Significance of Oxygen Supply in Jarosite Biosynthesis Promoted by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans

Qingjie Hou; Di Fang; Jianru Liang; Lixiang Zhou

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120966

Abstract

Jarosite [(Na⁺, K⁺, NH₄⁺, H₃O⁺)Fe₃(SO₄)₂(OH)₆] is an efficient scavenger for trace metals in Fe- and SO₄^2--rich acidic water. During the biosynthesis of jarosite promoted by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, the continuous supply of high oxygen levels is a common practice that results in high costs. To evaluate the function of oxygen in jarosite production by A. ferrooxidans, three groups of batch experiments with different oxygen supply levels (i.e., loading volume percentages of FeSO₄ solution of 20%, 40%, and 70% v/v in the flasks), as well as three groups of sealed flask experiments with different limiting oxygen supply conditions (i.e., the solutions were not sealed at the initial stage of the ferrous oxidation reaction by paraffin but were rather sealed at the end of the ferrous oxidation reaction at 48 h), were tested. The formed Fe-precipitates were characterized via X-ray powder diffraction and scanning electron microscope-energy dispersive spectral analysis. The results showed that the biosynthesis of jarosite by A. ferrooxidans LX5 could be achieved at a wide range of solution loading volume percentages. The rate and efficiency of the jarosite biosynthesis were poorly correlated with the concentration of dissolved oxygen in the reaction solution. Similar jarosite precipitates, expressed as KFe₃ (SO₄) ₂(OH)₆ with Fe/S molar ratios between 1.61 and 1.68, were uniformly formed in unsealed and 48 h sealed flasks. These experimental results suggested that the supply of O₂ was only essential in the period of the oxidation of ferrous iron to ferric but was not required in the period of ferric precipitation.

Citation: Hou Q, Fang D, Liang J, Zhou L (2015) Significance of Oxygen Supply in Jarosite Biosynthesis Promoted by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0120966. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120966

Academic Editor: Adam Driks, Loyola University Chicago, UNITED STATES

Received: November 16, 2014; Accepted: January 27, 2015; Published: March 25, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Hou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41371476, 21377057 and 21477054). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Jarosite [(Na⁺, K⁺, NH₄⁺, H₃O⁺)Fe₃(SO₄)₂(OH)₆] is a ubiquitous Fe(III)-mineral in acid mine drainage (AMD), AMD impacted sediments, and coastal acid sulfate soils [1,2]. In these natural acidic environments, the formation of jarosite is mainly attributed to the biological oxidation of Fe(II) to Fe(III) (by acidophilic Fe-oxidizing microorganisms) and precipitation of Fe(III) [3,4].

An important environmental function of this ferric hydroxysulfate mineral is its high capability to remove trace elements from solution via sorption or co-precipitation mechanisms [5]. The sorption capacity of K-jarosite [KFe₃(SO₄)₂(OH)₆] for Cr (VI) has been shown to reach up to 80 mg/g [6]. Jarosite, which functions as an iron scavenger, is widely used for the removal of iron impurities in hydrometallurgy [7,8]. Many investigations focusing on the field of AMD have indicated that a number of metal contaminants (Cu, As, Cd, Ni, etc.) in AMD-polluted sites can be naturally attenuated by newly formed jarosite precipitates [9,10]. Moreover, this material is also an efficient mineralogical control on aqueous concentrations of As in As-contaminated water, such as AMD and As-bearing groundwater [11]. Meanwhile, the formation of jarosite should be minimized as much as possible in several applications involving Fe-oxidizing microorganisms, such as ore biohydrometallurgy and sludge bioleaching, because jarosite decreases the solubilization efficiencies of targeted metals to an extent [12,13]. Given the high metal uptake feature of jarosite, the manner by which to synthesize this Fe(III)-mineral efficiently and economically has received a great deal of attention.

Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, one of the most common acidophilic Fe-oxidizing microorganisms, has been proven to be capable of forming various jarosite group minerals [2,3]. The formation rate and efficiency of jarosite by A. ferrooxidans are dependent on many factors, including pH, temperature, aging time, dissolved oxygen (DO) levels, concentrations of Fe²⁺ and monovalent cations (K⁺, NH₄⁺, Na⁺ and H₃O⁺), and molar ratio of Fe/K, Fe/NH₄, Fe/Na, and Fe/H₃O [14–16]. Previous studies have suggested that yellowish, well-crystalline NH₄-jarosite could be synthesized within 48 h from acidic FeSO₄ solutions inoculated with A. ferrooxidans at ambient temperature and pressure conditions [3,17]. NH4 in the crystal lattices of jarosite can be displaced by Ag⁺, K⁺, Na⁺, and H₃O⁺ to form the corresponding jarosite group minerals [18,19]. The pH range of 1.0–3.0 is well-documented to favor jarosite formation, whereas a higher pH range results in the dominant formation of schwertmannite [Fe₈O₈(OH)₆SO₄] [11].

Given that A. ferrooxidans is known to be an aerobic bacterium, the continuous supply of O₂ (e.g., DO > 5.0 mg/L) has been considered to be essential for jarosite synthesis, which will result in high costs [20,21]. Notably, our recent study found that when statically incubating FeSO₄ solution containing A. ferrooxidans LX5 for 40 h, a significant amount of yellowish hydroxysulfate precipitates was generated, thereby implying that oxygen might not be indispensable throughout the experiment on jarosite biosynthesis [13]. However, this assumption is not supported by direct evidence. In particular, the quantitative relationship between DO level and formed jarosite amount remains unclear.

The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of DO on jarosite formation by A. ferrooxidans. The varying DO levels were indirectly achieved by changing the reaction solution loading volumes in the conical flasks as well as sealing the solution with paraffin at different reaction periods. The expected results obtained from this study will contribute to a better understanding of the biogenic jarosite formation process promoted by A. ferrooxidans in acidic natural or artificial environments while providing an economical approach for the highly efficient biosynthesis of jarosite.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

No specific permits were required for the described field studies, and no specific permissions were required for these locations. The location is not privately owned or protected in any way.

Preparation of A. ferrooxidans LX5 cell suspension

A. ferrooxidans LX5 (CGMCC No. 0727) obtained from China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) was grown in 9K medium developed by Silverman and Lundgren [22]. The medium contained the following mineral salts: 44.48 g of FeSO₄·7H₂O, 3.00 g of (NH₄)₂SO₄, 0.10 g of KCl, 0.50 g of K₂HPO₄, 0.50 g of MgSO₄·7H₂O, and 0.01 g of Ca(NO₃)2 in 1 L of deionized water, adjusted to pH 2.5 with H₂SO₄. A. ferrooxidans LX5 cell suspension was prepared as reported previously [23]. The final cell density was approximately 3.0 × 10⁸ cells/mL.

Effect of oxygen supply level (as indicated by different reaction solution loading volumes) on jarosite formation promoted by A. ferrooxidans LX5

The ferrous bio-oxidation was performed in 500 mL conical flasks, each containing 3.0 × 10⁸ cells/mL of A. ferrooxidans LX5 and different loading volumes of 9K mineral salt solutions. To achieve different DO concentrations in the reaction solutions, 100, 200, and 350 mL of 9K medium, with equivalent to 20%, 40%, and 70% of solution loading volume percentages, were added to 500 mL conical flasks, respectively. The solution pH was uniformly adjusted to pH 2.5 with H₂SO₄, followed by incubation at 28°C and 180 rpm in a rotary shaker. During incubation, the concentrations of DO, Fe²⁺, Fe³⁺, and the precipitates in the solutions were periodically determined. Given that the abiotic oxidation of ferrous iron is hardly initiated below pH 4.5, a control group without the inoculation of A. ferrooxidans LX5 was not designed in this study.

Effect of limiting oxygen supply on the jarosite formation promoted by A. ferrooxidans LX5

Three groups of sealed flask experiments were performed to determine whether O₂ was continuously required in the whole jarosite biosynthesis process. One group of flasks was not sealed throughout the jarosite formation, whereas another group of flasks was sealed at the end of the ferrous oxidation reaction (i.e., no Fe²⁺ remained in the solution). Several flasks, which were sealed by paraffin at the beginning of the ferrous oxidation reaction, were designed as the control group.

After 120 h of incubation, all precipitates that formed in the flasks were filtered through Whatman No. 4 filter paper, washed twice with distilled water, dried at 60°C to constant weight, and characterized via the methods described below.

During these trials, the water content lost in the flasks due to evaporation was replenished with distilled water by weight method. All experiments were performed in triplicate. The data were presented as the mean values of triplicate samples with standard deviations.

Analytical methods

The DO values of the solutions were measured using a Thermo DO analyzer. The concentrations of Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺ were determined via 1, 10-phenanthroline colorimetric method [24].

The crystal structure of the formed Fe-precipitates was examined via X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) (Rigaku Rotaflex D/max, Japan) with CuKα radiation (50 kV, 150 mA). XRD patterns were obtained by scanning speed of 6 deg/min and scanning angles in 10–80 deg. The characteristic reflection peaks (d-values) were matched with the peaks in the database of the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards [25].

Morphology and elemental composition were examined using a scanning electron microscope equipped with an energy dispersive spectral analyzer (EDS) [Zeiss S-EV018, Germany], operated at 20.0 kV accelerating voltage [13,23]. EDS analysis of mineral sample has typically been applied to quantitative identification of major elements with rough estimates of composition based on relative peak intensities.

Results and Discussion

Effects of oxygen supply level on the jarosite formation

Dynamic changes in the concentrations of DO, Fe²⁺, Fe³⁺, and precipitate mass with different loading volumes of the reaction solutions (20%, 40%, and 70% v/v) during the ferrous bio-oxidation and ferric precipitation periods are shown in Fig. 1. The concentrations varied drastically with increasing reaction time. For example, DO concentrations in the solution decreased rapidly in the first 40 h to 80 h because of consumption during the bacterial oxidation of ferrous iron and then increased gradually from their lowest values (5.8, 2.0, and 0.7 mg/L in 20%, 40%, and 70% of loading volume percentages, respectively) to saturate values (9.0 mg/L) because of the subsequent supplement of O₂ from air.

Download:

Fig 1. Changes in the concentrations of DO, Fe²⁺, Fe³⁺, and Fe-precipitates during the jarosite formation process with reaction solution loading volume percentages ranging from 20% to 70% (■70% of loading volume, ○40% of loading volume, Δ20% of loading volume).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120966.g001

A continuous decrease in Fe²⁺ concentration was observed in all three groups of reaction systems, and the decrease rate increased with decreasing solution loading volume (Fig. 1B), which was attributed to the fact that the presence of higher levels of DO in the solution was favorable for the growth of A. ferrooxidans LX5 [20,26]. Notably, for 20% solution loading volume percentage, the DO concentration was always maintained higher than 6 mg/L in the whole ferrous bio-oxidation period, and 9 g/L of Fe²⁺ was oxidized completely within 30 h, which was equivalent to a Fe²⁺ oxidation rate of 300 mg/(L∙h). This value, however, was cut in half at a solution loading volume percentage of 40%. These findings were consistent with those in previous reports [13,27,28].

Following a continuous decease in Fe²⁺ concentration, Fe³⁺ concentration in all three reaction systems gradually increased, but the increase dynamics at different loading volume conditions showed a significant difference from that of Fe²⁺ changes (Fig. 1C). When the solution loading volume percentage was decreased from 40% to 20%, an increase in the rate of Fe³⁺ production from 112.5 mg/(L∙h) to 150 mg/(L∙h) was observed, which was probably associated with the hydrolysis reaction and formation of Fe-precipitates, which are attributed to a part of the already produced Fe³⁺ [27,29,30]. In fact, when the FeSO₄ solution became a weakly yellow turbid suspension, the precipitates formed shortly afterwards. Fig. 1D shows the precipitate contents formed at different reaction solution loading volumes. Approximately 2 g/L of Fe-precipitate was formed in the first 24 h, after which it increased rapidly with increasing reaction time, finally reaching 11 g/L, 9.5 g/L, and 7.5 g/L in 20%, 40%, and 70% loading volume percentages, respectively. This finding implied that the oxygen supply level in the reaction solution had no substantial influence on the contents of the formed Fe-precipitates.

The Pearson linear regression model was used to determine the relationships between the concentrations of DO, Fe³⁺, Fe²⁺, and Fe²⁺ oxidation rate and the formation of Fe-precipitates (Table 1). The formation of Fe-precipitates was poorly correlated with DO concentration [R² = 0.158 and root mean square error (Root-MSE) = 41.42] and mainly correlated with the concentrations of produced Fe³⁺ (R² = 0.952 and Root-MSE = 16.72). Similar results have been reported by Huang and Zhou [16] and Mahiroglu et al. [31], who found that the Fe²⁺ oxidation rate, to a great extent, had a dominant function in the formation of monomineral phase of iron hydroxysulfate.

Download:

Table 1. Pearson correlation between the concentrations of DO, Fe²⁺, and Fe³⁺ and the mass of produced jarosite.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120966.t001

Effect of limiting oxygen supply on the jarosite formation

To determine further the function of DO in the Fe-precipitate formation, three groups of sealed flasks experiments [i.e., flasks containing FeSO₄ solution were not sealed by paraffin, sealed at the start of the ferrous oxidation reaction (0 h), and at the end of the ferrous oxidation reaction (48 h)] were conducted. Notably, Fig. 2 shows that DO concentration in the initially sealed reaction solution decreased sharply from 10 mg/L to 0.3 mg/L within the first 24 h and then remained at this value. Accordingly, a marked inhibition of Fe²⁺ bio-oxidation and Fe-precipitate formation was observed as indicated by low oxidation rate of Fe²⁺ (5.5%) and trace amounts of Fe-precipitates (0.65 g/L) at the termination of the reaction (120 h). This finding suggested that relying only on the DO remaining in the initial reaction solution hardly supports the O₂ requirement for jarosite formation given that A. ferrooxidans should utilize O₂ to oxidize ferrous iron and obtain energy for its growth [3, 32]. Meanwhile, almost the same dynamic changes in the concentrations of Fe²⁺, Fe³⁺, and Fe-precipitates were observed even though the DO concentration in unsealed flasks was always five times that in 48 h sealed flasks during the ferric precipitation period. This phenomenon suggested that the supply of oxygen had an important function in the oxidation of Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺ by A. ferrooxidans LX5; however, its function in the formation of Fe-precipitates could be neglected possibly because the energy released from the oxidation of Fe²⁺ can be used for the subsequent hydrolysis reaction of Fe³⁺ into jarosite [33,34]. This advantage would substantially reduce the cost of commercial jarosite synthesis because the aeration operation can be eliminated in the Fe³⁺ precipitation period.

Download:

Fig 2. Changes in the concentrations of DO, Fe²⁺, Fe³⁺, and Fe-precipitates during the jarosite formation process with limiting oxygen supply (■sealed at 0 h, Δsealed at 48 h, ○unsealed).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120966.g002

Characteristics of Fe-precipitates

The XRD results indicated that the Fe-precipitates that formed in both the unsealed and 48 h sealed groups exhibited fine crystallinity because of the presence of strong and sharp whole-angle diffraction peaks (Fig. 3). These precipitates were uniformly identified as jarosite according to the JCPDS card [26] given that no significant difference was observed between the XRD patterns of the precipitate in the present study and the standard jarosite pattern.

Download:

Fig 3. XRD patterns of Fe-precipitates formed at 48 h sealed (a) and unsealed reaction solutions (b).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120966.g003

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed that irregular geometric-type jarosite particles with diameters of 1 μm to 1.5 μm and a smooth surface were dominantly formed in the unsealed and 48 h sealed groups (Fig. 4). The jarosite particles formed at different solution loading volume conditions significantly varied in both particle size and morphology (Fig. 5). Spheroid-type jarosite particles with a diameter of 6 μm and a rough surface were formed at a solution loading volume percentage of 20%. At a solution loading volume percentage of 70%, the formed jarosite particles exhibited an irregular shape, and their surfaces were relatively smoother. The difference in the morphology and size of jarosite formed at different solution loading volumes was mainly attributed to the varying shearing force in the flasks. Similar phenomena have been reported by Asokan et al. [6] and Elwood et al. [35], who found that the diameters of jarosite particles formed at different hydraulic shearing forces were in the range of 1 μm to 16.2 μm.

Download:

Fig 4. SEM images of Fe-precipitates formed at 48 h sealed (a) and unsealed reaction solutions (b).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120966.g004

Download:

Fig 5. SEM images of Fe-precipitates formed in the solutions with the loading volume percentage of 20% (a) and 70% (b).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120966.g005

EDS analysis (Fig. 6) revealed that 15.3 wt% to 19.6 wt% of S and 24.6 wt% to 31.7 wt% of Fe were incorporated into the product of jarosite precipitates formed at the 48 h sealed and unsealed groups, resulting in Fe/S molar ratios of 1.61 and 1.68, respectively. The Fe/S molar ratio of jarosite obtained in the present study was consistent with the range between 1.38% and 1.8% described by Johnston et al. [36] and Wang et al. [37]. Based on these findings, we can conclude that during jarosite biosynthesis promoted by A. ferrooxidans LX5, the supply of O₂ is only required in the oxidation of ferrous iron to ferric and did not significantly contribute to the ferric precipitation reaction.

Download:

Fig 6. EDS analysis of Fe-precipitates formed at 48 h sealed and unsealed reaction solutions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120966.g006

Conclusion

The synthesis of jarosite promoted by A. ferrooxidans LX5 can be achieved at a wide range of oxygen supply level. The rate and efficiency of jarosite biosynthesis were poorly correlated with the DO concentration in the reaction solution. The continuous supply of O₂ was only required during the period of ferrous iron oxidation to ferric and was not required during the ferric precipitation reaction. This study provided insight into the biosynthesis mechanism of jarosite promoted by A. ferrooxidans LX5 and provides useful information on the regulation of jarosite biosynthesis.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their valuable suggestions and comments on our research work.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: QH DF JL LZ. Performed the experiments: QH DF. Analyzed the data: QH DF JL LZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: QH DF JL LZ. Wrote the paper: QH DF.

References

1. Biliana G, Jörg G, Udo B. Disslution at the surface of jarosite: an in situ AFM study. Chem Geol. 2005;215: 499–516.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Han HS, Sun W, Hu YH, Jia BL, Tang HH. Anglesite and silver recovery from jarosite residues through roasting and sulfidization-flotation in zinc hydrometallurgy. J Hazard Mater. 2014; 278: 49–54. pmid:24953935
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Daoud J, Karamanev D. Formation of jarosite during Fe²⁺ oxidation by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Miner Eng. 2006;19: 960–967.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Wang JW, Bai JF, Xu JQ, Liang B. Bioleaching of metals from printed wire boards by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and their mixture. J Hazard Mater. 2009;172: 1100–1105. pmid:19699031
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Carlson L, Bigham JM, Schwertmann U, Kyek A. Wagner FScavenging of As from acid mine drainage by schwertmannite and ferrihydrite: a comparison with synthetic analogues. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;36: 1712–1719. pmid:11993868
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Lazaridis NK, Bakoyannakis DN, Deliyanni EA. Chromium (VI) sorptive removal from aqueous solutions by nanocrystalline akaganeite. Chemosphere. 2005;58: 65–73. pmid:15522334
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Barham RJ. Schwertmannite: A unique mineral, contains a replaceable ligand, transformation to jarosite, hematites, and/or basic iron sulfate. J Mater Res. 1997;12: 2751–2758.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Kaksonen AH, Morris C, Rea S, Li J, Usher KM, McDonald RG, et al. Biohydrometallurgical iron oxidation and precipitation: Part II-Jarosite precipitate characterisation and acid recovery by conversion to hematite. Hydrometallurgy. 2014;147–148: 264–272. pmid:25355275
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Pappu A, Saxena M, Asolekar SR. Jarostie characteristics and its utilization potentials. Science of the Total Environ. 2006;359: 232–243.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Mehdi K, Majid HT, Reza N, Hamid H. Hydrochemistry, mineralogy and chemical fractionation of mine and processing wastes associated with porphyry copper mines: A case study from the Sarcheshmeh mine, SE Iran. Appl Geochem. 2011;26: 714–730.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Johnston SG, Burton ED, Keene AF, Friedrich BP, Voegelin A, Blackford MG, et al. Arsenic mobilization and iron transformations during sulfidization of As (V)-bearing jarosite. Chem Geol. 2012;334: 9–24.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Mousavi SM, Yaghmaei S, Salimi F, Jafari A. Influence of process variables on biooxidation of ferrous sulfate by an indigenous Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Part Ⅰ: Flask experiments. Fuel. 2006;85: 2555–2560.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Liao YH, Zhou LX, Bai SY, Liang JR, Wang SM. Occurrence of biogenic schwertmannite in sludge bioleaching environments and its adverse effect on solubilization of sludge-borne metals. Appl Geochem. 2009;24: 1739–1746.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Wang YJ, Yang XJ, Li HY, Tu W. Immobilization of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans with complex of PVA and sodium alginate. Poly Degrad Stab. 2006;91: 2408–2414.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Dutrizac JE, Chen TT. The behavior of phosphate during jarosite precipitation. Hydrometallurgy. 2010;102: 55–65.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Huang S, Zhou LX. Fe²⁺ oxidation rate drastically affect the formation and phase of secondary iron hydroxysulfate mineral occurred in acid mine drainage. Mater Sci Eng C. 2012;32: 916–921.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Egal M, Casiot C, Morin G, Parmentier M, Bruneel O, Lebrun S, et al. Kinetic control on the formation of tooeleite, schwertmannite and jarosite by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans strains in an As (III)-rich acid mine water. Chem Geol. 2009;265: 432–441.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Pappu A, Saxena M, Asolekar SR. Jarostie characteristics and its utilization potentials. Sci Total Environ. 2006;359: 232–243. pmid:15978656
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Silva LFQ, Vallejuelo SFO, Martinez AI. Study of environmental pollution and mineralogical characterization of sediment rivers from Brazilian coal mining acid drainage. Sci Total Environ. 2013;447: 169–178. pmid:23380565
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Gleisner M, Herbert JRR, Kockum PCF. Pyrite oxidation by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans at various concentrations of dissolved oxygen. Chem Geol. 2006;225: 16–29.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Ohmura N, Sasaki K, Matsumoto N, Saiki H. Anaerobic respiration using Fe3+, S0, and H2 in the chemolithoautotrophic bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. J Bacteriol. 2002;184: 2081–2087. pmid:11914338
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Silverman MP, Lundgren DG. Studies on the chemoautotrophic iron bacterium Ferrobacillus ferrooxidans. I. An improved medium and a harvesting procedure for securing high cell yield. J Bacteriol. 1959;77: 642–647. pmid:13654231
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Bai SY, Xu ZH, Wang M, Liao YH, Liang JR, Zheng CC, et al. Both initial concentrations of Fe (II) and monovalent cations jointly determine the formation of biogenic iron hydroxysulfate precipitates in acidic sulfate-rich environments. Mater Sci Eng C. 2012;32: 2323–2329.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 1995.
25. JCPDS (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards). Mineral Powder Diffraction Files, International Center for Diffraction Data, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania. 2002.
26. Yoshiki K, Takashi M. Rate law of Fe(II) oxidation under low O₂ conditions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2013;123: 338–350.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Flávio LSC, Victor AO, Damaris G, Adelson DS, Versiane Al. High-temperature bioleaching of nickel sulfides: thermodynamic and kinetic implications. Hydrometallurgy. 2010;105: 103–109.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Sun LX, Zhang X, Tan WS, Zhu ML. Effect of agitation intensity on the biooxidation process of refractory gold ores by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy. 2012;127–128: 99–103.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Wang M, Zhou LX. Simultaneous oxidation and precipitation of iron using jarosite immobilized Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and its relevance to acid mine drainage. Hydrometallurgy. 2012;125–126: 152–156.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Song YW, Wang M, Liang JR, Zhou LX. High-rate precipitation of iron as jarosite by using a combination process of electrolytic reduction and biological oxidation. Hydrometallurgy. 2014;143: 23–27.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Mahiroglu A, Yel ET, Sevimli MF. Treatment of combined acid mine drainage (AMD)—Flotation circuit effluents from copper mine via Fenton’s process. J Hazard Mater. 2009;166: 782–787. pmid:19147282
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Jensen AB, Webb C. Ferrous sulphate oxidation using Thiobacillus ferrooxidans: a review. Process Biochem. 1995;30: 225–236.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Majzlan J, Navrotsky A. Thermodynamics of iron oxides: part III. Enthalpies of formation and stability of ferrihydrite (−Fe(OH)₃), schwertmannite (−FeO(OH)_3/4(SO₄)_1/8), and ε-Fe₂O₃_. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2004;68: 1049–1059.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Amouric A, Brochier AC, Johnson DB, Bonnefoy V, Hallberg KB. Phylogenetic and genetic variation among Fe(II)-oxidizing acidithiobacilli supports the view that these comprise multiple species with different ferrous iron oxidation pathways. Microbiology. 2011;157: 111–122. pmid:20884692
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Elwood MME, Madden AS, Rimstidt JD, Zahrai S, Kendall MR, Miller MA. Jarosite dissolution rates and nanoscale mineralogy. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2012;91: 306–321.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Johnston SG, Keene AF, Bush RT, Burton ED, Sullivan LA, Isaacson L, et al. Iron geochemical zonation in a tidally inundated acid sulfate soil wetland. Chem Geol. 2011;280: 257–270.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Wang H, Bigham JM., Tuovinen OHFormation of schwertmannite and its transformation to jarosite in the presence of acidophilic iron-oxidizing microorganisms. Mater Sci Eng C. 2006;26: 588–592.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Biliana G, Jörg G, Udo B. Disslution at the surface of jarosite: an in situ AFM study. Chem Geol. 2005;215: 499–516.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Han HS, Sun W, Hu YH, Jia BL, Tang HH. Anglesite and silver recovery from jarosite residues through roasting and sulfidization-flotation in zinc hydrometallurgy. J Hazard Mater. 2014; 278: 49–54. pmid:24953935
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] PubMed/NCBI

[7] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Daoud J, Karamanev D. Formation of jarosite during Fe²⁺ oxidation by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Miner Eng. 2006;19: 960–967.
View Article
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Wang JW, Bai JF, Xu JQ, Liang B. Bioleaching of metals from printed wire boards by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and their mixture. J Hazard Mater. 2009;172: 1100–1105. pmid:19699031
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[12] View Article

[13] PubMed/NCBI

[14] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Carlson L, Bigham JM, Schwertmann U, Kyek A. Wagner FScavenging of As from acid mine drainage by schwertmannite and ferrihydrite: a comparison with synthetic analogues. Environ Sci Technol. 2002;36: 1712–1719. pmid:11993868
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[16] View Article

[17] PubMed/NCBI

[18] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Lazaridis NK, Bakoyannakis DN, Deliyanni EA. Chromium (VI) sorptive removal from aqueous solutions by nanocrystalline akaganeite. Chemosphere. 2005;58: 65–73. pmid:15522334
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] PubMed/NCBI

[22] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Barham RJ. Schwertmannite: A unique mineral, contains a replaceable ligand, transformation to jarosite, hematites, and/or basic iron sulfate. J Mater Res. 1997;12: 2751–2758.
View Article
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Kaksonen AH, Morris C, Rea S, Li J, Usher KM, McDonald RG, et al. Biohydrometallurgical iron oxidation and precipitation: Part II-Jarosite precipitate characterisation and acid recovery by conversion to hematite. Hydrometallurgy. 2014;147–148: 264–272. pmid:25355275
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] PubMed/NCBI

[29] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Pappu A, Saxena M, Asolekar SR. Jarostie characteristics and its utilization potentials. Science of the Total Environ. 2006;359: 232–243.
View Article
Google Scholar

[31] View Article

[32] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Mehdi K, Majid HT, Reza N, Hamid H. Hydrochemistry, mineralogy and chemical fractionation of mine and processing wastes associated with porphyry copper mines: A case study from the Sarcheshmeh mine, SE Iran. Appl Geochem. 2011;26: 714–730.
View Article
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Johnston SG, Burton ED, Keene AF, Friedrich BP, Voegelin A, Blackford MG, et al. Arsenic mobilization and iron transformations during sulfidization of As (V)-bearing jarosite. Chem Geol. 2012;334: 9–24.
View Article
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Mousavi SM, Yaghmaei S, Salimi F, Jafari A. Influence of process variables on biooxidation of ferrous sulfate by an indigenous Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Part Ⅰ: Flask experiments. Fuel. 2006;85: 2555–2560.
View Article
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Liao YH, Zhou LX, Bai SY, Liang JR, Wang SM. Occurrence of biogenic schwertmannite in sludge bioleaching environments and its adverse effect on solubilization of sludge-borne metals. Appl Geochem. 2009;24: 1739–1746.
View Article
Google Scholar

[43] View Article

[44] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Wang YJ, Yang XJ, Li HY, Tu W. Immobilization of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans with complex of PVA and sodium alginate. Poly Degrad Stab. 2006;91: 2408–2414.
View Article
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Dutrizac JE, Chen TT. The behavior of phosphate during jarosite precipitation. Hydrometallurgy. 2010;102: 55–65.
View Article
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Huang S, Zhou LX. Fe²⁺ oxidation rate drastically affect the formation and phase of secondary iron hydroxysulfate mineral occurred in acid mine drainage. Mater Sci Eng C. 2012;32: 916–921.
View Article
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Egal M, Casiot C, Morin G, Parmentier M, Bruneel O, Lebrun S, et al. Kinetic control on the formation of tooeleite, schwertmannite and jarosite by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans strains in an As (III)-rich acid mine water. Chem Geol. 2009;265: 432–441.
View Article
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Pappu A, Saxena M, Asolekar SR. Jarostie characteristics and its utilization potentials. Sci Total Environ. 2006;359: 232–243. pmid:15978656
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Silva LFQ, Vallejuelo SFO, Martinez AI. Study of environmental pollution and mineralogical characterization of sediment rivers from Brazilian coal mining acid drainage. Sci Total Environ. 2013;447: 169–178. pmid:23380565
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Gleisner M, Herbert JRR, Kockum PCF. Pyrite oxidation by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans at various concentrations of dissolved oxygen. Chem Geol. 2006;225: 16–29.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Ohmura N, Sasaki K, Matsumoto N, Saiki H. Anaerobic respiration using Fe3+, S0, and H2 in the chemolithoautotrophic bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. J Bacteriol. 2002;184: 2081–2087. pmid:11914338
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Silverman MP, Lundgren DG. Studies on the chemoautotrophic iron bacterium Ferrobacillus ferrooxidans. I. An improved medium and a harvesting procedure for securing high cell yield. J Bacteriol. 1959;77: 642–647. pmid:13654231
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Bai SY, Xu ZH, Wang M, Liao YH, Liang JR, Zheng CC, et al. Both initial concentrations of Fe (II) and monovalent cations jointly determine the formation of biogenic iron hydroxysulfate precipitates in acidic sulfate-rich environments. Mater Sci Eng C. 2012;32: 2323–2329.
View Article
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 1995.

[ref25] 25. JCPDS (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards). Mineral Powder Diffraction Files, International Center for Diffraction Data, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania. 2002.

[ref26] 26. Yoshiki K, Takashi M. Rate law of Fe(II) oxidation under low O₂ conditions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2013;123: 338–350.
View Article
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Flávio LSC, Victor AO, Damaris G, Adelson DS, Versiane Al. High-temperature bioleaching of nickel sulfides: thermodynamic and kinetic implications. Hydrometallurgy. 2010;105: 103–109.
View Article
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Sun LX, Zhang X, Tan WS, Zhu ML. Effect of agitation intensity on the biooxidation process of refractory gold ores by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy. 2012;127–128: 99–103.
View Article
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Wang M, Zhou LX. Simultaneous oxidation and precipitation of iron using jarosite immobilized Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and its relevance to acid mine drainage. Hydrometallurgy. 2012;125–126: 152–156.
View Article
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Song YW, Wang M, Liang JR, Zhou LX. High-rate precipitation of iron as jarosite by using a combination process of electrolytic reduction and biological oxidation. Hydrometallurgy. 2014;143: 23–27.
View Article
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Mahiroglu A, Yel ET, Sevimli MF. Treatment of combined acid mine drainage (AMD)—Flotation circuit effluents from copper mine via Fenton’s process. J Hazard Mater. 2009;166: 782–787. pmid:19147282
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Jensen AB, Webb C. Ferrous sulphate oxidation using Thiobacillus ferrooxidans: a review. Process Biochem. 1995;30: 225–236.
View Article
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Majzlan J, Navrotsky A. Thermodynamics of iron oxides: part III. Enthalpies of formation and stability of ferrihydrite (−Fe(OH)₃), schwertmannite (−FeO(OH)_3/4(SO₄)_1/8), and ε-Fe₂O₃_. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2004;68: 1049–1059.
View Article
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Amouric A, Brochier AC, Johnson DB, Bonnefoy V, Hallberg KB. Phylogenetic and genetic variation among Fe(II)-oxidizing acidithiobacilli supports the view that these comprise multiple species with different ferrous iron oxidation pathways. Microbiology. 2011;157: 111–122. pmid:20884692
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Elwood MME, Madden AS, Rimstidt JD, Zahrai S, Kendall MR, Miller MA. Jarosite dissolution rates and nanoscale mineralogy. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2012;91: 306–321.
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Johnston SG, Keene AF, Bush RT, Burton ED, Sullivan LA, Isaacson L, et al. Iron geochemical zonation in a tidally inundated acid sulfate soil wetland. Chem Geol. 2011;280: 257–270.
View Article
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Wang H, Bigham JM., Tuovinen OHFormation of schwertmannite and its transformation to jarosite in the presence of acidophilic iron-oxidizing microorganisms. Mater Sci Eng C. 2006;26: 588–592.
View Article
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

Preparation of A. ferrooxidans LX5 cell suspension

Effect of oxygen supply level (as indicated by different reaction solution loading volumes) on jarosite formation promoted by A. ferrooxidans LX5

Effect of limiting oxygen supply on the jarosite formation promoted by A. ferrooxidans LX5

Analytical methods

Results and Discussion

Effects of oxygen supply level on the jarosite formation

Effect of limiting oxygen supply on the jarosite formation

Characteristics of Fe-precipitates

Conclusion

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References