Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Twist1- and Twist2-Haploinsufficiency Results in Reduced Bone Formation

  • Yanyu Huang,

    Affiliations Department of Biomedical Sciences and Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis, Texas A&M University Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, United States of America, The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine, Ministry of Education, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

    ⨯
  • Tian Meng,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Sciences and Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis, Texas A&M University Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Suzhen Wang,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Sciences and Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis, Texas A&M University Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Hua Zhang,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Sciences and Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis, Texas A&M University Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Gabriele Mues,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Sciences and Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis, Texas A&M University Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Chunlin Qin,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Sciences and Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis, Texas A&M University Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Jian Q. Feng,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Sciences and Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis, Texas A&M University Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Rena N. D'Souza,

    Affiliations Department of Biomedical Sciences and Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis, Texas A&M University Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, United States of America, The University of Utah School of Dentistry, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Yongbo Lu

    ylu@bcd.tamhsc.edu

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Sciences and Center for Craniofacial Research and Diagnosis, Texas A&M University Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, United States of America

    ⨯

Abstract

Background

Twist1 and Twist2 are highly homologous bHLH transcription factors that exhibit extensive highly overlapping expression profiles during development. While both proteins have been shown to inhibit osteogenesis, only Twist1 haploinsufficiency is associated with the premature synostosis of cranial sutures in mice and humans. On the other hand, biallelic Twist2 deficiency causes only a focal facial dermal dysplasia syndrome or additional cachexia and perinatal lethality in certain mouse strains. It is unclear how these proteins cooperate to synergistically regulate bone formation.

Methods

Twist1 floxed mice (Twist1f/f) were bred with Twist2-Cre knock-in mice (Twist2Cre/+) to generate Twist1 and Twist2 haploinsufficient mice (Twist1f/+; Twist2Cre/+). X-radiography, micro-CT scans, alcian blue/alizarin red staining, trap staining, BrdU labeling, immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridizations, real-time PCR and dual luciferase assay were employed to investigate the overall skeletal defects and the bone-associated molecular and cellular changes of Twist1f/+;Twist2Cre/+ mice.

Results

Twist1 and Twist2 haploinsufficient mice did not present with premature ossification and craniosynostosis; instead they displayed reduced bone formation, impaired proliferation and differentiation of osteoprogenitors. These mice exhibited decreased expressions of Fgf2 and Fgfr1–4 in bone, resulting in a down-regulation of FGF signaling. Furthermore, in vitro studies indicated that both Twist1 and Twist2 stimulated 4.9 kb Fgfr2 promoter activity in the presence of E12, a Twist binding partner.

Conclusion

These data demonstrated that Twist1- and Twist2-haploinsufficiency caused reduced bone formation due to compromised FGF signaling.

Citation: Huang Y, Meng T, Wang S, Zhang H, Mues G, Qin C, et al. (2014) Twist1- and Twist2-Haploinsufficiency Results in Reduced Bone Formation. PLoS ONE 9(6): e99331. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099331

Editor: Pierre J. Marie, Inserm U606 and University Paris Diderot, France

Received: September 12, 2013; Accepted: May 14, 2014; Published: June 27, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 Huang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work was supported by National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research/National Institutes of Health grants DE021773 to YL, DE013368 to RD, and DE005092 to CQ. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Mammalian Twist1 and Twist2 are two members of the Twist subfamily of the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors that have been highly conserved during evolution [1]. In Drosophila, a single Twist gene, DTwist, is essential for embryonic gastrulation and mesodermal formation [2], [3]. Mouse Twist1 was identified by its high homology with DTwist [4], [5], while Twist2, originally called “Dermo1”, was discovered by a yeast-two-hybrid screen using the ubiquitous bHLH protein E12 as bait [6]. The expression patterns of Twist1 and Twist2 show an extensive overlap during mouse embryonic development [6], and their encoded proteins exhibit a high degree (up to 98%) of sequence similarity [7]. Both proteins perform various functions by forming either homodimers or heterodimers with bHLH E proteins (E12/E47) that bind to DNA canonical regulatory sequences called “E-boxes” (CANNTG) in the promoter region of target genes [8].

In humans, mutations in the TWIST1 gene are associated with Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome (SCS), which is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by craniosynostosis, brachydactyly, soft tissue syndactyly and facial dysmorphism [9]. The skeletal phenotype of Twist1-heterozygous mouse consistently resembles that of human SCS with premature fusion of the cranial suture [9], [10]. As mouse embryonic development progresses, the Twist1 expression declines in the developing bones of the skull [11]. In addition, Twist1 overexpression was found to inhibit osteoblast differentiation in vitro and in vivo [12], [13], [14]. Together, these observations suggest that Twist1 negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation.

Various molecular mechanisms may be responsible for the inhibitory role of Twist1 in osteoblast differentiation. Twist1 may modulate FGF signaling, especially Fgfr2 expression in cranial suture development [15], [16], [17] or it may directly bind to and inhibit the transactivation function of Runx2, a master regulator of osteogenesis [11]. In addition, Twist1 might indirectly regulate the Runx2 expression through modulating FGFR2 expression as shown in the ex vivo cultured primary osteoblasts isolated from human SCS patients [18]. Finally, it is possible that Twist1 inhibits osteoblast apoptosis via the suppression of TNF-α expression [19].

Twist2 has been shown to have an inhibitory function similar to that of Twist1 in bone formation [11]. While recessive TWIST2 mutations in humans and its inactivation in mice result in a focal facial dermal dysplasia (FFDD) syndrome, there is no Twist2-deficient skeletal phenotype [20]. The phenotypic difference between the Twist1- and Twist2-deficient subjects is indeed intriguing when viewed in the context of their significantly overlapping expression patterns in vivo [6] and their similar functions in bone formation [11]. Thus, it is largely unknown how Twist1 and Twist2 synergistically regulate bone formation and what molecular mechanism is involved.

In this study, we generated a compound Twist1- and Twist2-haploinsufficient animal model, Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice, by crossing Twist1 floxed mice with Twist2 Cre knock-in mice. Thus, the compound Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice had one allele of Twist2 replaced by the cre recombinase and one allele of Twist1 deleted specifically in tissues where the Twist2 gene was expressed. To our surprise, we found that the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice exhibited reduced bone formation and impaired proliferation and differentiation of osteoprogenitors. The skeletal abnormalities were associated with reduced FGF signaling as a consequence of the decreased expressions of Fgf2 and Fgfrs.

Materials and Methods

Ethical Approval

All animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Texas A&M University Baylor College of Dentistry. IACUC has specifically given ethical approval for all the procedures in this study.

Generation of Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+

Twist1 floxed mice (Twist1flox/flox) were maintained on a C57/129 mixed genetic background [21] and Twist2 Cre Knock-in mice (Twist2cre/+) were on a 129 genetic background [22]. The Twist1flox/flox mice were bred with Twist2cre/+ mice to generate compound Twist1flox/+; Twist2cre/+ mice. The Twist2Cre/+ mice carry a Cre recombinase that replaces one allele of the Twist2 gene [22]; therefore, the floxed Twist1 allele is deleted in the tissues where the Twist2 gene is active. The Twist1 floxed mice and Twist2Cre/+ mice were genotyped as described previously [21], [22]. In this study, we analyzed the skeletal phenotype of 6–8 day-old Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice and used age-matched Twist1flox/+; Twist2+/+ as control mice (counting the day of birth as day 0).

Alcian blue/alizarin red staining of the skeleton

Alcian blue/alizarin red staining was performed to analyze the overall skeletal and mineralization defects, as described previously [23]. Briefly, 6-day-old Twist1flox/+; Twist2cre/+ mice and control mice were sacrificed, skinned, eviscerated and fixed for three days in 95% ethanol. They were then stained with alcian blue for cartilage and alizarin red for bone visualization.

Plain X-ray radiography and high-resolution microcomputed tomography (μ-CT)

The femurs and tibiae from 6-day-old Twist1flox/+; Twist2cre/+ mice and control mice were dissected free of the skeletal muscles and fixed in 70% ethanol. For plain X-ray radiography, the femurs were analyzed with a Faxitron MX-20 specimen radiography system (Faxitron X-ray Corp., Buffalo Grove, IL) as described previously [24]. For the high-resolution μ-CT analyses, the tibiae were scanned at 3.5-µm resolution using a μ-CT35 imaging system (Scanco Medical, Basserdorf, Switzerland), as previously described [24]. The trabecular bone was analyzed at a threshold of 160 in 20 sections underneath the growth plate.

Histology, immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization

For histologic analysis, the bone specimens from 6-day-old mice were fixed in freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde, decalcified in 10% EDTA with 0.5% paraformaldehyde, and embedded in paraffin using standard procedures [25]. Serial 7-µm sections were cut and mounted on silane-coated slides. The sections were then used for Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining, Tatrate-resistant alkaline phosphatase (TRAP) staining, immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization, as described previously [24], [25].

The following antibodies were used for the immunohistochemical analyses: anti-Osterix (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA; 1∶400), rabbit anti-biglycan antibody “LF-159” (a gift from Dr. Larry Fisher, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; 1∶1000), anti-Fgfr2 polyclonal antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; 1∶5000), and anti-phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; 1∶100). All the immunohistochemical experiments were performed with a 3, 3-diaminobenzidine kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

For the in situ hybridization, the RNA probes for dentin matrix protein (Dmp1), osteocalcin (Ocn) and alkaline phosphatase (Alp) were labeled with digoxigenin (DIG) using a RNA Labeling Kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DIG-labeled RNA probes were detected by an enzyme-linked immunoassay with a specific anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase antibody conjugate (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and a VECTOR NBT/BCIP alkaline phosphatase substrate (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), which produced a blue color indicating positive signals. Methyl green was used for counterstaining.

Cell proliferation assay

Six-day-old Twist1flox/+; Twist2cre/+ mice and control mice were intraperitoneally injected with 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) (10 mg/100 g body weight) at 24 hours and then two hours before sacrifice. The long bones were collected and processed for paraffin sectioning as described above. The incorporated BrdU was detected with a BrdU staining kit (Invitrogen, Camarillo, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The BrdU-positive nuclei and total nuclei were counted in the metaphysis region (trabecular bone) as well as in the midshaft (cortical bone). The data represented the percentage of BrdU-positive nuclei from four individual animals each group.

Quantitative Real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen, Camarillo, CA, USA) from the long bones of 8-day-old Twist1/2 dHet mice and control mice and reverse-transcribed into cDNA with a Reverse Transcription Kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed using a Go Tag qPCR Master Mix System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Mouse 18S rRNA primers (PPM57735E-200, QIAGEN, Germantown, MD, USA) were used for normalization. The primers for Alp, Ocn, bone sialoprotein (Bsp), osterix (Osx), Dmp1 and Runx2 were reported elsewhere [26], [27]. The primers for Fgf2, Fgfr1, Fgfr2, Fgfr3, Fgfr4, Erm (Etv5) and Pea3 (Etv4) are listed in Table 1. The primers for Fgfr2 were specifically designed to amplify the mesenchymal isoform of Fgfr2 (Fgfr2-IIIc). All experiments were performed in triplicate on three animals. The data were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method as described previously [28].

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Primers used for real-time PCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099331.t001

Cell culture, constructs and promoter luciferase assay

The C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal cells and MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cells were cultured as described previously [29]. A 4.9 kb-Fgfr2 promoter luciferase construct and expression constructs for Twist1 and E12 have been reported elsewhere [30]. An expression construct for Twist2 was generated by cloning Twist2 cDNA into the BamHI and EcoRI sites of pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen). The promoter luciferase assay was performed as described previously [24], [30]. Briefly, C3H10T1/2 cells and MC3T3-E1 cells were plated in 24-well plates at a density of 3×104 cells per well. Then the cells were transiently transfected with 0.1 µg of 4.9 kb-Fgfr2 promoter luciferase construct, together with 0.4 µg of various constructs expressing Twist1, Twist2 or E12 using FuGENE 6 Transfection Reagent (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The total amounts of transfected DNA were balanced by the addition of an empty vector (pcDNA3). A Renilla luciferase expression construct was co-transfected as an internal control to monitor the transfection efficiency. Forty-eight hours later, the transfected cells were analyzed using a dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The luciferase activities were normalized by the control. All experiments were carried out in triplicate and repeated three times.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were performed with a one-way ANOVA for a multiple group comparison and the Student's t-test for a two-group comparison. If significant differences were found with the one-way ANOVA, the Student's t-test was used to determine which groups were significantly different from the others. The quantified results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Generation of Twist1- and Twist2-haploinsufficient mice

Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice were generated by breeding Twist1 floxed mice (Twist1flox/flox) with Twist2 Cre Knock-in mice (Twist2cre/+), in which one allele of Twist2 was replaced by the Cre recombinase. Twist2-Cre is active in the condensed mesenchyme that will later produce the chondrocytes and osteoblasts [22]; therefore, in the compound Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice, the floxed Twist1 allele is deleted in the osteoblasts and their precursors. Consequently, both Twist1 and Twist2 were haploinsufficient in the osteoblast lineage of the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. Real-time PCR confirmed that the mRNA levels of both Twist1 and Twist2 were about three folds less in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice than in the control mice (Figure S1). Although the floxed Twist1 allele was conditionally deleted, the compound Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice had a phenotype similar to that of the mice completely heterozygous for both the Twist1 and Twist2 genes [31]. Most of them died within two weeks after birth but a few of them survived to adulthood and were fertile.

Reduced bone formation in Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice

We first examined the overall skeletal structures of Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice in Figure 1. The alcian blue/alizarin red staining showed that Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice had a much smaller skeleton with delayed fusion of the interfrontal suture, open posterior fontanelles and delayed ossification in the metatarsals and phalanges (Figs. 1A–C). In addition, the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice developed an extra toe close to the hallux (Fig. 1C), the hallmark of Twist1 heterozygous mice [32]. Plain X-radiography showed that the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice had reduced radiopacity in the tibiae compared to the control mice (Fig. 1D). Micro-CT images further confirmed that the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice had reduced trabecular bone and decreased cortical bone thickness (Fig. 1E). The quantitative analyses revealed a significant decrease in trabecular bone volume versus total volume (BV/TV) and in apparent bone density in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice (Figs. 1F–G). The material density was also slightly reduced in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice although the difference in this parameter was not statistically significant compared to the control mice (Fig. 1H). These data demonstrated that bone formation was inhibited in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. Reduced bone formation in Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice.

(A) Skeletons of 6-day-old control (left) and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ (right) mice stained with alcian blue (cartilage) and alizarin red (bone). The skeleton of the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mouse is remarkably smaller. (B) Alcian blue- and alizarin red-stained skull from 6-day-old Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice (right) showed delayed fusion of interfrontal suture and open posterior fontanel (arrows), compared with the control mice (left). (C) Alcian blue- and alizarin red-stained hind foot of 6-day-old control (left) and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ (right) mice. Note the delayed ossification in metatarsals (mt) and phalanges (pl), and an additional toe (arrow) originating from the same (or duplicated) metatarsal as the hallux in Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. (D) Plain X-radiography of the tibiae from 6-day-old control (left) and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice (right). The Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice had shorter tibiae and reduced radiopacity, compared to the control mice. (E) Representative three-dimensional μ-CT images of tibiae from 6-day-old control (left) and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ (right) mice. The Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice showed reduced trabecular (arrowheads) and cortical bones (arrows). (F–H) Quantitative μ-CT data showing that the 6-day-old Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice had a significant decrease in the ratio of bone volume (BV)/total volume (TV) (F) and in apparent bone density (G), compared to the control mice (n = 6, P<0.001). The Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice also presented reduced material density although no statistically significant difference was observed (H).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099331.g001

Defects in osteoblast differentiation in Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice

We carried out a series of histological and molecular analyses to determine whether there were any abnormalities in osteoclast numbers and/or osteoblast differentiation. First, H&E staining confirmed that the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice formed less trabecular bone and thinner periosteum and cortical bone (Figs. 2A–B). Second, TRAP staining showed that the distribution and size of the osteoclasts in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice were similar to those of the control mice (Fig. 2C). Although the osteoclast density was slightly increased in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice, no significant difference was observed between two groups. Third, we examined the expression levels of the osteoblast differentiation markers by in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR. These methods revealed that the levels of the osteoblast differentiation markers Alp (Figs. 2D and 3), Ocn (Figs. 2E and 3), biglycan (Fig. 2H) and Bsp (Fig. 3) were sharply reduced in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice compared to the control mice. In addition, the osteocyte marker Dmp1 was also dramatically decreased (Fig. 2F and 3). Furthermore, the expression levels of Runx2 and Osx, two key transcription factors essential for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation, were remarkably reduced in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice, compared to the control mice (Figs. 2G and 3). Taken together, these findings supported the hypothesis that the reduced bone formation resulted from defects in osteoblast differentiation rather than abnormal osteoclast activities.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Histological examination of Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice.

(A–B) Femur sections of 6-day-old control and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice were stained with H&E. The Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice displayed reduced metaphyseal trabecular bone (A, red arrows) and a decreased thickness of the periosteum (B, blue arrows) and cortical bone (B, red arrows). (C) TRAP staining of femur sections of 6-day-old control and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. Note that the osteoclasts (red arrows) appeared to be similar in size and distribution in the control and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. The osteoclast densities were 0.55±0.06/0.01 mm2 in the controls (n = 5) and 0.60±0.02/0.01 mm2 in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice (n = 5, P>0.05). (D–F) In situ hybridization analyses (signal in blue) of the transcripts of Alp (D), Ocn (E) and Dmp1 (F) in the femurs of one-week-old control and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. (G, H) Immunohistochemical analyses (signal in brown) of the osterix (G) and biglycan (H) protein levels in the femurs of the 6-day-old control and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. Scale bar = 100 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099331.g002

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 3. Quantitative real-time PCR analyses of osteoblast differentiation markers.

Real-time PCR was performed with total RNA isolated from the long bones of the one-week-old control and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. The expressions of key transcription factors associated with osteoblast differentiation (Runx2 and osterix), osteoblast markers (Alp, Ocn and Bsp) and osteocyte marker (Dmp1) were reduced in Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. The mRNA levels in the control mice were set as one, and the mRNA levels of Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice were expressed as folds of those in the control mice. The data represented three analyses (n = 3) for each group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099331.g003

Reduced cell proliferation in Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice

Since the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice had a reduced periosteal layer compared to the control mice (Fig. 2B), we performed BrdU labeling to determine whether the proliferation of osteoblasts and their progenitors was affected. We noticed that the BrdU-positive cells in the area of the metaphysis (Figs. 4A), as well as in the mid diaphyseal periosteum and cortical bone (Fig. 4D), were significantly reduced in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. However, no difference in the osteoblast apoptosis was observed (Figure S2). These findings suggested that the reduced cell proliferation might also contribute to the reduced bone formation in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 4. Cell proliferation was reduced in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice.

(A–B) BrdU immunohistochemical staining of the femur sections of 7-day-old control and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. The BrdU-positive cells (signal in brown) were counted in a 100-µm zone of the metaphysis, demarcated by the chondro-osseous junction and the marked line (A), and in the femoral diaphysis (B). The osteoblast/osteoprogenitor proliferation was reduced in both the metaphysis (C) and diaphysis (D) in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice, compared to the control mice (n = 4, *P<0.05). The data were expressed as the percentage of BrdU-positive nuclei versus total nuclei. Scale bars: 100 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099331.g004

Reduced FGF signaling in Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice

A variety of studies have indicated interactions between Twist1 and FGF signaling although the outcome of such interactions appears to be context dependent [15], [17], [18], [33]. We analyzed the components of the FGF signaling pathway in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. Quantitative real-time PCR revealed a substantial decrease in the transcript levels of Fgf2 and Fgfrs1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice (Fig. 5A). Immunohistochemistry further confirmed that the Fgfr2 protein was markedly reduced in the long bones of the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice (Fig. 5B). FGF signaling triggered the MAP kinase cascade, resulting in the phosphorylation and activation of p44/42 (Erk1/2) and the expression of two effector molecules, Erm and Pea3 [34]. Consistent with the reduced Fgf2 and Fgfr expression, the immunohistochemistry revealed that the levels of phospho-Erk1/2 were considerably lower in Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice than in the control mice (Fig. 5C). Accordingly, quantitative real-time PCR demonstrated that the levels of Erm and Pea3 transcripts were significantly downregulated (Fig. 5A). These data demonstrated that FGF signaling was reduced in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice, suggesting that Twist1 and Twist2 might upregulate the expressions of Fgf2 and Fgfrs.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 5. Reduced FGF signaling in Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice.

(A) Quantitative real-time PCR was performed to analyze the mRNA levels of Fgf2, Fgfr1, Fgfr2, Fgfr3 and Fgfr4, as well as two effector molecules, Erm and Pea3, using total RNA isolated from the long bones of 8-day-old control and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. The mRNA levels in the control mice were set as one, and the mRNA levels of Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice were expressed as folds of those in the control mice. The data represented three analyses (n = 3) for each group. (B) Immunohistochemistry showed that the level of the Fgfr2 protein (signal in brown) was reduced in the femurs of the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice (right), compared to the control mice (left). (C) Immunohistochemistry showed that there was less phospho-Erk1/2 (signal in brown) than in the femurs of Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice, compared to the control mice. Scale bars: 100 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099331.g005

Twist1 and Twist2 stimulated Fgfr2 promoter activity

As described above, Fgfr2 was significantly downregulated at both the mRNA and protein levels in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. The skeletal phenotype of Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice partially resembles that of the Fgfr2 conditional knock-out mice [22]. Therefore, we examined whether Twist1 and Twist2 could upregulate the Fgfr2 promoter activity in vitro. Our promoter luciferase reporter assay revealed that Twist1 or Twist2 alone was unable to significantly stimulate a 4.9 kb Fgfr2 promoter fragment. However, they strongly enhanced the stimulatory activity of E12, a ubiquitously expressed Twist binding partner, in both the C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal cells and MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast cells (Fig. 6). This in vitro evidence implied that Twist1 and Twist2, together with E12, could regulate the Fgfr2 expression.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 6. Effects of Twist1, Twist2 and E12 on the activity of a 4.9Fgfr2 promoter fragment.

C3H10T1/2 (A) and MC3T3-E1 cells (B) were transiently co-transfected with a 4.9 kb Fgfr2 promoter luciferase construct and the indicated expression constructs, along with a pRL-TK construct as an internal control. The luciferase activities were determined by a dual luciferase assay system, and the promoter activities were expressed as luciferase activities relative to that of the control. The values represented mean ± SD. n = 3 for each group. “a” indicates significant difference from the control (p<0.05); “b” denotes a significant difference from all other groups (p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099331.g006

Discussion

Twist1 and Twist2 are two highly conserved members of the Twist subfamily of bHLH transcription factors. In this study, we generated Twist1- and Twist2-haploinsufficient mice (Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+), and found that these mice displayed delayed closure of the cranial sutures. Furthermore, we found that the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice presented with reduced bone formation and impaired osteoprogenitor proliferation and osteoblast differentiation as well as compromised FGF signaling.

Previous studies have demonstrated that the cranial sutures of the Twist1 heterozygous mice prematurely fuse [10], [11], [32]. To confirm this finding, we crossed the Twist1-floxed mice (Twist1flox/flox) with Sox2-Cre transgenic mice expressing a Cre recombinase ubiquitously in the epiblast cells at embryonic day 6.5 and generated conditional Twist1-haploinsufficient mice (Twist1flox/+; Sox2-Cre) (Figure S3). We found that the Twist1flox/+; Sox2-Cre mice developed craniosynostosis - a phenotype that is similar to the Twist1 heterozygous mice [11], [32], characterized by much narrower sagittal and interfrontal sutures and had additional toe originating from a duplicated metatarsal as demonstrated by alcian blue and alizarin red staining (Figure S3A–D). The plain X-radiography and histological examination did not reveal apparent difference in the radiopacity of the long bones, in the metaphyseal trabecular bones or in the diaphyseal cortical bones between Twist1flox/+; Sox2-Cre and control mice (Figure S3E–G). In contrast, although the Twist2 heterozygous mice are viable and fertile with no apparent phenotype [20], [31], the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice showed reduced growth of both cranial and long bones as well as delayed closure of the cranial sutures. Therefore, the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice displayed a skeletal phenotype that is opposite to that of Twist1 heterozygous mice.

Our current studies and the studies from other labs have demonstrated that Twist1 and Twist2 share similar in vitro and in vivo functions [11]. Therefore, the phenotypic difference between single Twist1/2-heterozygous mice and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice might be due to the overlapping expression patterns of Twist1 and Twist2 during mouse embryonic development [6]. Both Twist1 and Twist2 are highly expressed in the condensed mesenchyme that later gives rise to osteoblasts and chondrocytes [6], [11], [22]. Thus, the outcomes of the loss of Twist1 and/or Twist2 really depend on the relative expression of both genes in a specific tissue.

Accumulating evidence supports the notion that Twist1 might control cranial suture development through modulating FGF signaling. It was found that the mutations in FGF receptors FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 in humans are associated with craniosynostosis, a characteristic phenotype of the Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome caused by dominant loss-of-function TWIST1 mutations [35]. In addition, the primary cranial osteoblasts isolated from SCS patients with Twist1 mutations show reduced FGFR2 transcript levels, which can be restored by overexpression of TWIST1 [18]. Twist1 haploinsufficiency in mice also results in an altered Fgfr2 expression pattern in the cranial sutures [17]. It has been proposed that Twist1 haploinsufficiency favors the formation of Twist1 homodimers in the osteogenic front of cranial sutures, which results in the upregulation of Fgfr2 expression and leads to craniosynostosis [16]. Taken together, the data from these human and mouse studies suggest that Twist1 might regulate FGF signaling, particularly the Fgfr2 expression, in a context-dependent manner.

Our current studies provide further support that Twist1 and Twist2 regulate FGF signaling in bone formation. We found that Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice had reduced FGF signaling in bone as a result of decreased expression of not only Fgfr2 but also Fgfr1, Fgfr3, Fgfr4 and even Fgf2. FGF signaling plays essential roles throughout osteogenesis, including the commitment of mesenchymal cells to osteoprogenitors, the proliferation and differentiation of osteoprogenitors to osteoblasts, and osteoblast apoptosis [22], [36]. Indeed, the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice displayed reduced proliferation of osteoprogenitor cells and defective osteoblast differentiation. Some of the skeletal abnormalities even resemble those of Fgfr2 conditional knockout mice [22]. Consistent with the in vivo results, our in vitro promoter luciferase assays further supported the role of Twist1 and Twist2 in the upregulation of Fgfr2 promoter activity when E12 was present. However, it remains to be determined why only Twist/E12 heterodimers, instead of Twist homodimers, stimulate Fgfr2 promoter activity.

In summary, our current study suggested that Twist1 and Twist2 may synergistically enhance the proliferation and differentiation of osteoprogenitors via the upregulation of FGF signaling during skeletal development. However, further studies are necessary to determine whether these two genes perform identical functions and could completely replace each other in vivo. Research is also needed to advance our understanding of how the expression levels of Twist1 and Twist2 are temporally and spatially regulated during development and how fine-tuning achieves the optimal Twist protein level needed for normal skeletal development. Such knowledge is essential for the development of future therapies aimed at correcting the effects of Twist deficiency in humans.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

The mRNA levels of Twist1 and Twist2 in the long bones of Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. Real-time PCR was performed with total RNA isolated from the long bones of the 8-day-old control and Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. The primers used for Twist1 were sense 5′- CAGCGGGTCATGGCTAAC-3′ and antisense 5′- GCAGGACCTGGTACAGGAAG-3′, and for Twist2 sense 5′- AGCAAGAAATCGAGCGAAGA-3′ and antisense 5′- CAGCTTGAGCGTCTGGATCT-3′. The mRNA levels of Twist1 and Twist2 were about three folds less in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice than in the control mice. The data represented three analyses (n = 3) for each group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099331.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Osteoblast apoptosis in the Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice. TUNEL assay was used to analyze the osteoblast apoptosis in the long bones of 6-day-old Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice and control mice. Three serial sections from each of four individual Twist1flox/+; Twist2Cre/+ mice and control littermates were counted. No significant difference in osteoblast apoptosis was found between the two groups of mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099331.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

Skeletal abnormalities of Twist1flox/+; Sox2-Cre mice. (A) The skeletons of 7-day-old Twist1flox/+ (control) and Twist1flox/+; Sox2-Cre mice were stained with alcian blue and alizarin red. (B–C) Alcian blue and alizarin red stained skulls, femurs and tibiae, and hind feet from 7-day-old control mice and Twist1flox/+; Sox2-Cre mice; The Twist1flox/+; Sox2-Cre mice showed much narrower sagittal and interfrontal sutures (arrows; B) and had additional toe (arrow) originating from a duplicated metatarsal (MT; D), but the femurs and tibiae showed no apparent difference between two groups (C). (E) Plain X-radiography of the hind limbs from 7-day-old control and Twist1flox/+; Sox2-Cre mice. No apparent difference was noted between the two groups of mice. (F and G) Histological examination of Twist1flox/+; Sox2-Cre mice. Tibia sections of 7-day-old control and Twist1flox/+; Sox2-Cre mice were stained with H&E. No apparent difference was observed in the metaphyseal trabecular bone (F) or in the diaphyseal cortical bone (G) between these two groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099331.s003

(TIF)

Materials and Methods S1.

Generation of Twist1flox/+; Sox2-Cre mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099331.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Jeanne Santa Cruz for her assistance with editing this article. We thank the China Scholarship Council for supporting Yanyu Huang.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: YL YH. Performed the experiments: YH TM SW. Analyzed the data: YH GM YL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HZ CQ JQF RND. Wrote the paper: YH YL.

References

  1. 1. Qin Q, Xu Y, He T, Qin C, Xu J (2012) Normal and disease-related biological functions of Twist1 and underlying molecular mechanisms. Cell research 22: 90–106.
  2. 2. Thisse B, el Messal M, Perrin-Schmitt F (1987) The twist gene: isolation of a Drosophila zygotic gene necessary for the establishment of dorsoventral pattern. Nucleic Acids Res 15: 3439–3453.
  3. 3. Simpson P (1983) Maternal-Zygotic Gene Interactions during Formation of the Dorsoventral Pattern in Drosophila Embryos. Genetics 105: 615–632.
  4. 4. Wolf C, Thisse C, Stoetzel C, Thisse B, Gerlinger P, et al. (1991) The M-twist gene of Mus is expressed in subsets of mesodermal cells and is closely related to the Xenopus X-twi and the Drosophila twist genes. Dev Biol 143: 363–373.
  5. 5. Gitelman I (1997) Twist protein in mouse embryogenesis. Dev Biol 189: 205–214.
  6. 6. Li L, Cserjesi P, Olson EN (1995) Dermo-1: a novel twist-related bHLH protein expressed in the developing dermis. Dev Biol 172: 280–292.
  7. 7. Franco HL, Casasnovas J, Rodriguez-Medina JR, Cadilla CL (2011) Redundant or separate entities?–roles of Twist1 and Twist2 as molecular switches during gene transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 1177–1186.
  8. 8. Massari ME, Murre C (2000) Helix-loop-helix proteins: regulators of transcription in eucaryotic organisms. Mol Cell Biol 20: 429–440.
  9. 9. el Ghouzzi V, Le Merrer M, Perrin-Schmitt F, Lajeunie E, Benit P, et al. (1997) Mutations of the TWIST gene in the Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. Nat Genet 15: 42–46.
  10. 10. Carver EA, Oram KF, Gridley T (2002) Craniosynostosis in Twist heterozygous mice: a model for Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. Anat Rec 268: 90–92.
  11. 11. Bialek P, Kern B, Yang X, Schrock M, Sosic D, et al. (2004) A twist code determines the onset of osteoblast differentiation. Dev Cell 6: 423–435.
  12. 12. Hayashi M, Nimura K, Kashiwagi K, Harada T, Takaoka K, et al. (2007) Comparative roles of Twist-1 and Id1 in transcriptional regulation by BMP signaling. J Cell Sci 120: 1350–1357.
  13. 13. Isenmann S, Arthur A, Zannettino AC, Turner JL, Shi S, et al. (2009) TWIST family of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors mediate human mesenchymal stem cell growth and commitment. Stem Cells 27: 2457–2468.
  14. 14. Lee MS, Lowe GN, Strong DD, Wergedal JE, Glackin CA (1999) TWIST, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, can regulate the human osteogenic lineage. J Cell Biochem 75: 566–577.
  15. 15. Connerney J, Andreeva V, Leshem Y, Mercado MA, Dowell K, et al. (2008) Twist1 homodimers enhance FGF responsiveness of the cranial sutures and promote suture closure. Dev Biol 318: 323–334.
  16. 16. Connerney J, Andreeva V, Leshem Y, Muentener C, Mercado MA, et al. (2006) Twist1 dimer selection regulates cranial suture patterning and fusion. Dev Dyn 235: 1345–1357.
  17. 17. Rice DP, Aberg T, Chan Y, Tang Z, Kettunen PJ, et al. (2000) Integration of FGF and TWIST in calvarial bone and suture development. Development 127: 1845–1855.
  18. 18. Guenou H, Kaabeche K, Mee SL, Marie PJ (2005) A role for fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 in the altered osteoblast phenotype induced by Twist haploinsufficiency in the Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 14: 1429–1439.
  19. 19. Yousfi M, Lasmoles F, El Ghouzzi V, Marie PJ (2002) Twist haploinsufficiency in Saethre-Chotzen syndrome induces calvarial osteoblast apoptosis due to increased TNFalpha expression and caspase-2 activation. Hum Mol Genet 11: 359–369.
  20. 20. Tukel T, Sosic D, Al-Gazali LI, Erazo M, Casasnovas J, et al. (2010) Homozygous nonsense mutations in TWIST2 cause Setleis syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 87: 289–296.
  21. 21. Chen YT, Akinwunmi PO, Deng JM, Tam OH, Behringer RR (2007) Generation of a Twist1 conditional null allele in the mouse. Genesis 45: 588–592.
  22. 22. Yu K, Xu J, Liu Z, Sosic D, Shao J, et al. (2003) Conditional inactivation of FGF receptor 2 reveals an essential role for FGF signaling in the regulation of osteoblast function and bone growth. Development 130: 3063–3074.
  23. 23. Feng JQ, Huang H, Lu Y, Ye L, Xie Y, et al. (2003) The Dentin matrix protein 1 (Dmp1) is specifically expressed in mineralized, but not soft, tissues during development. J Dent Res 82: 776–780.
  24. 24. Gibson MP, Zhu Q, Wang S, Liu Q, Liu Y, et al. (2013) The rescue of dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1)-deficient tooth defects by the transgenic expression of dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) indicates that DSPP is a downstream effector molecule of DMP1 in dentinogenesis. J Biol Chem 288: 7204–7214.
  25. 25. Zhang R, Lu Y, Ye L, Yuan B, Yu S, et al. (2011) Unique roles of phosphorus in endochondral bone formation and osteocyte maturation. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 26: 1047–1056.
  26. 26. Cao Z, Zhang H, Zhou X, Han X, Ren Y, et al. (2012) Genetic evidence for the vital function of Osterix in cementogenesis. J Bone Miner Res 27: 1080–1092.
  27. 27. Rangiani A, Cao Z, Sun Y, Lu Y, Gao T, et al. (2012) Protective roles of DMP1 in high phosphate homeostasis. PLoS One 7: e42329.
  28. 28. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25: 402–408.
  29. 29. Siyam A, Wang S, Qin C, Mues G, Stevens R, et al. (2012) Nuclear localization of DMP1 proteins suggests a role in intracellular signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 424: 641–646.
  30. 30. Lu Y, Li Y, Cavender AC, Wang S, Mansukhani A, et al. (2012) Molecular studies on the roles of Runx2 and Twist1 in regulating FGF signaling. Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists 241: 1708–1715.
  31. 31. Sosic D, Richardson JA, Yu K, Ornitz DM, Olson EN (2003) Twist regulates cytokine gene expression through a negative feedback loop that represses NF-kappaB activity. Cell 112: 169–180.
  32. 32. Bourgeois P, Bolcato-Bellemin AL, Danse JM, Bloch-Zupan A, Yoshiba K, et al. (1998) The variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance of the twist-null heterozygous mouse phenotype resemble those of human Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 7: 945–957.
  33. 33. Miraoui H, Severe N, Vaudin P, Pages JC, Marie PJ (2010) Molecular silencing of Twist1 enhances osteogenic differentiation of murine mesenchymal stem cells: implication of FGFR2 signaling. J Cell Biochem 110: 1147–1154.
  34. 34. Bottcher RT, Niehrs C (2005) Fibroblast growth factor signaling during early vertebrate development. Endocr Rev 26: 63–77.
  35. 35. Li C, Chen L, Iwata T, Kitagawa M, Fu XY, et al. (1999) A Lys644Glu substitution in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) causes dwarfism in mice by activation of STATs and ink4 cell cycle inhibitors. Hum Mol Genet 8: 35–44.
  36. 36. Marie PJ (2003) Fibroblast growth factor signaling controlling osteoblast differentiation. Gene 316: 23–32.