Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Brands and Inhibition: A Go/No-Go Task Reveals the Power of Brand Influence

  • The PLOS ONE Staff

In Fig 1, the legend improperly differentiates between high and low familiarity/liking. Please see the corrected Fig 1 here. The publisher apologizes for the error.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Performance of participants for the different measures, and the different subjective-ratings.

(a) GO trial accuracy. I.e. pressing the space bar when required to do so. (b) Percentage of commission errors. I.e. pressing the space bar when it was not required to do so. (c) Mean RT for GO trials, (d) Mean RT for commission errors. Error bars indicate standard error. * Denotes significance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143985.g001

Reference

  1. 1. Peatfield N, Caulfield J, Parkinson J, Intriligator J (2015) Brands and Inhibition: A Go/No-Go Task Reveals the Power of Brand Influence. PLoS ONE 10(11): e0141787. pmid:26544606

Citation: The PLOS ONE Staff (2015) Correction: Brands and Inhibition: A Go/No-Go Task Reveals the Power of Brand Influence. PLoS ONE 10(11): e0143985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143985

Published: November 23, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 The PLOS ONE Staff. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited