Figures
Abstract
A two-state life history model governed by ODEs is formulated to elucidate the population dynamics of jellyfish and to illuminate the triggering mechanism of its blooms. The polyp-medusa model admits trichotomous global dynamic scenarios: extinction, polyps survival only, and both survival. The population dynamics sensitively depend on several biotic and abiotic limiting factors such as substrate, temperature, and predation. The combination of temperature increase, substrate expansion, and predator diminishment acts synergistically to create a habitat that is more favorable for jellyfishes. Reducing artificial marine constructions, aiding predator populations, and directly controlling the jellyfish population would help to manage the jellyfish blooms. The theoretical analyses and numerical experiments yield several insights into the nature underlying the model and shed some new light on the general control strategy for jellyfish.
Citation: Xie C, Fan M, Wang X, Chen M (2015) Dynamic Model for Life History of Scyphozoa. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0130669. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130669
Academic Editor: Gui-Quan Sun, Shanxi University, CHINA
Received: April 23, 2015; Accepted: May 25, 2015; Published: June 26, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Xie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11271065, http://isisn.nsfc.gov.cn/egrantindex/funcindex/prjsearch-list (MF)), the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of P. R. China (no. 20130043110001, (MF), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (no. DC201502050203, DC12010310 (CBX) and no. 14ZZ1309 (MC)). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Jellyfish are among the most conspicuous animals widely distributing in the oceans. They have complex life histories and demographics and plays an essential role in the marine ecosystems acting as a ‘keystone’ species [1]. Jellyfish has been abnormally blooming and flourishing in many waters since 1980s [2–8]. Bloom or large swarm is usually used for a large group of jellyfish that gather in a small area, but may also have a time component, referring to seasonal increases, or numbers beyond what was expected. Blooms are distinct-varying in species composition and size. For example, in Japan, blooms should be > 2,000 medusae of Nemopilema nomurai entrapped per set net per day [9], while in the Mediterranean, blooms should be up to 600 medusae of Pelagia noctiluca per m3 [7]. Jellyfish blooms cause extreme problems to both marine ecosystems and human enterprises [3, 8, 10, 11].
The most metagenetic scyphozoan has complicated life history (Fig 1). Extensive studies [12–16] demonstrate that the early developmental stages in the life cycle play a critical role in the development of jellyfish outbursts. Research is crucial on expounding jellyfish ecology and characterizing its complex life history.
The life history usually comprises two stages (pelagic and benthic) with several different phases (planula, polyp, strobila, ephyra, and medusa). The solid lines with arrows depict the natural life cycle. The dash line from Medusa to Young Polyp represents the supplement involving sexual reproduction by medusa, settlement and metamorphosis by planula. The dash line from Developed Polyp to Medusa indicates the progress of strobilation, liberation and growing up.
The causes of jellyfish blooms are still uncertain but heavily related to the anthropogenic impact [10, 17] such as overfishing [3, 6, 11], eutrophication [18], climate change [19], habitat modification [20, 21] and alien invasion [22–24]. Those factors directly or indirectly irritate the modes of reproduction of medusae and polyps. For example, overfishing results in the decrease of predators and competitors of medusae [1]; eutrophication brings about abnormal phytoplankton blooms, ocean acidification and hypoxia, which damage the fish but have no effect on jellyfish [4, 25–27]; climate warming accelerates the budding and triggers the strobilation, and, in particular, the temperature usually has determinant effect on the variation and expanding of jellyfish population in the early life stages [16, 28, 29], even “the warmer the better” [30]; habitat modification, i.e. global ocean sprawl of artificial substrates [31], provides suitable habitat for the benthic stage of the life history and has been potentially linked to huge polyp populations and medusa blooms [20, 21]; the alien jellyfish is usually invasive and increasing dramatically, exerts tremendous pressure on native species and shifts the pelagic ecosystem structure seriously [7, 23, 24]. Jellyfish populations definitely respond to those changes from human’s activities. Yet the general awareness of these phenomena is still embryonic and few (theoretical) studies are available [7].
In the course of 20 century, the studies of aquatic system have changed significantly and shifted from purely descriptive disciplines to sciences that champion quantitative approaches and aim to reveal mechanistic relationships [32]. In particular, the use of mathematical formulations and models has emerged as a means to better describe, understand and predict the dynamical properties in aquatic systems. In the paper, we will propose a two-dimensional dynamic model governed by ordinary differential equations to characterize the dynamics of the life history of scyphozoa and provide insight into the mechanisms of jellyfish blooms.
Among the existing models for jellyfish, most are of a statistical nature investigating correlations between environmental indices and abundance [33, 34] or statistical analyses for the changes in jellyfish abundance over time [35, 36]. Others are food chain or food net models governed by system of differential equations based on the energy flowing [37–39]. However, except that [40] modeled the dynamics of a polyp population in a laboratory experiment by the logistic model, there is less dynamic modeling approach to identify the mechanisms forcing the population dynamics of jellyfish through their impact on the life cycle.
The aim of this paper is threefold. First, we expound the long term dynamics of jellyfish by formulating a two-dimensional dynamic model illustrating the scyphozoan life history. Second, we investigate the significant effect of some biotic and abiotic factors such temperature, substrate, and predation on the population dynamics and characterize their key sensitive impacts. Third, we discuss the mechanisms leading to the rapid expansion of jellyfish population even when there is only a few invaders.
Methods
In this section, a dynamic model is formulated to quantitatively characterize the dynamics of the life history of scyphozoa and to expound the mechanisms driving the variation of population with changing environment.
The life history of most scyphozoan jellyfish comprises several phases (Fig 1). Medusae are dioecious, with the sperm and eggs which combine to produce a planula. The planulae typically settle to the bottom and then metamorphoses into tentacle-bearing polyps (or scyphistomae). The sessile scyphistoma reproduce asexually by budding, stolon, and formation of podocysts. The segmented parts of the strobilating polyp (strobila) develop into ephyra (incipient medusae) that eventually break loose and become ephyrae. After ephyrae are released, strobilae regress to initial scyphistomae and the ephyra grows rapidly into an adult medusa, completing the life cycle.
In this study, our main purpose is to elucidate the population dynamics and the impacts of some environmental factors. We solely focus on the abundance but not on the somatic growth or morphological change of scyphozoan. The planula is the larval stage of polyp and the ephyra is incipient medusa. Either planula and polyp or ephyra and medusa are coincident in the quantity but are different only in the survival rate. That is to say, the number of polyps recruited by planulae is equal to the number of surviving planulae, similarly numbers of medusa are linearly correlated with that of supplementary ephyrae. Moreover, because the number from strobila to young polyp by the regression does not change and the difference between young polyp and developed polyp is only in shape, all phases in the benthic stage including young polyp, developed polyp, and strobila can be integrated into polyp and the change in the number of the benthic polyps only comes from asexual reproduction. In addition, polyp and medusa are two main stages of the life cycle of jellyfish [13], so we assume that the life cycle is simplified to an alternation between the bottom-dwelling polyp (benthic stage) and free-swimming medusa (pelagic stage). Moreover, the asexual reproduction rate and strobilation rate are assumed to be functions of temperature and the resource is sufficient for the jellyfish growth.
Let P(t) and M(t) be the population size or number of polyps and medusae at time t, respectively. The abundance of polyps changes due to asexual reproduction (α(T)P), recruitment from planulae by sexual reproduction (s1γM), natural death (d1P), mortality being covered by silt or consumed by nudibranch (d2P), and intraspecific competition for substrates (b1P2). The change of medusae allows for the recruitment of ephyrae via strobilation (s2β(T)nP), natural death (d3M), mortality due to predation from other species (d4M), and intraspecific competition (b2M2).
Based on the above framework, the two-state model for scyphozoan growth, different from the classical Kolmogorov model [41], is given by
(1)
Parameters for the governing system (1) are listed in Table 1 with biological description, ranges from references, and default values used for numerical simulations. The parameter ranges are estimated or evaluated from the empirical and field experiments in references after standardized by days. The details of the standardization are presented in S1 File.
Analysis
In this section, we analyze the global dynamics of the governing system using standard qualitative analysis techniques. To facilitate the discussion below, let a = α(T) − d1 − d2, b = s1γ, c = s2β(T)n, and d = d3 + d4. Then the final form of the model we investigate is
(2)
where a ∈ ℝ, b ≥ 0, c ≥ 0, d > 0, b1 > 0, b2 > 0.
Let l = (∣a∣d + bc)/b1d. Then is positively invariant with respect to system (2). The Dulac’s criterion precludes the existence of nontrivial periodic solutions in Ω. System (2) possibly admits several different equilibrium states: extinction E0(0, 0), partial survival E1(a/b1, 0), and coexistence E*(P*, M*). The standard qualitative analysis techniques help to characterize the existence and stability of those equilibria and then the global dynamics of system (2) (see Table 2 for summarization and the S2 File for details of the proof).
The extinction equilibrium E0 always exists and is globally asymptotically stable if ad + bc < 0. In fact, ad + bc < 0 implies a < 0, i.e., α(T) < d1 + d2, which implies that the cloning rate of polyp is less than its mortality rate. In addition, ad + bc < 0 indicates that the loss dominates recruitment and hence the system is extinct. If ad + bc ≥ 0, then E0 is unstable and saddle-node bifurcation occurs when ad + bc = 0.
If ad + bc > 0 and c = 0, i.e., c = 0 and a > 0, then the boundary equilibrium E1(a/b1, 0) exists and is globally asymptotically stable. In fact, c = s2β(T)n = 0 implies that there is no survival of the ephyrae or the temperature is insufficient to strobilate. In such scenario, the polyps would be sleeping in the seabed for a long time and there is no supplement from polyp to medusa. Therefore, the system will stabilize at the boundary equilibrium E1(a/b1, 0) and there is a heteroclinic orbit connecting E0 with E1 (see Fig 2(a)).
(a) ad + bc > 0, c = 0. There are two equilibria with E0 being unstable and E1 being globally asymptotically stable. There is a heteroclinic orbit from E0 to E1. (b) ad + bc > 0, c ≠ 0. There are two equilibria with E0 being unstable and E* being globally asymptotically stable and there is a heteroclinic orbit from E0 to E*.
The positive equilibrium E*(P*, M*) exists and is globally asymptotically stable if and only if ad + bc > 0 and c ≠ 0. Moreover, there is a heteroclinic orbit connecting E0 and E* (Fig 2(b) illustrating such a heteroclinic orbit connecting the two equilibrium points for a set of physiologically relevant parameters). E* being globally asymptotically stable implies that both polyp and medusa will eventually survive whatever the initial state of the system is. In fact, M* ∈ (0, cl/d), P* ∈ (0, l + a/b1) if a ≤ 0, and P* ∈ [a/b1, l) if a > 0.
Obviously, with the decreasing of b 1 (intraspecific competition of polyps) or d (mortality of medusae), i.e., the increasing of l, the upper bound of both P* and M* will sharply increase, and the number of polyps and medusae will burst even when the initial population sizes are at very low levels. This can help to explain why only a few invaders can colonize, multiply, even become the dominant species in some sense. All of these findings are also supported by numerical simulations below.
In particular, if ad + bc > 0, c ≠ 0, and b = 0, E*(P*, M*) takes the form of . In this case, b = s1γ = 0 indicates that there is no survival of the planulae or no sexual reproduction, in other words, there is no recruitment from the pelagic to the benthic stage. However, the existence of budding et al. can expand the population of polyps in the benthos. The above findings show that the benthic stage is more crucial and more control effort should be implemented in benthic stage.
Simulation
In order to characterize the effect of temperature, substrate, and predator on the population dynamics of jellyfish, we deliberately investigate a specific jellyfish Aurelia sp.. The reason is that they are cosmopolitan and predominant scyphozoan species in many regions worldwide such as northwest Europe [49–51], North America [52], the Black Sea [5], East Asia [3, 46, 53], and Australia [54]. In the same framework, one can also explore other scyphozoan such as Cyanea nozakii Kishinouye or the giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai, the dominant species causing problems in the waters of China [55, 56] and East Asian waters [57].
The positive equilibrium being globally asymptotically stable indicates that, in the long run, the population size will eventually stabilize at a fixed equilibrium, which is independent of the initial values but varies in response to environmental conditions (parameters) (Fig 3). Fig 3(a) and 3(b) depict the cases that the parameters take the values of V1 and V2, respectively. Obviously, the numbers of two stages in Fig 3(a) are lower than those in Fig 3(b). In fact, if the environmental conditions are relatively optimal (e.g., the reproduction being high while the loses and competitions being low in Fig 3(b)), the population sizes abruptly shoot up in a very short time even the initial population sizes are very small. To some extend, Fig 3(b) can help to explain why only a few invaders (even P = 0, M = 2) can bring about rapid expansion from rare species to dominated species. [22] indicates such a case that Aurelia sp.1 is endemic to the western North Pacific and disperses globally from Japan likely related to the historical shipping activity.
(a) The parameters take the values of V1 in Table 1. (b) The parameters take the values of V2 in Table 1. In this case, the reproduction is high while the losses and competition are low. The solution curves eventually tend to high population level up to 30–50 times of the solution curves in (a) starting from the same initial values (0, 2), which depicts the invaders colonize and multiply from rare species to dominated species.
Next, we numerically explore the impact of several key limiting factors such as temperature, substrate, and predation on the population dynamics of scyphozoan.
Temperature, one of the important motivating factors that affects asexual reproduction of the scyphozoan, is considered first. We perform a sensitivity analysis as well as a parameter optimization to fit the experimental data. In Fig 4, the budding rate α(T) and stroibilation rate β(T) are fitted to the data from [42], where salinity is fixed at 27. After standardized by days (the details are presented in S1 File), the experiment data is plotted in Fig 4 and is marked by stars. Fig 4(a) and 4(b) depict the optimal fitted curves of α(T) and β(T) with respect to T ∈ [7, 22], where
(3)
(4)
The fitting is pretty good and the summed square of residuals (usually labeled as SSE) are 1.448 × 10−12 and 1.625 × 10−4, respectively.
(a) and (b) are fitting curves of α(T) and β(T), where the stars depict the experimental data from [42] standardized by days. (c) is a fitting stairs analogue to (b), which indicates that the temperature warming 1°C leads to the varying of the number of ephyrae. (d) is the bifurcation picture of the population size with respect to temperature, where b1 = 0.0012, α(T) and β(T) are given by Eqs (3) and (4), respectively, and the other parameter values are given by V2 in Table 1. The peaks of the population size of polyps and medusae occur at 12.5°C and 16.8°C, respectively. The high temperature is detrimental to the populations and leads to the decrease of population level.
Fig 4(c) is an analogue fitting stairs to Fig 4(b), where the stairs indicate that the increase of temperature (per 1°C warming) leads to the variation of ephyrae. The mean value of the relative growth rate from 7°C to 15°C is 12.1%, which is a little bit more than the experimental result 11.3% in [42]. However, from Fig 4(c), the relative growth rates from 7°C to 9°C reach 18.3% and 16.2% for every increased degree of temperature. The relatively high growth rates at low temperature coincide with the phenomena in situ observed in [52], the Cornet Bay marina, Washington, USA, where the strobilation occurs from January to April and the temperature varies from 7.6°C to 9°C. So, in some sense, the fitting well depicts the actual case.
Fig 4(d) represents the variation of steady state population sizes with temperature. From Fig 4(d), the number of polyps reaches its peak at T = 12.5°C, which corresponds to the maximum budding rate of experimental data. Then the population size of polyps almost remains constant until T = 16.8°C, at which the medusae monotonously increases to its maximum level. The difference induced by temperature is reasonable. Because, compared with the strobilation, the budding occurs in lower temperature range and clonal expansion makes it possible to release more ephyrae under high temperature. In addition, Fig 4(d) reveals that continuous high temperature may be detrimental to the population. Although the medusae peak theoretically appears at 16.8°C, which is higher than the experimental result 15°C, our theoretical finding is still significant since the experiment was done only at several typical temperatures instead of continuous temperatures spectrum.
Fig 5(a) depicts the impact of b1 on the steady state population sizes or numbers of polyp and medusa. With the decreasing of intraspecific competition between polyps (b1), the population explodes abruptly. We also note that, as b1 decreases from 0.1 to 0.0001, the number of polyps and medusae increases from 660 to 49000 and from 660 to 6900, respectively. Fig 5(a) only draws a part of the curves (i.e., b1 ∈ (0, 0.016]). The whole curves for b1 ∈ (0, 0.1] shows that, when b1 > 0.016, the increasing of b1 has little effect on the variation of population sizes; for 0 < b1 < 0.016, the change is obvious. The value 0.016 of b1 is just the reciprocal of the maximum carrying numbers (62 ind/cm2) [48].
(a) Steady state population sizes of polyp and medusa with respect to b1 (the intra-specific competition between polyps). (b) Steady state population sizes of polyp and medusa with respect to d4 (the mortality rate of medusa induced by inter-specific predation). The values of parameters are given by V2 in Table 1 except s1 = 0.2 in (a).
The numerical simulation further justifies that the intraspecific competition between polyps are mainly the spatial competition (i.e., substrate colony). The decreasing of b1, which means the intraspecific interactions of polyps for the spatial competition grows weaker (for example, due to the substrate extending), implies that the rate of successful settlement of planulae (s1) increases. In Fig 5(a), s1 is set to be 0.2.
Fig 5(b) represents the relations of steady state population sizes of polyp and medusa with respect to d4. We observe that, with the decreasing of the predation on medusae (d4), the number of polyps increases simultaneously, even the average increasing speed is higher than that of medusae. Whence, the decrease of predation benefits the growth rate of jellyfish in the pelagic stage.
Results and Discussion
We have formulated a two-state life history model governed by ODEs is derived to characterize the population dynamics of scyphozoan. Despite its relative simplicity, we offer some hypotheses generated from numerical experiments which may inform future empirical and theoretical experimentation, as well as an extension to the model which may allow for more robust theoretical exploration of jellyfish ecology. Our theoretical analyses and numerical experiments yield several insight into the nature of the model and the system it represents. We found that the polyp-medusa model admits trichotomous global dynamic scenarios: either E0, or E1, or E* being globally asymptotically stable. The analytical and numerical analyses elucidate that the population dynamics sensitively depend on several key limiting factors such as substrate, temperature, and predation.
Artificial structures provide new habitats for planula settlement, extend the distribution of scyphozoan species, give rise to the decreasing of b1 and the increasing of s1, and result in the increasing frequency of jellyfish blooms. Many studies focus on the important role of substrates playing in the population dynamics of jellyfish, among which, the majority focus on the preference of polyps for different substrate types, natural or artificial [12, 48, 58], and others illustrate that the possible link between ocean sprawl and jellyfish proliferation is crucial for expounding the mechanism of jellyfish blooms [20, 21, 54]. Our theoretical study confirms that the scyphozoan species are explicitly and sensitively affected by the expansion of substrates and the benthic phase of scyphozoan life cycle contributes much more to the abundance of the medusa. The potential that artificial structures serving as substrate for polyps in jellyfish blooms must be considered in practical management.
Temperature is one of the most important triggering factors of jellyfish blooms. This study reveals that, within a suitable range of temperature, the increasing of temperature might lead to the explosion of polyps and medusae, but much higher temperatures would be detrimental to both forms. This finding is consistent with the experiment results in [46]. It is well known that the global warming has caused the ocean water to warm rather erratically and has proved to have negative effects for many species regulating jellyfish such as Leatherback and specialized fish species while has helped jellyfish thrive [1, 17]. This accounts for possible the fact that ongoing increases in water temperature result in the appearance of adult jellyfish swarms.
In addition to the problems due to temperature change, the decline of predation may also accelerate the rapid growth of jellyfish. Many predators regulating jellyfish numbers are victims of human activities such as overfishing [59]. Some adult fish are among the main predators of jellyfish, their rapid disappearance has allowed the jellyfish population to skyrocket [1]. In addition, the unrestricted fishing has reduced the number of creatures that jellyfish compete with for plankton and other forms of food and is resulting in a decreased level of competition for the jellyfish, which also fuels the growth of the jellyfish population [11]. Increasing and enforcing fishing regulations must be on the way. One more method to control the jellyfish blooms is to increase the predation by introducing other gelatinous zooplankton [24, 60] or jellyfish-eating fish such as silver pomfret Pampus argenteus [61].
In summary, jellyfish blooms seem to be related to human induced stresses like predation fading, habitat modification, and climate (temperature) change. The combination of these factors acts synergistically to create a habitat that is more favorable for jellyfishes. Reducing artificial marine constructions, aiding predator populations, and directly controlling the jellyfish population would all, if implemented with an adaptive management style plan, help to manage the jellyfish blooms. This theoretical study provides insight into the facts underlying this model, illuminates the triggering mechanisms of jellyfish blooms, and sheds some new light on the general control strategy for jellyfish.
Although the numerically simulations are carried out for a specified species Aurelia sp., the idea and approach fall into a general framework that can be applied to other scyphozoan species and compensate the experimental studies. The reason is that both empirical and field experiments are case-related and limited by experimental circumstance. For example, A. aurita lives in much warmer temperatures (19 ∼ 32°C) in Taiwan [46], a relatively colder range (7 ∼ 15°C) in the northeast Pacific, and in a wider temperature range (5 ∼ 30°C) in Japan [28]. Moreover, the experiments are usually done only for several typical temperature scenarios instead of continuous temperature spectrum.
In this study, predation is simply included implicitly as constant per capita death rate induced by predators, rather than being subsumed as a dependent trophic variable input to scyphozoa populations. While this is a very strong assumption, it allows us to focus solely on the scyphozoan life cycle and several typical limiting factors. More biotic and abiotic factors and processes must be incorporated into the dynamic modeling of scyphozoan and marine ecosystems. It will be more interesting but more challenging.
Supporting Information
S1 File. Estimation of model parameters.
We deal with the dimensional homogeneity by standardizing the data by days since different dimensions are adopted in different experiments. The estimated parameter values or ranges are list in Table 1.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130669.s001
(PDF)
S2 File. Existence and stability of equilibria of system (2).
The standard qualitative analysis techniques help to prove the existence and stability of the equilibria and the global dynamics of system (2).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130669.s002
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for insightful comments, which improve the presentation of the manuscript. The authors also thank Profs. Song Sun and Yantao Wang from Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for their help on the estimation of the parameters, and suggestive and illuminating discussion.
Author Contributions
Analyzed the data: MF CBX. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MF CBX. Wrote the paper: MF CBX. Designed the study: MF CBX. Theoretical analysis: CBX MF XW. Numerical experiments: CBX MC XW.
References
- 1. Pauly D, Graham W, Libralato S, Morissette L, Palomares MD. Jellyfish in ecosystems, online databases, and ecosystem models. Hydrobiologia. 2009;616(1):67–85.
- 2. Brodeur RD, Sugisaki H, Hunt GL Jr. Increases in jellyfish biomass in the Bering Sea: implications for the ecosystem. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2002;233:89–103.
- 3. Dong Z, Liu D, Keesing JK. Jellyfish blooms in China: Dominant species, causes and consequences. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2010;60(7):954–963. pmid:20553695
- 4. Grove M, Breitburg DL. Growth and reproduction of gelatinous zooplankton exposed to low dissolved oxygen. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2005;301:185–198.
- 5. Kideys AE. Recent dramatic changes in the Black Sea ecosystem: the reason for the sharp decline in Turkish anchovy fisheries. Journal of Marine Systems. 1994;5(2):171–181.
- 6. Lynam CP, Gibbons MJ, Axelsen BE, Sparks CA, Coetzee J, Heywood BG, et al. Jellyfish overtake fish in a heavily fished ecosystem. Current Biology. 2006;16(13):R492–R493. pmid:16824906
- 7.
Mills CE. Jellyfish blooms: are populations increasing globally in response to changing ocean conditions? In: Jellyfish Blooms: Ecological and Societal Importance. Springer; 2001. p. 55–68.
- 8. Uye Si. Blooms of the giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai: a threat to the fisheries sustainability of the East Asian Marginal Seas. Plankton and Benthos Research. 2008;3(Supplement):125–131.
- 9.
Uye Si. The giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai in East Asian marginal seas. In: Jellyfish Blooms. Springer; 2014. p. 185–205.
- 10. Purcell JE, Uye Si, Lo WT. Anthropogenic causes of jellyfish blooms and their direct consequences for humans: a review. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2007;350:153.
- 11. Purcell JE, Arai MN. Interactions of pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores with fish: a review. Hydrobiologia. 2001;451(1–3):27–44.
- 12. Holst S, Jarms G. Substrate choice and settlement preferences of planula larvae of five Scyphozoa (Cnidaria) from German Bight, North Sea. Marine Biology. 2007;151(3):863–871.
- 13. Katsuki T, Greenspan RJ. Jellyfish nervous systems. Current Biology. 2013;23(14):R592–R594. pmid:23885868
- 14. Lucas CH, Graham WM, Widmer C. Jellyfish Life Histories: Role of Polyps in Forming and Maintaining Scyphomedusa Populations. Advances in marine biology. 2012;63:133–196. pmid:22877612
- 15. Pitt KA, Duarte CM, Lucas CH, Sutherland KR, Condon RH, Mianzan H, et al. Jellyfish body plans provide allometric advantages beyond low carbon content. PloS one. 2013;8(8):e72683. pmid:23967331
- 16. Prieto L, Astorga D, Navarro G, Ruiz J. Environmental control of phase transition and polyp survival of a massive-outbreaker jellyfish. PloS one. 2010;5(11):e13793. pmid:21072185
- 17. Richardson AJ, Bakun A, Hays GC, Gibbons MJ. The jellyfish joyride: causes, consequences and management responses to a more gelatinous future. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2009;24(6):312–322.
- 18.
Arai MN. Pelagic coelenterates and eutrophication: a review. In: Jellyfish Blooms: Ecological and Societal Importance. Springer; 2001. p. 69–87.
- 19. Brodeur RD, Decker MB, Ciannelli L, Purcell JE, Bond NA, Stabeno PJ, et al. Rise and fall of jellyfish in the eastern Bering Sea in relation to climate regime shifts. Progress in Oceanography. 2008;77(2):103–111.
- 20. Lo WT, Purcell JE, Hung JJ, Su HM, Hsu PK. Enhancement of jellyfish (Aurelia aurita) populations by extensive aquaculture rafts in a coastal lagoon in Taiwan. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil. 2008;65(3):453–461.
- 21. Miyake H, Terazaki M, Kakinuma Y. On the polyps of the common jellyfish Aurelia aurita in Kagoshima Bay. Journal of Oceanography. 2002;58(3):451–459.
- 22. Dawson MN, Gupta AS, England MH. Coupled biophysical global ocean model and molecular genetic analyses identify multiple introductions of cryptogenic species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(34):11968–11973. pmid:16103373
- 23.
Graham WM, Bayha KM. Biological invasions by marine jellyfish. In: Biological invasions. Springer; 2007. p. 239–255.
- 24. Kideys AE. Fall and rise of the Black Sea ecosystem. Science. 2002;297(5586):1482–1484. pmid:12202806
- 25. Condon RH, Decker MB, Purcell JE. Effects of low dissolved oxygen on survival and asexual reproduction of scyphozoan polyps (Chrysaora quinquecirrha). Hydrobiologia. 2001;451(1–3):89–95.
- 26. Ishii H, Ohba T, Kobayashi T. Effects of low dissolved oxygen on planula settlement, polyp growth and asexual reproduction of Aurelia aurita. Plankton and Benthos Research. 2008;3(Supplement):107–113.
- 27. Purcell J, Breitburg D, Decker M, Graham W, Youngbluth M, Raskoff K. Pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores in low dissolved oxygen environments: A review. Coastal hypoxia: consequences for living resources and ecosystems. 2001;58:77–100.
- 28. Han CH, Uye Si. Combined effects of food supply and temperature on asexual reproduction and somatic growth of polyps of the common jellyfish Aurelia aurita sl. Plankton and Benthos Research. 2010;5(3):98–105.
- 29. Willcox S, Moltschaniwskyj NA, Crawford C. Asexual reproduction in scyphistomae of Aurelia sp.: Effects of temperature and salinity in an experimental study. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2007;353(1):107–114.
- 30. Ruiz J, Prieto L, Astorga D. A model for temperature control of jellyfish (Cotylorhiza tuberculata) outbreaks: A causal analysis in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon. Ecological Modelling. 2012;233:59–69.
- 31. Duarte CM, Pitt KA, Lucas CH, Purcell JE, Uye Si, Robinson K, et al. Is global ocean sprawl a cause of jellyfish blooms? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2012;11(2):91–97.
- 32. Fussmann GF. The Lake as a System of Differential Equations–A Paradigm for the Aquatic Ecologist of the 21st Century? International Review of Hydrobiology. 2008;93(4–5):532–540.
- 33. Decker M, Brown C, Hood R, Purcell J, Gross T, Matanoski J, et al. Predicting the distribution of the scyphomedusa Chrysaora quinquecirrha in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2007;329:99–113.
- 34.
Purcell JE. Extension of methods for jellyfish and ctenophore trophic ecology to large-scale research. In: Jellyfish Blooms: Causes, Consequences, and Recent Advances. Springer; 2009. p. 23–50.
- 35. Condon RH, Duarte CM, Pitt KA, Robinson KL, Lucas CH, Sutherland KR, et al. Recurrent jellyfish blooms are a consequence of global oscillations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(3):1000–1005.
- 36. Daskalov GM, Grishin AN, Rodionov S, Mihneva V. Trophic cascades triggered by overfishing reveal possible mechanisms of ecosystem regime shifts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(25):10518–10523.
- 37. Haraldsson M, Tönnesson K, Tiselius P, Thingstad TF, Aksnes DL. Relationship between fish and jellyfish as a function of eutrophication and water clarity. Marine Ecology Progress Series; 2012; 471:73–85.
- 38. Legović T. A recent increase in jellyfish populations: a predator-prey model and its implications. Ecological modelling. 1987;38(3):243–256.
- 39. Oguz T, Salihoglu B, Fach B. A coupled plankton-anchovy population dynamics model assessing nonlinear controls of anchovy and gelatinous biomass in the Black Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2008;369:229–256.
- 40. Melica V, Invernizzi S, Caristi G. Logistic density-dependent growth of an Aurelia aurita polyps population. Ecological Modelling. 2014;291:1–5.
- 41. Kolmogorov AN. Sulla teoria di Volterra della lotta per lésistenza. Giornale Instituto Ital Attuari. 1936;7:74–80.
- 42. Purcell JE. Environmental effects on asexual reproduction rates of the scyphozoan Aurelia labiata. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2007;348:183–196.
- 43. Lucas C. Population dynamics of Aurelia aurita (Scyphozoa) from an isolated brackish lake, with particular reference to sexual reproduction. Journal of Plankton Research. 1996;18(6):987–1007.
- 44. Lucas CH. Reproduction and life history strategies of the common jellyfish, Aurelia aurita, in relation to its ambient environment. Hydrobiologia. 2001;451(1–3):229–246.
- 45. Conley K, Uye Si. Effects of hyposalinity on survival and settlement of moon jellyfish (Aurelia aurita) planulae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2015;462:14–19.
- 46. Liu WC, Lo WT, Purcell JE, Chang HH. Effects of temperature and light intensity on asexual reproduction of the scyphozoan, Aurelia aurita (L.) in Taiwan. Hydrobiologia. 2009;616(1):247–258.
- 47.
Palomares M, Pauly D. The growth of jellyfishes. In: Jellyfish Blooms: Causes, Consequences, and Recent Advances. Springer; 2009. p. 11–21.
- 48. Gröndahl F. Evidence of gregarious settlement of planula larvae of the scyphozoan Aurelia aurita: An experimental study. Marine ecology progress series. 1989;56(1):119–125.
- 49. Schneider G. Estimation of food demands of Aurelia aurita medusae populations in the Kiel Bight/western Baltic. Ophelia. 1989;31(1):17–27.
- 50. Möller H. Population dynamics of Aurelia aurita medusae in Kiel Bight, Germany (FRG). Marine Biology. 1980;60(2–3):123–128.
- 51. Van Der Veer H, Oorthuysen W. Abundance, growth and food demand of the scyphomedusa Aurelia aurita in the western Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research. 1985;19(1):38–44.
- 52. Purcell JE, Hoover RA, Schwarck NT. Interannual variation of strobilation by the scyphozoan Aurelia labiata in relation to polyp density, temperature, salinity, and light conditions in situ. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2009;375:139–149.
- 53.
Ishii H, Tanaka F. Food and feeding of Aurelia aurita in Tokyo Bay with an analysis of stomach contents and a measurement of digestion times. In: Jellyfish Blooms: Ecological and Societal Importance. Springer; 2001. p. 311–320.
- 54. Willcox S, Moltschaniwskyj NA, Crawford CM. Population dynamics of natural colonies of Aurelia sp. scyphistomae in Tasmania, Australia. Marine Biology. 2008;154(4):661–670.
- 55. Dong J, Sun M, Wang B, Liu H. Comparison of life cycles and morphology of Cyanea nozakii and other scyphozoans. Plankton Benthos Res. 2008;3(Suppl):118–124.
- 56. Zhang F, Sun S, Jin X, Li C. Associations of large jellyfish distributions with temperature and salinity in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea. Hydrobiologia. 2012;690(1):81–96.
- 57. Kawahara M, Uye Si, Ohtsu K, Iizumi H. Unusual population explosion of the giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai (Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae) in East Asian waters. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2006;307:161–173.
- 58.
Hoover RA, Purcell JE. Substrate preferences of scyphozoan Aurelia labiata polyps among common dock-building materials. In: Jellyfish Blooms: Causes, Consequences, and Recent Advances. Springer; 2009. p. 259–267.
- 59. Roux JP, van der Lingen CD, Gibbons MJ, Moroff NE, Shannon LJ, Smith AD, et al. Jellyfication of marine ecosystems as a likely consequence of overfishing small pelagic fishes: lessons from the Benguela. Bulletin of Marine Science. 2013;89(1):249–284.
- 60. Li ZF, Liu CS, Zhuang ZM, Zou AG, Chen SQ, Yan JP, et al. The Mutual Predatory Relationship of Jellyfishes in Different Life Stages Between Aurelia sp. 1 and Rhopilema Esculenta. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica. 2012;3:026.
- 61. Liu CS, Zhuang ZM, Chen SQ, Shi ZH, Yan JP, Liu CL. Medusa consumption and prey selection of silver pomfret Pampus argenteus juveniles. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology. 2014;32:71–80.