Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Exposure to Bisphenol-A during Pregnancy Partially Mimics the Effects of a High-Fat Diet Altering Glucose Homeostasis and Gene Expression in Adult Male Mice

  • Marta García-Arevalo,

    Affiliations Instituto de Bioingeniería, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica En Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas, CIBERDEM, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain

    ⨯
  • Paloma Alonso-Magdalena,

    Affiliations Departamento de Biología Aplicada, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica En Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas, CIBERDEM, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain

    ⨯
  • Junia Rebelo Dos Santos,

    Affiliations Instituto de Bioingeniería, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain, Departamento de Biologia Estructural e Funcional, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil

    ⨯
  • Ivan Quesada,

    Affiliations Instituto de Bioingeniería, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain, Departamento de Biología Aplicada, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica En Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas, CIBERDEM, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain

    ⨯
  • Everardo M. Carneiro,

    Affiliation Departamento de Biologia Estructural e Funcional, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil

    ⨯
  • Angel Nadal

    nadal@umh.es

    Affiliations Instituto de Bioingeniería, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica En Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas, CIBERDEM, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Elche, Spain

    ⨯

Abstract

Bisphenol-A (BPA) is one of the most widespread EDCs used as a base compound in the manufacture of polycarbonate plastics. The aim of our research has been to study how the exposure to BPA during pregnancy affects weight, glucose homeostasis, pancreatic β-cell function and gene expression in the major peripheral organs that control energy flux: white adipose tissue (WAT), the liver and skeletal muscle, in male offspring 17 and 28 weeks old. Pregnant mice were treated with a subcutaneous injection of 10 µg/kg/day of BPA or a vehicle from day 9 to 16 of pregnancy. One month old offspring were divided into four different groups: vehicle treated mice that ate a normal chow diet (Control group); BPA treated mice that also ate a normal chow diet (BPA); vehicle treated animals that had a high fat diet (HFD) and BPA treated animals that were fed HFD (HFD-BPA). The BPA group started to gain weight at 18 weeks old and caught up to the HFD group before week 28. The BPA group as well as the HFD and HFD-BPA ones presented fasting hyperglycemia, glucose intolerance and high levels of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) in plasma compared with the Control one. Glucose stimulated insulin release was disrupted, particularly in the HFD-BPA group. In WAT, the mRNA expression of the genes involved in fatty acid metabolism, Srebpc1, Pparα and Cpt1β was decreased by BPA to the same extent as with the HFD treatment. BPA treatment upregulated Pparγ and Prkaa1 genes in the liver; yet it diminished the expression of Cd36. Hepatic triglyceride levels were increased in all groups compared to control. In conclusion, male offspring from BPA-treated mothers presented symptoms of diabesity. This term refers to a form of diabetes which typically develops in later life and is associated with obesity.

Citation: García-Arevalo M, Alonso-Magdalena P, Rebelo Dos Santos J, Quesada I, Carneiro EM, Nadal A (2014) Exposure to Bisphenol-A during Pregnancy Partially Mimics the Effects of a High-Fat Diet Altering Glucose Homeostasis and Gene Expression in Adult Male Mice. PLoS ONE 9(6): e100214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214

Editor: Raul M. Luque, University of Cordoba, Spain

Received: January 10, 2014; Accepted: May 22, 2014; Published: June 24, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 Garcia-Arevalo et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This research was supported by grants from Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad grants, BFU2011-28358 and BFU2010-21773, and Generalitat Valenciana grants Prometeo/2011/080 and ACOMP/2010/113. The “Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabolicas Asociadas” is an initiative of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: Please note that co-author Angel Nadal is a member of the PLOS ONE editorial board. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE Editorial Policies and Criteria.

Introduction

Bisphenol-A BPA is a high production volume chemical, which is widely used in manufacturing polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins. Releases of BPA to the environment are higher than 1 million pounds per year (Environmental Protection Agency; http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/bpa.html). BPA is found in many dairy products, including food packaging, i.e: inner lining of cans, baby bottles, thermal paper, etc. [1]. When polycarbonate plastic is heated or treated with acid or basic media the ester bonds formed between each BPA monomer are hydrolyzed and BPA then migrates [2]. Because of its widespread use, BPA is found in the urine of 93% of US citizens [3] and its concentrations in urine and blood are as high as 1–18 nM [4].

Bisphenol-A exerts its actions by interfering with the endocrine system at different levels, although its role as an estrogen mimic is the best known one [5]. Using genetically modified mice, it has been demonstrated that it acts as a potent estrogenic compound after binding to extranuclear estrogen receptors, ERα and ERβ [6], [7], [8].

The etiology of type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is based on the decreased insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissue together with the disruption of pancreatic β-cell mass and function. Both genetic and environmental factors play key roles. Epidemiology has established robust associations of T2DM with obesity, age, sedentary life, economic status, ethnicity, smoking and exposure to endocrine disruptors [9], [10]. Exposure to bisphenol-A has been epidemiologically associated to T2DM, cardiovascular diseases, insulin resistance and obesity [11], [12], [13].

Animal studies indicate that exposure to BPA is involved in developmental alterations of the reproductive tract and nervous system, the incidence of cancer and also in metabolic disorders including type-2 diabetes and obesity [10], [14], [15], [16]. The timing of exposure is a key factor to obtain different metabolic phenotypes. In adult animals, the exposure to BPA provokes decreased food intake, lower body temperature and locomotive activity, glucose intolerance, insulin resistance and alterations of pancreatic beta cell function [17], [18]. Perinatal exposure elicits increased body weight, adiposity and alterations in glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity [19], [20], [21], [22]. A recent study indicates that the perinatal exposure of rats to low doses of BPA increases weight gain and exacerbates the effect of a high fat diet on glucose homeostasis and β-cell function [20]. In mice, exposure to BPA during pregnancy induced hyperinsulinaemia, glucose intolerance and insulin resistance in 6 month old male offspring [23], [24].

In our research, pregnant mice were exposed to a vehicle or BPA 10 µg/kg/day and one month old male offspring were fed either a normal diet (ND) or a high fat diet (HFD) for 13 or 24 weeks. We then studied body weight change, glucose homeostasis, glucose stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) and insulin content as well as gene expression in active metabolic tissue: white adipose tissue, liver and skeletal muscle.

Materials and Methods

Animals and treatment

Pregnant OF-1 mice were purchased from Charles River (Barcelona, Spain) and individually housed under standard conditions. Mice were maintained on 2014 Teklad Global 14% Protein Rodent Maintenance Diet (Harlan Laboratories, Barcelona, Spain), which does not contain alfalfa or soybean meal (chow diet). The composition of the diet is as follows: calories from protein, 18%; calories from fat, 11%; and calories from carbohydrate, 71%, with energy of 2.9 kcal/g.

The ethical committee of Miguel Hernandez University “Comisión de Ética en la Investigación Experimental” specifically reviewed and approved this study (approval ID: IB-AN-001-11). Animals were treated humanely and with regard to alleviate suffering.

BPA was dissolved in tocopherol-stripped corn oil and administered subcutaneously on days 9–16 of gestation. The daily dose used was 10 µg/kg. Pups of the same treatment group were pooled together and then placed in equal numbers with foster mothers of the same treatment group. Animals were weaned on postnatal day 21 and housed (8 mice/group) from weaning through adulthood in type III cage of polycarbonate plastic (Tecniplast), 530 cm2. We used new cages to avoid BPA release as much as possible. Pups housed together were of the same sex. After the age of one month, they were maintained, ad libitum, during 13 or 24 weeks on a chow diet or High Fat Diet (HFD), D12451, (Research Diets Inc., New Brunswick, NJ, USA.). Experiments were performed when mice were 17 or 28 weeks of age. The composition of the diet is as follows: calories from protein, 20%; calories from fat, 45%, and calories from carbohydrate, 35%, with energy of 4.7 kcal/g. We should consider that, minor differences in the composition exist between a chow diet and the corresponding control low-fat diet for the HFD. Composition of diets may determine changes in gene expression, however, differences between chow diet and HFD or control low-fat diet and HFD are low.

Only male offspring was used in this study since previous work from our group demonstrated that under the same BPA treatment no differences on glucose homeostasis were found in the female offspring, at least during the analyzed period of life.

Islet cell isolation

Pancreatic islets of Langerhans were isolated by collagenase (Sigma, Madrid, Spain) digestion (modified from [25]). The solution used for the isolation of the islets of Langerhans contained (in mmol/l): 115 NaCl, 10 NaHCO3, 5 KCl, 1.1 MgCl2, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 2.5 CaCl2, 25 HEPES, and 5 D-glucose, pH 7.4, as well as 0.25% BSA. Freshly isolated islets were used for calcium and insulin secretion measurements after 2 hours of recovery.

Glucose and insulin tolerance tests

For intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests (ipGTT), animals were fasted for 6 h [26], and blood samples were obtained from the tail vein. Animals were then injected intraperitoneally with 1.5 g/kg body weight of glucose, and blood samples were taken at the indicated intervals.

For intraperitoneal insulin tolerance tests (ipITT), fed animals were used. Animals were injected intraperitoneally with 0.75 IU/kg body weight of soluble insulin, and blood samples were obtained from the tail vein. Blood glucose was measured in each sample using an Accu-check compact glucometer (Roche, Madrid, Spain). Levels of glycemia after insulin injection are expressed as % of glycemia compared to basal glycemia levels in fed state.

ipGTT and ipITT were made at 17 and 28 weeks of age.

Serum analysis

Blood samples were collected for biochemical analysis at decapitation in fed state animals. Serum samples were obtained by centrifugation for 15 minutes at 1200 rpm at 4°C. Samples were stored at −80°C. The serum insulin level was analyzed by Ultra Sensitive Mouse Insulin ELISA Kit (Crystal Chem, Downers Grove, IL). Serum glycerol and triglyceride levels were measured by Serum Triglyceride Determination kit (TR0100, Sigma). Non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs) were measured using a NEFA-HR(2) kit for serum determination (Wako).

Insulin secretion and content

Freshly isolated islets were left to recover in the isolation medium for 2 h in the incubator at 37°C. After recovery, groups of 5 were transferred to 400 µl of a buffer solution containing 140 mM NaCl, 4.5 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 20 mM HEPES and the corresponding glucose concentration (3, 8 or 16 mM) with final pH at 7.4. Afterwards, 100 µl of the buffer solution with the corresponding glucose concentration with 5% BSA was added, incubated at room temperature for 3 min and left to cool down for 15 min on ice. Then, the medium was collected and insulin was measured in duplicate samples by radioimmunoassay using a Coat-a-Count kit (Siemens, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Protein concentration was measured by the Bradford dye method [27].

To obtain the insulin content, the islets grouped in batches of 5 were handpicked with a micropipette and incubated overnight in an ethanol/HCl buffer (75% Ethanol (v/v); 0.4% HCl (stock 37%) (v/v) and 24.6% distilled water (v/v)) at 4°C. At the end of the incubation period, the buffer was removed and studied for insulin content using radioimmunoassay with a Coat-a-Count kit. Protein determination was performed using the Bradford dye method. Insulin and protein content was determined in each islet sample and the ratio of both parameters was calculated for each sample.

Real-time PCR

Quantitative PCR assays were performed using CFX96 Real Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and 7500 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). RNA extraction was made with TriPure Isolation Reagent (Roche), and 1 µg of RNA was used for retrotranscription reaction (HighCapacity cDNA Reverse transcription, Applied Biosystems). Reactions were carried out in a final volume of 10 µl, containing 200 nM of each primer, 1 µl of cDNA, and 1×IQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). Samples were subjected to the following conditions: 10 min at 95°C, 40 cycles (10 s at 95°C, 7 s at 60°C, and 12 s at 72°C), and a melting curve of 63–95°C with a slope of 0.1 C/s. The housekeeping gene was ribosomal protein large P0, also known as 36B4, and it was used as the endogenous control for quantification [28]. The resulting values were analyzed with CFX Manager Version 1.6 (Bio-Rad), and values were expressed as the relative expression respect to control levels (2−ΔΔCT) [29]. Primers are described in Table S1.

Triglycerides extraction and quantification in liver

Liver tissue (100 mg) was homogenized and then added 500 µL of SDS 0.1% in an eppendorf tube. The mixture was homogenized again and was left shaking overnight at room temperature. Then 400 µL of the mix were transferred to a new tube, a volume of methanol was added and the sample was mixed. After that, 800 µL of chloroform were added and the mixture was incubated during 30 min on ice. Then 48 µL of KCl 0.5 M were added and the mixture was incubated during 30 min on ice. The sample was then centrifuged for 10 min at 2000 rpm at 4°C. The organic phase was transferred to an eppendorf tube and the chloroform was let to evaporate overnight. Finally the extract was resuspended with 100% Ethanol and triglycerides were measured by using the Triglyceride Determination kit (TR0100, Sigma).

Recording intracellular calcium concentrations

Freshly isolated islets of Langerhans were loaded with 5 µM Fura-2 AM for at least 1 h at room temperature. Calcium recordings in islets were obtained by imaging intracellular calcium under an inverted epifluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Axiovert 200). Images were acquired every 2 s with an extended Hamamatsu Digital Camera C4742-95 (Hamamatsu Photonics, Barcelona, Spain) using a dual filter wheel (Sutter Instrument CO, CA, USA) equipped with 340 nm and 380 nm, 10 nm bandpass filters (Omega optics, Madrid, Spain). Data was acquired using Aquacosmos software from Hamamatsu (Hamamatsu Photonics, Barcelona, Spain). Fluorescence changes are expressed as the ratio of fluorescence at 340 nm and 380 nm (F340/F380). Results were plotted and analyzed using commercially available software (Sigmaplot, Jandel Scientific).

Statistical analysis

SigmaStat 3.1 software (Systat Software, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. To assess differences between treatment groups for each exposure paradigm, we used the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Holm-Sidak or Tukey method. When data did not pass the parametric test, we used ANOVA on ranks followed by Dunn's test. Results were considered significant at p<0.05. Data are shown as mean ± SEM.

Results

The effects of BPA on weight, food intake, retroperitoneal and gonadal fat pad weight and plasma NEFA

To examine the effects of BPA on the glucose metabolism of offspring, we treated pregnant mice with either a vehicle or BPA at a dose of 10 µg/kg/day on GD9–GD16. Throughout the groups, animals were matched for gestation day to minimize potential differences in the background levels of maternal hormones during the last phase of pregnancy. One month old mice were exposed to a normal chow diet (ND) or a high fat diet (HFD) for 13 weeks or 24 weeks. In total, we had 4 different groups for each age: vehicle treated animals fed ND (Control), animals exposed to 10 µg/kg/day of BPA fed ND (BPA), vehicle treated animals fed a HFD (HFD) and animals exposed to 10 µg/kg/day of BPA fed a HFD (HFD-BPA).

Body weights (BWs) at birth was diminished in BPA-treated mice (data not shown). BWs from the different groups were measured weekly starting at the age of 4 weeks (Figure 1A). HFD and HFD-BPA groups presented a higher weight than those fed a ND during the whole treatment. Remarkably, those in the BPA group started to gain more weight in the 18th week compared with the Control and from that point on their weight increased until it became similar to that of the HFD and HFD-BPA groups (figure 1A). The weight increase of the BPA group was not significantly different when compared with the rest of the groups using ANOVA either at the age of 17 weeks or 28 weeks (Figure 1B and C). However, at the age of 28 weeks, it was significantly different when compared with the Control as shown by the use of student's t-test (Figure 1C). Calorie intake remained unchanged in BPA mice compared with the Control group throughout the study (Figure 1D and E), yet it was increased in HFD and HFD-BPA groups compared with Control (Figure 1D and E) and remarkably, in HFD-BPA compared with HFD when they were 28 weeks old (Figure 1E).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. Body weight and calorie intake in the four study groups.

A) Body weight evolution from 4 weeks to 28 weeks old. Animals were started on the HFD at 4 weeks. Arrows indicate weeks 17 and 28, the age when experiments were done (n = 150 animals from 26 litters). B) Body weight of offspring from the four different groups at 17 weeks (Control n = 46 animals from 8 litters, BPA n = 28 from 5 litters, HFD n = 38 from 8 litters and HFD-BPA n = 30 from 5 litters). C) Body weight of offspring from the four different groups at 28 weeks (Control n = 19 animals from 8 litters, BPA n = 15 from 5 litters, HFD n = 26 from 8 litters and HFD-BPA n = 15 from 5 litters), *P<0.01 Student's t-test compared to Control. D) Food intake for the four different groups compared at 17 weeks old (n = 142 animals from 26 litters) E) Food intake for the four different groups compared at 28 weeks old (n = 75 animals from 26 litters). Data are expressed as mean±SEM. Significance by one way ANOVA followed by Tukey, Holm-sidak or Dann's method, p<0.05. b compares control vs. HFD, c control vs. HFD-BPA, d HFD vs. BPA, e HFD vs. HFD-BPA, f BPA vs. HFD-BPA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.g001

By the age of 17 weeks the HFD animals were observed to have significant differences in both the perigonadal and retroperitoneal fat pad weights compared with the rest of the groups. It should be noted that the HFD-BPA group presented a diminished perigonadal and retroperitoneal fat pad weight compared with the HFD one (Figure 2A and B). Later, at the age of 28 weeks, perigonadal fat pad weight was significantly increased in the BPA group compared with the Control (Figure 2C). As for the retroperitoneal fat pad; its weight was increased in the HFD group compared with the rest of the groups and despite being higher in the HFD-BPA group than in the Control one, it was significantly lower compared with the HFD group (Figure 2D). No significant differences were observed with BPA treatment in the weight of the liver and gastrocnemius muscle (Figure S1).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Adipose tissue weight and plasma NEFA levels in offspring.

A) Perigonadal and B) Retroperitoneal fat depots, expressed as % of body weight at 17 weeks old (n = 8 animals from 5–8 litters). C) Perigonadal and D) Retroperitoneal fat depots, expressed as % of body weight at 28 weeks old. (n = 6–8 animals from 5–8 litters). E) Plasma Nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs) levels at 17 weeks old (n = 7–9 animals from 7 litters) and F) 28 weeks old (n≥5 animals from 4–7 litters). Data are expressed in mean ±SEM; significance p<0.05 by one way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak or Dunnett's method; a control vs. BPA; b control vs. HFD, c control vs. HFD-BPA, d HFD vs. BPA, e HFD vs. HFD-BPA, f BPA vs. HFD-BPA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.g002

Plasma non esterified fatty acid (NEFA) levels were increased in all groups, BPA, HFD and HFD-BPA compared with the control group at 17 and 28 weeks old (Figure 2E and F).

Glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity

In 17-week-old animals, a difference in fasting blood glucose levels was observed between the control group and the rest of the groups (table 1 and figure 3A). Remarkably, the BPA group was hyperglycemic in the fasted state compared with the control while no significant differences were found between the BPA, HFD and HFD-BPA groups (Table 1 and Figure 3A). In the fed state, no significant differences were found in glucose levels and plasma insulin between the 4 different groups using ANOVA one way (Table 1). The BPA, HFD and HFD-BPA groups presented higher insulin levels compared with the control one when each condition was compared with the control using student's t-test (p<0.05) and presented a high tendency when Kruskal-Wallis one way ANOVA on ranks was used (p<0.1). In 17 week old mice, glucose tolerance was impaired in the HFD and HFD-BPA groups compared with the Control, while HFD and HFD-BPA presented no significant difference (Figure 3A, see inset). The BPA group showed a tendency to be glucose intolerant although no significant differences were found compared with the Control (Figure 3A, see inset). When we used an intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test (ipITT) to study insulin sensitivity, no change was obtained between the 4 different groups (Figure 3B).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 3. BPA, HFD and HFD-BPA groups exhibit hyperglycaemia and glucose intolerance.

A) ipGTT were performed on the four groups at 17 weeks old. The inset shows mean±SEM of the ipGTT Area Under the Curve (n≥6 animals from ≥6 litters). B) ipITT in 17 week old animals (n≥6 animals from ≥6 litters) C) ipGTT were performed on the four groups at 28 weeks old. The inset shows mean±SEM of the ipGTT Area Under the Curve (n≥12 animals from ≥6 litters). D) ipITT in 28 week old animal. (n≥11 animals from ≥6 litters). Data are expressed in mean±SEM. Significance P<0.05 by one way ANOVA followed by Tukey or Dunnett's method; a control vs. BPA; b control vs. HFD, c control vs. HFD-BPA, d HFD vs. BPA, e HFD vs. HFD-BPA, f BPA vs. HFD-BPA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.g003

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Plasma hormones and metabolite levels in offspring at the age of 17 weeks.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.t001

In 28-week-old animals, the BPA group presented hyperglycaemia in contrast to the control group (Table 2 and Figure 3C). Moreover, the AUC of the BPA and HFD groups were significantly different compared with the control one but presented no significant difference when compared with each other (figure 3C, inset). In the fed state, no statistically significant difference was observed in plasma glucose and insulin levels (table 2), although a high tendency towards hyperinsulinaemia was seen in the BPA group. Insulin sensitivity had a tendency to be impaired in all groups compared with the Control one, yet no significant differences were obtained during the first 45 minutes after injecting insulin (Figure 3D). When comparing just Control and HFD conditions we found statistically significant differences in the glycemia levels in response to insulin (Figure S3).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Plasma hormones and metabolite levels in 28 week old offspring.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.t002

The change induced by HFD on glucose tolerance seems to be more pronounced at 17 than at 28 weeks of age, we believe this could be related to a deterioration of glucose tolerance in vehicle treated mice with age.

In summary, these experiments pointed to the fact that animals treated with BPA had an impaired glucose tolerance when compared with the Control. Remarkably, the phenotype of the BPA group resembles that of HFD mice.

The effect of BPA on glucose stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) and insulin content

Islets from adult offspring whose mothers were treated with BPA during pregnancy, feeding with either HFD or ND, presented an increased insulin secretion in response to basal levels of glucose, 3 mM, (Figure 4A inset) as well as in response to stimulatory glucose levels, 16 mM at 17 weeks old (Figure 4A). HFD treated animals presented an increase of GSIS similar to that found in the BPA group, even though basal insulin secretion at 3 mM of glucose was not increased. The HFD-BPA group showed an enhanced insulin release in response to 3 and 8 mM of glucose when compared to the control but a diminished GSIS in response to 16 mM of glucose when compared with the BPA group, which suggests that BPA exposure may have a detrimental action on high glucose stimulated insulin secretion when combined with a HFD.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 4. Glucose-induced insulin secretion from isolated islets.

A) Insulin secretion from islets exposed to 3, 8 and 16 mM glucose for 1 hour, in animals from the four different groups at the age of 17 weeks. (n≥9 experiments with 7 animals from 7 litters). The inset shows the insulin release when islets were exposed to 3 mM of glucose. B) Insulin secretion from islets exposed to 3, 8 and 16 mM of glucose for 1 hour, in animals from the four different groups at the age of 28 weeks (n≥6 experiments with ≥6 animals from ≥6 litters). C) Insulin content from isolated islets at the age of 17 weeks (n≥10 experiments with 7 animals from 7 litters). D) Insulin content from isolated islets at 28 weeks (n≥8 experiments with ≥6 animals from ≥6 litters). Data are expressed in mean±SEM, p<0.05 by one way ANOVA followed by Tukey, Dunnet or Dunn's method; a control vs. BPA; b control vs. HFD, c control vs. HFD-BPA, d HFD vs. BPA, e HFD vs. HFD-BPA, f BPA vs. HFD-BPA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.g004

No difference in insulin secretion between the BPA and Control groups was obtained in 28-week-old animals, yet the HFD and HFD-BPA groups showed a significantly diminished GSIS when compared with the control and BPA groups. Notably, insulin release in response to 8 and 16 mM of glucose was decreased in the HFD-BPA group compared with the HFD one (Figure 4B). This result indicates that GSIS was progressively worsened by HFD in offspring whose mothers were exposed to BPA during pregnancy and therefore, the effect of HFD was exacerbated by intra uterine BPA exposure (Figure 4B).

At the age of 17 weeks, islet insulin content was significantly higher in the BPA and HFD-BPA groups compared with the Control one, however, the Control and HFD groups did not present differences (Figure 4C). At the age of 28 weeks, the situation was different. There were no significant differences between the Control, BPA and HFD-BPA groups and the HFD group presented an insulin content slightly diminished compared with the Control (Figure 4D).

In order to evaluate if the stimulus-secretion pathway was altered, glucose induced Ca2+ signaling was monitored. In 17 week old animals, [Ca2+]i oscillations induced by 8 and 16 mM of glucose were unaltered in all the measured conditions (Figure S1 A–C). In 28 week old animals fed a ND, the BPA group presented a higher [Ca2+]i response to 16 mM of glucose (Figure S2) which was blunted in HFD animals.

The effects of BPA on gene expression in white adipose tissue, liver and skeletal muscle

White adipose tissue (WAT), the liver and skeletal muscle are key organs involved in the metabolism of lipids and carbohydrates. We measured the changes in the expression of several metabolic genes involved in lipogenesis, fatty acid uptake, fatty acid oxidation and glucose uptake and metabolism at the age of 17 weeks. This age was chosen because it was just prior to the moment when weight increases. Therefore, the observed changes may have been involved in the process of weight increase.

In WAT (perigonadal pad), a significant decrease in Srebp1c (Figure 5A), Pparα and Cpt1β (Figure 5C) mRNA levels was found in the BPA group compared with the Control. In the case of Srebp1c and Pparα, the changes in BPA were equal to those found in HFD. Acacα and Cd36 expression tended to decrease (Figure 5A and B) although the results were not statistically significant. Fas expression was suppressed in the HFD and HFD-BPA groups to the same extent, which was expected as a consequence of the decrease in Srebpc1 expression. Remarkably, Fas mRNA expression was not modified in the BPA group compared with the Control (Figure 5A). Hexokinase mRNA expression was markedly down regulated by HFD-BPA compared to Control (Figure 5D).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 5. mRNA gene expression associated with A) Lipogenesis, B) Fatty Acid Uptake, C) Fatty Acid Oxidation and D) Glucose Uptake and Metabolism, in White Adipose Tissue (WAT) from Control (n≥5 animals from ≥5 litters), BPA (n≥5 animals from ≥5 litters), HFD (n≥5animals from ≥5 litters) and HFD-BPA (n≥5 animals from ≥5 litters) dams at 17 weeks old.

Animals were treated with HFD at week 4. Gene expression was assessed by real-time RT-PCR. Data are expressed as mean±SEM and statistical significance was determined using one way ANOVA followed by Tukey, Duncans or Dunn's method. Significance p<0.05; a compared control vs. BPA; b control vs. HFD, c control vs. HFD-BPA, d HFD vs. BPA, e HFD vs. HFD-BPA, f BPA vs. HFD-BPA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.g005

In the liver, mRNA levels of Pparγ were increased in BPA treated mice, which differed from what was observed in the HFD and HFD-BPA groups that remained the same as the Control (Figure 6A). The mRNA expression of Cd36 involved in FA uptake was significantly decreased in the BPA and HFD-BPA groups compared with the Control and HFD (Figure 6B). Acacβ levels were highly increased in BPA group; an opposite effect to the one produced in the HFD and HFD-BPA groups (Figure 6C) yet the difference was not significant compared with the control. The relative expression of Prkaa, the AMPK gene, was significantly increased in the BPA group and showed a tendency to increase in the HFD and HFD-BPA groups (Figure 6D). Pparα and Pepck expression, involved in fatty acid oxidation and gluconeogenesis was not significantly changed by any of the treatments (Figure 6C, D). In view of these results we measured the hepatic levels of triglycerides. We found an increase in all groups of animals compared to control one. This increase was more pronounced in the HFD group but we also found a significant increment in the BPA group (Figure 6E).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 6. mRNA gene expression associated with A) Lipogenesis, B) Fatty Acid and Glucose Uptake, C) Fatty Acid Oxidation and D) Glucose Metabolism, in the liver from Control (n≥5animals from ≥5 litters), BPA (n≥5 animals from ≥5 litters), HFD (n≥5 animals from ≥5 litters) and HFD-BPA (n≥5 animals from ≥5 litters) dams at the age of 17 weeks.

Animals started to be treated with HFD at the age of 4 weeks. Gene expression was assessed by real-time RT-PCR. E) Hepatic trygliceride content from Control (n≥5animals from ≥5 litters), BPA (n≥5 animals from ≥5 litters), HFD (n≥5 animals from ≥5 litters) and HFD-BPA (n≥5 animals from ≥5 litters) dams at the age of 17 weeks. Data are expressed as mean±SEM and statistical significance was determined using one way ANOVA followed by Tukey or Dunn's method. Significance p<0.05; a compares control vs. BPA; b control vs. HFD, c control vs. HFD-BPA, d HFD vs. BPA, e HFD vs. HFD-BPA, f BPA vs. HFD-BPA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.g006

In skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius), the mRNA levels of the transcription factor involved in fatty acid oxidation, Pparα and Acox1β were markedly up regulated by HFD. A tendency to increase was present in the BPA and HFD-BPA groups although the difference was not statistically significant. Remarkably, the increase in Cpt1α induced by HFD was completely abrogated in the HFD-BPA group (Figure 7A). The levels of hexokinase as well as those of Cd36 increased significantly only in the HFD group (Figure 7B). No significant changes were observed in Glut 4 and AMPK (Figure 7B).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 7. mRNA gene expression associated with A) Fatty Acid Oxidation and B) Fatty Acid and Glucose Uptake and Metabolism, in Skeletal Muscle from Control (n≥5 animals from ≥5 litters), BPA (n≥5 animals from ≥5 litters), HFD (n≥5 animals from ≥5 litters) and HFD-BPA (n≥5 animals from ≥5 litters) dams at the age of 17 weeks.

Animals started to be treated with HFD at week 4. Gene expression was assessed by real-time RT-PCR. Data are expressed as mean±SEM and statistical significance was determined using one way ANOVA followed by Duncan or Dunn's method. Significance p<0.05; a compared control vs. BPA; b control vs. HFD, c control vs. HFD-BPA, d HFD vs. BPA, e HFD vs. HFD-BPA, f BPA vs. HFD-BPA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.g007

Discussion

The exposure to endocrine disrupters has been unveiled as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Numerous evidence exists in animal and epidemiological studies to establish a link between EDC exposure and T2D [10], [30], [31], [32]. These endocrine disruptors include persistent organic pollutants, heavy metals and plastic components such as phthalates and bisphenol-A, among others that are presently emerging. In addition, other EDCs have been described as obesogenic, such as tributyltin, triflumizole [33], [34] and DES [35], [36].

The present study together with previous observations [20], [23], [24], [37] have demonstrated that the exposure to low doses of BPA during pregnancy alters glucose homeostasis in male offspring. We have demonstrated here that glucose homeostasis and mRNA expression of genes involved in the glucose and lipid metabolism in WAT, liver and skeletal muscle are altered by prenatal exposure to BPA in a similar manner to that of HFD fed animals unexposed to BPA. Moreover, some important HFD effects were worsened by BPA exposure.

The body weight of BPA animals reached levels comparable to those of HFD at 20 weeks. This was unexpected, because previous work from our group had not registered an increase in weight using the same treatment (days 9–16 of pregnancy) [23]. The reason for this difference is unknown. It is possible that the use of different animals (from the same strain) or small unpredicted differences in the batches of diet food may have had an influence on the results. It is of note that at week 17, 2 mice/cage were removed, so the cage density changed from 8mice/group to 6 mice/group. This is, however, unlikely to affect weight only in the BPA-treated group, because this change was performed in all groups including control. In a recent article, a non-monotonic relationship between BPA exposure during pregnancy and weight increase in offspring was reported [24]. Only those animals whose mothers were exposed to BPA 500 µg/kg/day presented a significant higher weight at the age of 18 weeks. It is plausible that the difference in the levels of BPA to which fetuses are exposed may change from one experiment to another and might be responsible for the variations in weight increase. In any case, new experiments are required to unequivocally solve the question of whether exposure during pregnancy is critical to elicit weight increase later in life. There is more evidence; however, to suggest that perinatal exposure (during pregnancy and lactation) to BPA, increases body weight in mice [19], [38], [39] and rats [20], [40]. Therefore, BPA exposure during the lactation period may be critical to induce obesity later in life [41]. In humans, evidence has been recently published suggesting an association between urinary BPA levels in children and obesity [42], yet more studies are needed to establish a solid link.

Perigonadal fat pad weight increased with BPA at 28 weeks. Surprisingly in the HFD-BPA group the weight of the perigonadal fat pad, was decreased at 17 and 28 weeks without a change in the total body weight. Notably, perigonadal fat mass was increased in the BPA group, a phenomenon that will be explored in the future. In all cases, NEFA levels were highly increased at both ages when compared with the Control. High NEFA levels in plasma are a risk factor for metabolic syndrome and induce β-cell death [43], [44], [45], [46]. Fasted glucose levels were also increased to the same extent at 17 weeks in the BPA, HFD and HFD-BPA groups. High glucose levels together with high levels of NEFAs, could be partly responsible not only for the increase in glucose stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in the BPA and HFD groups at 17 weeks as a compensatory response, but for the subsequent decrease of GSIS at 28 weeks because of glucolipotoxicity. Interestingly, this decrease was clearly potentiated by BPA in the HFD-BPA group, indicating that BPA may exacerbate the effect of HFD on pancreatic β-cell function. These different processes have been described when the compensatory adaptive state progresses to diabetes in obese individuals [44], [47], [48], [49], [50].

BPA exposure during pregnancy predispossed offspring to develop glucose intolerance when a glucose tolerance test was performed after 6 h fasting. At 17 weeks of age the group of animals that have been treated with HFD are already glucose intolerance, meanwhile BPA showed a clear tendency to that. At 28 weeks of age, BPA mice presented glucose intolerance to the same extent that HFD group. No difference was obtained between the HFD and HFD-BPA groups, unlike what was described in rats in which perinatal exposure to BPA exacerbated the action of HFD in male offspring [20].

No differences in insulin sensitivity among the groups were reported, a slightly different result to the one described in Alonso-Magdalena et al [23]. In that report, animals exposed to 10 µg/kg/day presented glucose intolerance and insulin resistance while those exposed to 100 µg/kg/day were glucose intolerant with no change in insulin sensitivity. These results suggested that BPA exposure and insulin sensitivity could be related in a non-monotonic dose dependent manner. Recently, Angle et al [24], have demonstrated the existence of this non-monotonic relationship using a full range of BPA doses. Insulin sensitivity decreased at 5 and 5000 µg/kg/day of BPA but remained normal at 50, 500 and 50000 µg/kg/day of BPA. Non-monotonic dose responses are a general phenomenon that occurs with some EDCs, including BPA [51]. Therefore, fetuses may be exposed to different BPA levels in blood depending on the mother's BPA metabolism, on whether BPA is administered: by injection, gavage or using a micropipetter among other variables. Small variations in the real dose of BPA may exist between one experiment and another. This might be responsible for the differences in insulin sensitivity, weight changes and other endpoints found in different reports. It is worth noting, however, that in most of the published studies, pregnancy and perinatal BPA exposure worsened glucose tolerance at any of the concentrations assayed from 5 and 50000 µg/kg/day [20], [23], [24], [37], [52]. Exposure to lower levels 2.5 ng/kg/day produced no effect on glucose tolerance [53].

When mRNA expression of key genes in WAT, liver and skeletal muscle was studied, the most significant changes appeared in WAT and the liver. In WAT, BPA imitated HFD in decreasing the transcription factor Srebp1c, which is involved in the regulation of lipid biosynthesis in animal cells and plays an important role in the regulation of lipogenic enzyme gene expression [54]. The main lipogenic enzymes controlled by Srebp1c are acetyl-CoA carboxylase (Acc) and fatty acid synthase (Fas). Here the mRNAexpression levels of both enzymes were decreased due to HFD treatment but not because of the exposure to BPA. Thus, it seems that an alternative mechanism may exist to regulate Fas gene expression in the BPA group.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (Pparα) is a dietary lipid sensor whose activation results in hypolipidemic effects and mediates the expression of genes promoting fatty acid beta-oxidation. BPA exposure decreases Pparα expression in WAT to the same extent as HFD. A decrease in Pparα should result in a reduced capacity to metabolize long-chain fatty acids, an effect reported in Pparα KO mice, that contributes to both increased adipose tissue stores with aging and to the obese phenotype of these mice [55]. In the present study, the decrease in Pparα occurs simultaneously with a decrease in carnitine palmitoyltransferase1β (Cpt1β) mRNA expression, particularly in the BPA group. Cpt1β is involved in mitochondrial fatty acid uptake and catalyzes the rate-limiting step of fatty acid oxidation. The transcription of Cpt1 is regulated by a number of factors, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α, glucocorticoids, and insulin [56]. Its decrease in WAT could result in a lower rate of fatty acids delivery to other peripheral tissues; mainly the liver. Additionally, it could contribute to an increase in weight. This would explain why BPA treatment during pregnancy induced a decreased expression in key genes such as Srebpc1, Pparα and Cpt1β in offspring to the same extent as HFD during 13 weeks.

In the liver, BPA specifically increases Pparγ and AMPK expression and decreases the expression of Cd36. Pparγ expression in the liver is much lower than in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue [57], [58] but it may have a pivotal role because it controls the expression of genes associated with lipid metabolism. An increase in PPARγ expression by BPA may increase hepatic fat accumulation [57]. Indeed we do observe an increase of triglycerides content in the liver of BPA animals compared to control group. The expression of Cd36 was highly decreased by exposure to BPA, contrary to the lack of its effect in the HFD group. Cd36 is a fatty acid transport protein whose increased expression in the liver contributes to dyslipidemia before the onset of type 2 diabetes [59]. In our study, Cd36 expression decreased in the BPA and HFD-BPA groups. This might reduce fatty acid uptake and thereby contribute to the increase in NEFA levels in plasma as is the case in CD36 KO mice with higher plasma triglyceride and NEFA levels [60]. AMPK mRNA levels were elevated in the BPA group. AMPK is a fuel sensor protein that inhibits anabolic pathways and activates catabolic pathways in the liver. Over activity of hepatic AMPK has a net effect of increasing fat oxidation and decreasing the rate of glucose oxidation [61], [62]. Because of its favorable global metabolic effects when activated, the higher expression of AMPK found in the present study may be a compensating mechanism to counteract the hyperglycaemia detected in the BPA, HFD and HFD-BPA groups, which probably is due to an incomplete blockade of liver gluconeogenesis.

In the skeletal muscle, HFD provoked a downregulation of Pparα and Acox1β gene expression, yet BPA produced no significant effect by itself.

During the last decade, environmentally relevant concentrations of Bisphenol-A have been demonstrated to alter pancreatic beta cell function [6], [63], [64], [65] and liver metabolism [66], [67] and to induce insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia in adult mice [17], [18]. Perinatal or pregnancy exposure to BPA elicited weight increase and adipocity in offspring [20], [24], [38], [39], [40]; altered glucose tolerance [20], [23], [24], [37], [52] and insulin sensitivity [23], [24], [37]. Our research has demonstrated that exposure to an environmentally relevant dose of BPA during pregnancy, alters the expression of important genes involved in lipogenesis and fatty acid oxidation in adipocytes as well as fatty acid uptake in the liver. These alterations are associated with increased NEFA levels in plasma which are a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. In fact, animals exposed to BPA that were fed a HFD during 24 weeks had a deteriorated GSIS compared to HFD fed animals. Moreover, BPA treatment worsened the HFD effect on GSIS indicating that exposure to BPA exacerbates the deleterious action of HFD in the pancreatic β-cell. Phenotypically, mice treated with BPA presented higher body weight, fasted hyperglycaemia and altered glucose tolerance. These parameters were not aggravated by HFD. Therefore, these mice suffered primary symptoms of diabesity, a term used to refer to a form of diabetes which typically develops in later life and is associated with being obese. Whether human exposure to bisphenol-A is high enough to cause similar actions to those found in animals is still a matter of debate [68]. In any case, the dose of BPA used in the present study (10 µg/kg/day), is clearly below the referenced dose established by the EPA (50 µg/kg/day) [69]. As regards its potential translation to a reasonable exposition dose in humans, recent studies have suggested that the average adult is exposed to concentrations of BPA, in the range of 0.4–1.5 µg BPA/kg BW per day [70], [71]. However, after exhaustively reviewing all available human studies, scientists have reported that daily intake of BPA should be higher than initially thought and that, approximately 500 µg/kg/day would be required to account for the reported levels of BPA in adults [72]. Human exposure to BPA is variable but it has been measured in several studies and the central tendency is that unconjugated levels of BPA in humans are in the 0.3–4.4 ng/mL range in tissues and fluids in fetuses, children and adults; which exceed the circulating levels extrapolated from acute exposure studies in laboratory animals [73].

Above of that we must bear in mind that we are all exposed to a mixture of endocrine disruptors, including bisphenol-A, phthalates and persistent organic pollutants, which have been associated to type 2 diabetes and other metabolic alterations in human epidemiological studies. These EDCs may have additive effects in humans [74]. Although this possibility needs further exploration, it makes the exposure to EDC a real threat for metabolic disorders.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Liver and gastrocnemius muscle weights. A) Liver and B) gastrocnemius muscle weight, both expressed as % of body weight at the age of 17 weeks. (n≥6 animals from ≥5 litters). C) Liver and D) gastrocnemius muscle weight, both expressed as % of body weight at 28 weeks. (n≥8 animals from ≥5 litters). Data are expressed in mean ±SEM, *p<0.05 BPA vs all conditions by one way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's method.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Calcium response to increased glucose concentration in isolated islets of animals exposed to BPA in uterus. A) [Ca2+]i response of a representative islet of Langerhans in response to 3, 8 and 16 mM glucose applied for 5, 11 and 11 min, respectively. B) Area under curve (AUC) was done during 10 min period in 8 mM glucose and C) in 16 mM of glucose in 17 week old offspring. D) Area under curve (AUC) during 10 min period in 8 mM of glucose and E) in 16 mM of glucose in 28 week old offspring. (n≥5 islets from ≥4 animals from ≥4 litters). Data are expressed in mean±SEM and analyzed by one way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak; *p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

Insulin sensitivity is decreased in HFD animals compared to control at 28 weeks of age. ipITT was performed in animals fed with HFD or chow diet during 24 weeks (n≥11 animals from ≥6 litters). Data are expressed in mean±SEM. Significance P<0.05 by t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.s003

(TIF)

Table S1.

Real time PCR primers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.s004

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Maria Luisa Navarro and Salomé Ramón for their excellent technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AN PAM MGA EMC IQ. Performed the experiments: MGA PAM. Analyzed the data: MGA PAM JR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AN EMC IQ. Wrote the paper: AN.

References

  1. 1. Talsness CE, Andrade AJ, Kuriyama SN, Taylor JA, vom Saal FS (2009) Components of plastic: experimental studies in animals and relevance for human health. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364: 2079–2096.
  2. 2. Welshons WV, Nagel SC, vom Saal FS (2006) Large effects from small exposures. III. Endocrine mechanisms mediating effects of bisphenol A at levels of human exposure. Endocrinology 147: S56–69.
  3. 3. Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, Reidy JA, Needham LL (2008) Exposure of the U.S. population to bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003–2004. Environ Health Perspect 116: 39–44.
  4. 4. Vandenberg LN, Hauser R, Marcus M, Olea N, Welshons WV (2007) Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA). Reprod Toxicol 24: 139–177.
  5. 5. Wetherill YB, Akingbemi BT, Kanno J, McLachlan JA, Nadal A, et al. (2007) In vitro molecular mechanisms of bisphenol A action. Reprod Toxicol 24: 178–198.
  6. 6. Alonso-Magdalena P, Ropero AB, Carrera MP, Cederroth CR, Baquie M, et al. (2008) Pancreatic insulin content regulation by the estrogen receptor ER alpha. PLoS One 3: e2069.
  7. 7. Soriano S, Alonso-Magdalena P, Garcia-Arevalo M, Novials A, Muhammed SJ, et al. (2012) Rapid insulinotropic action of low doses of bisphenol-A on mouse and human islets of Langerhans: role of estrogen receptor beta. PLoS One 7: e31109.
  8. 8. Alonso-Magdalena P, Ropero AB, Soriano S, Garcia-Arevalo M, Ripoll C, et al. (2012) Bisphenol-A acts as a potent estrogen via non-classical estrogen triggered pathways. Mol Cell Endocrinol 355: 201–207.
  9. 9. Fradin D, Bougneres P (2011) T2DM: Why Epigenetics? J Nutr Metab 2011: 647514.
  10. 10. Alonso-Magdalena P, Quesada I, Nadal A (2011) Endocrine disruptors in the etiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol 7: 346–353.
  11. 11. Lang IA, Galloway TS, Scarlett A, Henley WE, Depledge M, et al. (2008) Association of urinary bisphenol A concentration with medical disorders and laboratory abnormalities in adults. JAMA 300: 1303–1310.
  12. 12. Shankar A, Teppala S (2011) Relationship between urinary bisphenol A levels and diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96: 3822–3826.
  13. 13. Wang T, Li M, Chen B, Xu M, Xu Y, et al. (2012) Urinary bisphenol A (BPA) concentration associates with obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97: E223–227.
  14. 14. Maffini MV, Rubin BS, Sonnenschein C, Soto AM (2006) Endocrine disruptors and reproductive health: the case of bisphenol-A. Mol Cell Endocrinol 254–255: 179–186.
  15. 15. Hajszan T, Leranth C (2010) Bisphenol A interferes with synaptic remodeling. Front Neuroendocrinol 31: 519–530.
  16. 16. Vandenberg LN, Maffini MV, Sonnenschein C, Rubin BS, Soto AM (2009) Bisphenol-A and the great divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption. Endocr Rev 30: 75–95.
  17. 17. Alonso-Magdalena P, Morimoto S, Ripoll C, Fuentes E, Nadal A (2006) The estrogenic effect of bisphenol A disrupts pancreatic beta-cell function in vivo and induces insulin resistance. Environ Health Perspect 114: 106–112.
  18. 18. Batista TM, Alonso-Magdalena P, Vieira E, Amaral ME, Cederroth CR, et al. (2012) Short-term treatment with bisphenol-A leads to metabolic abnormalities in adult male mice. PLoS One 7: e33814.
  19. 19. Rubin BS, Soto AM (2009) Bisphenol A: Perinatal exposure and body weight. Mol Cell Endocrinol 304: 55–62.
  20. 20. Wei J, Lin Y, Li Y, Ying C, Chen J, et al. (2011) Perinatal exposure to bisphenol A at reference dose predisposes offspring to metabolic syndrome in adult rats on a high-fat diet. Endocrinology 152: 3049–3061.
  21. 21. Vom Saal FS, Nagel SC, Coe BL, Angle BM, Taylor JA (2012) The estrogenic endocrine disrupting chemical bisphenol A (BPA) and obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol 354: 74–84.
  22. 22. Taylor M, Lau BP, Feng SY, Bourque C, Buick JK, et al. (2013) Effects of oral exposure to arsenobetaine during pregnancy and lactation in sprague-dawley rats. J Toxicol Environ Health A 76: 1333–1345.
  23. 23. Alonso-Magdalena P, Vieira E, Soriano S, Menes L, Burks D, et al. (2010) Bisphenol A exposure during pregnancy disrupts glucose homeostasis in mothers and adult male offspring. Environ Health Perspect 118: 1243–1250.
  24. 24. Angle BM, Do RP, Ponzi D, Stahlhut RW, Drury BE, et al. (2013) Metabolic disruption in male mice due to fetal exposure to low but not high doses of bisphenol A (BPA): Evidence for effects on body weight, food intake, adipocytes, leptin, adiponectin, insulin and glucose regulation. Reprod Toxicol 42: 256–268.
  25. 25. Li DS, Yuan YH, Tu HJ, Liang QL, Dai LJ (2009) A protocol for islet isolation from mouse pancreas. Nat Protoc 4: 1649–1652.
  26. 26. Andrikopoulos S, Blair AR, Deluca N, Fam BC, Proietto J (2008) Evaluating the glucose tolerance test in mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 295: E1323–1332.
  27. 27. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254.
  28. 28. Marroqui L, Vieira E, Gonzalez A, Nadal A, Quesada I (2011) Leptin downregulates expression of the gene encoding glucagon in alphaTC1-9 cells and mouse islets. Diabetologia 54: 843–851.
  29. 29. Kubista M, Andrade JM, Bengtsson M, Forootan A, Jonak J, et al. (2006) The real-time polymerase chain reaction. Mol Aspects Med 27: 95–125.
  30. 30. Casals-Casas C, Desvergne B (2011) Endocrine disruptors: from endocrine to metabolic disruption. Annu Rev Physiol 73: 135–162.
  31. 31. Neel BA, Sargis RM (2011) The paradox of progress: environmental disruption of metabolism and the diabetes epidemic. Diabetes 60: 1838–1848.
  32. 32. Hectors TL, Vanparys C, van der Ven K, Martens GA, Jorens PG, et al. (2011) Environmental pollutants and type 2 diabetes: a review of mechanisms that can disrupt beta cell function. Diabetologia 54: 1273–1290.
  33. 33. Chamorro-Garcia R, Sahu M, Abbey RJ, Laude J, Pham N, et al. (2013) Transgenerational inheritance of increased fat depot size, stem cell reprogramming, and hepatic steatosis elicited by prenatal exposure to the obesogen tributyltin in mice. Environ Health Perspect 121: 359–366.
  34. 34. Li X, Pham HT, Janesick AS, Blumberg B (2012) Triflumizole is an obesogen in mice that acts through peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma). Environ Health Perspect 120: 1720–1726.
  35. 35. Newbold RR (2008) Prenatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES). Fertil Steril 89: e55–56.
  36. 36. Newbold RR, Padilla-Banks E, Jefferson WN (2009) Environmental estrogens and obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol 304: 84–89.
  37. 37. Liu J, Yu P, Qian W, Li Y, Zhao J, et al. (2013) Perinatal bisphenol A exposure and adult glucose homeostasis: identifying critical windows of exposure. PLoS One 8: e64143.
  38. 38. Howdeshell KL, Hotchkiss AK, Thayer KA, Vandenbergh JG, vom Saal FS (1999) Exposure to bisphenol A advances puberty. Nature 401: 763–764.
  39. 39. Rubin BS, Murray MK, Damassa DA, King JC, Soto AM (2001) Perinatal exposure to low doses of bisphenol A affects body weight, patterns of estrous cyclicity, and plasma LH levels. Environ Health Perspect 109: 675–680.
  40. 40. Somm E, Schwitzgebel VM, Toulotte A, Cederroth CR, Combescure C, et al. (2009) Perinatal exposure to bisphenol a alters early adipogenesis in the rat. Environ Health Perspect 117: 1549–1555.
  41. 41. Nadal A (2013) Obesity: Fat from plastics? Linking bisphenol A exposure and obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol 9: 9–10.
  42. 42. Trasande L, Attina TM, Blustein J (2012) Association between urinary bisphenol A concentration and obesity prevalence in children and adolescents. JAMA 308: 1113–1121.
  43. 43. Boslem E, Weir JM, MacIntosh G, Sue N, Cantley J, et al. (2013) Alteration of endoplasmic reticulum lipid rafts contributes to lipotoxicity in pancreatic beta-cells. J Biol Chem 288: 26569–26582.
  44. 44. Weir GC, Bonner-Weir S (2004) Five stages of evolving beta-cell dysfunction during progression to diabetes. Diabetes 53 Suppl 3: S16–21.
  45. 45. Marchetti P, Bugliani M, Boggi U, Masini M, Marselli L (2012) The pancreatic beta cells in human type 2 diabetes. Adv Exp Med Biol 771: 288–309.
  46. 46. Supale S, Li N, Brun T, Maechler P (2012) Mitochondrial dysfunction in pancreatic beta cells. Trends Endocrinol Metab 23: 477–487.
  47. 47. Kahn SE, Hull RL, Utzschneider KM (2006) Mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nature 444: 840–846.
  48. 48. Sachdeva MM, Stoffers DA (2009) Minireview: Meeting the demand for insulin: molecular mechanisms of adaptive postnatal beta-cell mass expansion. Mol Endocrinol 23: 747–758.
  49. 49. Collins SC, Hoppa MB, Walker JN, Amisten S, Abdulkader F, et al. (2010) Progression of diet-induced diabetes in C57BL6J mice involves functional dissociation of Ca2(+) channels from secretory vesicles. Diabetes 59: 1192–1201.
  50. 50. Lin Y, Sun X, Qiu L, Wei J, Huang Q, et al. (2013) Exposure to bisphenol A induces dysfunction of insulin secretion and apoptosis through the damage of mitochondria in rat insulinoma (INS-1) cells. Cell Death Dis 4: e460.
  51. 51. Vandenberg LN, Colborn T, Hayes TB, Heindel JJ, Jacobs DR Jr, et al. (2012) Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. Endocr Rev 33: 378–455.
  52. 52. Mackay H, Patterson ZR, Khazall R, Patel S, Tsirlin D, et al. (2013) Organizational effects of perinatal exposure to bisphenol-A and diethylstilbestrol on arcuate nucleus circuitry controlling food intake and energy expenditure in male and female CD-1 mice. Endocrinology 154: 1465–1475.
  53. 53. Ryan KK, Haller AM, Sorrell JE, Woods SC, Jandacek RJ, et al. (2010) Perinatal exposure to bisphenol-a and the development of metabolic syndrome in CD-1 mice. Endocrinology 151: 2603–2612.
  54. 54. Toth JI, Datta S, Athanikar JN, Freedman LP, Osborne TF (2004) Selective coactivator interactions in gene activation by SREBP-1a and -1c. Mol Cell Biol 24: 8288–8300.
  55. 55. Guerre-Millo M, Rouault C, Poulain P, Andre J, Poitout V, et al. (2001) PPAR-alpha-null mice are protected from high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance. Diabetes 50: 2809–2814.
  56. 56. Kersten S, Seydoux J, Peters JM, Gonzalez FJ, Desvergne B, et al. (1999) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha mediates the adaptive response to fasting. J Clin Invest 103: 1489–1498.
  57. 57. Gavrilova O, Haluzik M, Matsusue K, Cutson JJ, Johnson L, et al. (2003) Liver peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma contributes to hepatic steatosis, triglyceride clearance, and regulation of body fat mass. J Biol Chem 278: 34268–34276.
  58. 58. Bryzgalova G, Lundholm L, Portwood N, Gustafsson JA, Khan A, et al. (2008) Mechanisms of antidiabetogenic and body weight-lowering effects of estrogen in high-fat diet-fed mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 295: E904–912.
  59. 59. Koonen DP, Jacobs RL, Febbraio M, Young ME, Soltys CL, et al. (2007) Increased hepatic CD36 expression contributes to dyslipidemia associated with diet-induced obesity. Diabetes 56: 2863–2871.
  60. 60. Goudriaan JR, Dahlmans VE, Teusink B, Ouwens DM, Febbraio M, et al. (2003) CD36 deficiency increases insulin sensitivity in muscle, but induces insulin resistance in the liver in mice. J Lipid Res 44: 2270–2277.
  61. 61. Muoio DM, Newgard CB (2006) Obesity-related derangements in metabolic regulation. Annu Rev Biochem 75: 367–401.
  62. 62. Viollet B, Foretz M, Guigas B, Horman S, Dentin R, et al. (2006) Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in the liver: a new strategy for the management of metabolic hepatic disorders. J Physiol 574: 41–53.
  63. 63. Nadal A, Ropero AB, Laribi O, Maillet M, Fuentes E, et al. (2000) Nongenomic actions of estrogens and xenoestrogens by binding at a plasma membrane receptor unrelated to estrogen receptor alpha and estrogen receptor beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 11603–11608.
  64. 64. Quesada I, Fuentes E, Viso-Leon MC, Soria B, Ripoll C, et al. (2002) Low doses of the endocrine disruptor bisphenol-A and the native hormone 17beta-estradiol rapidly activate transcription factor CREB. FASEB J 16: 1671–1673.
  65. 65. Nadal A, Alonso-Magdalena P, Soriano S, Quesada I, Ropero AB (2009) The pancreatic beta-cell as a target of estrogens and xenoestrogens: Implications for blood glucose homeostasis and diabetes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 304: 63–68.
  66. 66. Marmugi A, Ducheix S, Lasserre F, Polizzi A, Paris A, et al. (2012) Low doses of bisphenol A induce gene expression related to lipid synthesis and trigger triglyceride accumulation in adult mouse liver. Hepatology 55: 395–407.
  67. 67. Grasselli E, Cortese K, Voci A, Vergani L, Fabbri R, et al. (2013) Direct effects of Bisphenol A on lipid homeostasis in rat hepatoma cells. Chemosphere 91: 1123–1129.
  68. 68. Sharpe RM, Drake AJ (2013) Obesogens and obesity—an alternative view? Obesity (Silver Spring) 21: 1081–1083.
  69. 69. Environmental Protection Agency Webpage. Available: http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0356.htm. Accessed 2014 May 29.
    • 70. World Health Organization Webpage. Available: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/chem/chemicals/bisphenol_release/en/. Accessed 2014 May 29.
      • 71. Lakind JS, Naiman DQ (2008) Bisphenol A (BPA) daily intakes in the United States: estimates from the 2003–2004 NHANES urinary BPA data. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 18: 608–615.
      • 72. Taylor JA, Vom Saal FS, Welshons WV, Drury B, Rottinghaus G, et al. (2011) Similarity of bisphenol A pharmacokinetics in rhesus monkeys and mice: relevance for human exposure. Environ Health Perspect 119: 422–430.
      • 73. vom Saal FS, Akingbemi BT, Belcher SM, Birnbaum LS, Crain DA, et al. (2007) Chapel Hill bisphenol A expert panel consensus statement: integration of mechanisms, effects in animals and potential to impact human health at current levels of exposure. Reprod Toxicol 24: 131–138.
      • 74. Silva E, Rajapakse N, Scholze M, Backhaus T, Ermler S, et al. (2011) Joint effects of heterogeneous estrogenic chemicals in the E-screen—exploring the applicability of concentration addition. Toxicol Sci 122: 383–394.