Figures
Abstract
Enterovirus 74 (EV74) is a rarely detected viral infection of children. In 2010, EV74 was identified in New Zealand in a 2 year old child with acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) through routine polio AFP surveillance. A further three cases of EV74 were identified in children within six months. These cases are the first report of EV74 in New Zealand. In this study we describe the near complete genome sequence of four EV74 isolates from New Zealand, which shows only limited sequence identity in the non-structural proteins when compared to the other two known EV74 sequences. As is typical of enteroviruses multiple recombination events were evident, particularly in the P2 region and P3 regions. This is the first complete EV74 genome sequenced from a patient with acute flaccid paralysis.
Citation: Peacey M, Hall RJ, Wang J, Todd AK, Yen S, Chan-Hyams J, et al. (2013) Enterovirus 74 Infection in Children. PLoS ONE 8(10): e76492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076492
Editor: Shamala Devi Sekaran, University of Malaya, Malaysia
Received: January 27, 2013; Accepted: August 29, 2013; Published: October 2, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Peacey et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was funded by the Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment and the Ministry of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The genus Enterovirus (EV), family Picornaviridae, comprises more than 110 serotypes [1]. Most are known human pathogens and are classified as four species Enterovirus (EV)-A, EV-B, EV-C (includes poliovirus) and EV-D determined by phylogenetic analysis and differing from each other by >40% nucleotide divergence. The majority of Enterovirus infections are asymptomatic, but can cause a broad spectrum of disease such as acute respiratory illness, gastrointestinal illness and more serious manifestations, including aseptic meningitis, encephalitis and acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) [2].
The enterovirus genome comprises a single open reading frame translated into a polypeptide cleaved by viral proteases. The translated product has three domains; P1, P2, P3. The viral capsid proteins (VP4-VP1) are encoded in the P1 domain and provide the basis for classification of enteroviruses. Non-structural proteins 2A-C and 3A-D are respectively encoded in the P2 and P3 domains [3].
Recombination has been widely reported between polio strains and non-polio enteroviruses. Enterovirus species B has been shown undergo much more frequent recombination events than found for species A [1,4-11]. Recent studies have suggested recombination frequently occurs between independently evolving genomes creating new virus variants where the boundaries between lineages are not fixed [10]. Recombination is thought to occur through two mechanisms; 1. ‘copy choice’ where the viral polymerase switches template RNA molecules during minus-strand RNA synthesis and 2. a proposed non-replicative mechanism involving relatively unspecific covalent joining of RNA fragments [11].
Enterovirus 74 (EV74) is a rare viral pathogen usually infecting children, and has been known to cause AFP. EV74 was first proposed as a new serotype in the EV-B species by Oberste et al. in 2004 after sequencing the VP1 gene. The full genome of a 1975 Californian strain USA/CA75-10213 (AY556057) isolated from stool was sequenced providing a prototype for EV74 [12].
To date cases have been reported worldwide from the USA, Finland, India, China, France, Bangladesh, Iraq, Korea and the Central African Republic [12-16]. All patients were children ranging in age from 12 months to 14 years old and the manifestations of the different isolates varied. Of the thirteen cases where any patient data was available, four patients suffered acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), two patients presented with fever and two had acute gastroenteritis. Pneumopathy, seizures and headaches were reported separately in single cases, and symptoms in the remainder of cases are not reported [12,17-19].
EV74 was first identified in New Zealand in 2010, in a 2 year old child with AFP during routine polio AFP surveillance by partial sequencing of the VP1 gene. A further three cases of EV74 were identified in children within a six month period, but none were known to have resulted in AFP. Deep sequencing was employed to determine the full genome of the New Zealand EV74 isolate, resulting in AFP, revealing significant recombination. Full genome sequences for the additional three EV74 isolates from New Zealand were then obtained and compared revealing multiple recombination events.
Methods
Patients and specimen collection
Samples were collected by the National Poliovirus and Enterovirus Reference Laboratory at the Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR), approved by the Ministry of Health, for public health purposes. Data was analysed anonymously. Clinical specimens or cell culture isolates from un-typed enteroviruses occurring in four major hospitals (based in Auckland, Waikato, Wellington and Christchurch) are received year round as part of the New Zealand enterovirus surveillance network.
Viruses and cells
Human rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) cells (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA, passage 242-256) were propagated in 10% Hanks Minimal Essential Medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (HyClone, New Zealand), 7.5% (v/v) sodium bicarbonate, 1% (v/v) 1M HEPES and Gentamicin (53 µg/ml, Pfizer), Streptomycin (13 U/ml, Life Technologies) and Penicillin (13 µg/ml, Life Technologies). Although EV74 isolates grew best in RD and MRC5 cells, good growth was also observed in L20B cells and limited growth in MEK cells.
Faecal specimens
Chloroform extraction of faecal specimens was performed by combining a 0.5-0.8g of faecal material with 8 glass beads, and 400 µl of chloroform. The suspension was then shaken vigorously for 20 minutes prior to centrifugation at 2800 x g for 20 minutes. The supernatant was removed, 400 µl of chloroform added and before centrifugation at 2800 x g for 10 minutes. Again the supernatant was removed and centrifuged at 13000 x g for 5 minutes before re-suspension in phosphate buffered saline. The final suspension was inoculated into RD cell lines.
Roche 454 enterovirus genome sequencing
Full-length genomic sequence of EV74 from strain NZ2284 was obtained by sequencing using a Roche GS FLX instrument. RNA from passage 1 viral culture was extracted using the MagMax Viral RNA kit (Life Technologies, Cat# AM1939) as per the manufacturer’s instructions, except without the inclusion of carrier RNA, and a final elution volume of 50µL. RNA concentration was determined to be too low (
< 1µg) for direct inclusion in the Roche GS FLX sequencer library preparation, so Multiple strand Displacement Amplification (MDA) using the Quantitect Whole Transcriptome Kit (Qiagen, Cat# 207043) was employed in combination with a SuperScript III First-Stand Synthesis kit, random hexamers and protocol(Life Technologies, Cat# 18080-051). Two amplification methods were trialled, differing only with the omission of the ligation step in one of the amplification reactions (both sets of data were used in the subsequent analysis). 500 ng of amplified DNA was nebulized and used to make a barcoded, GS FLX Rapid Library (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Completed library length was between 500 bp and 900 bp with a concentration of 3.45 x 109 molecules/µL. An emPCR reaction was performed using a library concentration of 2 cpb per oil giving approximately 500,000 enriched beads. These were loaded onto a GS Junior Titanium PTP plate and sequenced on a GS Junior instrument using Titanium chemistry (Roche). The utilities sffinfo21 and FASTX-Toolkit22 were used to remove adaptor and primer sequences and filter sequence based upon data quality. Subsequent BLAST search performance was enhanced because redundant sequence information was not submitted. Enterovirus short reads identified in a BLASTN search as EV74 sequence were assembled into 11 contigs using Roche Newbler de novo assembler (Roche) [20]. Further assembly and annotation was achiev
ed using Geneious 5.5.6 (Biomatters Limited, New Zealand).
Sanger full-genome sequencing
All four New Zealand strains were sequenced as described previously (Lukashev, 2005). Nucleic acid was reverse transcribed into cDNA using random hexamers and the Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR. cDNA was then amplified using Platinum® PCR SuperMix (Life Technologies, Cat# 12532016). After an initial activation for 2 minutes at 94°C, a three-step cycling procedure was used consisting of; 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 minute, annealing at 45°C for 1 minute and extension at 72°C for 2 minutes. A final extension took place at 72°C for 5 minutes. Samples were run on an E-Gel EX 2% precast agarose gel (Life Technologies, Cat# G501808). DNA bands of interest were extracted and purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Cat# 28104) and sequenced using an ABI 3130XL automated DNA sequencer and ABI Big Dye v3.1 technology (Life Technologies).
Phylogenetic analysis
New Zealand isolate sequences were deposited in the NCBI Genbank database and assigned accession numbers KC568446 (NZ45), KC568447, (NZ234), KC568448 (NZ2205) and KC568449 (NZ2284). These sequences were aligned with complete prototype EV-B genome sequences using Geneious 5.6.5 and CLUSTALW (gap open cost 15 and gap extend cost 6.66). See Table 1 for a complete list of EV-B viruses and accession numbers of New Zealand isolates used in this study. Phylogenetic trees were built with Geneious 5.6.5 using the neighbour-joining method and Jukes-Cantor evolution model. A bootstrap resampling method was used with 1,000 replicates. In-tree comments were added using Visio 2010 (Microsoft).
| Type | Accession | Strain | Type | Accession | Strain | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAV9 | D00627 | Griggs | E30 | AF162711 | Bastianni | ||
| CBV1 | M16560 | Not Found in NCBI | E31 | AY302554 | Caldwell | ||
| CBV2 | AF081485 | Ohio | E32 | AY302555 | PR-10 | ||
| CBV3 | AY896762 | CBV3-11059-99 | E33 | AY302556 | Toluca-3 | ||
| CBV4 | X05690 | J.V.B. Benschoten | EV69 | AY302560 | Toluca-1 | ||
| CBV5 | AF114383 | Faulkner | EV73 | AF241359 | CA55-1988 | ||
| CBV6 | AF105342 | Schmit | EV74 | AY556057 | USA/CA75-10213 | ||
| E1 | AF029859 | Farouk / ATCC VR-1038 | EV74 | JQ397329 | Rikaze-136/XZ/CHN/2010 | ||
| E2 | AY302545 | Cornelis | EV74 | KC568446 | NZ45 | ||
| E3 | AY302553 | Morrisey | EV74 | KC568447 | NZ234 | ||
| E4 | AY302557 | Pesacek | EV74 | KC568448 | NZ2205 | ||
| E5 | AF083069 | Noyce | EV74 | KC568449 | NZ2284 | ||
| E6 | AY302558 | D’Amori | EV75 | AY556070 | USA/OK85-10362 | ||
| E7 | AY302559 | Wallace | EV77 | AY843302 | USA/TX97-10394 | ||
| E9 | X92886 | Barty | EV79 | AY843297 | USA/CA79-10384 | ||
| E11 | X80059 | Not Found in NCBI | EV80 | AY843298 | USA/CA67-10387 | ||
| E12 | X79047 | prototype Travis | EV81 | AY843299 | USA/CA68-10389 | ||
| E13 | AY302539 | Del Carmen | EV82 | AY843300 | USA/CA64-10390 | ||
| E14 | AY302540 | Tow | EV83 | AY843301 | USA/CA76-10392 | ||
| E15 | AY302541 | CH 96-51 | EV84 | DQ902712 | CIV2003-10603 | ||
| E16 | AY302542 | Harrington | EV85 | JX898909 | HTYT-ARL-AFP02F/XJ/CHN/2011 | ||
| E17 | AY302543 | CHHE-29 | EV86 | AY843304 | BAN00-10354 | ||
| E18 | HM777023 | Kor05-ECV18-054cn | EV87 | AY843305 | BAN01-10396 | ||
| E19 | AY302544 | Burke | EV88 | AY843306 | BAN01-10398 | ||
| E20 | AY302546 | JV-1 | EV97 | AY843307 | BAN99-10355 | ||
| E21 | AY302547 | Farina | EV98 | NC_013114 | T92-1499 | ||
| E24 | AY302548 | DeCamp | E100 | NC_009887 | BAN2000-10500 | ||
| E25 | AY302549 | JV-4 | EV101 | AY843308 | CIV03-10361 | ||
| E26 | AY302550 | Coronel | EV107 | NC_013115 | TN94-0349 | ||
| E27 | AY302551 | Bacon | PV | NC002058 | Poliovirus 1 Mahoney | ||
| E29 | AY302552 | JV-10 |
Table 1. Prototype Enterovirus B strains and New Zealand EV74 isolates.
Recombination Analysis
Aligned sequences were analysed using SimPlot version 3.5.1 [21] to identify areas of recombination. Similarity plots were created with a window size of 500 nt, step size of 20 nt, and the Jukes-Cantor model. Bootscan search settings were as follows; neighbour-joining method, Kimura evolution model and 100 replicates, with a window size of 500 nt and step size of 20 nt.
Results
Four samples from EV74 infected patients were received within a six month period coinciding with the summer in New Zealand. All four cases came from the central North Island, within 400 km (250 miles) of each other (Table 2). Consistent with international reports of EV74, the patients were all children, ranging in age from 1 month to 10 years of age [12,17-19]. Three of the four patients were male and all patients presented to hospital with fever. Other symptoms included headache, diarrhoea, photophobia, rash and in one case AFP.
| Strain | Date received | Gender | Age | Symptoms | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NZ2205 | 4/11/2010 | M | 10 y | Headache, fever, photophobia, flu-like symptoms | Bay of Plenty |
| NZ2284 | 30/11/2010 | M | 2 y | AFP, fever, unable to stand | Bay of Plenty |
| NZ45 | 25/01/2011 | F | 1 m | Febrile illness | Gisborne |
| NZ234 | 28/04/2011 | M | 9 m | Diarrhoea, fever, rash | Hamilton |
Table 2. Summary of data collected for EV74 infected patients.
Deep sequencing of isolate NZ2284 yielded 60,274 sequences ranging between 53 bps and 1200 bps in length before quality trimming. A BLASTN and BLASTX search were performed on the quality-checked dataset which identified 43,824 (73%) of the 60,284 reads as EV and 5,435 reads (9%) specifically as EV74. Closer examination of EV74 BLASTN alignments revealed 39% of sequences aligned with the VP1 region. De novo assembly of all enterovirus sequence reads provided coverage of 91% of the EV74 genome with an average depth of 65.
A sanger–sequencing approach consisting of eight overlapping amplicons was employed to provide full genome sequences for all four New Zealand EV74 samples. All but 30-58 nt of the 5’ NTR was not determined for each EV74 strain with each sequence ranging in length from 7311-7359nt. Complete concordance was observed between deep-sequencing and sanger-sequencing data for isolate NZ2284.
Similarity Plot, Bootscan analysis, pairwise sequence comparison and multiple alignments were used to examine the relationship of New Zealand isolates to the two existing full-length EV74 reference sequences available in the public databases. The four New Zealand EV74 isolates showed an average of 92.1% and 92.8% nucleotide sequence identity to the VP1 gene of EV74 reference genomes USA/CA75-10213 (AY556057) and Rikaze-136/XZ/CHN/2010 (JQ397329), respectively, confirming that EV74 was the correct genotype designation for these isolates (Figure 1). Whole genome comparison of all four sequenced New Zealand EV74 isolates showed an average nucleotide sequence identity of 98.7% to each other, indicating a common strain, but only 79.8% identity to USA/CA75-10213, and 80.9% identity to Rikaze-136/XZ/CHN/2010.
Schematic above the graph indicates the position of each gene within the EV genome.
Phylogenetic trees were constructed for each gene and the P1, P2 and P3 coding regions (Figure 2) with all available EV B reference genomes (Table 1). All four New Zealand EV74 isolates group closely with both the EV74 reference strains in the P1 region, but do not show a similar grouping in either the P2 or P3 region suggesting a recombination event. No distinguishing relationship to another EV reference strain is observed within the P2 region (bootstrap values < 50) (Figure 3). Examination of the P3 region by both phylogenetics and bootscan analysis (Figure 4) shows the four New Zealand EV74 isolates grouped most closely with E1, E84, E9 and EV101 reference strains. When the 3AB and 3C genes are considered the same phylogenetic relationships are revealed along with E12, although bootstrap values for 3AB relationship is low (Figure 3).
Trees were rooted with PV1. Bootstrap values below 50 were removed. Bars indicate nucleotide substitution distance.
Trees were rooted with PV1. Bootstrap values below 50 were removed. Bars indicate nucleotide substitution distance.
A, comparison of NZ2284 with all available prototype EV B strains. B, comparison of NZ2284 with all available prototype EV B strains excluding strains E1, E9, EV84 and EV101 but with a consensus sequence of these 4 strains. C, comparison of NZ2284 with all available prototype EV B strains including E12 but excluding strains E1, E9, EV84 and EV101. Schematic above the graph indicates the position of each gene within the EV genome.
As a contemporary strain is likely to be a closer ancestor, rather than a reference strain, a BLAST search was performed for each gene region to identify the most similar sequences (Table 3). Unsurprisingly the P1 region showed the closest similarity to EV74 strains with the top hit ranging in similarity from 83.4% to 86.5%. Within the P2 and P3 regions greater similarity was observed to contemporary strains although only gene regions 2B and 3B showed similarity higher than 85%.
| Region | Genotype | Description | Accession Number | % Identical Sites |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VP4 | EV74 | Enterovirus 74 strain IRQ00-10218 | AY556061 | 86.50% |
| EV74 | Enterovirus 74 strain BAN00-10217 | AY556059 | 85.50% | |
| EV74 | Enterovirus 74 strain CHN97-10215 | AY556060 | 85.00% | |
| VP2 | EV74 | Human enterovirus 74 strain Rikaze-136/XZ/CHN/2010 | JQ397329 | 84.60% |
| EV74 | Enterovirus 74 strain BAN00-10217 | AY556059 | 84.20% | |
| EV74 | Enterovirus 74 strain CHN97-10215 | AY556060 | 84.10% | |
| VP3 | EV74 | Enterovirus 74 strain IRQ00-10218 | AY556061 | 83.70% |
| EV74 | Enterovirus 74 strain CHN97-10215 | AY556060 | 83.40% | |
| EV74 | Enterovirus 74 strain BAN00-10217 | AY556059 | 83.40% | |
| VP1 | EV74 | Human enterovirus 74 isolate N-434A | JN204052 | 84.80% |
| EV74 | Human enterovirus 74 isolate N-433 | JN204051 | 84.80% | |
| EV74 | Human enterovirus 74 isolate KOR06-332 | EF617336 | 84.10% | |
| 2A | CB5 | Human coxsackievirus B5 isolate CVB5/SD/09 | JX276378 | 82.90% |
| E9 | Echovirus E9 strain MSH/KM812/2010 | JN596587 | 82.90% | |
| CB4 | Human coxsackievirus B4 isolate J4 | AY831488 | 82.80% | |
| 2B | CB4 | Human coxsackievirus B4 isolate F1 | AY831498 | 90.60% |
| CB4 | Human coxsackievirus B4 isolate J12 | AY831496 | 90.60% | |
| CB4 | Human coxsackievirus B4 isolate F3 | AY831499 | 90.60% | |
| 2C | CB3 | Human coxsackievirus B3 | JN979570 | 83.00% |
| E16* | Human echovirus AMS721 | EF155422 | 82.90% | |
| E30 | Human echovirus 30, isolate CF1495-00 | AM237320 | 82.80% | |
| 3A | E6 | Human echovirus 6 isolate CF1007_FRA00 | FN691457 | 84.60% |
| E30 | Human echovirus 30 isolate CF298-81 | AM237328 | 84.60% | |
| E6 | Human echovirus 6 isolate CF621_FRA01 | FN691459 | 84.60% | |
| 3B | CA9* | Human enterovirus B strain Cuba35of93 | AY466030 | 95.50% |
| CA9* | Human enterovirus B strain Cuba689of93 | AY466032 | 95.50% | |
| CA9* | Human enterovirus B strain Cuba23of00 | AY466033 | 95.50% | |
| 3C | CA9* | Human enterovirus B strain Cuba267of90 | AY466029 | 84.70% |
| EV101 | Human enterovirus 101 strain CIV03-10361 | AY843308 | 84.30% | |
| E9 | Human echovirus 9 strain Barty | AF524866 | 83.90% | |
| 3D | E1 | Echovirus 1 (strain Farouk / ATCC VR-1038) | AF029859 | 84.60% |
| CA9* | Human enterovirus B strain Cuba267of90 | AY466029 | 84.50% | |
| CA9* | Human enterovirus B strain Cuba689of93 | AY466032 | 84.00% |
Table 3. Three closest BLAST hits for each gene region of NZ2284.
Discussion
Four New Zealand EV74 viruses were isolated and sequenced showing 98.7% nucleotide sequence identity. These viruses were isolated during a six month interval within 400km of each other. These genetic and epidemiological indicators suggest a common circulating strain. There was no apparent genetic difference between the NZ2284 strain isolated from a patient with AFP, and other isolates from patients with milder symptoms. This is consistent with previous observations that the severity of symptoms does not necessarily correlate with genomic changes in the viral genome [22].
Full genome sequencing of all four isolates revealed recombination had taken place within the non-structural coding region when compared to either of the two prototypic reference strains. This can be expected, as the California strain, USA/CA75-10213, was isolated in 1975, given the time that has elapsed and frequency of recombination among the EV B species [12]. Work by Simmonds et al. suggests the likelihood of recombination occurring somewhere between the VP1 and 3D regions after only one year is almost 40%, while strains isolated more than 10 years apart are almost certain to have undergone a recombination event [23].
During 2010, an EV74 virus was isolated in China, strain Rikaze-136/XZ/CHN/2010 [14]. Despite being isolated during the same year this strain was significantly different (80.9% sequence identity) suggesting a different lineage from the New Zealand isolated strains.
The determination of the sites of recombination in the NZ EV74 isolates is complexand not the focus of this paper. No recombination was observed within the structural region of EV74 (bootstrap value of 100) consistent with previous findings that recombination within this region occurs only rarely [23]. Simplot analysis demonstrates a clear distinction in homology between all EV74 isolates and other EV B strains in the structural region. Distinction of EV serotypes in the non-structural regions is not as clear, especially in the P2 region where it is likely that multiple recombination events have taken place creating a mosaic within this region. Phylogenetic analysis of the P2 region of all EV B prototype strains shows no clear relationship. This is consistent with work mapping phylogeny violations in tree ordering, demonstrating the P2 region is a hotspot for recombination [23].
There is greater sequence homology in the P3 region of the NZ EV74 strains, with a common sequence related to E1, E9, EV84 and EV101 viruses. Again, this situation is complex as when compared to contemporary strains further recombination is evident.
The occurrence and clustering of rare enteroviruses in the human population, such as the four EV74 isolates we reported here, reiterates that on-going surveillance is necessary to determine the epidemiology of these viruses. Furthermore, detailed characterisation of the viral genomes is required to understand the evolution of rare enteroviruses and to assist in the assessment of their potential threat as an emergent disease. The genetic data we report in this study support the notion that there was a cluster of EV74 cases in New Zealand, but do not support the hypothesis that AFP could be caused by a distinct genetic lineage of EV74.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank the technical staff in the National Poliovirus and Enterovirus Reference Laboratory at the Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited (ESR). As well, the staff at Auckland and Dunedin Hospitals for the acquisition of specimens and for providing us with clinical details.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: MP RJH. Performed the experiments: AKT SY JC CR JS. Analyzed the data: MP RJH JW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: QSH. Wrote the manuscript: MP.
References
- 1. Oberste MS, Maher K, Pallansch MA (2004) Evidence for frequent recombination within species human enterovirus B based on complete genomic sequences of all thirty-seven serotypes. J Virol 78: 855-867. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.78.2.855-867.2004. PubMed: 14694117.
- 2. Yozwiak NL, Skewes-Cox P, Gordon A, Saborio S, Kuan G et al. (2010) Human enterovirus 109: a novel interspecies recombinant enterovirus isolated from a case of acute pediatric respiratory illness in Nicaragua. J Virol 84: 9047-9058. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00698-10. PubMed: 20592079.
- 3. Smura T, Savolainen-Kopra Carita, Roivainen Merja (2011) Evolution of newly described enteroviruses. Future Virol 6.1: 109-123. doi:https://doi.org/10.2217/fvl.10.62.
- 4. Santti J, Hyypiä T, Kinnunen L, Salminen M (1999) Evidence of recombination among enteroviruses. J Virol 73: 8741-8749. PubMed: 10482628.
- 5. Lindberg AM, Andersson P, Savolainen C, Mulders MN, Hovi T (2003) Evolution of the genome of Human enterovirus B: incongruence between phylogenies of the VP1 and 3CD regions indicates frequent recombination within the species. J Gen Virol 84: 1223-1235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.18971-0. PubMed: 12692288.
- 6. Tapparel C, Junier T, Gerlach D, Van-Belle S, Turin L et al. (2009) New respiratory enterovirus and recombinant rhinoviruses among circulating picornaviruses. Emerg Infect Dis 15: 719-726. doi:https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1505.081286. PubMed: 19402957.
- 7. Lukashev AN, Lashkevich VA, Ivanova OE, Koroleva GA, Hinkkanen AE et al. (2003) Recombination in circulating enteroviruses. J Virol 77: 10423-10431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.77.19.10423-10431.2003. PubMed: 12970427.
- 8. Lukashev AN, Lashkevich VA, Ivanova OE, Koroleva GA, Hinkkanen AE et al. (2005) Recombination in circulating Human enterovirus B: independent evolution of structural and non-structural genome regions. J Gen Virol 86: 3281-3290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.81264-0. PubMed: 16298973.
- 9. Han JF, Jiang T, Fan XL, Yang LM, Yu M et al. (2012) Recombination of human coxsackievirus B5 in hand, foot, and mouth disease patients, China. Emerg Infect Dis 18: 351-353. doi:https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1802.111524. PubMed: 22305307.
- 10. Lukashev AN (2005) Role of recombination in evolution of enteroviruses. Rev Med Virol 15: 157-167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.457. PubMed: 15578739.
- 11. Simon-Loriere E, Holmes EC (2011) Why do RNA viruses recombine? Nat Rev Microbiol 9: 617-626. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2614. PubMed: 21725337.
- 12. Oberste MS, Michele SM, Maher K, Schnurr D, Cisterna D et al. (2004) Molecular identification and characterization of two proposed new enterovirus serotypes, EV74 and EV75. J Gen Virol 85: 3205-3212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.80148-0. PubMed: 15483233.
- 13. Oberste MS, Feeroz MM, Maher K, Nix WA, Engel GA et al. (2013) Characterizing the Picornavirus Landscape among Synanthropic Nonhuman Primates in Bangladesh, 2007 to 2008. J Virol 87: 558-571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00837-12. PubMed: 23097448.
- 14. Wang J, Zhang Y, Hong M, Li X, Zhu S et al. (2012) Isolation and characterization of a Chinese strain of human enterovirus 74 from a healthy child in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China. Arch Virol 157: 1593-1598. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-012-1332-9. PubMed: 22576315.
- 15. Bessaud M, Pillet S, Ibrahim W, Joffret ML, Pozzetto B et al. (2012) Molecular characterization of human enteroviruses in the Central African Republic: uncovering wide diversity and identification of a new human enterovirus A71 genogroup. J Clin Microbiol 50: 1650-1658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.06657-11. PubMed: 22337981.
- 16. Blomqvist S, Paananen A, Savolainen-Kopra C, Hovi T, Roivainen M (2008) Eight years of experience with molecular identification of human enteroviruses. J Clin Microbiol 46: 2410-2413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00313-08. PubMed: 18463218.
- 17. Norder H, Bjerregaard L, Magnius L, Lina B, Aymard M et al. (2003) Sequencing of 'untypable' enteroviruses reveals two new types, EV-77 and EV-78, within human enterovirus type B and substitutions in the BC loop of the VP1 protein for known types. J Gen Virol 84: 827-836. doi:https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.18647-0. PubMed: 12655083.
- 18. Phan TG, Nguyen TA, Shimizu H, Yagyu F, Okitsu S et al. (2005) Identification of enteroviral infection among infants and children admitted to hospital with acute gastroentritis in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. J Med Virol 77: 257-264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.20445. PubMed: 16121381.
- 19. Tan CY, Ninove L, Gaudart J, Nougairede A, Zandotti C et al. (2011) A retrospective overview of enterovirus infection diagnosis and molecular epidemiology in the public hospitals of Marseille, France (1985-2005). PLOS ONE 6: e18022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018022. PubMed: 21437207.
- 20. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403-410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. PubMed: 2231712.
- 21. Lole KS, Bollinger RC, Paranjape RS, Gadkari D, Kulkarni SS et al. (1999) Full-length human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomes from subtype C-infected seroconverters in India, with evidence of intersubtype recombination. J Virol 73: 152-160. PubMed: 9847317.
- 22. Jee YM, Cheon DS, Kim K, Cho JH, Chung YS et al. (2003) Genetic analysis of the VP1 region of human enterovirus 71 strains isolated in Korea during 2000. Arch Virol 148: 1735-1746. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-003-0133-6. PubMed: 14505086.
- 23. Simmonds P, Welch J (2006) Frequency and dynamics of recombination within different species of human enteroviruses. J Virol 80: 483-493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.80.1.483-493.2006. PubMed: 16352572.