Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genetically and Phenotypically Distinct Pseudomonas aeruginosa Cystic Fibrosis Isolates Share a Core Proteomic Signature

  • Anahit Penesyan,

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

  • Sheemal S. Kumar,

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

  • Karthik Kamath,

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

  • Abdulrahman M. Shathili,

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

  • Vignesh Venkatakrishnan,

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

  • Christoph Krisp,

    Affiliations Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

  • Nicolle H. Packer,

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

  • Mark P. Molloy,

    Affiliations Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

  • Ian T. Paulsen

    ian.paulsen@mq.edu.au

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

The opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa is among the main colonizers of the lungs of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. We have isolated and sequenced several P. aeruginosa isolates from the sputum of CF patients and compared them with each other and with the model strain PAO1. Phenotypic analysis of CF isolates showed significant variability in colonization and virulence-related traits suggesting different strategies for adaptation to the CF lung. Genomic analysis indicated these strains shared a large set of core genes with the standard laboratory strain PAO1, and identified the genetic basis for some of the observed phenotypic differences. Proteomics revealed that in a conventional laboratory medium PAO1 expressed 827 proteins that were absent in the CF isolates while the CF isolates shared a distinctive signature set of 703 proteins not detected in PAO1. PAO1 expressed many transporters for the uptake of organic nutrients and relatively few biosynthetic pathways. Conversely, the CF isolates expressed a narrower range of transporters and a broader set of metabolic pathways for the biosynthesis of amino acids, carbohydrates, nucleotides and polyamines. The proteomic data suggests that in a common laboratory medium PAO1 may transport a diverse set of “ready-made” nutrients from the rich medium, whereas the CF isolates may only utilize a limited number of nutrients from the medium relying mainly on their own metabolism for synthesis of essential nutrients. These variations indicate significant differences between the metabolism and physiology of P. aeruginosa CF isolates and PAO1 that cannot be detected at the genome level alone. The widening gap between the increasing genomic data and the lack of phenotypic data means that researchers are increasingly reliant on extrapolating from genomic comparisons using experimentally characterized model organisms such as PAO1. While comparative genomics can provide valuable information, our data suggests that such extrapolations may be fraught with peril.

Introduction

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder affecting most critically the lungs, and also the pancreas, liver, and intestine. It is characterized by abnormal transport of chloride and sodium ions across the epithelium leading to thick, viscous secretions. It is most common among the Caucasian population where, according to the World Health Organisation, approximately 1 in 2500 children are born with the genetic mutation leading to the development of CF. CF is caused by mutations in the gene encoding for the CF transmembrane conductance regulator protein (CFTR) involved in the regulation of the movement of chloride and sodium ions across epithelial membranes. The thick mucus that forms as a result of CFTR mutations represents a breeding ground for various microorganisms that cause chronic infection in lungs, thus leading to complications associated with the disease.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a Gram-negative opportunistic human pathogen, is one of the main colonizers of lungs in CF patients. It was found that by the age of 3 years, over 95% of children with CF show evidence of intermittent P. aeruginosa infection [1]. Moreover, early colonization with P. aeruginosa has been strongly correlated with poor prognosis in CF [2, 3]. By the age of 25, according to the 2010 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient registry Annual Data Report, P. aeruginosa becomes the most dominant microorganism in the respiratory tract of CF patients.

Due to its metabolic versatility, innate resistance to the majority of drugs used in clinical practice, and extensive biofilm formation, infections caused by P. aeruginosa are especially hard to treat using conventional treatment regimes and are often destined to fail. As a result, CF is ranked among the most widespread life-shortening genetic diseases with the current life expectancy often not exceeding mid 40s.

Successful CF pathogens, including P. aeruginosa, have developed an effective arsenal to establish infection and evade the host response, together with an ability to adapt readily to the lung environment [4]. Thus, according to reports, isolates of P. aeruginosa that are involved in the acute infection and initial colonisation of CF lungs in early childhood differ from those found in adults with established chronic infections, the latter often showing adaptations specific to the CF lung environment [5, 6].

Considering its role in the disease progression, it is not surprising that P. aeruginosa has become a focal point for research in CF and other biofilm related complications. Improvements in DNA sequencing technology have led to the sequencing of hundreds of P. aeruginosa genomes in recent years, many of them from CF patients. However, for the vast majority of these strains there is little or no published experimental data on their phenotypic features (Fig 1). Instead most phenotypic experimental work on P. aeruginosa has focused on common well-characterised model strains, such as PAO1. Our knowledge of these sequenced CF isolates is thus largely based on extrapolations from model strains via in silico genome comparisons.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Data on P. aeruginosa (PA) genome assemblies released in the last 5 years (2010–2014 inclusive).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.g001

Strain PAO1 is a widely used model organism and the first Pseudomonas species to have its genome sequenced [7]. In 2014 alone 155 articles were published, as listed on NCBI PubMed, using PAO1 as a model P. aeruginosa strain, and 15% of those articles made direct correlations to CF. As strain PAO1 does not have a CF origin but was isolated from a wound infection in 1955 [8] and has been maintained in laboratories worldwide since then, PAO1 may have questionable relevance to CF.

In this study we have obtained fresh isolates of P. aeruginosa from the sputum of CF patients, subsequently named PASS1-4, and compared them with each other and with the model laboratory strain PAO1. The study aimed to identify specific adaptations developed by P. aeruginosa during chronic infection of CF lungs with an overarching aim of better understanding the mechanisms that render P. aeruginosa a successful CF lung colonizer. Significant differences were observed in genomes and phenomes amongst the CF isolates reflecting varying adaptation paths. At the same time, the CF isolates shared a common proteomic signature that was remarkably distinct from the proteome of PAO1.

Our study highlights the limitations of using model organisms when examining the role of bacteria in the context of their natural host/environment. Isolates from hosts/environments of interest may have developed specific adaptations that may not be present in model strains, or may have been lost during prolonged cultivation. Understanding these adaptations would be crucial for the successful treatment of infections caused by pathogens; therefore, the use of freshly obtained isolates is an important adjunct to work on model strains.

Materials and Methods

Strains used in this study

P. aeruginosa isolates PASS1-4 were previously obtained from the sputum of adult CF patients: PASS1 was obtained from a 40-year old female patient, PASS2 –from a 27-year old male, PASS3 –from a 23 year old male and PASS4 –from a 23-year old female [9]. Strains PASS1-4, as well as P. aeruginosa PAO1, were maintained in stock in -80°C freezer and grown on Luria Bertani (LB) solid or liquid media whenever needed unless otherwise stated, allowing minimal passaging before the assays.

Genome sequencing, assembly and comparative genomics

DNA was isolated from P. aeruginosa strains using the Invitrogen PureLink Genomic DNA kit and sequenced at the Ramaciotti Centre for Gene Function Analysis (UNSW, Sydney) on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. Sequence data was assessed for quality using FastQC (Babraham Bioinformatics) and assembled de novo using the VELVET algorithm [10]. Genome assembly quality and statistics were further evaluated using QUAST [11].

Genome sequencing data for strains PASS1-4 have been deposited to the NCBI Whole Genome Shotgun (WGS) database and are accessible under BioProject ID numbers PRJNA295120, PRJNA295121, PRJNA295122 and PRJNA295123 respectively (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject).

The phylogenetic relationship of PASS1-4 strains to other P. aeruginosa strains in the MLST database (http://pubmlst.org/paeruginosa) was inferred via maximum likelihood analysis using the Arb software package [12]. The phylogenetic analysis was based on concatenated nucleotide sequences of seven genes utilized in the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of P. aeruginosa. These included acsA (acetyl coenzyme A synthetase), aroE (shikimate dehydrogenase), guaA (GMP synthase), mutL (DNA mismatch repair protein), nuoD (NADH dehydrogenase I chain C, D), ppsA (phosphoenolpyruvate synthase), trpE (anthralite synthetase component I). Further analysis has been performed by assigning a number to each distinct allele within a locus according to the number available in the P. aeruginosa MLST database. As a result, each isolate was given up to seven numbers that represented its strain type. Any strain type that did not have a match in the existing database was designated as a “new” type.

Multiple genome alignments were performed using BRIG [13] and MAUVE [14] software.

Reciprocal similarity searches of all predicted and expressed proteins were performed using BLAST algorithm [15], as well as Proteinortho5 tool [16] followed by the visualization of results using FriPan (http://www.vicbioinformatics.com/software.fripan.shtml).

Carbon source utilization

Carbon source utilization was assessed by growing bacteria in M9 minimal medium (Sigma) with the addition of the substrate of interest as a sole carbon source, in biological triplicates. Cultures were incubated on a horizontal shaker for 48 hours at 37°C after which the growth was assessed.

Biofilm formation in flow cells

To assess formation of biofilms by P. aeruginosa, strains PASS1-4 and PAO1 were grown in continuous flow-cell system [17] in LB medium at 37°C for 48 hours and biofilms formed on the surface of coverslips were imaged using Olympus FV1000 Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy (LSCM) System after staining with the BacLight Live/Dead stain (Molecular Probes). Three-dimensional rendering of LSCM images and the subsequent quantification were performed using the Imaris software (Bitplane). Quadruplicate images were used in the quantitative assessment of LSCM images of each sample; these included two independent flow cell chambers that were inoculated from separate culture stocks, and two distant fields of view in each chamber.

Binding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to mucin

P. aeruginosa isolates were cultured in 10 ml of LB broth at 37°C for 8 hours with shaking at 185 rpm. Bacterial cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 3000 x g for 5 min, washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and then fluorescently labelled by resuspension in 1 ml of PBS with SYBR® Green (0.1% w/v, Sigma) for 3 min. Labelled cells were collected by centrifugation at 3000 x g for 3 mins, and then washed thrice in PBS to remove residual dye. Meanwhile, PVDF membranes were placed into the wells of a 96-well microtiter plate and activated by soaking in methanol followed by washing three times in PBS. Fifty microliters of 1 mg/ml porcine gastric mucin (PGM, Sigma) were added into each well containing a PVDF membrane. Bacteria were resuspended in PBS to an OD600 = 1.0, applied to the wells of 96-well microplate containing the mucin-coated PVDF membranes and incubated for 30 minutes while slowly shaking at 100 rpm at RT. Unbound bacteria were washed off the membrane three times with PBS and the attached bacteria were fluorescently measured (Ex 485nm, Em 520nm) using a Fluorostar Galaxy plate reader (BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany). Wells containing immobilised mucin (no bacteria applied) were used as a negative control. The binding to the mucin by the different bacterial strains was normalized against the maximum bacterial binding measured on each plate.

Flagella mediated motility

Flagella mediated motility was assayed by point inoculation of LB plates containing 0.3% (w/v) agar as previously described [18]; zone sizes were observed after 48 hours of incubation at 37°C. The assay was performed in biological triplicates.

Virulence against the nematode eukaryotic model Caenorhabditis elegans

To assess toxicity against the nematode C. elegans, a selective grazing assay was performed as previously described [19]. Briefly, all strains of P. aeruginosa were spotted from frozen stock cultures on a single LB agar plate, followed by incubation at 37°C for 4 days. At day 4, 5 μl of M9 medium with four to five L4-stage nematodes were added next to each colony. The plates were stored at room temperature and checked daily. A strain was considered positive if the colony was not grazed after 14 days of incubation with C. elegans, across all three biological replicates. The assay was performed in three biological replicates.

Assessment of phenazine production

Phenazine compounds were extracted from P. aeruginosa cultures (in biological triplicates) after 40 hours of growth in LB broth, at 37°C with shaking. Two millilitres of chloroform were added to 5 ml of culture and incubated with shaking for 20 minutes. Chloroform fractions were collected, dried under reduced pressure and dissolved in 80% v/v acetonitrile in 25 mM ammonium acetate. Filtered samples were applied to the Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 Rapid Resolution column (Agilent, 2.1 x 50 mm, 1.8 micron) and analysed using the Infinity 1290 Ultra High Performace Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) instrument equipped with the Infinity 1290 photodiode array detector (Agilent). The separation program was adopted for UHPLC based on the previously published protocol [20]. The solvent flow rate was 0.5 ml/min and consisted of 0.25 minutes of 8% v/v acetonitrile–25 mM ammonium acetate, followed by a 3-min linear gradient to 80% v/v acetonitrile–25 mM ammonium acetate. UHPLC gradient profiles were monitored at spectral peak maxima of 257.0 and 313.0 nm.

Pyoverdine production

Pyoverdine production was assessed by growing strains on iron-limited King’s medium at 37°C for 40 hours, in biological triplicates, followed by visualization of pyoverdine under UV light, as previously described [21].

Protein extraction for proteomics

Overnight cultures of P. aeruginosa strains (PAO1, PASS1, PASS2, PASS3 and PASS4) in LB broth, in biological triplicates, were inoculated into fresh LB broth and grown to mid-logarithmic phase with incubation at 37°C and shaking at 200 rpm. Cells were collected by centrifugation at 2500 x g for 10 min at 4°C and washed thrice with PBS, pH 7.4. The cell pellet (~ 0.5g) was weighed and resuspended in 0.5ml of PBS (pH 7.4) containing complete protease inhibitor cocktail (EDTA-free, Roche), benzonase (1:100 v/v, Sigma) and equal amounts of acid washed glass beads (Sigma Aldrich). Cells were lysed by bead-beating thrice at 4.5 Throw for 20 seconds using a FastPrep FP120 bead-beater apparatus (Savant) with 10 min breaks on ice. Cell debris and unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 2500 x g for 8 min at 4°C. Proteins in the supernatant were precipitated by the addition of ice-cold acetone in the ratio of 1:9 (v/v) and incubated overnight at -20°C followed by centrifugation at 2500 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The pellet was washed twice and resuspended in 1% (w/v) SDS in deionized water. Total protein content was measured using Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific).

1D SDS-PAGE and in-gel digestion

Thirty micrograms of protein from each sample was diluted using NuPAGE Laemmli loading buffer (Life Technologies) containing 50 mM DTT and denatured at 95°C for 5 min. Samples were spun down and loaded into a NuPAGE (4–12% T Bis-Tris) precast ready gel. Electrophoresis was performed using NuPAGE MOPS SDS running buffer to run the sample 10 mm into the gel. After electrophoresis the gels were stained with colloidal Coomassie blue (Sigma Aldrich) and the band was cut into 1 mm3 cubes and transferred into 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes to perform in-gel tryptic digestion.

Trypsin in-gel digestion and peptide extraction were performed as previously described [22]. Briefly, gel bands were destained using acetonitrile (ACN) and 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate (ABC) in the 1:1 ratio, followed by reduction with 10 mM DTT prepared in 100 mM ABC at 56°C for 30 min and alkylation with 55 mM iodoacetamide prepared in 100 mM ABC for 20 min in the dark. The gel plugs were washed twice with ACN, with 5 minutes of incubation during each wash. The gel plugs were subsequently dried in a vacuum centrifuge, and digested overnight with sequencing-grade modified trypsin (Promega) in the ratio 1:30 at 37°C. Products of digestion were collected in 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes and combined with extracts from a consecutive extraction with ACN and 5% (v/v) formic acid at 37°C for 30 min. The total extract was then concentrated in a vacuum centrifuge and reconstituted with loading buffer (2% v/v ACN, 0.1% v/v FA) for mass spectrometry.

Mass spectrometry

Peptides were analysed using a data-independent acquisition method known as SWATH-MS [23]. Five spectral ion libraries were generated, one for each strain by pooling biological replicates and separating the peptides into five salt fractions by online strong cation exchange chromatography (SCX) These libraries were later used for proteomics data analysis. Fractionated samples were analysed using a nanoLC ultra 2D cHiPLC system (Eksigent, part of SCIEX) in conjunction with a TripleTOF® 5600 (ABSciex) using positive nanoflow electrospray analysis and an information-dependent acquisition (IDA) mode. In data dependent MS/MS acquisition 20 most intense m/z values exceeding a threshold > 150 counts per second (cps) with charge stages between 2+ and 4+ were selected for analysis following a full MS survey scan and excluded for 20 sec to minimize redundant precursor sampling.

For SWATH-MS, each biological triplicate was analyzed within a 60 min increasing ACN RP gradient (5% to 45% using 90% v/v ACN 0.1% v/v FA) using 60 variable window m/z ranges (400–1250 m/z) selected based on intensity distribution of precursor m/z in the IDA data sets. Collision energies were calculated for 2+ precursors with m/z values of lowest m/z in window + 5 m/z and a collision energy spread of 5 eV was used.

Protein identification

Spectral libraries for SWATH-MS quantitation were generated with ProteinPilotTM software 4.2 using the ParagonTM algorithm (ABSciex) thorough ID mode including biological modifications [23]. MS/MS data were searched against the Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO1 protein sequence database retrieved from GenBank (January 2013) and Pseudomonas Genome Database (www.pseudomonas.com) [24] and in-silico translated genome databases of PASS1-4 strains. Carbamidomethylation of Cys residues was selected as a fixed modification. An Unused Score cut-off was set to 2.0 (99% confidence), equivalent to a protein false discovery rate (FDR) < 1%.

Proteomic data analysis

Generated protein libraries for each strain were imported into PeakViewTM software 2.1 using the SWATH MicroApp 2.0 (release 27 November 2013) and matched against SWATH-MS data for each individual replicate. After retention time calibration with endogenous peptides, data were processed using the following settings; a maximum of 100 peptides per protein, maximal 6 transitions per peptide, peptide confidence threshold of 60%, transition FDR < 1%, 10 min extraction window and fragment extraction tolerance of 75 ppm.

Expressed proteins were determined by comparing summed protein areas from extracted ion chromatograms between PAO1 and PASS1-4 strains to identify those with a +/- 5-fold change and ANOVA p < 0.01.

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository [25] with the dataset identifier PXD002865.

In order to reveal similarities and differences in the proteomics profiles of P. aeruginosa strains tested, the reciprocal Blast searches and orthologue analyses were performed as was previously described for the predicted proteome.

Proteins identified as being expressed by P. aeruginosa strains during the growth in LB medium were mapped onto the P. aeruginosa PAO1 curated database in BioCyc [26] and metabolic pathways visualized using the Pathway Tools 17.5 cellular overview diagram and Omics Viewer [27].

Results and Discussion

Colony morphology of isolated CF strains

Four P. aeruginosa isolates were obtained from the sputum of CF patients at the Westmead Hospital (Sydney, Australia) and were minimally passaged. Isolates displayed significant diversity in their colony morphology: PASS1 formed pale-green non-mucoid colonies when grown on LB agar, PASS2 –light brown non-mucoid colonies, PASS3 –mainly white mucoid colonies and PASS4 –dark green-blue non-mucoid colonies.

Whole genome sequencing and phylogeny

De novo assembly of the sequencing reads obtained from Illumina HiSeq platform yielded draft genomes as per Table 1. Strain PASS3 was found to have the largest genome, and PASS2 genome was the smallest. Based on the MLST phylogeny, strains PASS1 and PASS3 were found to have an identical MLST sequence, while PASS2 and PASS4 were in different MLST clusters distinct from PASS1, PASS3 and PAO1 (Fig 2). Consistent with their isolation source, all CF isolates (PASS1-4) clustered with other Australian sputum isolates, while PAO1 was closely related to a more diverse set of isolates from various sources, including tissue infection strains.

thumbnail
Fig 2. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree generated using concatenated sequences of MLST genes in P. aeruginosa.

Isolates mentioned in this study are shown in bold; all the other closely related MLST sequences are retrieved from P. aeruginosa PubMLST database (http://pubmlst.org/paeruginosa). P. aeruginosa PA14 is used as an outgroup. The scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per nucleotide position.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.g002

Comparative genomics and the analysis of predicted proteins

Multiple genome alignments using BRIG [13] and MAUVE [14] tools show extensive gene conservation and synteny between PAO1 and the PASS1-4 genomes (Fig 3). The analysis of strain PASS2 draft genome also revealed an absence of a ~ 160 kB genomic region corresponding to the nucleotide positions between 2439150 and 2602350 in the PAO1 genome and containing genes with locus tags PA2218-PA2354 (Fig 3). This region, absent in PASS2, contains a number of potential virulence and colonization determinants, including the psl cluster of genes responsible for the production of biofilm matrix component Psl, as well as genes encoding chitinase and those involved in biosynthesis of L-2-amino-4-methoxy-trans-3-butenoic acid (AMB) toxin (Fig 3). This may represent an adaptation to the CF lung via genome reduction and the loss of several virulence factors. Decreased virulence has been previously described among the characteristics of P. aeruginosa isolates from chronic lung infections as a way of minimizing the host immune response and limiting bacterial resource expenditure [28]. A similar large deletion of ~ 180 kB spanning from PA2272 to PA2410 has been previously reported in a different CF isolate [29].

thumbnail
Fig 3. Circular representation of P. aeruginosa PASS1-4 draft genomes aligned against the reference genome of PAO1, generated using BRIG software.

The two innermost circles represent the GC Content and the GC Skew respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.g003

BLAST searches of predicted proteins of PASS1-4 strains and the standard laboratory strain PAO1 revealed 4676 shared protein sequences between all 5 strains (Fig 4C). Ortholog analysis of all predicted proteins performed using Proteinortho5, followed by visualization of results via FriPan demonstrated distinct clustering of PAO1 at a significant distance from CF isolates PASS1-4. Interestingly, significant differences were also observed among PASS1-4 strains, i.e. PASS1 and PASS3 showed high degree of similarity, while PASS2 and PASS4 clustered together with a lower level of similarity (Fig 4A and 4B), in agreement with the MLST phylogeny (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Comparison of predicted and expressed proteins in CF isolates PASS1-4 and the reference strain PAO1.

The 2-dimensional plot (A) and clustering representation (B) of all predicted proteins of corresponding strains analysed via Proteinortho and FriPan software; (C)–Venn diagram representing the results of reciprocal BLAST searches of all predicted proteins in corresponding strains. The 2-dimensional plot (D) and clustering representation (E) of all expressed proteins of corresponding strains as assessed by proteomics and analysed via Proteinortho and FriPan software; (F)–Venn diagram representing the results of reciprocal BLAST searches of expressed proteins detected via proteomics; the number of proteins uniquely expressed by PAO1 is shown in blue, the number of proteins shared by PASS1-4 and not expressed by PAO1 is in red.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.g004

Carbon source utilization

Genomic analysis revealed that PASS2 lacks genes essential for the utilization of various carbon sources. Many of these genes were located in the ~160 kB region of DNA absent in strain PASS2. These include genes involved in transport and catabolism of mannitol (PA2337-PA2344); the bkd operon for utilization of valine, leucine and isoleucine; and genes involved in the utilization of gluconate and glycerol (PA2321-2322 and PA2352 respectively). Minimal media growth experiments confirmed that PASS2 was unable to grow in the minimal medium in the presence of the above-mentioned compounds as sole carbon sources (data not shown).

Biofilm formation

Biofilm formation in flow chambers highlighted differences in the biofilm forming ability and biofilm architecture of the P. aeruginosa strains. PASS1, PASS3 and PASS4 were shown to form thicker biofilms compared to PAO1 (Fig 5A and 5B). Conversely, strain PASS2 was not able to form a biofilm on the surface of glass coverslips in the flow chambers. This is likely due to the loss of the psl cluster of genes responsible for the biosynthesis of exopolysacharide Psl located within the PA2218-PA2354 region absent in this strain (Fig 3). Psl is one of the major exopolysaccharides involved in the formation of biofilm matrix in P. aeruginosa, along with alginate and Pel. Non-mucoid strains, such as PASS2, primarily utilize either the Psl or Pel polysaccharides for biofilm formation [30, 31]. Previous mutational analyses demonstrated that Psl plays an important role in surface attachment for most isolates and the Psl deficiency often leads to the lack of biofilm formation [30].

thumbnail
Fig 5. (A) Representative images of biofilms formed in flow cells by strains PASS1-4 and PAO1 after 48 hours of growth in LB medium at 37°C. (B) Quantitative analysis of quadruplicate LSCM images (derived from two independent flow cell chambers that were inoculated from separate overnight cultures, and two distant fields of view in each chamber) was performed using Imaris software.

Images were taken using Olympus FV1000 confocal laser-scanning microscopy (LSCM) system, 3D pictures were built using Imaris software package (Bitplane). Cells are stained using BacLight Live/Dead stain (Molecular Probes); live cells are presented in green, dead cells—in red. Scale bars on LSCM images represent 50 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.g005

Extracellular substances like exopolysaccharide Psl, are often regarded as “public goods” as they can benefit the overall population and not only the single producer strain [32]. Production of such metabolites is often metabolically expensive. This inevitably leads to the emergence of “social cheaters”–phenotypes that do not produce certain public goods, and, therefore, do not bear the cost of their production, but still benefit from metabolites produced by other members of the community [33, 34]. Hence, it is possible that strain PASS2 may have evolved as a “cheater” phenotype and may still be able to form biofilms in the mixed communities with other strains present in the CF lung, benefiting from Psl produced by other strains. PASS2 was the only P. aeruginosa strain isolated from that particular CF patient, so it is not possible to directly investigate this “cheater” hypothesis.

Flagella and pili

Flagella and pili are important factors in biofilm formation, especially in the initial stages of attachment. Thus, flagella, besides being motility organelles, also play a direct role in virulence as major antigenic determinants for the immune response to P. aeruginosa infection [35]. PASS1, PASS3 and PAO1 shared a similar organization of flagellar biogenesis genes, while PASS2 and PASS4 showed distinct differences (S1A Fig). Based on the molecular weight and serological properties of flagellin, P. aeruginosa have been previously classified into two groups carrying A- and B- type flagellins [36, 37]. PASS1 and PASS3 share four genes orthologous to PA1088-PA1091 of PAO1, typical of B-type flagellins [38]. In contrast, the same region in PASS2 and PASS4 had a more complex polymorphic organisation characteristic of strains with a highly glycosylated and more heterogenous type A flagellin The duplication of the fliS gene observed in PASS2 and PASS4 was also characteristic for type A flagella [38].

It is largely accepted that glycosylation of flagellins is important for virulence and host specificity, however the precise physiological activity remains unclear [39, 40]. Strains PASS2 and PASS4 exhibited little or no flagellum-dependent swimming motility as opposed to PAO1, PASS1 and PASS3 (S1B Fig); whether this is a general feature of type A flagellin has yet to be elucidated.

Flagellar components have been shown to be important for adhesion to mucins [41]. Mucins are major macromolecular glycoprotein components of the mucus that line the surface of lung epithelium and that vary in their composition and bacterial adhesion properties in CF [42, 43]. Mucins are overproduced in the lungs of CF patients and binding of P. aeruginosa to lung epithelial mucins in CF has been previously reported [44]. The mucin-binding assay showed variations amongst the isolates, with PASS4 showing the highest level of binding to mucin. Notably, PASS2 binding to mucin was comparable to that of PASS3 (Fig 6) despite the decreased biofilm formation in flow cells (Fig 5A and 5B). This data suggests that adhesion to biological surfaces, such as to the mucins on the epithelium, is multifactorial and bacteria may employ various tools for attachment to surfaces that may allow them to at least partially compensate for a loss of another mechanism.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Binding of isolates PASS1-4 and PAO1 to porcine gastric mucine (PGM).

The Y-axis represents the binding to mucin by the different bacterial strains as arbitrary fluorescent units (FU) normalised against the maximum bacterial binding of PASS4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.g006

Bacterial type IV pili (T4P) have been extensively studied for their contribution to motility, biofilm formation and virulence [45]. T4P may, therefore, play a major role in the colonization, survival and virulence in the CF lung. Based on genomic context of T4P genes, pili are classified into groups I-V [46]. PAO1 has been shown to encode a group II pilin [46], this is also true for strains PASS1 and PASS3 based on our analyses, whereas strains PASS2 and PASS4 were found to encode group I pili. Interestingly, Kus et al. [46] have described the high prevalence of group I pili in isolates from CF patients, possibly representing a specific adaptation to the CF lung environment. Nevertheless, the significance and specific role of group I T4P in CF is currently unclear.

Phenazine production

Phenazines are secondary metabolites produced by a variety of bacteria, most notably pseudomonads, and have been studied intensively because of their broad-spectrum antibiotic properties and proven role in virulence. Many phenazine-producing bacteria are commonly found associated with host organisms [47]. The well-known phenazines produced by P. aeruginosa include phenazine-carboxylic acid (PCA), phenazine-carboxamide (PCN) and hydroxyl-phenazine (1-OH-PHZ), and especially pyocyanin (PYO). The latter is produced in concentrations close to 100 μmol/L during infection in CF [48, 49]; and its presence is associated with high morbidity and mortality in CF patients [50, 51].

Lau et al, using PYO-deficient mutants, have provided direct evidence that PYO is among the most potent virulence factors in the arsenal of P. aeruginosa. Mutants lacking PYO production were attenuated in their ability to infect mouse lungs in an acute pneumonia model of infection when compared with isogenic wild-type bacteria [52]. Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) analyses revealed that PASS2 and PASS3 did not produce detectable phenazines (Fig 7). This was confirmed in a Caenorhabditis elegans selective grazing assay, where PASS2 and PASS3 were completely grazed by nematodes, indicative of a less-toxic/less-virulent phenotype, whereas all other P. aeruginosa colonies remained intact (Fig 8). The activity of phenazines as anti-nematode compounds against C. elegans has been recently demonstrated [53]. Production of the phenazine carboxamide was not observed in the strain PASS4. There is no evidence for absence or a significant disruption of genes involved in the production and modification of phenazines in any of the PASS1-4 genomes.

thumbnail
Fig 7. Production of the phenazines phenazine-carboxylic acid (PCA), pyocyanin (PYO), phenazine-carboxamide (PCN) and hydroxyl-phenazine (1-OH-PHZ) as assessed by UHPLC.

The Y-axis represents arbitrary values based on chromatographic peak areas representative for each compound as observed at 257 nm, in logarithmic scale. Error bars represent standard deviations between three biological replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.g007

thumbnail
Fig 8. Nematode selective grazing assay using Caenorhabditis elegans.

A representative Petri dish with colonies of various P. aeruginosa isolates before C. elegans inoculation (A) and after the 2-week incubation with C. elegans (B). Colonies of isolates that have been completely grazed by nematodes, and, thus represent the less-toxic/less-virulent phenotypes, are shown in blue. Escherichia coli OP50 was used as a positive control for C. elegans grazing.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.g008

Production of pyoverdine

One of the main characteristics of fluorescent pseudomonads is the production a fluorescent yellow-green siderophore, pyoverdine, important for iron acquisition in low iron environments [54]. PASS2 and PASS4 did not produce pyoverdine on iron-limited King’s medium, while PASS3 showed only trace amounts of pyoverdine as compared to PAO1 and PASS1 based on a pyoverdine production assay (Fig 9).

thumbnail
Fig 9. Representative image showing the production of fluorescent siderophore pyoverdine as assessed under the UV light.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.g009

Genomic analysis revealed the loss of several genes in the pyoverdine biosynthesis pathway in both strains PASS2 and PASS4 including either complete or partial loss of genes orthologous to PA2398-PA2402 encoding the ferripyoverdine receptor FpvA, pyoverdine synthetase PvdD, protein PvdJ, and the peptide synthase, respectively; which would explain the lack of pyoverdine production in strains PASS 2 and PASS4. Longitudinal studies of CF patients have reported an increased occurrence of pyoverdine-negative isolates with chronic P. aeruginosa colonization [55, 56]. The increased availability of heme in CF lungs may select for the use of hemophores rather than siderophores by P. aeruginosa in the CF lung environment [56, 57].

The LasR quorum sensing (QS) regulator has a role in regulation of the production of virulence factors such as phenazines and pyoverdine, and lasR mutants have been frequently described among P. aeruginosa CF isolates [58, 59]. Sequence analysis of lasR in PASS1-4 strains revealed a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in PASS1 and a 6-nucleotide insertion in PASS2 (Table 2). The same SNP observed in PASS1 was also present in the lasR gene in PASS3, as well as an additional deletion leading to a frameshift error. The lasR gene in PASS4 was identical to that of PAO1. From this analysis, PASS1-2 strains may be attenuated in the LasR regulator, while PASS3 would most certainly be LasR deficient. This may explain the decreased pyoverdine production by PASS3, despite it carrying an intact pyoverdine biosynthetic gene cluster. The inability of PASS2 and PASS4 to produce pyoverdine is almost certainly due to the loss of several pyoverdine biosynthetic genes. The lack of phenazine production by PASS2 and PASS3 might be due to these two strains having the most severe mutations in the lasR regulator.

thumbnail
Table 2. Summary of mutations in the lasR regulator gene correlated with the observed production of phenazines (PCA, PYO, PCN, 1-OH-PHZ) and pyoverdine (PVD), and the integrity of the pyoverdine biosynthesis gene cluster.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.t002

The deficiency in lasR, in conjunction with the deficiency in the psl cluster of genes responsible for the production of a major exopolysaccharide, may aid to the lifestyle of PASS2 as a potential “social cheater”. LasR deficiency may further render PASS2 “deaf” to QS signals and, therefore, limit its response in production of various metabolically costly QS-controlled virulence factors and toxins benefiting the bacterial population [60, 61].

Other virulence factors

Several other virulence factor genes were missing in PASS2 and PASS4, compared to the genome of PAO1. The colicin-like pyocin S5 and its cognate immunity protein (encoded by PA0985 and PA0984 in PAO1 genome respectively), pyocin S4 (PA3866), a probable non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (PA2402), and phospholipase D (PA3487) were absent in both PASS2 and PASS4. In addition, PASS2 also lacks genes for the production of paerucumarin (PA2254-PA2257), chitinase (PA2300), and AMB toxin (PA2302-PA2306).

Distinct P. aeruginosa lifestyle strategies in the CF lung

Based on genomic and phenotypic comparisons the four CF isolates obtained directly from the sputum of CF patients revealed significant differences in lifestyle strategy. PASS2 and PASS4 shared some common features with the loss of various virulence determinants, and similar organization of their pili and flagellar loci. PASS2 showed significant genome reduction, with the loss of additional virulence factors, narrowing of potential carbon substrates that can be utilized and even significant reduction in biofilm forming capacity due to the lack of polysaccharide Psl production. The defect in the LasR QS regulator in PASS2 probably also impacts its virulence potential. These adaptations in PASS2 may limit the host immune response as well as reducing expenditure of cellular resources, possibly representing a passive, “cheater” strategy [28].

In contrast, based on the increased production of phenazines such as pyocyanin and increased biofilm forming capacity, isolates PASS1 and PASS4 (the latter even despite the loss of several other virulence genes) may have taken a different adaptation path by enhancing their virulence and colonization potential, possibly representing more aggressive phenotypes. The virulence of PASS1 and PASS4 was also demonstrated against the eukaryotic model C. elegans (Fig 8). The virulent phenotype of PASS4 in the C. elegans model, despite the clear loss of known virulence factors, highlights an issue in making virulence predictions based on genomic analyses alone.

PASS3 is closely related to PASS1 based on MLST and genomic comparisons, but differs significantly in phenotype. PASS3 displays low toxicity in the C. elegans model and is deficient in phenazine production, possibly as a result of mutations in lasR. However, PASS3 shows enhanced biofilm formation and conversion to a mucoid phenotype, which likely enhances its survival and persistence, and therefore may have adopted a more “defensive” strategy.

Table 3 summarizes the overall genetic and phenotypic differences observed between PASS1-4 strains and PAO1. The diversity seen amongst the CF isolates in this and previous studies [62, 63] suggests that there is no single preferred adaptation pathway for success in a CF lung.

thumbnail
Table 3. Summary of genomic and phenotypic characteristics of P. aeruginosa CF isolates PASS1-4 and the model strain PAO1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.t003

In order to enable researchers to broaden P. aeruginosa research beyond the limitations of model laboratory strains, recently a P. aeruginosa reference panel of 43 strains has been suggested, also based on the origin, in order to reflect its diversity [64]. Nevertheless, the diversity seen among our 4 isolates with each of these strains equipped with a unique set of defensive and offensive tools, suggests that differences that exist between strains that originate even from the same environment like CF can make it impossible to pinpoint a single phenotype/strain with a set of defined characteristics that would be representative for that environment.

CF isolates share a core proteomic signature distinct from PAO1

A shotgun proteomic analysis was undertaken to investigate protein expression profiles of the four clinical isolates and the model P. aeruginosa strain. There were striking differences in protein expression between the common laboratory model organism PAO1 and the CF isolates PASS1-4. With ~ 1300–1400 proteins identified for each of these organisms, only 526 were shared among all five, while PAO1 showed 827 unique proteins not detected in any of the CF isolates when cultured in a common laboratory medium LB. Conversely, PASS1-4 strains shared 703 commonly expressed proteins, none of which were detected in PAO1 (Fig 4F, S2 Table). This trend can also be seen on FriPan 2D plot where PAO1 appears at a considerable distance from PASS1-4 strains, while CF strains PASS1-4 among themselves retained the overall similarity profiles with PASS1 and PASS3, and PASS2 and PASS4 clustering together (Fig 4D and 4E), consistent with the overall pattern observed in bioinformatics analysis for all predicted proteins (Fig 4A and 4B).

The proteins uniquely expressed by PAO1 (827 in total) and those uniquely shared by PASS1-4 strains (703 in total), were mapped onto the metabolic pathways of PAO1 using Pathway Tools 17.5 (Fig 10, S2 and S3 Figs). The analysis revealed distinct differences in cell physiology between the CF strains and the model strain PAO1. PAO1 expressed an array of membrane transport proteins involved in the uptake of a broad range of amino acids, polyamines, carbohydrates and other organic nutrients, whose expression was not detected in any of the PASS1-4 strains. There was essentially no expression of biosynthetic genes involved in amino acid, polyamine, carbohydrates, nucleoside or nucleotide biosynthesis (Fig 10A, S2 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 10. Schematic metabolic overview showing differences in protein abundance between PAO1 (A) and the CF isolates PASS1-4 (B) as assessed via proteomics.

Shading represents the percentage of expressed proteins within each metabolic category. Assignment to metabolic categories is based on analysis using Pathway Tools [27]. Full details of the Pathway Tools analysis are shown in S2 and S3 Figs, and the full list of express proteins for each strain is provided in S2 Table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.g010

In contrast, PASS1-4 expressed only a small select group of transporters for compounds such as sugars, dipeptides, and heme. Instead the PASS1-4 strains expressed many proteins involved in biosynthetic pathways for compounds such as nucleosides and nucleotides, amino acids, carbohydrates and polyamines (Fig 10B, S3 Fig).

The proteomic data indicates that in a conventional laboratory medium PAO1 may transport a diverse set of “ready-made” nutrients from the rich LB medium, whereas CF isolates PASS1-4 require only a limited number of nutrients from the LB medium, relying mainly on their own metabolism for synthesis of other essential nutrients. Interestingly, despite dramatic differences in the proteins involved in biosynthesis, in general, the expression of proteins involved in the catabolism of various compound groups were similar. This might indicate that PAO1 and PASS1-4 strains all have access to a variety of compound classes, but, as mentioned above, may vary significantly in the means of obtaining these compounds: PAO1 –via transport, and PASS1-4 –via intracellular biosynthesis. This probably reflects specialization in the CF strains geared towards utilization of select types of nutrients that might be abundant in CF lungs, such as highly glycosylated mucins, and further highlights the preference for heme as a possible source of iron in CF isolates. Conversely, PAO1, having been grown and maintained in laboratories worldwide for decades, may have adapted to using the broad variety of nutrients present in common growth media, such as LB. The proteomics data reveals significant differences in the metabolic strategies of CF isolates compared with PAO1 and emphasises the limitations presented by the use of laboratory model organisms for studying processes in specific hosts or environments.

Concluding remarks

Significant phenotypic differences were observed amongst the P. aeruginosa CF isolates PASS1-4 including differences in traits important for successful CF lung colonization and survival. Phenotypic diversity has been previously shown among the P. aeruginosa CF isolates [62, 63], particularly with respect to the decreased virulence in chronic infections [6567]. While the classical reduction of virulence seen in many CF isolates was observed in PASS2, and the conversion to mucoid phenotype by PASS3, a more aggressive phenotype was shown by PASS1 and PASS4 with increased production of known virulence factors such as phenazines, and increased biofilm formation. This suggests that there is no single pathway of adaptation to an environment such as the CF lung; instead, strains acquire adaptations that allow them to pursue different lifestyles ranging from passive, defensive to aggressive. This makes it extremely difficult to predict the development of certain traits in a particular environment or host, and, hence, make assumptions for the suitable treatment strategies.

Relying on genomic data to make predictions about phenotypes can be problematic. In silico analysis of genomes of all 5 isolates in this study revealed a high degree of similarity between the strains with 80% of shared predicted proteome, which is in the range commonly observed for strains in the same species implying possible phenotypic similarities. However, actual protein expression by these strains grown in a common laboratory medium revealed dramatically different expression profiles suggesting distinct physiological and metabolic states that were not predictable at the genomic level via in silico analysis. This further highlights the limitations of model laboratory strains and the need to complement analyses in model organisms with direct experimental work on isolates from the relevant host or environment.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Genomic alignment of flagella biogenesis genes in strains PASS1-4 as compared to PAO1 using MAUVE.

Sequences conserved among all 5 isolates are presented in mauve, sequences shared between isolates PAO1, PASS1 and PASS3 are in green, sequences shared between isolates PASS2 and PASS4 are presented in blue (A). Flagella-mediated swimming motility assay for strains PASS1-4 and PAO1 (B).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Pathway Tools 17.5 cellular overview diagram showing proteins/pathways expressed uniquely by PAO1, in red.

The shapes on the diagram represent specific types of compounds as follows: square—carbohydrate, triangle—amino acid, upside down triangle—cofactor, ellipse (horizontal)—purine, ellipse (vertical)—pyrimidine, diamond—proteins, T-shape—tRNA, circle—all other compounds. The shading of the icon indicates the phosphorylation state of the compound: shaded compounds are phosphorylated; unshaded compounds are unphosphorylated. Shapes/paths located on outer rectangles represent transporters/membrane proteins. The arrows indicate the direction of the transport: pointing in—uptake, pointing out—export.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Pathway Tools 17.5 cellular overview diagram showing proteins/pathways expressed uniquely by PASS1-4 strains, in red.

The shapes on the diagram represent specific types of compounds as follows: square—carbohydrate, triangle—amino acid, upside down triangle—cofactor, ellipse (horizontal)—purine, ellipse (vertical)—pyrimidine, diamond—proteins, T-shape—tRNA, circle—all other compounds. The shading of the icon indicates the phosphorylation state of the compound: shaded compounds are phosphorylated; unshaded compounds are unphosphorylated. Shapes/paths located on outer rectangles represent transporters/membrane proteins. The arrows indicate the direction of the transport: pointing in—uptake, pointing out—export.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.s003

(TIF)

S1 Table. MLST allelic profiles and strain types of P. aeruginosa isolates obtained from the CF sputum in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.s004

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Proteins identified in strains PASS1-4 and PAO1 grown in LB medium via proteomics (p < 0.01).

+ protein identified in the strain culture (shaded),—protein not identified in the strain culture (unshaded), NA—protein does not have an ortholog in the PAO1 genome or did not map to an ortholog in PAO1 due to differences in the sequence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138527.s005

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Aspects of this research were facilitated by access to the Australian Proteome Analysis Facility supported by the Australian Government’s National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Scheme, and the Macquarie University Microscopy Unit.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AP SSK KK NHP MPM ITP. Performed the experiments: AP SSK KK AMS VV. Analyzed the data: AP SSK KK AMS CK ITP. Wrote the paper: AP SSK KK AMS CK NHP MPM ITP.

References

  1. 1. Burns JL, Gibson RL, McNamara S, Yim D, Emerson J, Rosenfeld M, et al. Longitudinal assessment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in young children with cystic fibrosis. J Infect Dis. 2001;183(3):444–52. pmid:11133376
  2. 2. Emerson J, Rosenfeld M, McNamara S, Ramsey B, Gibson RL. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other predictors of mortality and morbidity in young children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2002;34(2):91–100. pmid:12112774
  3. 3. Nixon GM, Armstrong DS, Carzino R, Carlin JB, Olinsky A, Robertson CF, et al. Clinical outcome after early Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2001;138(5):699–704. pmid:11343046
  4. 4. Callaghan M, McClean S. Bacterial host interactions in cystic fibrosis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2012;15(1):71–7. pmid:22137884
  5. 5. Naughton S, Parker D, Seemann T, Thomas T, Turnbull L, Rose B, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa AES-1 exhibits increased virulence gene expression during chronic infection of cystic fibrosis lung. PLoS One. 2011;6(9).
  6. 6. Hare NJ, Solis N, Harmer C, Marzook NB, Rose B, Harbour C, et al. Proteomic profiling of Pseudomonas aeruginosa AES-1R, PAO1 and PA14 reveals potential virulence determinants associated with a transmissible cystic fibrosis-associated strain. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12.
  7. 7. Stover CK, Pham XQ, Erwin AL, Mizoguchi SD, Warrener P, Hickey MJ, et al. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature. 2000;406(6799):959–64. pmid:10984043
  8. 8. Holloway BW. Genetic recombination in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Gen Microbiol. 1955;13(3):572–81. pmid:13278508
  9. 9. Thaysen-Andersen M, Venkatakrishnan V, Loke I, Laurini C, Diestel S, Parker BL, et al. Human neutrophils secrete bioactive paucimannosidic proteins from azurophilic granules into pathogen-infected sputum. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(14):8789–802. pmid:25645918
  10. 10. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18(5):821–9. pmid:18349386
  11. 11. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(8):1072–5. pmid:23422339
  12. 12. Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar A, et al. ARB: A software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(4):1363–71. pmid:14985472
  13. 13. Alikhan N, Petty NK, Ben Zakour NL, Beatson SA. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): Simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics. 2011;12.
  14. 14. Darling ACE, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004;14(7):1394–403. pmid:15231754
  15. 15. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–10. pmid:2231712
  16. 16. Lechner M, Findeiß S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF, Prohaska SJ. Proteinortho: Detection of (Co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12.
  17. 17. Christensen BB, Sternberg C, Andersen JB, Palmer RJ Jr, Nielsen AT, Givskov M, et al. Molecular tools for study of biofilm physiology. Methods Enzymol. 1999;310:20–42. pmid:10547780
  18. 18. Murray TS, Kazmierczak BI. Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibits sliding motility in the absence of type IV pili and flagella. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(8):2700–8. pmid:18065549
  19. 19. Ballestriero F, Thomas T, Burke C, Egan S, Kjelleberg S. Identification of compounds with bioactivity against the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans by a screen based on the functional genomics of the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas tunicata D2. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(17):5710–7. pmid:20601498
  20. 20. Mavrodi DV, Bonsall RF, Delaney SM, Soule MJ, Phillips G, Thomashow LS. Functional analysis of genes for biosynthesis of pyocyanin and phenazine-1-carboxamide from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(21):6454–65. pmid:11591691
  21. 21. Owen JG, Ackerley DF. Characterization of pyoverdine and achromobactin in Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola 1448a. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11.
  22. 22. Shevchenko A, Tomas H, Havlis J, Olsen JV, Mann M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(6):2856–60. Epub 2007/04/05. pmid:17406544.
  23. 23. Gillet LC, Navarro P, Tate S, Röst H, Selevsek N, Reiter L, et al. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: A new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11(6).
  24. 24. Winsor GL, Lam DK, Fleming L, Lo R, Whiteside MD, Yu NY, et al. Pseudomonas Genome Database: improved comparative analysis and population genomics capability for Pseudomonas genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database issue):D596–600. Epub 2010/10/12. pmid:20929876; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3013766.
  25. 25. Vizcaino JA, Deutsch EW, Wang R, Csordas A, Reisinger F, Rios D, et al. ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(3):223–6. Epub 2014/04/15. pmid:24727771; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3986813.
  26. 26. Caspi R, Altman T, Billington R, Dreher K, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(D1):D459–D71.
  27. 27. Paley SM, Karp PD. The Pathway Tools cellular overview diagram and Omics Viewer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(13):3771–8. pmid:16893960
  28. 28. Bragonzi A, Cigana C, Lorè NI, Bernardini ML. Dampening host sensing and avoiding recognition in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:852513. pmid:21785567
  29. 29. Smith EE, Buckley DG, Wu Z, Saenphimmachak C, Hoffman LR, D'Argenio DA, et al. Genetic adaptation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(22):8487–92. pmid:16687478
  30. 30. Colvin KM, Irie Y, Tart CS, Urbano R, Whitney JC, Ryder C, et al. The Pel and Psl polysaccharides provide Pseudomonas aeruginosa structural redundancy within the biofilm matrix. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14(8):1913–28. pmid:22176658
  31. 31. Wozniak DJ, Wyckoff TJO, Starkey M, Keyser R, Azadi P, O'Toole GA, et al. Alginate is not a significant component of the extracellular polysaccharide matrix of PA14 and PAO1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(13):7907–12. pmid:12810959
  32. 32. West SA, Diggle SP, Buckling A, Gardner A, Griffin AS. The social lives of microbes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2007;38:53–77.
  33. 33. West SA, Griffin AS, Gardner A, Diggle SP. Social evolution theory for microorganisms. Nat Rev Micro. 2006;4(8):597–607. http://www.nature.com/nrmicro/journal/v4/n8/suppinfo/nrmicro1461_S1.html.
  34. 34. Griffin AS, West SA, Buckling A. Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria. Nature. 2004;430(7003):1024–7. pmid:15329720
  35. 35. Drake D, Montie TC. Flagella, motility and invasive virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Gen Microbiol. 1988;134(1):43–52. pmid:3141566
  36. 36. Lanyi B. Serological properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. II. Type-specific thermolabile (flagellar) antigens. Acta Microbiol Acad Sci Hung. 1970;17(1):35–48. Epub 1970/01/01. pmid:4990318.
  37. 37. Allison JS, Dawson M, Drake D, Montie TC. Electrophoretic separation and molecular weight characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa H-antigen flagellins. Infect Immun. 1985;49(3):770–4. pmid:3928494
  38. 38. Arora SK, Bangera M, Lory S, Ramphal R. A genomic island in Pseudomonas aeruginosa carries the determinants of flagellin glycosylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(16):9342–7. pmid:11481492
  39. 39. Takeuchi K, Taguchi F, Inagaki Y, Toyoda K, Shiraishi T, Ichinose Y. Flagellin glycosylation island in Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea and Its role in host specificity. J Bacteriol. 2003;185(22):6658–65. pmid:14594840
  40. 40. Merino S, Tomás JM. Gram-negative flagella glycosylation. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(2):2840–57. pmid:24557579
  41. 41. Arora SK, Ritchings BW, Almira EC, Lory S, Ramphal R. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa flagellar cap protein, FliD, is responsible for mucin adhesion. Infect Immun. 1998;66(3):1000–7. Epub 1998/03/06. pmid:9488388; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC108008.
  42. 42. Schulz BL, Sloane AJ, Robinson LJ, Prasad SS, Lindner RA, Robinson M, et al. Glycosylation of sputum mucins is altered in cystic fibrosis patients. Glycobiology. 2007;17(7):698–712. pmid:17392389
  43. 43. Venkatakrishnan V, Packer NH, Thaysen-Andersen M. Host mucin glycosylation plays a role in bacterial adhesion in lungs of individuals with cystic fibrosis. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2013;7(5):553–76. pmid:24138697
  44. 44. Sajjan U, Reisman J, Doig P, Irvin RT, Forstner G, Forstner J. Binding of nonmucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa to normal human intestinal mucin and respiratory mucin from patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 1992;89(2):657–65. Epub 1992/02/01. pmid:1737853; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC442899.
  45. 45. Burrows LL. Pseudomonas aeruginosa twitching motility: Type IV pili in action. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66:493–520. pmid:22746331
  46. 46. Kus JV, Tullis E, Cvitkovitch DG, Burrows LR. Significant differences in type IV pilin allele distribution among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis (CF) versus non-CF patients. Microbiology. 2004;150(5):1315–26.
  47. 47. Pierson Iii LS, Pierson EA. Metabolism and function of phenazines in bacteria: Impacts on the behavior of bacteria in the environment and biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86(6):1659–70. pmid:20352425
  48. 48. Caldwell CC, Chen Y, Goetzmann HS, Hao Y, Borchers MT, Hassett DJ, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin pyocyanin causes cystic fibrosis airway pathogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2009;175(6):2473–88. pmid:19893030
  49. 49. Wilson R, Sykes DA, Watson D, Rutman A, Taylor GW, Cole PJ. Measurement of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phenazine pigments in sputum and assessment of their contribution to sputum sol toxicity for respiratory epithelium. Infect Immun. 1988;56(9):2515–7. pmid:3137173
  50. 50. Courtney JM, Bradley J, McCaughan J, O'Connor TM, Shortt C, Bredin CP, et al. Predictors of mortality in adults with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007;42(6):525–32. pmid:17469153
  51. 51. Murray TS, Egan M, Kazmierczak BI. Pseudomonas aeruginosa chronic colonization in cystic fibrosis patients. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2007;19(1):83–8. pmid:17224667
  52. 52. Lau GW, Ran H, Kong F, Hassett DJ, Mavrodi D. Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyocyanin is critical for lung infection in mice. Infect Immun. 2004;72(7):4275–8. pmid:15213173
  53. 53. Cezairliyan B, Vinayavekhin N, Grenfell-Lee D, Yuen GJ, Saghatelian A, Ausubel FM. Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phenazines that kill Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(1).
  54. 54. Meyer JM. Proverdines: Pigments, siderophores and potential taxonomic markers of fluorescent pseudomonas species. Arch Microbiol. 2000;174(3):135–42. pmid:11041343
  55. 55. De Vos D, De Chial M, Cochez C, Jansen S, Tümmler B, Meyer JM, et al. Study of pyoverdine type and production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients: Prevalence of type II pyoverdine isolates and accumulation of pyoverdine-negative mutations. Arch Microbiol. 2001;175(5):384–8. pmid:11409549
  56. 56. Nguyen AT, O'Neill MJ, Watts AM, Robson CL, Lamont IL, Wilks A, et al. Adaptation of iron homeostasis pathways by a Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyoverdine mutant in the cystic fibrosis lung. J Bacteriol. 2014;196(12):2265–76. pmid:24727222
  57. 57. Konings AF, Martin LW, Sharples KJ, Roddam LF, Latham R, Reid DW, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa uses multiple pathways to acquire iron during chronic infection in cystic fibrosis lungs. Infect Immun. 2013;81(8):2697–704. PMC3719594. pmid:23690396
  58. 58. D'Argenio DA, Wu M, Hoffman LR, Kulasekara HD, Déziel E, Smith EE, et al. Growth phenotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR mutants adapted to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Mol Microbiol. 2007;64(2):512–33. pmid:17493132
  59. 59. Stintzi A, Evans K, Meyer JM, Poole K. Quorum-sensing and siderophore biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: LasR/lasI mutants exhibit reduced pyoverdine biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998;166(2):341–5. pmid:9770291
  60. 60. Wang M, Schaefer AL, Dandekar AA, Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing and policing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa social cheaters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(7):2187–91. pmid:25646454
  61. 61. Czárán T, Hoekstra RF. Microbial communication, cooperation and cheating: Quorum sensing drives the evolution of cooperation in bacteria. PLoS One. 2009;4(8):e6655. pmid:19684853
  62. 62. Mowat E, Paterson S, Fothergill JL, Wright EA, Ledson MJ, Walshaw MJ, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa population diversity and turnover in cystic fibrosis chronic infections. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(12):1674–9. pmid:21297072
  63. 63. Workentine ML, Sibley CD, Glezerson B, Purighalla S, Norgaard-Gron JC, Parkins MD, et al. Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Populations in a Cystic Fibrosis Patient. PLoS One. 2013;8(4).
  64. 64. De Soyza A, Hall AJ, Mahenthiralingam E, Drevinek P, Kaca W, Drulis-Kawa Z, et al. Developing an international Pseudomonas aeruginosa reference panel. MicrobiologyOpen. 2013;2(6):1010–23. pmid:24214409
  65. 65. Bradbury RS, Reid DWEC, Inglis TJJ, Champion AC. Decreased virulence of cystic fibrosis Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Dictyostelium discoideum. Microbiol Immunol. 2011;55(4):224–30. pmid:21272061
  66. 66. Jeukens J, Boyle B, Kukavica-Ibrulj I, Ouellet MM, Aaron SD, Charette SJ, et al. Comparative genomics of isolates of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic strain associated with chronic lung infections of cystic fibrosis patients. PLoS One. 2014;9(2).
  67. 67. Lelong E, Marchetti A, Simon M, Burns JL, van Delden C, Köhler T, et al. Evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence in infected patients revealed in a Dictyostelium discoideum host model. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(9):1415–20. pmid:21091830