Figures
Abstract
Background and objective
Cigarette smoking may increase the risk of developing pancreatic cancer, although its impact on pancreatitis has only been discerned in recent years. However, the results of previous studies differ. We performed a meta-analysis to provide a quantitative pooled risk estimate of the association of cigarette smoking with pancreatitis.
Method
A literature search of the MEDLINE and Embase databases was conducted, and studies were selected that investigated the association of cigarette smoking with pancreatitis. Summary relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model.
Results
Twenty-two studies were included. The summary RRs (95% CI) associated with ever, current and former smokers for acute and chronic pancreatitis (AP/CP) were as follows: 1.51 (1.10, 2.07)/3.00 (1.46, 6.17), 1.42 (1.08, 1.87)/2.72 (1.74, 4.24), and 1.22 (0.99, 1.52)/1.27 (1.00, 1.62), respectively. Moreover, studies that analyzed both AP and CP were also summarized: 1.73 (1.18, 2.54) for ever smokers, 1.67 (1.03, 2.68) for current smokers and 1.56 (1.16, 2.11) for former smokers, respectively. There was no evidence of publication bias across the studies.
Citation: Ye X, Lu G, Huai J, Ding J (2015) Impact of Smoking on the Risk of Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0124075. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124075
Academic Editor: Masaru Katoh, National Cancer Center, JAPAN
Received: August 27, 2014; Accepted: February 25, 2015; Published: April 16, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Ye et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The incidence of acute pancreatitis (AP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) has increased in recent decades [1–3]. AP is defined as an acute inflammatory process of the pancreas and is a frequent cause of hospitalization in the USA [4]. The premature activation of proenzymes within the pancreas is generally accepted as the cause of AP. Cholelithiasis, excessive alcohol intake, hyperlipidemia, pancreatic trauma, infections, and medications are the well-documented risk factors [1–3]. Abundant data indicate that AP progresses to recurrent AP and then to CP in a disease continuum [4]. Although the incidence of CP is lower, patients with CP have a lower quality of life and shorter lifespan than the general population [4].
Cigarette smoking is a well-established risk factor for the development of pancreatic cancer [5]. However, the reported correlations between smoking and pancreatitis risk are inconsistent [6–27]: some studies showed a positive correlation [6–8,11–15,17,19–24,27], whereas others failed to demonstrate such an association [9,10,16,18,25,26]. This lack of consistency across studies may be due to differences in study populations, differences in methodology or exposure definitions, variations in the quantity of cigarettes consumed, or a shortage of data on confounding factors. Additionally, alcohol intake may confound the correlation between smoking and pancreatitis because individuals who drink alcohol also often smoke and vice versa. Several experimental studies have shown that smoking induces pathological and functional changes in the exocrine pancreas. Nicotine induces damage through signal transduction pathways in pancreatic acinar cells, leading to elevated levels of intracellular calcium release and/or impaired pancreatic blood flow. Moreover, nicotine also alters gene expression in the exocrine pancreas, which affects the ratio of trypsinogen to its endogenous inhibitor [28–30]. One recent meta-analysis summarized the results from 12 studies and confirmed the detrimental effects of smoking on the pancreas [31]. The risk of CP was more than 2-fold greater among current smokers compared with never smokers. Also, a dose-response effect of smoking on CP risk was confirmed. However, this study was limited by the inappropriate inclusion of patients with AP and studies using unspecified definitions of CP, which may have biased the conclusions.
The knowledge that cigarette smoking is a potential risk factor for pancreatitis would allow preventive measures for high-risk patients and could lead to new intervention strategies. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the correlation between smoking and pancreatitis using recently published studies.
Methods
Search strategy and data extraction
We conducted this meta-analysis by following the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines [32]. Two investigators (Ye XH and Huai JP) independently performed a search of MEDLINE (from 1 January 1966 to 31 July 2014) and Embase (from 1 January 1974 to 31 July 2014) to identify potentially relevant articles. The following search terms were used: smoking (“tobacco”, “cigarette”, “smoke”, “smoking”), and pancreatitis (“acute pancreatitis”, “chronic pancreatitis”, “pancreatitis”). Manual searches of the bibliographies from these potential articles were also conducted to identify additional studies relevant to the review. Only the citations from English-language literature that met the following inclusion criteria were included: (1) case-control or cohort design and published in manuscript form; (2) smoking included as an exposure of interest; (3) pancreatitis included as an outcome of interest; and (4) studies reported relative risks (RRs) or odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of pancreatitis for different smoking categories. If multiple reports based on the same population were retrieved, the most informative study was selected. Studies were excluded if: (1) the definition of pancreatitis was not specified; (2) data were not meta-analyzable (such as letters, reviews, practice guidelines, editorials, case reports and consensus statements); or (3) duplicate reports.
Data were independently extracted by two authors (Ye XH and Huai JP) using a standardized data collection form. For each eligible study, the following data were extracted: first author’s last name, publication year, location of the study population, study design, number of subjects, smoking categories (ever, current and former), variables adjusted in the analysis, and RR with corresponding 95% CI for each category of smoking exposure. If an RR was not reported, it was calculated using the original data (number of cases and control subjects exposed to smoking) from the study. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus.
Assessment of study quality
The well-established, validated Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used for assessing the quality of the included studies [33]. It allocates a maximum of 9 points to each of three categories: (1) patient selection (three items); (2) comparability of the two study arms (two items); and (3) assessment of outcome (two items). Studies with 7–9 points were considered of high quality, studies with 5–6 points were considered of moderate quality, and studies with 0–4 points were considered of poor quality [34]. The NOS score was assessed independently by two reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved through discussions between the reviewers.
Statistical analyses
Different measures of risk were included in this meta-analysis: case-control studies (OR) and cohort studies (RR). Because clinical heterogeneity existed among the definitions of smoking, we calculated the summary RRs with their corresponding 95% CIs using a random-effects model [35]. When more than one category of smoking fell into the same level, we combined the corresponding RRs using the method of Hamling et al. [36]. If studies reported separate RRs for males and females, we calculated the pooled RR and its corresponding 95% CI. We conducted further analyses stratified by study design, geographic region, source, gender, etiology of pancreatitis, cigarette consumption, and adjustment for alcohol intake.
A dose-response meta-analysis of the correlation between smoking and the risk of pancreatitis was also performed using a generalized least-squares trend estimation analysis (GLST) [37,38]. To determine the dose-response relationship, we included studies that reported at least three categories representing the levels of cigarette smoking and provided the number of cases and participants, the adjusted RR, and the corresponding 95% CI. The midpoint of each exposure category was assigned to each corresponding risk estimate. When the highest category was open-ended, we assumed that it had the same amplitude as the preceding category. If the lowest category was open-ended, then the lowest boundary was considered as zero.
Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Q-statistic and quantified using I2 [39]. For the Q test, P < 0.10 was considered to imply statistical heterogeneity. I2 is the proportion of total variation contributed by between-study variation. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s test [40,41]. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA software (version 12.0; College Station, Texas, USA).
Results
Study identification and characteristics
Our initial literature search retrieved 1,432 articles, and 1,398 were excluded after an inspection of the titles or abstracts revealed that they were reviews, experimental studies, meta-analyses or other irrelevant articles. Of the remaining 34 articles, 12 articles were subsequently excluded from the meta-analysis. Three were duplicate reports based on the same study population, five were not meta-analyzable, and four did not evaluate the correlation between smoking and pancreatitis. As a result, 22 studies [6–27] were identified in this meta-analysis (Fig 1).
The characteristics of the 22 included studies are listed in Table 1. The studies were published between 1982 and 2014 and were performed in 10 countries. Of the 22 studies, 9 were conducted in the USA, 9 in Europe, 3 in Asia, and 1 in Australia. Fourteen studies recruited both male and female participants, and 5 studies included only men. Three studies did not report the number of male and female patients [17,21,26]. The number of patients in each study ranged from 36 to 1,000 and included 4,831 cases with pancreatitis. Adjustments were made for potential confounding factors in 13 of the 22 studies. Most of the included studies were of moderate-to-high quality (Table 2).
Smoking and AP
Eleven studies that included 2,703 patients investigated the correlation between smoking and the development of AP (Fig 2) [11,13,17–21,23–25,27]. Study data were collected from 1996 to 2014. The meta-analysis of ever (versus never) smokers included eight studies [11,17–21,25,27]. The summary RR associated with ever smoking was 1.51 (95% CI: 1.10, 2.07), and there was significant heterogeneity among studies (Q = 32.50, P < 0.001, I2 = 78.5%). Nine studies analyzed current (versus never) smokers [13,17–21,23–25], and the combined results indicated that current smokers were also more likely to develop AP (RR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.87). The heterogeneity was significant among the studies on current smokers (Q = 32.84, P < 0.001, I2 = 75.6%). When the seven studies on former (versus never) smokers were combined [11,17–20,24,25], the correlation with AP was marginal (RR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.52), and significant heterogeneity was detected across the studies (Q = 14.49, P = 0.025, I2 = 58.6%).
CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.
Smoking and CP
Nine studies that included 1,490 patients investigated the correlation between smoking and the development of CP (Fig 3) [8–12,15,19,20,22]. Study data were collected from 1991 to 2010. The meta-analysis of eight studies on ever (versus never) smokers revealed a positive correlation between smoking and developing CP (RR = 3.00, 95% CI: 1.46, 6.17); however, significant heterogeneity was detected among the studies (Q = 58.65, P < 0.001, I2 = 88.1%). Six studies reported RRs on the development of CP for current and former smokers [9,12,15,19,20,22]. The summary RRs were 2.72 (95% CI: 1.74, 4.24) for current smokers and 1.27 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.62) for former smokers. Significant heterogeneity was found for the current smokers (Q = 12.70, P = 0.026, I2 = 60.6%), whereas no significant heterogeneity was detected for the former smokers (Q = 6.56, P = 0.435, I2 = 0.0%).
CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.
Smoking and pancreatitis
Because abundant evidence now indicates that AP and CP are manifestations of the same disease process [26], we also included studies that combined AP and CP into one single outcome (pancreatitis) for analysis. Five studies, which included 660 patients, investigated the correlation between smoking and the development of pancreatitis (Fig 4) [6,7,14,16,26]. Study data were collected from 1982 to 2014. The summary RRs of the five studies for ever (versus never) smokers was 1.73 (95% CI: 1.18, 2.54), and the heterogeneity was not significant (Q = 6.58, P = 0.16, I2 = 39.2%). The pooling of four studies [6,14,16,26] that evaluated current (versus never) smokers also revealed a correlation between current smoking and pancreatitis (RR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.03, 2.68). There was no significant heterogeneity among studies (Q = 5.66, P = 0.129, I2 = 47.0%). The meta-analytical results for three studies [6,14,16] associated with former (versus never) smokers yielded an RR of 1.56 (95% CI: 1.16, 2.11). No significant heterogeneity was detected across the studies (Q = 1.34, P = 0.513, I2 = 0.0%).
CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.
Dose-response analysis
Three studies (two case-controls and one cohort) were eligible, i.e., they contained the required data for a dose-response analysis [11,13,17]. As shown in Fig 5, the pooled results indicated that a 10 cigarettes/day increment was significantly associated with a 69% increase in the risk of AP (RR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.37, 2.07). Significant heterogeneity was found between studies (Q = 6.74, P = 0.034, I2 = 70.3%); however, the heterogeneity became unremarkable when the cohort study was excluded (Q = 0.82, P = 0.364, I2 = 0.0%).
CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk; RR indicates the risk of acute pancreatitis per 10 cigarettes increment in amount of smoking.
Subgroup analysis
The summary RRs of the subgroup analyses based on study characteristics are presented in Table 3. For AP, the meta-analysis results were non-significant in some strata when data were stratified by region (USA), design (case-control), source (hospital), and etiology (post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, PEP). Moreover, the subgroup analysis based on etiology (non-PEP/PEP) reduced the heterogeneity of the correlation between smoking and AP (S1 Fig). However, the results did not differ significantly in the CP and pancreatitis groups.
When we limited the analysis to studies that controlled for alcohol consumption or used patients with alcoholism as a control group, the summary RRs remained significant in the AP, CP, and pancreatitis groups.
We considered that dose differences might contribute to the observed heterogeneity of the results. Thus, another analysis was performed using categories that defined cigarette consumption per day. Seven studies reported that the development of AP [11, 13, 17, 20], CP [11, 12, 20] or pancreatitis (AP and CP combined) [6, 14] correlated with cigarette consumption. For AP, there was no heterogeneity detected for patients who smoked 1–10 or 11–20 cigarettes per day, whereas severe heterogeneity was found for those who smoked ≥1 pack (1 pack = 20 cigarettes) per day (Q = 18.34, P < 0.001, I2 = 83.6%; Table 4). There was also a significant dose-response relation in current smokers: the RR was 1.69 (95% CI: 1.37, 2.07) for patients smoking <1 pack per day and 3.35 (95% CI: 2.38, 4.73) for patients smoking ≥1 pack per day.
The subgroup analysis based on gender indicated a significant correlation between smoking and CP for both sexes. The significantly greater RRs for male patients with CP were 5.62 (95% CI: 2.58, 12.25) for ever smokers and 7.15 (95% CI: 4.60, 11.11) for current smokers. The RRs for female patients were 1.79 (95% CI: 1.22, 2.64) and 2.53 (95% CI: 1.76, 3.64) for ever and current smokers, respectively.
Publication bias
There was no evidence for a significant publication bias: for AP, P = 1.000 using the Begg’s test and P = 0.577 using the Egger’s test; for CP, P = 0.621 using the Begg’s test and P = 0.989 using the Egger’s test; for pancreatitis, P = 0.327 using the Begg’s test and P = 0.782 using the Egger’s test. Therefore, the summary estimates were not substantively affected by publication bias (Fig 6).
Begg’s funnel plot for acute pancreatitis (A), for chronic pancreatitis (B), and for pancreatitis (C; acute and chronic combined into one single outcome).
Discussion
To our knowledge, this systematic review and meta-analysis represents the first attempt to summarize recent studies investigating the impact of cigarette smoking on the development of pancreatitis. We included 22 studies that comprised 4,831 cases of pancreatitis. Our main finding was that both ever and current smokers had higher risks of developing pancreatitis compared with never smokers. Moreover, this causative relationship was verified by the reduced or eliminated risk after smoking cessation. In comparison with current smokers, the risk of pancreatitis decreased for those who were former smokers. Also, a significant correlation between smoking and CP was observed for both sexes, whereas the trend of developing CP was more pronounced for males. This finding raises the possibility of an interaction between gender and risk. Moreover, cigarette smoking was found to be associated with AP development in a dose-response manner. The likelihood of developing AP was increased in participants who smoked ≥1 pack per day over those who smoked <1 pack per day. Additionally, each increment of 10 cigarettes/day added an additional 69% risk of developing AP (Table 3 and Fig 5).
Our results have substantial clinical and public health implications. To date, the number of habitual smokers is increasing despite numerous anti-smoking campaigns [42]. Also, cigarette smoking affects the age at diagnosis and exacerbates the disease. It may also accelerate the progression towards cancer for patients with hereditary pancreatitis who are at an increased risk of developing pancreatic carcinomas [43]. The awareness of cigarette smoking as a potential risk factor for developing pancreatitis would allow preventive measures for high-risk patients and would support the proactive implementation of preventive strategies. Therefore, early education on the benefits of smoking cessation should be the responsibility of clinical physicians who have patients with pancreatitis. Moreover, physicians who realize the risk of pancreatitis for smokers will be able to help patients and their families understand the potential benefits of smoking cessation on outcome.
An important attribute of this study is that the quantitative risk assessment for pancreatitis was controlled for alcohol consumption. Nicotine can induce pancreatic damage and upregulate intracellular calcium release and/or impair pancreatic blood flow. Additionally, gene expression levels in the exocrine pancreas are altered by nicotine absorption, thus affecting the ratio of trypsinogen to its endogenous inhibitor [28–30]. Although previous experimental studies have demonstrated that smoking can lead to pathological and functional changes in the exocrine pancreas, there is still an argument against the role of cigarette smoking in pancreatitis development given that smokers also often consume alcohol [9,31,44]. Indeed, the role of smoking may be attenuated if alcohol consumption acts as a primary risk factor in the incidence of pancreatitis. However, the RR for both AP and CP remained significant and varied little after we separately analyzed studies that reported the alcohol use–adjusted RR or employed data for patients with alcoholism only. Therefore, strong evidence has been provided for the role of smoking in the causation of pancreatitis.
Another major strength of our meta-analysis is that we used more restricted study inclusion criteria and reported RRs for AP, CP, and pancreatitis (AP and CP combined as a single outcome) separately. A previous meta-analysis of 12 studies that solely investigated the correlation between smoking and CP revealed a role for smoking in CP development [31]. However, this meta-analysis was limited by the inclusion of a study that included cases of AP and studies that did not differentiate between AP and CP [6,7,14,16]. These limitations could distort the correlation and might lead to biased conclusions. To avoid such limitations, we excluded these studies and updated information regarding the correlation between smoking and CP, including nine studies of CP.
There was significant heterogeneity among certain results. The included studies were heterogeneous according to study region, design, source, etiology, and duration of follow-up. We used a random-effects model, which assumed that the true effects were normally distributed, and more weight was assigned to small-sized studies compared with in the fixed-effects model [45]. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to address heterogeneity (Table 3). Subgroup analyses of AP based on etiology (PEP versus non-PEP) reduced the heterogeneity in all categories of cigarette smoking. Two of the PEP studies showed an inverse relationship compared with the non-PEP studies [18,25]. Nicotine may activate the nicotinic anti-inflammatory pathway, thereby reducing pancreatic inflammation [18,25]. Nicotine also relaxes the Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in experimental models, which reduces sphincter spasms and obstructions and may also have direct protective effects by reducing secretagogue-evoked cell necrosis in dispersed pancreatic acini [18,25]. Thus, we propose that the etiology of AP may have contributed to the heterogeneity. The RRs of ever smokers for both AP and CP were significantly heterogeneous, whereas for current and former smokers the heterogeneity was less remarkable or not present. This could be due to the inconsistent definition of ever smokers among the various articles we assessed and inconsistent reporting of the details of exposure. Another important source of heterogeneity was the contribution of dose differences. Therefore, we performed an analysis based on the cigarette consumption. However, data were only available for the AP group (Table 4). Most CP and pancreatitis studies did not specify the dose exposure differences.
As with all meta-analyses of observational studies, our results have certain limitations. First, the lack of uniformity in the categories of cigarette smoking was probably a weak point across the included studies, and certain smokers may have been misclassified because smoking exposure was not updated during the follow-ups. Second, a dose-response analysis could be conducted only for the AP group because exposure details were lacking for the other groups. Thus, we could only calculate the incremental changes in AP risk per 10 cigarettes smoked. Third, the majority of studies included in this meta-analysis were case-control studies, which are more susceptible to selection and recall bias. Fourth, the duration of smoking exposure should be considered as an important factor in the development of AP or CP. Consequently, the incidence of AP and CP as well as the strength of the correlation may have been underestimated because the duration of smoking and initiation of smoking varied considerably among studies. Moreover, there is concern that differences in country of origin, i.e., geographic differences, may have impacted the correlation between smoking and development of AP or CP. A recent prospective population-based study in Taiwan did not observe significant association between smoking and pancreatitis [26]. This supports significant differences between ethnic groups with respect to the risk of developing pancreatitis [26]. However, further exploration of potential ethnic differences is not feasible because of limited study in Asians, and thus more studies focusing on Asians are required.
In summary, the results from this meta-analysis suggest that cigarette smoking is associated with an increased risk of both AP and CP. Smoking cessation should be integrated into the management of patients with pancreatitis. Further studies, particularly of the dose-response relationship between cigarette smoking and pancreatitis, are required.
Supporting Information
S1 PRISMA Checklist. PRISMA Checklist for systematic review and meta-analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124075.s001
(DOC)
S1 Fig. Cigarette smoking and the risk of acute pancreatitis without PEP.
CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk; PEP, post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124075.s002
(TIF)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: GRL. Performed the experiments: XHY. Analyzed the data: JPH GRL XHY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JD. Wrote the paper: XHY JPH JD.
References
- 1. Hirota M, Shimosegawa T, Masamune A, Kikuta K, Kume K, Hamada S, et al. The sixth nationwide epidemiological survey of chronic pancreatitis in Japan. Pancreatology. 2012;12: 79–84. pmid:22487515
- 2. Yadav D, Timmons L, Benson JT, Dierkhising RA, Chari ST. Incidence, prevalence, and survival of chronic pancreatitis: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106: 2192–2199. pmid:21946280
- 3. Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. Trends in the epidemiology of the first attack of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Pancreas. 2006;33: 323–330. pmid:17079934
- 4. Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2013;144: 1252–1261. pmid:23622135
- 5. Iodice S, Gandini S, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB. Tobacco and the risk of pancreatic cancer: a review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;393: 535–545. pmid:18193270
- 6. Yen S, Hsieh CC, MacMahon B. Consumption of alcohol and tobacco and other risk factors for pancreatitis. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;116: 407–414. pmid:7124709
- 7. Lowenfels AB, Zwemer FL, Jhangiani S, Pitchumoni CS. Pancreatitis in a native American Indian population. Pancreas. 1987;2: 694–697. pmid:3438307
- 8. Bourliere M, Barthet M, Berthezene P, Durbec JP, Sarles H. Is tobacco a risk factor for chronic pancreatitis and alcoholic cirrhosis? Gut. 1997;32: 1392–1395.
- 9. Haber PS, Wilson JS, Pirola RC. Smoking and alcoholic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1993;8: 568–572. pmid:8302794
- 10. Levy P, Mathurin P, Roqueplo A, Rueff B, Bernades P. A multidimensional case-control study of dietary, alcohol, and tobacco habits in alcoholic men with chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1995;10: 231–238. pmid:7624300
- 11. Talamini G, Bassi C, Falconi M, Frulloni L, Di Francesco V, Vaona B, et al. Cigarette smoking: an independent risk factor in alcoholic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1996;12: 131–137. pmid:8720658
- 12. Lin Y, Tamakoshi A, Hayakawa T, Ogawa M, Ohno Y. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for chronic pancreatitis: a case-control study in Japan. Research Committee on Intractable Pancreatic Diseases. Pancreas. 2000;21: 109–114. pmid:10975702
- 13. Blomgren KB, Sundstrom A, Steineck G, Genell S, Sjostedt S, Wiholm A Swedish case-control network for studies of drug-induced morbidity—acute pancreatitis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;58: 275–283. pmid:12136374
- 14. Morton C, Klatsky AL, Udaltsova N. Smoking, coffee, and pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99: 731–738. pmid:15089909
- 15. Rothenbacher D, Low M, Hardt PD, Klor HU, Ziegler H, Brenner H. Prevalence and determinants of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency among older adults: results of a population-based study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40: 697–704. pmid:16036530
- 16. Yadav D, Eigenbrodt ML, Briggs MJ, Williams DK, Wiseman EJ. Pancreatitis: prevalence and risk factors among male veterans in a detoxification program. Pancreas. 2007;34: 390–398. pmid:17446836
- 17. Lindkvist B, Appelros S, Manjer J, Berglund G, Borgstrom A. A prospective cohort study of smoking in acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2008;8: 63–70. pmid:18235217
- 18. Debenedet AT, Raghunathan TE, Wing JJ, Wamsteker EJ, DiMagno MJ. Alcohol use and cigarette smoking as risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7: 353–358e4. pmid:19168153
- 19. Tolstrup JS, Kristiansen L, Becker U, Gronbaek M. Smoking and risk of acute and chronic pancreatitis among women and men: a population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169: 603–609. pmid:19307524
- 20. Yadav D, Hawes RH, Brand RE, Anderson MA, Money ME, Banks PA, et al. Alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and the risk of recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169: 1035–1045. pmid:19506173
- 21. Gonzalez-Perez A, Schlienger RG, Rodriguez LA. Acute pancreatitis in association with type 2 diabetes and antidiabetic drugs: a population-based cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33: 2580–2585. pmid:20833867
- 22. Law R, Parsi M, Lopez R, Zuccaro G, Stevens T. Cigarette smoking is independently associated with chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2010;10: 54–59. pmid:20332662
- 23. Li N, Tieng A, Novak S, Fernandes A, Jalal PK, Akerman M, et al. Effects of medications on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2010;10: 238–242. pmid:20484961
- 24. Sadr-Azodi O, Andren-Sandberg A, Orsini N, Wolk A. Cigarette smoking, smoking cessation and acute pancreatitis: a prospective population-based study. Gut. 2012;61: 262–267. pmid:21836026
- 25. DiMagno MJ, Spaete JP, Ballard DD, Wamsteker EJ, Saini SD. Risk models for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP): smoking and chronic liver disease are predictors of protection against PEP. Pancreas. 2013;42: 996–1003. pmid:23532001
- 26. Lin HH, Chang HY, Chiang YT, Wu MS, Lin JT, Liao WC. Smoking, Drinking and Pancreatitis: A Population-based Cohort Study in Taiwan. Pancreas. 2014;43: 1117–1122. pmid:25083998
- 27. Yang H, Wang L, Shi YH, Sui GT, Wu YF, Lu XH, et al. Risk factors of acute pancreatitis in the elderly Chinese population: A population-based cross-sectional study. J Dig Dis. 2014;15: 501–507. pmid:24957953
- 28. Wittel UA, Singh AP, Henley BJ, Andrianifahanana M, Akhter MP, Cullen DM, et al. Cigarette smoke-induced differential expression of the genes involved in exocrine function of the rat pancreas. Pancreas. 2006;33: 364–370. pmid:17079941
- 29. Wittel UA, Pandey KK, Andrianifahanana M, Johansson SL, Cullen DM, Akhter MP, et al. Chronic pancreatic inflammation induced by environmental tobacco smoke inhalation in rats. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101: 148–159. pmid:16405548
- 30. Malfertheiner P, Schutte K. Smoking—a trigger for chronic inflammation and cancer development in the pancreas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101: 160–162. pmid:16405549
- 31. Andriulli A, Botteri E, Almasio PL, Vantini I, Uomo G, Maisonneuve P, et al. Smoking as a cofactor for causation of chronic pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Pancreas. 2010;39: 1205–1210. pmid:20622705
- 32. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283: 2008–2012. pmid:10789670
- 33. Wells GA, Shea B, O’connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. pmid:23658850
- 34. Huai J, Ye X. A meta-analysis of critically ill patients reveals several potential risk factors for delirium. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014;36: 488–496. pmid:24950918
- 35. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7: 177–188. pmid:3802833
- 36. Hamling J, Lee P, Weitkunat R, Ambuhl M. Facilitating meta-analyses by deriving relative effect and precision estimates for alternative comparisons from a set of estimates presented by exposure level or disease category. Stat Med. 2008;27: 954–970. pmid:17676579
- 37. Greenland S, Longnecker MP. Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose-response data, with applications to meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135: 1301–1309. pmid:1626547
- 38. Berlin JA, Longnecker MP, Greenland S. Meta-analysis of epidemiologic dose-response data. Epidemiology. 1993;4: 218–228. pmid:8512986
- 39. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21: 1539–1558. pmid:12111919
- 40. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50: 1088–1101. pmid:7786990
- 41. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315: 629–634. pmid:9310563
- 42. Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006;3: e442. pmid:17132052
- 43. Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, Whitcomb DC, Lerch MM, DiMagno EP. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for pancreatic cancer in patients with hereditary pancreatitis. JAMA. 2001;286: 169–170. pmid:11448279
- 44. Alexandre M, Pandol SJ, Gorelick FS, Thrower EC. The emerging role of smoking in the development of pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2011;11: 469–474. pmid:21986098
- 45. Thompson SG, Sharp SJ. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. Stat Med. 1999;18: 2693–2708. pmid:10521860