Figures
Abstract
Considering the economic importance of chickpea (C. arietinum L.) seeds, it is important to understand the mechanisms underlying seed development for which a cDNA library was constructed from 6 day old chickpea embryos. A total of 8,186 ESTs were obtained from which 4,048 high quality ESTs were assembled into 1,480 unigenes that majorly encoded genes involved in various metabolic and regulatory pathways. Of these, 95 ESTs were found to be involved in ubiquitination related protein degradation pathways and 12 ESTs coded specifically for putative F-box proteins. Differential transcript accumulation of these putative F-box genes was observed in chickpea tissues as evidenced by quantitative real-time PCR. Further, to explore the role of F-box proteins in chickpea seed development, two F-box genes were selected for molecular characterization. These were named as CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM depending on their C-terminal domains, PP2 and LysM, respectively. Their highly conserved structures led us to predict their target substrates. Subcellular localization experiment revealed that CarF-box_PP2 was localized in the cytoplasm and CarF-box_LysM was localized in the nucleus. We demonstrated their physical interactions with SKP1 protein, which validated that they function as F-box proteins in the formation of SCF complexes. Sequence analysis of their promoter regions revealed certain seed specific cis-acting elements that may be regulating their preferential transcript accumulation in the seed. Overall, the study helped in expanding the EST database of chickpea, which was further used to identify two novel F-box genes having a potential role in seed development.
Citation: Gupta S, Garg V, Bhatia S (2015) A New Set of ESTs from Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Embryo Reveals Two Novel F-Box Genes, CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM, with Potential Roles in Seed Development. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0121100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121100
Academic Editor: Xianlong Zhang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, CHINA
Received: November 15, 2014; Accepted: February 9, 2015; Published: March 24, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Gupta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: The nucleotide sequences of ESTs reported in this paper have been submitted to GenBank with accession numbers JK475124-JK475133, EX567519 and JK707012-JK711021. The coding sequences of CarF-box_LysM and CarF-box_PP2 genes have been submitted to NCBI with accession numbers JX294993 and JX294994, respectively.
Funding: This work was supported by the core grant of the National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India and by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, under the Next Generation Challenge Programme on Chickpea Genomics (grant number BT/PR12919/AGR/02/676/2009). The authors are thankful to Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India, for providing fellowship to SG.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Apart from being an important source of food for humans and animals, seeds provide protection and nourishment to developing embryo and permit it to remain quiescent at dormant stage until conditions become favourable for seedling development [1]. Exploring the process of embryogenesis at the molecular and cellular levels can provide insights into different aspects of early seed development including the developmental and metabolic regulation [2]. Expressed sequence tag (EST) has proved its usefulness in functional genomics approaches for gene discovery, large-scale expression analysis in various tissues and developmental stages and genome annotation in many plant species such as in Arabidopsis [2,3], wheat [4], rice [5] and legumes, such as Medicago truncatula [6,7] and soybean [8].
Chickpea represents the third most important pulse crop in the world (FAOSTAT 2011; http://faostat.fao.org). It has a genome size of 740 Mb and chromosome number 2n = 16 [9]. Chickpea seed is high in carbohydrates and proteins and also contains minerals and vitamins essential for human nutrition [9]. Due to its agronomical usefulness, the study of seed development in chickpea is of particular importance. A significant number of ESTs have been generated from root, leaf and pod of chickpea [10–12]. More recently, chickpea transcriptome has been sequenced using next-generation sequencing technologies [13–16]. However, transcripts from developing chickpea embryo remain uncharacterized. Thus, it becomes necessary to develop a dataset of genes expressing in early seed that can be used as a platform to identify the cellular processes and regulatory networks that underlie early seed development.
The ubiquitin/ proteasome pathway is the major regulatory mechanism for selective protein degradation in a wide variety of cellular processes including plant development [17]. It involves three enzymatic steps: (1) activation of ubiquitin by E1 enzyme (ubiquitin activating enzyme) in an ATP dependent manner, (2) transfer of activated ubiquitin to E2 (ubiquitin conjugating enzyme) and (3) transfer of ubiquitin to the target protein by E3 complex (ubiquitin protein ligase). SCF complex (Skp1, Cullin1, F-box containing complex) is one of the best characterized E3 ligases and is composed of Skp1, Cullin1, Rbx1 and F-box protein [18]. F-box proteins comprise a large family of proteins found in yeast, nematode, fish, human, mammals and plants [19]. These proteins share a conserved 40–50 amino acid long F-box motif. These interact with Skp1 via an N-terminal F-box motif and with their substrate via a C-terminal protein-protein interaction domain [20]. Thus, F-box proteins play a crucial role in targeting appropriate substrates to the SCF complex. Plants have been reported to contain the largest known number of F-box proteins with nearly 800 F-box proteins identified in Arabidopsis and 971 in rice [19]. Several of them have been extensively studied in recent years and are reported to be regulating a diverse range of cellular functions such as in plant growth and development, floral development, lateral root formation, leaf senescence, circadian rhythms, self incompatibility, defence, stress response, control of cell cycle, hormone signaling and seed germination, etc. [21]. Although various F-box genes and their functions have been discovered in many living organisms in previous years, till now there is very little information about F-box genes in chickpea [22] or F-box genes involved specifically in seed development. However, one report by Jain et al. [23] has implicated the probable role of F-box genes in seed development in rice on the basis of expression analysis. Therefore, efforts have been made in the present study to identify F-box genes having a potential role in chickpea seed development.
The objective of this study was therefore to generate the first set of chickpea ESTs from 6 DAA (days after anthesis) embryos which would serve as a foundation to investigate the regulation of genes during early seed development. Analysis of this dataset revealed a distinct set of ESTs that encoded genes involved in protein turnover. We analyzed the transcript accumulation patterns of F-box genes for elucidating their roles in Ub/26S proteasome-mediated protein degradation pathway during seed development. Two putative F-box genes were selected for further molecular characterization on the basis of their preferential accumulation in developing chickpea seed as well as the nature of C-terminal domains present. These were named as CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM depending on their C-terminal domains, PP2 and LysM, respectively. F-box genes having these domains at their C-terminal ends have not been characterized till date. This study represents an important step towards understanding the early stages of chickpea seed development.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
No specific permission was required for growing the plants in the NIPGR (National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India) field which is meant for research purposes and is not privately owned or protected. The study did not involve any endangered or protected species.
Plant Material
C. arietinum cv. ICCV2 (single-podded, kabuli) was used for the construction of the chickpea embryo cDNA library. It was grown in the field conditions and monitored for flowering. Completely opened flowers were tagged [24] and seeds were collected 6 days after anthesis (DAA). Chickpea embryos were separated manually from the seeds by using forceps and kept on ice in a sterile eppendorf tube. Excised embryos were frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C. For gene expression analyses at different stages of seed development, flowers were similarly tagged and seeds collected at 5 DAA, 10 DAA, 20 DAA, 30 DAA and 40 DAA. Fully opened flower tissue was also collected from the field. The leaf, stem and root tissues were collected from the 2 week old chickpea seedlings grown in greenhouse.
cDNA library construction and EST sequencing
Total RNA was extracted from isolated frozen embryos by LiCl method [25]. Double stranded cDNA was synthesised using the SMART cDNA Library Construction Kit (Clontech, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol, and introduced into the TOPO TA Cloning vector (Invitrogen). This was transformed into E. coli DH5α competent cells. Successful recombinants were obtained by screening white colonies grown on Luria–Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with 100 μg/ml ampicillin, 20% (w/v) IPTG and 2% (w/v) X-gal. A total of 8184 recombinant clones were picked and colony PCR performed to determine their insert size. Those having insert size >500 bp were selected for plasmid isolation using alkaline lysis method [26].
About 5000 plasmids were sequenced by 5’ end single-pass sequencing on automated DNA capillary sequencer ABI PRISM 3730X (Applied Biosystems) using BigDye Terminator (Applied Biosystems) technology according to the manufacturer's instructions using M13 forward primer. M13 reverse primer was used for those sequences which could not amplify with M13 forward primer. All EST sequences were deposited in the GenBank database under the Accession numbers JK475124-JK475133, EX567519 and JK707012- JK711021.
EST sequence processing, assembly and annotation
The ESTs were scanned and trimmed for vector sequences using NCBI’s VecScreen tool. Low quality and short (<100 bp) sequences were also removed. High-quality ESTs were assembled into contigs and singletons using Contig Assembly Program CAP3 [27].
The resulting contigs and singletons were then imported into the functional annotation and analysis tool Blast2GO [28] and were compared against the NCBI non-redundant (Nr) protein database BLASTX (e value cut-off of 1e-3). Subsequently, mapping of the ESTs was performed. Based on the results obtained, Gene Ontology (GO) annotation was performed with default settings. GO terms were assigned to each unigene and classified into 3 functional annotation categories- Biological Process, Cellular Component and Molecular Function. Finally, the assignment of the ESTs into metabolic pathways was done by KAAS (http://www.genome.jp/tools/kaas/) and KOBAS (http://kobas.cbi.pku.edu.cn/home.do).
For the detection of novel transcripts, the chickpea transcripts datasets available at CTDB (Garg et al. 2011a) were used for the BLASTN analysis (e-value cutoff of 10–5). For comparative analysis, the seed specific transcripts of Arabidopsis were downloaded from TAIR (http://www.arabidopsis.org/), soybean seed transcripts from SoyBase [29] and Medicago early seed and late seed library EST sequences from DFCI MtGI database (http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/cgi-bin/tgi/gimain.pl?gudb=medicago). The downloaded sequences were BLAST searched (BLASTN; e-value cutoff of 10–5) against the chickpea embryo transcripts.
Real-time PCR analysis
Total RNA extractions from different vegetative tissues (flower, leaf, root and stem) as well as seeds at 5 developing stages (5 DAA, 10 DAA, 20 DAA, 30 DAA and 40 DAA) were performed by LiCl method. The cDNA was synthesized from 3 μg of DNase I-treated RNA using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Clontech, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primer pairs used in quantitative real-time PCR have been listed in S1 Table and were designed with the Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems, USA). All the quantitative real-time PCR reactions included 2 μl of cDNA, 200 nM of each primer and 10 μl of SYBER GREEN PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) in a final volume of 20 μl. The following thermal cycle conditions were used with the ABI 7500 Real Time System (Applied Biosystems, USA): (1) incubation at 50°C for 2 m, (2) initial denaturation step of 95°C for 10 m and, (3) 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 m at 60°C. EF1α was used as control [30]. All quantitative real-time PCR experiments were performed twice using two biological replicates and each reaction was run in triplicate. The relative gene expression levels were obtained by relative quantification (RQ) according to the 2-ΔΔCt method [31].
Isolation and cloning of CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM
The EST, F-box protein_7672 (GenBank accession no. JK710732) in the cDNA library constructed from 6 DAA embryos of chickpea was used as a template to obtain full length sequence by 5’ and 3’ RACE using SMART RACE cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech, USA). The gene-specific primers, GSP1_7672 and GSP2_7672 (listed in S1 Table) were used to amplify the gene from cDNA of 10 DAA chickpea seed. The PCR products were cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega) and sequenced. The full length cDNA sequence was deduced by aligning and assembling the sequences of the EST, 5’ RACE and 3’ RACE products. The open reading frame (ORF) sequence was deduced by ORF Finder (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html).
To obtain the full length sequence for F-box protein_3599 (GenBank accession no. JK709226), the EST sequence was BLAST searched against the whole genome sequence of chickpea [32]. The CDS was predicted by GenMark (http://exon.gatech.edu/eukhmm.cgi) and FGENESH (www.softberry.com). Primers were designed using Primer3 program (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/) [33] to amplify the putative CDS from total cDNA of chickpea 10 DAA seed. The PCR product obtained was purified and cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector and confirmed by sequencing.
Sequence analysis
The obtained full length sequences were analyzed using bioinformatic tools at the websites http://www.expasy.org/, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ and Predictprotein (http://www.predictprotein.org/). Conserved domain analysis was performed using Pfam (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/) and SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/). Homologous sequences were searched using BLASTX with default parameters at NCBI (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) for phylogenetic analysis. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using Clustal Omega (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). Phylogenetic relationship tree was constructed using MEGA (ver. 5) [34] by Neighbour-Joining (NJ) method utilizing the p-distance method and complete deletion options. The reliability of the obtained tree was tested using a bootstrapping method with 1000 replicates. The homologs for CarF-box_PP2 are as follows: M. truncatula (XP_003590890.1), Glycine max (XP_006588465.1), Phaseolus vulgaris (XP_007143948.1), V. vinifera (CBI38318.3), P. trichocarpa (XP_002324348.1), A. thaliana (NP_973399.1), Zea mays (NP_001150987.1), Oryza sativa (EAY87984.1), Hordeum vulgare (BAJ93930.1) and for CarF-box_LysM, M. truncatula [XP_003591114.1], G. max [NP_001240110.1], P. vulgaris [XP_007144727.1], V. vinifera [XP_002284540.1], A. thaliana [NP_564673.1], H. vulgare [BAJ88125.1], Zea mays [DAA50836.1], O. sativa [NP_001050989.1], Triticum aestivum [ADP02186.1].
Protein structure modeling
Homology modelling for CarF-box_LysM and CarF-box_PP2 was performed using Modeller 9.10 [35]. Templates used for CarF-box_LysM were 2DJPA (Chain A, The Solution Structure of the LysM domain of Human Hypothetical protein Sb145), 4I6JB (Chain B, A Ubiquitin Ligase-substrate Complex) and 1FQVA (Chain A, Insights into SCF Ubiquitin Ligases from the structure of the Skp1-Skp2 Complex) which showed 38%, 44% and 28% identity, respectively with CarF-box_LysM. For CarF-box_PP2 templates used were 3hq2A, 1p9eA and 2odoA showing 29%, 29% and 28% sequence identity with CarF-box_PP2, respectively. The best models were selected on the basis of the DOPE scores and were refined and energy minimization was done using KoBaMIN [36] and quality of the models assessed by PROCHECK [37], to obtain a final model. Structures were visualized using PyMOL (http://www.pymol.org/).
Southern Hybridization
Genomic DNA was isolated from chickpea leaves by CTAB method [38]. DNA (10 μg) was digested with Bgl II, Hind III, Sal I, Rsa I and Sty I, respectively for CarF-box_PP2 and Bgl II, Sal I and Nco I, respectively for CarF-box_LysM. Digested DNA was separated on 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel, and transferred onto Hybond N nylon membrane (Amersham Biosciences, UK) in 20x SSC. Full length cDNA of CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM were used as probe to hybridize the respective blots. The probes were labelled with α-32P-dCTP using NEBlot Kit (NEB, USA). Pre-hybridization was performed at 60°C for 2 h in pre-hybridization buffer (0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer- pH-7.2, 10% SDS and 0.5 M EDTA), followed by hybridization with the labelled probe kept at the same temperature overnight. After hybridization, the blots were washed with 2X SSC, 0.1% SDS for 10 m at 60°C followed by washing with 1X SSC, 0.1% SDS for 10 m at room temperature [39]. The membranes were exposed to PhosphorImager screen (Amersham Biosciences, UK) for 24 h and the images were acquired by scanning the screen with Typhoon 9210 scanner (Amersham Biosciences, UK).
Northern Hybridization
Total RNA (20 μg) from different stages of chickpea developing seed and vegetative tissues was isolated by LiCl method, fractionated by electrophoresis on denaturing formaldehyde 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel and then transferred to Hybond N nylon membrane (Amersham, UK). The full length cDNA of CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM were used as probes. A 250 bp cDNA amplicon of EF1α (Acc. No. AJ004960) was used to reprobe the membrane. Hybridization, washing and exposure of membrane to PhosphorImager screen were performed according to the protocol described for southern hybridization.
Semi-quantitative PCR analysis
First-strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA of chickpea 10 DAA seed as described for real-time PCR analysis. Gene-specific primers, FBPP2, FBLysM and EF1α (internal control) used for amplifying the genes are listed in S1 Table. PCR amplifications were performed in Mastercycler (Eppendorf). The PCR reaction (50 μl) contained 2 μl first-strand cDNA template, 5 μl 10x Titanium Taq PCR buffer (Clontech), 0.5 μM of each primer, 0.25 mM of dNTPs and 0.2 μl of 50X Titanium Taq DNA polymerase (Clontech). The following PCR conditions were used: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 m, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 1 m 30 s. Final extension was done at 72°C for 7 m. The amplified products were visualized by electrophoresis in 1.2% ethidium bromide stained agarose gels.
Subcellular localization
The full length ORFs of CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM without termination codons were each inserted between the Nco I and Spe I sites on the pCAMBIA1302 vector using primers FBLysM _PCAM and FBPP2_PCAM (S1 Table), so as to create in-frame fusion constructs between the F-box gene and the GFP gene. The fusion constructs p35S::CarF-box_PP2-GFP and p35S::CarF-box_LysM-GFP as well as control GFP vector were transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101 and infiltrated into Nicotiana tabacum leaf according to the protocol by Sparkes et al. [40]. After the incubation period of 72 h in growth chamber, GFP fluorescence was detected and images recorded using TCS-SP-2 (Leica, Germany) scanning confocal microscope. GFP was excited at 489 nm with the argon laser. The experiment was repeated and at least three replicates were used each time.
Yeast two-hybrid Assay
Protein-protein interactions were analyzed using the MATCHMAKER Gold yeast two-hybrid system (Clontech, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The coding regions of CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM were amplified by PCR and cloned into the DNA binding domain vector (pGBKT7, Clontech) to make the baits. SKP1_ ORF primers were designed to amplify the coding sequence of CarSKP1 from the EST (acc no. JK710347) which was cloned into the activation domain vector (pGADT7, Clontech) to make the prey. Y2H Gold yeast strain (Clontech) was co-transformed with plasmids pGBKT7:CarF-box_PP2 and pGADT7:CarSKP1. Similarly, co-transformation was carried out with plasmids pGBKT7:CarF-box_LysM and pGADT7:CarSKP1. The yeast cultures were plated on synthetic drop out (SD) medium lacking leucine and tryptophan to test for co-transformation. Colonies obtained were streaked on SD medium without leucine, tryptophan, adenine and histidine and supplemented with X-α-gal and aureobasidin to test for protein-protein interactions. Furthermore, colony PCR was performed to amplify the inserts in the vector using primers PGBKT7 and PGADT7. All the primers used have been listed in S1 Table.
Promoter Analysis
A 2500 bp region upstream of start codon of CarF-box_PP2 and 700 bp region upstream of start codon of CarF-box_LysM were obtained from the chickpea genome [32] by BLAST search. The sequences were subjected to in-silico analysis using PLACE (http://www.dna.affrc.go.jp/PLACE/signalscan.html) and PlantCARE databases (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/), online tools for promoter prediction.
Results
Generation and sequencing of chickpea embryo ESTs
To get an insight into the genes involved in chickpea early seed development, embryos were isolated from 6 DAA chickpea seeds and a cDNA library was constructed. A total of 8186 recombinant clones were obtained which were screened by colony PCR to check the size of inserts. Around 5000 recombinant clones were found to have inserts above 500 bp in length and were selected for Sanger sequencing. The sequences obtained were trimmed to remove the vector sequences from the ESTs using the VecScreen tool of NCBI. Also, those sequences which had length <100 bp, were removed. This resulted in 4048 good quality sequences which were then assembled using CAP3 program into 1480 unigenes comprising of 443 contigs and 1037 singletons (S2 Table). The unigene length ranged from 100 to 1400 bp with an average size of 575 bp. The number of ESTs in the contigs ranged from 2 to 288. About 91.6% of the contigs had less than 10 ESTs with 210 having only 2 sequences.
EST annotation and functional classification
In order to assign putative functions to unigenes and analyse their involvement in different biological processes, Gene Ontology (GO) annotations were done using BLAST2GO program [28] which subjected the 1480 unigenes to BLASTX against NCBI Nr (non-redundant) protein database. A total of 1025 (69.2%) unigenes found significant hits with an e-value cut-off ≤ 10–3. Of the 1025 unique sequences with significant hits, 894 (60.4%) showed similarity to proteins of known function, 131 (8.85%) showed similarity to predicted proteins of unknown function (42 unigenes corresponded to ‘hypothetical protein’, 15 to ‘uncharacterized protein’, 57 to ‘protein’ and 17 to ‘unknown protein’), whereas 455 (30.7%) showed no significant similarity to any sequence contained in the Nr database. The GO annotation of the unigenes revealed mapping of 95.2% (976 out of 1025) of the unigenes showing a significant hit out of which 815 (55%) were successfully annotated with 4334 GO terms distributed among the three GO categories- Biological Process, Cellular Component and Molecular Function (Fig. 1). The unigenes were thus functionally classified with one or more ontologies with 672 (45.4%) of the 1480 unigenes been assigned GO terms associated with molecular functions, 663 (44.8%) were involved in a biological process, and 661 (44.6%) were cellular components. Under the category ‘Biological Process’, subcategories “metabolic process”, “cellular process”, “response to stimulus” and “biological regulation” accounted for 28%, 22%, 14% and 9% of the annotations, respectively. In the category ‘Molecular Function’, 44% of the unigenes annotations were grouped into the subcategory “binding” and 32% in the subcategory “catalytic activity”. Within the ‘Cellular Component’ category, 38% belonged to “cell” followed by 33% to “organelle” and 16% to “macromolecular complex”.
Distribution of gene ontology terms for the three categories: A) Biological Process, B) Molecular Function, and C) Cellular Component.
Unigenes were also annotated using KAAS (KEGG Automatic Annotation Server) and KOBAS (KEGG Orthology Based Annotation System). KAAS results showed enrichment for the category metabolic pathways (98 unigenes), followed by the categories ribosomes (71), biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (40), oxidative phosphorylation (24), and protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum (18). KOBAS database showed similar results and the pathways were further characterized into subsets which has been summarized in S3 Table. Under the metabolism category, energy metabolism (30.5%), secondary metabolites (22.7%), carbohydrate metabolism (11.6%) and amino acid metabolism (11.2%) were major contributors. In the category of genetic information and processing, translation (72.8%) and folding, sorting, and degradation (18.9%) were the major sub-categories. In the category of environmental information processing, the majority were related to signal transduction (39.5%). Cell death (62.5%) constituted the majority of cellular processes category as opposed to cell growth (28.1%).
Additionally, the NGS based datasets of desi, kabuli and wild chickpea transcriptome available in Chickpea Transcriptome Database ([13]; http://www.nipgr.res.in/ctdb.html) were used for the BLASTN analysis. Of the 1480 unigenes, 1414 showed high homology to known chickpea transcripts. Thus, 66 putative novel chickpea transcripts were discovered. The 1480 unigenes were also BLAST searched against the datasets containing transcripts derived from seed tissues of A. thaliana (TAIR), G. max (SoyBase; [29]) and M. truncatula (The DFCI Medicago truncatula Gene Index) to find out the genes common between the different plant species during seed development. A total of 245 unigenes found match with Arabidopsis, 101 with soybean and 312 unigenes found homology with ESTs from Medicago seed tissues. A total of 20 transcripts were found to be common across the three species studied which comprised of ESTs encoding genes such as lipid transfer protein, cysteine proteinase, elongation factor, heat shock protein, NAC domain protein, defensin, among others.
Most abundant ESTs
To identify genes that were highly expressed in the 6 DAA chickpea embryos, contigs that were built of the most abundantly occurring ESTs were identified. Transcripts frequently found in the library were genes associated with (i) cell growth and maintenance (histone H3.2, Ca+2 ATPase, chk1 checkpoint-like protein, proline-rich protein), (ii) stress and defence responses (defensin precursor, putative senescence-associated protein) (iii) transporters (early nodulin 93, nuclear transport factor), (iv) translation and post-translational modifications (DNA-directed RNA polymerase, ribosomal protein, translation elongation factor, polyubiquitin), (v) transcription factors (zinc finger family protein, AP2/ERF domain-containing transcription factor), and (vi) EST sequences without functional annotation. ESTs encoding histones were found to be most abundant. Highly abundant unigenes with >10 ESTs have been presented in S4 Table. ESTs encoding storage proteins were, as expected, almost nonexistent at this stage of seed development.
ESTs involved in ubiquitination related protein degradation pathway
Interestingly, 49 unigenes (comprising of 95 ESTs) exhibited homologies with the genes involved in ubiquitination related protein degradation pathway (Fig. 2) suggesting that Ub-mediated protein degradation processes may play an important role in seed development. Occurrence of a significant number of transcripts encoding ubiquitin/polyubiquitin (25 ESTs), F-box proteins (12), 26S proteasome regulatory subunit (11), ubiquitin fusion protein (9), RING box protein (7), Skp1-like protein (2) and Cullin1 protein (2) among others suggests that SCF complex mediated 26S proteasome degradation pathway may be prevalent during seed development. For further analysis, we focused on ESTs encoding the F-box protein, a subunit of SCF complex involved in 26S proteasome degradation pathway and responsible for conferring specificity to the SCF complex for a substrate that has to be degraded. The 12 ESTs encoding putative F-box genes were assembled into 9 unigenes which have been listed in Table 1.
Distribution of ESTs and unigenes in each category is presented.
Transcript profiles of putative F-box protein encoding genes
To investigate the physiological role, the transcript levels of the 9 F-box encoding genes obtained from the cDNA library were monitored across the different stages of chickpea seed development as well as in other vegetative tissues viz., flower, root, stem and leaf using quantitative real-time PCR (Fig. 3). Transcripts encoding Cyclin like F-box protein_4086 (Acc no. JK709422), F-box protein_3599 (Acc no. JK709226), F-box protein_7672 (Acc No. JK710732) and Tubby protein_661 (Acc no. JK707406) showed preferential expression in early stages (5–20 DAA) of seed development whereas, Kelch repeat containing F-box protein_1520 (Acc No. JK707984) and Tubby protein_7979 (Acc no. JK710918) showed higher expression in the later stages (30 and 40 DAA, respectively) of seed development. Cyclin like F-box_484 (Acc no. EX567519) expressed highly in flower whereas PHD/F-box protein_430 (Acc no. JK710881) showed almost equal level of expression in all the tissues. Transcripts encoding skp1 interacting protein 15 (Acc no. JK710696) showed ubiquitous expression in different chickpea tissues.
The transcript accumulation patterns were observed in various chickpea organs including developing seeds at 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 days after anthesis (DAA), flower, root, stem and leaf. The expression levels were obtained by normalization with chickpea EF1α. The error bars indicate standard deviations.
Sequence analyses of CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM
The two ESTs encoding putative F-box proteins namely, F-box protein_7672 and F-box protein_3599 were chosen for detailed molecular characterization depending on their preferential transcript accumulation in the early stages of seed development as well as the C-terminal domains present. The putative F-box protein_7672 was designated as CarF-box_PP2 (for Cicer arietinum F-box protein containing PP2 domain) and F-box protein_3599 as CarF-box_LysM (for Cicer arietinum F-box protein containing LysM domain).
RACE technology was used to obtain the full length sequence of CarF-box_PP2 which was 1214 bp in length consisting of 147 bp 5’-untranslated region (5’ UTR), 816 bp coding region and 251 bp 3’-untranslated region (3’ UTR) (Fig. 4A). The full length of CarF-box_PP2 has been deposited in NCBI GenBank with accession number JX294994. On comparing the cDNA sequence with the genomic sequence of the gene from the available chickpea genome [32], it was found to contain 3 exons and 2 introns and was present on chromosome 4. It encodes a protein of 271 amino acid length having a predicted molecular mass of 31.15 kDa with a calculated pI of 8.21 as calculated by Expasy tool. Analysis of the protein sequence using Pfam and SMART softwares revealed a conserved cyclin like F-box motif at the N-terminal (amino acid positions 4–47) which suggests that the gene encodes a putative F-box protein. Also, Phloem Protein 2 (PP2) domain was predicted at the C-terminal (amino acid positions 102–268) (Fig. 4A). BLASTX result showed homology of CarF-box_PP2 with F-box proteins from other plant species viz., M. truncatula (71%), L. japonicus (69%), G. max (67%), P. trichocarpa (50%), R. communis (49%), V. vinifera (48%), A. thaliana (45%) and O. sativa (41%). The F-box domain of the gene was found to be highly conserved when aligned with the F-box motifs of its homologs using Clustal Omega (S1A1 Fig.). In order to find the phylogenetic relationship between CarF-box_PP2 and F-box genes of other plants, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the amino acid sequences of CarF-box_PP2 and homologous sequences from various plants (S1A2 Fig.). The results showed that CarF-box_PP2 was most closely related to the F-box gene of M. truncatula. Southern blotting analysis revealed that CarF-box_PP2 is a single copy gene in the chickpea genome (S2A Fig.). Three bands were observed with chickpea genomic DNA digested with restriction enzymes, Rsa I and Sty I, which cut the gene at two sites, whereas only one band was observed when the gene was cut with restriction enzymes, Bgl II, Hind III and Sal I, the sites for which were not present within the gene.
Red boxes indicate exons, grey boxes are UTRs and lines between boxes indicate introns. Conserved domain organization as determined using NCBI conserved domain database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi/).
A 1250 bp full length sequence of CarF-box_LysM was obtained by BLAST searching the 692 bp EST F-box protein_3599 against whole genome sequence of chickpea [32]. It contained a 5’UTR of 109 bp, 786 bp of coding region and 3’UTR of 355 bp (Fig. 4B). The full length of CarF-box_PP2 has been deposited in NCBI GenBank with accession number JX294993. On comparing the cDNA sequence with the genomic sequence of the gene from the chickpea genome, it was found to contain 1 intron and was present on chromosome 4. The CarF-box_LysM gene encodes a protein of 261 amino acids with a calculated molecular mass of 29.16 kDa and an isoelectric point of 6.21. Analysis of the protein sequence using Pfam and SMART softwares revealed a conserved cyclin like F-box motif at the N-terminal (amino acid positions 44–84) which suggests that the gene encodes a putative F-box protein. Also, LysM domain was predicted at the C-terminal (amino acid positions 115–159) (Fig. 4B). BLASTX results showed that the gene exhibits 89% identity to M. truncatula F-box protein, 82% to G. max, 67% to V. vinifera, 65% to P. trichocarpa, 63% to A. thaliana, 62% with R. communis and 55% to O. sativa. The F-box domain was found to be highly conserved when aligned with its homologs (S1B1 Fig.). To understand the evolution of CarF-box_LysM, a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on full length amino acid sequences of CarF-box_LysM and 9 homologs of this protein from other plants (S1B2 Fig.). The results indicated that as expected the protein was most closely related to its homolog from M. truncatula. Southern blot analysis revealed that CarF-box_LysM is a single copy gene in chickpea genome (S2B Fig.).
CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM proteins have conserved structures
To build structural models of CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM proteins, homology modelling using Modeller 9.10 was performed and the reliability as well as model quality of the final structural models was assessed with PROCHECK [37]. The Ramachandran plot generated by PROCHECK showed that the u/c angles of the majority of the residues were in the favoured regions, indicating that the predicted models had a good stereochemical quality. CarF-box_PP2 showed 3-alpha helical F-box domain followed by a PP2 domain comprising of 8 parallel β strands (Fig. 5A–5C). PP2 domain was depicted by loops also, probably because it could not find structural homology with the templates in these regions. Two most highly conserved residues in the F-box domain were Leu7 and Pro8 along with others such as Ile15, Leu16, Ser27 and Ser30. On the other hand, the structure model of CarF-box_LysM consisted of two domains, N-terminal F-box-like domain and the C-terminal LysM domain. The F-box like domain consists of α-helices and parallel β-strands and LysM domain showing typical βααβ secondary structure where the two helices were present on the same side of an anti-parallel β sheet (Fig. 5D–5F). The most highly conserved residues in the F-box-like domain were Leu52, Ile55, Leu59, Ser68 and Val70. Overall, the structures of domains in CarF-box_LysM and CarF-box_PP2 were found to be highly conserved.
The 3D structures are shown as (A,D) ribbon diagram and (C,F) surface view. The F-box domains are labelled and shown in blue colour. The C-terminal domains, PP2 and LysM are shown in red. Conserved residues in the F-box domains (B,E) are shown in pink.
CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM show differential expression in seed tissues
Northern blot analyses confirmed differential expression of CarF-box_PP2 in the developing seed with more expression during the early stages of seed development (10 DAA and 20 DAA) (Fig. 6). Similarly, expression level of CarF-box_LysM was seen to be higher in early stage of seed development (10 DAA) and lower in later stages (20–40 DAA) (Fig. 6).
A) Northern-blot analysis of the total RNA isolated from fully-opened flower and developing seeds (10 DAA, 20 DAA, 30 DAA and 40 DAA) of chickpea. Full-length CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM cDNA were used as probes. EF1α was used to reprobe the blot. B) Semi-quantitative PCR analysis. The cDNA was amplified using gene-specific primers for CarF-box_PP2, CarF-box_LysM and EF1α.
Semi-quantitative PCR was also performed to complement the results obtained by quantitative real-time PCR and Northern analyses. The results were fairly consistent showing similar trends in all the cases. Taken together, the results suggest that both the genes may be playing a key role during early stages of chickpea seed development.
CarF-box_PP2 is a cytoplasmic protein and CarF-box_LysM is a nuclear protein
Agrobacterium mediated transient transformation revealed the subcellular localizations of CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM. The control GFP was uniformly distributed throughout the cell. GFP signal of CarF-box_PP2 was detected predominantly in the cytoplasm, whereas, CarF-box_LysM-targeted GFP accumulated in the nucleus. This was further confirmed by DAPI staining. Blue colour stained nucleus suggests that CarF-box_LysM is a nuclear protein (Fig. 7). The results correlated with the localization predictions made by PredictProtein tool which predicted that CarF-box_LysM has a nuclear localization signal DSLKRS at position 217 in the amino acid sequence.
Transiently transformed tobacco leaf epidermal cells show enrichment of the CarF-box_PP2 protein in the cytoplasm and CarF-box_LysM in the nucleus. A) Flourescence, B) Bright field, C) Merged and D) DAPI stained nuclei. 1) GFP only (Control) 2) p35S::CarF-box_PP2-GFP, 3) p35S::CarF-box_LysM-GFP. Scale bars = 50 μm.
CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM interact with CarSKP1
Yeast two-hybrid assays were performed using the Gal4 based Yeast two hybrid system to evaluate whether CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM function as components of SCF complex by interacting with CarSKP1 (Acc. No. JK710347). Transformed yeast colonies (pGBKT7:CarF-box_PP2 + pGADT7:CarSKP1 and pGBKT7:CarF-box_LysM + pGADT7:CarSKP1) appeared blue on DDO/X/A and QDO/X/A after incubation at 30˚C for 4 days similar to the positive control (positive interaction between p53 and T-antigen) (Fig. 8). The interactions were further confirmed to be positive by rescuing the bait plasmids from yeast cells and growing bait on LB/Kan medium and prey on LB/Amp medium by transforming E. coli as well as by sequencing. Thus it was demonstrated that both the genes were able to interact with CarSKP1 protein providing evidence that both CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM were indeed F-box proteins and could form SCF complexes.
The interactions are shown in transformed Y2H Gold cells of yeast grown on SD/-Leu/-Trp/X- α-gal (A) and SD/-Ade/-His/-Leu/-Trp/X-α-gal/Aba (B). 1, pGBKT7-53+pGADT7-RecT (positive control); 2, pGBKT7-Lam+pGADT7-RecT (negative control); 3, pGBKT7-CarF-box+pGADT7-CarSKP1.
Promoters of CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM may be seed-specific
Because of the preferential expressions of CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM in early stages of developing seeds, attention was also focused on the promoter regions of both the genes. The promoter sequences were analyzed with the PlantCARE [41] and PLACE [42] softwares to predict the core promoter and cis-elements. A putative TATA box along with several CAAT boxes and 5’ UTR Py-rich stretches were identified in both the promoters. Several kinds of multi-copies of seed-specific promoter motifs, such as RY repeat motif, ACGT motif, SEF4 motif, -300 element, Amylase box, Pyrimidine box, CAREs, AACA motif and Skn-1 motif (Table 2; S3 and S4 Figs.) were observed. These seed-specific motifs in the promoters of CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM may be directing their preferential expression in the seed. However, the bioinformatics analysis is to be complemented and validated with experiments.
Discussion
Although chickpea serves as one of the most important agricultural crops worldwide, its seed providing a major source of protein for humans and animals, few studies have been dedicated to seed development. A large collection of ESTs from different chickpea tissues are available in public databases. In chickpea, at the time of initiation of this study, there were < 10000 ESTs available in the dbEST (as of February 2009) which have currently increased to 38097. However, more recently in the last two years 34760 desi [13], 43389 kabuli [15] and 37265 wild [16] chickpea transcripts obtained by next generation sequencing technology have become available. Of these only a small percentage corresponds to young pod or seed. Moreover till date, there are no ESTs available in the EST database or in the CTDB chickpea database that have been isolated from the chickpea embryo. In this study, we have for the first time generated the ESTs from 6 DAA chickpea embryo with the aim of gaining insights into chickpea early seed development. The present study reports the generation and analysis of 4048 ESTs from 6 DAA chickpea embryos which were assembled into 1480 unigenes. Interestingly, the functional profile of the unigenes expressed in chickpea embryos as revealed by GO analysis was quite similar to the patterns of expression described for developing seeds of Arabidopsis [3], M. truncatula [6,7], soybean [8], rice [5] and G. max [29]. Overall, in 6 DAA embryos, a large proportion of genes related to cell cycle regulation, chromosome organization and DNA processing, protein synthesis, transport, signal transduction, metabolism, defence and stress response, protein fate, energy and transcriptional and translational regulator activity were observed, reflecting the probable high cell division activity required by the developing embryo [43]. Production of energy via pathways such as glycolysis, TCA cycle, starch and sucrose metabolism, oxidative phophorylation, and carbon fixation are very important for the developing embryo [1,6,8] as was also evident from our data which was significantly enriched for GO terms and metabolic pathways related to carbon metabolism, including glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, starch biosynthesis, and fatty acid biosynthesis reflecting high rate of metabolism occurring in the highly differentiating and developing tissues of embryo.
A substantial number of ESTs encoding protein synthesis components along with ribosomal proteins as well as protein degradation machinery components reflected a high demand for protein synthesis and turnover in developing seeds. This shows the need to produce and subsequently degrade huge amounts of proteins in the actively developing seeds illustrating the high energy requirements of the embryo tissue. Several ESTs encoding proteins related to ubiquitin mediated proteasomal degradation pathway were found in our embryo cDNA library including polyubiquitin, F-box protein, RING box protein, ubiquitin fusion protein, etc. suggesting that regulatory mechanisms at the post-translational level are important during seed development. Importance of ubiquitin/proteasome related genes during seed development has been reported earlier [7,44]. It is highly likely that the accumulation of these ESTs may have a significant role in chickpea seed development that involves a series of cell division and cell proliferation events.
F-box protein, a subunit of SCF complex, is one of the components of the 26S proteasomal degradation pathway machinery which targets diverse substrates for ubiquitination and thereby regulates a wide-range of cellular processes [21]. One strategy to elucidate the possible involvement of F-box genes in processes such as seed development is to monitor their transcript levels across the developmental stages of chickpea seed. Therefore, quantitative real-time PCR analysis of F-box genes was carried out to reveal their transcript accumulation patterns in different vegetative tissues as well as in different stages of seed development. Accumulation of F-box protein_3599 and F-box protein_7672 transcripts in the young seed tissue suggest that they may be participating in an important aspect of chickpea seed development such as protein degradation during cell division and cell structure construction to ensure rapid availability of proteins to the developing embryo. However, further experiments are needed to demonstrate their role in seed development.
Several F-box genes have been cloned and characterized from Arabidopsis and rice but only one F-box gene has been identified in chickpea, i.e. the kelch repeat containing F-box protein CarF-box1 [22]. A diverse array of protein-protein interaction domains that participate in substrate recognition have been identified in the C-terminal regions of F-box proteins [45]. Moreover, F-box proteins not only use protein–protein interactions but also protein–carbohydrate interactions for substrate recognition in the Ub/proteasome pathway [46–48]. Domain organization analyses in the present study revealed that F-box protein_7672 and F-box protein_3599 contain PP2 (Phloem protein 2) and LysM domain, respectively at their C-terminals. The domains, PP2 and LysM, have been demonstrated to be probably recognizing glycoproteins and structural glycans, respectively [49,50]. Although PP2 and LysM domain containing proteins without F-box domains have been studied structurally and functionally [49–53], there is little information about such proteins containing F-box domain at their N-terminal ends [46–48]. This led us to speculate whether PP2 and LysM domains have retained their substrate specificity in proteins having F-box domains as well or they function differently in the presence of F-box domain. Therefore, in this study, we have characterized two novel F-box genes from chickpea, CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM, which had PP2 (Phloem protein 2) and LysM domain respectively, at their C-terminals and which showed preferential transcript accumulation in early stages of seed development.
It has been well established that F-box proteins interact with SKP1 proteins in the SCF complex [54]. Our yeast two hybrid assay demonstrated that both the chickpea F-box genes interacted with CarSKP1 suggesting that the chickpea proteins were active F-box proteins and constituted a part of an SCF complex. Their substrate specificity can be speculated based on their domain architecture. Phloem lectins or Phloem protein 2 proteins (PP2 proteins) were earlier thought to be only associated with structural phloem proteins. Acquisition of additional domains, such as F-box domain, through the course of their evolution, reflected the divergence from their only phloem function and addition of a new function to target protein for degradation [51]. Beneteau et al. [49] demonstrated the lectin properties of the PP2 domain in the Arabidopsis protein AtPP2-A1 and suggested that the PP2 recognizes either endogenous glycoproteins or glycosylated components of insects such as aphids. The FBA family of F-box proteins in mammals, having lectin-like properties, was proposed to target misfolded glycoproteins for proteasomal degradation [47,48]. In another study in tobacco, it was established that F-box proteins with a Nictaba domain are capable of interacting with glycosylated proteins of the plant cell [52]. The structural basis of recognition and ubiquitination of glycoproteins has been studied in detail [55]. Moreover, all the lectin domains crystallized till date has a structure consisting of β strands. Owing to the high structural similarity between PP2 domain of the CarF-box_PP2 protein and the other lectin domains known, it can be hypothesised that plant F-box proteins with PP2 domain have a lectin activity, recognising a glycoprotein for degradation in plant cells. Moreover, glycosylation of the proteins take place in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Misfolded proteins are translocated back to the cytoplasm to be disposed off by ER-associated Ub/proteasome degradation pathway [55]. It is highly likely that CarF-box_PP2 may be targeting a glycoprotein in the cytoplasm as suggested by its localization in the cytoplasm.
The LysM motif recognizes structural glycans such as peptidoglycan, chitooligosaccharides (chitin) and other structurally-related oligosaccharides [50]. Peptidoglycan is the major structural component of the bacterial cell wall, while, chitin is a component of fungal cell wall. It is possible that CarF-box_LysM proteins are involved in defence responses implicated by bacteria or fungi, by recruiting their cell wall components to the SCF complex for degradation via their C-terminal LysM domain, thus, contributing to plant immunity. The structures of LysM domains in various proteins studied in E. coli [53] and Arabidopsis [50] have been shown to have conserved architecture of βααβ form. Similar domain architecture observed in CarF-box_LysM suggests a similar role of LysM domain in F-box proteins.
Promoters are important genetic engineering tools which can be used for directing the expression of foreign genes in the seed. Thus, it is quite promising to develop new seed-specific promoters which can drive the target gene to express specifically in seeds thereby opening up avenues to enrich and enhance seed nutrients through transgenic approaches. Although most of the seed-specific promoters identified thus far are from genes encoding seed-storage proteins [56,57], other genes highly expressing in seeds during development may also be exploited for the isolation of seed specific promoters [58]. Several such seed-specific promoters have been isolated and characterized such as from soybean [59] and Arabidopsis [60]. Chickpea seed being economically important, identification of such promoters will be helpful in chickpea crop improvement by utilizing biotechnological approaches to target seed-specific expression of important genes [58]. The present study showed that CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM transcripts preferentially accumulated in chickpea seed. The spatial and temporal expression patterns for both the genes increased the possibility of their promoters being seed-specific. Online tools such as PLACE and PlantCare revealed that, besides the core elements such as TATA box and CAAT box, promoters of both the genes had several cis-elements involved in directing seed-specific expression, such as the Skn-1 motif and the RY element, among others as mentioned in Table 2, which have been demonstrated to have seed-specific promoter activity [61–71]. Based on these observations, the promoters can be selected as probable candidates to direct gene expression in seeds.
Conclusions
In this study, attempts have been made to expand the EST database of chickpea through the construction of cDNA library from 6 DAA chickpea embryos which here served two functions—firstly it provided a new EST dataset which provided an opportunity for the functional dissection of gene expression during seed development. Secondly, the dataset helped in identification of genes playing an important role during seed development leading to the characterization of two novel F-box genes in chickpea. Based on the results, it could be suggested that the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis mechanism involving CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM, had a potential role in chickpea seed development, although further studies are needed to elucidate their precise role in seed development.
Accession Numbers
The nucleotide sequences of ESTs reported in this paper has been submitted to GenBank with accession numbers JK475124-JK475133, EX567519 and JK707012-JK711021. The coding sequences of CarF-box_LysM and CarF-box_PP2 genes have been submitted to NCBI with accession numbers JX294993 and JX294994, respectively.
Supporting Information
S2 Table. EST sequence and assembly statistics.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121100.s002
(PDF)
S3 Table. The distribution of the KEGG pathways.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121100.s003
(PDF)
S4 Table. Highly abundant genes in the cDNA library.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121100.s004
(PDF)
S1 Fig. Analysis of the deduced amino acid sequence of A) CarF-box_PP2, B) CarF-box_LysM.
1) Amino acid alignment of F-box domains of A and B with their homologs. Hyphens indicate gaps introduced to maximize the sequence alignment. Residues are highlighted according to the degree of conservation. 2) Phylogenetic tree constructed using CarF-box_PP2 and CarF-box_LysM sequences from chickpea and their homologs from other plant species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA5; bootstrap values are in percentages
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121100.s005
(PDF)
S2 Fig. Genomic Southern blot analysis of A) CarF-box_PP2, B) CarF-box_LysM.
Genomic DNA (10 μg) was digested with restriction enzymes depicted in respective lanes, separated on 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel and transferred onto Hybond-N nylon membrane. Full length cDNAs of A and B were labeled with α-32P-dCTP as probe.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121100.s006
(PDF)
S3 Fig. Promoter region of CarF-box_PP2.
The seed specific cis-acting regulatory elements are shown in colored blocks. Region underlined is the TATA box. TSS (transcription start site) is depicted by bold larger font.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121100.s007
(PDF)
S4 Fig. Promoter region of CarF-box_LysM.
The seed specific cis-acting regulatory elements are shown in colored blocks. Region underlined is the TATA box. TSS (transcription start site) is depicted by bold larger font.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121100.s008
(PDF)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: SB. Performed the experiments: SG VG. Analyzed the data: SG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SG SB. Wrote the paper: SG VG SB.
References
- 1. Belmonte MF, Kirkbride RC, Stone SL, Pelletier JM, Bui AQ, Yeung EC, et al. Comprehensive developmental profiles of gene activity in regions and subregions of the Arabidopsis seed. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110: E435–E444. pmid:23319655
- 2. Casson S, Spencer M, Walker K, Lindsey K. Laser capture microdissection for the analysis of gene expression during embryogenesis of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2005;42: 111–123. pmid:15773857
- 3. White JA, Todd J, Newman T, Focks N, Girke T, De Ilárduya OM, et al. A new set of Arabidopsis expressed sequence tags from developing seeds. The metabolic pathway from carbohydrates to seed oil. Plant Physiol. 2000;124: 1582–1594. pmid:11115876
- 4. Wan Y, Poole RL, Huttly AK, Toscano-Underwood C, Feeney K, Welham S, et al. Transcriptome analysis of grain development in hexaploid wheat. BMC Genomics 2008;9: 121. pmid:18325108
- 5. Ge X, Chen W, Song S, Wang W, Hu S, Yu J. Transcriptomic profiling of mature embryo from an elite super-hybrid rice LYP9 and its parental lines. BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8: 114. pmid:19000321
- 6. Gallardo K, Firnhaber C, Zuber H, Héricher D, Belghazi M, Henry C, et al. A combined proteome and transcriptome analysis of developing Medicago truncatula seeds: evidence for metabolic specialization of maternal and filial tissues. Mol Cell Prot. 2007;6: 2165–2179.
- 7. Firnhaber C, Pühler A, Küster H. EST sequencing and time course microarray hybridizations identify more than 700 Medicago truncatula genes with developmental expression regulation in flowers and pods. Planta 2005;222: 269–283. pmid:15968508
- 8. Jones S, Gonzalez D, Vodkin L. Flux of transcript patterns during soybean seed development. BMC Genomics 2010;11:136. pmid:20181280
- 9. Upadhyaya HD, Dwivedi SL, Baum M, Varshney RK, Udupa SM, Cholenahalli GLL, et al. Genetic structure, diversity, and allelic richness in composite collection and reference set in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8: 106. pmid:18922189
- 10. Buhariwalla HK, Jayashree B, Eshwar K, Crouch JH. Development of ESTs from chickpea roots and their use in diversity analysis of the Cicer genus. BMC Plant Biol. 2005;5: 16. pmid:16107212
- 11. Ashraf N, Ghai D, Barman P, Basu S, Gangisetty N, Mandal MK, et al. Comparative analyses of genotype dependent expressed sequence tags and stress-responsive transcriptome of chickpea wilt illustrate predicted and unexpected genes and novel regulators of plant immunity. BMC Genomics 2009;10: 415. pmid:19732460
- 12. Varshney RK, Hiremath PJ, Lekha P, Kashiwagi J, Balaji J, Deokar AA, et al. A comprehensive resource of drought- and salinity- responsive ESTs for gene discovery and marker development in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). BMC Genomics 2009;10: 523. pmid:19912666
- 13. Garg R, Patel RK, Jhanwar S, Priya P, Bhattacharjee A, Yadav G, et al. Gene discovery and tissue-specific transcriptome analysis in chickpea with massively parallel pyrosequencing and web resource development. Plant Physiol. 2011a;156: 1661–1678. pmid:21653784
- 14. Garg R, Patel RK, Tyagi AK, Jain M. De novo assembly of chickpea transcriptome using short reads for gene discovery and marker identification. DNA Res. 2011b;18: 53–63. pmid:21217129
- 15. Agarwal G, Jhanwar S, Priya P, Singh VK, Saxena MS, Parida SK, et al. Comparative analysis of kabuli chickpea transcriptome with desi and wild chickpea provides a rich resource for development of functional markers. PloS One 2012;7: e52443. pmid:23300670
- 16. Jhanwar S, Priya P, Garg R, Parida SK, Tyagi AK, Jain M. Transcriptome sequencing of wild chickpea as a rich resource for marker development. Plant Biotech J. 2012;10: 690–702. pmid:22672127
- 17. Schwechheimer C, Schwager K. Regulated proteolysis and plant development. Plant Cell Rep. 2004;23: 353–364. pmid:15365760
- 18. Smalle J, Vierstra RD. The ubiquitin 26S proteasome proteolytic pathway. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55: 555–590. pmid:15377232
- 19. Hua Z, Zou C, Shiu SH, Vierstra RD. Phylogenetic comparison of F-Box (FBX) gene superfamily within the plant kingdom reveals divergent evolutionary histories indicative of genomic drift. PloS One 2011;6: e16219. pmid:21297981
- 20. Hua Z, Vierstra RD. The cullin1-RING ubiquitin-protein ligases. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2011;62: 299–334. pmid:21370976
- 21. Lechner E, Achard P, Vansiri A, Potuschak T, Genschik P. F-box proteins everywhere. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9: 631–638. pmid:17005440
- 22. Jia Y, Gu H, Wang X, Chen Q, Shi S, Zhang J, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of an F-box family gene CarF-box1 from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39: 2337–2345. pmid:21667242
- 23. Jain M, Nijhawan A, Arora R, Agarwal P, Ray S, Sharma P, et al. F-box proteins in rice. Genome-wide analysis, classification, temporal and spatial gene expression during panicle and seed development, and regulation by light and abiotic stress. Plant Physiol. 2007;143: 1467–1483. pmid:17293439
- 24. Peterson CM, CO’H Mosjidis, Dute RR, Westgate ME. A flower and pod staging system for soybean. Ann Bot. 1992;69: 59–67.
- 25. Barlow JJ, Mathias AP, Williamson R, Gammack DB. A simple method for the quantitative isolation of undegraded high molecular weight ribonucleic acid. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 1963;13: 61–66. pmid:14069514
- 26.
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989.
- 27. Huang X, Madan A. CAP3: a DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res. 1999;9: 868–877. pmid:10508846
- 28. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2005;21: 3674–3676. pmid:16081474
- 29. Severin AJ, Woody JL, Bolon YT, Joseph B, Diers BW, Farmer AD, et al. RNA-Seq Atlas of Glycine max: a guide to the soybean transcriptome. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10: 160. pmid:20687943
- 30. Garg R, Sahoo A, Jain M. Validation of internal control genes for quantitative gene expression studies in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;396(2): 283–8. pmid:20399753
- 31. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001;25(4):402–408. pmid:11846609
- 32. Jain M, Misra G, Patel RK, Priya P, Jhanwar S, Khan AW, et al. A draft genome sequence of the pulse crop chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant J. 2013;74: 715–729. pmid:23489434
- 33. Rozen S, Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132(3): 365–386.
- 34. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28: 2731–2739. pmid:21546353
- 35. Eswar N, Eramian D, Webb B, Shen MY, Sali A. Protein structure modeling with MODELLER. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;426: 145–159. pmid:18542861
- 36. Rodrigues JPGLM, Levitt M, Chopra G. KoBaMIN: a knowledge-based minimization web server for protein structure refinement. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40: W323–W328. pmid:22564897
- 37. Laskowski RA, Macarthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: a program to check the steriochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallography 1993;26: 283–291.
- 38. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 1987;19: 11–15.
- 39.
Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA; 2001. pp. 1–68.
- 40. Sparkes IA, Runions J, Kearns A, Hawes C. Rapid, transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in tobacco plants and generation of stably transformed plants. Nature Protocols 2006;1: 2019–2025. pmid:17487191
- 41. Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y, et al. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30: 325–327. pmid:11752327
- 42. Higo K, Ugawa Y, Iwamoto M, Korenaga T. Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27: 297–300. pmid:9847208
- 43. Wobus U, Weber H. Seed maturation: genetic programmes and control signals. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999;2: 33–38. pmid:10047566
- 44. Moon J, Parry G, Estelle M. The ubiquitin–proteasome pathway and plant development. Plant Cell 2004;16: 3181–3195. pmid:15579807
- 45. Gagne JM, Downes BP, Shiu SH, Durski AM, Vierstra RD. The F-box subunit of the SCF E3 complex is encoded by a diverse superfamily of genes in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99: 11519–11524. pmid:12169662
- 46. Lannoo N, Peumans WJ, Van Damme EJM. Do F-box proteins with a C-terminal domain homologous with the tobacco lectin play a role in protein degradation in plants? Biochemical Society transactions 2008;36: 843–847. pmid:18793148
- 47. Glenn KA, Nelson RF, Wen HM, Mallinger AJ, Paulson HL. Diversity in tissue expression, substrate binding, and SCF complex formation for a lectin family of ubiquitin ligases. J Biol Chem. 2008;283: 12717–12729. pmid:18203720
- 48. Yoshida Y, Chiba T, Tokunaga F, Kawasaki H, Iwai K, Suzuki T, et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase that recognizes sugar chains. Nature 2002;418: 438–442. pmid:12140560
- 49. Beneteau J, Renard D, Marché L, Douville E, Lavenant L, Rahbé Y, et al. Binding properties of the N-acetylglucosamine and high-mannose N-glycan PP2-A1 phloem lectin in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010;153: 1345–1361. pmid:20442276
- 50. Tanaka K, Nguyen CT, Liang Y, Cao Y, Stacey G. Role of LysM receptors in chitin-triggered plant innate immunity. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;8: 147–153.
- 51. Dinant S, Clark AM, Zhu Y, Palauqui J, Kusiak C, Thompson GA. Diversity of the superfamily of phloem lectins (Phloem Protein 2) in angiosperms. Plant Physiol. 2003;131(1): 114–128. pmid:12529520
- 52. Lannoo N, Peumans WJ, Van Pamel E, Alvarez R, Xiong TC, Hause G, et al. Localization and in vitro binding studies suggest that the cytoplasmic/nuclear tobacco lectin can interact in situ with high-mannose and complex N-glycans. FEBS lett. 2006;580: 6329–6337. pmid:17084390
- 53. Bateman A, Bycroft M. The structure of a LysM domain from E. coli membrane-bound lytic murein transglycosylase D (MltD). J Mol Biol. 2000;299: 1113–1119. pmid:10843862
- 54. Risseeuw EP, Daskalchuk TE, Banks TW, Liu E, Cotelesage J, Hellmann H, et al. Protein interaction analysis of SCF ubiquitin E3 ligase subunits from Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2003;34: 753–767. pmid:12795696
- 55. Mizushima T, Yoshida Y, Kumanomidou T, Hasegawa Y, Suzuki A, Yamane T, et al. Structural basis for the selection of glycosylated substrates by SCF (Fbs1) ubiquitin ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104: 5777–5781. pmid:17389369
- 56. Yang Y, Niu Y, Xu C, Wang Y, Liu J, Yang WD, et al. Characterization of upstream sequences from the 8S globulin gene of Vigna radiata. Afr J Biotech. 2011;10(55): 11477–11482.
- 57. Caiyin Q, Li M, Wei D, Cai Y, Xing L. Isolation and sequencing analysis on the seed-specific promoter from soybean. Front Agr China 2007;1: 17–23.
- 58. Zavallo D, Bilbao ML, Hopp HE, Heinz R. Isolation and functional characterization of two novel seed-specific promoters from sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2010;29: 239–248. pmid:20084514
- 59. Awazuhara M, Kim H, Goto DB, Matsui A, Hayashi H, Chino M, et al. A 235-bp region from a nutritionally regulated soybean seed-specific gene promoter can confer its sulfur and nitrogen response to a constitutive promoter in aerial tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2002;163: 75–82.
- 60. Rossak M, Smith M, Kunst L. Expression of the FAE1 gene and FAE1 promoter activity in developing seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 2001;46: 717–725. pmid:11575726
- 61. Ezcurra I, Ellerstrom M, WycliVe P, Stalberg K, Rask L. Interaction between composite elements in the napA promoter: both the B-box ABA-responsive complex and the RY/G complex are necessary for seed-specific expression. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;40:699–709. pmid:10480393
- 62. Fujiwara T, Beachy RN. Tissue-specific and temporal regulation of a beta-conglycinin gene: roles of the RY repeat and other cis-acting elements. Plant Mol Biol. 1994;24: 261–272. pmid:8111031
- 63. Colot V, Robert LS, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW, Thompson RD. Localization of sequences in wheat endosperm protein genes which confer tissue-specific expression in tobacco. EMBO J. 1987;6:3559–3564. pmid:15467781
- 64. Thomas MS, Flavell RB. Identification of an enhancer element for the endosperm-specific expression of high molecular weight glutenin. Plant Cell 1990;2: 1171–1180. pmid:2152160
- 65. Wu C, Washida H, Onodera Y, Harada K, Takaiwa F. Quantitative nature of the prolamin-box, ACGT and AACA motifs in a rice glutelin gene promoter: minimal cis-element requirements for endosperm-specific gene expression. Plant J. 2000;23: 415–421. pmid:10929134
- 66. Huang N, Sutliff TD, Litts JC, Rodriguez RL. Classification and characterization of the rice alpha-amylase multigene family. Plant Mol Biol. 1990;14:655–668. pmid:2102847
- 67. Sutoh K, Yamauchi D. Two cis-acting elements necessary and sufficient for gibberellin-upregulated proteinase expression in rice seeds. Plant J. 2003;34: 635–645. pmid:12787245
- 68. Kim SY, Chung HJ, Thomas TL. Isolation of a novel class of bZIP transcription factors that interact with ABA-responsive and embryo-specification elements in the Dc3 promoter using a modified yeast one-hybrid system. Plant J. 1997;11: 1237–1251. pmid:9225465
- 69. Morita A, Umemura T, Kuroyanagi M, Futsuhara Y, Perata P, Yamaguchi J. Functional dissection of a sugar-repressed K-amylase gene (RAmy1A) promoter in rice embryos. FEBS Lett. 1998;423: 81–85. pmid:9506846
- 70. Allen RD, Bernier F, Lessard PA, Beachy RN. Nuclear factors interact with a soybean beta conglycinin enhancer. Plant Cell 1989;1: 623–631. pmid:2535514
- 71. Washida H, Wu CY, Suzuki A, Yamanouchi U, Akihama T, Harada K, et al. Identification of cis-regulatory elements required for endosperm expression of the rice storage protein glutelin gene GluB-1. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;40: 1–12. pmid:10394940