Figures
Abstract
The Proline-, glutamic acid- and leucine-rich protein 1 (PELP1) is an estrogen receptor (ER) coactivator and a proto-oncogene known to be deregulated in endocrine cancers. In breast cancer, PELP1 overexpression has been associated with endocrine therapy resistance. Although PELP1 is known to be regulated by estrogens in vitro, its association with estrogen levels within the tissue of breast cancer patients has not previously been assessed. Here, we determined PELP1 mRNA expression levels in paired samples of normal and malignant breast tissue obtained from 32 postmenopausal and 11 premenopausal women. In the total sample set, PELP1 levels were higher in tumors compared to normal breast tissue (P = 0.041). Among postmenopausal women, PELP1 tumor levels correlated positively with estrone (E1) and estradiol (E2) levels in both normal tissue (r = 0.543, P = 0.003 and r = 0.601, P = 0.001, respectively) and plasma (r = 0.392, P = 0.053 and r = 0.403, P = 0.046, respectively). Analyzing all ER+ tumors (n = 26), PELP1 correlated positively with E1 and E2 in tumor tissue (r = 0.562, P = 0.003 and r = 0.411, P = 0.037, respectively) and normal tissue (r = 0.461, P = 0.018 and r = 0.427, P = 0.030, respectively) in addition to plasma E1, E2 and estrone sulphate (E1S) concentrations (r = 0.576, P = 0.003, r = 0.456, P = 0.025 and r = 0.406, P = 0.049, respectively). Finally, PELP1 correlated positively with ER mRNA (ESR1) (r = 0.553, P = 0.026) in ER+ tumors, whereas a negative association between PELP1 and ESR1 (r = -0.733, P = 0.010) was observed in ER- breast tumors. Taken together, tumor PELP1 mRNA expression is associated with estrogen levels in breast cancer, suggesting a potentially important role of PELP1 in ER+ breast cancer growth in vivo.
Citation: Flågeng MH, Knappskog S, Gjerde J, Lønning PE, Mellgren G (2015) Estrogens Correlate with PELP1 Expression in ER Positive Breast Cancer. PLoS ONE 10(8): e0134351. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134351
Editor: Gokul M. Das, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, UNITED STATES
Received: March 16, 2015; Accepted: July 9, 2015; Published: August 6, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Flågeng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The study was funded by the Norwegian Cancer Society (https://kreftforeningen.no), The Western Norway Regional Health Authority (http://www.helse-bergen.no/forskning/samarbeidsorganet), Odd Fellow Medisinsk Vitenskapelig Forskningsfond (oddfellow.no). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The human estrogen receptor (ER) plays an important role in development and progression of breast cancer. Elevated estrogen levels have been associated with higher risk of incident cancer in postmenopausal women (summarized in [1]). Approximately 75% of all breast cancers are ER-positive, thus blocking the growth stimulatory effects of estrogens by endocrine therapy is a major treatment option in breast cancer.
The transcriptional capacity of ER is highly dependent on coregulators (coactivators and corepressors) which regulate its transcriptional activity (reviewed in [2]). ER coregulators have been shown to play a role in endocrine responsiveness and development of resistance to endocrine treatment [3–5]. The coactivator proline-, glutamic acid-, and leucine-rich protein (PELP) 1 is an ER coactivator and proto-oncogene, which is dysregulated in breast cancer and associated with poor survival [6–9]. PELP1 is overexpressed in 60–80% of breast tumors [6–9] and plays important roles in both ER genomic and non-genomic signaling [10, 11]. In the nucleus, PELP1 interacts with a number of transcription factors [10]. The proto-oncogenic functions of PELP1 involve different cellular processes including epigenetic modifications leading to ER transactivation and breast cancer progression [12–14]. Furthermore, PELP1 activates kinase cascades in the cytoplasm such as MAPK activation via c-Src and PI3K signaling [9, 11, 15, 16].
PELP1 expression is upregulated by ER in breast cancer cells in vitro [17]. Recently, it was also demonstrated that overexpression of PELP1 in murine mammary glands resulted in development of hyperplasia and carcinoma [18]. However, the potential role of PELP1 as an executor of estrogens pro-carcinogenic effects in human breast cancer remains to be verified.
In the present study, we explored potential associations between PELP1 and E2-dependent ER signaling in breast cancer patients. We analyzed PELP1 mRNA expression levels in breast cancer and normal tissue samples and potential connections to ER- and postmenopausal status of the patients. Moreover, we correlated PELP1 with the ER mRNA expression (ESR1) and estrogen levels in plasma, normal breast tissue and tumor tissue [19]. Our findings add novel information regarding association and, potentially, regulation of the oncogene PELP1 by estrogens in ER+ breast cancer.
Materials and Methods
Study population and sample collection
The study population has been described in detail elsewhere [19]. A total of 13 premenopausal and 34 postmenopausal patients selected for mastectomy at the Department of Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, were enrolled. Tissues obtained from mastectomy specimens, both normal and tumor tissue, were removed and immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen in the operating theatre, before they were stored in liquid nitrogen until use. Normal tissue was isolated from the breast quadrant farthest from the tumor-containing quadrant in the breast. Blood samples for plasma measurements were obtained at the day of surgery after fasting overnight, and stored at -20°C until use. Both tumor and normal breast tissue were not available for gene expression analysis from one patient in addition to normal breast tissue from one patient and tumor tissues from two further patients, leaving 43 patients for statistical comparisons between tumor and normal tissue. Additionally, four of the patients had received hormone replacement therapy within the 4 weeks pre-surgical period and were excluded from the correlation analysis with the estrogen levels.
Ethics statements
The protocol for the study was presented and exempted from review by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK) at the time of collection. The study was performed in accordance to Norwegian law and regulations, and all patients provided written informed consent. After the samples had been collected, each patient was allocated a trial number, demographic data was collected, and the database anonymized.
Real time PCR quantification
Total RNA was extracted from ~25 mg tissue using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. RNA concentrations were estimated by optical density (OD) measurement using the Nanodrop (Saveen Werner, Copenhagen, Denmark). For each sample, 1 μg total RNA was reversely transcribed by the 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) using random primers. The cDNA was diluted 1/10 in PCR-grade water and stored at -20°C until use.
Real time PCR analyses were performed in three parallel runs on a Light Cycler 480 (LC480) Thermo Cycler (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). A negative control was included in each run. Three reference genes were analyzed in each sample: Gene-specific primers and probes for PELP1 and the reference genes Pumilio homolog 1 (PUM1) and Ribosomal protein, large, P0 (RPLP0) were designed using Universal Probe Library (UPL, Roche, Basel, Switzerland, S1 Table). Reference analysis kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was used for the TATA-box binding protein (TBP) reference gene. Amplification reaction mixture consisted of 2.5 μL diluted cDNA, 10 μL LC480 Probe Master mix (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), 0.4 μmol/L of each primer, 0.2 μmol/L of UPL probe, or 0.2 μmol/L of TBP reference primers and 0.1 μmol/L TBP reference probe in a total volume of 20 μL. Thermocycling setup used was as following: pre-incubation at 95°C for 10 minutes, 45 cycles with denaturation at 95°C for 10 seconds, primer annealing at 60°C for 30 seconds and DNA sequence extension at 72°C for 1 second followed by fluorescence measurement. The PCR products were then cooled at 40°C. Crossing points (Cp) and the standard curve efficiency from a serially diluted cDNA sample were used to quantify relative expression levels of each target gene separately. PELP1 mRNA was detected well in both tissues, with an average Cp of 29.9 (range: 26.1–37.8) in the total data set. Data are presented relative to the mean value of the three reference genes in each single sample.
ESR1, HER1 and NRG1 mRNA expression levels in tumors have been analyzed and reported previously [20, 21].
Measurement of estrogen levels
Estrogen levels measured in plasma and the paired normal and tumor tissue samples from 13 premenopausal and 30 postmenopausal women have previously been reported [19]. In brief, estrogen fractions were measured with highly sensitive RIA methods, subsequent to pre-analytical purification through LH20 column (plasma) or HPLC (tissue) chromatography [22, 23]. Sensitivity limits for the different analysis were 19.8 fmol/g for estrone (E1), 4.3 fmol/g for estradiol (E2) and 11.9 fmol/g for estrone sulphate (E1S) in tissue, whereas in serum the sensitivity limits were 1.14 pmol/L for E1, 0.67 pmol/L for E2, and 0.55 pmol/L for E1S [22, 23].
Statistical analysis
The mRNA expression level is presented as geometric mean with 95% confidence interval (CI) of the mean. We used Spearman Rank test to perform correlation analyses of PELP1 levels in normal and tumor tissue with levels of E1, E2 and E1S in normal tissue, tumor tissue and plasma. Additionally, the same test was used to analyze correlations between PELP1 and HER1 and NRG1 during estrogen deprivation. A multivariate binary regression analysis was performed to analyze association between the covariates PELP1 and ESR1 dependent of ER status. Differences in mRNA expression between paired tumor- and normal-tissue samples were analyzed using the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test. Differences in PELP1 levels between ER+ and ER- or pre- and postmenopausal subjects were analyzed using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U rank test of independent samples. All P-values were two-sided and the threshold P-value for statistical significance was 0.05. All analyses were performed using the software SPSS Statistics version 19 (IBM SPSS Statistics).
Results
Patient characteristics and tissue specimens
The study population includes 47 pre-and postmenopausal breast cancer patients with ER+ and ER- disease (Table 1), described in detail elsewhere [19]. Among these, 43 patients, 32 postmenopausal and 11 premenopausal, were available for gene expression analyses both from normal and malignant breast tissue.
Expression of PELP1 mRNA in normal and malignant breast tissue
The ER-coactivator PELP1 was well detected in both normal and malignant breast tissue and its mRNA expression level is presented relative to the mean of the three reference genes TBP, PUM1 and RPLP0. Comparing normal and malignant breast tissue for each individual patient in the total data set we observed elevated PELP1 levels in 25 out of 43 tumors. In malignant breast tissue geometric (geo) mean of PELP1 expression was 1.37 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.22–1.53), compared to normal tissue with geo mean of 1.25 (95% CI: 1.15–1.37, P = 0.041, S1 Fig). No significant differences were observed in tumor PELP1 levels between the subgroups of pre- and postmenopausal (geo mean: 1.41 95% CI: 1.10–1.81; 1.35, 95% CI: 1.19–1.52, respectively) or ER+ and ER- subjects (geo mean: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.11–1.94 and 1.33, 95% CI: 1.18–1.50, respectively, S2 Fig).
Correlations between tumor PELP1 mRNA and estrogen levels
In order to elucidate associations between PELP1 and estrogens in vivo, we performed Spearman correlations of tumor PELP1 mRNA with E1, E2 and E1S levels in tumor, normal breast tissue and plasma from breast cancer patients (Table 2). In all patients, tumor PELP1 correlated with normal tissue concentrations of E1 and E2 (r = 0.366, P = 0.020 and r = 0.329, P = 0.038, respectively). In the postmenopausal subgroup, tumor PELP1 correlated with E1 and E2 concentrations in normal tissue (r = 0.543, P = 0.003 and r = 0.601, P = 0.001, Fig 1A and 1B, respectively) and plasma (r = 0.392, P = 0.053 (borderline significance) and r = 0.403, P = 0.046, Fig 1C and 1D, respectively). Interestingly, no intratumoral correlations between PELP1 and estrogens were observed in the total dataset or in the subgroup of postmenopausal patients. Additionally, no correlations at all were observed between tumor PELP1 levels and estrogens among premenopausal patients (data not shown).
Scatterplots illustrating correlations of tumor PELP1 mRNA levels with corresponding normal tissue E1 (A) and E2 (B) levels in addition to E1 (C) and E2 (D) in plasma in the subgroup of postmenopausal patients. RNA was extracted from tumor tissue and reverse transcriptase (RT)-real-time PCR of PELP1 and 3 reference genes, TBP, PUM1 and RPLP0, was performed in order to analyze relative PELP1 mRNA tumor levels. Correlations were evaluated using Spearman Rank (two-tailed) test.
Correlations of PELP1 mRNA with estrogens in ER+ tumors
Further, we conducted analyses in two tumor subgroups, ER+ and ER-, and examined potential correlations of PELP1 with estrogens (Table 3). Among ER+ patients, PELP1 tumor levels were positively correlated with tumor tissue E1 and E2 concentrations (r = 0.562, P = 0.003 and r = 0.411, P = 0.037, respectively), E1 and E2 in normal tissue (r = 0.461, P = 0.018 and r = 0.427, P = 0.030, respectively) and E1, E2 and E1S plasma levels (r = 0.576, P = 0.003; r = 0.456, P = 0.025 and r = 0.406, P = 0.049, respectively). Similar correlations were not observed in the subgroup of ER- tumors (Table 3). Furthermore, PELP1 levels were positively correlated with ESR1 in the ER+ tumors (r = 0.553, P = 0.026, Fig 2), whereas a negative correlation was observed with ESR1 in ER- tumors (r = -0.733, P = 0.010). In a multivariate model taking ER+/- status into account when assessing the association between PELP1 and ESR1 expression, we observed a highly significant correlation (P ≤ 0.001). Taken together, the positive correlations between PELP1 and estrogen levels in tumor, normal tissue and circulation seem to be exclusive to estrogen responsive ER+ tumors only.
Scatterplot illustrating correlations of PELP1 with ESR1 in ER- (open circle) and ER+ (filled circle) tumors. Relative PELP1 expression levels were analyzed using RT- real-time PCR whereas ESR1 tumor levels are published before [21]. Correlations were evaluated using Spearman Rank (two-tailed) test. Association between PELP1 and ESR1 levels when ER status was taken into account was verified using a multivariate logistic regression model (P ≤ 0.001).
We further restricted our analysis to postmenopausal women with ER+ disease, showing that PELP1 tumor levels were positively correlated with E1 concentration in tumor (r = 0.583, P = 0.009, Table 4), E1 and E2 concentration in normal tissue (r = 0.679, P = 0.001; r = 0.618, P = 0.005, respectively) and E1 and E2 plasma concentrations (r = 0.653, P = 0.003; r = 0.519, P = 0.027, respectively). Additionally, PELP1 and ERS1 intratumoral expression levels were positively correlated in ER+ tumors from postmenopausal women (r = 0.593, P = 0.033).
PELP1 mRNA is negatively correlated with EGFR1/HER1 and NRG1 mRNA
Previously, we have demonstrated that the mRNA expression levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR or HER1) and the ligand and growth factor Neuregulin (NRG1) are negatively regulated by estrogens in this data set [20]. Thus, we analyzed any correlations between PELP1, HER1 and NRG1. We observed PELP1 to be negatively correlated with both HER1 (Fig 3; r = -0.343, P = 0.033) and NRG1 (r = -0.367, P = 0.022) within tumor tissue. Taken together, these results support the theory that PELP1 is positively regulated by estrogens in vivo.
Tumor PELP1 mRNA levels were correlated with HER1 (A) and NRG1 (B) tumor levels. Relative PELP1 expression levels were analyzed using RT- real-time PCR whereas HER1 and NRG1 tumor levels are published before [20]. Correlations were evaluated using Spearman Rank (two-tailed) test.
Discussion
It is well known that estrogens and ER regulate breast cancer cell proliferation [1]. However, ER signaling is complex and involves multiple coregulatory proteins [24] including PELP1, an ER coactivator that is dysregulated in breast cancer [6, 9, 10]. In this clinical study, PELP1 mRNA expression levels in matched malignant and normal breast tissue from breast cancer patients were analyzed and correlated with E1, E2 and E1S levels. Our results suggest PELP1 to be associated and potentially regulated by estrogens in ER+ breast cancers.
PELP1 has previously been shown to be overexpressed in 60–80% of breast tumors [6, 9]. In line with this, we found PELP1 levels to be higher in malignant- as compared to normal breast tissue, in our dataset. High PELP1 protein expression has been associated with tumor grade, proliferation, node-positive invasive cancer and distant metastases, decreased breast cancer specific survival and disease free survival [6–8]. Recent data suggest that PELP1 promotes oncogenesis by alternative splicing, leading to the activation of unique pathways. This occurs in addition to modulation of epigenetic alternations at ER target promoters [12, 14, 25, 26].
PELP1 is known to be modulated by the E2-ER pathway [17]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no associations between PELP1 and in vivo breast cancer estrogen levels have been shown previously. The finding that PELP1 tumor levels correlated with normal tissue estrogens indicates an association between PELP1 and estrogens in breast cancer patients. Considering the fact that tissue- and plasma estrogen levels are elevated in pre- compared to postmenopausal women [19], we analyzed these subgroups separately. We found PELP1 tumor levels in postmenopausal patients to be positively associated with estrogen levels in normal tissue and plasma. Although, the presence of association cannot establish causality, this may indicate that tumor PELP1 is regulated by estrogen in these patients. Cyclic secretion of hormones among premenopausal women during menstrual cycle complicates the analyses of associations between plasma estrogens and other biomarkers and may explain the lack of correlations between PELP1 and estrogens in either tissue or serum.
PELP1 is an estrogen-regulated ER target gene, exhibiting proximal estrogen responsive element (ERE) half sites in its promoter [17]. In addition, PELP1 may regulate aromatase and, thereby, modulate in situ estrogen synthesis in tumors [27]. Since E2 levels are markedly higher in ER+ compared to ER- tumors [19], we explored associations between PELP1 in these two tumors separately. PELP1 in ER+ tumors was found to be associated with E1 and E2 concentrations in plasma, normal tissue and tumors. In contrast, no associations between PELP1 and estrogens were observed within ER- tumors. Relationships between plasma estrogen levels and expression of estrogen-dependent genes in ER+ tumors have also been shown by others [28], underlining the fact that tissue and plasma estrogen levels in general are at equilibrium [29]. The increase of estrogen levels in breast tumors as compared to surrounding tissues has been suggested to be a consequence of enhanced uptake of estrogens from the circulation and binding of estrogens to ER, rather than in situ estrogen synthesis in the tumor [21, 29]. If the association between PELP1 and estrogens levels was a consequence of increased in situ estrogen synthesis mediated by PELP1, we would expect no correlations between PELP1 in tumors and normal tissue and serum estrogens. Thus, based on these data, and the knowledge that PELP1 is an estrogen regulated gene [17], we hypothesize that the tumor PELP1 level is regulated by circulating estrogens. Moreover, we have previously reported the epidermal growth factor receptor HER1 and the growth factor NRG1, to be suppressed by estrogens in tumors [20]. The negative correlation between PELP1 and HER1 and NRG1 observed in this data set further support our hypothesis that PELP1 is positively regulated by estrogens in vivo.
PELP1 expression has been suggested to play a significant role in both ER+ and ER- breast cancer [6, 7, 9]. Our finding that PELP1 was positively correlated with ESR1 in ER+ tumors and negatively correlated with ESR1 in ER- tumors supports the theory that PELP1 may have differential roles in these tumors. PELP1 is a unique protein exhibiting ten nuclear receptor interacting boxes (LXXLL motifs) important for interacting with ER, additionally to several consensus PXXP motifs facilitating interaction with proteins containing SH3 domains [10, 11]. Due to these interacting domains and its presence both in the nucleus and cytoplasm, PELP1 is involved in multiple biological processes that may have different effects in ER+ and ER- tumors.
The present study has some limitations. The sample size is small, especially when subgroups of patients based on ER-status or menopausal stage are analyzed. Previous data from in vitro studies support our findings showing a positive correlation between estrogens and PELP1 [17], but we cannot exclude other unknown factors that may have regulatory effects on PELP1 in vivo, and the results should be interpreted with caution. Another limitation of our study is that only mRNA and not protein levels have been analyzed. It should be noted that changes in mRNA and protein expression does not always go in parallel, and other regulatory mechanisms such as posttranslational modifications or changes in turnover may affect the protein expression of PELP1. Thus, in another clinical study, associations between estrogens and PELP1 should be confirmed on the protein level.
PELP1 is a transcriptional regulator recruiting other coregulators and remodeling chromatin to facilitate access to the promoter of its target genes [30]. Recent results based on RNA-sequencing have demonstrated that PELP1 regulates a number of genes involved in estrogen signaling, breast cancer progression and RNA splicing [26]. Moreover, PELP1 deregulation alters expression of ER-targets genes in vivo [18]. PELP1-driven tumors are known to be ER+ and have excessive activation of Src and MAPK [31]. PELP1 interacts with Src and acts as a scaffold protein, mediating ER-Src interaction [11, 32]. The ER-Src axis may promote hormonal resistance by proto-oncogenes such as PELP1 and HER2 [31]. The present data, revealing associations between PELP1and estrogens in ER+ tumors, contribute to the accumulating evidence of PELP1’s tumorigenic behavior.
Conclusions
In summary, this study provides novel information regarding the association of the ER-coactivator PELP1 with estrogens in breast cancer patients. We hypothesize that estrogens influence PELP1 mRNA expression in breast tumor tissue, suggesting a potential important role of PELP1 in ER+ breast cancer growth in vivo.
Supporting Information
S2 Fig. Tumor PELP1 levels in ER+ and ER- tumors and from pre and postmenopausal subjects.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134351.s002
(EPS)
S1 Table. Primer and probes for real-time PCR.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134351.s003
(DOCX)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: MHF GM PEL. Performed the experiments: MHF SK JG. Analyzed the data: MHF SK JG PEL GM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PEL GM. Wrote the paper: MHF SK JG PEL GM.
References
- 1. Key T, Appleby P, Barnes I, Reeves G. Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(8):606–16. Epub 2002/04/18. pmid:11959894.
- 2. O'Malley BW. Coregulators: from whence came these "master genes". Mol Endocrinol. 2007;21(5):1009–13. Epub 2007/02/08. me.2007-0012 [pii] pmid:17284664.
- 3. Fleming FJ, Myers E, Kelly G, Crotty TB, McDermott EW, O'Higgins NJ, et al. Expression of SRC-1, AIB1, and PEA3 in HER2 mediated endocrine resistant breast cancer; a predictive role for SRC-1. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57(10):1069–74. pmid:15452162.
- 4. McBryan J, Theissen SM, Byrne C, Hughes E, Cocchiglia S, Sande S, et al. Metastatic progression with resistance to aromatase inhibitors is driven by the steroid receptor coactivator SRC-1. Cancer Res. 2012;72(2):548–59. Epub 2011/11/24. pmid:22108824.
- 5. Osborne CK, Bardou V, Hopp TA, Chamness GC, Hilsenbeck SG, Fuqua SA, et al. Role of the estrogen receptor coactivator AIB1 (SRC-3) and HER-2/neu in tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(5):353–61. pmid:12618500.
- 6. Habashy HO, Powe DG, Rakha EA, Ball G, Macmillan RD, Green AR, et al. The prognostic significance of PELP1 expression in invasive breast cancer with emphasis on the ER-positive luminal-like subtype. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;120(3):603–12. Epub 2009/06/06. pmid:19495959.
- 7. Kumar R, Zhang H, Holm C, Vadlamudi RK, Landberg G, Rayala SK. Extranuclear coactivator signaling confers insensitivity to tamoxifen. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(12):4123–30. Epub 2009/05/28. 1078-0432.CCR-08-2347 [pii] pmid:19470742; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2756964.
- 8. Rajhans R, Nair S, Holden AH, Kumar R, Tekmal RR, Vadlamudi RK. Oncogenic potential of the nuclear receptor coregulator proline-, glutamic acid-, leucine-rich protein 1/modulator of the nongenomic actions of the estrogen receptor. Cancer Res. 2007;67(11):5505–12. Epub 2007/06/05. 67/11/5505 [pii] pmid:17545633; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2774841.
- 9. Vadlamudi RK, Manavathi B, Balasenthil S, Nair SS, Yang Z, Sahin AA, et al. Functional implications of altered subcellular localization of PELP1 in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65(17):7724–32. Epub 2005/09/06. pmid:16140940; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1343458.
- 10. Vadlamudi RK, Wang RA, Mazumdar A, Kim Y, Shin J, Sahin A, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of PELP1, a novel human coregulator of estrogen receptor alpha. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(41):38272–9. Epub 2001/08/02. pmid:11481323.
- 11. Barletta F, Wong CW, McNally C, Komm BS, Katzenellenbogen B, Cheskis BJ. Characterization of the interactions of estrogen receptor and MNAR in the activation of cSrc. Mol Endocrinol. 2004;18(5):1096–108. pmid:14963108.
- 12. Mann M, Cortez V, Vadlamudi R. PELP1 oncogenic functions involve CARM1 regulation. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34(7):1468–75. pmid:23486015; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3697892.
- 13. Mann M, Cortez V, Vadlamudi RK. Epigenetics of estrogen receptor signaling: role in hormonal cancer progression and therapy. Cancers. 2011;3(3):1691–707. pmid:21814622; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3147309.
- 14. Nair SS, Nair BC, Cortez V, Chakravarty D, Metzger E, Schule R, et al. PELP1 is a reader of histone H3 methylation that facilitates oestrogen receptor-alpha target gene activation by regulating lysine demethylase 1 specificity. EMBO reports. 2010;11(6):438–44. Epub 2010/05/08. pmid:20448663; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2892318.
- 15. Migliaccio A, Di Domenico M, Castoria G, Nanayakkara M, Lombardi M, de Falco A, et al. Steroid receptor regulation of epidermal growth factor signaling through Src in breast and prostate cancer cells: steroid antagonist action. Cancer Res. 2005;65(22):10585–93. Epub 2005/11/17. pmid:16288052.
- 16. Nagpal JK, Nair S, Chakravarty D, Rajhans R, Pothana S, Brann DW, et al. Growth factor regulation of estrogen receptor coregulator PELP1 functions via Protein Kinase A pathway. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6(5):851–61. Epub 2008/05/29. pmid:18505929; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2782677.
- 17. Mishra SK, Balasenthil S, Nguyen D, Vadlamudi RK. Cloning and functional characterization of PELP1/MNAR promoter. Gene. 2004;330:115–22. Epub 2004/04/17. [pii]. pmid:15087130.
- 18. Cortez V, Samayoa C, Zamora A, Martinez L, Tekmal RR, Vadlamudi RK. PELP1 Overexpression in the Mouse Mammary Gland Results in the Development of Hyperplasia and Carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2014;74(24):7395–405. pmid:25377474; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4268231.
- 19. Lonning PE, Helle H, Duong NK, Ekse D, Aas T, Geisler J. Tissue estradiol is selectively elevated in receptor positive breast cancers while tumour estrone is reduced independent of receptor status. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;117(1–3):31–41. Epub 2009/07/14. S0960-0760(09)00185-X [pii] pmid:19591931.
- 20. Flageng MH, Knappskog S, Haynes BP, Lonning PE, Mellgren G. Inverse Regulation of EGFR/HER1 and HER2-4 in Normal and Malignant Human Breast Tissue. PloS one. 2013;8(8):e74618. pmid:23991224; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3750010.
- 21. Haynes BP, Straume AH, Geisler J, A'Hern R, Helle H, Smith IE, et al. Intratumoral estrogen disposition in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(6):1790–801. Epub 2010/03/11. doi: 1078-0432.CCR-09-2481 [pii] pmid:20215536.
- 22. Geisler J, Berntsen H, Lonning PE. A novel HPLC-RIA method for the simultaneous detection of estrone, estradiol and estrone sulphate levels in breast cancer tissue. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2000;72(5):259–64. pmid:10822015.
- 23. Geisler J, Ekse D, Helle H, Duong NK, Lonning PE. An optimised, highly sensitive radioimmunoassay for the simultaneous measurement of estrone, estradiol and estrone sulfate in the ultra-low range in human plasma samples. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;109(1–2):90–5. Epub 2008/02/05. S0960-0760(07)00274-9 [pii] pmid:18242079.
- 24. McDonnell DP, Norris JD. Connections and regulation of the human estrogen receptor. Science. 2002;296(5573):1642–4. pmid:12040178.
- 25. Cortez V, Mann M, Tekmal S, Suzuki T, Miyata N, Rodriguez-Aguayo C, et al. Targeting the PELP1-KDM1 axis as a potential therapeutic strategy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14(4):R108. Epub 2012/07/21. pmid:22812534.
- 26. Mann M, Zou Y, Chen Y, Brann D, Vadlamudi R. PELP1 oncogenic functions involve alternative splicing via PRMT6. Molecular oncology. 2014;8(2):389–400. pmid:24447537; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3943689.
- 27. Rajhans R, Nair HB, Nair SS, Cortez V, Ikuko K, Kirma NB, et al. Modulation of in situ estrogen synthesis by proline-, glutamic acid-, and leucine-rich protein-1: potential estrogen receptor autocrine signaling loop in breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2008;22(3):649–64. Epub 2007/12/15. me.2007-0350 [pii] pmid:18079323; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2262166.
- 28. Dunbier AK, Anderson H, Ghazoui Z, Folkerd EJ, A'Hern R, Crowder RJ, et al. Relationship between plasma estradiol levels and estrogen-responsive gene expression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1161–7. Epub 2010/02/04. JCO.2009.23.9616 [pii] pmid:20124184; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2834467.
- 29. Lonning PE, Haynes BP, Straume AH, Dunbier A, Helle H, Knappskog S, et al. Exploring breast cancer estrogen disposition: the basis for endocrine manipulation. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2011;17(15):4948–58. Epub 2011/07/28. pmid:21791635.
- 30. Nair SS, Mishra SK, Yang Z, Balasenthil S, Kumar R, Vadlamudi RK. Potential role of a novel transcriptional coactivator PELP1 in histone H1 displacement in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64(18):6416–23. pmid:15374949.
- 31. Vallabhaneni S, Nair BC, Cortez V, Challa R, Chakravarty D, Tekmal RR, et al. Significance of ER-Src axis in hormonal therapy resistance. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;130(2):377–85. Epub 2010/12/25. pmid:21184269; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3243930.
- 32. Cheskis BJ, Greger J, Cooch N, McNally C, McLarney S, Lam HS, et al. MNAR plays an important role in ERa activation of Src/MAPK and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways. Steroids. 2008;73(9–10):901–5. Epub 2008/02/12. pmid:18261753.