Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Dramatic Declines of Montane Frogs in a Central African Biodiversity Hotspot

  • Mareike Hirschfeld ,

    Affiliation Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany

  • David C. Blackburn,

    Current address: Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32605, United States of America

    Affiliation Department of Herpetology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 94118, United States of America

  • Thomas M. Doherty-Bone,

    Affiliation Conservation Research & Action for Amphibians of Cameroon, Royal Zoological Society of Scotland, Edinburgh Zoo, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

  • LeGrand Nono Gonwouo,

    Affiliation Cameroon Herpetology-Conservation Biology Foundation (CAMHERP-CBF), PO Box 8218, Yaoundé, Cameroon

  • Sonia Ghose,

    Current address: Population Biology Graduate Group, University of California–Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States of America

    Affiliation Department of Herpetology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 94118, United States of America

  • Mark-Oliver Rödel

    Affiliation Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany


Amphibian populations are vanishing worldwide. Declines and extinctions of many populations have been attributed to chytridiomycosis, a disease induced by the pathogenic fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd). In Africa, however, changes in amphibian assemblages were typically attributed to habitat change. We conducted a retrospective study utilizing field surveys from 2004–2012 of the anuran faunas on two mountains in western Cameroon, a hotspot of African amphibian diversity. The number of species detected was negatively influenced by year, habitat degradation, and elevation, and we detected a decline of certain species. Because another study in this region revealed an emergence of Bd in 2008, we screened additional recent field-collected samples and also pre-decline preserved museum specimens for the presence of Bd supporting emergence before 2008. When comparing the years before and after Bd detection, we found significantly diminished frog species richness and abundance on both mountains after Bd emergence. Our analyses suggest that this may be the first disease-driven community-level decline in anuran biodiversity in Central Africa. The disappearance of several species known to tolerate habitat degradation, and a trend of stronger declines at higher elevations, are consistent with Bd-induced declines in other regions. Not all species decreased; populations of some species remained constant, and others increased after the emergence of Bd. This variation might be explained by species-specific differences in infection probability. Increased habitat protection and Bd-mitigation strategies are needed for sustaining diverse amphibian communities such as those on Mt. Manengouba, which contains nearly half of Cameroon’s frog diversity.


Causes of current global amphibian declines are manifold, including habitat loss and fragmentation, environmental pollution, climate change, and emerging infectious diseases like chytridiomycosis caused by chytrid fungi Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and B. salamandrivorans [15]. Severe population declines of amphibians are generally the consequence of an interaction of several of the aforementioned factors. The outbreak of chytridiomycosis is often linked to weather conditions [6] and season [7]. The most studied pathogenic fungus in amphibians, B. dendrobatitidis (Bd), is distributed worldwide [8], and amphibians have been particularly impacted in Central America and Australia [911]. Although amphibians across much of continental Africa (summarized in reference [12]) and Madagascar [13,14] have tested positive for Bd, no large-scale declines caused by the disease have been reported. In Africa, changes in local amphibian species composition, richness, and abundance are usually attributed to habitat change [1520]. Only a few declines of a single species in Tanzania [21,22] and Lesotho [23] were assumed to be related to Bd.

Cameroon is among the richest countries for amphibian diversity, and its volcanic line is one of Africa’s most important biodiversity hotspots [24]. Field observations over the past decade indicate that several montane frog species have become difficult or even impossible to find, and recent studies suggest an emergence of Bd in the mountains of Cameroon around 2008 [25,26]. Here, we report a decline in montane frog species. We test if this decline can be robustly explained by habitat disturbance or the emergence of Bd. We utilize extensive data from amphibian surveys collected from 2004–2012 on two mountains with rich endemic anuran faunas. We test whether the number of species detected is related to environmental factors or study year and investigate whether the frequencies of particular genera and species differ between surveys before and after the first detection of Bd on these mountains.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

No Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) or ethics committee approved this study as this was not required by Cameroonian law. However, all work complied with the guidelines for the use of live amphibians and reptiles in field research compiled by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists (ASIH), The Herpetologists' League (HL) and the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles (SSAR).

The amphibian data presented here are compiled from several studies to examine the taxonomy of species present in Cameroon. Species collected for related studies from our study sites and nearby sites and later tested for Bd are included and listed in S1 Table.

For the amphibian survey, individuals were identified to species level in the field and immediately released at the same site. In cases of taxonomic uncertainty, frogs and tadpoles were collected as vouchers for later identification. In those instances, individuals were anesthetised and euthanized using a water bath with either MS-222 (tricaine methanesulfonate) or chlorobutanol, both recommended for painlessly killing amphibians. For additional Bd screenings in the field, we used epithelial swabbing. Cotton swabs were utilised to brush the skin of living amphibians.

None of the species involved in our study are protected by any national or international law. The land where our study took place is publicly owned, and access is controlled by the community. We only worked in an area after permission by the person in authority (e.g. village chiefs, community elders). Study sites were either located in non-protected areas or the access to protected sites (Kilum-Ijim Plantlife Sanctuary, Mt. Oku) was explicitly allowed by permit.

Research permits covered all areas visited and the entire study protocol, including euthanasia, collection, and the export of species. They were issued by the Cameroonian Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation (MINRESI) and the Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife (MINFOF).

Study area

We focused on anuran assemblages from two major peaks of the Cameroon Volcanic Line (Fig 1): Mount Manengouba (2411 meters above sea level-MASL) in southwestern Cameroon, and Mount Oku (3011 MASL) in the North-West Region. At lower elevations, both mountains are characterized by habitats strongly impacted by human activity, e.g. villages, fields, and plantations. At higher elevations, variously sized remnants of montane cloud forests and grasslands (the latter mostly used for grazing livestock) dominate the landscape. Our surveys covered a large elevational and geographical range on both Mt. Manengouba (620–2244 m asl; 4°49'–5°05'N; 9°39'–9°53'E) and Mt. Oku (1569–3011 m asl; 6°09'–6°17'N; 10°19'–10°31'E). Sampling focused on riparian habitats, but also included forested areas lacking standing waters or streams, as well as near crater lakes on both mountains.

Fig 1. Map of the study region.

Locations of the study sites, Mt. Manengouba and Mt. Oku, are marked with black triangles, additional localities surveyed for Bd are represented by black dots; map based on SRTM elevation model (light = low, dark = high elevations) [27].

Amphibian surveys

Our study is based on combining data from surveys conducted by researchers that were working independently with differing goals and methods, and thus some levels of granularity in the data are unavoidable. From 2004 to 2012, we repeatedly surveyed both mountains during wet (May–September) and dry (October–April) seasons. We determined the presence of adult anuran species using visual and acoustic encounter surveys during day and night searches. Visually detected frogs were caught by hand. LNG, MH, DCB, and MOR collected data on Mt. Manengouba, and TMD-B, DCB, and LNG on Mt. Oku. The search methods comprised plot searches, transect walks, and incidental searches. In addition, qualitative searches for tadpoles using dip nets were applied in both regions. For our analyses we defined each distinct search per site, independent of method, as one “search event”. On Mt. Manengouba, a total of 366 search events were conducted between 2004 and 2012 (2004: 5, 2005: 25, 2006: 66, 2007: 31, 2008: 70, 2010: 71, 2011: 63, 2012: 35). On Mt. Oku we conducted 193 search events during the same period (2004: 2, 2006: 97, 2008: 18, 2009: 21, 2010: 3, 2012: 52). We recorded date, GPS coordinates, elevation, number of surveyors, search time, and the species detected at each location. At each site we assigned the habitat to a general category (primary forest, secondary forest, strongly disturbed and open habitat, village, montane grassland) and noted the availability of nearby ponds and streams. Habitat categories as well as the presence of a pond and stream were binary coded (true or false) for each search event. Collected vouchers (see above) of frogs and tadpoles are stored at the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (ZMB), Natural History Museum London (BMNH), the Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ), and in Yaoundé (foundation for a future national reference collection).

Bd screenings

To supplement recently published surveys of Bd in Cameroon [25,26,28,29], we assessed the occurrence of Bd in Cameroon using both preserved museum specimens collected from 1908 to 2006 and additional field collected samples from 2011 and 2013. Field samples were collected on Mt. Manengouba and Mt. Oku, as well as from many other sites in the country including highland areas and lower elevation localities (Fig 1). Historical samples were taken from museum specimens collected from the same or nearby sites. All museum-preserved specimens were housed at the California Academy of Sciences (CAS) or at the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University (MCZ). Importantly, many records in Doherty-Bone et al. [26] and museum specimens collected in 2004 and 2006 by DCB correspond to the field records used in this study on declines.

We used standard skin swabbing techniques to test for the presence of Bd [3032]. Using a MW113 dry swab (Medical Wire and Equipment Company), all specimens were stroked 30 times. This included ten strokes of each side of the ventrum, and five strokes on each of the hind feet, focusing on sampling between the toes. Field swabs were then placed in microcentrifuge tubes (1.5 ml) containing 70% ethanol. Gloves were used during collection of swabs from museum specimens, and changed between handling every specimen. In addition, to decrease the chance of cross contamination between museum specimens housed in shared jars, each specimen was rinsed in 70% ethanol prior to swabbing. Museum specimen swab samples were stored in microcentrifuge tubes without alcohol. Once collected, we attempted to keep swabs as cold as possible in the field and the lab (ideally 4°C) until DNA extraction and quantitative PCR [33]. Prior to DNA extraction, we dried swab samples by spinning in a centrifuge under vacuum (SpeedVac™). We extracted DNA using the Prepman™ Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent (Life Technologies), and conducted real-time quantitative PCR according to standard methods [30,31]. These methods for DNA extraction and qPCR have been validated both in live specimens and formalin-fixed museum specimens stored in 70% ethanol [32,34]. Genomic equivalent (GE) results were multiplied by the dilution factor of 80 to estimate the number of zoospores in a swab, or zoospore equivalent (ZE).

Data analysis

Sampling effort was measured in person-hours and calculated as the number of surveyors multiplied by search time. We calculated the sampling success expressed as the number of species recorded per person-hour for each search event. As survey time was not available for all incidental searches, the sample size of values related to time (sampling effort, sampling success) was smaller than the overall number of search events.

To investigate whether sampling success was influenced by one or a combination of the selected factors (habitat category, availability of ponds or streams, study year, elevation) and their interactions (study year*elevation to test for differences along the elevation with time), a generalized mixed-effect model was calculated (function glmer, R package 'lme4' [35]). Numeric variables (elevation, study year) were scaled from 0 to 1. We corrected for possible differences among both mountains by adding the study area (Mt. Manengouba or Mt. Oku) as a random factor to the model. The model was reduced stepwise backwards based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC). To test for an influence of the emergence of Bd, the data were grouped by whether the search events occurred before or after the first detection of Bd on each mountain. To assess species-level responses, we calculated the frequency of occurrence for a species as the number of search events detecting the species, divided by the total number of search events for each year and the period before and after Bd occurrence, respectively. A similar approach was applied for each genus.

Our data (Shapiro-Wilk test: species per sampling event: W = 0.90, p < 0.0001; sampling success: W = 0.82, p < 0.0001; R package ‘stats’) and their residuals (visually tested using QQ plots, R package ‘stats’) were not normally distributed. We thus applied Pearson’s correlation coefficient to test for dependencies, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for pairwise comparisons before and after Bd detection on each mountain and a generalized mixed-effect model for negative binomial distribution (differences from negative binomial: species per sampling event: χ² = 7.58, df = 10, p = 0.06; sampling success: χ² = 4.09, df = 4, p = 0.39; function goodfit, R package ‘vcd’). All statistical analyses were conducted in R 3.1.1 (R Development Core Team).


Species richness and sampling success

In total, 89 frog species representing 21 genera were detected on Mt. Manengouba. These comprise all species that have been documented historically [3638] as well as species recently described from this mountain [3941]. On average, 3.55 ± 2.32 (mean ± SD, range: 0–15, n = 366) species were detected per search event. Survey effort ranged from 0.01 to 20 person-hours (3.56 ± 2.56, n = 291) and sampling success ranged from 0 to 6.5 (1.21 ± 0.98, n = 291). On Mt. Oku, 28 frog species representing 14 genera with a mean of 1.10 ± 0.99 species per search event (range: 0–6, n = 193) were detected. As for Mt. Manengouba, our surveys documented all previously known species for Mt. Oku as well as new species [41]. The person-hours spent during a search event varied from 0.25 to 19.5 (3.81 ± 3.00, n = 84). The sampling success ranged from 0 to 4 (0.50 ± 0.73, n = 84).

We focused subsequent analysis on sampling success only as this measure takes sampling effort into account and was moreover highly correlated with the number of species detected (cor = 0.66, df = 373, p < 0.0001, n = 375). Sampling success decreased with elevation, study year and the availability of ponds; it decreased with habitat categories ‘village’, ‘secondary forest’, ‘primary forest’ as well as ‘mountainous grassland’ (final generalized mixed-effect model, ΔAIC = 4.8, Table 1).

Table 1. Effects of habitat and study year on species sampling success.

Bd screenings

We tested 531 preserved specimens and 1271 additional recent field-collected samples for Bd (S2 Table and S3 Table). Combined with published Bd screenings (see Materials and Methods), these data provide a chronology of the occurrence of Bd across Cameroon. Bd was first detected in the lowlands at Batouri in 1934 and again in the lowlands near Sangmelima in 1960, though both times at low infection intensities. There are no Bd-positive records in the highlands of Cameroon until 2008 (S3 Table), although sample sizes were frequently below the threshold required to robustly infer prevalence below 1% (n = 298) or even 5% (n = 59) [42]. In total, 309 frogs tested positive for Bd with genomic equivalent scores ranging from 0.0001 to 517.46 (7.11 ± 38.71, n = 309, S2 Table and S3 Table for details). Bd was first detected in samples from Mt. Manengouba in 2011 and from Mt. Oku in 2008, supporting Doherty-Bone et al. [25].

Bd detection and sampling success

To test for the influence of Bd on the low number of species detected in recent years, we combined search events based on whether they were conducted before or after the first detection of Bd on each mountain. On Mt. Manengouba, we observed 86 species before and only 40 after the first detection of Bd. The sampling success and the number of species observed per search event decreased significantly after the detection (Table 2; Fig 2A and 2B). Similarly on Mt. Oku we found fewer species (18 versus 24) and significantly fewer species per sampling event (Table 2, Fig 2C) after the first positive Bd record compared to before. Sampling success was also higher before Bd detection, although not significantly (Table 2, Fig 2D).

Fig 2. Differences in detected anuran species between search events conducted before and after Bd-positive records in these study regions.

(A) Number of species per sampling event at Mt. Manengouba. (B) Sampling success (number of species recorded per person-hour for each search event at Mt. Manengouba. (C) Number of species per sampling event at Mt. Oku. (D) Sampling success at Mt. Oku. Boxplots depicting events before the detection of Bd in the region are shown as colored white, and those representing events after detection of Bd are shown as colored black. See Table 2 for statistical results and sample sizes

Table 2. Differences in sampling success and species occurrence before and after the first positive Bd record on Mt. Manengouba in 2011 and Mt. Oku in 2008.

Detection trends of specific species and genera

Although overall fewer species were detected in recent years, not all species were affected similarly. Some species were observed less frequently, but others showed little difference or even increased frequency of observations (see Fig 3 and S2 Fig). On Mt. Manengouba, puddle frogs (Phrynobatrachus) were common until 2010, but observations decreased dramatically in the years 2011 and 2012 (Fig 3C). In contrast night frogs (Astylosternus) were found in approximately half of the search events in all study years on Mt. Manengouba (Fig 3A). Egg frogs (Leptodactylodon) were found more frequently after the emergence of Bd (Fig 3B). Although the frequency of single species observed varied among study years, some species appeared to have decreased (e.g. Cardioglossa manengouba, Phrynobatrachus jimzimkusi) whereas others appeared to have increased (e.g. Astylosternus perreti, Leptodactylodon mertensi, Leptopelis calcaratus) over time (Fig 3D–3F, Figures A and B in S2 Fig). On Mt. Oku, species were detected less frequently. If only considering those species recorded at least 10 times across all sampling events, two genera, squeakers (Arthroleptis) and Phrynobatrachus, exhibited the largest apparent declines when comparing search events before and after Bd-emergence, whereas Astylosternus slightly increased. When considering specific species on Mt. Oku, one night frog (Astylosternus rheophilus) and two puddle frogs (Phrynobatrachus steindachneri-jimzimkusi complex, P. werneri) appeared to have declined, whereas Astylosternus ranoides appeared to have increased considerably (Figure D in S2 Fig). Though caecilians were not the focus of field work, Crotaphatrema lamottei has been observed (2012 and 2013) on Mt. Oku following declines of anurans, which suggests that the population of this rare species has not changed [43] in relation to previously common anuran species that have disappeared. Though the amphibian fauna differs between the study sites, frogs inhabiting both mountains likewise decreased (e.g. P. steindachneri-jimzimkusi complex, P. werneri).

Fig 3. Frequency of detection of selected frog genera and species during all study years on Mt. Manengouba.

Shown is the proportion of search events in which a genus (A-C) or a species (D-G) was present in a given year. The latter two bars show search events in which a genus or species was detected in all search events before and after the first recorded detection of Bd in the region (compare S3 Table). Bars showing events before the detection of Bd are colored white and those showing events after first detection of Bd are colored black. The number of search events was as follows: 2004 = 5; 2005 = 25; 2006 = 66; 2007 = 31; 2008 = 70; 2010 = 71; 2011 = 63; 2–12 = 35. Search events prior to detection of Bd = 366 and after detection of Bd = 98. For additional genus and species information, see S2 Fig.


Our study reveals the first community-level declines in numbers of observable African amphibians associated with an increase of Bd prevalence rather than dramatic changes in land use or loss of habitat. Although the decline of a few other amphibians in Africa has been associated with this pathogen, Bd does not seem to have negatively affected other species in these faunas. The abrupt decrease in species occurrence and richness described here is comparable with Bd-induced amphibian declines on other continents. The magnitude of the apparent decline, however, differs by being less at our Central African study sites. For example, we did not detect large numbers of dead frogs as reported from the Neotropics [10] and Australia [9,10,44]. However, villagers around Mt. Manengouba have reported observing dead frogs on several occasions along different local rivers (unpublished data), but the cause of these mortality events remain unknown. Natural habitats on Mt. Manengouba and Mt. Oku are threatened, mainly due to loss (slash and burn for farming) and degradation (wood-cutting, encroachment by agriculture, livestock grazing). In our study, the strength of habitat disturbance had no clear effect on sampling success. Sampling success likewise increased with pristine (‘primary forest’) and strongly altered (‘village’) habitat categories. Following this, and supported by the decline of species previously common in strongly degraded habitats and not dependent on pristine forests (e.g. Phrynobatrachus jimzimkusi), anthropogenic habitat conversion cannot explain the strong declines in the past few years.

The application of pesticides can be lethal to amphibians [45,46] and is common on both mountains studied here (personal observations). However, if pesticide use predominantly underlies observed declines, we would expect stronger responses at lower elevations (near farms), yet we observed a stronger decline at higher elevations (see S1 Fig), against the flow direction where agricultural run-offs are unlikely.

Climate change threatens tropical montane amphibians [47] and cannot be ruled out as a potential factor driving observed changes to the anuran assemblages. While climate data are limited for our study sites, our ad hoc field observations suggest that climate conditions were fairly consistent (e.g. length and strength of the dry season, precipitation etc.) over this study period. The observed changes could also be due to natural population fluctuations [48]. However, as the decline was not limited to a single taxon or to species with similar environmental requirements and life-histories (e.g. tree frogs vs. leaf litter frogs; direct-developing vs. larval development) we consider natural population fluctuations as an improbable explanation.

Because Bd prefers cooler and moist areas [49,50], species associated with streams at higher elevations have an increased susceptibility [5153], causing stronger Bd-induced declines at higher elevations [44,54,55]. In our study, the negative effect of pond availability on sampling success might be simply due to an increase of study sites with ponds visited over time (percentage of visited sites with pond per year: t = -2.86, df = 7, p < 0.05, n = 9). Although there was no significant interaction of elevation and study year in the model (see Table 1), separate analysis revealed a stronger decline over time at higher elevations (see S1 Fig). Given this phenomenon and the other available data, Bd seems the most plausible driver of the change in anuran communities observed on these mountains during the past decade, possibly being reinforced by other stressors like habitat degradation, pollution or change in microclimatic conditions. Individual species respond differently to Bd (e.g. [56,57], this study). This may be the result of differences in microhabitats and life-history traits [5860], behaviour [6164], condition and life-stage [65], skin peptides [66], and even associated microbiota [67]. Species of the genus Phrynobatrachus seem particularly susceptible as they were rarely or never observed after the emergence of Bd on both mountains. In our study areas, these species inhabit the leaf litter and breed in temporary waters and medium-sized streams where their tadpoles develop [68]. Their preferred moist habitats and close association with streams correspond well to the environmental requirements of Bd [49,50] and might increase their susceptibility to infection. While stream-dwelling anuran species are particularly affected by Bd [60,69], not all such species at our study sites declined, including species of Leptopelis, Leptodactylodon, and Astylosternus. Here, the use of different microhabitats might result in different exposure to Bd. Astylosternus tadpoles, for example, live in fast-flowing and sandy streams ([70], personal observation), whereas Phrynobatrachus tadpoles occur in slow-moving parts of streams and adjacent pools, hiding between stones and in the leaf litter [68]. Many Leptopelis species included here are largely arboreal, but deposit eggs in humid soil [71] and thus may have less exposure as adults to Bd than species found in streams and ponds. In contrast, Leptodactylodon are often found close to or even in the streams where they reproduce. They hide in muddy burrows and piles of dead leaves and branches along the streams [(personal observation; [72]). Their tadpoles dwell mostly beneath stones and in the leaf litter of slower-moving streams [73]. The microhabitats of both life-cycle stages thus meet the environmental requirements of Bd. Their resistance might be due to reasons like skin structure, peptide composition, behaviour and microbiota, but this remains unknown. In summary, when considering the different possibilities for the decline with the evidence (species-specific reactions, habitat requirements, elevational distribution), Bd still seems to be the most likely factor.

It is unknown whether the emergence of Bd in the highlands of Cameroon is novel or endemic [74]. The first studies of recently collected material from Cameroon failed to detect Bd [25,26,75]. However, the data presented here support a long-term presence of Bd in the lowlands [28] though at a much lower prevalence than recently documented from the earliest 20th century in the Atlantic coastal forests of Brazil [76]. We do not know the Bd-strain of the historical positives, although sequences of recent Bd positives suggest a relationship to the hypervirulent global panzootic lineage ([77], DCB & SG unpublished data). In the case of endemic emergence, Bd might not have been detected by past studies [25,26] because of low-intensity infections leading to false negative results [31] or strains and other chytrid pathogens which are not detectable with protocols currently applied [4]. Alternatively, the few early reports of Bd in Cameroon could be the result of false positives. Infection intensities observed in this study were not as high as those observed for species in Bd-induced declines elsewhere [78]. This may be affected by our surveys occurring during periods of low virulence prior to or following disease outbreak, or pathogenic DNA becoming depleted during transport back to the laboratory in the tropical climate [79]. The low sample sizes and differential diagnostic sampling regime (museum vs. toe-clip vs. swab) of historic samples also makes robust inference of historical absence of Bd in the mountains difficult. To unambiguously confirm the association of Bd with the observed declines, further examination of museum specimens, infection experiments, and other factors that might change host-parasite dynamics are required.

Because tropical mountains host large numbers of endemic species, die-offs on single mountains may lead to the extinction of entire species. This may include the two Cameroonian mountains studied here and other mountains in the Cameroon Volcanic Line. Urgent conservation strategies are needed for conserving the frog species endemic to these mountains. Captive breeding programs are conceivable for critically endangered species to facilitate later reintroductions or translocations following disease-induced mortality events [80]. Another approach could be antifungal treatments of species in risk [81] possibly combined with environmental disinfection which successfully eliminated Bd infection in pond breeding amphibian species [82]. However, as susceptibility to lethal diseases might be strongly linked to the stress experienced by a species, the protection of the remaining habitats is also critical to conserving the rich amphibian assemblages on both mountains.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Sampling success in response to study year and elevation and its interaction.

Sampling success (species detected per man hour) decreased on both mountains significantly with study year (Spearman Rank Correlation: Manengouba (grey): rho = -0.48, p < 0.0001; Oku (red): rho = -0.31, p < 0.01), elevation (Manengouba: rho = -0.12, p < 0.05; Oku: rho = -0.33, p < 0.01), and the interaction of elevation and study year (Manengouba: rho = -0.49, p < 0.0001; Oku: rho = -0.39, p < 0.001); elevation and year are scaled form 0 to 1, respectively.


S2 Fig. Frequency of both genera and species in the study regions over time.

Proportion of search events that a genus or species of frog was present per year on Mt. Manengouba (A–C) and Mt. Oku (D). Bars before the detection of Bd are colored white, and after Bd black; number of search events Mt. Manengouba: 2004 = 5, 2005 = 25, 2006 = 66, 2007 = 31, 2008 = 70, 2010 = 71, 2011 = 63, 2012 = 35, before Bd = 366, after Bd = 98; Mt. Oku: 2004 = 2, 2006 = 97, 2008 = 18, 2009 = 21, 2010 = 3, 2012 = 52, before Bd = 99, after Bd = 94. For each plot, the rightmost two bars show the proportion of search events that a genus or species was detected before and after the first Bd record on that mountain. The genera and species shown here are restricted to those recorded during at least 10 search events. See Fig 3 for additional genera and species from Mt. Manengouba.


S1 Table. Voucher specimens.

Individuals collected at Mt. Manengouba, Mt. Oku and neighboring localities for the purpose of other study questions. Those vouchers were tested for the study presented herein to obtain a continuous Chronology of Bd records.


S2 Table. Chronology of Bd records and infection load.

Field-collected and museum samples from Cameroon tested for Bd. Given is an identification number (Museums Catalogue or Field Number), species identity, year of collection, screening results (positive or negative, zoospore equivalent, ZE and genomic equivalent, GE), and collection site. Individuals tested positive are highlighted in yellow.


S3 Table. Summary of the chronology of Bd emergence in Cameroon based on screening field-collected and museum samples.

Field-collected and museum samples from Cameroon tested for Bd summarized by collection site and year. Confidence intervals for prevalence are calculated using R package ‘PropCIs’.



We thank the Cameroonian Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife and Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation for issuing research, collection and export permits. Thanks also go to all village chiefs and community elders who offered permission to work in their various localities. Our gratitude goes likewise to our many field assistants for their invaluable help.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MH DCB TMD-B LNG MOR. Performed the experiments: MH DCB TMD-B LNG SG MOR. Analyzed the data: MH TMD-B. Wrote the paper: MH DCB TMD-B MOR. Laboratory work: DCB TMD-B SG. Amphibian surveys: MH DCB TMD-B LNG MOR.


  1. 1. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, et al. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science. 2004;306(5702):1783–6. pmid:15486254
  2. 2. Skerratt LF, Berger L, Speare R, Cashins S, McDonald KR, Phillott AD, et al. Spread of chytridiomycosis has caused the rapid global decline and extinction of frogs. Ecohealth. 2007;4:125–34.
  3. 3. Blaustein AR, Walls SC, Bancroft BA, Lawler JJ, Searle CL, Gervasi SS. Direct and indirect effects of climate change on amphibian populations. Diversity. 2010;2:281–313.
  4. 4. Martel A, Spitzen-van der Sluijs A, Blooi M, Bert W, Ducatelle R, Fisher MC, et al. Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans sp. nov. causes lethal chytridiomycosis in amphibians. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(38):15325–9. pmid:24003137
  5. 5. Martel A, Blooi M, Adriaensen C, Van Rooij P, Beukema W, Fisher M, et al. Recent introduction of a chytrid fungus endangers western Palearctic salamanders. Science. 2014;346(6209):630–1. pmid:25359973
  6. 6. Murray KA, Skerratt LF, Garland S, Kriticos D, McCallum H. Whether the weather drives patterns of endemic amphibian chytridiomycosis: A pathogen proliferation approach. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e61061. pmid:23613783
  7. 7. Phillott AD, Grogan LF, Cashins SD, McDonald KR, Berger LEE, Skerratt LF. Chytridiomycosis and seasonal mortality of tropical stream-associated frogs 15 years after introduction of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Conserv Biol. 2013;27(5):1058–68. pmid:23678872
  8. 8. Olson DH, Aanensen DM, Ronnenberg KL, Powell CI, Walker SF, Bielby J, et al. Mapping the global emergence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, the amphibian chytrid fungus. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e56802. pmid:23463502
  9. 9. Lips KR, Brem F, Brenes R, Reeve JD, Alford RA, Voyles J, et al. Emerging infectious disease and the loss of biodiversity in a Neotropical amphibian community. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(9):3165–70. pmid:16481617
  10. 10. Berger L, Speare R, Daszak P, Green DE, Cunningham AA, Goggin CL, et al. Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rain forests of Australia and Central America. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:9031–6. pmid:9671799
  11. 11. Crawford AJ, Lips KR, Bermingham E. Epidemic disease decimates amphibian abundance, species diversity, and evolutionary history in the highlands of central Panama. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(31):13777–82. pmid:20643927
  12. 12. Penner J, Adum GB, McElroy MT, Doherty-Bone T, Hirschfeld M, Sandberger L, et al. West Africa—A safe haven for frogs? A sub-continental assessment of the chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis). PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e56236. pmid:23426141
  13. 13. Kolby JE. Presence of the amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in native amphibians exported from Madagascar. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e89660. pmid:24599336
  14. 14. Bletz MC, Rosa GM, Andreone F, Courtois EA, Schmeller DS, Rabibisoa NHC, et al. Widespread presence of the pathogenic fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in wild amphibian communities in Madagascar. Scientific Reports. 2015;5(8633).
  15. 15. Akani GC, Politano E, Luiselli L. Amphibians recorded in forest swamp areas of the River Niger Delta (southeastern Nigeria), and the effects of habitat alteration from oil industry development on species richness and diversity. Applied Herpetology. 2004;2:1–22.
  16. 16. Gower DJ, Aberra RK, Schwaller S, Largen MJ, Collen B, Spawls S, et al. Long-term data for endemic frog genera reveal potential conservation crisis in the Bale Mountains, Ethiopia. Oryx. 2013;47(01):59–69.
  17. 17. Russel C, Downs CT. Effect of land use on anuran species composion in north-eastern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Appl Geogr. 2012;35:247–56.
  18. 18. Hillers A, Veith M, Rödel M-O. Effects of forest fragmentation and habitat degradation on West African leaf-litter frogs. Conserv Biol. 2008;22(3):762–72. pmid:18410401
  19. 19. Ernst R, Rödel M-O. Anthropogenically induced changes of predictability in tropical anuran assemblages. Ecology. 2005;86(11):3111–8.
  20. 20. Adum GB, Eichhorn MP, Oduro W, Ofori-Boateng C, Rödel M- O. Two-stage recovery of amphibian assemblages following selective logging of tropical forests. Conserv Biol. 2013;27(2):354–63. pmid:23282143
  21. 21. Channing A, Finlow-Bates KS, Haarklau SE, Hawkes PG. The biology and recent history of the critically endangered Kihansi spray toad Nectophrynoides asperginis in Tanzania. Journal of East African Natural History. 2006;95(2):117–38.
  22. 22. Weldon C, du Preez LH. Decline of Kihansi spray toad, Nectophrynoides asperginis, from the Udzungwa mountains, Tanzania. Froglog. 2004;62:2–3.
  23. 23. Minter LR, Burger M, Harrison JA, Braack HH, BP J., Knoepfer D. Atlas and red data book of the frogs of South Africa, Lesotho & Swaziland. Washington D.C.: SI/MAB Biodiversity Program Series #9, Smithsonian Institution; 2004.
  24. 24. Myers N. The biodiversity challenge: expanded hot-spots analysis. Environmentalist. 1990;10:243–356. pmid:12322583
  25. 25. Doherty-Bone TM, Gonwouo NL, Hirschfeld M, Ohst T, Weldon C, Perkins M, et al. Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in amphibians of Cameroon, including first records for caecilians. Dis Aquat Organ. 2013;102:187–93. pmid:23446968
  26. 26. Doherty-Bone TM, Bielby J, Gonwouo NL, LeBreton M, Cunningham AA. In a vulnerable position? Preliminary survey work fails to detect the amphibian chytrid pathogen in the highlands of Cameroon, an amphibian hotspot. Herpetological Journal. 2008;18:115–8.
  27. 27. Jarvis A, Reuter HI, Nelson A, Guevara E. Hole-filled seamless SRTM data V4, International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). 2008. Available:
  28. 28. Soto-Azat C, Clarke BT, Poynton JC, Cunningham AA. Widespread historical presence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in African pipid frogs. Divers Distrib. 2010;16(1):126–31.
  29. 29. Baláž V, Kopecký O, Gvoždík V. Presence of the amphibian chytrid pathogen confirmed in Cameroon. Herpetological Journal. 2012;22:191–4.
  30. 30. Boyle DG, Boyle DB, Olsen V, Morgan JAT, Hyatt AD. Rapid quantitative detection of chytridiomycosis (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) in amphibian samples using real-time Taqman PCR assay. Dis Aquat Organ. 2004;60:141–8. pmid:15460858
  31. 31. Hyatt AD, Boyle DG, Olsen V, Boyle DB, Berger L, Obendorf D, et al. Diagnostic assays and sampling protocols for the detection of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Dis Aquat Organ. 2007;73:175–92. pmid:17330737
  32. 32. Cheng TL, Rovito SM, Wake DB, Vredenburg VT. Coincident mass extirpation of Neotropical amphibians with the emergence of the infectious fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:9502–7. pmid:21543713
  33. 33. Van Sluys M, Kriger KM, Phillott AD, Campbell R, Skerratt LF, Hero J- M. Storage of samples at high temperatures reduces the amount of amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis DNA detectable by PCR assay. Dis Aquat Organ. 2008;81:93–7. pmid:18924373
  34. 34. Richards-Hrdlicka KL. Extracting the amphibian chytrid fungus from formalin-fixed specimens. Methods Ecol Evol. 2012;3:842–9.
  35. 35. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7, Available: 2014.
  36. 36. Amiet J-L. Ecologie et distribution des Amphibiens Anoures de la région de Nkonsamba (Cameroun). Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de Yaoundé. 1975;20:33–107.
  37. 37. Perret J-L. Les amphibiens du Cameroun. Zoologische Jahrbücher (Systematik). 1966;8:289–464.
  38. 38. Gartshore ME. The status of the montane herpetofauna of the Cameroon highlands. In: Stuart SN, editor. Conservation of Cameroon Montane Forests. 1986. Cambridge: International Council for Bird Preservation; 1986. p. 204–40.
  39. 39. Blackburn DC. A new species of Cardioglossa (Amphibia: Anura: Arthroleptidae) endemic to Mount Manengouba in the Republic of Cameroon, with an analysis of morphological diversity in the genus. Zool J Linn Soc. 2008;154:611–30.
  40. 40. Blackburn DC, Gonwouo LN, Ernst R, Rödel M-O. A new squeaker frog (Arthroleptidae: Arthroleptis) from the Cameroon Volcanic Line with redescriptions of Arthroleptis adolfifriederici Nieden, 1911 “1910” and A. variabilis Matschie, 1893. Breviora. 2009;515:1–22.
  41. 41. Zimkus BM, Gvoždík V. Sky islands of the Cameroon Volcanic Line: A diversification hot spot for puddle frogs (Phrynobatrachidae: Phrynobatrachus). Zool Scr. 2013;42(6):591–611.
  42. 42. Thrusfield M. Veterinary epidemiology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1995.
  43. 43. Doherty-Bone TM, Ndifon RK, San Mauro D, Wilkinson M, Gonwouo NL, Gower DJ. Systematics and ecology of the caecilian Crotaphatrema lamottei (Nussbaum) (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Scolecomorphidae). Journal of Natural History. 2011;45:827–41.
  44. 44. Lips KR. Mass mortality and population declines of anurans at an upland site in western Panama. Conserv Biol. 1999;13(1):117–25.
  45. 45. Mann RM, Hyne RV, Choung CB, Wilson SP. Amphibians and agricultural chemicals: Review of the risks in a complex environment. Environ Pollut. 2009;157(11):2903–27. pmid:19500891
  46. 46. Relyea RA. The impact of insecticides and herbicides on the biodiversity and productivityof aquatic communities. Ecol Appl. 2005;15(2):618–27.
  47. 47. Williams SE, Bolitho EE, Fox S. Climate change in Australian tropical rainforests: An impending environmental catastrophe. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003;270:1887–92.
  48. 48. Alford RA, Richards SJ. Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology. Annual Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 1999;30:133–65.
  49. 49. Berger L, Speare R, Hines HB, Marantelli G, Hyatt AD, McDonald KR, et al. Effect of season and temperature on mortality in amphibians due to chytridiomycosis. Aust Vet J. 2004;82(7):434–9. pmid:15354853
  50. 50. Drew A, Allen EJ, Allen LJS. Analysis of climatic and geographic factors affecting the presence of chytridiomycosis in Australia. Dis Aquat Organ. 2006;68(3):245–50. pmid:16610590
  51. 51. Hero J-M, Morrison C. Frog declines in Australia: global implications. Herpetological Journal. 2004;14:175–86.
  52. 52. Ad Carnaval, Puschendorf R, Peixoto O, Verdade V, Rodrigues M. Amphibian chytrid fungus broadly distributed in the Brazilian atlantic rain forest. Ecohealth. 2006;3(1):41–8.
  53. 53. Rödder D, Kielgast J, Bielby J, Schmidtlein S, Bosch J, Garner TW, et al. Global amphibian extinction risk assessment for the panzootic chytrid fungus. Diversity. 2009;1(1):52–66.
  54. 54. Lips KR. Decline of a tropical montane amphibian fauna. Conserv Biol. 1998;12(1):106–17.
  55. 55. Young BE, Lips KR, Reaser JK, Ibáñez R, Salas AW, Cedeño JR, et al. Population declines and priorities for amphibian conservation in Latin America. Conserv Biol. 2001;15(5):1213–23.
  56. 56. Puschendorf R, Bolanos F, Chaves G. The amphibian chytrid fungus along an altitudinal transect before the first reported declines in Costa Rica. Biol Conserv. 2006;132:136–42.
  57. 57. Gahl MK, Longcore JE, Houlahan JE. Varying responses of northeastern North American amphibians to the chytrid pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Conserv Biol. 2012;26(1):135–41. pmid:22181933
  58. 58. Bielby J, Cooper N, Cunningham AA, Garner TWJ, Purvis A. Predicting susceptibility to future declines in the world's frogs. Conserv Lett. 2008;1(2):82–90.
  59. 59. Murray KA, Rosauer D, McCallum H, Skerratt LF. Integrating species traits with extrinsic threats: closing the gap between predicting and preventing species declines. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;278(1711):1515–23.
  60. 60. Kriger KM, Hero J-M. The chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis is non-randomly distributed across amphibian breeding habitats. Divers Distrib. 2007;13:781–8.
  61. 61. Woodhams DC, Alford RA, Marantelli G. Emerging disease of amphibians cured by elevated body temperature. Dis Aquat Organ. 2003;55:65–7. pmid:12887256
  62. 62. Todd BD. Parasites lost? An overlooked hypothesis for the evolution of alternative reproductive strategies in amphibians. The American Naturalist. 2007;170(5):793–9. pmid:17926300
  63. 63. Nichols DK, Lamirande EW, Pessier AP, Longcore JE. Experimental transmission of cutaneous chytridiomycosis in dendrobatid frogs. J Wildl Dis. 2001;37(1):1–11. pmid:11272482
  64. 64. Berger L, Speare R, Skerratt LF. Distribution of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and pathology in the skin of green tree frogs Litoria caerulea with severe chytridiomycosis. Dis Aquat Organ. 2005;68:65–70. pmid:16465835
  65. 65. Garner TWJ, Walker S, Bosch J, Leech S, Rowcliffe JM, Cunningham AA, et al. Life history tradeoffs influence mortality associated with the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. OIKOS. 2009;118:783–91.
  66. 66. Rollins-Smith LA, Conlon MJ. Antimicrobial peptide defenses against chytridiomycosis, an emerging infectious disease of amphibian populations. Dev Comp Immunol. 2005;29:589–98. pmid:15784290
  67. 67. Harris RN, Lauer A, Simon MA, Banning JL, Alford RA. Addition of antifungal skin bacteria to salamanders ameliorates the effects of chytridiomycosis. Dis Aquat Organ. 2009;83(1):11–6. pmid:19301631
  68. 68. Pfalzgraff T, Hirschfeld M, Barej MF, Dahmen M, Gonwouo LN, Doherty-Bone TM, et al. The tadpoles of four Central Africa Phrynobatrachus species. Salamandra. 2015;51(91–102).
  69. 69. Lips KR, Reeve JD, Witters LR. Ecological traits predicting amphibian populations declines in Central America. Conserv Biol. 2003;17(4):1078–88.
  70. 70. Channing A, Rödel M-O, Channing J. Tadpoles of Africa. The biology and identification of all known tadpoles in sub-Saharan Africa. Frankfurt/M.: Edition Chimaira; 2012.
  71. 71. Schiøtz A. Treefrogs of Africa. Frankfurt/M.: Edition Chimaira; 1999.
  72. 72. Amiet J-L. Révision du genre Leptodactylodon Andersson (Amphibia, Anura, Astylosterninae). Annales de la Faculté des Science de Yaoundé. 1980;27:69–224.
  73. 73. Mapouyat L, Hirschfeld M, Rödel M-O, Liedtke HC, Loader SP, Gonwouo LN, et al. The tadpoles of nine Cameroonian Leptodactylodon species (Amphibia, Anura, Arthroleptidae). Zootaxa. 2014;3765:29–53. pmid:24870883
  74. 74. Rachowicz LJ, Hero J-M, Alford RA, Taylor JW, Morgan JAT, Vredenburg VT, et al. The novel and endemic pathogen hypotheses: Competing explanations for the origin of emerging infectious diseases of wildlife. Conserv Biol. 2005;19(5):1441–8.
  75. 75. Blackburn DC, Evans BJ, Pessier AP, Vredenburg VT. An enigmatic mortality event in the only population of the critically endangered Cameroonian frog Xenopus longipes. Afr J Herpetol. 2010;59(2):1–12.
  76. 76. Rodriguez D, Becker CG, Pupin NC, Haddad CFB, Zamudio KR. Long-term endemism of two highly divergent lineages of the amphibian-killing fungus in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Mol Ecol. 2014;23(4):774–87. pmid:24471406
  77. 77. Farrer RA, Weinert LA, Bielby J, Garner TWJ, Balloux F, Clare F, et al. Multiple emergences of genetically diverse amphibian-infecting chytrids include a globalized hypervirulent recombinant lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(46):18732–6. pmid:22065772
  78. 78. Kinney VC, Heemeyer JL, Pessier AP, Lannoo MJ. Seasonal pattern of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection and mortality in Lithobates areolatus: Affirmation of Vredenburg's “10,000 Zoospore Rule”. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(3):e16708.
  79. 79. Van Sluys M, Kriger KM, Phillott A, Campbell R, Skerratt L, Hero J-M. Storage of samples at high temperatures reduces the amount of amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis DNA detectable by PCR assay. Dis Aquat Organ. 2008;81:93–7. pmid:18924373
  80. 80. Griffiths RA, Pavajeau L. Captive breeding, reintroduction, and the conservation of amphibians. Conserv Biol. 2008;22(4):852–61. pmid:18616746
  81. 81. Hudson MA, Young RP, Lopez J, Martin L, Fenton C, McCrea R, et al. In-situ itraconazole treatment improves survival rate during an amphibian chytridiomycosis epidemic. Biol Conserv. 2016;195:37–45.
  82. 82. Bosch J, Sanchez-Tomé E, Fernández-Loras A, Oliver JA, Fisher MC, Garner TW. Successful elimination of a lethal wildlife infectious disease in nature. Biol Lett. 2015;11(11):20150874. pmid:26582843