Figures
The images for Figs 4 and 5 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 4 should be Fig 5, and the image that appears as Fig 5 should be Fig 4. The figure captions appear in the correct order.
Here, the bifurcation plots are obtained by plotting the resident population densities from the last 200 generations after discarding transient dynamics. Both bifurcation parameters 3≤μ≤ 4 (left) and 0≤ε≤0.26 (right) are incremented with a stepsize of 0.001. The left-panel plots are for different values of the gain parameter ε = 0.005 (a1), 0.05 (a2), 0.1 (a3) and 0.2 (a4). The right-panel plots are for μ = 3.57 (b1), μ = 3.83 (b2), μ = 3.9 (b3) and μ = 4 (b4).
Time series are for different combinations of the gain parameter ε and growth rate μ: (T1) ε = 0.005, μ = 3.8; (T2) ε = 0.005, μ = 3.9; (T3) ε = 0.05, μ = 3.9 and (T4) ε = 0.1, μ = 3.75. Only 500 generations are used in all four plots after discarding transients. Two horizontal lines are given by and
. The two values are derived from the analysis of the simplified version of (2) for n = 1 and n = 0, respectively. The time series T4 is plotted on a different y–scale to emphasize small fluctuations in the time series. The dashed-line represents the unstable fixed point of the map with ε = 0.
Reference
Citation: Singh BK, Parham PE, Hu C-K (2016) Correction: Structural Perturbations to Population Skeletons: Transient Dynamics, Coexistence of Attractors and the Rarity of Chaos. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0157617. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157617
Published: June 10, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Singh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.