Figures
Abstract
The stress-induced epimutations could be inherited over generations and play important roles in plant adaption to stressful environments. Upland rice has been domesticated in water-limited environments for thousands of years and accumulated drought-induced epimutations of DNA methylation, making it epigenetically differentiated from lowland rice. To study the epigenetic differentiation between upland and lowland rice ecotypes on their drought-resistances, the epigenetic variation was investigated in 180 rice landraces under both normal and osmotic conditions via methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) technique. Great alterations (52.9~54.3% of total individual-locus combinations) of DNA methylation are recorded when rice encountering the osmotic stress. Although the general level of epigenetic differentiation was very low, considerable level of ΦST (0.134~0.187) was detected on the highly divergent epiloci (HDE). The HDE detected in normal condition tended to stay at low levels in upland rice, particularly the ones de-methylated in responses to osmotic stress. Three out of four selected HDE genes differentially expressed between upland and lowland rice under normal or stressed conditions. Moreover, once a gene at HDE was up-/down-regulated in responses to the osmotic stress, its expression under the normal condition was higher/lower in upland rice. This result suggested expressions of genes at the HDE in upland rice might be more adaptive to the osmotic stress. The epigenetic divergence and its influence on the gene expression should contribute to the higher drought-resistance in upland rice as it is domesticated in the water-limited environment.
Citation: Xia H, Huang W, Xiong J, Tao T, Zheng X, Wei H, et al. (2016) Adaptive Epigenetic Differentiation between Upland and Lowland Rice Ecotypes Revealed by Methylation-Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0157810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810
Editor: Manoj Prasad, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, INDIA
Received: January 25, 2016; Accepted: June 6, 2016; Published: July 5, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Xia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This research was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31200279) by HX, Project of Shanghai Talent Youth of Agriculture, 2015 (Grant No. 2121555) by HX, Project of Subject Construction, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2015 (Grant No. SAAS-2015(07)) by LJL, and the National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Plan)(Grant No. 2014AA10A603, 2014AA10A604) by LJL. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
How plants adapt to the stressful environment is a fundamental question in the evolutionary biology of plants. Apart from the genetic mechanisms, epigenetic processes are considered having evolutionary significances in plant adaption to the stressful environment [1–3], including the DNA methylation [4–6]. Many studies have shown that the DNA methylation in plants is sensitive to various abiotic stressors, such as salt [7], nitrogen-deficiency [8], temperature [9–11], osmotic [12], and drought [13, 14], making the plant a rapid response to the stress[15–17].The epimutation of DNA methylation could be generated at a higher rate than equivalent genetic mutations [18], particularly in the stressful environment. Some of the stress-induced epimutation could be inherited over generations [19–22], forming novel epigenetic variants [23]. As the epimutation of DNA methylation contributes to heritable phenotypes [4, 15, 24], the stress-induced epigenetic variants could be the target of natural selection [8, 25]. The transgenerational inherited epimutations in the plant populations from different habitats promotes adaptive epigenetic divergence among them [5, 26]. Although many studies have described the role played by the DNA methylation in plant populations of wild species adapting to different ecosystems [27–30], the adaptive epigenetic divergence among ecotypes of a crop under the human selection (domestication) is still rare. Given the important agricultural traits are always promoted during the adaption of crop ecotypes to different agro-ecosystems [31], the adaptive epigenetic divergence of DNA methylation among crop ecotypes and its underlying mechanism should be studied with emphasis.
Asia cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) is one of the most important cereal crops. During the process of domestication, upland and lowland rice have adapted to different agricultural ecosystems of contrasting soil-water conditions [32]. Upland rice is always planted in the unbunded fields with good drainage of soil. On the contrary, lowland rice is commonly planted in fields with well water maintaining and irrigation conditions. Consequently, upland rice encounters higher risks of drought and has acquired higher drought-resistances [32, 33]. However, only very limited genetic divergence has been detected between upland and lowland rice which cannot fully explain their differences on the drought-resistance [33, 34].On the contrary, great alterations of DNA methylation have been detected when rice encountering the drought stress [7, 13, 14] and some of these drought-induced epimutations could be transgenerational inherited to next few generations [35]. All these findings raise questions that whether the stress-induced epimutation of DNA methylation could lead to adaptive epigenetic divergence between upland and lowland rice ecotypes and whether the epigenetic divergence is associated with the drought-resistance?
The osmotic stress (also called hypertonic dehydration) always occurs along with the drought and the osmotic-tolerance is a vital part of the drought-resistance [36]. As the epigenetic status of a plant could be largely influenced by its development [37], it is difficult to fairly investigate the DNA methylation in large amount of rice landraces with varied growth period under field conditions to the drought stress. Therefore, we decided to investigate epigenetic status of rice at the seedling stage to the osmotic stress which could be conducted in well-controlled laboratory conditions. By this design, we can explore the adaptive epigenetic divergence between rice ecotypes on their drought-resistances.
The technique of methylation sensitive amplification polymorphisms (MSAP) is modified from the amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) by using a pair of isoschizomeric restriction enzymes with different sensitivities to site-specific cytosine methylation. The MSAP method has been widely used in studies of ecological and population epigenetics in latest years [29, 38–40]. To explore the evolutionary significance of DNA methylation in rice ecotypes adapting to agro-ecosystems of contrasting soil-water conditions, the adaptive epigenetic divergence and its influence on the gene expression between upland and lowland rice ecotypes are investigated.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
All the rice materials were planted in the fields of experimental station belonged to Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences to gain the seeds and the laboratory experiment was conducted under indoor conditions. We have granted the permission to conduct these field and laboratory experiments. There were no endangered wild species in the experimental station and the laboratory experiment had no negative impacts to the environment.
Plant materials
180 plant materials, including 71 japonica-upland, 59 japonica-lowland, 24 indica-upland, and 26 indica-lowland landraces from four provinces of China were involved in this study to investigate the epigenetic variance and differentiation between upland rice and lowland rice ecotypes (Table 1).
Normal and osmotic treatment
Seeds of the 180rice landraces were germinated on the 48-well plate and growing in agrowth chamber (14 hours of daytime at 30°C and 10 hours of night at 20°C with 70% relative humidity).One rice landrace had two plates with 24 individuals per plate. After 20 days of growing in the normal nutrient solution, one plate was treated with 20% PEG6000 to simulate the osmotic stress (OS), while the other plate was kept in the normal nutrient solution as control (CK). After treatedin20% PEG6000 for 24hours, three individual seedlings of each landrace in the OS plate were harvested when they showed signs of slight leaf rolling. The relative water content of seedlings under OS condition were similar (p = 0.405) in upland rice (61.8±0.9%) and in lowland rice (62.9±1.0%). At the same time, three individual seedlings of each landrace in the CK plate were also sampled.
Procedures DNA extraction and MSAP genotyping
Total genomic DNA was extracted following the common cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol. Three seedlings of each materials were mixed together to include the epigenetic variation within a material. The procedure of MSAP was described in detail in our previous study [35]. 16selective primer combinations were involved in this study (S1 Table). The 5’ end of the selective primer was labeled with fluorescent dyes. The PCR products were then analyzed on ABI 3130XL (Applied Biosystems, USA) using ROX500 as an internal standard. The resulting chromatograms were analyzed by Peakscanner ver. 1.0 and then scored manually. Based on the visualized chromatograms, MSAP bands could be accurately separated and scored (S1 Fig).
Comparisons of the banding patterns of EcoRI/HpaII and EcoRI/MspI reactions results in four conditions of a particular fragment, representing different types of DNA methylation (Table 2).The “0/0” type could be determined as hyper-methylation if it represented other methylation types in the CK or OS condition. To be more cautious, if the proportion of the uninformative type V (scored as “0/0” in both CK and OS conditions) exceeded 10%, this epilocus was excluded in our data set. To test the particular impacts of the methylation type I (un-methylation), II (hemi-methylation), III (fully-methylation), and VI (hyper-methylation), the improved ‘Mixed-Scoring 2’ approach [29] was used to study the epigenetic differentiation between upland and lowland rice ecotypes (Table 2). It generated the final epigenetic data matrix by transforming the four discernible methylation types of each multistate epilocus into separate binary sub-epiloci (S3 Table).
Data analysis
DNA methylation status and epigenetic divergence between upland and lowland rice in CK and OS conditions.
The DNA methylation level of each epilocus was calculated as the proportion of (Type II + Type II + Type IV)/ (Type I + Type II + Type III + Type IV). The epigenetic diversity was quantified by the percentage of polymorphic loci (PLP) and the Shannon’s information index (H’). The population structure of the four subspecies-ecotypeswas described by principal coordinates analyses (PCoA) based on the distance matrix calculated by GenAlex ver. 6.43 using the total data and four types of the sub-epiloci (I, II,III, and IV) separately (S2 Table). Epigenetic variation among populations and groups was quantified by the hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) implemented in GenAlex ver. 6.43. The AMOVA were also conducted using the SSR data extracted from our previous study of same plant materials [33]. The ΦST/ΦCT was calculated as the percentage of epigenetic/genetic variance between populations to the total epigenetic variance via AMOVA, representing the level of epigenetic/genetic divergence. The pairwise ΦSTs were calculated among the nine populations respectively using the epigenetic data of CK and OS, as well as the ΦCT using the SSR data extracted from our previous study [33]. Mantel tests were conducted among these pairwise epigenetic and genetic matrices.
Determination of highly divergent epilocus and its behavior in CK and OS conditions.
Highly divergent epilocus (HDE) was defined as the epilocus containing at least one of the four types of sub-epiloci with the ΦST beyond 95% confidence interval (CI) among total sub-epiloci. It was detected respectively in the CK (HDE-CK) and OS (HDE-OS) conditions. Corresponding sub-epilocus of I, II, III, and IV types belonged to the one epilocus were jointly excluded from the neutral epiloci when any one of them was determined as the HDE.
The HDE-CK represents different methylation status between upland and lowland rice in CK. Methylation levels of HDE-CK and the neutral loci were respectively calculated in upland and lowland rice under CK and OS conditions. The HDE-OS represents different methylation status between upland and lowland rice in OS, resulting from the different responses of DNA methylation to the stress. As the methylation degrees were assigned to the four methylation types (I, II, III, and IV) (Table 2), the degree of DNA methylation alterations could be quantified by the difference of methylation degree (DMD) from CK to OS. It was calculated as: methylation degree in OS—methylation degree in CK. The positive/negative value of the DMD mean re-methylation/de-methylation in responses to the osmotic stress at this epilocus. The difference of DMD between upland and lowland rice on HDE-OS was expected to be significantly higher than that on the neutral epiloci. To test these, independent t-test were conducted via SPSS ver. 15.0.
The annotation of genes at epigenetic loci and their expressions.
PCR products between 100-400bpfrom five MSAP primer combinations (S3 Table) were recycled from 1.5% agorose gel and directly sent to sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 2500. The quality-controlled reads were mapped to the reference genome MSU 7.0. Although there were thousands of sequenced DNA fragments in the PCR products, the one with higher abundance should be resulted from the reaction of the enzymes and selective amplification, forming the stronger signal in the chromatogram. Therefore, only the DNA fragments with depth >200were considered as the potential epilocus scored in this study. We then calculated the molecular length (bp) of these sequenced fragments between the cutting sites of the two restriction enzyme (EcoRI: G|AATTC; HpaII/MspI: C|CGG). If the length of a fragment rigorously matched with the molecular weight of a scored MSAP band (±0.5bp), it was then determined as the corresponding epilocus. To validate the results of direct sequencing from PCR products, four MSAP epiloci (M102, M112, M117, and M124) were recycled from the polyacrylamide gel as they had clear bands near the marker ladder standards (100bp, 150bp, 200bp and 250bp). They were sequenced after cloned to the pEASYR-Blunt Simple Cloning Vector (TRANSGEN BIOTECH Company, China, Product#CB111) (S4 Table).
Expression levels of four HDE genes were then quantified by RT-PCR in5-10 upland and lowland materials in CK and OS conditions using ecotype-preferential epigenotypes with three individual replicates for each material (S5 Table). The Actin was used as the reference to calculate the relative expression levels of these genes. Fold difference (FD) between upland and lowland rice was calculated as: expression in upland rice / that in lowland rice while fold change (FC) between CK and OS conditions was calculated as: expression in OS/ that in CK.
Results
Methylation status of the four rice groups in CK and OS conditions
There were 1217scoredepiloci on the 16 MSAP primers of which 745 (61.2%) were polymorphic. These polymorphic epiloci yielded 313 informative epiloci ranging from 7~39 for each MSAP primer combinations (S1 and S2 Tables). These 313 informative loci further yielded 1198 and 1188polymorphic sub-epiloci in CK and OS conditions (S2 Table).
There were great variations of methylation levels (from 0~100%) among the 313 raw MSAP loci (S2 Fig) and no significant difference was detected among groups (Table 3). The percentages of polymorphic loci (PLP) for the four groups were 79.7–93.5% and 81.4–93.7% respectively in the CK and OS conditions, also with no detectable significance (Table 3). The mean Shannon’s information indices (H’) ranged from 0.532~0.541 among the four rice groups in CK while they ranged from 0.528~0.579 in OS (Table 3). There were 52.9~54.3% individual-locus combinations altered their methylation status from CK to OS in the four groups (S6 Table), resulting in the separation of CK and OS samples along the first axis (S3 Fig).
Epigenetic divergence between upland and lowland rice in CK and OS conditions
The result of PCoA using total sub-epiloci of CK separated japonica and indica subspecies along the first coordinate, as well as some of the japonica-upland and japonica-lowland landraces (Fig 1a). It was very similar when total sub-epiloci in the OS condition were used (Fig 1b). Noticeably, the distance matrix of the rice landraces constructed from the total sub-epiloci was significantly correlated with the matrices respectively constructed from four types of sub-epiloci separately both in CK (S4 Fig) and OS (S5 Fig) with similar R squares.
IU: indica-upland; IL: indica-lowland; JU: japonica-upland; JL: japonica-lowland.
Generally, very low levels of epigenetic variance were detected between upland and lowland rice. For example, the AMOVA based ΦST was 2.7%between japonica-upland and japonica-lowland rice, while it was only 1.9% between indica-upland and indica-lowland rice (Table 4) in CK condition. The ΦST became even lower when rice encountering osmotic stress. The epigenetic divergence (ΦST) was much lower than genetic divergence (ΦCT) calculated from the SSR (Table 4).
The matrices of pairewise ΦST from total sub-epiloci among rice populations in CK (Fig 2a) and OS (Fig 2b) were poorly correlated with that from SSR data, demonstrating obvious differences between epigenetic and genetic structures. For example, the ΦCT between Pop3 and Pop7from Hebei province was the lowest, while the ΦST between the two populations was the highest (Fig 2). Additionally, the matrix of pairwise ΦSTs in CK was highly correlated with that in OS (Fig 2c).
a) Correlation between pairwise ΦST of epigenetic data in CK (upper) and pairwise ΦCT of genetic SSR data (below). b) Correlation between pairwise ΦST of epigenetic data in OS (upper) and pairwise ΦCT of genetic SSR data (below). c) Correlation between pairwise ΦST of epigenetic data in OS (upper) and in OS (below). The p values and R squares indicate the correlations via Mantel tests.
Adaptive divergence between upland and lowland rice on highly divergent epiloci
In japonica subspecies, 94 sub-epiloci were detected as HDE-CK (Panel A in S6 Fig) in while 82 sub-epiloci were detected as HDE-OS (Panel C in S6 Fig). In indica subspecies, 77 sub-epiloci were detected as HDE-CK (Panel B in S6 Fig) while 89 sub-epiloci were detected as HDE-OS (Panel D in S6 Fig). Noticeably, there were only few HDE shared in japonica and indica subspecies (S7 Fig). Similarly, the highly divergent epiloci in CK was seldom overlapped with these in OS (S7 Fig).
The ΦST on HDE-CK between upland and lowland ecotypeswere0.137 (p = 0.0001) in japonica and 0.187(p = 0.0001) in indica, while the ΦST on neutral loci were 0.012 (p = 0.0009) in japonica and 0.002(p = 0.2980) in indica. The ΦST on HDE-OS between upland and lowland ecotypes were 0.134 (p = 0.0001) in japonica and 0.149 (p = 0.0001) in indica, while the ΦST on neutral epiloci were 0.012 (p = 0.0001) in japonica and -0.009 (p = 0.9574) in indica.
The methylation levels of HDE-CK in upland rice was significantly lower than that in lowland rice in both japonica (p = 0.034) and indica (p = 0.010) subspecies in CK conditions, while they became almost equal (p>0.05) in OS conditions (Table 5). Methylation levels of neutral epiloci were almost the same in upland and lowland rice both in CK and OS conditions (Table 5). Additionally, the lower methylation level of HDE-CK in upland rice was mainly contributed from epiloci of de-methylation type (S7 Table). These results indicated that the HDE-CK, particularly those of de-methylation type, tended to be at lower methylation levels in upland rice in the CK condition. The DMD from CK to OS was significantly higher on the HDE-OS than it on the neutral loci both in japonica (0.262±0.022 vs. 0.147±0.008, p<0.001) and indica (0.240±0.026 vs. 0.154±0.009, p<0.001).Additionally, there were 32.8% (38 in 119) HDE-OS oppositely altered between upland and lowland rice on their methylation levels when they encountered the OS stress, while the proportion in neutral epiloci was only 15.4% (64 in 415).
Annotations and expressions of genes at HDE
There were 118 fragments covering 64 epiloci scored in this study, 62 among which were considered as HDE genes (S3 Table). Three out of four annotated epiloci were successfully validated by the cloning of eluted MSAP bands, indicating a good annotation of MSAP loci using our method (S4 Table). Four HDE genes were selected to test their expressions in upland and lowland rice (Fig 3 and S5 Table). For LOC_Os05g18604 (M093, HDE-CK), the expression level of epigenotype‘1/1’ in upland rice (50% in upland, 22.6% in lowland) was significantly lower [FD (fold difference) = 0.68]than that of epigenotype ‘1/0’ in lowland rice (31.8%in upland, 69.8% in lowland) in CK (Fig 3a). It was down-regulated [FC (fold change) = 0.45in lowland rice while FC = 0.50 in upland rice when encountering osmotic stress. For LOC_Os12g44160 (M312, HDE-CK), the expression level of epigenotype ‘1/0’ in upland rice (49.2% in upland, 17.5% in lowland) was significantly higher (FD = 1.68) than the ‘0/1’ in lowland rice (11.9% in upland, 40.3% in lowland) in CK (Fig 3b).It was up-regulated (FC = 1.45) when encountering osmotic stress in lowland rice. For LOC_Os05g38400 (M280, HDE-CK), the expression level of epigenotype ‘1/1’ in upland rice (25% in upland, 10.9% in lowland) was marginally lower (FD = 0.68) than the epigenotype ‘0/1’ in lowland rice (20.6% in upland, 39.1% in lowland) in CK (Fig 3c). It was down-regulated (FC = 0.44 in lowland rice while FC = 0.55 in upland rice) when encountering osmotic stress. As great variations among landraces, the expression level ofLOC_Os02g06160 (M007, HDE-OS) was apparently higher in upland rice both in CK (FD = 2.84) and OS (FD = 1.61) conditions although with no significances (Fig 3d).It was up-regulated (FC = 3.34 in lowland rice while FC = 1.89 in upland rice) in the response to the osmotic stress. Noticeably, if the expression level of a gene was up-/down-regulated from CK to OS, it was higher/lower in upland rice in the CK condition, suggesting its expression in upland rice was more adaptive to the osmotic stress.
a) LOC_Os05g18604; b) LOC_Os12g44160; c) LOC_Os05g38400; d) LOC_Os02g06160.White bar indicates gene expression in lowland rice while black bar indicates gene expression in upland rice. Error bars indicate standard errors. ‘*’ and ‘+’ indicate the levels of significance of p<0.05 and p<0.10 between upland and lowland rice ecotypes.
Discussion
Great alterations of DNA methylation induced by the osmotic stress
Stress-induced alterations of DNA methylation have been reported to be associated with plant adaptive responses to various stresses [12, 13, 15]. It is proposed that the stress-induced adaptive-associated epigenetic variants can be inherited and receiving nature selections [4, 41]. Therefore, the alterations of DNA methylation in the stress are one of the sources of novel epimutants. In this study, we detected great genome-wide alterations of DNA methylation from CK to OS, covering about ~53% individual-locus combinations by MSAP. This ratio is similar with that detected in rice treated with salt stress (Karan et al. 2012) but much higher than that induced by drought [13]. The great alterations lead to the CK samples separated from the OS samples along the first coordinate. Given the transgenerational inheritance [8, 15, 20], the osmotic-induced genome-wide alterations of DNA methylation in responses to the osmotic stress is the molecular basis of adaptive divergence between upland and lowland rice on their drought-resistances.
Adaptive epigenetic differentiation between upland and lowland rice on the HDE
Many previous studies focus the epigenetic divergence only in natural environments [26, 29, 40] or normal cultivations [42]. However, the epigenetic variation in the stressed condition also provides informative cues of adaptive epigenetic divergence among plant populations. Therefore, the epigenetic divergence between upland and lowland rice were investigated both in the normal and osmotic conditions. The epigenetic divergence between upland and lowland rice was generally very low in both CK and OS conditions. This is not surprise as the epigenetic divergence always occurs only on adaption-associated epiloci [28, 29, 40]. The HDE-CK and HDE-OS are considered to be evolutionary consequences of rice ecotypes adaption to different agro-ecosystems. As a result, the epigenetic differentiation between these two rice ecotypes on HDE is much higher. The relative poor correlations between the epigenetic and genetic population structures are also detected, similar with many other reports [40]. The explanation is that the epigenetic markers, particularly the epiloci under selections, are more closely aligned with environmental conditions [27–29].
Evolutionary significance of the HDE when upland and lowland rice adapted to agricultural ecosystems of contrasting soil-water conditions
The methylation status of HDE-CK detected in this study is kept at lower methylation levels in upland rice in normal condition, particularly the epiloci of de-methylation type. This should be meaningful for upland rice adapting to water-limited environments, as low levels of methylation at upstream always associated with higher or quicker responses of gene expression to the stress [43, 44]. The three genes of HDE-CK provide evidences that the ecotype-preferential epigenotypes have impacts on gene expressions and should be therefore associated with stress-resistance in plants. For example, LOC_Os05g18604 (OsSCP28) encodes the serine carboxypeptidase which has been reported to be associated with responses against oxidative stress in rice [45]. LOC_Os12g44160 (encoding a putative oxidoreductases) and LOC_Os05g38400 (encoding a FtsH protease) should be also associated with abiotic stress as their functions reported in other species [46–47]. Interestingly, once the expression of a gene is up-/down-regulated when encountering the osmotic stress, its expression was higher/lower in upland rice in the normal condition than that in lowland rice. This result indicated that the upland rice maybe more adaptive to the drought as the expression level of the HDE gene was more close to the level under the stressed conditions.
The HDE-OS tends to oppositely altered from CK to OS between upland and lowland rice, representing different responses of DNA methylation to osmotic stress between upland and lowland rice. However, the gene expression of HDE-OS seems to have the similar pattern in the response to the osmotic stress in upland and lowland rice, reflecting by the LOC_Os02g06160 (encoding a cysteine-rich receptor-like protein kinase). The HDE-OS should be also meaningful for upland rice adapting to water-limited environments as the opposite alterations of DNA methylation in the stress always represents distinguished stress tolerances in divergent plant genotypes [13, 15]. Consequently, the presentation of HDE-OS could also associate to the higher drought-resistance in upland rice, although it requires further evidences.
Conclusions
The adaptive epigenetic divergence occurs between upland and lowland rice when they adapting to agro-ecosystems of contrasting soil-water conditions, resulting in the highly divergent epiloci (HDE) both in normal (CK) and osmotic stress (OS). The HDE-CK kept at low levels of DNA methylation in upland rice in the normal condition. The HDE-OS tends to alter oppositely between upland and lowland rice, representing distinguished drought-resistance of upland and lowland rice. The HDE should be the transgenerational inherited epimutaions during upland rice adapting to water-limited environments and its expression level is more adaptive to the osmotic stress in the upland ecotype. The HDE between upland and lowland rice should be one of the reasonable explanations to the higher drought-resistance in upland rice. The underlying epigenetic mechanism by which upland rice has achieved higher drought-resistance and adaptively differentiated from lowland rice is also called the methylation-mediated memory of stress-tolerance [48, 49]. This mechanism has the applicable potential in improving stress-tolerance in rice. Additionally, HDE genes could be associated with drought-resistance and applicable as epigenetic markers in drought-resistance breeding.
Supporting Information
S1 Fig. Examples of resulting chromatograms visualized by the Peakscanner ver. 1.0.
The y axis indicates the strength of fluorescent signal while the x axis indicates the molecular weight (bp).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s001
(JPG)
S2 Fig. Great variation of methylation levels on the 313 epiloci of different groups in CK and OS conditions.
a) japonica upland (blue bars) and lowland (red bars) rice in CK; b)indica upland (blue bars) and lowland (red bars) rice in CK; c) japonica upland (blue bars) and lowland (red bars) rice in OS; d)indica upland (blue bars) and lowland (red bars) rice in OS.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s002
(JPG)
S3 Fig. Population structures of samples in CK (triangle) and OS (circles) conditions investigated by Principal Coordinate Analysis.
Blue, green, yellow, and brown respectively represent japonica-upland, japonica-lowland, indica-upland, and indica-lowland rice.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s003
(JPG)
S4 Fig. Population structures of CK samples investigated by Principal Coordinate Analysis using separated sub-epiloci of methylation type I (un-methylation) (a), II (hemi-methylation) (b), III (fully-methylation) (C), and IV (hyper-methylation) (d).
R squares indicate their correlations with total sub-epiloci via mantel test.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s004
(JPG)
S5 Fig. Population structures of OS samples investigated by Principal Coordinate Analysis using separated sub-epiloci of methylation type I (un-methylation) (a), II (hemi-methylation) (b), III (fully-methylation) (C), and IV (hyper-methylation) (d).
R squares indicate their correlations with total sub-epiloci via mantel test.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s005
(JPG)
S6 Fig. Number of highly divergent sub-epiloci (HDE) detected in this study.
a) HDE detected in japonica subspecies in CK, b) HDE detected in indica subspecies in CK, c) HDE detected in japonica subspecies in OS, and d) HDE detected in indica subspecies in OS. Purple, yellow, green, and pink colors indicate four types of sub-epiloci (I, II, III, and IV) respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s006
(JPG)
S7 Fig. Number of highly divergent sub-epiloci (HDE) shared among subspecies and treatments.
Purple, yellow, green, and pink colors indicate the HDE detected respectively in japonica in CK, indica in CK, japonica in OS, and indica in OS.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s007
(JPG)
S1 Table. Information of primer combinations involved in this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s008
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Matrices of raw data and generated from mixed scoring.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s009
(XLSX)
S3 Table. Information of sequenced MSAP fragments.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s010
(XLS)
S4 Table. The MSAP epiloci validated by cloning the eluted MSAP bands.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s011
(DOCX)
S5 Table. Genes selected in qPCR and their epigenotypes in CK and OS conditions.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s012
(XLS)
S6 Table. Alteration of methylation types from CK to OS in different rice groups.
JU; japonica upland; JL: japonica lowland; J: japonica; IU: indica upland; IL: indica lowland; I: indica.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s013
(DOCX)
S7 Table. Methylation levels on De-methylation/Re-methylation types of highly divergent epiloci in normal condition.
The values in bold and with ‘‘*” indicated significant differences (p<0.05) between upland and lowland ecotypes by independent t test.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157810.s014
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
Rice materials were kindly provided by Rice Research Institute of Guangxi Academy of Agriculture Science, Hebei Academy of Agriculture Science, Yunnan Academy of Agriculture Science, and Jiangsu Academy of Agriculture Science.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: HX LJL XGZ LC. Performed the experiments: HX WXH JX TT YXY. Analyzed the data: HX WXH HBW XGZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HX XGZ HBW. Wrote the paper: HX WXH JX LJL.
References
- 1. Mirouze M, Paszkowski J.Epigenetic contribution to stress adaptation in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol.2011; 14: 267–274. pmid:21450514
- 2. Shea N, Pen I, Uller T. Three epigenetic information channels and their different roles in evolution. J Evolution Biol.2011; 24:1178–1187.
- 3. Holeski LM, Jander G, Agrawal AA. Transgenerational defense induction and epigenetic inheritance in plants. Trends Ecol Evol.2012; 27: 618–626. pmid:22940222
- 4. Angers B, Castonguay E, Massicotte R. Environmentally induced phenotypes and DNA methylation: how to deal with unpredictable conditions until the next generation and after. Mol Ecol.2010; 19:1283–1295. pmid:20298470
- 5. Bräutigam K, Vining KJ, Clement LP. Epigenetic regulation of adaptive responses of forest tree species to the environment. Ecol Evol.2013; 3: 399–415. pmid:23467802
- 6. Sahu PP, Pandey G, Sharma N, Puranik S, Muthamilarasan M, Prasad M. Epigenetic mechanisms of plant stress responses and adaptation. Plant Cell Rep.2013; 32: 1151–1159. pmid:23719757
- 7. Karan R, Leon TD, Biradar H, Subudhi PK. Salt stress induced variation in DNA methylation pattern and its influence on gene expression in contrasting rice genotypes. PLOS ONE.2012;7: e40203. pmid:22761959
- 8. Kou HP, Li Y, Song XX, Ou XF, Xing SC, Ma J, et al. Heritable alteration in DNA methylation induced by nitrogen-deficiency stress accompanies enhanced tolerance by progenies to the stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Physiol.2011; 168: 1685–1693. pmid:21665325
- 9. Fan HH, Wei J, Li TC, Li ZP, Guo N, Cai YP, Lin Y. DNA methylation alterations of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in response to cold stress. Acta Physiol Plant.2013; 35: 2445–2453.
- 10. Shan XH, Wang XY, Yang G, Wu Y, Su SZ, Li SP, et al. Analysis of the DNA methylation of maize (Zea mays L.) in response to cold stress based on methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphisms. J Plant Biol.2013; 56:32–38.
- 11. Gao GZ, Li J, Li H, Li F, Xu K, Yan GX, et al. Comparison of the heat stress induced variations in DNA methylation between heat-tolerant and heat-sensitive rapeseed seedlings. Breeding Sci.2014;64: 125–133.
- 12. Colaneri AC, Jones AM. Genome-wide quantitative identification of DNA differentially methylated sites in Arabidopsis seedlings growing at different water potential. PLOS ONE.2013;8: e59878. pmid:23577076
- 13. Wang WS, Pan YJ, Zhao XQ, Dwivedi D, Zhu LH, Ali J, et al. Drought-induced site-specific DNA methylation and its association with drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot.2011;62: 1951–1960. pmid:21193578
- 14. Gayacharan , Joel AJ. Epigenetic responses to drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol Mol Biol Plants.2013;19:379–387. pmid:24431506
- 15. Ou XF, Zhang YH, Xu CM, Lin XY, Zang Q, Zhuang TT, et al. Transgenerational inheritance of modified DNA methylation patterns and enhanced tolerance induced by heavy metal stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLOS ONE.2012;7: e41143. pmid:22984395
- 16. Yu YJ, Yang XJ, Wang HY, Shi FX, Liu Y, Liu JS, et al. Cytosine methylation alteration in natural populations of Leymus chinensis induced by multiple abiotic stresses. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8: e55772. pmid:23418457
- 17. Rico L, Ogaya R, Barbeta A, Peñuelas J. Changes in DNA methylation fingerprint of Quercus ilex trees in response to experimental field drought simulating projected climate change. Plant Biol.2014; 16: 419–427. pmid:23889779
- 18. Becker C, Hagmann J, Müller J, Koenig D, Stegle O, Borgwardt K, et al. Spontaneous epigenetic variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana methylome. Nature. 2011; 12:480–245.
- 19. Boyko A, Blevins T, Yao Y, Golubov A, Bilichak A, Ilnytskyy Y, et al. Transgenerational adaptation of Arabidopsis to stress requires DNA methylation and the function of Dicer-like proteins. PLOS One.2010; 5:e9514. pmid:20209086
- 20. Verhoeven KJF, Jansenl JJ, Dijk PJ, Biere A. Stress-induced DNA methylation changes and their heritability in asexual dandelions. New Phytol.2010; 185: 1108–1118. pmid:20003072
- 21. Becker C, Weigel D. Epigenetic variation: origin and transgenerational inheritance. Curr Opin Plant Biol.2012; 15: 562–567. pmid:22939250
- 22. Feng Q, Yang C, Lin X, Wang J, Ou X, Zhang C, et al. Salt and alkaline stress induced transgenerational alteration in DNA methylation of rice (Oryza sativa). Aust J Crop Sci.2012; 6:877–883.
- 23. Schmitz RJ, Schultz MD, Lewsey MG, Malley RC, Urich MA, Libiger O, et al. Transgenerational epigenetic instability is a source of novel methylation variants. Science.2011; 334: 369. pmid:21921155
- 24. Róis AS, López CMR, Cortinhas A, Erben M, Espírito-Santo D, Wilkinson MJ, et al. Epigenetic rather than genetic factors may explain phenotypic divergence between coastal populations of diploid and tetraploid Limonium spp. (Plumbaginaceae) in Portugal. BMC Plant Biol.2013; 13: 205. pmid:24314092
- 25. Zhang YY, Fischer M, Colot V, Bossdorf O. Epigenetic variation creates potential for evolution of plant phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol.2013; 197: 314–322. pmid:23121242
- 26. Herrera CM, Bazaga P. Epigenetic differentiation and relationship to adaptive genetic divergence in discrete populations of the violet Viola cazorlensis.New Phytol.2010; 187: 867–876. pmid:20497347
- 27. Lira-Medeiros CF, Parisod C, Fernandes RA, Mata CS, Cardoso MA, Ferreira PCG. Epigenetic variation in mangrove plants occurring in contrasting natural environment. PLOS ONE.2010;5: e10326. pmid:20436669
- 28. Paun O, Bateman RM, Fay MF, Hedrén M, Civeyrel L, Chase Mark. Stable epigenetic effects impact adaptation in Allopolyploid Orchids (Dactylorhiza: Orchidaceae). Mol. Biol.Evol.2010; 27: 2465–2473. pmid:20551043
- 29. Schulz B, Eckstein RL and Durka W. Epigenetic variation reflects dynamic habitat conditions in a rare floodplain herb. Mol Ecol. 2014; 23: 3523–3537. pmid:24943730
- 30. Zhao W, Shi XZ, Li JG, Guo W, Liu CB, Chen X. Genetic, epigenetic, and HPLC fingerprint differentiation between natural and Ex-situ populations of Rhodiola sachalinensis from Changbai Mountain, China. PLOS ONE.2014;9: e112869. pmid:25386983
- 31. Ross-Ibarra J, Morrell PL, Gaut BS. Plant domestication, a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation. P Natl Acad Sci USA.2007; 104: 8641–8648.
- 32. Bernier J, Atlin GN, Serraj R, Kumar A, Spaner D. Breeding upland rice for drought resistance. J Agr Food Chem.2008; 88: 927–939.
- 33. Xia H, Zheng XG, Chen L, Gao H, Yang H, Long P, et al. Genetic differentiation revealed by selective loci of drought-responding EST-SSRs between upland and lowland rice in China. PLOS ONE.2014;9: e106352. pmid:25286109
- 34. Lyu J, Li BY, He WM, Zhang SL, Gou ZH, Zhang J, et al. A genomic perspective on the important genetic mechanisms of upland adaptation of rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14: 160. pmid:24920279
- 35. Zheng XG, Chen L, Li MS, Lou QJ, Xia H, Wang P, et al. Transgenerational variations in DNA methylation induced by drought stress in two rice varieties with distinguished difference to drought resistance. PLOS ONE.2013;8: e80253. pmid:24244664
- 36. Mahajan S, Tuteja N. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: An overview. Archives Biochem Biophy. 2005;444: 139–158.
- 37. Steimer A, Schob H, Grossniklaus U. Epigenetic control of plant development: New layers of complexity. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004; 7: 11–19. pmid:14732436
- 38. Herrera CM, Medrano MO, Bazaga P. Variation in DNA methylation transmissibility, genetic heterogeneity and fecundity-related traits in natural populations of the perennial herb Helleborus foetidus. Mol Ecol.2014; 23:1085–1095. pmid:24471446
- 39. Schulz B, Eckstein RL, Durka W. Scoring and analysis of methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphisms for epigenetic population studies. Mol Ecol Resour.2013; 13: 642–653. pmid:23617735
- 40. Wenzel MA, Piertney SB. Fine-scale population epigenetic structure in relation to gastrointestinal parasite load in red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scotica). Mol Ecol.2014; 23: 4256–4273. pmid:24943398
- 41. Richards EJ. Natural epigenetic variation in plant species: a view from the field. CurrOpin Plant Biol.2011; 14: 204–209
- 42. Gao LX, Geng Y, Li B, Chen JK, Yang J. Genome-wide DNA methylation alterations of Alternanthera philoxeroides in natural and manipulated habitats: implications for epigenetic regulation of rapid responses to environmental fluctuation and phenotypic variation. Plant Cell Environ.2010; 33: 1820–1827. pmid:20545886
- 43. Akimoto K, Katakami H, Kim H, Ogawa E, Sano CM, Wada Y, et al. Epigenetic inheritance in rice plants. Ann Bot.2007; 100: 205–217. pmid:17576658
- 44. Li X, Zhu JD, Hu FY, Ge S, Ye MZ, Xiang H, et al. Single-base resolution maps of cultivated and wild rice methylomes and regulatory roles of DNA methylation in plant gene expression. BMC Genomics.2012; 13: 300 pmid:22747568
- 45. Liu H, Wang X, Zhang H, Yang Y, Ge X, Song F. A rice serine carboxypeptidase-like gene OsBISCPL1 is involved in regulation of defense responses against biotic and oxidative stress. Gene. 2008;420:57–65. pmid:18571878
- 46. Langklotz S, Baumann U, Narberhaus F. Structure and function of the bacterial AAA protease FtsH. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular Cell Research, 2012; 1823: 40–48.
- 47. Zhang XJ, Yang GG, Shi R, Han X, Qi L, Wang R, et al. Arabidopsis cysteine-rich receptor-like kinase 45 functions in the responses to abscisic acid and abiotic stresses. Plant PhysiolBioch.2014;67: 189–198.
- 48. Ding Y, Fromm M, Avramova Z. Multiple exposures to drought ‘train’ transcriptional responses in Arabidopsis. NatCommun.2012; 3: 740.
- 49. Kinoshita T, Seki M. Epigenetic memory for stress response and adaptation in plants. Plant Cell Physiol.2014; 55: 1859–1863. pmid:25298421