Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Comprehensive Gene Expression Profiling Reveals Synergistic Functional Networks in Cerebral Vessels after Hypertension or Hypercholesterolemia

  • Wei-Yi Ong ,

    wei_yi_ong@nuhs.edu.sg

    Affiliations Department of Anatomy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Neurobiology and Ageing Research Program, Life Sciences Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore

  • Mary Pei-Ern Ng,

    Affiliation Department of Anatomy, National University of Singapore, Singapore

  • Sau-Yeen Loke,

    Affiliation Department of Anatomy, National University of Singapore, Singapore

  • Shalai Jin,

    Affiliation Department of Anatomy, National University of Singapore, Singapore

  • Ya-Jun Wu,

    Affiliation Department of Anatomy, National University of Singapore, Singapore

  • Kazuhiro Tanaka,

    Affiliation Department of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore

  • Peter Tsun-Hon Wong

    Affiliations Department of Pharmacology, National University of Singapore, Neurobiology and Ageing Research Program, Life Sciences Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Abstract

Atherosclerotic stenosis of cerebral arteries or intracranial large artery disease (ICLAD) is a major cause of stroke especially in Asians, Hispanics and Africans, but relatively little is known about gene expression changes in vessels at risk. This study compares comprehensive gene expression profiles in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) of New Zealand White rabbits exposed to two stroke risk factors i.e. hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia, by the 2-Kidney-1-Clip method, or dietary supplementation with cholesterol. Microarray and Ingenuity Pathway Analyses of the MCA of the hypertensive rabbits showed up-regulated genes in networks containing the node molecules: UBC (ubiquitin), P38 MAPK, ERK, NFkB, SERPINB2, MMP1 and APP (amyloid precursor protein); and down-regulated genes related to MAPK, ERK 1/2, Akt, 26 s proteasome, histone H3 and UBC. The MCA of hypercholesterolemic rabbits showed differentially expressed genes that are surprisingly, linked to almost the same node molecules as the hypertensive rabbits, despite a relatively low percentage of ‘common genes’ (21 and 7%) between the two conditions. Up-regulated common genes were related to: UBC, SERPINB2, TNF, HNF4A (hepatocyte nuclear factor 4A) and APP, and down-regulated genes, related to UBC. Increased HNF4A message and protein were verified in the aorta. Together, these findings reveal similar nodal molecules and gene pathways in cerebral vessels affected by hypertension or hypercholesterolemia, which could be a basis for synergistic action of risk factors in the pathogenesis of ICLAD.

Introduction

Atherosclerotic stenosis of large arteries at the base of the brain or intracranial large artery disease (ICLAD) is a major cause of stroke especially in Asians, Hispanics and Africans [1], and is possibly the most common vascular lesion in the world [2]. It affects the middle cerebral artery (MCA), intracranial portion of the internal carotid artery, vertebrobasilar artery and the posterior and anterior cerebral arteries [1]. ICLAD carries a poor prognosis in terms of subsequent vascular event and death, and there is 25 - 30% incidence of recurrence in the 2 years after stroke [3], [4]. The disease is also prevalent among 53% of vascular dementia and 18% of Alzheimer’s disease patients of Asian ethnicity [1], [5].

The risk factors for ICLAD include hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and cigarette smoking [6], and a strong association is found between asymptomatic ICLAD presenting as intracranial stenosis or calcification with large artery stiffness, and patients with untreated hypertension [7]. Arterial stiffness is a major determinant of increased systolic blood pressure, and is associated with lesions in intracranial arteries [8]. Prolonged elevation of blood pressure leads to reduction in vessel cross sectional area, increased wall thickness and accelerated plaque formation [9], [10]. Moreover, hypertension is thought to drive the atherosclerotic changes from larger to smaller vessels, and from extracranial- to intracranial vessels [11], [12]. Hypercholesterolemia is also a risk factor for ICLAD [6], and ischemic stroke from both extracranial and intracranial large-artery atherothromboembolism is associated with increased dietary intake of saturated fat, physical inactivity, obesity, and diabetes [13]. Reduction of cholesterol levels with statin treatment delays the progression of lesions in patients with ICLAD [14]. Increased lipoprotein is an independent biochemical risk factor for the development of ICLAD [15], and increased serum cholesterol is associated with elevated levels of oxidized low density lipoprotein [16]. The latter inhibits nitric oxide in endothelial cells to induce vasospasm [17] or increases tissue factor activity in these cells, to promote thrombosis [18]. Other factors that could contribute to ICLAD include increased oxidative stress in vessel walls [19]. A combination of hypercholesterolemia and hypertension may result in greater damage to vessels [9], [20].

Epidemiological studies indicate that there is increased risk of a second stroke especially in the first 1 or 2 years of post-stroke event [3], [4], [21], [22]. The reasons for this are not fully understood, but almost certainly involve gene expression changes at the vascular level that drive the atherothrombotic process. Thus far, however, there have been no studies to delineate global gene expression or gene network profiles in large intracerebral arteries at risk of atherothrombosis.

The present study was carried out to compare gene expression and morphological changes in intracranial vessels of rabbits, after exposure to hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia. These conditions were induced by mostly non-genetically based methods, to reduce possible confounding effects during microarray analysis. The middle cerebral artery (MCA) was chosen for study, as this vessel is often affected in ICLAD [1], [23], [24], [25].

Materials and Methods

Animals

Male New Zealand White rabbits were used as it is the gold standard in atherosclerosis studies [26]. Although it is possible to produce hypertension in rats and mice, it is difficult to produce hypercholesterolemia in these animals [27]. The very small size of the MCA in rats and mice also hinders gene expression analyses of these vessels. Rabbits were approximately 8 weeks old (young adults) and weighed 2.0–2.5 kg each at the start of the experiments. Two sets of experiments were carried out: i) to determine gene expression changes in the MCA after hypertension, and ii) to determine gene expression changes in the MCA after hypercholesterolemia plus sham operation, and gene expression changes in the MCA after hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia. The first set of experiments were carried on 6 rabbits with the Goldblatt 2-Kidney 1-Clip (2K1C) method used to induce hypertension and fed with normal diet, vs. 6 sham operated controls on a normal diet. The second set of experiments were carried out on 6 rabbits on a high cholesterol diet with sham operation, 6 rabbits with 2K1C to induce hypertension plus a high cholesterol diet, and 6 rabbits on a normal diet.

The 2K1C procedure to induce hypertension was carried out as previous described [28]. In brief, animals were anesthetized with ketamine (75 mg/kg)/xylazine (10 mg/kg) cocktail followed by isoflurane maintenance, and the left renal artery exposed. The artery was partially occluded by attachment of a U-shaped silver ‘clip’ with a 0.6 mm slot. The clip was in left in place until the animals were sacrificed. Sham operated animals received the same surgical procedures as the 2K1C group, except that the renal artery was not partially occluded after its exposure. Animals that were subsequently treated with high cholesterol diet were allowed to recover from surgery for 1 week before treatment with diet containing cholesterol. Rabbits on this diet were fed with GPR diet +1% cholesterol (Glen Forrest Stockfeeders, Australia). Sham operated control rabbits were fed with GPR diet without cholesterol. All procedures including animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the National University of Singapore, and carried out in accordance with guidelines of the National Advisory Committee for Laboratory Animal Research.

Measurement of Body Weight, Mean Arterial Pressure and Serum Total Cholesterol

Rabbits were anaesthetized by intramuscular injection of ketamine/xylazine cocktail, followed by mean arterial pressure measurements, and collection of blood. Mean arterial pressure was recorded from the ‘middle’ ear artery (Powerlab 4/30, AD Instruments, CO, USA), and blood samples obtained for cholesterol analysis, at 0, 4, 10 and 12 weeks. Approximately 3 mL of blood was withdrawn from the artery and collected in BD Vacutainer® Serum Tubes with Clot activator and silicone-coated interior (Becton Dickinson, NJ, USA). Whole blood was centrifuged at 1,000 g for 15 min, and the serum transferred to new vials and kept frozen at −80°C till analysis. Serum total cholesterol levels were measured by a fluorometric assay (Ex/Em 535/587 nm, BioVision Inc., CA, USA). Samples were analyzed in triplicates and read with a microplate reader (Infinite® i-control, Tecan Trading AG, Switzerland).

Tissue Harvesting and RNA Extraction

The 2K1C rabbits on normal diet, sham operated control rabbits on normal diet, or hypercholesterolemia plus sham operated rabbits and hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia rabbits were sacrificed 12 weeks after surgery. Sham operated control rabbits or untreated controls on a normal diet were sacrificed after a similar time. Animals were deeply anaesthetized by ketamine/xylazine cocktail and euthanized by intravenous injection of pentobarbital (250 mg/kg). The brains were removed and hemisected. The left half of the brain was immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M phosphate buffer in preparation for histology or electron microscopy (see below). The right MCA was identified and quickly stripped off the surface of the brain without any underlying cortical tissue, immersed in RNAlater® (Ambion, TX, USA), frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in −80°C till further analysis. Total RNA was extracted using TRizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Extracted RNA was purified using the RNeasy® Micro Kit (Qiagen, CA, USA). The cerebral neocortex, hippocampus, liver, kidney, aorta and other organs were also removed and snap frozen or stored in paraformaldehyde for future analyses.

DNA Microarray Analysis

Ten µL of total RNA from the MCA of four rabbits from each group were submitted to Genomax Technologies, Singapore. RNA quality was confirmed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. cRNA was then generated and labeled using the one-cycle target labeling method, and hybridized to the 1-colour Agilent Rabbit Microarray (G2519F-020908; Agilent Technologies, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Data was collected and exported into GeneSpring v11 software (Agilent Technologies) for analysis, using a parametric test based on the cross gene error model. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are those that show significantly increased or decreased expression compared to sham-operated controls using one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD post-hoc test and corrected for multiple comparisons using Benjamini Hochberg FDR. P<0.01 was considered significant. In this study, to reduce false positives, only DEGs with greater than 4-fold change (or in the case of common genes between two data sets, greater than 4-fold change in at least one data set) were presented and used in IPA network analyses.

Network Analyses

The gene sets were analyzed using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software (Ingenuity® Systems, www.ingenuity.com). Gene identifiers and corresponding expression values of up-regulated or down-regulated DEGS with more than 4-fold change was uploaded into IPA application. Each identifier mapped to its corresponding object in Ingenuity’s Knowledge Base, and was overlaid onto a global molecular network developed from information contained in the Ingenuity Knowledge Base. “Focus Genes” (Network Eligible genes) are defined as DEGs that have at least one other molecule in the Knowledge Base that interacts with it to form a “network”. The latter shows interactions between focus genes and ‘node molecules’ in the network, and how they work together at the molecular level.

Electron Microscopy

The left half of the brain was dissected out, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.1 M phosphate buffer, and kept at 4°C. Blocks containing the MCA were osmicated, dehydrated in an ascending series of ethanol and acetone and embedded in Araldite. Thin sections were cut, mounted on Formvar coated copper grids and stained with lead citrate. They were viewed using a Jeol 1010 electron microscope (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan).

Quantitative Real-time PCR

The mRNA of one of the node molecules identified by IPA, HNF4A, was further verified in the aorta by real-time RT-PCR. This was necessary, as only a small amount of RNA could be extracted from the rabbit MCA. Purified RNA from the descending aorta of 4 hypercholesterolemia plus sham, 4 hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia and 4 untreated control rabbits were reverse-transcribed with the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). Reaction conditions were 25°C for 10 min, 37°C for 120 min and 85°C for 5 sec. Real-time PCR amplification was performed using the 7500 Real time PCR system with TaqMan® Universal PCR Master Mix and probes. The PCR conditions were initial incubation of 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min. Rabbit TaqMan® probe for HNF4A was purchased from Applied Biosystems. Rabbit ß-actin TaqMan® probe was used as an internal control. The fold change in expression was calculated using the 2-delta delta CT method as described previously [29]. Possible significant differences between the means were analyzed, using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post hoc test. p<0.05 was considered significant.

Western Blot Analysis

Aorta samples were homogenized in 10 volumes of ice-cold lysis buffer (150 mM sodium chloride, 50 mM Tris–hydrochloride, 0.25 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium orthovanadate, and 0.1% protease inhibitor cocktail, pH 7.4), followed by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was then collected, and protein concentrations measured using the Bio-Rad protein assay kit. The homogenates (20 µg) were resolved in 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels under reducing conditions and electrotransferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. Non-specific binding sites on the PVDF membrane were blocked by incubation in 5% non-fat milk in tris-buffered saline-0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) for 1 h. The PVDF membrane was incubated overnight at 4°C with a mouse monoclonal anti-HNF4A antibody (K9218, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) diluted 1∶500 in 5% non-fat milk/TBST. After washing with TBST, the membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary anti-mouse IgG (Pierce, IL, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Immunoreactivity was visualized using a chemiluminescence substrate (Millipore, MA, USA). Loading controls were carried out by incubating the blots at room temperature for 30 min with stripping buffer (100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, and 62.5 mM Tris-hydrochloride, pH 6.7), followed by reprobing with a mouse monoclonal antibody to ß-actin (Sigma, MO, USA; diluted 1∶10,000 in TBST). Exposed films containing blots were scanned and densities of the bands normalized to those of ß-actin. Possible significant differences between the values from treated and control rabbits were analyzed, using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post hoc test. p<0.05 was considered significant.

Histochemistry and Immunohistochemistry

Aorta samples were sectioned at 40 µm using a freezing microtome. Sections were processed for histochemistry using Masson’s Trichrome histochemical stain, or immunoperoxidase staining. The latter sections were incubated in a blocking solution composed of 5% donkey serum (Vector) and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 h, followed by incubation with mouse monoclonal antibody to HNF4A (diluted 1∶100 in PBS) overnight. The sections were then washed three times in PBS and incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse secondary antibody. Immunoreaction product was visualized using an avidin-biotinylated horseradish peroxidase kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, USA). Histochemically or immunohistochemically stained sections were mounted on glass slides and viewed using a light microscope (IX70, Olympus, Japan).

Results

1. Body Weight, Mean Arterial Pressure and Serum Total Cholesterol Levels

The average body weight was not significantly different between the 2K1C and sham operated groups (data not shown),but mean arterial pressure of 2K1C group was markedly higher than that of sham group at 4, 10, 12 weeks after the surgery (Figure 1A). The serum total cholesterol level remained at a low level (<100 mg/dl) for both groups throughout the experiment, and no difference was found between the groups, except for a slightly lower value in the 2K1C group on week 4 (Figure 1B). The average body weight among all groups was not significantly different (data not shown).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Mean arterial pressure and serum cholesterol levels in rabbits.

(A) Mean arterial pressure in hypertension only rabbits. (B) Serum cholesterol levels in hypertension only rabbits. (C) Mean arterial pressure in hypercholesterolemia plus sham- and hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia rabbits. (D) Serum cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolemia plus sham- and hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia rabbits. H: Hypertension only. HC: Hypercholesterolesterolemia plus sham operation. HTHC: Hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia. MAP: mean arterial pressure. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs. control (Student’s t-test in A,B; repeated measure ANOVA followed by Tukey test in C,D).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g001

Increased mean arterial pressure was found in the 2K1C plus cholesterol-fed rabbits (Figure 1C), and markedly elevated serum total cholesterol levels (>200mg/dl) were found in both the hypercholesterolemia plus sham- and 2K1C plus hypercholesterolememia groups at 4, 10 and 12 weeks, compared to control rabbits on a normal diet (Figure 1D).

2. Microarray Analyses

2.1. Microarray analyses of the hypertension only group.

The gene expression profile in the MCA of the hypertension only group was compared with that of sham operated controls on a normal diet. After unknown genes and repeated probes of the same genes were omitted, 51 up-regulated and 97 down-regulated genes (greater than 4-fold change) were found in the MCA (Figure 2). Among the highly up-regulated genes in the MCA of the hypertension only group compared to sham controls were FAM167A, CERS3 and FAM53C (Table 1). Among the highly down-regulated genes were FOXN1, NSRP1 and THUMPD3 (Table 2). The panel of genes was imported into IPA to analyze network interactions.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Venn diagram of DEGs in the MCA of hypertension only rabbits; hypercholesterolemia plus sham operated rabbits; and hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia rabbits; all vs. sham operated control rabbits.

A: total number of genes, B: up-regulated genes C: down-regulated genes (One gene which is common between the Hypertension only- and Hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group was both up- and down-regulated, and omitted).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g002

thumbnail
Table 1. Up-regulated genes in the MCA of ‘hypertension only’ rabbits vs. sham controls with greater than 4-fold change.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Down-regulated genes in the MCA of ‘hypertension only’ rabbits vs. sham controls with greater than 4-fold change.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.t002

The IPA network with the ‘largest number of up-regulated focus genes’, contained 16 focus genes with functions in Cancer, Connective Tissue Disorders, Skeletal and Muscular Disorders. Focus genes in this network were ASB4, C1orf50, CCDC89, CSDE1, DIS3L2, EHBP1, FAM167A, GIT1, KIAA0232, NAA25, NAE1, PHRF1, SIPA1L3, TAF15, TESK2 and TTLL5. They were related to the ‘node molecule’, UBC (ubiquitin) (Figure 3, Table 1). The network with the second largest number of up-regulated focus genes had 12 focus genes, with functions in Cell-mediated Immune Response, Cellular Development, Cellular Function and Maintenance. Focus genes were CCL1, CD46, CYP1A2, FANCC, MEP1B, MFI2, MMP1, PDCD11, RNASE1, SERPINB2, SPAG6 and ZDHHC23; they were related to P38 MAPK, ERK, NFkB, SERPINB2, MMP1 and APP (Figure 4, Table 1).

thumbnail
Figure 3. IPA network showing the network with the largest number of up-regulated focus genes in the MCA of the hypertension only group, compared with sham operated controls.

Nodes are displayed using various shapes that represent functional classes of gene products. Focus genes in this network are indicated in grey nodes. Solid and dotted lines indicate direct and indirect interactions, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g003

thumbnail
Figure 4. IPA network showing the network with the second largest number of up-regulated focus genes in the hypertension only group, compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g004

The network with the largest number of down-regulated focus genes contained 23 focus genes with functions in Cardiovascular System Development and Function, Organismal Development, Cell Morphology. Focus genes in this network were ANK2, BTG1, CCNH, EPAS1, GNMT, HPGD, ITK, KDM4A, LIMD1, MS4A1, NDUFB6, NPM1, OGN, PAK4, PAPOLA, PARK7, PSMD4, PURA, RPL26, SFRP4, SPARC, TNFAIP8 and TRPV5. They were related to MAPK, ERK1/2, Akt, 26s proteasome, histone H3 and PKC (Figure 5, Table 2). The network with the second largest number of down-regulated focus genes had 16 focus genes with functions in Cell Death and Survival, Embryonic Development, Cellular Development. Focus genes were ARMCX3, BUD31, DPY19L1, FAM177A1, FAM210B, GALK2, ITM2C, LSG1, LYRM7, MRPL15, NDUFAF5, SEC24A, TBC1D8B, THUMPD3, TIMMDC1 and TOMM5; they were related to UBC (ubiquitin)(Figure 6, Table 2).

thumbnail
Figure 5. IPA network showing the network with the largest number of down-regulated focus genes in the hypertension only group, compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g005

thumbnail
Figure 6. IPA network showing the network with the second largest number of down-regulated focus genes in the hypertension only group, compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g006

2.2. Microarray analyses of the hypercholesterolemia plus sham group.

The gene expression profile in the MCA of the hypercholesterolemia plus sham group was compared with that of sham controls on a normal diet. After unknown and repeated genes were omitted, 107 up-regulated and 351 down-regulated genes (greater than 4-fold change) were found (Figure 2). Among the highly up-regulated genes in the MCA of the hypercholesterolemia plus sham group compared to sham controls were SLFN14, CA1, and LOC100357902 (Table 3). Among the highly down-regulated genes were LOC100125984, PFDN5 and CUL3 (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 3. Up-regulated genes in the MCA of ‘hypercholesterolemia plus sham’ rabbits vs. sham controls with greater than 4-fold change.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Down-regulated genes in the MCA of ‘hypercholesterolemia plus sham’ rabbits vs. sham controls with greater than 4-fold change.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.t004

The IPA network with the ‘largest number of up-regulated focus genes’, contained 21 focus genes with functions in Cell Death and Survival, Lipid Metabolism, Small Molecule Biochemistry. Focus genes in this network were ATP7A, C11orf71, C1orf51, CA1, CA2, CCNB3, CMTM2, CORIN, DTX3, EPHA1, FAM19A4, GTF2E2, MEP1B, NAA25, PALM2, RNASE1, SOAT2, SP110, TENM4, TSPAN33 and UHRF1BP1. They were related to the ‘node molecules’, APP and tretinoin (Figure 7, Table 3). The next network of up-regulated focus genes had 18 focus genes, with functions in Organ Morphology, Reproductive System Development and Function, Developmental Disorder. Focus genes were APBB3, AQP1, CD2, FANCC, FCRL3, FSHR, IAPP, IKBKE, MAP3K4, NR1D1, OGT, PSMC3IP, SERPINB2, SP100, SYK, TAF15, TMEM173 and TRAF3IP1; they were related to P38 MAPK, ERK1/2, NFkB, SERPINB2, Akt, interferon alpha and VEGF (Figure 8, Table 3).

thumbnail
Figure 7. IPA network showing the network with the largest number of up-regulated focus genes in the hypercholesterolemia plus sham group, compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g007

thumbnail
Figure 8. IPA network showing the network with the second largest number of up-regulated focus genes in the hypercholesterolemia plus sham group, compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g008

The network with the largest number of down-regulated focus genes contained 26 focus genes with functions in Tissue Development, Connective Tissue Disorders, and Developmental Disorder. Focus genes in this network were ARNT, BMF, CADM1, CDC37L1, DNAJB4, DNAJC6, ELOVL5, GPBP1, GTF2F2, INSIG1, INSIG2, KDM4A, KIF20A, NUMB, PHIP, PKN2, PSMC6, PSMD4, PVRL3, RNF168, RPN1, SNAP25, SNTA1, SPRR3, STX2 and TOP2B. They were related to Ubiquitin, 26s Proteasome and Akt (Figure 9, Table 4). The next network of down-regulated focus genes had 25 focus genes with functions in Organ Morphology, Visual System Development and Function, Lipid Metabolism. Focus genes were ABLIM1, ACTA1, ATAD2, CDC73, CRYAA, CYP7A1, DHX9, HNRNPC, ME1, MLL3, MYBBP1A, PABPC4, POU2F3, SHROOM3, SMARCA5, SMARCAD1, SYT12, TIAL1, TMPO, TRPM7, USP3, WDR61, XRN1, YWHAQ and ZBTB44; they were related to histone H3 and F Actin (Figure 10, Table 4).

thumbnail
Figure 9. IPA network showing the network with the largest number of down-regulated focus genes in the hypercholesterolemia plus sham group, compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g009

thumbnail
Figure 10. IPA network showing the network with the second largest number of down-regulated focus genes in the hypercholesterolemia plus sham group, compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g010

2.3. Microarray analyses of the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group.

The gene expression profile in the MCA of the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group was compared with that of sham controls on a normal diet. After unknown and repeated genes were omitted, 222 up-regulated and 133 down-regulated genes (greater than 4-fold change) were found (Figure 2). Among the highly up-regulated genes in the MCA of the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group compared to sham controls were EPHA1, SP110, SLFN14 (Table 5). Among the highly down-regulated genes were FOXN1, TNFRSF11B and GAPDHS (Table 6).

thumbnail
Table 5. Up-regulated genes in the MCA of ‘hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia’ rabbits vs. sham controls with greater than 4-fold change.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.t005

thumbnail
Table 6. Down-regulated genes in the MCA of ‘hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia’ rabbits vs. sham controls with greater than 4-fold change.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.t006

The IPA network with the ‘largest number of up-regulated focus genes’, contained 22 focus genes with functions in Tissue Development, Connective Tissue Disorders, Developmental Disorder. Focus genes in this network were ALAS2, CCL19, CD2, CD4, CD244, CLEC1B, CNP, DHRS9, FKBP1B, IAPP, KLF13, LTN1, MS4A2, RASGRP4, RNASEL, SLC5A1, SPTA1, SYK, TMEM173, TRAF3IP1, TYMP and UBASH3B. They were related to ERK1/2, Interferon alpha, IL12 complex and SYK (complex), CD2, CD4 and CD244 (Figure 11, Table 5). The next network of up-regulated focus genes had 18 focus genes, with functions in Organ Morphology, Visual System Development and Function, Lipid Metabolism. Focus genes were CA2, CDH17, COL17A1, ELOVL3, FANCC, FCRLA, FLT3, HRH1, MAP3K4, MEP1B, MMP1, NFkBID, NR1D1, PIGR, RET, SERPINB2, SPINK1 and TINF2; they were related to P38 MAPK, NFkB, SERPINB2, MMP1 and TNF (Figure 12, Table 5).

thumbnail
Figure 11. IPA network showing the network with the largest number of up-regulated focus genes in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group, compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g011

thumbnail
Figure 12. IPA network showing the network with the second largest number of up-regulated focus genes in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group, compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g012

The network with the largest number of down-regulated focus genes contained 21 focus genes with functions in Cardiovascular Disease, Cellular Assembly and Organization, Post-Translational Modification. Focus genes in this network were ARNT, CCT2, ELAVL4, HNRNPC, KIF20A, ME1, NCALD, NRGN, PDK4, PFDN5, PLN, PPP1R8, PPYR1, SHROOM3, SNAP25, SNTA1, SSB, STMN2, SYT12, TTN and WAC. They were related to ERK, Akt, PKC, Vegf, actin and insulin. (Figure 13, Table 6). The next network of down-regulated focus genes had 20 focus genes with functions in Endocrine System Disorders, Gastrointestinal Disease, and Hereditary Disorder. Focus genes were BMF, CDX1, CKM, CRYAA, DNAJB4, DNAJC6, GTF2E2, IFIH1, IFRD1, INSIG2, PAX4, PLP1, POU2F3, PSMD4, RPN1, SAP30, SMARCA5, TANK, TIAL1 and WDR61; they were related to P38 MAPK, NFkB, 26S proteasome, histone H3, interferon alpha and IL12 (Figure 14, Table 6).

thumbnail
Figure 13. IPA network showing the network with the largest number of down-regulated focus genes in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group, compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g013

thumbnail
Figure 14. IPA network showing the network with the second largest number of down-regulated focus genes in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group, compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g014

2.4. Microarray analyses of the common area between hypertension only- and hypercholesterolemia plus sham groups.

The gene expression profile in the common area between the hypertension only- and hypercholesterolemia plus sham groups was also compared with that of sham controls on a normal diet (Fig. 2A). After unknown and repeated genes were omitted, 18 up-regulated and 13 down-regulated genes (greater than 4-fold change) were found (Figure 2). Among the highly up-regulated genes in the MCA of the hypertension only group compared to sham controls were Nibrin like (LOC100352398), TAF15 and ANKAR (Table 7). Among the highly down-regulated genes in the MCA of the hypertension only group were FOXN1, ribosomal protein S3a-like and ADAMTS17 (Table 8).

thumbnail
Table 7. Up-regulated genes in the MCA that are common between ‘hypertension only’ and ‘hypercholesterolemia plus sham’ rabbits (both vs. sham controls) with greater than 4-fold change (see Fig. 2).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.t007

thumbnail
Table 8. Down-regulated genes in the MCA that are common between ‘hypertension only’ and ‘hypercholesterolemia plus sham’ rabbits (both vs. sham controls) with greater than 4-fold change.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.t008

A single network of up-regulated focus genes was found, which contained 13 focus genes with functions in Drug Metabolism, Endocrine System Development and Function, Lipid Metabolism. Focus genes in this network were ASB4, DIS3L2, DZANK1, FANCC, GUCY2D, MEP1B, NAA25, RNASE1, RXFP2, SERPINB2, SIPA1L3, TAF15 and TESK2. They were related to UBC, APP, SERPINB2, TNF and HNF4A (Figure 15, Table 7).

thumbnail
Figure 15. IPA network showing the network with the largest number of up-regulated focus genes in the common area between the hypertension only and hypercholesterolemia plus sham group, compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g015

A single network of down-regulated focus genes was found, which contained 11 focus genes with functions in Cell Morphology, Embryonic Development, and Cellular Compromise. Focus genes were ADAMTS17, BCCIP, FAM177A1, FOXN1, HPGDS, LSG1, MRPL15, PPIG, PSMD4, RPL26 and TOMM5. They were related to UBC (Figure 16, Table 8).

thumbnail
Figure 16. IPA network showing the network with the largest number of down-regulated focus genes in the common area between the hypertension only and hypercholesterolemia plus sham group, compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g016

2.5. Microarray analyses of the ‘exclusive area’ in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group.

The gene expression profile in the exclusive area of the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group was compared with that of sham controls on a normal diet (Fig. 2A). After unknown and repeated genes were omitted, 132 up-regulated and 22 down-regulated genes (greater than 4-fold change) were found (Figure 2). Among the highly up-regulated genes in the MCA of the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia compared to sham controls were SLFN, MRS2 and HEAT repeat containing (LOC100357872) (Table 9). Among the highly down-regulated genes in the MCA of the hypertension group were SST, ADAM6, and PRLR (Table 10). The panel of genes was analyzed by IPA.

thumbnail
Table 9. Up-regulated genes in the MCA that are exclusive to ‘hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia’ rabbits vs. sham controls with greater than 4-fold change.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.t009

thumbnail
Table 10. Down-regulated genes in the MCA that are exclusive to ‘hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia’ rabbits vs. sham controls with greater than 4-fold change.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.t010

The IPA network with the largest number of up-regulated focus genes contained 20 focus genes with functions in Cell Death and Survival, Cellular Compromise, Inflammatory Response. Focus genes in this network were CCL19, CD2, CD4, CD244, CDH17, CGN, CNP, COL17A1, DHRS9, FLT3, IQUB, KLF13, LTN1, MS4A2, PIGR, RASGRP4, RET, RNASEL, TYMP and UBASH3B. They were related to P38 MAPK, ERK 1/2, interferon alpha and CD2, CD4 and CD244 (Figure 17, Table 9). The next network of up-regulated focus genes had 14 focus genes with functions in Cell Cycle, Nervous System Development and Function, Cell Death and Survival. Focus genes were C5orf28, CDK15, FAM71C, GBA3, GLB1L3, IRX2, LRRTM4, NAA25, NAV2, PRPF18, PSRC1, PTCH2, SLC13A1 and STAMBPL1; they were related to UBC and APP (Figure 18, Table 9).

thumbnail
Figure 17. IPA network showing the network with the largest number of up-regulated focus genes in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group (exclusive area), compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g017

thumbnail
Figure 18. IPA network showing the network with the second largest number of up-regulated focus genes in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group (exclusive area), compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g018

The network with the largest number of down-regulated focus genes contained 10 focus genes with functions in Digestive System Development and Function, Hepatic System Development and Function, Organ Morphology. Focus genes in this network were ELAVL4, GFRA4, KCNK18, PAX4, PDK4, POU3F4, PRLR, SPHKAP, SST and STMN2. They were related to MAPK, ERK and insulin (Figure 19, Table 10). The next network of down-regulated focus genes also had 10 focus genes with functions in Metabolic Disease, Gene Expression, and Cellular Compromise. Focus genes were INHBE, KIAA1549, MARCH6, MOBP, NRGN, OLFM3, PLP1, SEMA4D, SULT4A1 and ZC3H7B; they were related to UBC and APP (Figure 20, Table 10).

thumbnail
Figure 19. IPA network showing the network with the largest number of down-regulated focus genes in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group (exclusive area), compared with sham operated controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g019

thumbnail
Figure 20. IPA network showing the network with the second largest number of down-regulated focus genes in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group (exclusive area), compared with sham group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g020

3. Electron Microscopy of the MCA

The MCA of sham operated rabbits on a normal diet showed continuous healthy appearing endothelial cells (Figure 21A). In comparison, the MCA of hypertension only rabbits contained pyknotic endothelial cells (Figure 21B), while that of hypercholesterolemia plus sham rabbits showed large intracellular vacuoles in endothelial cells (Figure 21C). The above changes were exacerbated in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia rabbits, and pyknotic endothelial cells, breaks in the basement membrane, and large extracellular spaces were present between the basement membrane and underlying smooth muscle cells (Figure 21D, E). In addition, subendothelial foam cells were observed (Figure 21E, F) consistent with early atherosclerotic changes. The tunica media and tunica adventitia had a normal appearance.

thumbnail
Figure 21. Electron micrographs of the MCA.

(A) Sham operated rabbit on a normal diet showing continuous endothelial cells (EC) (B) Hypertension only rabbit, showing a pyknotic cell (arrow) in the endothelial layer (EC). (C) Hypercholesterolemia plus sham rabbit, showing large intracellular vacuoles (V) in endothelial cells. (D) Hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia rabbit, showing breaks in the basement membrane (BR), and a large extracellular space (S) between the basement membrane and the underlying smooth muscle cells. (E) Hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia rabbit, showing a pyknotic cell among the endothelial layer (arrow), and presence subendothelial foam cells (FC). (F) Higher magnification of a foam cell in E, showing intracellular vacuoles, and extracellular spaces (S) containing collagen fibrils. Scale: A = 1 µm, B–D = 0.5 µm, E = 2 µm, F = 0.2 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g021

4. Vascular Changes in the Aorta

4.1. RT-PCR.

HNF4A mRNA expression was increased in the aorta of the hypercholesterolemia plus sham-operated group- and hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group (3.64 and 2.25-fold change respectively), compared to controls on a normal diet (Figure 22A).

thumbnail
Figure 22. HNF4A expression in the aorta.

(A) Real-time RT-PCR analyses of HNF4A in the aorta of control, hypercholesterolemia plus sham, and hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia rabbits. The mean and standard error are shown. *p<0.05 vs. controls by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (n = 4 in each group). (B) Western blot analyses of HNF4A in the aorta of control, hypercholesterolemia plus sham and hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia rabbits. (C) Densitometric analyses of HNF4A protein, normalized to ß-actin. The mean and standard error are shown. *p<0.05 vs. control by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post-hoc test (n = 3 in each group). Abbreviations as in Fig. 1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g022

4.2. Western blot analyses.

The antibody to HNF4A detected a 53 kDa band in homogenates of the aorta consistent with the expected molecular weight of the protein (Figure 22B). Increased density of the HNF4A band relative to beta actin was found in homogenates from hypercholesterolemia plus sham- and hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group compared to controls, indicating up-regulation of HNF4A protein expression after exposure to hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia (Figure 22C).

4.3. Histochemistry and immunohistochemistry.

The general structure of the aorta was examined by Masson’s Trichrome staining (Figure 23A–C). Hypercholesterolemia plus sham rabbits as well as the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia rabbits showed neointimal formation along part of the circumference of the vessel. This was associated with migration of red-staining, smooth muscle cells from the tunica media into the neointima (Figure 23C). The changes were more pronounced in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia than the hypercholesterolemia plus sham rabbits (Figure 23A–C). The tunica media and tunica adventitia had a normal appearance.

thumbnail
Figure 23. Histochemical and immunohistochemical staining of the aorta from rabbits exposed to stroke risk factors.

A, D, G: Rabbits on normal diet. B, E, H: Hypercholesterolemia plus sham group. C, F, I: Hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group. A-C: Aorta of rabbits stained by Masson’s Trichrome. Increased thickness of the neointima (NI) is seen in the hypercholesterolemia plus sham group (B, arrow). The changes are exacerbated in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group (C, arrow). SM = smooth muscle cells in the neointima. D, E, F: Aorta of rabbits immunostained with a mouse monoclonal antibody to HNF-4A. Very little or no labeling is present in normal rabbits, but dense staining is observed in endothelial cells in the hypercholesterolemia plus sham, and hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia rabbits (arrows). G, H,I: Higher magnification of the aorta of rabbits immunostained with mouse monoclonal antibody to HNF-4A, showing dense staining in endothelial cells of hypercholesterolemia plus sham, and hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia rabbits (arrows). Scale: A-F = 200 µm, G-I = 70 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068335.g023

Immunostaining of the aorta with HNF4A antibody showed that the endothelial layer of hypercholesterolemia plus sham group and the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group were densely stained for HNF4A, compared to controls (Figure 23D–I). Immunolabel was observed in the nucleus and cytoplasm of endothelial cells and other cells near the endothelial layer. No staining was observed in the tunica media or adventitia (Figure 23D-I). These results indicate that increased HNF4A gene expression in the aorta occurred mainly in endothelial cells.

Discussion

The present study was carried out to elucidate differential gene expression changes in the MCA of rabbits exposed to two stroke risk factors, i.e. hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia. Of the DEGs in the MCA that were altered by a single risk factor, hypertension alone vs. sham controls on a normal diet, FAM167A had the highest fold change, followed by CERS3 and FAM53C. FAM167A encodes a ubiquitously expressed gene, the function of which remains unknown. CERS3 (ceramide synthase 3) catalyzes the condensation of sphinganine and fatty acyl-coenzyme A to form dihydroceramide, which is oxidized to ceramide [30]. Among the down-regulated DEGs in the MCA of the hypertension only group were FOXN1, NSRP1 and THUMPD3. Forkhead transcription factor is essential for thymus development [31] and keratinocyte differentiation [32].

Of the DEGs in the MCA that were up-regulated in the hypercholesterolemia plus sham group vs. sham controls on a normal diet, SLFN14 had the largest fold change, followed by CA1 and Gap protein alpha-3 protein-like (LOC100357902). SLFN14 is part of the Schlafen family of proteins which have growth regulatory properties [33]. CA1 (carbonic anhydrase I) is a member of the carbonic anhydrase family that catalyzes the hydration and dehydration of CO2/H2CO3 [34] and gene mutation is associated with rheumatoid arthritis [35].

Among the DEGs that were down-regulated in the hypercholesterolemia plus sham group vs. sham controls were beta tropomyosin (LOC100125984), PFDN5 and CUL3. The latter is a member of the cullin protein family [36], [37] involved in ubiquitination [38], and gene polymorphism is associated with hypertension [39].

Of the DEGs in the MCA that were up-regulated in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group vs. sham controls on a normal diet, EPHA1 had the largest fold change, followed by SP110, and SLFN14. EPHA1 (Ephrin receptor A1) has recently been identified in large-scale genome-wide association studies to be one of the risk genes for late onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [40], [41]. SLFN14 has been mentioned in the hypertension only group.

Among the DEGs that were down-regulated in the hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia group were FOXN1, TNFRSF11B, and GAPDHS. TNFRSF11B (tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11b) is the gene encoding osteoprotegerin, a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily of cytokines [42] involved in bone resorption [43] and vascular diseases [44], [45]. Gene polymorphism of TNFRSF11B is a risk factor for ischemic stroke [46]. FOXN1 has been mentioned in the hypertension only group.

Of the DEGs in the that were up-regulated in common between the hypertension only- and hypercholesterolemia plus sham groups (both vs. sham controls), Nibrin like (LOC100352398) showed the largest fold change, followed by TAF15, and ANKAR. TAF15 (TATA box binding protein associated factor 15) is a member of the FET family of RNA-binding proteins [47]. ANKAR (ankyrin and armadillo repeat containing) is one of the genes affected in aortic dilatation/dissection [48].

Among the DEGs that were down-regulated in common, between the hypertension only, and hypercholesterolemia plus sham groups (both vs. sham controls) were FOXN1, Ribosomal protein S3-like (LOC100354966) and ADAMTS17 (ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 17). The ADAMTS family of genes is involved in cancer, arthritis and coagulation [49], and variants of ADAMTS17 are associated with pediatric stroke [50].

The network in the MCA with largest number of up-regulated focus genes affected by hypertension showed many focus genes related to the ‘node molecule’, ubiquitin, a regulatory protein that directs other proteins to the proteasome [51]. Apart from chronic neurodegenerative diseases, the ubiquitin-proteasome system is implicated in brain ischemia by inducing cell damage or leukocyte infiltration into the brain [51]. The network with the second largest number of up-regulated molecules was related to P38 MAPK and ERK. P38 MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) is a member of the MAPK family involved in stress-related signal transductions [52], and sustained activation can result in apoptosis in various cell types [53], [54], [55]. Inhibition of P38 activity is reported to reduce infarct volume and neurological deficits [52], [56] as well as cytokine expression after stroke [52]. ERK1/2 (extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2) is a well-characterized member of the MAPK family that is activated by mitogens or stressors, and plays an important role in cell differentiation and proliferation [57], [58]. Phosphorylated ERK1/2 is increased after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion, and the ERK pathway is involved in both neuroprotection and cell death [58]. Other focus genes in this network were related to NF-κB, SERPINB2, MMP1 and APP. NF-κB (nuclear factor-kappa B) is a central regulator of inflammation and apoptosis [59] and is active in many chronic inflammatory diseases including atherosclerosis [60]. It could have damaging effects in cerebral ischemia [61], [62], and inhibition of NF-κB decreases neointimal formation [63], [64], [65] and reduces infarct volume and neurological deficits after stroke [66]. On the other hand, NF-κB activation could also be neuroprotective [67], [68], as it participates in cell death/survival pathways through regulation of pro- and anti-apoptotic genes [69], [70]. SERPINB2 (serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 2), also known as plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) type 2 is a physiological inhibitor of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) [71]. Increased SERPINB2 expression is found in the AD brain [72], and after brain ischemia or trauma, particularly in the basement membrane and endothelial cells of vessels adjacent to the lesion [73]. MMP1 (matrix metallopeptidase 1) belongs to a family of protein-digesting enzymes that degrades the extracellular matrix in both physiological and pathological conditions including stroke [74]. MMP1 is increased in atherosclerotic plaques [75] and gene polymorphism is suggested to influence the risk of coronary heart disease [76]. APP (β-amyloid precursor protein) can be processed by an amyloidogenic pathway to form A-beta. The latter and vascular risk factors [77], [78] play important roles in the pathogenesis of AD [79], [80], and endothelial dysfunction in APP overexpressing mice increases the susceptibility of the brain to AD pathology [81] and cerebral ischemia [82].

The network in the MCA with the largest number of down-regulated focus genes affected by hypertension was related to MAPK, ERK 1/2, Akt, 26s proteasome, histone and PKC, while the network with the second largest number of down-regulated focus genes was related to UBC. Akt is a serine/threonine kinase that is activated by PI3K in various growth factors-mediated signaling cascades [83]. The PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is important in mediating cell survival [83], [84] and Akt activity is shown to confer neuroprotection after ischemic brain injury [85], [86]. PKC (protein kinase C) is a serine-threonine kinase family that is important in regulating cellular functions, and several isozymes of PKC such as PKC<$>\raster="rg1"<$>, PKCδ and PKCγ, are associated with cerebral ischemic and reperfusion injury [87], [88]. The use of PKCδ peptide inhibitors is reported to alleviate reperfusion injury and reduce stroke infarct size [87], [88], [89]. 26s Proteasome is an essential component of the ubiquitin-proteasome system which functions to degrade cellular proteins [90]. The exact role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in cerebral ischemia is at present unclear, and deleterious effects of proteasome malfunction, as well as beneficial effects of proteasome inhibition on cerebral ischemia have been reported [51], [90]. Histones affect gene transcription by binding to DNA; hence changes in histone H3 may affect the expression of downstream molecules in vessels during hypercholesterolemia. Interestingly, promising outcomes from the use of histone deacetylase (HDACs) inhibitors have been reported in preclinical stroke models [91].

Gene network analysis of the MCA after hypercholesterolemia (plus sham operation), surprisingly, showed very similar networks as that the hypertension only group. This was despite a relatively low percentage of genes in the common area between these two conditions (20.8% of hypertension genes and 6.8% of hypercholesterolemia genes were in the common area, respectively). The results suggest recruitment of different focus genes that are related to similar ‘node molecules’, as in the following example: the network in the MCA with largest number of up-regulated focus genes affected by hypercholesterolemia showed many molecules related to APP. This is similar to hypertension only rabbits, and could indicate synergism of the two risk factors in affecting the expression of molecules related to APP. Other focus genes were related to tretinoin or all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) [92], a molecule known to modulate A-beta associated memory deficits and neuropathological alterations in animal models of AD [92], [93].

The network with the second largest number of up-regulated focus genes also had many similarities with the hypertension only group, with P38 MAPK, ERK 1/2, NFkB, SERPINB2 and Akt being central players, together with focus genes related to interferon alpha and VEGF. Interferon alpha is a member of a family of nonspecific antiviral agents with immunomodulatory and cytostatic properties [94]. Although other isoforms of the interferon family such as interferon beta and gamma are associated with atherosclerosis [94], a possible role of interferon alpha in this condition is yet unknown. Vegf (vascular endothelial growth factor) is involved in conditions such as atherosclerosis, cerebral edema, brain and vascular repair following ischemia [95], and plasma vegf values are increased immediately after stroke [96].

The network in the MCA with largest number of down-regulated focus genes affected by hypercholesterolemia is related to ubiquitin, 26s proteasome and Akt, and the network with the second largest number of down-regulated focus genes is related to histone H3 and F actin. These changes in ubiquitin, proteasome, and histone H3 are very similar to that of hypertension only animals. Down-regulation of genes related to actin may affect process outgrowth or motility of vascular cells, and actin cytoskeleton signaling is one of the functional pathways that are related to male-specific ischemic stroke genes [97].

The network in the MCA with largest number of up-regulated focus genes affected by hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia showed many molecules related to ERK 1/2, interferon alpha, IL12, SYK, CD2, CD4, and CD244. IL12 (interleukin 12) is a proinflammatory and immunomodulatory cytokine [98] released in response to tissue injury [99]. Elevated serum levels of IL12 are observed in patients with acute myocardial infarction [100], traumatic brain injury [101] and ischemic stroke [102]; in addition, IL 12 signaling is related to female-specific ischemic stroke genes [97]. SYK (spleen tyrosine kinase) is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase [103] involved in signaling cascades in platelets [104]. The use of inhibitors of SYK is a potential treatment for occlusive vascular disease, due to its effect in modulating platelet aggregation and thrombus formation [104]. SYK also phosphorylates tau [105] and α-synuclein [106]. CD2 (CD2 molecule) is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily and mediates the activation of T and natural killer cells [107]. CD4 (CD4 molecule) is expressed on the surface of T cells [108] and CD4+ T cells are regulators of humoral and cellular immune response [109]. Lack of CD4+ T cells is associated with decreased lesion size after stroke [110]. CD244 (CD244 molecule, natural killer cell receptor 2B4) is part of the ‘signaling lymphocyte activation molecule’ (SLAM) family of receptors [111] and is present on natural killer cells, activated CD8+ T cells, and monocytes [112], [113]. It is postulated that CD244 may be involved in a pathway that promotes inflammatory neurological disease [114]. The network with the second largest number of up-regulated focus genes was related to P38 MAPK, NFkB, SERPINB2, MMP1 and Tnf (family). TNF (tumor necrosis factor) plays a key role in increasing the expression of inflammation related genes in atherosclerosis [115], and expression is increased in brain during ischemia [116] or in patients who suffer intracerebral hemorrhage [117]. Antagonism of the TNF-α receptor modulates neurovascular injury and improves neurobehavioral outcomes, after intracerebral hemorrhage in mice [118].

The network in the MCA with largest number of down-regulated focus genes affected by hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia showed many molecules related to ERK, Akt, PKC, Vegf, actin, and insulin. Diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance increase the risk of ICLAD and stroke [119], [120], [121], [122], [123]. Moreover, patients with diabetes show poorer post-stroke functional outcomes in terms of mortality [124], [125] and cognition [126]. These findings may be related to the effect of insulin on activation of NFkB and generation of pro-inflammatory factors involved in atherogenesis [127]. The network with the second largest number of down-regulated focus genes was related to P38 MAPK, NFkB, 26s proteasome, histone H3, interferon alpha and IL12.

The common area between the hypertension only- and hypercholesterolemia plus sham groups showed up-regulated focus genes related to UBC, APP, SERPINB2, TNF and HNF4A, and down-regulated focus genes related to UBC. HNF4A (hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha) is a ligand activated nuclear transcription factor that regulates the expression of many genes involved in lipid transport and glucose metabolism and are associated with cell cycle, immunity, apoptosis, stress response and cancer [128]. Increased expression of HNF4A was shown by RT-PCR and Western blot, and the protein immunolocalized to endothelial cells in the aorta. Since HNF4A suppresses hepatocyte proliferation in adult mice [129], increased expression may likewise affect the turnover of endothelial cells. The effect of this on atherosclerosis is unclear, although excess proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells is known to have an atherogenic effect [130].

The hypertension plus hypercholesterolemia ‘exclusive’ area showed up-regulated and down-regulated pathways, related to many of the node molecules mentioned above. This area is tentatively interpreted as containing genes that are exacerbated by two risk factors, and the effects tends towards recruitment of additional molecules into existing networks rather than initiation of new networks.

An ischemic cerebrovascular event or transient ischemic attack is a risk factor for a subsequent event [21], [22], [131]. The reasons for this are multifactorial [132] and may be partly due to presence of existing atherosclerotic lesions. The present findings extend these concepts to the gene network level, and delineates pathways related to NF-κB and TNF that are involved in inflammation and atherosclerosis [60], [133], as well as focus genes related to ubiquitin, proteasome, histone, HNF4A, insulin and APP. It is hoped that these could provide a framework for better understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms, and development of new therapies for ICLAD.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WYO PTHW. Performed the experiments: WYO MPEN SLJ YJW. Analyzed the data: WYO SYL MPEN KT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WYO PTHW. Wrote the paper: WYO SYL MPEN KT.

References

  1. 1. Wong LK (2006) Global burden of intracranial atherosclerosis. Int J Stroke 1: 158–159.
  2. 2. Gorelick PB, Wong KS, Bae HJ, Pandey DK (2008) Large artery intracranial occlusive disease: a large worldwide burden but a relatively neglected frontier. Stroke 39: 2396–2399.
  3. 3. Wong KS, Li H (2003) Long-term mortality and recurrent stroke risk among Chinese stroke patients with predominant intracranial atherosclerosis. Stroke 34: 2361–2366.
  4. 4. Mazighi M, Tanasescu R, Ducrocq X, Vicaut E, Bracard S, et al. (2006) Prospective study of symptomatic atherothrombotic intracranial stenoses: the GESICA study. Neurology 66: 1187–1191.
  5. 5. De Silva DA, Ancalan M, Doshi K, Chang HM, Wong MC, et al. (2009) Intracranial large artery disease in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia among ethnic Asians. Eur J Neurol 16: 643–645.
  6. 6. Ingall TJ, Homer D, Baker HL Jr, Kottke BA, O’Fallon WM, et al. (1991) Predictors of intracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis. Duration of cigarette smoking and hypertension are more powerful than serum lipid levels. Arch Neurol 48: 687–691.
  7. 7. Zhang J, Li Y, Wang Y, Niu W, Zhang Y, et al. (2011) Arterial stiffness and asymptomatic intracranial large arterial stenosis and calcification in hypertensive chinese. Am J Hypertens 24: 304–309.
  8. 8. O’Rourke MF, Safar ME (2005) Relationship between aortic stiffening and microvascular disease in brain and kidney: cause and logic of therapy. Hypertension 46: 200–204.
  9. 9. Xu CP, Glagov S, Zatina MA, Zarins CK (1991) Hypertension sustains plaque progression despite reduction of hypercholesterolemia. Hypertension 18: 123–129.
  10. 10. Hollander W, Prusty S, Kemper T, Rosene DL, Moss MB (1993) The effects of hypertension on cerebral atherosclerosis in the cynomolgus monkey. Stroke 24: 1218–1226; discussion 1226–1217.
  11. 11. Ropper AH, Adams RD, Victor M, Samuels MA (2009) Adams and Victor’s principles of neurology. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical. x, 1572 p. p.
  12. 12. Mills S, Cain J, Purandare N, Jackson A (2007) Biomarkers of cerebrovascular disease in dementia. Br J Radiol 80 Spec No 2: S128–145.
  13. 13. Hankey GJ, Wong KS, Chankrachang S, Chen C, Crimmins D, et al. (2010) Management of cholesterol to reduce the burden of stroke in Asia: consensus statement. Int J Stroke 5: 209–216.
  14. 14. Mok VC, Lam WW, Fan YH, Wong A, Ng PW, et al. (2009) Effects of statins on the progression of cerebral white matter lesion: Post hoc analysis of the ROCAS (Regression of Cerebral Artery Stenosis) study. J Neurol 256: 750–757.
  15. 15. Vrhovski-Hebrang D, Flegar-Mestric Z, Preden-Kerekovic V, Perkov S, Hebrang A, et al. (2002) Biochemical risk factors in angiographically established stenosis of cerebral arteries. Croat Med J 43: 696–701.
  16. 16. Chen CH, Jiang T, Yang JH, Jiang W, Lu J, et al. (2003) Low-density lipoprotein in hypercholesterolemic human plasma induces vascular endothelial cell apoptosis by inhibiting fibroblast growth factor 2 transcription. Circulation 107: 2102–2108.
  17. 17. Giardina JB, Tanner DJ, Khalil RA (2001) Oxidized-LDL enhances coronary vasoconstriction by increasing the activity of protein kinase C isoforms alpha and epsilon. Hypertension 37: 561–568.
  18. 18. Weis JR, Pitas RE, Wilson BD, Rodgers GM (1991) Oxidized low-density lipoprotein increases cultured human endothelial cell tissue factor activity and reduces protein C activation. FASEB J 5: 2459–2465.
  19. 19. Steinberg D (2009) The LDL modification hypothesis of atherogenesis: an update. J Lipid Res 50 Suppl: S376–381
  20. 20. Alexander RW (1995) Theodore Cooper Memorial Lecture. Hypertension and the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Oxidative stress and the mediation of arterial inflammatory response: a new perspective. Hypertension 25: 155–161.
  21. 21. Burn J, Dennis M, Bamford J, Sandercock P, Wade D, et al. (1994) Long-term risk of recurrent stroke after a first-ever stroke. The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke 25: 333–337.
  22. 22. Viitanen M, Eriksson S, Asplund K (1988) Risk of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction and epilepsy during long-term follow-up after stroke. Eur Neurol 28: 227–231.
  23. 23. Ritman EL, Lerman A (2007) The dynamic vasa vasorum. Cardiovasc Res 75: 649–658.
  24. 24. Olsen TS, Skriver EB, Herning M (1985) Cause of cerebral infarction in the carotid territory. Its relation to the size and the location of the infarct and to the underlying vascular lesion. Stroke 16: 459–466.
  25. 25. Brown AT, Skinner RD, Flores R, Hennings L, Borrelli MJ, et al. (2010) Stroke location and brain function in an embolic rabbit stroke model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21: 903–909.
  26. 26. Yanni AE (2004) The laboratory rabbit: an animal model of atherosclerosis research. Lab Anim 38: 246–256.
  27. 27. Russell JC, Proctor SD (2006) Small animal models of cardiovascular disease: tools for the study of the roles of metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Pathol 15: 318–330.
  28. 28. Akabane S, Natsume T, Matsushima Y, Deguchi F, Kuramochi M, et al. (1985) Alterations in renal Na+K+ATPase activity and [3H]ouabain binding in Goldblatt hypertensive rabbits. J Hypertens 3: 469–474.
  29. 29. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25: 402–408.
  30. 30. Merrill AH Jr, Jones DD (1990) An update of the enzymology and regulation of sphingomyelin metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta 1044: 1–12.
  31. 31. Nowell CS, Bredenkamp N, Tetelin S, Jin X, Tischner C, et al. (2011) Foxn1 regulates lineage progression in cortical and medullary thymic epithelial cells but is dispensable for medullary sublineage divergence. PLoS Genet 7: e1002348.
  32. 32. Phillips MA, Qin Q, Hu Q, Zhao B, Rice RH (2013) Arsenite Suppression of BMP Signaling in Human Keratinocytes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol.
  33. 33. Schwarz DA, Katayama CD, Hedrick SM (1998) Schlafen, a new family of growth regulatory genes that affect thymocyte development. Immunity 9: 657–668.
  34. 34. Supuran CT (2008) Carbonic anhydrases–an overview. Curr Pharm Des 14: 603–614.
  35. 35. Chang X, Zheng Y, Yang Q, Wang L, Pan J, et al. (2012) Carbonic anhydrase I (CA1) is involved in the process of bone formation and is susceptible to ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Res Ther 14: R176.
  36. 36. Du M, Sansores-Garcia L, Zu Z, Wu KK (1998) Cloning and expression analysis of a novel salicylate suppressible gene, Hs-CUL-3, a member of cullin/Cdc53 family. J Biol Chem 273: 24289–24292.
  37. 37. Furukawa M, He YJ, Borchers C, Xiong Y (2003) Targeting of protein ubiquitination by BTB-Cullin 3-Roc1 ubiquitin ligases. Nat Cell Biol 5: 1001–1007.
  38. 38. Petroski MD, Deshaies RJ (2005) Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 9–20.
  39. 39. Boyden LM, Choi M, Choate KA, Nelson-Williams CJ, Farhi A, et al. (2012) Mutations in kelch-like 3 and cullin 3 cause hypertension and electrolyte abnormalities. Nature 482: 98–102.
  40. 40. Hollingworth P, Harold D, Sims R, Gerrish A, Lambert JC, et al. (2011) Common variants at ABCA7, MS4A6A/MS4A4E, EPHA1, CD33 and CD2AP are associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet 43: 429–435.
  41. 41. Naj AC, Jun G, Beecham GW, Wang LS, Vardarajan BN, et al. (2011) Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet 43: 436–441.
  42. 42. Simonet WS, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, Kelley M, Chang MS, et al. (1997) Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell 89: 309–319.
  43. 43. Fu YX, Gu JH, Zhang YR, Tong XS, Zhao HY, et al.. (2013) Osteoprotegerin influences the bone resorption activity of osteoclasts. Int J Mol Med.
  44. 44. Ueland T, Yndestad A, Oie E, Florholmen G, Halvorsen B, et al. (2005) Dysregulated osteoprotegerin/RANK ligand/RANK axis in clinical and experimental heart failure. Circulation 111: 2461–2468.
  45. 45. Ziegler S, Kudlacek S, Luger A, Minar E (2005) Osteoprotegerin plasma concentrations correlate with severity of peripheral artery disease. Atherosclerosis 182: 175–180.
  46. 46. Biscetti F, Straface G, Giovannini S, Santoliquido A, Angelini F, et al. (2013) Association between TNFRSF11B gene polymorphisms and history of ischemic stroke in Italian diabetic patients. Hum Genet 132: 49–55.
  47. 47. Kovar H (2011) Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: The Two Faces of the FUS/EWS/TAF15 Protein Family. Sarcoma 2011: 837474.
  48. 48. Meienberg J, Rohrbach M, Neuenschwander S, Spanaus K, Giunta C, et al. (2010) Hemizygous deletion of COL3A1, COL5A2, and MSTN causes a complex phenotype with aortic dissection: a lesson for and from true haploinsufficiency. Eur J Hum Genet 18: 1315–1321.
  49. 49. Le Goff C, Cormier-Daire V (2011) The ADAMTS(L) family and human genetic disorders. Hum Mol Genet 20: R163–167.
  50. 50. Arning A, Hiersche M, Witten A, Kurlemann G, Kurnik K, et al. (2012) A genome-wide association study identifies a gene network of ADAMTS genes in the predisposition to pediatric stroke. Blood 120: 5231–5236.
  51. 51. Meller R (2009) The role of the ubiquitin proteasome system in ischemia and ischemic tolerance. Neuroscientist 15: 243–260.
  52. 52. Barone FC, Irving EA, Ray AM, Lee JC, Kassis S, et al. (2001) Inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase provides neuroprotection in cerebral focal ischemia. Med Res Rev 21: 129–145.
  53. 53. Frasch SC, Nick JA, Fadok VA, Bratton DL, Worthen GS, et al. (1998) p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent and -independent intracellular signal transduction pathways leading to apoptosis in human neutrophils. J Biol Chem 273: 8389–8397.
  54. 54. Aoshiba K, Yasui S, Hayashi M, Tamaoki J, Nagai A (1999) Role of p38-mitogen-activated protein kinase in spontaneous apoptosis of human neutrophils. J Immunol 162: 1692–1700.
  55. 55. Xia Z, Dickens M, Raingeaud J, Davis RJ, Greenberg ME (1995) Opposing effects of ERK and JNK-p38 MAP kinases on apoptosis. Science 270: 1326–1331.
  56. 56. Barone FC, Irving EA, Ray AM, Lee JC, Kassis S, et al. (2001) SB 239063, a second-generation p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor, reduces brain injury and neurological deficits in cerebral focal ischemia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 296: 312–321.
  57. 57. Roux PP, Blenis J (2004) ERK and p38 MAPK-activated protein kinases: a family of protein kinases with diverse biological functions. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68: 320–344.
  58. 58. Sawe N, Steinberg G, Zhao H (2008) Dual roles of the MAPK/ERK1/2 cell signaling pathway after stroke. J Neurosci Res 86: 1659–1669.
  59. 59. Hoffmann A, Baltimore D (2006) Circuitry of nuclear factor kappaB signaling. Immunol Rev 210: 171–186.
  60. 60. Monaco C, Paleolog E (2004) Nuclear factor kappaB: a potential therapeutic target in atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Cardiovasc Res 61: 671–682.
  61. 61. Nurmi A, Lindsberg PJ, Koistinaho M, Zhang W, Juettler E, et al. (2004) Nuclear factor-kappaB contributes to infarction after permanent focal ischemia. Stroke 35: 987–991.
  62. 62. Schneider A, Martin-Villalba A, Weih F, Vogel J, Wirth T, et al. (1999) NF-kappaB is activated and promotes cell death in focal cerebral ischemia. Nat Med 5: 554–559.
  63. 63. Breuss JM, Cejna M, Bergmeister H, Kadl A, Baumgartl G, et al. (2002) Activation of nuclear factor-kappa B significantly contributes to lumen loss in a rabbit iliac artery balloon angioplasty model. Circulation 105: 633–638.
  64. 64. Yoshimura S, Morishita R, Hayashi K, Yamamoto K, Nakagami H, et al. (2001) Inhibition of intimal hyperplasia after balloon injury in rat carotid artery model using cis-element ‘decoy’ of nuclear factor-kappaB binding site as a novel molecular strategy. Gene Ther 8: 1635–1642.
  65. 65. Zuckerbraun BS, McCloskey CA, Mahidhara RS, Kim PK, Taylor BS, et al. (2003) Overexpression of mutated IkappaBalpha inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and intimal hyperplasia formation. J Vasc Surg 38: 812–819.
  66. 66. Xu L, Zhan Y, Wang Y, Feuerstein GZ, Wang X (2002) Recombinant adenoviral expression of dominant negative IkappaBalpha protects brain from cerebral ischemic injury. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 299: 14–17.
  67. 67. van den Tweel ER, Kavelaars A, Lombardi MS, Groenendaal F, May M, et al. (2006) Selective inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB activation after hypoxia/ischemia in neonatal rats is not neuroprotective. Pediatr Res 59: 232–236.
  68. 68. Blondeau N, Widmann C, Lazdunski M, Heurteaux C (2001) Activation of the nuclear factor-kappaB is a key event in brain tolerance. J Neurosci 21: 4668–4677.
  69. 69. Dutta J, Fan Y, Gupta N, Fan G, Gelinas C (2006) Current insights into the regulation of programmed cell death by NF-kappaB. Oncogene 25: 6800–6816.
  70. 70. Barkett M, Gilmore TD (1999) Control of apoptosis by Rel/NF-kappaB transcription factors. Oncogene 18: 6910–6924.
  71. 71. Medcalf RL, Stasinopoulos SJ (2005) The undecided serpin. The ins and outs of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2. FEBS J 272: 4858–4867.
  72. 72. Akiyama H, Ikeda K, Kondo H, Kato M, McGeer PL (1993) Microglia express the type 2 plasminogen activator inhibitor in the brain of control subjects and patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 164: 233–235.
  73. 73. Dietzmann K, von Bossanyi P, Krause D, Wittig H, Mawrin C, et al. (2000) Expression of the plasminogen activator system and the inhibitors PAI-1 and PAI-2 in posttraumatic lesions of the CNS and brain injuries following dramatic circulatory arrests: an immunohistochemical study. Pathol Res Pract 196: 15–21.
  74. 74. Horstmann S, Kalb P, Koziol J, Gardner H, Wagner S (2003) Profiles of matrix metalloproteinases, their inhibitors, and laminin in stroke patients: influence of different therapies. Stroke 34: 2165–2170.
  75. 75. Morgan AR, Rerkasem K, Gallagher PJ, Zhang B, Morris GE, et al. (2004) Differences in matrix metalloproteinase-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-12 transcript levels among carotid atherosclerotic plaques with different histopathological characteristics. Stroke 35: 1310–1315.
  76. 76. Ye S, Gale CR, Martyn CN (2003) Variation in the matrix metalloproteinase-1 gene and risk of coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J 24: 1668–1671.
  77. 77. Skoog I, Gustafson D (2002) Hypertension and related factors in the etiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 977: 29–36.
  78. 78. Meyer JS, Rauch GM, Rauch RA, Haque A, Crawford K (2000) Cardiovascular and other risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Ann N Y Acad Sci 903: 411–423.
  79. 79. Altman R, Rutledge JC (2010) The vascular contribution to Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 119: 407–421.
  80. 80. Zlokovic BV (2011) Neurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and other disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 12: 723–738.
  81. 81. Iadecola C, Zhang F, Niwa K, Eckman C, Turner SK, et al. (1999) SOD1 rescues cerebral endothelial dysfunction in mice overexpressing amyloid precursor protein. Nat Neurosci 2: 157–161.
  82. 82. Zhang F, Eckman C, Younkin S, Hsiao KK, Iadecola C (1997) Increased susceptibility to ischemic brain damage in transgenic mice overexpressing the amyloid precursor protein. J Neurosci 17: 7655–7661.
  83. 83. Dudek H, Datta SR, Franke TF, Birnbaum MJ, Yao R, et al. (1997) Regulation of neuronal survival by the serine-threonine protein kinase Akt. Science 275: 661–665.
  84. 84. Brunet A, Datta SR, Greenberg ME (2001) Transcription-dependent and -independent control of neuronal survival by the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11: 297–305.
  85. 85. Wu J, Li Q, Wang X, Yu S, Li L, et al. (2013) Neuroprotection by curcumin in ischemic brain injury involves the akt/nrf2 pathway. PLoS One 8: e59843.
  86. 86. Zhao H, Shimohata T, Wang JQ, Sun G, Schaal DW, et al. (2005) Akt contributes to neuroprotection by hypothermia against cerebral ischemia in rats. J Neurosci 25: 9794–9806.
  87. 87. Chou WH, Messing RO (2005) Protein kinase C isozymes in stroke. Trends Cardiovasc Med 15: 47–51.
  88. 88. Bright R, Mochly-Rosen D (2005) The role of protein kinase C in cerebral ischemic and reperfusion injury. Stroke 36: 2781–2790.
  89. 89. Bright R, Raval AP, Dembner JM, Perez-Pinzon MA, Steinberg GK, et al. (2004) Protein kinase C delta mediates cerebral reperfusion injury in vivo. J Neurosci 24: 6880–6888.
  90. 90. Wojcik C, Di Napoli M (2004) Ubiquitin-proteasome system and proteasome inhibition: new strategies in stroke therapy. Stroke 35: 1506–1518.
  91. 91. Langley B, Brochier C, Rivieccio MA (2009) Targeting histone deacetylases as a multifaceted approach to treat the diverse outcomes of stroke. Stroke 40: 2899–2905.
  92. 92. Sodhi RK, Singh N (2013) All-trans retinoic acid rescues memory deficits and neuropathological changes in mouse model of streptozotocin-induced dementia of Alzheimer’s type. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 40: 38–46.
  93. 93. Ding Y, Qiao A, Wang Z, Goodwin JS, Lee ES, et al. (2008) Retinoic acid attenuates beta-amyloid deposition and rescues memory deficits in an Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mouse model. J Neurosci 28: 11622–11634.
  94. 94. Young JL, Libby P, Schonbeck U (2002) Cytokines in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Thromb Haemost 88: 554–567.
  95. 95. Greenberg DA, Jin K (2013) Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and stroke. Cell Mol Life Sci.
  96. 96. Matsuo R, Ago T, Kamouchi M, Kuroda J, Kuwashiro T, et al. (2013) Clinical significance of plasma VEGF value in ischemic stroke - research for biomarkers in ischemic stroke (REBIOS) study. BMC Neurol 13: 32.
  97. 97. Tian Y, Stamova B, Jickling GC, Liu D, Ander BP, et al. (2012) Effects of gender on gene expression in the blood of ischemic stroke patients. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 32: 780–791.
  98. 98. Trinchieri G (1998) Interleukin-12: a cytokine at the interface of inflammation and immunity. Adv Immunol 70: 83–243.
  99. 99. DeGraba TJ (1998) The role of inflammation after acute stroke: utility of pursuing anti-adhesion molecule therapy. Neurology 51: S62–68.
  100. 100. Zhou RH, Shi Q, Gao HQ, Shen BJ (2001) Changes in serum interleukin-8 and interleukin-12 levels in patients with ischemic heart disease in a Chinese population. J Atheroscler Thromb 8: 30–32.
  101. 101. Arand M, Melzner H, Kinzl L, Bruckner UB, Gebhard F (2001) Early inflammatory mediator response following isolated traumatic brain injury and other major trauma in humans. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386: 241–248.
  102. 102. Zaremba J, Losy J (2006) Interleukin-12 in acute ischemic stroke patients. Folia Neuropathol 44: 59–66.
  103. 103. Sada K, Takano T, Yanagi S, Yamamura H (2001) Structure and function of Syk protein-tyrosine kinase. J Biochem 130: 177–186.
  104. 104. Speich HE, Grgurevich S, Kueter TJ, Earhart AD, Slack SM, et al. (2008) Platelets undergo phosphorylation of Syk at Y525/526 and Y352 in response to pathophysiological shear stress. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 295: C1045–1054.
  105. 105. Lebouvier T, Scales TM, Hanger DP, Geahlen RL, Lardeux B, et al. (2008) The microtubule-associated protein tau is phosphorylated by Syk. Biochim Biophys Acta 1783: 188–192.
  106. 106. Negro A, Brunati AM, Donella-Deana A, Massimino ML, Pinna LA (2002) Multiple phosphorylation of alpha-synuclein by protein tyrosine kinase Syk prevents eosin-induced aggregation. FASEB J 16: 210–212.
  107. 107. Crawford K, Stark A, Kitchens B, Sternheim K, Pantazopoulos V, et al. (2003) CD2 engagement induces dendritic cell activation: implications for immune surveillance and T-cell activation. Blood 102: 1745–1752.
  108. 108. Hedrick SM (2002) T cell development: bottoms-up. Immunity 16: 619–622.
  109. 109. Stockinger B, Bourgeois C, Kassiotis G (2006) CD4+ memory T cells: functional differentiation and homeostasis. Immunol Rev 211: 39–48.
  110. 110. Gu L, Xiong X, Zhang H, Xu B, Steinberg GK, et al. (2012) Distinctive effects of T cell subsets in neuronal injury induced by cocultured splenocytes in vitro and by in vivo stroke in mice. Stroke 43: 1941–1946.
  111. 111. Veillette A, Latour S (2003) The SLAM family of immune-cell receptors. Curr Opin Immunol 15: 277–285.
  112. 112. Speiser DE, Colonna M, Ayyoub M, Cella M, Pittet MJ, et al. (2001) The activatory receptor 2B4 is expressed in vivo by human CD8+ effector alpha beta T cells. J Immunol 167: 6165–6170.
  113. 113. Tangye SG, Phillips JH, Lanier LL, Nichols KE (2000) Functional requirement for SAP in 2B4-mediated activation of human natural killer cells as revealed by the X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome. J Immunol 165: 2932–2936.
  114. 114. Enose-Akahata Y, Matsuura E, Oh U, Jacobson S (2009) High expression of CD244 and SAP regulated CD8 T cell responses of patients with HTLV-I associated neurologic disease. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000682.
  115. 115. McKellar GE, McCarey DW, Sattar N, McInnes IB (2009) Role for TNF in atherosclerosis? Lessons from autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 6: 410–417.
  116. 116. Perez-de-Puig I, Martin A, Gorina R, Rosa XD, Martinez E, et al.. (2013) Induction of hemeoxygenase (HO)-1 expression after inhibition of HO activity promotes inflammation and worsens ischemic brain damage in mice. Neuroscience.
  117. 117. Fang HY, Ko WJ, Lin CY (2007) Inducible heat shock protein 70, interleukin-18, and tumor necrosis factor alpha correlate with outcomes in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci 14: 435–441.
  118. 118. King MD, Alleyne CH, Jr., Dhandapani KM (2013) TNF-alpha receptor antagonist, R-7050, improves neurological outcomes following intracerebral hemorrhage in mice. Neurosci Lett.
  119. 119. Park JH, Kwon HM (2008) Association between metabolic syndrome and previous ischemic lesions in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 110: 215–221.
  120. 120. De Silva DA, Woon FP, Lee MP, Chen CL, Chang HM, et al. (2009) Metabolic syndrome is associated with intracranial large artery disease among ethnic Chinese patients with stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 18: 424–427.
  121. 121. Rundek T, Gardener H, Xu Q, Goldberg RB, Wright CB, et al. (2010) Insulin resistance and risk of ischemic stroke among nondiabetic individuals from the northern Manhattan study. Arch Neurol 67: 1195–1200.
  122. 122. Wannamethee SG, Perry IJ, Shaper AG (1999) Nonfasting serum glucose and insulin concentrations and the risk of stroke. Stroke 30: 1780–1786.
  123. 123. Kaneda Y, Ishikawa S, Sadakane A, Gotoh T, Kayaba K, et al.. (2013) Insulin Resistance and Risk of Cerebral Infarction in a Japanese General Population: The Jichi Medical School Cohort Study. Asia Pac J Public Health.
  124. 124. Tuomilehto J, Rastenyte D, Jousilahti P, Sarti C, Vartiainen E (1996) Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for death from stroke. Prospective study of the middle-aged Finnish population. Stroke 27: 210–215.
  125. 125. Prosser J, MacGregor L, Lees KR, Diener HC, Hacke W, et al. (2007) Predictors of early cardiac morbidity and mortality after ischemic stroke. Stroke 38: 2295–2302.
  126. 126. Luchsinger JA, Tang MX, Stern Y, Shea S, Mayeux R (2001) Diabetes mellitus and risk of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with stroke in a multiethnic cohort. Am J Epidemiol 154: 635–641.
  127. 127. Bienek R, Marek B, Kajdaniuk D, Borgiel-Marek H, Piecha T, et al. (2012) Adiponectin, leptin, resistin and insulin blood concentrations in patients with ischaemic cerebral stroke. Endokrynol Pol 63: 338–345.
  128. 128. Bolotin E, Liao H, Ta TC, Yang C, Hwang-Verslues W, et al. (2010) Integrated approach for the identification of human hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha target genes using protein binding microarrays. Hepatology 51: 642–653.
  129. 129. Bonzo JA, Ferry CH, Matsubara T, Kim JH, Gonzalez FJ (2012) Suppression of hepatocyte proliferation by hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha in adult mice. J Biol Chem 287: 7345–7356.
  130. 130. Rivard A, Andres V (2000) Vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Histol Histopathol 15: 557–571.
  131. 131. Bergman D (2011) Preventing recurrent cerebrovascular events in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: the current data. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 23: 659–666.
  132. 132. Hillen T, Coshall C, Tilling K, Rudd AG, McGovern R, et al. (2003) Cause of stroke recurrence is multifactorial: patterns, risk factors, and outcomes of stroke recurrence in the South London Stroke Register. Stroke 34: 1457–1463.
  133. 133. Csiszar A, Wang M, Lakatta EG, Ungvari Z (2008) Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction during aging: role of NF-kappaB. J Appl Physiol 105: 1333–1341.