Figures
Abstract
In different primate lentiviruses, three proteins (Vpu, Env and Nef) have been shown to have anti-tetherin activities. SIVden is a primate lentivirus harbored by a Cercopithecus denti (C. denti) whose genome code for a Vpu gene. We have compared the activity of HIV-1 Vpu and of SIVden Vpu on tetherin proteins from humans, from C. denti and from Cercopithecus neglectus (C. neglectus), a monkey species that is naturally infected by SIVdeb, a virus closely related to SIVden but which does not encode a Vpu protein. Here, we demonstrate that SIVden Vpu, is active against C. denti tetherin, but not against human tetherin. Interestingly, C. neglectus tetherin was more sensitive to SIVden Vpu than to HIV-1 Vpu. We also identify residues in the tetherin transmembrane domains that are responsible for the species-specific Vpu effect. Simultaneous mutation (P40L and T45I) of human tetherin conferred sensitivity to SIVden Vpu, while abolishing its sensitivity to HIV-1 Vpu. We next analyzed the anti-tetherin activity of the Nef proteins from HIV-1, SIVden and SIVdeb. All three Nef proteins were unable to rescue virus release in the presence of human or C. denti tetherin. Conversely, SIVdeb Nef enhanced virus release in the presence of C. neglectus tetherin, suggesting that SIVdeb relies on Nef in its natural host. Finally, while HIV-1 Vpu not only removed human tetherin from the cell surface but also directed it for degradation, SIVden Vpu only induced the redistribution of both C. denti and C. neglectus tetherins, resulting in a predominantly perinuclear localization.
Citation: Nikovics K, Dazza M-C, Ekwalanga M, Mammano F, Clavel F, Saragosti S (2012) Counteraction of Tetherin Antiviral Activity by Two Closely Related SIVs Differing by the Presence of a Vpu Gene. PLoS ONE 7(4): e35411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035411
Editor: Chen Liang, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Canada
Received: January 26, 2012; Accepted: March 15, 2012; Published: April 17, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Nikovics et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by Agence National de Recherche sur le SIDA (ANRS). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have read the journal's policy and have the following conflicts: FM is currently an academic editor for PLoS ONE. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Introduction
Evolution of mammalian species, and of primate species in particular, has been strongly affected by retroviral infections [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. In defense against retroviruses several species have evolved cellular protein that can protect cells against retroviral infection, termed restriction factors. One recently identified restriction factor, tetherin/BST2/CD317/HM1.24, is a membrane protein that exerts its antiviral effect by retaining retroviral particles (but also virions of other enveloped viruses) at the surface of infected cells, thereby strongly reducing viral propagation [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. In a number of cell types, tetherin expression is induced by type I interferon, and can therefore be considered as one component of innate immunity [11], [13]. In turn, some retroviruses have evolved a variety of countermeasures that aim at reducing the level of surface expression of tetherin in infected cells.
Primate lentiviruses principally use two viral proteins, Nef and Vpu, to down-regulate surface expression of tetherin [11], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. The extent to which downregulation of tetherin is the consequence of an activity of either of these two proteins varies widely across primate lentiviral lineages, essentially as a function of the ability of tetherins from the natural host species of these viruses to respond to either Nef or Vpu. In viruses that do not express Vpu, Nef usually mediates anti-tetherin activity. This is the case for the majority of lentiviruses from non-hominid primates, best illustrated by the strong ability of Nef from SIVmac to counteract tetherin from Rhesus macaques [16], [18], [19], [20]. In contrast, Vpu is the only protein able to down-regulate tetherin in HIV-1, a property explained by the fact that human tetherin carries a 5 amino acid deletion in its intracytoplasmic domain that makes it insensitive to regulation by Nef [3], [16].
Between these two extremes, a few viral lineages express both Nef and Vpu. Some of these viruses, such as SIVcpz, a group of chimpanzee viruses from which HIV-1 was transmitted to humans, rely essentially on Nef to counteract tetherin expression, in spite of the presence of a Vpu protein [6], [18], [21]. In other viruses, such as SIVmus, regulation of tetherin is achieved by Vpu rather than by Nef [18]. The reason why these viruses rely on Vpu rather than on Nef for regulation of tetherin, in spite of the fact that the tetherin protein of their natural hosts does not bear a deletion in their intracytoplasmic domain, remains unclear. One possible explanation for relying either on Nef or Vpu for regulation of tetherin is that a number of primate lentiviruses may have been recently transmitted to their host species and that their Vpu protein may not be optimized for regulation of the tetherin protein expressed in the new host. Some extent of species-specificity has been described for the regulatory effect of Vpu proteins [17], [18], [22]. Furthermore, the ability of some HIV-1 Vpu proteins to antagonize macaque tetherin in vitro and in vivo was reported recently [23].
To gain further insight into primate lentiviral regulation of tetherin proteins, we have focused our attention on two closely related monkey viruses, SIVden from C. denti, which expresses a Vpu protein [24], and SIVdeb from C. neglectus, a virus that belongs to a lineage phylogenetically close to SIVden but that does not express a Vpu protein [24], [25]. We initially compared the sensitivity of human, C. denti and C. neglectus tetherins to SIVden Vpu and HIV-1 Vpu. Counteraction of tetherin antiviral activity showed a species-specific pattern, and some key residues in Vpu involved in antagonizing BST2 were identified by mutagenesis. We then analyzed the effect of Nef proteins from HIV-1, SIVden and SIVdeb on tetherin from the three host species. Significant counteraction of tetherin activity was observed only when Nef from SIVdeb (which does not encode a vpu gene) was used against tetherin from its natural host, C neglectus. These findings are discussed from the perspective of the evolutionary forces acting on the viruses and their hosts.
Results
Comparison and expression of human, C. denti and C. neglectus tetherin proteins
As shown on figure 1, alignment of tetherin amino acid sequences from humans, C. denti and C. neglectus reveals a number of important differences. The first such difference is the deletion of 5 amino acids in the intracytoplasmic domain of human tetherin, the cause of its insensitivity to Nef proteins [3], [16]. In addition, several notable differences (8 amino acid substitutions and an insertion of two amino-acids) are also seen between the three tetherin proteins in the transmembrane (TM) domain, a region known to command susceptibility to down-regulation of tetherin by HIV-1 Vpu [13], [16], [26], [27], [28], [29]. These differences in both the cytoplasmic and transmembrane regions of tetherin are indicative of strong potential differences in their susceptibility to down-regulation by Vpu and Nef proteins.
A. Alignment of the cytoplasmic tail and transmembrane domains of tetherins from 16 primates. The accession numbers of the sequences used in this figure are: Human NP 004326; Gorilla gorilla ADI58594; P. troglodytes ADI58593; P. paniscus ADI58595; C. nictitans ACX46125; C. mona ACX46126; C. cephus ACX46508; P. nemaeus ADI58604; C. aethiops ADI58600; E. patas ADI58599; P. pygmaeus ADI58596; M. mulatta ADI58602; N. leucogenys ADI58597; H. agilis ADI58598; C. guereza kikuyuensis ADI58603; M. talapoin ADI58601. B. Differences in the TM domain of human, C. denti and C. neglectus tetherins are highlighted in the blue box. Red numbers and letters indicate the amino acids we mutated in this study. In both panels, amino acid identity is indicated by dots and sequence gaps are indicated by dashes.
We generated plasmids expressing human, C. denti and C. neglectus tetherin sequences tagged with a hemagglutinin (HA) epitope at their N-terminus. Human epithelial 293T cells, a cell line that does not express human tetherin unless treated with type I interferon [11], [13], were co-transfected with one of the three tetherin expression plasmids and with an indicator HIV-1 genome able to assemble and release HIV-1 virions but that does not express Vpu or Nef (pNL4.3-ΔVpuΔNef). Tetherin activity was expressed as the percentage of HIV-1 particles released in the supernatant, based on HIV-1 p24 Elisa, relative to the amount of particles released in the absence of transfected tetherin expression plasmid. Because the readout of our experiments was the ability of tetherin proteins to inhibit viral particle release, we chose to normalize the amounts of transfected tetherin expression plasmids based on this antiviral activity. To determine how much of each of the three plasmids was to be transfected to achieve comparable antiviral activity, three serial dilutions (1, 0.3 and 0.1 micrograms) of the plasmids were transfected in 293T cells together with the indicator pNL4.3-ΔVpuΔNef genome. As shown on figure 2A, inhibition of virion release by human tetherin was much stronger than that obtained with C. denti tetherin or of C. neglectus tetherin, a phenomenon essentially explained by the higher level of stable expression of human tetherin in 293T cells, as it can be seen in figure 2B. Transfection of 1 microgram of C. denti tetherin or of C. neglectus tetherin expression plasmid reduced pNL4.3-ΔVpuΔNef virion release to levels that represented 10–15% of those obtained in absence of tetherin. A comparable level of inhibition was measured when only 0.1 microgram of human tetherin expression plasmid was transfected (figure 2A). Therefore, we chose to use these amounts of the respective plasmids, yielding comparable levels of tetherin antiviral activity, in all further experiments.
A. Virus particle release was tested in 293T cells transfected with HIV-1ΔVpuΔNef NL4.3 proviral DNA (500 ng) in the presence of human, C. denti and C. neglectus tetherin. Virus production expressed as a percentage of maximal particle release in the absence of tetherin is shown for increasing amounts of plasmid DNA encoding for the three tetherin constructs (100, 330 and 1000 ng). Differences in the amount of plasmid DNA in each transfection were compensated by the addition of control vector (pcDNA3). After 42 h, the amount of virus released into cell culture supernatant was measured by HIV-1 p24 ELISA. This figure is representative of three independent experiments. B. Expression of Vpu constructs. Western blot analysis was performed to determine the expression levels of the three plasmids encoding HA-tagged tetherins. 293T cells were cotransfected with 1000 ng of each plasmid. Tetherin migrated as several species in SDS-PAGE analyses, presumably as a result of heterogeneus glycosylation. Forty-two hours after transfection cell lysates were collected and analyzed by Western blot. The expression level of HIV-1 Gag protein was monitored with an anti-p24 antibody. Actin was used as a loading control.
Species-specificity of tetherin antagonism by HIV-1 and SIVden Vpu
Susceptibility of each of the three tetherin proteins to antagonism by different Vpu proteins was evaluated by co-transfecting 293T cells with normalized amounts of tetherin expression plasmid, together with the indicator pNL4.3-ΔVpuΔNef genome and a plasmid expressing the Vpu protein of HIV-1 or SIVden.
With human tetherin, only HIV-1 Vpu was found to strongly antagonize the antiviral effect of tetherin (figure 3A), contrasting with SIVden Vpu, which failed to exert any antagonistic effect.
Viral particle release from 293T cells was measured after cotransfection of a HIV-1ΔVpuΔNef proviral construct (500 ng) with different tetherin-encoding plasmids: (A) human (100 ng), (B) C. denti (1000 ng), and (C) C. neglectus (1000 ng), and in the absence or presence of HIV-1 or SIVden Vpu encoding plasmids (250 ng). (A, B and C). Viral particle release was quantified 24 h post-transfection by p24 ELISA. The amount of p24 antigen produced relative to the virus yield obtained in the absence of tetherin (100%) is plotted. Results are expressed as mean ± SD for 5 experiments. The indicated p values correspond to the comparison with the “no vpu” sample. (D) Forty-two hours after transfection cell lysates were collected and analyzed by Western blot. The expression level of HIV-1 Gag protein was monitored with an anti-p24 antibody. Actin was used as a loading control. The depicted gel is representative of three independent experiments. For all viral release assays, the cell-associated p24 was monitored. Molecular weight markers are shown on the left in kilodaltons.
With C. denti tetherin, the only significant antagonistic effect was seen with SIVden Vpu, for which the rescue of particle release reached 60% of that of pNL4.3-ΔVpuΔNef expressed without tetherin (figure 3B). Mirroring the lack of effect of SIVden Vpu on human tetherin, HIV-1 Vpu had no significant antagonistic effect on C. denti tetherin. The tetherin protein of C. neglectus a monkey species naturally infected by a virus that does not express a Vpu protein, was moderately but significantly susceptible to antagonism by SIVden Vpu, but not susceptible to HIV-1 Vpu (figure 3C). These findings corroborate that the antagonistic properties of the Vpu protein from a given primate lentivirus are for the most part specific for the tetherin expressed by its natural host species, a sign of strong species adaptation of these viruses [17], [18], [22].
In all of these experiments, we ascertained that the changes in HIV-1 p24 content of culture supernatants that we observed were actually related to changes in virion release: as shown on figure 3D, neither tetherin nor Vpu expression had any effect on overall expression of HIV-1 Gag in transfected cells.
Although the species-specificity of tetherin antagonism by Vpu is known to be determined by sequences in the transmembrane region of tetherin, the role of particular residues in this region remains unclear. Comparison of the transmembrane domains of C. denti and C. neglectus tetherins revealed only two differences at positions 28 (V vs. A) and 43 (L vs. P) in C. denti tetherin numbering. Comparison of the transmembrane domains of human and C. denti tetherins revealed eight differences at positions 23, 24, 30, 33, 36, 40 and 45 (in human tetherin numbering) and 2 amino acid indel positions 25–26.
It was reported that amino acid sequences in the transmembrane domain of human tetherin is critical for the interaction with HIV-1 Vpu but the molecular basis behind the Vpu counteraction of tetherin is still not fully elucidated. An important difference between human and C. denti/C. neglectus tetherins is the presence of a 2 amino acid insertion (glycine-isoleucine) in human tetherin at positions 25–26. These 2 amino acid are deleted in tetherins proteins from Old World monkeys, but presents in hominoids and New World Monkeys [3]. Deletion of these two amino acid in human tetherin only produced an overall drop in HIV-1 Vpu susceptibility with no increase in SIVden Vpu antagonism (figure 4A). Similarly, insertion of these two amino-acids in C. denti tetherin produced a moderate drop in susceptibility to SIVden Vpu and no change in susceptibility to HIV-1 Vpu (figure 4B), thereby demonstrating that these two amino-acids play no role in species-specific regulation of human tetherin and C. denti tetherin by HIV-1 and SIVden Vpu proteins [3], [27], [30], [31].
HIV-1 Vpu and SIVden Vpu were tested for their ability to rescue p24 release for HIV-1ΔVpuΔNef in 293T cells expressing human tetherin delta 25–26 (A) or C. denti tetherin insertion 28–29 (B). Twenty-four h after transfection the p24 content of the supernatant from each sample was quantified using a p24 ELISA. and expressed as the percent of p24 of the control without tetherin. Results are the mean ± SD for 5 independent experiments. The indicated p values correspond to the comparison with the «no vpu» sample.
We then focused our study on the residue 40P/43L/43P (human/C. denti/C. neglectus numbering respectively) because of the divergence between C. denti and C. neglectus and on residue 45T/48I/48I that was shown to be required for the antagonism by Vpu [27], [31], [32]. To evaluate the role of these residues, individual and combined substitutions were introduced in human tetherin. As shown on figure 5 A and B, neither of the P40L or T45I substitutions alone were able to alter the strong specificity of HIV-1 Vpu for human tetherin, even if the P40L mutation significantly increased susceptibility of human tetherin to SIVden Vpu. When both P40L and T45I were expressed together in human tetherin, however, susceptibility of this mutant protein to HIV-1 Vpu dropped sharply, while susceptibility to SIVden Vpu increased to 50%, a level close to that observed with wild-type C. denti tetherin. In contrast, reverse substitutions at these positions in C. denti tetherin failed to produce a similar clear-cut change in species specificity (data not shown).
Amino acid substitutions were introduced into full-length human tetherin: (A) P40L, (B) T45I, (C) P40L+T45I. HIV-1 Vpu and SIVden Vpu were tested for their ability to rescue HIV-1ΔVpuΔNef virus release in cells expressing the different human tetherin mutants. Transfection and assay conditions were the same as described in Figure 4 legend.
Overall, these findings emphasize that in spite of numerous differences in the transmembrane region of human tetherin and C. denti tetherin, most of the species-specificity of their susceptibility by the two different Vpu proteins tested here are essentially carried by the combined residues 40 and 45 in human tetherin.
Species-specificity of tetherin antagonism by HIV-1, SIVden and SIVdeb Nef
In addition to evaluate species-specificity of human, C. denti and C. neglectus tetherin to different Vpu proteins, we also examined the extent to which these tetherins were affected by the Nef proteins from HIV-1, SIVden and SIVdeb. As shown on figure 6A, the antiviral effect of human tetherin was not affected by any of the three Nef proteins, consistent with the fact that human tetherin carries a 5 amino acid deletion in its cytoplasmic domain that makes it insensitive to down-regulation by Nef [3], [16]. None of the three Nef proteins expressed any significant effect on C. denti tetherin (figure 6B), despite that this tetherin displays no deletion in its cytoplasmic domain. The only tetherin for which some effect of Nef could be measured was C. neglectus tetherin (Figure 6C): a small, albeit significant, antagonistic effect of this tetherin was seen with the Nef protein from SIVdeb, the virus that naturally infects C. neglectus monkeys. Interestingly, substitution of tryptophan at position 17 in C. neglectus tetherin by a cysteine, as found in C. denti tetherin, reduces the extent to which SIVdeb Nef counteracts BST2 activity on virion release (Figure 6D), suggesting that this residue participates to the species-specific activity of Nef. Thus, although clearly not as marked as in the case of Vpu, some extent of species-specificity can be seen in the counteracting effect of Nef on the tetherin proteins from the species studied here. Interestingly, the only antagonistic Nef protein was from the virus that does not express a Vpu protein, an effect that was only found significant when targeting the tetherin protein from its natural host species.
HIV-1 Nef, C. denti Nef and C. neglectus Nef were tested for the ability to rescue virus release using vpu and nef-deficient strain of HIV-1 in the presence of human (A), C. denti (B), C. neglectus (C) and C. neglectus (W17C) (D) tetherin. The p24 antigen yield was measured from 293T cells cotransfected with a HIV-1ΔVpuΔNef proviral construct (500 ng), with pcDNA3 vectors expressing the indicated tetherin protein and in combination with plasmids expressing different Nef proteins. Twenty-four h post-transfection, the amount of virus released into the cell culture supernatant was measured by HIV-1 p24 antigen-capture ELISA. All values are shown relative to those obtained in the absence of tetherin expression vector (100%). The indicated p values correspond to the comparison with the «no vpu» sample.
Effect of SIVden and HIV-1 Vpu proteins on human and C. denti tetherin expression profiles
We next examined the mechanisms through which Vpu proteins antagonized the antiviral effects of the tetherin proteins studied here. Two mechanisms have been proposed to explain down-regulation of tetherin by Vpu: accelerated degradation and redistribution, which results in reduced surface expression but conserved overall amounts of tetherin protein. Each of the three tetherin expression plasmids was co-transfected in 293T cells in the presence or absence of the HIV-1 or SIVden Vpu expression plasmids. The transfected cells were subjected to western blot analysis of tetherin content using an anti-HA antibody. As shown on figure 7A, HIV-1 Vpu had a marked effect on total amounts of human tetherin. In contrast, SIVden Vpu, which exerted a strong antagonistic effect on the antiviral properties of C. denti tetherin, did not produce any change in the total amounts of this protein. As expected from the results of our experiments evaluating antagonism of tetherin antiviral activity, HIV-1 Vpu had no effect on C. denti tetherin and C. neglectus tetherin expression levels. Similarly, SIVden Vpu did not reduce cellular amounts of human tetherin and C. neglectus tetherin.
(A) 293T cells were cotransfected with HIV-1ΔVpuΔNef proviral construct (500 ng) and a plasmid encoding HA-tagged tetherins (human (100 ng), C. denti (1000 ng) and C. neglectus (1000 ng) and with or without HIV-1 Vpu plasmid (250 ng) or SIVden Vpu plasmid (250 ng). The effect of the two Vpu constructs on tetherin protein levels was monitored by Western blotting, using an anti-HA antibody. Tetherin migrated as several species in SDS-PAGE analyses, presumably as a result of heterogeneus glycosylation. The depicted gel is representative of three independent experiments. (B) Subcellular localization of tetherin. 293T cells were cotransfected with 1000 ng of DNA encoding the indicated tetherin proteins (HA-tagged), with a proviral construct (1000 ng) and with a HIV-1 Vpu or SIV Vpu plasmid (500 ng). 24 h after transfection the cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with rat anti-HA (green) monoclonal antibody (clone 3F10, Roche Applied Science). Nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). Cells were examined by confocal microscopy. Images are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bars represent 10 µm.
To further address the possibility that HIV-1 and SIVden Vpu proteins exerted their antagonistic effects on tetherin through different mechanisms, we used confocal microscopy to examine the cellular distribution of tetherin in the absence and presence of Vpu proteins. Representative images are shown on figure 7B, and a quantitative analysis, based on random examination of 100 cells in each of the transfection conditions, is presented on Table 1. In the absence of Vpu, human tetherin, C. denti tetherin and C. neglectus tetherin are all localized both at the cell surface and in intracellular compartments. In the presence of HIV-1 Vpu, the pattern of expression of human tetherin changed dramatically. In most cells, the amount of human tetherin expressed became very weak and diffuse, while in ∼10% of cells tetherin expression was restricted to the perinuclear region. A different pattern was seen with C. denti tetherin in the presence of SIVden Vpu. In this case, only redistribution was observed and tetherin was expressed in cytoplasmic and perinuclear compartments, at the expense of surface expression. This is fully consistent with the notable impact of SIVden Vpu protein on C. denti tetherin antiviral activity in spite of the lack of effect of SIVden Vpu on overall expression of C. denti tetherin seen on western blots.
Discussion
Primate lentiviruses have evolved three distinct mechanisms to counteract the effects of tetherin, a restriction factor that retains virions at the surface of the producer cell, thereby limiting their ability to spread to new target cells. The majority of these viruses takes advantage of the multifunctional Nef protein, a protein that, depending on the virus, also has the ability to downmodulate surface expression of a variety of host cell membrane proteins such as CD3, CD4 or MHC class I [6], [33]. A subset of Cercopithecus lentiviruses have acquired a vpu gene [24], [34], [35], that has the capacity to interact with the transmembrane region of tetherin, an interaction that leads to endocytosis and/or accelerated degradation of the restriction factor [6], [17], [18]. Of note, the Vpu proteins of some primate lentiviruses also exert an inhibitory effect on surface expression of CD4 [6], [36]. Finally, in a few viruses for which neither Vpu nor Nef seem able to counteract tetherin, this function is achieved by the intracellular domain of their Env protein [28], [37], [38].
The evolutionary mechanisms explaining why some primate viruses rely on Vpu for regulation of tetherin while still expressing a Nef protein are not fully explained. Differents parameters seems to have driven evolution towards the use of Nef or Vpu. In SIVcpz, a virus infecting chimpanzees which was reported to arise from recent recombination between SIVgsn (a Vpu-expressing monkey virus) and SIVrcm (a monkey virus without a vpu gene) [39], the SIVgsn-derived Vpu protein fails to efficiently counteract chimpanzee tetherin but this function is fulfilled by SIVrcm-derived Nef [6], [17], [18]. In humans, a different situation is encountered: the human tetherin protein carries a deletion of a 5-amino acid motif in its cytoplasmic domain making it insensitive to Nef, a situation that has probably forced (at least in HIV-1 group M) rapid evolution of a Vpu protein with strong activity against human tetherin [3], [6], [16], [17], [18], [19]. Yet another particular situation is encountered with HIV-2 in humans, as HIV-2 is derived from SIVsmm, a monkey virus with no vpu gene. Because it could neither rely on Nef nor on Vpu for down-regulation of human tetherin, HIV-2 has evolved an Env protein that has acquired this property [38], [40]. Similarly, SIV from Tantalus monkeys (SIVtan) encodes an envelope glycoprotein able to counteract tetherin from Tantalus monkeys, rhesus monkeys, sooty mangabeys, and humans [28].
These observations and assumptions, however, do not fully explain why, earlier in primate lentiviral evolution, some monkey viruses have acquired a Vpu protein while others have solely relied on their Nef protein for counteracting tetherin.
The ability of SIVden Vpu protein to antagonize tetherins was already addressed [6], [18]. In this study we have examined the anti-tetherin activity of two closely related monkey viruses, SIVden from C. denti, which expresses a Vpu protein, and SIVdeb from C. neglectus, which does not have a Vpu gene. The tetherin proteins from these two monkey species are closely related, diverging only by a few polymorphisms in their cellular and transmembrane domains, which are known to determine tetherin sensitivity to Vpu and Nef, respectively.
We first compared the sensitivity of human, C. denti and C. neglectus tetherins to SIVden Vpu and HIV-1 Vpu (Figure 2). HIV-1 and SIVden Vpu proteins strongly and almost exclusively affected the antiviral activity of human and C. denti tetherins, respectively. Interestingly, C. neglectus tetherin appeared more sensitive to SIVden Vpu than to HIV-1 Vpu, consistent with the high homology found between the Vpu-sensitive domains of C. denti and C. neglectus tetherins.
In our study, the specific activity of SIVden Vpu on C. denti tetherin was explained by the presence in tetherin of a leucine at position 40 and of an isoleucine at position 45 fond in C. denti tetherin. Introduction of these two amino acid simultaneously in human tetherin reproduced the phenotype observed with wild-type C. denti tetherin (Figure 3).
The deletion of two amino acids at position 25–26 in human tetherin, as well as the insertion of the corresponding amino acids in C. denti tetherin, however, failed to exert any effect on virus-host specificity (Figure 4).
In this study, we also examined susceptibility of the three tetherins to the Nef proteins from HIV-1, SIVden and SIVdeb. Consistent with previous studies, the antiviral activity of human tetherin was resistant to all three Nef proteins. Clearly, C. neglectus tetherin was the most sensitive to Nef, an effect that was most significant using SIVdeb Nef, a finding fully consistent with the fact that this SIVdeb does not express a Vpu protein and appears to rely on Nef for counteracting tetherin. Interestingly, introduction of the W17C substitution in C. neglectus tetherin, which reproduces the sequence of C. denti tetherin at this site, abrogated the effect of Nef, emphasizing the importance of this residue in virus-host adaptation. It is noteworthy that the effect of Nef on C. neglectus tetherin, although significant, was only partial (30% rescue of the block in virus release exerted by tetherin), and reminiscent of observations by Lim et al. with SIVagm from African green monkeys [3]. As suggested by these authors for SIVagm, it is possible that in C. neglectus, infection by SIVdeb may induce only limited induction of interferon type I production, thereby limiting the amount of tetherin to which the virus is confronted during in vivo replication. Similarly, the impact of SIVden Vpu on C. denti tetherin is clearly partial (60%) compared to that observed with HIV-1 and human tetherin. Again, such partial activity is suggestive of the fact that C. denti may not need as much neutralization of tetherin as that required for human infection by HIV-1. Nonetheless, the fact that SIVden relies essentially on Vpu for activity on tetherin, and the fact that this effect on C. denti tetherin is clearly stronger than that of SIVdeb Nef on C. neglectus tetherin, together suggest that during infection of C. denti, SIVden may be confronted to higher levels of tetherin expression than those in SIVdeb-infected C. neglectus monkeys.
These results do not exclude the possibility that the Env protein from SIVdeb may also participate in antagonizing the antiviral activity of tetherin, as has been observed for HIV-2 [38], [40] and SIVtan [28], although viruses that employ two different proteins to inhibit tetherins have not as yet been described. Testing this possibility will require the identification of functional SIVdeb Env proteins.
Another interesting finding of our study, pertaining to the particularly strong activity of HIV-1 Vpu on human tetherin, was the striking difference observed on the pattern of cellular expression of the three tetherins tested here in response to the two Vpu proteins. As shown on figure 5 and table 1, HIV-1 Vpu almost completely abolished expression of human tetherin, confirming earlier findings that human tetherin was not only removed from the cell surface but also directed to an efficient degradation pathway. In contrast, the activity of SIVden Vpu on both C. denti and C. neglectus tetherins, only resulted in redistribution of these proteins, with a predominantly perinuclear expression. Although it is conceivable that this effect is related to differences in intrinsic recycling and degradation pathway targeting properties between HIV-1 and SIVden Vpu proteins, it is also possible that redistribution and perinuclear expression without degradation is related to the partial activity of SIVden Vpu on C. denti and C. neglectus tetherins. In this case the incomplete activity of SIVden Vpu would be sufficient for redirecting tetherins to the perinuclear compartment but not quite sufficient for achieving full targeting to a degradation compartment.
Our findings endorse the assumption that Vpu and Nef-mediated tetherin antagonism are original properties of primate lentiviruses, and the resistance of human tetherin to primate lentivirus Vpus and Nefs seems to represent a significant barrier to zoonotic transmissions [6], [16], [17], [18], [19].
Materials and Methods
Construction of the plasmid HIV-1ΔVpuΔNef-Renilla
The Vpu region of the plasmid deleted of Nef pNL4-3-lucR [41] was deleted and replaced by the deletion mutant produced by Klimkait et al (1990). This mutation comprises a deletion of 48 nucleotides immediately following the initiator methionine codon of the vpu ORF plus a 7-nucleotide insertion, and results in a minus-1 frameshift and premature termination after 14 missense codons [42].
Tetherin cloning
Tetherin genomic regions were PCR amplified from HeLa cells and from C. denti and C. neglectus uncultured peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) DNA. A unique forward primer was used (5′-TGGAACTTGCTATTGGTCAG-3′). Two reverse primers were synthesized, one for human and C. denti tetherins (5′-CCTTCTCACTGGATTCTCC-3′) and one for C. neglectus (5′-CCTTCTCACTGGATTCTCA-3′).
Splice-overlap-extension PCR was used to splice the introns. The integrity of all PCR derived cDNAs was confirmed by sequence analysis.
N-terminal HA-tagged tetherins were obtained by PCR using a N-terminal primer containing the HA sequence. These products were cloned into the KpnI-Xho1 sites of pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO (Invitrogen).
Vpu and Nef cloning
The pNG227 plasmid containing four copies of Mason-Pfizer monkey virus constitutive transport element was a gift of Michael H. Malim. The two Vpu proteins and the three Nef proteins were cloned in pNG227 using the XbaI-SalI sites.
Tetherin-HA for confocal microscopy was obtained by inserting a single HA epitope tag to the ectodomain of the three BST2 proteins by primer-directed mutagenesis using PCR [27]. Overlap-extension PCR approaches were used to insert the HA-tag at a position 463 nucleotide of human tetherin protein, using PCR-A primers 5′-CCGGTACCATGGCATCTACTTCGTATGA-3′ (forward) and 5′-AGTCTGGGACGTCGTATGGGTATGCGGCGTAGTACTTCTTGTCCGCGATTCTCAC –3′ (reverse), and PCR-B primers 5′- CATACCCATACGACGTCCCAGACTACGCTGCCCCCAGCTCCCAGGACTCCAGCTC –3′ (forward) and 5′- GTCTCGAGTCACTGCAGCAGAGCGCTTAGG –3′ (reverse). For the monkey tetherins, the HA epitope was inserted at a position orthologous to nucleotide 463 using primers C. denti tetherin PCR-A 5′- CCGGTACCATGGCACCTATTTTGTATGACT -3′ (forward), 5′- GGCAGCGTAGTCTGGGACGTCGTATGGGTATGCGGCGGAGTTCGTGTCCGCGATT-3′ (reverse), PCR-B 5′- TACCCATACGACGTCCCAGACTACGCTGCCGCCAGCCCCCAGGACTCCAGCTGCG-3′ (forward), and 5′- GGCTCGAGTCACAGCAGCAGAGCGCCCAAG-3′ (reverse), respectively. C. neglectus tetherin primers PCR-A 5′- CCGGTACCATGGCACCTATTTTGTATGACT-3′ (forward), 5′- GCGTAGTCTGGGACGTCGTATGGGTATGCGGCGGAGTTCGTGTCCGCGATTCTCA-3′ (reverse), PCR-B 5′- TACCCATACGACGTCCCAGACTACGCTGCCAGCCCCCAGGACTCCAGCTGCGCGG-3′ (forward), and 5′- GTCTCGAGTCACAGCAGCAGAGCGCCCAAG-3′ (reverse), respectively. PCR fragments were cloned into pcDNA3 vector by inserting a KpnI-XhoI restriction site. All plasmids were confirmed by nucleotide sequence analyses.
Cell lines
The human cell line 293T were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC Cat No. CRL-11268) and cultured according to the instructions provided.
Virus yield and tetherin antagonism
To determine the capability of Vpu and Nef to antagonize tetherin, 293T cells were seeded in a 12-well plate and transfected with 500 ng of the pNL4.3-ΔVpuΔNef proviral construct, tetherin expression vectors [human (100 ng), C. denti (1000 ng) and C. neglectus (1000 ng)], 250 ng µg HIV-1 Vpu or SIVden Vpu expression plasmids and 600 ng of Nef expressing plasmids. A pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen) was used to equalize the DNA concentration. Transfection were made using jetPEI transfection reagent (PolyPlus transfection) according to manufacturer's recommendations. At 42 hours post-transfection supernatants were harvested, clarified by centrifugation at 800 g and analyzed for p24 antigen by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Innogenetics, Belgium).
Western blot
To monitor tetherin expression, 293T cells were cotransfected with the indicated amount of N-terminally HA-tagged tetherin expression constructs [(human (100 ng), C. denti (1000 ng) and C. neglectus (1000 ng)], proviral constructs pNL4.3-ΔVpuΔNef-Renilla (500 ng) and HIV-1 Vpu (250 ng) or SIVden Vpu (250 ng) plasmids. The transfections were made as described above. One day post-transfection cells were washed once with PBS and lysed in the sample buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, 100 mM DTT, 10% glycerol and 0,005% bromophenol blue]. Proteins were solubilized by heating for 10 min at 95°C. Residual insoluble material was removed through centrifugation (10 min at 11000× g). Cell lysates were separated on SDS-PAGE and transferred to Nitrocellulose membranes and probed with anti-HA Rat antibody (Roche, 3F10, 1∶1000 dilution). Specific antibody-antigen complexes were identified using horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rat IgG secondary antibodies (AP136P, Millipore) and then incubated with the chemiluminescent substrate (RPN2135, Amersham). Densitometry quantification was achieved using ImageJ software.
For internal controls, blots were re-incubated with mouse antibodies specific for HIV1 p24 (ab9071, Abcam) and actin (A 2066, Sigma). Subsequently, blots were probed with anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IRDye antibodies (Odyssey 926-32222, 926-32213) and proteins revealed using a LI-COR Odyssey scanner.
Confocal microscopy
Subconfluent monolayer of adherent human 293T cells grown on coverslips in 6-well plates were cotransfected with tetherin plasmids carrying HA-tag in the ectodomain (1000 ng), with a proviral constructs pNL4.3-ΔVpuΔNef (1000 ng) and HIV-1 Vpu or SIVden Vpu (500 ng), and with appropriate amounts of the empty pcDNA3 vector used as carrier plasmid DNA to normalize the quantity of DNA transfected per well. The transfections were made as described above. After 24 hours, cells were fixed with 3% formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature, washed three times with 50 mM ammonium chloride in PBS. The cells were incubated with 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS. For labeling the cell surface, the cells were incubated with anti-HA rat primary antibodies (Roche, 3F10, 1∶2000 dilution) for 1 h. For permeabilization, cells were treated for 5 min at room temperature with 0.1% Triton X-100 buffered with PBS. After washing three times with PBS, non-specific binding was blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with an anti-HA Rat primary antibodies (Roche, 3F10, 1∶2000 dilution). Cells were washed for 20 min in PBS, and incubated with anti-mouse immunoglobulin G-Alexa Fluor (IgG-Alexa Fluor 488, 1∶500 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, cells were washed again for 20 min in PBS and then mounted using Vectashield+DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Cells were then examined using a LSM ZEISS 510 confocal microscope.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: KN FC SS. Performed the experiments: KN MCD SS. Analyzed the data: KN FC FM SS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KN MCD ME FC SS. Wrote the paper: FC SS.
References
- 1. Liu J, Chen K, Wang JH, Zhang C (2010) Molecular evolution of the primate antiviral restriction factor tetherin. PLoS One 5: e11904.
- 2. Evans DT, Serra-Moreno R, Singh RK, Guatelli JC (2010) BST-2/tetherin: a new component of the innate immune response to enveloped viruses. Trends Microbiol 18: 388–396.
- 3. Lim ES, Malik HS, Emerman M (2010) Ancient adaptive evolution of tetherin shaped the functions of Vpu and Nef in human immunodeficiency virus and primate lentiviruses. J Virol 84: 7124–7134.
- 4. Sawyer SL, Wu LI, Emerman M, Malik HS (2005) Positive selection of primate TRIM5alpha identifies a critical species-specific retroviral restriction domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 2832–2837.
- 5. Sawyer SL, Emerman M, Malik HS (2004) Ancient adaptive evolution of the primate antiviral DNA-editing enzyme APOBEC3G. PLoS Biol 2: E275.
- 6. Schmokel J, Sauter D, Schindler M, Leendertz FH, Bailes E, et al. (2011) The presence of a vpu gene and the lack of Nef-mediated downmodulation of T cell receptor-CD3 are not always linked in primate lentiviruses. J Virol 85: 742–752.
- 7. Perez-Caballero D, Zang T, Ebrahimi A, McNatt MW, Gregory DA, et al. (2009) Tetherin inhibits HIV-1 release by directly tethering virions to cells. Cell 139: 499–511.
- 8. Fitzpatrick K, Skasko M, Deerinck TJ, Crum J, Ellisman MH, et al. (2010) Direct restriction of virus release and incorporation of the interferon-induced protein BST-2 into HIV-1 particles. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000701.
- 9. Hammonds J, Wang JJ, Yi H, Spearman P (2010) Immunoelectron microscopic evidence for Tetherin/BST2 as the physical bridge between HIV-1 virions and the plasma membrane. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000749.
- 10. Jouvenet N, Neil SJ, Zhadina M, Zang T, Kratovac Z, et al. (2009) Broad-spectrum inhibition of retroviral and filoviral particle release by tetherin. J Virol 83: 1837–1844.
- 11. Neil SJ, Zang T, Bieniasz PD (2008) Tetherin inhibits retrovirus release and is antagonized by HIV-1 Vpu. Nature 451: 425–430.
- 12. Kaletsky RL, Francica JR, Agrawal-Gamse C, Bates P (2009) Tetherin-mediated restriction of filovirus budding is antagonized by the Ebola glycoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 2886–2891.
- 13. Van Damme N, Goff D, Katsura C, Jorgenson RL, Mitchell R, et al. (2008) The interferon-induced protein BST-2 restricts HIV-1 release and is downregulated from the cell surface by the viral Vpu protein. Cell Host Microbe 3: 245–252.
- 14. Dube M, Roy BB, Guiot-Guillain P, Binette J, Mercier J, et al. (2010) Antagonism of tetherin restriction of HIV-1 release by Vpu involves binding and sequestration of the restriction factor in a perinuclear compartment. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000856.
- 15. Goffinet C, Homann S, Ambiel I, Tibroni N, Rupp D, et al. (2010) Antagonism of CD317 restriction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) particle release and depletion of CD317 are separable activities of HIV-1 Vpu. J Virol 84: 4089–4094.
- 16. Jia B, Serra-Moreno R, Neidermyer W, Rahmberg A, Mackey J, et al. (2009) Species-specific activity of SIV Nef and HIV-1 Vpu in overcoming restriction by tetherin/BST2. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000429.
- 17. Sauter D, Schindler M, Specht A, Landford WN, Munch J, et al. (2009) Tetherin-driven adaptation of Vpu and Nef function and the evolution of pandemic and nonpandemic HIV-1 strains. Cell Host Microbe 6: 409–421.
- 18. Yang SJ, Lopez LA, Hauser H, Exline CM, Haworth KG, et al. (2010) Anti-tetherin activities in Vpu-expressing primate lentiviruses. Retrovirology 7: 13.
- 19. Zhang F, Wilson SJ, Landford WC, Virgen B, Gregory D, et al. (2009) Nef proteins from simian immunodeficiency viruses are tetherin antagonists. Cell Host Microbe 6: 54–67.
- 20. Sauter D, Specht A, Kirchhoff F (2010) Tetherin: holding on and letting go. Cell 141: 392–398.
- 21. Sauter D, Vogl M, Kirchhoff F (2011) Ancient origin of a deletion in human BST2/Tetherin that confers protection against viral zoonoses. Hum Mutat.
- 22. Lim ES, Emerman M (2009) Simian immunodeficiency virus SIVagm from African green monkeys does not antagonize endogenous levels of African green monkey tetherin/BST-2. J Virol 83: 11673–11681.
- 23. Shingai M, Yoshida T, Martin MA, Strebel K (2011) Some human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpu proteins are able to antagonize macaque BST-2 in vitro and in vivo: Vpu-negative simian-human immunodeficiency viruses are attenuated in vivo. J Virol 85: 9708–9715.
- 24. Dazza MC, Ekwalanga M, Nende M, Shamamba KB, Bitshi P, et al. (2005) Characterization of a novel vpu-harboring simian immunodeficiency virus from a Dent's Mona monkey (Cercopithecus mona denti). J Virol 79: 8560–8571.
- 25. Bibollet-Ruche F, Bailes E, Gao F, Pourrut X, Barlow KL, et al. (2004) New simian immunodeficiency virus infecting De Brazza's monkeys (Cercopithecus neglectus): evidence for a cercopithecus monkey virus clade. J Virol 78: 7748–7762.
- 26. Schubert U, Bour S, Ferrer-Montiel AV, Montal M, Maldarell F, et al. (1996) The two biological activities of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpu protein involve two separable structural domains. J Virol 70: 809–819.
- 27. McNatt MW, Zang T, Hatziioannou T, Bartlett M, Fofana IB, et al. (2009) Species-specific activity of HIV-1 Vpu and positive selection of tetherin transmembrane domain variants. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000300.
- 28. Gupta RK, Mlcochova P, Pelchen-Matthews A, Petit SJ, Mattiuzzo G, et al. (2009) Simian immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein counteracts tetherin/BST-2/CD317 by intracellular sequestration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 20889–20894.
- 29. Iwabu Y, Fujita H, Kinomoto M, Kaneko K, Ishizaka Y, et al. (2009) HIV-1 accessory protein Vpu internalizes cell-surface BST-2/tetherin through transmembrane interactions leading to lysosomes. J Biol Chem 284: 35060–35072.
- 30. Ruiz A, Lau D, Mitchell RS, Hill MS, Schmitt K, et al. (2010) BST-2 mediated restriction of simian-human immunodeficiency virus. Virology 406: 312–321.
- 31. Kobayashi T, Ode H, Yoshida T, Sato K, Gee P, et al. (2011) Identification of amino acids in the human tetherin transmembrane domain responsible for HIV-1 Vpu interaction and susceptibility. J Virol 85: 932–945.
- 32. Gupta RK, Hue S, Schaller T, Verschoor E, Pillay D, et al. (2009) Mutation of a single residue renders human tetherin resistant to HIV-1 Vpu-mediated depletion. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000443.
- 33. Arhel NJ, Kirchhoff F (2009) Implications of Nef: host cell interactions in viral persistence and progression to AIDS. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 339: 147–175.
- 34. Courgnaud V, Abela B, Pourrut X, Mpoudi-Ngole E, Loul S, et al. (2003) Identification of a new simian immunodeficiency virus lineage with a vpu gene present among different cercopithecus monkeys (C. mona, C. cephus, and C. nictitans) from Cameroon. J Virol 77: 12523–12534.
- 35. Courgnaud V, Salemi M, Pourrut X, Mpoudi-Ngole E, Abela B, et al. (2002) Characterization of a novel simian immunodeficiency virus with a vpu gene from greater spot-nosed monkeys (Cercopithecus nictitans) provides new insights into simian/human immunodeficiency virus phylogeny. J Virol 76: 8298–8309.
- 36. Piguet V, Schwartz O, Le Gall S, Trono D (1999) The downregulation of CD4 and MHC-I by primate lentiviruses: a paradigm for the modulation of cell surface receptors. Immunol Rev 168: 51–63.
- 37. Bour S, Schubert U, Peden K, Strebel K (1996) The envelope glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 enhances viral particle release: a Vpu-like factor? J Virol 70: 820–829.
- 38. Ritter GD Jr, Yamshchikov G, Cohen SJ, Mulligan MJ (1996) Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 glycoprotein enhancement of particle budding: role of the cytoplasmic domain. J Virol 70: 2669–2673.
- 39. Bailes E, Gao F, Bibollet-Ruche F, Courgnaud V, Peeters M, et al. (2003) Hybrid origin of SIV in chimpanzees. Science 300: 1713.
- 40. Bour S, Strebel K (1996) The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 2 envelope protein is a functional complement to HIV type 1 Vpu that enhances particle release of heterologous retroviruses. J Virol 70: 8285–8300.
- 41. Matsuoka S, Dam E, Lecossier D, Clavel F, Hance AJ (2009) Modulation of HIV-1 infectivity and cyclophilin A-dependence by Gag sequence and target cell type. Retrovirology 6: 21.
- 42. Klimkait T, Strebel K, Hoggan MD, Martin MA, Orenstein JM (1990) The human immunodeficiency virus type 1-specific protein vpu is required for efficient virus maturation and release. J Virol 64: 621–629.