination (DAP).

The F₁ hybrid seeds exhibited precocious germination at 20 days after pollination (DAP) and callus tissues at 40 and 50 DAP.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103.s003

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Fatty acid composition of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and F₁ hybrid seeds.

Values indicate the mean fatty acid content (%) ± standard deviation of three replicates. DAP, days after pollination; B. rapa, B. rapa L. ‘Jangkang’; B. napus, B. napus L. ‘Youngsan’; TG B. napus, transgenic B. napus L. ‘Youngsan’; B. rapa × TG B. napus, F₁ hybrid between B. rapa L. ‘Jangkang’ and TG B. napus L. ‘Youngsan’.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103.s004

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Seed characteristics of F1 hybrid between B. rapa and TG B. napus.

Values indicate the mean ±standard deviation from three replications. TG B. napus, transgenic B. napus L. cv. Youngsan; B. rapa ♀ x TG B. napus♂, F₁ hybrid between B. rapa L. cv. Jangkang and TG B. napus L. cv. Youngsan.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162103.s005

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted with the support of the Research Program for Agricultural Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01186703), National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: SIS YJO.
Formal analysis: YJO.
Funding acquisition: SIS.
Investigation: SIS.
Methodology: SIS HCK.
Project administration: SIS.
Validation: YHL.
Visualization: YJO.
Writing – original draft: SIS KRL YHL.
Writing – review & editing: KRL HSC AC.

References

1. Tsuda M, Ohsawa R, Tabei Y. Possibilities of direct introgression from Brassica napus to B. juncea and indirect introgression from B. napus to related Brassicaceae through B. junce. Breeding Sci. 2014; 64: 74–82.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Wilkinson M, Tepfer M. Fitness and beyond: Preparing for the arrival of GM crops with ecologically important novel characters. Environ Biosafety Res. 2009; 8: 1–14. pmid:19419648
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Hillbeck A, Meier M, Römbke J, Jänsch S, Teichmann H, Tappeser B. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants—concepts and controversies. Environ Sci Eur. 2011; 23:13.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Snow AA, Moran-Palma P. Commercial cultivation of transgene crops: potential ecological risks. Bioscience 1997; 47: 86–97.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Gueritaine G, Sester M, Eber F, Chevre AM, Darmency H. Fitness of backcross six of hybrids between transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Mol Ecol. 2002; 11: 1419–1426. pmid:12144662
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Chevre A-M, Eber F, Jenczewski E, Darmency H, Renard M. Gene flow from oilseed rape to weedy species. Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci. 2003; 53: 22–25.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Halfhill MD, Sutherland JP, Moon HS, Poppy GM, Warwick SI, Weissinger AK, et al. Growth, productivity, and competitiveness of introgressed weedy Brassica rapa hybrids selected for the presence of Bt cry1Ac and gfp transgenes. Mol Ecol. 2005; 14: 3177–3189. pmid:16101783
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Legere A. Risks and consequences of gene flow from herbicide-resistant crops: canola (Brassica napus L) as a case study. Pest Manag Sci. 2005; 61: 292–300. pmid:15593291
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Jorgensen RB, Andersen B. Spontaneous hybridizaon between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy Brassica campestris (Brassicaceae)—a rise of growing genetically-modified oilseed rape. Am J Bot. 1994; 81: 1620–1626.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Mikkelsen TR, Andersen B, Jörgensen RB. The risk of crop transgene spread. Nature 1996; 380: 31.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Jørgensen RB, Andersen B, Hauser TP, Landbo L, Mikkelsen TR, Østergård H. Introgression of crop genes from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) to related wild species—an avenue for the escape of engineered genes. Acta Hort. 1998; 459: 211–217.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Xiao L, Lu C, Zhang B, Bo H, Wu Y, Wu G, et al. Gene transferability from transgenic Brassica napus L. to various subspecies and varieties of Brassica rapa. Transgenic Res. 2009; 18: 733–746. pmid:19357986
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Wilkinson MJ, Sweet J, Poppy GM. Risk assessment of GM plants: Avoiding gridlock?. Trends Plant Sci. 2003b; 8: 208–212.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Cao D, Stewart CN Jr, Zheng M, Guan Z, Tandg Z, Wei W, et al. Stable Bacillus thuringiensis transgene introgression from Brassica napus to wild mustard B. juncea. Plant Sci. 2014; 227: 45–50. pmid:25219305
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Halfhill MD, Millwood RJ, Raymer PL, Stewart CN Jr. Bt transgenic canola hybridization with its weedy relative, Brassica rapa. Environ Biosafety Res. 2002; 1: 19–28.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Allainguillaume J, Alexander M, Bullock J, Saunders M, Allender CJ, King G, Ford CS, et al. Fitness of hybrids between rapeseed (Brassica napus) and wild Brassica rapa in natural habitats. Mol Ecol. 2006; 15: 1175–1184. pmid:16599976
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Warwick SI, Simard MJ, Legere A, Beckie HJ, Braun L, Zhu B, et al. Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Wild.) OE Schulz. Theor Appl Genet. 2003; 107: 528–539.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Tomiuk J, Hauser TP, Bagger-Jorgensen R. A- or C-chromosomes, does it matter for the transfer of transgenes from Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;100: 750–754.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Warwick SI, Légère A, Simard MJ, James T. Do escaped transgenes persist in nature? The case of an herbicide resistance transgene in a weedy Brassica rapa population. Mol Ecol. 2008; 17: 1387–1395. pmid:17971090
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Mikkelsen TR, Jensen J, Jorgensen RB. Inheritance of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) RAPD markers in a backcross progeny with Brassica campestris. Theor Appl Genet. 1996b; 92: 492–497.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Snow AA, Andersen B, Jörgensen RB. Costs of transgenic herbicide resistance introgressed from Brassica napus into weedy B. rapa. Mol Ecol. 1999; 8: 605–615.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Hauser TP, Jørgensen RB, Østergård H. Fitness of backcross and F₂ hybrids between weedy Brassica rapa and oilseed rape (B. napus). Heredity 1998a; 81: 436–443.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Hauser TP, Shaw RG, Østergård H. Fitness of F₁ hybrids between weedy Brassica rapa and oilseed rape (B. napus). Heredity 1998b; 81: 429–435.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Lee J, Lee I. Regulation and function of SOC1, a flowering pathway integrator. J Exp Bot. 2010; 61: 2247–2254. pmid:20413527
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Lee H, Suh SS, Park E, Cho E, Ahn JH, Kim SG, et al. The AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 MADS domain protein integrates floral inductive pathways in Arabidopsis. Gene Dev. 2000; 14: 2366–2376. pmid:10995392
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Hong JK, Kim S-Y, Kim K-S, Kwon S-J, Kim JS, Kim JA, et al. Overexpression of a Brassica rapa MADS-box gene, BrAGL20, induces early flowering time phenotypes in Brassica napus. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2012; 7: 231–237.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Rogers SO, Bendich AJ. Extraction of DNA from plant, fungal and algal tissues, In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoort RA, Boston MA, editors. Plant Molecular Biology Manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994. D 1 pp. 1–8.
28. Yao K, Lockhart KM, Kalanack JJ. Cloning of dehydrin coding sequences from Brassica juncea and Brassica napus and their low temperature-inducible expression in germinating seeds. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2005; 43: 83–89. pmid:15763669
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Naidu M, Hafeeza K, Sulochanamma G, Sowbhagya HB, Hebbar U, Prakash M, et al. Effect of drying methods on the quality characteristics of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) Greens. Dry Technol. 2012; 30: 808–816.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Meng JL. Studies on pollen-pistil interaction between Brassica napus and its relative species and genus. Acta Agronomica Sin. 1990; 16(1): 19–25.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Calder RA. Interpollination of brassicas. Its significance in relation to seed-production. New Zeal J of Agr. 1937; 55: 299–308.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Hauser TP, Ostergard H. Precocious germination of Brassica rapa x B. napus seeds within pods. Hereditas 1999; 130: 89–93.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Phillips J, Artsaenko O, Fiedler U, Horstmann C, Mock HP, Müntz K, et al. Seed-specific immunomodulation of abscisic acid activity induces a developmental switch. The EMBO J. 1997; 16: 4489–4496. pmid:9303293
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Liu Y, Tang Z, Darmency H, Stewart CN Jr, Di K, Wei W, et al. The effect of seed size on hybrids formed between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and wild brown mustard (B. junccea). PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e39705. pmid:22745814
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Mishra MK. Stomatal characteristics at different ploidy level in Coffea L. Ann Bot. 1999; 80: 689–692.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Beck SL, Dunlop R, Fossey A. Stomatal length and frequency as a measure of ploidy level in black wattle, Acacia meamsii (de Wild). Bot J Linn Soc. 2003; 141: 177–181.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Yuan SX, Liu YM, Fang ZY, Yang LM, Zhuang M, Zhang YY, et al. Study on the relationship between the ploidy level of microspore-derived plants and the number of chloroplasts in stomatal guard cells in Brassica oleracea. Agr Sci China 2009; 8: 939–946.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Ye YM, Tong J, Shi XP, Yuan W, Li GR. Morphological and cytological studies of diploid and colchicines-induced tetraploid lines of crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica L.). Sci Hortic. 2010; 124: 95–101.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Padoan D, Mossad A, Chiancone B, Germana MA, Kjan PSSV. Ploidy levels in Citrus clementine affects leaf morphology, stomatal density and water content. Theor Exp Plant Physiol. 2013; 25(4): 283–290.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Hetherington AM, Woodward FI. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 2003; 424: 901–908. pmid:12931178
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Halfhill MD, Millwood RJ, Weissinger AK, Warwick SL, Stewart CN. Additive transgene expression and genetic introgression in multiple green-fluorescent protein transgenic crop x weed hybrid generations. Theor ApplGenet. 2003;107: 1533–1540.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Komeda Y. Genetic regulation of time to flower in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004; 55: 521–535. pmid:15377230
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Parcy F. Flowering: a time for integration. Int J Dev Biol. 2005; 49: 585–593. pmid:16096967
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Gregis V, Sessa A, Colombo L, Kater MM. AGL24, SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE, and APETALA1 redundantly control AGAMOUS during early stages of flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006; 18: 1373–1382. pmid:16679456
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Lee J, Oh M, Park H, Lee I. SOC1 translocated to the nucleus by interaction with AGL24 directly regulates LEAFY. Plant J. 2008; 55: 832–843. pmid:18466303
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Mandal S, Yadav S, Singh R, Begum G, Suneja P, Singh M. Correlation studies on oil content and fatty acid profile of some Cruciferous species. Genet Resour Crop Ev. 2002; 49: 551–556.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Barthet VJ. (n-7) and (n-9) cis-monounsaturated fatty acid contents of 12 Brassica species. Phytochemistry 2008; 69: 411–417. pmid:17889912
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Bozcali E, Süzer Ö, Gürsoy HN, Atukeren P, Gümüstas KM. Effects of erucic acid supplemented feeding on chronic doxorubucin toxicity in rats. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2009; 2(4): 337–347. pmid:20057977
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Stefansson BR, Hougen FW, Downey RK. Note on the isolation of rape plants with seed oil free from erucic acid. Can J Plant Sci. 1961; 41: 218–219.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Broun P, Gettner S, Somerville C. Genetic engineering of plant lipids. Annu Rev Nutr. 1999; 19: 197–216. pmid:10448522
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Downey RK, Craig BM. Genetic control of fatty acid biosynthesis in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1964; 41: 475–478.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Ecke W, Uzunova M, Weißleder K. Mapping the genome of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). II. Localization of genes controlling erucic acid synthesis and seed oil content. Theor Appl Genet. 1995; 91: 972–977. pmid:24169985
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Qiu D, Morgan C, Shi J, Long Y, Liu J, Li R, et al. A comparative linkage map of oilseed rape and its use for QTL analysis of seed oil and erucic acid content. Theor Appl Genet. 2006; 114: 67–80. pmid:17033785
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Wang N, Wang Y, Tian F, King GJ, Zhang C, Long Y, et al. A functional genomics resource for Brassica napus: development of an EMS mutagenized population and discovery of FAE1 point mutations by TILLING. New Phytol. 2008; 180: 751–765. pmid:18811617
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Wu G, Wu Y, Xiao L, Li X, Lu C. Zero erucic acid trait of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) results from a deletion of four base pairs in the fatty acid elongase 1 gene. Theor Appl Genet. 2008; 116: 491–499. pmid:18075728
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. Wang N, Shi L, Tian F, Ning H, Wu X, Long Y, et al. Assessment of FAE1 polymorphisms in three Brassica species using EcoTilling and their association with differences in seed erucic acid content. BMC Plant Biol. 2010; 10: 137. pmid:20594317
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
57. Lu C, Kato M. Fertilization fitness and relation to chromosome number in interspecific progeny between Brassica napus and B. rapa: A comparative study using natural and resynthesized B. napus. Breeding Sci.2001; 51: 73–81.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Tsuda M, Ohsawa R, Tabei Y. Possibilities of direct introgression from Brassica napus to B. juncea and indirect introgression from B. napus to related Brassicaceae through B. junce. Breeding Sci. 2014; 64: 74–82.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Wilkinson M, Tepfer M. Fitness and beyond: Preparing for the arrival of GM crops with ecologically important novel characters. Environ Biosafety Res. 2009; 8: 1–14. pmid:19419648
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] PubMed/NCBI

[7] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Hillbeck A, Meier M, Römbke J, Jänsch S, Teichmann H, Tappeser B. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants—concepts and controversies. Environ Sci Eur. 2011; 23:13.
View Article
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Snow AA, Moran-Palma P. Commercial cultivation of transgene crops: potential ecological risks. Bioscience 1997; 47: 86–97.
View Article
Google Scholar

[12] View Article

[13] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Gueritaine G, Sester M, Eber F, Chevre AM, Darmency H. Fitness of backcross six of hybrids between transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Mol Ecol. 2002; 11: 1419–1426. pmid:12144662
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] PubMed/NCBI

[17] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Chevre A-M, Eber F, Jenczewski E, Darmency H, Renard M. Gene flow from oilseed rape to weedy species. Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci. 2003; 53: 22–25.
View Article
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Halfhill MD, Sutherland JP, Moon HS, Poppy GM, Warwick SI, Weissinger AK, et al. Growth, productivity, and competitiveness of introgressed weedy Brassica rapa hybrids selected for the presence of Bt cry1Ac and gfp transgenes. Mol Ecol. 2005; 14: 3177–3189. pmid:16101783
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Legere A. Risks and consequences of gene flow from herbicide-resistant crops: canola (Brassica napus L) as a case study. Pest Manag Sci. 2005; 61: 292–300. pmid:15593291
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Jorgensen RB, Andersen B. Spontaneous hybridizaon between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy Brassica campestris (Brassicaceae)—a rise of growing genetically-modified oilseed rape. Am J Bot. 1994; 81: 1620–1626.
View Article
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Mikkelsen TR, Andersen B, Jörgensen RB. The risk of crop transgene spread. Nature 1996; 380: 31.
View Article
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Jørgensen RB, Andersen B, Hauser TP, Landbo L, Mikkelsen TR, Østergård H. Introgression of crop genes from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) to related wild species—an avenue for the escape of engineered genes. Acta Hort. 1998; 459: 211–217.
View Article
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Xiao L, Lu C, Zhang B, Bo H, Wu Y, Wu G, et al. Gene transferability from transgenic Brassica napus L. to various subspecies and varieties of Brassica rapa. Transgenic Res. 2009; 18: 733–746. pmid:19357986
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] PubMed/NCBI

[41] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Wilkinson MJ, Sweet J, Poppy GM. Risk assessment of GM plants: Avoiding gridlock?. Trends Plant Sci. 2003b; 8: 208–212.
View Article
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Cao D, Stewart CN Jr, Zheng M, Guan Z, Tandg Z, Wei W, et al. Stable Bacillus thuringiensis transgene introgression from Brassica napus to wild mustard B. juncea. Plant Sci. 2014; 227: 45–50. pmid:25219305
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Halfhill MD, Millwood RJ, Raymer PL, Stewart CN Jr. Bt transgenic canola hybridization with its weedy relative, Brassica rapa. Environ Biosafety Res. 2002; 1: 19–28.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Allainguillaume J, Alexander M, Bullock J, Saunders M, Allender CJ, King G, Ford CS, et al. Fitness of hybrids between rapeseed (Brassica napus) and wild Brassica rapa in natural habitats. Mol Ecol. 2006; 15: 1175–1184. pmid:16599976
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Warwick SI, Simard MJ, Legere A, Beckie HJ, Braun L, Zhu B, et al. Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Wild.) OE Schulz. Theor Appl Genet. 2003; 107: 528–539.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Tomiuk J, Hauser TP, Bagger-Jorgensen R. A- or C-chromosomes, does it matter for the transfer of transgenes from Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;100: 750–754.
View Article
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Warwick SI, Légère A, Simard MJ, James T. Do escaped transgenes persist in nature? The case of an herbicide resistance transgene in a weedy Brassica rapa population. Mol Ecol. 2008; 17: 1387–1395. pmid:17971090
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Mikkelsen TR, Jensen J, Jorgensen RB. Inheritance of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) RAPD markers in a backcross progeny with Brassica campestris. Theor Appl Genet. 1996b; 92: 492–497.
View Article
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Snow AA, Andersen B, Jörgensen RB. Costs of transgenic herbicide resistance introgressed from Brassica napus into weedy B. rapa. Mol Ecol. 1999; 8: 605–615.
View Article
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Hauser TP, Jørgensen RB, Østergård H. Fitness of backcross and F₂ hybrids between weedy Brassica rapa and oilseed rape (B. napus). Heredity 1998a; 81: 436–443.
View Article
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Hauser TP, Shaw RG, Østergård H. Fitness of F₁ hybrids between weedy Brassica rapa and oilseed rape (B. napus). Heredity 1998b; 81: 429–435.
View Article
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Lee J, Lee I. Regulation and function of SOC1, a flowering pathway integrator. J Exp Bot. 2010; 61: 2247–2254. pmid:20413527
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] PubMed/NCBI

[81] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Lee H, Suh SS, Park E, Cho E, Ahn JH, Kim SG, et al. The AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 MADS domain protein integrates floral inductive pathways in Arabidopsis. Gene Dev. 2000; 14: 2366–2376. pmid:10995392
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] PubMed/NCBI

[85] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Hong JK, Kim S-Y, Kim K-S, Kwon S-J, Kim JS, Kim JA, et al. Overexpression of a Brassica rapa MADS-box gene, BrAGL20, induces early flowering time phenotypes in Brassica napus. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2012; 7: 231–237.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Rogers SO, Bendich AJ. Extraction of DNA from plant, fungal and algal tissues, In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoort RA, Boston MA, editors. Plant Molecular Biology Manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994. D 1 pp. 1–8.

[ref28] 28. Yao K, Lockhart KM, Kalanack JJ. Cloning of dehydrin coding sequences from Brassica juncea and Brassica napus and their low temperature-inducible expression in germinating seeds. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2005; 43: 83–89. pmid:15763669
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Naidu M, Hafeeza K, Sulochanamma G, Sowbhagya HB, Hebbar U, Prakash M, et al. Effect of drying methods on the quality characteristics of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) Greens. Dry Technol. 2012; 30: 808–816.
View Article
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Meng JL. Studies on pollen-pistil interaction between Brassica napus and its relative species and genus. Acta Agronomica Sin. 1990; 16(1): 19–25.
View Article
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Calder RA. Interpollination of brassicas. Its significance in relation to seed-production. New Zeal J of Agr. 1937; 55: 299–308.
View Article
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Hauser TP, Ostergard H. Precocious germination of Brassica rapa x B. napus seeds within pods. Hereditas 1999; 130: 89–93.
View Article
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Phillips J, Artsaenko O, Fiedler U, Horstmann C, Mock HP, Müntz K, et al. Seed-specific immunomodulation of abscisic acid activity induces a developmental switch. The EMBO J. 1997; 16: 4489–4496. pmid:9303293
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Liu Y, Tang Z, Darmency H, Stewart CN Jr, Di K, Wei W, et al. The effect of seed size on hybrids formed between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and wild brown mustard (B. junccea). PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e39705. pmid:22745814
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Mishra MK. Stomatal characteristics at different ploidy level in Coffea L. Ann Bot. 1999; 80: 689–692.
View Article
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Beck SL, Dunlop R, Fossey A. Stomatal length and frequency as a measure of ploidy level in black wattle, Acacia meamsii (de Wild). Bot J Linn Soc. 2003; 141: 177–181.
View Article
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Yuan SX, Liu YM, Fang ZY, Yang LM, Zhuang M, Zhang YY, et al. Study on the relationship between the ploidy level of microspore-derived plants and the number of chloroplasts in stomatal guard cells in Brassica oleracea. Agr Sci China 2009; 8: 939–946.
View Article
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Ye YM, Tong J, Shi XP, Yuan W, Li GR. Morphological and cytological studies of diploid and colchicines-induced tetraploid lines of crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica L.). Sci Hortic. 2010; 124: 95–101.
View Article
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Padoan D, Mossad A, Chiancone B, Germana MA, Kjan PSSV. Ploidy levels in Citrus clementine affects leaf morphology, stomatal density and water content. Theor Exp Plant Physiol. 2013; 25(4): 283–290.
View Article
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Hetherington AM, Woodward FI. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 2003; 424: 901–908. pmid:12931178
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Halfhill MD, Millwood RJ, Weissinger AK, Warwick SL, Stewart CN. Additive transgene expression and genetic introgression in multiple green-fluorescent protein transgenic crop x weed hybrid generations. Theor ApplGenet. 2003;107: 1533–1540.
View Article
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Komeda Y. Genetic regulation of time to flower in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004; 55: 521–535. pmid:15377230
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] PubMed/NCBI

[139] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Parcy F. Flowering: a time for integration. Int J Dev Biol. 2005; 49: 585–593. pmid:16096967
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Gregis V, Sessa A, Colombo L, Kater MM. AGL24, SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE, and APETALA1 redundantly control AGAMOUS during early stages of flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006; 18: 1373–1382. pmid:16679456
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] PubMed/NCBI

[147] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Lee J, Oh M, Park H, Lee I. SOC1 translocated to the nucleus by interaction with AGL24 directly regulates LEAFY. Plant J. 2008; 55: 832–843. pmid:18466303
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Mandal S, Yadav S, Singh R, Begum G, Suneja P, Singh M. Correlation studies on oil content and fatty acid profile of some Cruciferous species. Genet Resour Crop Ev. 2002; 49: 551–556.
View Article
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Barthet VJ. (n-7) and (n-9) cis-monounsaturated fatty acid contents of 12 Brassica species. Phytochemistry 2008; 69: 411–417. pmid:17889912
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Bozcali E, Süzer Ö, Gürsoy HN, Atukeren P, Gümüstas KM. Effects of erucic acid supplemented feeding on chronic doxorubucin toxicity in rats. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2009; 2(4): 337–347. pmid:20057977
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Stefansson BR, Hougen FW, Downey RK. Note on the isolation of rape plants with seed oil free from erucic acid. Can J Plant Sci. 1961; 41: 218–219.
View Article
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Broun P, Gettner S, Somerville C. Genetic engineering of plant lipids. Annu Rev Nutr. 1999; 19: 197–216. pmid:10448522
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[167] View Article

[168] PubMed/NCBI

[169] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Downey RK, Craig BM. Genetic control of fatty acid biosynthesis in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1964; 41: 475–478.
View Article
Google Scholar

[171] View Article

[172] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Ecke W, Uzunova M, Weißleder K. Mapping the genome of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). II. Localization of genes controlling erucic acid synthesis and seed oil content. Theor Appl Genet. 1995; 91: 972–977. pmid:24169985
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] PubMed/NCBI

[176] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Qiu D, Morgan C, Shi J, Long Y, Liu J, Li R, et al. A comparative linkage map of oilseed rape and its use for QTL analysis of seed oil and erucic acid content. Theor Appl Genet. 2006; 114: 67–80. pmid:17033785
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] PubMed/NCBI

[180] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Wang N, Wang Y, Tian F, King GJ, Zhang C, Long Y, et al. A functional genomics resource for Brassica napus: development of an EMS mutagenized population and discovery of FAE1 point mutations by TILLING. New Phytol. 2008; 180: 751–765. pmid:18811617
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] PubMed/NCBI

[184] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Wu G, Wu Y, Xiao L, Li X, Lu C. Zero erucic acid trait of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) results from a deletion of four base pairs in the fatty acid elongase 1 gene. Theor Appl Genet. 2008; 116: 491–499. pmid:18075728
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] PubMed/NCBI

[188] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Wang N, Shi L, Tian F, Ning H, Wu X, Long Y, et al. Assessment of FAE1 polymorphisms in three Brassica species using EcoTilling and their association with differences in seed erucic acid content. BMC Plant Biol. 2010; 10: 137. pmid:20594317
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] PubMed/NCBI

[192] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Lu C, Kato M. Fertilization fitness and relation to chromosome number in interspecific progeny between Brassica napus and B. rapa: A comparative study using natural and resynthesized B. napus. Breeding Sci.2001; 51: 73–81.
View Article
Google Scholar

[194] View Article

[195] Google Scholar

Characteristics Analysis of F₁ Hybrids between Genetically Modified Brassica napus and B. rapa

Characteristics Analysis of F₁ Hybrids between Genetically Modified Brassica napus and B. rapa

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Plant materials

Outcrossing rate of F₁ hybrid between B. rapa and transgenic B. napus

Confirmation of hybridization by PCR

Confirmation of hybridization by flow cytometry

Comparing of flowering time in transgenic B. napus and F₁ hybrid

RNA extraction and real-time RT-PCR

Structural analysis of pollen and stomata

Lipid extraction and fatty acid methyl ester analysis

Comparison of FAE1 sequences

Results

Outcrossing rate analysis between Brassica rapa and transgenic B. napus

Confirmation of hybridization by PCR and flow cytometry

Pollen morphology

Correlation between ploidy and stomatal density

Flowering time and expression of flowering-related genes in F₁ hybrids

Fatty acid composition

Characterization of Bn.FAE1-A8 and Bn.FAE1-C3

Seed production of the BC1 generation

Discussion

Outcrossing rate between B. rapa and transgenic B. napus

Correlation between ploidy level and stomatal density

Expression of flowering-related genes in F₁ hybrids

Fatty acid composition and FAE1 characterization in F₁ hybrids

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. PCR analysis of bar and target gene in Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic B. napus, F₁ hybrid and BC₁ progeny.

S2 Fig. Flow cytometry histograms, showing the ploidy levels of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and F₁ hybrids.

S3 Fig. Seed development of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and the F₁ hybrid at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 days after pollination (DAP).

S1 Table. Fatty acid composition of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and F₁ hybrid seeds.

S2 Table. Seed characteristics of F1 hybrid between B. rapa and TG B. napus.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Plant materials

Outcrossing rate of F1 hybrid between B. rapa and transgenic B. napus

Confirmation of hybridization by PCR

Confirmation of hybridization by flow cytometry

Comparing of flowering time in transgenic B. napus and F1 hybrid

RNA extraction and real-time RT-PCR

Structural analysis of pollen and stomata

Lipid extraction and fatty acid methyl ester analysis

Comparison of FAE1 sequences

Results

Outcrossing rate analysis between Brassica rapa and transgenic B. napus

Confirmation of hybridization by PCR and flow cytometry

Pollen morphology

Correlation between ploidy and stomatal density

Flowering time and expression of flowering-related genes in F1 hybrids

Fatty acid composition

Characterization of Bn.FAE1-A8 and Bn.FAE1-C3

Seed production of the BC1 generation

Discussion

Outcrossing rate between B. rapa and transgenic B. napus

Correlation between ploidy level and stomatal density

Expression of flowering-related genes in F1 hybrids

Fatty acid composition and FAE1 characterization in F1 hybrids

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. PCR analysis of bar and target gene in Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic B. napus, F1 hybrid and BC1 progeny.

S2 Fig. Flow cytometry histograms, showing the ploidy levels of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and F1 hybrids.

S3 Fig. Seed development of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and the F1 hybrid at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 days after pollination (DAP).

S1 Table. Fatty acid composition of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and F1 hybrid seeds.

S2 Table. Seed characteristics of F1 hybrid between B. rapa and TG B. napus.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

Outcrossing rate of F₁ hybrid between B. rapa and transgenic B. napus

Comparing of flowering time in transgenic B. napus and F₁ hybrid

Flowering time and expression of flowering-related genes in F₁ hybrids

Expression of flowering-related genes in F₁ hybrids

Fatty acid composition and FAE1 characterization in F₁ hybrids

S1 Fig. PCR analysis of bar and target gene in Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic B. napus, F₁ hybrid and BC₁ progeny.

S2 Fig. Flow cytometry histograms, showing the ploidy levels of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and F₁ hybrids.

S3 Fig. Seed development of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and the F₁ hybrid at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 days after pollination (DAP).

S1 Table. Fatty acid composition of Brassica napus, B. rapa, transgenic (TG) B. napus, and F₁ hybrid seeds.