Figures
Abstract
Guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) is the biosynthetic precursor of creatine which is involved in storage and transmission of phosphate-bound energy. Hepatocytes readily convert GAA to creatine, raising the possibility that the active uptake of GAA by hepatocytes is a regulatory factor. The purpose of this study is to investigate and identify the transporter responsible for GAA uptake by hepatocytes. The characteristics of [14C]GAA uptake by hepatocytes were elucidated using the in vivo liver uptake method, freshly isolated rat hepatocytes, an expression system of Xenopus laevis oocytes, gene knockdown, and an immunohistochemical technique. In vivo injection of [14C]GAA into the rat femoral vein and portal vein results in the rapid uptake of [14C]GAA by the liver. The uptake was markedly inhibited by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and nipecotinic acid, an inhibitor of GABA transporters (GATs). The characteristics of Na+- and Cl−-dependent [14C]GAA uptake by freshly isolated rat hepatocytes were consistent with those of GAT2. The Km value of the GAA uptake (134 µM) was close to that of GAT2-mediated GAA transport (78.9 µM). GABA caused a marked inhibition with an IC50 value of 8.81 µM. The [14C]GAA uptake exhibited a significant reduction corresponding to the reduction in GAT2 protein expression. GAT2 was localized on the sinusoidal membrane of the hepatocytes predominantly in the periportal region. This distribution pattern was consistent with that of the creatine biosynthetic enzyme, S-adenosylmethionine∶guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase. GAT2 makes a major contribution to the sinusoidal GAA uptake by periportal hepatocytes, thus regulating creatine biosynthesis in the liver.
Citation: Tachikawa M, Ikeda S, Fujinawa J, Hirose S, Akanuma S-i, Hosoya K-i (2012) γ-Aminobutyric Acid Transporter 2 Mediates the Hepatic Uptake of Guanidinoacetate, the Creatine Biosynthetic Precursor, in Rats. PLoS ONE 7(2): e32557. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032557
Editor: Taro Yamashita, Kanazawa University, Japan
Received: October 15, 2011; Accepted: February 1, 2012; Published: February 27, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Tachikawa et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was supported, in part, by a Grant-in Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) is the biosynthetic precursor of creatine which plays an important role in storage and transmission of phosphate-bound energy in tissues with high energy demands [1]. The physiological importance of creatine biosynthesis has been demonstrated by an inherited deficiency of the creatine biosynthetic enzyme, S-adenosylmethionine∶guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase (GAMT) [2]. Patients exhibit a severe reduction in creatine and the simultaneous accumulation of GAA in the plasma, and brain, thus causing mental retardation, delayed speech, and epilepsy [3].
The liver is the main organ responsible for creatine biosynthesis. Indeed, high levels of GAMT mRNA are found in this tissue in humans and mice [4] and a severe reduction in GAMT activity has been detected in the liver of patients with GAMT deficiency [5]. However, the hepatocytes are incapable of the full synthesis of creatine from arginine and glycine whereas they readily convert GAA to creatine [6]. It is thus conceivable that GAA needs to be delivered from the circulating blood to hepatocytes for creatine synthesis.
We have found that GAA transport is mediated by a creatine transporter (CRT/Solute carrier SLC6A8) [7] and a taurine transporter (TauT/SLC6A6) [8]. However, CRT mRNA is not expressed in the human liver [9]. TauT-knockout mice exhibit only a 30% reduction in the taurine content of hepatocytes [10]. These lines of evidence prompted us to hypothesize that another transporter makes a substantial contributor to GAA uptake by hepatocytes.
Hepatocyte heterogeneity has been proposed in terms of transport and enzymatic activities [11]. The autoradiographical pattern of the liver after [3H]glutamate bolus administration shows that glutamate is exclusively taken up by pericentral hepatocytes, independent of the perfusion direction [11]. This is consistent with the immunohistochemical distribution of glutamine synthetase [12] which converts glutamate to glutamine. The functional coupling of glutamate uptake and glutamine synthesis in the pericentral hepatocytes raises the possibility that the sinusoidal transport of GAA and creatine synthesis occur in the same compartment of a particular hepatocyte population.
The purpose of this study is to identify the transporter responsible for GAA uptake by hepatocytes using a combination of the in vivo liver uptake method, freshly isolated hepatocytes, an expression system of Xenopus laevis oocytes, and RNA interference. The localization of the transporter in the liver was determined by immunohistochemical analysis.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Adult male Wistar rats (260–280 g) were purchased from Japan SLC (Hamamatsu, Japan). Mature female Xenopus laevis were purchased from Kato-S-Science (Chiba, Japan) and maintained in a controlled environment. All experiments were approved by the Animal Care Committee, University of Toyama (Protocol# S2008PHA-1, A2011PHA-15, A2011PHA-16).
Reagents
[1-14C]Guanidinoacetic acid ([14C]GAA, 55 mCi/mmol), [3H]water (18 mCi/mol), and [4-14C]creatine ([14C]creatine, 50 mCi/mmol) were obtained from Moravek Biochemicals (Brea, CA), Parkin-Elmer Life and Analytical Sciences (Boston, MA), and American Radiolabeled Chemicals (St. Louis, MO), respectively. All other chemicals were commercial products of analytical grade.
In vivo blood-to-liver transport of [14C]GAA after its femoral vein administration
Rats were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (50 mg/kg body weight), and [14C]GAA (3 µCi per rat) dissolved in 400 µL extracellular fluid buffer containing (in mM) 122 NaCl, 25 NaHCO3, 3 KCl, 0.4 K2HPO4, 1.4 CaCl2, 1.2 MgCl2, 10 D-glucose, and 10 HEPES was injected into the femoral vein. Tissue sampling and determination of radioactivity were performed according to a previous report [13]. As an index of the tissue distribution of GAA, the apparent liver-to-plasma concentration ratio was used. This ratio (mL/g liver) was defined as the amount of [14C] per gram liver divided by that per milliliter plasma, calculated over the time-period of the experiment. The results were shown as the apparent liver-plasma concentration ratio (mL/g liver) versus time (min).
In vivo blood-to-liver transport of [14C]GAA after its portal vein administration
Rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (50 mg/kg body weight), and their rectal temperatures were maintained at 37°C using a hot plate. The hepatic artery was ligated, and 200 µL Ringer's HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) containing both 10 µCi [14C]GAA or [14C]creatine and 0.5 µCi [3H]water as a highly diffusible internal reference, was rapidly injected into the portal vein. Eighteen seconds after injection, the right major lobe was excised from the liver and solubilized in Soluen-350 (Parkin-Elmer Life Science). The radioactivities of 3H and 14C in the liver and the injection solutions were determined using a liquid scintillation spectrophotometer (LSC-5000, Aloka, Tokyo, Japan). LUI is defined in equation 1, and was determined using equation 2:(1)
(2)Here, ET and ER are the fractions of [14C]GAA or [14C]creatine and [3H]water, respectively, extracted by the liver during a single pass. The value of ET can be estimated when LUI and ER are determined experimentally. Because the ER value of [3H]water is reported to be 65±4% in rats [14], the following equation is valid:
(3)The apparent fractional extractions consist of intracellular uptake, distribution to the interstitial space, and retention in the vascular space. Therefore, the extravascular extraction of [14C]GAA, which reflect only the intracellular uptake, was obtained as follows:
(4)Here, Ens represents the fractional extraction for distribution in the vascular and extracellular space. In this calculation, we used the reported Ens value of 13±3% for rats [14].
[14C]GAA uptake by freshly isolated hepatocytes
Rat hepatocytes were isolated by collagenase perfusion and Percoll isodensity centrifugation as described previously [15]. The hepatocytes were resuspended in Tyrode buffer containing (in mM) 137 NaCl, 2.7 KCl, 1.05 MgCl2, 1.8 CaCl2, 12 NaHCO3, 0.4 NaH2PO4, and 5.6 D-glucose. Uptake of [14C]GAA or [14C]creatine by the freshly isolated hepatocytes was examined according to the methods described previously [16]. In brief, after centrifugation and aspiration of the buffer, uptake was initiated by applying 100 µL Tyrode buffer containing [14C]GAA or [14C]creatine at 37°C in the presence or absence of inhibitors. Na+-free Tyrode buffer was prepared by replacement of NaCl, NaH2PO4 and NaHCO3 with equimolar N-methyl-D-glucamine, KH2PO4, and KHCO3, respectively. Cl−-free uptake buffer was prepared by replacement with equimolar gluconate. After a predetermined period, uptake was terminated by centrifugation of the solution. The cells were then solubilized in 1 N NaOH and subsequently neutralized with 1 N HCl. The cell-associated radioactivity and protein content were assayed by liquid scintillation spectrometry and detergent compatible protein assay (a DC protein assay kit, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Kinetic analyses
The kinetic parameters for GAA uptake by freshly isolated rat hepatocytes were obtained from equation 5:(5)where V is the uptake rate of GAA, C is the GAA concentration in the medium, Km is the Michaelis-Menten constant, and Vmax is the maximum uptake rate. To obtain kinetic parameters, the equation was fitted using the iterative non-linear least-squares regression analysis program, MULTI [17].
The median inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of GABA, taurine and creatine for [14C]GAA uptake by rat hepatocytes was estimated from equation 6, using MULTI.(6)where Pmin, Pmax, and [I] are the minimum percentage of control, the maximum percentage of control, and the concentration of inhibitor, respectively.
RNA interference
RNA interference was performed using the BLOCK-iT Pol II miR RNAi expression kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) unrelated to and targeted to the GABA transporter (GAT) 2/SLC6A13 (Rmi603286, Invitrogen) were expressed in primary cultured rat hepatocytes by transient transfection using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) as previously reported [18].
[14C]GAA and [14C]creatine uptake by rat GAT2-expressing Xenopus laevis oocytes
Using T7 RNA polymerase, capped cRNA was transcribed from NotI-linearized pGEM-HEN containing an open reading frame of rat GAT2 cDNA. Defolliculated oocytes were injected with 23 nL water or the capped cRNA (30–50 ng) and incubated at 18°C in freshly prepared standard oocyte saline solution containing 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM HEPES, 25 µg/mL gentamycin, 2.5 mM pyruvate and 1% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.5. The standard oocyte saline solution used to incubate the oocytes was replaced with fresh solution daily. Experiments were performed after incubation for 4 to 6 days. For the uptake study by Xenopus laevis oocytes, oocytes were preincubated with 500 µL ND96 solution containing (in mM) 96 NaCl, 2 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 5 HEPES for 20 min at 20°C before the uptake experiment. The uptake experiment was initiated by replacing the ND96 solution with 200 µL of the same solution containing [14C]GAA (45 µM) and [14C]creatine (45 µM). After incubation for a designated time at 20°C, the uptake was terminated by addition of ice-cold ND96 solution. Oocytes were then washed four times with ice-cold ND96 solution and solubilized in 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate solution, and the accumulated radioactivity was determined in a liquid scintillation counter (LSC-5000, Aloka).
Antibody preparation
Polyclonal antibodies to organic anion transporting polypeptide 1a4 (oatp1a4/Slco1a4) and multidrug resistant protein 6 (MRP6/ABCC6) were raised against amino acid residues 625–661 of rat oatp1a4 (GenBank accession number: NP_571981) and 1468–1502 of rat MRP6 (GenBank accession number: NP_112275). The polypeptides were expressed as glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins using the pGEX4T-2 plasmid vector (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, UK). The fusion protein was purified with glutathione-Sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare), emulsified with Freund's complete adjuvant (Difco, Detroit, MI), and injected subcutaneously into female Hartley guinea-pigs at intervals of 2 weeks. Two weeks after the sixth injection, affinity-purified antibodies were prepared, first using protein G-Sepharose (GE Healthcare) and then using antigen peptides coupled to cyanogens bromide-activated Sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare). For the preparation of affinity media, polypeptides free of GST were obtained by elution of the cleaved polypeptide after in-column thrombin digestion of fusion proteins bound to glutathione-Sepharose 4B.
Immunoblotting
Under deep pentobarbital anesthesia (100 mg/kg body weight, i.p.), rat liver and heart were transcardially perfused with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The tissues were then homogenized using the nitrogen cavitation technique (800 psi, 15 min, 4°C) in buffer with the following composition (in mM): 10 HEPES, 1 EDTA, 1 EGTA, 320 sucrose, 1 phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), pH 7.4. The homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min. The supernatant fluids were further centrifuged at 100,000 g for 60 min to obtain a crude membrane fraction from the pellets. The protein concentration was determined using a DC protein assay kit (Bio-rad). Protein samples (50 µg per lane) were fractionated by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electroblotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The blotted membrane was incubated with an affinity-purified antibody to GAT2 (Sigma Aldrich), oatp1a4, and MRP6 at 0.1–0.5 µg/mL in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 and 125 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) containing 0.1% Tween 20 and 4% skimmed milk for 16 h at 4°C, and visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (GE Healthcare).
Immunohistochemistry
Under deep pentobarbital anesthesia (100 mg/kg body weight, i.p.), the liver of adult rats were obtained after transcardial fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The liver was immersed in 30% sucrose in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer. Frozen sections (40 µm in thickness) were prepared on a cryostat (CM1900; Leica, Nussloch, Germany). The sections were immunoreacted overnight with rabbit antibody to GAT2 (2 µg/mL, Sigma Aldrich), singly or in combination with guinea-pig oatp1a4 antibody (1 µg/mL), guinea-pig MRP6 antibody (1 µg/mL) and guinea-pig GAMT antibody (2 µg/mL, [19]). Subsequently, they were incubated with species-specific Alexa Fluor 488- (Invitrogen) and Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) for 2 h. Photographs were taken using a confocal laser scanning microscope (TCS-SP5; Leica).
Statistical analysis
All data except for kinetic parameters are presented as the mean±SEM. The kinetic parameters are presented as the mean±SD. An unpaired, two-tailed Student's t-test was used to determine the significance of differences between two group means. One-way analysis of variance followed by the modified Fisher's least-squares difference method was used to assess the statistical significance of differences among means of more than two groups.
Results
In vivo hepatic uptake of [14C]GAA and [14C]creatine
The liver-to-plasma concentration ratio of [14C]GAA rapidly increased up to 5 min after its intravenous administration (Figure 1A). The extravascular extraction of [14C]GAA after its bolus injection into the portal vein was estimated to be 182±1%, and this was reduced by increasing the unlabeled GAA concentration in the injection solution (Figure 1B). Table 1 shows the inhibition profile of in vivo hepatic uptake of [14C]GAA. GAA, GABA, and β-alanine produced a marked inhibition by more than 60% in each case at a concentration of 1 mM whereas taurine at the same concentration had no significant effect. GAA, GABA, β-guanidinopropionic acid, and nipecotic acid significantly inhibited the [14C]GAA uptake by more than 69% at a concentration of 10 mM. In contrast, taurine, creatine, creatinine, and L-alanine, each at a concentration of 10 mM, had a much weaker effect or no effect at all. The hepatic uptake of [14C]creatine was not inhibited by unlabeled creatine at concentrations of 10 mM and 100 mM (Figure 1C). These results indicate that the rapid accumulation of [14C]GAA in the liver is mediated by a carrier system preferring GABA over taurine and creatine.
(A) [14C]GAA uptake by the liver after its intravenous administration. Each point represents the mean±SEM (n = 5–7). (B) Concentration-dependent uptake of GAA by rat liver after its injection into the portal vein. The extravascular extraction of [14C]GAA was plotted against the concentration of unlabeled GAA in the injection solution. Each point represents the mean±SEM (n = 3–4). (C) Simultaneous injection of unlabeled creatine had no effect on [14C]creatine uptake by the liver. Each column represents the mean±SEM (n = 5–6).
Kinetics and characteristics of [14C]GAA and [14C]creatine uptake by freshly isolated rat hepatocytes
[14C]GAA uptake by hepatocytes exhibited time-dependent increases up to 5 min (Figure 2A). In contrast, there was no time-dependent increase in [14C]creatine uptake by hepatocytes (Figure 2A). Unlabeled creatine, at a concentration of 10 mM, did not affect the [14C]creatine uptake (Figure 2A inset). The absence of either Na+ or Cl− reduced the [14C]GAA uptake by 64.4% and 59.7%, respectively (Table 2). The [14C]GAA uptake took place in a concentration-dependent manner and consisted of a single saturable component (Figure 2B). The apparent Km and Vmax values of the saturable component were 134±27 µM and 1.53±0.12 nmol/(min·mg protein), respectively. Table 2 shows the inhibition profile of several compounds, each at a concentration of 2 mM, on the [14C]GAA uptake. GABA, β-alanine, GAA, β-guanidinopropionic acid, guanidinoethansulfonic acid and nipecotic acid produced a marked inhibition by more than 67%. In contrast, creatinine, betaine, guanidinosuccinic acid, L-arginine, L-alanine, and L-serine had much weaker effects. GABA, taurine, and creatine inhibited the [14C]GAA uptake in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 value of 8.81±1.33 µM, 1.13±0.30 mM, and 1.42±0.53 mM, respectively (Figure 2C–E). These results indicate that Na+- and Cl−-dependent GAA uptake by hepatocytes is mediated via a carrier system preferring GABA over taurine and creatine, most probably GAT. Among the GAT subtypes, GAT2 is predominantly expressed in rat liver [20]. A previous report has demonstrated that rat GAT2 was silenced by the expression of shRNA against rat GAT2 in a primary culture of rat hepatocytes [18]. [14C]GAA uptake was reduced by 46.4% in GAT2-silenced hepatocytes corresponding to the reduction in GAT2 protein (Figure 2F).
(A) Time-course of [14C]GAA (18 µM) uptake (open circle) and [14C]creatine (30 µM) uptake (closed circle) by hepatocytes. Inset graph shows no effect of unlabeled creatine (10 mM) on the [14C]creatine uptake at 2 min. Each point represents the mean±SEM (n = 3–4). (B) Concentration-dependence of GAA uptake by hepatocytes. The uptake was measured at the indicated concentration for 3 min. Each point represents the mean±SEM (n = 4). (C–E) Inhibitory effect of GABA (C), taurine (D), and creatine (E) on [14C]GAA uptake by freshly isolated rat hepatocytes. [14C]GAA (18 µM) uptake for 3 min at 37°C was measured in the presence and absence (control) of each compound at the designated concentrations. Each point represents the mean±SEM (n = 3–4). (F) Effect of treatment of shRNA, unrelated or targeted to GAT2, for 24 h on [14C]GAA (18 µM) uptake by primary cultures of rat hepatocytes at 37°C for 3 min. Immunoblotting (inset) with antibodies to GAT2 and Na+, K+-ATPase used as an internal standard shows the reduction of GAT2 protein expression in GAT2-silenced hepatocytes. Each column represents the mean±SEM (n = 4). *p<0.01, significantly different from the control.
Characteristics of [14C]GAA uptake in rat GAT2-expressing Xenopus oocytes (GAT2/oocytes)
[14C]GAA uptake by GAT2/oocytes was 433-fold greater than that by water-injected oocytes whereas [14C]creatine uptake by GAT2/oocytes was 28-fold higher than in water-injected oocytes (Figure 3A). The [14C]GAA uptake by GAT2/oocytes exhibited a time-dependent increase, and the uptake in these oocytes was several-fold higher than in water-injected oocytes (Figure 3B). The GAA uptake by GAT2/oocytes exhibited saturable kinetics with a Km of 78.9±26.4 µM and a Vmax of 193±32 pmol/(h·oocyte) (Figure 3C). The inhibitory effects of GAT substrates and inhibitors on the [14C]GAA uptake were further examined (Figure 3B and Table 3). GAA, GABA, β-alanine, γ-guanidinobutyric acid, and β-guanidinopropionic acid exhibited a marked inhibition of over 95%, each at a concentration of 5–10 mM. Nipecotic acid, taurine, guanidinoethansulfonic acid, and creatine inhibited the [14C]GAA uptake by more than 42%, each at a concentration of 5 mM. In contrast, creatinine, methlguanidine, guanidinosuccinic acid, betaine, L-alanine, homovanilic acid, and L-arginine did not produce any significant inhibition.
(A) Uptake of [14C]GAA (45 µM), and [14C]creatine (45 µM) by oocytes injected with water (Water; open column) and GAT2 cRNA (GAT2; closed column) for 1 h at 20°C. Each column represents the mean±SEM (n = 8–14). *p<0.01, significantly different from the control. (B) Time-courses of [14C]GAA uptake (45 µM) by oocytes injected with water (closed circle) and GAT2 cRNA (open circle) at 20°C. The [14C]GAA uptake was inhibited by unlabeled GAA (10 mM; open square). Each point represents the mean±SEM (n = 9–15). *p<0.01, significantly different from the control. (C) Concentration-dependence of [14C]GAA uptake by GAT2/ooccytes at 20°C. The uptake was measured at the indicated concentration for 1 h. Each point represents the mean±SEM (n = 5–15).
Expression and localization of GAT2 in rat liver
Using immunoblotting with the crude membrane fraction from rat liver, the antibodies to GAT2, oatp1a4, and MRP6 recognized a single band at 70 kDa, 92 kDa, 178 kDa, respectively (Figure 4A). The size of each band detected was consistent with the previous results [21], [22]. On the other hand, no band was detected in rat heart used as negative control for oatp1a4 and MRP6 expression (Figure 4A). Therefore, the antibodies to GAT2, oatp1a4, and MRP6 were judged to be specific. The GAT2 antibody predominantly labeled hepatocytes in the periportal region rather than pericentral region (Figure 4B). The intense signals of GAMT were also distributed predominantly in the periportal region than in the pericentral region (Figure 4C). In contrast, the reverse was found for the distribution patterns of GAT2 and oatp1a4: oatp1a4 was predominantly distributed in the pericentral region (Figure 4D–E). The immunoreactivities of GAT2 were partially overlapped with those of oatp1a4 which is localized on the sinusoidal membrane in the liver (Figure 4E3 inset). The immunostaining of rat GAT2 was localized on the plasma membrane of hepatocytes which express GAMT (Figure 4F). Using double immunofluorescence for MRP6, a marker of the lateral membrane of hepatocytes, the GAT2 immunoreactivities did not overlap with those of MRP6 (Figure 4G). These results indicate that GAT2 is preferentially localized on the sinusoidal membrane of hepatocytes in the periportal region.
Red and green fluorescence is defined at the lower left corner of each panel. (A) Immunoblot of GAT2, oatp1a4, and MRP6 in rat liver and heart. Rat heart was used as negative control for oatp1a4 and MRP6 expression. The size of the marker proteins is indicated to the left. (B–C) Preferential distribution of GAT2 (B and C) and GAMT (C) in hepatocytes around the portal vein. (D–E) Distribution of GAT2 and oatp1a4 in the liver. E3 inset: Localization of GAT2 on the oatp1a4-positive sinusoidal membrane (arrowheads). (F) Plasma membrane localization of GAT2 in GAMT-positive hepatocytes. (G) Double immunofluorescence of GAT2 and MRP6, a marker of the lateral membrane of hepatocytes. Arrowheads indicate the bile canaliculus. Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, blue). In B–E, single (*) and double (**) asterisks indicate the portal spaces and the central vein, respectively. Scale bars: B–D, 100 µm; E–G, 10 µm.
Discussion
The present study demonstrates that GAT2 is responsible for the rapid uptake of GAA on the sinusoidal membrane of hepatocytes predominantly in the periportal region.
In vivo bolus injection of [14C]GAA into the rat femoral vein or portal vein results in its rapid extraction by the liver (Figure 1A and B). Considering that the GAA concentration in the central vein is lower than that in the hepatic artery and portal vein [6], the liver would be responsible for GAA clearance from the circulating blood. Since GABA and GAT inhibitors, such as β-guanidinopropionic acid and nipecotinic acid, produce a marked inhibition (Table 1), an isoform of GATs is most likely involved in the GAA uptake by the liver. Furthermore, the degree of inhibition by β-alanine is comparable with that by GAA and GABA, each at a concentration of 1 mM (Table 1), suggesting that GAA, GABA and β-alanine share a common transport system in the liver. Previous reports have demonstrated that GAT2 mediates the uptake of β-alanine and its analog α-fluoro-β-alanine by rat hepatocyets [23] and that α-fluoro-β-alanine rapidly accumulates in the rat liver after its intravenous administration [24]. It thus appears that the rapid uptake of [14C]GAA by the liver is also mediated by GAT2. In support of this notion, the characteristics of Na+- and Cl−-dependent [14C]GAA uptake by freshly isolated rat hepatocytes (Figure 2 and Table 2) support the hypothesis that GAT2 plays a major role in GAA uptake by hepatocytes, especially based on the following evidence. (i) The Km value (134 µM; Figure 2B) and the inhibition profile (Table 2) of the [14C]GAA uptake is in good agreement with those of GAT2-mediated GAA transport (Figure 3C and Table 3). (ii) GABA causes a marked reduction in the [14C]GAA uptake with the lowest IC50 value (Figure 2C). (iii) [14C]GAA uptake exhibits a significant reduction corresponding to the decrease in the protein expression of GAT2 (Figure 2F). The Na+-dependence (64.4%; Table 2) of the [14C]GAA uptake is almost identical to the degree of inhibition by 2 mM GABA (approximately 80%; Table 2). Therefore, GAT2 would make at least a 64.4% contribution to the total [14C]GAA uptake by hepatocytes.
The freshly isolated rat hepatocytes have much higher GAA uptake activity compared with creatine uptake (Figure 2A) whereas the liver concentration of creatine is 100-to-680-fold greater than that of GAA in humans and rats [25]. This confirms the belief that GAA is readily converted to creatine [6] as soon as GAA is taken up by hepatocytes. Immunohistochemical analysis reveals that GAT2 is localized on the sinusoidal membrane of hepatocytes predominantly in the periportal region (Figure 4). This distribution pattern is in good agreement with that of GAMT, the creatine synthetic enzyme (Figure 4). The functional coupling between GAT2 and GAMT suggests that the supplying pathway for GAA regulates creatine synthesis in periportal hepatocytes.
It has become evident that hepatocytes located at different distances from the portal spaces exhibit different transport characteristics. This includes the preferential uptake of glutamate [11] and taurocholate [26] by pericentral and periportal hepatocytes, respectively, after injection into the portal vein. However, only a limited number of studies have addressed the question as to whether this heterogeneity is merely due to the location of hepatocytes or to intrinsic differences between the cells. The present study provides evidence to support the hypothesis that GAT2 is responsible for the periportal region-predominant uptake of GAA by GAMT-expressing hepatocytes and supports the latter concept. This zonal arrangement for creatine synthesis in the liver may explain the discrepancy that although the GAA biosynthetic enzyme, L-arginine∶glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT), is expressed predominantly in pericentral hepatocytes [27], the hepatocytes are incapable of the full synthesis of creatine from arginine and glycine [6].
GAT2 mediates the hepatic uptake of GABA, β-alanine, and γ-butyrobetaine, a synthetic precursor of carnitine, with the Km values of 9–35.3 µM [18], [23]. Since the blood concentrations of GABA (0.13 µM; [28]), β-alanine (<0.5 µM; [29]), and γ-butyrobetaine (0.84–0.95 µM; [30]) are smaller than the Km value of GAT2-mediated transport for each substrate, GAT2 in the hepatocytes would not be fully saturated by endogenous substrates of GAT2 under physiological conditions. The GAA uptake by rat hepatocytes with a Km value of 134 µM (Figure 2) would operate at only a small fraction of its maximal activity at a plasma concentration of 3.73 µM [25]. However, such a transport system would be relevant for GAA with fluctuations in its plasma concentration. Creatine supplementation decreases the blood concentration of GAA due to the downregulation of AGAT activity in the kidney [6]. Since excess creatine does not alter GAMT activity in the liver [6], the decrease in GAT2-mediated GAA uptake by hepatocytes results in the reduction of creatine biosynthesis in the liver. Patients with GAMT deficiency exhibit a marked reduction in creatine and a simultaneous accumulation of GAA (12.9–20.7 µM; [31]) in the circulating blood. Although oral treatment with creatine increases its plasma concentration above the normal range (270–763 µM), the problem is that the GAA concentration in the plasma remains elevated [31]. The present study indicates that creatine affects GAA uptake by hepatocytes and GAT2-mediated GAA transport (Figures 2E and 3A, and Tables 2 and 3), implying that the hepatic clearance of GAA from the circulating blood is disturbed by increased levels of creatine. Therefore, monitoring the creatine concentration in the plasma will be beneficial to ensure that the plasma level of creatine will not exceed the normal range.
The liver does not express any isoforms of creatine kinases [32], [33] and a carrier system for creatine uptake (Figures 1C and 2). This implies that creatine produced in hepatocytes is released into the blood stream. Nevertheless, the creatine level in the liver remains higher than that in the blood [25], raising the possibility that the liver serves as the storage compartment for creatine. It is thus intriguing to pursue the mechanism(s) of the continuous release or stimuli-dependent release of creatine from hepatocytes.
In conclusion, GAT2 makes a major contribution to GAA uptake by periportal hepatocytes on the sinusoidal membrane. The present findings shed light on a regulatory system for creatine biosynthesis and a functional heterogeneity of hepatocytes.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr T. Abe for supplying the pGEM-HEN vector for protein expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: MT KH. Performed the experiments: MT SI JF SH SA. Analyzed the data: MT SI SA. Wrote the paper: MT KH.
References
- 1. Wyss M, Kaddurah-Daouk R (2000) Creatine and creatinine metabolism. Physiol Rev 80: 1107–1213.
- 2. Braissant O, Henry H, Beard E, Uldry J (2011) Creatine deficiency syndromes and the importance of creatine synthesis in the brain. Amino Acids 40: 1315–1324.
- 3. Nasrallah F, Feki M, Kaabachi N (2010) Creatine and creatine deficiency syndromes: biochemical and clinical aspects. Pediatr Neurol 42: 163–171.
- 4. Schmidt A, Marescau B, Boehm EA, Renema WK, Peco R, et al. (2004) Severely altered guanidino compound levels, disturbed body weight homeostasis and impaired fertility in a mouse model of guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase (GAMT) deficiency. Hum Mol Genet 13: 905–921.
- 5. Stockler S, Isbrandt D, Hanefeld F, Schmidt B, von Figura K (1996) Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency: the first inborn error of creatine metabolism in man. Am J Hum Genet 58: 914–922.
- 6. da Silva RP, Nissim I, Brosnan ME, Brosnan JT (2009) Creatine synthesis: hepatic metabolism of guanidinoacetate and creatine in the rat in vitro and in vivo. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 296: E256–261.
- 7. Tachikawa M, Fujinawa J, Takahashi M, Kasai Y, Fukaya M, et al. (2008) Expression and possible role of creatine transporter in the brain and at the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier as a transporting protein of guanidinoacetate, an endogenous convulsant. J Neurochem 107: 768–778.
- 8. Tachikawa M, Kasai Y, Yokoyama R, Fujinawa J, Ganapathy V, et al. (2009) The blood-brain barrier transport and cerebral distribution of guanidinoacetate in rats: involvement of creatine and taurine transporters. J Neurochem 111: 499–509.
- 9. Sora I, Richman J, Santoro G, Wei H, Wang Y, et al. (1994) The cloning and expression of a human creatine transporter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 204: 419–427.
- 10. Warskulat U, Borsch E, Reinehr R, Heller-Stilb B, Monnighoff I, et al. (2006) Chronic liver disease is triggered by taurine transporter knockout in the mouse. FASEB J 20: 574–576.
- 11. Stoll B, McNelly S, Buscher HP, Haussinger D (1991) Functional hepatocyte heterogeneity in glutamate, aspartate and alpha-ketoglutarate uptake: a histoautoradiographical study. Hepatology 13: 247–253.
- 12. Burger HJ, Gebhardt R, Mayer C, Mecke D (1989) Different capacities for amino acid transport in periportal and perivenous hepatocytes isolated by digitonin/collagenase perfusion. Hepatology 9: 22–28.
- 13. Ohtsuki S, Tachikawa M, Takanaga H, Shimizu H, Watanabe M, et al. (2002) The blood-brain barrier creatine transporter is a major pathway for supplying creatine to the brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 22: 1327–1335.
- 14. Pardridge WM, Mietus LJ (1979) Transport of protein-bound steroid hormones into liver in vivo. Am J Physiol 237: E367–372.
- 15. Berry MN, Friend DS (1969) High-yield preparation of isolated rat liver parenchymal cells: a biochemical and fine structural study. J Cell Biol 43: 506–520.
- 16. Petzinger E, Muller N, Follmann W, Deutscher J, Kinne RK (1989) Uptake of bumetanide into isolated rat hepatocytes and primary liver cell cultures. Am J Physiol 256: G78–86.
- 17. Yamaoka K, Tanigawara Y, Nakagawa T, Uno T (1981) A pharmacokinetic analysis program (multi) for microcomputer. J Pharmacobiodyn 4: 879–885.
- 18. Fujita M, Nakanishi T, Shibue Y, Kobayashi D, Moseley RH, et al. (2009) Hepatic uptake of gamma-butyrobetaine, a precursor of carnitine biosynthesis, in rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 297: G681–686.
- 19. Tachikawa M, Fukaya M, Terasaki T, Ohtsuki S, Watanabe M (2004) Distinct cellular expressions of creatine synthetic enzyme GAMT and creatine kinases uCK-Mi and CK-B suggest a novel neuron-glial relationship for brain energy homeostasis. Eur J Neurosci 20: 144–160.
- 20. Borden LA, Smith KE, Hartig PR, Branchek TA, Weinshank RL (1992) Molecular heterogeneity of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transport system. Cloning of two novel high affinity GABA transporters from rat brain. J Biol Chem 267: 21098–21104.
- 21. Reichel C, Gao B, Van Montfoort J, Cattori V, Rahner C, et al. (1999) Localization and function of the organic anion–transporting polypeptide oatp2 in rat liver (oatp2). Gastroenterology 117: 688–695.
- 22. Madon J, Hagenbuch B, Landmann L, Meier PJ, Stieger B (2000) Transport function and hepatocellular localization of mrp6 in rat liver. Mol Pharmacol 57: 634–641.
- 23. Liu M, Russell RL, Beigelman L, Handschumacher RE, Pizzorno G (1999) beta-alanine and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine concentrative transport in rat hepatocytes is mediated by GABA transporter GAT-2. Am J Physiol 276: G206–210.
- 24. Zhang RW, Soong SJ, Liu TP, Barnes S, Diasio SB (1992) Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of 2-fluoro-beta-alanine in rats. Potential relevance to toxicity pattern of 5-fluorouracil. Drug Metab Dispos 20: 113–119.
- 25. Marescau B, Deshmukh DR, Kockx M, Possemiers I, Qureshi IA, et al. (1992) Guanidino compounds in serum, urine, liver, kidney, and brain of man and some ureotelic animals. Metabolism 41: 526–532.
- 26. Groothuis GM, Hardonk MJ, Keulemans KP, Nieuwenhuis P, Meijer DK (1982) Autoradiographic and kinetic demonstration of acinar heterogeneity of taurocholate transport. Am J Physiol 243: G455–462.
- 27. McGuire DM, Gross MD, Elde RP, van Pilsum JF (1986) Localization of L-arginine-glycine amidinotransferase protein in rat tissues by immunofluorescence microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 34: 429–435.
- 28. Arrue A, Davila R, Zumarraga M, Basterreche N, Gonzalez-Torres MA, et al. (2010) GABA and homovanillic acid in the plasma of Schizophrenic and bipolar I patients. Neurochem Res 35: 247–253.
- 29. Harris RC, Tallon MJ, Dunnett M, Boobis L, Coakley J, et al. (2006) The absorption of orally supplied beta-alanine and its effect on muscle carnosine synthesis in human vastus lateralis. Amino Acids 30: 279–289.
- 30. Noel H, Parvin R, Pande SV (1984) gamma-butyrobetaine in tissues and serum of fed and starved rats determined by an enzymic radioisotopic procedure. Biochem J 220: 701–706.
- 31. Stockler S, Marescau B, De Deyn PP, Trijbels JM, Hanefeld F (1997) Guanidino compounds in guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency, a new inborn error of creatine synthesis. Metabolism 46: 1189–1193.
- 32. Payne RM, Haas RC, Strauss AW (1991) Structural characterization and tissue-specific expression of the mRNAs encoding isoenzymes from two rat mitochondrial creatine kinase genes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1089: 352–361.
- 33. Trask RV, Billadello JJ (1990) Tissue-specific distribution and developmental regulation of M and B creatine kinase mRNAs. Biochim Biophys Acta 1049: 182–188.