Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • The PLOS ONE Staff

Notice of Republication

This article was republished on May 27, 2014, to include Checklist S1, the PRISMA checklist, which was mistakenly omitted during the production process. The publisher apologizes for the error. Please download this article again to view the correct version. The originally published, uncorrected article and the republished, corrected article are provided here for reference.

Supporting Information

File S1.

Originally published, uncorrected article.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101068.s001

(PDF)

File S2.

Republished, corrected article.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101068.s002

(PDF)

Reference

  1. 1. Long Y, Yao D-s, Pan X-w, Ou T-y (2014) Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 9(4): e94116

Citation: The PLOS ONE Staff (2014) Correction: Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 9(6): e101068. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101068

Published: June 24, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 The PLOS ONE Staff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.