Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Can the Understory Affect the Hymenoptera Parasitoids in a Eucalyptus Plantation?

Abstract

The understory in forest plantations can increase richness and diversity of natural enemies due to greater plant species richness. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the presence of the understory and climatic season in the region (wet or dry) can increase the richness and abundance of Hymenoptera parasitoids in Eucalyptus plantations, in the municipality of Belo Oriente, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. In each eucalyptus cultivation (five areas of cultivation) ten Malaise traps were installed, five with the understory and five without it. A total of 9,639 individuals from 30 families of the Hymenoptera parasitoids were collected, with Mymaridae, Scelionidae, Encyrtidae and Braconidae being the most collected ones with 4,934, 1,212, 619 and 612 individuals, respectively. The eucalyptus stands with and without the understory showed percentage of individuals 45.65% and 54.35% collected, respectively. The understory did not represent a positive effect on the overall abundance of the individuals Hymenoptera in the E. grandis stands, but rather exerted a positive effect on the specific families of the parasitoids of this order.

Introduction

Monocultures have a lower biodiversity, which may make it necessary to control insect pests with pesticides. The use of synthetic pesticides leads to accumulation of potentially toxic substances in soil, water, and food resources. The negative impacts of these compounds include reduction in the biodiversity and degradation of the ecosystem quality, which has necessitated searching for environmentally friendly and cheaper methods of pest control [1].

The landscape affects the biological control due to the migration of the predators and parasitoids from the adjacent natural habitats to the farmland [2,3]. These habitats provide resources such as alternative hosts or prey, water, food, favorable microclimate and shelter beneficial for the arthropods [4]. Food availability is an important factor to supply the energy for locomotion or flight and to maintain the longevity and fecundity of the natural enemies [5]. Herbs and shrubs [6,7], including plants such as Apiaceae, Asteraceae and Fabaceae may harbor hosts or prey [7] which can increase the diversity and abundance of the natural enemies [8]. In addition, plants, including the cultivated species have special structures as hair, domatia and nectaries that provide shelter for the natural enemies [5].

The presence of the understory vegetation in the temperate deciduous forests increased the animal and plant diversity [9]. However, the understory revealed a homogenizing effect on the composition of the fauna in the temperate forest, unlike that observed in a Chinese subtropical forest [10]. The understory can alter the foraging chances and reduce the negative interactions between the pests and natural enemies [11]. Forest ecosystems can provide organic compounds [12], prey [13], competitors [14] and predators [15] which can affect the survival of the organisms [16]. Because of these reasons, we expect the presence of the understory will increase the richness and abundance of Hymenoptera parasitoids in eucalyptus plantations which may facilitate biocontrol of pest organisms

Parasitoids reduce number of pest rather than controlling [2,3]. Therefore, the maintenance of the understory and preservation of the remnant of the native vegetation in the eucalyptus plantations have been promoted to increase the invertebrate communities with the potential for biological control [17,18]. Parasitism is normally higher in the diverse landscapes due to the greater number of nectar sources and microclimates [19,20].

Heavy rains and sudden changes between the rainy and dry season may have a negative impact on social wasp populations, caused by the lower resistance of parasitoid wasps to the associated pathogens mediated by unfavorable conditions [21]. In the dry season, the parasitism level may be reduced due to some species of Lepidoptera develop before their parasitoid associate, facilitating lepidopteran pests proliferation [22].

The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the presence of the understory and climatic season in the region (wet or dry) favors the richness and abundance of Hymenoptera parasitoids in Eucalyptus plantations.

Materials and Methods

Sampling was conducted in ten areas of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden stands with five areas with understory and five where it was absent, with 5-year-old trees in Belo Oriente, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. The spacing between plants was 3 x 2 meters, and eucalypt plantations with and without understory was surrounded by remnant of native vegetation, represented by fragments of the Atlantic Forest.

Collecting pots with 80% alcohol were placed in the traps and removed and replaced every 15 days during the drier months (March-June) and raining months (June to October). These pots were taken to the Laboratory of Biological Control (LCBI) of the Institute for Applied Biotechnology to Agriculture (BIOAGRO) of the Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) in Viçosa, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.

The climate of the Belo Oriente region, Minas Gerais State, Brazil is of tropical type (Aw according to the Köppen classification), with annual average temperatures between 22 and 27°C, relative humidity of 67%, average annual rainfall from 701 to 1500 mm and an average altitude of 240 m. The eucalypt plantation had 815.50 ha, distant about 10 m by native vegetation with 1,363.83 ha, represented by fragments of the Atlantic Forest. The native understory in the area consisted of herbs of the Asteraceae, Bignoniaceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Heliconiaceae, Lauraceae, Leguminosae, Malvaceae, Moraceae, Poaceae, Rubiaceae, Rutaceae and Sapindaceae families. This vegetation was removed in the areas without the understory and left in those with understory. The samples were taken with Malaise traps set at 2 m height [23].

The methods, species collected and areas where the e collections used in the manuscript followed recommendations of the Instituto Brasileiro de Meio-Ambiente (IBAMA), with number of collection license SISBIO—21060–2. The material collected was sorted and quantified and the parasitoids were stored in alcohol. Those belonging to the order Hymenoptera were identified until the family level [24,25,26] and deposited in the entomological collection of LCBI/UFV.

The data on the most abundant Hymenoptera families found in the eucalyptus stands with or without the understory were fit with linear models and after confirming normal distribution of the residuals with the Shapiro-Wilk test and homogeneity of variances with the Bartlett test analysis of variances were performed. Later t test was performed to comparing the sites with and without understory.

Results

A total of 9,639 individuals from 30 Hymenoptera parasitoid families were collected. Mymaridae, Scelionidae, Encyrtidae and Braconidae were the most abundant ones with 4,934, 1,212, 619 and 612 individuals, respectively (Fig 1). The relative abundance of Hymenoptera compared to all individuals collected was similar between eucalyptus stands with or without the understory, 45.65% and 54.35%, respectively. However, we did not find a general change in abundance with or without understory, but rather that some families increased while others decrease with understory.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Abundance of of Hymenoptera parasitoid individuals collected with Malaise traps in Eucalyptus grandis stands without and with understory and total number of individuals collected, Municipality of Belo Oriente, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151165.g001

The family Mymaridae and the superfamily Ichneumonoidea, especially Braconidae and Ichneumonidae were the most abundant in the eucalypt stands, both with or without the understory. However, the Aphelinidae, Ceraphronidae, Encyrtidae, Scelionidae families had high abundance in the eucalypt stands without an understory (Fig 1; Tables 1 and 2).

thumbnail
Table 1. Analysis of variance for the number of individuals of the high abundance families of Hymenoptera parasitoids (Families) collected in Eucalyptus grandis with and without understory.

Municipality of Belo Oriente, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151165.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Mean number of individuals collected with Malaise traps type in eucalypt plantations with and without understory in Belo Oriente, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151165.t002

The date of the collection affected the abundance of some of the Hymenoptera (Fig 2; Table 1). The family Mymaridae showed higher abundance from the fourth to the tenth collections (June-August) during the winter months in the region (Table 1). The Scelionidae, Braconidae and Aphelinidae were not affected by the sampling period (Table 1); Ceraphronidae was the most abundantfrom mid-August to the first of September; Encyrtidae had greater abundance in the eucalyptus without an understory in July (Table 1); Eulophidae had similar numbers of individuals in the eucalyptus stands with and without an understory and Ichneumonidae was had the highest abundance from August (10th. collection), but with similar numbers in the eucalyptus stands with and without the understory (Fig 2; Tables 1 and 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Abundance of individuals from families of Hymenoptera parasitoids collected with Malaise traps in stands of Eucalyptus grandis with and without understory.

Municipality of Belo Oriente, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Eucalyptus understory—full signal, no eucalyptus understory—open signs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151165.g002

The diversity index of Berger-Parker H' for parasitoid families was higher in areas of eucalyptus without (H' = 2.01) than in those with (H' = 1.67) understory (Table 3). However, the dominance index was higher in areas of eucalyptus with understory (H' = 0.61) than among those without understory (H' = 0.43) (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Number of individuals, richness, diversity and dominance of Hymenoptera families, collected with Malaise traps type in Belo Oriente, Minas Gerais, Brazil eucalypt plantations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151165.t003

Discussion

The analysis of the family taxon of insects is important, particularly in the forest environments for conservation, planning and biomonitoring [27,28]. Hymenoptera family level becomes important because there are many with parasitoids species with unique habit, as Braconidae, Chalcididae, Encyrtidae, Ichneumonidae, Mymaridae, Scelionidae and Trichogrammatidae, which may favor natural biological control in cultivated eucalyptus [29,30,31,32,33]. The large number of Hymenoptera families with individuals captured in the E. grandis plantations, with or without an understory, indicates the presence and diversity of the lepidopteran defoliators or other arthropods groups in these forest systems [34,35], because of their association with their hosts [36]. The physical factors of the habitat, cultural practices and pesticides to control the pests and the diseases can affect the diversity of the parasitoids [37]. In addition, plants can provide essential resources and shelter to these organisms, which can affect their abundance and survival, attack rate to herbivores and parasitoid fecundity, crucial for the efficiency and frequency of these biological control agents [5].

The similarity in the abundance of the Hymenoptera parasitoids in the eucalyptus stands with or without an understory may reflect the fact that their populations are originated from the fragments of the native forest [38] surrounding the plantations. This can increase the biodiversity in the crop area acting as the reservoirs and biological corridors of movement and distribution of the natural enemies in the eucalyptus plantations [7,39,40]. Thus, fragments of the native vegetation between the eucalypt stands could maintain the populations of the natural enemies even when their hosts become scarce in the eucalyptus plantations, besides allowing their migration to the interior of such plantations [41]. The fusion of the conservation areas can facilitate the dispersal of the insects to the eucalyptus stands, especially those of the natural enemies [42]. A mosaic landscape composed of both cultivated and fragments of native vegetation can create multiple habitats for the breeding, feeding and sheltering of the natural enemies [7,43]. This can improve the environmental stability in the homogeneous stands [18], and reduce the lepidopteran defoliator populations in the forest plantations [44]. Areas of the native vegetation between the forest plantations is a technique of the integrated management of insect pests in the eucalyptus plantations in Brazil [45], in which the study area included about 46.87% of its surface with preserved native forest among the eucalyptus stands.

The greater abundance of the Aphelinidae, Ceraphronidae, Scelionidae and Encyrtidae in the areas of E. grandis without an understory may be due to the host stages preferred by natural enemies of these families. The egg, larva and pupa stages are more exposed and their movements are easily identified in these environments [7, 46]. The shortness in height (2 m) of flight interception traps (Malaise) used in the research, trapped mainly the smaller Hymenoptera as Braconidae, Encyrtidae, Mymaridae and Scelionidae, similar to the results of the research conducted with bottle traps at the ground level [47]. This can be explained by the fact that these Hymenoptera are not very mobile, being positive phototropic and geotropic negatives. Such traits are likely to be crucial for the collection of individuals of these families. [48]. However, this differs from those with the traps at least 5 m in height to collect insects in the canopy which are more viable for collecting the larger species, such as individuals of the Vespidae family [49].

The highest dominance index (Berger-Parker H') of Hymenoptera parasitoids in areas with understory was due to that parasitoids, especially to those of Mymaridae family, are better adapted to exploiting features as nectar and pollen [50] and refugees in understory plants during the culture disturbance [51,52].This confirms that more complex environments have typically a larger number of niches and resources [53,54]. The diverse vegetation of the understory can facilitate the development of natural enemies that can maintain high biocontrol rates in forest plantations [55,56,57]. The presence of fragments of native forest surrounding the E. grandis plantation favored quality in both systems evaluated (absence and presence of understory). However, the greatest diversity index (Shannon-Wiener H') of Hymenoptera parasitoids families in areas without understory can be explained by the lack of vegetation barriers such as herbs and shrubs that comprise the understory. This could have allowed the parasitoid flight to areas without understory and therefore favoring high Hymenoptera family diversity [58].

The higher frequency of the Mymaridae family, especially found in the E. grandis stands without an understory, concurs with that reported for these parasitoids in the understory, edge and interior of a tropical forest in Central Amazonian [59] and in the understory of the temperate forests in northeastern Canada [48]. The Mymaridae are exclusively egg parasitoids of Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Lepidoptera, Odonata, Orthoptera, Psocoptera and Thysanoptera, including the bronze-bug, Thaumastocoris peregrinus Carpintero & Dellape (Hemiptera: Thaumastocoridae) a major insect pest of the eucalyptus plantations in Brazil [60]. Although poorly known, due to its small size, the species of this family are a very common and diverse group [61].

The abundance of Scelionidae in the eucalyptus stands, especially without an understory is noteworthy because this family includes the egg parasitoids of agricultural and forest pest species [62]. Trissolcus basalis (Wollaston) and Telenomus podisi Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) are the most important egg parasitoids of the phytophagous [63] and predatory (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) bugs [64].

Encyrtidae species, which were abundant in the eucalyptus stands without an understory, also had high abundance in temperate forests and in the Island of Borneo [48]. This family includes important species for the biological control of pests, especially those of Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera and Lepidoptera [65].

The low variation in the number of individuals of some parasitoid families of Hymenoptera as Bethylidae, Chalcidae, Figitidade, Pteromalidae, etc. over time, in the eucalyptus stands with an understory shows their greater stability in this plantation system, which may have been aided by the lower disturbance in the ecosystem that boasted no cultural practices such as cleaning the area [66].

The high number of the individuals of Ichneumonoidae in the eucalyptus stands with and without an understory, especially those of the families Braconidae and Ichneumonoidae, may indicate the presence of hosts such as Oxydia vesulia (Cramer, 1779) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), a pest of E. grandis and of Croton floribundus Spreng (Euphorbiaceae) [67]. Chalcidoidea, belonging to this superfamily, is an extremely diverse group, with an estimated 500,000 species [68].

The Eulophidae, with similar numbers of individuals in the plantations with and without an understory, are important pupa parasitoids of the primary pest of eucalyptus, Thyrinteina leucocerae Rindge (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), parasitized by Palmistichus elaeisis Delvare and LaSalle, 1993 [69].

Differences in the number of individuals of the Hymenoptera parasitoids, with the higher frequency from the end of the rainy season in the region (June), may be due to the fact that the rainfall alters the foliar plant characteristics, and thus feeding and development of the herbivore, with consequences on the interactions at the higher trophic levels [70]. Plants in tropical forests with dry weather have leaves with short life which are thinner and high in nitrogen content [71] and with greater defenses against the herbivores than those in the rainforests [72,73]. This can increase the developmental stage of the caterpillars eating leaves with high defense and, thus exposing them to predators and parasitoids for longer periods [74,75,76]. Moreover, the smaller parasitoids are more affected by the dry conditions due to the increased drying [77].

Conclusions

The presence of an understory within the eucalyptus plantations seemed to hinder the movement of some Hymenoptera species, although similar family richness was found in understory present and absent areas. This leads to lower diversity and higher dominance of Mymaridae over the remaining Hymenoptera families. Although some families may benefit from the higher plant diversity in understory present plantations, the fragments of native vegetation surrounding the plantations might override this benefit as it probably acts as a source of parasitoids that may better penetrate plantations without understory. The presence of parasitoids was evaluated but their effect in form of parasitism rates of pests and ultimately lowering damage to eucalyptus plantations still needs to be evaluated, but we showed the first insights on how the understory and the climatic season may change biological control prospects

Acknowledgments

To “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)”, “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)” and “Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)” for financial support. Global Edico Services corrected and edited the English of this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: OTD RCR JCZ. Performed the experiments: OTD RCR JES JCZ. Analyzed the data: FSR FLF SLAJ JES. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: FSR CFW JES JCZ. Wrote the paper: OTD RCR FSR RAPR JES JCZ.

References

  1. 1. Thies C, Haenke S, Scherber C, Bengtsson J, Bommarco R, Clement LW, et al. (2011) The relationship between agricultural intensification and biological control: experimental tests across Europe. Ecol Appl 21: 2187–2196. pmid:21939053
  2. 2. Bianchi FJJA, Booij CJH, Tscharntke T (2006) Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 273: 1715–1727.
  3. 3. Tscharntke T, Bommarco R, Clough Y, Crist TO, Kleijn D, Rand TA, et al. (2007) Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale. Biol Control 43: 294–309.
  4. 4. Bradford MA, DeVore JL, Maerz JC, McHugh JV, Smith CL, Strickland MS (2010) Native, insect herbivore communities derive a significant proportion of their carbon from a widespread invader of forest understories. Biol Invasions 12: 721–724.
  5. 5. Cortesero AM, Stapel JO, Lewis WJ (2000) Understanding and manipulating plant attributes to enhance biological control. Biol Cont 17: 35–49.
  6. 6. Jäkel A, Roth M (2004) Conversion of single-layered Scots pine monocultures into close-to-nature mixed hardwood forests: effects on parasitoid wasps as pest antagonists. Eur J Forest Res 123: 203–212.
  7. 7. Sousa SM, Faria ML, Latini AO (2010) Sobrevivência diferencial de pupas de Euselasia apisaon Dahman (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae) em plantas de sub-bosque nos plantios de Eucalyptus de Belo Oriente, MG. Neotrop Entomol 39: 681–685. pmid:21120372
  8. 8. Altieri MA (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecos Environ 74: 19–31.
  9. 9. Vockenhuber EA, Scherber C, Langenbruch C, Meibner M, Seidel D, Tscharntke T (2011) Tree diversity and environmental context predict herb species richness and cover in Germany’s largest connected deciduous forest. Perspect. Plant Ecol Evol Syst 13: 111–119.
  10. 10. Both S, Fang T, Böhnke M, Bruelheide H, Geibler C, Kühn P, et al. (2011) Lack of tree layer control on herb layer characteristics in a subtropical forest, China. J Veg Sci 22: 1120–1131.
  11. 11. Dall'Oglio OT, Zanuncio TV, Tavares WS, Serrão JE, Wilcken CF, Zanuncio JC (2013) Atlantic rainforest remnant harbors greater biotic diversity but reduced lepidopteran populations compared to a Eucalyptus plantation. Fla Entomol 96: 887–896.
  12. 12. Wedraogo FX, Belgy G, Berthelin J (1993) Seasonal nitrification measurements with different species of forest litter applied to granite-sand-filled lysimeters in the field. Biol Fertil Soils 15: 28–34.
  13. 13. Sebens KP (1981) Recruitment in a sea anemone population: juvenile substrate becomes adult prey. Science 213: 785–787. pmid:17834588
  14. 14. Grosberg RK (1981) Competitive ability influences habitat choice in marine invertebrates. Nature 290: 700–702.
  15. 15. Sih A (1982) Foraging strategies and the avoidance of predation by an aquatic insect, Notonecta hoffmanni. Ecology 63: 786–796.
  16. 16. Morin PJ (2002) Community ecology. Oxford, Blackwell Science.
  17. 17. Frew A, Nielsen UN, Riegler M, Johnson SN (2013) Do eucalypt plantation management practices create understory reservoirs of scarab beetle pests in the soil? Forest Ecol Manag 306: 275–280.
  18. 18. Macedo-Reis LE, Soares LGS, De Faria ML, Santo MME, Zanuncio JC (2013) Survival of a lepidopteran defoliator of Eucalyptus is Influenced by local hillside and forest remnants in Brazil. Fla Entomol 96: 941–947.
  19. 19. Andow D (1991) Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annu Rev Entomol 36: 561–586.
  20. 20. Stephan JG, Albertsson J, Wang L, Porcel M (2015) Weeds within willow short-rotation coppices alter the arthropod community and improve biological control of the blue willow beetle. BioControl 1:1–12.
  21. 21. Dejean A, Céréghino R, Carpenter JM, Corbara B, Hérault B, Rossi V, et al. (2011) Climate change impact on Neotropical social wasps. PLoS ONE 6: 27004.
  22. 22. Parks D (2011) Climate change and caterpillars. Available: http://www.earthwatch.org/europe/expeditions/exped_research_focus/rf-cluttonbrock-010420.
  23. 23. Townes HA (1972) A light-weight Malaise trap. Entomol News 83: 239–247.
  24. 24. Grissell EE, Schauff ME (1990) A handbook of the families of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Entomol Soc Wash, Washington.
  25. 25. Goulet H, Huber JT (1993) Hymenoptera of the world: an identification guide to families. Research Branch Agriculture Canada Publication, Ottawa.
  26. 26. Gibson GAP, Huber JT, Woolley JB (1997) Annoted keys to the Genera of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). NRC Research Press, Ottawa.
  27. 27. Andersen AN (1995) Measuring more of biodiversity: genus richness as a surrogate for species richness in Australian ant fauna. Biol Conserv 73: 39–43.
  28. 28. Balmford A, Green MJB, Murray G (1996) Using higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness: I. regional tests. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 263: 1267–274.
  29. 29. Santolamazza S, Baquero E, Cordero-Rivera A (2011) Incidence of Anagrus obscurus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) egg parasitism on Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis and Platycnemis pennipes (Odonata: Calopterygidae: Platycnemididae) in Italy. Entomol Sci 14: 366–369.
  30. 30. Lotfalizadeh H (2012) Review of chalcidoid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of xylophagous beetles. Mun Entomol Zool 7: 309–333.
  31. 31. Zappalà L, Bernardo U, Biondi A, Cocco A, Deliperi S, Delrio G, et al. (2012) Recruitment of native parasitoids by the exotic pest Tuta absoluta in Southern Italy. B Insectol 65: 51–61.
  32. 32. Cancino ER, Kasparyan DR, Moreno AG, Khalaim AI, Blanco JMC (2014) Biodiversity of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) in México, Rev Mex Biodivers 85: 385–391.
  33. 33. Kapranas A, Tena A (2015) Encyrtid parasitoids of soft scale insects: Biology, behavior, and their use in biological control. Annu Rev Entomol 60: 195–211. pmid:25341100
  34. 34. Zanuncio JC, Zanuncio TV, Freitas FA, Pratissoli D (2003) Population density of Lepidoptera in a plantation of Eucalyptus urophylla in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Anim Biol 53: 17–26.
  35. 35. Zanuncio JC, Lemes P, Santos G, Soares M, Wilcken C, Serrão J (2014) Population dynamics of Lepidoptera pests in Eucalyptus urophylla plantations in the Brazilian Amazonia. Forests 5: 72–87.
  36. 36. Vollhardt IMG, Tscharntke T, Wackers FL, Bianchi FJJA, Thies C (2008) Diversity of cereal aphid parasitoids in simple and complex landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 126: 289–292.
  37. 37. Gagic V, Tscharntke T, Dormann CF, Gruber B, Wilstermann A, Thies C (2011) Food web structure and biocontrol in a four-trophic level system across a landscape complexity gradient. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 278: 2946–2953.
  38. 38. Barbosa VS, Leal IR, Iannuzzi L, Almeida-Cortez J (2005) Distribution pattern of herbivorous insects in a remnant of Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Neotrop Entomol 34: 701–711.
  39. 39. Roschewitz I, Hücker M, Tscharntke T, Thies C (2005) The influence of landscape context and farming practices on parasitism of cereal aphids. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108: 218–227.
  40. 40. Thies C, Roschewitz I, Tscharntke T (2005) The landscape context of cereal aphid–parasitoid interactions. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 272: 203–210.
  41. 41. Andow DA (1991) Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annu. Rev Entomol 36: 561–586.
  42. 42. Zanuncio JC, Torres JB, Sediyama CAZ, Pereira FF, Pastori PL, Wermelinger ED, et al. (2009) Mortality of the defoliator Euselasia eucerus (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae) by biotic factors in an Eucalyptus urophylla plantation in Minas Gerais State, Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc 81: 61–66. pmid:19274332
  43. 43. Plécas M, Gagic V, Jankovic M, Petrovic-Obradovic O, Kavallieratos NG, Tomanovic Z, et al. (2014) Landscape composition and configuration influence cereal aphid–parasitoid–hyperparasitoid interactions and biological control differentially across years. Agric Ecosyst Environ 183: 1–10.
  44. 44. Gamez-Virues S, Gurr GM, Raman A, La Salle J, Nicol H (2008) Effects of flowering groundcover vegetation on diversity and activity of wasps in a farm shelterbelt in temperate Australia. BioControl 54: 211–218.
  45. 45. Barlow J, Araujo IS, Overal WL, Gardner TA, Mendes FD, Lake IR, et al. (2008) Diversity and composition of fruit-feeding butterflies in tropical Eucalyptus plantations. Biodivers Conserv 17: 1089–1104.
  46. 46. Bernays EA (1997) Feeding by lepidopteran larvae is dangerous. Ecol Entomol 22: 121–123.
  47. 47. Darling DC, Packer L (1988) Effectiveness of malaise traps in collecting Hymenoptera the influence of trap design, mesh size, and location. Can Entomol 120: 787–796.
  48. 48. Vance CC, Smith SM, Malcolm JR, Huber J, Bellocq MI (2007) Differences between forest type and vertical strata in the diversity and composition of Hymenpteran families and Mymarid genera in Northeastern temperate Forests. Environ Entomol 36: 1073–1083. pmid:18284731
  49. 49. Souza AR, Venâncio DFA, Zanuncio JC, Prezoto F (2011) Sampling methods for assessing social wasps species diversity in a Eucalyptus plantation. J Econ Entomol 104: 1120–1123. pmid:21735938
  50. 50. Lee JC, Heimpel GE (2008) Floral resources impact longevity and oviposition rate of a parasitoid in the field. J Anim Ecol 77: 565–572. pmid:18248386
  51. 51. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity–ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8: 857–874.
  52. 52. Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA, Didham RK, Fahrig L, Batáry P, et al. (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes–eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87: 661–685. pmid:22272640
  53. 53. Altieri MA, Whitcomb WH (1979) The potential use of weeds in the manipulation of benefical insects. HortScience 14: 12–18.
  54. 54. Potter KM, Koch FH (2014) Patterns of forest phylogenetic community structure across The United States and their possible forest health implications. Forest Sci 60: 851–861.
  55. 55. Concepción ED, Díaz M, Baquero RA (2007) Effects of landscape complexity on the ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes. Landsc Ecol 23: 135–148.
  56. 56. Batáry P, Matthiesen T, Tscharntke T (2010) Landscape-moderated importance of hedges in conserving farmland bird diversity of organic vs. conventional croplands and grasslands. Biol Conserv 143: 2020–2027.
  57. 57. Batáry P, Báldi A, Kleijn D, Tscharntke T (2011) Landscape-moderated biodiversity effects of agri-environmental management: a meta-analysis. Proc Biol Sci 278: 1894–1902. pmid:21106585
  58. 58. Berta CD, Liliana V, Mabel RS, Mercedes D, Virginia CM, Constanza PE (2013) Diversidad de parasitoides registrados en el agroecosistema soja en la provincia de Tucumán, Argentina. Acta zool lill 57: 14–21.
  59. 59. Querino RB, Couceiro SRM, Queiroz LO, Penteado-Dias AM (2011) The spatial distribution of Hymenoptera parasitoids in a forest reserve in Central Amazonia, Manaus, AM, Brazil. Braz J Biol 71: 865–871.
  60. 60. Mutitu EK, Garnas JR, Hurley BP, Wingfield MJ, Harney M, Bush SJ, et al. (2013) Biology and rearing of Cleruchoides noackae (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), an egg parasitoid for the biological control of Thaumastocoris peregrinus (Hemiptera: Thaumastocoridae). J Econ Entomol 106: 1979–1985. pmid:24224238
  61. 61. Huber JT, Viggiani G, Jesu R (2009) Order Hymenoptera, family Mymaridae. Arthropod Fauna UAE 2: 270–297.
  62. 62. Orr DB (1988) Scelionid wasps as biological control agents: A review. Fla Entomol 71, 501–506.
  63. 63. Tillman PG (2010) Parasitism and predation of stink bug (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) eggs in Georgia corn fields. Environ Entomol 39: 1184–1194. pmid:22127170
  64. 64. Zanuncio JC, Oliveira HN, Torres JB, Pratissoli D (2000) Egg parasitoids of Podisus sculptus Distant (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in an Eucalyptus plantation in the Brazilian Amazonian Region. Rev Biol Trop 48: 989–992. pmid:11487944
  65. 65. Van Driesche RGV, Bellows TS (1996) Biological control. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  66. 66. Murta AF, Ker FTO, Costa DB, Espírito-Santo MM, Faria ML (2008) Influence of atlantic rain forest remnants on the biological control of Euselasia apisaon (Dalman) (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae) by Trichogramma maxacalii (Voegele e Pointel) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Neotrop Entomol 37: 229–232. pmid:18506305
  67. 67. Fernandes LBD, Dias MM, Fernandes MA, Penteado-Dias AM (2010) Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) parasitoids of Lepidoptera caterpillars feeding on Croton floribundus Spreng (Euphorbiaceae). Rev Bras Entomol 54: 263–269.
  68. 68. Heraty JM, Burks RA, Cruaud A, Gibson GAP, Liljeblad J, Munro J, et al. (2013) A phylogenetic analysis of the megadiverse Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Cladistics 29: 466–542.
  69. 69. Pereira FF, Zanuncio TV, Zanuncio JC, Pratissoli D, Tavares MT (2008) Species of Lepidoptera defoliators of Eucalyptus as new host for the parasitoid Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Braz Arch Biol Technol 51: 259–262.
  70. 70. Santiago LS, Mulkey SS (2005) Leaf productivity along a precipitation gradient in lowland Panama: patterns from leaf to ecosystem. Trees-Struct Funct 19: 349–356.
  71. 71. Givinish T (1999) On the causes of gradients in tropical tree diversity. J Ecol 87: 193–210.
  72. 72. Wilf P, Labandeira CC, Johnson KR, Coley PD, Cutter AD (2001) Insect herbivory, plant defense, and early Cenozoic climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 6221–6226. pmid:11353840
  73. 73. Withers TM (2001) Colonization of eucalypts in New Zealand by Australian insects. Austral Ecol 26, 467–476.
  74. 74. Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, Mcpherson BA, Thompson JN, Boecklen W (1980) Interactions among three insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 11: 41–65.
  75. 75. Coley PD, Barone JA (1996) Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 27: 305–335.
  76. 76. Benrey B, Denno RF (1997) The slow growth high mortality hypothesis: a test using the cabbage butterfly. Ecology 78: 987–999.
  77. 77. Hance T, Baaren J, Vernon P, Boivin G (2007) Impact of extreme temperature on parasitoids in a climate change perspective. Annu Rev Entomol 52: 107–26. pmid:16846383