Figures
Abstract
Congenital cataract is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of eye disorders that causes visual impairment and childhood blindness. The purpose of this study was to identify the genetic defect associated with autosomal dominant congenital perinuclear cataract in a Chinese family. A detailed family history and clinical data of the family were recorded, and candidate gene sequencing was performed to screen for mutation-causing disease in our study. Direct sequencing revealed a c.601G>A (p.E201K) transversion in exon 2 of GJA8. This mutation co-segregated with all affected individuals in the family and was not found in unaffected family members or 100 unrelated controls. The function and mechanism of novel GJA8 point mutation E201K in Chinese patients were then investigated in this study. We found E201K aberrantly located in cytoplasm and prevented its location in the plasma membrane. Induction of E201K expression led to a decrease in cell growth and viability by MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. Our study provides important evidence that GJA8 is a disease-causing gene for congenital cataract and that mutation of GJA8 has a potential causative effect.
Citation: Su D, Yang Z, Li Q, Guan L, Zhang H, E D, et al. (2013) Identification and Functional Analysis of GJA8 Mutation in a Chinese Family with Autosomal Dominant Perinuclear Cataracts. PLoS ONE 8(3): e59926. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059926
Editor: Andreas R. Janecke, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria
Received: November 28, 2012; Accepted: February 20, 2013; Published: March 29, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Su et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This research was supported by grants from the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (Grant No. 2010GJSSJKA07). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Congenital cataract is the most common cause of treatable childhood blindness. More than 1 million blind children in Asia suffer from cataract [1]. Genetically, autosomal dominant inheritance (ADCC) is the most common mode of transmission, and nearly a third of cases show a positive family history [2], [3]. The prevalence of congenital cataracts is 1 to 6 per 10,000 live births [4]. Approximately half are inherited, either in isolation or as part of a syndrome of ocular or systemic anomalies [2].The penetrance of congenital cataract is almost complete but expressivity is highly variable. According to morphology, congenital cataracts can be classified into several subtypes: sutural, pulverulent, whole lens, nuclear, lamellar(also referred to as perinuclear), cortical, polar, cerulean, coralliform, and other minor subtypes [5], [6]. These cataract subtypes can result from mutations at different genetic loci and can have different inheritance patterns.
To date, more than 30 independent loci and 20 cataract-related genes have been identified as being associated with isolated autosomal dominant congenital cataract (ADCC). Several genes are highly expressed in the lens and have been associated with congenital cataracts that can be considered as candidate genes for hereditary cataracts. And these genes include gap junction protein, alpha 3, (GJA3), and gap junction protein, alpha 8, (GJA8); crystallins such as αA-crystallin (CRYAA), βA1-crystallin (CRYBA1), βB1-crystallin (CRYBB1), βB2-crystallin (CRYBB2), γC-crystallin (CRYGC), γD-crystallin (CRYGD) and γS-crystallin (CRYGS), intrinsic member protein (LIM2), and major intrinsic protein (MIP), cytoskeletal proteins, such as beaded filament structural protein 1 (BFSP1), beaded filament structural protein 2 (BFSP2), transcription factors, such as paired-like homeodomain 3 (PITX3), heat shock transcription factor 4 (HSF4), Maf-like protein gene (MAF), and paired box gene 6 (PAX6), and others, such as chromatin modifying protein 4B (CHMP4B) and Eph-receptor type-A2 (EPHA2) and so on[7]–[12].
In this study, we applied a functional candidate approach to test the known genes in a Chinese family. A novel missense mutation in GJA8 was identified to be responsible for the cataracts in the family. Functional analysis showed that mutation of GJA8 prevented its location in the plasma membrane and led to a decrease in cell growth and proliferation. These results suggest the novel missense mutation in GJA8 may contribute to the development of nuclear cataract.
Methods
Family Data and Clinical Examination
The three generation Chinese cataract family was recruited from Beijing tongren hospital, capital medical University, Beijing, China. The research was approved by the ethics committee of Capital Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from all participants of the family, from Guangdong province. The study protocol followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Detailed family medical history was recorded by interviewing the family members. All participating members underwent ophthalmic examination including visual acuity, slit lamp examination, intraocular pressure measurement, ultrasonography, fundus examination of the dilated pupil. Slit-lamp photography was performed to document the phenotype of the cataract patients. 100 unrelated subjects without cataracts were recruited from the Ophthalmology Clinic of Beijing Tongren Hospital as normal controls. They were given complete ophthalmologic examinations and did not have eye diseases except mild myopia.
Clinical Examination and Isolation of Genomic DNA
About 2 ml of peripheral blood was collected from the family members who took part in the study. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood using the QIAamp Blood kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).
Mutation Screening
We used the functional candidate gene analysis approach, 11 candidate genes, including CRYAA, CRYAB, CRYBA1, CRYBB1, CRYBB2, CRYGC, CRYGD, CRYGS, GJA3, GJA8, MIP, HSF4, and BFSP2 were analyzed. Each exon and intron-exon junction of the genes were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers listed in Table 1. The PCR products of proband were sequenced using ABI 3730 Automated Sequencer (PE Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The sequencing results were analyzed using Chromas 2.33 (http://www.technelysium.com.au/chromas.html) and compared to the reference sequence in the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) database.
Bioinformatics Analysis
The amino acid sequences of GJA8 from several different species were obtained from NCBI GenBank and conservation analysis was performed by CLC Main Workbench Software (Aarhus, Denmark). The function impact of the mutation was predicted by PolyPhen (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/).
Cell Culture and Transfection
The cell lines Hela were maintained in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 mg/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C. Transfection was carried out using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA).
Western Blotting
Total proteins were extracted from Hela cells transfected with GJA8-WT-GFP (wild-type), GJA8-E201K-GFP and GFP vector plasmids. After electrophoresis, a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane was incubated with anti-β-actin antibody (Sigma) and anti-GFP (Abcam). The signals were visualized by using the chemiluminescent substrate method with the SuperSignal West Pico kit provided by Pierce Co.
Subcellular Localization
Hela cells were seeded in six-well tissue culture plates 24 h prior to transfection at approximately 60% confluency. GFP-GJA8 expression constructs containing wild-type or mutants were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were then analyzed by fluorescence microscopy.
Cell Proliferation and MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) Assay
The protocol is adapted from literature methods [13], [14]. Briefly, After transfection, Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium was supplemented with 5 mg/ml MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) solution for 4 h at 37°C. Thereafter, the medium was aspirated, and the formazan product was solubilized with 100 μl of methyl sulfoxide MTT solution was removed. Viability was assessed by measuring the absorbance at 492 nm with microplatereader.
Results
Clinical Evaluation
Eleven family members of a three-generation cataract Chinese family participated in the study (five affected and six unaffected individuals) (Fig. 1A). All patients in this pedigree had bilateral cataracts. The spectrum of all patients belong to lamellar (perinuclear) cataracts, which is an subtype of congenital cataracts. Most patients experienced decreased visual acuity at 3 years of age, followed by a gradual decrease in visual acuity until surgery was required. The proband, who was a 22-year-old boy, had decreased vision at 3 years of age and was diagnosed with bilateral lamellar (perinuclear) cataract at the age of 22. Slit-lamp examination revealed opacification of perinuclear cataract with opacities involving the nucleus (Fig. 1B). His best corrected visual acuity was 0.3/0.4.
(A) A Chinese family that has had autosomal dominant cataracts. The arrow indicates the proband. Pedigree of a Chinese three-generation family with autosomal dominant cataract. The black symbols indicate individuals with a diagnosis of congenital cataract performed by genetic analysis. The arrow indicates the proband. The asterisk indicates family members who attended this study. (B) Slit-lamp photographs of the proband. A and C in the photograph: Slit-lamp photographs of the proband (III:1) show perinuclear cataract in the right eye. B and D in the photograph: The photographs of the proband (III:1) show perinuclear cataract involving the nucleus of the left eye.
Mutation Analysis
We identified a transversion of G>A at c.601 in exon 2 of GJA8 in all affected individuals via direct gene sequencing of the coding regions of the candidate genes (Fig .2A). However, we did not find this mutation in any unaffected family members, or in the 100 unrelated control individuals (Fig. 2B). We found no further gene mutations in individuals from the studied family, except for a few nonpathogenic single nucleotidepolymorphisms (SNPs).
A: Sequence of affected individual. In panel A, the heterozygous mutation c.601G>A was identified in all affected participants. B: Sequence of unaffected individual.
Bioinformatics Analysis
The c.601G>A mutation resulted in a substitution of glutamic acid (Glu) with Lysine (Lys) at the 201st amino acid position (E201K). CLC Main Workbench Software revealed that the Glu at the 201st amino acid position is highly conserved among many species (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the structure and function impact of the GJA8 E201K mutation was predicted by PolyPhen (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), and the result indicated that E201K could probably be damaging, with a score of 0.999 [15], [16].
The alignment data indicates that the Glu at the 201st amino acid position is highly conserved among many species (indicated by an arrow).
Functional Analysis
The amount of each of the in-vitro translated wild-type and mutant GJA8 proteins were detected by western blot analysis with anti-GFP antibody (Fig. 4A). The GJA8 WT and GJA8 E201K mutant proteins were expressed at similar levels in western blot analysis of the cell lysates, indicating that mutation did not result in the expression or instability of the protein.
(A) Western blotting of wild-type and mutant GJA8. Hela cells were transfected with GJA8WT and GJA8E201K expression plasmids, respectively and western blotting was performed with GFP antibody. (B) Subcellular localization of GJA8. GFP-GJA8 expression constructs containing wild-type or mutant were transfected into Hela cells using Lipofectamine 2000. Localization of wild-type and mutant GJA8 GFP-fusion protein in transfected Hela cells was viewed using a fluorescent microscope. (C) Induction of GJA8E201K protein expression decreased the number of cells. Phase contrast photomicrographs from cells containing wild-type or mutant GJA8. GJA8WT (left panel) and GJA8E201K (right panel) cells were observed using a phase contrast microscope after transfection for wild-type and mutant GJA8 expression plasmids for 72 hours. Bar, 100 μm. (D) Graph shows the quantitation of these data as mean ± S.E.M. of the number of cells containing wild-type or mutant GJA8, respectively. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01 (n = 3). (E) Induction of GJA8E201K protein expression decreased the viability of cells by MTT assay. Cells were transfected with wild-type and mutant GJA8 vectors for 3 days and cell viability was tested using MTT assay.
We then examined the subcellular location of GJA8 wild-type and mutant protein. Subcellular localization was determined using C-terminal GFP fusion constructs of mutant and wild-type GJA8, followed by fluorescence microscopy. GFP as a control was located in the nucleus and cytoplasm and GJA8 WT was mainly detected in the plasma membrane (Fig. 4B). GJA8 E201K was aberrantly located in the cytoplasm, indicating that E201K mutation of GJA8 prevented its location in the plasma membrane.
To test directly whether expression of GJA8 mutation had a deleterious effect on cell growth or proliferation, we compared the effects of induced GJA8 WT and GJA8 E201K expression on cell numbers. As shown in Fig. 4C, a dramatic decrease in cell numbers was observed when comparing GJA8 E201K-transfected cells with GJA8 WT- transfected cells. Quantitation of these results revealed that the number of cells transfected with GJA8 E201K was only about 60% of that observed in cells transfected with GJA8 WT (Fig. 4D). Similarly, induction of GJA8 E201K expression dramatically reduced cell viability compared to GJA8 WT cells by MTT assay (Fig. 4E).
Discussion
In this study we identified a novel G>A mutation of GJA8 in a three-generation Chinese pedigree, which was associated with perinuclear opacities of the lens involving the nucleus. This mutation co-segregated with the phenotype and was not found in 100 unrelated control individuals.
Perinuclear cataracts affect the regions of the perinucleus, but the nucleus is clear. Perinuclear cataracts may occur in isolation or are associated with opacities involving other lens regions. However, genes associated with perinuclear cataract were not clearly identified. Mutations in GJA8 have been considered as cataractogenesis in humans. To date, 17 mutations in this gene have been identified to contribute to assorted phenotypic cataracts [29]. In this study, we identified a novel mutation, c.601G>A in GJA8, which was associated with perinuclear cataract in a Chinese family.
Our study showed that GJA8WT protein was mainly detected in the plasma membrane, whereas GJA8E201K was aberrantly located in the cytoplasm. GJA8 belong to the connexin gene family [17]. Each connexin includes cytoplasmic amino and carboxyl termini as well as four transmembrane domains linked by a single cytoplasmic loop and two extracellular domains, E1 and E2 [18], [19], which are thought to play a role in connexon docking and channel gating. E201K mutation of GJA8 located in the second extracellular domains and the 201st residue is quite near the transmembrane domain. The cytoplasmic location of GJA8E201K mutant protein may be explained by the proximity of the E201K residue to the fourth transmembrane domain of GJA8.
GJA8, an important component of gap junction channels, plays an important role in intercellular communication and transfer of molecules [20]. The lens is an avascular organ dependent on gap junction-mediated transportation of ion gradients and metabolic materials and intercellular communication for organ function and homeostasis [21]–[24]. In our study, we found that induction of GJA8E201K expression dramatically reduced cell viability and proliferation compared to GJA8WT cells. At the cellular level, GJA8E201K aberrant location may lead to capacity deficiency of GJA8E201K to form functional hemichannels, and trigger a complex sequence of events including loss of membrane potential, disruption of transmembrane ion gradients, and subsequent decreased metabolic activity, and finally decreased cell growth.
Our data showed that induction of GJA8 E201K expression for 72 hours led to a decrease in the number of cells and reduction of cell viability. Recent studies have shown that gap junctional coupling provided through wild-type GJA8 had been implicated in cell proliferation. Peter et al had showed that G46V mutation of GJA8 decreased the viability of cells obtaining GJA8 G46V protein. Our in-vitro over-expression of the GJA8 E201K mutation has a similar toxic effect on cell growth as reported for other GJA8 mutations [25]–[29], however we cannot exclude that in-vivo, the effect of the p.E201K mutation might be mediated by its mislocalization in the cytoplasm, being unable to contribute to the cell metabolism in the lens.
Acknowledgments
We thank the patients and their families for participation in this study. We are grateful to all the people who helped us successfully complete the research.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: DS XM. Performed the experiments: ZY LG HZ DE LZ. Analyzed the data: QL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ZY SZ. Wrote the paper: DS.
References
- 1. Francis PJ, Berry V, Bhattacharya SS, Moore AT (2000) The genetics of childhood cataract. J Med Genet 37: 481–8.
- 2. Francis PJ, Moore AT (2004) Genetics of childhood cataract. Curr Opin Ophthalmol15: 10–5.
- 3. Reddy MA, Francis PJ, Berry V, Bhattacharya SS, Moore AT (2004) Molecular genetic basis of inherited cataract and associated phenotypes. Surv Ophthalmol 49: 300–15.
- 4. Holmes JM, Leske DA, Burke JP, Hodge DO (2003) Birth prevalence of visually significant infantile cataract in a defined U.S. population. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. Apr 10(2): 67–74.
- 5. Zhang LY, Yam GH, Tam PO, Lai RY, Lam DS, et al. (2009) An αA-crystallin gene mutation, Arg12Cys, causing inherited cataract-microcornea exhibits an altered heat-shock response. Mol Vis 15: 1127–1138.
- 6. Zhang Q, Guo X, Xiao X, Yi J, Jia X, et al. (2004) Clinical description and genome wide linkage study of Y-sutural cataract and myopia in a Chinese family. Mol Vis10: 890–900.
- 7.
de Figueirêdo ES, de Vasconcellos JP, Arieta CE, de Melo MB (2011) Novel human CRYGD rare variant in a Brazilian family with congenital cataract. Mol Vis 17: p. 2207–11.
- 8. Hejtmancik JF (2008) Congenital cataracts and their molecular genetics. Semin Cell Dev Biol 19: 134–49.
- 9. Burdon KP, Wirth MG, Mackey DA, Russell-Eggitt IM, Craig JE, et al. (2004) Investigation of crystallin genes in familial cataract, and report of two disease associated mutations. Br J Ophthalmol 88: 79–83.
- 10. Vanita V, Hennies HC, Singh D, Nürnberg P, Sperling K, et al. (2006) A novel mutation in GJA8 associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract in a family of Indian origin. Mol Vis 12: 1217–22.
- 11. Boyadjiev SA, Justice CM, Eyaid W, McKusick VA, Lachman RS, et al. (2003) A novel dysmorphic syndrome with open calvarial sutures and sutural cataracts maps to chromosome 14q13-q21. Hum Genet 113: 1–9.
- 12. Zhu Y, Shentu X, Wang W, Li J, Jin C, et al. (2010) Chinese family with progressive childhood cataracts and IVS3+1G>A CRYBA3/A1 mutations. Mol Vis16: 2347–53.
- 13. Buch K, Peters T, Nawroth T, Sänger M, Schmidberger H, et al. (2012) Determination of cell survival after irradiation via clonogenic assay versus multiple MTT Assay–a comparative study. Radiat Oncol. Jan 3 7: 1.
- 14. Price P, McMillan TJ (1990) Use of the tetrazolium assay in measuring the response of human tumor cells to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res. Mar 1 50(5): 1392–6.
- 15. Bennett TM, Shiels A (2011) A recurrent missense mutation in GJA3 associated with autosomal dominant cataract linked to chromosome 13q. Mol Vis. 17: 2255–62.
- 16. Need AC, Shashi V, Hitomi Y, Schoch K, Shianna KV, et al. (2012) Clinical application of exome sequencing in undiagnosed genetic conditions. J Med Genet. Jun 49(6): 353–61.
- 17. Gerido DA, White TW (2004) Connexin disorders of the ear, skin, and lens. Biochim Biophys Acta 1662: 159–170.
- 18. Bruzzone R, White TW, Paul DL (1996) Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. Eur J Biochem 238: 1–27.
- 19. Harris AL (2001) Emerging issues of connexin channels: biophysics fills the gap. Q Rev Biophys 34: 325–472.
- 20. White TW, Bruzzone R, Goodenough DA, Paul DL (1992) Mouse Cx50, a functional member of the connexin family of gap junction proteins, is the lens fiber protein MP70. Mol Biol Cell 3: 711–720.
- 21. Francis P, Berry V, Bhattacharya S, Moore A (2000) Congenital progressive polymorphic cataract caused by a mutation in the major intrinsic protein of the lens, MIP (AQP0). Br J Ophthalmol 84(12): p.1376–9.
- 22. Willecke K, Eiberger J, Degen J, Eckardt D, Romualdi A, et al. (2002) Structural and functional diversity of connexin genes in the mouse and human genome. Biol Chem 383: 725–737.
- 23. Beahm DL, Hall JE (2002) Hemichannel and junctional properties of connexin 50. Biophys J 82: 2016–2031.
- 24. Klein BE, Howard KP, Sivakumaran TA, Klein R (2012) The relationship of cataract and cataract extraction to age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 119(8): 1628–33.
- 25. Minogue PJ, Tong JJ, Arora A, Russell-Eggitt I, Hunt DM, et al. (2009) A mutant connexin50 with enhanced hemichannel function leads to cell death. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Dec 50(12): 5837–45.
- 26. Tong JJ, Minogue PJ, Guo W, Chen TL, Beyer EC, et al. (2011) Different consequences of cataract-associated mutations at adjacent positions in the first extracellular boundary of connexin50. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. May 300(5): C1055–64.
- 27. Breitman ML, Clapoff S, Rossant J, Tsui LC, Glode LM, et al. (1987) Genetic ablation: targeted expression of a toxin gene causes microphthalmia in transgenic mice. Science 238: 1563–1565.
- 28. Landel CP, Zhao J, Bok D, Evans GA (1988) Lens-specific expression of recombinant ricin induces developmental defects in the eyes of transgenic mice. Genes Dev 2: 1168–1178.
- 29. Hu S, Wang B, Zhou Z, Zhou G, Wang J, et al. (2010) A novel mutation in GJA8 causing congenital cataract-microcornea syndrome in a Chinese pedigree. Mol Vis 16: 1585–1592.