Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A Novel Multiplex PCR Discriminates Bacillus anthracis and Its Genetically Related Strains from Other Bacillus cereus Group Species

  • Hirohito Ogawa,

    Affiliations Hokudai Center for Zoonosis Control in Zambia, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia, Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Daisuke Fujikura,

    Affiliation Division of Infection and Immunity, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

  • Miyuki Ohnuma,

    Affiliation Division of Infection and Immunity, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

  • Naomi Ohnishi,

    Affiliation Division of Infection and Immunity, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

  • Bernard M. Hang'ombe,

    Affiliation Department of Paraclinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Hitomi Mimuro,

    Affiliations Division of Bacteriology, Department of Infectious Diseases Control, International Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, Pathogenic Microbes Repository Unit, International Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

  • Takayuki Ezaki,

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Regeneration and Advanced Medical Science, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan

  • Aaron S. Mweene,

    Affiliation Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Hideaki Higashi

    hidea-hi@czc.hokudai.ac.jp

    Affiliations Hokudai Center for Zoonosis Control in Zambia, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia, Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia, Division of Infection and Immunity, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, Global Station for Zoonosis Control, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

Abstract

Anthrax is an important zoonotic disease worldwide that is caused by Bacillus anthracis, a spore-forming pathogenic bacterium. A rapid and sensitive method to detect B. anthracis is important for anthrax risk management and control in animal cases to address public health issues. However, it has recently become difficult to identify B. anthracis by using previously reported molecular-based methods because of the emergence of B. cereus, which causes severe extra-intestinal infection, as well as the human pathogenic B. thuringiensis, both of which are genetically related to B. anthracis. The close genetic relation of chromosomal backgrounds has led to complexity of molecular-based diagnosis. In this study, we established a B. anthracis multiplex PCR that can screen for the presence of B. anthracis virulent plasmids and differentiate B. anthracis and its genetically related strains from other B. cereus group species. Six sets of primers targeting a chromosome of B. anthracis and B. anthracis-like strains, two virulent plasmids, pXO1 and pXO2, a bacterial gene, 16S rRNA gene, and a mammalian gene, actin-beta gene, were designed. The multiplex PCR detected approximately 3.0 CFU of B. anthracis DNA per PCR reaction and was sensitive to B. anthracis. The internal control primers also detected all bacterial and mammalian DNAs examined, indicating the practical applicability of this assay as it enables monitoring of appropriate amplification. The assay was also applied for detection of clinical strains genetically related to B. anthracis, which were B. cereus strains isolated from outbreaks of hospital infections in Japan, and field strains isolated in Zambia, and the assay differentiated B. anthracis and its genetically related strains from other B. cereus group strains. Taken together, the results indicate that the newly developed multiplex PCR is a sensitive and practical method for detecting B. anthracis.

Introduction

Anthrax is an important worldwide zoonosis caused by the spore-forming bacterium Bacillus anthracis, a Gram-positive, rod-shaped bacterium that is transmitted among soil, wildlife, livestock and humans. This disease is still enzootic in most countries in Africa and Asia and occurs sporadically in Europe, the American continent and Australia [1]. The cycle of infection is primarily found in herbivores (e.g., cattle, sheep, goats) infected after contact with soil contaminated with spores. Spores ingested by herbivores germinate within the host to produce vegetative forms, which multiply and express their virulence factors, killing the host [2]. Human infections are caused by contact with infected animals or their products, and the following three forms of anthrax are found depending on the three different infection routes: cutaneous, gastrointestinal and inhalation forms of anthrax. Cutaneous anthrax accounts for more than 95% of human cases worldwide [3]. In cases of gastrointestinal anthrax, the lesion may occur anywhere within the gastrointestinal tract, though mostly in the ileum and cecum, after ingestion of contaminated meat that has not been sufficiently cooked. In recent years, injection anthrax has been identified as the fourth form of anthrax [4]. This type of anthrax is recognized among the drug (e.g., heroin) users in Europe, and the symptoms depend on the type of infection (i.e., cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and inhalation).

B. anthracis is an important pathogen that has been extensively studied not only for maintenance of public health worldwide but also for the defense against an effective biological weapon. Indeed, envelopes containing B. anthracis spores were mailed to news media companies and government officials, leading to the first bioterrorism-related cases of anthrax in the United States of America in 2001 [5]. Anthrax occurred in 22 people with 5 deaths from inhalation anthrax in these biological attacks. The lethal dose for 50% of test subjects for humans is between 8,000 and 10,000 spores, and once symptoms of inhalational anthrax appear, treatment is almost invariably ineffective [6].

A rapid and sensitive method to detect B. anthracis is important for control of anthrax in animal cases to maintain public health and for appropriate treatment in human cases. Several PCR [1,79], real-time PCR [10] and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) [11] techniques have been developed to detect chromosomal genes (e.g., S-layer (sap) and Ba813), virulent plasmid pXO1, encoding protective antigen (pag), lethal factor (lef) and edema factor (cya), and virulent plasmid pXO2, encoding capsule protein (cap). These genes have been used as markers to discriminate B. anthracis from other bacteria in the B. cereus group, which includes B. anthracis, B. cereus (known as a potential food poisoning pathogen) [12], B. thuringiensis (known as an insect pathogen) [13], B. mycoides, B. pseudomycoides and B. weihenstephanensis. Among the B. cereus group species, B. anthracis, B. cereus and B. thuringiensis are considered as the same species based on genetic evidence [14] and are difficult to discriminate despite the existence of gene markers. Furthermore, there have been reports about severe manifestations and fatal cases caused by B. cereus (extra-intestinal B. cereus, e.g., strains F837/76, 03BB102) [15,16], B. thuringiensis isolated from a necrotic human wound (human pathogenic B. thuringiensis, e.g., 97–27 subsp. konkukian serotype H34) [17,18] and B. anthracis-like strains (e.g., B. cereus var. anthracis strain CI isolated from chimpanzees) [19,20]. Some of these bacteria have been shown to harbor B. anthracis virulent plasmids [2123] or had chromosomal backgrounds closely related to B. anthracis [16,17]. Therefore, the establishment of a new detection method is needed to discriminate B. anthracis from other B. cereus group species including the above genetically related strains of B. anthracis.

In this study, we developed a practical B. anthracis multiplex PCR containing internal control primers targeting exogenous bacterial and mammalian genes. This assay is capable of screening for the presence of pXO1 and pXO2 and of differentiating B. anthracis and its genetically related strains from other B. cereus group.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

Bacillus strains and bacterial DNAs used for optimization of 16S rRNA amplification are listed in Tables 13. Bacillus species listed in Tables 1 and 2, excepted for Sterne 34F2, GTC02891, GTC02896, GTC02916, GTC02917, GTC03222 and GTC02826T, were isolated from natural sources according to the following protocol. One gram of specimen was suspended in 10 ml of sterilized saline followed by incubation at 75°C for 20 min. An aliquot of the sample was inoculated on 10% (v/v) sheep blood agar and cultured at 37°C overnight. The isolates were used in this study after cloning and characterization. Bacillus strains were grown on brain heart infusion agar or 10% (v/v) sheep blood agar at 37°C overnight for subsequent studies. B. anthracis was handled in the biosafety level 3 facility of the Hokudai Center for Zoonosis Control in Zambia, School of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Zambia. Six GTC strains were obtained from the Pathogenic Microorganism Genetic Resource Stock Center, School of Medicine, Gifu University (Table 2). Thirteen bacterial genomes were obtained from the Pathogenic Microbes Repository Unit, International Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Bacterial DNAs used for optimization of 16S rRNA amplification in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122004.t003

In this study, five GTC strains (GTC02891, GTC02896, GTC02916, GTC02917 and GTC03222) shown in Table 2 as well as B. cereus var. anthracis strain CI, four B. cereus strains (F837/76, AH820, 03BB102 and E33L) and two B. thuringiensis strains (97–27 subsp. konkukian serotype H34 and Al Hakam) shown in Fig. 1 were used as genetically related strains of B. anthracis.

thumbnail
Fig 1. BA_5031 and hBC/BT primer annealing sites on genome sequences of Bacillus cereus group strains.

Alignment of B. anthracis, B. cereus, B.thuringiensis, B. toyonensis, B. cytotoxis and B. weihenstephanensis BA_5031 (A) and BACI_c47770 (B) sequences from the database and primer sequences in this study. The rectangles shaded with grey correspond to BA_5031 and BACI_c47770 primer sequences. GENETYX-MAC Network Version 15.0.5 software was used for multiple sequence alignment. Expected amplification was simulated in silico using Amplifx 1.7.0 software.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122004.g001

Human and animal samples

Blood or tissue samples from a human (Homo sapiens) and 13 animals were used in this study. The animals included cattle (Bos taurus), sheep (Ovis aries), goat (Capra hircus), donkey (Equus asinus), rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), African elephant (Loxodonta africana), African buffalo (Syncerus caffer), hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius), puku (Kobus vardonii), warthog (Phacochoerus africanus), spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta), bushbuck (Tragelaphus scriptus), and lion (Panthera leo), of which 8 wildlife animals were from South Luangwa National Park, Lower Zambezi National Park, and their game management areas.

Ethical statements for the project

Approval for wildlife animal sampling and soil sampling in the national park and game management areas was obtained from the Zambia Wildlife Authority (ZAWA) in the Republic of Zambia. Some of the animals were hunted by a hunting company for meat with permission from ZAWA to control their large numbers, and tissue specimens from non-endangered species, African buffalo, puku, warthog, spotted hyena and bushbuck, were kindly provided. Other samples were taken from carcasses to determine the cause of death. We received a waiver of approval from the University of Zambia Research Ethics Committee to do animal research following approval from ZAWA and the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock. The human blood sample was taken from the first author (Dr. Hirohito Ogawa) with the author’s consent.

DNA extraction

A bacteria colony on the agar plate was suspended in 100 μl of sterile phosphate buffered saline followed by heating at 95°C for 15 min and centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 2 min at 4°C, and then 1 μl of the supernatant was directly used for PCR.

Human and animal DNAs were extracted from 100 μl of blood or 10% (w/v) tissue homogenate by using TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies) or QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was dissolved in 100 μl of distilled water or Buffer AE (QIAGEN).

For a sensitivity test, 100 μl of LB broth was collected, followed by heating at 95°C for 20 min and centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 2 min at 4°C, and then 1 μl of the supernatant was directly used for PCR.

Primer design

Six primer sets were designed for the multiplex PCR targeting the B. anthracis chromosome and two plasmids, pXO1 and pXO2, common bacterial and mammalian genes and chromosome of the genetically related strains of B. anthracis to detect and discriminate B. anthracis and other Bacillus species by the amplified band patterns (Table 4). Three primer sets targeting the B. anthracis Ba813 region, tentatively termed “BA_5031” from the locus tag name of B. anthracis strain Ames, on the chromosome, pag encoded on pXO1 and cap encoded on pXO2 were designed to detect B. anthracis genes. One primer set (hBC/BT) targeting the region, tentatively termed “BACI_c47770” from the locus tag name of Bacillus cereus var. anthracis strain CI [19], which was capable of detecting the region of the genetically related strains of B. anthracis but not that of B. anthracis, was designed for discriminating them. Two primer sets targeting the 16S rRNA gene (16S rRNA) on a bacterial chromosome and beta-actin gene (ACTB) on a mammalian chromosome were designed as internal controls. Amplifx 1.7.0 (http://crn2m.univ-mrs.fr/pub/amplifx-dist) was used to simulate PCR reaction using the newly designed primers.

PCR with newly designed primer set(s)

Multiplex PCR was carried out using a TaKaRa Multiplex PCR Assay Kit (TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A total volume of 25 μl of reaction mixture containing 0.6 μM of BA_5031 primer set, 0.2 μM of cap and ACTB primer sets, 0.1 μM of hBC/BT primer set, 0.05 μM of 16S rRNA and pag primer sets and 1 μl of template DNA was used (Table 4). The multiplex PCR program consisted of initial denaturation at 94°C for 1 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 58°C for 2 min, extension at 72°C for 2 min, and final extension at 72°C for 10 min.

A PCR using each primer set was carried out using a TaKaRa Multiplex PCR Assay Kit (TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A total volume of 25 μl of reaction mixture containing 0.2 μM of each primer and 1 μl of template DNA was used. The PCR program consisted of initial denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 58°C for 25 sec, and extension at 72°C for 1 min.

Previously reported PCR compared to the newly developed multiplex PCR

Five PCRs with each primer shown in Table 5 were carried out using a TaKaRa Multiplex PCR Assay Kit (TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primer concentration and annealing temperature were the same as those in previous studies [1,710]. The PCR program for single PCR consisted of initial denaturation at 94°C for 1 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at a stable temperature for each primer set (Table 4) for 25 sec, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR program for duplex PCR consisted of initial denaturation at 94°C for 1 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at a stable temperature for primer sets (Table 4) for 90 sec, extension at 72°C for 90 sec, and final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

A commercial kit (TaKaRa Bacillus anthracis PCR Detection Kit, TaKaRa) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This PCR system contained internal control genes for pag and cap. Either or both internal control bands amplified by the pag primer set (409 bp) and cap primer set (98 bp) would appear when the detection limit for pag and cap was below or the sample was lacking either or both of the plasmids.

Sensitivity test of multiplex PCR

The B. anthracis strain CZC5 (Accession number: BAVT00000000) [24] was cultured on LB agar at 37°C overnight. One colony with a diameter of approximately 3 mm was suspended in 3 ml of LB broth followed by serial 10-fold dilution in LB broth with 5% (v/v) sheep blood. Each 100 μl of suspension was collected from the dilution and used for DNA extraction according to the heating method described above. An aliquot from the dilution was cultured for counting colony-forming units (CFU/ml) on LB agar at 37°C overnight.

Sequence analysis

Sequence analysis of the PCR product was carried out by direct sequencing or a cloning method using pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega). Purified PCR products or plasmids were sequenced in a 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies) following reaction using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. T7-GG primer (5’-AATACGACTCACTATAGGG-3') and SP6 primer (5’-CAAGCTATTTAGGTGACACTATAG-3') were used for sequence analysis of the plasmid.

Results

Specificity of internal control primers targeting ACTB and 16S rRNA

To confirm the host range of the ACTB primer set, we attempted to amplify ACTB from DNAs extracted from a human and various kinds of mammalian animals. As a result, all of them were amplified (S1 Fig.). Nucleotide sequences of all of the products were determined and identified as an ACTB derived from the respective templates.

Next, the 16S rRNA primer set was assessed with a probe match function in Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) [25] in silico to determine the suitability for 16S rRNA amplification in common bacteria. The 16S-663F and 16S-1395R obtained 93.72% and 95.67% coverage of 9209 strain type of the domain Bacteria sequences submitted to repositories, respectively, using RDP’s probe match function with three errors allowance in each primer under the following data set options: strain type, isolate source, all size, and good quality (S1 Table). Combined in silico performance of the 16S-663F and 16S-1395R set covered 90.15% of the domain Bacteria (S1 Table). As a practical validation, PCR using the 16S-663F and 16S-1395R primer set detected 16S rRNA from B. anthracis genomic DNA and 13 bacterial genomic DNAs (Table 3) in two major bacteria phyla: Proteobacteria and Firmicutes.

Specificity of primers targeting the chromosome and virulent plasmids of B. anthracis

For specific amplification of B. anthracis, four target genes, Ba813 region, tentatively termed “BA_5031” on the chromosome, pag on pXO1, cap on pXO2 and a chromosomal region tentatively termed “BACI_c47770”, which was a specific region for genetically related strains of B. anthracis (described in Materials and Methods), were designed (Table 4).

It is known that the Ba813, a 277-bp fragment encoded on B. anthracis chromosomal DNA, has been specific to B. anthracis [26]. However, some B. cereus strains harboring Ba813 have been isolated from humans with severe manifestations [15,21,27]. For amplification of chromosomal DNA, primers to amplify the 1027 bp of BA_5031 were designed for B. anthracis as well as the genetically related strains of B. anthracis (Fig. 1). Furthermore, we designed a hBC/BT primers to amplify the 197 bp of the region tentatively termed “BACI_c47770” for discriminating between B. anthracis and the genetically related strains of B. anthracis (Fig. 1). Each specific band was amplified by PCR using each primer set (S2 Fig.).

Comparison of multiplex PCR and the existing PCR methods

First, to examine whether the six newly designed primer sets could correctly amplify each target gene by the multiplex PCR simultaneously, we performed multiplex PCR for B. anthracis-infected elephant blood and hippopotamus tissue [28], B. anthracis isolates harboring both the virulent plasmids from a hippopotamus as a wildlife animal (strain CZC5: pXO1+/pXO2+/Ba813+/16S rRNA+) [24,28], from a cow as a domestic animal (strain M1: pXO1+/pXO2+/Ba813+/16S rRNA+) and from soil (strain L158–1: pXO1+/pXO2+/Ba813+/16S rRNA+), B. anthracis strain CZC5 derivative lacking pXO1 (strain CZC5 clone1: pXO1-/pXO2+/Ba813+/16S rRNA+), commercial animal vaccine strain lacking pXO2 (strain Sterne 34F2: pXO1+/pXO2-/Ba813+/16S rRNA+) and B. anthracis strain Sterne 34F2 derivative lacking pXO1 (strain Sterne 34F2 clone2: pXO1-/pXO2-/Ba813+/16S rRNA+). The expected fragments were amplified in all 8 samples (Fig. 2, uppermost panel).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Comparison of the specificity of multiplex PCR and those of existing PCR methods.

The expected DNA fragments corresponding to the characteristics of samples were amplified in all samples by the multiplex PCR assay established in this study (uppermost panel) and by three single PCRs, two duplex PCRs and PCR using a commercial kit (lower panels). Template DNA was extracted from B.anthracis-infected tissues and B.anthracis harboring or lacking virulent plasmids. Lane M, 100-bp DNA ladder; lane 1, DNA from B.anthracis-infected elephant blood; lane 2, DNA from B.anthracis-infected hippopotamus tissue; lane 3, DNA from B.anthracis strain CZC5; lane 4, DNA from B.anthracis strain M1; lane 5, DNA from B.anthracis strain L158–1; lane 6, DNA from B.anthracis strain CZC5 clone1; lane 7, DNA from B.anthracis vaccine strain Sterne 34F2; lane 8, B.anthracis vaccine strain Sterne 34F2 clone2; lane 9, distilled water as a negative control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122004.g002

Next, to compare the results, several PCR methods including World Health Organization (WHO) recommended methods [1,710] and a method using a commercial PCR kit were performed. These PCR methods also detected each gene according to the variation of the isolates (Fig. 2).

Sensitivity of multiplex PCR using B. anthracis strain CZC5 in this study

To determine the sensitivity, one colony suspended in LB broth with 5% (v/v) sheep blood was serially diluted 10-fold in same medium, and aliquots were used for both DNA extraction by the boiling method and counts of CFU on an LB agar plate. All 5 bands except for BACI_c47770 could be simultaneously detected from 2.99 × 103 CFU/ml (Fig. 3). These amounts corresponded to 3.0 CFU/PCR reaction. The sensitivity of previously reported PCR methods including PCR using a commercial kit were less than or equal to the same serially diluted samples (data not shown).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Sensitivity of multiplex PCR for B. anthracis cultured in liquid media.

DNA fragments were amplified by the multiplex PCR in the extracted DNA from B. anthracis strain CZC5 cultured in LB broth containing 5% (v/v) sheep blood (lanes 1 to 7). All 5 bands were simultaneously detected at the template concentration of 2.99 × 103 CFU/ml (lane 3). Lane M, 100-bp DNA ladder; lanes 1 to 7, serially 10-fold diluted B. anthracis strain CZC5. Lane 3, 2.99 × 103 CFU/ml; lane 4, 3.83 × 102 CFU/ml; lane 5, 2.0 × 10 CFU/ml; lanes 6 and 7, 0 CFU/ml; lanes 8, distilled water as a negative control. CFU/ml in lanes 1 and 2 were not determined because of uncountable colonies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122004.g003

Application to B. cereus clinical strains genetically related to B. anthracis and field isolates

The applicability of multiplex PCR to clinical strains genetically related to B. anthracis, which were B. cereus strains isolated from outbreaks of hospital infection [23], and field isolates was studied (Table 2). Six field isolates in Zambia except for LZ48–5 and 5 clinical strains (GTC02891, GTC02896, GTC02916, GTC02917, GTC03222) were positive for both BA_5031 and BACI_c47770 (Fig. 4). Furthermore, GTC02917 was clearly cap-positive, being in accord with a report by Zhang et al. [23]. Four field isolates in Japan were 16S rRNA-single positive. The newly developed multiplex PCR detected each gene according to the variation of the isolates. Regional variation of isolates was not found among band patterns. Interestingly, the band patterns were closely related to genetic differences analyzed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) defined by Priest et al. [29] (S3 Fig.). Basically, lineage Anthracis was both BA_5031 and 16S rRNA-positive, and lineage Cereus III and/or assortative lineages were BA_5031, 16S rRNA and BACI_c47770-positive in Clade 1. Plasmid genes (cap and pag) were detected according to isolates’ characteristics. In Clade 2, GTC02826T from lineage Tolworthi, BC_CZC1 and BC_CZC2 were 16S rRNA-single positive. LZ48–5 was both BA_5031 and 16S rRNA-positive, the pattern of which was the same as that of B. anthracis vaccine strain (Sterne 34F2); however, LZ48–5 was hemolytic (B. anthracis being non-hemolytic). In Clade 3, BP_CZC1 and BP_CZC1 were also 16S rRNA-single positive.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Multiplex PCR for Bacillus field isolates and clinical strains genetically related to B. anthracis.

Field isolates in Zambia (left panel) and clinical outbreak strains in Japan (right panel), which were genetically related to B. anthracis, and field isolates in Japan (right panel) were subjected to the multiplex PCR assay developed in this study and Ba813 PCR [8]. Lane M, 100-bp DNA ladder; lane 1, B. cereus strain LZ48–5; lane 2, B. cereus strain LZ136–1; lane 3, B. cereus strain LZ136–2; lane 4, B. cereus strain LZ77–1; lane 5, B. cereus strain LZ77–2; lane 6, B. cereus strain LZ78–7; lane 7, B. cereus strain LZ78–8; lane 8, B. cereus strain GTC02891; lane 9, B. cereus strain GTC02896; lane 10, B. cereus strain GTC02916; lane 11, B. cereus strain GTC02917; lane 12, B. cereus strain GTC03222; lane 13, B. cereus strain BC_CZC1; lane 15, B. cereus strain BC_CZC2; lane 15, B. pseudomycoides strain BP_CZC1; lane 16, B. pseudomycoides strain BP_CZC2; lane NC, distilled water as a negative control; lane BC, B. cereus strain GTC02826T; lane BA, B. anthracis strain CZC5 as a positive control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122004.g004

Discussion

A rapid and sensitive method to detect B. anthracis is important in anthrax risk management and control as it enables early tracing and elimination of the infection source and timely diagnosis for appropriate treatment of the disease. Severe extra-intestinal infections due to B. cereus and B. thuringiensis in humans have recently been reported [1518,27]. These isolates have been found to be genetically closer to B. anthracis than to B. cereus or B. thuringiensis typical strains [16,17,22], and their emergence has led to complexity of diagnosis. In this study, we developed a novel B. anthracis multiplex PCR method.

The multiplex PCR assay contains multiple internal control primers, targeting the ACTB on the mammalian chromosome and the 16S rRNA on a common bacterial chromosome, to allow for monitoring of appropriate amplification. Since the actual specimens were derived from a human, mammalian animals or their products, bacteria isolates and environment samples containing commensal bacteria (e.g., water and soil), both target genes were chosen.

Universal PCR primers for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA are widely available [3033]. Recently, Winsley et al. [34] redesigned the 16S rRNA primer set to detect a wider range of bacteria including candidates belonging to new bacteria phyla. Since it has been assumed that their degenerate primer set hampered PCR amplification with other primers, a novel 16S rRNA primer set (16S-663F and 16S-1395R) was designed in this study. However, the 16S-663F and 16S-1395R combination showed lower homology to 16S rRNA among some kinds of bacteria, especially Caldiserica (0/1; 0%), Chlorobi (2/22; 9.09%), Spirochaetes (33/71; 46.48%) and Thermotogae (18/38; 47.37%) in S1 Table. These bacteria have unique morphological properties and/or differences of cultural conditions (e.g., temperature, existence of oxygen, etc.), which easily enable them to be distinguished from B. anthracis. Therefore, the 16S rRNA primer set can detect bacterial DNA derived from cultivable bacteria in standard media and can work as an internal control without the influence of lower homology to 16S rRNA among the above bacteria (Caldiserica, Chlorobi, Spirochaetes and Thermotogae). The 16S rRNA primer set could also work as an internal control to examine environment samples (e.g., water and soil) because these samples contain innumerable commensal bacteria. Indeed, 16S rRNA was amplified by the set of 16S-663F and 16S-1395R primers in all 14 bacterial DNAs including B. anthracis belonging to Proteobacteria and Firmicutes (Table 3), which were composed of major Gram-positive and-negative bacteria (data not shown). It is clear that the novel 16S rRNA primer set works to amplify the bacterial gene and is useful for preparation of an internal control in the multiplex PCR. Recently, the Ground Anthrax Bacillus Refined Isolation (GABRI) method, which was able to detect very low level of B. anthracis from the contaminated samples (e.g., soil), has been reported [35]. The usage of GABRI method should have a better influence to the set of 16S-663F and 16S-1395R primers, since the environmental contaminants are strongly reduced by this method.

In order to detect B. anthracis, three target genes, pag on pXO1, cap on pXO2 and the Ba813 region on the chromosome, were chosen as markers of B. anthracis. Since pXO1 and pXO2 are closely related to virulence of B. anthracis strains, possession of which is valuable information to know virulence of strains. The multiplex PCR in this study could identify all B. anthracis strains, which showed variations of plasmid possession, in one reaction; however, previously reported methods could not identify them (Fig. 2). Interestingly, duplex PCR [1], single PCR to detect cap [10] and pag [7], and a commercial PCR kit could not even detect the B. anthracis genome to B. anthracis strain Sterne 34F2 clone2 (pXO1-/pXO2-/Ba813+/16S rRNA+), although B. anthracis, which dose not harbor pXO1 and pXO2, is avirulent and not a public health threat (Fig. 2). Our multiplex PCR clearly enables detection of B. anthracis and its plasmid possession in one reaction. In the past decade, some B. cereus strains possessing B. anthracis pag [22] as well as cap [21,23] have been reported. Furthermore, the multiplex PCR could identify the characteristics of field isolates and extra-intestinal B. cereus clinical strains, especially strain GTC02891 possessing cap (Fig. 4), indicating that pag and cap primer sets contained in the multiplex PCR are useful for detecting pag and cap even in the genetically related strains of B. anthracis.

Although Ba813 (277 bp in length) is known as one of the important markers on the chromosome to identify and monitor B. anthracis [36], it has been reported that some B. cereus strains were found to harbor it [23,36]. In this study, the Ba813 region (1008 bp) including the 277-bp length of Ba813, tentatively termed “BA_5031”, was newly designed to amplify B. anthracis (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the hBC/BT primer set, which is capable of detecting the region, tentatively termed “BACI_c47770”, in the genetically related strains of B. anthracis (Fig. 1). These strains have been reported over the past two decades [1618,21,23], emphasizing the importance of diagnosis and monitoring of these strains. However, there are no reports to the effective chromosomal DNA markers and assays targeting them, since the cross-reactions are frequently observed between B. anthracis and Bacillus strains genetically related to B. anthracis [37]. The isolates listed in Table 2 were identified by MLST (S3 Fig.). Interestingly, Zambian isolates (LZ77–1, LZ77–2, LZ78–7, LZ78–8, LZ136–1 and LZ136–2) except for LZ48–5 and clinical outbreak strains in Japan belonged to the same lineage in MLST, in which extra-intestinal B. cereus and human pathogenic B. thuringiensis strains were allocated. The band pattern of multiplex PCR also demonstrated that these strains were not typical B. cereus strains (Fig. 4); moreover, the BA_5031 and BACI_c47770 band pattern was also the same as that of B. cereus and B. thuringiensis, which are genetically closely related to B. anthracis (Ba_5031+/ BACI_c47770+) according to the result of in silico simulation (Fig. 1). It can be seen that our multiplex PCR discriminates Bacillus strains genetically related to B. anthracis as well as B. anthracis from B. cereus group species. LZ48–5 belonging to an unassigned lineage showed both a BA_5031 and 16S rRNA-positive band pattern as did B. anthracis strain Sterne 34F2 (vaccine strain) in multiplex PCR; unfortunately, the newly developed method could not discriminate a LZ48–5 without a hemolysis test. Only in this case, the combination of multiplex PCR and a hemolysis test might be required for identification; however, B. anthracis lacking virulent plasmids is not a public health threat because strains lacking either plasmid are avirulent or significantly attenuated.

Sensitive and simple detection is required for diagnosis and treatment of anthrax, since a complicated method is burdensome for the examiner and may produce inconclusive results due to human error. Therefore, DNA extracted from liquid culture by heating was directly used in the sensitivity test to avoid a complicated method. To confirm the sensitivity in the culture condition with blood, LB broth with 5% (v/v) sheep blood was used for the test. All 5 DNA fragments could be simultaneously detected from 3.0 CFU/PCR reaction (Fig. 3). Regarding 16S rRNA and cap primer sets under a multiple primer condition, specific DNA fragments were detected from 0.4 CFU/PCR reaction. The sensitivities of PCRs using a single primer set targeting pag and a single primer set targeting cap for blood samples containing B. anthracis were reported by Kurosaki et al. to be 3.6 and 90 CFU/PCR reaction, respectively [11]. Furthermore, the sensitivities of 6 previously reported PCR methods including PCR using a commercial kit were less than or equal to these sensitivities (data not shown). The results suggest that our multiplex PCR detected target genes equivalently to single PCR. By testing a dilution series of cultural B. anthracis, it was demonstrated that our multiplex PCR assay is a sensitive method for detection of B. anthracis as well as differentiation of B. anthracis and B. anthracis-like strains.

In conclusion, the newly developed multiplex PCR is a sensitive and practical method for detecting B. anthracis from various kinds of specimens. This assay can also discriminate the virulence of B. anthracis and its genetically related strains from other B. cereus group strains.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Matches from the Ribosomal Database Project’s (RDP) probe match function to the primers 16S-663F and 16S-1395R designed in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122004.s001

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Specificity of ACTB primer set for human and animal samples.

ACTB fragments were amplified by PCR using an ACTB primer set for a human sample and various kinds of animal samples. Lane M, 100-bp DNA ladder; lane NC, negative control (distilled water).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122004.s002

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Specificity of BA_5031, cap, pag, and hBC/BT primer sets.

Specific bands were amplified by single PCR each using the BA_5031 primer set (lanes 1 and 2), cap primer set (lanes 3 and 4), pag primer set (lanes 4 and 6), hBC/BT primer set (lanes 7 to 9) and 16S rRNA primer set (lanes 10 to 12). The expected band sizes amplified by BA_5031, cap, pag, BACI_c47770 and 16S rRNA primer sets were 1027 bp, 578 bp, 364 bp, 197 bp and 733 bp, respectively. Lane M, 100-bp DNA ladder; lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, B. anthracis strain CZC5; lanes 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, distilled water. lanes 8, 11, B. cereus strain LZ77–1 as a positive control for the hBC/BT primer set. Single PCR using the 16S rRNA primer set was used to confirm template DNA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122004.s003

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Phylogenetic analysis of Bacillus strains used in this study by multilocus sequence typing (MLST).

In order to confirm the phylogenetic relationships, concatenated sequences of B. cereus type strain and 5 clinical strains, 7 field isolates in Zambia and 4 field isolates in Japan (Table 2) were used to construct a maximum likelihood tree according to the published MLST method [29]. Bold font indicates sequences from this study. The rectangles shaded with grey indicate the genetically related strains of B. anthracis in Fig. 1. Clade and lineage names are as designated by a published study [29].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122004.s004

(EPS)

Acknowledgments

We thank Yuka Thomas, Evans Mulenga, Ladslav Moonga, Dr. Emiko Nakagawa, Dr. David Squarre, Dr. Yasuko Orba and Dr. Hirofumi Sawa for their tremendous support. We also thank the Zambia Wildlife Authority and the Conservation Lower Zambezi for providing permission and the enabling environment for sampling in the national park and game management area.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: HO HH. Performed the experiments: HO DF MO NO. Analyzed the data: HO MO. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BH HM TE AM HH. Wrote the paper: HO HH.

References

  1. 1. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the Surveillance and Control of Anthrax in Human and Animals. 3rd ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 1998.
  2. 2. Mock M, Fouet A. Anthrax. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55: 647–671. pmid:11544370
  3. 3. Dixon TC, Meselson M, Guillemin J, Hanna PC. Anthrax. N Engl J Med. 1999;341: 815–826. pmid:10477781
  4. 4. Hicks CW, Sweeney DA, Cui X, Li Y, Eichacker PQ. An overview of anthrax infection including the recently identified form of disease in injection drug users. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38: 1092–1104. pmid:22527064
  5. 5. Jernigan DB, Raghunathan PL, Bell BP, Brechner R, Bresnitz EA, Butler JC, et al. Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax, United States, 2001: epidemiologic findings. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8: 1019–1028. pmid:12396909
  6. 6. Franz DR, Jahrling PB, Friedlander AM, McClain DJ, Hoover DL, Bryne WR, et al. Clinical recognition and management of patients exposed to biological warfare agents. JAMA. 1997;278: 399–411. pmid:9244332
  7. 7. Beyer W, Glöckner P, Otto J, Böhm R. A nested PCR method for the detection of Bacillus anthracis in environmental samples collected from former tannery sites. Microbiol Res. 1995;150: 179–186. pmid:7600011
  8. 8. Brightwell G, Pearce M, Leslie D. Development of internal controls for PCR detection of Bacillus anthracis. Mol Cell Probes. 1998;12: 367–377. pmid:9843654
  9. 9. Hutson RA, Duggleby CJ, Lowe JR, Manchee RJ, Turnbull PC. The development and assessment of DNA and oligonucleotide probes for the specific detection of Bacillus anthracis. J Appl Bacteriol. 1993;75: 463–472. pmid:8300447
  10. 10. Makino SI, Cheun HI, Watarai M, Uchida I, Takeshi K. Detection of anthrax spores from the air by real-time PCR. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001;33: 237–240. pmid:11555211
  11. 11. Kurosaki Y, Sakuma T, Fukuma A, Fujinami Y, Kawamoto K, Kamo N, et al. A simple and sensitive method for detection of Bacillus anthracis by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;107: 1947–1956. pmid:19493277
  12. 12. Granum PE, Lund T. Bacillus cereus and its food poisoning toxins. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;157: 223–228. pmid:9435100
  13. 13. Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van Rie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Feitelson J, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62: 775–806. pmid:9729609
  14. 14. Helgason E, Økstad OA, Caugant DA, Johansen HA, Fouet A, Mock M, et al. Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus thuringiensis—one species on the basis of genetic evidence. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66: 2627–2630. pmid:10831447
  15. 15. Turnbull PC, Jørgensen K, Kramer JM, Gilbert RJ, Parry JM. Severe clinical conditions associated with Bacillus cereus and the apparent involvement of exotoxins. J Clin Pathol. 1979;32: 289–293. pmid:107202
  16. 16. Hoffmaster AR, Hill KK, Gee JE, Marston CK, De BK, Popovic T, et al. Characterization of Bacillus cereus isolates associated with fatal pneumonias: strains are closely related to Bacillus anthracis and harbor B. anthracis virulence genes. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44: 3352–3360. pmid:16954272
  17. 17. Han CS, Xie G, Challacombe JF, Altherr MR, Bhotika SS, Bruce D, et al. Pathogenomic sequence analysis of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis isolates closely related to Bacillus anthracis. J Bacteriol. 2006;188: 3382–3390. pmid:16621833
  18. 18. Hernandez E, Ramisse F, Ducoureau JP, Cruel T, Cavallo JD. Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. konkukian (serotype H34) superinfection: case report and experimental evidence of pathogenicity in immunosuppressed mice. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36: 2138–2139. pmid:9650985
  19. 19. Klee SR, Özel M, Appel B, Boesch C, Ellerbrok H, Jacob D, et al. Characterization of Bacillus anthracis-like bacteria isolated from wild great apes from Côte d'Ivoire and Cameroon. J Bacteriol. 2006;188: 5333–5344. pmid:16855222
  20. 20. Klee SR, Brzuszkiewicz EB, Nattermann H, Brüggemann H, Dupke S, Wollherr A, et al. The genome of a Bacillus isolate causing anthrax in chimpanzees combines chromosomal properties of B. cereus with B. anthracis virulence plasmids. PLOS One. 2010;5: e10986. pmid:20634886
  21. 21. Sue D, Hoffmaster AR, Popovic T, Wilkins PP. Capsule production in Bacillus cereus strains associated with severe pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44: 3426–3428. pmid:16954292
  22. 22. Hoffmaster AR, Ravel J, Rasko DA, Chapman GD, Chute MD, Marston CK, et al. Identification of anthrax toxin genes in a Bacillus cereus associated with an illness resembling inhalation anthrax. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101: 8449–8454. pmid:15155910
  23. 23. Zhang J, van Hung P, Hayashi M, Yoshida S, Ohkusu K, Ezaki T. DnaJ sequences of Bacillus cereus strains isolated from outbreaks of hospital infection are highly similar to Bacillus anthracis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;70: 307–315. pmid:21683265
  24. 24. Ohnishi N, Maruyama F, Ogawa H, Kachi H, Yamada S, Fujikura D, et al. Genome Sequence of Bacillus anthracis outbreak strain in Zambia, 2011. Genome Announc. 2014;2: e00116–14. pmid:24604644
  25. 25. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, et al. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37: D141–145. pmid:19004872
  26. 26. Ramisse V, Patra G, Garrigue H, Guesdon JL, Mock M. Identification and characterization of Bacillus anthracis by multiplex PCR analysis of sequences on plasmids pXO1 and pXO2 and chromosomal DNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996;145: 9–16. pmid:8931320
  27. 27. Helgason E, Caugant DA, Olsen I, Kolstø AB. Genetic structure of population of Bacillus cereus and B. thuringiensis isolates associated with periodontitis and other human infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38: 1615–1622. pmid:10747152
  28. 28. Hang'ombe MB, Mwansa JC, Muwowo S, Mulenga P, Kapina M, Musenga E, et al. Human-animal anthrax outbreak in the Luangwa valley of Zambia in 2011. Trop Doct. 2012;42: 136–139. pmid:22472314
  29. 29. Priest FG, Barker M, Baillie LW, Holmes EC, Maiden MC. Population structure and evolution of the Bacillus cereus group. J Bacteriol. 2004;186: 7959–7970. pmid:15547268
  30. 30. Marchesi JR, Sato T, Weightman AJ, Martin TA, Fry JC, Hiom SJ, et al. Design and evaluation of useful bacterium-specific PCR primers that amplify genes coding for bacterial 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64: 795–799. pmid:9464425
  31. 31. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev. 1995;59: 143–169. pmid:7535888
  32. 32. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol. 1991;173: 697–703. pmid:1987160
  33. 33. Lane DJ, Pace B, Olsen GJ, Stahl DA, Sogin ML, Pace NR. Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82: 6955–6959. pmid:2413450
  34. 34. Winsley T, van Dorst JM, Brown MV, Ferrari BC. Capturing greater 16S rRNA gene sequence diversity within the domain Bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78: 5938–5941. pmid:22685133
  35. 35. Fasanella A, Di Taranto P, Garofolo G, Colao V, Marino L, Buonavoglia D, et al. Ground Anthrax Bacillus Refined Isolation (GABRI) method for analyzing environmental samples with low levels of Bacillus anthracis contamination. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13: 167. pmid:23865983
  36. 36. Ramisse V, Patra G, Vaissaire J, Mock M. The Ba813 chromosomal DNA sequence effectively traces the whole Bacillus anthracis community. J Appl Microbiol. 1999;87: 224–228. pmid:10475954
  37. 37. Ågren J, Hamidjaja RA, Hansen T, Ruuls R, Thierry S, Vigre H, et al. In silico and in vitro evaluation of PCR-based assays for the detection of Bacillus anthracis chromosomal signature sequences. Virulence. 2013;4: 671–685. pmid:24005110