Figures
Abstract
The neotropical bracken fern Pteridium arachnoideum (Kaulf.) Maxon. (Dennstaedtiaceae) is described as an aggressive pioneer plant species. It invades abandoned or newly burned areas and represents a management challenge at these invaded sites. Native to the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado (Tropical Savanna) Brazilian biomes, P. arachnoideum has nevertheless become very problematic in these conservation hotspots. Despite some reports suggesting a possible role of allelopathy in this plant’s dominance, until now there has been little evidence of isolated and individually identified compounds with phytotoxic activities present in its tissues or in the surrounding environment. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the allelopathic potential of P. arachnoideum by isolating and identifying any secondary metabolites with phytotoxic activity in its tissues, litter, and soil. Bioguided phytochemical investigation led to the isolation and identification of the proanthocyanidin selligueain A as the major secondary compound in the green fronds and litter of this fern. It is produced by P. arachnoideum in its green fronds, remains unaltered during the senescence process, and is the major secondary compound present in litter. Selligueain A showed phytotoxic activity against the selected target species sesame (Sesamum indicum) early development. In particular, the compound inhibited root and stem growth, and root metaxylem cell size but did not affect chlorophyll content. This compound can be considered as an allelochemical because it is present in the soil under P. arachnoideum patches as one of the major compounds in the soil solution. This is the first report of the presence of selligueain A in any member of the Dennstaedtiaceae family and the first time an isolated and identified allelochemical produced by members of the Pteridium species complex has been described. This evidence of selligueain A as a putative allelochemical of P. arachnoideum reinforces the role of allelopathy in the dominance processes of this plant in the areas where it occurs.
Citation: de Jesus Jatoba L, Varela RM, Molinillo JMG, Ud Din Z, Juliano Gualtieri SC, Rodrigues-Filho E, et al. (2016) Allelopathy of Bracken Fern (Pteridium arachnoideum): New Evidence from Green Fronds, Litter, and Soil. PLoS ONE 11(8): e0161670. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161670
Editor: Zhihui Cheng, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, CHINA
Received: February 10, 2016; Accepted: August 9, 2016; Published: August 23, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 de Jesus Jatoba et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was possible thanks to Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (http://www.capes.gov.br/) funding awarded to LJJ (Social Demand and Abroad Doctoral Internship - BEX 13753/12-6). All analyses performed in Spain were funded by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (http://www.mineco.gob.es/; AGL2013-42238-R) and Consejería de Economía Innovación y Ciencia, Junta de Andalucía (http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/organismos/empleoempresaycomercio.html; DP12-TEP-725) grants awarded to FAM. Analyses performed in Brazil were funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (http://www.capes.gov.br/), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (http://cnpq.br/), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (http://www.fapesp.br/) grants awarded to SCJG and ERF. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Pteridium plants are cosmopolitan heliophyte ferns that are among the most abundant plant taxa on the planet, present on all continents except Antarctica [1,2]. Plants of the Pteridium genus exhibit extensive phenotypic plasticity with many morphological intermediates between definable morphotypes and the ability for these to hybridize over long distances. Until 2009, the genus was considered monotypic with two subspecies (Pteridium aquilinum ssp. aquilinum and Pteridium aquilinum ssp. caudatum). Eight varieties were recognized within subspecies aquilinum, all found in Europe, and four were recognized within subspecies caudatum, found in South and Central America, Asia, and Oceania [1,2]. A growing need for the revision of the systematics of this species complex culminated in the proposal and adoption of a new infrageneric taxonomic classification based on an analysis of chromosome ploidy and mitochondrial DNA. Pteridium arachnoideum is a separate species according to this classification [1]. In this study, the most recent nomenclature has been adopted, although many of the references on the biology, ecology, and phytochemistry of Pteridium species adhere to the previous classification system.
Pteridium ferns represent a challenge to biodiversity management and conservation around the world as they become dominant in degraded or anthropogenic impacted areas [3,4] and change the environment significantly. They affect soil physicochemical parameters and the cycling and availability of nutrients [5]. The large amount of litter they produce acts as fuel biomass, contributing to large, hot fires [6]. They also represent a challenge in the areas of environmental restoration by interfering with the seed bank composition [7], resprouting of species of interest [6], and vegetation restoration dynamics [8]. The neotropical bracken fern Pteridium arachnoideum (Kaulf.) Maxon. (Dennstaedtiaceae) is described as an aggressive pioneer species that is difficult to manage in the abandoned or newly burned areas it invades [2,9]. It has become problematic in the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado (Tropical Savanna) Brazilian biomes, both of which are classified as conservation hotspots [10]. Its effects on these biomes include seed bank depletion [11], interference with tree species establishment in the Atlantic Forest [9], and interference with the vegetation structure of the Tropical Savanna [12].
Understanding the mechanisms that govern plant dominance and the success of invasive plants has been one of the greatest scientific challenges of the recent decades [13]. These mechanisms involve ecological and evolutionary processes [14], including interactions mediated by resources and competition in the strict sense [15] as well as interactions such as allelopathy [16]. Allelopathy is defined as any direct or indirect effect on the growth, survival, or reproduction of a target plant mediated by the secondary metabolites produced by a donor plant and released into the environment [17].
Secondary metabolites with allelopathic potential are known as allelochemicals. Allelochemicals produce environmental modifications and phytotoxic effects directly via phytotoxicity, or indirectly [18] by interfering with soil microbiota [19], nutrient cycling dynamics and availability [20], or other processes. In this scenario, the isolation and identification of chemical compounds with experimentally observed activities is an essential step in confirming allelopathy [21,22].
Many studies on the phytochemistry of Pteridium species have been performed because of pharmaceutical and toxicological interest in their secondary metabolites. In particular, there has been research concerning pterosins and pterosides activities, such as carcinogenic activity, and of the sesquiterpene ptaquiloside, which is the compound principally responsible for the carcinogenic effects of P. aquilinum in mammals [2,23]. These plants produce large amounts of secondary metabolites with diverse, but not yet fully understood, biological activities [2] and become dominant and problematic in the impacted areas where they occur. However, the mechanisms by which they attain this dominance are not yet well established. Allelopathic interactions can play an important role in this phenomenon, but despite reports on the possible role of allelopathy in this plant’s dominance [9,24], no compounds with phytotoxic activity or any activities associated with allelopathic interactions have been isolated or individually identified for P. arachnoideum or any Pteridium species.
Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the allelopathic potential of P. arachnoideum by isolating and identifying secondary metabolites with phytotoxic activity in its tissues, and the availability of such metabolites in the surrounding environment.
Materials and Methods
Initial Extraction and Bioguided Isolation
Plant Material.
Plant material comprising green fronds, litter, and rhizomes of P. arachnoideum was collected at the end of the dry season from the Tropical Savanna reserve area of the Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Paulo State, Brazil (21°58'02.0" S, 047°52'09.9" W). A voucher specimen was deposited at the herbarium of the UFSCar Botany Department (Voucher n° HUFSCAR8797). Following inspection to remove visible damaged or fungal infected material, it was washed, and green fronds and litter were dried in the shade in a greenhouse (17–43°C). Rhizomes were dried in an oven with forced air circulation at 40°C until a constant weight was reached (190 h). Plant material was ground in an electric mill, and the resulting powder was used for extraction (CITES/FLORA IBAMA Export Permit n° 12BR009485/DF).
Equipment and Reagents.
Commercially available solvents and reagents were used as supplied. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was run on 400 MHz, 500 MHz, and 600 MHz (Agilent, USA) or 400 MHz (Bruker, USA) spectrometers. Chemical shifts were given in ppm, referenced to the deuterated methanol solvent (Methanol-d4) residual 1H signal (δ 4.78), or with tetramethylsilane as internal standard. Analysis by thin layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out using Alugram Sil G/UV254 eluted with ethyl acetate (EtOAc), and Alugram RP-18 W/UV254 plates (both Macherey-Nagel, Germany) eluted with H2O/methanol (MeOH) (5:2 v/v) or H2O/MeOH/Acetonitrile (ACN) (5:1:1 v/v). Column chromatography was performed using Lichroprep RP-18 (40–63 μm; Merck, Germany), Discovery DSC-18 (50 μm; SUPELCO, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and silica gel 0.060–0.200 mm, 60 Å (Acros Organics, Belgium). Flash chromatography was performed on a CombiFlash Rf apparatus using a 15.5 g RediSep Rf Gold C18 column (both Teledyne Isco, USA). High pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with a refractive index (RI) detector (HPLC-RI; Merck-Hitachi, Japan) was performed using LiChrospher RP-18 (10 μm, 250 × 10 mm; Merck, Germany) and Gemini C18 (5 μm, 250 × 4.60 mm; Phenomenex, USA) columns. HPLC coupled with photodiode array (PDA; HPLC-PDA) detector was performed in Waters Alliance 2695 chromatographic system coupled with a Waters 2995 PDA detector (USA), using a Luna 5-μm Phenyl-Hexyl column (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm; Phenomenex, USA).
Extraction and Isolation.
Each plant material sample was extracted using 100 g of dried powder and 500 mL of hexane (Hex) in an ultrasonic bath for 15 min to remove fats and waxes. Following vacuum filtration, this extraction procedure was repeated four times. Defatted material was subjected to five extractions with EtOAc and five extractions with MeOH [25], yielding two extracts each for green fronds (EtOAc, 1.12 g; MeOH, 30.86 g), litter (EtOAc, 455.8 mg; MeOH, 4.80 g) and rhizomes (EtOAc, 255.3 mg; MeOH, 6.78 g).
The EtOAc extracts were first subjected to reverse phase chromatography for chlorophyll removal using a gradient with increasing amounts of MeOH in water (pure water; H2O/MeOH 5:1, 5:2, 5:3, 5:4 v/v; pure MeOH) followed by pure dichloromethane [25]. After TLC analysis, four fractions were obtained from green fronds (GF-1–GF-4) and litter (L-1–L-4).
Fractions GF-2 and L-2 were subjected to normal phase chromatographic processes in a silica gel column eluted using a gradient with increasing amounts of acetone in hexane (Hex/Acetone 1:1, 5:3, 10:7; 5:4; pure acetone) followed by pure MeOH to obtain multiple subfractions: GF-2A–GF-2E and L-2A–L-2D.
Fractions GF-2B and L-2C were subjected to reverse phase HPLC-RI using a semi-preparative column and isocratic elution with ACN/H2O (20:7 v/v) to obtain the following subfractions: GF-2B.1 and GF-2B.2 (from GF-2B), and L-2C.1 and L-2C.2 (from L-2C). Subfraction GF-2B.2 was purified by reverse phase HPLC-RI using an analytical column and isocratic elution with ACN/H2O (1:5 v/v). Crude extracts and fractions were subjected to 1H-NMR analysis, and the purified fraction GF-2B.2p was subjected to additional 13C, COSY-1H-1H, HMBC, and HSQC NMR analyses.
Wheat Coleoptile Bioassays.
The phytotoxic activities of the fractions were measured by conducting bioassays using fragments of etiolated wheat coleoptiles. Wheat seeds (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Catervo) were distributed on Petri dishes (20-mm diameter) lined with a sheet of filter paper moistened with 5 mL of distilled water. Petri dishes were then wrapped in aluminum foil and placed in a germination chamber for 72 h at 25 ± 1°C. Under a safe green light, the apical 2 mm of each etiolated wheat seedling was cut off and discarded. The next 4 mm of each coleoptile was collected for bioassay [25]. Wheat seeds were donated by the Agricultural and Fishery Research and Instruction Institute of Spain (IFAPA Centro Rancho de la Merced, Jerez de la Frontera, CA, Spain). The fractions tested were presolubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and diluted with a potassium phosphate buffer solution (250-mL distilled water, 5-g sucrose, 0.2625-g citric acid, and 0.725-g dibasic potassium phosphate; pH 5.6) to obtain solutions of 0.8, 0.4 and 0.2 mg.mL−1 with a constant DMSO concentration (5 μL.mL−1). For the bioassay conducted using isolated selligueain A, solutions of 1, 0.3, 0.1, 0.03, and 0.01 mM were prepared as previously described [25]. An herbicide treatment was adopted using Logran Extra (terbutryn 59.4% + triasulfuron 0.6%; Syngenta Agro, Spain) solubilized in buffer solution at the same concentrations used for fractions or isolated selligueain A and DMSO (5 μL.mL−1). Negative control was performed using buffer solution and DMSO (5 μL.mL-1). Bioassays were prepared in triplicate for each treatment by adding 2 mL of each solution and five wheat coleoptile fragments to each test tube. Test tubes were capped and kept in the dark in a germination chamber under rotation (0.25 rpm) at 25 ± 1°C [25]. After 24 h, the tubes were opened and the coleoptiles were photographed and measured using Photomed 4 software (Universidad de Cádiz, Puerto Real, Spain).
Soil Analysis
Samples of surficial soil (15 cm in depth) were collected at the start of the dry season from under a P. arachnoideum patch in the Tropical Savanna reserve area of UFSCar, São Paulo State, Brazil (21°58'02.0" S, 047°52'09.9" W). Soil samples were placed in food plastic bags and transported immediately to the laboratory for extraction. Four soil samples (ESQ-1–ESQ-4) were collected (0.58 ± 0.18 kg) from locations spaced at least two meters apart.
Prior to extraction, each sample was inspected to remove visible root, leaf, stone, and arthropod fragments. The extraction was performed for each sample with 50 g of fresh soil and 200 mL of MeOH, under constant agitation in an orbital shaker (120 rpm) for 18 h [26]. The extract was then filtered with qualitative filter paper and dried under constant air flow. The dried extract was suspended in 4 mL of MeOH and filtered with a Minisart® syringe filter (hydrophilic, cellulose acetate, 28 mm, 0.2-μm pore diameter, Sartorius Stedim Biotech, Germany) to remove fine particles and dried under constant air flow.
Soil extracts were then solubilized in 4 mL MeOH and analyzed by TLC (eluted with H2O/MeOH 5:2 v/v) and HPLC-PDA for detection of selligueain A. HPLC-PDA was performed using gradient elution with increasing amounts of ACN (solvent B) in water (solvent A). The gradient profile was as follows: 0–20 min, linear 20–30% of B; 20–25 min, linear 30–100% of B; 25–30 min, linear 100–20% of B. Soil analysis was performed by separate injections of the isolated selligueain A standard and soil extracts in succession.
The selligueain A used as a standard for the soil extract analyses and early growth bioassays was obtained from the EtOAc litter extract of P. arachnoideum by flash chromatography as follows. Litter material was extracted as previously described, and after the first reverse phase chromatographic separation, the corresponding sample L-2 was subjected to reverse phase flash chromatography with 214-nm ultraviolet (UV) light monitoring using gradient elution with increasing amounts of MeOH (solvent B) in water (solvent A) to provide the desired compound. The gradient profile was as follows: 0–10 min, linear 0–10% of B; 10–20 min, linear 10–40% of B; 20–30 min, linear 40–70% of B; 30–45 min, linear 70–100% of B. Selligueain A was collected as a peak at 22 min (40% of B; H2O/MeOH 5:2 v/v).
Early Growth Bioassay
The phytotoxicity of selligueain A was tested on sesame seedlings (Sesamum indicum L. var. BRS seda) early growth as a measure of its allelopathic potential. Phytotoxicity was assessed by measuring morphological and biochemical parameters that can influence competitiveness in field conditions, such as stem and root length and chlorophyll content [27,28]. As this bioassay was intended to serve as the first assessment of selligueain A phytotoxicity to plant early development, sesame was chosen as the target species because of its genetic homogeneity, which tends to result in less variance in early development parameters compared with that of the wild species [29]. Sesame seeds were provided by Dr. Nair H. C. Arriel, Brazilian Enterprise for Agriculture Research (EMBRAPA, Campina Grande, PB, Brazil). Selligueain A was solubilized in a 10 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid buffer solution with DMSO (5 μL.mL−1) to obtain solutions of 1, 0.3, 0.1, 0.03, and 0.01 mM. The buffer pH was adjusted to 6.00 using 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution. A control was performed using buffer solution and DMSO (5 μL.mL−1) only [27].
In a germination chamber, sesame seeds were pregerminated in distilled water at 25°C under a 12 h photoperiod. The bioassay was performed with four replicates each of 10 pregerminated seeds (root 2 mm in length) in transparent plastic boxes (11 × 6 × 4 cm) lined with two sheets of qualitative filter paper, moistened with 6 mL of each solution. The boxes were sealed in plastic bags and kept under the pregermination conditions for 7 days [27]. After this time, the stems and roots of the seedlings were measured, photosynthetic cotyledons were removed and stored frozen (-20°C) until chlorophyll extraction, and roots were removed and fixed in 70% ethanol (EtOH) for metaxylem cell evaluation.
Chlorophyll Content.
Samples of photosynthetic cotyledons (30 mg of fresh weight) were collected and stored frozen in the dark until chlorophyll extraction was performed. The samples collected were one per replicate for each treatment in the early growth bioassay.
Total chlorophyll extraction was performed with the photosynthetic cotyledon samples in sealed test tubes containing 5 mL of DMSO. The test tubes were immersed in water bath at 70°C for 2 h under a safe green light until the photosynthetic cotyledons became visually translucent [30]. Subsequently, the test tubes were kept at room temperature and protected from light until they were cool.
The absorbance of the chlorophyll extracts was measured at 665 nm and 648 nm in a Hach DR 5000 spectrophotometer (Loveland, CO, USA). Results are expressed as chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll in milligrams per gram of fresh tissue, using the following equations [31]:
(1)
(2)
(3)
where Ca, Cb, and Ca + b are the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll concentrations (mg.g−1 of fresh tissue), respectively; and A665 and A648 are the absorbances at 665 nm and 648 nm, respectively.
Metaxylem Cell Evaluation.
To assess metaxylem cell growth, the sesame roots of each treatment and of the control of the early growth bioassay were removed and immediately immersed in 70% EtOH. Staining was performed according to a modified Fuchs method [27]. After 7 days in 70% EtOH, the roots were clarified in a 10% NaOH solution at 50°C for 48 h. Roots were then immersed in a 0.25% lacmoid (C48H31N3O13) ethanolic solution for 24 h.
Following the staining processes, roots were mounted on glass slides with Apathy’s syrup [27] and left at room temperature in the dark until they were dry. The central region of each root was photographed using an optical microscope (Olympus-BX41) coupled to a digital camera (Sony CCD-IRIS) at 20× magnification. Ten metaxylem cells from each of the four root replicates were measured for each treatment and the control using Image J 1.48v software [32].
Statistical Analysis
Data from the wheat coleoptile bioassays were evaluated in terms of percentage inhibition or stimulation compared with that of the negative control [25], according to eq (4):
(4)
where Cr is the length of the reference wheat coleoptile (4 mm);
is the average length of the wheat coleoptile from each treatment; and
is the average length of the wheat coleoptile from the negative control.
The mean inhibitory concentration value (IC50) was calculated from the results of the bioassays with the isolated selligueain A, which exhibited over 50% inhibition compared with that of the negative control. This involved adjusting the phytotoxicity data using a logarithmic scale to generate a sigmoidal dose–response curve defined by eq (5):
(5)
where X is the concentration logarithm; Y is the response (phytotoxicity); Ymax and Ymin are the maximum and minimum values of the response, respectively; and IC50 is the X value for the curve that is midway between Ymax and Ymin [27]. The goodness of fit of the data to the three-parameter logistic model (3PL) from the IC50 calculation is described by the determination coefficient (R2). The curve fitting and IC50 and R2 value calculations were performed using GraphPad Prism 4.0 software (La Jolla, CA, USA).
Data from the bioassays were subjected to Shapiro–Wilk normality test and Levene’s variance homoscedasticity test. When both requirements were met, the data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s mean comparison test. When one or both requirements were not met, the data were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test, followed by Welch’s t-test mean comparison test.
Results and Discussion
Bioguided Isolation
For the green fronds extract, fractions GF-1–GF-3 significantly inhibited wheat coleoptile elongation (Fig 1A). Fraction GF-1 (9.26 mg) showed the highest inhibitory activity ranging from −76% to −39% from highest to lowest concentration. The GF-2 and GF-3 fractions (253.3 mg and 56.4 mg, respectively) were also inhibitory, ranging from −52% to −18% for the GF-2 fraction and from −53% to −26% for GF-3 fraction. According to TLC and 1H-NMR analysis, these samples contained the same major compound. The compound was the purest in the GF-1 fraction, with an increasing presence of interfering compounds in the subsequent fractions. Given the small yield of the GF-1 fraction, the phytochemical study and bioguided isolation were continued with the GF-2 fraction, which was of greater mass and purer than the GF-3 fraction.
(A) and (B): Green frond fractions; (C): Litter fractions. Black columns, 0.8 mg.mL−1; gray columns, 0.4 mg.mL−1; white columns, 0.2 mg.mL−1. Vertical bars indicate standard deviation. Values marked with the letter a (p < 0.01) or b (0.01 < p < 0.05) are significantly different from those of the negative control according to Welch's test.
Five subfractions were obtained from the GF-2 fraction (GF-2A–GF-2E) following normal phase chromatography. Of these, the most active fraction was GF-2A (17.3 mg), with inhibitory activity on wheat coleoptile elongation ranging from −76% to −38%, from highest to lowest concentration; followed by GF-2B (69.7 mg), with inhibitory activity ranging from −43% to −15% (Fig 1B). According to 1H-NMR analysis, the GF-2A and GF-2B fractions contained the same major compound present in a purer form in the GF-2A fraction. Given the small quantity of GF-2A sample, isolation of the major compound by HPLC-IR was conducted on the GF-2B sample yielding the fraction GF-2B.2p (11.3 mg), a purified compound from green fronds.
An analysis of NMR data combined with spectral results reported in the literature led to the identification of the compound in the GF-2B.2p fraction as proanthocyanidin selligueain A [33,34] (S1 File, Fig 2).
Following the isolation and identification of selligueain A from the green frond extract, a phytochemical study of the litter extract was performed to determine whether the major polyphenolic compound in the litter corresponded to that found in the green fronds or to its derivatives, resulting from the metabolic processes of leaf senescence.
Four fractions were obtained from the EtOAc extract of the litter following reversed phase chromatography (L-1–L-4). Fractions L-1 (9.9 mg) and L-2 (82.1 mg) contained the major compound observed in the crude EtOAc extract, with an increasing presence of interfering compounds in subsequent fractions. The inhibitory activity of fraction L-1 ranged from −84% to −53%, whereas that of fraction L-2 ranged from −64% to −23% (Fig 1C). Fraction L-3 (13.9 mg) also showed strong inhibitory activity ranging from −90% to −60%. This activity was comparable to that of the herbicide treatment, though the major compound of the L-1 and L-2 fractions was not present (Fig 1C). Instead, 1H-NMR analysis revealed the presence of flavonol glycosides as major compounds in the L-3 fraction (S2 File).
Given the small yield of the L-1 fraction, the isolation of the major polyphenol compound was performed on the L-2 fraction. Fraction L-2C.1 (6.1 mg) was isolated following normal phase column chromatography and HPLC-RI, and its major compound was identified as selligueain A by NMR analysis (S3 File); the same major compound present in the EtOAc extract of green fronds.
Proanthocyanidin Selligueain A
Proanthocyanidins are condensed tannins, oligopolymers of three-ring flavonoids with C–C bonds, characterized by the monomers catechin and epicatechin and two hydroxyl radicals attached to ring B [35]. Tannins are considered to be the fourth most important group of biochemical compounds produced by vascular plants, representing a significant portion of the carbon terrestrial biomass [36]. As tannins are complex and costly molecules from an energetic point of view, they are believed to play an important role in plant function and evolution, with activity toward protection against UV radiation [36,37]. Several biological activities have been ascribed to proanthocyanidins and materials rich in these compounds, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities [24,38,39]. From an ecological standpoint, condensed tannins are described as having defensive action against herbivory [40] and influencing litter decomposition [41,42], nutrient cycling, and soil microbial activity [43], among other processes.
Selligueain A was first described in the rhizomes of Selliguea feei Bory (Polypodiaceae) [33] and is also present in Polypodium feei (Bory) Mett., another species of the Polypodiaceae family [44]. This is the first report of selligueain A in Pteridium arachnoideum or any member of the Dennstaedtiaceae family, occurring in its green fronds but not its rhizomes.
Phytotoxic Activity of Selligueain A
Most of the tannins produced by Pteridium plants are of the condensed type, proanthocyanidin or prodelphinidin derivatives. Although these tannins are not considered to be among the main toxic compounds produced by these plants, antiherbivore activity has been observed [2,45].
A correlation between the proanthocyanidin concentration and the altitude at which the Pteridium plants grow in the Andes region has been observed [37]. This correlation could be an adaptive response to the increased intensity of UV-B radiation at higher altitudes. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities have also been attributed to selligueain A following its isolation from Polypodium feei rhizomes [44]. However, until now no activities of ecological importance have been attributed to this compound. Selligueain A is present both in P. arachnoideum green fronds and litter, remaining unaltered during the senescence process. As a resource and an energetically costly compound, its persistence in the litter material indicates putative ecological importance. Therefore, we tested the phytotoxic activity and allelopathic potential of selligueain A using measures of wheat coleoptile elongation and sesame early growth.
Selligueain A exhibited phytotoxic activity at all concentrations tested, although a significant reduction in activity was observed from the highest to lowest concentrations (Fig 3). At the highest concentration, the inhibitory activity on wheat coleoptile elongation was over −71%, with an IC50 value of 0.69 mM (R2 = 0.94).
Vertical bars show standard deviation. Values marked with the letter a (p < 0.01) and b (0.01 < p < 0.05) are significantly different from those of the negative control according to Welch's test.
This phytotoxic activity indicates that in addition to protection against UV radiation, proanthocyanidins and other condensed tannins produced by P. arachnoideum may also possess allelopathic activity.
Phytotoxicity to Sesame Early Growth
Selligueain A inhibited stem and root development at all concentrations tested. This inhibition ranged from −52% to −34% for stem development and from −46% to −35% for root development (Table 1). Although stem development was inhibited slightly more than root development, potentially affecting the ability to compete for space and light in field conditions, root development inhibition can disrupt water and nutrient intake, which are critical to seedling survival and establishment [46,47].
Root growth occurs by two main mechanisms: cell division and cell elongation. New cells are produced by rapid cell division in the apical meristem and elongated in the elongation zone of the root tip. In the elongation zone the cells expand, increasing the vacuolar volume and surface area along the root longitudinal axis. This process is under hormonal control and is critical to the development of a functional root system [46]. Here, we chose to evaluate the metaxylem cells because as an anatomic character, they are readily measurable, larger than other root cells, and have thicker cell walls [27], which allows the anatomical evaluation of root cell elongation.
From the size class distribution of the metaxylem cell data (Table 2), a uniform distribution of control cell size was observed, with a greater distribution frequency (40%) of cells between 140 μm and 170 μm. Root metaxylem cells of sesame seedlings grown in the presence of selligueain A were smaller compared with those of the controls. The average metaxylem cell size of the control seedlings was 167 μm. Metaxylem cells of sesame seedlings were significantly smaller at 82 μm and 103 μm in the presence of 1.0 mM or 0.3 mM selligueain A, respectively (Table 2 and Fig 4). The inhibitory activity of selligueain A on metaxylem cell size ranged from −51% to −14% from highest to lowest concentration (Table 1), with an IC50 value of 0.98 mM (R2 = 0.96).
20× magnification.
Chlorophyll content is related to light capture efficiency [48], and as chlorophyll a has several physiological functions in the plant, this biochemical parameter can reflect growth disruptions and toxic stress [49]. Although early growth inhibition was observed, selligueain A showed no inhibitory activity against the chlorophyll content of the sesame seedlings tested (Table 3).
Selligueain A showed phytotoxic activity against the early growth of sesame, affecting stem and root size in particular. At a cellular level, root growth inhibition is caused by a reduction in root cell elongation, at least for the two higher concentrations tested (1 mM and 0.3 mM). The inhibition observed at lower concentrations may be due to cell division disruption, although this mechanism was not assessed in this study [46]. It is possible that outcomes from laboratory studies may not reproduce under field conditions because environmental factors may interfere with Selligueain A activity. Nevertheless, this is the first evidence of the potential for phytotoxicity and allelopathy from a compound isolated and identified from P. arachnoideum or any member of the Pteridium species complex, supporting the role of allelopathy in this plant’s dominance.
Soil Analysis
Despite the evidence from our laboratory experiments suggesting phytotoxic activity and allelopathic potential of selligueain A, the compound can only be considered as an allelochemical if it is present in the environment and available in the soil under natural conditions during the development of the target species [22,50].
HPLC-PDA analysis of the isolated selligueain A used as a standard showed this compound as a chromatographic peak at 17.50 s (Fig 5), with UV absorption at 272 nm (H2O/ACN 5:2 v/v). For the soil sample extracts, selligueain A was identified as one of the major compounds in the solution of four independent soil samples (Fig 5).
S: selligueain A standard; E1: ESQ-1 soil sample extract; E2: ESQ-2 soil sample extract; E3: ESQ-3 soil sample extract; E4: ESQ-4 soil sample extract; 1: selligueain A peak.
Plant-produced compounds are released in the environment by several mechanisms. Of these, lixiviation from green fronds and litter and litter decomposition are the two most likely to be involved in the release of selligueain A from P. arachnoideum [50].
Allelopathic activity has been attributed to phenolic acids associated with the root system of P. aquilinum and to green frond leachates of P. esculentum [51,52]. The results reported herein corroborate the hypothesis of allelopathy in bracken fern with the identification of a phytotoxic condensed tannin, a polyphenolic compound produced by the green fronds of P. arachnoideum and present as a major secondary metabolite in frond litter. This compound may then be leached or liberated by litter decomposition into the soil [16] to be found associated with the plant’s root system but not present within the plant’s rhizome tissue.
Efforts made to control Pteridium invasions, including control and restoration experiments conducted in the UK and Norway, have shown that in the long-term, mechanical cutting twice a year and litter removal were the best approaches for controlling P. aquilinum and promoting higher species richness [4,8,53]. Bracken litter depth and cover influenced seed bank composition in acid grasslands and heathlands in the UK, acting as a barrier that interfered with seed germination or impeded seeds from the seed rain from reaching the soil [7]. The effects of neotropical bracken on the seed bank composition in the Atlantic Forest in Brazil [11] may also be associated with litter cover. However, in addition to the mechanical effect, the new evidence presented herein suggests that the removal of litter as a source of allelochemicals may also be associated with the observed improvement in species richness [4]. Accordingly, more research is needed to establish whether the phenotypic plasticity within the Pteridium genus [1,2] influences their chemical composition, with special attention given to condensed tannins present in the green fronds and frond litter. This information could lead to the development of more efficient control protocols for Pteridium for the purposes of ecological restoration.
Conclusions
This study expands on our knowledge of the phytochemical constituents of Pteridium arachnoideum, reporting for the first time that proanthocyanidin selligueain A is present in a member of the Dennstaedtiaceae family. Likewise, this is the first time an isolated and identified putative allelochemical compound produced by a member of the Pteridium species complex has been described. Selligueain A is produced by P. arachnoideum in its green fronds, remains unaltered during the senescence process, and is the major secondary compound in the litter. This compound showed phytotoxic activity against the early development of sesame seedlings, inhibiting root and stem growth and root metaxylem cell size. Selligueain A can be considered as an allelochemical because it is present in the soil under P. arachnoideum as one of the major compounds in the soil solution. This evidence of selligueain A as a putative allelochemical produced by P. arachnoideum indicates that allelopathy is involved in this plant’s dominance in the areas where it occurs.
Supporting Information
S1 File. NMR (MeOD4) spectrum of selligueain A from green fronds of P. arachnoideum.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161670.s001
(PDF)
S2 File. 1H NMR (MeOD4) of the L-3 fraction of the EtOAc extract of P. arachnoideum litter.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161670.s002
(PDF)
S3 File. 1H NMR (MeOD4) of selligueain A from the litter of P. arachnoideum.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161670.s003
(PDF)
Author Contributions
- Conceptualization: LJJ SCJG RMV.
- Data curation: LJJ.
- Formal analysis: LJJ RMV JMGM ZUD.
- Funding acquisition: SCJG ERF FAM.
- Investigation: LJJ ZUD.
- Methodology: LJJ SCJG RMV ERF FAM.
- Resources: SCJG ERF FAM.
- Supervision: SCJG ERF FAM.
- Visualization: LJJ.
- Writing – original draft: LJJ.
- Writing – review & editing: SCJG RMV JMGM FAM.
References
- 1. Der JP, Thomson JA, Stratford JK, Wolf PG. Global chloroplast phylogeny and biogeography of bracken (Pteridium; Dennstaedtiaceae). Am J Bot. 2009; 96: 1041–1049. pmid:21628254
- 2. Gil da Costa RM, Bastos MMSM, Oliveira PA, Lopes C. Bracken-associated human and animal health hazards: chemical, biological and pathological evidence. J Hazard Mater. Elsevier B.V.; 2012; 203–204: 1–12.
- 3. Suazo-Ortuño I, Lopez-Toledo L, Alvarado-Díaz J, Martínez-Ramos M. Land-use change dynamics, soil type and species forming mono-dominant patches: the case of Pteridium aquilinum in a neotropical rain forest region. Biotropica. 2015; 47: 18–26.
- 4. Stewart G, Cox E, Le Duc M, Pakeman R, Pullin A, Marrs R. Control of Pteridium aquilinum: meta-analysis of a multi-site study in the UK. Ann Bot. 2008; 101: 957–70. pmid:18337356
- 5. DeLuca TH, Zewdie SA, Zackrisson O, Healey JR, Jones DL. Bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum L. kuhn) promotes an open nitrogen cycle in heathland soils. Plant Soil. 2012; 367: 521–534.
- 6. Adie H, Richert S, Kirkman KP, Lawes MJ. The heat is on: frequent high intensity fire in bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) drives mortality of the sprouting tree Protea caffra in temperate grasslands. Plant Ecol. 2011; 212: 2013–2022.
- 7. Ghorbani J, Le Duc MG, McAllister HA, Pakeman RJ, Marrs RH. Effects of the litter layer of Pteridium aquilinum on seed banks under experimental restoration. Appl Veg Sci. 2006; 9: 127–136.
- 8. Maren I, Vandvik V, Ekelund K. Restoration of bracken-invaded Calluna vulgaris heathlands: effects on vegetation dynamics and non-target species. Biol Conserv. 2008; 141: 1032–1042.
- 9. Matos DMDS, Belinato TA. Interference of Pteridium arachnoideum (Kaulf.) Maxon. (Dennstaedtiaceae) on the establishment of rainforest trees. Brazilian J Biol. 2010; 70: 311–316.
- 10. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GA, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000; 403: 853–8. pmid:10706275
- 11. Silva USR, Matos DMS. The invasion of Pteridium aquilinum and the impoverishment of the seed bank in fire prone areas of Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biodivers Conserv. 2006; 15: 3035–3043.
- 12. Miatto RC, Silva IA, Silva-Matos DM, Marrs RH. Woody vegetation structure of Brazilian Cerrado invaded by Pteridium arachnoideum (Kaulf.) Maxon (Dennstaedtiaceae). Flora—Morphol Distrib Funct Ecol Plants. Elsevier GmbH.; 2011; 206: 757–762.
- 13. Catford JA, Jansson R, Nilsson C. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers Distrib. 2009; 15: 22–40.
- 14. Fridley JD, Sax DF. The imbalance of nature: revisiting a Darwinian framework for invasion biology. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2014; 23: 1157–1166.
- 15. Orrock JL, Dutra HP, Marquis RJ, Barber N. Apparent competition and native consumers exacerbate the strong competitive effect of an exotic plant species. Ecology. Ecological Society of America; 2015; 96: 1052–1061.
- 16. Greer MJ, Wilson GWT, Hickman KR, Wilson SM. Experimental evidence that invasive grasses use allelopathic biochemicals as a potential mechanism for invasion: chemical warfare in nature. Plant Soil. 2014; 385: 165–179.
- 17.
Rice EL. Allelopathy. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press Inc.; 1984.
- 18.
Einhelling FA. Mechanisms and modes of action of allelochemicals. In: Putnam AR, Tang CS, editors. The Science of Allelopathy. New York, NY, USA: Wiley—Interscience; 1986. pp. 171–188.
- 19. Cipollini D, Rigsby CM, Barto EK. Microbes as targets and mediators of allelopathy in plants. J Chem Ecol. 2012;
- 20. Kraus TEC, Dahlgren RA, Zasoski RJ. Tannins in nutrient dynamics of forest ecosystems—a review. Plant Soil. 2003; 256: 41–66.
- 21. Blair AC, Weston LA, Nissen SJ, Brunk GR, Hufbauer RA. The importance of analytical techniques in allelopathy studies with the reported allelochemical catechin as an example. Biol Invasions. 2008; 11: 325–332.
- 22. Duke SO. Proving allelopathy in crop–weed interactions. Weed Sci. 2015; 63: 121–132.
- 23. Prakash AS, Pereira TN, Smith BL, Shaw G, Seawright AA. Mechanism of bracken fern carcinogenesis: evidence for H-ras activation via initial adenine alkylation by ptaquiloside. Nat Toxins. 2006; 4: 221–227.
- 24. Wang HH, Chen BJ, Hsu LM, Cheng YM, Liou YJ, Wang CY. Allelopathic effects of bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum L. Kuhn) in Taiwan. Allelopath J. 2012; 27: 97–110.
- 25. Miranda MAFM, Varela RM, Torres A, Molinillo JMG, Gualtieri SCJ, Macías FA. Phytotoxins from Tithonia diversifolia. J Nat Prod. 2015; 78: 1083–1092. pmid:25879678
- 26.
Sampietro DA, Soberón JR, Sgariglia MA, Quiroga EN, Vattuone MA. Soil, air and water samples. In: Sampietro DA, Catalan CAN, Vattuone MA, editors. Isolation, identification and characterization of allelochemicals / natural products. Enfield, NH, USA: Science Publichers; 2009. pp. 7–29.
- 27. Anese S, Jatoba LJ, Grisi PU, Gualtieri SCJ, Santos MFC, Berlinck RGS. Bioherbicidal activity of drimane sesquiterpenes from Drimys brasiliensis Miers roots. Ind Crops Prod. 2015; 74: 28–35.
- 28. Gatti AB, Ferreira AG, Arduin M, Perez SCJGA. Allelopathic effects of aqueous extracts of Aristolochia esperanzae O. Kuntze on development of Sesamum indicum L. seedlings. Acta Bot Brasilica. 2010; 24: 454–461.
- 29. Macías FA, Castellano D, Molinillo JMG. Search for a standard phytotoxic bioassay for allelochemicals. Selection of standard target species. J Agric Food Chem. 2000; 48: 2512–2521. pmid:10888578
- 30. Parry C, Blonquist JM, Bugbee B. In situ measurement of leaf chlorophyll concentration: analysis of the optical/absolute relationship. Plant Cell Environ. 2014; 37: 2508–20. pmid:24635697
- 31. Barnes JD, Balaguer L, Manrique E, Elvira S, Davison AW. A reappraisal of the use of DMSO for the extraction and determination of chlorophylls a and b in lichens and higher plants. Environ Exp Bot. 1992; 32: 85–100.
- 32. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012; 9: 671–675. pmid:22930834
- 33. Baek N-I, Chung M-S, Shamon L, Kardono LBS, Tsauri S, Padmawinata K, et al. Selligueain A, a novel highly sweet proanthocyanidin from de rhizomes of Selliguea feei. J Nat Prod. 1993; 56: 1532–1538. pmid:8254348
- 34. Fu C, Wang H, Ng WL, Song L, Huang D. Antioxidant activity and proanthocyanidin profile of Selliguea feei rhizomes. Molecules. 2013; 18: 4282–4292. pmid:23579995
- 35.
Ebrahimnejad H, Burkholz T, Jacob C. Flavonols and proanthocyanidins. In: Jacob C, Kirsch G, Slusarenko A, Winyard PG, Burkholz T, editors. Recent advances in redox active plant and microbial products. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014. pp. 211–232.
- 36. Alonso-Amelot ME, Oliveros-Bastidas A, Calcagno-Pisarelli MP. Phenolics and condensed tannins of high altitude Pteridium arachnoideum in relation to sunlight exposure, elevation, and rain regime. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2007; 35: 1–10.
- 37. Alonso-Amelot ME, Oliveros A, Calcagno-Pisarelli MP. Phenolics and condensed tannins in relation to altitude in neotropical Pteridium spp. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2004; 32: 969–981.
- 38. Nakashima S, Oda C, Masuda S, Tagashira M, Kanda T. Isolation and structure elucidation of tetrameric procyanidins from unripe apples (Malus pumila cv. Fuji) by NMR spectroscopy. Phytochemistry. 2012; 83: 144–52. pmid:22889530
- 39. Sarg TM, Abbas FA, El-Sayed ZI, Mustafa AM. Two new polyphenolic compounds from Ficus retusa L. “variegata” and the biological activity of the different plant extracts. J Pharmacogn Phyther. 2011; 3: 89–100.
- 40. Moctezuma C, Hammerbacher A, Heil M, Gershenzon J, Méndez-Alonzo R, Oyama K. Specific polyphenols and tannins are associated with defense against insect herbivores in the tropical oak Quercus oleoides. J Chem Ecol. 2014; 40: 458–467. pmid:24809533
- 41. Coq S, Souquet J-M, Meudec E, Cheynier V, Hättenschwiler S. Interspecific variation in leaf litter tannins drives decomposition in a tropical rain forest of French Guiana. Ecology. 2010; 91: 2080–2091. pmid:20715630
- 42. Hättenschwiler S, Jørgensen HB. Carbon quality rather than stoichiometry controls litter decomposition in a tropical rain forest. J Ecol. 2010; 98: 754–763.
- 43. Smolander A, Kanerva S, Adamczyk B, Kitunen V. Nitrogen transformations in boreal forest soils—does composition of plant secondary compounds give any explanations? Plant Soil. 2011; 350: 1–26.
- 44. Subarnas A, Wagner H. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity of the proanthocyanidin selligueain A from Polypodium feei METT. Phytomedicine. 2000; 7: 401–5. pmid:11081991
- 45. Alonso-Amelot ME, Oliveros A, Calcagno MP, Arellano E. Bracken adaptation mechanisms and xenobiotic chemistry. Pure Appl Chem. 2001; 73: 549–553.
- 46. Dolan L, Davies J. Cell expansion in roots. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004; 7: 33–39. pmid:14732439
- 47. Grossnickle SC. Why seedlings survive: influence of plant attributes. New For. 2012; 43: 711–738.
- 48. Lohbeck M, Poorter L, Martínez-Ramos M, Rodriguez-Velázquez J, van Breugel M, Bongers F. Changing drivers of species dominance during tropical forest succession. Funct Ecol. 2014; 28: 1052–1058.
- 49. Flores-de-Santiago F, Kovacs JM, Flores-Verdugo F. Seasonal changes in leaf chlorophyll a content and morphology in a sub-tropical mangrove forest of the Mexican Pacific. Mar Ecol. 2012; 444: 57–68.
- 50. Zeng R Sen. Allelopathy—the solution is indirect. J Chem Ecol. 2014; 515–516. pmid:24946747
- 51.
Glass ADM. The allelopathic potential of phenolic acids associated with the rhizosphere of Pteridium aquilinum. Can J Bot. NRC Research Press Ottawa, Canada; 1976; 54: 2440–2444. https://doi.org/10.1139/b76-259
- 52.
Taylor JE, Thomson JA. Allelopathic activity of frond run-off from Pteridium esculentum. In: Taylor JA, Smith RT, editors. Bracken Biology and Management. Occasional. Sydney, Australia: Australian Institute of Agricultural Science—AIAS; 1990. pp. 203–208.
- 53. Ghorbani J, Duc MGLE, Mcallister HA, Pakeman RJ, Marrs RH. Effects of experimental restoration on the diaspore bank of an upland moor degraded by Pteridium aquilinum invasion. L Degrad Dev. 2007; 669: 659–669.