Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Regulation of Hippocampal cGMP Levels as a Candidate to Treat Cognitive Deficits in Huntington’s Disease

  • Ana Saavedra,

    Affiliations Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Immunologia Neurociències, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Barcelona, Spain

    ⨯
  • Albert Giralt,

    Affiliations Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Immunologia Neurociències, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Barcelona, Spain

    ⨯
  • Helena Arumí,

    Affiliations Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Immunologia Neurociències, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Barcelona, Spain

    ⨯
  • Jordi Alberch,

    Affiliations Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Immunologia Neurociències, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Barcelona, Spain

    ⨯
  • Esther Pérez-Navarro

    estherperez@ub.edu

    Affiliations Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Immunologia Neurociències, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Barcelona, Spain

    ⨯

Abstract

Huntington’s disease (HD) patients and mouse models show learning and memory impairment associated with hippocampal dysfunction. The neuronal nitric oxide synthase/3',5'-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (nNOS/cGMP) pathway is implicated in synaptic plasticity, and in learning and memory processes. Here, we examined the nNOS/cGMP pathway in the hippocampus of HD mice to determine whether it can be a good therapeutic target for cognitive improvement in HD. We analyzed hippocampal nNOS and phosphodiesterase (PDE) 5 and 9 levels in R6/1 mice, and cGMP levels in the hippocampus of R6/1, R6/2 and HdhQ7/Q111 mice, and of HD patients. We also investigated whether sildenafil, a PDE5 inhibitor, could improve cognitive deficits in R6/1 mice. We found that hippocampal cGMP levels were 3-fold lower in 12-week-old R6/1 mice, when they show deficits in object recognition memory and in passive avoidance learning. Consistent with hippocampal cGMP levels, nNOS levels were down-regulated, while there were no changes in the levels of PDE5 and PDE9 in R6/1 mice. A single intraperitoneal injection of sildenafil (3 mg/Kg) immediately after training increased cGMP levels, and improved memory in R6/1 mice, as assessed by using the novel object recognition and the passive avoidance test. Importantly, cGMP levels were also reduced in R6/2 mouse and human HD hippocampus. Therefore, the regulation of hippocampal cGMP levels can be a suitable treatment for cognitive impairment in HD.

Citation: Saavedra A, Giralt A, Arumí H, Alberch J, Pérez-Navarro E (2013) Regulation of Hippocampal cGMP Levels as a Candidate to Treat Cognitive Deficits in Huntington’s Disease. PLoS ONE 8(9): e73664. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073664

Editor: Pedro Gonzalez-Alegre, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, United States of America

Received: April 29, 2013; Accepted: July 19, 2013; Published: September 5, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Saavedra et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work was supported by Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain (PI10/01072 to EP-N), Redes Temáticas de Investigación Cooperativa Sanitaria (grant number RD06/0010/0006), Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Spain (SAF2011-29507 to JA), and Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain (2009SGR-00326 to JA). AS and AG and are supported by Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Spain (Juan de la Cierva subprograme, JCI-2010-08207 and CAPLE2009-0089, respectively). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Huntington’s disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder caused by an expanded CAG repeat in the coding region of the huntingtin gene [1]. Although HD is essentially a movement disorder, several evidence indicates that cognitive impairment appears early, even before the onset of motor symptoms, both in patients and mouse models (reviewed in 2). The molecular events involved in this cognitive decline are now beginning to be uncovered. For instance, we recently demonstrated that cognitive dysfunction in R6/1 and R6/2 mice, two exon-1 models of HD, correlates with increased hippocampal cAMP-regulated protein kinase (PKA) activity, and that its inhibition re-establishes recognition memory in mutant mice, supporting the idea that PKA-dependent processes are occluded in HD mice hippocampus [3].

The nitric oxide/soluble guanylyl cyclase/3',5'-cyclic guanosine monophosphate /cGMP-dependent protein kinase (NO/sGC/cGMP/cGK) signaling pathway has been widely implicated in synaptic plasticity, and in learning and memory in different brain regions, including the hippocampus, cerebellum and amygdala (reviewed in 4). NO is produced by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and stimulates the activity of sGC leading to the production of cGMP [5]. In turn, cGMP can activate cGMP-gated channels [6], modulate the activity of phosphodiesterases (PDEs) [7], and activate cGK, with the consequent phosphorylation of specific proteins involved in signal transduction [8]. Importantly, cognitive loss in Alzheimer’s disease and during aging has been associated with a down-regulation of the NO/cGMP/cGK pathway [9]. However, the integrity of the NOS/cGMP pathway in the hippocampus of HD mice and patients, and the potential contribution of its alteration to learning and memory defects have not been addressed yet. Interestingly, neuronal NOS (nNOS) mRNA levels are decreased in the caudate of HD patients [10], and changes in nNOS protein levels have been also reported in the striatum and cortex of HD mouse models [11–15].

Phosphodiesterases (1–11) play an important role in signal transduction by specifically catalyzing the hydrolysis of the second messengers cAMP and/or cGMP, thereby regulating their intracellular concentration [7]. Evidence from studies in subjects with intact memory and in models of impaired memory indicates that PDE inhibitors can be potentially used as cognitive enhancers [16–21]. Importantly, treatment with sildenafil, a selective inhibitor of the cGMP-specific PDE5 [22], is beneficial in models of cognitive loss associated with aging [23,24] and different pathological conditions including Alzheimer’s disease [25–27], pre-eclampsia [28], and hepatic encephalopathy [29].

The aim of this study was to investigate the nNOS/cGMP pathway in the hippocampus of HD mouse models and patients in order to determine whether it can be a good therapeutic target to improve cognitive function in HD. Our results showed that the nNOS/cGMP pathway is disrupted in the hippocampus of R6 mice and in HD patients and that PDE5 inhibition may prove to be beneficial to ameliorate cognitive deficits in HD.

Materials and Methods

HD mouse models

In this study we used male R6/1 and R6/2 heterozygous transgenic mice (B6CBA background) expressing the exon-1 of mutant huntingtin (mhtt) with 145 and 115 CAG repeats, respectively [30,31], and their corresponding wild-type littermates. Male wild-type HdhQ7/Q7 and heterozygous mutant HdhQ7/Q111 knock-in mice were obtained from matings between male and female HdhQ7/Q111 heterozygous as described previously [32]. Mouse genotype and repeat length were determined as described elsewhere [30,33,34]. All mice were housed together in numerical birth order in groups of mixed genotypes, and data were recorded for analysis by microchip mouse number (Avid Identification Systems, Inc., Norco, CA). The animals were housed with access to food and water ad libitum in a colony room kept at 19-22°C and 40-60% humidity, under a 12: 12 h light/dark cycle. All procedures were performed in compliance with the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, and approved by the local animal care committee of Universitat de Barcelona (99/01), and Generalitat de Catalunya (99/1094).

Post-mortem human brain tissue

Hippocampal samples were obtained from the Neurological Tissue Bank of the Biobank-Hospital Clínic-Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August, Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS; Barcelona, Spain; URL: www.clinicbiobanc.org), and from the Institute of Neuropathology, Hospital de Bellvitge (University of Barcelona, Spain; URL: www.idibell.cat/modul/biobanc/en), following the guidelines and approval of the local ethics committee (Hospital Clínic of Barcelona’s Clinical Research Ethics Committee). cGMP levels were analyzed in hippocampal samples from six HD patients and five control cases. Details are provided in Table 1.

Pathological diagnosisCAG repeatsGenderAge (years)Post-mortem delay (h)
None-Male393:30
None-Male643:30
None-Female718:30
None-Female6015:30
None-Female8123:30
HD, Vonsattel grade 462Female284:15
HD, Vonsattel grade 444Male595:30
HD, Vonsattel grade 140Male737:00
HD, Vonsattel grade 3-4n.d.Male557:00
HD, Vonsattel grade 345Male537:00
HD, Vonsattel grade 342Female7217:00

Table 1. Details of control and HD human samples analyzed in the present study.

n.d., non-determined
CSV
Download CSV

Determination of hippocampal cGMP levels

Hippocampal cGMP levels were analyzed by using the acetylated version of a commercially available cGMP enzyme immunoassay kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). The two hippocampi of every mouse were pooled and lysed in 200 μl 0.1 M HCl provided in the kit. Human hippocampal tissue was lysed in 400 μl 0.1 M HCl. Samples were sonicated and centrifuged at 600 x g for 15 min at room temperature. The supernatant was collected, acetylated and used according with the manufacturer instructions.

Total protein extraction

Wild-type and R6/1 mice were killed by cervical dislocation at the age of 8, 12, 20 and 30 weeks, and hippocampi were quickly removed. Tissue was homogenized in lysis buffer [50mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 100 mM NaF, 5μM ZnCl2 and 10 mM EGTA] plus protease inhibitors [phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride, PMSF (2mM), aprotinin (1μg/ml), leupeptin (1μg/ml) and sodium orthovanadate (1mM)] and centrifuged at 16100xg for 20min. The supernatants were collected and the protein concentration was measured using the Dc protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

Western blot analysis

Western blot analysis was performed as previously described [34]. The primary antibodies used were: anti-nNOS (1:500; BD Transduction Laboratories, San Jose, CA), anti-PDE5A and anti-PDE9A (1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Loading control was performed by reprobing the membranes with an anti-α-tubulin antibody (1:50000; Sigma-Aldrich) during 20min at room temperature. Then, membranes were washed with TBS-T (Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20), incubated for 1h (20 min for α-tubulin) at room temperature with the corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:2000; Promega, Madison, WI), and washed again with TBS-T. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using the Western Blotting Luminol Reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and quantified by a computer-assisted densitometer (Gel-Pro Analyzer, version 4, Media Cybernetics).

Sildenafil treatments

To analyze the effect of PDE5 inhibition on cognitive function, 12-week-old wild-type and R6/1 mice received an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of vehicle (water) or sildenafil (3 mg/Kg). This dose was selected based on previous studies showing improvement in memory consolidation when sildenafil was administered immediately after training [35–39]. Mice were injected immediately after training in the novel object recognition test (NORT) and in the passive avoidance test, respectively. Memory was assessed 24 h later. The washout period between the two memory tasks was of at least 5 days. Another group of 12-week-old wild-type and R6/1 mice was trained in the passive avoidance test and received an i.p. injection of vehicle or sildenafil (3 mg/Kg) immediately after training. Mice were sacrificed 1 h later, and the hippocampi were quickly dissected, immediately frozen in dry ice, and stored at -80°C until analysis of cGMP levels.

Learning and memory assessment

Learning and memory was analyzed using the NORT [40], and the passive avoidance paradigm [41,42]. Behavioral testing was carried out during the light phase of the animals (ranging from 8: 00 am to 8: 00 pm) in a room maintained in the same environmental conditions as the colony room. The NORT was performed in 12-week-old wild-type and R6/1 mice as previously described [3]. Briefly, mice were first habituated to the arena (circular; 40 cm diameter x 40 cm height) in the absence of objects (3 days, 15 min/day). On the fourth day, a training session was performed during 10 min by presenting two similar objects resembling eggs. Twenty-four hours later, in the testing session, the animals were exposed for 5 min to a familiar and a new object (resembling a cup). The object preference was measured as the time exploring each object (nose spokes) x 100/time exploring both objects. In order to avoid odors, the arena was rigorously cleaned between animal trials by flushing with 70° ethanol and allowing it to dry. The effects of motivation, locomotor activity and anxiogenic components on the learning task were monitored by assessing the distance traveled and the time spent in the center of the open field (automated SMART junior software; Panlab, Spain), as well as the number of defecations. The passive avoidance test is used to assess learning and memory based on the natural preference of mice for a dark environment, and the association between an aversive stimulus (e.g. foot shock) and the preferred environmental context. We used the same mice as for the NORT. The experiment was conducted in a two-compartment device divided by a sliding door (preferred dimly lit compartment; 2-5 Lux; in cm 25 (l) x 25 (b) x 20 (h); brightly lit compartment; 160 Lux; in cm 20 (l) x 15 (b) x 16 (h)). The dark chamber had a stainless steel grid floor for shock delivery. Mice were not previously exposed to the inhibitory avoidance apparatus. On the training day, each mouse was placed into the brightly lit compartment facing to the opposite side of the sliding door. Five seconds later the sliding door was open to allow access to the dimly lit compartment, and the latency to enter the dark compartment (step-through latency) was registered for a maximum of 600 s. Upon entry into the preferred dark compartment with all paws the door was closed and mice received a mild foot shock (1 mA, 2 sec). Twenty seconds later mice were removed from the apparatus and returned to their home cage. Twenty-four hours later mice were returned to the brightly lit compartment, and following a procedure similar to that of training, except that foot shock was omitted (retention test), the latency to enter the shock-paired compartment was recorded for a maximum of 600 s. The retention test was ended when mice stepped completely into the dark compartment, or failed to cross within 600 s. In this case they were assigned a score of 600 s. Retention latency is an index of memory since mice that learn the task avoid the compartment previously paired with the shock, and show greater latency to enter the dark compartment.

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis were performed by using the unpaired Student’s t-test (95% confidence) or the two-way ANOVA as appropriate, and indicated in the figure legends. Values of p<0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

cGMP levels are reduced in the hippocampus of R6/1 mice

To address whether changes in cGMP levels might contribute to hippocampal-dependent cognitive deficits in HD mice, we analyzed cGMP levels in the hippocampus of the R6/1 mouse model of HD at 8 and 12 weeks of age. There were no significant changes in cGMP levels in 8-week-old R6/1 compared with wild-type mice (t14=0.5277, p=0.6060; Figure 1). Conversely, at 12 weeks of age, when they show memory impairment [3], cGMP levelswere significantly reduced compared with control littermates (t15=5.121, p<0.001; Figure 1). These results suggest that alterations in the cGMP pathway in the hippocampus of R6/1 mice can participate in cognitive impairment in hippocampal-dependent tasks.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. cGMP levels in the hippocampus of R6/1 mice.

Hippocampal cGMP levels were analyzed in wild-type (WT) and R6/1 mice at 8 and 12 weeks of age by enzyme immunoassay. Values are expressed as percentage of WT mice, and are the mean ± SEM (n=7-10). Data were analyzed by Student’s t-test. ***p<0.001 as compared with age-matched WT mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073664.g001

nNOS levels are down-regulated in the hippocampus of R6/1 mice

NO activates sGC, which upon activation catalyzes the formation of cGMP. Therefore, the significant decrease in cGMP levels in the hippocampus of R6/1 mice could be related to reduced nNOS levels leading to a lower production of NO. To check this possibility, we analyzed the levels of nNOS in the hippocampus of R6/1 mice at different stages of the disease progression. In agreement with cGMP levels (Figure 1), nNOS protein levels were unchanged in 8-week-old R6/1 mice compared with wild-type animals (t12=0.064, p=0.95), but there was a dramatic reduction in nNOS levels in the hippocampus of 12-, 20- and 30-week-old R6/1 animals compared with age-matched controls (12 weeks: t11=6.489, p<0.0001; 20 weeks: t9=10.41, p<0.0001 and 30 weeks: t11=3.416, p=0.0058; Figure 2A).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. nNOS, PDE5A and PDE9A levels in the hippocampus of R6/1 mice.

nNOS (A), PDE5A (B) and PDE9A (C) protein levels were analyzed by Western blot of protein extracts obtained from the hippocampus of 8- to 30-week-old wild-type (WT) and R6/1 mice. Representative immunoblots are shown. Values (obtained by densitometric analysis of Western blot data) are expressed as percentage of WT mice, and shown as mean ± SEM (n=5-8 in A, n=5-12 in B and n=5-7 in C). Data were analyzed by Student’s t-test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 as compared with age-matched WT mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073664.g002

In addition to nNOS activity, cGMP levels can also be modulated by PDEs [7]. For this reason, we next analyzed the protein levels of different PDEs, focusing on cGMP-specific PDEs expressed in the hippocampus, PDE5A and PDE9A [43,44]. PDE5A protein levels were unchanged in R6/1 mice at 12 (t11=0.849, p=0.413) and 20 (t14=1.137, p=0.274) weeks of age, and were significantly reduced compared to wild-type animals only at 30 weeks of age (t21=2.642, p=0.015) (Figure 2B). In contrast, PDE9A protein levels were not altered in the hippocampus of R6/1 mice compared with littermate controls at any of the ages analyzed (Figure 2C). These findings indicate that changes in PDE5A and PDE9A levels do not contribute to the reduction of cGMP levels in the hippocampus of 12-week-old R6/1 mice, and that the down-regulation of nNOS is likely the major contributor to reduced hippocampal cGMP levels in the presence of N-terminal exon-1 mhtt.

Sildenafil treatment increases hippocampal cGMP levels and improves memory in R6/1 mice

The severe down-regulation of cGMP levels in the hippocampus of R6/1 mice (Figure 1) when cognitive impairment in hippocampal-dependent tasks is evident [3] lead us to hypothesize that pharmacological modulation of cGMP levels could ameliorate cognitive dysfunction in these mice. To address our hypothesis, wild-type and R6/1 mice received an i.p. injection of sildenafil (3 mg/Kg) or vehicle after training in the NORT and passive avoidance test, respectively, and memory was assessed 24 h later. In the NORT, during the training session, there were no differences in the time spent exploring the two objects (data not shown). Conversely, and as previously reported [3], R6/1 mice showed memory deficits (genotype effect: F(1,33)=14.32, p=0.0006) as indicated by their lower preference for the novel object as compared with wild-type mice (Figure 3A). In contrast, sildenafil-treated R6/1 mice showed a higher preference for the new object than vehicle-treated R6/1 animals (treatment effect: F(1,33)=10.49, p=0.0027), and were indistinguishable from wild-type vehicle-treated mice (Figure 3A). Sildenafil treatment also improved memory in wild-type mice (t=2.469, p<0.05) (Figure 3A). No significant differences were observed in motor activity or anxiety levels during memory assessment (Table 2), indicating that alterations in spontaneous locomotor activity or anxiety levels were unlikely to affect the performance of sildenafil-treated mice in the NORT.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 3. Memory is improved in sildenafil-treated R6/1 mice.

Twelve-week-old wild-type (WT) and R6/1 mice received an i.p injection of sildenadil (3 mg/Kg) or vehicle immediately after training for the NORT (A) and the passive avoidance test (B), respectively (n=7-11). Preference for the new object in the NORT (A) and for the brightly lit compartment in the passive avoidance test (B) was quantified 24 h after the training session. A different cohort of mice (n=4-5) was trained for the passive avoidance test, received an i.p. injection of sildenadil (3 mg/Kg) or vehicle immediately after, and was sacrificed 1 h later to determine hippocampal cGMP levels (C). Bars represent the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni as a post hoc test. *p<0.05 as compared with WT vehicle-treated mice; $p<0.05 as compared with R6/1 vehicle-treated mice and #p<0.05 as compared with WT sildenafil-treated mice (A). *p<0.05 as compared with latency to step through during training in WT mice groups; & p<0.05 as compared with latency to step through during training and † p<0.05 as compared with latency to step through during testing in WT vehicle-treated mice (B). **p<0.01 as compared with WT vehicle-treated mice, and $p<0.05 as compared with R6/1 vehicle-treated mice (C).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073664.g003

GroupDay 1Day 2Day 3Training trialTesting trial
DefecationsWT vehicle3.24±0.723.10±0.842.00±0.223.10±1.522.32±0.24
R6/1 vehicle2.99±2.213.40±0.743.2±1.332.22±0.993.11±1.32
WT sildenafil3.31±2.104.72±0.974.2±1.493.23±1.082.76±1.33
R6/1 sildenafil3.00±0.223.92±0.414.0±0.333.69±1.513.22±1.40
Time in center (%)WT vehicle29.55±2.6931.17±5.1231.23±7.5513.32±4.2719.31±2.88
R6/1 vehicle41.01±7.5526.41±9.3833.92±7.6615.88±5.7715.65±7.99
WT sildenafil32.23±2.2224.04±6.2228.55±3.0514.23±8.1122.25±6.36
R6/1 sildenafil35.75±9.3325.94±6.8127.44±6.4516.55±5.9725.44±4.54
Distance traveled (cm)WT vehicle4525±3233775±3933444±2522223±3631923±222
R6/1 vehicle3800±2983383±3032955±4222099±5251714±193
WT sildenafil4350±2343815±4123221±3313012±4952013±432
R6/1 sildenafil4185±3343292±3682978±5222168±3561982±297

Table 2. Anxiety and locomotor activity assessment during the NORT in wild-type and R6/1 mice treated with vehicle or sildenafil.

The number of defecations, time spent in the center of the open field and the distance traveled were analyzed during the NORT in wild-type (WT) and R6/1 mice treated with vehicle or sildenafil (3 mg/Kg) immediately after training. Day 1-3 correspond to habituation. Values are shown as mean ± SEM. For each parameter data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA.
CSV
Download CSV

In the passive avoidance test, we found that the step-through latency during the training session was higher in R6/1 than in wild-type animals (genotype effect: F(1,34)=13.83, p=0.0007) (Figure 3B). In the testing session, vehicle-injected R6/1 mice showed a lower latency to step into the compartment previously paired with the shock than wild-type vehicle-treated mice (genotype effect: F(1,33)=8.791, p=0.0056) (Figure 3B). This finding indicated that R6/1 mice suffer memory deficits in avoidance learning. In contrast, sildenafil-treated R6/1 mice showed a recall latency indistinguishable from vehicle-treated wild-type mice (Figure 3B), which further supports the idea that sildenafil treatment improves memory in mutant mice. In this paradigm we did not find improvement in wild-type mice receiving sildenafil treatment after training (t=0.032, p>0.05) probably because vehicle-treated animals already performed near the threshold (Figure 3B).

Next, we sought to determine whether memory improvement found in sildenafil-treated R6/1 mice was related to higher cGMP levels following training that could contribute to memory consolidation in mutant mice. To this end, wild-type and R6/1 mice were trained in the passive avoidance test, received an i.p. injection of vehicle or sildenafil (3 mg/Kg) immediately after training, and were sacrificed 1 h later to determine hippocampal cGMP levels. We found that cGMP levels were lower in vehicle-treated R6/1 mice compared with vehicle-treated wild-type animals, and that treatment with sildenafil after training increased cGMP levels in both genotypes (Figure 3C). Summarizing, this set of results indicates that increasing hippocampal cGMP levels rescues memory deficiencies in R6/1 mice, and that this can be a good therapeutic target to fight cognitive decline in HD.

cGMP levels are also reduced in the hippocampus of R6/2 mice and HD patients

We next analyzed if the reduction of cGMP levels found in R6/1 mice hippocampus could be replicated in other HD mouse models when they show cognitive deficits. For this we examined R6/2 mice, which also express N-terminal exon-1 mhtt but show earlier onset and more severe phenotype than R6/1 mice [33], and HdhQ7/Q111 mice, which show late onset and slow progression of the disease [31]. As observed in R6/1 mice, we found that at 9-11 weeks, when R6/2 mice suffer from memory impairment [3], hippocampal cGMP levels were significantly reduced compared with age-matched controls (t13=2.538, p=0.0247) (Figure 4A). In contrast, we did not observe significant changes in cGMP levels in the hippocampus of 8-month-old HdhQ7/Q111 mice compared with age-matched controls (t11=1.732, p=0.1112) (Figure 4B). Finally, we quantified cGMP levels in hippocampal samples from control subjects and HD patients. We found that cGMP levels were significantly reduced in postmortem hippocampal samples from HD patients compared with control subjects (t9=2.452, p=0.0366) (Figure 4C). These results indicate that reduced cGMP levels can contribute to cognitive impairment and that targeting this pathway might also lead to cognitive improvement in HD patients, while cognitive deficits in 8-month-old HdhQ7/Q111 mice [45] are unlikely to be related to alterations in hippocampal cGMP levels.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 4. cGMP levels in the hippocampus of HD mice and patients.

Hippocampal cGMP levels were analyzed by enzyme immunoassay of samples obtained from 9- to 11-week-old wild-type and R6/2 mice (A), 8-month-old HdhQ7/Q7 and HdhQ7/Q111 mice (B), and control subjects and HD patients (C). Values are expressed as percentage of control mice (A and B; n=6-8) and subjects (C; n=5-6), respectively, and are the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed by Student’s t-test. *p<0.05 as compared with the control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073664.g004

Discussion

In this work we show for the first time that the nNOS/cGMP pathway is severely down-regulated in the hippocampus of R6/1 mice, and that PDE5 inhibition improves memory deficits in these animals. Importantly, we also detected decreased levels of cGMP in the hippocampus of R6/2 mice and HD patients, leading us to propose PDE5 inhibition as a therapy to fight cognitive decline in HD.

We detected reduced cGMP levels in the hippocampus of R6/1 mice at 12, but not at 8, weeks of age. Changes in cGMP levels could result from altered synthesis by sGC or increased degradation by PDEs, but we did not detect changes in the protein levels of the cGMP-specific PDE5A and PDE9A in the hippocampus of R6/1 mice at this age. Since we found that, in correlation with cGMP levels, nNOS levels were reduced in 12-, but not in 8-week-old R6/1 mice hippocampus, the alterations in cGMP levels are likely related to diminished nNOS levels, lower NO production and consequent reduced cGMP synthesis by sGC. The finding that nNOS levels were significantly reduced in the hippocampus of R6/1 mice indicates that the levels of this protein are sensitive to the presence of mhtt in several brain regions as nNOS protein levels/NOS activity are also down-regulated in the striatum and cortex of R6 mice [11,14].

We and others have reported that R6/1, R6/2 and HdhQ7/Q111 HD mouse models show object recognition impairment before motor symptoms develop [3,45,46]. Moreover, R6/2 mice display impaired performance in the passive avoidance test [47]. Here, we show that object recognition memory and passive avoidance learning deficits correlate with reduced hippocampal cGMP levels in R6 mice. Accumulating evidence indicates that the activation of the NO/sGC/cGMP/cGK signaling cascade is important during the early phase of memory consolidation. For example, infusion of the cGMP analog 8-Br-cGMP just after the first trial improves memory performance in the object recognition test [48], and in the inhibitory avoidance test [49], while inhibition of nNOS, sGC or cGK impairs object recognition [50]. In addition, hippocampal NOS activity [51], cGMP levels [49,52], and cGK activity [52] increase immediately after training for inhibitory avoidance learning. Thus, the fact that reduced cGMP levels in R6 mice correlate with cognitive deficits suggests an involvement of this pathway in this phenomenon. In contrast, since we did not detect differences in hippocampal cGMP levels between 8-month-old HdhQ7/Q111 and wild-type mice, alterations in cGMP signaling are likely not participating in memory impairment reported in mutant mice [45]. However, we cannot rule out that this pathway might be affected in older animals. The lack of changes in cGMP levels is consistent with the finding that hippocampal nNOS levels were not altered in 8-month-old HdhQ7/Q111 compared with wild-type mice (data not shown). Cortical and striatal nNOS levels undergo a biphasic dysregulation in exon-1 mouse models, with increased levels/activity at early/middle stages followed by a reduction at later stages of the disease progression [13,14]. Thus, it is likely that the late onset and slow progression of the disease in HdhQ7/Q111 mice compared with exon-1 models contributes to these differences.

Importantly, in the present study we showed that memory deficits in object recognition and in the passive avoidance test in R6/1 mice were rescued by the post-training injection of sildenafil. In addition, sildenafil treatment also increased object recognition memory in wild-type mice. Likewise, previous studies have shown that administration of sildenafil, or other PDE5 inhibitors, improves object recognition both in normal subjects, and in models of impaired cognition (reviewed in 18), and ameliorates inhibitory avoidance response in mice showing deficits in this task [53,54]. In contrast, sildenafil-induced memory improvement is abolished in animals receiving an intra-hippocampal infusion of a cGK inhibitor [27,37]. The finding that sildenafil increases cGMP levels and improves novel object recognition memory and passive avoidance learning in R6/1 mice further supports the idea that decreased hippocampal cGMP levels contribute to cognitive dysfunction in these mice.

In addition to the hippocampus (present results and [55,56]), it is noteworthy that sildenafil also increases cGMP levels in the cortex [55,57] and striatum [56], and that PDE5 inhibition improves the performance in cognitive tasks involving these brain regions, both in unimpaired subjects and in models of impaired memory (reviewed in 18). Moreover, it increases NOS activity in the striatum and cortex [58], which might be relevant in the context of HD, as nNOS mRNA levels are decreased in the caudate of HD patients [10]. It is also worthy to mention that treatment with sildenafil restores cGMP levels in pathological situations associated with reduced cGMP in the brain [28,29], improves memory in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease [25–27], and ameliorates age-related cognitive decline [23,24]. Importantly, it has been recently shown in patients with erectile dysfunction that treatment with a PDE5 inhibitor improves cognitive function [59]. The finding that hippocampal cGMP levels are decreased in R6 mice, and in human HD hippocampus, together with previous results indicating that nNOS pathway is also highly affected in the striatum and cortex of HD mice [11–15], suggests that PDE5 inhibition can be a good therapeutic strategy for cognitive improvement in HD.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to A. López and M.T. Muñoz for their technical support and to Neurological Tissue Bank of the Biobank-Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS (Barcelona, Spain) and the Institute of Neuropathology (Hospital de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain) for providing us human hippocampal samples from control and HD cases.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AS AG EP-N. Performed the experiments: AS AG HA. Analyzed the data: AS AG HA. Wrote the manuscript: AS JA EP-N.

References

  1. 1. the Huntington’s Disease Collaborative Research Group (1993) A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell 72: 971-983. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90585-E. PubMed: 8458085.
  2. 2. Giralt A, Saavedra A, Alberch J, Perez-Navarro E (2012) Cognitive dysfunction in Huntington’s disease: humans, mouse models and molecular mechanisms. J Huntington’s Dis 1: 155-173.
  3. 3. Giralt A, Saavedra A, Carretón O, Xifró X, Alberch J et al. (2011) Increased PKA signaling disrupts recognition memory and spatial memory: role in Huntington’s disease. Hum Mol Genet 20: 4232-4247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddr351. PubMed: 21835884.
  4. 4. Kleppisch T, Feil R (2009) cGMP signalling in the mammalian brain: role in synaptic plasticity and behaviour. Handb Exp Pharmacol: 549-579. PubMed: 19089345.
  5. 5. Kots AY, Martin E, Sharina IG, Murad F (2009) A short history of cGMP, guanylyl cyclases, and cGMP-dependent protein kinases. Handb Exp Pharmacol: 1-14. PubMed: 19089322.
  6. 6. Biel M, Michalakis S (2009) Cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. Handb Exp Pharmacol: 111-136. PubMed: 19089328.
  7. 7. Bender AT, Beavo JA (2006) Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: molecular regulation to clinical use. Pharmacol Rev 58: 488-520. doi:https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.58.3.5. PubMed: 16968949.
  8. 8. Hofmann F, Bernhard D, Lukowski R, Weinmeister P (2009) cGMP regulated protein kinases (cGK). Handb Exp Pharmacol: 137-162. PubMed: 19089329.
  9. 9. Domek-Łopacińska KU, Strosznajder JB (2010) Cyclic GMP and nitric oxide synthase in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol 41: 129-137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-010-8104-x. PubMed: 20213343.
  10. 10. Norris PJ, Waldvogel HJ, Faull RL, Love DR, Emson PC (1996) Decreased neuronal nitric oxide synthase messenger RNA and somatostatin messenger RNA in the striatum of Huntington’s disease. Neuroscience 72: 1037-1047. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(95)00596-X. PubMed: 8735228.
  11. 11. Deckel AW, Gordinier A, Nuttal D, Tang V, Kuwada C et al. (2001) Reduced activity and protein expression of NOS in R6/2 HD transgenic mice: effects of L-NAME on symptom progression. Brain Res 919: 70-81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(01)03000-1. PubMed: 11689164.
  12. 12. Deckel AW, Tang V, Nuttal D, Gary K, Elder R (2002) Altered neuronal nitric oxide synthase expression contributes to disease progression in Huntington’s disease transgenic mice. Brain Res 939: 76-86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(02)02550-7. PubMed: 12020853.
  13. 13. Deckel AW, Elder R, Fuhrer G (2002) Biphasic developmental changes in Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent proteins in R6/2 Huntington’s disease mice. Neuroreport 13: 707-711. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200204160-00034. PubMed: 11973475.
  14. 14. Pérez-Severiano F, Escalante B, Vergara P, Ríos C, Segovia J (2002) Age-dependent changes in nitric oxide synthase activity and protein expression in striata of mice transgenic for the Huntington’s disease mutation. Brain Res 951: 36-42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(02)03102-5. PubMed: 12231454.
  15. 15. Jarabek BR, Yasuda RP, Wolfe BB (2004) Regulation of proteins affecting NMDA receptor-induced excitotoxicity in a Huntington’s mouse model. Brain 127: 505-516. PubMed: 14662521.
  16. 16. Blokland A, Schreiber R, Prickaerts J (2006) Improving memory: a role for phosphodiesterases. Curr Pharm Des 12: 2511-2523. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/138161206777698855. PubMed: 16842174.
  17. 17. Puzzo D, Sapienza S, Arancio O, Palmeri A (2008) Role of phosphodiesterase 5 in synaptic plasticity and memory. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 4: 371-387. PubMed: 18728748.
  18. 18. Reneerkens OA, Rutten K, Steinbusch HW, Blokland A, Prickaerts J (2009) Selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors: a promising target for cognition enhancement. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 202: 419-443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1273-x. PubMed: 18709359.
  19. 19. Rose GM, Hopper A, De VM, Tehim A (2005) Phosphodiesterase inhibitors for cognitive enhancement. Curr Pharm Des 11: 3329-3334. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/138161205774370799. PubMed: 16250839.
  20. 20. Siuciak JA (2008) The role of phosphodiesterases in schizophrenia : therapeutic implications. CNS Drugs 22: 983-993. doi:https://doi.org/10.2165/0023210-200822120-00002. PubMed: 18998737.
  21. 21. Xu Y, Zhang HT, O’Donnell JM (2011) Phosphodiesterases in the central nervous system: implications in mood and cognitive disorders. Handb Exp Pharmacol: 447-485. PubMed: 21695652.
  22. 22. Boolell M, Allen MJ, Ballard SA, Gepi-Attee S, Muirhead GJ et al. (1996) Sildenafil: an orally active type 5 cyclic GMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor for the treatment of penile erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 8: 47-52. PubMed: 8858389.
  23. 23. Orejana L, Barros-Miñones L, Jordán J, Puerta E, Aguirre N (2012) Sildenafil ameliorates cognitive deficits and tau pathology in a senescence-accelerated mouse model. Neurobiol Aging 33: 625-620. PubMed: 21546125.
  24. 24. Palmeri A, Privitera L, Giunta S, Loreto C, Puzzo D (2013) Inhibition of phosphodiesterase-5 rescues age-related impairment of synaptic plasticity and memory. Behav Brain Res 240: 11-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.10.060. PubMed: 23174209.
  25. 25. Cuadrado-Tejedor M, Hervias I, Ricobaraza A, Puerta E, Pérez-Roldán JM et al. (2011) Sildenafil restores cognitive function without affecting beta-amyloid burden in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Br J Pharmacol 164: 2029-2041. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01517.x. PubMed: 21627640.
  26. 26. Puzzo D, Staniszewski A, Deng SX, Privitera L, Leznik E et al. (2009) Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibition improves synaptic function, memory, and amyloid-beta load in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. J Neurosci 29: 8075-8086. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0864-09.2009. PubMed: 19553447.
  27. 27. Zhang J, Guo J, Zhao X, Chen Z, Wang G et al. (2013) Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil prevents neuroinflammation, lowers beta-amyloid levels and improves cognitive performance in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Behav Brain Res 250: 230-237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.017. PubMed: 23685322.
  28. 28. Cauli O, Herraiz S, Pellicer B, Pellicer A, Felipo V (2010) Treatment with sildenafil prevents impairment of learning in rats born to pre-eclamptic mothers. Neuroscience 171: 506-512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.08.065. PubMed: 20832451.
  29. 29. Erceg S, Monfort P, Hernández-Viadel M, Rodrigo R, Montoliu C et al. (2005) Oral administration of sildenafil restores learning ability in rats with hyperammonemia and with portacaval shunts. Hepatology 41: 299-306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20565. PubMed: 15660436.
  30. 30. Giralt A, Rodrigo T, Martín ED, Gonzalez JR, Milà M et al. (2009) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor modulates the severity of cognitive alterations induced by mutant huntingtin: involvement of phospholipaseCgamma activity and glutamate receptor expression. Neuroscience 158: 1234-1250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.11.024. PubMed: 19121372.
  31. 31. Rué L, López-Soop G, Gelpi E, Martínez-Vicente M, Alberch J et al. (2013) Brain region- and age-dependent dysregulation of p62 and NBR1 in a mouse model of Huntington’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 52: 219-228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2012.12.008. PubMed: 23295856.
  32. 32. Wheeler VC, Auerbach W, White JK, Srinidhi J, Auerbach A et al. (1999) Length-dependent gametic CAG repeat instability in the Huntington’s disease knock-in mouse. Hum Mol Genet 8: 115-122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/8.1.115. PubMed: 9887339.
  33. 33. Mangiarini L, Sathasivam K, Seller M, Cozens B, Harper A et al. (1996) Exon 1 of the HD gene with an expanded CAG repeat is sufficient to cause a progressive neurological phenotype in transgenic mice. Cell 87: 493-506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81369-0. PubMed: 8898202.
  34. 34. Saavedra A, Giralt A, Rué L, Xifró X, Xu J et al. (2011) Striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase expression and activity in Huntington’s disease: a STEP in the resistance to excitotoxicity. J Neurosci 31: 8150-8162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3446-10.2011. PubMed: 21632937.
  35. 35. Baratti CM, Boccia MM (1999) Effects of sildenafil on long-term retention of an inhibitory avoidance response in mice. Behav Pharmacol 10: 731-737. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00008877-199912000-00004. PubMed: 10780288.
  36. 36. Devan BD, Sierra-Mercado D Jr., Jimenez M, Bowker JL, Duffy KB et al. (2004) Phosphodiesterase inhibition by sildenafil citrate attenuates the learning impairment induced by blockade of cholinergic muscarinic receptors in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 79: 691-699. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2004.09.019. PubMed: 15582676.
  37. 37. Hosseini-Sharifabad A, Ghahremani MH, Sabzevari O, Naghdi N, Abdollahi M et al. (2012) Effects of protein kinase A and G inhibitors on hippocampal cholinergic markers expressions in rolipram- and sildenafil-induced spatial memory improvement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 101: 311-319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2012.01.017. PubMed: 22306745.
  38. 38. Prickaerts J, van Staveren WC, Sik A, Markerink-van Im Niewohner U et al. (2002) Effects of two selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, sildenafil and vardenafil, on object recognition memory and hippocampal cyclic GMP levels in the rat. Neuroscience 113: 351-361. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00199-9. PubMed: 12127092.
  39. 39. Prickaerts J, Sik A, van der Staay FJ, de VJ, Blokland A (2005) Dissociable effects of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors on object recognition memory: acquisition versus consolidation. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 177: 381-390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-1967-7. PubMed: 15630588.
  40. 40. Dere E, Huston JP, de Souza Silva MA (2007) The pharmacology, neuroanatomy and neurogenetics of one-trial object recognition in rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31: 673-704. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.01.005. PubMed: 17368764.
  41. 41. Ambrogi Lorenzini CG, Baldi E, Bucherelli C, Sacchetti B, Tassoni G (1996) Role of dorsal hippocampus in acquisition, consolidation and retrieval of rat’s passive avoidance response: a tetrodotoxin functional inactivation study. Brain Res 730: 32-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(96)00427-1. PubMed: 8883885.
  42. 42. Ambrogi Lorenzini CG, Baldi E, Bucherelli C, Sacchetti B, Tassoni G (1997) Role of ventral hippocampus in acquisition, consolidation and retrieval of rat’s passive avoidance response memory trace. Brain Res 768: 242-248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(97)00651-3. PubMed: 9369321.
  43. 43. Lakics V, Karran EH, Boess FG (2010) Quantitative comparison of phosphodiesterase mRNA distribution in human brain and peripheral tissues. Neuropharmacology 59: 367-374. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.05.004. PubMed: 20493887.
  44. 44. van Staveren WC, Steinbusch HW, Markerink-van Im Repaske DR, Goy MF et al. (2003) mRNA expression patterns of the cGMP-hydrolyzing phosphodiesterases types 2, 5, and 9 during development of the rat brain. J Comp Neurol 467: 566-580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10955. PubMed: 14624489.
  45. 45. Giralt A, Puigdellívol M, Carretón O, Paoletti P, Valero J et al. (2012) Long-term memory deficits in Huntington’s disease are associated with reduced CBP histone acetylase activity. Hum Mol Genet 21: 1203-1216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddr552. PubMed: 22116937.
  46. 46. Nithianantharajah J, Barkus C, Murphy M, Hannan AJ (2008) Gene-environment interactions modulating cognitive function and molecular correlates of synaptic plasticity in Huntington’s disease transgenic mice. Neurobiol Dis 29: 490-504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2007.11.006. PubMed: 18165017.
  47. 47. Cowin RM, Bui N, Graham D, Green JR, Grueninger S et al. (2011) Onset and progression of behavioral and molecular phenotypes in a novel congenic R6/2 line exhibiting intergenerational CAG repeat stability. PLOS ONE 6: e28409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028409. PubMed: 22163300.
  48. 48. Prickaerts J, de VJ, Honig W, Steinbusch HW, Blokland A (2002) cGMP, but not cAMP, in rat hippocampus is involved in early stages of object memory consolidation. Eur J Pharmacol 436: 83-87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2999(01)01614-4. PubMed: 11834250.
  49. 49. Bernabeu R, Schmitz P, Faillace MP, Izquierdo I, Medina JH (1996) Hippocampal cGMP and cAMP are differentially involved in memory processing of inhibitory avoidance learning. Neuroreport 7: 585-588. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199601310-00050. PubMed: 8730835.
  50. 50. Furini CR, Rossato JI, Bitencourt LL, Medina JH, Izquierdo I et al. (2010) Beta-adrenergic receptors link NO/sGC/PKG signaling to BDNF expression during the consolidation of object recognition long-term memory. Hippocampus 20: 672-683. PubMed: 19533679.
  51. 51. Bernabeu R, de Stein ML, Fin C, Izquierdo I, Medina JH (1995) Role of hippocampal NO in the acquisition and consolidation of inhibitory avoidance learning. Neuroreport 6: 1498-1500. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199507310-00008. PubMed: 7579133.
  52. 52. Bernabeu R, Schroder N, Quevedo J, Cammarota M, Izquierdo I et al. (1997) Further evidence for the involvement of a hippocampal cGMP/cGMP-dependent protein kinase cascade in memory consolidation. Neuroreport 8: 2221-2224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199707070-00026. PubMed: 9243615.
  53. 53. Patil CS, Singh VP, Singh S, Kulkarni SK (2004) Modulatory effect of the PDE-5 inhibitor sildenafil in diabetic neuropathy. Pharmacology 72: 190-195. PubMed: 15452368.
  54. 54. Patil CS, Singh VP, Kulkarni SK (2006) Modulatory effect of sildenafil in diabetes and electroconvulsive shock-induced cognitive dysfunction in rats. Pharmacol Rep 58: 373-380. PubMed: 16845211.
  55. 55. Marte A, Pepicelli O, Cavallero A, Raiteri M, Fedele E (2008) In vivo effects of phosphodiesterase inhibition on basal cyclic guanosine monophosphate levels in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum of freely moving rats. J Neurosci Res 86: 3338-3347. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.21788. PubMed: 18655195.
  56. 56. Puerta E, Hervias I, Goñi-Allo B, Lasheras B, Jordan J et al. (2009) Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors prevent 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-induced 5-HT deficits in the rat. J Neurochem 108: 755-766. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05825.x. PubMed: 19187094.
  57. 57. Zhang R, Wang Y, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Tsang W et al. (2002) Sildenafil (Viagra) induces neurogenesis and promotes functional recovery after stroke in rats. Stroke 33: 2675-2680. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000034399.95249.59. PubMed: 12411660.
  58. 58. Domek-Łopacińska K, Strosznajder JB (2008) The effect of selective inhibition of cyclic GMP hydrolyzing phosphodiesterases 2 and 5 on learning and memory processes and nitric oxide synthase activity in brain during aging. Brain Res 1216: 68-77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.02.108. PubMed: 18499090.
  59. 59. Shim YS, Pae CU, Kim SW, Kim HW, Kim JC et al. (2011) Effects of repeated dosing with Udenafil (Zydena) on cognition, somatization and erection in patients with erectile dysfunction: a pilot study. Int J Impot Res 23: 109-114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2011.13. PubMed: 21544084.