Figures
Abstract
Reproductive meristems and embryos display dormancy mechanisms in specialized structures named respectively buds and seeds that arrest the growth of perennial plants until environmental conditions are optimal for survival. Dormancy shows common physiological features in buds and seeds. A genotype-specific period of chilling is usually required to release dormancy by molecular mechanisms that are still poorly understood. In order to find common transcriptional pathways associated to dormancy release, we analyzed the chilling-dependent expression in embryos of certain genes that were previously found related to dormancy in flower buds of peach. We propose the presence of short and long-term dormancy events affecting respectively the germination rate and seedling development by independent mechanisms. Short periods of chilling seem to improve germination in an abscisic acid-dependent manner, whereas the positive effect of longer cold treatments on physiological dwarfing coincides with the accumulation of phenylpropanoids in the seed.
Citation: Leida C, Conejero A, Arbona V, Gómez-Cadenas A, Llácer G, Badenes ML, et al. (2012) Chilling-Dependent Release of Seed and Bud Dormancy in Peach Associates to Common Changes in Gene Expression. PLoS ONE 7(5): e35777. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035777
Editor: Randall P. Niedz, United States Department of Agriculture, United States of America
Received: November 24, 2011; Accepted: March 21, 2012; Published: May 10, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Leida et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by the Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)-FEDER (grant no. RTA2007-00060), and the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain (grant no. AGL2010-20595). CL was funded by a fellowship from IVIA (Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Perennial plants protect important and delicate tissues as reproductive meristems and embryos in specialized structures respectively designated buds and seeds. Growth of bud and embryo meristems leading respectively to blooming and germination is strictly regulated by dormancy mechanisms, which impose a physiological constraint to this growth until environmental conditions are optimal for long-term survival [1]–[5]. Dormancy is released in different species by post-harvest storage of seeds (after-ripening), moist chilling of seeds (stratification) or a prolonged period of chilling in buds. In stone-fruit species, a high correlation between the chilling requirements for seed and bud dormancy release has been observed [6], [7], which suggests the presence of common regulatory mechanisms. Insufficient cold stratification of seeds in peach (Prunus persica), almond (Prunus dulcis), and other rosaceous plants may cause, in addition to low germination rates, a shoot development abnormality called physiological dwarfing [8]. Physiological dwarfs are characterized by a temperature-dependent rosette-type habit of growth, with short internodes, and deformed leaves [9].
Seed dormancy has been observed throughout higher plants with physiological and morphological particularities in different species [10]. In most popular model organisms, physiological dormancy integrates contributions from the embryo and the seed coat, being the coat component at least partially due to the mechanical resistance to breakage of endosperm and testa layers [11]. The ratio of the hormones abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellins (GA) is considered a relevant factor regulating seed dormancy processes. Several genetic approaches utilizing mostly mutant and transgenic lines of Arabidopsis thaliana and Solanaceae species have established that ABA is involved in induction and maintenance of dormancy, whereas GAs release dormancy and promote germination [12]. Other hormones including ethylene, brassinosteroids, auxin and cytokinins have been also proposed to affect dormancy and germination. The molecular factors and pathways conditioning seed dormancy status have been enumerated in several recent reviews [13]–[16]. Early studies showed that the orthologous B3 class transcription factors encoded by VIVIPAROUS 1 (VP1) in maize and ABA-INSENSITIVE 3 (ABI3) in A. thaliana are involved in seed development and dormancy [17], [18]. The basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor encoded by ABA-INSENSITIVE 5 (ABI5) interacts with ABI3 and mediates its effect on the expression of ABA responding genes thought the ABA-response element ABRE [19], [20].
Bud dormancy in perennial plants resembles seed dormancy at the hormonal level [21]. The involvement of ABA in bud dormancy events is suggested by multiple physiological and transcriptomic studies [22]–[26], though few genetic approaches support this statement [27], [28]. The DORMANCY ASSOCIATED MADS-box (DAM) group of transcription factors related to SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP) of A. thaliana, have been proposed to regulate bud dormancy processes in peach [29], leafy spurge [30] and Japanese apricot [31]. DAM gene expression correlates with the dormancy state of buds, with higher transcript accumulation during the cold season followed by chilling-dependent down-regulation prior to dormancy release [30], [32], [33]. Different transcriptomic approaches have been conducted in order to identify DAM-like and other genes related to dormancy at the expression level [27], [34]–[41].
In order to find common molecular features between seed and bud dormancy processes, we investigated the expression of DAM and other bud dormancy-associated genes, involved in transcriptional regulation, ABA response and metabolism, and desiccation tolerance, during the stratification of seeds in peach. The elucidation of general regulation pathways in both seed and bud structures may contribute to improve our basic knowledge on dormancy mechanisms, and be employed in plant breeding projects that profit from an early prediction of chilling requirements for blooming of new genotypes.
Results
Effect of Stratification on Seed Germination and Seedling Development in Peach
An in vitro culture experiment was performed in order to characterize the response of peach embryos to different periods of cold stratification. The early variables germination rate, defined as the rate of embryos showing an at least 2-mm long radicle, and shoot emergence were measured after 0, 1, 3, 7 and 9 weeks of chilling treatment. After few days, the germination rate was nearly identical and total in embryos with periods of cold stratification of one week or longer, whereas non-stratified embryos showed a lower rate of about 80% (Figure 1A). The stratification also improved shoot growth. Embryos with three weeks and longer periods of chilling showed a significantly higher percentage of shoot emergence than one-week and non-stratified samples from the first growth measurements, whereas shoot emergence in embryos stratified for one week was higher than in untreated samples at 14 days and longer growing times (Figure 1B).
The germination rate (A) and percentage of shoot emergence (B) were measured at different times after discrete periods of stratification: one week (black squares), three weeks (black triangles), seven weeks (white circles), nine weeks (white squares) and no stratification (black circles). Samples having non-overlapping binomial confidence intervals (95%) with the untreated sample are labelled with an asterisk.
In addition to these early observations on germination and shoot emergence, germinated embryos showed long-term effects of chilling on seedling development. At the end of the in vitro experiment, seedlings with 0–1 weeks of stratification were small and not viable in most cases, whereas those with 3–9 weeks of chilling were larger with variable rates of physiological abnormalities, such as dwarfing (Figure 2A). The height of seedlings grown in vitro was significantly improved by the cold treatment, with optimal values in plants stratified for 7 and 9 weeks (Figure 2B). The rate of dwarfed individuals was also lower after 7 and 9 weeks of stratification (Figure 2C). A qualitative classification of physiological dwarfs attending to the height of the plant, the presence of rosettes and the size and form of leaves was performed, which served to assign dwarfing values from 1 (those dwarfs more similar to normal plants) to 4 (those with deeper symptoms) (Figure 2D). According to this classification, we found that chilling reduced the qualitative dwarfing level in a similar way to the dwarfing rate (Figure 2E). Plants stratified for 7 and 9 weeks grew actively during a time interval of three weeks, while those stratified for 3 weeks hardly increased their average height during the same period (Figure 2F). Interestingly, plants stratified for 7 and 9 weeks also reduced their rate of dwarfing in this time interval, due to an overall recovery of growth by the appearance of lateral shoots with normal development (Figure 2G).
(A) Representative plants subject to different stratification periods were photographed at the end of the in vitro experiment. (B) Average height of seedlings after seven weeks in growth chamber. (C) Percentage of dwarfed plants after seven weeks in growth chamber. (D) Representative seedlings showing different qualitative levels of dwarfism: level 1 individuals were slightly shorter than normal ones and had both normal and curved leaves; level 2 seedlings had shorter internodes and mostly abnormal leaves; level 3 dwarfism led to small deformed leaves grouped in a rosette-like structure; and finally level 4 dwarfs had a drastic reduction of growth and barely recognizable leaves. (E) Average qualitative dwarfing of seedlings grown for seven weeks. The height (F) and rate of dwarfing (G) of seedlings obtained from embryos stratified for three (black triangles), seven (white circles) and nine weeks (white squares), were measured at different times. In (B) and (E), error bars represent standard deviation, n>35. Non-overlapping letters (a-d) indicate significant difference within (F) or between different stratification treatments (B,E), based on ANOVA analysis and Multiple Range Tests procedure with a confidence level of 95%. Asterisks indicate non-overlapping binomial confidence intervals (95%) with non-stratified samples (C) or samples stratified for 3 weeks (G).
Regulation of Gene Expression in Stratified Seeds
Previous transcriptomic approaches performed in our group, based on transcript enrichment by suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) and cDNA microarray hybridization, led to a set of genes differentially expressed during bud dormancy release in peach [26], [41]. We selected several of these genes, previously validated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR on buds, for its expression analysis in peach embryos subject to the stratification treatments described above. The genes DAM1, DAM4, DAM5 and DAM6 are components of the DAM multigene family coding for MADS-box transcription factors involved in bud dormancy regulation in peach and other species. The expression of DAM genes was fairly detectable by quantitative real-time RT-PCR in peach seeds, in contrast with the lack of detectable DAM expression by northern analysis reported in leafy spurge seeds [30]. DAM1 and DAM6 reduced gradually and significantly their expression during the chilling treatment to reach their lowest values in 7 and 9 weeks samples (Figure 3). However, DAM4 and DAM5 transcripts were accumulated during the first week under stratification and subsequently reduced at longer time samples.
Relative expression of bud-dormancy related genes was determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR with specific primers (Table S1). The name of the gene or transcript model is shown in the upper side of the graph. Expression levels are relative to Actin. An expression value of one is assigned to the non-stratified sample. Data are means from two biological samples with 2–3 technical replicates each, with error bars representing standard deviation. Non-overlapping letters (a–d) indicate significant difference between different stratification treatments, based on ANOVA analysis and Multiple Range Tests procedure with a confidence level of 95%.
We assayed other genes down-regulated during bud dormancy release, related to elements of the ABA and drought stress response in A. thaliana [26]. The genes coding for STRESS ASSOCIATED PROTEIN (SAP)-like (peach transcript model ppa012373m), AWPM19-like (ppa012188m), DEHYDRATION-RESPONSIVE ELEMENT BINDING PROTEIN2 (DREB2)-like (ppa007606m), and LATE EMBRYOGENESIS ABUNDANT (LEA) protein (ppa008651m) reduced drastically their expression in stratified embryos (Figure 3), as previously observed in peach buds subject to environmental chilling. The ABA-INSENSITIVE FIVE BINDING PROTEIN (AFP)-like gene showed an early down-regulation in the first chilling week, followed by a slow recovery to reach initial expression values. Most of genes investigated with a higher expression in buds after dormancy release had a negligible expression in embryos, but ppa008548m coding for a putative cinnamoyl-CoA reductase showed detectable expression after 7 and 9 weeks of stratification.
We analyzed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR two additional transcripts that were not previously identified in our transcriptomic experiments, but were considered putative candidates to affect dormancy responses in seeds and buds. The ABA-INSENSITIVE 3 (ABI3)-like transcript (ppa001608m) strongly declined during the first three weeks of chilling, whereas FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)-like (ppa012320m) had higher expression values in last stratification stages (Figure 3).
ABA Content Rapidly Decreases During Stratification
The ABA content in stratified embryos decreased from about 140 ng per gram (fresh weight) to less than 10 ng after one week of chilling. The hormone content did not change significantly after longer chilling treatments (Figure 4A). No genes have been described in peach related to ABA degradation, but protein similarity searches led to the identification of ppa005020m and ppa005059m, highly similar to ABA 8′-hydroxylase genes CYP707A2 from A. thaliana and CYP707A1 from Prunus avium respectively [42], [43]; and ppa004957m and ppa025943m, similar to ABA glucosyltransferase gene UGT71B6 from A. thaliana [44]. An expression analysis of these genes revealed that ppa005020m, ppa004957m and ppa025943m were significantly up-regulated during one-week stratification (Figure 4B), and thus one or more of them could account for the observed decrease of ABA in the embryo.
(A) ABA content in the embryo was determined as detailed in Materials and Methods. (B) Relative gene expression by quantitative real-time RT-PCR of peach genes coding for putative ABA degrading enzymes, as ABA 8′-hydroxylase and ABA glucosyltransferase (GTase), based on protein similarity to known enzymes in other species. Expression levels are relative to Actin. Data are means from three biological replicates (A) or two biological samples with 2–3 technical replicates each (B), with error bars representing standard deviation. The significant difference between treatments, using ANOVA and Multiple Range Tests with a confidence level of 95%, is indicated by different letters (a-d).
In order to identify cis-regulatory elements responding to ABA and drought stress in the genes analyzed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR, we examined 1 kb sequence of their promoters beginning from the transcription start when known, otherwise the translation start ATG was used. We performed a search of ABA-responsive elements (ABRE), C-repeat/dehydration-responsive elements (CRT/DRE), and RY repeats as described in Materials and Methods. Genes repressed by chilling treatment had at least one of these three elements in their promoters with the exception of DAM1 gene, and four of them had the three elements (Figure 5). We did not find any of these regulatory sequences in the promoter of the ppa008548m gene induced by cold stratification.
The ABA-response element (ABRE, white rectangles), C-repeat/dehydration-responsive element (CRT/DRE, black rectangles), and seed-specific RY repeats (white circles) were localized in the 1-kb upstream sequence from the transcriptional start site when known, and from the translation start (in ppa006974m and ppa008548m), of chilling affected genes, as described in Materials and Methods.
Phenylpropanoid Metabolites Accumulate During Prolonged Cold Treatment
A systematic analysis of metabolites was performed in stratified embryos. We found several intermediate metabolites of the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway accumulating in embryos stratified for 7 and 9 weeks. Phenylpropanoids are compounds synthesized from the amino acid phenylalanine that lead to the lignin precursors monolignols through the activity of cinnamoyl CoA reductase and other enzymes. Interestingly ppa008548m gene, coding for a cinnamoyl CoA reductase-like, was also found expressed in 7 and 9 weeks samples after quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis (Figure 3), which suggested a link between both data. Among these phenylpropanoids, the ferulic acid approximately doubled its initial content during long chilling treatments (Figure 6). Over-accumulation of other compounds from this pathway was even more pronounced. Caffeic, coumaric and cinnamic acids increased respectively 40-fold, 100-fold and 4-fold after a stratification period of 7 weeks, followed by a slight decrease two weeks later. Interestingly, the hormone salicylic acid increased its content during the chilling treatment in a similar way to phenylpropanoid metabolites (Figure 6). However, the addition of salicylic acid to the culture medium at different concentrations did not ameliorate the germination or physiological dwarfing defects observed in peach seeds (data not shown).
Ferulic, caffeic, coumaric and cinnamic acids, and the phytohormone salicylic acid were determined in embryos after different chilling treatments. Data are means from three biological replicates, with error bars representing standard deviation. Different letters (a-c) indicate significant difference between treatments, based on ANOVA and Multiple Range Tests with a confidence level of 95%.
Discussion
Stratification has Short and Long-term Effects on Peach Germination and Development
Short chilling treatments of one and three weeks were sufficient for optimal germination and shoot emergence, respectively. These chilling requirements for radicle and shoot growth were lower than those reported by other physiological studies [45], [46], which may be due to genotype-based differences or most likely to previous removal of the seed coat in our samples. Coat excision helped to discard the mechanical and physiological contribution of the coat to seed dormancy, which in consequence was exclusively dependent on the embryo component. This experimental procedure was essential to distinguish the observed effects of cold stratification on both, seed germination and seedling dwarfing. Thus, in addition to early benefits of chilling on germination and shoot emergence, longer chilling treatments of seven and nine weeks reduced the physiological dwarfing of seedlings. This double effect of stratification on germination and subsequent development of seedlings has been noted previously in stone-fruit species [8], [47], but no molecular mechanisms have been proposed to explain it. The improved germination ratio observed after one week of chilling was associated to a drastic reduction in ABA content, in close agreement with the known role of this hormone in the induction and maintenance of dormancy in seeds. However, the alleviation of dwarfing at long chilling treatments was not related to changes in ABA, which precludes a function of ABA in this seedling developmental abnormality. The peach genes ppa005020m, ppa004957m and ppa025943m, coding respectively for an ABA 8′-hydroxylase-like and two ABA glucosyltransferase-like genes were induced by stratification, which suggests that one or more of them could be involved in ABA removal and consequently modulate embryo dormancy.
Other investigated compounds, as salicylic acid and the phenylpropanoids ferulic, caffeic, coumaric and cinnamic acids, followed a modification pattern opposite to ABA. They accumulated in embryos stratified for seven to nine weeks, coinciding with a lower rate of seedling dwarfing. Overproduction of these compounds could benefit the normal development of seedlings or simply be a biochemical feature of dormancy-released embryos prepared to develop normally, however we have not obtained experimental evidences supporting any of these hypotheses. The phenylpropanoids pathway results in the synthesis of the monolignols p-coumaryl, coniferyl and sinapyl alcohols, which are the main precursors of lignin polymers, through the sequential activity of cinnamoyl CoA reductase (CCR) and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) enzymes [48]. Lignin deposition contributes to the secondary thickening of the cell wall, and takes part in xylem cell differentiation. The synthesis of this complex polymer becomes detectable in early stages of seedling development in A. thaliana, associated to the developing vasculature [49]. Interestingly, a triple A. thaliana null mutant in one CCR and two CAD genes, leading to a strong reduction in lignin deposition, displayed a severe dwarf phenotype and abnormal leaf morphology [50], resembling the symptoms of physiological dwarfing described in this work. These observations and the high-chilling dependent induction of ppa008548m in stratified embryos (Figure 3), coding for a predicted protein similar to CCR, suggest the participation of phenylpropanoids and lignin biosynthesis pathways in the alleviation of anomalies associated to physiological dwarfing.
Bud and Seed Dormancy Regulate a Common Set of Genes
The quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis of genes previously related to bud dormancy revealed a parallel pattern of gene expression in buds and embryos. Several genes down-regulated during bud dormancy release after the fulfilment of cultivar-specific chilling requirements were also repressed by cold stratification in embryos. This suggests the presence of common regulatory pathways in dormancy release mechanisms of buds and seeds, although it might also be due to the effect of common environmental factors acting on the expression of certain genes without any regulatory role in dormancy release. The in silico search of known homologous genes in other species and cis-elements in their promoters pointed to a common effect of ABA and drought signalling on such genes. However ABA could only account for transcript accumulation changes observed during the first week of chilling, due to the stabilization of ABA content after this time. Consequently, later down-regulation of the expression of these genes should be assigned to additional regulatory pathways. Drought and cold share common regulatory mechanisms through the CRT/DRE elements; thus imbibition and chilling of seeds caused by the stratification treatment could exert contradictory effects on the expression of genes showing this element. The intensity and the time response of drought and cold signals could be different and consequently affect differently to gene expression values measured in this work.
DAM genes are particularly interesting among this set of genes. DAM have been related to bud dormancy maintenance by expression and functional studies in multiple species, and are considered the major known regulators of this process [26], [29], [30]–[33], [38]. The fact that DAM1, DAM5 and DAM6 are also significantly repressed during chilling treatment of the embryo suggests their participation in mechanisms of transcriptional regulation associated to release of seed dormancy by stratification, but additional experimental evidences are required to confirm it. Recently, DAM5 and DAM6 genes have been found modified by long genomic insertions into their first intron in the peach ‘Okinawa’, a low chilling rootstock showing lower DAM5 and DAM6 expression in buds [51]. Interestingly, ‘Okinawa’ seeds also had a positive germination response to stratification periods at 7°C [52].
Previous molecular studies relating seed germination and flowering in A. thaliana have been recently published. The FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) gene coding for a MADS box transcription factor involved in flowering time regulation through the vernalization pathway, also affected the temperature-dependent germination of dormant seeds [53]. The effect of FLC on seed germination was most likely mediated by FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), which has also been shown to play a role in meristem growth and possibly dormancy per se [54]–[56], and which appears to be regulated by DAM genes [30], [31]. Interestingly, a peach gene similar to FT increased its expression after stratification during 7–9 weeks (Figure 3), which points to the presence of a related signalling pathway in peach. The RNA Polymerase II Associated Factor 1 Complex (PAF1C) of A. thaliana has been also proposed to have a dual role in flowering and seed dormancy [57]. Moreover, a poplar orthologue of ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 3 (ABI3) gene, involved in the ABA-dependent expression of many seed-specific genes in A. thaliana, is expressed in buds during bud set and causes some alterations in bud development when overexpressed and silenced [22].
The transcriptional similarities between bud and seed dormancy highlighted in this work may also be relevant for plant breeding purposes. The selection of early and late flowering genotypes from a segregating population usually requires the arduous evaluation of large collections of individuals, which could be improved by a previous selection of the desirable trait at the seed level. Previous studies found a positive correlation between the chilling requirements for seed germination and blooming in almond and apple [58], [59]. This work contributes to characterize the molecular bases underlying these and other physiological observations with high interest to plant breeders.
Materials and Methods
Plant Material and in vitro Culture
The Prunus persica L. Batsch cv ‘Big Top’ was grown in an orchard located at the Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA) in Moncada (Spain) under standard agricultural practices. Mature fruits were collected and immediately broken to eliminate the endocarp with special scissors. Seeds were disinfected and flamed with alcohol, and then the coats were removed under sterile conditions. Embryos were cultured in a sterile Woody Plant Medium [60], solidified with 0,8% Bacteriological Agar and distributed in 20 ml aliquots into 25×150 mm culture tubes. Chilling treatment or stratification was performed by storing the tubes at 4°C in continuous darkness for 0, 1, 3, 7 or 9 weeks. After the stratification period, 8–10 embryos were frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C for RNA extraction and RT-PCR, and 48 embryos (tubes) were placed in a culture chamber at 24°C. The embryos were maintained in darkness during the first week and then in 16 hours light-photoperiod conditions for the rest of the development. The germination and shoot emergence rates, height of seedlings, and dwarfing phenotype were noted once per week.
Quantitative Real-time RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from 100 mg of seeds deprived of their coats using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), but adding 1% (w:v) polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP-40) to the extraction buffer before use. From 8 to 10 individuals were pooled for each treatment. We performed two RNA extractions per sample, which were treated independently until cDNA synthesis, constituting two biological replicates. One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed with SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in a total volume of 20 µl. Two microliter of a 40X diluted first-strand cDNA were used for PCR reactions in a final volume of 20 µl. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), using Perfecta SYBR Green SuperMix ROX (Quanta Biosciences, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Primer pairs are listed in Table S1. Cycling protocol consisted of 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C for denaturation, and 1 min at 60°C for annealing and extension. Specificity of the PCR reaction was assessed by the presence of a single peak in the dissociation curve after the amplification and through size estimation of the amplified product by agarose electrophoresis. We used as reference a peach Actin transcript amplified with specific primers. Relative expression was measured by the relative standard curve procedure. Results were the average of two independent biological replicates with 2–3 technical replicates each.
Plant Hormone and Metabolite Analyses
Plant hormones and phenolics were analyzed by LC/ESI-MS-MS essentially as described [61]. Briefly, fresh frozen plant material was extracted in ultrapure water using a tissue homogenizer (Ultra-Turrax, Ika-Werke, Staufen, Germany) after addition of 50 µl of a mixture of internal standards (see [61] for further details). After extraction and centrifugation, pH of the supernatant was adjusted to 3.0 and partitioned twice against di-ethyl-ether (Panreac, Barcelona, Spain). The organic layers were combined and evaporated in a centrifuge vacuum evaporator (Jouan, Saint-Herblain, France). The dry residue was thereafter resuspended in a water:methanol (9∶1) solution, filtered and injected in a HPLC system (Alliance 2695, Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). Analytes were then separated in reversed-phase Kromasil 100 C18 column (100×2.1 mm, 5 µm particle size, Scharlab, Barcelona, Spain) using methanol and 0.01% acetic acid in water as solvents at a flow rate of 300 µl min–1. The mass spectrometer, a triple quadrupole (Quattro LC, Micromass Ltd., Manchester, UK) was operated in negative ionization electrospray mode using N2 as nebulization and desolvation gas and set at 100 and 800 l h-1, respectively. During measurements, capillary voltage was set at 3.5 kV whereas cone voltage was adjusted for every analyte. The precursor and product ions as well as cone and collision voltages were selected after direct injection of pure commercial standards into the mass spectrometer.
Statistical Analysis
Significant changes of height, level of qualitative dwarfing, metabolite content and gene expression between different stratification treatments or growth times were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVI software (StatPoint Technologies, Warrenton, VA, USA). Multiple Range Tests were performed in order to determine which sample means were significantly different from the others, using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) method of Fisher with a confidence level of 95%. Significant differences were labelled with different letters from “a” to “d” in graphic representations.
The variables germination rate, percentage of shoot emergence and rate of dwarfing were compared between stratification treatments by confidence intervals in the case of binomial, as proposed by Clopper and Pearson [62]. Stratified and untreated samples were considered significantly different when their 95% confidence intervals were not overlapping, shown by an asterisk label in the graph.
Promoter Analysis
The promoter sequence of transcript models was obtained from peach genome database at phytozome (http://www.phytozome.net/cgi-bin/gbrowse/peach/). We selected 1-kb upstream sequence from the transcriptional start site when known, and from the translation start ATG in ppa006974m and ppa008548m genes. The ABRE element was located in these sequences applying a matrix-based procedure [63]. The core sequence of the CRT/DRE element (G/A)(C/T)CGAC was screened manually [64]. Finally, the RY-repeat element involved in seed-specific expression was searched using the Plant Cis-acting Regulatory DNA Elements Database (PLACE) [65].
Supporting Information
Table S1.
Primers employed in the quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035777.s001
(XLS)
Acknowledgments
We thank José Martínez, Enzo Stasi and José Palanca for technical assistance in the plant material maintenance.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: MLB GR. Performed the experiments: CL AC VA GR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AGC GL. Wrote the paper: GR.
References
- 1. Vegis A (1964) Dormancy in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 15: 185–224.
- 2. Lang GA (1987) Dormancy: a new universal terminology. HortScience 22: 817–820.
- 3. Bewley JD (1997) Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell 9: 1055–1066.
- 4. Anderson JV, Chao WS, Horvath DP (2001) A current review on the regulation of dormancy in vegetative buds. Weed Sci 49: 581–589.
- 5. Koornneef M, Bentsink L, Hilhorst H (2002) Seed dormancy and germination. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5: 33–36.
- 6. Kester DE (1969) Pollen effects on chilling requirements of almond and almond hybrid seeds. J Am Soc Hort Sci 94: 318–321.
- 7. Pasternak G, Powell LE (1980) Chilling requirements of apple seeds from cultivars having low and high chilling requirements for shoot growth. HortScience 15: 408.
- 8.
Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davies FT, Geneve RL (2011) Hartmann & Kester’s plant propagation: principles and practices. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. 230 p.
- 9. Pollock BM (1962) Temperature control of physiological dwarfing in peach seedlings. Plant Physiol 37: 190–197.
- 10. Finch-Savage WE, Leubner-Metzger G (2006) Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol 171: 501–523.
- 11. Debeaujon I, Leon-Kloosterziel KM, Koornneef M (2000) Influence of the testa on seed dormancy, germination, and longevity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 122: 403–413.
- 12. Kucera B, Cohn MA, Leubner-Metzger G (2005) Plant hormone interactions during seed dormancy release and germination. Seed Sci Res 15: 281–307.
- 13.
Bentsink L, Soppe W, Koornneef M (2007) Genetic aspects of seed dormancy. In: Bradford KJ, Nonogaki H, editors. Annual Plant Reviews Volume 27: Seed Development, Dormancy and Germination. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 113–132.
- 14. Finkelstein R, Reeves W, Ariizumi T, Steber C (2008) Molecular aspects of seed dormancy. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59: 387–415.
- 15. Holdsworth MJ, Bentsink L, Soppe WJJ (2008) Molecular networks regulating Arabidopsis seed maturation, after-ripening, dormancy and germination. New Phytol 179: 33–54.
- 16. North H, Baud S, Debeaujon I, Dubos C, Dubreucq B, et al. (2010) Arabidopsis seed secrets unravelled after a decade of genetic and omics-driven research. Plant J 61: 971–981.
- 17. McCarty DR, Hattori T, Carson CB, Vasil V, Lazar M, et al. (1991) The viviparous-1 developmental gene of maize encodes a novel transcriptional activator. Cell 66: 895–905.
- 18. Giraudat J, Hauge BM, Valon C, Smalle J, Parcy F, et al. (1992) Isolation of the Arabidopsis ABI3 gene by positional cloning. Plant Cell 4: 1251–1261.
- 19. Nakamura S, Lynch TJ, Finkelstein RR (2001) Physical interactions between ABA response loci of Arabidopsis. Plant J 26: 627–635.
- 20. Carles C, Bies-Etheve N, Aspart L, Léon-Kloosterziel KM, Koornneef M, et al. (2002) Regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana Em genes: role of ABI5. Plant J 30: 373–383.
- 21. Powell LE (1987) Hormonal aspects of bud and seed dormancy in temperate-zone woody plants. HortScience 22: 845–850.
- 22. Rohde A, Prinsen E, De Rycke R, Engler G, Van Montagu M, et al. (2002) PtABI3 impinges on the growth and differentiation of embryonic leaves during bud set in poplar. Plant Cell 14: 1885–1901.
- 23. Arora R, Rowland LJ, Tanino K (2003) Induction and release of bud dormancy in woody perennials: a science comes of age. HortScience 38: 911–921.
- 24. Horvath DP, Anderson JV, Chao WS, Foley ME (2003) Knowing when to grow: signals regulating bud dormancy. Trends Plant Sci 8: 534–540.
- 25. Rohde A, Bhalerao RP (2007) Plant dormancy in the perennial context. Trends Plant Sci 12: 217–223.
- 26. Leida C, Conesa A, Llácer G, Badenes ML, Ríos G (2012) Histone modifications and expression of DAM6 gene in peach are modulated during bud dormancy release in a cultivar-dependent manner. New Phytol 193: 67–80.
- 27. Ruttink T, Arend M, Morreel K, Storme V, Rombauts S, et al. (2007) A molecular timetable for apical bud formation and dormancy induction in poplar. Plant Cell 19: 2370–2390.
- 28. Arend M, Schnitzler JP, Ehlting B, Hänsch R, Lange T, et al. (2009) Expression of the Arabidopsis mutant ABI1 gene alters abscisic acid sensitivity, stomatal development, and growth morphology in gray poplars. Plant Physiol 151: 2110–2119.
- 29. Bielenberg DG, Wang Y, Li Z, Zhebentyayeva T, Fan S, et al. (2008) Sequencing and annotation of the evergrowing locus in peach (Prunus persica [L.] Batsch) reveals a cluster of six MADS-box transcription factors as candidate genes for regulation of terminal bud formation. Tree Genet Genomes 4: 495–507.
- 30. Horvath DP, Sung S, Kim D, Chao W, Anderson J (2010) Characterization, expression and function of DORMANCY ASSOCIATED MADS-BOX genes from leafy spurge. Plant Mol Biol 73: 169–179.
- 31. Sasaki R, Yamane H, Ooka T, Jotatsu H, Kitamura Y, et al. (2011) Functional and expressional analyses of PmDAM genes associated with endodormancy in Japanese apricot. Plant Physiol 157: 485–497.
- 32. Jiménez S, Reighard GL, Bielenberg DG (2010) Gene expression of DAM5 and DAM6 is suppressed by chilling temperatures and inversely correlated with bud break rate. Plant Mol Biol 73: 157–167.
- 33. Yamane H, Ooka T, Jotatsu H, Hosaka Y, Sasaki R, et al. (2011) Expressional regulation of PpDAM5 and PpDAM6, peach (Prunus persica) dormancy-associated MADS-box genes, by low temperature and dormancy-breaking reagent treatment. J Exp Bot 62: 3481–3488.
- 34. Jia Y, Anderson JV, Horvath DP, Gu YQ, Lym RG, et al. (2006) Subtractive cDNA libraries identify differentially expressed genes in dormant and growing buds of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Plant Mol Biol 61: 329–344.
- 35. Mazzitelli L, Hancock RD, Haupt S, Walker PG, Pont SDA, et al. (2007) Co-ordinated gene expression during phases of dormancy release in raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) buds. J Exp Bot 58: 1035–1045.
- 36. Rohde A, Ruttink T, Hostyn V, Sterck L, Driessche KV, et al. (2007) Gene expression during the induction, maintenance, and release of dormancy in apical buds of poplar. J Exp Bot 58: 4047–4060.
- 37. Horvath DP, Chao WS, Suttle JC, Thimmapuram J, Anderson JV (2008) Transcriptome analysis identifies novel responses and potential regulatory genes involved in seasonal dormancy transitions of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.). BMC Genomics 9: 536.
- 38. Yamane H, Kashiwa Y, Ooka T, Tao R, Yonemori K (2008) Suppression subtractive hybridization and differential screening reveals endodormancy-associated expression of an SVP/AGL24-type MADS box gene in lateral vegetative buds of Japanese apricot. J Am Soc Hort Sci 133: 708–716.
- 39. Mathiason K, He D, Grimplet J, Venkateswari J, Galbraith DW, et al. (2009) Transcript profiling in Vitis riparia during chilling requirement fulfillment reveals coordination of gene expression patterns with optimized bud break. Funct Integr Genomics 9: 81–96.
- 40. Jiménez S, Li Z, Reighard GL, Bielenberg DG (2010) Identification of genes associated with growth cessation and bud dormancy entrance using a dormancy-incapable tree mutant. BMC Plant Biol 10: 25.
- 41. Leida C, Terol J, Martí G, Agustí M, Llácer G, et al. (2010) Identification of genes associated with bud dormancy release in Prunus persica by suppression subtractive hybridization. Tree Physiol 30: 655–666.
- 42. Kushiro T, Okamoto M, Nakabayashi K, Yamagishi K, Kitamura S, et al. (2004) The Arabidopsis cytochrome P450 CYP707A encodes ABA 8′-hydroxylases: key enzymes in ABA catabolism. EMBO J 23: 1647–1656.
- 43. Ren J, Sun L, Wu J, Zhao S, Wang C, et al. (2010) Cloning and expression analysis of cDNAs for ABA 8′-hydroxylase during sweet cherry fruit maturation and under stress conditions. J Plant Physiol 167: 1486–1493.
- 44. Priest DM, Ambrose SJ, Vaistij FE, Elias L, Higgins GS, et al. (2006) Use of the glucosyltransferase UGT71B6 to disturb abscisic acid homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 46: 492–502.
- 45. Davies FT (1983) Breaking seed dormancy of ‘Nemaguard’ peach. HortScience 18: 959.
- 46. Frisby JW, Seeley SD (1993) Chilling of endodormant peach propagules. I. Seed germination and emergence. J Am Soc Hort Sci 118: 248–252.
- 47. Martínez-Gómez P, Dicenta F (2001) Mechanisms of dormancy in seeds of peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) cv. GF305. Sci Hort 91: 51–58.
- 48. Boerjan W, Ralph J, Baucher M (2003) Lignin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54: 519–546.
- 49. Dharmawardhana DP, Ellis BE, Carlson JE (1992) Characterization of vascular lignification in Arabidopsis thaliana. Can J Bot 70: 2238–2244.
- 50. Thévenin J, Pollet B, Letarnec B, Saulnier L, Gissot L, et al. (2011) The simultaneous repression of CCR and CAD, two enzymes of the lignin biosynthetic pathway, results in sterility and dwarfism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant 4: 70–82.
- 51. Yamane H, Tao R, Ooka T, Jotatsu H, Sasaki R, et al. (2011) Comparative analyses of dormancy-associated MADS-box genes, PpDAM5 and PpDAM6, in low- and high-chill peaches (Prunus persica L.). J Japan Soc Hort Sci 80: 276–283.
- 52. Pérez-González S (1997) Genotypic differentiation in temperature requirements for stratification in subtropical peach seeds. HortScience 32: 1064–1068.
- 53. Chiang GCK, Barua D, Kramer EM, Amasino RM, Donohue K (2009) Major flowering time gene, FLOWERING LOCUS C, regulates seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 11661–11666.
- 54. Bohlenius H, Huang T, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Brunner AM, Jansson S, et al. (2006) CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science 312: 1040–1043.
- 55. Rinne PL, Welling A, Vahala J, Ripel L, Ruonala R, et al. (2011) Chilling of dormant buds hyperinduces FLOWERING LOCUS T and recruits GA-inducible 1,3-{beta}-glucanases to reopen signal conduits and release dormancy in Populus. Plant Cell 23: 130–146.
- 56. Hsu CY, Adams JP, Kim H, No K, Ma C, et al. (2011) FLOWERING LOCUS T duplication coordinates reproductive and vegetative growth in perennial poplar. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 10756–10761.
- 57. Liu Y, Geyer R, van Zanten M, Carles A, Li Y, et al. (2011) Identification of the Arabidopsis REDUCED DORMANCY 2 gene uncovers a role for the polymerase associated factor 1 complex in seed dormancy. PLoS One 6: e22241.
- 58. Kester DE, Raddi P, Asay R (1977) Correlations of chilling requirements for germination, blooming and leafing within and among seedling populations of almond. J Am Soc Hort Sci 102: 145–148.
- 59. Mehlenbacher SA, Voordeckers AM (1991) Relationship of flowering time, rate of seed germination, and time of leaf budbreak and usefulness in selecting for late-flowering apples. J Am Soc Hort Sci 116: 565–568.
- 60. Lloyd G, McCown B (1981) Commercially feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kolmia latifolia, by use of shoot tip culture. Comb Proc Inter Plant Prop Soc 30: 421–427.
- 61. Durgbanshi A, Arbona V, Pozo O, Miersch O, Sancho JV, et al. (2005) Simultaneous determination of multiple phytohormones in plant extracts by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem 53: 8437–8442.
- 62. Clopper CJ, Pearson ES (1934) The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 26: 404–413.
- 63. Gómez-Porras JL, Riaño-Pachón DM, Dreyer I, Mayer JE, Mueller-Roeber B (2007) Genome-wide analysis of ABA-responsive elements ABRE and CE3 reveals divergent patterns in Arabidopsis and rice. BMC Genomics 8: 260.
- 64. Xue GP (2002) Characterisation of the DNA-binding profile of barley HvCBF1 using an enzymatic method for rapid, quantitative and high-throughput analysis of the DNA-binding activity. Nucleic Acids Res 30: e77.
- 65. Higo K, Ugawa Y, Iwamoto M, Korenaga T (1999) Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database:1999. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 297–300.