Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Boundary Layer Flow Past a Stretching Surface in a Porous Medium Saturated by a Nanofluid: Brinkman-Forchheimer Model

Abstract

In this study, the steady forced convection flow and heat transfer due to an impermeable stretching surface in a porous medium saturated with a nanofluid are investigated numerically. The Brinkman-Forchheimer model is used for the momentum equations (porous medium), whereas, Bongiorno’s model is used for the nanofluid. Uniform temperature and nanofluid volume fraction are assumed at the surface. The boundary layer equations are transformed to ordinary differential equations in terms of the governing parameters including Prandtl and Lewis numbers, viscosity ratio, porous medium, Brownian motion and thermophoresis parameters. Numerical results for the velocity, temperature and concentration profiles, as well as for the reduced Nusselt and Sherwood numbers are obtained and presented graphically.

Introduction

Flow in porous media has been the subject of numerous investigations during the past several decades. The interest in this subject has been stimulated, to a large extent, by the fact that thermally driven flows in porous media have several applications in chemical and mechanical engineering, e.g. food processing and storage, geophysical systems, electro- chemistry, fibrous insulation, metallurgy, the design of pebble bed nuclear reactors, underground disposal of nuclear or non-nuclear waste, microelectronics cooling, etc. Detailed literature review can be found in the books by Pop and Ingham [1], Ingham and Pop [2], Nield and Bejan [3], Vafai [4], [5] and Vadasz [6]. One of the fundamental problems in porous media is the flow and heat transfer driven by a linearly stretching surface through a porous medium. It seems that the first study of the steady flows of a viscous incompressible fluid (non-porous media) driven by a linearly stretching surface through a quiescent fluid has been reported by Crane [7]. Further, Elbashbeshy and Bazid [8] studied flow and heat transfer in a porous medium over a stretching surface with internal heat generation and suction/blowing when the surface is held at a constant temperature. Cortell [9] has presented an analytical solution of the problem considered by Elbashbeshy and Bazid [8] considering the following two cases: (i) constant surface temperature (CST) and (ii) prescribed surface temperature (PST). Extension of these problems were further considered by Pantokratoras [10], Tamayol et al. [11], and Fang and Zhang [12]. Further, we notice that Kaviani [13] has investigated the effect of the solid matrix on the forced convection boundary layer flow and heat transfer from a semi-infinite flat plate embedded in a porous medium. Kaviani [13] transformed the governing equations and solved numerically.

Solid particles can be added in the base fluids of lower thermal conductivity to improve heat transfer. Such fluids were introduced by Choi [14] and are known as nanofluids. These fluids have higher thermal conductivity and thus give higher thermal performance. It was shown that metallic nanoparticles with high thermal conductivity increase the effective thermal conductivity of these fluids remarkably. Eastman et al. [15] showed that an increase in the thermal conductivity depends on the shape, size and thermal properties of the nanoparticles. Several studies have also been reported in the literature, which claim that the addition of nanoparticles in the base fluid may cause a considerable decrease in the heat transfer (Putra et al. [16], and Wen and Ding [17]). It is important to note that, in the numerical studies, the increase in the heat transfer depends on the existing models used to predict the properties of the nanofluids (Ho et al. [18] and Abu-Nada [19]). Buongiorno [20] found that the nanoparticle absolute velocity can be written as the sum of the base fluid velocity and the slip velocity. Several numerical and experimental studies on the heat transfer using nanofluids are available in the open literature, e.g. Khanafer et al. [21], Maiga et al. [22], Tiwari and Das [23], Oztop and Abu-Nada [24], Muthtamilselvan et al. [25], Ghasemi and Aminossadati [26], Popa et al. [27], etc. The book by Das et al. [28] and the review papers by Daungthongsuk and Wongwises [29], Wang and Mujumdar [30], [31], and Kakaç and Pramunjaroenkij [32] present excellent information on nanofluids.

Nield and Kuznetsov [33] revisited the Cheng and Minkowycz’s problem [34] for natural convective boundary layer flow over a vertical flat plate embedded in a porous medium filled with nanofluid. They employed Buongiorno [20] model and considered the combined effects of both heat and mass transfer. In an another paper, Kuznetsov and Nield [35] used the same Buongiorno’s [20] model and obtained numerical solution for the natural convective heat transfer of a nanofluid past a vertical flat plate. Later on, Khan and Pop [36], and Bachock et al. [37] used Buongiorno’s [20] nanofluid model and investigated the boundary-layer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching surface, while Ahmad and Pop [38] investigated the mixed convection boundary layer flow over a vertical flat plate embedded in a porous medium saturated with a nanofluid. They employed the model proposed by Tiwari and Das [23]. Therefore, the present investigation deals with the steady forced convection flow and heat transfer due to a stretching flat surface in a porous medium saturated with a nanofluid by considering the Brinkman-Forchheimer model (see Nield and Bejan, [3]) for the momentum equation and Bongiorno’s [20] model for the energy and nanofluid volume fraction equations. The paper uses, in fact, the idea of the paper by Kuznetsov and Nield [39] to the case of a stretching surface in a nanofluid. The boundary layer equations are transformed to ordinary differential equations in terms of the governing parameters including Prandtl and Lewis numbers, viscosity ratio, porous medium, Brownian motion and thermophoresis parameters. Numerical results for velocity, temperature and concentration profiles, as well as for the reduced Nusselt and Sherwood numbers are obtained and presented graphically for different values of the governing parameters. It is found that these parameters have substantial effects on the flow and heat transfer characteristics.

Basic Equations

Consider the steady boundary layer flow past a stretching surface in a porous medium filled with a nanofluid as shown in Fig. 1. It is assumed that the uniform temperature of the surface is and that of the nanofluid volume fraction is , while the uniform temperature and nanofluid volume fraction in the ambient fluid (inviscid flow) are and , respectively. It is also assumed that the plate is stretched with a linearly velocity , where is a positive constant. Further, it is assumed that the second-order inertial term in the Navier-Stokes equations is neglected (see Vafai and Tien [40]; Hong et al. [41], Laurial and Prasad [42], Nakayama [43], Nield and Bejan, pp. 16, [3]). The flow is assumed to be slow so that an advective term and a Forchheimer quadratic drag term do not appear in the momentum equations. Under these assumptions, the following five field equations embody the conservation of total mass, momentum (Brinkman-Forchheimer equations), and energy and nanofluid volume fraction equations for the nanofluid are considered as,

thumbnail
Figure 2. Dimensionless velocity, temperature and concentration profiles for a nanofluid.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047031.g002

thumbnail
Figure 3. Dimensionless velocity profiles for different values of the viscosity ratio and Porous medium parameters .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047031.g003

(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)where and are Cartesian coordinates along the stretching wall and normal to it, respectively, and are the velocity components along the and axes, is the pressure, is the temperature in the fluid phase, is the nanoparticle volume fraction, is the porosity, is the permeability of the porous medium, and are the density and dynamic viscosity of the fluid, respectively. Further, is the effective viscosity, is the heat capacity of the fluid, is the effective heat capacity of the nanoparticle material and is the effective thermal conductivities of the porous medium. A detailed discussion on can be found in Nield and Bejan [3]. The coefficients that appear in Eqs. (4) and (5) are the Brownian diffusion coefficient and the thermophoretic diffusion coefficient . Details of the derivation of Eqs. (4)–(7) are given in the papers by Buongiorno [20], Nield and Kuznetsov [33], Kuznetsov and Nield [39]. The boundary conditions of Eqs. (1)–(5) are

(6)We look for a similarity solution of Eqs. (1)–(4) of the following form.(7)where is the stream function which can be defined as and . Using (7), Eqs. (2)–(5) can be written as

(8)(9)(10)subject to the boundary conditions (6), which become

(11)Here primes denote differentiation with respect and the six parameters are defined as(12)where are the Prandtl and Lewis numbers, are the viscosity ratio and porous medium parameters, and and are the nanofluid parameters. It is important to note that this boundary value problem reduces to the classical problem of flow and heat and mass transfer due to a stretching surface in a viscous (regular) fluid when and in Eqs. (8)–(10). (The boundary value problem for then becomes ill-posed and is of no physical significance). It is worth pointing out that because this is a forced convection problem, Eq. (8) is decupled by Eqs. (9) and (10).

thumbnail
Figure 4. Effects of Prandtl number and the viscosity ratio on dimensionless temperature.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047031.g004

thumbnail
Figure 5. Effects of Prandtl numbers on dimensionless temperature for different values of the porous medium parameter .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047031.g005

The physical quantities of most interest are the local Nusselt number and the local Sherwood number , which are defined as(13)where and are the heat and mass fluxes from the surface of the sheet. After some algebra, we obtain(14)where is the local Reynolds number. Kuznetsov and Nield [35] referred and as the reduced Nusselt number and reduced Sherwood number , respectively.

We notice that for and Eqs. (8)–(10) with the boundary conditions (11) reduce to those derived by Khan and Pop [36] for a stretching sheet in a nanofluid. Further, for , Eq. (8) reduces to(14)along with the boundary conditions

(15)The analytical solution of this problem is given (see Cortell [9]) in the following form(16)

thumbnail
Figure 6. Effects of Lewis numbers on dimensionless concentration for different values of the porous medium parameter .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047031.g006

thumbnail
Figure 7. Effects of Lewis numbers on dimensionless concentration for different values of the viscosity ratio parameter .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047031.g007

Results and Discussion

Equations (8)–(10) with the boundary conditions (11) were solved numerically for different values of the governing parameters where and using an implicit finite-difference method as in Khan and Pop [36]. The boundary conditions in Eq. (11) at are replaced by a sufficiently large value . In this study, we get for all values of the governing parameters. The step size of is taken in all cases.

thumbnail
Figure 8. Variation of the reduced Nusselt number with Brownian motion and viscosity ratio parameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047031.g008

thumbnail
Figure 9. Variation of the reduced Nusselt number with Brownian motion and porous medium parameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047031.g009

The velocity, temperature and concentration profiles of a nanofluid for specific conditions are shown in Fig. 2. It is clear from the figure that the velocity converges quickly, whereas the temperature and concentration profiles behave in the same manner and converge together. The effects of the viscosity ratio and porous medium parameter on the velocity profiles are shown in Fig. 3. It is clear from figure that the dimensionless velocity increases and the rate of convergence decreases with an increase in the effective viscosity of the nanofluid. The dimensionless velocity also increases with the decrease in the porous medium parameter . As expected, the dimensionless velocity boundary layer thickness increases with an increase in the porous medium parameter and decrease in the viscosity ratio M.

thumbnail
Figure 10. Variation of the reduced Sherwood number with Brownian motion and porous medium parameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047031.g010

thumbnail
Figure 11. Variation of the reduced Sherwood number with Brownian motion and the viscosity ratio parameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047031.g011

Figures 4 and 5 show the effects of Prandtl numbers on temperature profiles for different values of the viscosity ratio and the porous medium parameter respectively. The other governing parameters like are kept constant. As expected, the thermal boundary layer thickness increases with the decrease in Prandtl number in both figures. Figure 4 shows that the dimensionless temperature increases with the decrease in the viscosity ratio , whereas, Fig. 5 shows that the dimensionless temperature increases with the increase in the porous medium parameter . This is actually due to the decrease in the effective viscosity of the nanofluid and the permeability of the porous medium.

The effects of the Lewis number on concentration profiles for different values of the porous medium parameter and the viscosity ratio are shown in Figs. 6 and 7 respectively. It can be seen that the concentration boundary layer thickness increases with an increase in the Lewis number. This is due to the fact that the decrease in the Brownian diffusion coefficient causes an increase in the concentration. Figure 6 shows that the dimensionless concentration increases with an increase in the porous medium parameter . The dimensionless concentration is maximum at the stretching surface and converges quickly for larger values of the Lewis number and porous medium parameter. The dimensionless concentration also converges quickly for larger values of viscosity ratio parameter , as shown in Fig. 7.

The variation of the reduced Nusselt number with nanofluid parameters for several values of the viscosity ratio parameter and the porous medium parameter is shown in Figs. 8 and 9 respectively. It can be seen that the reduced Nusselt number decreases with an increase in the Brownian motion and thermophoresis parameters. For the fixed value of the porous medium parameter , the reduced Nusselt number increases with an increase the viscosity ratio parameter , as shown in Fig. 8, whereas the reduced Nusselt number decreases with an increase in the porous medium parameter . This is shown in Fig. 9 for the fixed value of the viscosity ratio parameter .

Figures 10 and 11 show the variation of the reduced Sherwood number with nanofluid parameters for several values of the porous medium and the viscosity ratios parameters respectively. Like the reduced Nusselt numbers, the reduced Sherwood numbers also decrease with an increase in the Brownian motion and thermophoresis parameters. For smaller values of the Brownian motion and thermophoresis parameters, the change in the reduced Sherwood numbers is smaller but it increase quickly with an increase in and , as shown in Fig. 10 for the fixed value of the Lewis number. It also shows that the reduced Sherwood number decreases with an increase in the porous medium parameter . Finally, Fig. 11 shows the effect of the viscosity ratio parameter on the reduced Sherwood number for the fixed value of Lewis number. The reduced Sherwood number increases with the viscosity ratio parameter .

Conclusions

In this study, the steady forced flow and heat transfer due to an impermeable stretching surface in a porous medium saturated with a nanofluid are investigated numerically by using an implicit finite difference method. The effects of the viscosity ratio and porous medium parameter on the dimensionless velocity, temperature and concentration profiles as well as on the reduced Nusselt and Sherwood numbers are presented graphically.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WAK IP. Analyzed the data: WAK IP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WAK IP. Wrote the paper: WAK IP. Solved the problem: WAK. Obtained the results: WAK. Formulated the problem: IP. Write up: IP.

References

  1. 1. Pop I, Ingham DB (2001) Convective Heat Transfer. Mathematical and Computational Modeling of Viscous Fluids and Porous Media Pergamon, Oxford.
  2. 2. Ingham DB, Pop I (eds.) (2005) Transport Phenomena in Porous Media III. Elsevier, Oxford.
  3. 3. Nield DA, Bejan A (2006) Convection in Porous Media (3rd ed.). Springer New York.
  4. 4. Vafai K (2005) Handbook of Porous Media (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis, New York.
  5. 5. Vafai K (2010) Porous Media: Applications in Biological Systems and Biotechnology. CRC Press.
  6. 6. Vadasz P (2008) Emerging Topics in Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media. Springer, New York.
  7. 7. Crane LJ (1970) Flow past a stretching plate. J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP) 21: 645–647.
  8. 8. Elbashbeshy EMA, Bazid MAA (2004) Heat transfer in a porous medium over a stretching surface with internal heat generation and suction or injection. Appl. Math. Comp. 158: 799–807.
  9. 9. Cortell R (2005) Flow and heat transfer of a fluid through a porous medium over a stretching surface with internal heat generation/absorption and suction/blowing. Fluid Dyn Res 37: 231–245.
  10. 10. Pantokratoras A (2009) Flow adjacent to a stretching permeable sheet in a Darcy-Brinkman porous medium. Transp. Porous Med. 80: 223–227.
  11. 11. Tamayol A, Hooman K, Bahrami M (2010) Thermal analysis of flow in a porous medium over a permeable stretching wall. Transp. Porous Med. 85: 661–676.
  12. 12. Fang T, Zhang J (2011) Note on the heat transfer of flows over a stretching wall in porous media: exact solutions. Transp. Porous Med. 86: 579–584.
  13. 13. Kaviany M (1987) Boundary-layer treatment of forced convection heat transfer from a semi-infinite flat plate embedded in porous media. ASME J. Heat Transfer 109: 345–349.
  14. 14. Choi SUS (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. Proc. 1995 ASME Int. Mech. Engng. Congress and Exposition 66 (1995), San Franciscos, USA, ASME, FED 231/MD, 99–105.
  15. 15. Eastman JA, Choi SUS, Li S, Yu W, Thompson LJ (2001) Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol- based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Applied Physics Letter 78: 718–720.
  16. 16. Putra N, Roetzel W, Das SK (2003) Natural convection of nanofluids. Heat Mass Transfer 39: 775–784.
  17. 17. Wen D, Ding Y (2005) Formulation of nanofluids for natural convective heat transfer applications. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 26: 855–864.
  18. 18. Ho CJ, Chen MW, Li ZW (2008) Numerical simulation of natural convection of nanofluid in a square enclosure: effects due to uncertainties of viscosity and thermal conductivity. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 51: 4506–4516.
  19. 19. Abu-Nada E (2009) Effects of variable viscosity and thermal conductivity of Al2O3–water nanofluid on heat transfer enhancement in natural convection. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 30: 679–690.
  20. 20. Buongiorno J (2006) Convective transport in nanofluids. ASME J. Heat Transfer 128: 240–250.
  21. 21. Khanafer K, Vafai K, Lightstone M (2003) Buoyancy-driven heat transfer enhancement in a two-dimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 46: 3639–3653.
  22. 22. Maïga SEB, Nguyen CT, Galanis N, Roy G (2004) Heat transfer behaviours of nanofluids in a uniformly heated tube. Superlattices & Microstructures 35: 543–557.
  23. 23. Tiwari RK, Das MK (2007) Heat transfer augmentation in a two-sided lid-driven differentially heated square cavity utilizing nanofluids. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 50: 2002–2018.
  24. 24. Oztop HF, Abu-Nada E (2008) Numerical study of natural convection in partially heated rectangular enclosures filled with nanofluids. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 29: 1326–1336.
  25. 25. Muthtamilselvan M, Kandaswamy P, Lee J (2010) Heat transfer enhancement of copper-water nanofluids in a lid-driven enclosure. Comm. Nonlinear. Sci. Numer. Simulat. 15: 1501–1510.
  26. 26. Ghasemi B, Aminossadati SM (2010) Mixed convection in a lid-driven triangular enclosure filled with nanofluids. Int. Comm. Heat Mass Transfer 37: 1142–1148.
  27. 27. Popa CV, Fohanno S, Nguyen CT, Polidori G (2010) On heat transfer in external natural convection flows using two nanofluids. Int. J. Thermal Sci. 49: 901–908.
  28. 28. Das SK, Choi SUS, Yu W, Pradet T (2007) Nanofluids: Science and Technology. Wiley, New Jersey.
  29. 29. Daungthongsuk W, Wongwises S (2007) A critical review of convective heat transfer nanofluids. Renew. Sust. Eng. Rev. 11: 797–817.
  30. 30. Wang XQ, Mujumdar AS (2008) A review on nanofluids – Part I: theoretical and numerical investigations. Brazilian J. Chem. Engng. 25: 613–630.
  31. 31. Wang XQ, Mujumdar AS (2008) A review on nanofluids – Part II: experiments and applications. Brazilian J. Chem. Engng. 25: 631–648.
  32. 32. Kakaç S, Pramuanjaroenkij A (2009) Review of convective heat transfer enhancement with nanofluids. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 52: 3187–3196.
  33. 33. Nield DA, Kuznetsov AV (2009) The Cheng–Minkowycz problem for natural convective boundary-layer flow in a porous medium saturated by a nanofluid. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 52: 5792–5795.
  34. 34. Cheng P, Minkowycz WJ (1977) Free convection about a vertical flat plate embedded in a porous medium with application to heat transfer from a dike. J. Geophys. Res. 82: 2040–2044.
  35. 35. Kuznetsov AV, Nield DA (2010) Natural convective boundary-layer flow of a nanofluid past a vertical plate. Int. J. Thermal Sci. 49: 243–247.
  36. 36. Khan WA, Pop I (2010) Boundary-layer flow of a nanofluid past a stretching sheet. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 53: 2477–2483.
  37. 37. Bachok N, Ishak A, Pop I (2010) Boundary-layer flow of nanofluids over a moving surface in a flowing fluid, Int. J. Thermal Sci. 49: 1663–1668.
  38. 38. Ahmad S, Pop I (2010) Mixed convection boundary layer flow from a vertical flat plate embedded in a porous medium filled with nanofluids. Int. Comm. Heat Mass Transfer 37: 987–991.
  39. 39. Kuznetsov AV, Nield DA (2010) Thermal instability in a porous medium layer saturated by a nanofluid: Brinkman model. Transp. Porous Med. 81: 409–422 (2010)..
  40. 40. Vafai K, Tien CL (1981) Boundary and inertia effects on flow and heat transfer in porous media. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 24: 195–203.
  41. 41. Hong JT, Yamada Y, Tien CL (1987) Effects of non-Darcian and nonuniform porosity on vertical-plate natural convection in porous media. ASME J. Heat Transfer 109: 356–362.
  42. 42. Lauriat G, Prasad V (1987) Natural convection in a vertical porous cavity: a numerical study for Brinkman-extended Darcy formulation. ASME J. Heat Transfer 109: 688–696.
  43. 43. Nakayama A (1995) PC-Aided Numerical Heat Transfer and Convective Flow. CRC Press, Tokyo.