Figures
Abstract
Rapid fibrovascularization is a prerequisite for successful biomaterial engraftment. In addition to their well-known roles in fibrinolysis, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or their inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) have recently been implicated as individual mediators in non-fibrinolytic processes, including cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation. Since these events are critical for fibrovascularization of biomaterial, we hypothesized that the components of the plasminogen activation system contribute to biomaterial engraftment. Employing in vivo and ex vivo microscopy techniques, vessel and collagen network formation within porous polyethylene (PPE) implants engrafted into dorsal skinfold chambers were found to be significantly impaired in uPA-, tPA-, or PAI-1-deficient mice. Consequently, the force required for mechanical disintegration of the implants out of the host tissue was significantly lower in the mutant mice than in wild-type controls. Conversely, surface coating with recombinant uPA, tPA, non-catalytic uPA, or PAI-1, but not with non-catalytic tPA, accelerated implant vascularization in wild-type mice. Thus, uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 contribute to the fibrovascularization of PPE implants through common and distinct effects. As clinical perspective, surface coating with recombinant uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 might provide a novel strategy for accelerating the vascularization of this biomaterial.
Citation: Reichel CA, Hessenauer MET, Pflieger K, Rehberg M, Kanse SM, Zahler S, et al. (2015) Components of the Plasminogen Activation System Promote Engraftment of Porous Polyethylene Biomaterial via Common and Distinct Effects. PLoS ONE 10(2): e0116883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116883
Academic Editor: Joseph Najbauer, University of Pécs Medical School, HUNGARY
Received: August 1, 2014; Accepted: December 16, 2014; Published: February 6, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Reichel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was supported by Förderprogramm Forschung und Lehre (FöFoLe) der Medizinischen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (to CAR and AB). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
In reconstructive medicine, biomaterials are used for the augmentation or replacement of tissues [1]. If autologous transplant materials are not sufficiently available, reconstructive options for bone and cartilage tissue defects include the use of porous polyethylene biomaterial (PPE) implants [1]. PPE implants are available for numerous applications ranging from orbital floor reconstruction [2] over auricular reconstruction [3] to facial contour implants [4]. This implant material has proofed to be biocompatible, long-term stable, non-soluble, and non-resorbable over a period of more than 30 years of clinical use [5–7]. However, there are applications which are less favorable for implant integration, such as rhinoplasty and reconstructive nose surgery [8] as well as reconstructions in irradiated or scar tissue, where blood supply is weak [9].
A ‘moderate’ inflammatory response upon implantation, which induces only transient and limited changes in microvascular permeability and alterations in leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions, as well as the rapid formation of a dense vessel and collagen network within the implant are considered to be prerequisites for successful biomaterial engraftment [10,11]. Interference with or delay of these events promote implant infection and dislocation, which ultimately might result in implant rejection [10,11].
Fibrinolysis is a fundamental biological process, which maintains tissue perfusion by preventing clot formation in blood vessels [12,13]. Plasmin is the key enzyme in the fibrinolytic system, which mediates the dissolution of fibrin polymers [14,15]. Its zymogen plasminogen is activated by tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) [16] and–to a lesser degree–by urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) [13,17]. The activity of these serine proteases is tightly controlled by plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) [18]. These components of the plasminogen activation system are expressed by a variety of cell types, including endothelial cells [19–21]. In addition to their well-known roles in fibrinolysis, uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 are increasingly recognized as individual mediators in non-fibrinolytic processes, such as cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation [22–30]. Since these events are critical for the fibrovascularization of biomaterial, we hypothesized that the plasminogen activation system is involved in the biointegration of PPE implants.
In the present study, we demonstrate that endogenously released uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 contribute to the functional biointegration of PPE implants via common and distinct effects: Whereas tPA predominantly facilitates the initial vessel sprouting into PPE biomaterial, uPA additionally exhibits sustained effects on vascularization of these implants. Interestingly, PAI-1, which serves as the principal inhibitor of tPA and uPA in fibrinolysis, supports vascularization of PPE biomaterial differentially at various time points after implantation. Moreover, the major components of the plasminogen activation system were found to be critically involved in collagen deposition within PPE biomaterial thereby promoting mechanical tissue integration of the implants. Notably, uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 exhibited strong chemotactic effects on endothelial cells. Accordingly, surface coating with recombinant uPA (mainly via its non-proteolytic properties) and–to a lesser degree–with tPA (mainly via its proteolytic properties) or PAI-1 accelerated vascularization of PPE implants. Our experimental findings provide novel insights into the mechanisms underlying tissue integration of biomaterials and propose surface coating with recombinant uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 as a novel promising strategy for accelerating the vascularization of PPE implants under unfavorable conditions.
Materials and Methods
Animals
All animal experiments were performed according to German legislation for the protection of animals and approved by the Regierung von Oberbayern, München, Germany. Protocols were approved under permit 55.2-1-54-2531-115-10.
Female C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany). Female uPA-/-, tPA-/-, and PAI-1-/- mice were generated as described previously and backcrossed on the C57BL/6J background for 10 generations [31,32]. All experiments were performed with mice at the age of 8–16 weeks. Animals were housed in single cages and had free access to tap water and standard laboratory food (ssniff, Spezialdiaeten GmbH, Soest, Germany) throughout the experiments.
Dorsal skinfold chamber model
The surgical preparation of the dorsal skinfold chamber was performed as described previously [11,33]. Briefly, two symmetrical titanium frames were implanted on the extended dorsal skinfold thereby sandwiching the double layer of the shaved and depilated skin. Subsequently, one layer of skin–consisting of epithelial skin layer, subcutaneous tissue, and striated skin muscle–was completely removed in a circular area of about 15 mm in diameter and the remaining contralateral layers are covered with a removable coverslip incorporated into the observation window of the titanium frame. All surgical procedures were performed under anesthesia with ketamine (75 mg/kg b.w. i.p., Ketavet; Parke-Davis, Berlin, Germany) and xylazine (25 mg/kg b.w. i.p., Rompun; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany). After surgery, animals were allowed to recover for a period of 48 hours from anesthesia and microsurgery. Only chamber preparations fulfilling the criteria of microscopically intact microcirculation and no signs of inflammation were included in the experiments. For the implantation of the PPE material, the coverslip of the skinfold chamber was temporarily removed and the PPE material was implanted into the striated skin muscle. The chambers were well tolerated and the animals showed no signs of discomfort, as indicated by normal feeding and sleeping habits. At the end of the experiment, animals were euthanized by an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (Narcoren, Merial, Germany).
Preparation of PPE implants
Porous polyethylene sheets (PPE; Medpor; PorexSurgical, Newnan, GA; pore size 100–250 μm) were cut into 3.0 x 3.0 x 0.1 mm slices and subsequently steam sterilized. Before implantation, the PPE material was either bathed in sterile 0.9% saline solution or coated as described previously [34] using 50 μL growth factor reduced (GFR) BD Matrigel Matrix (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) or GFR BD Matrigel Matrix supplemented with 1 μg of recombinant murine uPA, diisopropyl fluorophosphate (DFP)-uPA, tPA, non-enzymatic (NE)-tPA, or PAI-1 (Molecular Innovations, Novi, MI). Liquid GFR BD Matrigel entered the PPE material thoroughly at 4°C and was allowed to polymerize for 1h at 37°C before implantation.
In vivo fluorescence microscopy
For in vivo fluorescence microscopy, the awake chamber-bearing mice were immobilized in a Perspex tube on a custom-made stage (Effenberger, Munich, Germany) under a modified Zeiss microscope (Axiotech Vario; Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled dextran (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany; MW 500,000; 0.05–0.1 mL of a 5% solution in 0.9% saline) was used to enhance the contrast of the vascular network and rhodamine 6G (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR; 0.04 mL of a 0.05% solution in 0.9% saline) was used to visualize leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions. The fluorescent dyes were administered via tail vein injection. Selective observation of FITC-labeled plasma and rhodamine 6G-labeled leukocytes was possible using epi-illumination with a 100 W mercury lamp with selective filter blocks (Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany).
Microcirculatory analysis
In each experiment, 9 regions of interest (ROI) were selected following a given scheme: 1 ROI in the center of the implant, 1 ROI in each corner of the rectangular implant and 4 ROIs in the surrounding host tissue. These ROIs were examined on day 7, 10, and 14 after biomaterial implantation. In vivo fluorescence microscopy images were acquired by a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (Sony XC-77CE; Sony, Cologne, Germany) and recorded on digital tapes (Sony DVCAM DSV 45P; Sony, Cologne, Germany) for subsequent off-line analysis (Cap Image; Zeintl, Heidelberg, Germany). Parameters for offline analysis included absolute and functional vessel density, vessel diameters, and blood flow velocities. Furthermore, skeletonized maps of the vessel network were analyzed using the ImageJ plugin ‘Analyze Skeleton’, quantifying numbers of vessel junctions, numbers of vessel branches, and average branch lengths. Leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions were characterized as numbers of rolling (< 50% of red blood cell velocity) cells crossing a given line in 30 sec and firmly adherent (for > 30 sec) cells on 100 μm of vessel wall.
Dynamic breaking strength
Mechanical integration of the implant material into the host tissue was assessed on day 14 after implantation by measuring the force required for mechanical removal of the implant out of the host tissue using a newton meter as described previously [34].
Collagen deposition
Collagen deposition within the pores of the implant was analyzed using multi-photon microscopy of fixed tissue samples (TriMScope, LaVision BioTec, Bielefeld, Germany) as described elsewhere [35]. Images were aquired using an XLUMPlanFl 20 x/0.95 W objective. Excitation wavelength was 1275 nm, with a laser intensity of 20 mW. The second harmonic (SHG) signal was detected using a 624/40 filter. Optical sections (500 μm x 500 μm, 1450 px) were scanned at 4 μm distances using the same settings for all samples analyzed. Z- stacks covering 100 μm were projected and further processed using ImageJ software. The second harmonic generation (SHG) signal was measured in 3 ROIs within the pores of each implant and normalized to the background signal.
Confocal microscopy
Implants were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.02% Triton X-100 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and blocked with 1% BSA for 24 hours at 4°C. Subsequently implants were incubated with primary antibodies against uPA, tPA, PAI-1 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX), and CD31 for 72 hours at 4°C. Secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rat IgG, Alexa Fluor 680 goat anti-rat IgG; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) were incubated for 72 hours at 4°C. Images were obtained using a SP8 SMD confocal microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and a 63 x HC PL APO 1.2 NA water objective.
Cell migration
Chemotaxis experiments were performed in a chemotaxis slide (Ibidi, Martinsried, Germany). Microscopy was performed at 37°C and 5% CO2 on an inverted microscope Eclipse Ti (Nikon, Duesseldorf, Germany), a 4 x objective and a CCD camera. Images were obtained over a total time of 20 hours every ten minutes.
HUVECs (Human umbilical vein endothelial cells from Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany) were cultured in growth medium (ECGM, Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany) containing 10% fetal calf serum. After reaching confluency, cells were trypsinised, embedded into 30% Matrigel (Corning, Amsterdam, Netherlands), diluted with basal medium (ECBM, Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany) and finally filled into the chemotaxis chambers at a density of 3 x 106 cells/mL. ECGM was used as attractant-free medium, while ECGM supplemented with 30 ng/mL recombinant human tPA, 20 ng/mL uPA, or 1 μg/mL PAI-1 (Sino Biological, Beijing, China) was used to analyze the chemotactic effect of these proteins on migration of HUVECs.
Cell tracking was performed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA) plugin “Manual Tracking”. 30 cells per experiment were tracked and each experiment was repeated independently three times. For further analysis and evaluation of chemotactical processes “Chemotaxis and Migration Tool” (ibidi, Martinsried, Germany) was used.
Experimental protocol
In a first set of experiments, PPE implants were engrafted into dorsal skinfold chambers in wild-type (WT), uPA-/-, tPA-/-, and PAI-1-/- mice (n = 6 per group). In a second set of experiments, implants coated with Matrigel as well as with Matrigel supplemented with murine uPA, DFP-uPA, tPA, NE-tPA, or PAI-1 were implanted into dorsal skinfold chambers in WT mice (n = 5 or 6 per group).
In vivo fluorescence microscopy was performed on days 7, 10, and 14 after implantation. Mice were sacrificed via terminal injection of 200 mg/kg pentobarbital, and immediately afterwards the measurement of the dynamic breaking strength was performed.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed with a statistical software package (SigmaStat for Windows, Jandel Scientific, Erkrath, Germany). The ANOVA on ranks test followed by the Dunnett test was used for the estimation of stochastic probability in intergroup comparisons. Mean values and SEM are given. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Expression of uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 in PPE implants
Since plasmin(ogen) has previously been implicated in tissue integration of biomaterial [36], we hypothesized that components of the plasminogen activation system are also involved in the biointegration of these implants. Using immunostaining and confocal microscopy, expression of uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 was detected in CD31+ microvascular endothelial cells as well as in and around the newly formed microvessels within the implant (Fig. 1A).
The distribution of uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 in engrafted PPE biomaterial was analyzed ex vivo in implants from WT mice by confocal microscopy (A; scale bar: 100 μm). Vascularization of PPE implants was analyzed in WT as well as in uPA-, tPA-, or PAI-1-deficient mice by in vivo fluorescence microscopy. Representative in vivo microscopy images of PPE biomaterial vascularization in a WT mouse are shown (B; scale bar: 100 μm). Panels show results for the absolute (C) and functional (D) vessel density within the implant (mean ± SEM for n = 6; * p < 0.05 vs. WT).
Role of uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 for vascularization of PPE implants
Rapid vascularization of PPE biomaterial is a prerequisite for its successful tissue integration [10,11]. To evaluate the functional relevance of uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 for vascularization of PPE implants, vascularization of this biomaterial was analyzed on days 7, 10, and 14 after implantation into dorsal skinfold chambers in WT, uPA-/-, tPA-/-, or PAI-1-/- mice by in vivo fluorescence microscopy. In WT animals, initial vessel formations within the PPE implants, which were only partially perfused, were found on day 7 after implantation. On day 10 after implantation, a further densification of the vessel network was observed, whereas on day 14 after implantation, a complete network of perfused vessels was established in the PPE implants (Fig. 1B). Whereas in tPA-deficient animals absolute (Fig. 1C; representing the entire vessel network including perfused and non-perfused vessels) and functional (Fig. 1D; representing only the network of perfused vessels) vessel density were significantly reduced in the initial phase of biomaterial engraftment, PAI-1-deficient animals exhibited a significant defect in absolute vessel density at day 10 and in functional vessel density at days 10 and 14 after implantation. In uPA-deficient animals, however, absolute and functional vessel density of PPE implants were significantly diminished during the entire experimental period as compared to WT controls.
In order to assess the role of uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 for vascularization of PPE implants in more detail, a comprehensive analysis of the architecture of the newly formed vessel network was performed (Fig. 2A). In the early engraftment phase, a significant reduction in both numbers of vessel branches (Fig. 2B) and vessel junctions (Fig. 2C) was detected in uPA-/- or tPA-/- animals as compared to WT animals. In addition, numbers of triple junctions (Fig. 2D; representing 3 joining vessels) or quadruple junctions (Fig. 2E; representing 4 joining vessels) were significantly reduced in the mutant animals as compared to WT controls. Whereas numbers of vessel branches and junctions were significantly diminished in uPA-deficient animals as compared to WT controls at days 10 and 14 after PPE implantation, these parameters remained unaltered in tPA-deficient animals during this late time period. PAI-1-deficient animals exhibited only a transient significant defect in the formation of vessel branches and junctions at day 10 after implantation, whereas numbers of triple and quadruple vessel network junctions were significantly lower at days 7 and 10 after implantation as compared to WT animals. Noteworthy, the average vessel branch length remained constant over time in all experimental groups (data not shown).
A detailed analysis of the vessel network within the PPE implants in WT as well as in uPA-, tPA-, or PAI-1-deficient mice was performed by software-assisted skeletonizing of the vessel network. Representative images of this analysis in a WT mouse are shown (A; scale bar: 100 μm). Panels show results for the number of branches (B) and total junctions (C) as well as triple (D) and quadruple (E) junctions in the vessel network (mean ± SEM for n = 6; * p < 0.05 vs. WT).
Moreover, the vessel density in the host tissue surrounding the implant material was constant during the entire observation phase and did not differ among experimental groups (A Table in S1 File). Furthermore, no significant differences among experimental groups were observed in average diameters, blood flow velocities, and shear rates in microvessels within the implant material and the surrounding tissue at all time points (B Table in S1 File).
Role of uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 for leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions in PPE implants
Leukocyte recruitment is thought to play a critical role in the engraftment of PPE biomaterial [11]. Using in vivo fluorescence microscopy, interactions of fluorescence-labeled leukocytes with endothelial cells were analyzed in the newly formed microvasculature within the PPE implants (Fig. 3A). Upon biomaterial implantation, the number of leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions in newly formed microvessels of the implant was low. Whereas in the early engraftment phase the number of intravascularly rolling leukocytes was significantly diminished in microvessels of implants in uPA-/-, tPA-/-, or PAI-1-/- animals (Fig. 3B), the number of firmly adherent leukocytes remained unchanged (Fig. 3C).
Interactions of fluorescence-labeled leukocytes and endothelial cells in newly formed microvessels within the PPE implants in WT as well as in uPA-, tPA-, or PAI-1-deficient mice were analyzed by in vivo fluorescence microscopy. Representative in vivo microscopy images of these processes in a WT mouse are shown (A; scale bar: 100 μm). Panels show results for the number of intravascularly rolling (B) and adherent (C) leukocytes (mean ± SEM for n = 6; * p < 0.05 vs. WT).
No significant differences in leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions were observed in the microvasculature of the host tissue surrounding the implant material (A Table in S1 File).
Role of uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 for mechanical tissue integration of PPE implants
As a measure of functional tissue integration of PPE implants, the disintegration force required for the mechanical removal of the implant out of the host tissue was assessed at the end of each experiment on day 14 after implantation. In our experiments, the required disintegration force was significantly lower in uPA-/-, tPA-/-, or PAI-1-/- animals as compared to WT control animals (Fig. 4A).
Panel (A) shows results for the disintegration force (mean ± SEM for n = 6; * p < 0.05 vs. WT). The disintegration force required for mechanical removal of the implant out of the host tissue was determined in WT as well as in uPA-, tPA-, or PAI-1-deficient mice. Collagen deposition within the PPE biomaterial was analyzed ex vivo in implants from WT as well as from uPA-, tPA-, or PAI-1-deficient mice by second harmonic imaging microscopy. A representative image from a WT mouse is shown (B; scale bar: 100 μm; red dotted lines delineate pores of the implant material, in which collagen (white) is deposited). Panel (C) shows quantitative results for the second harmonic signal (mean ± SEM for n = 4; * p < 0.05 vs. WT).
Mechanical tissue integration of PPE biomaterial is established through the formation of a tight collagen network within the implant that is connected to the surrounding tissue. As a measure of collagen deposition within the implant material, the second harmonic signal (visualizing collagen) was analyzed by using multi-photon microscopy (Fig. 4B). In our experiments, the second harmonic signal in implants from uPA-/-, tPA-/-, or PAI-1-/- animals was significantly lower than in WT controls (Fig. 4C).
Chemotactic effect of recombinant uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 on microvascular endothelial cells
Since uPA-, tPA-, and PAI-1-deficiency was associated with reduced vascularization of PPE biomaterial, we hypothesized that these effects are due to the ability of the different components of the plasminogen activation system to recruit endothelial cells. As a measure of the chemotactic effect of uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 on endothelial cells, the forward migration index (FMI) for migrating endothelial cells was determined in an in vitro assay (Fig. 5A). Upon exposure to uPA, tPA, or PAI-1, the FMI for migrating endothelial cells was significantly higher than in control experiments (Fig. 5B).
The effect of recombinant uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 on migration of endothelial cells was analyzed in vitro. Representative migration plots are shown (A). Panels show results for the forward migration index (FMI) of migrating endothelial cells upon exposure to recombinant uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 (B; mean ± SEM for n = 3; * p < 0.05 vs. +/-).
Effect of surface coating with recombinant uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 on tissue integration of PPE implants
To translate our in vitro results in a clinically more relevant situation, PPE biomaterial was coated with recombinant murine uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 embedded in Matrigel and implanted into dorsal skinfold chambers of WT mice. Surface coating with uPA and–to a lesser degree–with tPA or PAI-1 resulted in increased absolute (Fig. 6A) and functional (Fig. 6B) vessel density in PPE implants in the early engraftment phase as compared to Matrigel-coated control implants.
Vascularization of PPE implants, which were coated with recombinant uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 embedded in Matrigel, was analyzed by in vivo fluorescence microscopy in WT mice. Panels show results for the relative increase in absolute (A) and functional (B) vessel density within the implant as well as for the increase in the number of branches (C) and junctions (D) in the vessel network as compared to Matrigel-coated control implants (mean ± SEM for n = 5 – 6).
A more detailed analysis revealed that surface coating of PPE implants with recombinant uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 resulted in a significant elevation in numbers of vessel branches (Fig. 6C) and vessel junctions in the vessel network of PPE implants (Fig. 6D) as compared to control implants. No significant differences were observed in vessel diameters, blood flow velocities, and shear rates among experimental groups (C Table in S1 File). Furthermore, surface coating with recombinant uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 had no effect on leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions in microvessels within the implant material (C Table in S1 File) or the surrounding host tissue (D Table in S1 File). Moreover, the vessel density of the surrounding host tissue remained comparable during the entire observation period among experimental groups (D Table in S1 File). Similarly, mechanical tissue integration of the implant material remained unaltered upon surface coating with recombinant uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 (E Table in S1 File).
Effect of surface coating with non-catalytically active uPA or tPA proteins on vascularization of PPE implants
To characterize the functional relevance of the catalytic properties of uPA and tPA for early vascularization of PPE biomaterial, implants were coated with DFP-uPA (in which the catalytic activity of uPA is inhibited by diisopropyl fluorophosphate (DFP)) or NE-tPA (which represents a tPA mutant protein completely lacking its catalytic activity) proteins. Surface coating with DFP-uPA resulted in a significant increase in the absolute (Fig. 7A) and functional (Fig. 7B) vessel density in the implant material as compared to control implants. This increase was comparable to implants coated with catalytically active uPA during the early integration phase. In contrast, surface coating with NE-tPA barely enhanced the absolute or functional vessel density in PPE biomaterial. Noteworthy, biomaterial coating with NE-tPA can therefore also be considered as an additional negative control in our experiments.
Vascularization of PPE implants, which were coated with DFP-uPA or NE-tPA embedded in Matrigel, was analyzed by in vivo fluorescence microscopy in WT mice. Panels show results for the relative increase in absolute (A) and functional (B) vessel density within the implant as compared to Matrigel-coated control implants (mean ± SEM for n = 5 – 6).
As confirmed before by zymography, there was no proteolytic activity of DFP-uPA detectable (data not shown; [37]).
Discussion
Rapid fibrovascularization is a prerequisite for successful engraftment of biomaterials [10, 11]. In addition to their well-known roles in fibrinolysis, the plasminogen activators uPA and tPA as well as their inhibitor PAI-1 are increasingly recognized as individual and autonomous mediators in non-fibrinolytic processes, including cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation [22–30]. Since these events are critical for the fibrovascularization of biomaterial [10, 11], we hypothesized that the components of the plasminogen activation system contribute to the functional biointegration of PPE implants.
In a first approach, immunostaining and confocal microscopy were used to evaluate whether the major components of the plasminogen activation system are present in engrafted PPE implants. Here, we show that uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 are expressed by microvascular endothelial cells and deposited in and around the newly formed microvessels within the implant. These observations complement previous reports documenting that uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 are synthesized by cultured endothelial cells [19–21].
The rapid establishment of a reliable vessel network within implanted biomaterial is strictly required for the survival of oxygen dependent structures as well as for the prevention of implant infection and rejection [38,39]. To analyze the functional relevance of the plasminogen activation system for the vascularization of PPE biomaterial, in vivo epi-fluorescence microscopy was employed in implants engrafted in dorsal skinfold chambers of WT and appropriate mutant mice. Our data indicate that the major components of the plasminogen activation system selectively, but differentially support the vascularization process of this biomaterial without effects on the existing microvasculature of the surrounding host tissue: Whereas tPA is predominantly involved in the initial stages of microvessel network formation within PPE implants, uPA additionally exhibits sustained effects on vascularization of this biomaterial. Noteworthy, PAI-1 which serves as the principal inhibitor of the plasminogen activators in fibrinolysis, promotes the formation of the vessel network within the implant differentially at various stages of PPE implant integration. Our results extend previous observations implicating uPA [23], tPA [40], and PAI-1 [41] in vasculo-/angiogenesis.
Taking a closer look on the architecture of the developing vessel network within the implant, we found that uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 predominantly facilitate branch formation, but not length extension of single vessel segments in the growing network suggesting that these endogenously released proteins are particularly involved in the maturation of the vessel network within the biomaterial. This is an interesting finding which might be related to non-fibrinolytic properties of these proteins that have been identified to promote proliferation of endothelial cells [42–44].
In addition to its non-fibrinolytic effects on endothelial cells, uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 have been reported to contribute to the regulation of leukocyte recruitment under severe inflammatory conditions including ischemia-reperfusion injury [37,45–47] or sepsis [48]. Upon biomaterial implantation, however, only a ‘moderate’ inflammatory response arises which might explain that deficiency of the major components of the plasminogen activation system did not substantially alter leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions within the implant or in the surrounding host tissue in our experiments.
Along with the vascularization of PPE implants, fibroblasts invade the pores of this biomaterial and secrete collagen. This leads to the formation of a dense collagen network that ultimately ties the implant to the surrounding host tissue. Using second harmonic generation multi-photon microscopy, we were able to demonstrate that the major components of the plasminogen activation system are critically involved in the development of this collagen network. In this context, uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 are thought to induce proliferation of fibroblasts and stimulate collagen production [28–30]. Accordingly, the force needed for mechanical removal of the implant out of the host tissue was significantly reduced in uPA-, tPA-, or PAI-1-deficient animals. Thus, our experimental data reveal that the major components of the plasminogen activation system play a crucial role for the tissue integration of PPE implants through common and distinct effects on fibrovascularization of this biomaterial.
Despite its excellent biocompatibility, there are applications which are less favorable for PPE implant integration, such as rhinoplasty and reconstructive nose surgery [8] as well as reconstructions in irradiated or scar tissue [9], where blood supply is weak. Previous attempts to improve tissue integration of biomaterials included coating of implants with autologous material, such as chondrocytes [10,49], adipocytes [50], adipose tissue derived microvascular fragments [51], or acellular dermis [52] as well as with specific growth factors, e. g. basic fibroblast growth factor [bFGF; [53–55]] or vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF; [34]]. Less specific, but already in clinical use, PPE coated with oxidized cellulose polymers and the patient’s blood (which contains uPA, tPA, and PAI-1) is successfully employed in reconstructive nose surgery [56,57]. Together with our actual findings on the role of the plasminogen activation system for the engraftment of PPE implants, we consequently hypothesized that surface coating with recombinant uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 supports the tissue integration of this biomaterial. In a separate set of in vitro experiments, we found that uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 potently attract endothelial cells. These results are in line with recent observations involving the plasminogen activation system in VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor)-dependent vessel growth which represents one of the most prominent pathways in angiogenesis [27]. To translate these results into a clinically more relevant context, PPE implants were embedded in Matrigel supplemented with components of the plasminogen activation system and engrafted in dorsal skinfold chambers of WT mice (Fig. 6). Surface coating with recombinant uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 lead to an accelerated vascularization of PPE implants predominantly in the initial engraftment phase. Whereas tPA particularly improved initial implant vascularization (as compared to uPA or PAI-1), surface coating with recombinant PAI-1 still showed beneficial effects on vessel network formation within the implant at late stages of the engraftment process. Notably, surface coating with recombinant uPA exhibited the most striking effect on initial implant vascularization (as compared to tPA or PAI-1) that persisted (at lower levels) over the entire experimental period.
In recent studies, the plasminogen activators have been supposed to mediate their non-fibrinolytic properties via catalytic and non-catalytic effects [24–27,36]. Towards a more mechanistic understanding of these uPA- and tPA-dependent engraftment processes, we coated PPE implants with modified tPA or uPA proteins lacking their catalytic activity. Our experimental data indicate that tPA promotes the vascularization of PPE implants mainly via its proteolytic properties, whereas uPA predominantly employs its non-proteolytic properties to support vessel network formation in this biomaterial. Since plasmin has previously been implicated in tissue integration of biomaterial implants [36], our data suggest that the reported effect of plasmin on biomaterial engraftment is predominantly mediated via tPA-dependent proteolytical activation of plasminogen. In this context it is interesting that tPA-dependent activation of plasminogen has recently been found to contribute to biological processes different from vessel network formation including leukocyte recruitment to inflamed tissue [47].
In contrast to our findings on vascularization of PPE implants, however, surface coating with components of the plasminogen activation system did not further enhance collagen deposition and subsequent mechanical tissue integration of this biomaterial in our experiments. These observations might be explained by the already outstanding engraftment properties of PPE in densely vascularized and healthy host tissue. Under unfavorable implant conditions, however, surface coating with components of the plasminogen activation system might provide a novel, tailor-made strategy for the acceleration of biomaterial vascularization at different stages of the engraftment process which might prevent implant infection and rejection.
Conclusions
Collectively, our experimental data demonstrate that endogenously released uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 contribute to the functional biointegration of PPE implants via common and distinct effects on implant fibrovascularization: Whereas tPA predominantly facilitates the initial vessel network formation in PPE biomaterial, uPA additionally exhibits sustained effects on vascularization of these implants. Notably, PAI-1, which serves as the principal inhibitor of tPA and uPA in fibrinolysis, supports vascularization of PPE biomaterial differentially at various stages of the engraftment process. Furthermore, the major components of the plasminogen activation system were found to be crucially involved in collagen deposition within PPE biomaterial thereby promoting mechanical tissue integration of the implants. Interestingly enough, uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 exhibited strong chemotactic effects on endothelial cells. Accordingly, surface coating with recombinant uPA (mainly via its non-proteolytic properties) and–to a lesser degree–with tPA (mainly via its proteolytic properties) or PAI-1 accelerated vascularization of PPE implants. Our experimental findings provide novel insights into the mechanisms underlying tissue integration of biomaterials and propose surface coating with recombinant uPA, tPA, or PAI-1 as a novel promising strategy for accelerating the vascularization of PPE implants under unfavorable conditions.
Supporting Information
S1 File. Contains the following files: A Table. Microhemodynamic parameters and leukocyte responses in host tissue.
Microhemodynamic parameters and leukocyte responses in the host tissue were determined as detailed in Material and Methods (mean ± SEM for n = 5 – 6). B Table. Microhemodynamic parameters in implants. Microhemodynamic parameters in implants were obtained as detailed in Material and Methods (mean ± SEM for n = 5 – 6). C Table. Microhemodynamic parameters and leukocyte responses in coated implants. Microhemodynamic parameters and leukocyte responses in coated implants were determined as detailed in Material and Methods (mean ± SEM for n = 5–6). D Table. Vessel density and leukocyte responses in host tissue upon engraftment of coated implants. Vessel density and leukocyte responses in the host tissue were determined upon engraftment of coated implants as detailed in Material and Methods (mean ± SEM for n = 5–6). E Table. Mechanical tissue integration of coated PPE biomaterial. The disintegration force required for mechanical removal of implants coated with recombinant murine uPA, tPA, PAI-1, DFP-uPA, or NE-tPA out of the host tissue was determined upon engraftment of coated implants as detailed in Material and Methods (mean ± SEM for n = 5–6).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116883.s001
(DOCX)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: CAR METH SS. Performed the experiments: METH KP MR. Analyzed the data: CAR METH KP MR SZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SMK FK. Wrote the paper: CAR METH KP MR SMK SZ FK AB SS.
References
- 1. Yaremchuk MJ (2003) Facial skeletal reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 111: 1818–1827. pmid:12711941
- 2. Potter JK, Malmquist M, Ellis E 3rd (2012) Biomaterials for reconstruction of the internal orbit. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 24: 609–627. pmid:23107429
- 3. Berghaus A, Stelter K, Naumann A, Hempel JM (2010) Ear reconstruction with porous polyethylene implants. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 68: 53–64. pmid:20442561
- 4. Menderes A, Baytekin C, Topcu A, Yilmaz M, Barutcu A (2004) Craniofacial reconstruction with high-density porous polyethylene implants. J Craniofac Surg 15: 719–724. pmid:15346006
- 5. Gosau M, Schiel S, Draenert GF, Ihrler S, Mast G, et al. (2006) [Craniofacial augmentation with porous polyethylene implants (Medpor: first clinical results]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 10: 178–184. pmid:16685567
- 6. Niechajev I (2012) Facial reconstruction using porous high-density polyethylene (medpor): long-term results. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36: 917–927. pmid:22684610
- 7. Berghaus A (1985) Porous polyethylene in reconstructive head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 111: 154–160. pmid:3977737
- 8. Stelter K, Strieth S, Berghaus A (2007) Porous polyethylene implants in revision rhinoplasty: chances and risks. Rhinology 45: 325–331. pmid:18085029
- 9. Kim SG, Kim YU, Park JC, Oh YK (2001) Effects of presurgical and post-surgical irradiation on the healing process of Medpor in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30: 438–442. pmid:11720047
- 10. Ehrmantraut S, Naumann A, Willnecker V, Akinyemi S, Korbel C, et al. (2012) Vitalization of porous polyethylene (Medpor(R)) with chondrocytes promotes early implant vascularization and incorporation into the host tissue. Tissue Eng Part A 18: 1562–1572. pmid:22452340
- 11. Laschke MW, Vollmar B, Menger MD (2011) The dorsal skinfold chamber: window into the dynamic interaction of biomaterials with their surrounding host tissue. Eur Cell Mater 22: 147–164; discussion 164–147. pmid:21932192
- 12. Reichel CA, Kanse SM, Krombach F (2012) At the interface of fibrinolysis and inflammation: the role of urokinase-type plasminogen activator in the leukocyte extravasation cascade. Trends Cardiovasc Med 22: 192–196. pmid:23062972
- 13. Del Rosso M, Margheri F, Serrati S, Chilla A, Laurenzana A, et al. (2011) The urokinase receptor system, a key regulator at the intersection between inflammation, immunity, and coagulation. Curr Pharm Des 17: 1924–1943. pmid:21711238
- 14. Das R, Pluskota E, Plow EF (2010) Plasminogen and its receptors as regulators of cardiovascular inflammatory responses. Trends Cardiovasc Med 20: 120–124. pmid:21335281
- 15. Syrovets T, Lunov O, Simmet T (2012) Plasmin as a proinflammatory cell activator. J Leukoc Biol 92: 509–519. pmid:22561604
- 16. Sheehan JJ, Tsirka SE (2005) Fibrin-modifying serine proteases thrombin, tPA, and plasmin in ischemic stroke: a review. Glia 50: 340–350. pmid:15846799
- 17. Smith HW, Marshall CJ (2010) Regulation of cell signalling by uPAR. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 23–36. pmid:20027185
- 18. McMahon B, Kwaan HC (2008) The plasminogen activator system and cancer. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb 36: 184–194. pmid:19176991
- 19. Pepper MS, Vassalli JD, Montesano R, Orci L (1987) Urokinase-type plasminogen activator is induced in migrating capillary endothelial cells. J Cell Biol 105: 2535–2541. pmid:3121633
- 20. Diamond SL, Eskin SG, McIntire LV (1989) Fluid flow stimulates tissue plasminogen activator secretion by cultured human endothelial cells. Science 243: 1483–1485. pmid:2467379
- 21. Pepper MS, Ferrara N, Orci L, Montesano R (1991) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induces plasminogen activators and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in microvascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 181: 902–906. pmid:1755866
- 22. Stefansson S, Lawrence DA (2003) Old dogs and new tricks: proteases, inhibitors, and cell migration. Sci STKE 2003: pe24. pmid:12837933
- 23. Deindl E, Ziegelhoffer T, Kanse SM, Fernandez B, Neubauer E, et al. (2003) Receptor-independent role of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator during arteriogenesis. FASEB J 17: 1174–1176. pmid:12692088
- 24. van Hinsbergh VW, Engelse MA, Quax PH (2006) Pericellular proteases in angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 26: 716–728. pmid:16469948
- 25. Binder BR, Mihaly J, Prager GW (2007) uPAR-uPA-PAI-1 interactions and signaling: a vascular biologist’s view. Thromb Haemost 97: 336–342. pmid:17334498
- 26. Brodsky S, Chen J, Lee A, Akassoglou K, Norman J, et al. (2001) Plasmin-dependent and -independent effects of plasminogen activators and inhibitor-1 on ex vivo angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H1784–1792. pmid:11557572
- 27. Breuss JM, Uhrin P (2012) VEGF-initiated angiogenesis and the uPA/uPAR system. Cell Adh Migr 6: 535–615. pmid:23076133
- 28. Shetty S, Kumar A, Johnson AR, Pueblitz S, Holiday D, et al. (1996) Differential expression of the urokinase receptor in fibroblasts from normal and fibrotic human lungs. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 15: 78–87. pmid:8679225
- 29. Hao S, Shen H, Hou Y, Mars WM, Liu Y (2010) tPA is a potent mitogen for renal interstitial fibroblasts: role of beta1 integrin/focal adhesion kinase signaling. Am J Pathol 177: 1164–1175. pmid:20639453
- 30. Zhang YP, Wang WL, Liu J, Li WB, Bai LL, et al. (2013) Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promotes the proliferation and inhibits the apoptosis of pulmonary fibroblasts by Ca(2+) signaling. Thromb Res 131: 64–71. pmid:23021499
- 31. Carmeliet P, Schoonjans L, Kieckens L, Ream B, Degen J, et al. (1994) Physiological consequences of loss of plasminogen activator gene function in mice. Nature 368: 419–424. pmid:8133887
- 32. Carmeliet P, Kieckens L, Schoonjans L, Ream B, van Nuffelen A, et al. (1993) Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene-deficient mice. I. Generation by homologous recombination and characterization. J Clin Invest 92: 2746–2755. pmid:8254028
- 33. Lehr HA, Leunig M, Menger MD, Nolte D, Messmer K (1993) Dorsal skinfold chamber technique for intravital microscopy in nude mice. Am J Pathol 143: 1055–1062. pmid:7692730
- 34. Strieth S, Weger T, Bartesch C, Bittmann P, Stelter K, et al. (2010) Biocompatibility of porous polyethylene implants tissue-engineered by extracellular matrix and VEGF. J Biomed Mater Res A 93: 1566–1573. pmid:20014297
- 35. Rehberg M, Krombach F, Pohl U, Dietzel S (2011) Label-free 3D visualization of cellular and tissue structures in intact muscle with second and third harmonic generation microscopy. PLoS One 6: e28237. pmid:22140560
- 36. Busuttil SJ, Ploplis VA, Castellino FJ, Tang L, Eaton JW, et al. (2004) A central role for plasminogen in the inflammatory response to biomaterials. J Thromb Haemost 2: 1798–1805. pmid:15456492
- 37. Reichel CA, Uhl B, Lerchenberger M, Puhr-Westerheide D, Rehberg M, et al. (2011) Urokinase-type plasminogen activator promotes paracellular transmigration of neutrophils via Mac-1, but independently of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor. Circulation 124: 1848–1859. pmid:21969013
- 38.
Schumann P, Lindhorst D, von See C, Menzel N, Kampmann A, et al. (2013) Accelerating the early angiogenesis of tissue engineering constructs in vivo by the use of stem cells cultured in matrigel. J Biomed Mater Res A.
- 39. Laschke MW, Harder Y, Amon M, Martin I, Farhadi J, et al. (2006) Angiogenesis in tissue engineering: breathing life into constructed tissue substitutes. Tissue Eng 12: 2093–2104. pmid:16968151
- 40. Yip HK, Sun CK, Tsai TH, Sheu JJ, Kao YH, et al. (2013) Tissue plasminogen activator enhances mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells and angiogenesis in murine limb ischemia. Int J Cardiol 168: 226–236. pmid:23063135
- 41. Isogai C, Laug WE, Shimada H, Declerck PJ, Stins MF, et al. (2001) Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promotes angiogenesis by stimulating endothelial cell migration toward fibronectin. Cancer Res 61: 5587–5594. pmid:11454712
- 42. Czekay RP, Wilkins-Port CE, Higgins SP, Freytag J, Overstreet JM, et al. (2011) PAI-1: An Integrator of Cell Signaling and Migration. Int J Cell Biol 2011: 562481. pmid:21837240
- 43. Welling TH, Huber TS, Messina LM, Stanley JC (1996) Tissue plasminogen activator increases canine endothelial cell proliferation rate through a plasmin-independent, receptor-mediated mechanism. J Surg Res 66: 36–42. pmid:8954829
- 44. Prager GW, Mihaly J, Brunner PM, Koshelnick Y, Hoyer-Hansen G, et al. (2009) Urokinase mediates endothelial cell survival via induction of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein. Blood 113: 1383–1390. pmid:18948573
- 45. Roelofs JJ, Rouschop KM, Leemans JC, Claessen N, de Boer AM, et al. (2006) Tissue-type plasminogen activator modulates inflammatory responses and renal function in ischemia reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 131–140. pmid:16291841
- 46. Lau CL, Zhao Y, Kim J, Kron IL, Sharma A, et al. (2009) Enhanced fibrinolysis protects against lung ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137: 1241–1248. pmid:19379998
- 47. Uhl B, Zuchtriegel G, Puhr-Westerheide D, Praetner M, Rehberg M, et al. (2014) Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Promotes Postischemic Neutrophil Recruitment via Its Proteolytic and Nonproteolytic Properties. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 34: 1495–1504. pmid:24764453
- 48. Abraham E, Gyetko MR, Kuhn K, Arcaroli J, Strassheim D, et al. (2003) Urokinase-type plasminogen activator potentiates lipopolysaccharide-induced neutrophil activation. J Immunol 170: 5644–5651. pmid:12759445
- 49. Monroy A, Kojima K, Ghanem MA, Paz AC, Kamil S, et al. (2007) Tissue engineered cartilage "bioshell" protective layer for subcutaneous implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 71: 547–552. pmid:17240459
- 50. Kim NJ, Choung HK, Khwarg SI (2006) The survival of freely grafted orbital fat on porous polyethylene orbital implants in the rabbit. Korean J Ophthalmol 20: 143–146. pmid:17004626
- 51. Laschke MW, Kleer S, Scheuer C, Schuler S, Garcia P, et al. (2012) Vascularisation of porous scaffolds is improved by incorporation of adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments. Eur Cell Mater 24: 266–277. pmid:23007911
- 52. Thakker MM, Fay AM, Pieroth L, Rubin PA (2004) Fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants wrapped with acellular dermis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 20: 368–373. pmid:15377904
- 53. Nicaeus TE, Tolentino MJ, Adamis AP, Rubin PA (1996) Sucralfate and basic fibroblast growth factor promote endothelial cell proliferation around porous alloplastic implants in vitro. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 12: 235–239. pmid:8944383
- 54. Soparkar CN, Wong JF, Patrinely JR, Appling D (2000) Epidermal and fibroblast growth factors enhance fibrovascular integration of porous polyethylene implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 16: 337–340. pmid:11021382
- 55. Park WC, Han SK, Kim NJ, Chung TY, Khwarg SI (2005) Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on fibrovascular ingrowth into porous polyethylene anophthalmic socket implants. Korean J Ophthalmol 19: 1–8. pmid:15929480
- 56. Erol OO (2000) The Turkish delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 2229–2241; discussion 2242–2223. pmid:10839424
- 57. Richardson S, Agni NA, Pasha Z (2011) Modified Turkish delight: morcellized polyethylene dorsal graft for rhinoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40: 979–982. pmid:21514116