Figures
Abstract
Objective
To assess the factors associated with the progression of isolated terminal ileal lesions (ITILs) at colonoscopy in Chinese patients.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with ITILs were enrolled. The ileoscopy was performed by two experienced gastroenterologists every 52 weeks. A logistic regression analysis was used to elucidate the factors associated with Crohn's disease (CD) and mucosal healing. A log rank test was used to assess the differences of the cumulative proportion of CD and mucosal healing in different groups at different times.
Results
(1) A total of 34 patients were included and no patient had taken nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug in the last 6 months; eight (23.5%) patients had a clinical diagnosis of CD, 14 (41.2%) patients achieved mucosal healing, and 12 (35.3%) patients showed no significant changes in the lesions at last follow-up. (2) The logistic regression analysis showed that only abdominal pain was a factor in the ITIL disease outcomes. (3) The cumulative proportion of CD in the abdominal pain group after 3 years was statistically higher than that in the non-abdominal pain group (42.7% vs. 6.2%, χ2 = 10.129, P = 0.001). However, the cumulative proportion of mucosal healing in the non-abdominal pain group was statistically higher than that in the abdominal pain group (73.3% vs. 5.6%, χ2 = 5.225, P = 0.022). (4) The numbers of lesions observed on the initial colonoscopy exams and the initial histologic findings were not related to the ITIL disease outcomes.
Citation: Fangbin Z, Weiwei H, Wugan Z, Cong Z, Yanjun C, Feng X (2014) The Analysis of Factors Associated with Progression of Isolated Terminal Ileal Lesions. PLoS ONE 9(3): e90797. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090797
Editor: John Green, University Hospital Llandough, United Kingdom
Received: July 31, 2013; Accepted: February 5, 2014; Published: March 13, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Fangbin et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was sponsored by research funding for the doctoral program of higher education of China and the Youth Innovation Fund of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Ileal intubation is increasingly recognized as being valuable in patients with abdominal pain, diarrhea or bloody stools—particularly where inflammatory bowel disease is a consideration. [1]–[3] This has led to an increased identification of patients (about 0.1–0.3%) who are not easily classified—those with Isolated ileal abnormalities, which we have coined isolated terminal ileal lesions (ITILs). [4], [5] It is likely that a proportion of these patients are suffering from a restricted form or so-called forme fruste of Crohn's disease (CD). Currently, the clinical significance of this entity is unclear. [2], [6], [7].
The present study evaluated the clinical course of patients with ITILs to determine the clinical significance of these lesions.
Materials and Methods
Subjects
Patients diagnosed with ITILs at the Gastroenterology clinic of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University Hospital from 2005 to 2010 were actively recruited to this study with the goal of evaluating the natural history of terminal ileal lesions. All patients underwent gastroscopy and double contrast small bowel radiography to evaluate their upper gastrointestinal and small intestinal mucosa.
Subjects were excluded if they fulfilled any of the following criteria: (1) a follow-up of less than 2 years; (2) a history of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or glucocorticoid use within the 6 months before the study; (3) erosions in other parts of the colon in addition to the terminal ileum; (4) oral or genital ulcerations suggestive of Behçet disease; (5) infectious colitis (except tuberculosis); (6) a prior history of CD or ulcerative colitis; (7) a history of colorectal cancer or surgery; (8) a history of systemic lupus erythematosus or vasculitis; or (9) poor adherence to the study: rejection of colonoscopies during the follow-up.
Study Design
Clinical data, including sex, age, clinical symptoms and medical records were recorded. The patient information was collected by a clinician. All patients were asked to ingest 2 L of polyethylene glycol solution in the evening before the ileoscopy. The ileoscopy was performed by two experienced gastroenterologists at weeks 0, 52, 104, 156, 208, 260, 312, 364, 416, 468, and 520. Two biopsy specimens were obtained from the most severe area of the lesion in each subject. All of the biopsy specimens were evaluated separately by two experienced pathologists. In cases in which they did not agree on an evaluation, a discussion with a senior gastrointestinal pathologist was employed.
Drug therapy was directed toward the dominant symptoms: a selective smooth-muscle relaxant for abdominal pain, loperamide for diarrhea, and lactulose syrup or polyethylene glycol for constipation. (Table 1) The treatments were withdrawn when the clinical symptoms resolved and reintroduced when the clinical symptoms recurred. Patients with positive occult blood test, mild abdominal discomfort, or surveillance after colorectal polypectomy underwent no any treatment during the total duration of follow-up.
The symptoms were assessed daily by asking the patient to complete a diary regarding the following: abdominal pain, discomfort, stool frequency, and stool consistency.
Assessment of overall symptom relief was measured weekly. (Table 2) Patients were assessed for symptom recurrence weekly by telephone interview and monthly at a clinic visit.
The patients recorded the overall clinical symptom relief in a diary by answering ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to the following question: ‘Do you consider that over the past week you have had satisfactory relief from your symptoms?’ ‘Satisfactory’ meant that compared with their typical experience of the disorder in the past, the patient felt that during the past week their clinical symptoms had been alleviated to the extent that they would take medication to maintain that state.
At scheduled doctor visits, response to initial treatment was designated when patients' overall satisfactory relief from symptoms for at least 2 of the 4 previous weeks; those whose overall satisfactory relief from symptoms for less than 2 weeks in the 4 previous weeks were considered nonresponders.
Patients requesting urgent restoration of medication treatment because of recurring/worsening symptoms before or at a scheduled telephone contact during the withdrawal period were considered to have relapsed.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill, USA). To elucidate the factors associated with developing CD and mucosal healing, a logistic regression analysis was used and results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A Kaplan–Meier plot and a log-rank test were used to visualize and to test differences between CD and mucosal healing in probability of remaining in the study. A χ2 test was used to compare the endoscopic findings, pathologic findings on the initial colonoscopy exams and disease outcomes of ITILs. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.
Ethical Considerations
The ethics committee of the participating center approved the study (reference numbers: 20050401GS-7 (University of Zhengzhou)). The study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants at recruitment.
Results
Subject Characteristics
During the study period, 32,197 patients underwent colonoscopic examinations at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center. Of these, 43 were assigned an endoscopic diagnostic code for ITILs. Of these 43 patients, seven patients (16.3%) with a follow-up of less than 2 years and two patients (4.7%) with poor compliance were excluded, the data of these 9 patients wasn't analyzed in this study; the remaining 34 patients (79.1%) met the study criteria. These 34 patients including in this study have no a history of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (such as aspirin) or glucocorticoid use within the 6 months before the study. These 34 patients including in this study have no family history of IBD.
The patient sample consisted of 19 men and 15 women with a mean age of 33.3±11.1 years (range 22–62 years), and the mean follow-up was 3 years (range 2–5 years). The indications for colonoscopy included abdominal pain in 10 (29.4%) patients, stools >3 times daily in nine patients (26.5%), abdominal pain and diarrhea in four patients (11.8%), abdominal pain and constipation in two patients (5.9%), positive occult blood test in two patients (5.9%), mild abdominal discomfort in two patients (5.9%), constipation in one patient (2.9%), diarrhea in one patient (2.9%), and surveillance after colorectal polypectomy in three patients (8.8%). Table 3 shows the demographic characteristics of the 34 patients.
According to the Rome III criteria, [9] two of the 34 patients (5.9%) with abdominal pain and diarrhea and two of the 34 patients (5.9%) with abdominal pain and constipation met criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), two of the 34 patients (5.9%) with abdominal discomfort were considered functional bloating, one of the 34 patients (2.9%) with constipation was considered functional constipation, one of the 34 patients (2.9%) with diarrhea was considered functional diarrhea, two of the 34 patients (5.9%) with abdominal pain and diarrhea were considered unspecified functional bowel disorder.
Clinical Findings
Of the 34 patients, eight (23.5%) were eventually diagnosed with CD on follow-up, 14 (41.2%) achieved mucosal healing, and 12 (35.3%) showed no significant changes in the lesions. Of the 31 patients categorized as symptomatic (symptom onset at least 3 days per month in the last 3 months), eight (26%) had a clinical diagnosis of CD during the follow-up; the mean interval between the first visit and the appearance of typical CD symptoms was 2.0 years (range 1.0–4.0 years). Of the three patients categorized as asymptomatic (without symptom or symptom onset less than 3 days per month in the last 3 months), 2 (66.7%) achieved mucosal healing, and one (33.3%) showed no significant changes in the lesions.
Of the 31 symptomatic patients, 29 (93.5%, 29/31) underwent drug therapy based on their dominant symptoms, 26 (89.7%, 26/29) attained recovery during the initial treatment period, 23 (88.5%, 23/26) experienced symptoms relapse during the withdrawal period, and 20 (87.0%, 20/23) attained recovery during the retreatment period.
Of the 12 patients who showed no significant changes in the lesions, all attained recovery during the initial treatment period, 10 (83.3%, 10/12) experienced symptom relapse during the withdrawal period, and nine (90.0%, 9/10) attained recovery during the retreatment period.
Endoscopic and Pathologic Findings
Normal mucosa was observed on the gastroscopies and radiological exams in the 34 patients.
All of the 34 patients underwent ileoscopy. On the initial colonoscopy exams, each case demonstrated one to several discrete, focal erosions within an otherwise normal small bowel mucosa. The erosions were located less than 5 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve. Most of the erosions were surrounded by normal or edematous mucosa and were covered by thin or faint exudates. (Fig. 1a, 1b, and 1c) The size of the erosions was estimated to be 2 to 3 mm. Of the 34 patients, 10 patients (29.4%) had a single erosion, and 24 patients (70.6%) had several erosions.
Erosions surrounded by normal mucosa (1a), edematous mucosa (1b), and covered by thin or faint exudates (1a, 1b, and 1c).
Of the eight patients with a clinical diagnosis of CD, typical longitudinal ulcerations existed in seven patients, irregular ulcerations existed in one patient (Fig. 2a and 2b), narrowing or stricture on imaging in four patients, perianal disease in one patient, and multiple episodes of small bowel obstruction in one patient.
Typical longitudinal ulcerations of CD covered with mucous exudates (2a), and irregular ulcerations existed of CD covered with mucous exudates (2b). CD, Crohn's disease.
The initial histologic findings in the patients included mucosal edema (7), erosions (8), acute or chronic inflammatory cells (11) and architectural alterations (3). The 8 patients with a final diagnosis of CD had non-caseating granulomas (3), architectural alterations (9) cryptitis (3), or focal chronic (lymphocytes and plasma cells) inflammation (7).
All of the patients responded to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatments (1 patient was treated with infliximab and azathioprine, two patients were treated with azathioprine, and five patients were treated with 5-amino salicylic acid) and were still on maintenance therapy for CD at the most recent follow-up.
Clinical Symptoms and Outcomes
We conducted a logistic regression analysis to assess the factors associated with progression of isolated terminal ileal lesions in the 34 patients. The independent variables were age, sex, clinical symptoms, and duration of follow-up; the dependent variables were developing CD and mucosal healing. In this regression model, only abdominal pain was significantly associated with developing CD and mucosal healing (developing CD: OR 13.1 95% CI, 1.4–124.5, P = 0.025; mucosal healing OR = 38.1 95% CI, 3.5–414.0, P = 0.003).
The 34 patients were divided into an abdominal pain group and an non-abdominal pain group based on their clinical symptoms; the abdominal pain group contained 16 patients (10 patients with abdominal pain, four patients with abdominal pain and diarrhea, and two patients with abdominal pain and constipation), and the non-abdominal pain group contained 18 patients (nine patients with stools >3 times daily, two patients with positive occult blood tests, two patients with mild abdominal discomfort, three patients with surveillance after colorectal polypectomy, one patient with constipation, and one patient with diarrhea). In the abdominal pain group, seven patients were eventually diagnosed with CD on follow-up, Including two patients with IBS. The median interval between the first visit and the presentation of typical CD symptoms was 2 years (range 1–4 years). In the remaining nine patients with abdominal pain, eight showed no significant changes compared with their initial colonoscopic findings, and one patient achieved mucosal healing after anti-tuberculosis therapy for 9 months. In the non-abdominal pain group, 13 patients achieved mucosal healing. The median interval between the first visit and mucosal healing was 3 years (range 1–5 years). In the remaining five patients without abdominal pain, four showed no significant changes, and one patient with a positive occult blood test developed CD in the 3rd year of follow-up.
Of the 34 patients, sex and age were not significantly different between the abdominal pain and non-abdominal pain groups. The Kaplan–Meier method showed that the cumulative proportions of CD in the abdominal pain group in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years of follow-up were 6.2%, 31.2% and 42.7%, respectively, whereas in the non-abdominal pain group, the proportions were 0, 0, and 6.2%, respectively. The log-rank test showed that the cumulative proportion of CD in the abdominal pain group after 3 years was statistically higher than that in the non-abdominal pain group (42.7% vs. 6.2%, χ2 = 10.129, P = 0.001). (Fig. 3) The cumulative proportions of mucosal healing in the non-abdominal pain group in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th years of follow-up were 6.2%, 27.8%, 55.6% and 73.3%, respectively, whereas the proportions in the abdominal pain group were 5.6%, 5.6%, 5.6% and 5.6%, respectively. The cumulative proportion of mucosal healing in the non-abdominal pain group after 4 years was statistically higher than that in the abdominal pain group (73% vs. 6%, χ2 = 5.225, P = 0.022). (Fig. 4)
The cumulative proportions of CD in the abdominal pain group in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years of follow-up were 6%, 31% and 43%, respectively, and the proportions in the non-abdominal pain group were 0, 0, and 6%, respectively. Moreover, the cumulative proportion of CD in the abdominal pain group after 3 years was statistically higher than that in the non-abdominal pain group (43% vs. 6%, χ2 = 10.129, P = 0.001). CD, Crohn's disease.
The cumulative proportions of mucosal healing in the non-abdominal pain group in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th years of follow-up were 6%, 28%, 56% and 73%, respectively, and the proportions in the abdominal pain group were 6%, 6%, 6% and 6%, respectively. Moreover, the cumulative proportion of mucosal healing in the non-abdominal pain group after 4 years was statistically higher than that in the abdominal pain group (73% vs. 6%, χ2 = 5.225, P = 0.022).
Endoscopic Findings, Pathologic Findings and Outcomes
Next, we analyzed the association between the initial endoscopic findings and ITIL disease outcomes. We found that the numbers of lesions on the initial colonoscopy exams did not differ in the patients who were eventually diagnosed with CD on follow-up, achieved mucosal healing, and showed no significant changes in the lesions (2 (1–3) vs. 2.5 (1–3) vs. 2.5 (1–3), χ2 = 1.252, P = 0.535). Similarly, the initial histologic findings did not differ in these three groups (the proportion of patients with mucosal edema 25.0% (2/8) vs. 21.4% (3/14) vs.16.7% (2/12), χ2 = 0.427, P = 1.000; the proportion of patients with erosions 12.5% (1/8) vs. 21.4% (3/14) vs. 33.3% (4/12), χ2 = 1.144, P = 0.678; the proportion of patients with acute or chronic inflammatory cells 25.0% (2/8) vs. 50.0% (7/14) vs.16.7% (2/12), χ2 = 3.304, P = 0.207; and the proportion of patients with architectural alterations 12.5% (1/8) vs. 0 (0/14) vs. 16.7% (2/12), χ2 = 2.543, P = 0.317).
Discussion
Through a prospective study, we aimed to assess the factors associated with progression of ITILs in 34 Chinese patients.
ITILs are not uncommonly seen during routine screening colonoscopy, the frequency was about 0.1–0.3% and 0.1% (34/32,197) in this study. [4], [5] The clinical significance of the ITILs is unclear. Goldstein et al. reported that eight of 28 patients (28.6%) developed typical CD at an average interval of 3.6 years. [7] Then, Courville et al. reported that 10 of 29 patients (34.5%) developed typical CD at an average interval of 2.2 to 12.6 years. [10] A recent study by Chang et al. reported that 1 of 93 patients (1.1%) developed typical CD at an average interval of 29.9 months. [4] Conversely, Lengeling et al. reported that 40 patients identified with “ulcerative ileitis” at ileocolonoscopy had no specific disease process development in a median follow-up of 3.2 years. [5] In this study, 23.5% of the patients were eventually diagnosed with CD on follow-up, and 41.2% of the patients achieved mucosal healing. The lower probability of achieving mucosal healing in this study could have been the result of the patients with different clinical symptoms, different follow-up lengths, and racial differences.
Aphthoid or small erosions have been considered one of the earliest manifestations of CD. Two previous studies showed that 44% (4/9) and 50% (5/10) of patients with aphthous-type CD later developed typical CD. [11], [12] More recent studies have shown that the disease outcomes of ITILs are related to the clinical symptoms of patients. A study by Goldstein et al. reported that all 8 patients (29%) with ITILs who had developed CD on follow-up presented with abdominal pain, mucus-rich, blood-tinged stools; irregular bowel function with intermittent constipation and diarrhea; and low-level systemic malaise. [7] Recently, a study by Courville et al. reported that 10 of 15 (66.7%) symptomatic patients, and 0 of 14 asymptomatic patients had developed CD at the most recent follow-up. [10] Our findings are similar in those patients undergoing colonoscopy for symptoms; eight of 31 (26%) symptomatic patients and zero of three asymptomatic patients had developed CD during the follow-up. We conducted a logistic regression analysis and found that only abdominal pain was significantly associated with developing CD. Further analysis showed that the cumulative proportion of CD in the abdominal pain group after 3 years was statistically higher than that in the non-abdominal pain group.
Should patients with ITILs be treated? Two studies reported that isolated terminal ileal ulcerations completely resolved without any treatment on follow-up colonoscopy in 66.7% of asymptomatic patients (four of six patients and 62 of 93 patients, respectively). [4], [10] In this present study, two of the three (66.7%) asymptomatic patients completely resolved without inflammatory bowel disease-related treatment. We conducted a logistic regression analysis and found that only abdominal pain was significantly associated with mucosal healing. Further analysis showed that the cumulative proportion of mucosal healing in the non-abdominal pain group was statistically higher than that in the abdominal pain group. Our findings suggest that these patients in the non-abdominal pain group do not warrant any inflammatory bowel disease-related treatment, and a wait and watch approach seems to be the most prudent at the present time.
A study by Courville et al. reported that the endoscopic and histopathological findings in patients with asymptomatic ileitis closely mimicked those observed in CD, but these patients did not progress to overt CD on long-term follow-up. [10] A recent study by Chang et al. reported that the proportion of patients with ulcerations <5 mm in diameter was not significantly different between the 60 patients showing isolated terminal ileal ulcerations resolution without treatment and the 31 patients with continued isolated terminal ileal ulcerations on follow-up. [4] Similar to these reports, we found that the numbers of lesions on the initial colonoscopy exams were not related to the ITIL disease outcomes. Similarly, the initial histologic findings were not related to the ITIL disease outcomes. Thus, the endoscopic or histopathological findings may not be useful in predicting the disease outcomes in patients with ITILs.
Irregular bowel movements, pain or bloating may coexist in a considerable number of IBD patients, which were present in 35.4–46% of CD patients and 37.5% (3/8) in this study. [13], [14] There is uncertainty as to the aetiology of these apparent functional symptoms in IBD patients. Genetic factors, disordered gut permeability, psychosocial stress, or a persistent increase in TNF-α or mucosal pain receptor in colonic mucosa may contribute to these symptoms. [14]–[21] A previous study by Keohane et al. found that faecal calprotectin levels were helpful to identify CD patients with IBS-type symptoms. [22] Then, a study by Berrill et al. found a conflicting result. [23] However, a systematic diagnostic approach is required to assess IBD patients with IBS-type symptoms as sub-clinical inflammation may play a role in a proportion of cases. [23]
Calprotectin is an abundant calcium-binding protein that is derived predominantly from neutrophils and, to a lesser extent, from monocytes and reactive macrophages. [24] The presence of calprotectin in faeces is directly proportional to neutrophil migration towards the intestinal tract. [25]–[27] Two studies by Tibble and Carroccio et al. found that approximately half of patients with active celiac disease had elevated fecal calprotectin concentrations. [28], [29] Another study by Berni et al examined a total of 38 children with celiac disease. They found that those patients with active celiac disease had elevated fecal calprotectin concentrations compared with healthy control subjects and that there was a trend toward normal values after 4 weeks of an exclusion diet. [30] However, the specificity for the diagnosis of ITILs should be low, as several diseases such IBD, microscopic colitis, allergic colitis, colorectal neoplasia, gastrointestinal infection and chronic diarrhea can also increase faecal calprotectin. [29], [31]–[34] High concentration of calprotectin in faeces is a strong argument to carry out a colonoscopy in order to rule out the presence of IBD or other organic pathologies. Maybe faecal calprotectin is useful during the follow-up on ITILs.
In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that the ITIL disease outcomes are related to the clinical symptoms. ITILs are likely to develop into CD in patients with abdominal pain but are likely to resolve in patients without abdominal pain. It should be noted that all patients underwent gastroscopy and double contrast small bowel radiography instead of MRI, or videocapsule to evaluate their upper gastrointestinal and small intestinal mucosa, so subtle small bowel lesions may be missed diagnosis in these patients. Our study is limited by the small number of patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these initial findings. It remains unclear whether ITILs should be treated with 5-aminosalicylates or corticosteroids in patients with abdominal pain. Thus, further randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in large cohorts of subjects are needed to verify this question.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: ZF HW CY. Performed the experiments: ZF ZW XF. Analyzed the data: ZF HW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ZF ZC CY. Wrote the paper: ZF ZC.
References
- 1. McHugh JB, Appelman HD, McKenna BJ (2007) The diagnostic value of endoscopic terminal ileum biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol 102: 1084–1089.
- 2. Geboes K, Ectors N, D'Haens G, Rutgeerts P (1998) Is ileoscopy with biopsy worthwhile in patients presenting with symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease? Am J Gastroenterol 93: 201–206.
- 3. Geboes K (2007) The strategy for biopsies of the terminal ileum should be evidence based. Am J Gastroenterol 102: 1090–1092.
- 4. Chang HS, Lee D, Kim JC, Song HK, Lee HJ, et al. (2010) Isolated terminal ileal ulcerations in asymptomatic individuals: natural course and clinical significance. Gastrointest Endosc 72: 1226–1232.
- 5. Lengeling RW, Mitros FA, Brennan JA, Schulze KS (2003) Ulcerative ileitis encountered at ileo-colonoscopy: likely role of nonsteroidal agents. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1: 160–169.
- 6. Greaves ML, Pochapin M (2006) Asymptomatic ileitis: past, present, and future. J Clin Gastroenterol 40: 281–285.
- 7. Goldstein NS (2006) Isolated ileal erosions in patients with mildly altered bowel habits. A follow-up study of 28 patients. Am J Clin Pathol 125: 838–846.
- 8. O'Donnell LJD, Virjee J, Heaton KW (1990) Detection of pseudodiarrhea by simple clinical assessment of intestinal transit rate. BMJ 300: 439–440.
- 9. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC (2006) Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 130: 1480–1491.
- 10. Courville EL, Siegel CA, Vay T, Wilcox AR, Suriawinata AA, Srivastava A (2009) Isolated asymptomatic ileitis does not progress to overt Crohn disease on long-term follow-up despite features of chronicity in ileal biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol 33: 1341–1347.
- 11. Hizawa K, Iida M, Kohrogi N, Kuroki F, Yao T, et al. (1994) Crohn disease: early recognition and progress of aphthous lesions. Radiology 190: 451–454.
- 12. Matsumoto T, Iida M, Nakamura S, Hizawa K, Yao T, Fujishima M (2000) Crohn's disease of aphthous type: serial changes in intestinal lesions. Br J Radiol 73: 1046–1051.
- 13. Halpin SJ, Ford AC (2012) Prevalence of symptoms meeting criteria for irritable bowel syndrome in inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 107: 1474–1482.
- 14. Vivinus-Nébot M, Frin-Mathy G, Bzioueche H, Dainese R, Bernard G, et al. (2013) Functional bowel symptoms in quiescent inflammatory bowel diseases: role of epithelial barrier disruption and low-grade inflammation. Gut [Epub ahead of print].
- 15. Zucchelli M, Camilleri M, Andreasson AN, Bresso F, Dlugosz A, et al. (2011) Association of TNFSF15 polymorphism with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 60: 1671–1677.
- 16. Villani AC, Lemire M, Thabane M, Belisle A, Geneau G, et al. (2010) Genetic risk factors for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome following a waterborne outbreak of gastroenteritis. Gastroenterology 138: 1502–1513.
- 17. Porter CK, Gloor K, Cash BD, Riddle MS (2011) Risk of functional gastrointestinal disorders in U.S. military following self-reported diarrhea and vomiting during deployment. Dig Dis Sci 56: 3262–3269.
- 18. Zhou Q, Zhang B, Verne GN (2009) Intestinal membrane permeability and hypersensitivity in the irritable bowel syndrome. Pain 146: 41–46.
- 19. Singh S, Graff LA, Bernstein CN (2009) Do NSAIDs, antibiotics, infections, or stress trigger flares in IBD? Am J Gastroenterol 104: 1298–1313.
- 20. Spiller R, Garsed K (2009) Postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 136: 1979–1988.
- 21. Akbar A, Yiangou Y, Facer P, Brydon WG, Walters JR, et al. (2010) Expression of the TRPV1 receptor differs in quiescent inflammatory bowel disease with or without abdominal pain. Gut 59: 767–774.
- 22. Keohane J, O'Mahony C, O'Mahony L, O'Mahony S, Quigley EM, Shanahan F (2010) Irritable bowel syndrome-type symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a real association or reflection of occult inflammation? Am J Gastroenterol 105: 1788, 1789–1794.
- 23. Berrill JW, Green JT, Hood K, Campbell AK (2013) Symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: examining the role of sub-clinical inflammation and the impact on clinical assessment of disease activity. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 38: 44–51.
- 24. Bjerke K, Halstensen TS, Jahnsen F, Pulford K, Brandtzaeg P (1993) Distribution of macrophages and granulocytes expressing L1 protein (calprotectin) in human Peyer's patches compared with normal ileal lamina propria and mesenteric lymph nodes. Gut 34: 1357–1363.
- 25. Vermeire S, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P (2006) Laboratory markers in IBD: useful, magic, or unnecessary toys? Gut 55: 426–431.
- 26. Vermeire S, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P (2004) C-reactive protein as a marker for inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10: 661–665.
- 27. Vermeire S, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P (2005) The role of C-reactive protein as an inflammatory marker in gastrointestinal diseases. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2: 580–586.
- 28. Tibble JA, Sigthorsson G, Foster R, Forgacs I, Bjarnason I (2002) Use of surrogate markers of inflammation and Rome criteria to distinguish organic from nonorganic intestinal disease. Gastroenterology 123: 450–460.
- 29. Carroccio A, Iacono G, Cottone M, Di Prima L, Cartabellotta Fe, et al. (2003) Diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin assay in distinguishing organic causes of chronic diarrhea from irritable bowel syndrome: a prospective study in adults and children. Clin Chem 49 (6 Pt 1) 861–867.
- 30. Berni Canani R, Rapacciuolo L, Romano MT, Tanturri de Horatio L, Terrin G, et al. (2004) Diagnostic value of faecal calprotectin in paediatric gastroenterology clinical practice. Dig Liver Dis 36: 467–470.
- 31. Tibble J, Teahon K, Thjodleifsson B, Roseth A, Sigthorsson G, et al. (2000) A simple method for assessing intestinal inflammation in Crohn's disease. Gut 47: 506–513.
- 32. Stavlo PL, Libsch KD, Rodeberg DA, Moir CR (2003) Pediatric ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcomes and quality of life. J Pediatr Surg 38: 935–939.
- 33. Limburg PJ, Ahlquist DA, Sandborn WJ, Mahoney DW, Devens ME, et al. (2000) Fecal calprotectin levels predict colorectal inflammation among patients with chronic diarrhea referred for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 95: 2831–2837.
- 34. Gisbert JP, McNicholl AG (2009) Questions and answers on the role of faecal calprotectin as a biological marker in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Liver Dis 41: 56–66.