Figures
Fig 1 and Fig 2 are inadvertently switched. Fig 1 should be Fig 2 and Fig 2 should be Fig 1. The authors have provided the correct figures here.
For visualization, subtrees containing Antarctic sponges were pruned from the complete phylogenetic tree that included all sequences analyzed (i.e. GenBank + sequences from this study). Orders are indicated for each subtree. Bootstrap support is given near each branch of the tree. Specimens originally classified as a different species using morphology and reclassified after DNA-barcoding or presenting molecular-morphological discrepancies are in red (see Table 1). Specimens belonging the Spirophorida were sequenced for this study but were already published by Szitenberg et al. 2013.
For visualization, subtrees containing Antarctic sponges were pruned from the complete phylogenetic tree that included all sequences analyzed (i.e. GenBank + sequences from this study). Bootstrap support is given near each branch of the tree. Specimens originally classified as a different species using morphology and reclassified after DNA-barcoding or presenting molecular-morphological discrepancies are in red (see Table 1).
Reference
Citation: Vargas S, Kelly M, Schnabel K, Mills S, Bowden D, Wörheide G (2015) Correction: Diversity in a Cold Hot-Spot: DNA-Barcoding Reveals Patterns of Evolution among Antarctic Demosponges (Class Demospongiae, Phylum Porifera). PLoS ONE 10(7): e0133096. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133096
Published: July 14, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Vargas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited