Figures
Abstract
Sporotrichosis is a polymorphic disease caused by a complex of thermodimorphic fungi including S. brasiliensis, S. schenckii sensu stricto (s. str.), S. globosa and S. luriei. Humans and animals can acquire the disease through traumatic inoculation of propagules into the subcutaneous tissue. Despite the importance of sporotrichosis as a disease that can take epidemic proportions there are just a few studies dealing with genetic polymorphisms and genomic architecture of these pathogens. The main objective of this study was to investigate chromosomal polymorphisms and genomic organization among different isolates in the S. schenckii complex. We used pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to separate chromosomal fragments of isolated DNA, followed by probe hybridization. Nine loci (β-tubulin, calmodulin, catalase, chitin synthase 1, Internal Transcribed Spacer, Pho85 cyclin-dependent kinase, protein kinase C Ss-2, G protein α subunit and topoisomerase II) were mapped onto chromosomal bands of Brazilian isolates of S. schenckii s. str. and S. brasiliensis. Our results revealed the presence of intra and interspecies polymorphisms in chromosome number and size. The gene hybridization analysis showed that closely related species in phylogenetic analysis had similar genetic organizations, mostly due to identification of synteny groups in chromosomal bands of similar sizes. Our results bring new insights into the genetic diversity and genome organization among pathogenic species in the Sporothrix schenckii complex.
Citation: Sasaki AA, Fernandes GF, Rodrigues AM, Lima FM, Marini MM, dos S. Feitosa L, et al. (2014) Chromosomal Polymorphism in the Sporothrix schenckii Complex. PLoS ONE 9(1): e86819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086819
Editor: Gustavo Henrique Goldman, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil
Received: September 20, 2013; Accepted: December 14, 2013; Published: January 23, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Sasaki et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: AAS is a fellow of Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and acknowledges the financial support of Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. GFF is a fellow of FAPESP (2011/01628-8). AMR is a fellow of Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP 2011/07350-1) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (BEX 2325/11-0). ZPdC thanks FAPESP (Proc. 09/54024-2) and CNPq (Proc. 472600/2011-7). CNPq (http://www.cnpq.br/), and CAPES (http://www.capes.gov.br/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Sporotrichosis is a chronic, granulomatous, subcutaneous disease caused by several thermodimorphic pathogenic species in the Sporothrix schenckii complex [1]. It is widely reported that the infection occurs through traumatic inoculation of fungal propagules into the skin by contaminated material, such as soil, thorns or splinters. Sporotrichosis mainly affects humans and animals [2]–[4]. The zoonotic potential, as exemplified by animal scratches and bites, particularly from cats, are the most common modes of transmission to humans in hyperendemic areas in Brazil [5], [6]. In some cases, human infections are associated with transmission from wild animals; for example, injuries caused by armadillos when hunting the animal [7]. Sporotrichosis has a worldwide distribution with a high incidence in temperate and tropical regions including Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Uruguay), South Africa, India, and Japan [8].
Currently, medically relevant Sporothrix spp. in the S. schenckii complex are S. brasiliensis (Clade I), S. schenckii sensu stricto (s. str.) (Clade II), S. globosa (Clade III), and S. luriei (Clade VI) [1]; while, S. mexicana (Clade IV) and S. pallida (Clade V) are remotely related in phylogenetic analysis [1], [3], [6] and, therefore, are considered apart from the clinical group. These species were identified based on multi-locus sequencing, morphology, and physiological characteristics [9], [10]. Sporothrix schenckii s. str. is found predominantly on the American, Asian, and African continents; S. globosa is a widespread species, found with high frequency in Europe and Asia; and S. brasiliensis has been isolated exclusively in Brazil [1], [9]. Sporothrix luriei is a rare pathogen. Four human cases have been reported, but the etiological agent was only isolated in the first reported case [11]. In Brazil, over the last decades, the incidence of sporotrichosis has increased exponentially to epidemic proportions. The epidemic occurred mainly in Rio de Janeiro, and was caused by S. brasiliensis [6], [9].
Recent studies have shown important differences in virulence and drug resistance profiles among different species in the S. schenckii complex. Sporothrix brasiliensis is the most virulent species. In contrast, S. globosa and S. mexicana showed little or no virulence in a murine model [12]–[14]. When compared for drug resistance, S. brasiliensis was less resistant than other species, and S. mexicana was the most resistant [15]. Despite these findings, little is known about the genetic mechanisms of virulence and drug resistance in the S. schenckii complex.
Fungi present complex genomes and fungal chromosomes are small and difficult to visualize with traditional karyotyping techniques [16]. The development of pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) by Schwartz and Cantor [17] and improvements of this technique over the years have promoted a novel method for studying fungal chromosomes. With this method, the molecular karyotypes of eight S. schenckii sensu lato (s.l.) isolates were defined in Japan. Those isolates appeared to include 6 to 8 chromosomal bands, and each band contained one or more chromosomes of the same size. The genome size was estimated to be approximately 28 Mb [18]. In that study, the authors applied four distinct conditions to separate and estimate the chromosome numbers and sizes for S. schenckii s.l. isolates. The four different conditions used made it difficult to compare similar chromosomes, and that approach may not have provided accurate estimates of the genome size. Furthermore, that study was performed before the new Sporothrix species had been defined; hence, it is not clear whether the authors studied S. schenckii s. str. or isolates of S. globosa, which are also found in the Asian territory.
The genomic organization and chromosome number in different species in the S. schenckii complex remain unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate chromosomal polymorphisms among Sporothrix spp. isolates from diverse geographic origins with the PFGE technique. Additionally, we used hybridization to map the location of nine genetic markers onto the chromosomal bands of Brazilian isolates of S. schenckii s. str. and S. brasiliensis. Our results showed the existence of polymorphisms in the number and size of chromosomes among different Sporothrix isolates. This information will be useful for genetic mapping and for future studies on the chromosomal organization and epidemiology of the S. schenckii complex.
Materials and Methods
Fungal Strains and Growth Conditions
Fungal isolates (n = 23) were grown on Sabouraud agar slants at room temperature for 7 days. Then, the total growth from each slant was transferred to a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 ml of Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth (Acumedia, USA), supplemented with dextrose (18 g/L), pH 8.0, and incubated at 37°C for 10 days, under gentle shaking. This procedure induced yeast formation. The codes and information for all isolates are summarized in Table 1.
Isolation of Genomic DNA and Preparation of Intact Chromosomal DNA from Sporothrix spp. Cells
Genomic DNA was extracted according to the protocol of de Bievre et al. [19], with some modifications. Briefly, yeast cells were washed 3 times with wash buffer (50 mM EDTA, pH 8.0); then, cells were resuspended in protoplast buffer, which contained 5 mM EDTA, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.01% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol, and 0.1 mg/mL zymolyase-20T (MP Biomedicals, USA). Cells were incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Next, lysis buffer was added, which contained 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mg/mL proteinase K, 5% (w/v), and sarkosyl. Cells were incubated for 1 h at 56°C. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected and mixed with phenol:chloroform:isoamilic alcohol (25∶24∶1) and incubated at room temperature, under gentle shaking, for 10 min. The samples were centrifuged, and supernatants were incubated with absolute ethanol and 300 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.2) at −20°C for 16 h. After centrifugation, the pellet was washed with 70% ethanol dried, and resuspended in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0), supplemented with 1 µg/mL RNAse. The solution was incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The remaining DNA in solution was washed with phenol:chloroform:isoamilic alcohol (25∶24∶1) and centrifuged. The water phase was collected, isopropyl alcohol was added, and the suspension was incubated for 16 h at −20°C. Finally, the samples were centrifuged, and the pellet washed with 70% ethanol. The pellet was allowed to dry at 37°C, then resuspended in sterile water, and stored at −20°C until use.
We embedded cells within agarose plugs that could be inserted into a PFGE system for chromosome isolation. PFGE plugs were prepared according to the protocol of Herschleb et al. [20], with minor modifications. Briefly, yeast cells were harvested from BHI broth and washed 3 times with wash buffer (EDTA 50 mM, pH 8.0); 2×108 yeast cells were used to prepare each agarose plug. The cells were mixed with Zymolyase solution (1 mg/mL Zymolyase-20T in glycerol-phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) and 1% Low Melting Point Agarose (FMC BioProducts, USA) to achieve a final concentration of 1×108 cells/mL. Then, the cell suspension was pipetted into a casting mold, and the agar was allowed to solidify at 4°C. The plugs were removed from the molds, and a spheroplast solution (0.5 M EDTA, 7.5% β-mercaptoethanol, pH 8.0) was added. The PFGE plugs were incubated overnight at 37°C. The spheroplast solution was replaced with NDSK buffer, which contained 0.5 M EDTA, 1% (w/v) N-laurylsarcosine (Sigma, USA), and 1 mg/ml Proteinase K (Sigma, USA), pH 9.5. Then, the PFGE plugs were washed 3 times with wash buffer, and incubated overnight at 50°C. After washing 3 times with wash buffer, the NDSK buffer was replaced with stock solution (0.5 M EDTA, pH 9.5) and stored at 4°C until use.
Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis
The PFGE separation was performed according to Feitosa et al. [21], with minor modifications. Briefly, DNA plugs were loaded onto the PFGE gel (0.8%), and chromosomal separation was carried out in the Gene Navigator System (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, USA) at a constant temperature of 10°C. The best chromosomal band resolution was achieved in 1× TAE buffer with homogeneous pulses and interpolation for 168 h at 42 V (phase 1: pulse time 900 s/24 h; phase 2∶1800 s/24 h; phase 3∶2700 s/48 h; phase 4∶3600 s/48 h; phase 5∶4500 s/24 h). Schizosaccharomyces pombe chromosomes (Bio-Rad, USA) were run in parallel as standard size markers. After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with 0.5 µL/mL ethidium bromide (0.5 µL/mL; EtBr) for 15 min, and washed with distilled water for 15 min. The digital images of the gel were acquired with a L-Pix Touch documentation system (Loccus Biotecnologia, Brazil).
Densitometric Analysis
Densitometric analysis was performed with LabImage 1D, ver. 3.3.4 software (Kapelan Bio-Imaging, Germany), and chromosomal band sizes were estimated. Each chromosomal band size was calculated by comparing its migration with that of S. pombe chromosomes, which were used as standard size markers.
PCR Amplification and DNA Probes
PCR was used to amplify gene fragments from β-tubulin (β-tub) [10], calmodulin (Calm) [22], catalase (Cata) [23], chitin synthase 1 (CHS1) [24], Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) [25], Pho85 cyclin-dependent kinase (Pho85) [26], protein kinase C Ss-2 (PKC) [27], G protein α subunit (GProt) [28], and topoisomerase II (Topo) [29] with primers designed to target specific gene sequences (Table S1). The DNA sample from S. schenckii s. str. (Ss126) (100 ng/µL) was also amplified in PCR reactions with the PCR Master Mix (Promega, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Each amplicon was cloned into the pGEM-T Easy Vector System (Promega, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. These plasmids were transfected into Subcloning Efficiency DH5-α Competent Cells (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Plasmids were purified with the NucleoSpin Plasmid kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany) and sequenced with the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) and an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA).
Radiolabeling Probes and Southern Blot Hybridization
Specific probe sequences were prepared by excising DNA fragments from the plasmids with the EcoRI restriction enzyme (Fermentas, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The probes were purified with the NucleoSpin Extract II kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). In addition, the entire 7.0 Mb chromosomal band of isolate Ss126 was excised from an agarose gel, and the agarose was digested with β-agarase (Lonza, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Also, genomic DNA was digested with the HaeIII restriction enzyme (Fermentas, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, then the fragments were purified to use as a probe. All probes were radiolabeled with the Random Primers Labeling System kit (Invitrogen, USA) and dCTP (α-P32) (Perkin Elmer, USA).
After PFGE, chromosomal bands were transferred to a Hybond-N nylon membrane (Amersham Bioscience, United Kingdom) by capillary action at room temperature. DNA was fixed to the membrane in a GS Gene Linker UV™ Chamber (Bio-Rad, USA) under UV irradiation (150 mJ). The fixed membranes were stored at −4°C until use.
For hybridization, the membranes were incubated with pre-hybridization buffer, which contained 0.25 M Na2PO4, 2 mL phosphoric acid (85%), 7% SDS, 1% BSA, and 1 mM EDTA, for 30 min at 65°C. The radiolabeled probes were added, and hybridization was carried out at 65°C, for 16 h. The membranes were washed once in 20 ml of Solution I (0.25 M Na2PO4, 2 mL phosphoric acid, 1% SDS, and 1 mM EDTA) at 65°C for 30 min, and then once in 20 ml of solution II (0.125 M Na2PO4, 1 mL phosphoric acid [85%], 1% SDS, and 1 mM EDTA) for 30 min. Next, the membranes were exposed to x-ray film (GE Healthcare, United Kingdom) for 2 to 4 days at −80°C, and finally, the film was developed.
Phylogenetic Analysis
The calmodulin gene [9] and ITS region fragments [1] were amplified directly from genomic DNA with primer sets CL1 and CL2A (for calmodulin) and ITS1 and ITS4 (for ITS). Amplified products were gel-purified with the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega Corp., USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA samples were sequenced as described above. Fragments were sequenced on both strands to increase the quality of sequence data (Pherd>30). Alignment of sequences was performed with the ClustalW algorithm [30], implemented in BioEdit software [31]. Retrieved alignments were manually corrected to avoid mispaired bases. Nucleotide sequences were exported into a FASTA file to use in a BLAST search (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST).
For reference sequences, this study included calmodulin sequences (n = 43) from other isolates of S. schenckii s. str. (n = 8), S. brasiliensis (n = 9), S. globosa (n = 8), and S. mexicana (n = 2), and ITS sequences (n = 43) from isolates of S. schenckii s. str. (n = 8), S. brasiliensis (n = 6), S. globosa (n = 7), S. mexicana (n = 1), and S. brunneoviolacea (n = 1). These sequences were previously deposited in GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) and described by Marimon et al. [9], [10], Rodrigues et al. [3], [6], Fernandes et al. [14], Madrid et al. [32], Zhou et al. [1], Oliveira et al. [33], and Silva-Vergara et al. [34] (Table 1). The calmodulin and ITS sequences were concatenated with FaBox software [35], available at http://www.birc.au.dk/fabox. Evolutionary analysis was performed in MEGA5 [36] with Neighbor-joining and Maximum Likelihood methods. To estimate confidence values for individual clades, the Tamura 3-parameter nucleotide substitution model was used [37], with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1) rate variation among sites, and 1,000 bootstrap replicates [38].
Results
Phylogenetic Analysis
The Calm and ITS regions were amplified with PCR, which yielded fragments of approximately 800 bp and 620 bp, respectively. These sequences were aligned and concatenated for phylogenetic analysis. The concatenated sequences were 1,389 bp long and included 872 invariable characters (63%), 224 variable parsimony-informative characters (16%), and 183 singleton characters. Positions that contained gaps or missing data were eliminated. The 43 concatenated sequences were clustered into 7 main groups. Clades I–III and VI (S. brasiliensis, S. schenckii s. str., S. globosa and S. luriei, respectively) are related to human and animal infections, while S. pallida (Clade V), S. mexicana (Clade IV) and S. brunneoviolacea are well described as soil and decaying wood inhabiting (Fig. 1).
In the bootstrap test (1,000 replicates), replicate trees in associated taxa were clustered together. The bootatrap for each tree branch is shown next to the corresponding branch. Star symbols indicate that the isolate was used for pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The cross symbols indicate isolates used in hybridization experiments with genetic markers (probes).
In general, S. schenckii (Clade II) isolates were highly diverse; most isolates from Brazil preferentially clustered into the subclade opposite to the type strain (CBS 359.36). However, the isolates from Mexico and Peru were distributed through the clade II. On the other hand, clade I (S. brasiliensis) and clade III (S. globosa) appeared to be more homogenous, with low genetic diversity.
Molecular Karyotype and Chromosomal Polymorphisms in the S. schenckii Complex
The chromosomal bands of Sporothrix spp. isolates were separated by PFGE and stained with EtBr. A visible chromosomal band on the PFGE may contain one or more co-migrating chromosomes which are not necessarily homologous.
In the densitometric analysis of chromosomal bands separated with PFGE, we determined the numbers and sizes of chromosomes among 16 isolates of the S. schenckii complex. The different S. schenckii s. str. isolates displayed remarkable differences in chromosome profiles. The isolates had 4 to 7 chromosomal bands, ranging from 2.0 to 7.0 Mb (Fig. 2A, C; Figs. S1 and S2). In contrast, S. brasiliensis isolates showed fewer polymorphisms; in which the karyotype was composed of 5 to 7 chromosomal bands, ranging from 2.9 to 7.0 Mb (Fig. 2B, D; Fig. S3). Interestingly, several isolates of S. schenckii s. str. and S. brasiliensis had similar electrophoretic karyotypic profiles (Fig. 2A and Fig. S1A–C; Fig. 2D and Fig. S3A, C, respectively). The isolates of S. mexicana and S. luriei had karyotype profiles composed of 4 (ranging from 4.0 to 7.0 Mb) and 6 (ranging from 1.2 to 7.0 Mb) chromosomal bands, respectively (Fig. 2E–F).
Each panel shows (left) the ethidium bromide-stained gel after pulsed field gel electrophoresis of chromosomes from the fungus strain indicated, and (right) a graph of the densitometric analysis. The size of each chromosomal band (Mb) is indicated on the left and above the corresponding peaks on the graph. Open arrows indicate where samples were loaded.
To facilitate visualization and comparisons among the karyotype profiles of all isolates from the S. schenckii complex, we created a schematic of chromosomal bands (Fig. 3). Most chromosomal bands of S. schenckii s. str. and S. brasiliensis isolates ranged in size from 7.0 to 5.8 Mb and from 3.5 to 2.5 Mb. Several isolates also had bands ranging from 5.7 to 3.8 Mb. Sporothrix mexicana had no chromosomal bands smaller than 4.0 Mb, but the S. luriei isolate had a small chromosomal band of 1.2 Mb. The electrophoretic karyotypes were not correlated with the source of isolation (i.e., human or environment) or with the clinical characteristics of the disease.
Each species is grouped inside a colored rectangle. Red: S. schenckii; Yellow: S. brasiliensis; Blue: S. mexicana; Purple: S. luriei. The sizes of chromosomal bands (Mb) are shown on the left. Σ: The minimum genome sizes estimated by summing the chromosomal bands (Mb) are shown at the bottom.
Mapping S. schenckii s. str. Genes in Chromosomal Bands of Different Isolates
Due to the high prevalence of S. brasiliensis and S. schenckii s. str. in Brazil [3], [6], [9], we evaluated the differences in genome structures among eight S. schenckii s. str. isolates and two S. brasiliensis isolates collected in distinct regions of Brazil. The hybridization profiles generated with nine genetic markers were very similar among the S. schenckii s. str. and S. brasiliensis isolates. Some probes, like Calm, CHS1, ITS, GProt, PKC, Pho85, and Topo, hybridized preferentially with the large chromosomal bands (Fig. 4A–G). On the other hand, other probes, like β-tub and Cata, hybridized preferentially with small chromosomal bands (Fig. 4H–I).
Southern blots show radiolabeled probes hybridized to fungi chromosomes. Probes that specifically targeted A: calmodulin (Calm), B: chitin synthase 1 (CHS1), C: Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS), D: G protein α subunit (GProt), E: protein kinase C Ss-2 (PKC), F: Pho85 cyclin-dependent kinase (Pho85), and G: topoisomerase II (Topo) hybridized preferentially to large bands in most isolates. Probes for H: β-tubulin (β-tub) and I: catalase (Cata) hybridized preferentially to small bands in most isolates. J: The 7.0 Mb chromosomal band from isolate Ss126 was used as a probe. The hybridization pattern shows evidence for repetitive sequences. The sizes of major chromosomal bands (Mb) are indicated on the left. The open arrows indicate the wells where samples were loaded. Areas enclosed in a dashed box (E and I) are lanes that were exposed for longer times to better visualize the hybridization signals.
The probe hybridization patterns on chromosomal bands are shown schematically in Figure 5. The 6.5 Mb chromosomal band hybridized with 3 to 6 probes. Four isolates of S. schenckii showed a similar pattern of hybridization (Ss51, Ss137, Ss126 and Ss03) on the 6.5 Mb chromosomal band; in figure 5 the colors indicate the six different probes that hybridized with this band: Calm, CHS1, ITS, PCK, GProt, and Topo. Interestingly, probe Pho85 hybridized with the 5.8 Mb chromosomal band in all isolates. The ITS probe hybridized with small chromosomal bands in S. brasiliensis isolates, but with large chromosomal bands in S. schenckii s. str. In addition to this general observation, it is interesting to note that some chromosomal polymorphisms were detected, mainly in the S. schenckii s. str. isolates. We identified several possible events, including translocation and duplication.
The S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis isolates are indicated at the top. Each grey box represents a chromosomal band with the indicated size (Mb, left). The probes that hybridized to each band are color-coded (bottom). β-tubulin (β-Tub), calmodulin (Calm), catalase (Cata), chitin synthase 1 (CHS1), internal transcribed spacer (ITS), Pho85 cyclin-dependent kinase (Pho85), protein kinase C Ss-2 (PKC), G protein α subunit (GProt), and topoisomerase II (Topo).
Mapping the chromosomal bands with the catalase probe yielded weak hybridization signals in isolates Ss140 and Ss39. Those signals could be clarified when the Hybond nylon membrane was subjected to longer exposure times. The same occurred with PKC in isolates Ss137, Ss126, and Ss03 (Fig. 4E, I). We also observed that Calm, GProt, and ITS probes hybridized with two chromosomal bands in the Ss39 isolate; Calm and GProt hybridized with the 6.7 Mb and 4.7 Mb bands, and ITS hybridized with the 6.7 Mb and 5.8 Mb bands. This suggested the possibility that a gene duplication event may have occurred in this isolate (Fig. 5). In addition, a comparison of the hybridization profiles showed that Calm and GProt were present in all isolates. It is tempting to suggest that those two genes may constitute a linkage group; therefore, they may be two parts of the same DNA molecule. Another possible gene duplication event occurred in the Ss03 isolate; this involved the β-tubulin gene which hybridized to two chromosomal bands of 3.5 Mb and 2.7 Mb. Whether only the gene locus or the entire chromosome was duplicated remains to be demonstrated.
We also identified a possible translocation event of PKC gene. In Ss141 isolate, the PKC probe strongly hybridized to the 2.7 Mb chromosomal band while in others isolates it hybridized on larger size bands (6.5 Mb, 6.3 Mb and 5.4 Mb). Other genes (CHS1, Topo, GProt and Calm) that were mapped with PKC on larger size bands did not move to 2.7 Mb band (Fig. 4), supporting the hypothesis above. Despite the previously reported [39] diploid nature of S. schenckii s.l., our results suggested that this organism may be aneuploid for several chromosomes.
To establish a correlation among the 7.0 Mb chromosomal bands observed in all isolates, this band from isolate Ss126 was excised from the gel, radiolabeled with 32P, and hybridized to the chromoblots. The 7.0 Mb probe hybridized preferentially with the large chromosomal bands in S. schenckii isolates. This hybridization pattern suggested the presence of repetitive sequences in S. schenckii s. str., particularly in the large chromosomal bands (Fig. 4J). The weak hybridization signals in isolate Ss39 may have been due to low amounts of DNA in the PFGE plugs, because the plugs prepared with this isolate appeared to yield less DNA than that yielded with the other isolates. In S. brasiliensis isolates, the hybridization signal was less intense for the larger chromosomal bands and more intense for the smaller bands (Fig. 4J). The hybridization intensity was different between the two Sporothrix species, with a stronger signal in S. schenckii s. str. than in S. brasiliensis. This may have reflected a difference in the content of repetitive sequences.
Estimation of Genome Size
The minimum size of a genome was estimated as the sum of the individual chromosomal bands. The minimum genome size of S. schenckii s. str. isolates varied from 25.1 to 37.5 Mb, and that of S. brasiliensis isolates varied from 25.7 to 34.7 Mb (Fig. 3). The average genome sizes of S. schenckii s. str. and S. brasiliensis were 29.3 Mb and 27.4 Mb, respectively; the genome sizes of S. mexicana and S. luriei isolates were 22.1 Mb and 26.8 Mb, respectively (Fig. 6A).
A: The average minimum genome size for different Sporothrix species was estimated by summing all the chromosomal bands detected after pulsed field gel electrophoresis. B: Comparison of genome sizes estimated from genome sequencing (blue) and estimated from the sum of chromosomal bands (red) for isolates ATCC MYA-4821 (S. schenckii) and ATCC MYA-4823 (S. brasiliensis); the differences in size estimated with the different methodologies are indicated on the right.
Based on genomic data from the genome sequencing project of S. schenckii s. str. (ATCC MYA-4821) and S. brasiliensis (ATCC MYA-4823) isolates, the genome sizes of ATCC MYA-4821 and ATCC MYA-4823 were estimated to be 32.5 Mb and 33.4 Mb, respectively (Marcus de Melo Teixeira and Maria Sueli Soares Felipe, personal communication). In the present study, the minimum genome sizes evaluated by PFGE of these isolates were estimated to be 25.3 Mb (ATCC MYA-4821) and 25.7 Mb (ATCC MYA-4823). Thus, the genome sizes based on genome sequencing were larger than those based on the sum of chromosomal bands (Fig. 6B).
Densitometric analyses showed that both the ATCC MYA-4821 and ATCC MYA-4823 isolates had very high peak pixel intensities for the 7.0 Mb chromosomal band. The 7.0 Mb band was also strongly stained with EtBr (Figure S2A and Figure S3A, ATCC MYA-4821 and ATCC MYA-4823, respectively). In fact, the pixel intensities of the 7.0 Mb chromosomal band (113 for ATCC MYA-4821 S. schenckii and 80 for ATCC MYA-4823 S. brasiliensis,) were close to twice that of the 6.5 Mb chromosomal band (66 and 54 for ATCC MYA-4821 and ATCC MYA-4823, respectively; data not shown). This observation suggested the possibility that an additional chromosome may be present in the 7.0 Mb chromosomal band. This might explain the difference in genome size estimations discussed above. For example, when a second 7.0 Mb chromosome band was added to the sum of all chromosomal bands, the minimum genome sizes were 32.3 Mb and 32.7 Mb for ATCC MYA-4821 and ATCC MYA-4823, respectively. Therefore, our estimations of genome sizes would be very close to those reported based on genome sequencing. Taken together, our results strongly suggested that the 7.0 Mb chromosomal band might contain two or more chromosomes for the ATCC MYA-4823 and ATCC MYA-4821 isolates.
Another indication of chromosomal band co-migration arose from the S. schenckii s. str. gene mapping. The hybridization analysis suggested that the 6.5 Mb chromosomal band might harbor two co-migrating chromosomes. In most S. schenckii isolates, the probes Calm, ITS, CHS1, PKC, GProt, and Topo hybridized with the 6.5 Mb chromosomal band; however, in isolates Ss61 and Ss39, those probes hybridized with two chromosomal bands that ranged from 6.3 to 6.7 Mb (Figs. 4 and 5). The presence of a second 6.5 Mb chromosomal band would increase the average minimum genome size of the S. schenckii isolates to 32.0 Mb (Ss51, Ss137, Ss126, and Ss03) and 37.2 Mb (Ss141). Those values were very close to those reported from genome sequencing, except for the Ss141 isolate, where we estimated a size that was approximately 5.0 Mb higher than the size they estimated. This difference could be explained by karyotype polymorphisms that were previously described for this species.
Discussion
Based on the phylogenetic analysis with sequences from Calm and ITS, we were able to differentiate among the species in the S. schenckii complex. In this study, we found tree topology that was similar to that reported in other studies that used only calmodulin sequences [3], [6], [9], [11], [32].
The electrophoretic karyotype profiles of S. brasiliensis isolates showed less variability than those observed in S. schenckii s. str. isolates. These results were consistent with the phylogenetic data [6], [9]; the variability among isolates within the species was less frequent in S. brasiliensis than in S. schenckii s. str. No correlation was found between the electrophoretic karyotype profiles and the cluster organizations among the isolates described in this study.
Variations in chromosome length are common in fungal strains, although the mechanism underlying chromosome length polymorphisms remains unclear. Potential mechanisms include a recombination between repeated sequences that are in the same orientation (which can cause deletions); chromosome breakage and repair (which can lead to translocations and/or deletions); heterochromosomal recombinations; recombinations between subtelomeric regions; and the loss of a chromosome that contains sequences that are not required for growth [40], [41]. Recently, chromosome fusion was observed in offspring of the fungus Zymoseptoria tritici, and the probable mechanism was attributed to a breakage-fusion-bridge cycle [42]. Chromosomal length polymorphisms are observed in both asexual and sexual fungi species. For example, in Didymella rabiei, the teleomorphic state of the phytopathogenic fungus Ascochyta rabiei, the karyotype polymorphism was observed among different species isolated across the globe; nevertheless, compared to asexual ascomycetes, A. rabiei had a relatively conserved karyotype [43]. This finding showed that sexual or asexual reproduction was independent of the degree of karyotype polymorphism within a species.
As expected, the present study revealed that the S. schenckii complex displayed extensive polymorphisms in chromosome number and size. The first report of polymorphisms in S. schenckii s.l. showed that isolates from a restricted area of Japan had 6 to 8 chromosomal bands, ranging from 0.5 to 6.2 Mb [18]. In the present study, we found no chromosomal bands smaller than 1.2 Mb; however, we identified chromosomal bands larger than 6.2 Mb. Most of the chromosomal bands observed in both studies were similar in size; however, in our study, polymorphisms in the number and sizes of chromosomal bands were evident. In the present study, we found that the S. schenckii s. str. isolate from Japan had 6 chromosomal bands, and the band sizes were similar to those found by Tateishi et al. [18]. These results showed that, despite different methodologies, our estimations of chromosomal bands sizes agreed with those reported previously. This agreement reinforced our finding that the Sporothrix schenckii complex had a high level of chromosome polymorphisms.
The electrophoretic karyotype profiles of isolates showed no correlation with the clinical characteristics or the sources of isolation. This was also described when other techniques were used, such as RAPD. In this study no correlation could be observed among the Brazilian isolates of S. schenckii s.l. from different geographic regions or among the clinical characteristics of sporotrichosis [44]. In Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Feitosa et al. [21] compared isolates from different sources (human, animal, and soil), from different geographical regions (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Peru), and with different clinical characteristics. They found no correlation between karyotype profiles and clinical/epidemiological characteristics. Canteros et al. [45] also found no correlation between the electrophoretic karyotype and geographic region in Histoplasma capsulatum isolated from Latin American patients. Thus, our results were consistent with those on other thermodimorphic fungi. The finding that chromosome rearrangements occurred suggested that they may play an important role in the structure of the genome.
Our results showed that the organization of the Sporothrix genome was relatively conserved among different isolates. The variations observed among the isolates suggested the occurrence of chromosome rearrangements, such as translocations. Some of the chromosome rearrangements and/or duplications observed in our study may also have occurred in P. brasiliensis [21]. The hybridization patterns observed with different probes suggested the presence of gene linkage groups and synteny among the Sporothrix species analyzed. The synteny was conserved in closely related species, consistent with observations in other fungi, like P. brasiliensis, where genes were linked on the same chromosome among different isolates [21], [46].
The finding that the 7.0 Mb chromosomal band from isolate Ss126 hybridized to multiple bands from the Brazilian isolates suggested the presence of repeated sequences in S. schenckii s. str. and S. brasiliensis isolates. The repeated sequences might reflect the chromosomal rearrangements observed in this study, because repeated sequences can provide a substrate for recombination, duplication, deletion, and inversion events [47]. It is interesting to note that, in S. brasiliensis, the strongest signals were observed in the small-sized bands, and the opposite occurred in S. schenckii s. str. Transposons (one class of repeated sequences) constituted 8–9% of the P. brasiliensis genome and 16% of the P. lutzii genome. Transposable elements were responsible for the addition of 3.0 Mb to the genome of P. lutzii [46]. These results suggested that the differences in chromosome sizes among S. schenckii complex isolates may be related to the number of repetitive sequences.
The minimum haploid genome size was calculated by summing the sizes of the chromosomal bands. For S. schenckii s. str., we calculated an average minimum size of 29.3 Mb, similar to the 28 Mb reported by Tateishi et al. [18]. Torres-Guerrero [39] estimated a genome size of 45 Mb for S. schenckii s.l. isolates, based on the diphenylamine method. The discrepancy among these values may be related to the different isolates studied, because they can present chromosomal length polymorphisms, as well as to the different methodologies employed. The ploidy of S. schenckii s. str. remains uncertain. Torres-Guerrero found evidence for a diploid genome; however, the possibility of aneuploidy could not be rejected. Based on chromosome-size summations among S. schenckii s. str. isolates, genome size estimations have varied from 21.7 to 37.4 Mb; but these estimates were at least 2.07 fold lower than the genome size estimation reported by Torres-Guerrero [39].
The haploid genome sizes of S. schenckii (ATCC MYA-4821) and S. brasiliensis (ATCC MYA-4823), estimated from DNA sequencing, were 32.5 Mb and 33.4 Mb, respectively (Marcus de Melo Teixeira and Maria Sueli Soares Felipe, personal communication). Our results strongly suggested that the chromosomal band of 7.0 Mb, and in some cases, the band of 6.5 Mb, may have been duplicated in several isolates. The fluorescence intensities of these bands provided clues that suggested the presence of a duplicated band in isolates ATCC MYA-4821 and ATCC MYA-4823. When the duplicated chromosome was added to the sum of chromosomal bands, the calculated genome size was very close to those reported by groups that had assembled the genomes of S. schenckii s. str. and S. brasiliensis.
When genome sizes calculated by summing the chromosomal bands were compared to genome sizes obtained in genome sequencing, they generally tended to show high similarity. For instance, in Microsporum canis, this type of comparison suggested a doublet band that contributed to the genome size [48]. In contrast, for Paracoccidioides brasiliensis the genome size estimated by sequencing was similar to that estimated by PFGE [46].
S. schenckii complex isolates have shown variable levels of virulence, depending on the species [12], [14]. Generally, the most virulent species in the S. schenckii complex is S. brasiliensis, which showed a high degree of fungal burden in organs and was associated with high mortality [12], [14]. A previous study of these isolates revealed that they present variable degrees of virulence [14]. For instance, CBS 120339 and IPEC 16919 (S. brasiliensis) exhibited significantly higher fungal burdens and remarkable brain tropism compared to S. schenckii s. str. [12]. The rare species S. luriei (CBS 937.72) showed high virulence profile in murine model [13]. On the other hand, S. mexicana isolates (including CBS 120341) displayed little or no virulence in a murine model [12]. S. schenckii s. str. isolated from distinct regions of Brazil showed various degrees of virulence in the murine model. The S. schenckii were classified as: non-virulent (Ss143 and Ss39), low virulence (Ss141 and Ss16), medium virulence (Ss51 and Ss126) and high virulence (Ss40) [14]. Interestingly, despite the fact that isolate Ss39 (S. schenckii) was considered non-virulent, it was isolated from a human patient. One potential explanation for the disease was the presence of an underlying disease that compromised the host immune system [14].
A comparison between karyotype and virulence profiles showed that isolates with different degrees of virulence sometimes displayed similar karyotypes. For example, the extremely virulent S. brasiliensis isolates, CBS 120339 and IPEC 16919 [12], the highly virulent, S. schenckii isolate, Ss126, and the moderately virulent isolate, Ss51 [14], all had a similar profile of 3 large bands and 2 small bands. In contrast, the S. schenckii isolate with low virulence (Ss141) had 3 large bands, 2 intermediate bands, and one small band. Isolates with no virulence had different chromosomal band profiles. For example, Ss39 (S. schenckii) had 7 bands (4 large bands, 1 intermediate band, and 2 small bands) and isolate CBS 120341 (S. mexicana) had only four chromosomes (2 large bands and 2 intermediate bands).
Small chromosomes that carried virulence factor genes were described in Alternaria alternata, a phytopathogenic fungus. Strains of A. alternata pathotypes showed small chromosomes (<1.7 Mb), but these were not observed in nonpathogenic isolates [49]. The small chromosomes that we observed varied from 1.2 Mb to 3.5 Mb. Our results suggested that small chromosomes might carry virulence factors, because the nonpathogenic species, S. mexicana (CBS 120341) did not harbor any small chromosomes, and it was considered non/slightly virulent in other studies [12]. However, the mechanism of pathogenicity appears to be more complicated than simply the presence or absence of small chromosomes as evidenced by the isolate, Ss39, which carried small chromosomes, but the virulence level was distinct from the other isolates in a murine model.
The test for susceptibility to antifungal drugs [15] showed that S. schenckii s. str. and S. brasiliensis were highly susceptible to most antifungals tested in vitro; however terbinafine, ketoconazole, and posaconazole were the most effective drugs. On the other hand, S. globosa and S. mexicana were drug-resistant [15]. In Candida albicans, resistance to fluconazole was associated with chromosome loss and/or gain. In vitro experiments showed that aneuploidy could occur after a week of exposure to fluconazole [50], [51]. Also, in C. neoformans, an adaptive mechanism of resistance against azoles, called “heteroresistance”, was found to be due to azole-associated acquisition of aneuploidy after undergoing azole maintenance therapy [52]. It is unknown whether this mechanism might play some role in members of the Sporothrix schenckii complex, but isolates tested in previous studies were resistant to fluconazole [15]. Our results suggested that aneuploidy could occur in Sporothrix, and it is tempting to hypothesize that this phenomenon could be responsible for the differences in drug resistance, as described for other fungi [52]. Genome-wide mapping of fungal chromosomal bands would be a valuable future project that could elucidate the role of chromosomal polymorphisms in the biology of the S. schenckii complex.
Conclusions
In light of recent taxonomic changes in the genus Sporothrix this study was the first to analyze chromosomal polymorphisms in diverse isolates of the S. schenckii complex and to assign genes to chromosomal bands of S. schenckii s. str. and S. brasiliensis isolated from Brazil. The minimum genome size of S. schenckii complex isolates was variable. Based on data from genome sequencing, we hypothesized that the isolates studied here may have harbored two 7.0 Mb chromosomes. The virulence in Sporothrix spp. is a complex phenomenon that may be orchestrated by polymorphisms in chromosomes, and deserves to be studied further. Overall, our results provided the number of chromosomes in these fungi; this information will facilitate the complete assembly of the genome sequences, and it will contribute to the understanding of the genomic organization of these species.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Densitometric analysis of S. schenckii isolates from Brazil. Each panel shows (left) the ethidium bromide-stained gel after pulsed field gel electrophoresis of chromosomes from the fungus strain indicated, and (right) a graph of the densitometric analysis. The size of each chromosomal band (Mb) is indicated on the left and above the corresponding peaks on the graph. Open arrows indicate where samples were loaded.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086819.s001
(TIF)
Figure S2.
Densitometric analysis of S. schenckii from the American continent and Japan. Chromosomes are shown for fungi isolates from A: United States; B and D: Peru; C, E and G: Mexico; and F: Japan. Each panel shows (left) the ethidium bromide-stained gel after pulsed field gel electrophoresis of chromosomes from the fungus strain indicated, and (right) a graph of the densitometric analysis. The size of each chromosomal band (Mb) is indicated on the left and above the corresponding peaks on the graph. Open arrows indicate where samples were loaded.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086819.s002
(TIF)
Figure S3.
Densitometric analysis of S. brasiliensis from Brazil. Each panel shows (left) the ethidium bromide-stained gel after pulsed field gel electrophoresis of chromosomes from the fungus strain indicated, and (right) a graphic of the densitometric analysis. The size of each chromosomal band (Mb) is indicated on the left and above the corresponding peaks on the graph. Open arrows indicate where samples were loaded.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086819.s003
(TIF)
Table S1.
Genes, primer sequences, PCR programs, and references used in this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086819.s004
(DOCX)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: AAS LdSF ZPdC. Performed the experiments: AAS. Analyzed the data: AAS GFF AMR FML MM JFdS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MdMT MSF ZPdC. Wrote the paper: AAS JFdS FML MM ZPdC.
References
- 1.
Zhou X, Rodrigues AM, Feng P, Hoog GS (2013) Global ITS diversity in the Sporothrix schenckii complex. Fungal Divers: 1–13.
- 2. Kauffman CA, Bustamante B, Chapman SW, Pappas PG (2007) Clinical practice guidelines for the management of sporotrichosis: 2007 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 45: 1255–1265.
- 3. Rodrigues AM, de Hoog S, de Camargo ZP (2013) Emergence of pathogenicity in the Sporothrix schenckii complex. Med Mycol 51: 405–412.
- 4.
Rippon JW (1988) Sporotricosis. In: Rippon JW, editor. Medical Mycology: The Pathogenic Fungi and Pathogenic Actinomycetes. 3a ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.
- 5. Schubach A, Barros MB, Wanke B (2008) Epidemic sporotrichosis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 21: 129–133.
- 6. Rodrigues AM, de Melo Teixeira M, de Hoog GS, Schubach TMP, Pereira SA, et al. (2013) Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals a High Prevalence of Sporothrix brasiliensis in Feline Sporotrichosis Outbreaks. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7: e2281.
- 7. Alves SH, Boettcher CS, Oliveira DC, Tronco-Alves GR, Sgaria MA, et al. (2010) Sporothrix schenckii associated with armadillo hunting in Southern Brazil: epidemiological and antifungal susceptibility profiles. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 43: 523–525.
- 8. Bustamante B, Campos PE (2001) Endemic sporotrichosis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 14: 145–149.
- 9. Marimon R, Cano J, Gene J, Sutton DA, Kawasaki M, et al. (2007) Sporothrix brasiliensis, S. globosa, and S. mexicana, three new Sporothrix species of clinical interest. J Clin Microbiol 45: 3198–3206.
- 10. Marimon R, Gene J, Cano J, Trilles L, Dos Santos Lazera M, et al. (2006) Molecular phylogeny of Sporothrix schenckii. J Clin Microbiol 44: 3251–3256.
- 11. Marimon R, Gene J, Cano J, Guarro J (2008) Sporothrix luriei: a rare fungus from clinical origin. Med Mycol 46: 621–625.
- 12. Arrillaga-Moncrieff I, Capilla J, Mayayo E, Marimon R, Marine M, et al. (2009) Different virulence levels of the species of Sporothrix in a murine model. Clin Microbiol Infect 15: 651–655.
- 13. Fernández-Silva F, Capilla J, Mayayo E, Guarro J (2012) Virulence of Sporothrix luriei in a Murine Model of Disseminated Infection. Mycopathologia 173: 245–249.
- 14.
Fernandes GF, Dos Santos PO, Rodrigues AM, Sasaki AA, Burger E, et al.. (2013) Characterization of virulence profile, protein secretion and immunogenicity of different Sporothrix schenckii sensu stricto isolates compared with S. globosa and S. brasiliensis species. Virulence 4.
- 15. Marimon R, Serena C, Gene J, Cano J, Guarro J (2008) In vitro antifungal susceptibilities of five species of Sporothrix. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52: 732–734.
- 16. Wieloch W (2006) Chromosome visualisation in filamentous fungi. J Microbiol Methods 67: 1–8.
- 17. Schwartz DC, Cantor CR (1984) Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis. Cell 37: 67–75.
- 18. Tateishi T, Murayama SY, Otsuka F, Yamaguchi H (1996) Karyotyping by PFGE of clinical isolates of Sporothrix schenckii. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 13: 147–154.
- 19. de Bievre C (1969) [Conditions of extraction and estimation of the nucleic acids of Sporotrichum schenckii, dimorphic fungus pathogenic for man. Application to the study of filamentous and levuriform phases]. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 117: 694–707.
- 20. Herschleb J, Ananiev G, Schwartz DC (2007) Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Nat Protoc 2: 677–684.
- 21. Feitosa LS, Cisalpino PS, dos Santos MR, Mortara RA, Barros TF, et al. (2003) Chromosomal polymorphism, syntenic relationships, and ploidy in the pathogenic fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Fungal Genet Biol 39: 60–69.
- 22. O’Donnell K (2000) Molecular phylogeny of the Nectria haematococca-Fusarium solani species complex. Mycologia 92: 919–938.
- 23. Wang XH, Li RY, Cao CW, Wang YH, Liu W, et al. (2008) Differential mRNA expression of Sporothrix schenckii catalase gene in two growth phases and effect factors. Chin Med J (Engl) 121: 2100–2102.
- 24. Carbone I, Kohn LM (1999) A Method for Designing Primers Set for Speciation Studies in Filamentous Ascomycetes. Mycologia 91: 553–556.
- 25.
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Aplication. San Diego: Academic Press. 358–364.
- 26. de Jesus-Berrios M, Rodriguez-del Valle N (2002) Expression of a Pho85 cyclin-dependent kinase is repressed during the dimorphic transition in Sporothrix schenckii. Fungal Genet Biol 37: 39–48.
- 27. Aquino-Pinero E, Rodriguez-del Valle N (2002) Characterization of a protein kinase C gene in Sporothrix schenckii and its expression during the yeast-to-mycelium transition. Med Mycol 40: 185–199.
- 28. Delgado N, Rodriguez-del Valle N (2000) Presence of a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein alpha subunit in Sporothrix schenckii. Med Mycol 38: 109–121.
- 29. Kanbe T, Natsume L, Goto I, Kawasaki M, Mochizuki T, et al. (2005) Rapid and specific identification of Sporothrix schenckii by PCR targeting the DNA topoisomerase II gene. J Dermatol Sci 38: 99–106.
- 30. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673–4680.
- 31. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
- 32. Madrid H, Gene J, Cano J, Silvera C, Guarro J (2010) Sporothrix brunneoviolacea and Sporothrix dimorphospora, two new members of the Ophiostoma stenoceras-Sporothrix schenckii complex. Mycologia 102: 1193–1203.
- 33. Oliveira MM, Sampaio P, Almeida-Paes RD, Pais C, Zancope-Oliveira RM (2012) Rapid identification of Sporothrix species by T3B PCR fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol 50: 2159–2162.
- 34. Silva-Vergara ML, de Camargo ZP, Silva PF, Abdalla MR, Sgarbieri RN, et al. (2012) Disseminated Sporothrix brasiliensis infection with endocardial and ocular involvement in an HIV-infected patient. Am J Trop Med Hyg 86: 477–480.
- 35. Villesen P (2007) FaBox: an online toolbox for fasta sequences. Mol Ecol Notes 7: 965–968.
- 36. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731–2739.
- 37. Tamura K (1992) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+C-content biases. Mol Biol Evol 9: 678–687.
- 38.
Felsenstein J Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap.
- 39. Torres-Guerrero H (1999) Ploidy study in Sporothrix schenckii. Fungal Genet Biol 27: 49–54.
- 40. Zolan ME (1995) Chromosome-length polymorphism in fungi. Microbiol Rev 59: 686–698.
- 41. Fierro F, Martin JF (1999) Molecular mechanisms of chromosomal rearrangement in fungi. Crit Rev Microbiol 25: 1–17.
- 42. Croll D, Zala M, McDonald BA (2013) Breakage-fusion-bridge Cycles and Large Insertions Contribute to the Rapid Evolution of Accessory Chromosomes in a Fungal Pathogen. PLoS Genet 9: e1003567.
- 43. Akamatsu HO, Chilvers MI, Kaiser WJ, Peever TL (2012) Karyotype polymorphism and chromosomal rearrangement in populations of the phytopathogenic fungus, Ascochyta rabiei. Fungal Biol 116: 1119–1133.
- 44. Fernandes GF, Santos PO, Amaral CC, Sasaki AA, Godoy-Martinez P, et al. (2009) Characteristics of 151 Brazilian Sporothrix schenckii Isolates from 5 Different Geographic Regions of Brazil: A Forgotten and Re-Emergent Pathogen. Open Mycol J 3: 48–58.
- 45. Canteros CE, Zuiani MF, Ritacco V, Perrotta DE, Reyes-Montes MR, et al. (2005) Electrophoresis karyotype and chromosome-length polymorphism of Histoplasma capsulatum clinical isolates from Latin America. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 45: 423–428.
- 46. Desjardins CA, Champion MD, Holder JW, Muszewska A, Goldberg J, et al. (2011) Comparative genomic analysis of human fungal pathogens causing paracoccidioidomycosis. PLoS Genet 7: e1002345.
- 47. Sankoff D, Nadeau JH (1996) Conserved synteny as a measure of genomic distance. Discrete Appl Math 71: 247–257.
- 48. Coelho LM, Cursino-Santos JR, Persinoti GF, Rossi A, Martinez-Rossi NM (2013) The Microsporum canis genome is organized into five chromosomes based on evidence from electrophoretic karyotyping and chromosome end mapping. Med Mycol 51: 208–213.
- 49. Akagi Y, Akamatsu H, Otani H, Kodama M (2009) Horizontal Chromosome Transfer, a Mechanism for the Evolution and Differentiation of a Plant-Pathogenic Fungus. Eukaryot Cell 8: 1732–1738.
- 50. Selmecki AM, Dulmage K, Cowen LE, Anderson JB, Berman J (2009) Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet 5: e1000705.
- 51. Selmecki A, Forche A, Berman J (2006) Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug-resistant Candida albicans. Science 313: 367–370.
- 52. Kwon-Chung KJ, Chang YC (2012) Aneuploidy and Drug Resistance in Pathogenic Fungi. PLoS Pathog 8: e1003022.