Figures
Abstract
The barnacle Megabalanus coccopoma is native to shorelines from Baja California to Peru and has been introduced to a number of other locations including the Atlantic US SE coast, where it was first recorded in 2006. In 2009, the range of M. coccopoma in the SE US extended from Ft. Pierce, FL north to Cape Hatteras, NC with seasonal populations found as far north as Kitty Hawk, NC. During the exceptionally cold winter of 2009/2010, the range of M. coccopoma shifted dramatically due to the dieback of all monitored populations north of Florida. We examined body size, distribution, and density of M. coccopoma during the summers of 2010, 2011, and 2012 to describe the extent of the range retraction and the rate of range re-expansion. In 2010, recruits were found as far north as Tybee Island, Ga, but no established populations were found north of Florida. In 2011 recruits were found at Rodanthe, NC but established populations were still limited to Florida. By 2012 populations were established in Rodanthe, NC, slightly north of its previously known range limit. Estimated rates of range re-expansion were 255.8 km/yr in 2010 and 794.1 km/yr in 2011. Rates of re-expansion to the north in 2010 and 2011 were faster than have previously been reported for any marine species, and are one of the few rates published for any tropical marine invertebrate.
Citation: Crickenberger S, Moran A (2013) Rapid Range Shift in an Introduced Tropical Marine Invertebrate. PLoS ONE 8(10): e78008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078008
Editor: Kerrie Swadling, University of Tasmania, Australia
Received: July 17, 2013; Accepted: September 17, 2013; Published: October 3, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Crickenberger et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This research was conducted under an award from the Estuarine Reserves Division, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NSF OCE-0961996 to ALM. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Poleward range shifts are becoming increasingly common, a phenomenon which often leads to tropical species moving into historically temperate ecosystems [1-3]. Introductions of new species as the result of poleward range shifts can negatively impact ecosystems [4,5] and these range shifts are pervasive in marine environments, consistent with warming trends associated with climate change [6-9]. The frequency of extreme weather events is also predicted to increase with global climate change [10], and extreme warm [11,12] and cold events [13] have been implicated in dramatic decreases in species abundance, but the effects of extreme weather events on range shifts and limits have received less attention than localized consequences of extreme events [14-16].
While tropical species are increasingly becoming established in historically temperate regions [17,18], most studies on tropical invaders have focused on local extinctions rather than range shifts [19,20] and little is known about lower thermal tolerances of tropical species, which likely set northern range limits of these species as the tropical belt broadens [21-24]. The climate variability hypothesis predicts that, due to the relative stability of tropical climates, tropical species will have narrower windows of thermal tolerance than temperate species [25]. Likewise, because of the relative lack of seasonal variation in temperature in the tropics, tropical species are generally thought to have a lower capacity for acclimation than temperate species [26]. Tropical species that have narrow thermal tolerance windows and low acclimatory ability may be particularly vulnerable to extreme cold events, and therefore invasive populations of tropical species may be generally more ephemeral than temperate species when both are moving poleward.
On the Atlantic SE coast of the US, the ranges of a number of species originating in the tropics have been expanding northward [2,27-29]. Over the same time frame, the number of extremely cold days has increased in frequency along the Atlantic coast of the US SE [30]; these cold events may play a role in regulating the dynamics of tropical species that have invaded temperate ecosystems. During the winter of 2009/2010 air temperatures were the coldest they have been in more than 30 years throughout the US SE [31] and seawater temperatures were colder than those in the past 20 years (South Carolina Department of Natural Resources-Marine Resources Division, unpublished data). The exceptionally cold temperatures during the winter of 2009/2010 were associated with the lowest Arctic Oscillation index (AO) and the 5th highest El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) index recorded [31], and were implicated in localized die-offs of three different tropical marine invertebrates in the US SE including the crab Petrolisthes armatus [22] and the mussels Perna viridis [20] and Mytella charruana [33]; P. armatus and P. viridis have experienced high mortality during previous cold winters [19,20]. Here we report the range retraction of the barnacle Megabalanus coccopoma following the cold winter of 2009/2010 and the species’ very rapid subsequent range re-expansion.
Methods
Study species
Megabalanus coccopoma is a highly gregarious acorn barnacle native to coasts extending from the southern tip of Baja California, Mexico to Peru [34] that commonly attaches to recently disturbed surfaces in the lower intertidal or subtidal [35]. M. coccopoma has been a successful invader of nearshore marine systems in many locations worldwide. The earliest report of this species outside of its native range came from the western Indian Ocean in 1875 [36]. In the 1970s M. coccopoma was reported from the western Atlantic in Brazil [34,37,38] and it was first documented in the United States in 2001 when several individuals were found near Jefferson, LA; these individuals did not survive the winter [39]. In 2006, M. coccopoma was found for the first time on the SE coast outside of the Gulf of Mexico when it appeared in Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina (http://nas.er.usgs.gov/). Populations of M. coccopoma are now well established in the SE United States since 2007 ( [29,40]; S. Crickenberger pers. obs.), along with Brazil since the 1970s [41-46], the Atlantic coast of Mexico since at least 2005 [47], southern Japan since 2005, the east coast of Australia since at least 2006 [48], and western Africa since at least 2010 [49]. Records from the North Sea off the coasts of Belgium and the Netherlands suggest the presence of sporadic and seasonal populations there [50-53] and seasonal populations of M. coccopoma were reported in Southern California during an El Niño year [54].
Sites and survey methods
Surveys of body size and density of M. coccopoma were conducted from 16 July to 30 July 2010, 25 July to 10 August 2011, and 25 July to 11 August 2012 to determine the distribution and abundance of juvenile and adult M. coccopoma along the SE US coast. In this region, recruitment of M. coccopoma peaks in May to June and then tails off through August ( [40]; S. Crickenberger pers. obs.), therefore our sampling schedule allowed us to quantify both presence and abundance of new recruits and to clearly separate young-of-the-year from barnacles from previous recruitment seasons based on size (see below). Density (barnacles/cm2) and basal rostro-carinal diameter (mm) (as an estimate of size) of M. coccopoma were recorded at 14 locations in 2010 and 19 locations in 2011 and 2012 between the northernmost and southernmost extents of the range of M. coccopoma in the Atlantic SE US (Table 1). Basal rostro-carinal diameters of all barnacles collected from all the quadrat(s) at each site were measured with calipers. One to four sites within each location were sampled (Table 1). At sites with large areas of continuous substrate (i.e. floating docks, jetties, buoys, beach groins), three to six quadrats of 100 cm2 were sampled every half to one meter along a 10 m transect laid in the zone of maximum density. At sites where substrate was discontinuous (i.e. pier pilings), three to six 100 cm2 quadrats were sampled in the zone of maximum density. When no M. coccopoma were sampled in any quadrats or when only a single structure was present (i.e. channel markers), all of the M. coccopoma on the structure(s) were collected and the area of the structure(s) was quantified. If no M. coccopoma were found during the initial search the site was subsequently searched for the lesser of 30 minutes or the time required to survey the entire structure. If no specimens were found in this second search, M. coccopoma was considered absent from that site. Low availability of hard substrate limited the number of potential quadrats at some sites. Sapelo Island National Estuarine Research Reserve (NERR) granted permission for collection in Sapelo Island NERR and Al Segars granted permission for sampling in ACE Basin NERR. Permission was granted for privately owned floating docks on the day of collection. Other sites did not require permission for collection because M. coccopoma is not an endangered or protected species and/or the sites were not privately owned or protected.
| Location | Abbreviation | Site °N | Site °W | Years Surveyed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ft. Pierce, FL | FTP | 27°28.273' | 080°17.234' | 2010, 2011, 2012 |
| 27°27.658' | 080°19.008' | 2010, 2011, 2012 | ||
| 27°27.654' | 080°19.013' | 2011, 2012 | ||
| Ponce Inlet, FL | PON | 29°04.698' | 080°54.996' | 2010, 2011 |
| 29°04.884’ | 080°56.125' | 2010, 2011, 2012 | ||
| Daytona Beach, FL | DBP | 29°13.653' | 081°00.319’ | 2011, 2012 |
| GTMNERR, FL | GTM | 29°42.380' | 081°13.793' | 2010, 2011 |
| 29°41.975' | 081°13.936' | 2010 | ||
| 29°43.398' | 081°14.736' | 2011, 2012 | ||
| 29°42.943' | 081°14.354’ | 2010, 2011, 2012 | ||
| Flagler Beach, FL | FLG | 29°28.812' | 081°07.527' | 2011, 2012 |
| Jacksonville Beach, FL | JAK | 30°23.784' | 081°25.799' | 2011 |
| 30°17.614' | 081°23.263' | 2011, 2012 | ||
| Fernandina Beach, FL | FER | 30°30.636' | 081°27.655’ | 2011, 2012 |
| 30°37.240' | 081°26.272’ | 2011, 2012 | ||
| Saint Simons Island, GA | SSI | 31°08.022' | 081°23.734' | 2010, 2011, 2012 |
| Sapelo Island NERR, GA | SAP | 31°25.083' | 081°17.779' | 2011, 2012 |
| 31°32.422' | 081°14.544' | 2011, 2012 | ||
| 31°32.476' | 081°10.697' | 2011, 2012 | ||
| Tybee Island, GA | TYB | 31°59.494' | 080°50.698' | 2010, 2011, 2012 |
| Hunting Island, SC | HBG | 32°21.563' | 080°25.527' | 2010, 2011, 2012 |
| ACE Basin NERR, SC | ACE | 32°29.610' | 080°21.005' | 2010, 2011, 2012 |
| 32°28.063' | 080°20.066' | 2011, 2012 | ||
| Folly Beach, SC | FBP | 32°39.219' | 079°56.333' | 2010, 2011, 2012 |
| Murrells Inlet, SC | MUR | 33°31.537' | 079°01.811' | 2010 |
| 33°34.560' | 078°59.845' | 2011, 2012 | ||
| Wrightsville Beach, NC | WBP | 34°12.837' | 077°47.270' | 2010, 2011, 2012 |
| 34°11.589' | 077°48.250' | 2011, 2012 | ||
| Frisco, NC | FRP | 35°13.512' | 075°38.161’ | 2010, 2011, 2012 |
| Avon, NC | AVP | 35°20.839' | 075°30.026' | 2010, 2011, 2012 |
| Rodanthe, NC | ROP | 35°35.100' | 075°27.648' | 2010, 2011, 2012 |
| Kill Devil Hills, NC | KDH | 36°02.663' | 075°40.454' | 2010, 2011, 2012 |
Table 1. Locations and sites sampled for Megabalanus coccopoma in 2010, 2011, and 2012.
Population distribution
Populations of M. coccopoma at each location were classified as either established, present, or absent based on sizes of the barnacles (if present) at that location. Populations were considered established if any barnacles at that location were larger than the largest size the barnacles could reach since the beginning of the settlement season based on growth observations from 2012 (see below). To measure growth rates of individual barnacles and to estimate the size barnacles could reach in one settlement season, six quadrats (10 x 10 cm) were established at Flagler Beach Pier (29°28.812' N, 081°07.527' W), within the zone of maximum density of M. coccopoma. Three of the plots were entirely cleared of barnacles and three were partially cleared, leaving a clump of existing individuals in the center of the quadrats to allow tracking of barnacle growth and survivorship of new recruits. Plots were marked at each corner with carriage bolts screwed into the pier pilings. Quadrats were photographed monthly from 3 April 2012 to 28 July 2012 using a digital camera (Nikon Coolpix AW100) and a PVC frame placed over the carriage bolts to ensure consistent camera distance for size measurements. Rostro-carinal basal diameter was measured from digital photographs with ImageJ [55] on all barnacles in each of 30 total quadrats. All newly settled barnacles (within the last month) were individually followed for growth. Across all quadrats, 16 barnacles that settled early in the spawning season survived to the last sampling period. Using the mean and standard deviation of this sample, we used JMP 10.0 (Version 10, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to calculate the 99% upper one-sided tolerance interval with 99% confidence; this allowed us to establish a conservative lower size limit for second-year barnacles such that we could say, with 99% confidence, that there was a 99% chance that a barnacle above that size was too large to be from the current recruitment season. Populations were categorized as established if the size of any barnacles present in that population was above the upper tolerance interval. Populations were categorized as present if all barnacles at that site were below the upper tolerance interval. Determination of absence is described above. Where possible we sampled multiple sites within locations and size data were pooled among sites to determine whether each location was categorized as established or present; data were pooled because we were interested in broad, rather than local, patterns of colonization and extinction. No quantitative survey data were available for 2009, so distributional data for this year was gathered from sources listed in Table S1.
Population density
The site with the greatest density at each location was used to represent that location, to avoid sampling artificially low densities from sites where all M. coccopoma were removed in the previous year. In locations where three years of data were collected, density data were non-normal and variances were heterogeneous with the exceptions of PON and FTP. Therefore, maximum density within each location was compared among years using Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by Wilcoxon paired comparisons when significant differences among years were found. In locations where data were only collected for 2011 and 2012, data were normally distributed and variances were homogenous, so paired t-tests were used to compare densities between years. Maximum density data from FER were transformed by adding one to all values followed by log transformation to achieve normality. Low numbers of quadrats (due to the limited availability of hard substrate at some sites) limited our degrees of freedom within sites and prohibited examining all locations in a single analysis. All statistical analyses were performed in JMP (Version 10, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Range shifts
Range shifts between years were calculated as great circle distances using the Vincenty formula, which calculates the distance between two points on an ellipsoidal model of the earth [56]. The range retraction that occurred during the winter of 2009/2010 was estimated by calculating the distance between the most northern population known from 2009, at Avon, NC (35°20.839' N, 075°30.026' W), and the most northern established population found during the summer of 2010 at St. Augustine, FL (29°42.943' N, 081°14.354' W). The range re-expansion that occurred over the summer of 2010 was calculated as the distance from St. Augustine, FL to the most northern location where M. coccopoma were present (at Tybee Island, GA (31°59.494’ N, 080°50.698’ W)) in 2010. For the summer of 2011, range re-expansion was calculated as the distance from the northernmost established population found in the summer of 2011 at Fernandina Beach, FL (30°30.636' N, 081°27.655’ W) to the northernmost present population found in the summer of 2011 at Rodanthe, NC (35°35.100’ N, 075°27.648’ W).
Environmental temperatures
Temperature data from January and February of 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 were obtained from the National Data Buoy Center (http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/) and the National Estuarine Research Reserve System Central Data Management Office (http://cdmo.baruch.sc.edu/get/export.cfm). Temperature data from each station were compiled into daily means and used to calculate average winter (January and February) temperatures for each year at each station. Maximum and minimum temperatures were the maximum and minimum daily means that occurred at each station in each year.
Results
Upper tolerance limit for size of year-old barnacles
The 16 barnacles that settled early in the spawning season (May) and survived to the last sampling period (28 July 2012) had a mean size of 13.6 mm (± 0.5 mm SD) basal rostro-carinal diameter. The 99% upper one-sided tolerance interval with 99% confidence was 32.8 mm, which was 12.6 mm greater than the size of the largest barnacle in the group of 16. All barnacles greater than the upper one-sided tolerance interval of 32.8 mm were considered to have settled in the previous recruitment season and locations where these larger barnacles were found were termed as established populations (Figure 1; Table S2).
The distribution of M. coccopoma in 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 showing populations that, in each year, were established (black circles), present but not established (gray circles), or absent (light gray circles). Locations for temperature stations are marked with white triangles. Temperatures are the daily mean January and February temperatures for each station with bars representing the maximum and minimum recorded daily temperatures. Temperature records were unavailable for two locations in 2009 and one location in 2010.
Distribution
After the cold winter of 2009/2010, M. coccopoma died off at all study sites north of Florida. During the summers of 2010 and 2011 the range of M. coccopoma rapidly expanded poleward. In summer 2010, M. coccopoma was present but not established from Tybee Island south to St. Augustine, FL (29°42.943' N, 081°14.354' W), but was absent from sites north of Tybee Island, GA (31°59.494’ N, 080°50.698’ W). Established populations were found south of St. Augustine, FL, with the exception Ponce Inlet (29°04.884' N, 080°56.125' W). In 2011, new recruits were found as far north as Rodanthe, NC (35°35.100’ N, 075°27.648’ W) with established populations still limited to Florida. In 2012, established populations were found as far north as Rodanthe, NC, slightly further north than their previously reported northernmost limit at Avon, NC (35°20.848’ N, 75°30.110’ W) (Table S1, S2). Established populations were not continuously distributed throughout their full range. At two sites that were south of the northernmost established population, only new recruits were found at Murrells Inlet, SC (33°34.560’ N, 078°59.845’ W) and Wrightsville Beach, NC (34°12.837’ N, 077°47.270’ W) (Figure 1).
Density
Density increased at most locations north of Florida from one summer to the next in 2010, 2011 and 2012. In 2010, low densities of M. coccopoma were found at St. Simons Island, GA (31°08.022'N, 081°23.734'W) and Tybee Island, GA (31°59.494'N, 080°50.698'W). Compared to 2010, densities significantly increased at all locations north of Florida in 2011 except for Hunting Island, SC (32°21.563'N, 080°25.527'W), ACE Basin NERR, SC (32°29.610'N, 080°21.005'W), Wrightsville Beach, NC (34°12.837'N, 077°47.270'W) and Frisco, NC (35°13.512'N, 075°38.161'N) where densities remained unchanged. Although M. coccopoma was present at ACE Basin NERR, Wrightsville Beach, NC and Frisco, NC in 2011, densities were not significantly different from zero. Densities were significantly higher at four locations in Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina in 2012 compared to 2011. Density significantly increased at St. Simons Island, GA, Hunting Island, SC, Frisco, NC and Rodanthe, NC (35°35.100'N, 075°27.648'N). Densities at other locations remained the same, with the exception of Folly Beach, SC (32°39.219'N, 079°56.333'N), where density decreased (Figure 2; Table 2).
Location abbreviations represent locations in increasing latitude as listed in Table 1. ND represents locations that were not sampled in 2010 and ‘0’ represents locations where Megabalanus coccopoma was absent. Bars within a location are not significantly different if they share the same letter.
| Location | Chi-square/ t-Ratio | DF | Prob>Chi-square/ Prob> |t| |
|---|---|---|---|
| FTP | 7.5114 | 2 | 0.0234 |
| DBP* | -3.41419 | 5.846323 | 0.0148 |
| PON | 7.4583 | 2 | 0.024 |
| GTM | 4.7849 | 2 | 0.0914 |
| FLG* | -2.11132 | 7.042936 | 0.0724 |
| JAK* | -1.32702 | 8.797383 | 0.2179 |
| FER* | 0.263084 | 9.45832 | 0.7981 |
| NEP | 8.857 | 2 | 0.029 |
| SAP* | 1.333989 | 3.130966 | 0.2709 |
| TYB | 8.5118 | 2 | 0.0142 |
| HBG | 10.4554 | 2 | 0.0054 |
| ACE | 4.633 | 2 | 0.0986 |
| FBP | 13.4731 | 2 | 0.0012 |
| MUR | 6.8 | 2 | 0.0334 |
| WBP | 7.3194 | 2 | 0.0257 |
| FRP | 10.2785 | 2 | 0.0059 |
| AVP | 8.2904 | 2 | 0.0158 |
| ROP | 10.8833 | 2 | 0.0043 |
Table 2. Effect of year on maximum Megabalanus coccopoma density at each location.
Rates of range shifts
In 2009, the range of M. coccopoma extended north to Avon, NC (35°20.839' N, 075°30.026' W) with some seasonal populations as far north as Kitty Hawk, NC (36°6.070’ N, 075°42.698’ W). The exceptionally cold winter of 2009/2010 caused local extinctions of all M. coccopoma at study sites north of Florida (Figure 1), and in the following two summers (2010 and 2011) the species’ range rapidly re-expanded northward. The estimated range retraction during the winter of 2009/2010 was 825.2 km. The estimated range re-expansion rate was 255.8 km/yr in 2010 and 794.1 km/yr in 2011. In 2012 range limits were unchanged from 2011.
Discussion
After the dieback during the winter of 2009/2010, range re-expansion by M. coccopoma was rapid in both 2010 and 2011; the 2011 rate was more than three times higher than the most rapid rate documented for any marine invertebrate, 235 km/yr for the mussel Perna perna [57]. Coastal currents, in concert with warmer temperatures during the winter of 2011/2012, likely played a major role in the rapid range re-expansion of M. coccopoma (Fig. 1). Currents important for larval transport along the US SE coast are primarily wind driven and vary seasonally [58,59]. Coastal currents are rotating towards and then flowing poleward along the Atlantic SE coast [60-62] during the peak recruitment period of M. coccopoma from May to July, and drifter data suggest transport from central Florida to the Outer Banks of North Carolina is possible in as few as 15 days [40,63]. These wind-driven currents could have facilitated the rapid range re-expansion of M. coccopoma and may also explain why the first reports of this species in the SE US in 2006 were spread over a wide geographic area including sites in Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina (http://nas.er.usgs.gov).
While current regimes are likely to have played an important role, the rapid range re-expansion of M. coccopoma may also have been facilitated by the species’ high fecundity, rapid maturation, and aggregative settlement. M. coccopoma typically release 30,0000 nauplii per spawning event, while other acorn barnacles produce around 6,000 (Crickenberger, unpublished data [35]; and sources within). Reproduction begins at a young age; gametic tissue can be found in barnacles with rostro-carinal basal diameters as small as 8.7 mm (~1 month old), with nauplii hatching from barnacles as small as 19.6 mm in rostro-carinal basal diameter (~3 months old) (Crickenberger, unpublished data). This suggests barnacles that recruit in the spring could reach reproductive maturity within a single season, potentially contributing larvae to the second, smaller peak in recruitment in October and November (pers. obs; [40]). Likewise, where M. coccopoma is abundant, barnacles typically grow on top one another in large aggregated clumps. Dense clumps can provide access to mates at the range edge and alleviate Allee effects that could otherwise slow rates of range expansion [64]. Allee effects are likely to be particularly strong in sessile animals with internal fertilization such as M. coccopoma [65,66].
Anthropogenic factors could also have played a role in the rapid range re-expansion. M. coccopoma was introduced to Brazil in the 1970s, probably arriving on ship hulls. Ships from Brazil with M. coccopoma attached to their hulls likely traveled to the US Gulf and the Atlantic coast of Florida, allowing the barnacles to release their larvae which then developed and settled in these regions during the initial introduction of M. coccopoma to the US SE [39,45]. However, the increases in density along the coast between the summers of 2010, 2011 and 2012 (Figure 2; Table 2, S2) are consistent with natural dispersal via seasonal patterns of poleward currents during spawning rather than with repeated introductions on ship hulls.
Marine species are projected to continue moving northward along the Atlantic SE coast of the US with climate change [67]. However, the number of extremely cold days has increased in frequency along the Atlantic coast of the US SE [30] and extreme cold events are predicted to increase in frequency [32]. These cold events may play a role in regulating the dynamics of tropical species that have made their way into temperate ecosystems. In contrast to tropical species, which undergo localized extinctions in response to extreme cold weather events [19,68,69], temperate species tend to respond to colder than average winters through recruitment failure and reductions in adult density [13,70]. Only rarely have localized extinctions due to extreme cold events occurred in temperate species [14]. Limited selection for cold tolerance mechanisms in the tropics, narrow thermal tolerance windows, and low capacity for acclimation may make tropical species particularly vulnerable to cold mortality [26,71,72]. Based on temperatures at which localized die-offs occurred during the winter of 2009/2010, M. coccopoma lives near its lower thermal limits within the temperate portion of its invaded range in the US SE (Figure 1). Similarly cold winters have occurred multiple times in the past [19,20,73-75] and are likely to occur in the future [32]. Although M. coccopoma was able to rapidly re-colonize throughout the extent of its range retraction, rates of range expansion of other species with more limited dispersal and colonization capabilities and/or less serendipitous timing of reproduction will likely be lower. Future projections of species range shifts due to climate change should incorporate the likely effects of extreme cold events on species moving out of the tropics into temperate regions.
Supporting Information
Table S1.
List of locations and sources for Megabalanus coccopoma prior to the range retraction during the winter of 2009/2010. Populations were considered established if listed as such on the USGS NAS database or if large, dense aggregations were known to be present prior to the cold snap from various unpublished sources. Otherwise Megabalanus coccopoma was considered present at a given location.
(DOCX)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078008.s001
(DOCX)
Table S2.
Size of Megabalanus coccopoma at locations surveyed in 2010, 2011, and 2012.
(DOCX)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078008.s002
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We thank the staffs at GTMNERR, Sapleo NERR, ACE Basin NERR and J. Crickenberger for assistance with sampling.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: SC ALM. Performed the experiments: SC. Analyzed the data: SC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SC ALM. Wrote the manuscript: SC ALM.
References
- 1. Baker P, Fajans JS, Arnold WS, Ingrao DA, Marelli DC et al. (2007) Range and dispersal of a tropical marine invader, the asian green mussel, Perna viridis, in subtropical waters of the southeastern United States. J Shellfish Res 26: 345-355. doi:https://doi.org/10.2983/0730-8000(2007)26[345:RADOAT]2.0.CO;2.
- 2. Harrison JR, Knott DM (2007) Occurrence of Microtralia ovula and Creedonia succinea (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Ellobiidae) in South Carolina. Southeast Nat 6: 173-178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1656/1528-7092(2007)6[173:OOMOAC]2.0.CO;2.
- 3.
Carlton JT (2011) Invertebrates, marine. In: D. Rm, Simberloff. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions; University of California Press. pp. 385-390.
- 4. Zeidberg LD, Robison BH (2007) Invasive range expansion by the Humboldt squid, Dosidicus gigas, in the eastern North Pacific. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 12948-12950. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702043104. PubMed: 17646649.
- 5. Ling SD (2008) Range expansion of a habitat-modifying species leads to loss of taxonomic diversity: A new and impoverished reef state. Oecologia 156: 883-894. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1043-9. PubMed: 18481099.
- 6. Harley CD, Randall Hughes A, Hultgren KM, Miner BG, Sorte CJ et al. (2006) The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. Ecol Lett 9: 228-241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00871.x. PubMed: 16958887.
- 7. Mieszkowska N, Hawkins S, Burrows M, Kendall M (2007) Long-term changes in the geographic distribution and population structures of Osilinus lineatus (Gastropoda: Trochidae) in Britain and Ireland. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 87: 537-545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315407053799.
- 8. Hawkins S, Sugden H, Mieszkowska N, Moore P, Poloczanska E et al. (2009) Consequences of climate-driven biodiversity changes for ecosystem functioning of north European rocky shores. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 396: 245-259. doi:https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08378.
- 9.
Parry ML, Canziani JP, Palutikof JP, van der Linden Hanson CE (2007) Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Working group II contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 982pp.
- 10. Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parmesan C, Changnon SA, Karl TR et al. (2000) Climate extremes: Observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289: 2068-2074. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5487.2068. PubMed: 11000103.
- 11. Harley CD (2008) Tidal dynamics, topographic orientation, and temperature-mediated mass mortalities on rocky shores. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 371: 37-46. doi:https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07711.
- 12. Coma R, Ribes M, Serrano E, Jiménez E, Salat J et al. (2009) Global warming-enhanced stratification and mass mortality events in the Mediterranean. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 6176-6181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805801106. PubMed: 19332777.
- 13.
Strasser M, Pieloth U (2001) Recolonization pattern of the polychaete Lanice conchilega on an intertidal sand flat following the severe winter of 1995/96. Helgol Mar Res 55: 176-181.
- 14. Crisp D (1964) The effects of the severe winter of 1962-63 on marine life in Britain. J Anim Ecol 33: 165-210. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2355.
- 15. Smale DA, Wernberg T (2013) Extreme climatic event drives range contraction of a habitat-forming species. Proc R Soc Lond B 280: 1754. PubMed: 23325774.
- 16. Bennie J, Hodgson JA, Lawson CR, Holloway CT, Roy DB et al. (2013) Range expansion through fragmented landscapes under a variable climate. Ecol Lett 16: 921-929. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12129. PubMed: 23701124.
- 17. Rahel FJ, Olden JD (2008) Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Conserv Biol 22: 521-533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00950.x. PubMed: 18577081.
- 18. Figueira WF, Booth DJ (2010) Increasing ocean temperatures allow tropical fishes to survive overwinter in temperate waters. Glob Change Biol 16: 506-516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01934.x.
- 19.
Hartman M, Stancyk S, Lohrer A (2001) An invasive crab, Petrolisthes armatus, as alternative prey in an oyster reed ecosystem. 16th Biennial Conference of the Estuarine. Research Federation, November 4-8, 2001. St. Petersburg Beach, FL.
- 20. Firth LB, Knights AM, Bell SS (2011) Air temperature and winter mortality: Implications for the persistence of the invasive mussel, Perna viridis in the intertidal zone of the south-eastern United States. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 400: 250-256. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.02.007.
- 21. Kimball ME, Miller JM, Whitfield PE, Hare JA (2004) Thermal tolerance and potential distribution of invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans/miles complex) on the east coast of the United States. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 283: 269-278. doi:https://doi.org/10.3354/meps283269.
- 22. Canning-Clode J, Fowler AE, Byers JE, Carlton JT, Ruiz GM (2011) Caribbean Creep’Chills out: Climate change and marine invasive species. PLOS ONE 6: e29657. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029657. PubMed: 22216340.
- 23. Kemp DW, Oakley CA, Thornhill DJ, Newcomb LA, Schmidt GW et al. (2011) Catastrophic mortality on inshore coral reefs of the Florida Keys due to severe low-temperature stress. Glob Change Biol 17: 3468-3477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02487.x.
- 24. Urian AG, Hatle JD, Gilg MR (2011) Thermal constraints for range expansion of the invasive green mussel, Perna viridis, in the southeastern United States. J Exp Zool Ecol Genet Physiol 315: 12-21. PubMed: 20853420.
- 25. Stevens GC (1989) The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: How so many species coexist in the tropics. Am Nat 133: 240-256. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/284913.
- 26. Pörtner HO (2002) Climate variations and the physiological basis of temperature dependent biogeography: Systemic to molecular hierarchy of thermal tolerance in animals. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 132: 739-761. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00045-4. PubMed: 12095860.
- 27. Meister HS, Wyanski DM, Loefer JK, Ross SW, Quattrini AM et al. (2005) Further evidence for the invasion and establishment of Pterois volitans (Teleostei: Scorpaenidae) along the Atlantic coast of the United States. Southeast Nat 4: 193-206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1656/1528-7092(2005)004[0193:FEFTIA]2.0.CO;2.
- 28. Precht WF, Aronson RB (2004) Climate flickers and range shifts of reef corals. Front Ecol Environ 2: 307-314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0307:CFARSO]2.0.CO;2.
- 29. Carolina South Department of Natural Resources (2008). S C Aquatic Invasive Species Manage Plan: 95.
- 30. Lima FP, Wethey DS (2012) Three decades of high-resolution coastal sea surface temperatures reveal more than warming. Nat Commun, 3: 704-. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1713. PubMed: 22426225.
- 31.
National Climate Data Center 2009-2010 Cold Season. p. 2010; NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, NC.
- 32. Wang C, Liu H, Lee SK (2010) The record-breaking cold temperatures during the winter of 2009/2010 in the Northern Hemisphere. Atmos Sci Lett 11: 161-168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.278.
- 33. Spinuzzi S, Schneider KR, Walters LJ, Yuan WS, Hoffman EA (2013) Tracking the distribution of non-native marine invertebrates (Mytella charruana, Perna viridis and Megabalanus coccopoma) along the south-eastern USA. Mar Biodivers Rec 6: e55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755267213000316.
- 34. Henry DP, McLaughlin PA (1986) The recent species of Megabalanus (Cirripedia, Balanomorpha) with special emphasis on Balanus tintinnabulum (Linnaeus) sensu lato. Zoologische Verhandelingen 235: 69.
- 35.
Southward AJ (1987) Barnacle biology. Rotterdam, Netherlands: CRC Press. 496pp.
- 36. Innocenti G (2006) Collections of the natural history museum, zoological section la specola of the University of Florence. XXII. Crustacea, class Maxillopoda, subclass Thecostraca, infraclass Cirripedia. Atti Soc Toscana Sci Nat Mem Ser B 113: 1-11.
- 37. Lacombe D, Monteiro W (1974) Balanídeos como indicadores de poluição na Baía de Guanabara. Braz J Biol 34: 633-644.
- 38.
Lacombe D (1977) Cirripédios da Baía da Ribeira. Angra dos Reis, RJ, Brasil, Rio de Janeiro: Publicações do Instituto de Pesquisas da Marinha, Rio de Janeiro 129: 1-12.
- 39.
Perreault RT (2004) An exotic tropical barnacle, Megabalanus coccopoma (Darwin 1854), in Louisiana: Its probable arrival and environmental implications. The Proceedings of the Louisiana Academy of Sciences 66. pp. 13-16.
- 40. Gilg MR, Lukaj E, Abdulnour M, Middlebrook M, Gonzalez E et al. (2010) Spatio-temporal settlement patterns of the non-native titan acorn barnacle, Megabalanus coccopoma, in northeastern Florida. J Crust Biol 30: 146-150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1651/09-3148.1.
- 41. Széchy MTM, Paula EJ (2000) Padrões estruturais quantitativos de bancos de sargassum (Phaeophyta, Fucales) do litoral dos estados do Rio de Janeiro e São Paulo, Brasil. Rev Bras Bot 23: 121-132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042000000200002.
- 42. Young PS (2000) Cirripedia Thoracica (Crustacea) collected during the "Campagne de La Calypso (1961-1962)" from the Atlantic shelf of South America. Zoosystema 22: 85-100.
- 43. Breves-Ramos A, Lavrado HP, Junqueira AOR, Silva SHG (2005) Succession in rocky intertidal benthic communities in areas with different pollution levels at Guanabara Bay (RJ-Brazil). Braz Arch Biol Technol 48: 951-965. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132005000800012.
- 44. Silveira NG, Souza RCCL, Fernandes FC, Silva EP (2007) Occurrence of Perna perna, Modiolus carvalhoi (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Mytilidae) and Megabalanus coccopoma (Crustacea, Cirripedia) off Areia Branca, Rio Grande do Norte state, Brazil. Biociências (On-Line) 14.
- 45. Farrapeira CMR, Melo AVOM, Barbosa DF, Silva KME (2007) Ship hull fouling in the port of Recife, Pernambuco. Brazilian. J Oceanogr 55: 207-221.
- 46. Souza RC, POLEZA M, Máximo M, Resgalla C Jr (2007) Utilização de larvas do cirripedia Megabalanus coccopoma (Darwin, 1854) como organismo-teste na avaliação de toxicidade aguda. J Braz Soc Ecotoxicol 2: 7-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.5132/jbse.2007.01.002.
- 47. Celis , Antonio , Rodriguez-Almaraz Gabino, Alvarez Fernando (2007) Los cirripedios toracicos (Crustacea) de aguas someras de Tamaulipas, Mexico. Rev Mex Biodivers 78: 325-337.
- 48. Yamaguchi T, Prabowo RE, Ohshiro Y, Shimono T, Jones D et al. (2009) The introduction to Japan of the titan barnacle, Megabalanus coccopoma (Darwin, 1854) (Cirripedia: Balanomorpha) and the role of shipping in its translocation. Biofouling 25: 325-333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010902738048. PubMed: 19219673.
- 49. Kerckhof F, Haelters J, Degraer S (2010) The barnacles Chirona (Striatobalanus) amaryllis (Darwin 1854) and Megabalanus coccopoma (Darwin 1854) (Crustacea, Cirripedia): Two invasive species new to tropical West African waters. Afr J Mar Sci 32: 265-268. doi:https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2010.501573.
- 50. Nilsson-Cantell C (1932) Revision der sammlung rezenter cirripedien des naturhistorischen museums in Basel. Verh Naturforsch Ges Basel 42: 103-137.
- 51. Kerckhof F, Cattrijsse A (2001) Exotic cirripedia (balanomorpha) from buoys off the Belgian coast. Mar Biodivers 31: 245-254.
- 52.
Kerckhof F (2002) Barnacles (Cirripedia, Balanomorpha) in Belgian waters, an overview of the species and recent evolutions, with emphasis on exotic species. Bulletin van het Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen.Biologie= Bulletin de l'. Biologie: Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 72: 93-104.
- 53. Wolff WJ (2005) Non-indigenous marine and estuarine species in the Netherlands. Zool Meded 79: 1-116.
- 54. Newman WA, McConnaughey RR (1987) A tropical eastern pacific barnacle, Megabalanus coccopoma (Darwin), in southern California, following El Niño 1982-83. Pac Sci 41: 31-36.
- 55. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9: 671-675. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089. PubMed: 22930834.
- 56. Vincenty T (1975) Direct and inverse solutions of geodesics on the ellipsoid with application of nested equations. Surv Rev 23: 88-93.
- 57. Sorte CJB, Williams SL, Carlton JT (2010) Marine range shifts and species introductions: Comparative spread rates and community impacts. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19: 303-316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00519.x.
- 58. Epifanio C, Garvine R (2001) Larval transport on the Atlantic continental shelf of North America: A review. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 52: 51-77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2000.0727.
- 59. Edwards K, Hare J, Werner F, Blanton B (2006) Lagrangian circulation on the southeast US continental shelf: Implications for larval dispersal and retention. Cont Shelf Res 26: 1375-1394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2006.01.020.
- 60. Weber A, Blanton J (1980) Monthly mean wind fields for the South Atlantic Bight. J Phys Oceanogr 10: 1256-1263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1980)010.
- 61. Blanton J, Schwing F, Weber A, Pietrafesa L, Hayes D (1985) Wind stress climatology in the South Atlantic Bight. Coast Estuarine Sci 2: 10-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/CO002p0010.
- 62. Blanton BO, Aretxabaleta A, Werner FE, Seim H (2003) Monthly climatology of the continental shelf waters of the South Atlantic Bight. J Geophys Res 108: 2156-2202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB001929.
- 63. Hare JA, Walsh HJ (2007) Planktonic linkages among marine protected areas on the south Florida and southeast United States continental shelves. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64: 1234-1247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/f07-089.
- 64. Taylor CM, Hastings A (2005) Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecol Lett 8: 895-908. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00787.x.
- 65. Crisp D (1958) The spread of Elminius modestus Darwin in north-west Europe. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 37: 483-520. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400023833.
- 66. Kent A, Hawkins SJ, Doncaster CP (2003) Population consequences of mutual attraction between settling and adult barnacles. J Anim Ecol 72: 941-952. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00762.x.
- 67. Pereira HM, Leadley PW, Proença V, Alkemade R, Scharlemann JPW et al. (2010) Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science 330: 1496-1501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196624. PubMed: 20978282.
- 68. Laboy-Nieves EN, Klein E, Conde JE, Losada F, Cruz JJ et al. (2001) Mass mortality of tropical marine communities in Morrocoy, Venezuela. Bull Mar Sci 68: 163-179.
- 69. Walker ND, Roberts H, Rouse L Jr, Huh O (1982) Thermal history of reef-associated environments during a record cold-air outbreak event. Coral Reefs 1: 83-87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301689.
- 70. Wethey DS, Woodin SA, Hilbish TJ, Jones SJ, Lima FP et al. (2011) Response of intertidal populations to climate: Effects of extreme events versus long term change. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 400: 132-144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.02.008.
- 71. Stillman JH (2003) Acclimation capacity underlies susceptibility to climate change. Science 301: 65-65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1083073. PubMed: 12843385.
- 72. Tewksbury JJ, Huey RB, Deutsch CA (2008) Putting the heat on tropical animals. ScienceN Y Then Washington 320: 1296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159328.
- 73. Storey M, Gudger E (1936) Mortality of fishes due to cold at Sanibel Island, Florida, 1886-1936. Ecology 17: 640-648. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1932762.
- 74. Bohnsack JA (1983) Resiliency of reef fish communities in the Florida Keys following a January 1977 hypothermal fish kill. Environ Biol Fishes 9: 41-53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00001057.
- 75. Witherington BE, Ehrhart LM (1989) Hypothermic stunning and mortality of marine turtles in the Indian River Lagoon system, Florida. Copeia 3: 696-703.