The Efficacy of Chinese Medicinal Herbs towards Grape Phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch) (Hemiptera, Phylloxeridae)

Yongqiang Liu; Zhongyue Wang; Junping Su; Weiwei Liu; Khalid Hussain Dhiloo; Yuyuan Guo

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128038

Abstract

Bio-insecticidal effects of seven Chinese medicinal herbs on mortality, fecundity, developmental periods and life table parameters of the grape phylloxera were investigated. In an excised root bioassay experiment aqueous extracts from seven Chinese medicinal herbs increased grape phylloxera first instar mortality (26.00–38.50%) compared to other instars. The intrinsic rate of increase (r_m), finite rate of increase (λ), fecundity rate and net reproductive rate (R₀) were significantly reduced by A. bidentata, A. tataricus, O. basilicum, P. frutescens and N. cataria. In a glasshouse pot trial, eggs, nymphs, adults and total population were significantly reduced before population establishment compared to those after its population established, by A. bidentata, A. tataricus and O. basilicum. Overall, A. bidentata, A. tataricus and O. basilicum can be used to suppress all life-stages of grape phylloxera.

Citation: Liu Y, Wang Z, Su J, Liu W, Hussain Dhiloo K, Guo Y (2015) The Efficacy of Chinese Medicinal Herbs towards Grape Phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch) (Hemiptera, Phylloxeridae). PLoS ONE 10(7): e0128038. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128038

Editor: Monica Scali, Universita degli Studi di Siena, ITALY

Received: January 12, 2015; Accepted: April 21, 2015; Published: July 17, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: The work was supported by the National Technology System project for Grape Industry (nycytx-30). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Grape phylloxera, Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Fitch) (Hemiptera, Phylloxeridae), is an aphid-like pest, native to eastern North America but nowadays it is widely regarded as the most destructive insect pest of commercial grapevines Vitis worldwide [1]. Root-feeding stages are the most economically damaging and the subterranean habitat makes control difficult [2]. In the 19^th century, European vineyards were ravaged by these pests. Grape phylloxera was first reported as a grape pest in France and spread across continental Europe and finally around the world [3]. Since the 1920s, some studies on biology and control of grape phylloxera have been conducted worldwide.

Since the early historical outbreaks, grape phylloxera has been managed effectively using resistant rootstocks [2]. However, this strategy is facing a challenge as resistance of rootstocks to grape phylloxera that is being questioned as a result of genotype-genotype interactions between the host and pest. For example, host-associated grape phylloxera genetic clones with a preference for different Vitis genotypes has been observed in endemic Californian, German, Austrian, Australia and Hungarian grape phylloxera strains under laboratory conditions as well as under field conditions Californian [2, 4]. Moreover, the emergence of grape phylloxera biotype B caused a breakdown in the resistance of the widely planted rootstock AXR#1 (V. vinifera ‘Aramon’×V. rupestris) and cost the viticulture industry between US$ 1 and 6 billion [5–6].

There has been limited use of alternative chemical, biological and cultural control options for over nine decades, due to restrictions to high mammal’s toxicity insecticides and the insects’ subterranean habitat, no fully effective alternative control strategy has been developed for root-galling grape phylloxera in commercial vineyards. [2,4,7–9]. It is therefore necessary to explore more effective control options.

One potential option is to use intercropping plants with insecticidal activity. Intercropping is the simultaneous production of two or more crops in the same field [10]. Historically it has significantly contributed to agriculture and plays an important role in sustainable agriculture. Nowadays, intercropping based on the insecticidal characteristics of plant itself or its secondary metabolism is being used commonly to overcome agricultural pest problems globally [11–12]. In the case of phylloxera control it would be necessary to identify and utilize high efficacy plants which can be intercropped with grapevines.

More than 1500 plants species have been reported possessing insecticidal value[13], however, intercropped with grapevines required the plants have shade tolerance in order to complete the entire growth period under the grape arbor. Therefore, the present study was conducted to compare the effects of aqueous root extracts to grape phylloxera from seven Chinese medicinal herbs which have insecticidal activity [13–20], shade tolerance and can be artificially cultivated.

Materials and Methods

Insects and plants

With the authorization of Huaihua Agriculture Bureau, Hunan Province, grape phylloxera were collected from phylloxera-infested vineyards near Shuangxi town, Huaihua city, Hunan Province, China (27°14′N, 109°51′E). Post collection, phylloxera were maintained on excised grapevine roots petri dishes (12-cm diameter) in controlled environment incubators set of 26 ± 1°C, 80 ± 5% RH and a photoperiod of 0:24 h (L:D). Fresh excised roots (3–7 mm in diameter and 5 cm in length) of Vitis labruscana Kyoho were used to maintain and allow for the development of phylloxera population. One end of each root was wrapped in wet cotton to prevent desiccation. The maintenance method was followed according to de Benedictis and Granett [21].

The grape cultivar used in the study was ‘Kyoho’ (Vitis. vinifera L. × V. Labrusca L. cv. Kyoho), that is one of the main grape cultivar grown commercially in Hunan Province, China.

Seven Chinese medicinal herbs from four families (Table 1) with known insecticidal properties were tested in the present study [22]. Seeds or young plants of the selected herbs were purchased from Anguo Chinese medicinal herbs market (Hebei, China) and then planted in the experimental field plots near Shuangxi town, Huaihua city, Hunan Province, China (27°14′N, 109°51′E).

Download:

Table 1. Selected Chinese medicinal herbs with known insecticidal activity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128038.t001

Grapevine root-dip bioassay

Fresh roots were obtained from mature Chinese medicinal herbs in the experimental field plots between 16–20^th of August, 2012. After washing with sterilized water, the roots were dried at 50°C for 24 h and ground using a Chinese medicine grinder (Deqing Baiji Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd., China) and then filtered to a fine powder using a 40 mesh stainless steel sieve. For extraction, 10 g of powdered roots were dissolved in 1:20 (w/v) of distilled water and vibration extracted for 12 h at 25°C. The mixture was stored at 25°C for 12 h and then filtered by centrifugation (10 min, 3000 g). The filtered root extracts were stored in the refrigerator at 4°C for the further studies [23].

A root dipping method, adopted from a leaf-dip bioassay method [24] was used to determine the effect of Chinese medicinal herbs aqueous root extraction against grape phylloxera. Grapevine roots were obtained from the vineyard in the experimental field plots. Roots of (3–7 mm in diameter and 5 cm in length) were washed with distilled water. Each root piece was immersed in aqueous herb root extracts for 5 min and then dried on tissue paper in a fume hood for 1.5 h. After drying, the roots were placed in pairs on filter paper discs in glass petri dishes (12 cm diam.). One end of each root was wrapped in wet cotton to prevent desiccation. All of the petri dishes were maintained in controlled environment incubators as mentioned above (26 ± 1°C, 80 ± 5% RH) and a photoperiod of 0:24 h (L:D). Grape phylloxera eggs (approximately 6 h old) were selected from the laboratory colony and placed on each grape root in petri dishes which were sealed as to prevent insect escaping or cross contamination. Seven herb root extract treatments and one control treatment were used and in each treatment about 200 eggs were exposed, i.e. 50 eggs were considered as one replicate and four replicates per treatment. Bioassay plates were checked after every 24 h, and hatched and unhatched eggs were counted. The eggs were considered as unviable if no hatching occurred during the experiment. The mortality and survival of nymphs, adult survival and number of eggs laid were recorded on daily basis. The nymph instar was estimated based on its size [25]. The experiments continued until the death of each individual.

Life table parameters including intrinsic rate of increase (r_m), finite rate of increase (λ), net reproductive rate (R₀), mean generation time (T) and population doubling time (DT) were calculated.

Potted grapevine bioassay

One year-old grapevine seedlings were potted in 6L pots filled with culture substrates composed of soil, fowl manure and sand at a 7: 1: 1 ratio. Sixty days after transplanting, the potted grapevines were used in two different experiments.

Potted experiment 1: A total of 200 grape phylloxera eggs were first placed onto the excised grapevine roots (3–7 mm in diameter and 5 cm in length), then were placed near the grapevine roots in the pots and Simultaneously before the phylloxera population established, twenty plants of the medicinal herbs were transplanted into each potted grapevine. The numbers of eggs, nymphs and adults per plant were checked for 120 days after inoculation.

Potted experiment 2: A total of 200 phylloxera eggs were first placed onto the excised grapevine roots (3–7 mm in diameter and 5 cm in length), then were placed near the grapevine roots in the pots and 60 days later after its population established, twenty plants of the medicinal herbs were transplanted into each potted grapevine. The numbers of eggs, nymphs and adults per plant were counted for 60 days after inoculation.

In both experiments, each treatment was replicated 3 times, with 5 potted grapevines for each replication. The potted grapevine monocultures were used as control.

Data analysis

The following life table parameters were calculated for grape phylloxera for all Chinese medicinal herbs: the net reproductive rate, (R₀) = ∑l_xm_x; the intrinsic rate of increase (r_m), which was calculated by iteratively solving the equation ∑l_xm_xe^-rmx = 1; the mean generation time, (T) = lnR_o/r_m; doubling time, (DT) = ln (2)/r_m; and the finite rate of increase, (λ) = e^rm. In the equations, l_x is the age-specific survival rate, which is the probability to survive to a particular age x, and m_x is the age-specific fecundity, which is calculated as the number of live females per female for age x [26]. All data were analyzed by SPSS 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago). Egg hatching rate, nymphs (1^st, 1^st -2^nd, 1^st -3^rd, 1^st -4^th and 1^st, 2^nd, 3^rd, 4^th instar) mortality, the data on development rate of each stage of the grape phylloxera at different Chinese medicinal herbs, life table parameters and control efficiency of 3 Chinese medicinal herbs to total population and different development stages of grape phylloxera in potted test were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. If the ANOVA indicated a significant difference, Tukey's HSD (honestly significant difference) test was followed to separate the means. Differences of the control efficiency in potted test before and after its population established were analyzed by t-tests. All the proportion data were square root arcsine transformed before processed.

Results

Nymph mortality

In the excised root bioassay no significant hatching differences (F = 0.87, d.f. = 7, 24, P = 0.55) were observed for all treatments including control, with 86.50 ± 5.00, 87.50 ± 4.43, 89.50 ± 4.43, 91.00 ± 4.76, 91.00 ± 3.46, 92.00 ± 2.83, 92.00 ± 5.16, and 92.00 ± 4.32% for A. bidentata, A. tataricus, O. basilicum, P. frutescens, N. cataria, M. haplocalyx, C. obtusifolia extracts and control, respectively. There were significantly higher mortality between treatments and control for 1^st instar (F = 8.78, d.f. = 7, 24, P < 0.001), 1^st -2^nd instar (F = 10.93, d.f. = 7, 24, P < 0.001), 1^st -3^rd instar (F = 11.47, d.f. = 7, 24, P < 0.001) and 1^st -4^th instar nymphs (F = 12.94, d.f. = 7, 24, P < 0.001) mortality. All seven Chinese medicinal herbs extracts showed higher activity to 1^st instar nymphs than other nymphal stages (A. bidentata: F = 73.28, d.f. = 3, 12, P < 0.001; A. tataricus: F = 20.42, d.f. = 3, 12, P < 0.001; O. basilicum: F = 64.85, d.f. = 3, 12, P < 0.001; P. frutescens: F = 20.26, d.f. = 3, 12, P < 0.001; N. cataria: F = 67.36, d.f. = 3, 12, P < 0.001; M. haplocalyx: F = 43.63, d.f. = 3, 12, P < 0.001; C. obtusifolia: F = 71.65, d.f. = 3, 12, P < 0.001). All seven Chinese medicine herbs extracts showed effective results on nymphs of grape phylloxera and A. bidentate, A. tataricus and O. basilicum extracts have higher effects to them, whereas, there were no significantly differences among A. bidentate, A. tataricus and O. basilicum (Fig 1).

Download:

Fig 1. Mean mortality (%±SE) of grape phylloxera eggs, on grapevine root treated with aqueous root extract of Chinese medicinal herbs.

Within each diagram and instars, means followed by the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test, P>0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128038.g001

Effect of seven Chinese medicinal herbs on developmental period

Table 2 shows the effect of treatments on life history parameters of grape phylloxera extracts on life history statistics of grape phylloxera.

Download:

Table 2. Life history parameters (mean ± SE) of grape phylloxera treated by aqueous root extract of seven Chinese medicinal herbs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128038.t002

Seven Chinese medicinal herbs extracts didn’t have any egg developmental period (F = 1.84, d.f. = 7, 24, P = 0.13) and total life span (F = 1.29, d.f. = 7, 24, P = 0.3). First instar developmental period was significantly prolonged by A. bidentata A. tataricus and O. basilicum extracts (F = 19.36, d.f. = 7, 24, P < 0.001). Second (F = 27.30, d.f. = 7, 24, P < 0.001), third (F = 11.21, d.f. = 7, 24, P = 0.3) and fourth instars (F = 9.70, d.f. = 7, 24, P < 0.001) developmental period was also significantly delayed by A. bidentata and A. tataricus extracts compared to the control second and fourth instar developmental period was significantly delayed by O. basilicum and by O. basilicum, P. frutescens, N. cataria and M. haplocalyx respectively compared to the control. Adult developmental periods were significantly reduced by A. bidentata, A. tataricus, O. basilicum, P. frutescens, N. cataria and M. haplocalyx extracts as compared to the control (F = 18.03, d.f. = 7, 24, P < 0.001).

In addition, phylloxera fecundity was significantly reduced by A. bidentata, A. tataricus, O. basilicum, P. frutescens and N. cataria extracts compared to the control (F = 14.07, d.f. = 7, 24, P < 0.001).

Life table parameters

The data on life table parameters viz., ‘r_m’, ‘λ’, ‘R₀’, ‘T’ and ‘DT’ of grape phylloxera treated by aqueous root extract of seven chinese medicinal herbs are presented in Table 3.

Download:

Table 3. Life table parameters (mean ± SE) of grape phylloxera treated by aqueous root extract of Chinese medicinal herbs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128038.t003

The intrinsic rate of increase ‘r_m’ was significantly decreased by A. bidentata A. tataricus, O. basilicum, P. frutescens and N. cataria extracts compared with the control (F = 25.69, d.f. = 7, 24, P < 0.001).

The finite rate of ‘λ’ increase was reduced by A. bidentata A. tataricus, O. basilicum, P. frutescens and N. cataria extracts as compared to the control (F = 25.79, d.f. = 7, 24, P < 0.001). Net reproductive rate was significantly lower from A. bidentata, A. tataricus, O. basilicum, P. frutescens and N. cataria extracts, compared with the control (F = 10.58, d.f. = 7, 24, P < 0.001).

The mean generation time ‘T’ increased significantly when treated with A. bidentata A. tataricus and O. basilicum extracts, compared with the control (F = 28.98, d.f. = 7, 24, P < 0.001). Population doubling time ‘DT’ was significantly longer when treated with A. bidentata, A. tataricus and O. basilicum extracts, compared with the control.

Effect of selected Chinese medicinal herbs on grape phylloxera on potted grapevines

Results in Table 4 show that before the grape phylloxera population established, the total population was significantly reduced by A. bidentata, A. tataricus and O. basilicum compared with the control (F = 161.75, d.f. = 3, 8, P < 0.001). Similarly reduced egg (F = 191.38, d.f. = 3, 8, P < 0.001), nymph (F = 24.43, d.f. = 3, 8, P < 0.001) and adult (F = 290.37, d.f. = 3, 8, P < 0.001).

Download:

Table 4. The effects of Chinese medicinal herbs to grape phylloxera in potted grapevine bioassay before its population established.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128038.t004

Post-phylloxera establishment (Table 5), the total population was significantly decreased by A. bidentata, A. tataricus and O. basilicum compared with the control (F = 9.11, d.f. = 3, 8, P = 0.006). The number of eggs also significantly lower when treated with A. bidentata, A. tataricus and O. basilicum, respectively (F = 17.15, d.f. = 3, 8, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference found in nymph abundance (F = 2.24, d.f. = 3, 8, P = 0.16). However, adult abundance was significantly decreased by A. bidentata and A. tataricus treatments.

Download:

Table 5. The effects of Chinese medicinal herbs to grape phylloxera in potted grapevine bioassay after its population established.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128038.t005

Potted test showed that the total population of grape phylloxera was comparatively decreased more before its population established by A. bidentata (77.17 ± 1.50%), A. tataricus (77.32 ± 5.28%) and O. basilicum (62.82 ± 7.15%) than after its population established by A. bidentata (34.09 ± 4.75%), A. tataricus (26.10 ± 5.50%) and O. basilicum (23.13 ± 4.36%) (A. bidentata: t = 14.65, df = 4, P < 0.001; A. tataricus: t = 9.32, df = 4, P = 0.001; O. basilicum: t = 7.89, df = 4, P = 0.001) (Fig 2D). Similar differences were observed in eggs (A. bidentata: t = 13.63, df = 4, P < 0.001; A. tataricus: t = 8.56, df = 4, P = 0.001; O. basilicum: t = 8.57, df = 4, P = 0.001)(Fig 2A), nymphs (A. bidentata: t = 11.45, df = 4, P < 0.001; A. tataricus: t = 4.83, df = 4, P = 0.008; O. basilicum: t = 5.29, df = 4, P = 0.006)(Fig 2B) and adults (A. bidentata: t = 11.78, df = 4, P < 0.001; A. tataricus: t = 11.85, df = 4, P < 0.001; O. basilicum: t = 8.53, df = 4, P = 0.001)(Fig 2C).

Download:

Fig 2. The decline rate of grape phylloxera eggs (A), nymphs (B), adults (C) and total population (eggs, nymphs and adults) (D) on potted grapevines before (pot experiment 1) and after (pot experiment 2) its population established.

** indicate a significant difference determined by t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128038.g002

Discussion

In this study, we tested the activity of seven Chinese medicinal herbs, using aqueous root extracts to grape phylloxera in the laboratory by excised root bioassay. We then evaluated the efficacy of three selected Chinese medicinal herbs against grape phylloxera in a potted grapevine test. In the excised root bioassay all seven Chinese medicinal herbs, A. bidentata A. tataricus, O. basilicum, P. frutescens and N. cataria showed significantly high effects towards grape phylloxera. In the potted grapevine bioassays, all of the selected three Chinese medicinal herbs (A. bidentata A. tataricus and O. basilicum) exhibited high control efficacy to grape phylloxera before its population established. Therefore, the selected three Chinese medicinal herbs have potential for the control of grape phylloxera.

The results revealed the insecticidal effects of seven Chinese medicinal herbs aqueous root extraction on grape phylloxera. The extracts increased nymph mortality, increased the nymph development time and decreased its fecundity. Similar observations have been reported using other plant extracts for several insects pests. Neem seed oil, Eichlornia crassipes (Ponteriaceae) and Dysoxylum malabaricum Bedd. (Meliaceae) extracts showed larvicidal activity against Aphis glycines (Glover), Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and Anopheles stephensi Liston, respectively [27–29]. The developmental time of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae), Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and Pieris rapae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) was significantly prolonged by neem, Eichlornia crassipes (Ponteriaceae) and Rhododendron molle (G. Don.) (Ericaceae) flower extracts, respectively [27, 30–31]. Jeyabalan et al. [32] also reported that Pelargonium citrosa (Vanleenii) (Geramiaceae) extracts prolonged the duration of larval instars of Anopheles stephensi (Liston) (Diptera: Culicidae). Fecundity of Aphis glycines (Homoptera, Aphididae) and Tribolium confusum (Jacqueline DuVal) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) was significantly reduced by azadirachtin [29, 33]. Reduction in fecundity of Sitophilus granaries (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), S. zeamais (L.) and Prostephanus truncatus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae) was also observed when exposed to powdered leaves of Chenopodium ambrosioides (L.) (Chenopodiaceae) [34].

The intrinsic rate of increase (r_m) is a measure of the ability of a population to increase exponentially in an unlimited environment. It provides an effective summary of an insect’s life history traits [35] and has also been recommended together with toxicity assessment to provide a more accurate estimate of population-level effect of toxic compounds [36–38]. In our study, r_m is positive and was significantly reduced by A. bidentata A. tataricus, O. basilicum, P. frutescens and N. cataria root extracts. This means that the grape phylloxera population exponential rate of increase when treated by Chinese medicinal herbs is lower than the control [39]. So these Chinese medicinal herbs root extracts significantly delayed the population increase of grape phylloxera.

Reproduction rate (R₀) of grape phylloxera was significantly reduced by A. bidentata A. tataricus, O. basilicum, P. frutescens and N. cataria in the present study. This decline is regarded as a function of pesticide [40], therefore, A. bidentata A. tataricus, O. basilicum, P. frutescens and N. cataria demonstrated insecticidal properties to grape phylloxera. Doubling time of populations may show effects on increase in the time it takes for survivors to compensate for loss of individuals [41]. Doubling time of grape phylloxera was prolonged between 6.514–8.127 days by A. bidentata A. tataricus and O. basilicum extracts as compared to 4.984 days in control. So the population of grape phylloxera treated by three Chinese medicinal herbs needs more time to compensate for loss of individuals.

Under potted bioassay conditions, three Chinese medicinal herbs (A. bidentata, A. tataricus and O. basilicum) showed higher control efficiency towards grape phylloxera pre-population establishment than post-population establishment. This may be caused by treatments having a higher activity to 1^st instar nymphs than other instars (Fig 2). In terms of future management options this result indicates that the timing of application of Chinese medicinal herbs should focus on the period before its population established. Flooding of vineyards during the winter can decrease phylloxera populations [42]. Therefore, flooding during winter, combined with Chinese medicinal herbs intercropping in vineyards may potentially be used for grape phylloxera control. Further tests of the combination of these two methods, under field conditions need to be conducted.

Plant extracts with insecticidal activity have repellent, antifeedant and growth regulation effects upon insects, as they can affect insect physiology in diverse ways [13]. A. bidentata, A. tataricus, O. basilicum and P. frutescens extracts showed lethal effects to larvae of Chironomus tentans, Pieris rapae, Aedes aegypti and adults of Sitophilus zeamais, respectively. Meanwhile, O. basilicum and P. frutescens extracts have repellent effects to mosquitoes, A. bidentate and A. tataricus extracts have antifeedant effects to Chironomus tentans and Pieris rapae larvae, respectively [14, 16–18]. M. haplocalyx oil demonstrated repellency, adulticidal, larvicidal, growth and reproduction inhibition activity to various insects/pests [19]. Ren et al. [20] reported that trypsin inhibitor (COTI) from C. obtusifolia extracts had inhibitory effects on the development of Pieris rapae. Our results showed seven Chinese medicinal herbs extracts have insecticidal activities and growth regulation effects to grape phylloxera nymphs, but the mode of action of the plant extracts or their constituents, as insecticides is not clearly known. However, knowing the kinds of the secondary metabolites, their mechanisms of action are important for optimizing the application of the Chinese medicinal herbs, which requires a further research.

This study will provide valuable information on the potential use of intercropped Chinese medicinal herbs ccontaining secondary metabolites, which could effectively control grape phylloxera. The intercropping of plants with insecticidal activities and grapes should be enhanced greatly as a new strategy for sustainable management of grape phylloxera.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the National Technology System project for Grape Industry (nycytx-30). The authors thank Prof. Yongjun Zhang and Prof. Huizhu Yuan for their helpful comments. We also thank Mr. Zukang Pu from the Huaihua Plant Protection Station of Hunan Province as well as Mr. Yaoxiang Liu, Mrs. Fang Su and Mr. Bin Liu from the Hongjiang Plant Protection Station of Hunan Province for their assistance during the trials that were conducted in Hongjiang City.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: YQL ZYW YYG. Performed the experiments: JPS WWL. Analyzed the data: YQL ZYW JPS YYG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ZYW. Wrote the paper: YQL ZYW JPS WWL KHD YYG.

References

1. Herbert K, Powell K, Mckay A, Hartley D, Herdina , Ophel-Keller K (2008) Developing and testing a diagnostic probe for grape phylloxera applicable to soil samples. J Econ Entomol 101: 1934–1943. pmid:19133477
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Powell KS, Cooper PD, Forneck A (2013) The biology, physiology and host-plant interactions of grape phylloxera Daktulosphaira vitifoliae. Behav Phys Root Herbiv 45: 159–218.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Granett J, Walker MA, Kocsis L, Omer AD (2001) Biology and management of grape phylloxera. Annu Rev Entomol 46: 387–412. pmid:11112174
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Herbert KS, Umina PA, Mitrovski PJ, Powell KS, Viduka K, Hoffman AA (2010) Clone lineages of grape phylloxera differ in their performance on Vitis vinifera. Bull Entomol Res 100: 671–678. pmid:20482931
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Granett J, Timper P, Lider LA (1985) Grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) biotypes in California. J Econ Entomol 78: 1463–1467.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Williams RN, Shambaugh GF (1988) Grape phylloxera (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) biotypes confirmed by electrophoresis and host susceptibility. Ann Entomol Soc Am 81: 1–5.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Donald WL (2000) Grape phylloxera [Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae)] related root damage in organically and conventionally managed vineyards. Ph-D thesis. Davis: University of California, America.
8. Dunstone RJ, Corrie AM, Powell KS (2003) Effect of sodium hypochlorite on first instar phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch) mortality. Aust J Grape Wine Res 9: 107–109.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Benheim D, Rochfort S, Robertson E, Potter ID, Powell KS (2012) Grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae)-a review of potential detection and alternative management options. Ann Appl Biol 161: 91–115.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Fukai S, Trenbath BR (1993) Processes determining intercrop productivity and yields of component crops. Field Crops Res 34: 247–271.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Hummel JD (2009) Insect and agronomic responses in canola and wheat intercrops. Ph-D thesis. University of Alberta, Canada.
12. Bickerton MW (2011) Intercropping for conservation biological control of European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Bell peppers. Ph-D thesis. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, America.
13. Kumar P, Mishra S, Malik A, Satya S (2011) Insecticidal properties of Mentha species: a review. Industrial Crops and Products 34: 802–817
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Chen PL, Li HP, Gu J, Sun XQ, Gu Y, Dai GH (2007) Effect of 22 plant extracts bioactivities of Clostera anastomosis (L.). J Shanghaijiaotong Univ (Agric Sci) 25: 587–610.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Hao HL, Deng XJ, Du JW (2006) Extraction of catnip essential oil components and their repellent activity against Aedes albopoctus and Culex pipien pallens. Acta Entomol Sin 49: 533–537.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Wang YX (2009) Biological activity of Perilla frutescens essential oil and its effect on enzyme activity of Sitophilus zeamais. Master thesis: Northeast Normal University, Jilin, China.
17. Zhang GZ, Xu HH, Zhao SH (2000) Biological activities of extracts of plants from Qinghai-tibet plateau. J Qinghai Univ (Nat Sci) 18: 3–6.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Chokechaijaroenporn O, Bunyapraphatsara N, Kongchuensin S (1994) Mosquito repellent activities of ocimum volatile oils. Phytomedicine 1: 135–139. pmid:23195886
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Ren W, Liao H, Du LF (2007) Inhibitory effect of trypsin inhibitor from Cassia obtusifolia seeds against pieris rapae Larvae. Sichuan J Zool 26: 635–637.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Worwood V (1993) The complete book of essential oils and aromatherapy. New World Library.
21. De Benedictis JA, Granett J (1992) Variability of response of grape phylloxera (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) to bioassays that discriminate between California biotypes. J Econ Entomol 85: 1527–1534.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Yang RZ, Tang CS (1988) Plants used for pest control in China: a literature review. Econ botany 42: 376–406.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Sisodia S, Siddiqui MB (2010) Allelopathic effect by aqueous extracts of different parts of Croton bonplandianum Baill. on some crop and weed plants. J Agri Ext Rural Dev 2: 22–28.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Cahill M, Byrne FJ, German K, Denholm I, Devonshire AL (1995) Pyrethroid and organophosphate resistance in the tobacco whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Bull Entomol Res 85: 181–187.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Zhang HG, Liu CH, Wang ZY, Zhong XH, Fan XC, et al. (2009) Identification of the resistance to grape phylloxera of Chinese wild grape species. J Fruit Sci 26: 306–310.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Birch LC (1948) The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J Anim Ecol 17: 15–26.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Rani PV, Jamil K (1989) The effect of water hyacinth leaf extract on mortality, growth and metamorphosis of certain pests of stored products. Insect Sci Appl 10: 327–332.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Senthil Nathan S (2006) Effects of Melia azedarach on nutritional physiology and enzyme activities of the rice leaffolder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Pestic Biochem Physiol 84: 98–108.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Kraiss H, Cullen EM (2008) Insect growth regulator effects of azadirachtin and neem oil on survivorship, development and fecundity of Aphis glycines (Homoptera, Aphididae) and its predator, Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). Pest Manag Sci 64: 660–668. pmid:18247318
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Zhong GH, Hu MY, Weng QF, Ma AQ, Xu WS (2001) Laboratory and field evaluations of extracts from Rhododendron molle flowers as insect growth regulator to imported cabbage worm, Pieris rapae L. (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). J Appl Entomol 125: 563–596.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Charleston DS (2004) Integrating biological control and botanical pesticides for management of Plutella xylostella. PhD-Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
32. Jeyabalan D, Arul N, Thangamathi P (2003) Studies on effects of Pelargonium citrosa leaf extracts on malarial vector, Anopheles stephensi Liston. Bioresour Technol 89: 185–189. pmid:12699939
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Athanassiou CG, Kontodimas DC, Kavallieratos NG, Veroniki MA (2005) Insecticidal effect of NeemAzal against three stored-product beetle species on rye and oats. J Econ Entomol 98: 1733–1738. pmid:16334347
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Topondjou LA, Adler C, Bouda H, Fontem DA (2002) Efficacy of powder and essential oil from Chenopodium ambrosioides leaves as post-harvest grain protectants against six-stored product beetles. J Stored Prod Res 38: 395–402.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Dixon AFG (1987) Parthenogenetic reproduction and the rate of increase in aphids. In: Minks A.K., Harrewijn P. (Eds.), Aphids. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 269–287.
36. Stark JD, Tanigoshi L, Bounfour M, Antonelli A (1997) Reproductive potential, its influence on the susceptibility of the species to pesticides. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 37: 273–279. pmid:9378095
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Walthall WK, Stark JD (1997) A comparison of acute mortality and population growth rate as endpoints of toxicological effect. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 37: 45–52. pmid:9212335
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Forbes VE, Calow P (1999) Is the per capita rate of increase a good measure of population-level effects in ecotoxicology? Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 1544–1556.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Stark JD, Vargas R, Banks JE (2007) Incorporating ecologically relevant measures of pesticide effect for estimating the compatibility of pesticides and biocontrol agents. J Econ Entomol 100: 1027–1032. pmid:17849847
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Stark JD, Wennergren U (1995) Can population effects of pesticides be predicted from demographic toxicological studies? J Econ Entomol 88: 1089–1096.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Ahamad N, Ansari MS, Nazrussalam (2012) Effect of neemarin on life table indices of Plutella xylostella (L.). Crop prot 38: 7–14.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Galet P (1982) Phylloxera. In Les Maladies et le Parasites de la Vigne, Tome II Les Parasites Animaux, pp. 1059–1313. Montpellier: Paysan du Midi.

[ref1] 1. Herbert K, Powell K, Mckay A, Hartley D, Herdina , Ophel-Keller K (2008) Developing and testing a diagnostic probe for grape phylloxera applicable to soil samples. J Econ Entomol 101: 1934–1943. pmid:19133477
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Powell KS, Cooper PD, Forneck A (2013) The biology, physiology and host-plant interactions of grape phylloxera Daktulosphaira vitifoliae. Behav Phys Root Herbiv 45: 159–218.
View Article
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Granett J, Walker MA, Kocsis L, Omer AD (2001) Biology and management of grape phylloxera. Annu Rev Entomol 46: 387–412. pmid:11112174
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] PubMed/NCBI

[11] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Herbert KS, Umina PA, Mitrovski PJ, Powell KS, Viduka K, Hoffman AA (2010) Clone lineages of grape phylloxera differ in their performance on Vitis vinifera. Bull Entomol Res 100: 671–678. pmid:20482931
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] PubMed/NCBI

[15] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Granett J, Timper P, Lider LA (1985) Grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) biotypes in California. J Econ Entomol 78: 1463–1467.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Williams RN, Shambaugh GF (1988) Grape phylloxera (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) biotypes confirmed by electrophoresis and host susceptibility. Ann Entomol Soc Am 81: 1–5.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Donald WL (2000) Grape phylloxera [Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae)] related root damage in organically and conventionally managed vineyards. Ph-D thesis. Davis: University of California, America.

[ref8] 8. Dunstone RJ, Corrie AM, Powell KS (2003) Effect of sodium hypochlorite on first instar phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch) mortality. Aust J Grape Wine Res 9: 107–109.
View Article
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Benheim D, Rochfort S, Robertson E, Potter ID, Powell KS (2012) Grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae)-a review of potential detection and alternative management options. Ann Appl Biol 161: 91–115.
View Article
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Fukai S, Trenbath BR (1993) Processes determining intercrop productivity and yields of component crops. Field Crops Res 34: 247–271.
View Article
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Hummel JD (2009) Insect and agronomic responses in canola and wheat intercrops. Ph-D thesis. University of Alberta, Canada.

[ref12] 12. Bickerton MW (2011) Intercropping for conservation biological control of European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Bell peppers. Ph-D thesis. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, America.

[ref13] 13. Kumar P, Mishra S, Malik A, Satya S (2011) Insecticidal properties of Mentha species: a review. Industrial Crops and Products 34: 802–817
View Article
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Chen PL, Li HP, Gu J, Sun XQ, Gu Y, Dai GH (2007) Effect of 22 plant extracts bioactivities of Clostera anastomosis (L.). J Shanghaijiaotong Univ (Agric Sci) 25: 587–610.
View Article
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Hao HL, Deng XJ, Du JW (2006) Extraction of catnip essential oil components and their repellent activity against Aedes albopoctus and Culex pipien pallens. Acta Entomol Sin 49: 533–537.
View Article
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Wang YX (2009) Biological activity of Perilla frutescens essential oil and its effect on enzyme activity of Sitophilus zeamais. Master thesis: Northeast Normal University, Jilin, China.

[ref17] 17. Zhang GZ, Xu HH, Zhao SH (2000) Biological activities of extracts of plants from Qinghai-tibet plateau. J Qinghai Univ (Nat Sci) 18: 3–6.
View Article
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Chokechaijaroenporn O, Bunyapraphatsara N, Kongchuensin S (1994) Mosquito repellent activities of ocimum volatile oils. Phytomedicine 1: 135–139. pmid:23195886
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] PubMed/NCBI

[50] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Ren W, Liao H, Du LF (2007) Inhibitory effect of trypsin inhibitor from Cassia obtusifolia seeds against pieris rapae Larvae. Sichuan J Zool 26: 635–637.
View Article
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Worwood V (1993) The complete book of essential oils and aromatherapy. New World Library.

[ref21] 21. De Benedictis JA, Granett J (1992) Variability of response of grape phylloxera (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) to bioassays that discriminate between California biotypes. J Econ Entomol 85: 1527–1534.
View Article
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Yang RZ, Tang CS (1988) Plants used for pest control in China: a literature review. Econ botany 42: 376–406.
View Article
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Sisodia S, Siddiqui MB (2010) Allelopathic effect by aqueous extracts of different parts of Croton bonplandianum Baill. on some crop and weed plants. J Agri Ext Rural Dev 2: 22–28.
View Article
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Cahill M, Byrne FJ, German K, Denholm I, Devonshire AL (1995) Pyrethroid and organophosphate resistance in the tobacco whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Bull Entomol Res 85: 181–187.
View Article
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Zhang HG, Liu CH, Wang ZY, Zhong XH, Fan XC, et al. (2009) Identification of the resistance to grape phylloxera of Chinese wild grape species. J Fruit Sci 26: 306–310.
View Article
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Birch LC (1948) The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J Anim Ecol 17: 15–26.
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Rani PV, Jamil K (1989) The effect of water hyacinth leaf extract on mortality, growth and metamorphosis of certain pests of stored products. Insect Sci Appl 10: 327–332.
View Article
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Senthil Nathan S (2006) Effects of Melia azedarach on nutritional physiology and enzyme activities of the rice leaffolder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Pestic Biochem Physiol 84: 98–108.
View Article
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Kraiss H, Cullen EM (2008) Insect growth regulator effects of azadirachtin and neem oil on survivorship, development and fecundity of Aphis glycines (Homoptera, Aphididae) and its predator, Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). Pest Manag Sci 64: 660–668. pmid:18247318
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[80] View Article

[81] PubMed/NCBI

[82] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Zhong GH, Hu MY, Weng QF, Ma AQ, Xu WS (2001) Laboratory and field evaluations of extracts from Rhododendron molle flowers as insect growth regulator to imported cabbage worm, Pieris rapae L. (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). J Appl Entomol 125: 563–596.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Charleston DS (2004) Integrating biological control and botanical pesticides for management of Plutella xylostella. PhD-Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.

[ref32] 32. Jeyabalan D, Arul N, Thangamathi P (2003) Studies on effects of Pelargonium citrosa leaf extracts on malarial vector, Anopheles stephensi Liston. Bioresour Technol 89: 185–189. pmid:12699939
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] PubMed/NCBI

[90] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Athanassiou CG, Kontodimas DC, Kavallieratos NG, Veroniki MA (2005) Insecticidal effect of NeemAzal against three stored-product beetle species on rye and oats. J Econ Entomol 98: 1733–1738. pmid:16334347
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] PubMed/NCBI

[94] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Topondjou LA, Adler C, Bouda H, Fontem DA (2002) Efficacy of powder and essential oil from Chenopodium ambrosioides leaves as post-harvest grain protectants against six-stored product beetles. J Stored Prod Res 38: 395–402.
View Article
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Dixon AFG (1987) Parthenogenetic reproduction and the rate of increase in aphids. In: Minks A.K., Harrewijn P. (Eds.), Aphids. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 269–287.

[ref36] 36. Stark JD, Tanigoshi L, Bounfour M, Antonelli A (1997) Reproductive potential, its influence on the susceptibility of the species to pesticides. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 37: 273–279. pmid:9378095
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Walthall WK, Stark JD (1997) A comparison of acute mortality and population growth rate as endpoints of toxicological effect. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 37: 45–52. pmid:9212335
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Forbes VE, Calow P (1999) Is the per capita rate of increase a good measure of population-level effects in ecotoxicology? Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 1544–1556.
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Stark JD, Vargas R, Banks JE (2007) Incorporating ecologically relevant measures of pesticide effect for estimating the compatibility of pesticides and biocontrol agents. J Econ Entomol 100: 1027–1032. pmid:17849847
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] PubMed/NCBI

[113] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Stark JD, Wennergren U (1995) Can population effects of pesticides be predicted from demographic toxicological studies? J Econ Entomol 88: 1089–1096.
View Article
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Ahamad N, Ansari MS, Nazrussalam (2012) Effect of neemarin on life table indices of Plutella xylostella (L.). Crop prot 38: 7–14.
View Article
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Galet P (1982) Phylloxera. In Les Maladies et le Parasites de la Vigne, Tome II Les Parasites Animaux, pp. 1059–1313. Montpellier: Paysan du Midi.

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Insects and plants

Grapevine root-dip bioassay

Potted grapevine bioassay

Data analysis

Results

Nymph mortality

Effect of seven Chinese medicinal herbs on developmental period

Life table parameters

Effect of selected Chinese medicinal herbs on grape phylloxera on potted grapevines

Discussion

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References