AKT1E17K Is Oncogenic in Mouse Lung and Cooperates with Chemical Carcinogens in Inducing Lung Cancer

Donatella Malanga; Stefania Belmonte; Fabiana Colelli; Marzia Scarfò; Carmela De Marco; Duarte Mendes Oliveira; Teresa Mirante; Caterina Camastra; Monica Gagliardi; Antonia Rizzuto; Chiara Mignogna; Orlando Paciello; Serenella Papparella; Henrik Fagman; Giuseppe Viglietto

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147334

Abstract

The hotspot AKT1^E17K mutation in the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1 occurs in approximately 0.6–2% of human lung cancers. Recently, we have demonstrated that AKT1^E17K transforms immortalized human bronchial cells. Here by use of a transgenic Cre-inducible murine strain in the wild type Rosa26 (R26) locus (R26-AKT1^E17K mice) we demonstrate that AKT1^E17K is a bona-fide oncogene and plays a role in the development of lung cancer in vivo. In fact, we report that mutant AKT1^E17K induces bronchial and/or bronchiolar hyperplastic lesions in murine lung epithelium, which progress to frank carcinoma at very low frequency, and accelerates tumor formation induced by chemical carcinogens. In conclusion, AKT1^E17K induces hyperplasia of mouse lung epithelium in vivo and cooperates with urethane to induce the fully malignant phenotype.

Citation: Malanga D, Belmonte S, Colelli F, Scarfò M, De Marco C, Oliveira DM, et al. (2016) AKT1^E17K Is Oncogenic in Mouse Lung and Cooperates with Chemical Carcinogens in Inducing Lung Cancer. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0147334. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334

Editor: Francisco X. Real, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), SPAIN

Received: March 30, 2015; Accepted: January 1, 2016; Published: February 9, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Malanga et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC 2012-14, IG_12969) and Ministero Istruzione Università e Ricerca (MIUR PRIN, prot. 2010W4J4RM_001; PONa3_00239; PON01_02782) to GV. HF was supported by Västra Götalandsregionen under the LUA/ALF agreement and by the Assar Gabrielssons and Magnus Bergvalls Foundations.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, being associated with a 5-year worldwide survival rate of less than 15% [1,2]. Mutational activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway is the major pathogenic event in non tobacco-induced adenocarcinoma (ADC), whereas the pathway driven by v-Ki-ras2/Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is involved in tobacco-mediated lung carcinogenesis [3–6]. Unfortunately, activating mutations in EGFR are typically not present in lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), the second most common type of NSCLC [7], and thus targeted therapy is ineffective. Recent studies showing 2–4% rate of p110 α-catalytic subunit of PI3K (PIK3CA) mutations [8–10] and 1% rate of AKT1 mutations [11,12] in SCC have suggested that targeting these genes may prove a successful therapeutic option [7,13–15].

The AKT kinases (AKT1, AKT2, AKT3) represent the primary downstream end-point of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, regulating proliferation, survival, metabolism and invasion. AKT1 and AKT2 are frequently activated in human cancer [16–18] following loss of the lipid phosphatase PTEN, activating mutations and/or copy number variation in EGFR or HER2 tyrosine kinase receptors, activating mutations in KRAS, in PIK3CA [19,20]^, [21] or in AKT1 itself [22]. In lung cancer a somatic mutation in the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of AKT1 that results in glutamic acid to lysine substitution at residue 17 (E17K) was reported with overall frequency of 0.6–2% [7,11,12,23–25].

AKT1^E17K shows increased affinity for PI(4,5)P2, enhanced plasma membrane recruitment and constitutive activation [22,26]. Endogenous AKT1^E17K mutant protein detected in lung cancer cells shows enhanced membrane localization [11], which results in the activation of downstream signalling [11,22].

The role of mutant AKT1^E17K in epithelial tumorigenesis remains unclear because studies in cellular models in breast and lung cells have produced discordant results [27–30]. In addition, no murine strain that models the AKT1^E17K mutation has been generated so far.

These considerations prompted us to address the role of AKT1^E17K in the transformation of lung epithelial cells in vivo. Herein, we demonstrate that AKT1^E17K promotes hyperplasia in the mouse lung and cooperates with other genetic lesions to induce the full malignancy.

Materials and Methods

Vector Design and Generation of transgenic mice

To generate R26-AKT1^E17K transgenic mice human AKT1 cDNA was amplified by PCR from human blood mononuclear cells by PCR using primers 5’-ATGAGCGACGTGGCTATT-3’ and 5’-TCAGGCCGTGCCGCTGGC-3’. The PCR product was cloned into a shuttle plasmid (pBlueScript) using standard cloning techniques. Mutant AKT1^E17K cDNA was generated by Quick Change Site-Direct Mutagenesis (Stratagene) and sub-cloned into the pROSA26 vector [31–33] to obtain the targeting construct pR26-AKT1^E17K, which consisted of 5' and 3' homology arms of the ROSA26 locus, FRT/FRT-flanked neomycin resistance (Neo) cassette and loxP/loxP-flanked triple polyadenylation (tpA) sequence. See Fig 1 for details.

Download:

Fig 1. Generation of transgenic R26-AKT1^E17K mouse.

A. Schematic representation of the targeting construct used for the conditional knock-in in the R26 locus. The human AKT1^E17K cDNA preceded by a loxP-flanked transcriptional stop cassette, was recombined into the R26 locus. Cre-mediated removal of the stop cassette links Rosa26 exon 1 to the exogenous cDNA allowing expression of the transgene. B. Southern blot of EcoRV digested genomic DNA derived from mESCs transfected with the targeting construct carrying mutant AKT1. Lane 1: DNA from non-targeted mESCs, lane 2 and 3: DNA from DNA from two different R26-AKT1^E17K mESCs strains. Endogenous allele corresponds to the 11.5 kb band (WT); mutant allele corresponds to the 4.3 kb band (REC). C. Relative mRNA expression of human AKT1^E17K by Q-RT-PCR in targeted mESCs and in the corresponding cells transfected with the Flp (pFlpE-IRES-Puro) or Cre recombinase (pCre-IRES-Puro). Data are from replicate experiments as the mean±SD. ***p<0.001. D. Genotype analysis by PCR on tail-tip DNA of genetically modified mice as indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334.g001

30μg of the R26-AKT1^E17K plasmid was linearized with SfiI restriction enzyme (New England, Biolabs) and electroporated into mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC). G418-resistant mESC clones were isolated and screened for correct targeting of the locus by PCR (primers F1 and R1, respectively: 5'-AGGGAACGCAGGGAGACTGAGGTGACCCTTCTTT-3', 5'-GATTGTCTGTTGTGCCCAGTCATAGCCGAATAGC-3) amplifying a 3.9 kb fragment. PCR positive G418-resistant clones were subsequently screened by Southern blot probing for the 5’ recombination junction. Once identified, targeted mESC clones were transfected with Flp-expressing plasmid (pFlpE-IRES-puro) for the excision of the Neo cassette. Subsequently, Neo-deleted mESC clones were isolated, screened by PCR (primers F2 and R2, respectively: 5'-CGGCCTCGACTCTACGATACCGTCGATCC-3', R2 5'-GGATCGAGATCTGATAACTTCGTA-3') and injected into B6 blastocysts, which were subsequently transferred into pseudo-pregnant females to produce chimeric animals at the Embryonic Stem Cell Facility of IRGS (Ariano Irpino, Avellino, Italy). The generated chimeras were bred to establish germline transmission of the human allele. Genotypes of R26-AKT1^E17K mice were determined by PCR using genomic DNA isolated from the tail tips with the following primers: 5'ARMF, 5'-AACTGCAGACTTGTGGGATAC-3'; 3'ARMR, 5'-ATATTAGTCCACCTCACTCCT-3'; mE17KR5 5'-GCCAACCCTCCTTCACAATA-3'. The R26-AKT1^E17K line was mated with Ttf1-Cre line (a gift of Dr. Mario De Felice, IRGS, Ariano Irpino, Italy), to generate R26-AKT1^E17K; Ttf1-Cre; mice. The Ttf1-Cre mice were genotyped by using the following primers: FP, 5'-CCTGATGGACATGTTCAGGGACA-3': RP, 5'-GCCAGATCTCCTGTGCAGCATGT-3'. R26-AKT1^E17K mice were back-crossed on B6 background. In all experiments littermates were used as controls.

Animal experimentation was approved by the local ethical committee “Comitato Etico per la Sperimentazione Animale” (CESA) of IRSG and conform to regulations and guidelines of Italy and the European Union. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering (S1 ARRIVE Checklist). Mice were housed in a highly controlled microbiological environment to guarantee SPF conditions. They were maintained in IVC cages, under constant conditions of temperature (22±2°C), humidity (55%±10 UR) and light/dark cycle of 12/12 hours. The animals had free access to irradiated standard diet and water. Mice were genotyped by PCR of tail DNA [34]. The deletion of loxP-flanked transcriptional stop sequences was determined by PCR using the following primers:

TRF, 5'-GGATCGACGGTATCGTAGAGTCGAGGCCG-3';

L2R 5'-GCCAATGAAGGTGCCATCATTCTTGAGGAGGAAG-3'.

Expression of AKT1^E17K in mESCs transfected with pCre-IRES-puro was determined by quantitative RT-PCR.

Southern blot

A standard protocol for Southern blot was used. Genomic DNA (30 μg) was digested with EcoRV. A 500bp probe on the 5’ side of the targeted insertion site (from CTTGAAAGTGGAGTAACTAC to TCAGAAGCTTTGAACTAGAA in the ROSA26 locus) was labelled with DIG-dUTP, using PCR DIG Probe Synthesis Kit (Roche Diagnostics AG, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). This probe identifies a 11.5 kb fragment in wild type ROSA26 locus and a 4.3kb fragment in targeted ROSA26 locus.

Western Blot and antibodies

Whole tissue protein extracts were prepared with NP-40 buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40) containing protease inhibitors (SigmaFast, Sigma-Aldrich). Western blot analysis was carried out by standard methods[11]. Anti-phospho-AKT (Ser473) (#4058), anti-AKT1 (#2938), anti-phospho-FoxO1 (Ser256) (#9461), anti-FoxO1 (#2880), anti-phospho-GSK3-α/β (Ser21/9) (#9331), anti-GSK3-α (#9338), anti-GSK3-β (#9332) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danver, MA).

Quantitative reverse transcription real-time PCR (Q-RT-PCR)

Total RNA was prepared as described [35]. RT-PCR was performed on RNA extracted by Trizol (Invitrogen) and retro-transcribed with SuperScript II (Invitrogen). Q-RT-PCR was performed using the Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix in ABI Prism 7900 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Gene expression was normalised to GAPDH mRNA content. The relative amounts of mRNA or DNA were calculated by the comparative cycle threshold (CT) method [36]. The following primers are used in Q-RT-PCR

AKT1R26 forward 5'-CACACCACCTGACCAAGATG-3';

AKT1R26 reverse 5'-AATCAAGGGTCCCCAAACTC-3'.

Virus infection of mice

Control R26 and R26-AKT1^E17K mice were infected with 10⁶ or 10⁷ pfu of Adenoviruses expressing Cre (Ad-Cre) (Vector Biolabs, Philadelphia, PA). Mice between 6 and 12 weeks of age were anesthetized with isoflurane and Ad-Cre was administered intranasally. Mice received 120 μl of Ad-Cre, in two doses of 60 μl each, with a break between the two doses, to allow the mice to recover a normal breathing. Control mice received equal amount of buffer phosphate saline solution (S1 ARRIVE Checklist).

Experimental Carcinogenesis

R26 or R26-AKT1^E17K littermates were either infected with Ad-Cre (10⁶−10⁷ PFU) or treated with solvent alone before receiving intra-peritoneal injection with a single dose of 1 mg/g of body weight of urethane, an ethyl ester of carbamic acid extensively used in murine models of carcinogenesis [37], dissolved in sterile 0.9% saline solution. Mice were monitored weekly and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. No mouse had to be euthanized prior to the specific experimental end-point (6, 9 and 18 months, respectively) for health reasons. Mice were sacrificed after 6, 9 and 18 months by cervical dislocation (S1 ARRIVE Checklist). Lungs were removed and inflated with 10% neutral buffered formalin. Lung tissues were collected and fixed with 10% formalin, and embedded in paraffin using standard procedures. Lung sectioning was performed to encompass 1.5 mm of the lung parenchyme; frontal sections were collected at 15 levels with 100 μm spacing) of the sagittal distance to adequately cover both peripheral and central regions. Sections were mounted on slides and stained with hematoxylin ad eosin and were evaluated by light microscopy by veterinary pathologists and human pathologist (OP, HF and CM). For each tumor the slide with maximum lesion diameter was identified and recorded under the microscope.

Histological analysis and immunohistochemistry

Lung tissues were collected and fixed with 10% formalin, and embedded in paraffin using standard procedures. Sections (5μm) were mounted on slides and stained with hematoxylin and eosin to be evaluated by light microscopy by veterinary (OP and HF) or human (CM) pathologists. A combined score of hyperplastic lesions was calculated by adding a score measuring the number of epithelial layers (Layer score) to a score measuring percentage of hyperplasia present in the whole section (Global hyperplasia score). The Layer score was defined as follows: score 1, presence of 1–2 layer(s), score 2, presence of 2–3 layers, score 3, presence of >4 layers. The Global hyperplasia score was defined as follows: score 1, when hyperplasia was present in 1–20% of total sections analysed (3 serial sections/mouse); score 2, when hyperplasia was fond in 21–60% of total sections analysed (3 serial sections/mouse); score 3, when hyperplasia was found in 61–100% of total sections analysed (3 serial sections/mouse).

Immunostaining with anti-phospho-AKT was performed with standard protocols using the Vectastain Universal Quick Kit and DAB Peroxidase Substrate Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Antigen retrieval was carried out with microwave treatment in antigen unmasking solution (VectorLaboratory, Burlingame, CA) for 10 min. Rabbit anti-phospho-AKT (Ser473) (1:1,000, #4058) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology.

Immunostaining for Ki67 was performed with standard protocols using Bond™ Polymer Refine Detection (Leica Biosystem, Buffalo Grove, IL) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Rabbit anti-Ki67 (1:100, PA5-19462) was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Thermo Fisher Sientific, Pittsburgh, PA). Immunostaining for p21 was performed with standard protocols using EnVision™ Detection Systems Dako, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Rabbit polyclonal Ab-5; anti-p21/WAF1 antiserum (1:50) was purchased from Oncogene Research Products (Cambridge, MA). Ki67 and p21 positivity was determined by counting positive nuclei in 10 fields at X400 magnification.

Laser capture microdissection (LCM)

Microdissection was performed using the Laser Microdissector Leica LMD6 & LMD7 (Leica Microsystem, Milan). 5-μm tumor tissue sections onto glass slides were inserted into the Laser Microdissector for dissection of lung tumors. Selected areas were captured with infrared laser pulses onto CapSure Macro LCM Caps.

Direct Kras sequencing

Microdissected samples were lysed by SB LysePrep Kit (Silicon Biosystem, Bologna) according to manufacturer' instructions. Aliquots of lysis solution (2.5 μl) were used as template for DNA amplification with the following primers: mKrasF-TCCTAC AGGAAACAAGTA and mKras R-TTATTTATGGCAAATACA. The amplification program used was: 95°C/5 min; 35x (95°C/30 s, 52°C/30 s 72°C/30 s) for denaturation, annealing, and extension; 72°C/7 min to terminate extension, followed by cooling to 15°C. PCR products were separated on 2% agarose gels and purified by the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen). Purified PCR products were analyzed on 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). For all analyses, data were aligned to the consensus sequence obtained from the BLAST GenBank database.

Immunofluorescence staining

Deparaffinized sections were hydrated in decreasing ethanol gradient solutions and rinsed in wash solution (TBST, 0.05 mol/L Tris Buffered Saline with Tween20). Antigen retrieval was performed with citrate buffer pH 6 for 30 minutes at 98°C followed by washing in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4). Sections were incubated with antibodies against SP-C (goat polyclonal antibody anti-SP-C, 1:200 diluition, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or CC-10 (goat polyclonal antibody anti-CC-10, 1:200 diluition, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 60 min, followed by incubation with secondary Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-goat IgG antibodies (1:400 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 60 min. The cells were counterstained with DAPI (2 μg/mL; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mounted using anti-fade mounting medium (DakoEnvision System, Inc, CA, USA) and observed at Fluorescence Microscopy (Leica Microsystems).

Statistical analysis

Data presented are the means ± SD of n independent assays or replicates as indicated in the text. Continuous variables were analyzed by Student’s t-test or ANOVA test, while categorical variables were analysed by χ² or Fisher’s exact tests. Significance was calculated by Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test (GraphPad Prizm 5 Software, San Diego, CA).

Results

Mutant AKT1^E17K promotes hyperplasia of bronchi and bronchioli

We generated a transgenic mouse strain (R26-AKT1^E17K) that conditionally expresses human mutant AKT1 in the lung by use of a knock-in system (Cre conditional Rosa26, R26) that harbours loxP-flanked transcriptional stop sequences upstream of mutant AKT1 cDNA (Fig 1A). Murine ESCs were targeted and screened by Southern blot to identify clones that carried the recombinant allele (Fig 1B) and for Cre-induced expression of the transgene (Fig 1C). Cre-responsive R26-AKT1^E17K mESCs were then used to generate chimeric mice. Germline transmission of the knocked-in allele was confirmed by PCR (Fig 1D).

To express mutant AKT1 in lung epithelium we used two different systems: intranasal instillation of an Adenovirus carrying the Cre recombinase (Ad-Cre) or mating of R26-AKT1^E17K mice with Ttf1-Cre mice [38,39]. The use of Ttf1-Cre mice allowed expression of the transgene in the bronchial epithelium [39]^, [40] whereas instillation of Ad-Cre presents the advantages of allowing the somatic activation of the transgene in patched areas and of not selecting in advance the cell type in which the transgene is expressed.

In the first set of experiments, we crossed the R26-AKT1^E17K mice with Ttf1-Cre. Fig 2A shows the deletion of the loxP cassette in lung tissues of R26-AKT^E17K; Ttf1-Cre mice; Fig 2B shows real-time RT-PCR expression of mutant AKT1 in the lung and Fig 2C shows increased levels of phosphorylated AKT and/or AKT substrates (GSK3α/β, FOXO1) in lungs from R26-AKT^E17K; Ttf1-Cre mice compared to R26-Ttf1-Cre littermates. We measured AKT1 expression by RT-PCR in five additional tissues (tail, muscle, kidney, spleen, heart and liver) derived from R26-AKTE17K; Ttf1-Cre and R26-Ttf1-Cre littermate mice and the results are shown in S1 Fig. As shown, no expression is observed in tissues different from lungs.

Download:

Fig 2. Phenotypic analysis of R26-AKT1^E17K; Ttf1-Cre mice.

A. PCR analysis of lung DNA from R26-AKT1^E17K; Ttf1-Cre and control littermates. ∆Stop tpA: lox-P flanked transcription termination stop signal. B. Relative mRNA expression of human AKT1 by Q-RT-PCR on RNA of lungs from R26; Ttf1-Cre, R26-AKT1^E17K; Ttf1-Cre. Data are presented from replicate analysis as the mean±SD. C. Representative immunoblot analysis of pAKT, total AKT1 and downstream signalling proteins in total protein extracts from whole lungs of R26; Ttf1-Cre and R26-AKT1^E17K; Ttf1-Cre mice, respectively. D-E. Representative H&E staining of lungs from R26;Ttf1-Cre and R26-AKT1^E17K; Ttf1-Cre, respectively. Magnification as indicated. F-G. Representative pAKT staining of lungs from R26;Nkx2.1-Cre and R26-AKT1^E17K;Nkx2.1-Cre, respectively. Magnification as indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334.g002

Mice of 2 (n = 10), 6 (n = 8) and 12 (n = 11) months of age were sacrificed as end-points. Ttf1-Cre mice showed no evidence of disease up to 12 months of age (n = 7). Conversely, histo-pathological analysis revealed the presence of hyperplastic lesions in the lung of all 12 month-old R26-AKT1^E17K;Ttf1-Cre mice (Fig 2D and 2E). These mice showed moderate hyperplasia of the bronchial and/or terminal bronchial epithelium with polarized nuclei. Alveolar epithelium was normal though atelectasis was observed in some mice. Immunostaining with anti-pS473 demonstrated increased levels of AKT activation in the hyperplastic lungs of R26-AKT1^E17K;Ttf1-Cre mice compared with control or Ttf1-Cre mice (Fig 2F and 2G).

We also activated the mutant AKT1^E17K transgene by intranasal administration of Ad-Cre (10⁶, 10⁷ pfu) in 6–12 weeks-old R26-AKT1^E17K mice. After 6, 9 and 18 months (n = 8, 8 and 7, respectively) mice were sacrificed and lungs were analysed. We did not observe lung abnormalities in R26-AKT1^E17K mice treated with solvent alone (PBS) (n = 7) (Fig 3A). Conversely, virtually all R26-AKT1^E17K mice developed moderate bronchial and/or terminal bronchiolar hyperplasia at 9 months after Ad-Cre administration (Fig 3B and 3C).

Download:

Fig 3. Phenotypic analysis of R26-AKT1^E17K mice infected with Ad-Cre.

A-D. Representative H&E staining of lung epithelium of R26-AKT1^E17K mice treated with solvent alone (not infected) or infected with Ad-Cre (9 and 18 month-old, respectively). Magnification as indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334.g003

To further characterise the lesions detected in transgenic R26-AKT1^E17K mice, we evaluated lung hyperplasia by analysing the number of epithelial layers in the bronchial epithelium and the percentage of hyperplasia on the whole area of 3 serial sections derived from representative R26-AKT1^E17K mice after 6 (n = 3) and 9 (n = 3) months from Ad-Cre administration (mice code #7a-#12a). As controls we made use of the same number of R26-AKT1^E17K mice treated with solvent alone (mouse code #1a-#6a), respectively. The quantification of epithelial layers and of hyperplastic areas was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Results are summarised in Table 1. Representative images of the scores assigned for the number of layers are shown in S2 Fig.

Download:

Table 1. Evaluation of hyperplastic lesions in R26-AKT1^E17K mice.

Hyperplastic lesions were classified on the basis of the number of epithelial layers and the percentage of hyperplasia. Evaluation of epithelial layers, score 1: 1–2 layers of epithelial cells, score 2: 2–3 layers of epithelial cells, score 3: >4 layers of epithelial cells (n = 6 mice/group; 3 serial sections/mouse). Evaluation of the extent of hyperplasia, score 1: hyperplasia in 1–20% of total sections analysed; score 2: hyperplasia in 21–60% of total sections analysed; score 3: hyperplasia in 61–100% of total sections analysed (n = 6 mice/group; 3 serial sections/mouse). Lesions were classified according to a Combined score resulting from the sum of the score of layers and score of the percentage of hyperplasia observed (p<0.05; t-Student).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334.t001

Among the control mice Layer score was 1 for 4 out of 6 mice and 2 for 2 out of 6 mice. Global hyperplasia score was 1 for 5/6 and 2 for 1/6 mice. Conversely, of the R26-AKT1^E17K mice Layer score was 1 for 1/6 mice and 2 for 5/6 mice and Global hyperplasia score was 1 for 2/6, 2 for 2/6 and 3 for 2/6 mice. Finally, we found that R26-AKT1^E17K mice presented a Combined score of hyperplasia of 3.8±0.4 that was significantly higher than that in control mice (2.5±0.3) (n = 6/group; p<0.05).

Subsequently, we investigated whether the hyperplasic lesions observed were proliferative or senescence-related by immonostaining of Ki67 and p21. Results are summarised in Table 2 and representative images of staining for Ki67 and p21 in mouse lungs are shown in S3 Fig. We found that the average number of Ki67-positive nuclei in transgenic R26-AKTE17K mice (11.1±1.2, n = 5) was more than 2-fold increased compared to control mice (4.6±0.49, n = 3). Conversely, no significant difference of p21 staining was observed. These results suggest that the hyperplastic lesions induced by AKT1^E17K in the lung of transgenic mice are a result of increased cell proliferation.

Download:

Table 2. Evaluation of Ki67 and p21 staining in R26-AKT1^E17K mice

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334.t002

It is of note that after 18 months from the treatment, two out of seven R26-AKT1^+/E17K mice treated with Ad-Cre developed a single nodule each, which was diagnosed as bronchio-alveolar adenocarcinoma with papillary pattern consisting of cords and nests of epithelial cells surrounded by sparse fibrovascular stroma (Fig 3D). Immunostaining analysis demonstrated high levels of pAKT in the hyperplastic and neoplastic lesions of R26-AKT1^E17K mice infected with Ad-Cre compared with lungs from non-infected mice (Fig 4A–4C).

Download:

Fig 4. Immunostaining analysis of R26-AKT1^E17K mice.

pAKT immunostaining of lung tissues from R26-AKT1^E17K mice treated with solvent alone (A) or infected with Ad-Cre after 9 and 18 months from infection, respectively (B, C).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334.g004

In conclusion, it appears that the mutant AKT1^E17K allele induces moderate hyperplasia of bronchi and/or terminal bronchioli that, in the long-term and at low frequency, can progress to overt carcinoma.

Mutant AKT1^E17K cooperates with chemical carcinogens

In human cells, AKT1^E17K promotes proliferation and migration when expressed in bronchial cells immortalized by the Adeno 12/SV0 hybrid virus [30]. To investigate whether AKT1 mutations are able to cooperate with other oncogenic hits also in vivo, we made use of ethyl carbamate (urethane), a chemical compound present in smoke that has been extensively used to experimentally model multistage lung carcinogenesis [41]. R26 or R26-AKT1^E17K littermates were either infected with Ad-Cre (10⁶−10⁷ PFU) or treated by solvent alone before being exposed to urethane (1mg/g) and analysed after 6 or 9 months. Multiplicity and size of tumors/lung were found to be significantly higher in R26-AKT1^E17K mice infected with Ad-Cre. Being relatively resistant to urethane, R26-AKT1^E17K mice that had not been previously exposed to Ad-Cre developed nodules in 1 out of 6 mice at 6 months and in 1 out of 4 mice at 9 months after urethane administration, respectively (Fig 5A). Conversely, almost all R26-AKT1^E17K mice that had been infected with Ad-Cre prior of urethane administration, presented lung nodules both after 6 (n = 4) and 9 (n = 6) months of treatment. The average number of tumors developed by mutant mice treated with urethane and infected with Ad-Cre was 3/mouse at 6 months and 7/mouse at 9 months; conversely, mice treated only with urethane developed <0.15 tumor/mouse at 6 months and of 1.6 tumors/mouse at 9 months (Fig 5A). Notably, the size of the tumors developed by mutant mice upon infection with Ad-Cre was dependent on the dose of Ad-Cre administered (Fig 5B).

Download:

Fig 5. Mutant AKT1^E17K accelerates tumor formation induced by chemical carcinogens.

A. Lung tumor multiplicity in R26-AKT1^E17K infected with Ad-Cre (6 and 9 months after the treatment, respectively). Each point represents one mouse; bars represent means ± SD. **p<0.01, *p<0.05. B. Diameter of lung tumors generated by urethane in R26-AKT1^E17K mice treated with increasing doses of Ad-Cre. Bars represent mean diameter of tumor ±SD. *p<0.05. C, D. Representative H&E staining of lung lesions developed in R26-AKT1^E17K mice treated with solvent or Ad-Cre, as indicated, 9 months after urethane administration. E, F. Phosporylated AKT staining of lung lesions developed in R26-AKT1^E17K mice treated with solvent or Ad-Cre, as indicated, 9 months after urethane administration. Magnification as indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334.g005

Tumors generated by urethane in the AKT1^E17K background were diagnosed as bronchio-alveolar adenomas/adenocarcinomas that presented more frequently papillary pattern (Fig 5C and 5D). A final observation was that, unlike tumors generated in control mice that demonstrated little or moderate staining for pAKT, those generated in R26-AKT1^E17K mice presented a marked increase in pAKT staining (Fig 5E and 5F). Finally, we analysed Kras status in urethane-treated mice. DNA was extracted from microdissected formalin-fixed paraffine-embedded tumors of selected urethane-treated mice (2 mice treated with urethane alone and 4 mice treated with urethane plus Ad-CRE). The region spanning codon 61 in exon 3 of Kras gene was amplified and subjected to Sanger DNA sequencing. Sequence analysis of tumors demonstrated the presence of an A>G transition in codon 61 leading to Q61 replacement with R. See S4 Fig for representative chromatograms. These results indicate that AKT1^E17K may cooperate with the oncogenic events induced by urethane in mouse lung (i.e. Kras gain of function mutations), thus accelerating progression to overt tumors.

In the mouse, Clara cells line bronchiolar epithelium and express Clara cell-associated protein 10 (CC10) whereas alveolar type II (AT2) cells reside in the alveoli and express surfactant protein C (SPC) [42–44].

Therefore, to characterize the cells that constitute the lung lesions induced by AKT1^E17K in mouse, we performed indirect immunofluorescence for SP-C and CC10 on FFPE lung sections derived from R26-AKT1^E17K mice treated with Ad-CRE (4 mice of 9 months), urethane (2 mice of 9 months) and in R26-AKT1^E17K treated with urethane followed by Ad-CRE administration (2 mice of 9 months).

In agreement with previous studies [45,46], we found that lung tumors induced by urethane were strongly positive for SP-C but stained only weakly for CC10 (Fig 6), suggesting that urethane-induced tumors in these mouse strains show an AT2 phenotype.

Download:

Fig 6. Indirect immunofluorescence for CC10 and SP-C in mouse lung.

Representative immunofluorescence images of lung sections from R26-AKT1^E17K infected with Ad-Cre, treated with urethane or both. Panels A–C show lung sections analyzed using antibodies to CC10. Panels D–F show lung sections analyzed using antibodies to SP-C. Nuclei were stained with DAPI and are shown in blue. Magnification, 60X.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334.g006

Conversely, hyperplastic lesions initiated by AKT1^E17K in the lung were consistently positive for both SP-C and CC10. This immunophenotype is typical of i) a subset of variant Clara cells termed bronchioalveolar stem cells (BASCs) located at the bronchioalveolar duct junctions [47–49] and capable of differentiating into both Clara cells and AT2s [48] and ii) of a bronchiolar cell type (SPC⁺ bronchiolar epithelial cells, SBEC) that represents a SP-C+/CC10+ intermediate stage of Clara cell differentiation into AT2 cells [50].

Discussion

The hotspot E17K mutation in the PH domain of AKT1 occurs in approximately 0.6–2% of human NSCLC patients. Recently, we have demonstrated that AKT1^E17K confers proliferative and pro-migratory characteristics to immortalized human bronchial epithelial cells. However, so far no murine model that recapitulates the E17K mutation identified in human lung cancer has been generated.

In this manuscript, we have genetically engineered a transgenic Cre-inducible murine strain in the Rosa26 locus (R26-AKT1^E17K) that allows targeted expression of mutant AKT1^E17K and studied its effects after activation in the lung. The most prominent findings are that in mice, AKT1^E17K promotes hyperplasia in bronchi and bronchi-alveoli and strongly cooperates with chemical carcinogens to induce malignancy. We found that, coincident with increased AKT signalling in lung epithelial cells, expression of mutant AKT1^E17K in the lung epithelium induced at high frequency moderate or severe hyperplasia of bronchi and/or terminal bronchioli that, in the long term, may progress to overt carcinoma in a very limited number of animals. It is of note that, hyperplastic lesions initiated by AKT1^E17K in the lung were positive for both Clara cell (CC10+) and AT2 (SP-C+) markers, an immunophenotype shared with rare BASCs at the bronchioalveolar duct junctions [47–49] and bronchiolar epithelial SBECs that exhibit Clara cell morphology and express both CC10 and SP-C [50].

Although AKT1^E17K mutation has, to our knowledge, not been reported in premalignant lung lesions isolated from patients, AKT signalling is frequently activated in bronchial pre-malignancy as shown by immunohistochemical studies of AKT phosphorylation in bronchial dysplasia [51]. Thus, the present study indicates the relevance of AKT1 activation as an early event that stimulates proliferation in the mouse lung, as observed in human cellular models [30].

Hyperplasia induced by mutant AKT1 in the mouse lung occurs later (on average, 12 months) compared with those induced by the oncogenic version of other genes within the PI3K pathway such as the upstream regulators EGFR (3–4 weeks) or KRAS^G12D (3 weeks). In addition to this, in R26-AKT1^E17K mice lung tumors appears with longer latency and lower incidence compared with mice expressing mutant Egfr (3–4 weeks from the activation of the oncogene) [52,53], Pik3ca^H1047R (12–60 weeks) [54] or Kras^G12D (in which the hyperplastic lesions progress to adenoma by 6 weeks, and less frequently to adenocarcinoma after 15 weeks of age) [38,55,56]. Conversely, analysis of Pten knock-out mice showed contradictory results [57,58] possibly depending on the specific promoter (CC10 and SP-C, respectively) used to delete the transgene or on the genetic background of the mouse strain [59]. In fact, Pten deficiency is not sufficient to induce histological abnormalities of the lung or to initiate lung tumorigenesis up to 12 months when induced by CCSP-driven Cre [57] but is able to induce macroscopic lung tumors after 13–20 months when induced by SP-C-driven Cre [58].

It is to be noted that the R26-AKT1^E17K mouse described here only partly recapitulates the human disease. On one hand, transgenic mice develop hyperplasia that in the long term (and infrequently) progresses to full-blown neoplastic lesions. This suggests that AKT1^E17K mutation, which in the human seems to be a weak driver mutation considering its rarity and absence in cell lines, represents a weak oncogene for the lung epithelium also in the mouse. However, at difference with what occurs in human patients, where the mutant allele AKT1^E17K is detected predominantly in SCC, the few tumors that develop in transgenic mice are ADC. This situation is reminiscent of mutant Pik3ca and/or Pten silencing both of which lead to ADC development in mice ^{41, 44, 45} but are preferentially detected in SCC in human.

Possibly, the observed difference in tumor histotype between human and mouse is dependent on the type of cell in which the oncogene is expressed. In fact, most oncogenes whose expression has been induced by Ad-CRE in mouse lung (Kras, Egfr, Pik3ca, Pten etc.) promote development of ADC, raising the possibility that Ad-CRE allows expression of transgenes only in ADC precursor cells. On the other hand, we have recently reported that human immortalized bronchial cells (BEAS-2B) transduced with a lentiviral vector carrying the activated AKT1^E17K mutant become tumorigenic and induce the appearance of poorly differentiated tumors [30].

A further consideration derives from the conclusions of chemical carcinogenesis experiments performed in R26-AKT1^E17K mice. In these experiments, AKT1^E17K strongly cooperated with urethane, a chemical carcinogen that induces A-G transitions at the codon 61 of the Kras gene [60–62]. The observed cooperation between oncogenically activated AKT1 and urethane is consistent with the evidence that AKT1 is the primary AKT isoform activated by mutant Kras in urethane-driven lung tumors in mice [62–64]. In addition it is of note that a synergy between activation of PI3K pathway and mutant Kras occurs in mice transgenic for mutant Pik3ca [54,65] or knock-out for Pten [11,57], indicating that signalling through both pathways is important for full oncogenic action in lung epithelial cells.

In summary, the conclusion drawn by the experiments reported here is that mutant AKT1^E17K is an oncogene that can initiate cancer in the mouse lung, though its oncogenic potency is apparently weaker than that of other oncogenes acting in the lung such as mutant EGFR, Kras or PIK3CA. Instead, the effects exerted by AKT1^E17K are more similar to those elicited by PTEN deficiency. This may account for the finding that AKT1 mutations are detected in a small fraction of lung cancer patients (0.5–2%) and are not selected for in human NSCLC cell lines.

Supporting Information

S1 ARRIVE Checklist. Guidelines Checklist.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334.s001

(PDF)

S1 Fig. Relative mRNA expression of human AKT1 by Q-RT-PCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334.s002

(TIFF)

S2 Fig. Score of the layers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334.s003

(TIFF)

S3 Fig. Immunostaining analysis of Ki67 and p21 in R26-AKT1^E17K mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334.s004

(TIFF)

S4 Fig. Mutation analysis of KRAS in R26-AKT1^E17K mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147334.s005

(TIFF)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Marzia Scarfò, Andrea Affuso and Antonio Dionisio (Biogem s.c.a r.l., Ariano Irpino, Italy) for mouse experiments. This work was supported by Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC 2012–14, IG_12969) and Ministero Istruzione Università Ricerca (MIUR, PRIN, prot. 2010W4J4RM_001; PONa3_00239; PON01_02782) to GV. HF was supported by Västra Götalandsregionen under the LUA/ALF agreement and by the Assar Gabrielssons and Magnus Bergvalls Foundations.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: DM GV. Performed the experiments: DM SB MS FC TM MG CC. Analyzed the data: DM CDM OP SP HF CM DMO AR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DM OP SP HF GV. Wrote the paper: DM HF GV.

References

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al. (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90. pmid:21296855
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, Ward EM (2010) Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19: 1893–1907. pmid:20647400
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, et al. (2004) EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 304: 1497–1500. pmid:15118125
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, et al. (2004) Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 350: 2129–2139. pmid:15118073
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Boch C, Kollmeier J, Roth A, Stephan-Falkenau S, Misch D, et al. (2013) The frequency of EGFR and KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): routine screening data for central Europe from a cohort study. BMJ Open 3.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Rodenhuis S, Slebos RJ (1992) Clinical significance of ras oncogene activation in human lung cancer. Cancer Res 52: 2665s–2669s. pmid:1562997
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Rekhtman N, Paik PK, Arcila ME, Tafe LJ, Oxnard GR, et al. (2012) Clarifying the spectrum of driver oncogene mutations in biomarker-verified squamous carcinoma of lung: lack of EGFR/KRAS and presence of PIK3CA/AKT1 mutations. Clin Cancer Res 18: 1167–1176. pmid:22228640
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Yamamoto H, Shigematsu H, Nomura M, Lockwood WW, Sato M, et al. (2008) PIK3CA mutations and copy number gains in human lung cancers. Cancer Res 68: 6913–6921. pmid:18757405
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Kawano O, Sasaki H, Endo K, Suzuki E, Haneda H, et al. (2006) PIK3CA mutation status in Japanese lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 54: 209–215. pmid:16930767
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Samuels Y, Wang Z, Bardelli A, Silliman N, Ptak J, et al. (2004) High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science 304: 554. pmid:15016963
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Malanga D, Scrima M, De Marco C, Fabiani F, De Rosa N, et al. (2008) Activating E17K mutation in the gene encoding the protein kinase AKT1 in a subset of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Cell Cycle 7: 665–669. pmid:18256540
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Do H, Salemi R, Murone C, Mitchell PL, Dobrovic A (2010) Rarity of AKT1 and AKT3 E17K mutations in squamous cell carcinoma of lung. Cell Cycle 9: 4411–4412. pmid:20980808
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Felip E, Gridelli C, Baas P, Rosell R, Stahel R, et al. (2011) Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: consensus on pathology and molecular tests, first-line, second-line, and third-line therapy: 1st ESMO Consensus Conference in Lung Cancer; Lugano 2010. Ann Oncol 22: 1507–1519. pmid:21536661
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Ju YS, Lee WC, Shin JY, Lee S, Bleazard T, et al. (2012) A transforming KIF5B and RET gene fusion in lung adenocarcinoma revealed from whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing. Genome Res 22: 436–445. pmid:22194472
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Viglietto G (2009) An interview with Dr. Giuseppe Viglietto on his highly cited paper published in Cell Cycle. Cell Cycle 8: 2869–2870.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Altomare DA, Testa JR (2005) Perturbations of the AKT signaling pathway in human cancer. Oncogene 24: 7455–7464. pmid:16288292
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Nicholson KM, Anderson NG (2002) The protein kinase B/Akt signalling pathway in human malignancy. Cell Signal 14: 381–395. pmid:11882383
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Plas DR, Thompson CB (2005) Akt-dependent transformation: there is more to growth than just surviving. Oncogene 24: 7435–7442. pmid:16288290
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Samuels Y, Diaz LA Jr., Schmidt-Kittler O, Cummins JM, Delong L, et al. (2005) Mutant PIK3CA promotes cell growth and invasion of human cancer cells. Cancer Cell 7: 561–573. pmid:15950905
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Brugge J, Hung MC, Mills GB (2007) A new mutational AKTivation in the PI3K pathway. Cancer Cell 12: 104–107. pmid:17692802
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Xu CX, Jin H, Shin JY, Kim JE, Cho MH (2010) Roles of protein kinase B/Akt in lung cancer. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2: 1472–1484.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Carpten JD, Faber AL, Horn C, Donoho GP, Briggs SL, et al. (2007) A transforming mutation in the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1 in cancer. Nature 448: 439–444. pmid:17611497
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Do H, Krypuy M, Mitchell PL, Fox SB, Dobrovic A (2008) High resolution melting analysis for rapid and sensitive EGFR and KRAS mutation detection in formalin fixed paraffin embedded biopsies. BMC Cancer 8: 142. pmid:18495026
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Bleeker FE, Felicioni L, Buttitta F, Lamba S, Cardone L, et al. (2008) AKT1(E17K) in human solid tumours. Oncogene 27: 5648–5650. pmid:18504432
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Kim MS, Jeong EG, Yoo NJ, Lee SH (2008) Mutational analysis of oncogenic AKT E17K mutation in common solid cancers and acute leukaemias. Br J Cancer 98: 1533–1535. pmid:18392055
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Landgraf KE, Pilling C, Falke JJ (2008) Molecular mechanism of an oncogenic mutation that alters membrane targeting: Glu17Lys modifies the PIP lipid specificity of the AKT1 PH domain. Biochemistry 47: 12260–12269. pmid:18954143
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Lauring J, Cosgrove DP, Fontana S, Gustin JP, Konishi H, et al. (2010) Knock in of the AKT1 E17K mutation in human breast epithelial cells does not recapitulate oncogenic PIK3CA mutations. Oncogene 29: 2337–2345. pmid:20101210
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Yi KH, Axtmayer J, Gustin JP, Rajpurohit A, Lauring J (2013) Functional analysis of non-hotspot AKT1 mutants found in human breast cancers identifies novel driver mutations: implications for personalized medicine. Oncotarget 4: 29–34. pmid:23237847
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Beaver JA, Gustin JP, Yi KH, Rajpurohit A, Thomas M, et al. (2013) PIK3CA and AKT1 mutations have distinct effects on sensitivity to targeted pathway inhibitors in an isogenic luminal breast cancer model system. Clin Cancer Res 19: 5413–5422. pmid:23888070
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. De Marco C, Malanga D, Rinaldo N, De Vita F, Scrima M, et al. (2015) Mutant AKT1-E17K is oncogenic in lung epithelial cells. Oncotarget.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Soriano P (1999) Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet 21: 70–71. pmid:9916792
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Srinivas S, Watanabe T, Lin CS, William CM, Tanabe Y, et al. (2001) Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC Dev Biol 1: 4. pmid:11299042
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Friedrich G, Soriano P (1991) Promoter traps in embryonic stem cells: a genetic screen to identify and mutate developmental genes in mice. Genes Dev 5: 1513–1523. pmid:1653172
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Laird PW, Zijderveld A, Linders K, Rudnicki MA, Jaenisch R, et al. (1991) Simplified mammalian DNA isolation procedure. Nucleic Acids Res 19: 4293. pmid:1870982
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162: 156–159. pmid:2440339
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25: 402–408. pmid:11846609
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Redente EF, Orlicky DJ, Bouchard RJ, Malkinson AM (2007) Tumor signaling to the bone marrow changes the phenotype of monocytes and pulmonary macrophages during urethane-induced primary lung tumorigenesis in A/J mice. Am J Pathol 170: 693–708. pmid:17255336
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Jackson EL, Willis N, Mercer K, Bronson RT, Crowley D, et al. (2001) Analysis of lung tumor initiation and progression using conditional expression of oncogenic K-ras. Genes Dev 15: 3243–3248. pmid:11751630
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. DeFelice M, Silberschmidt D, DiLauro R, Xu Y, Wert SE, et al. (2003) TTF-1 phosphorylation is required for peripheral lung morphogenesis, perinatal survival, and tissue-specific gene expression. J Biol Chem 278: 35574–35583. pmid:12829717
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Lazzaro D, Price M, de Felice M, Di Lauro R (1991) The transcription factor TTF-1 is expressed at the onset of thyroid and lung morphogenesis and in restricted regions of the foetal brain. Development 113: 1093–1104. pmid:1811929
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Tuveson DA, Jacks T (1999) Modeling human lung cancer in mice: similarities and shortcomings. Oncogene 18: 5318–5324. pmid:10498884
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Almendro V, Fuster G (2011) Heterogeneity of breast cancer: etiology and clinical relevance. Clin Transl Oncol 13: 767–773. pmid:22082639
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Liu X, Driskell RR, Engelhardt JF (2006) Stem cells in the lung. Methods Enzymol 419: 285–321. pmid:17141060
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Rock JR, Hogan BL (2011) Epithelial progenitor cells in lung development, maintenance, repair, and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27: 493–512. pmid:21639799
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Mason RJ, Kalina M, Nielsen LD, Malkinson AM, Shannon JM (2000) Surfactant protein C expression in urethane-induced murine pulmonary tumors. Am J Pathol 156: 175–182. pmid:10623665
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Balli D, Zhang Y, Snyder J, Kalinichenko VV, Kalin TV (2011) Endothelial cell-specific deletion of transcription factor FoxM1 increases urethane-induced lung carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 71: 40–50. pmid:21199796
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Hong KU, Reynolds SD, Giangreco A, Hurley CM, Stripp BR (2001) Clara cell secretory protein-expressing cells of the airway neuroepithelial body microenvironment include a label-retaining subset and are critical for epithelial renewal after progenitor cell depletion. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 24: 671–681. pmid:11415931
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Kim CF, Jackson EL, Woolfenden AE, Lawrence S, Babar I, et al. (2005) Identification of bronchioalveolar stem cells in normal lung and lung cancer. Cell 121: 823–835. pmid:15960971
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Giangreco A, Reynolds SD, Stripp BR (2002) Terminal bronchioles harbor a unique airway stem cell population that localizes to the bronchoalveolar duct junction. Am J Pathol 161: 173–182. pmid:12107102
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Zheng D, Limmon GV, Yin L, Leung NH, Yu H, et al. (2013) A cellular pathway involved in Clara cell to alveolar type II cell differentiation after severe lung injury. PLoS One 8: e71028. pmid:23940685
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Tsao AS, McDonnell T, Lam S, Putnam JB, Bekele N, et al. (2003) Increased phospho-AKT (Ser(473)) expression in bronchial dysplasia: implications for lung cancer prevention studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12: 660–664. pmid:12869408
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Ji H, Li D, Chen L, Shimamura T, Kobayashi S, et al. (2006) The impact of human EGFR kinase domain mutations on lung tumorigenesis and in vivo sensitivity to EGFR-targeted therapies. Cancer Cell 9: 485–495. pmid:16730237
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Politi K, Zakowski MF, Fan PD, Schonfeld EA, Pao W, et al. (2006) Lung adenocarcinomas induced in mice by mutant EGF receptors found in human lung cancers respond to a tyrosine kinase inhibitor or to down-regulation of the receptors. Genes Dev 20: 1496–1510. pmid:16705038
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Engelman JA, Chen L, Tan X, Crosby K, Guimaraes AR, et al. (2008) Effective use of PI3K and MEK inhibitors to treat mutant Kras G12D and PIK3CA H1047R murine lung cancers. Nat Med 14: 1351–1356. pmid:19029981
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Meuwissen R, Linn SC, van der Valk M, Mooi WJ, Berns A (2001) Mouse model for lung tumorigenesis through Cre/lox controlled sporadic activation of the K-Ras oncogene. Oncogene 20: 6551–6558. pmid:11641780
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. Guerra C, Mijimolle N, Dhawahir A, Dubus P, Barradas M, et al. (2003) Tumor induction by an endogenous K-ras oncogene is highly dependent on cellular context. Cancer Cell 4: 111–120. pmid:12957286
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
57. Iwanaga K, Yang Y, Raso MG, Ma L, Hanna AE, et al. (2008) Pten inactivation accelerates oncogenic K-ras-initiated tumorigenesis in a mouse model of lung cancer. Cancer Res 68: 1119–1127. pmid:18281487
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
58. Yanagi S, Kishimoto H, Kawahara K, Sasaki T, Sasaki M, et al. (2007) Pten controls lung morphogenesis, bronchioalveolar stem cells, and onset of lung adenocarcinomas in mice. J Clin Invest 117: 2929–2940. pmid:17909629
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
59. Freeman D, Lesche R, Kertesz N, Wang S, Li G, et al. (2006) Genetic background controls tumor development in PTEN-deficient mice. Cancer Res 66: 6492–6496. pmid:16818619
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
60. Meuwissen R, Berns A (2005) Mouse models for human lung cancer. Genes Dev 19: 643–664. pmid:15769940
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
61. You M, Candrian U, Maronpot RR, Stoner GD, Anderson MW (1989) Activation of the Ki-ras protooncogene in spontaneously occurring and chemically induced lung tumors of the strain A mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86: 3070–3074. pmid:2654935
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
62. Nuzum EO, Malkinson AM, Beer DG (1990) Specific Ki-ras codon 61 mutations may determine the development of urethan-induced mouse lung adenomas or adenocarcinomas. Mol Carcinog 3: 287–295. pmid:2244961
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
63. Kawano R, Nishisaka T, Takeshima Y, Yonehara S, Inai K (1995) Role of point mutation of the K-ras gene in tumorigenesis of B6C3F1 mouse lung lesions induced by urethane. Jpn J Cancer Res 86: 802–810. pmid:7591956
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
64. Hayashi S, Hong HH, Toyoda K, Ton TV, Devereux TR, et al. (2001) High frequency of ras mutations in forestomach and lung tumors of B6C3F1 mice exposed to 1-amino-2,4-dibromoanthraquinone for 2 years. Toxicol Pathol 29: 422–429. pmid:11560247
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
65. Gupta S, Ramjaun AR, Haiko P, Wang Y, Warne PH, et al. (2007) Binding of ras to phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110alpha is required for ras-driven tumorigenesis in mice. Cell 129: 957–968. pmid:17540175
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al. (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90. pmid:21296855
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, Ward EM (2010) Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19: 1893–1907. pmid:20647400
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, et al. (2004) EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 304: 1497–1500. pmid:15118125
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, et al. (2004) Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 350: 2129–2139. pmid:15118073
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Boch C, Kollmeier J, Roth A, Stephan-Falkenau S, Misch D, et al. (2013) The frequency of EGFR and KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): routine screening data for central Europe from a cohort study. BMJ Open 3.
View Article
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Rodenhuis S, Slebos RJ (1992) Clinical significance of ras oncogene activation in human lung cancer. Cancer Res 52: 2665s–2669s. pmid:1562997
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] PubMed/NCBI

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Rekhtman N, Paik PK, Arcila ME, Tafe LJ, Oxnard GR, et al. (2012) Clarifying the spectrum of driver oncogene mutations in biomarker-verified squamous carcinoma of lung: lack of EGFR/KRAS and presence of PIK3CA/AKT1 mutations. Clin Cancer Res 18: 1167–1176. pmid:22228640
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Yamamoto H, Shigematsu H, Nomura M, Lockwood WW, Sato M, et al. (2008) PIK3CA mutations and copy number gains in human lung cancers. Cancer Res 68: 6913–6921. pmid:18757405
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Kawano O, Sasaki H, Endo K, Suzuki E, Haneda H, et al. (2006) PIK3CA mutation status in Japanese lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 54: 209–215. pmid:16930767
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Samuels Y, Wang Z, Bardelli A, Silliman N, Ptak J, et al. (2004) High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science 304: 554. pmid:15016963
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Malanga D, Scrima M, De Marco C, Fabiani F, De Rosa N, et al. (2008) Activating E17K mutation in the gene encoding the protein kinase AKT1 in a subset of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Cell Cycle 7: 665–669. pmid:18256540
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Do H, Salemi R, Murone C, Mitchell PL, Dobrovic A (2010) Rarity of AKT1 and AKT3 E17K mutations in squamous cell carcinoma of lung. Cell Cycle 9: 4411–4412. pmid:20980808
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Felip E, Gridelli C, Baas P, Rosell R, Stahel R, et al. (2011) Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: consensus on pathology and molecular tests, first-line, second-line, and third-line therapy: 1st ESMO Consensus Conference in Lung Cancer; Lugano 2010. Ann Oncol 22: 1507–1519. pmid:21536661
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Ju YS, Lee WC, Shin JY, Lee S, Bleazard T, et al. (2012) A transforming KIF5B and RET gene fusion in lung adenocarcinoma revealed from whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing. Genome Res 22: 436–445. pmid:22194472
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Viglietto G (2009) An interview with Dr. Giuseppe Viglietto on his highly cited paper published in Cell Cycle. Cell Cycle 8: 2869–2870.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Altomare DA, Testa JR (2005) Perturbations of the AKT signaling pathway in human cancer. Oncogene 24: 7455–7464. pmid:16288292
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] PubMed/NCBI

[62] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Nicholson KM, Anderson NG (2002) The protein kinase B/Akt signalling pathway in human malignancy. Cell Signal 14: 381–395. pmid:11882383
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[64] View Article

[65] PubMed/NCBI

[66] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Plas DR, Thompson CB (2005) Akt-dependent transformation: there is more to growth than just surviving. Oncogene 24: 7435–7442. pmid:16288290
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] PubMed/NCBI

[70] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Samuels Y, Diaz LA Jr., Schmidt-Kittler O, Cummins JM, Delong L, et al. (2005) Mutant PIK3CA promotes cell growth and invasion of human cancer cells. Cancer Cell 7: 561–573. pmid:15950905
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] PubMed/NCBI

[74] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Brugge J, Hung MC, Mills GB (2007) A new mutational AKTivation in the PI3K pathway. Cancer Cell 12: 104–107. pmid:17692802
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] PubMed/NCBI

[78] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Xu CX, Jin H, Shin JY, Kim JE, Cho MH (2010) Roles of protein kinase B/Akt in lung cancer. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2: 1472–1484.
View Article
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Carpten JD, Faber AL, Horn C, Donoho GP, Briggs SL, et al. (2007) A transforming mutation in the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1 in cancer. Nature 448: 439–444. pmid:17611497
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[83] View Article

[84] PubMed/NCBI

[85] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Do H, Krypuy M, Mitchell PL, Fox SB, Dobrovic A (2008) High resolution melting analysis for rapid and sensitive EGFR and KRAS mutation detection in formalin fixed paraffin embedded biopsies. BMC Cancer 8: 142. pmid:18495026
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] PubMed/NCBI

[89] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Bleeker FE, Felicioni L, Buttitta F, Lamba S, Cardone L, et al. (2008) AKT1(E17K) in human solid tumours. Oncogene 27: 5648–5650. pmid:18504432
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] PubMed/NCBI

[93] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Kim MS, Jeong EG, Yoo NJ, Lee SH (2008) Mutational analysis of oncogenic AKT E17K mutation in common solid cancers and acute leukaemias. Br J Cancer 98: 1533–1535. pmid:18392055
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] PubMed/NCBI

[97] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Landgraf KE, Pilling C, Falke JJ (2008) Molecular mechanism of an oncogenic mutation that alters membrane targeting: Glu17Lys modifies the PIP lipid specificity of the AKT1 PH domain. Biochemistry 47: 12260–12269. pmid:18954143
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Lauring J, Cosgrove DP, Fontana S, Gustin JP, Konishi H, et al. (2010) Knock in of the AKT1 E17K mutation in human breast epithelial cells does not recapitulate oncogenic PIK3CA mutations. Oncogene 29: 2337–2345. pmid:20101210
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] PubMed/NCBI

[105] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Yi KH, Axtmayer J, Gustin JP, Rajpurohit A, Lauring J (2013) Functional analysis of non-hotspot AKT1 mutants found in human breast cancers identifies novel driver mutations: implications for personalized medicine. Oncotarget 4: 29–34. pmid:23237847
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Beaver JA, Gustin JP, Yi KH, Rajpurohit A, Thomas M, et al. (2013) PIK3CA and AKT1 mutations have distinct effects on sensitivity to targeted pathway inhibitors in an isogenic luminal breast cancer model system. Clin Cancer Res 19: 5413–5422. pmid:23888070
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. De Marco C, Malanga D, Rinaldo N, De Vita F, Scrima M, et al. (2015) Mutant AKT1-E17K is oncogenic in lung epithelial cells. Oncotarget.
View Article
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Soriano P (1999) Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet 21: 70–71. pmid:9916792
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Srinivas S, Watanabe T, Lin CS, William CM, Tanabe Y, et al. (2001) Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC Dev Biol 1: 4. pmid:11299042
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Friedrich G, Soriano P (1991) Promoter traps in embryonic stem cells: a genetic screen to identify and mutate developmental genes in mice. Genes Dev 5: 1513–1523. pmid:1653172
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Laird PW, Zijderveld A, Linders K, Rudnicki MA, Jaenisch R, et al. (1991) Simplified mammalian DNA isolation procedure. Nucleic Acids Res 19: 4293. pmid:1870982
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162: 156–159. pmid:2440339
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25: 402–408. pmid:11846609
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Redente EF, Orlicky DJ, Bouchard RJ, Malkinson AM (2007) Tumor signaling to the bone marrow changes the phenotype of monocytes and pulmonary macrophages during urethane-induced primary lung tumorigenesis in A/J mice. Am J Pathol 170: 693–708. pmid:17255336
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Jackson EL, Willis N, Mercer K, Bronson RT, Crowley D, et al. (2001) Analysis of lung tumor initiation and progression using conditional expression of oncogenic K-ras. Genes Dev 15: 3243–3248. pmid:11751630
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. DeFelice M, Silberschmidt D, DiLauro R, Xu Y, Wert SE, et al. (2003) TTF-1 phosphorylation is required for peripheral lung morphogenesis, perinatal survival, and tissue-specific gene expression. J Biol Chem 278: 35574–35583. pmid:12829717
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] PubMed/NCBI

[152] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Lazzaro D, Price M, de Felice M, Di Lauro R (1991) The transcription factor TTF-1 is expressed at the onset of thyroid and lung morphogenesis and in restricted regions of the foetal brain. Development 113: 1093–1104. pmid:1811929
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Tuveson DA, Jacks T (1999) Modeling human lung cancer in mice: similarities and shortcomings. Oncogene 18: 5318–5324. pmid:10498884
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Almendro V, Fuster G (2011) Heterogeneity of breast cancer: etiology and clinical relevance. Clin Transl Oncol 13: 767–773. pmid:22082639
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Liu X, Driskell RR, Engelhardt JF (2006) Stem cells in the lung. Methods Enzymol 419: 285–321. pmid:17141060
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Rock JR, Hogan BL (2011) Epithelial progenitor cells in lung development, maintenance, repair, and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27: 493–512. pmid:21639799
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] PubMed/NCBI

[172] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Mason RJ, Kalina M, Nielsen LD, Malkinson AM, Shannon JM (2000) Surfactant protein C expression in urethane-induced murine pulmonary tumors. Am J Pathol 156: 175–182. pmid:10623665
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] PubMed/NCBI

[176] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Balli D, Zhang Y, Snyder J, Kalinichenko VV, Kalin TV (2011) Endothelial cell-specific deletion of transcription factor FoxM1 increases urethane-induced lung carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 71: 40–50. pmid:21199796
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] PubMed/NCBI

[180] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Hong KU, Reynolds SD, Giangreco A, Hurley CM, Stripp BR (2001) Clara cell secretory protein-expressing cells of the airway neuroepithelial body microenvironment include a label-retaining subset and are critical for epithelial renewal after progenitor cell depletion. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 24: 671–681. pmid:11415931
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] PubMed/NCBI

[184] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Kim CF, Jackson EL, Woolfenden AE, Lawrence S, Babar I, et al. (2005) Identification of bronchioalveolar stem cells in normal lung and lung cancer. Cell 121: 823–835. pmid:15960971
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] PubMed/NCBI

[188] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Giangreco A, Reynolds SD, Stripp BR (2002) Terminal bronchioles harbor a unique airway stem cell population that localizes to the bronchoalveolar duct junction. Am J Pathol 161: 173–182. pmid:12107102
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] PubMed/NCBI

[192] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Zheng D, Limmon GV, Yin L, Leung NH, Yu H, et al. (2013) A cellular pathway involved in Clara cell to alveolar type II cell differentiation after severe lung injury. PLoS One 8: e71028. pmid:23940685
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[194] View Article

[195] PubMed/NCBI

[196] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Tsao AS, McDonnell T, Lam S, Putnam JB, Bekele N, et al. (2003) Increased phospho-AKT (Ser(473)) expression in bronchial dysplasia: implications for lung cancer prevention studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12: 660–664. pmid:12869408
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[198] View Article

[199] PubMed/NCBI

[200] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Ji H, Li D, Chen L, Shimamura T, Kobayashi S, et al. (2006) The impact of human EGFR kinase domain mutations on lung tumorigenesis and in vivo sensitivity to EGFR-targeted therapies. Cancer Cell 9: 485–495. pmid:16730237
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[202] View Article

[203] PubMed/NCBI

[204] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Politi K, Zakowski MF, Fan PD, Schonfeld EA, Pao W, et al. (2006) Lung adenocarcinomas induced in mice by mutant EGF receptors found in human lung cancers respond to a tyrosine kinase inhibitor or to down-regulation of the receptors. Genes Dev 20: 1496–1510. pmid:16705038
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[206] View Article

[207] PubMed/NCBI

[208] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Engelman JA, Chen L, Tan X, Crosby K, Guimaraes AR, et al. (2008) Effective use of PI3K and MEK inhibitors to treat mutant Kras G12D and PIK3CA H1047R murine lung cancers. Nat Med 14: 1351–1356. pmid:19029981
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[210] View Article

[211] PubMed/NCBI

[212] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Meuwissen R, Linn SC, van der Valk M, Mooi WJ, Berns A (2001) Mouse model for lung tumorigenesis through Cre/lox controlled sporadic activation of the K-Ras oncogene. Oncogene 20: 6551–6558. pmid:11641780
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[214] View Article

[215] PubMed/NCBI

[216] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Guerra C, Mijimolle N, Dhawahir A, Dubus P, Barradas M, et al. (2003) Tumor induction by an endogenous K-ras oncogene is highly dependent on cellular context. Cancer Cell 4: 111–120. pmid:12957286
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[218] View Article

[219] PubMed/NCBI

[220] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Iwanaga K, Yang Y, Raso MG, Ma L, Hanna AE, et al. (2008) Pten inactivation accelerates oncogenic K-ras-initiated tumorigenesis in a mouse model of lung cancer. Cancer Res 68: 1119–1127. pmid:18281487
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[222] View Article

[223] PubMed/NCBI

[224] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Yanagi S, Kishimoto H, Kawahara K, Sasaki T, Sasaki M, et al. (2007) Pten controls lung morphogenesis, bronchioalveolar stem cells, and onset of lung adenocarcinomas in mice. J Clin Invest 117: 2929–2940. pmid:17909629
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[226] View Article

[227] PubMed/NCBI

[228] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Freeman D, Lesche R, Kertesz N, Wang S, Li G, et al. (2006) Genetic background controls tumor development in PTEN-deficient mice. Cancer Res 66: 6492–6496. pmid:16818619
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[230] View Article

[231] PubMed/NCBI

[232] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Meuwissen R, Berns A (2005) Mouse models for human lung cancer. Genes Dev 19: 643–664. pmid:15769940
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[234] View Article

[235] PubMed/NCBI

[236] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. You M, Candrian U, Maronpot RR, Stoner GD, Anderson MW (1989) Activation of the Ki-ras protooncogene in spontaneously occurring and chemically induced lung tumors of the strain A mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86: 3070–3074. pmid:2654935
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[238] View Article

[239] PubMed/NCBI

[240] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Nuzum EO, Malkinson AM, Beer DG (1990) Specific Ki-ras codon 61 mutations may determine the development of urethan-induced mouse lung adenomas or adenocarcinomas. Mol Carcinog 3: 287–295. pmid:2244961
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[242] View Article

[243] PubMed/NCBI

[244] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Kawano R, Nishisaka T, Takeshima Y, Yonehara S, Inai K (1995) Role of point mutation of the K-ras gene in tumorigenesis of B6C3F1 mouse lung lesions induced by urethane. Jpn J Cancer Res 86: 802–810. pmid:7591956
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[246] View Article

[247] PubMed/NCBI

[248] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Hayashi S, Hong HH, Toyoda K, Ton TV, Devereux TR, et al. (2001) High frequency of ras mutations in forestomach and lung tumors of B6C3F1 mice exposed to 1-amino-2,4-dibromoanthraquinone for 2 years. Toxicol Pathol 29: 422–429. pmid:11560247
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[250] View Article

[251] PubMed/NCBI

[252] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Gupta S, Ramjaun AR, Haiko P, Wang Y, Warne PH, et al. (2007) Binding of ras to phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110alpha is required for ras-driven tumorigenesis in mice. Cell 129: 957–968. pmid:17540175
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[254] View Article

[255] PubMed/NCBI

[256] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Vector Design and Generation of transgenic mice

Southern blot

Western Blot and antibodies

Quantitative reverse transcription real-time PCR (Q-RT-PCR)

Virus infection of mice

Experimental Carcinogenesis

Histological analysis and immunohistochemistry

Laser capture microdissection (LCM)

Direct Kras sequencing

Immunofluorescence staining

Statistical analysis

Results

Mutant AKT1E17K promotes hyperplasia of bronchi and bronchioli

Mutant AKT1E17K cooperates with chemical carcinogens

Discussion

Supporting Information

S1 ARRIVE Checklist. Guidelines Checklist.

S1 Fig. Relative mRNA expression of human AKT1 by Q-RT-PCR.

S2 Fig. Score of the layers.

S3 Fig. Immunostaining analysis of Ki67 and p21 in R26-AKT1E17K mice.

S4 Fig. Mutation analysis of KRAS in R26-AKT1E17K mice.

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

Mutant AKT1^E17K promotes hyperplasia of bronchi and bronchioli

Mutant AKT1^E17K cooperates with chemical carcinogens

S3 Fig. Immunostaining analysis of Ki67 and p21 in R26-AKT1^E17K mice.

S4 Fig. Mutation analysis of KRAS in R26-AKT1^E17K mice.