Figures
Abstract
One of the modern crop breeding techniques uses doubled haploid plants that contain an identical pair of chromosomes in order to accelerate the breeding process. Rapid haploid identification method is critical for large-scale selections of double haploids. The conventional methods based on the color of the endosperm and embryo seeds are slow, manual and prone to error. On the other hand, there exists a significant difference between diploid and haploid seeds generated by high oil inducer, which makes it possible to use oil content to identify the haploid. This paper describes a fully-automated high-throughput NMR screening system for maize haploid kernel identification. The system is comprised of a sampler unit to select a single kernel to feed for measurement of NMR and weight, and a kernel sorter to distribute the kernel according to the measurement result. Tests of the system show a consistent accuracy of 94% with an average screening time of 4 seconds per kernel. Field test result is described and the directions for future improvement are discussed.
Citation: Wang H, Liu J, Xu X, Huang Q, Chen S, Yang P, et al. (2016) Fully-Automated High-Throughput NMR System for Screening of Haploid Kernels of Maize (Corn) by Measurement of Oil Content. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0159444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159444
Editor: Jin-Song Zhang, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, CHINA
Received: February 19, 2016; Accepted: June 30, 2016; Published: July 25, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This work was supported by The 13th Five-year National High-tech program: Maize Heterosis utilization technology and hybrid breeding, and Modern Maize Industry Technology System (CARS–02–09) from China government. The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [HZW, JL, XPX, QMH and SSC], but did not have any additional role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.
Competing interests: HZW is employed part-time at Niumag and PQY is the CEO of Niumag that commercializes the instrument used for this study. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. JL, MP, XPX, QMH, SSC, SJC and YQS do not have commercial or other associations that might pose a conflict of interest.
Introduction
Recently NMR has been widely used in material characterization, such as rubber crosslink density testing [1–2], food quality testing [3–5], rock core analysis [3,6–8], porosity of building materials such as cement and wood [3,9,10]. The oil content of seeds determines the value of crops, e.g. [11–13]. The measurement of oil and moisture content in crop seeds is important for the production, processing, storage and sale of oilseeds [14,15].
One of the modern crop breeding technologies uses doubled haploid (DH) plants which contain a pair of identical chromosomes [16,17]. For instance, cultivars purity can reach 98% by using traditional pedigree method only after 8 generations of selection, but the purity could achieve 100% in two generations using the DH technology [17].
Haploid refers to the gametophyte chromosome number. The haploid breeding is a technology that uses anther culture or gynogenesis to produce haploid, and then obtains new stable genotypes through natural or artificial doubling. The percentage of spontaneous haploid is found to be 1% in nature and thus not an effective breeding method. Doubled haploid can be produced by in vitro or in vivo induction methods with a significantly higher rate of 8~15% [18–23]. The high oil content inducer (such as the CAUHOI line [18]) allows the potential identification of haploids based on kernel oil content detectable by NMR.
Several approaches to identify haploid seeds have been used, such as field identification, conventional cytogenetic, morphological method, radioactive method, herbicide method, molecular marker method, genetic marker method [18]. For example, one haploid identification method is making use of ‘Navajo’ kernel trait: kernels with a pigmented endosperm and a non-pigmented embryo are selected as haploids. However, the expression of anthocyanin gene (and thus the color) can be affected by donor genotype and environment. Meanwhile, visual fatigue of the operators will reduce the accuracy of the screening. In comparison, the NMR approach is based on the oil content measured directly by NMR and can be scaled up to a high-throughput system to satisfy the practical high-volume selection process [24–27], such as screening millions of seeds in a two-week period at a continuous rate of screening about 1 kernel per second.
NMR has been used for nondestructive oil analysis of seeds [28] and materials. Kotyk et al. used a 1.5T whole-body MRI scanner with a 1-m diameter bore to analyze the oil content of 2592 corn kernels that are arranged on a cubic sample holder at a rate of 1 kernel per second [29]. Based on continuous wave-free precession (CWFP) sequence, Alberto et al. have used a superconducting magnet with a 2.1-T magnetic field and a 30 cm bore to analyze more than 20,000 seeds per hour, that is 5 kernels per second [30]. However, the actual rate limiting step of these systems is the manual handling and weighing of each kernel [29].weight of individual kernels was not reported[30].
In this paper, we describe a fully-automated, high-throughput NMR system for DH technology. The system automatically weighs each kernel and measures its oil content individually. It then sorts the kernel according to its oil content ratio (oil content divided by total weight). The current system has achieved 20,000 seeds per day at a rate of 1 kernel every 4 seconds. We will describe its design principle, major components, and examples of its operation and results.
Materials and Methods
Measurement of oil and water content by NMR
Measurement of oil and water content in corn.
The main fluid components in a corn kernel are water and oil. It is well-known that the signal for oil and water exhibits significantly different T2 [31]. We use spin-echo sequence in order to distinguish the oil and water signal and an example is shown in Fig 1.
The green line is the signal of bound water and the red line that of oil. Since the bound water decays quickly, thus the signal at TE = 7.5 ms is only contributed from the oil.
The spin echo signal from corn kernels (S(t)) follows a bi-exponential function:
(1)
Where So and Sw are respectively the protons density of oil and water in the seed. T2o and T2w are the transverse relaxation time of oil and water, respectively. At t = 0, the signal amplitude S(0) = So+Sw is the sum of the hydrogen of water and oil. S(0) is also measured by the FID signal right after the first 90 degree pulse. The Larmor frequency used was 22.06 MHz, the 90/180 degree pulses are 4/8 us long and detection bandwidth is 100KHz. Recycle time is 500 ms and two or four signals were accumulated according to the oil content of corn. The amplitude at zero time is obtained by FID.
A double exponential fitting is shown as the red and green lines in Fig 1. The green line stands for the fast relaxation component (bound water), and the red line is the slower component (oil). T2o and T2w in seeds are clearly different. The water in seeds after drying can be considered as bound water when the moisture content is lower than 15%, and T2w is short, typically shorter than 1 ms. On the other hand, the oil T2o is long, typically longer than 80ms. Our data shows T2o = 100 ms and T2w = 0.75 ms. As a result, for an echo time TE = 7.5 ms, the water contribution to the signal is essentially zero (exp(-7.5/0.75) = 0.00005) and the echo signal only contain oil contribution which can be expressed as:
Thus the water content Sw = S(0)-So.
Calibration of oil and water content.
In order to obtain quantitative water and oil content (A) in seeds, we compare the measurement NMR amplitude (S, in unit of volt) to the weight (mg) of water and oil of seed. In our system, a small background signal (b) can be observed, so that the oil and water content can be obtained by
(2)
k is the calibration constant. Experimental data in Fig 2 shows a linear relationship between S and A and the calibration constant is k = 361.7 mg/V, obtained by a least-square fit. This calibration is repeated every 24 hours in order to maintain the up-to-date calibration during screening processes.
Finally, the oil (or water) content ratio (OCR or WCR) is acquired by calculating A/m, where m is the mass of the sample obtained by the weighing sensor. It is important to note that the measurement condition should be kept the same at each measurement, such as NMR pulse sequence parameters, and sample and instrument temperatures.
Fully automatic high-throughput NMR system
The objective of this system is to measure the weight and oil content of each individual kernel and to sort it according to its oil content ratio. The system is comprised of three electronic-mechanical subsystems: 1) Single kernel feeder before the NMR unit, it selects a single kernel, weighs it and feeds it into the NMR unit; 2) NMR unit with a sample holder to perform NMR; 3) Kernel sorter distributes the kernels based on the result.
Single kernel feeder.
All major components of the feeder are shown in Fig 3:
- Sample hopper, 25 cm long, 12 cm wide and 30 cm tall. Kernels enough for 24-hours operation may be loaded.
- Picker unit that sucks in a single kernel.
- Stepping motor unit that rotates the picker.
- Pit, an indentation on the picker unit that is connected to a vacuum generator.
- Sample blowing pipe connected to an air compressor.
- Weighing sensor.
- Sample pipeline that blows the kernel into the NMR sample holder.
1: Sample hopper; 2: Picker unit that sucks in a single kernel; 3: Stepping motor unit; 4: Pit; 5: Sample blowing pipe; 6: Weighing sensor; 7: Sample pipeline; 8: Kernels.
The micro-controller controlled stepping motor unit (3) periodically rotates the picker unit (2) to the outlet of the hopper unit (1) that contains the corn kernels. The vacuum generator applies a negative pressure to the vacuum chamber in the picker unit in order to suck a single kernel into the picker unit at the position of the pit (4). The pit is a small indentation on the surface of picker unit large enough to hold one kernel and connected with the vacuum chamber. The picker unit then rotates to move the selected kernel to the weighing sensor (6) and drops the kernel by releasing the vacuum. And then the seed falls onto the weighing sensor. After a 1-s wait time for stability, the weight of the kernel is measured and the data is sent to the control software. Then, a puff of positive pressure air from sample blowing pipe (5) will push the seed into the sample pipeline (7) and the seeds will drop into the NMR sample holder for NMR measurement.
NMR sample holder.
As show in Fig 4, NMR sample holder consists of an RF coil (3), sample pipeline (1) and a sample plug (5). After entering into the sample pipeline, the kernel (4) will be stopped by the sample plug and positioned in the center of the magnet. Then, NMR measurement will be performed to obtain the oil content of the kernel. When the NMR measurement is complete, the sample plug moves downwards to lower the kernel into the kernel sorter. Once the sample is past to the sorter, the sample plug will be raised to return to the center of the magnet (2) for the next measurement.
1: Sample pipeline; 2: Magnet; 3: RF coil; 4: Kernel; 5: Sample plug.
Kernel sorter.
As shown in Fig 5, the kernel sorter consists of sort pipeline, sorting plug and high/low oil content pipelines. After the kernel (3) enters into the sort pipeline (2) from the sample pipeline (1), the sorting plug (6) will position itself according the measured oil content ratio to match the outlet pipeline (high or low oil content ratio) so that the kernel could slide off the corresponding pipeline by its own weight. The sorting plug and sample plug are driven by cylinder (5).
1: Sample pipeline; 2: Sort pipeline; 3: Kernel; 4: Sample plug; 5: Cylinder; 6: Sorting plug.
System control software.
The operation of the system hardware is fully controlled by the computer software integrated with the measurements. Fig 6 shows the flowchart of the automation system control software. There are three major steps of the operation:
- Sampling: using picker to suck in a kernel and drop it onto the weighing sensor; the weight of the kernel is taken;
- NMR: compressed air will push the selected kernel into the sample pipeline and NMR sample holder; NMR measurement is performed;
- Sorting: dependent on the oil content and the sample weight, the kernel is sorted into high or low oil content ratio bins.
To ensure the high success rate of the single kernel sampling, at each step of the operation, the system software checks the passage of the kernel via several sensors. For example, there is a magnetic switch to determine if the sample plug is inside the NMR magnet and this sensor is read by the system software. Also, after each weighing, the weighing sensor is reset after the kernel is loaded into the NMR sample pipeline.
Results and Discussions
To meet the demand of large-scale DH breeding of maize, National Maize Improvement Centre of China Agricultural University (CAU, Beijing) has applied this system to screen maize haploid kernels. Fig 7 shows the haploid and diploid kernels of zheng58 and Yu87-1 which were induced by CAUHOI. CAUHOI is an inducer lines with high oil content which was developed by CAU[18].
(a) Zheng58, the left 2 kernels are haploid, and the right 2 kernels are diploid; (b) Yu87-1, left 2 kernels are haploid and the right 2 kernels are diploid.
Optimal NMR measurement time for a single corn
In order to accelerate the speed of screening without affecting the accuracy of haploid identification, twenty F1 seeds (15 seeds of XY335 and 5 seeds of Zheng58/CAUHOI) randomly selected were measured for 10 times with measurement time of 1 and 2 s, and the oil contents obtained by the two different measurement times were compared. The result (Table 1 and Fig 8) shows no significant differences between the two measurement times. And linear regression fit indicates that oil content is significantly correlated (r = 0.994) with two measurements. Based on the above results, from sample feeding to discharge, the average speed of screening using this system will be 4 seconds per kernel.
Note: df is degree of freedom; Sig. (2 tailed): the two tailed value probability value; y1 and y2: oil content ratio at measurement time of 1 and 2 s, respectively. The original data for this analysis is shown in Fig 8.
Stability test
To validate the stability of the automatic screening system, the same kernel Zheng58/CAUHOI of 0.42g was tested 50 times using the NMR measurement time of 1 second. We found that the maximum oil content ratio: 7.2%, the minimum: 6.5%, the average: 6.7%, and the standard deviation: 0.7%. For this line, the oil content ratio of the diploid maize is more than twice that of the haploid, so the system stability can fully meet the demand of haploid screening.
Test success rate of the single kernel selection
We continuously tested the round and the flat corns (Fig 9) separately for ten hours in order to examine the success rate of the single kernel selection. In the 10-hour test of 9490 measurements of the round corns, the pit fails 672 times to load the single kernel, and thus the success rate is 92%. For the flat corns, the success rate was found 90%, slightly lower than that for the round corns. For other round seeds such as peanut and soybean, we found even higher success rate up to 98%.
Left: round shape corns; right: flat shape corns.
Test of soybeans
This high-throughput system was also used to measure oil and water content of two types of soybean seeds, one is larger (0.35–0.6g) and the other one smaller (0.12–0.3g). Fifty of the two types each were measured for a total of 13462 times. The success rate of the single kernel feeder in selecting a single seed is 97.4%. This result of better success rate is expected because soybean has much more regular in shape and size than corn kernels.
These two types of soybeans, named Feng1 and Feng2 produced by Northeast Institute of geography and agricultural ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, are special breeds for their high oil content. For Feng1, the measured mean OCR is 17.5% with a STD 2.0%. For Feng2, the measured mean OCR is 20.4% with a STD of 1.0%. These results show that Feng2 is not only higher in oil content, but also with much reduced variation in oil content among the seeds.
Field test of maize kernels
We carried out a field test of this screening system for ZD958 maize kernels induced by high oil inducer material CHOI3 [27]. The endosperm and embryo of diploid are color-labeled, but for haploid, only the endosperm is color-labeled. Because of being influenced by the genetic background of maternal germplasm and environment, the color label on the embryo of diploid is not very obvious from the photographs alone. In addition, the size, shape and quality between haploid and diploid are very similar, so the manual selection based on visual inspection in fact can be challenging.
We completed 1260 measurements in about 1.5 hours using our full automatic NMR system. The kernels were first sorted by the manual visual inspection to select diploids from haploids. Then, the kernels were fed into the NMR system for automated analysis. The experimental results of weight and oil content ratio of the kernels are shown in Fig 10. The OCR result shows a clear separation of haploid and diploid kernels.
Left panel: The distribution of ZD958 kernels weight (haploids, diploids and total kernels are shown as circles, squares and pluses, respectively) and their fitting distributions (haploids, diploids and total kernels are shown as a dash line, a dot-dash line and a solid line respectively). Right panel: The OCR distribution of ZA958 kernels (haploids and diploids are shown as circles and squares respectively) and their fitting distributions (haploids and diploids are shown as a dash line and a dot-dash line respectively). It shows that an OCR threshold of 4.25% can well distinguish diploids from haploids.
The distribution of weight and OCR appears to be consistent with a Gaussian form and the fitting is shown in Fig 10A and 10B respectively. The means and STD of the weight distribution of haploid and diploid kernels are 0.40(E1), 0.049(σ1) and 0.43(E2), 0.035(σ2), separately. The weight difference between diploids and haploids (E1-E2 = 0.03) is less than the width of the distributions ((σ1+σ2)/2 = 0.04), thus there are no significance differences in weight between haploid and diploid seeds and they can't be identified by weight alone.
Fig 10 shows the statistics distribution of the oil content ratio of the 1260 kernels with a peak value of OCR at 3.6% and STD of 0.47 for haploid, OCR at 5.5% and STD at 0.52 for diploid, respectively. The deference (E2-E1 = 1.9%) is clearly larger than the width of the distributions ((σ1+σ2)/2 = 0.5%), thus the haploid /diploid shows a significance OCR difference and the threshold at 4.25% can clearly distinguish the haploid. Using this threshold, the false negative probability, which is the possibility of diploid mis-selected to be haploid is 0.83%, and the false positive probability, which is the possibility of haploid mis-selected to be diploid is 7.27%, the total false screening probability is 8.2%. In breeding technology, both the false positive and negative probabilities must be controlled strictly.
The addition of the weight sensor is critical in obtaining OCR as the weight of the seeds varies significantly. Based on the oil content alone, 3.4% of diploid would be selected as haploid which accounts for 23% of the haploids, resulting in a much worse (by a factor of 4) selection compared to the use of OCR.
This method has been applied at CAU to examine several crosses with the high oil induction line CHOI3 [18]. The comparison of the NMR system with the conventional manual selection method by color labels is shown in Table 2 with an average success rate of 94%.
The results are from the first filial generation (F1) seeds of six crosses that were screened by the NMR system.
The high-throughput system described has achieved very high speed of oil content (in unit of g of oil) measurement[29]. However, it relies on manual handling of individual seeds for weight and loading the MRI sample container. As such, the overall speed is still impressive. However, the equipment used is a clinical MRI system with 1.5-T superconducting magnet which is highly expensive in acquisition, installation, operation and maintenance. Our NMR system uses a permanent magnet at a lower field and thus is much less expensive with low maintenance cost. The use of a much smaller RF coil tightly enclosing the sample makes the detection highly efficient and high SNR. As a result, the much lower-cost instrument of ours provides highly accurate data of oil content. The single-kernel feeder and the integrated weighing sensor allow the system to automatically measure OCR without any manual intervention and to operate continuously. The field tests of our systems have demonstrated the robust operation of our system.
Our current single kernel selection system shows a fail rate of up to 10% that need to be improved. The vacuum system may cause noticeable vibration and noise. We are currently updating the mechanical design of the single-kernel selection system to further reduce its fail rate and vibration coupling to the NMR system. Furthermore, NMR unit needs to be improved to accelerate the overall throughput of the system with a goal of one kernel per second.
Conclusion
This paper describes in details a fully-automated high-throughput NMR screening system for haploid maize selection and there need not any pre-treatment or post treatment to the kernels. We show that the combination of automated NMR and weight measurement is a key to obtain OCR and demonstrate the successful operation of the system in our laboratory and in field tests. Such fully automated system could accelerate corn breeding programs and reduce cost. It may also be useful for other agriculture and economically important seeds, such as oil seeds to obtain OCR and work specific to these fields is needed to further validate such application.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: HW JL SC (seventh author) PY. Performed the experiments: HW JL SC (fifth author). Analyzed the data: HW SC (fifth author) YS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HW XX QH SC (fifth author). Wrote the paper: HW YS.
References
- 1.
Blumich B (2000) NMR Imaging of Materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- 2. Mitchell J, Gladden LF, Chandrasekera TC, Fordham EJ (2014) Low-field permanent magnets for industrial process and quality control. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 76: 1–60. pmid:24360243
- 3. Hills BP (2006) Applications of Low-Field NMR to Food Science. Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy 58: 177–230.
- 4. Marcone MF, Wang SN, Albabish W, Nie SP, Somnarain D, Hil A (2013) Diverse food-based applications of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technology. Food Research International 51: 729–747.
- 5. Todt H, Guthausen G, Burk W, Schmalbein D, Kamlowski A (2006) Water/moisture and fat analysis by time-domain NMR. Food Chemistry 96: 436–440.
- 6. Song YQ (2013) Magnetic Resonance of Porous Media (MRPM): A perspective. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 229: 12–24. pmid:23294632
- 7. Chen RS, Stallworth PE, Greenbaum SG, Kleinberg RL (1994) Effects of Hydrostatic Pressure on Proton and Deuteron Magnetic Resonance of Water in Natural Rock and Artificial Porous Media. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series A. 110: 77–81.
- 8. Leslie HR, George ES (1994) Characterization of Water-in-Bitumen Emulsions in Model Porous Media by NMR Microscopic Imaging Techniques. Bulletin of Magnetic Resonance 14: 86–91.
- 9. Leandro L, Maria BT, Gisele XV, Souza N (2007) The Use of Low Field NMR and Thermal Analysis to the Wood Polymer Composite Study. Macromolecular Symposia 258: 108–112.
- 10. Greener J, Peemoeller H, Choi C, Holly R, Reardon EJ, Hansson CM, et al. (2000) Monitoring of Hydration of White Cement Paste with Proton NMR Spin–Spin Relaxation. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 83: 623–627.
- 11. Prestes RA, Colnago LA, Forato LA, Vizzotto L, Novotny EH, Carrilho E (2007) A rapid and automated low resolution NMR method to analyze oil quality in intact oilseeds. Analytica Chimica Acta 596: 325–329. pmid:17631114
- 12. Conway TF (1963) Nuclear magnetic resonance for determining oil content of seeds.Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society 40: 265–268.
- 13. Golsa SS, Jeffrey GB, Gary RA, Duane EF, Ron F, Istvan R (2011) Single Soybean Seed NMR Calibration for Oil Measurement Using Commercial Cooking Oils. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society 88: 1795–1798.
- 14. Gambhir PN (1992) Applications of low-resolution pulsed NMR to the determination of oil and moisture in oilseeds. Trends in Food Science & Technology 3:191–196.
- 15. Thygesen LG, Thybo AK, Engelsen SB (2001) Prediction of Sensory Texture Quality of Boiled Potatoes From Low-field 1H NMR of Raw Potatoes. The Role of Chemical Constituents. LWT-Food Science and Technology 34: 469–477.
- 16. Prigge V, Xu XW, Li L, Babu R, Chen SJ, Atlin GN, et al. (2012) New Insights into the Genetics of in Vivo Induction of Maternal Haploids, the Backbone of Doubled Haploid Technology in Maize. Genetics 190: 781–793. pmid:22135357
- 17. Geiger HH, Gordillo GA (2009) Doubled haploids in hybrid maize breeding. Maydica. 54: 485–499.
- 18. Chen SJ, Song TM (2003) Identification Haploid with High Oil Xenia Effect in Maize, Acta Agronomical Sinica 29: 587–590.
- 19. Prigge V, Sanchez C, Dhillon BS (2011) Doubled Haploids in Tropical Maize: I. Effects of Inducers and Source Germplasm on in vivo Haploid Induction Rates. Crop Science 51: 1498–1506.
- 20. Chalyk ST, Rotarenco VA (2001) The Use of Matroclinous Maize Haploids for Recurrent Selection. Russian Journal of Genetics 37: 1382–1387.
- 21. Rober FK, Gordillo GA, Geiger HH (2005) In Vivo Haploid Inductionin Maize—Performance of New Inducers and Significance of Doubled Lines in Tybrid Breeding. Maydica, 50, 275–283.
- 22. Liu ZZ, Song TM (2000) The breeding and identification of haploid inducer with high frequency parthenogenesis in maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica 26: 570–574.
- 23. Dang NC, Munsch M, Aulinger I, Renlai W, Stamp P (2012) Inducer line generated double haploid seeds for combined waxy and opaque 2 grain quality in subtropical maize (Zea mays. L.). Euphytica 183: 153–160.
- 24. Melchinger AE, Schipprack W, Würschum T, Chen SJ, Technow F (2013) Rapid and accurate identification of in vivo-induced haploid seeds based on oil content in maize. Scientific reports 3: 2129. pmid:23820577
- 25. Melchinger AE, Schipprack W, Friedrich UH, Mirdita V (2014) In Vivo Haploid Induction in Maize: Identification of Haploid Seeds by Their Oil Content. Crop Science 54: 1497–1504.
- 26. Liu J, Guo TT, Wang HZ (2012) Development of automatic nuclear magnetic resonance screening system for haploid kernels in maize. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 28: 233–236.
- 27. Dong X, Xu XW, Li L, Liu CX, Tian XL, Chen SJ (2014) Marker-assisted selection and evaluation of high oil in vivo haploid inducers in maize. Mol Breeding. 2014, 34, 1147–1158.
- 28. Nordon A, Mcgill CA, Littlejohn CD (2001) Process NMR spectrometry. Analyst 126: 260–272. pmid:11235115
- 29. Kotyk JJ, Pagel MD, Deppermann KL, Colletti RF, Hoffman NG,Yannakakis EJ, et al. (2005) High-throughput determination of oil content in corn kernels using nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society 82: 885–862.
- 30. Colnago LA, Englesberg M, Souza AA, Barbosa LL (2007) High-throughput, non-destructive determination of oil content in intact seeds by continuous wave-free precession NMR. Analytical Chemistry 79: 1271–1274. pmid:17263365
- 31. Gao SQ, Chapman WG, House WJ (2009) Application of low field NMR T 2 measurements to clathrate hydrates. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 197: 208–212. pmid:19201233