Figures
Abstract
Cross-reactive antibodies are characterized by their recognition of antigens that are different from the trigger immunogen. This happens when the similarity between two different antigenic determinants becomes adequate enough to enable a specific binding with such cross-reactive antibodies. In the present manuscript, we report the presence, at an “abnormal” high frequency, of antibodies in blood samples from French human subjects cross-reacting with a synthetic-peptide antigen derived from a Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) protein sequence. As the vector of T. cruzi is virtually confined to South America, the parasite is unlikely to be the trigger immunogen of the cross-reactive antibodies detected in France. At present, the cross-reactive antibodies are measured by using an in-house ELISA method that employs the T. cruzi -peptide antigen. However, to underline their cross-reactive characteristics, we called these antibodies “Trypanosoma cruzi Cross Reactive Antibodies” or TcCRA. To validate their cross-reactive nature, these antibodies were affinity-purified from plasma of healthy blood donor and were then shown to specifically react with the T. cruzi parasite by immunofluorescence. Seroprevalence of TcCRA was estimated at 45% in serum samples of French blood donors while the same peptide-antigen reacts with about 96% of T. cruzi -infected Brazilian individuals. In addition, we compared the serology of TcCRA to other serologies such as HSV 1/2, EBV, HHV-6, CMV, VZV, adenovirus, parvovirus B19, mumps virus, rubella virus, respiratory syncytial virus, measles and enterovirus. No association was identified to any of the tested viruses. Furthermore, we tested sera from different age groups for TcCRA and found a progressive acquisition starting from early childhood. Our findings show a large seroprevalence of cross-reactive antibodies to a well-defined T. cruzi antigen and suggest they are induced by a widely spread immunogen, acquired from childhood. The etiology of TcCRA and their clinical relevance still need to be investigated.
Citation: Saba ES, Gueyffier L, Dichtel-Danjoy M-L, Pozzetto B, Bourlet T, Gueyffier F, et al. (2013) Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi Cross-Reactive Antibodies Detected at High Rate in Non-Exposed Individuals Living in Non-Endemic Regions: Seroprevalence and Association to Other Viral Serologies. PLoS ONE 8(9): e74493. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074493
Editor: Sylvie Bisser, INSERM U1094, University of Limoges School of Medicine, France
Received: June 28, 2013; Accepted: July 22, 2013; Published: September 17, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Saba et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was funded by Infynity Biomarkers and the region Rhone Alpes. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: This study was partly funded by Infynity Biomarkers the employer of ESS and MAZ. Infynity Biomarkers discovered the biomarker. There are no further patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Introduction
The paradigm of antibody specificity is closely related to the primary amino-acid sequence forming the heavy and light chains in a spatial organization that is able to bind to a given antigenic structure. However, each individual antibody molecule has a built-in capability to bind to various antigenic motifs; this non-specific recognition can gradually attain degeneracy where an antibody molecule is able to bind to fairly distant antigens. Nevertheless, the specificity is accomplished when the sum of specific bindings to a given antigenic determinant is clearly superior to the cross-reactive bindings to a variety of different structures. This is typically obtained in polyclonal antisera.
An important cause of cross-reactivity is attributable to molecular mimicry between antigenic structures. Thus, an infective agent can partially mimic tissue-specific antigens and induce cross-reactive autoimmune antibodies. Antigen mimicry can drive an immune response, initially directed against a foreign antigen, to recognize the host antigens and then results in dysfunction and autoimmune diseases. Such mechanisms have been proposed to explain certain acquired immune pathogenesis [1],[2].
In the context of an infection by T. cruzi, either the parasite and/or the associated polyclonal reactivity ultimately lead to Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy (CCC) in about 30% of infected people 10 to 30 years after the infection [3]. The detection of T. cruzi nests in the heart of patients with chronic myocarditis suggests the persistence of the parasite as a cause for the development of CCC [4] Conversely, other researchers reported unsuccessful parasite detection in a great majority of patients with CCC which constitute a doubt about the necessity of the parasite for the development of Chagas pathology [5]. Furthermore, several reports indicate that the inflammatory tissue damage may not be correlated to the local presence of T. cruzi [6],[7]. Evidence for a direct pathogenic role of autoimmunity was suggested by the development of lesions in cardiac tissues after immunization with T. cruzi antigens in animal models [8]. Several T. cruzi antigens have been reported to present epitopes similar to mammalian antigens, including the family of trypanomastigote specific FI-160 antigens [9], cruzipain [10], calreticulin [11], SAPA [12], members of the ribosomal P protein family, and many other antigens (for a review see [3]). Aside from the controversial pathogenesis that leads to CCC after T. cruzi infection, in laboratory diagnostic testing, several cross-reactive antigens have been described to produce false reactivities in Chagas screening serological assays [13]. Some of them were observed to bind with antibodies induced by parasites belonging to the member of the same trypanosomatids group like for Leishmania [14] and also by more distant parasites like Malaria [15]. Cross reactivity is depending on the source of T. cruzi antigens used in the immunoassays development (recombinant proteins and synthetic peptides, or crude extracts from Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigote forms), however in such assays the frequency of cross-reactivity remains extremely limited due to regulatory considerations.
In the course of development of a new serodiagnostic assay for Chagas Oelemann et al observed a strong cross-reactivity of an antigen that we further called TCSP for Trypanosoma cruzi Synthetic Peptide [16]. This peptide belongs to the repetitive region of the 60 S L19 ribosomal protein of T. cruzi [17]. This repetitive region was initially described in an attempt to determine antigenic sequences of T. cruzi [18]. Repeated motifs are found in several members of the 60S ribosomal proteins [19]. The largest C terminal extensions (more than 160 amino acids) have been observed in T. cruzi L19 and T. cruzi S21 and are specific to trypanosomatids [20]
The objective of the present work is to describe the seroprevalence of cross-reacting antibodies to TCSP in a non-endemic region for T. cruzi. These antibodies are unexpectedly found at a high seroprevalence (40% to 50%) in serum of individuals living in France, not exposed to T. cruzi. They have thus been named TcCRA for Trypanosoma-cruzi-Cross Reactive Antibodies. Cross-reactivity of these TcCRA antibodies to T. cruzi is also demonstrated. These initial observational studies may help in further exploring potential association of TcCRA with diseases suspected but not yet proved to have an infectious origin.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
The Institutional Review Board we depend upon waived the study approval (CPP Sud-Est n° 2013/017). The sera that were tested indeed represented residual quantities from samples withdrawn for other purposes and all sera were anonymized prior to testing.
All our studies comply with the French legislation on the processing of personal data and have been declared to the competent authority (CNIL – National Commission for Information technology and Liberty).
T. cruzi -synthetic peptide (TCSP) antigen
The peptide sequence of 19 amino-acids is coupled to bovine serum albumin (BSA) and has the following sequence: BSA-AAAPAKAAAAPAKTAAAPV.
The peptide synthesis was performed using Fmoc-chemistry supplied by Protéogenix, France. The peptide was then covalently linked from the N-terminal side to bovine serum albumin (BSA) to facilitate its adsorption to microplates. This peptide is used as a target antigen throughout our work to detect TcCRA.
BLAST searches and Alignments
We performed a BLAST search using the Universal Protein Resource (www.uniprot.org), by querying first the TCSP peptide, then the repeated region harboring the peptide. This region, referenced as Q7M3W1 (97 amino-acids), is a fragment of T. cruzi ribosomal protein 60s L19 (XP_808122; 357 amino-acids). We searched across the Swiss Prot non-redundant database sequences by using the default settings [21].
Human serum collections
We tested TcCRA presence in 395 serum samples that were routinely collected for viral serology testing of one or more parameter(s) in a hospital setting (Lyon, France). We retained serum samples if a minimum of 0.5 mL was available.
In addition, 210 serum samples from healthy blood donors were obtained from different blood banks (Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) Rhône, EFS Nord and EFS Auvergne Loire). All samples from blood donors were screened negative for the following infectious serological markers, namely: human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV 1, 2 & O), Human T-lymphotropic viruses (HTLV I/II), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and Treponema palladium (TP). Moreover, blood donors are classically asked before sampling whether they have travelled to any of the endemic regions for T. cruzi. In case they have, their blood is tested for the presence of the parasite infection and their sample is discarded if found reactive.
Additionally, we tested 69 serums of pediatric patients (< 18 years) obtained from Amiens biobank, as well as 79 sera of T. cruzi -infected patients obtained from Fundação ProSangue (São-Paulo, Brazil).
Sex and age at sampling were scored for all samples (Table 1).
Serology testing
Antibodies specific to the TCSP peptide antigen were tested in serum samples using an in-house ELISA method. Briefly, TCSP was coated at a concentration of 1 µg/ml in 100 µL coating buffer pH 9.6 into 96-wells microplates (Nunc-Immuno™). Microplates were blocked with 200 µl of blocking buffer during 2 h at room temperature. Following incubation, the microplates were washed two times with ELISA wash buffer (PBS-Tween) using an automated washer (Labatech LT-3500). Samples were then diluted appropriately in sample diluents to 1/50. In brief, 100 µl of diluted sample or controls were then added to TCSP coated plate and incubated for 60 min at room temperature. At the end of the incubation, the plates were washed three times with wash buffer to remove unbound antibodies (LT-3500 Microplate washer). Alkaline Phosphatase-conjugated (PARIS BIOTECH, Compiègne, France) was diluted 1/1000 in conjugate buffer, and 100μl were then added to the microplate which was incubated for a final 60 min at room temperature. At the end of the incubation period, the plates were washed three times with wash buffer. Finally 100μl of para-Nitrophenyl Phosphate (p-NPP) substrate solution (1 mg/mL) were added to each well. The plate was then incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The absorbance was measured at 405 nm using a 96-well plate reader (Labatech LT-4000 Microplate reader) and the results analyzed using analysis software (Manta, Labatech). All reported data represent the average optical density (OD) of duplicate measurements. A cut-off value of 0.5 OD was calculated for determining seropositivity, it is determined as the mean plus 3 times the standard deviations (SD) of the tested samples OD on negative control samples.
Viral serologies for clinical samples were performed in a routine setting of Lyon’s Hospital as described in the kit inserts of the corresponding commercial assay used (Siemens, Germany).
Affinity-purified antibodies and immunofluorescence
50 ml from a 51 years old man TcCRA-positive plasma sample were used for affinity-purification. Gammaglobulins fraction was precipitated with 40% Ammonium Sulfate. Pellet was centrifuged at 4.000 g then dissolved in 30 ml of PBS after discarding the supernatant. When fully dispersed, the solution was dialyzed against PBS at 4°C overnight with two buffer changes. The dissolved fraction was used for immunoaffinity purification as follows: 20 mg Dynabeads MyOne™ Streptavidin T1 (Invitrogen 656.01) were incubated for 1 hour with 20 µg/ml of a biotinylated TCSP; the beads were then washed 3 times with PBS-Tween 20 and incubated with PBS 1% BSA for another hour to saturate all the unspecific binding sites. Washed one time after the saturation, the beads were incubated with 10 ml of the precipitate (Total IgGs) for one hour. After incubation the beads were washed 3 times with PBS-Tween 20, and incubated for 10 min with a glycine-HCL (pH 2.5) to elute TcCRA. After elution, pH was immediately neutralized to pH 7.5 by adding NaOH (1N). All incubations were performed at room temperature and before each step a magnet was used for 2 min to isolate beads from supernatant.
After the immunopurification, TcCRA solution (300 µg/mL) was diluted 1/50 then incubated in a wet chamber on an immunofluorescence assay used in routine screening (epimastigotes glass slides;from Biomérieux/IMUNOCRUZI) during 1 h at 37°C. Later, the slide was washed three times in PBS-Tween and incubated at dark with a diluted ready to use FITC-conjugated anti-Human IgG (NOVA Lite kits, INOVA Diagnostics) during 1 h at 37°C, then washed three times in PBS and mounted in buffered glycerin for observation under a fluorescence microscope (excitation at 488 nm) 60x. A negative control was obtained by using an irrelevant purified human IgG negative to TCSP antigen under identical concentration and testing conditions.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics are presented as frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables and as means (SD) for continuous variables. The Mann Whitney U test was used to compare age between sexes and Fisher’s Exact test was used to test equality of the proportion of males and females in the TcCRA positive group (Table 2). To investigate the equality of viral serology of other viruses and TcCRA status, the null-hypothesis that the proportion of discordant test results equals zero is tested using a single proportion test (Table 3). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (SPSS version 17.0).
Results
Immunofluorescence
Affinity-purified TcCRA were tested by immunofluorescence on T. cruzi epimastigotes slides. These purified antibodies reacted positive with the fixed parasite giving strong fluorescence signals (Figure 1) as compared to the negative control antibodies.
The horizontal bar embedded in the image B represents a 20 µm scale.
Serological testing
Sera from adult blood donors and pediatric patients.
We tested TcCRA in sera obtained from blood donors qualified after negative screening for all mandatory infectious markers (n = 210). Since seroprevalence in healthy young individuals (below 18 years old), for ethical reasons, is relatively complex to evaluate, we estimated the seroprevalence in pediatric patients. Sixty-nine serum samples from hospitalized children were tested to evaluate the seroprevalence of TcCRA in a lower age range than for blood donors. By merging the two groups, Figure 2 shows a steady increase of TcCRA seroprevalence from childhood to adulthood. There was no significant difference related to gender in the adult blood donors group (Table 2).
Sera from patients tested for different viral serologies.
395 serum samples obtained from patients referred for viral serology testing by different hospital wards in Lyon were tested for the presence of TCcRA. Each sample was analyzed in a clinical laboratory for at least one of the IgG antibodies specific to viral serologies. Table 3 shows the seroprevalence of TcCRA in each category of negative and positive viral serology. In this table, we tested TcCRA status against presence/absence of different viral serologies and p<0.0001 was obtained, providing evidence for the difference between TcCRA and other viral serology markers.
Sera of T. cruzi infected patients.
A cohort of 79 patients infected by T. cruzi and collected in Brazil for a study on Chagas disease was used in an ancillary study to evaluate the specific antibodies to the ribosomal protein antigen TCSP [22]. 96% (76/79) of samples were found reactive to this antigen. Under the testing conditions of such samples, no discrimination was feasible between genuine anti-T. cruzi antibodies and the cross-reactive TcCRA.
Sequence Homologies
A BLAST search with the TCSP sequence did not reveal any similarity with classical and frequent infectious agents that could explain the observed seroprevalence levels. We also performed searches with the Q7M3W1 repetitive fragment containing TCSP. Q7M3W1 fragment has been classified in the superfamily varicella-zoster virus gene 22. Searches indeed revealed a significant similarity with a tegument protein that belongs to a herpes virus family member [O39779, equine herpes virus 1, Fragment, ORF24, identity = 57%, score = 248, E-Value = 1.0E-19] (Figure 3). No other similarity with members of the Herpes family (and especially human) was evidenced through this search.
We then checked if the in silico similarity between TCSP and the equine herpes virus had a biological value. The equine peptide was synthesized and tested with TcCRA seropositive samples. Although linear sequence identity of the tested antigens exceeds 69%, only a minor fraction (below 1%) of samples reacted to the herpes equine antigen and no correlation was identified between both serologies (data not shown).
Discussion
We have discovered novel antibodies, called TcCRA, observed in around 45% of French blood donors though detected with an antigen derived from a Latin American parasite.
French individuals are virtually not exposed to T. cruzi. We however observed at a high frequency binding reactions in the ELISA tests performed on French blood samples. This strong TcCRA cross-reactivity with T. cruzi was further evidenced by the specific reaction obtained between affinity-purified TcCRA and T. Cruzi epimastigotes in immunofluorescence assays used for routine serodiagnosis. This led us to search for characteristics of the trigger immunogen through different approaches.
We estimated seroprevalence in different groups of individuals. Our data show a steady increase of seroprevalence from early childhood to an approximate level of 47%. No differences were found between men and women. This suggests a widely spread immunogen, acquired in childhood, probably latent after acquisition or initiating an autoimmune process, which would explain its immunity maintenance during adulthood.
In a second approach, we investigated potential homologies with other antigens than the one from T. cruzi. We could not identify any significant similarity to known pathogens with such a high level of prevalence through our BLAST searches. Intriguingly enough, the annotation of Q7M3W1 (eukaryotic) indicated a clustering in the “super family” of varicella-zoster virus gene 22 protein, through its homology with the equine ORF24 genes. So far there is no history of Equine Herpesvirus transmission to human [23] and our in-vitro experiments revealed no interaction between TcCRA and the homologous peptide derived from ORF24.
Without any conclusive outcome to the in-silico search of potential homologies, we explored the path of in-vitro cross-reactivity with the commonly tested viral agents widely prevalent within the French territory. We could not find any direct association, in the sera we tested, between TcCRA and any of the analyzed viral serologies, whether they belong to the Herpes virus family (namely HSV1/2, HHV6, EBV, CMV and VZV), or other viruses (Adenovirus, Parvovirus B19, Mumps virus, Rubella virus, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Measles and Enterovirus).
Based on our observations so far, we thus propose that the trigger immunogen, still to be characterized, could be a variant of a known infectious agent or even a new one in view of the lack of correlation with widely spread viruses. It could be of parasitic nature: cross-reactivity between T. Cruzi and closely related species like T. rangeli of Leishmania or with more distant species has indeed been observed [14]. However, though some of these species are found in Europe, their presence has not been reported in France. They are thus unlikely to explain the elevated seroprevalence levels of TcCRA.
Overall, the seroprevalence rate and age of acquisition hint at a cosmopolitan distribution for the target immunogen, which is likely to be present in the endemic, as well as in non-endemic, zones of T. cruzi. Given the strong cross-reactivity of TcCRA with the Latin American parasite, these antibodies could explain a certain amount of false reactivities typically observed in T. cruzi-screening assays that use whole extracts of the parasite. This hypothesis is reinforced by our immunoassay results on T. Cruzi infected patients (96% of positive reactions in a group of 79 individuals) showing that TCSP is an immunodominant antigen for Tc immunoassays and concomitantly can yield false reactivities in individuals uninfected by Tc. To resolve such false reactivities and achieve high assay specificity, Oelemann et al. made a careful selection of protein composition that excluded some of the T. cruzi antigens (such as TCSP) that might sustain the cross-reactivities [16].
We are confronted here to a case of cross-reactivity between distinct infectious agents striking by its extent: elevated prevalence estimated in different groups of individuals, either healthy (blood donors) or not (patients with diverse pathologies). Other examples in humans have been described in the literature but not necessarily on humoral immunity, such as cross-reactivity between HCV and Influenza virus, impacting cellular immunity. Wedemeyer et al. were indeed able to expand T-cells specific to a peptide derived from NS3 protein of HCV from blood of 9 of 15 HCV-negative blood donors (60%) [24]. They further confirmed that the cross-reactivity originated from a peptide of Influenza virus. They concluded on the influence past exposure to pathogens might have on host cellular responses to a new infection. Could there be a similar mechanism in Latin American patients having first acquired TcCRA target immunogen, where the immune response takes a different path in the course of an infection by T. cruzi due to the presence of cross-reactive antibodies?
Most of documented cross-reactivity cases refer to an infectious agent and a self-antigen rather than between pathogens. T. cruzi is an exemplar of molecular mimicry between some of the epitopes it bears and human proteins, which may initiate autoimmune disorders and alter several organs. This has been in particular proposed to explain (at least partially) Chagas pathogenesis through the induction of autoantibodies against Beta1-adrenoreceptors, provoking dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMs) [5]. Based on the reported presence of autoantibodies against the Beta1-adrenoreceptor in all forms of DCMs (idiopathic and chagasic), Levin and Hoebeke have proposed a parallel between both forms and a consensus peptide common to T. cruzi, to the Beta1-adrenoreceptor and to other pathogens that could explain the origin of idiopathic forms [25]. Their research works lead us to raise the question of potential analogous autoimmune mechanisms that may be elicited by the peptide sequence shared by T. cruzi and TcCRA target immunogen. This may be one possible explanation for the persistence of TcCRA during adulthood, another one being a repetitive exposure to the antigen through a latent infection. Exploring this hypothesis will be pursued, with the full awareness of the difficulty of the task. First, the long time span (several years or even decades) between the autoantibodies generation and the development of the associated clinical disease indeed requires long-term epidemiologic studies, taking many years to produce results [26]. Moreover, the occurrence of autoimmune diseases is suspected to be associated with a confluence of several factors such as genetic predisposition and environmental exposure [3]. Another source of complication in comprehending autoimmune processes is due to the low prognosis value of functional autoantibodies. Indeed only low correlations are found between autoantibodies and a given disease severity [27]. This extensive complexity probably explains why direct evidence about infections and their contribution to autoimmunity have been established only in a few instances, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome [28] and rheumatic fever [29].As for Chagas disease, some controversies are still under debate about its origin: either autoimmunity or parasite persistence.
Conclusion
The present report unveils a possible antigen mimicry characterized by a serological reactivity to a well-defined T. cruzi antigen in blood samples from individuals not exposed to the parasite. The measured seroprevalence of such cross-reactivity is in favor of a highly prevalent immunogen, acquired in childhood, which doesn’t seem to be associated with common known pathogens in clinical routine. Additional studies are required to identify the candidate agent probably bearing a structural immunogenic motif similar to the ribosomal antigen of T. cruzi. This initial work will serve as the basis for organizing prospective clinical investigations, where we will pursue the analysis of TcCRA in different groups of individuals (diseased and healthy) with the aim to identify its potential clinical significance and etiology.
Acknowledgments
All co-authors would like to thank Professor Olivier Garraud Director of EFS Auvergne-Loire for the supply of plasma that helped in affinity purification of TcCRA. We thank Professor Bruno Lina as well for providing access to the samples with viral serology results. Finally, thanks to Dr. Marc Vanregenmortel for the constructive discussions over the subject.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: MAZ ESS BP PV. Performed the experiments: MAZ ESS. Analyzed the data: MAZ ESS LG HP FG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MAZ YM TB ECS HP. Wrote the paper: MAZ ESS LG MD.
References
- 1. Cusick MF, Libbey JE, Fujinami RS (2012) Molecular mimicry as a mechanism of autoimmune disease. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 42: 102–111.
- 2. Ercolini AM, Miler SD (2009) The role of infections in autoimmune disease. Clin Exp Immunol 155: 1–15.
- 3. Marin-Neto JA, Cunha-Neto E, Maciel BC, Simões MV (2007) Pathogenesis of chronic Chagas heart disease. Circulation 115: 1109–1123.
- 4. Benvenuti LA, Roggério A, Freitas HFG, Mansur AJ, Fiorelli A, et al. (2008) Chronic American trypanosomiasis: parasite persistence in endomyocardial biopsies is associated with high-grade myocarditis. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 102: 481–487.
- 5. Teixeira AR, Hecht MM, Guimaro MC, Sousa AO, Nitz N (2011) Pathogenesis of Chagas’ Disease: Parasite Persistence and Autoimmunity. Clin Microbiol Rev 24: 592–630.
- 6. Elias FE, Vigliano CA, Laguens RP, Levin MJ, Berek C (2003) Analysis of the Presence of Trypanosoma Cruzi in the Heart Tissue of Three Patients with Chronic Chagas’ Heart Disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg 68: 242–247.
- 7. Palomino SAP, Aiello VD, Higuchi ML (2000) Systematic mapping of hearts from chronic chagasic patients: the association between the occurrence of histopathological lesions and Trypanosoma cruzi antigens. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 94: 571–579.
- 8. Teixeira AR, Gomes C, Nitz N, Sousa AO, Alves RM, et al. (2011) Trypanosoma cruzi in the Chicken Model: Chagas-Like Heart Disease in the Absence of Parasitism. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e1000.
- 9. Van Voorhis WC, Barrett L, Koelling R, Farr AG (1993) FL-160 proteins of Trypanosoma cruzi are expressed from a multigene family and contain two distinct epitopes that mimic nervous tissues. J Exp Med 178: 681–694.
- 10. Giordanengo L, Guiñazú N, Stempin C, Fretes R, Cerbán F, et al. (2002) Cruzipain, a major Trypanosoma cruzi antigen, conditions the host immune response in favor of parasite. Eur J Immunol 32: 1003–1011.
- 11. Ribeiro CH, López NC, Ramírez GA, Valck CE, Molina MC, et al. (2009) Trypanosoma cruzi calreticulin: a possible role in Chagas’ disease autoimmunity. Mol Immunol 46: 1092–1099.
- 12. Giordanengo L, Gea S, Barbieri G, Rabinovich GA (2001) Anti-galectin-1 autoantibodies in human Trypanosoma cruzi infection: differential expression of this beta-galactoside-binding protein in cardiac Chagas’ disease. Clin Exp Immunol 124: 266–273.
- 13. Cooley G, Etheridge RD, Boehlke C, Bundy B, Weatherly DB, et al. (2008) High Throughput Selection of Effective Serodiagnostics for Trypanosoma cruzi infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2: e316.
- 14. Caballero ZC, Sousa OE, Marques WP, Saez-Alquezar A, Umezawa ES (2007) Evaluation of serological tests to identify Trypanosoma cruzi infection in humans and determine cross-reactivity with Trypanosoma rangeli and Leishmania spp. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 14: 1045–1049.
- 15. Flores-Chavez M, Cruz I, Nieto J, Gárate T, Navarro M, et al. (2012) Sensitivity and specificity of an operon immunochromatographic test in serum and whole-blood samples for the diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Spain, an area of nonendemicity. Clin Vaccine Immunol 19: 1353–1359.
- 16. Oelemann WM, Vanderborght BO, Verissimo Da Costa GC, Teixeira MG, Borges-Pereira J, et al. (1999) A recombinant peptide antigen line immunoassay optimized for the confirmation of Chagas’ disease. Transfusion 39: 711–717.
- 17. El Sayed NM, Myler PJ, Bartholomeu DC, Nilsson D, Aggarwal G, et al. (2005) The genome sequence of Trypanosoma cruzi, etiologic agent of Chagas disease. Science 309: 409–415.
- 18. Hoft DF, Kim KS, Otsu K, Moser DR, Yost WJ, et al. (1989) Trypanosoma cruzi expresses diverse repetitive protein antigens. Infect Immun 57: 1959–1967.
- 19. Pais FS, DaRocha WD, Almeida RM, Leclercq SY, Penido ML, et al. (2008) Molecular characterization of ribonucleoproteic antigens containing repeated amino acid sequences from Trypanosoma cruzi. Microbes and Infection 10: 716–725.
- 20. Ayub MJ, Atwood J, Nuccio A, Tarleton R, Levin MJ (2009) Proteomic analysis of the Trypanosoma cruzi ribosomal proteins. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 382: 30–34.
- 21. The UniProt Consortium (2011) Reorganizing the protein space at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Research 40: D71–D75.
- 22. Sabino EC, Ribeiro AL, Salemi VMC, Di Lorenzo Oliveira C, Antunes AP, et al. (2013) Ten-year Incidence of Chagas Cardiomyopathy among Asymptomatic, T. cruzi Seropositive Former Blood Donors. Circulation. 127: 1105–1115.
- 23. Tischer BK, Osterrieder N (2010) Herpesviruses--a zoonotic threat? Vet Microbiol 140: 266–270.
- 24. Wedemeyer H, Mizukoshi E, Davis AR, Bennink JR, Rehermann B (2001) Cross-reactivity between hepatitis C virus and Influenza A virus determinant-specific cytotoxic T cells. Journal of virology 75: 11392–11400.
- 25. Levin MJ, Hoebeke J (2008) Cross-talk between anti-beta1-adrenoceptor antibodies in dilated cardiomyopathy and Chagas’ heart disease. Autoimmunity 41: 429–433.
- 26. Arbuckle MR, McClain MT, Rubertone MV, Scofield RH, Dennis GJ, et al. (2003) Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 349: 1526–1533.
- 27. Talvani A, Rocha MOC, Ribeiro AL, Borda E, Sterin-Borda L, et al. (2006) Levels of anti-M2 and anti-beta1 autoantibodies do not correlate with the degree of heart dysfunction in Chagas’ heart disease. Microbes Infect 8: 2459–2464.
- 28. Islam Z, Gilbert M, Mohammad QD, Klaij K, Li J, et al. (2012) Guillain-Barré Syndrome-Related Campylobacter jejuni in Bangladesh: Ganglioside Mimicry and Cross-Reactive Antibodies. PLoS ONE 7: e43976.
- 29. Rashid T, Ebringer A (2012) Autoimmunity in Rheumatic Diseases Is Induced by Microbial Infections via Crossreactivity or Molecular Mimicry. Autoimmune Dis 2012: 539282.