Figures
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous small non-coding RNAs that regulate various biological processes including sexual dimorphism. The oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis is one of the most destructive agricultural insect pests in many Asian countries. However, no miRNAs have been identified from the separate sex and gonads to elucidate sex gonad differentiation in B. dorsalis. In this study, we constructed four small RNA libraries from whole body of females, males (except ovaries and testes) and ovaries, testes of B. dorsalis for deep sequencing. The data analysis revealed 183 known and 120 novel miRNAs from these libraries. 18 female-biased and 16 male-biased miRNAs that may be involved in sexual differentiation were found by comparing the miRNA expression profiles in the four libraries. Using a bioinformatic approach, we predicted doublesex (dsx) as a target gene of the female-biased miR-989-3p which is considered as the key switch gene in the sex determination of tephritid insects. This study reveals the first miRNA profile related to the sex differentiation and gives a first insight into sex differences in miRNA expression of B. dorsalis which could facilitate studies of the reproductive organ specific roles of miRNAs.
Citation: Peng W, Tariq K, Xie J, Zhang H (2016) Identification and Characterization of Sex-Biased MicroRNAs in Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel). PLoS ONE 11(7): e0159591. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159591
Editor: Yun Zheng, Kunming University of Science and Technology, CHINA
Received: December 21, 2015; Accepted: July 6, 2016; Published: July 21, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Peng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This research was supported by the earmarked fund for the China Agricultural Research System (No. CARS-27) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2014PY005). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Sexual dimorphism is prevalent in insects, and it is thought that, transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulators have an impact in this biological process [1,2]. The regulation of sex-biased genes expression between males and females through several classes of small RNAs play important role in the sexual differentiation [3–5]. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of approximately 22 nucleotide (nt) endogenous non-coding small RNAs generated by Dicer enzymes processing of hairpin precursors that are involved in regulation gene expression at the post-transcriptional level [1,6–8]. In insects, mature miRNAs are loaded with an Argonaute protein to repress mRNA transcript or protein translation by binding to the 3’ UTR region of the target gene with imperfect complementarity [7]. The seed region (bases 2–8 from the 5’ end), which is the most highly conserved sequences of the miRNA contributes significantly to miRNA-target interaction [9–11]. The complex relationship between miRNA and mRNA form an intricate epigenetic mechanism for spatial and temporal gene expression regulation [12,13]. Thus miRNAs participate in regulating various biological processes including embryonic development, sexual identity, metamorphosis, fat metabolism and immune [3,14–17].
Recently, application of deep sequencing technology and in silico analysis have revealed amounts of miRNAs in plants, animals and viruses. The establishment of small RNA libraries of different life stages and specific tissue in these species stimulate a comprehensive and more in-depth studies of miRNAs in the development and other physiological process. The expression profiles and sex-biased miRNAs in sexual dimorphism have been characterized in the animals of mouse, chicken [18,19] and insects including Drosophila melanogaster, Tribolium castaneum, Manduca sexta [3,4,20,21]. Different miRNA expression profiles between testis and ovary in mouse have found 49 and 48 miRNAs exclusively existed in the gonad respectively. Mir-17-92 and Mir-106b-25 are involved in the mice spermatogenesis [18]. In D. melanogaster, sex-biased miRNAs are connected with the reproductive function and some new miRNAs are preferentially expressed in testis [4]. Furthermore, let-7 miRNA was found as a somatic systemic signal modulators to establish and maintain sexual identity in sexs and differentiation in gonads [3]. In the nondrosophilid insect T. castaneum, oocytes miRNAs play important role in maternal transcript degradation process [21]. All these diverse miRNAs between sexs highlight the significant function role in germline development and sexual differentiation.
Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (the oriental fruit fly), which is a badly invasive pest because of the damage to masses of fruits and vegetables like the citrus and guava, spread all over the South-East Asia and a number of Pacific Islands [22]. The fully sequenced genome and transcriptome analyses provide a greatly foundation database to understand the genetic network and molecular mechanism in B. dorsalis [23,24]. Although the previous report have sequenced the miRNAs during different developmental stages in life cycle of B. dorsalis [25] and different developmental stages of B. dorsalis testes [26], the miRNAs functions in sex determination and differentiation remain largely unknown.
In the present study, we constructed and sequenced four small RNA libraries between each sex and gonads of mature adult B. dorsalis, and identified numerous known and novel miRNAs highly expressed in the gonads, in order to understand these sex-biased miRNAs roles in reproduction and regulation of sex determination in B. dorsalis. These specific expression data will provide new informations to elucidate the regulatory role of miRNAs in sexually dimorphic traits and might contribute to understanding the sex determination mechanism in B. dorsalis.
Results
Global analysis of small RNA libraries
To identify the sex-biased miRNAs in B. dorsalis, four small RNA libraries from the mature females, males (without ovaries and testes) and ovaries, testes were constructed by using Illumina Solexa high-throughput sequencing technology. The four libraries produced a dataset of 40,931,727 raw reads in total: 10,482,821; 10,641,766 reads from the females and males. 9,989,208; 9,817,932 reads from the ovaries and testes (Table 1). These raw reads have been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (accession number: GSE80536). After removing junk sequences, simple sequences, sequences longer than 26 nt or shorter than 18 nt and filtering the RFam (rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA, and other RfamRNAs), B. dorsalis mRNAs and Repbase sequences, a total of 6,210,904; 7,237,349; 5,445,095 and 6,894,823 for females, males, ovaries and testes mappable clean reads were gained, respectively (Table 1). The length distribution of the total small RNA reads in the data set showed the majority of the small RNAs ranged from 19 nt to 22 nt and a peak at 21nt, which is the typical length of the mature miRNAs (Fig 1). Each sample’s length distribution showed in S1 Fig.
Identification of known and novel miRNAs from B. dorsalis
By filtering the data set and blasting against the known mature miRNAs and miRNA precursors in miRBase 20.0 (http://www.mirbase.org), we identified 141 miRNAs in the females library, 145 miRNAs in the males library, 127 miRNAs in the ovaries library, 143 miRNAs in the testes library and a total of 183 miRNAs in the combined data set (S1 Table). Low-energy, fold-back structures, and 18–24 nt mature miRNAs of miRNA precursors distinguish miRNAs from other small RNAs. The name of the most reads miRNA represented the particular miRNA and other variants. The expression levels of B. dorsalis known miRNAs ranging from 404222.33 counts for the most abundant to single count.
In addition to the known miRNAs, the remaining sequences were aligned with the whole genome sequence (WGS) of B. dorsalis to identify novel miRNAs. Sequences that did not mapped to the conserved sequences in miRBase 20.0 and previously identified known miRNAs of B. dorsalis were considered as novel or species-specific miRNAs. Using MIREAP software (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mireap/), 120 new novel miRNAs were obtained in the four libraries altogether (S2 Table). Amongst these novel miRNAs, 74, 74, 112 and 94 were detected in the females, males, ovaries and testes, respectively. Notably, almost all these novel miRNAs are either -5p or -3p arms of proposed precursors, which is coordinated with previous reports [25, 26]. The precursor secondary structure of each novel miRNA was constructed and the negative-folding free energies of their secondary structures range from 63.4 to 15.0 kcal/mol (S2 Table). In addition, secondary structures of one known and one novel miRNAs are shown in Fig 2.
(A) The predicted hairpin structure of the miR-8 hairpin, colored as miRNA and miRNA*. Red reflects miR-8-5p and yellow reflects miR-8-3p. (B) The predicted hairpin structure of the novel candidate hairpin, colored as miRNA and miRNA*. Red reflects PC-5p-15170 and yellow reflects PC-3p-3745.
Characterization of known and novel miRNAs
Base composition can affect the physiochemical and biological properties of miRNA including the secondary structures of miRNAs and the activity of enzymes [27,28]. Analysis of the nucleotide bias in miRNAs have been proved a dominant base for uracil (U) at the first nucleotide [29,30]. In our study, we analyzed the first nucleotide bias in all identified miRNAs. The percentage of the four nucleotides at first nucleotide showed that U was frequently existed (54.48%) at the 5’ end (Fig 3). The nucleotide bias of miRNAs in insects indicated this phenomenon might be involved in the regulation of the target gene.
We identified a total of 303 miRNAs, of which 183 known miRNAs belonged to 91 families. The conservation profile of the identified miRNAs that matched to other species are presented in Fig 4. Those conserved miRNA families partake the same seed regions and a few different nucleotide in the non-seed sequence regions. The seed sequence (bases 2–8 from the 5’ end) plays a key role in miRNA-target recognition for translational inhibition or mRNA cleavage [31]. The seed region ATCACAG in our study comprised 23 unique miRNAs including miR-2a, miR-2b, miR-5, miR-6, miR-11, miR-13a, miR-13b, miR-308 and miR-994 which belong to the same families demonstrate that miRNAs shared the same seed can regulate the gene expression corporately in different biological processes.
Sex-biased expression of miRNAs
To characterize the sex-biased expression patterns in B. dorsalis, the miRNAs from females, males, ovaries and testes library were cross-compared. In our study, we identified 18 female-biased and 16 male-biased miRNAs. Of the sex-biased miRNAs, some are pairs derived from the same precursor (like miR-5-5p and miR-5-3p; miR-8-5p and miR-8-3p), and most of the miRNAs prefer to cluster in the genome and express in a consistent sex-biased pattern (Table 2). Intriguingly, the female-biased and male-biased miRNAs are highly expressed in ovary and testes respectively (S3 Table). This suggests that sex-biased miRNAs are mainly involved in the reproductive function. qRT-PCR experiments were used to validate deep sequencing data by measuring the expression profiles of 10 random selected miRNAs. The results showed that miR-6-3p, miR-989-3p, miR-994-5p, miR-308-3p were significantly more highly expressed in the ovaries, miR-8-3p, miR-1-3p, miR-12-5p, miR-274-5p was preferentially expressed in the testes, while miR-995-3p and miR-276a co-expressed in the ovary and testes (Fig 5). The consistency of the miRNA expression and deep sequencing data indicates that all the analysis in our study is reliable.
The amount of expression was normalized to the level of α-tubulin. Error bars show SD from three independent experiments with three triplicates each and asterisks (* or** or ***) indicate significant differences (P< 0.05 or P<0.01 or P<0.001, respectively) compared to the relevant control in a two-tailed t-test.
Target prediction for sex-biased miRNAs and function analysis
Intending to understand the physiological functions and biological processes of sex-biased miRNAs in sex determination and gonad differentiation, we annotated the miRNAs and miRNA targets by Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis. Target prediction was performed by integrating miRanda [32] and TargetScan [33] data. Four female-biased and four male biased miRNAs and their related target gene are listed in Table 3. One target gene of the female-biased miR-989-3p is doublesex (dsx) which is considered as the key switch gene in the sex determination of tephritid insects. GO annotation and KEGG pathway analysis were performed to identify functional modules regulated by these miRNAs. GO enrichment analyses of the percentage of genes involved in biological process, cellular component, and molecular component are shown in Fig 6. The KEGG pathway analysis revealed 250 pathways that were enriched with miRNA targets (data not shown). Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, PPAR signaling pathway, gamma-Hexachlorocyclohexane degradation and D-Glutamine and D-glutamate metabolism ranked among the most enriched pathways. The 10 most-enriched Go categories for the target genes of miRNAs and KEGG pathways enriched in target genes of miRNAs are shown in S4 Table and S5 Table.
The terms were summarized into 3 main GO categories and 50 sub-categories. The y-axis represents the percentage of unigenes.
Discussion
To explore the differential expressed miRNAs between sexes and gonads, we identified and characterized miRNAs from females, males, ovaries and testes in B. dorsalis by Solexa deep sequencing. A total of 183 known and 120 novel miRNAs were gained from the four libraries. The length distribution of the total small RNA reads in data set presented that the dominant size was 21 nt followed by 22 and 20 nt sequences which is the typical length of the mature miRNAs, but a very low in 24, 25, 26 nt. In the previous report, only a total of 123 known and 60 novel miRNAs were identified in B. dorsalis [25]. The available of the whole genome sequence (WGS) of B. dorsalis enlarge the finding of known and novel miRNAs in our study.
Among these miRNAs in our study, 44 pairs of known miRNAs and miRNA*s (postfixed with 3p and 5p) were observed. The miRNA and miRNA* sequences from 44 pairs either share similar or differential expression. miRNA and miRNA* are the products of the same pre-miRNA and functioned differently [34]. miRNA is stable and loaded into RISC to recognize the target gene, while miRNA* is considered inactive and degraded immediately in cytosol [35,36]. But the recent reports showed that some miRNA* with high expression play potential roles in regulation [37]. The 3’ and 5’ arm miR-10 are co-expressed and both target Hox genes in Drosophila [38–40]. These miRNA precursors may produce functional molecules from both arms. In fact, miRNA*s could have some endogenous targets; Okamura found that D. melanogaster miR-iab-4-3p can involved in endogenous regulatory networks by target abrupt gene [41]. This differential expression of the 3p or 5p miRNA from the both arms of precursors are associated with specific tissue [42], and indicate a clue in miRNA evolution [43].
In our study, we identified 91 families from the 183 known miRNAs. miR-2a, miR-2b, miR-5, miR-6, miR-11, miR-13a, miR-13b, miR-308 and miR-994 with same seed region ATCACAG in our study is the most abundant family. miR-2 (miR-2, miR-13a and miR-13b) is involved in the metamorphosis through repressing the Krüppel homolog 1 (Kr-h1) expression in Blattella germanica [44]. While in Drosophila, miR-2 control apoptosis by targeting potential proapoptotic genes (reaper, grim and sickle) [45]. miR-10 members are considered a close interplay in regulation Hox [46]. All these signs show that miRNA family is conserved among species, but can alter target gene via different seed sequences during the course of evolution [47]. Previous studies showed that the first and ninth nucleotide which limit the seed region at the 5’ end of mature miRNA are enriched with uridine (U) and vital to miRNA-target recognition [31]. In our study, we found that uridine (U) was the most abundant (54.48%) at first nucleotide but not at ninth nucleotide, which is coordinated with previous reports [25].
In D. melanogaster, amounts of female-biased and male-biased miRNAs have found and distributed mostly in the gonad [4]. It is reported that these sex-biased miRNAs are encoded within the sex-biased genes and associated with the reproductive function [43,48]. Our study obtained 18 female-biased miRNAs and 16 male-biased miRNAs. Among these miRNAs, miR-989-3p, miR-994-5p, miR-996-3p, miR-318-3p, miR-92b-3p, miR-306-5p, miR-12-5p were also sex-biased expression in D. melanogaster [4], indicating the conservation of those sex-biased miRNAs among different species. miR-5-3p/miR-5-5p, miR-4-3p/miR-6-3p/miR-309-3p, miR-318-3p/miR-994-5p from female-biased miRNAs and miR-8-5p/miR-8-3p, miR-3477-5p/miR-12-5p, miR-252-5p/miR-1000-5p from male-biased miRNAs are clustered in B. dorsalis genome, suggesting that those clustered miRNA in B. dorsalis is transcribed in multicistronic primary-miRNA. Unexpectedly, all the sex-biased are located in the autosome rather than the male-biased miRNAs emerged in the X chromosome as reported [4]. The X chromosome cluster miR-982-5p, miR-983-5p, miR-984-5p, miR-973-3p, miR-9369-5p, miR-4966-5p, miR-975-5p in our library have a low expression in all samples, which is different from previous reports in D. melanogaster, the enriched X chromosome cluster miR-982/983/984 and miR-973/4966/975 are highly expressed in testes of D. melanogaster [4]. The divergence of X chromosome cluster miRNAs between D. melanogaster and B. dorsalis may be the results of a lossment of male genes and male-biased miRNAs from the X chromosome in evolution [4,49].
By using miRanda and TargetScan software, the target genes of sex-biased and gonad-specific miRNAs were predicted. We found one target gene of the female-biased miR-989-3p is doublesex (dsx) which is considered as the key switch gene in the sex determination of Bactrocera pests. The primary signal of sex-determination cascade in the tephritid insects relies on a Y-linked male-determining factor (M-factor) [50], while dsx is the bottom gene of the cascade and conserved in the regulation of sexual differentiation [51,52]. The linkage between miR-989-3p and dsx in our study indicate that sex-biased miRNAs may not only associated with the reproductive function but also involved in the sex-determination by regulating the cascade genes in B. dorsalis. Fagegaltier et al. (2014) found that let-7 as a ecdysone-mediated signaling factor affect the expression of sex-specific genes including sexlethal (sxl), dsx and yolk protein gene (yp1), which to some extent, maintaining sexual identity in the soma of D. melanogaster. Also, there are no miRNAs on the Y chromosome in B. dorsalis. Whlie in Bombyx mori, a W-chromosome specific small RNA (piRNA) have an effect on the sex-specific dsx splice variants and determined the primary sex in the WZ sex determination system [53]. The deficiency of Y-chromosome miRNAs in Diptera species indicates a different sRNA-mRNA interplay mechanism in XY system.
In this study, the potential miRNAs in females, males, ovaries and testes of B. dorsalis were identified and characterized using deep sequencing, and 183 known miRNAs, 120 novel miRNAs were abtained. The different expression between sexs and gonads suggested that these miRNAs may play important roles in reproduction processes such as spermatogenesis and oogenesis. Further function analyses of the sex-biased miRNAs and their target genes will be of great significance to better understand the somatic and germline sex determination mechanism in B. dorsalis and to develop new control approaches by miRNA interruption.
Materials and Methods
Sample preparation and RNA extraction
B. dorsalis were reared on artificial diet and cultured at 28°C under a photoperiod of 12 h light:12 h dark described previously in our laboratory [54]. Newly emerged virgin females and males were separated by sex and after 12 days mature female and male adults were dissected. After dissection, the gonads and the rest adult samples were immediately stored in RNAlater® Solution (Ambion). To identify the small RNAs involved in B. dorsalis gonad proliferation and sex differentiation, four small RNA libraries were constructed from the mature adults (without ovaries and testes respectively) and gonads samples. Total RNAs were extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, the quantity and purity were examined using an Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, CA, USA).
Small RNA library construction and deep sequencing
Small RNA libraries were generated from the four RNA samples with the TruSeq Small RNA Sample Prep Kits, following manufacturer’s guide (Illumina, San Diego, USA). The 18–30 nt length RNA fractions were separated by gel and ligated sequentially to 3’ and 5’ adaptors. Ligation products were then reverse transcribed using the primer on the 3’ adaptor and 15 PCRs amplified on the first strand synthesis production with both adaptor sequence primers. Ultimately, PCR products were purified, validated and sequenced by LC-Sciences using an Illumina Hiseq2500.
Small RNA sequence bioinformatic analysis
After removing low quality reads and adaptor sequences from the raw datas, large amounts of clean small RNAs were analyzed by BLAST against B. dorsalis mRNAs database [24], RFAM and Repbase to identify possible mRNA, rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA and other ncRNAs. The remaining clean reads were aligned to the miRNA precursors/mature miRNA sequences in miRBase and previously identified miRNAs of B. dorsalis [25], with the matched or one mismatch sequences, were identified as known miRNAs. The unmapped sequences after known miRNA identification were aligned to the genome of B. dorsalis and the hairpin RNA structures containing sequences were predicated from the flank 80 nt sequences using RNAfold software complying with criteria from the pre-miRNA statistics in miRBase to identify potentially novel miRNAs [55].
Comparison of differential miRNAs
The expression patterns of miRNAs between female and male, female and ovary, male and testes were compared in order to identify sex-biased and gonad specific expressed miRNAs. The abundance of each miRNA in the libraries was transformed through a modified global normalization according to the procedures described before [25]. Each library miRNAs expression were normalized to transcripts per million and those miRNAs which normalized expression were 0 were modified to 0.01. After removing the normalized expression of miRNAs which were less than 1 in four libraries, the normalized data were used to calculate fold-change values [= log2(X/Y)] and the log2-ratio plot. The statistically significant difference (threshold of a fold change >2 and P-value < 0.05) of each library was tested with Fisher test and chi-square test.
miRNA target gene prediction and pathway analysis
According to the procedures described in previous work [55], which provided by LC Sciences Service, we predicted the target genes of highly expressed miRNAs and analyzed the GO terms and KEGG Pathway of these miRNAs. First, TargetScan and MiRanda softwares were applied to identify miRNA binding sites. Then we combined the data which predicted by both softwares and calculated the overlaps. The gene ontology (GO) terms and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway of these highly miRNAs and miRNA targets were annotated [56] and analyzed with the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources Database [57]. The molecular function, cell component, and biological process were used to organize the target genes by functional classification.
qPCR assay of known miRNAs
The expression profiles of ten known miRNAs were investigated in this study. Reverse transcription reactions for mature miRNAs and α-tubulin as a control were conducted with three biological replicates total RNA (same RNA sources that were used for the sequencing experiments) using miRNA-specific stem-loop primers or an α-tubulin gene reverse primer. The stem-loop RT primers and gene-specific primers were designed according to previous work [25]. All primers are listed in S6 Table. The reaction system (20 μl) contained 1 μg RNA, 2 pmol stem-loop RT primer or α-tubulin gene reverse primer, 4 μl 5 ×PrimeScript Buffer, 10 nmol deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), 20 U Rnase Inhibitor, 100 U PrimeScript Reverse Transcriptase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and RNase-free water. The 10 μL reactions consisting of total RNA, stem-loop RT primer or α-tubulin gene reverse primer, 0.25 mM each of dNTPs and RNase-free water were first incubated for 5 min at 65°C, placed in an ice bath for 2 min, briefly centrifuged, and then other reagents were added. The 20 μL reactions were incubated in a MyCycler Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) for 60 min at 42°C for 15 min at 70°C, and then at 4°C for subsequent processes. The reverse transcription products were used for real-time qPCR. qPCRs were performed using SYBR Green qPCR mix following the manufacturer’s instructions in a real-time thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The qRT-PCR program was as follows: 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s. Three biological and technical replicates were performed. Real-time expression data were analyzed by 2-△△Ct method [58].
Supporting Information
S1 Fig. Length distribution and abundance of small RNAs in the four libraries.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159591.s001
(TIF)
S1 Table. Identification of known microRNAs in the four libraries.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159591.s002
(XLSX)
S2 Table. Identification of combined novel microRNAs in the four libraries.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159591.s003
(XLSX)
S3 Table. Identification of sex-biased microRNAs in the four libraries.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159591.s004
(XLSX)
S4 Table. The 10 most-enriched Go categories for the target genes of miRNAs.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159591.s005
(DOCX)
S5 Table. The most enriched KEGG pathways for target genes of miRNAs.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159591.s006
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the earmarked fund for the China Agricultural Research System (No. CARS-27) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2014PY005).
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: HZ WP. Performed the experiments: WP JX. Analyzed the data: WP KT HZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HZ. Wrote the paper: WP HZ.
References
- 1. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136(2):215–233. pmid:19167326
- 2. Yang X, Schadt EE, Wang S, Wang H, Arnold AP, Ingram-Drake L, et al. Tissue-specific expression and regulation of sexually dimorphic genes in mice. Genome Res. 2006;16(8):995–1004. pmid:16825664
- 3. Fagegaltier D, König A, Gordon A, Lai EC, Gingeras TR, Hannon GJ, et al. A genome-wide survey of sexually dimorphic expression of Drosophila miRNAs identifies the steroid hormone-induced miRNA let-7 as a regulator of sexual identity. Genetics. 2014;198(2):647–668. pmid:WOS:000343885300026
- 4. Marco A. Sex-biased expression of microRNAs in Drosophila melanogaster. Open Biol. 2014;4(4):140024. pmid:24694940
- 5. Marco A, Kozomara A, Hui JH, Emery AM, Rollinson D, Griffiths-Jones S, et al. Sex-biased expression of microRNAs in Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(9):e2402. pmid:24069470
- 6. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281–297. pmid:14744438
- 7. He L, Hannon GJ. MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(7):522–531. pmid:15211354
- 8. Jiang F, Ye X, Liu X, Fincher L, McKearin D, Liu Q. Dicer-1 and R3D1-L catalyze microRNA maturation in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 2005;19(14):1674–1679. pmid:15985611
- 9. Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell. 1993;75(5):843–854. pmid:8252621
- 10. Wightman B, Ha I, Ruvkun G. Posttranscriptional regulation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediates temporal pattern formation in C. elegans. Cell. 1993;75(5):855–862. pmid:8252622
- 11. Lai EC, Tomancak P, Williams RW, Rubin GM. Computational identification of Drosophila microRNA genes. Genome Biol. 2003;4(7):R42. pmid:12844358
- 12. Flynt AS, Lai EC. Biological principles of microRNA-mediated regulation: shared themes amid diversity. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(11):831–842. pmid:18852696
- 13. Siomi H, Siomi MC. On the road to reading the RNA-interference code. Nature. 2009;457(7228):396–404. pmid:19158785
- 14. Xu P, Vernooy SY, Guo M, Hay BA. The Drosophila microRNA Mir-14 suppresses cell death and is required for normal fat metabolism. Curr Biol. 2003;13(9):790–795. pmid:WOS:000182639900030
- 15. Pedersen IM, Cheng G, Wieland S, Volinia S, Croce CM, Chisari FV, et al. Interferon modulation of cellular microRNAs as an antiviral mechanism. Nature. 2007;449(7164):919–922. pmid:WOS:000250230600050
- 16. Caygill EE, Johnston LA. Temporal regulation of metamorphic processes in Drosophila by the let-7 and miR-125 heterochronic microRNAs. Curr Biol. 2008;18(13):943–950. pmid:18571409
- 17. Wienholds E, Kloosterman WP, Miska E, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Berezikov E, de Bruijn E, et al. MicroRNA expression in zebrafish embryonic development. Science. 2005;309(5732):310–311. pmid:15919954
- 18. Mishima T, Takizawa T, Luo SS, Ishibashi O, Kawahigashi Y, Mizuguchi Y, et al. MicroRNA (miRNA) cloning analysis reveals sex differences in miRNA expression profiles between adult mouse testis and ovary. Reproduction. 2008;136(6):811–822. pmid:WOS:000262309600015
- 19. Cutting AD, Bannister SC, Doran TJ, Sinclair AH, Tizard MV, Smith CA. The potential role of microRNAs in regulating gonadal sex differentiation in the chicken embryo. Chromosome Res. 2012;20(1):201–213. pmid:22161018
- 20. Zhang X, Zheng Y, Jagadeeswaran G, Ren R, Sunkar R, Jiang H. Identification and developmental profiling of conserved and novel microRNAs in Manduca sexta. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2012;42(6):381–395. pmid:22406339
- 21. Ninova M, Ronshaugen M, Griffiths-Jones S. Tribolium castaneum as a model for microRNA evolution, expression and function during short germband development. BioRxiv. 2015:018424.
- 22.
Zhang H, Li H. Photographic guide to key control techniques for citrus disease and insect pests. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press; 2012.
- 23. Shen GM, Dou W, Niu JZ, Jiang HB, Yang WJ, Jia FX, et al. Transcriptome analysis of the oriental fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis). PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e29127. pmid:22195006
- 24. Zheng W, Peng T, He W, Zhang H. High-throughput sequencing to reveal genes involved in reproduction and development in Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36463. pmid:22570719
- 25. Huang Y, Dou W, Liu B, Wei D, Liao C, Smagghe G, et al. Deep sequencing of small RNA libraries reveals dynamic expression patterns of microRNAs in multiple developmental stages of Bactrocera dorsalis. Insect Mol Biol. 2014;23(5):656–667. pmid:24957108
- 26. Tariq K, Peng W, Saccone G, Zhang H. Identification, characterization and target gene analysis of testicular microRNAs in the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis. Insect Mol Biol. 2016;25(1):32–43. pmid:26486729
- 27. Kudla G, Lipinski L, Caffin F, Helwak A, Zylicz M. High guanine and cytosine content increases mRNA levels in mammalian cells. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(6):e180. pmid:16700628
- 28. Shepotinovskaya IV, Uhlenbeck OC. Catalytic Diversity of Extended Hammerhead Ribozymes†. Biochem. 2008;47(27):7034–7042.
- 29. Dezulian T, Palatnik JF, Huson D, Weigel D. Conservation and divergence of microRNA families in plants. Genome Biol. 2005;6:P13.
- 30. Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005;120(1):15–20. pmid:WOS:000226365400006
- 31. Obad S, dos Santos CO, Petri A, Heidenblad M, Broom O, Ruse C, et al. Silencing of microRNA families by seed-targeting tiny LNAs. Nat Genet. 2011;43(4):371–378. pmid:21423181
- 32. Betel D, Wilson M, Gabow A, Marks DS, Sander C. The microRNA. org resource: targets and expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(suppl 1):D149–D153. pmid:18158296
- 33. Nam S, Li M, Choi K, Balch C, Kim S, Nephew KP. MicroRNA and mRNA integrated analysis (MMIA): a web tool for examining biological functions of microRNA expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(suppl 2):W356–W362. pmid:19420067
- 34. Hutvágner G, McLachlan J, Pasquinelli AE, Bálint É, Tuschl T, Zamore PD. A cellular function for the RNA-interference enzyme Dicer in the maturation of the let-7 small temporal RNA. Science. 2001;293(5531):834–838. pmid:11452083
- 35. O'Toole AS, Miller S, Haines N, Zink MC, Serra MJ. Comprehensive thermodynamic analysis of 3′ double-nucleotide overhangs neighboring Watson–Crick terminal base pairs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(11):3338–3344. pmid:16820533
- 36. Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N. Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(2):102–114. pmid:18197166
- 37. Yang JS, Phillips MD, Betel D, Mu P, Ventura A, Siepel AC, et al. Widespread regulatory activity of vertebrate microRNA* species. Rna. 2011;17(2):312–326. pmid:21177881
- 38. Stark A, Kheradpour P, Parts L, Brennecke J, Hodges E, Hannon GJ, et al. Systematic discovery and characterization of fly microRNAs using 12 Drosophila genomes. Genome Res. 2007;17(12):1865–1879. pmid:WOS:000251359900016
- 39. Brennecke J, Stark A, Russell RB, Cohen SM. Principles of microRNA-target recognition. PLoS Biol. 2005;3(3):e85. pmid:15723116
- 40. Enright AJ, John B, Gaul U, Tuschl T, Sander C, Marks DS. MicroRNA targets in Drosophila. Genome Biol. 2004;5(1):R1–R1. pmid:WOS:000187747000007
- 41. Okamura K, Phillips MD, Tyler DM, Duan H, Chou Y-t, Lai EC. The regulatory activity of microRNA* species has substantial influence on microRNA and 3′ UTR evolution. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15(4):354–363. pmid:18376413
- 42. Li SC, Liao YL, Ho MR, Tsai KW, Lai CH, Lin WC. miRNA arm selection and isomiR distribution in gastric cancer. BMC genomics. 2012;13(Suppl 1):S13. pmid:22369582
- 43. Marco A, Hui JH, Ronshaugen M, Griffiths-Jones S. Functional shifts in insect microRNA evolution. Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:686–696. pmid:20817720
- 44. Lozano J, Montañez R, Belles X. MiR-2 family regulates insect metamorphosis by controlling the juvenile hormone signaling pathway. PNAS. 2015;112(12):3740–3745. pmid:25775510
- 45. Stark A, Brennecke J, Russell RB, Cohen SM. Identification of Drosophila microRNA targets. PLoS Biol. 2003;1(3):E60. pmid:14691535
- 46. Tehler D, Høyland-Kroghsbo NM, Lund AH. The miR-10 microRNA precursor family. RNA Biol. 2011;8(5):728–734. pmid:21881411
- 47. Wheeler BM, Heimberg AM, Moy VN, Sperling EA, Holstein TW, Heber S, et al. The deep evolution of metazoan microRNAs. Evol Dev. 2009;11(1):50–68. pmid:19196333
- 48.
Fisher B, Weiszmann R, Frise E, Hammonds A, Tomancak P, Beaton A, et al. BDGP insitu homepage. Available: http://insitu.fruitfly.org/cgi-bin/ex/insitu.pl; 2012.
- 49. Parisi M, Nuttall R, Naiman D, Bouffard G, Malley J, Andrews J, et al. Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression. Science. 2003;299(5607):697–700. pmid:12511656
- 50. Willhoeft U, Franz G. Identification of the sex-determining region of the Ceratitis capitata Y chromosome by deletion mapping. Genetics. 1996;144(2):737–745. pmid:8889534
- 51. Hediger M, Burghardt G, Siegenthaler C, Buser N, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Dübendorfer A, et al. Sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster and Musca domestica converges at the level of the terminal regulator doublesex. Dev Genes Evol. 2004;214(1):29–42. pmid:WOS:000188301100004
- 52. Wilkins AS. Moving up the hierarchy: a hypothesis on the evolution of a genetic sex determination pathway. Bioessays. 1995;17(1):71–77. pmid:7702596
- 53. Kiuchi T, Koga H, Kawamoto M, Shoji K, Sakai H, Arai Y, et al. A single female-specific piRNA is the primary determiner of sex in the silkworm. Nature. 2014;509(7502):633–636. pmid:WOS:000336457100051
- 54. Peng W, Zheng W, Handler AM, Zhang H. The role of the transformer gene in sex determination and reproduction in the tephritid fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel). Genetica. 2015;143(6):717–727. pmid:26481008
- 55. Du Y, Wang X, Wang B, Chen W, He R, Zhang L, et al. Deep sequencing analysis of microRNAs in bovine sperm. Mol Reprod Dev. 2014;81(11):1042–1052. pmid:25279827
- 56. Ashburner M, Bergman CM. Drosophila melanogaster: a case study of a model genomic sequence and its consequences. Genome Res. 2005;15(12):1661–1667. pmid:16339363
- 57. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bolton E, Bryant SH, Canese K, et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(suppl 1):D38–D51. pmid:WOS:000285831700009
- 58. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408. pmid:11846609