Figures
Abstract
Recently nano-materials are widely used but they have shown contrasting effects on human and plant life. Keeping in view the contrasting results, the present study has evaluated plant growth response, antioxidant system activity and photosynthetic apparatus physiological and ultrastructural changes in Brassica napus L. plants grown under a wide range (0, 500, 2500, 4000 mg/l) of nano-TiO2 in a pot experiment. Nano-TiO2 has significantly improved the morphological and physiological indices of oilseed rape plants under our experimental conditions. All the parameters i-e morphological (root length, plant height, fresh biomass), physiological (photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll content, nitrate reductase activity) and antioxidant system (Superoxide dismutase, SOD; Guaiacol peroxidase, POD; Catalase, CAT) recorded have shown improvement in their performance by following nano-TiO2 dose-dependent manner. No significant chloroplast ultra-structural changes were observed. Transmission electron microscopic images have shown that intact & typical grana and stroma thylakoid membranes were in the chloroplast, which suggest that nano-TiO2 has not induced the stressful environment within chloroplast. Finally, it is suggested that, nano-TiO2 have growth promoting effect on oilseed rape plants.
Citation: Li J, Naeem MS, Wang X, Liu L, Chen C, Ma N, et al. (2015) Nano-TiO2 Is Not Phytotoxic As Revealed by the Oilseed Rape Growth and Photosynthetic Apparatus Ultra-Structural Response. PLoS ONE 10(12): e0143885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143885
Editor: Maoteng Li, Huazhong university of Science and Technology, CHINA
Received: May 31, 2015; Accepted: November 10, 2015; Published: December 1, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31101124), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (C2014407061), and PhD Research Startup Foundation of Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology (2013YB005). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Use of nanomaterials is one of the rapidly growing research areas during the last decade [1]. Nanomaterials are being applied in almost every field like cosmetics, medicine and agriculture etc. [2]. Nanomaterial’s (NMs) have tremendous potential to generate new ways to manipulate genome, DNA delivery and growth regulation in plants [3,4]. There is an extensive interest to investigate applying NMs to plants for agricultural use.
Nano-TiO2 is diversely used nanoparticles. Nano-TiO2 materials are being utilized as a disinfectant, antibiotic, biological sensor, tumor killing agent and antibacterial products [5]. Contrasting effects of nano-TiO2 on plant growth have been reported. Some studies have reported that nano-TiO2 is cytotoxic [6] but others are showing opposite results [7]. One study has shown that nano-TiO2 application may induce aged seeds vigor and chlorophyll content in spinach [8] and other has shown that nano-TiO2 is toxic for seed germination and root growth [9,10] which are considered as the most important basic toxicity research tools for plants. Overall, few systematic studies have been conducted to determine the effects of nano-TiO2 on plant physiology and plant development at the organism level. Information available about nano-TiO2 effect on chloroplast ultra-structural changes is scarce. However, literature has suggested that any abiotic change in the plant environment induce oxidative stress which in turn may damage the membrane system especially mitochondria and chloroplast ultra-structures [11] and ultimately hampers physiological performance of photosynthetic apparatus in plants. Limited literature is available on the plant biological and physiological effects of nano-TiO2 for its practical application in agriculture. Therefore, it is imperative to continue such studies to understand the effects of nano-TiO2 on plant growth and physiology.
Oilseed rape is considered as one of the main source of edible oil not only in China but all over the world. [12]. Therefore, oilseed rape potential must be exploited against various environmental stresses like nano-TiO2. Keeping in mind the importance of oilseed rape and contrasting biological responses of plants to nano-TiO2 toxicity, the present study was planned.
The study was executed with a wide range of nano-TiO2 toxicity on plant growth, antioxidant system and photosynthetic apparatus especially the chloroplast ultra-structures. Results from this research may help to understand the effects of nano-TiO2 in oilseed rape plants and further their application in the laboratory or field.
Materials and Methods
Characteristics of nanoparticles
Nano-TiO2 was purchased from the Shanghai Chemical Co. of China. Properties of the nano-TiO2 were as follows: aerosol, purity≥99.5%, anatase/rutile = 80:20 and particle size = 27 nm.
Plant material and treatment conditions
Seeds of Brassica napus L. (cv. Zhongshuang No. 11) were purchased during August, 2014 from a local seed company-Wuhan Zhongnongyou Seeds Technologies Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei Province, China (30°69N, 114°19E). The seeds were vernalized for 2 weeks and were sterilized for 10 min in 10% sodium hypochlorite solution before use.
Healthy seeds of Brassica napus L. (cv. Zhongshuang No. 11) were sown in plastic pots (30 cm diameter) having commercial soil (Sunshine Mix #5, Sun Gro, Canada). Five uniform plants per pot were allowed to grow after three weeks and there were four replications for each treatment. Forty four days old seedlings were sprayed with water or different concentrations of nano-TiO2 suspensions (500, 2500 and 4000 mg/l). Data for different parameters were recorded from the next day for four times with an interval of a week. Left over plants for each treatment were allowed to grow till maturity and then harvested to record the data for yield and yield components.
Morphological parameters
Five plants for each treatment were randomly sampled next day after nano-TiO2 treatment to record the data for taproot length, plant height and biomass of the seedlings and this action was repeated four times with an interval of a week.
Antioxidant enzymes assay
Crude enzyme was extracted from topmost fully expanded fresh leaf samples (0.5 g) by using potassium phosphate buffer with the help of mortar and pestle chilled at 4°C as described by Naeem et al. [13]. Extracted enzyme was used to determine the activity of following antioxidant enzymes:
Activities of catalase (CAT, EC1.11.1.6), superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC1.15.1.1) and guaiacol peroxidase (POD, EC1.11.1.7) were assayed following the protocols of Aebi [14], Zhou et al. [15], Zhou and Leul [16], respectively.
Nitrate reductase assay and chlorophyll pigment
Assay was performed by extracting oilseed rape leaves with an extraction buffer comprised of Tris–HCl (250 mM) with pH 8.0, EDTA (1 mM), Na2MoO4 (1 μM), flavin adenine dinucleotide (5 μM), dithiothreitol (3 mM), BSA (1%), β-mercaptoethanol (12 mM) and PMSF (250 μM). After extraction, samples were centrifuged at 13000 rpm just for 5 minutes to achieve the supernatants which in turn were mixed with a buffer having NaNO3-40 mM, Na2HPO4-80 mM, NaH2PO4 (pH 7.5)-20 mM and NADH-0.2 mM. At 25°C after 2 hours incubation, sulphanilamide-1% and N-(1-napthyl) ethylenediamine hydrochloride-0.05% were added to cease the reaction and finally absorbance was recorded with the help of spectrophotometer at 540 nm to calculate the concentration of nitrite [17].
Chlorophyll was extracted from the leaves by soaking in acetone and alcohol (1:1) mixture solution. Total chlorophyll contents were spectrophotometrically recorded [18].
Transmission electron microscopy
Completely unfolded leaves at the top of plants were used to obtain the control and treated samples excluding veins. Samples were washed thrice with glutaraldehyde-4% in phosphate buffer-0.1M after treatment with the same buffer for more than 12 hours. After incubation for 1 h in OsO4-1%, samples washing were repeated thrice after every ten minutes. In the next step, samples were dehydrated using gradually increased concentration of ethanol from 50–100% and ultimately for twenty minutes with acetone. After infiltration and embedding with Spurr’s resin, samples were heated at 70°C for nine hours. Finally, transmission electron microscope (JEOL TEM-1230EX) was used to observe the ultra-structures of the samples on copper grids [13].
Photosynthetic gas exchange
Photosynthetic gas exchange characteristics of healthy leaves were recorded at 10: 00 am in the morning with a CIRAS-1 portable photosynthesis system (PP-Systems, UK). Randomly three healthy and functional leaves were selected for each measurement. Photosynthetic parameters like net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and transpiration rate (Tr) were recorded and replicated at least eight times [19].
Results
Plant growth response
Phytotoxic effects of nano-TiO2 were recorded on plant growth in terms of taproot length, plant height and fresh biomass (Fig 1). A positive but not significant change was recorded for taproot length of oilseed rape plants (Fig 1A). However, oilseed rape plants height was increased after treated with different concentrations of nano-TiO2 (Fig 1B). Maximum height was recorded with 4000 mg/l nano-TiO2. The total biomass of plant vegetation (leaves, stems, and roots) of nano-TiO2-exposed seedlings increased approximately by 30–40% compared with control seedlings (Fig 1C). Increase in the biomass followed the dose dependent pattern of nano-TiO2. Minimum biomass was recorded in control plants and maximum at 4000 mg/l nano-TiO2 treated plants.
Results are shown as an average of measurements for five plants. Means with the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at P<0.05. Vertical bars represent±SE.
Antioxidant enzymes activity
The effect of nano-TiO2 on the protective antioxidant enzymes activity such as SOD, CAT and POD of oilseed rape is shown in Fig 2. Results have shown that immediately after exposure to nano-TiO2 at 45 days, the SOD, CAT and POD activity of oilseed rape depicted no significant change with the increase of nano-TiO2 as compared to control plants. However, during next three weeks (52, 59 and 66th day) SOD, CAT and POD activity of B. napus was significantly increased compared to the respective controls and followed the dose dependent pattern of nano-TiO2 (Fig 2A–2C). Maximum activities for all the enzymes tested were recorded in 66 days old plants treated with 4000 mg/l nano-TiO2. Overall, enzymes results have shown that the effect of nano-TiO2 on the activity of protective enzymes follow the same trend.
Results are shown as means of four replicates. Means with the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at P<0.05. Vertical bars represent±SE.
Nitrate reductase activity and chlorophyll content
Effect of nano-TiO2 on nitrate reductase activity and chlorophyll content is shown in the Fig 3. Results have shown that increasing dosage of nano-TiO2 has not induced significant change in the NR at 45th & 52nd day old seedlings. However, later on the activity of NR increased significantly and followed the concentration dependent pattern. Maximum values of NR were recorded at 66th day (Fig 3A).
Results are shown as means of four replicates. Means with the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at P<0.05. Vertical bars represent±SE.
Chlorophyll content data recorded for 45 days old seedlings showed no significant change with the increase of nano-TiO2 dosage (Fig 3B). However, the chlorophyll content of oilseed rape seedlings during the next weeks were dramatically higher and followed the nano-TiO2 concentration dependent pattern with maximum chlorophyll content in 66 days old plants treated with 4000 mg/l nano-TiO2. These results have shown that nano-TiO2 can significantly increase chlorophyll content of oilseed rape.
Photosynthetic apparatus physiological performance
Fig 4 shows the photosynthetic apparatus physiological changes induced by nano-TiO2 in oilseed rape plants. Photosynthetic parameters, i.e. net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, internal CO2 concentration and transpiration rate showed no significant change just after the exposure to nano-TiO2 at 45 days old seedlings. However, a significant increase was recorded with the increase in TiO2 concentration during the coming weeks and generally this increase was gradual. Maximum performance for all these parameters was recorded at 66th day of seedling age with 4000mg/l nano-TiO2 concentration except intercellular CO2 concentration whose results were indifferent.
A: net photosynthetic rate (Pn); B: stomatal conductance (Gs); C: intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci); D: transpiration rate (Tr). Results are shown as means of four replicates. Means with the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at P<0.05. Vertical bars represent±SE.
Ultra-structural changes in chloroplasts
Thylakoid membrane system was observed typical with no drastic changes in nano-TiO2 treated chloroplasts compared to the control. Grana and stroma membrane stacks were intact and there was no swelling in the stroma when treated with nano-TiO2. Starch grains were present in the chloroplast and more importantly plastoglobuli were lesser in number especially in 4000 mg/l nano-TiO2 treated plants compared to the control plants. Generally speaking, an increase in the dosage of nano-TiO2 didn’t induce any negative change in chloroplast ultra-structures (Fig 5A–5D).
Chloroplast ultra-structures (A) control (B) nano-TiO2 @ 500mg/l (C) nano-TiO2 @ 2500mg/l (D) nano-TiO2 @ 4000mg/l. CW, cell wall; St, stroma thylakoids; Gt, grana thylakoids; S, sugar grains; Pg, plastoglobuli. Bars A-B = 200 nm.
Effect on yield and yield components
At maturity, effect of nano-TiO2 on yield and yield components was monitored in terms of pods per plant, seeds per pod, 1000-seed weight and seed yield as shown in Fig 6. There was no statistical significant change for number of seeds per pod (Fig 6A). However, 1000-seed weight, seed yield per plant and number of seeds per pod was improved by increasing dose of nano-TiO2 especially at higher dose of 4000 mg/l (Fig 6B–6D). Generally speaking, results are showing that nano-TiO2 have no toxic effect on the ultimate seed yield of oilseed rape plants rather improves it.
Results are shown as means of four replicates. Means with the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at P<0.05. Vertical bars represent±SE.
Discussion
Nano-toxicity to plant life is an emerging arena and is being focused in the recent years [20]. Contrasting effects of nano-materials on plant growth and development is a feature of the previous studies. The present study is an effort to understand how diverse range of nano-TiO2 impacts the plant growth and development in oilseed rape.
Enhanced root length, plant height, biomass in the present study indicates that nano-TiO2 might have induced the absorption of water and fertilizer [21]. Increase in growth parameters also demonstrates that nano-TiO2 has catalyzed the photosynthetic process as shown in Fig 4. This promotion in plant growth may also be due to the increased inorganic nitrogen (such as NO3--N and NH+-N) conversion into organic nitrogen i-e protein and chlorophyll, which ultimately improve the plant growth [22, 23]. It could be speculated that relatively higher nitrate reductase activity (Fig 3A) in our present study might have provided the pool of NH4+ nitrogen by transforming the NO3- to NH4+ in vivo during nitrogen metabolism and then accelerate the formation of chlorophyll (Fig 3B) which ultimately has induced the plant growth [24]. Nitrate reductase activity enhanced in the present study might be linked with nitrate absorption as it has been reported that nitrate reductase activity induced under nitrate [25]. Results of this study are consistent with the findings of all the tested plant species i-e Brassica compestris L., Lactuca sativa L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. for root length [26] and spinach for biomass [27].
Although nano-TiO2 is not phytotoxic as revealed by the performance of plant growth indices but it has activated the antioxidant system (Fig 2) of oilseed rape plants as a matter of defense in response to oxidative stress [28, 25]. This means that abiotic stress was induced by nano-TiO2. Dose dependent increase in enzymes activities suggest us that increasing dose of nano-TiO2 would have increased the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and in turn antioxidant system enzymes activities were activated in the same fashion [29, 30]. Enhanced antioxidants activities suggest that nano-TiO2 induced stress was not severe to destroy the antioxidant system apparatus in the plants, rather activated it as a matter of defense and ultimately overall growth of plants.
Plant growth response and grain yield is ultimately controlled by the production of photosynthates. Induced photosynthetic gas exchange capacity by nano-TiO2 by following the dose dependent manner suggest that nano-TiO2 might has increased the absorption of nitrogen and magnesium minerals to promote the chlorophyllase activity and hence the chlorophyll synthesis which in turn might have increased light absorbance, improved light energy traffic and ultimately has avoided the chloroplasts damage (Fig 5) and prolonged the photosynthesis time of chloroplasts [31].
To analyze the chloroplast damage, transmission electron microscopic chloroplast ultra-structural images were executed which have revealed intact grana-stacks and no swelling in stroma (Fig 5) which means that either there was no over-production of ROS in the chloroplast or scavenged by the antioxidant system activated (Fig 2) by nano-TiO2. Chloroplast serves as an apparatus for photosynthesis reactions [32]. Reports have shown that chloroplast ultra-structures are affected by toxicity and in turn hamper the photosynthesis [33]. Under stress conditions, transpiration is hampered due to stomata closure, which declines the CO2 concentration within chloroplasts and consequently affects NADPH+ production and let the ferredoxin electrons reduce O2, ultimately induces the formation of reactive oxygen species like H2O2, OH- etc. [34]; these species may deteriorate the membrane system of the plant such as chloroplast. Few plastoglobuli observed in the chloroplast (Fig 5) is an indication of no lipid peroxidation of thylakoid or cell membrane. Presence of starch granules in the chloroplast also reveals that there was no stressful environment induced by the TiO2 in chloroplast, as complex sugars have not transformed into simple soluble sugars which are supposed to be the major compatible solutes for osmotic adjustment [35]. Improved yield and yield components data for our study is the ultimate response of nano-TiO2 on oilseed rape plants which confirms that nano-TiO2 is not toxic rather improves plant performance.
In summary, this article suggests that nano-TiO2 is non-phytotoxic as revealed by the improved photosynthetic apparatus physiological performance, no drastic changes in the thylakoid membranes, improvement in the plant growth and ultimately better yield of the oilseed rape plants. However, further studies are required to establish it, keeping in mind dose, exposure time, plant species and growth stage variability.
Acknowledgments
We are really thankful to Mr. Lulu Dai for providing his services to purchase seeds and chemicals required for our experiments and also acknowledge the useful suggestions and carful revisions of the manuscript made by Dr. GuangYuan Lu and Dr. Li Ren.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: JL XW CZ. Performed the experiments: JL LL. Analyzed the data: CC NM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MSN XW. Wrote the paper: JL MSN XW CZ.
References
- 1. Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005; 113, 823–839. pmid:16002369
- 2. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science, 2006; 311, 622–627. pmid:16456071
- 3. Torney F, Trewyn B, Lin VSY, Wang K. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles deliver DNA and chemicals into plants. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007; 2, 295–300. pmid:18654287
- 4. Liu Q, Chen B, Wang Q, Shi X, Xiao Z, Lin J, et al. Carbon nanotubes as molecular transporters for walled plant cells. Nano Lett. 2009; 9, 1007–1010. pmid:19191500
- 5. Iavicoli I, Leso V, Fontana L, Bergamaschi A. Toxicological effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of in vitro mammalian studies. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011; 15, 481–508. pmid:21744743
- 6. Kang SJ, Kim BM, Lee YJ, Chung HW. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles trigger p53-mediated damage response in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2008; 49, 399–405. pmid:18418868
- 7. Nohynek GJ, Dufour EK, Roberts MS. Nanotechnology, cosmetics and the skin: is there a health risk? Skin Pharmacol Phys. 2008; 21, 136–149.
- 8. Zheng L, Hong F, Lu S, Liu C. Effect of nano-TiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2005; 106, 279–297. pmid:15851835
- 9. Seeger EM, Baun A, Kastner M, Trapp S. Insignificant acute toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles to willow trees. J Soil Sediments. 2009; 9, 46–53.
- 10. Castiglione MR, Giorgetti L, Geri C, Cremonini R. The effects of nano-TiO2 on seed germination, development and mitosis of root tip cells of Vicia narbonensis L. and Zea mays L. J Nanopart Res. 2011; 13, 2443–2449.
- 11. Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002; 7, 405–410. pmid:12234732
- 12. Momoh EJJ, Zhou WJ, Kristiansson B. Variation in the development of secondary dormancy in oilseed rape genotypes under conditions of stress. Weed Res. 2002; 42, 446–455.
- 13. Naeem MS, Warusawitharana H, Liu HB, Liu D, Ahmad R, Waraich EA, et al. 5-Aminolevulinic acid alleviates the salinity-induced changes in Brassica napus as revealed by the ultrastructural study of chloroplast. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012; 57, 84–92 pmid:22695221
- 14. Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984; 105, 121–126. pmid:6727660
- 15. Zhou W, Zhao D, Lin X. Effects of waterlogging on nitrogen accumulation and alleviation of waterlogging damage by application of nitrogen fertilizer and mixtalol in winter rape (Brassica napus L.). J Plant Growth Regul. 1997; 16, 47–53.
- 16. Zhou WJ, Leul M. Uniconazole-induced tolerance of rape plants to heat stress in relation to changes in hormonal levels, enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation. Plant Growth Regul. 1999; 27, 99–104.
- 17. Mauriño SG, Echevarria C, Mejias JA, Vargas MA, Maldonado JM. Properties of the in vivo nitrate reductase assay in maize, soybean, and spinach leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology. 1986; 124, 123–130.
- 18. Pei ZF, Ming DF, Liu D, Wan GL, Geng XX, Gong HJ, et al. Silicon improves the tolerance to water deficit stress induced by polyethylene glycol in wheat seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2010; 29, 106–115.
- 19. Leul M, Zhou WJ. Alleviation of waterlogging damage in winter rape by application of uniconazole: Effects on morphological characteristics, hormones and photosynthesis. Field Crops Res. 1998; 59: 121–127.
- 20. Nowack B; Bucheli TD. Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut. 2007; 150, 5–22. pmid:17658673
- 21. Harrison CC. Evidence for intramineral macromolecules containing protein from plant silicas, Phytochemistry. 1996; 41, 37–42. pmid:8588873
- 22. Yang F, Hong FS, You WJ, Liu C. Influences of nano-anatase TiO2 on the nitrogen metabolism of growing spinach. Biol Trace Element Res. 2006; 110, 179–190.
- 23. Yang F, Liu C, Gao F, Su M, Wu X, Zheng L, et al. The improvement of spinach growth by nano-anatase TiO2 treatment is related to nitrogen photoreduction. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2007; 119, 77–88. pmid:17914222
- 24.
Buchanan BB, Gruissem W, Johones RL. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. Science Press. 2002.
- 25. Jbir N, Chaibi W, Ammar S, Jemmali A, Ayadi A. Root growth and lignification of two wheat species differing in their sensitivity to NaCl, in response to salt stress. C.R. Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 2001; 324, 863–868.
- 26. Song U, Shin M, Lee G, Roh J, Kim Y, Lee EJ. Functional analysis of TiO2 nanoparticle toxicity in three plant species. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2013; 155, 93–103. pmid:23900645
- 27. Zheng L, Hong F, Lu S, Liu C. Effect of nano-TiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2005; 104, 83–91. pmid:15851835
- 28. Shalata A, Mittova V, Volokita M, Guy M, Tal M. Response of the cultivated tomato and its wild salt-tolerant relative Lycopersicon pennellii to salt-dependent oxidative stress: the root antioxidative system. Physiol Plant. 2001; 112, 487–494. pmid:11473708
- 29. Bor M, Ozdemir F, Turkan I. The effects of salt stress on lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in leaves of sugar beet Beta vulgaris L. and wild beet Beta maritima L. Plant Sci. 2003; 164, 77–84.
- 30. Yusuf M, Hasan SA, Ali B, Hayat S, Fariduddin Q, Ahmad A. Effect of salicylic acid on salinity induced changes in Brassica juncea L. J Integr Plant Biol. 2008; 50, 1096–1102. pmid:18844778
- 31. Hong FS, Yang F, Liu C, Gao FQ, Wang ZG, Gu FG, et al. Influences of nano-TiO2 on the chloroplast ageing of spinach under light. Biol. Trace Element Res. 2005; 104(3), 249–260.
- 32. Woolhouse HW. The biochemistry and regulation of senescence in chloroplasts. Can. J. Bot. 1984; 62, 2934–2942.
- 33. Paramonova NV, Shevyakova NI, Kuznetsov VlV. Ultrastructure of chloroplasts and their storage inclusions in the primary leaves of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum affected by putrescine and NaCl. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2004; 51, 86–96.
- 34. Vranová E, Langebartels C, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, Van Camp W. Oxidative stress, heat shock and drought differentially affect expression of a tobacco protein phosphatase 2C. J Exp Bot. 2000; 51, 1763–1764. pmid:11053467
- 35. Kutik J, Hola D, Vicankova A, Smidova M, Kocova M, Kornerova M, et al. The heterogeneity of structural and functional photosynthetic characteristics of mesophyll chloroplasts in various parts of mature or senescing leaf blade of two maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes, Photosynthetica. 2001; 39, 497–506.