Figures
Abstract
Rolling circle amplification (RCA) generates single-stranded DNAs or RNA, and the diverse applications of this isothermal technique range from the sensitive detection of nucleic acids to analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Microwave chemistry is widely applied to increase reaction rate as well as product yield and purity. The objectives of the present research were to apply microwave heating to RCA and indicate factors that contribute to the microwave selective heating effect. The microwave reaction temperature was strictly controlled using a microwave applicator optimized for enzymatic-scale reactions. Here, we showed that microwave-assisted RCA reactions catalyzed by either of the four thermostable DNA polymerases were accelerated over 4-folds compared with conventional RCA. Furthermore, the temperatures of the individual buffer components were specifically influenced by microwave heating. We concluded that microwave heating accelerated isothermal RCA of DNA because of the differential heating mechanisms of microwaves on the temperatures of reaction components, although the overall reaction temperatures were the same.
Citation: Yoshimura T, Suzuki T, Mineki S, Ohuchi S (2015) Controlled Microwave Heating Accelerates Rolling Circle Amplification. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0136532. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136532
Editor: Shuang-yong Xu, New England Biolabs, Inc., UNITED STATES
Received: January 27, 2015; Accepted: August 4, 2015; Published: September 8, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Yoshimura et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by the Japan Society of the Promotion of Science, a Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research [23655146]; http://www.jsps.go.jp/english/index.html.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Rolling circle amplification (RCA), which is based on the mechanism of the replication of viral genomes, is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification technique that uses two primers, a circularized template and a DNA polymerase with strand displacement activity [1–5]. RCA efficiently synthesizes many copies of repeated sequences from circular DNA and RNA templates (Fig 1). Moreover, it detects single nucleotide polymorphisms using a circularized DNA probe called a padlock probe as well as efficiently amplifying bacterial genomes by a hyper-branch method [6–10]. Isothermal DNA polymerization has various application possibilities [11–14]. Microwave heating technology is applied to organic and inorganic chemistry using a microwave generator to produce useful effects such as rapid heating, decreased reaction times, and improved product yield and purity[15–18]. The microwave effect is debated to be the “Thermal-effect,” “Non-thermal effect,” and “Specific microwave effect (superheating or selectivity heating)”[19, 20]. One of the mechanisms of microwave heating in organic chemistry involves heating a low molecular weight compound with a dipole polarization and an ionic conduction. Enzymatic reactions (in the fields of proteomics, pretreatment, degradation, chemical synthesis, and optical resolution) are performed using microwave heating [21–25]. Published studies on PCR using microwave heating (microwave-assisted PCR, MW-PCR) show that amplicon synthesis is inefficient, large reaction volumes are required, and temperature is difficult to control or measure [26]. We reasoned that these problems may be attributed to the use of three temperatures (for annealing, elongation, and denaturation) in the MW-PRC method that are not precisely controlled by microwave heating. Temperature measurement under microwave irradiation is a matter of importance [27, 28]. For strict temperature control by microwave irradiation, a gene amplification study using microwave was reported in Milliliter-scale PCR [29]. Microwave device with several frequencies for PCR is developed to accurately control temperature [30, 31]. In contrast, RCA does not require complex temperature control compared with conventional PCR methods, and isothermal conditions are appropriate for controlling microwave heating. In our previous study, we reported the microwave-assisted RCA for the first time using a multi-mode microwave generator[32], but the reproducibility was difficult. We developed a novel single mode resonant cavity microwave generator with fiber-optic probe to improve accurate temperature measurement and reproducibility. Further, this applicator can be used by a conventional PCR-scale (50–100 μL). MW-RCA was performed using a circular DNA template and four thermostable DNA polymerases with strand displacement activity. We focused on microwave selectivity heating, which is one of the features of microwave heating. Microwave selectivity heating is thought to alter molecular motion state compared with conventional heating when the reaction temperature is the same. To examine the components of RCA responsible for microwave selectivity heating, we measured the temperature of RCA components under conventional and microwave heating conditions at the same temperature. MW-RCA, which increased the components of selectivity heating, was performed.
Primer 1 initiates the RCA reaction, and reverse primer 2 anneals to each tandem repeat generated by the rolling circle.
Here we show that microwave heating facilitated the synthesis of repetitive DNA through RCA using the four DNA polymerases. Analysis of the temperature profiles of each RCA component subjected to microwave heating revealed the selectivity heating of buffer components compared with primers, template DNA, dNTP, and RNase-free water. We show further that the components of RCA responsible for microwave selectivity heating related to the acceleration of MW-RCA.
Materials and Methods
Primers and templates
The RCA template and primers were designed to amplify sequences encoding a zinc finger protein for the expression of an artificial repetitive protein. The terminal region of primers contained restriction enzyme sites of BamHI and HindIII. Template (75 nucleotides [nt]): 5′-CTGTGCAAACACTACATTTGCTCTTTTGCCGACTGTGGCGCTGCTTATAACAAGAACTGGAAACTGCAGGCGCAT-3′. Primer-1s (45 nt): 5′-GGATCCTACATTTGCTCTTTTGCCGACTGTGGCGCTGCTTATAAC-3′. Primer-2 (44 nt): 5′-AAGCTTTAGTGTTTGCACAGATGCGCCTGCAGTTTCCAGTTCTT-3′.
RCA reactions, circularization
A circular RCA template was prepared according to previous published study [32]. Template oligonucleotide (0.1 nmol) was phosphorylated using T4 polynucleotide kinase (10 U) in 100 μL of solution at 37°C for 60 min. After heating at 72°C for 10 min, the phosphorylated template nucleotide (1 μL) was diluted with 36 μL of LK buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM dATP, and 25 μg/mL bovine serum albumin) containing 0.1 nmol of primer (primer-2). The primer–template mixture was annealed and incubated at 16°C for 1 h with T4 DNA Ligase (1050 U) in 950 μL of LK buffer. The circularized primer–template was precipitated from the phenol–chloroform–isoamyl alcohol extraction mixture and suspended in RNase-free water (TaKaRa). The DNA concentration of the final sample used for RCA was determined using a NanoDrop 2000c (Thermo Scientific) and was diluted to a final concentration of 60 ng/μL.
RCA
RCA reactions were performed to amplify the repetitive sequences using DNA polymerases with strand-displacement activity. The four thermostable DNA polymerases were as follows: Bst DNA polymerase Large Fragment (Bst-LF) (New England Biolabs, NEB), Bst DNA polymerase, Csa DNA polymerase, and 96–7 DNA polymerase (Nippon Gene). All RCA reactions were performed in a final volume of 50 μL at the optimum temperature of each enzyme in a 0.2-mL polypropylene tube (QSP) using a thermal-cycler (TaKaRa). Reactions were initiated after raising the temperature from 13°C to each initial temperature (60°C or 55°C) for 2 min. The control RCA reaction contained a dNTP mixture (each 2.5 mM), 10 pmol each of two primers, buffer specific for each DNA polymerase, eights units of each DNA polymerase, and 60 ng of each circular template–primer complex. Bst-LF was incubated in ThermoPol Buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 10 mM KCl, 2 mM MgSO4, and 0.1% Triton X-100; NEB) at 60°C for 20–60 min. The Bst DNA polymerase (Nippon Gene) was incubated in the Bst reaction buffer (8 mM Mg2+) at 60°C for 20–60 min. The Csa DNA polymerase (Nippon Gene) was incubated in the Csa reaction buffer (8 mM Mg2+) at 60°C for 10–60 min. The 96–7 DNA polymerase (Nippon Gene) was incubated in the 96–7 reaction buffer (9.5 mM Mg2+) at 55°C for 10–180 min. A thermal-cycler was used to inactivate each DNA polymerase.
Microwave applicator
Microwave-assisted heating experiments were performed using a microwave applicator in TM010 mode (SAIDA FDS), equipped with a fiber-optic probe (Neoptix) for internal online temperature control (Fig 2). This resonant cavity-type microwave applicator (2.45 GHz) more precisely controls output compared with the magnetron power generated by a solid-state device (maximum 10 W). All microwave reactions were performed using a 0.2-mL polypropylene tube (QSP). This instrument was operated in a cold room (5°C) for the continuous generation of microwave power. This cavity resonator allows users to control the temperature of a 50 μL volume reaction mixture.
MW-RCA
The temperature of the MW-RCA reaction mixture contained in a PCR tube was directly measured and was controlled using the fiber-optic probe (Fig 2B). All MW-RCAs were performed in a cold room. To prevent exceeding the target temperature, the temperature of the MW-RCA reaction mixture was raised from 13°C to 60°C in 2 min, and the reactions were incubated for 30 min (S1 and S5 Figs) because the microwave applicator was unable to maintain the reaction volume at 60°C over 30 min. The average microwave output at 60°C during the 30-min incubation was <2 W (S2 and S6 Figs). After terminating the MW-RCA reaction, DNA polymerases that were used in microwave heating were denatured by placing the tubes in a heating block at 90°C.
Temperature measurements of RCA and buffer components
Conventional heating using a 60°C heating block and microwave heating were measured using a fiber-optic probe in the cold room for 10 min beginning at 13°C. The data used to plot the temperatures represent the average of three measurements.
Preparation of RCA mixtures containing a 4-fold increased concentration of each of RCA component
Three RCA mixtures each containing a 4-fold excess concentration of the template–primer complex (200 ng) with two primers (each 40 pmol), dNTP (each 10 mM), and Bst-LF (32 U) were made up to 50 μL using RNase-free water. RCA mixtures each containing one component in 4-fold excess of its standard concentration in ThermoPol Buffer (NEB) were prepared as follows: 1 μL of each component (3 M Tris–HCl [pH 8.8], 1.5 M KCl, 1.5 M (NH4)2SO4, and 0.3 M MgSO4) was added to an RCA mixture containing a dNTP mixture (2.5 mM each), two primers (10 pmol), circular template–primer complex (50 ng), Bst-LF, and ThermoPol Buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 10 mM KCl, 2 mM MgSO4, and 0.1% Triton X-100).
Electrophoresis
RCA products were electrophoresed in 1.5% agarose gels and visualized using ethidium bromide. The electrophoresis buffer contained 222 mM Tris–borate buffer and 5 mM EDTA. The samples (5 μL) and a DNA marker (OneSTEP Marker 5, Nippon Gene) were electrophoresed for 30 min at 100 V. Gels were analyzed using an LAS-3000 Imaging System (Fujifilm) equipped with an ultraviolet filter (605DF40, Fujifilm).
Results
Comparison of MW-RCA with conventional RCA using four DNA polymerases
To determine the effect of microwave heating, MW-RCA was performed using four thermostable DNA polymerases that had strand displacement activity. Temperature, power, and frequency profiles of MW-RCA using Bst-LF at 30°C for 30 min is shown in Fig 3. A power profile of microwave is a value obtained by subtracting reflected power from incident power. Temperature profile data proved that MW-RCA was performed at precise temperatures. Conventional RCA and MW-RCA reactions were sampled at intervals from 10 to 60 min and 10 to 30 min, respectively, and analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis and fluorescence emission (Fig 4). The use of the microwave applicator ended in 30 min under high temperature conditions.
MW = microwave. (a) Bst DNA polymerase-LF, 10–60-min rolling circle amplification (RCA) and10–30-min microwave-assisted (MW)-RCA. (b) Bst DNA polymerase, 10–60-min RCA and 10–30-min MW-RCA (c) Csa DNA polymerase, 10–90-min RCA and 10–30-min MW-RCA. (d) 96–7 DNA polymerase, 10–120-min RCA and 10–30 min MW-RCA.
A comparison of MW-RCA with conventional RCA using the Bst-LF revealed that the reaction product of MW-RCA was increased by a factor of four compared with conventional RCA (Fig 4A). Fluorescence intensity showed a 4-fold increase than conventional RCA in 30 min. Repetitive DNA sequences repeated four times (300 bp) and eight times (600 bp) were accurately replicated using MW-RCA using Bst-LF under microwave irradiation. The results of each assay showed that the yields of DNA produced by MW-RCA using the Bst DNA polymerase (60°C) were markedly greater compared with those by conventional RCA during the first 30 min (Fig 4B). The fluorescence intensities of the MW-RCA reaction sampled at 20 and 30 min and those of the conventional RCA reaction sampled at 60 min showed that the former plateaued at 20 min (Fig 4B). The Bst DNA polymerase was the most effective enzyme for MW-RCA. In the same way, MW-RCA using the Csa DNA polymerase was accelerated at 60°C compared with conventional RCA, and polymerization was increased at 20 min. In contrast, DNA synthesis was not detectable in the conventional RCA reaction at 30 min (Fig 4C). The fluorescence intensity in MW-RCA using Csa was higher by a factor of 30 at 30 min compared with that of the conventional RCA, and it was almost equal to that of conventional RCA at 60 and 90 min (Fig 4C). Reactions using the 96–7 DNA polymerase were incubated at 55°C, its optimum temperature, and showed an increase in discrete bands at 120 min, representing repeated sequences that were detected in the conventional RCA reaction. In contrast, MW-RCA using the 96–7 DNA polymerase showed diffuse migration of high molecular weight DNA molecules at 20 min, although DNA synthesis using conventional RCA was undetectable after 60 min. The fluorescence intensity of the conventional RCA reaction products at 90 min was twice as that of MW-RCA at 30 min (Fig 4D). Temperature and power profiles of four DNA polymerases under microwave heating are indicated in the supporting information (S1 File).
Comparison of temperature profiles of RCA components using the microwave applicator and the heating block
To determine the component of RCA by microwave selectivity heating, we measured the temperatures of the five components (circularized template with primers, dNTPs, ThermoPol Buffer, Bst-LF, and RNase-free water) of the RCA and MW-RCA mixtures for 10 min from 13°C to 60°C. A fiber-optic probe was used to measure the temperature of the conventional heating block. All six samples (RCA and its five components) attained 60°C using a 60°C heating block (Fig 5A). By microwave heating the RCA mixture including all components reached 60°C in 2 min. Moreover, the ThermoPol Buffer with 45 μL of RNase-free water reached 60°C by microwave heating 10 s after the addition of the RCA mixture. Four samples (dNTPs with 46 μL of RNase-free water, circularized template with primers in 50 μL of RNase-free water, 8 U of the Bst DNA polymerase in 50 μL of RNase-free water, and 50 μL of RNase-free water) reached a maximum temperature of 42°C by microwave heating in 10 min (Fig 5B). Profiles of microwave power are showed in supporting information (S3 Fig).
Conventional heating was conducted in a 60°C heating block.
Effect of microwave irradiation on the temperatures of higher concentrations of buffer components added to RCA reaction mixtures
The results shown in Fig 5 suggest that the ThermoPol Buffer was a primary factor leading to an increase in temperature under microwave irradiation. To determine whether the ThermoPol Buffer contained a specific thermal component that was selectivity affected by microwave irradiation, we measured the temperatures of each of the four ThermoPol Buffer components (Fig 6A). The microwave applicator heated the four components (20 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 10 mM KCl, and 2 mM MgSO4) from 13°C to 60°C for 10 min. The four components did not reach 60°C (Fig 6A), i.e., the temperature increase of 10 mM (NH4)2SO4 was the highest (47°C). In contrast, 10 mM KCl reached 44°C and the temperatures of 20 mM Tris–HCl and 2 mM MgSO4 (42°C) were nearly identical to the temperature of the RNase-free water.
Further, to examine the MW-RCA increased component of microwave selectivity heating, we measured the temperatures of 4-fold excess concentrations of buffer components under microwave irradiation (Fig 6B). The temperature of 40 mM (NH4)2SO4 reached 60°C after 195 seconds and that of 40 mM KCl plateaued at 55°C; the maximum temperature of 80 mM Tris–HCl was 46°C. Increasing the concentration of MgSO4 from 2 mM to 8 mM increased its maximum temperature from 42°C to 44°C. The quadruple density of all four samples produced an increase in temperature. Profiles of microwave power are indicated in the supporting information (S4 Fig).
Comparison of RCA with MW-RCA reaction mixtures each containing a 4-fold increased concentration of each RCA component
To reveal the effect of the selectivity heating in MW-RCA, we compared the efficiency of DNA amplification in the RCA and MW-RCA reactions mixtures containing a 4-fold excess concentration of each RCA component (dNTP, template–primers, Bst-LF, Tris–HCl, KCl, (NH4)2SO4, and MgSO4). All reactions were performed for 30 min at 60°C using a thermal cycler with the microwave applicator, and the reaction products were analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis and SYBR Green assay. Profiles of temperature and power in microwave heating are indicated in the supporting information (S3 File). MW-RCA of the control and all seven types of MW-RCA reactions, each containing a 4-fold excess concentration of each RCA component, effectively amplified 75-bp circular templates compared with each control RCA (Fig 7). RCA reactions containing a 4-fold excess concentration of dNTPs incubated under conventional or microwave heating conditions did not amplify repetitive DNA (Fig 7A). Moreover, RCA reactions containing a 4-fold excess concentration of the Bst-LF were accelerated by conventional as well as microwave heating. RCA and MW-RCA reaction mixtures each containing template–primers at a 4-fold excess concentration were most effectively replicated by the other seven sample pairs (Fig 7A). The 4-fold increases in the concentrations of Tris–HCl and KCl accelerated RCA and MW-RCA reactions compared with controls. In contrast, MW-RCA reaction mixtures containing a 4-fold excess concentration of (NH4)2SO4 were accelerated to a greater extent compared with the control MW-RCA reaction, whereas the yield of the RCA reaction mixture containing a 4-fold excess concentration of (NH4)2SO4 was equal to that of the control conventional RCA reaction mixture. Similarly, MW-RCA using a 4-fold excess concentration of MgSO4 equivalently accelerated to an MW-RCA reaction containing a 4-fold excess concentration of (NH4)2SO4, although the conventional RCA reaction mixture containing a 4-fold excess concentration of MgSO4 yielded a slight increase of DNA.
(a) Agarose gel electrophoresis results. (b) Fluorescence intensity of SYBR Green I. C = conventional, MW = microwave.
Discussion
Our research focused on the acceleration of RCA by microwave heating. To accomplish our objective, we developed a microwave applicator, which avoided the problem of temperature measurement under microwave irradiation and allowed us to implement new reaction conditions that enhanced conventional RCA. We considered the possibility that microwave-assisted enzymatic reactions are more effective at higher temperatures compared with those at typical physiological conditions. Using four thermostable DNA polymerases with strand displacement activity, we compared the products of MW-RCA and conventional RCA and found that microwave heating accelerated the reactions catalyzed by the four DNA polymerases compared with conventional heating at the same temperature (Fig 4). In a previous study, DNA amplification of MW-PCR, which was controlled at the precise temperature using the three steps, was reported [29]. In this study, RCA using four thermostable DNA polymerases was accelerated by microwave heating. A RCA reaction is equivalent to an elongation reaction of three steps (annealing, elongation, and denaturation) of PCR. These results of MW-RCA suggest that the reason of acceleration in MW-PCR was DNA polymerization by microwave heating.
Why was RCA with four heat-stable DNA polymerases accelerated by microwave heating, although the overall reaction temperatures were the same? In another report of microwave-assisted enzymatic reactions, the authors hypothesized that microwave effects on enzymatic digestion are due to the increased dipole moments of α-helices of proteins [33]. A microwave study using immobilized thermostable lipase B suggested that the effect of microwave irradiation of enzymes was due to superheating of the water layer near the enzyme surface [34]. A study using thermostable β-glucosidase under microwave irradiation at frequencies of 2.45 and 5.8 GHz suggested, with respect to the heating mechanism, that 5.8 GHz irradiation affected only the water molecules in the buffer solution, whereas 2.45 GHz acted on both water molecules and buffering ions [35].
To elucidate the mechanism of this microwave heating effect in RCA, we compared the temperature increase of RCA components under conventional or microwave heating (see Fig 5). The RCA components of the Bst DNA polymerase-LF reaction mixture were used for this purpose, because only the ThermoPol buffer of this polymerase is a nonproprietary reagent. The temperature increases for all RCA components, which were placed in a 60°C heating block, were the same. Microwave heating to 60°C increased the temperature of the RCA mixture as well as that of the ThermoPol buffer to 60°C. In contrast, the temperature of the four RCA components (Bst DNA polymerase-LF, dNTP, template–primer, and water) was 42°C. These data indicate that the ThermoPol buffer in MW-RCA was selectively heated by microwave irradiation. ThermoPol buffer, which contains a high concentration of ionic molecules, is considered to be heated by conduction loss of microwave irradiation [19, 20].
We postulated that the acceleration of MW-RCA is caused by the components of Thermopol buffer on selective microwave heating. The approach to the microwave heating effect is expected to change the amount of the ThermoPol buffer, which was selectively heated by microwave irradiation. However, a substantial change in concentration of the ThermoPol buffer is impossible because enzymatic reactions have an optimum concentration. We focused on the four components of ThermoPol buffer. We hypothesized that the microwave selective heating could be observed with heating of only one of each buffer component under microwave irradiation. We accordingly prepared four samples of one-fold ThermoPol buffer components [Tris-HCl, KCl, (NH4)2SO4, and MgSO4] and four samples of ThermoPol buffer components in four-fold excess concentrations, and measured their temperatures under microwave heating (Fig 6). Temperature measurements of ThermoPol buffer components at four-fold excess concentrations showed an increase in temperature compared with one-fold concentrations. The microwave heating method correlated with the increase in concentrations of buffer components.
We performed MW-RCA reactions containing a four-fold higher concentration of each RCA component [dNTP, template–primers, Bst DNA polymerase-LF, Tris-HCl, KCl, (NH4)2SO4, and MgSO4] to identify a link between microwave selective heating and DNA amplification. There was no influence of pH change by the additional buffer component in RCA (S4 File). All results of microwave heating were accelerated compared with conventional heating (Fig 7). Two notable results were observed. MW-RCA with 40 mM of (NH4)2SO4 was accelerated relative to the control MW-RCA, whereas RCA with 40 mM of (NH4)2SO4 was amplified like the control of conventional RCA. (NH4)2SO4 plays the role of a buffering solution and is not important for DNA polymerization. In contrast, Mg2+ is necessary for the function of DNA polymerase. The conventional RCA reaction mixture containing 8 mM of MgSO4 contained a slightly amplified concentration of DNA. Conventional RCA with 8 mM of MgSO4 was not at optimum concentration, although MW-RCA reaction in mixtures containing 8 mM of MgSO4 was accelerated. As shown in Figs 5 and 6, buffer solutions of (NH4)2SO4 and MgSO4 showed large temperature increases per 1 mM under microwave irradiation. These findings suggest a link between the amplification of MW-RCA and the temperature increase of (NH4)2SO4 and MgSO4 under microwave irradiation.
The effect of Tris-HCl and KCl on MW-RCA was unclear, given that the conventional results of RCA containing four-fold excess concentrations of Tris-HCl (80 mM) and KCl (40 mM) were effectively amplified relative to control RCA (Fig 7B). Control RCA may improve the reaction by buffer composition of Tris-HCl and KCl. The complex dielectric constant of protein in water or buffer solution has been described in [35, 36]. We need to measure the complex dielectric constant of RCA components to understand the microwave heating effect of MW-RCA.
In conclusion, we report here the development of a microwave applicator for enzymatic reactions and demonstrate the effect of microwave heating on RCA of DNA. The temperature profiles of RCA components by microwave heating suggest that the ionic components of the ThermoPol buffer are selectively heated and that the rate of temperature increase induced by microwave heating depends on the components of a molecule and the concentrations of buffer components. These findings indicate that (NH4)2SO4 and MgSO4 play important roles in the mechanism of MW-RCA. The shortened reaction time and higher product yields indicate that microwave heating systems can be widely used to enhance enzymatic reactions. Studies are being conducted to further improve the maximum incubation time at temperatures higher than 60°C as well as to enhance the visualization of the heating process. Preliminary results indicate that MW-RCA can be accelerated at 37°C.
Supporting Information
S1 Fig. Temperature profiles of MW-RCA (Fig 4) using for DNA polymerization.
(a) Bst DNA polymerase-LF, 10–30-min MW-RCA. (b) Bst DNA polymerase, 10–30-min MW-RCA. (c) Csa DNA polymerase, 10–30-min MW-RCA. (d) 96–7 DNA polymerase, 10–30-min MW-RCA.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136532.s001
(EPS)
S2 Fig. Electric power profiles of MW-RCA (Fig 4) using for DNA polymerization.
(a) Bst DNA polymerase-LF, 10–30-min MW-RCA. (b) Bst DNA polymerase, 10–30-min MW-RCA. (c) Csa DNA polymerase, 10–30-min MW-RCA. (d) 96–7 DNA polymerase, 10–30-min MW-RCA.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136532.s002
(EPS)
S3 Fig. Electric power profiles of RCA components (Fig 5B) from 13°C to 60°C.
(a) RCA mixture (b) ThermoPol Buffer (c) dNTP (d) Bst DNA polymerase-LF (e) Template & primer (f) water
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136532.s003
(EPS)
S4 Fig. Electric power profiles of ThermoPol Buffer components (Fig 6) of x1 and x4 from 13°C to 60°C.
(a) 10 mM (NH4)2SO4 (b) 40 mM (NH4)2SO4 (c) 10 mM KCl (d) 40 mM KCl (e) 20 mM Tris–HCl (f) 80 mM Tris–HCl (g) 2 mM MgSO4 (h) 8 mM MgSO4.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136532.s004
(EPS)
S5 Fig. Temperature profiles of MW-RCA reaction mixtures (Fig 7) from each containing a 4-fold increased concentration of each RCA component from 13°C to 60°C.
(a) Control_MW-RCA (b) 10 mM dNTP_MW-RCA (c) 32 U Bst DNA polymerase-LF_MW-RCA (d) ×4 Template & primer_MW-RCA (e) 80 mM Tris–HCl_MW-RCA (f) 40 mM KCl_MW-RCA (g) 40 mM (NH4)2SO4_MW-RCA (h) 8 mM MgSO4_MW-RCA.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136532.s005
(EPS)
S6 Fig. Electric power profiles of MW-RCA reaction mixtures (Fig 7) each containing a 4-fold increased concentration of each RCA component at 60°C.
(a) Control_MW-RCA (b) 10 mM dNTP_MW-RCA (c) 32 U Bst DNA polymerase-LF_MW-RCA (d) ×4 Template & primer_MW-RCA (e) 80 mM Tris–HCl_MW-RCA (f) 40 mM KCl_MW-RCA (g) 40 mM (NH4)2SO4_MW-RCA (h) 8 mM MgSO4_MW-RCA.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136532.s006
(EPS)
S7 Fig. Comparison of NEB buffer with the buffer prepared by us in RCA using Bst DNA polymerase-LF.
1: NEB Thermopol-buffer (pH 8.8), 2: Prepared Thermopol-buffer (pH 8.80), 3: Prepared Thermopol-buffer (pH 8.34).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136532.s007
(EPS)
S1 File. Temperature and power profiles of MW-RCA (Fig 4).
S1 File shows the profiles of temperature (S1 Fig) and power (S2 Fig) to support the results of Fig 4.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136532.s008
(DOCX)
S2 File. Power profiles of microwave heating experiments of Figs 5 and 6.
S3 Fig shows the power profiles of RCA components, which were heated to reach the 60°C by microwave. S4 Fig also shows the power profiles of ThermoPol Buffer components with each concentration.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136532.s009
(DOCX)
S3 File. Temperature and power profiles of MW-RCA (Fig 7).
S3 File shows the profiles of temperature (S5 Fig) and power (S6 Fig) to support the results of Fig 7.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136532.s010
(DOCX)
S4 File. Comparison of ThermoPol Buffer (NEB) with prepared buffer for RCA.
The 1× Thermopol Reaction Buffer [20 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 10 mM KCl, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1% Triton X-100] was prepared at pH 8.8. The component of Bst DNA polymerase-LF [10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1% Triton X-100, 50% glycerol] was prepared. The pH of Scale-up fictitious RCA mixture containing Thermopol-buffer and enzyme component was measured (pH 8.71). The pH of fictitious RCA mixtures of one 4-fold constituent of Thermopol-buffer were measured (4-fold Tris–HCl: 8.73, 4-fold KCl; 8.69, 4-fold (NH4)2SO4: 8.37, 4-fold MgSO4: 8.67). Thus, to assess the effect of pH, RCA using the Thermopol-buffer prepared by us (pH 8.80 and 8.34) was performed and was compared with a control RCA using NEB Thermopol-buffer. As a result, no effect of RCA products by pH alteration of this range was confirmed by electrophoresis and fluorescence analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136532.s011
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. S. Maezawa and K. Kajimoto from the Tokyo University of Science for their valuable advice. Furthermore, we thank N. Ohneda, H. Odajima and SAIDA FDS for the microwave applicator. The authors would like to thank Enago for the English language review.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: TY SO. Performed the experiments: TY TS. Analyzed the data: TY TS SM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TY SM SO. Wrote the paper: TY.
References
- 1. Fire A, Xu S-Q. Rolling replication of short DNA circles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1995;92(10):4641–5.
- 2. Liu D, Daubendiek SL, Zillman MA, Ryan K, Kool ET. Rolling circle DNA synthesis: small circular oligonucleotides as efficient templates for DNA polymerases. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118(7):1587–94. pmid:20830216
- 3. Branch AD, Robertson HD. A replication cycle for viroids and other small infectious RNA's. Science. 1984;223(4635):450–5. pmid:6197756
- 4. Daròs J-A, Marcos JF, Hernandez C, Flores R. Replication of avocado sunblotch viroid: evidence for a symmetric pathway with two rolling circles and hammerhead ribozyme processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1994;91(26):12813–7.
- 5. Nilsson M, Malmgren H, Samiotaki M, Kwiatkowski M, Chowdhary BP, Landegren U. Padlock probes: circularizing oligonucleotides for localized DNA detection. Science. 1994;265(5181):2085–8. pmid:7522346
- 6. Thomas DC, Nardone GA, Randall SK. Amplification of padlock probes for DNA diagnostics by cascade rolling circle amplification or the polymerase chain reaction. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1999;123(12):1170–6. pmid:10583921
- 7. Larsson C, Koch J, Nygren A, Janssen G, Raap AK, Landegren U, et al. In situ genotyping individual DNA molecules by target-primed rolling-circle amplification of padlock probes. Nat Methods. 2004;1(3):227–32. pmid:15782198.
- 8. Hutchison CA 3rd, Smith HO, Pfannkoch C, Venter JC. Cell-free cloning using phi29 DNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(48):17332–6. pmid:16286637; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1283157.
- 9. Wang B, Potter SJ, Lin Y, Cunningham AL, Dwyer DE, Su Y, et al. Rapid and sensitive detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus by rolling circle amplification. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(5):2339–44. pmid:15872263
- 10. Cheng Y, Li Z, Zhang X, Du B, Fan Y. Homogeneous and label-free fluorescence detection of single-nucleotide polymorphism using target-primed branched rolling circle amplification. Anal Biochem. 2008;378(2):123–6. pmid:18420020
- 11. Abe N, Hiroshima M, Maruyama H, Nakashima Y, Nakano Y, Matsuda A, et al. Rolling Circle Amplification in a Prokaryotic Translation System Using Small Circular RNA. Angewandte Chemie. 2013;125(27):7142–6.
- 12. Hamblin GD, Carneiro KM, Fakhoury JF, Bujold KE, Sleiman HF. Rolling circle amplification-templated DNA nanotubes show increased stability and cell penetration ability. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(6):2888–91. pmid:22283197.
- 13. Göransson J, Ke R, Nong RY, Howell WM, Karman A, Grawé J, et al. Rapid identification of bio-molecules applied for detection of biosecurity agents using rolling circle amplification. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31068. pmid:22383994
- 14. Korlach J, Marks PJ, Cicero RL, Gray JJ, Murphy DL, Roitman DB, et al. Selective aluminum passivation for targeted immobilization of single DNA polymerase molecules in zero-mode waveguide nanostructures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(4):1176–81.
- 15. Lidström P, Tierney J, Wathey B, Westman J. Microwave assisted organic synthesis—a review. Tetrahedron. 2001;57(45):9225–83.
- 16. Kappe CO, Dallinger D. Controlled microwave heating in modern organic synthesis: highlights from the 2004–2008 literature. Mol Divers. 2009;13(2):71–193. pmid:19381851.
- 17. Bilecka I, Niederberger M. Microwave chemistry for inorganic nanomaterials synthesis. Nanoscale. 2010;2(8):1358. pmid:20845524
- 18. Baghbanzadeh M, Carbone L, Cozzoli PD, Kappe CO. Microwave-assisted synthesis of colloidal inorganic nanocrystals. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011;50(48):11312–59. pmid:22058070.
- 19.
Kappe CO, Stadler A, Dallinger D. Microwaves in organic and medicinal chemistry: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
- 20.
Loupy A. Microwaves in organic synthesis: Wiley-VCH; John Wiley, distributor]; 2006.
- 21. Sandoval WN, Pham VC, Lill JR. Recent developments in microwave-assisted protein chemistries–can this be integrated into the drug discovery and validation process? Drug discovery today. 2008;13(23):1075–81.
- 22. Gude VG, Patil P, Martinez-Guerra E, Deng S, Nirmalakhandan N. Microwave energy potential for biodiesel production. Sustainable Chemical Processes. 2013;1(1):5.
- 23. Martinez-Palou R. Microwave-assisted synthesis using ionic liquids. Mol Divers. 2010;14(1):3–25. pmid:19507045.
- 24. Reddy PM, Huang YS, Chen CT, Chang PC, Ho YP. Evaluating the potential nonthermal microwave effects of microwave-assisted proteolytic reactions. J Proteomics. 2013;80:160–70. pmid:23352896.
- 25. Yadav GD, Devendran S. Lipase catalyzed kinetic resolution of (±)-1-(1-naphthyl) ethanol under microwave irradiation. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic. 2012;81:58–65.
- 26. Fermér C, Nilsson P, Larhed M. Microwave-assisted high-speed PCR. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2003;18(2):129–32. pmid:12594005
- 27. Kappe CO. How to measure reaction temperature in microwave-heated transformations. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(12):4977–90. pmid:23443140.
- 28. Mochizuki D, Wada Y. Measurements of Accurate Temperatures in the Microwave Reactors. Mini Rev Org Chem. 2011;8(3):294–8.
- 29. Orrling K, Nilsson P, Gullberg M, Larhed M. An efficient method to perform milliliter-scale PCR utilizing highly controlled microwave thermocycling. Chem Commun (Camb). 2004;(7):790–1. pmid:15045065.
- 30. Kempitiya A, Borca-Tasciuc DA, Mohamed HS, Hella MM. Localized microwave heating in microwells for parallel DNA amplification applications. Applied Physics Letters. 2009;94(6):064106–3.
- 31. Shaw KJ, Docker PT, Yelland JV, Dyer CE, Greenman J, Greenway GM, et al. Rapid PCR amplification using a microfluidic device with integrated microwave heating and air impingement cooling. Lab Chip. 2010;10(13):1725–8. pmid:20414500.
- 32. Yoshimura T, Nishida K, Uchibayashi K, Ohuchi S. Microwave assisted rolling circle amplification. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser (Oxf). 2006;(50):305–6. pmid:17150939.
- 33. Collins JM, Leadbeater NE. Microwave energy: a versatile tool for the biosciences. Org Biomol Chem. 2007;5(8):1141–50. pmid:17406708.
- 34. Zhao H, Baker GA, Song Z, Olubajo O, Zanders L, Campbell SM. Effect of ionic liquid properties on lipase stabilization under microwave irradiation. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic. 2009;57(1–4):149–57.
- 35. Nagashima I, Sugiyama J, Sakuta T, Sasaki M, Shimizu H. Efficiency of 2.45 and 5.80 GHz microwave irradiation for a hydrolysis reaction by thermostable beta-Glucosidase HT1. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2014;78(5):758–60. pmid:25035975.
- 36. Suzuki M, Shigematsu J, Kodama T. Hydration study of proteins in solution by microwave dielectric analysis. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1996;100(17):7279–82.