Figures
There are a number of errors in the axes labels for Fig 8, “Heat maps for comparative performance analysis of different decomposition levels of wavelet analysis (from left to right: Jaccard index, sensitivity, and specificity).” The publisher apologizes for the errors. Please see the corrected Fig 8 here.
There is an error in the axis label for Fig 9, “Heat maps obtained by different methods with respect to Jaccard index.” The publisher apologizes for the error. Please see the corrected Fig 9 here.
There is an error in the axis label for Fig 10, “Heat maps obtained by different methods with respect to sensitivity.” The publisher apologizes for the error. Please see the corrected Fig 10 here.
There is an error in the axis label for Fig 11, “Heat maps obtained by different methods with respect to specificity.” The publisher apologizes for the error. Please see the corrected Fig 11 here.
There are a number of errors in the axes labels for Fig 12, “Heat maps for comparative performance analysis of the proposed method (skull stripping), the method ℳ2 (without skull stripping), and the method ℳ3 (masking using BET) for background separation (from left to right: Jaccard index, sensitivity, and specificity). The publisher apologizes for the errors. Please see the corrected Fig 12 here.
Reference
Citation: The PLOS ONE Staff (2015) Correction: Rough-Fuzzy Clustering and Unsupervised Feature Selection for Wavelet Based MR Image Segmentation. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0132081. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132081
Published: June 29, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 The PLOS ONE Staff. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited