Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: A Systematic Review of Internet-Based Worksite Wellness Approaches for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Management: Outcomes, Challenges & Opportunities

  • The PLOS ONE Staff
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Comments
  • Media Coverage

There is an error in Figure 2. Please see the correct Figure 2 here:

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Graphical Representation of Intervention Outcomes (Modified from Harvest Plots by Ogilvie et. al).

[11] Each bar represents a study. Dark bars indicate suitable study designs (category A or B) while the lighter bars indicate poor study design (category C, D or E). The numbers on top of each bar indicate the number of methodological criteria met (maximum 6). For each parameter, there are three possible outcomes – negative effect, no effect or positive effect.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083594.g002

Reference

  1. 1. Aneni EC, Roberson LL, Maziak W, Agatston AS, Feldman T, et al. (2014) A Systematic Review of Internet-Based Worksite Wellness Approaches for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Management: Outcomes, Challenges & Opportunities. PLoS ONE 9(1): e83594

Citation: The PLOS ONE Staff (2014) Correction: A Systematic Review of Internet-Based Worksite Wellness Approaches for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Management: Outcomes, Challenges & Opportunities. PLoS ONE 9(3): e92759. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092759

Published: March 14, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 The PLOS ONE Staff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.