Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Asthma, Airway Symptoms and Rhinitis in Office Workers in Malaysia: Associations with House Dust Mite (HDM) Allergy, Cat Allergy and Levels of House Dust Mite Allergens in Office Dust

  • Fang Lee Lim,

    Affiliation Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

  • Zailina Hashim ,

    Affiliation Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

  • Leslie Thian Lung Than,

    Affiliation Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

  • Salmiah Md Said,

    Affiliation Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

  • Jamal Hisham Hashim,

    Affiliations United Nations University-International Institute for Global Health (UNU-IIGH), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Department of Community Health, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • Dan Norbäck

    Affiliation Uppsala University, Department of Medical Science, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden


A prevalence study was conducted among office workers in Malaysia (N= 695). The aim of this study was to examine associations between asthma, airway symptoms, rhinitis and house dust mites (HDM) and cat allergy and HDM levels in office dust. Medical data was collected by a questionnaire. Skin prick tests were performed for HDM allergens (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae) and cat allergen Felis domesticus. Indoor temperature and relative air humidity (RH) were measured in the offices and vacuumed dust samples were analyzed for HDM allergens. The prevalence of D. pteronyssinus, D. farinae and cat allergy were 50.3%, 49.0% and 25.5% respectively. Totally 9.6% had doctor-diagnosed asthma, 15.5% had current wheeze and 53.0% had current rhinitis. The Der p 1 (from D. pteronyssinus) and Der f 1 (from D. farinae) allergens levels in dust were 556 ng/g and 658 ng/g respectively. Statistical analysis was conducted by multilevel logistic regression, adjusting for age, gender, current smoking, HDM or cat allergy, home dampness and recent indoor painting at home. Office workers with HDM allergy had more wheeze (p= 0.035), any airway symptoms (p= 0.032), doctor-diagnosed asthma (p= 0.005), current asthma (p= 0.007), current rhinitis (p= 0.021) and rhinoconjuctivitis (p< 0.001). Cat allergy was associated with wheeze (p= 0.021), wheeze when not having a cold (p= 0.033), any airway symptoms (p= 0.034), doctor-diagnosed asthma (p= 0.010), current asthma (p= 0.020) and nasal allergy medication (p= 0.042). Der f 1 level in dust was associated with daytime breathlessness (p= 0.033) especially among those with HDM allergy. Der f 1 levels were correlated with indoor temperature (p< 0.001) and inversely correlated with RH (p< 0.001). In conclusion, HDM and cat allergies were common and independently associated with asthma, airway symptoms and rhinitis. Der f 1 allergen can be a risk factor for daytime breathlessness.


Malaysia is a tropical country with warm and humid climate throughout the year. Continuous warm and humid environment will facilitate the growth and proliferation of both house dust mites (HDM) and storage mites. The mites have the ability to build up large populations as they can complete at least 12 life cycles per year [1]. One Malaysian study showed that Blomia tropicalis (8,934 mites/g), Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (4,553 mites/g) and Malayoglyphus intermedius (1,020 mites/g) were three most common in home dust [2], while in Malaysian schools, levels of HDM (Der p 1 and Der f 1) and Blomia tropicalis (Blo t) allergens in school dust were low [3]. Clinical studies in patients demonstrated that allergy to HDM and cat allergens were the most common allergies in Malaysia [47]. However, we found no previous population based epidemiological study from Malaysia investigating associations between HDM allergens in office dust and the prevalence of asthma, airway symptoms and rhinitis in office workers.

Asthma and rhinitis are common respiratory diseases which are increasing globally [8,9], especially among the younger population in Asian cities [8]. The prevalence of rhinitis can be up to 45% in children and adolescents in low and middle-income countries in Asia [10]. However, there is a large variation of asthma among adults between Asian countries, the prevalence ranging from 0.7% to 11.9% [11]. One Asia-Pacific study reported that the average prevalence of allergic rhinitis was 8.7% among both children and adults [12]. The prevalence of doctor-diagnosed allergic rhinitis among children and adults ranged from 2.5% in Philipines to 12.3% in Vietnam [12]. These large variation indicates that environmental factors could play a role in the occurrence of asthma and rhinitis in Asia.

Sensitization to HDM and cat allergens may cause asthma [1317] and rhinitis [18,19]. HDM allergens are a major indoor risk factor for asthma [20] triggering respiratory symptoms in many Asia countries [4,6,2123]. Most epidemiology studies on HDM and cat allergens are from home environments [24,25] and few studies are available on allergens levels in office dust [26,27]. Some office environment studies from temperate climate have found low levels of HDM in office dust [28,29]. One study from the US reported a positive association between levels of HDM allergens in office dust and respiratory symptoms in office workers [30].

In a post-industrial society, a large proportion of the working population have office work. Since the 1980s there has been a focus on health effects due to the indoor environment in offices in the USA [31,32] and Europe [33]. However, there are few studies on associations between indoor environment in offices and asthma or rhinitis [34]. Respiratory illness among office workers has economical implications since they can increase sickness absentism and lost work time as well as decrease of quality of life [35]. Nevertheless, we found few epidemiological studies on associations between the office environment and respiratory health among office workers in tropical countries [3638].

Carpets in offices can act as a reservoir of particle pollutants, including mites and mite allergens [39]. One study reported that offices with wall-to-wall carpet floors may contain HDM allergen in the carpets [26]. Offices with carpets have reported to have an excess of respiratory symptoms among the office workers [4042] as well as impaired work performance and productivity [43]. These studies indicate that carpeting in offices can cause impaired respiratory health in office workers. However, no previous office study was found on respiratory health and HDM allergen levels in relation to carpeting in tropical countries.

The warm and humid conditions in tropics could provide suitable growth conditions for house dust mites in the office environment, especially if there are carpets. Thus, this study has investigated associations between selected office indoor environmental exposures; personal factors such as age, gender, current tobacco smoke status, HDM and cat allergy; and the respiratory health of office workers. The first aim was to measure the prevalence of sensitization to HDM and cat allergens, asthma, airway symptoms and rhinitis among office workers in an academic institution in Malaysia. The second aim was to study associations between personal factors and the health variables mentioned above. The third aim was to determine the HDM allergens levels in settled office dust, indoor temperature, relative air humidity (RH) and carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the offices and the associations between wall-to-wall carpets and HDM allergens dust concentrations with the health variables mentioned above.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

The administrative office of the institution (UPM) provided a list of 61 offices in total. Administrative offices equipped with air-conditioning mechanical ventilation system with at least 15 office workers in one office were selected. Among the 61 offices listed, 50 fulfilled this inclusion criteria. However, four offices were excluded because the work tasks were different from ordinary office work. A letter was sent to the management of the 46 offices for study approval and 40 offices granted written or verbal permission. Thus, our study included 40 offices.

There were totally 2192 workers employed in the 40 offices selected and 701 workers agreed to participate (32.0%). All administrative workers aged 18 to 60 years were invited through emails or announcements by office representatives a few days before the data collection day. On the data collection day, the workers were invited again through face-to-face invitations. Six workers were excluded due to pregnancy thereby leaving 695 participants. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to the respondents and collected within two weeks. The respondents had no information on the environmental data being collected from the offices when answering the questionnaires. The filled in questionnaires were reviewed and respondents were consulted if there were any uncertainty in the information provided. Among the 695 participants, two were excluded from skin prick test due to recent severe asthma leaving 463 workers (66.7%) participating in the skin prick test.

Potential selection bias was investigated by interviewing non-participants at the end of the study. One to two randomly selected workers from each office, who did not participate in the questionnaire study, answered four yes/no health questions (ever doctor-diagnosed asthma, ever allergic rhinitis, rhinitis in the past 12 months and ever eczema) in a face-to-face interview. These interview questions were exactly the same questions as in the questionnaire study.


The questionnaire was adapted from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) [44] and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) [45]. It contained questions on the history of asthma, as well as airway and rhinitis symptoms. Respiratory symptoms in this study were defined as asthma, airway or rhinitis symptoms. The questionnaire consisted of four sections. The sections are described bellows:

Questions on personal factors and the home environment.

  1. Gender (male/female);
  2. Age;
  3. Ethnicity (Malay/Chinese/Indian/Others);
  4. What is your tobacco smoking status? (Never smoked/former smoker/current smoker);
  5. Are there any pets at your dwelling? (yes/no);
    1. If “Yes”, what type of pet? (dog/cat/bird/fish/others);
  6. Have the interior of your dwelling been painted during the last 12 months? (yes/no);
  7. Have any of the following been identified in your dwelling during the last 12 months?
    1. Water leakage or water damage indoors in walls, floor or ceiling (yes/no);
    2. Bubbles or yellow discoloration on plastic floor covering or black discoloration on parquet floor (yes/no);
    3. Visible mould growth on indoors on walls, floor or ceilings (yes/no);
    4. The smell of mould in one or more rooms (not the basement) (yes/no);

Questions on airway symptoms.

  1. Have you had wheezing or whistling in the chest at any time in the last 12 months? (yes/no);
  2. Have you been at all breathless when the wheezing noise was present? (yes/no);
  3. Have you had this wheezing or whistling when you did not have a cold? (yes/no);
  4. Have you had an attack of shortness of breath that came on during the day when being at rest at any time in the last 12 months? (yes/no);
  5. Have you had an attack of shortness of breath that came on following strenuous activity at any time in the last 12 months? (yes/no);
  6. Have you ever been woken by an attack of shortness of breath in the last 12 months? (yes/no);

Questions on asthma.

  1. Have you ever had asthma? (yes/no);
  2. Was the asthma diagnosed by a physician? (yes/no);
  3. Have you had any attack of asthma in the last 12 months? (yes/no);
  4. Are you currently using any asthma medication? (spray, inhalation powders, tablets) (yes/no);

Questions on rhinitis.

  1. Do you have any nasal allergies, including hay fever? (yes/no);
  2. Have you ever had a problem with sneezing, or a runny or a blocked nose when you did not have a cold or the flu in the last 12 months? (yes/no);
  3. Has this nose problem been accompanied by itchy or watery eyes? (yes/no);
  4. Have you used any steroid nasal sprays, antihistamines pills, capsules or tablets for treatment of your nasal disorder in the last 12 months? (yes/no);

Skin prick test

The office workers were informed on the procedure for the skin prick test one week before the testing. In addition, they were advised to avoid using any antihistamine drug until they had completed the test. Pregnant women (n = 6), subjects on beta-blocker medication, with severe dermatographism or persistent severe or unstable asthma (n = 2) were excluded from testing to avoid risk of anaphylaxis or difficulties in interpretation of test result [46].

The skin prick tests were carried out by experienced hospital nurses. Workers had to share information about their recent medication intake before the skin prick test was performed. Skin prick test kits (ALK Abello SA, Madrid, Spain) for D. pteronyssinus, D. farinae and Felis domesticus were used. The concentration of D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae allergen extracts were 30 HEP (histamine equivalent prick) while Felis domesticus allergen extract was 10 HEP. Normal saline solution and histamine were used as negative and positive controls. After 20 minutes, the wheal diameter was measured by adding the largest diameter and its perpendicular diameter and dividing the sum with two [22]. The mean wheal diameter for each control and allergen were calculated. The test result was considered as positive if the mean wheal diameter was ≥ 3 mm.

Building inspection and climate measurement

Due to time constrains, 25 offices out of the 40 were randomly selected for building inspection, as well as indoor and outdoor climate measurements. Then 15 offices (60%) which had 15 to 55 office workers were selected from the 25. Subsequently 10 offices (66%) with more than 55 office workers were then selected from 15 offices. In each of these 25 offices, one to five administrative rooms were included in the environmental measurements, depending on the size of the office. All rooms involved in dust sample collection were inspected and the indoor climate was measured.

A building inspection was carried out before indoor climate measurements and dust samplings were obtained. Signs of dampness such as water leakage, indoor mould growth, odor in the offices, information on the building materials, floor furnish, types of ventilation systems and presence of indoor plants in the office room were recorded. Questions were asked on the frequency of office cleaning and maintenance of the mechanical ventilation systems. A Q-trak indoor air quality monitor 7565 (TSI Incorporated, St. Paul, MN, USA) was used to measure indoor temperature (°C), RH (%), CO2 concentration (ppm) and carbon monoxide (CO) (ppm) during normal activities in the center of room. The Q-trak monitor was placed at height 1–1.5 m above the floor level and around 1 m from the workers for 50–70 minutes by logging average values per minute [47]. There was one Q-trak measurement for each office room during the dust sample collection, and two large offices had two Q-trak measurements. The outdoor climate was measured by the Q-trak instrument outside the office building on the same day.

Dust collection

In each of the 25 offices, dust was collected from one to five administrative rooms (2–10 dust samples), depending on the size of the office. Dust samples were collected from the main administrative rooms of each office. Each room was divided into two parts (entrance side half and window side half) and a dust sample was collected from each part [48]. Settled dust on floor, tables and chairs was collected by using a 1800 W electric power vacuum cleaner (Model PVC-31A, Pensonic, Malaysia) equipped with a special dust collector fitted with a Millipore filter (pore size 6 μm) (ALK Abello, Copenhagen, Denmark). The dust samples were collected by vacuum cleaning for eight minutes per sample, four minutes vacuuming of floor and four minutes vacuuming of tables/ chairs. The settled dust samples were sieved (particle diameter < 400 μm) to obtain fine dust [47]. The sieved dust samples was weighted and stored at -20°C until extraction [48].

Extraction and analysis of dust mites’ allergen

For extraction of house dust mite allergens, 2 ml of phosphate-buffer saline with Tween (PBS-T) was added into each fine dust sample (100 ± 5 mg) in a centrifuge tube. The centrifuge tubes were shaken for two hours at room temperature and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 3000 rpm [49]. Then, the supernatants were transferred into Eppendorf tube and stored at -20°C until analysis of dust mites. Two-sites monoclonal antibody (MAB) sandwich ELISAs (Indoor Biotechnologies, Inc., Charlottesville, VA) were used to analyze for Der p 1 and Der f 1. Analysis were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocols with the exception that Streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase was obtained from Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Kyoto, Japan. All units were expressed as ng/g [50]. The detection limit for HDM allergens was 10 ng/g.

Statistical analysis

All statistical tests were performed by the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 21.0 or the STATA statistical package 11.0 (for multi-level logistic regression). Initially, associations between personal factors (age, gender, smoking status, HDM allergy and cat allergy), asthma and respiratory symptoms were analyzed by Chi-square test. The symptom differences between participants and non-participant groups in the questionnaire study, skin prick test and environmental sampling study were also examined by Chi-square test.

The Der p 1 and Der f 1 level from dust samples were not normally distributed, thus median, interquartile range, minimum and maximum were reported and non-parametric statistical tests were used. Kendall’s tau beta test was applied to study the correlations between Der p 1 and Der f 1 levels in office dust; and environmental variables (indoor temperature, RH, CO2, CO and amount of sieved dust). Mann Whitney-U test was applied to test the differences between offices with and without carpeting, amount of dust and allergen level. Chi-square test was used to study associations between floor carpeting and respiratory symptoms.

Finally, associations between risk factors and symptoms were studied by two-level multiple logistic regression (individual level and office level) with each model including personal risk factors such as age, gender, smoking status, HDM and cat allergy. The associations between level of allergens in office dust samples and floor carpeting were analyzed with adjustment for age, gender, smoking status, HDM and cat allergy, any home dampness and indoor home painting in the last 12 months. Stratified analysis (stratified for HDM allergy) was performed using the same models. Two-tailed tests and a 5% level of significance were applied in all statistical analysis.

Ethics Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects in Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). Written consents were obtained from all respondents after the briefing on the study objective and procedures. For data collection on the study location, permission was obtained from the authorities.


A total of 695 workers participated in the study and 66.6% were females. The mean age was 34 years (range 18–59 years), with a majority of Malay (97.8%), followed by Chinese (0.9%). Overall, there were higher prevalence of current airway symptoms and asthma among females as compared to males (Table 1). Breathlessness during wheeze, daytime attack of breathlessness at rest, any daytime breathlessness, doctor-diagnosed asthma, current asthma medication, current asthma attack and current asthma were significantly higher among females. However, there was no significant difference in airway, asthma and rhinitis symptoms between smokers and non-smokers. A total of 30.2% of the men and 0.4% of the women were current smokers (p < 0.001).

Table 1. Asthma and respiratory symptoms among office workers, stratified for gender and smoking (n = 695).

We compared prevalence of asthma, rhinitis and eczema among participants and non-participants groups in the questionnaire study, the skin prick test, and the environment measurement. There were no significant differences between participants and non-participants (Table 2). A total of 16 office workers (3.5%) were sensitized only to Der p 1, 10 (2.2%) were sensitized only to Der f 1, and 217 (52.5%) were sensitized to Der p 1 or Der f 1. Many respondents were sensitized to cat allergy, but most of them were sensitized to both HDM and cat allergy (Fig 1). Participants with HDM allergy or cat allergy had significantly higher prevalence of asthma and respiratory symptoms (Table 3). In this study, 19.9% had cats in their current home. Those with cats at home had more daytime breathlessness at rest (OR = 1.81, 95%CI 1.05–3.13, p = 0.041) but there was no significant association between cat keeping and other types of respiratory symptoms. Moreover, there was no association between cat keeping and cat allergy (OR = 1.01, 95%CI 0.59–1.70, p = 1.000).

Table 2. Comparison of asthma, rhinitis and eczema among participants and non-participants.

Fig 1. Venn diagram for the distribution of subjects with a positive skin prick test to D. pteronyssinus, D. farinae and Felis domesticus in the group with skin prick test (n = 463).

Table 3. Asthma and respiratory symptoms among office workers with skin prick test (n = 463), stratified for house dust mite (HDM) and cat allergy.

All 35 office rooms in the 25 offices were in concrete buildings with mechanical ventilation system. Most of the rooms had split unit air conditioning systems, seven rooms had centralized air conditioning systems and eight rooms had a combination of centralized and split unit air conditioning systems. Among these 35 office rooms, three had visible indoor mould growth and seven had signs of water leakage. In total, 15 office rooms had a wall-to-wall carpet, 17 had tiles (stone materials), two had PVC (Polyvinyl chloride) plastic and one had a wooden floor.

Table 4 shows levels of Der p 1 and Der f 1 in office dust samples and the amount of sieved dust from the sampling filters. Although both allergens had similar median concentrations, some dust samples had much higher level of Der f 1 allergens. There was a tendency of an inverse correlation between Der p 1 and Der f 1 levels (p = 0.068). We examined the correlations between HDM allergens levels and indoor environmental variables. Der f 1 levels were positively correlated with indoor temperature (p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with RH (p < 0.001).

Table 4. Office environment and HDM allergens in the dust samples of 35 office rooms.

In addition, we studied associations between floor carpeting, and amount of sieved dust and allergen levels. There was no significant difference between office rooms with carpet and non-carpet floors for Der p 1 allergen level (floor carpeting with median Der p 1 = 467.7 ng/g, IQR = 375.4–581.8; and non-carpet floors with median Der p 1 = 568.7 ng/g, IQR = 380.5–581.1; p = 0.094) or Der f 1 allergen level (floor carpeting with median Der f 1 = 795.6 ng/g, IQR = 450.6–1118.5; and non-carpet floors with median Der f 1 = 516.0 ng/g, IQR = 395.0–1164.1; p = 0.431). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the amount of sieved dust in carpeted rooms (median = 0.99 g, IQR = 0.76–1.23) as compared to non-carpeted rooms (median = 0.91 g, IQR = 0.49–1.124; p = 0.520).

As a next step, we investigated associations between floor carpeting, HDM allergens levels and respiratory symptoms in bivariate analysis. There was an inverse association between wall-to-wall carpeting and wheezing when not having a cold (OR = 0.37, 95%CI 0.16–0.89, p = 0.025). However, no other respiratory symptoms were significantly associated with wall-to-wall carpets.

Associations between asthma, respiratory symptoms, personal factors and home environment factors were analyzed using multilevel logistic regression model (two levels, subject and office), including age, gender, current smoking, HDM allergy, cat allergy, any home dampness and indoor home painting in the last 12 months in the model (Table 5). Younger office workers had more rhinitis and rhinoconjuctivitis. Females had more wheeze, wheezing when not having a cold, daytime attack of breathlessness, nocturnal attacks of breathlessness and doctor-diagnosed asthma. Finally, those with HDM allergy had more wheeze, at least one airway symptoms, doctor-diagnosed asthma, current asthma, rhinitis and rhinoconjuctivitis. Finally, those with cat allergy had more wheeze, wheeze when not having a cold, at least one airway symptom, doctor-diagnosed asthma, current asthma and nasal allergy medication.

Table 5. Associations between asthma, respiratory symptoms, personal factors and home environment factors among office workers (n = 461) [OR(95%CI)].

In bivariate analysis, level of Der f 1 allergen was not significantly associated with current airway symptoms, asthma and allergic rhinitis but Der p1 allergen level was inversely associated with wheeze (p = 0.025) and at least one airway symptom (p = 0.014). We applied multilevel logistic regression analysis (two levels, subject and office), to analyze associations between levels of Der p 1, Der f 1, office floor carpeting and the 10 asthma and respiratory symptoms, adjusting for age, gender, current smoking status, HDM allergy, cat allergy, any home dampness and indoor home painting in the last 12 months (Table 6). Level of Der p 1 was negatively associated with wheeze and at least one airway symptoms. In contrast, level of Der f 1 was positively associated with any daytime breathlessness. We also analyzed the significant associations stratifying for HDM allergy. The negative association between wheeze and Der p 1 level was stronger among those with no HDM allergy (OR = 0.61, 95%CI 0.35–1.06, p = 0.082) as compared to those with HDM allergy (OR = 0.74, 95%CI 0.52–1.07, p = 0.110). The inverse association between at least one airway symptoms and the Der p 1 level was significant among those with HDM allergy (OR = 0.73, 95%CI 0.54–1.00, p = 0.054), but not among those without HDM allergy (OR = 0.71, 95%CI 0.47–1.09, p = 0.117). Finally, the positive association between any daytime breathlessness and the Der f 1 level was significant among those with HDM allergy (OR = 1.16, 95%CI 1.01–1.32, p = 0.033) but not among those without HDM allergy (OR = 1.03, 95%CI 0.79–1.35, p = 0.809).

Table 6. Associations between asthma, respiratory symptoms, levels of Der p 1 and Der f 1in office dust samples and office floor carpeting among office workers (n = 371)[OR(95%CI)].


HDM and cat allergies were very common among the office workers in this study and these allergies were independently associated with asthma, respiratory symptoms and rhinitis. The majority of those with HDM allergy were sensitized to both Der p 1 and Der f 1. Der f 1 level in office dust was correlated with indoor temperature but inversely correlated with indoor relative air humidity and there was a positive association between Der f 1 levels in office dust and daytime breathlessness, especially in HDM sensitized subjects. One limitation of this study is that we did not include other allergens, such as cockroach and Blomia tropicalis (storage mites) in our skin prick test. Thus, we might underestimate the true prevalence of Ig E-mediated allergy among the office workers.

We invited all offices within a major academic institution in Klang Valley, Malaysia. The office rooms involved in environmental data sampling were randomly selected from the office list. Thus, bias due to selection of buildings or rooms is less likely. Since the participation rate was relatively low in this study, we collected data on respiratory health among a sub-sample of non-participants by conducting a short face-to-face interview using questions from the study questionnaire. We found no significant difference in respiratory health between respondents and non-respondents in the questionnaire study, in the allergy testing and in the environmental measurements.

Information bias can influence epidemiological studies. In this study, the respondents did not have any information on the results of environmental measurement or the clinical tests when they answered the questionnaire. The questionnaire was answered before the clinical investigation and the environmental measurements. Therefore, information bias is less likely. Environmental sampling was conducted within two weeks from the day when respondents answered the questionnaire and all the dust samples were analyzed after the questionnaire data collection was completed. The same calibrated instrument was used all measurements. Dust samples were analyzed in an arbitrary sequence at the laboratory without any knowledge about the health status of respondents or environmental measurements. All dust samples were analyzed by the same person using the same laboratory equipment.

The data was analyzed by both bivariate and multivariate statistical analysis, mostly with similar results. Thus, we believe that our conclusions were not seriously influenced by selection or information bias or choice of a particular statistical model. However, cross sectional study design limits the possibility to draw conclusions about causal relationships. The majority of respondents were Malays, and the study was performed in one major academic institution in the Klang Valley only. To our knowledge, our study is the first study of office workers in Malaysia using skin prick allergy testing. Further larger studies in different areas are needed to verify the high prevalence of respiratory symptoms and HDM and cat allergy among office workers in Malaysia.

The prevalence of doctor-diagnosed asthma (9.6%), current wheeze (15.5%) and current rhinitis (53.0%) was high among the office workers. According to the world health survey [51], the prevalence of doctor-diagnosed adult asthma in Malaysia was 5.2%. In Singapore, 5.1% of adults had doctor-diagnosed adult asthma [52] and in Thailand, the prevalence of doctor-diagnosed asthma was 11.6% [53]. Song and colleagues has reviewed adult asthma in Asia and found a large variation between countries. The prevalence of adult asthma ranged from 0.7% in rural areas outside Beijing (China) to 12.0% in Al Ain (United Arab Emirates) [11]. For the other respiratory symptoms, the prevalence of wheeze in the last 12 months among adults in Malaysia has been reported to be 7.55% [51] and the prevalence of allergic rhinitis in Malaysia has been reported to be 7.1% [12]. The prevalence of adult allergic rhinitis in the Asia-Pacific region ranges from 8.7%, with Australia on the top rank (13.2%) and followed by Vietnam (12.3%) and Taiwan (9.6%) [12]. The prevalence of respiratory symptoms in this study was higher than in many other studies from Asian countries, which may be due to the high prevalence of HDM and cat allergies among office workers in this study. Previous population based studies have showed significant associations between HDM or cat sensitization with higher prevalence of asthma and respiratory symptoms [54,55]. Moreover, respondents with HDM sensitization reported higher prevalence of nasal symptoms compared to respondents with no HDM sensitization [56].

One important risk factor for asthma and airway symptoms in our study was female gender. This is in agreement with some previous population studies from western countries, but gender differences in respiratory health in Asia seem to be more unclear. One reason could be that in many Asian countries, very few women are smokers while the prevalence of smoking is high among men. However in our study, the gender differences remained significant even after adjusting for smoking habits. A population study among adults in European Union countries reported that females have a higher incidence of asthma in adulthood [57]. A population based cohort study found that the incidence of non-allergic asthma was higher in women than men [58]. All available studies in gender differences in population studies from Asia are prevalence studies. One prevalence study from Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, reported that women had slightly higher prevalence of doctor-diagnosed asthma, wheeze and allergic rhinitis [59]. In contrast, a study among university students in Phitsanulok, Thailand, found a lower prevalence of wheeze and asthma among females as compared to men [60]. One study from the northern part of Vietnam reported that males had more asthma, but they found no gender differences for allergic rhinitis [61]. One nationwide population survey in Thailand did not find any gender differences in respiratory symptoms [62].

In this study, the prevalence of cat allergy was high (25.4%) and 19.9% of respondents had a cat in their current dwelling. Cat allergy is a common allergy in some parts of Europe, Australia and New Zealand [44,63]. The overall prevalence of cat allergy in the 10-year follow up of the ECRHS (ECRHS II) was 7.8% [64]. However it seems that cat allergy has not been studied much in Asian countries, especially not among adults in South East Asia. One population study reported 4.1% cat allergy among children in Thailand [65]. Another study among adults in the northern part of Vietnam found 4.5% cat allergy [22] and one population study from China, including both children and adults, found 1.6% cat allergy [66]. Thus, the prevalence of cat allergy in our study was higher than previous studies on cat allergy from Asia.

There are also studies on cat allergy among hospital cases of patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis. Two studies among rhinitis patients in Malaysia found 20.0% [6] and 41.6% [7] of cat allergy respectively. One study among university staff and students in Thailand reported that 45.6% of the asthmatic subjects had cat allergy [53]. In Singapore, one study on rhinitis patients including both children and adults found 29.1% cat allergy [67] and another Singapore adult rhinitis patient study found 9.4% cat allergy [68]. One Hong Kong study which included children and adult patients with chronic rhinitis reported that 14% had cat allergy [69]. A multicenter study in China among patients with asthma and/or rhinitis found prevalence of 10.3% cat allergy [23].

We found cat allergy was significantly related to wheeze, wheeze when not have a cold, at least one airway symptoms, doctor-diagnosed asthma, current asthma and nasal allergies medication, even after mutual adjustment in statistical tests. Moreover, cat allergy was an independent risk factor for respiratory symptoms of the respondents, even after adjusting for HDM allergy and other potential confounders in this study. This result supports the finding of previous research that cat sensitization is an important risk factor for asthma in adults [57,70]. One limitation of our study is that we have no data on the cat allergen level in the office environment. In a community with high levels of cat ownership, people who are allergic to cats may get exposed to high levels of cat allergen, even though they do not own a cat in their home, since cat allergens can be passively transported with ease through clothing [71]. Our results indicate a clear need to further study the prevalence of cat allergy and its health implication in Malaysia as well as in other Asian countries.

HDM allergy was very common in our study and the majority (52.5%) of the office workers were sensitized to HDM allergens (D. pteronyssinus or D. farinae). Most (46.9%) were sensitized to both allergens, only 2.8% and 1.9% were sensitized to one HDM allergen only (only D. pteronyssinus or only D. farinae). We did not find any previous population based study of HDM allergy among adults in Malaysia. There is a limited number of population based studies investigating HDM allergy among adults in other countries in Asia. One population based study from Singapore found that 68.5% of adults were sensitized to D. pteronyssinus [72]. Another population study from Thailand found that 38% of adult asthmatics and 25% of adults without asthma were sensitized to HDM allergens [21]. One population based study from the northern part of Vietnam reported lower prevalence of HDM allergy among adults, 13.3% allergy to D. pteronyssinus and 10.5% allergy to D. farinae [22]. One population study from Fukui prefecture and central Hokuriku area of Japan found that 50% of all adults were sensitized to HDM allergens [73]. The ECRHS II, a population study performed in 10 different countries (mainly in Western Europe) reported that 14.1% of adults were sensitized to HDM [64]. Thus, the high prevalence of HDM allergy in our study is in agreement with most population studies from Asia.

Most studies on HDM allergy in Asia had been performed among hospital patients with asthma or allergic rhinitis [21,53,67,68,7477]. We found five patient studies of HDM allergy in Malaysia, mostly including both children and adults. One study reported 80.0% HDM allergy among adult patients [78]. Another study found 63.3% HDM allergy by skin prick test among adult patients [4]. Another study (age range 6–60 years) reported 82% HDM allergy [5]. Another study (age range 12–76 years) found 81.4% allergy to D. farinae and 93.6% allergy to D. pteronyssinus [6]. Finally, one recent study (age range 5–64 years) found 69.7% of HDM allergy [7]. One large multicenter study among allergy patients at different hospitals in China observed the prevalence of HDM allergy increased from north to south and with increasing temperature and RH [23]. Warm and humid climate facilitate HDM growth and can explain the high prevalence of HDM allergy found in this study as well as other studies in parts of Asia with similar climate.

Our findings concerning the health associations for HDM allergy are in agreement with many previous early studies, reporting that HDM allergy and exposure to HDM allergens were associated with asthma [7981], asthma symptoms [8286], and rhinitis [22]. HDM allergens can cause allergy, asthma and allergic airway inflammation by inducing adaptive Th2-based adaptive immune responses [87] and also activate innate immune cells [88,89].

The major site of exposure to HDM allergens is in the home environment, since HDM mainly live in bed mattresses [1,28,90]. Home environment studies from Malaysia reported high prevalence and density of B. tropicalis (average 8,934 mites/g per month), D. pteronyssinus (average 4,553 mites/g per month) and M. intermedius (average 1,020 mites/g per month) [2]. The allergens might be transported from the home by cloths. Neal and colleagues found live and dead mites in automobiles and clothing [91]. Nevertheless, the mites can also multiply or colonize in carpets or upholstered furniture if provided with sufficient food, protection, warmth and moisture [2,26]. One recent study on allergens in school dust in Malaysia found very low levels of house dust mites Der p 1 (range 2–33 ng/g); Der f 1 (range 4–50 ng/g), as well as low levels of the tropical storage mite Blo t (range 0.6–5.3 AU/g) [3]. There are few studies on HDM allergens in office dust. The levels of HDM allergens in office dust in our study was lower than the HDM allergen levels measured in the large United States office study [26] but higher than the HDM allergen levels measured in an Italian office study [27]. The levels in our study were comparable with the levels from another office study performed in Nanjing, China and United States [90].

To our knowledge, our study is the first study measuring HDM allergen levels in offices in Malaysia. We found positive associations between Der f 1 level and daytime breathlessness especially in subjects allergic to HDM. Moreover, we found higher levels of Der f 1 as compared to Der p 1 in office dust. Most other studies from the Asia-Pacific region were performed in homes, and have reported higher levels of Der p 1 level as compared to Der f 1 [92]. However, two other office studies found higher levels of Der f 1 level as compared to Der p 1 [26,28]. This might be because the dry indoor climate of the mechanical ventilated and air conditioned offices promoted the growth of D. farinae. There are biological and ecological differences between D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae. D. farinae is able to survive better than D. pteronyssinus in drier areas [93,94]. In our study, negative associations between Der p 1 level with wheeze and at least one airway symptoms were found. However, it cannot be interpreted as Der p 1 has protective effect on wheeze and airway symptoms because Der p 1 allergen involve in mechanisms (modulate differentiation and maturation of dendritic cells) which leading to Th2 cytokine immune response [89]. This negative association might be due to residual confounding since it was most pronounced in non-allergic subjects.

In conclusion, in our study HDM allergy, cat allergy and respiratory symptoms and rhinitis were very common among office workers in Malaysia. Moreover, HDM allergy and cat allergy were independently associated with asthma, airway symptoms and rhinitis. Further studies on allergy among office workers and other population studies in Malaysia should include allergy testing against HDM and cat allergy since these two types of allergens seem to be major allergens in this country. However, the health relevance of other less common IgE-mediated allergies in Malaysia also need to be further investigated. In office environments in Malaysia, Der f 1 allergens can be a risk factor for daytime respiratory symptoms among office workers.


We acknowledge the assistance of the hospital staff from Department of Othorinolaringology, Hospital Serdang. The doctor and staff nurses including Dr. Saraiza bt. Abu Bakar, Khattabiyah bt Ab. Jalal, Lee Seok Heng, Wan Rahana binti Wan Derman and Siti Rohani binti Mohamad Noor, in helping to conduct the skin prick test. We are especially grateful to the office workers who participated in the study and representatives of the office workers who provided assistance for our study.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: FLL ZH DN SMS JHH. Performed the experiments: FLL ZH DN LTLT. Analyzed the data: FLL DN SMS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ZH DN LTLT JHH. Wrote the paper: FLL DN ZH.


  1. 1. Nadchatram M. House dust mites, our intimate associates. Trop Biomed. 2005 Jun;22(1): 23–37. pmid:16880751
  2. 2. Mariana A, Ho TM, Wong AL. House dust mite fauna in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2000 Dec;31(4): 712–21. pmid:11414418
  3. 3. Norbäck D, Markowicz P, Cai GH, Hashim Z, Ali F, Zheng YW, et al. Endotoxin, ergosterol, fungal DNA and allergens in dust from schools in Johor Bahru, Malaysia—associations with asthma and respiratory infections in pupils. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 11;9(2): e88303. pmid:24523884
  4. 4. Asha’ari ZA, Yusof S, Ismail R, Che Hussin CM. Clinical features of allergic rhinitis and skin prick test analysis based on the ARIA classification: a preliminary study in Malaysia. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2010 Aug;39(8): 619–24. pmid:20838703
  5. 5. Ho TM, Murad S, Kesavapillai R, Singaram SP. Prevalence of allergy to some inhalants among rhinitis patients in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 1995 Jun;13(1): 11–6. pmid:7488338
  6. 6. Liam CK, Loo KL, Wong CM, Lim KH, Lee TC. Skin prick test reactivity to common aeroallergens in asthmatic patients with and without rhinitis. Respirology. 2002;7(4): 345–50. pmid:12421243
  7. 7. Samiah Yasmin AK, Karim AJ, Rohani M, Pathak R, Aye AM, Saeid RD, et al. Skin prick test reactivity to common aeroallergens among patients with rhinitis. American Journal of Ressaerch Communication. 2013;1(3): 18–26.
  8. 8. Asher MI, Montefort S, Björkstén B, Lai CKW, Strachan DP, Weiland SK, et al. Worldwide time trends in the prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in childhood: ISAAC Phases One and Three repeat multicountry cross-sectional surveys. Lancet. 2006 Aug 26;368(9537): 733–43. pmid:16935684
  9. 9. Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, Denburg J, Fokkens WJ, Togias A, et al. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008 Update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA(2)LEN and AllerGen). Allergy. 2008 Apr;63 Suppl 86: 8–160. pmid:18331513
  10. 10. Björkstén B, Clayton T, Ellwood P, Stewart A, Strachan D. Worldwide time trends for symptoms of rhinitis and conjunctivitis: phase III of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2008 Mar;19(2): 110–24. pmid:17651373
  11. 11. Song WJ, Kang MG, Chang YS, Cho SH. Epidemiology of adult asthma in Asia: toward a better understanding. Asia Pac Allergy. 2014 Apr;4(2): 75–85. pmid:24809012
  12. 12. Katelaris CH, Lai CKW, Rhee CS, Lee SH, Yun WD, Lim VL, et al. Nasal allergies in the Asian-Pacific population: results from the allergies in Asia-Pacific Survey. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Sep–Oct;25 Suppl 1: S3–15. pmid:22185687
  13. 13. Arbes SJ, Gergen P, Vaughn B, Zeldin D. Asthma cases attributable to atopy: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5): 1139–45. pmid:17889931
  14. 14. Kusel MM, de Klerk NH, Kebadze T, Vohma V, Holt PG, Johnston SL, et al. Early-life respiratory viral infections, atopic sensitization, and risk of subsequent development of persistent asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 May;119(5): 1105–10. pmid:17353039
  15. 15. Lowe L, Woodcock A. Lung function at age 3 years: effect of pet ownership and exposure to indoor allergens. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Oct;158(10): 996–1001. pmid:15466689
  16. 16. Simpson A, Woodcock A, Custovic A. Housing characteristics and mite allergen levels: to humidity and beyond. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001 Jun;31(6): 803–5. pmid:11422141
  17. 17. Simpson BM, Custovic A, Simpson A, Hallam CL, Walsh D, Marolia H, et al. NAC Manchester Asthma and Allergy Study (NACMAAS): risk factors for asthma and allergic disorders in adults. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001 Mar;31(3): 391–9. pmid:11260150
  18. 18. Milián E, Díaz AM. Allergy to house dust mites and asthma. P R Health Sci J. 2004 Mar;23(1): 47–57. pmid:15125219
  19. 19. Shaaban R, Zureik M, Soussan D, Neukirch C, Heinrich J, Sunyer J, et al. Rhinitis and onset of asthma: a longitudinal population-based study. Lancet. 2008;372(9643): 1049–57. pmid:18805333
  20. 20. Custovic A, Simpson A. The role of inhalant allergens in allergic airways disease. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2012;22(6): 393–401. pmid:23101182
  21. 21. Daengsuwan T, Lee B, Visitsuntorn N, Charroenratanakul S, Ruangrak S, Jirapongsananuruk O, et al. Allergen sensitization to aeroallergens including Blomia tropicalis among adult and childhood asthamatics in Thailand. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2003 Dec;21(4): 199–204. pmid:15198336
  22. 22. Lâm HT, Ekerljung L, Bjerg A, Tủờng NV, Lundbäck B, Rӧnmark E. Sensitization to airborne allergens among adults and its impact on allergic symptoms: a population survey in northern Vietnam. Clin Transl Allergy. 2014 Feb 10;4(1): 6. pmid:24512828
  23. 23. Li J, Sun B, Huang Y, Lin X, Zhao D, Tan G, et al. A multicentre study assessing the prevalence of sensitizations in patients with asthma and/or rhinitis in China. Allergy. 2009 Jul;64(7): 1083–92. pmid:19210346
  24. 24. Nam HS, Siebers R, Lee SH, Park JS, Kim YB, Choi YJ, et al. House dust mite allergens in domestic homes in Cheonan, Korea. Korean J Parasitol. 2008 Sep;46(3): 187–9. pmid:18830061
  25. 25. Zock JP, Heinrich J, Jarvis D, Verlato G, Norbäck D, Plana E, et al. Distribution and determinants of house dust mite allergens in Europe: the European Community Respiratory Health Survey II. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Sep;118(3): 682–90. pmid:16950288
  26. 26. Macher JM, Tsai FC, Burton LE, Liu KS (2005) Concentrations of cat and dust-mite allergens in dust samples from 92 large US office buildings from the BASE Study. Indoor Air. 2005;15 Suppl 9: 82–8. pmid:15910533
  27. 27. Perfetti L, Ferrari M, Galdi E, Pozzi V, Cottica D, Grignani E, et al. House dust mites (Der p 1, Der f 1), cat (Fel d 1) and cockroach (Bla g 2) allergens in indoor work-places (offices and archives). Sci Total Environ. 2004 Jul 26;328(1–3): 15–21. pmid:15207590
  28. 28. Brunetto B, Barletta B, Brescianini S, Masciulli R, Perfetti L, Moscato G, et al. Differences in the presence of allergens among several types of indoor environments. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2009;45(4): 409–14. pmid:20061661
  29. 29. Konishi E, Uehara K. Contamination of public facilities with Dermatophagoides mites (Acari: Phyroglyphidae) in Japan. Exp Appl Acarol. 1999;23: 41–50.
  30. 30. Menzies D, Comtois P, Pasztor J, Nunes F, Hanley JA. Aeroallergens and work-related respiratory symptoms among office workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Jan;101(1 Pt 1): 38–44.
  31. 31. Repace JL. Indoor air pollution. Environ Int. 1982;8: 21–36.
  32. 32. Weschler CJ. Changes in indoor pollutants since the 1950s. Atmos Environ. 2009;43(1): 153–69.
  33. 33. Skov P, Valbjørn O. The “sick” building syndrome in the office environment: the Danish town hall study. Environ Int. 1987;13(4–5): 339–49.
  34. 34. Akpinar Elci M, Siegel PD, Cox Ganser JM, Stemple KJ, White SK, Hilsbos K, et al. Respiratory inflammatory responses among occupants of a water-damaged office building. Indoor Air. 2008 Apr;18(2): 125–30. pmid:18333992
  35. 35. Cox Ganser JM, White SK, Jones R, Hilsbos K, Storey E, Enright PL, et al. Respiratory morbidity in office workers in a water-damaged building. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Apr;113(4): 485–90. pmid:15811840
  36. 36. Li C, Hsu C, Lu C. Dampness and respiratory symptoms among workers in daycare centers in a subtropical climate. Arch Environ Health. 1997 Jan–Feb;52(1): 68–71. pmid:9039861
  37. 37. Ooi PL, Goh KT, Phoon MH, Foo SC, Yap HM. Epidemiology of sick building syndrome and its associated risk factors in Singapore. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Mar;55(3): 188–93. pmid:9624270
  38. 38. Wan G, Li C. Dampness and airway inflammation and systemic symptoms in office building workers. Arch Environ Health. 1999 Jan–Feb;54(1): 58–63. pmid:10025418
  39. 39. Custovic A, Murray CS, Gore RB, Woodcock A. Controlling indoor allergens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 May;88(5): 432–42. pmid:12027062
  40. 40. Jaakkola JJ, Ieromnimon A, Jaakkola MS. Interior surface materials and asthma in adults: a population-based incident case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Oct 15;164(8): 742–9. pmid:16877535
  41. 41. Park JH, Cox Ganser J, Rao C, Kreiss K. Fungal and endotoxin measurements in dust associated with respiratory symptoms in a water-damaged office building. Indoor Air. 2006 Jun;16(3): 192–203. pmid:16683938
  42. 42. Nishihara N, Wargocki P, Tanabe S. Cerebral blood flow, fatigue, mental effort, and task performance in offices with two different pollution loads. Build Environ. 2014;71: 153–64.
  43. 43. Wyon DP. The effects of indoor air quality on performance and productivity. Indoor Air. 2004;14 Suppl 7: 92–101. pmid:15330777
  44. 44. Burney P, Malmberg E, Chinn S, Jarvis D, Luczynska C, Lai E. The distribution of total and specific serum IgE in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Mar;99(3): 314–22. pmid:9058686
  45. 45. Asher MI, Keil U, Anderson HR, Beasley R, Crane J, Martinez F, et al. International study of asthma and allergies in childhood (ISAAC): rationale and methods. Eur Respir J. 1995 Mar;8: 483–91. pmid:7789502
  46. 46. Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy [Internet]. Balgowlah: Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy; 2006 [updated 2012 Oct; cited 2014 Apr 23]. Skin prick testing for the diagnosis of allergic disease: a manual for practitioners. Available:
  47. 47. Zhao Z, Sebastian A, Larsson L, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Norbäck D. Asthmatic symptoms among pupils in relation to microbial dust exposure in schools in Taiyuan, China. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2008 Aug;19(5): 455–65. pmid:18221461
  48. 48. Zhang X, Zhao Z, Nordquist T, Larsson L, Sebastian A, Norbäck D. A longitudinal study of sick building syndrome among pupils in relation to microbial components in dust in schools in China. Sci Total Environ. 2011 Nov 15;409(24): 5253–9. pmid:21943723
  49. 49. Prester L, Brcić Karaconji I, Macan J. Determination of mite allergens in house dust using the enzyme immunoassay. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2007 Dec;58(4): 413–9. pmid:18063526
  50. 50. Zhao ZH, Elfman L, Wang ZH, Zhang Z, Norbäck D. A comparative study of asthma, pollen, cat and dog allergy among pupils and allergen levels in schools in Taiyuan city, China, and Uppsala, Sweden. Indoor Air. 2006 Dec;16(6): 404–13. pmid:17100662
  51. 51. To T, Stanojevic S, Moores G, Gershon AS, Bateman ED, Cruzz AA, et al. Global asthma prevalence in adults: findings from the cross-sectional world health survey. BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 19;12: 204. pmid:22429515
  52. 52. Lu Y, Feng L, Lim L, Ng TP. Asthma, life events and psychiatric disorders: a population-based study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;48(8): 1273–82. pmid:23370618
  53. 53. Uthaisangsook S. Risk factors for development of asthma in Thai adults in Phitsanulok: a university-based study. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2010 Mar;28(1): 23–8. pmid:20527512
  54. 54. Jarvis D, Zock JP, Heinrich J, Svanes C, Verlato G, Olivieri M, et al. Cat and dust mite allergen levels, specific IgG and IgG4, and respiratory symptoms in adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Mar;119(3): 697–704. pmid:17270260
  55. 55. Brunetto B, Brescianini S, Barletta B, Butteroni C, Rotondi D, Masciulli R, et al. Exposure to indoor allergens and association with allergy symptoms of employees in a work environment. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2009;45(4): 415–22. pmid:20061662
  56. 56. Vidal C, Boquete O, Gude F, Rey J, Meijide LM, Fernández Merino MC, et al. High prevalence of storage mite sensitization in a general adult population. Allergy. 2004 Apr;59(4): 401–5. pmid:15005763
  57. 57. Antó JM, Sunyer J, Basagaña X, Garcia Esteban R, Cerveri I, de Marco R, et al. Risk factors of new-onset asthma in adults: a population-based international cohort study. Allergy. 2010 Aug;65(8): 1021–30. pmid:20132157
  58. 58. Leynaert B, Neukirch C, Kony S, Guénégou A, Bousquet J, Aubier M, et al. Association between asthma and rhinitis according to atopic sensitization in a population-based study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Jan;113(1): 86–93. pmid:14713912
  59. 59. Sonomjamts M, Dashdemberel S. Prevalence of asthma and allergic rhinitis among adult population in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Asia Pac Allergy. 2014 Jan;4(1): 25–31. pmid:24527407
  60. 60. Uthaisangsook S. Prevalence of asthma, rhinitis, and eczema in the university population of Phitsanulok, Thailand. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2007 Jun–Sep;25(2–3): 127–32. pmid:18402299
  61. 61. Lâm HT, Rönmark E, Tủờng NV, Ekerljung L, Chúc NTK, Lundbӓck B. Increase in asthma and a high prevalence of bronchitis: results from a population study among adults in urban and rural Vietnam. Respir Med. 2011 Feb;105(2): 177–85. pmid:21030231
  62. 62. Dejsomritrutai W, Nana A, Chierakul N, Tscheikuna J, Sompradeekul S, Ruttanaumpawan P, et al. Prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and asthma in the adult population in Thailand. Chest. 2006 Mar;129(3): 602–9. pmid:16537857
  63. 63. Svanes C, Jarvis D, Chinn S, Burney P. Childhood environment and adult atopy: results from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Mar;103(3 Pt 1): 415–20. pmid:10069874
  64. 64. Bakolis I., Heinrich J, Zock JP, Norbäck D, Svanes C, Chen CM, et al. House dust-mite allergen exposure is associated with serum specific IgE but not with respiratory outcomes. Indoor Air. 2014 Jun 11.
  65. 65. Prasarnphanich T, Sindhurat S. Sensitization to common indoor allergens and its association with allergic diseases in Thai female high-school students. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005 Aug;16(5): 402–7. pmid:16101932
  66. 66. Kim JS, Ouyang F, Pongracic JA, Fang Y, Wang B, Liu X, et al. Dissociation between the prevalence of atopy and allergic disease in rural China among children and adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Nov;122(5): 929–35. pmid:18805578
  67. 67. Chew FT, Lim SH, Goh DY, Lee BW. Sensitization to local dust-mite fauna in Singapore. Allergy. 1999 Nov;54(11): 1150–9. pmid:10604550
  68. 68. John AB, Lee HS, Lee FY, Chng HH. Allergen skin test and total IgE in adults with rhinitis in Singapore. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 1996 Jun;14(1): 9–12. pmid:8980794
  69. 69. Yuen APW, Cheung S, Tang KC, Ho WK, Wong BYH, Cheung AC, et al. The skin prick test results of 977 patients suffering from chronic rhinitis in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2007 Apr;13(2): 131–6. pmid:17406040
  70. 70. Olivieri M, Zock JP, Accordini S, Heinrich J, Jarvis D, Künzli N, et al. Risk factors for new-onset cat sensitization among adults: a population-based international cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Feb;129(2): 420–5. pmid:22168997
  71. 71. Arbes SJ, Cohn R, Yin M, Muilenberg M, Friedman W, Zeldin DC. Dog allergen (Can f 1) and cat allergen (Fel d 1) in US homes: results from the National Survey of Lead and Allergens in Housing. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Jul;114(1): 111–7.
  72. 72. Andiappan AK, Puan KJ, Lee B, Nardin A, Poidinger M, Connolly J, et al. Allergic airway diseases in a tropical urban environment are driven by dominant mono-specific sensitization against house dust mites. Allergy. 2014 Apr;69(4): 501–9. pmid:24456108
  73. 73. Sakashita M, Hirota T, Harada M, Nakamichi R, Tsunoda T, Osawa Y, et al. Prevalence of allergic rhinitis and sensitization to common aeroallergens in a Japanese population. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2010;151(3): 255–61. pmid:19786806
  74. 74. Lal A, Sunaina Waghray S, Nand Kishore NN. Skin prick testing and immunotherapy in nasobronchial allergy: our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Apr;63(2): 132–5. pmid:22468248
  75. 75. Pumhirun P, Towiwat P, Mahakit P. Aeroallergen sensitivity of Thai patients with allergic rhinitis. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 1997 Dec;15(4): 183–5. pmid:9579610
  76. 76. Ramos JDA, Castillo MPS, Rosario M, Gapay MAS, Go TP, Kamantigue EG. Allergenicity and cross-reactivity of 3 house dust mite species among Filipino allergic patients. Philipp J Sci. 2007 Dec;136(2): 139–46.
  77. 77. Yong SB, Wu CC, Tzeng YC, Hung WC, Yang KD. Different profiles of allergen sensitization in different ages and geographic areas in Changhua, Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2013 Aug;46(4): 295–301. pmid:23058910
  78. 78. Asha’ari ZA, Suhaimi Y, Yusof RA, Rushdan I, Maraina CHC. Comparison of serum specific IgE with skin prick test in the diagnosis of allergy in Malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 2011 Aug;66(3): 202–6. pmid:22111441
  79. 79. Chew GL, Reardon AM, Correa JC, Young M, Acosta L, Mellins R, et al. Mite sensitization among Latina women in New York, where dust-mite allergen levels are typically low. Indoor Air. 2009 Jun;19(3): 193–7. pmid:19220508
  80. 80. Jaakkola MS, Ieromnimon A, Jaakkola JJ. Are atopy and specific IgE to mites and molds important for adult asthma? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Mar;117(3): 642–8. pmid:16522465
  81. 81. Stevens W, Addo Yobo E, Roper J, Woodcock A, James H, Platts Mills T, et al. Differences in both prevalence and titre of specific immunoglobulin E among children with asthma in affluent and poor communities within a large town in Ghana. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011 Nov;41(11): 1587–94. pmid:21810123
  82. 82. Gehring U, Heinrich J, Jacob B, Richter K, Fahlbusch B, Schlenvoiqt G, et al. Respiratory symptoms in relation to indoor exposure to mite and cat allergens and endotoxins. Eur Respir J. 2001 Sep;18(3): 555–63. pmid:11589355
  83. 83. Langley SJ, Goldthorpe S, Craven M, Woodcock A, Custovic A. Relationship between exposure to domestic allergens and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in non-sensitised, atopic asthmatic subjects. Thorax. 2005 Jan;60(1): 17–21. pmid:15618577
  84. 84. Li J, Wang H, Chen Y, Zheng J, Wong GW, Zhong N. House dust mite sensitization is the main risk factor for the increase in prevalence of wheeze in 13- to 14-year-old schoolchildren in Guangzhou city, China. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013 Oct;43(10): 1171–9. pmid:24074335
  85. 85. Raukas Kivioja A, Raukas ES, Meren M, Loit HM, Rönmark E, Lundbӓck B. Allergic sensitization to common airborne allergens among adults in Estonia. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2007;142(3): 247–54. pmid:17114890
  86. 86. van der Heide S, Dubois AE, Kauffman HF, de Monchy JG. Allergy to mites: relation to lung function and airway hyperresponsiveness. Allergy. 1998;53(48 Suppl): 104–7. pmid:10096820
  87. 87. Jacquet A. The role of innate immunity activation in house dust mite allergy. Trends Mol Med. 2011 Oct;17(10): 604–11. pmid:21741880
  88. 88. Jacquet A. Innate immune responses in house dust mite allergy. ISRN Allergy. 2013 Feb 28;2013: 735031. pmid:23724247
  89. 89. Wang JY. The innate immune response in house dust mite-induced allergic inflammation. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2013 Mar;5(2): 68–74. pmid:23450108
  90. 90. Yao M, Wu Y, Zhen S, Mainelis G. A comparison of airborne and dust-borne allergens and toxins collected from home, office and outdoor environments both in New Haven, United States and Nanjing, China. Aerobiologia (Bologna). 2009;25: 183–92.
  91. 91. Neal JS, Arlian LG, Morgan MS. Relationship among house-dust mites, Der 1, Fel d 1, and Can f 1 on clothing and automobile seats with respect to densities in houses. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Apr;88(4): 410–5. pmid:11991559
  92. 92. Wickens K, de Bruyne J, Calvo M, Choon Kook S, Jayaraj G, Lai CK, et al. The determinants of dust mite allergen and its relationship to the prevalence of symptoms of asthma in the Asia-Pacific region. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2004 Feb;15(1): 55–61. pmid:14998383
  93. 93. Arlian LG. Water balance and humidity requirements of house dust mites. Exp Appl Acarol. 1992 Nov;16(1–2): 15–35. pmid:1493740
  94. 94. Arlian LG, Morgan MS. Biology, ecology, and prevalence of dust mites. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2003 Aug;23(3): 443–68. pmid:14524385